Best of the Program | Guest: Daniel Kelly | 4/3/23

At blinds.com, it's not just about window treatments, it's about you, your style, your space, your way.

Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right.

From free expert design help to our 100% satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

Because at blinds.com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you.

Visit blinds.com now for up to 50% off with minimum purchase plus a professional measure at no cost.

Rules and restrictions apply.

Hey, today's podcast, we go into some of the things that are going on, getting ready for Donald Trump, who is going to be indicted.

Tomorrow, also a look at the economy, what Saudi Arabia did with oil.

Oil prices are going to go up.

This is, we're being set up by our enemies, and some of our enemies used to be our friends, Brazil and Saudi Arabia.

Come to mind, but it is coming.

Chaos is coming.

We give you all the details on that and so much more.

Brought to you by Relief Factor.

Yeah, it's our jam, okay?

Relief Factor.

Going about your daily life, tough, especially when you're in real pain.

I know the feeling.

I had severe pain for years.

It is one of the reasons why I left New York.

I thought the more moderate temperatures might help.

And then I stupidly moved to Dallas where there are no moderating temperatures.

Anyway, it is possible to set the burden down.

It is possible to be living your best life.

Please give Relief Factor a shot.

See what it can do for you.

Try it for three weeks.

If it ain't working in three weeks, it's not going to work for you.

But 70% of the people who try it go on to order more month after month.

It's relieffactor.com.

800, the number for relief.

That's 800 for relief.

ReliefFactor.com.

Feel the difference.

Here's the podcast.

You're listening to the best of the Glenbeck program.

Welcome to the Glenbeck Program.

We welcome Mr.

Pat Gray from Pat Gray Unleashed.

Pat, what is the big story in your world today?

Has to be Asa Hutchinson, doesn't it?

Has to be

good.

He's finally gotten into the race.

Oh, we

begging.

and pleading.

How I begged and pleaded.

Asa, please just consider 2024.

Would you please

just jump in?

We've been saying it since the early 20s.

Was it the 1920s?

Because I've been saying it for a long time.

It does seem like 100 years.

It does.

It does.

And finally,

finally.

And he had a good suggestion that, you know, everybody who's in front of him get out of the race.

And I think that's,

you know,

that'd be helpful for him.

So,

yeah.

So that's

good.

By the way,

DeSantis

was up in Pennsylvania and looks like he's, you know.

Almost for sure running.

Oh, for sure.

Right.

I mean, is there any doubt in your mind?

Well, no.

I've talked to him.

While he never said to me he was running, I've had several sit-downs with him.

And there's.

And pretty recent, right?

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

And there is absolutely no doubt in my mind.

I'm excited about that.

Are you?

Yeah, I am.

I think he's great.

I also like Vivek, though.

Yeah, I like Vivek, too.

Not a chance, but I like Vivek.

Greg, I know.

I like Vivek.

Just the name will probably hamper him.

Right?

It's so odd.

It's like, you know, Barack Obama.

Yeah.

You know,

we don't vote for people like that.

Weird names.

No,

we sure don't.

All right.

There's also, you know, Donald Trump, you know, being indicted tomorrow.

There is that.

Yeah, we got that going for us.

His legal team says that the judge is probably going to impose a gag order on him.

Is that even legal?

How is that possible?

I don't know.

These gag orders, they seem to happen a lot.

Yeah.

And no, if you're coming after me.

No, I'm going to defend myself in the media.

You're not going to have a one-way street on this.

Plus, I'm a presidential candidate.

You can't gag me.

How is that possible?

I don't think it is.

Well, the NYPD apparently is

not happy with the Manhattan DA.

They said

nobody wants to be the one bringing Trump in.

Cops believe this is a case of political

political persecution, and on the facts, it's a joke, according to NYPD sources.

We were kind of wondering this morning, why doesn't he just stay in Florida where DeSantis said he's not going to go get him?

He's not going to allow that.

Just stay there and

don't go to New York and you won't have to be brought in.

Wonder what would happen.

Wonder what would happen?

Are you going to forcefully go remove Donald Trump from Mar-a-Lago?

Yes, they would.

You think so?

Yeah, they would.

Man,

what a country.

Besides

Aza Hutchinson running, which just rolls off the tongue.

Sure does.

What else is?

And the Donald Trump.

Well, I really like the fact that James Patterson has called out the New York Times for their bizarre bestseller list practices.

And I think you might have mentioned this before,

if I'm not sure.

Yeah, I read the article this morning and it mentions me.

Yeah.

That

I've been saying this for you for a long, long time.

But Patterson is like,

I sold by far the most amount of books.

And what was he?

He was like, he has 114 New York Times bestsellers, which is the Guinness Brook of World Record holder.

And 67 of them went to number one.

Right.

So he's a guy who knows what he's talking about.

And he's not even talking about one of his books right now.

He's talking about Mike Pompeo's book, which was ahead of, I don't know, six books that were listed above him.

And he's like, why?

Bestseller should be, I don't know, the person who sold the best.

No, no, no.

They have a special look at it.

They have a special formula.

And what is that formula exactly?

If it's something the liberals like, it goes higher.

That doesn't seem like a good formula.

No, it's a very complex algorithm.

Very complex algorithm.

Don't they claim, do they claim some of these bookstores have more weight than others?

Yes, whatever.

These little teeny, you know, heritage bookstores, which all tend

to be around, you know, universities,

they get weighted more.

So if they sell one book, it's like selling three books.

Oh, that's crazy.

Yeah.

Oh, no.

No, it is crazy.

It's super, super accurate.

So

you got that going for you.

Stu, biggest story of the day for you.

I was just going to, just to finish up on that New York Times thing.

It is amazing that you're not speculating there.

That's like what they admit.

They admit they have their own formula that is going to bring in that certain books sold at certain bookstores count as more.

Right.

And these are the people that are talking to us about the science.

These are the people that are talking about fairness and facts.

The same type of people, certainly, that say an apple is an apple, and you have to admit when an apple is an apple.

But a book sale is not a book sale.

Right.

Exactly right.

Yeah, exactly right.

Can I bring up one other thing that seems kind of important to me, but I haven't heard hardly anybody talking about.

And that's the fact that, you know, here we are talking about TikTok and how China could be spying on all Americans.

I think a more important issue is that they control all of our medication.

Almost

all medication

is manufactured in China.

Why is that?

Because if they decide that,

I don't know, we really are an enemy and they don't want to provide us with our medication anymore, a lot of people are going to die, including me.

And so

now you care.

Now I care.

Now you care.

Right?

Okay.

I didn't care before when other people were going to die.

But now

it involves me.

Right.

And I kind of want my medication.

Right.

So why aren't we even talking about that?

How is it possible that why are we talking about all of the things

when it comes to China?

We're not talking about any of it.

You know what we're talking about?

Trans Day.

That's what we're talking about.

Right.

Trans Day.

What the hell?

Can we talk about the medical situation?

Could be one of the most important things of all time for us.

Do you know that we are now having baby food shortages?

Yes, again.

Again.

Again.

Again.

But that's okay.

So tariffs work wonders on that one.

No.

No, they're great.

You, by the way, Glenn said, I mean, what are we talking about?

The Trans Day.

But can we talk about the trans day for just one second?

Sure.

Because

here's the thing.

It's called the trans day of visibility.

Just to be clear, we can see.

We can tell.

We're aware.

This is not.

We have eyes.

We notice.

Yeah, but they understand it.

They don't understand what you're saying there, Stu.

I'm saying it's visible.

We are aware.

Yeah, but not until the day of visibility, though.

Not until the day of visibility.

No, we couldn't have seen them before that.

They were invisible.

Can I ask one question here?

Yeah.

We had a when, let's say some right-wing lunatic goes into a

trans gathering and commits a mass shooting.

First of all, we would be the first people on the air saying how terrible that was and how awful it was.

And how awful that person was.

And how awful that person was.

Even if they claim to be Christian or claim to be Republican or claim to be a Donald Trump supporter or whatever.

And just because I'm a clothes horse, I might have commented on the trans person's clothing and their outfit.

Might have.

That's good or bad.

You might have done it.

You might have done it.

You are fashion.

So you have this situation where if a right-wing person goes in and was to commit a mass shooting of trans people, we would,

media, society in general, would, of course, say, I can't believe this.

Are trans people in danger?

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Rightly so, right?

If there was a physical attack against trans people, that would be a normal reaction for society.

But what actually happened was a trans person shooting a bunch of children at a Christian school.

And the media reaction is still

trans people should be worried they're in danger.

What can

I do?

Well, wait, wait, wait, wait.

I'd just like to add just one little fact to that.

That makes the third trans

person

that has been a

shooter of multiple people.

Plus, a non-binary.

Yeah, non-binary.

So

they're in danger.

They can be killed by police at any time as they're shooting people.

And to be clear, we saw as protesters were holding up seven fingers to say there were seven victims of the shooting,

including the shooter.

I've heard zero from the media about how Christian children at schools should be worried about their futures.

That apparently is not interesting at all.

In fact, I haven't heard word one really about these victims.

All we've heard is about the trans people and how they are in danger from this incident somehow, because I guess evil conservatives are going to get mad that apparently trans people are shooting children in Christian schools.

Can you believe that?

They'll probably pounce on that as an opportunity to dislike trans people more.

I mean, it's just, this has been, of all the things we could describe the media and Democrats in general as being despicable on, this one might get close to the top of the charts.

In a story that has absolutely no relation to what we're talking about at all, cut four, please.

Have you seen the lightning that has struck New York over the weekend?

Watch this.

This is absolutely incredible.

I mean, that's nuts.

Yeah.

It's nuts.

Yeah.

If you're listening to us, you're like, what's nuts?

And you're not watching it with us on the blaze.

That's what's great.

You should be a subscriber.

A bolt of lightning anchors down on the Freedom Tower, and it just becomes a lightning cage and is held there for a while.

It's crazy.

It's really cool.

But, you know, I'm sure that.

Since nobody got hurt, it's really cool.

Yeah.

If it would have electrocuted everybody in the building, it wouldn't have been quite as cool.

Well, then we have to worry about trans lives.

Yeah,

how many trans people

and children, and who gives a flying crap?

All right, thank you, Pat.

Pat Gray from Pat Gray Unleashed.

You can hear every day before this rat-infested program.

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening.

Tomorrow is

a pretty big day for the Republic.

Tomorrow, a former president of the United States is going to be arraigned in New York.

And we'll find out what the charges are.

I mean, so far, we think that it is, you know, all around

the idea that Donald Trump claimed legal fees on paperwork when he paid somebody off in court, Stormy Daniels.

And apparently, you can't do that, as

Hillary Clinton found out, as she declared legal fees for the

dossier, right?

Yeah, Fusion GPS dossier.

And so

you had her get a nasty fine.

You have Donald Trump

possibly going to jail.

But we don't know what the charges are.

We hopefully will find out what they are after he has been arraigned.

Sorry, not arraigned, but indicted, and he comes in and fingerprinted, and they officially charge him.

Now,

it's my understanding that the judge may issue a gag order, which

is insanity, is insanity.

Wait a minute.

How do you would, wait a minute, you're saying that the media can pile on and say these things,

but he's not allowed to say anything and he's running for president of the United States.

How is that even possible?

They can just continue to slander him and he can't defend himself.

Yeah, absolutely incredible.

And we don't know that that's going to happen.

That is what has been reported, though, today.

And if that does happen, it's a disgrace because not only is he a free citizen that should be able to defend himself publicly, particularly in a situation like this.

I mean, this is not a, you know, it's not a major,

it's an improper classification of

campaign expenditures is what they're charging him with.

Obviously, he denies a lot of this.

But like,

besides the fact that any normal citizen should not have this happen to him, I mean, it's a central part of the argument Donald Trump is making to be re-elected, right?

The central part of his argument is that I am being targeted by these forces in the government that you need me there to stop.

Like, that is, it's like his entire argument to become president of the United United States again.

I know.

And they want to take him, they want to take that out of his mouth.

I mean, that's

absolutely impossible.

You know, we're actually repeating history.

I mean, not exactly, but the progressives are.

The progressive party put Eugene Debs,

he was the founder of the International Socialist Party, founder, I think, of the communist movement here in America.

He was a labor union guy, an organizer.

And he was put into jail under Grover Cleveland

because

convicted of federal charges for defying a court injunction against the strike and served six months in prison.

But then

in 1920, he's running.

And in 1918, he starts speaking out against World War I.

And And Woodrow Wilson charged him with the Sedition Act and put him in prison for 20 years, was it?

Convicted, sedition act, sentenced to a 10-year prison term.

So he was supposed to go to prison for 10 years.

And it was only because

Harding came in and Wilson didn't run for a third term that he was released.

The Republican came in and said the Sedition Act is absolutely unconstitutional.

They got rid of the Sedition Act and they forgave him, but he ran for president from prison,

from prison, and got 3.5%,

which is more than Asa Hutchinson will get being a free man, which is weird.

What do you think of the politics of this, Glenn, and how this plays out?

I mean, the standard way of thinking seems to be that this is going to help Trump in the primary and then question marks in the general.

What do you think of that analysis?

I think it makes America a more dangerous place

because you're going to have

you're going to have tensions

just escalate,

especially if they if they take away and give him a gag order.

They also can charge him for saying things against the district attorney, which is insane to me.

Where's your freedom of speech?

What do you mean,

you're not going to say things against the district attorney?

He's on television saying bad things about you.

What are you talking about?

So there may be a gag order coming.

They may throw additional charges on because of what he has said publicly about the district attorney.

I don't know, but I just, I don't see this being a good thing.

Does this rally Republican voters in the primary?

Oh, yeah.

Yeah.

Already has.

Let me see.

There's a new poll out

that shows, and this poll

was done by John McLaughlin.

Now, this is Trump's pollster,

but

it shows full-fledged ballot test, 14 potential Republican candidates.

President Trump leads with 51%.

DeSantis is now at 21.

In January, President Trump led the field 43.

DeSantis was at 31.

In a matchup of just DeSantis and Trump,

Trump skyrocketed over 60%, now 63% total.

DeSantis had just 30%.

And in the general election, margin of error, 3.1.

Trump found leading Biden 47 to 43%.

So

he's winning in all of them, and it looks like, except for the general,

it looks like the indictment is swaying Republicans.

I mean, you're hearing almost exclusively, I don't know, Asa Hutchinson might be the exception to this, but even the Republican candidates running against him are saying

what a disgrace this is, including DeSantis, including pretty much everybody coming out and saying, look, this is wrong.

The question, I think, is, you know, politically, you get past this first stage, right?

I mean, Trump comes into this is the overwhelming favorite.

I know some of these polls look close, but like, you know, he's he's a former president.

He controls every news cycle.

It would be, you know, he would have to, in some ways, blow this to not win.

I mean, DeSantis has never been proven on the stage, and I like DeSantis quite a bit, but

he's never been in this situation before.

We don't know what to expect out of a DeSantis run, assuming he does get in, which I'm sure he will.

He's done a really good job in Florida, and I think there's all expectations that he'd do a good job on a national campaign, but we still haven't seen that.

Trump has to be seen as the favorite.

And then you see an issue where, you know, again, the main...

conversation among Republicans and their politics right now is what's going on with Donald Trump.

It seems to be the only thing we've talked about since 2015 is just this one person.

And when you're that one person,

you have a massive advantage here, don't you?

Yeah, you do.

And here's the thing.

This isn't

the only investigation.

You have the investigation of election interference in Georgia.

You have the classified documents.

You have January 6th.

And you have the Stormy Daniels case.

This is only one out of four, which

is one of the most incredible things I have ever seen in American politics.

Never before has this happened.

Gerald Ford lost the reelection because, well, Gerald Ford sucked,

but also because he pardoned Richard Nixon and people thought that was wrong.

I happen to agree that that was wrong, but they did it for a reason.

You didn't want to have a sitting president go through trial.

I personally would have found that inspirational.

I personally

would have found a president going to trial for an actual crime

inspirational.

No one in our government is above the law.

No one.

You don't get, you break the law, you go to jail.

The problem is, and we see this now,

you can be had with as many laws as we have.

You can be had for anything.

Look at how this guy has had every single, I will bet you,

every single intelligence group, including the five eyes, looking for dirt on this guy.

Maybe the only one that wasn't was Israel.

Every other intelligence agency in the world was looking for dirt on this guy.

And, you know,

who was it?

Maxine Waters says, well, he earned this.

He earned this.

I'll tell you that right now.

Did he?

Did he?

Who could withstand that kind of scrutiny?

I've said to him myself, I got to tell you, Mr.

President, I mean,

I thought, because I lived in New York.

I watched you build these buildings.

And these buildings, remember, Stu?

They would just go up.

Trump buildings, they'd go up.

Everything else would take forever.

And Trump would just,

and it would be done.

And I said to him, you know, you're a construction guy in New York where everything's bottoming, you know?

Hey,

don't ask about Johnny.

He might be at the bottom of the river today.

And I said, if anything,

I thought for sure there would have been some bribes or something going on in New York.

I said, you are shockingly one of the cleanest guys.

You have to be one of the cleanest guys because they've gone after everything

and nothing.

You get this?

Something that's not really a crime?

What do you think about the?

Because there's a theory out there, and

whether it's coordinated or not is a separate question.

But the theory basically is that this Stormy Daniels case, being the worst, the weakest of the four or five cases that are out there,

was intentionally put forth first.

Now, of course, it is the oldest one, too, so it could just be that simple.

But the idea is that while they all want to go after Donald Trump, there weren't a lot of DAs that wanted to be the person who pulled the trigger on the first time a president had been charged.

It was a big hurdle, a big sort of wall there, and people didn't want to be the first one to go down that road and have to deal with all that.

And now that this Stormy Daniels thing has gone forward,

they're going to indict him, and they have indicted him on this, that it makes the other cases more likely to come forward because now they don't have to deal with that precedent setting.

Well, they're going to indict, I think, in Georgia, but again, it will be laughable.

You remember she was the foreman of the jury.

And she was like, Yeah, we got to get him on something.

I just couldn't wait to get him on something.

I mean, that's crazy.

They're going to probably indict there.

They cannot indict on the

documents.

How are they going to possibly indict?

He's so weak.

Weaker than this one, though?

Weaker than this one?

I mean, it's, it's,

they're both so weak that you would think there's no way.

But if they indict him on this, which is a misdemeanor that is out of its,

what do you call it?

You know, when it's times out of statue limitations, it's outside of that.

How are they even charging?

If that's indeed what they're charging with.

Right.

And it really is incredible.

And I think, you know, you're going to see, you can go back and forth on all these cases.

I'd love to get your take, maybe a little bit in a little while of which one you think are the most likely to come through.

What is Trump going to have to deal with here going forward?

The best of the Glenbeck program.

Welcome to the Glenbeck program.

We were just looking up Hungary.

It is where George Soros is from, and it is the country that I was thinking of.

1956, the Soviet Union invaded Hungary to crush a popular uprising against the communist government, and they had already infiltrated that government, had all their people in place.

They then caused chaos on the streets,

and then the tanks rolled in in 1956.

All right, we have Dan Kelly on.

He is a candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

He is a former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice.

This race in Wisconsin is extraordinarily important.

And he is on now with us.

He was up on an airplane and it was running late.

So he missed the first

exposure here just a few minutes ago.

We luckily have him on the phone now.

Hi, Dan.

How are you?

I'm doing great, Glenn.

Thank you so much for having me on your show.

This is great.

You bet.

You are running a very important

race right now.

How do you say the last name of Janet?

She who must not be named.

Okay.

So

she is from another planet, and she is not just a liberal, she is a progressive.

Tell me the difference between you two.

Yeah, it could not be larger.

It's the difference between the rule of law and the rule of Janet Pro de Sablitz.

And what I mean by that is, you know, in our constitutional system, the Constitution tells those in office what they are to do.

And I understand that as a Supreme Court justice, your role is simply to apply the existing law to resolve the cases that come before us.

That's the rule of law.

The rule of Janet, she intends to place herself above the law.

She has actually gone so far as to say that she would place her thumb on the scales of justice to make sure the cases are resolved according to her personal politics.

That is crazy.

It is crazy.

It is a complete breach of trust with the people of of Wisconsin.

It is unconstitutional, and she is dead set on doing this.

And this is why I think that this race is gaining attention across the country, because I don't think, I don't, I'm not aware of any judicial candidate in the history of the country who's ever campaigned on a platform of setting herself above the law, of rejecting the constitutional order.

And yet that's what she's all about.

And there are people like George Searles,

and Governor Pritzker from Illinois who are piling in tons of money to to make sure that this happens for them.

Well, I don't think that's going to happen here in Wisconsin because I think the people of Wisconsin have really level heads on their shoulders.

They've got to see right through this.

And they still treasure their constitutional order.

They treasure the liberties that their Constitution protects.

And the last thing they want is four progressive lawyers sitting in a Madison courtroom telling them what laws they can and cannot have and what liberties they may and may not enjoy.

I think they're going to reject that out of hand.

What is the balance of the court now?

Four to three, and one of the Constitution-following justices is retiring.

So

this is for all the Marbles.

If they win this seat,

the Constitutional Order in Wisconsin is going to crumble because you simply cannot have four lawyers setting themselves above the law and reducing the other two branches of government to basically just their handservants.

So that's the risk here.

But like I said, think the people of Wisconsin are going to see through this.

So we just need them to come out by tomorrow, no later than 8 o'clock,

and vote to uphold our constitutional heritage.

And

that's what it's about.

I just want to, because this is one of the most incredible things I've ever heard as you're talking, I'm looking it up.

There are some cases that she absolutely said she would put her thumb on the scale of justice to correct laws that she thinks are wrong, such as congressional district maps, which she called rigged.

So

if she disagrees with it, I mean, that is, that is,

that's not a judge.

That's a dictator.

That's exactly right.

So we call that when it happens on the court, we call it a judicial tyranny because she would be using power that the people of Wisconsin have never loaned to her.

And I understand the authority of the court is simply on loan from the people of Wisconsin to whom whom that power belongs.

And she just wants to reject all of that and become the source of authority, the source of law.

And

that would just overturn the constitutional order.

So

the future of our constitutional heritage in the state of Wisconsin is on the line.

But it's also going to have implications nationwide because if that gambit works here, there will be people that pick that up and use it as a template to push other courts in activist and political directions to set up judicial tyrannies in other states.

I know a federal judge who said the lower courts are already out of control.

He said

he has seen court rulings where the judge has said

this law doesn't make any sense and we're doing this and completely untethered from the Constitution or the rule of law, no matter what that

law is.

In 2020,

there was a $10 million bounty for this seat.

They spent $10 million for that race.

That was the record.

The national record is $15 million spent in Illinois.

Already, there is more than $37 million spent on this race.

Yeah.

We're expecting it to go north of $50 million by the end of the day tomorrow.

That is unbelievable.

Please tell me some of of that money is for our side.

It is.

So fortunately, there are folks around the country that still value the constitutional order, who understand that the role of the court is just to apply the law, not to make it up, not to change it, not to ignore it, but just to faithfully apply it every day as the Constitution commands them.

And so they've come along and they've been supporting our efforts here in Wisconsin.

And there's been enough that we've been able to get the information to all the folks across Wisconsin so that they can exercise an intelligent choice by 8 p.m.

tomorrow.

So, yeah, my opponent's got a ton of money and she'll outspend us.

But I'm not too worried about that because that bill of goods that she's trying to sell, I don't think there's enough money in the country to sell that to the good people of Wisconsin.

I don't know.

I mean,

I don't know how to judge the American people anymore.

I know that there's good people out there on both sides,

but there's not a lot of people that are awake on the other side.

And,

you know, we're sitting here facing some of the worst times our country has ever had.

And it doesn't seem like the American people really even know what's going on.

Yeah, well, and Glenn, you know, and I think that there is,

you're reflecting a measure of concern that I do have.

You and I both know what it took to originally secure secure the liberties that we cherish so well.

You know, at the end of the Declaration of Independence, right before everyone signed their names, they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

And many of them lost their lives or were bankrupted or convicted of treason.

But they didn't count that a price too high to pay to secure those liberties.

Now, today, we still have a responsibility of securing those liberties, but it's a pretty easy thing to do.

You just got to vote.

You don't have to lay your life on the line.

You don't have to face bankruptcy.

You don't have to sacrifice your sacred honor.

You just need to come out and vote.

And yet I'm worried that because it costs so little, the people might value it little.

So our project really is to remind the people of Wisconsin who they are, that they are the bosses in this form of government, and it's their responsibility to come out and make sure that we secure our constitutional heritage so we can hand that down to the next generation.

They can do the same after that.

It just comes down coming out.

Now, last fall, there were 2.6 million people that came out to vote.

And we're expecting that

if we reach 1.6 to 1.8 million by the end of the day tomorrow, that'll be a lot.

But think about that.

That's an 800,000 to a million vote drop-off between fall and spring.

And so our project is to get to all of them and remind them of the importance of securing our heritage.

because there is nothing written, and I know you've talked about this before, Glenn, there's nothing written that says that we are guaranteed to have our Constitution from one generation to the next.

No.

We have to do that.

We have to stand up and make sure that we secure it so that we can hand that down.

And we do that through voting.

And it's so easy to do.

What's really

so frustrating, Dan.

By the way, we are talking to Dan Kelly.

He is running for the Supreme Court in Wisconsin.

Tomorrow is the last day to vote.

It is extraordinarily important that you vote for Dan Kelly in Wisconsin.

Do it today.

Last chance is tomorrow.

But Dan, you know what's so frustrating is our founders knew this.

Thomas Jefferson said that it's not right, I'm paraphrasing horribly, that we would rule from the grave.

It needs to be up to every generation.

But they made that part of the Constitution.

You can change it by

changing the Constitution through amendments.

But they don't do that.

They never do that.

Instead, they undermine the Constitution and get activist judges, which is not a democracy.

That's not how a republic, for sure, but even a democracy is supposed to work.

Yeah, it's just lawless when that happens.

And it's not like we don't know how to do this.

I mean, we've amended the United States Constitution 27 27 times.

We've amended the Wisconsin Constitution more times than I can remember.

So we know how to do this.

When the document needs to change,

we can do that, but we follow the constitutional order.

That's what we require.

So

these

politicians who want to dress up like judges and go to the Supreme Court so that they can set aside laws that they don't like, so that they can change the meaning of our Constitution so it's more compatible with what they want, they are rejecting the very idea of law.

Law has has to have a fixed and discernible meaning.

And if it changes depending on what a judge says, then it's not really law at all.

It's just the judge exercising law power.

So it really is about protecting the concept of law.

It's about protecting the concept of the constitutional order.

Real quick, because I've only got about 90 seconds here.

You are for,

you know, actual sentencing of criminals.

The lenience lenience for criminals is not part of your playbook.

You support the Second Amendment.

It's not clear if she does, but she's supported by gun control groups.

The

life question, you are pro-life.

She is very pro-abortion.

And the lockdowns

from COVID, where do you stand against them?

Where was she or where is she?

So, yeah, so I think that she favors lawmaking wherever it might occur according to her particular taste.

Now, what I do, you know, I was on the court while the lockdown occurred, and the lockdown order came to us for review, and by a 4-3 decision, we decided that it was an unlawful order.

But two of us on the court, Justice Rebecca Bradley and I, we looked at that and we said, well,

there's a more serious question about whether, more than whether it went through the rule promulgation process.

It was a question of whether the executive branch agencies could use the power of the legislature to actually make laws all by themselves for the state of Wisconsin.

And so we looked at that and we said that was unconstitutional.

We struck down that order so that people could continue to enjoy the right to set their own laws in conversation with their legislatures.

So not have an executive branch bureaucrat usurp that power and exercise it on when they have no right or authority to do so.

Justice Daniel Kelly, thank you so much.

If you want to know more about him, you bet.

Good luck.

You want to know more about him, justicedanielkelly.com.

It is vital.

If you are in Wisconsin, you were thinking, ah, it doesn't matter.

If this matters to all of us, vote Daniel Kelly

in the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Whatever way you vote, I mean, I hope you vote for Daniel, but whatever way you vote, your voice must be heard in Wisconsin.

Last day to vote is tomorrow.

Attention, all small biz owners.

At the UPS store, you can count on us to handle your packages with care.

With our certified packing experts, your packages are properly packed and protected.

And with our pack and ship guarantee, when we pack it and ship it, we guarantee it.

Because your items arrive safe or you'll be reimbursed.

Visit the ups store.com/slash guarantee for full details.

Most locations are independently owned.

Product services, pricing, and hours of operation may vary.

See Center for Details.

The UPS store.

Be unstoppable.

Come into your local store today.