Best of the Program | Guest: Chip Roy | 1/4/22

Welcome to Sephora.

I'm looking for a perfume that's not too perfumey.

I got you.

Serum moisturizer or moisturizer syrup.

Let's get into layering.

My concealer is making me look worse.

Sounds like the wrong shade.

Let's get you meshed.

There's only one store that really gets what you're going for: get beauty from people who get beauty.

Only at Sephora.

Hi, I

let's get you a basket.

Goodness, Stu.

Is it not so great to be sitting here in the same room with me again?

Oh, I was dreaming about it all vacation, and now here it is.

Yes.

And wow.

So I had quite a vacation.

I

saw a lot of things, did a lot of thinking,

have

some new attitude and some new

ideas that we'll be explaining over the next few weeks.

Some things that we're going to talk about tonight, big one is the agenda for the Republicans.

I'm tired of them.

We have Chip Roy on today's podcast, and I think he's tired of it, too.

But we're going to talk a little bit about what's going on with the Speaker of the House, and I'm great.

I'm glad.

Good.

I don't want another mealy-mouthed, wishy-washy guy who's doing everything behind the scenes.

You know, no John Boehners.

No John Boehners.

What do you say?

No?

Yeah.

No Paul Ryan.

When I heard actually somebody say, well, maybe we can get Paul Ryan.

Are you out of your mind?

Oh my gosh, these guys don't get it.

No, they do not get it.

They do not understand the base, the voters.

They don't understand any of it.

And they're being

embarrassed publicly because of that

right now.

You think they might eventually get it under control, but nah.

Nah.

We'll see.

We'll see.

We have a lot to talk about.

That and so much more on today's podcast.

Here it is.

And don't forget to review the podcast and some of you.

Some of you do that like you're a professional.

Instead of saying, why don't you review the podcast?

Let's say it is a proof.

Sorry.

Take two.

Make sure that you review the podcast and also

follow the podcast and

also Studios America, which is also

available.

The podcast.

You're listening to

the best of the Blenbeck program.

Commodio Cordis.

Commodio Cordis.

Hmm?

What was that you said?

Commodio Cordis.

And that's all you can say.

May I just try to talk some common sense here?

The NFL player that had a heart attack on Monday night football, terrifying.

I don't usually watch sports.

I've been watching a lot of football with my son lately, and I was at dinner on Monday night and didn't see it.

My son and I come back to the hotel and we pass the gym.

Didn't go in.

God forgive me.

But we passed the gym and the Monday night football was on.

So this is your use of the gym?

You look at the TV that's on the TV.

Yeah, I looked through the glass at the TV and I was like, whoa, what's happening on Monday night football?

And so we got into the room and we watched it.

And

it was shocking.

It was shocking.

You know, something that it's one of those moments that

you will remember if you saw it.

Something that the sportscasters all night, I lost count of how many times is it?

We're not sure what's going to happen.

There's no precedent for this.

I've never seen anything like this.

I don't know.

Okay.

I noticed a couple of things that stuck out to me and

bothered me.

When I had to switch over to ESPN, I think it was, or the NFL network, to be able to see

what was going on.

They didn't replay

the scene over and over and over again.

That's unusual.

Not like we need to see it over and over again, but that's what television does, okay, for dummies like me who tune in in late.

And I'm like, where is the footage?

Where is the footage?

I had to go online to see the footage.

And that

shocked me.

It also was,

I don't know.

I think this is a good thing.

They immediately changed.

Even the sounders, you know, usually when the screen changes, you'll hear whoosh.

All of the noise went away

uh and it so it added to the drama of it

now

they wouldn't say and i thought it was extremely responsible they wouldn't say really what had happened i think they knew uh a few minutes before that's usually what happens when you're on a network

you get word of what is happening and then you're waiting for it to be verified before you say anything.

So I was like, there we're gonna have word here in a few minutes i'm like somebody is on the set standing there with what exactly happened

but we don't know exactly what happened and this was the thing that really

bothered me it started immediately

this is a covid vaccine

no this is what is it Commodio you're talking about

ailment known as

Commodio Cordis.

Commodio Cordis.

Commodio Cordis.

That's what it is.

All of a sudden, everybody's an expert on Commodio

Cordis.

Commodio Cordis.

Everybody is.

That's what it is.

That's exactly what it is.

Everyone knows instantly from the video.

Right.

And then everybody knows, no, that's not what it is.

It's the vaccine.

And then,

shut up.

You're an enemy of the state.

What the hell was that?

Okay.

So Komodio Cordis, and I am now an expert on this.

Once you can pronounce it, you're officially the experts.

It's rare.

It happens 10 to 20 times a year.

It happens mainly in children under the age of 18.

I don't know if that has anything to do with, I don't know what the age is.

Maybe it's 18.

I think it's a little younger than that, that you stop going,

I gotta

win, knock out out of me.

That doesn't happen when you're an adult.

You know, when you get the wind knocked out of you and you're like,

I can't

break.

You ever feel that?

Yeah, that's interesting.

I never put that together.

That doesn't happen later on.

I just thought it was because we don't fall out of trees.

Or we don't move.

Maybe that's it.

We don't move.

We don't fall out of trees.

But that stops happening.

Okay.

So it could be part of that that you don't really do a lot of stuff that where you get the wind knocked out of you.

But it mainly happens with people under 18.

It's much more rare in people over 20.

Now, is that possible?

Yeah,

it's absolutely possible.

Weird things happen to the body under

intense situations.

Car crashes.

He had a heart attack.

How did he have a heart attack?

He had a car crash.

Okay, might have become as he was going, oh my God.

Or the steering wheel came into his chest and stopped his heart.

That would be Komodio Curtis.

Good job.

Thank you.

Expert.

Doctor.

Thank you.

Well, I am a doctor.

So,

I mean, the hit he took or...

gave or I don't

was not out of the ordinary, was it?

No, it seemed very routine.

Yeah, yeah.

It wasn't brutal.

We've seen worse.

Much worse.

Yeah.

He took the hit and then he stood up and then we all watched in horror as he just fell to the ground unconscious.

He was given CPR

and AED.

It was used to shock his heart back in rhythm.

I found something out about

AEDs.

You know, when you're watching, you know, some hospital show and they're like, quick, he's flatlined.

Get a charge.

That doesn't actually start your heart back up.

It's, I,

as I understand it, it only shocks it into rhythm.

Right.

Yeah, okay.

Okay.

Because, I mean, and I would question you on this, but you're a doctor who's an expert.

Thank you very much.

So I would only commodial cordis.

Whoa.

You know what I'm saying?

So anyway,

the immediate reaction was mixed.

Most of our thoughts went directly to the well-being of Hamlin and his poor family and the teammates.

You know, and when you hear the NFL is like, well, we're not sure if we're going to continue to play.

I'm like, look at them.

Do you think anybody wants to finish this game?

And thoughts and prayers became okay again.

Nobody was saying, those are meaningless.

Shut up with your thoughts and prayers.

It became meaningful again.

In fact,

one of the sportscasters

did this.

Football gave me everything.

And I think even through the midst of absolute tragedy last night, I think you saw some of the beauty of football as well, that it's brought us all here together.

You know, like, this is a little bit different.

I've heard it all day, like thoughts and prayers.

And you just heard Sheriff and Jonathan Allen say, like, all we can do is pray for him.

I've heard the Buffalo Bills organization say, like, we believe in prayer.

And maybe this is not the right thing to do, but it's just on my heart that I want to pray for

Lamar Hamlin right now.

I'm going to do it out loud.

I'm going to close my eyes.

I'm going to bow my head, and I'm just going to pray for him.

God, we come to you in these moments that we don't understand, that are hard,

because we believe that you're God and coming to you and praying to you

has impact.

We're sad, we're angry,

and we want answers, but some things are unanswerable.

We just want to pray, truly come to to you, and pray for strength for Damar, for healing for Damar, for comfort for Damar to be with his family, to give them peace.

If we didn't believe that prayer didn't work, we wouldn't ask this of you, God.

I believe in prayer.

We believe in prayer.

We lift up DeMar Hamlin's name in your name.

Amen.

Amen.

Amen.

That's ESPN.

That's ESPN.

Wow.

Now,

this is sheer coincidence, but I read yesterday that Disney is thinking about selling ESPN.

So here's the thing.

If you look at the stats, according to Dr.

McCullough, who is

a world-famous, probably one of the most respected and decorated cardiologists in history, Peter McCullough,

He

published a paper, and I shouldn't say it that way because it was just an op-ed.

It wasn't a peer-reviewed paper.

He said, There is a sharp rise in athlete

deaths since vaccination.

1,598 athletes suffered cardiac arrest, 1,101 died.

Over the prior 38 years, 1,100 athletes aged of 35, no, sorry, 1,101 athletes died.

The age of 35,

sorry, the ages of 29

and younger was 35.

So it was mainly kids.

In 38 years, he says,

we had still less athlete cardiac arrest than we've had in just a couple of years since the COVID vaccine.

I don't know.

This is not a peer-reviewed study.

I don't even know if I trust peer-reviewed anything anymore.

But I don't know.

You don't know.

I don't think McCullough knows if this is what it was.

It would depend on what they're finding.

My real problem and my point on all of this is 2023 has to be the year of questions asked and answered.

Asked and answered.

If we are going to live in a free society, then no questions are off the table.

It used to be, well, that's a stupid question.

These aren't stupid questions.

Could it been Commodio Cardis accordis?

Yes, it could be, might be, probably is.

Could it be that it was the COVID vaccine?

Might be, could be, probably is.

Could it be both of them?

Maybe a mixture of four different things?

Might be, could be, probably is.

We have the same answer until we actually know.

The thing we have to get to is being willing to ask the questions.

The biggest problem

comes from the CDC

and the

AMA

and Fauci

and the government and Twitter in its old form and Facebook and Google that have all colluded to shut you up from asking questions.

You know how this wouldn't have been a big deal?

If we would have seen and been, they would have been open about all of the side effects of the vaccine.

If they just would have come out and said, hey, look, there's a possibility of these things.

This is the way it is.

Instead, we weren't allowed to question.

So you find out, wait a minute, that's not what you said.

Now,

everything you say is questioned.

And don't blame it on the conspiracy theorists.

Blame it on those who refused to allow questions to be asked and answered in a reasonable fashion.

This is the best of the Glen Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening.

Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program.

We're glad you're here.

We're really glad that Chip Roy is with us, talk to us about the battle for the Speaker of the House.

Hello, Chip.

How are you?

Glenn, I'm doing well.

We're

engaged in yet another series of meetings this morning.

We were here until midnight last night at the Capitol, and we're going to continue to fight for the people that sent us here to fight for.

Well, A, I appreciate that, and I hope that America responds.

I think

the Carl Roves of the world are thinking that people like you are going to get a lot of calls and

deluged at your office today saying, don't you dare, you go with Spear McCarthy.

I think the other is going to happen because I'm done, Chip.

I'm done.

When the Senate passed the omnibus bill, I was done.

If you guys don't have the freedom to investigate and the teeth and the backbone to actually do things in the interest of all Americans, why did we vote for any Republicans?

Well, Glenn, that's the question.

That is the central question.

People have been asking, like, what's the message?

I tried to deliver a message on the floor of the House last night that what we're fighting for are the tools and the leadership necessary to stop the swamp from rolling over the average American who are sick and tired of seeing this town undermine their freedom, spend money we don't have, and continue to violate every promise they've ever made in the campaign.

I'm going to come up and I'm going to cut spending.

We're going to balance the budget.

We're going to secure the border.

Bull.

You saw what happened unfold with that ridiculous $1.7 trillion bill.

There was no real significant pushback from the House leadership when Mitch McConnell stuck it to the American people, made it impossible for us to secure the border, took away our leverage, and did it so that the current D.C.

establishment could get what they wanted in terms of a big spending bill for the defense complex and to jam through something that the American people didn't want.

That's what we have to stop, Glenn.

Okay, so that's what this is about.

So I am with you.

So now,

will those of you who are

mounting this battle, is there a compromise McCarthy could make?

So I would have told you

48 hours ago that the answer to that question was yes.

The problem is, is there is a growing group of hardcore no votes against Kevin because of the way things unfolded yesterday at the Republican conference meeting, in which Mike Rogers stood up and threatened members from losing their committees.

And when lies were being told about what was behind the motives of members seeking quote petty personal privileges and being on certain committees which was a total lie because members offered in good faith all right put me on the appropriations committee I don't want to be in the appropriations committee but I'll do it right or put me on the rules committee

that was me I said sure put my name on the rules committee as someone who would do it even though I don't want to fly away from my home and miss my family on Sunday night and fly up here to be here on Monday mornings to set the rules and the rules committee is the funnel through which all things get to the floor the fight in 1923, when there were nine rounds of votes for the speaker, the culmination of that was a complete change of the rules committee because it's so powerful.

It's a secret committee kind of that nobody knows about that just sits there and decides what bills get to the floor, what's in them, and what it looks like.

So we had a debate about that, and then people lied about it.

So now you've got a bunch of members that are saying, you know what?

I can't trust them.

I'm not going to be able to vote for the guy.

Now, that being said, Glenn, literally the conversations I had until midnight last night and this morning is trying to work in good faith on how to change the institution.

I, speaking for myself,

there would be a path for me to get there.

But the path for me requires us to be able to control the ability of, to control the legislation that gets to the floor and stop something like that omnibus bill in December.

So hang on just a second.

May I just break this down for idiots like me?

I think what you're saying is, because I was stunned when I saw you all sitting in the chamber yesterday.

I'm like, wow, I haven't seen that since turn of the century.

The problem is all of these bills are being done behind closed doors by just a small group, and then it's brought to the floor, not for discussion, but for a vote.

Yes or no?

And you want that to stop, right?

Correct.

Yeah.

And we made progress.

And look, and Glenn, this is important.

The progress we've made over the last 60 days to get rules is not because Kevin was standing up trying to figure out, oh, I've got these great ideas on how to make the place better.

It was because some of us, five in particular, publicly, that were nosed said they weren't going to support Kevin.

And then another seven of us signed a letter saying, here are the kinds of things we want to see change.

That forced the conversation to get changed.

Now these guys are running around saying, well, we gave you everything you want.

No, you didn't.

You gave us some things that will be an improvement, but you didn't give us the key things, which is what is necessary to stop big bills that the defense world and the liberals

among Democrats jammed through.

Remember and consider.

Kevin voted in the minority with more Democrats than Republicans on multiple bills over the last decade.

Since he has been in Republican leadership, the debt has gone from $11 trillion to $32 trillion.

He voted, for example, for good last year.

You don't need to tell you,

I am not for.

And I get it.

Tell me what the specifics are that have to be changed, because I think people need to know specifically, what are we fighting for?

The key thing that I believe needs to change is that we have to have people on the rules committee who reflect the conservatives who send Republicans to Washington to change the town.

That seems wonky.

What is the real message?

Is that we need conservatives.

Enough conservatives.

I'm not saying put every Freedom Caucus member on that.

I'm saying you need to have actual conservatives who will stand up in defense of the American people from the big spending in this town, be on the committees that actually determine what gets to the floor, combined with the changes to the rules that we are partway down the road and getting of opening up the floor so we can have amendments and debate on the floor

so that we can kill this stuff.

So we're kind of halfway there, but halfway there ain't there.

And so if they're not going to work with us to get us there, then that's the problem.

And yesterday damaged that and may have created an environment where there's too many guys here who are saying, we can't cut a deal with Kevin.

I don't know.

That's what we're working through.

And

is there somebody that you think everybody could agree on?

Look, I think there's this, there's,

here's the problem.

If I go out and say I think person X is the guy, then that might poison.

Got it, got it, got it, got it.

So, so, So we're having conversations.

I promise you, there are people that would surprise you that are in the sort of center of the world around McCarthy who are having conversations openly.

Or I say openly, I mean privately with us, but like having conversation.

But let me give you an example.

I nominated yesterday two guys on the floor.

I picked one.

Byron Donalds was my first vote.

Why did I pick Byron?

Because Byron is a second-term congressman who is not sullied by the swamp.

Successful businessman, father, conservative.

He's a friend, proven track record, worked in the Texas, I'm sorry, the Florida legislature.

He's a good man.

The Speaker doesn't have to know every ins and outs of the swamp to make it work.

And in fact, we would be great.

It would be a breath of fresh air to have someone who doesn't come with the taint of the swamp.

So I picked Byron Donalds.

Second, I'd nominated Jim Jordan.

He's been here longer, but he's got a history and a track record of fighting the swamp.

That's the whole point.

Kevin doesn't have that.

Okay?

So if we're cutting a deal with Kevin, we better damn well get the rules that will box him in.

Otherwise, you've got to have a deal with a leader who you can trust to break the swamp, to break the cartel that's destroying our country, spending money we don't have, leaving our borders open, continuing to empower bureaucrats that undermine our freedom.

We have to stop it, Glenn.

The tools we need have to give us the tools to stop.

continuing to do the same thing we've been doing over and over again.

While every single Republican goes back in campaigns and then comes to this godforsaken town and throws our country down the drain and undermines everything that the men and women in uniform have fought so valiantly to save for our kids and our grandkids.

That's what this is about.

Do you have, are you fighting for or do you already have

enough power of investigation to be able to answer

the questions that must be answered this year?

Must be answered.

So I would say

we're going way down the path of organizing and we have the fire and we're ready to go after a lot of the entities that need to.

Jim Jordan and Judiciary Committee, for example.

And we've already been having lots of conversations and meetings.

Everybody's freaking out.

Oh, you don't have a speaker.

It's like, hold on, like 24 hours, 48 hours.

The world's not going to implode if we don't have a speaker in place while we try to get it right.

But we're ready to go on a lot of these things.

You would ask me, do we have everything?

I think we need a more aggressive, expanded church committee style effort to go after the weapon

government.

I think that we got some headway in that.

There were some offers to do it.

That was, I think, good conversations were going on that, but they kind of stalled on Monday night around other factors.

So, I think we've made headway and we're in a good place to be able to do some good things with that.

But we've got a lot more work we need to do.

Do you see us?

Um, I think in 29, or no, it was 1856, I think, where it went on for 130 votes.

Uh, do you see us in a 1856 or a 1920s kind of situation?

Well, right now we're through three votes.

We're going to go there in an hour and 15 minutes.

We know there's going to be at least a fourth.

My guess is there might be a fifth or a sixth, and we're going to continue to have conversations today.

Like I said, Kevin doesn't have the votes.

So we've got to work through and getting it there.

And we're either going to get it there through fixing the rules and getting it to where we can protect the American people and do what we said we would do to stop the swamp, or we need a new leader or both.

But we're working on it as hard as we know how to do.

But the American people need to be patient knowing that there's a group of people up here fighting for you.

That's what this is about, fighting to defend the American people against the swamp.

That's everything that we're trying to do.

And the most effective thing any listener can do.

Call your member and tell them to stand with us to get what we need to get to stop the swamp.

And that means Kevin McCarthy needs to come to the table or we need a new leader.

But don't go, you know, walk away and get, you know, don't walk away because you're hearing people go, oh, my God, you might end up with a Democrat speaker.

That's only going to happen if Republicans vote for a Democrat.

Republicans vote for Republicans.

You get a Republican speaker.

And we're going to keep working to do that.

Great.

Thank you so much.

I appreciate it.

Chip Roy from the great state of Texas Congressman from Texas, roy.house.gov.

The best of the Glenbeck program.

So

the president of Ukraine, Zelensky, held a video conference meeting with Larry Fink, the CEO.

Is Is there a guy who has a more apt name than Larry Fink

at BlackRock?

He's a character from Three's Company.

He's like a bond villain.

Larry Fink, he is the world's leading investment managers at BlackRock.

They manage about $8 trillion.

It's probably more than that

together, but under their direct leadership, $8 trillion.

Now,

they had some preliminary agreements with the head of state and Larry Fink.

The BlackRock team has been working for several months on a project to advise Ukrainian government on how to structure the country's reconstruction funds.

So I just want to

Ukraine comes and they want money for this war and our government gives them money and we don't send any accountants to track that money.

Then BlackRock starts working with their government and says, we'll help you use that money.

This doesn't sound like, doesn't sound like there's anything we should be watching here, does it?

He agreed with Larry Fink to focus on coordinating the efforts of all potential investors and participants in the reconstruction of their country, channeling investments into the most relevant and impactful sectors of the Ukrainian economy.

During the conversation, it was emphasized that

BlackRock leaders plan to visit Ukraine in the next year.

Our accountants?

No, but BlackRock will be there.

They are

going in and

looking after the allocated funds, and they're going to advise on structuring the reconstruction projects for Ukraine.

So

why

has

Ukraine become such a big deal?

If you go back in time, do you remember?

Ukraine was a big deal under Obama, with Biden.

Huge.

2014 had to have Ukraine.

Had to have Ukraine.

The State Department overthrows the sitting president and gets in the new president.

And then Biden comes over and threatens them with funds and says, you got to get rid of this prosecutor.

Otherwise, we're going to withhold funds.

And they get rid of that prosecutor.

This has been a money laundering scene for the left for a very, very

long time.

George Soros, all of the left is over in Ukraine.

Why is the question?

Now,

is it because

we are strategically using Ukraine to dismantle Russia because there is a fight for a new world order?

And it is either going to be the World Economic Forum's world order or the world order of the communists in China or the Putins of the world.

and that is a national socialistic kind of nation,

or what the World Economic Forum is going for is an international socialistic sort of program.

Okay?

That's truly what it is.

National and international.

They're not communists.

It is truly more fascism.

It is the definition of fascism.

When the state and the business collude with one another,

and the government tells business what they're going to do and what they're not going to do, and it's all privately owned, but it's a public-private partnership.

That is the literal definition of fascism.

This is what we went through in

World War II.

You had the national fascists of Italy and of

Germany,

and then you had the international communists of Russia.

At that time, we also had the free world.

This time, we don't have the free world.

What's happening now is we're arguing over fascism.

China might call themselves a communist party, but they're much more fascistic in nature than communist.

This is the argument.

Are we going to be international fascists or are we going to be national fascists?

If they can take down Russia, which is a lot easier than China, then you have a much better chance of the whole world being against China.

And you have national fascism.

I think that's one of the reasons.

But I also think that

there's just a lot of money sloshing around in Ukraine.

And there's a lot of slime in Ukraine.

Who's getting rich on this?

We need that question to be answered this year.

Before we go to war or give them any more money,

why

are we there?

Why are we now, according to

a source in the CIA, we're now directing internal hits on Russia for Ukraine.

Why would we do that?

And second of all, why would we announce that?

Why would we say that out loud?

Shh.

Inside voice.

It's insane.

I don't think even if Russia, if Putin says, I'll comply,

he's not going to give back Crimea.

But if he says, I'll comply and everything else, I don't think we're going to make a deal with him.

We want want the destruction for some reason.

And when I say we, I don't mean you and me.

There is some other

agenda at work.

And I have a feeling it revolves around international socialism or the great reset.

There's a couple of other things that you should be aware of.

The TSA is expanding facial recognition programs at major airports.

They're going to roll this out nationally soon, but the facial recognition program,

this is really, really bad.

Do not give the government a scan of your eye.

There is nothing worse than giving them a scan.

That is more unique than your fingerprint.

It gives more information about you than your fingerprint.

And people are just like, yeah, but I'll get through the line quicker.

Oh my gosh.

Don't do that.

It's now being used in more than a dozen airports.

Vegas, Denver, Dallas, Fort Worth.

TSA

says it's going to destroy most of the images.

That's kind of like mostly dead.

They're going to destroy most of the images within a couple of weeks.

Mm-hmm.

I'm sure.

Sure, sure, sure.

Let's watch for that

because you are going to see in the next year,

maybe two, but I think it's going to be this year, you are going to see the beginning of

a tracking system, a global monitoring system that is beyond your imagination.

We now have technology through low-altitude satellites, drones.

We are on the precipice of not a square inch of Earth

being

unseen 24 hours a day.

Not a square inch of Earth.

They're going to start it in the biggest of cities.

They already are doing it in China, but now we have the computing power and we have the photographic power of being able to monitor

everything everything and link everything.

Did you see the movie State of Fear?

Who was in that?

It was Gene Hackman

and Will Smith, I think.

That was

Enemy of the State.

Enemy of the State.

Thank you.

Enemy of the State.

Enemy of the State, if you saw that, I remember watching going, that technology doesn't exist, does it?

The answer then was no.

But the people in the Pentagon and the CIA, they were like, hey, that's a pretty good idea.

There's a fun toy.

Yeah, and we are now building it.

And there's probably no stopping it now, you know, unless we had Congress on our side, which don't count on that one.

But that is extraordinarily dangerous.

What part of that technology are you talking about when you say the unit?

The part of technology that could, what they're building now is low Earth or low altitude satellites in a string that can monitor one place all the time.

So

because the satellites move, you need a string of them.

So it's constantly trained on New York City and can lock in on New York City.

continually 24 hours a day.

And then it will have parameters through the algorithm of that's unusual, that's not right.

And it can, you know, it can read your, you know, the back of your credit card from space.

And the algorithm will say something, terrorist activity, something illegal may be happening.

And it can automatically gin down, zoom in on any area, alert the police, alert the feds, or it can zoom in.

And if it can't get close enough, all through algorithm, it will then start to use the local cameras all the way to your cell phones and be able to see exactly what's going on everywhere in that area.

So basically constant monitoring.

They're calling it the all-seeing eye.

I wrote about it.

It's called the eye of Moloch.

But that is now

coming soon to a world near you.

And even I know you, I think I understand what you meant by this, but you said, you know, oh, this is definitely going to happen unless Congress gets on our side.

But even if Congress was

a Congress that respected the Constitution, China's is not.

Someone eventually is going to do that.

No, somebody is going to do it.

And that is the excuse that all of them use.

Look, China is going to do it, so we better do it too.

The problem with it is once you have it,

no one,

no one ever gives that power up.

No one gives that power up.

That's the problem with the Intel being so tied into the administration.

You know, when you have the NSA gathering information on every American, their phone calls, everything,

no president is going to say, no, we should shut that down.

Mr.

President, Russia is doing it to the American people.

China is doing it to the American people.

We should at least know so we have the heads up.

They're just never going to get rid of it.

Never.

Well, it's not paranoia if they're really after you.

Exactly.

Exactly right.

It's not only true, but also the tagline for enemy of the state.

I got to watch that that again.

Yeah.

I've been reading up.

I think it's called whammy.

I've been reading up on it lately.

And it's a little terrifying.

The stuff that we've talked about it for years and said, one of these days,

well, when I say one of these days, it could be in the next six months that these things begin to come online.

I'm a little disturbed that if they're calling it whammy, are they naming it after the creature that steals your points on Press Your Luck, the old game show?

Oh my gosh, you figured it out.

I know.

No, no, no, no.