Debunking the Worst of the Pro-Abortion Myths | 6/27/22

migraine is 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more.

Botox, onabotulinum toxin A, prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they start.

It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month.

It prevents on average eight to nine headache days a month versus six to seven for placebo.

Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor.

Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms.

Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition.

Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk.

Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck, and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache.

Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness.

Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection.

Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, including ALS Lou Gehrig's disease, myasthenia gravis, or Lambert Eaton syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.

Why wait?

Ask your doctor, visit BotoxchronicMigraine.com, or call 1-800-44-BOTOX to learn more.

Let me tell you about rough greens.

First of all, I have three dogs.

I love those dogs.

I'm sure you love yours as well.

Though it's possible, I guess, that your dog is terrible and you don't love your dog.

I mean, I don't know your dog, so your dog might be awful.

But I will say, if you love your dog, you want to give them rough greens.

You want to have them eating in a way that's going to contribute to their happiness.

President Miles is one of my dogs.

He's 17 years old.

years old, I think.

And that means he's very old and he does not move around much, but he still cranks it up from time to time.

He gets the zoomies going a little bit.

The zoomies are a little slower than they used to be, though.

But that helps even an old dog like Miles feel better, which is fantastic.

Rough greens isn't a dog food.

It's a supplement that you sprinkle on top of the dog food and is filled with vitamins and minerals, probiotics, antioxidants.

And those, watch over there, Pat, if you don't mind.

Pat says hello.

Just go get rough greens, will you?

I mean, go get rough greens right now.

You can get a free bag of rough greens for your dog to try out.

All you pay is shipping.

Go to roughgreens.com slash Beckercall 833-GLEN33-833-G-L-E-N-N-33.

Call today.

Got no room to compromise.

We gotta stand together.

It's the current survival.

Stand up straight and hold the line.

It's a new day up time to rise.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This is the Glen Back Program.

It's Patton Stew for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

Just nothing to talk about.

I had the same problem prepping for the show today.

Yeah.

What do we talk about?

I don't know.

It's just really hard to figure out something because everything's so quiet right now.

Summer.

People are going on vacations.

Remember when that used to be the case?

Yeah.

There used to be a downtime.

It's been once in a while.

There was some downtime.

Not now.

And we'll get into some of that stuff.

Seems like there was some kind of ruling on Friday.

And we'll get into that much more in about 60 seconds.

Commodity prices, the war in Ukraine, supply chain chaos, that's all continuing to impact inflation.

And you can count on that going forward for quite a long time.

Everyday items are continuing to cost us more, and interest rates will rise again because of it.

It's extremely important for you to take care of your debt right now as much as you can.

You need to find more ways to save more.

And one of the best ways that I know about is to take, I don't know, 10 minutes out of your day and give American Financing a call.

They can give you a free mortgage review and let you know what options you have available.

American Financing has been America's home for home loans for over 20 years and their mortgage-based consultants can work for you, not the bank.

They can talk to you about things like your home equity, create a custom loan that puts you in a better financial position, and they're currently saving customers up to $1,000 a month.

And they never charge upfront or hidden fees.

Why not see what they can do for you?

What's the risk?

Call American Financing right now, 800-906-2440, 800-906-2440, or go to AmericanFinancing.net.

It's AmericanFinancing.net.

American Financing, NMLS, 1-82334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Welcome.

Glenn's on vacation this week.

It's Pat and Stew for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

The Roe ruling actually came down while you guys were on the air on Friday, right?

Yes, one of our favorite things.

Yeah.

That every single Supreme Court release of opinion happens during hour two of this program.

So, Pat, we've had many memories over the years of this happening, like the Obamacare

decision happening live on the air every single time.

And by the way, Today is no exception.

We will have Supreme Court opinions coming down in our hour two today as well.

There's still a few big ones out there.

I mean, obviously, the Dobbs case for abortion, Roe versus Wade, being overturned is going to be the marquee thing for God only knows how long.

But there's a huge case with the EPA, and the administrative state is on trial, basically, and that one.

And that one may be more

specific to everybody's life, right?

Like, that's one that can affect everyday life, where this is a case

basically questioning whether these, you know, administrative state apparatus can just do things on their own.

You know, can they just, what if they want to regulate CO2 emissions on their own?

What if we let them do that?

Why pass a law?

Let's just let them do it.

That whole thing is on trial right now, and that affects every aspect of our lives.

I mean, this, this country has been completely remade from what it was supposed to be

by these, by the administrative state.

And so that is, that's a big one.

There's one big one on religious liberty, a huge one on the border coming up about the remain in Mexico law.

We could get all those today.

I think there's eight remaining.

So we will have those in hour two of the program.

And probably, I don't think we'll get eight in one day.

They'll probably announce another decision day this week, but that's coming up today as well.

The Dobbs case, though, is still, it's not a one-day story, Pat.

No.

No, especially with the reaction to it.

Yeah.

Did Biden speak in time for you guys to play his thoughts on Friday?

I talked about it on Studos America on my show, which airs later on in the day here on Blaze TV, but

I don't think it happened during the show.

I think it was right after it.

Yeah.

Here's what Joe

had to say about the ruling initially.

Today is a

hyperbole, it suggests a very solemn moment.

Yeah.

Today the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people.

No, no, no, they didn't.

They didn't have it already recognized.

No.

They didn't limit it.

They simply took it away.

They didn't take it.

No, they did not take it away.

It really is.

But they did it.

They did it.

It's a sad day for the court and for the country.

No, it was a great day.

50 years ago, Roe v.

Wade was decided and has been the law of the land since then.

Oh, wow.

This landmark case protected women's right to choose, a right to make intensely personal decisions with their doctor,

free from

the interference of politics.

I don't know what word that would be.

It reaffirmed basic principles of equality.

Women have the power to control their own destiny.

And it reinforced a fundamental right of privacy.

No.

The right of each of us to choose how to live our lives.

You don't have the privacy to kill.

Now with Rogan.

Well, if we do a privacy.

Let's be very clear.

No, it's still.

The health and life of women in this nation.

Now at risk.

Really?

Yeah.

As chairman or ranking member, this is the same thing.

Is that why they always make the distinction public execution?

That's the abnormal way of doing it.

I have overseen more Supreme Court confirmations than anyone today.

Oh, so this is your fault.

This case

was always discussed.

It was.

I believe Roe v.

Wade was the correct decision.

No, you know.

As a matter of conscience.

We know you don't.

You've said it before.

Right.

To privacy and liberty in matters matters of family and personal autonomy.

It was a decision.

Which you don't have a big vaccine, by the way.

No.

There was a careful balance between a woman's right to choose earlier in her pregnancy and the state's ability to regulate later in her pregnancy.

Right.

A decision with broad national consensus.

No.

Most Americans.

I mean, look, you could describe

it.

Hold on, stop it.

Stop it.

You can describe abortion a lot of ways.

Arguing there is a broad national consensus is not one of them.

That is not a good, it's not a good summary.

It's just a lie.

Right.

This is a very divisive issue.

It's one that I think the other side is completely insane on.

I mean, frankly, I can't even understand the arguments most of the time.

They're so stupid.

However, I can even acknowledge there's not a national consensus on abortion.

No.

There's a lot of disagreement.

I mean, there's a national consensus basically on certain aspects of it.

Like, for example, you shouldn't have it in the third trimester.

There's basically a national consensus that the stated platform position of the Democratic Party is against the consensus.

That we can be clear on.

Other than that, really, there's not much of one.

Maybe on life of the mother.

I mean, life of the mother, even in all these states that are, you know, banning abortion, like Texas, there's still an exception for life of the mother.

That was in there.

That was basically

in the Kavanaugh concurrence that

signified, look, if you go after life of the mother, we're not going to rule on your side on that.

Like, I mean, that one seems to be the one that there's pretty much consensus on, I guess.

But not a lot of aspects of abortion.

There's consensus on Pat.

No, that is true.

And, you know, even he is at odds with himself.

Yes.

From 16 years ago.

Here's what he said back in 2006.

I do not view abortion as

a choice and a right.

I think it's always a tragedy.

And I think that it should be rare and safe.

And I think we should be focusing on how to limit the number of abortions.

And they ought to be able to have a common ground and consensus as to do that.

Is that amazing?

2006.

You know, he doesn't look at it as a right.

That's amazing.

If that was a clip from 1982,

which, by the way, he was still

in public office then,

maybe

you could say, okay,

it's changed over time.

2006?

Yeah.

That's amazing.

I didn't realize it was that recent.

I had heard that clip.

I didn't realize it was that recent.

That's 2006.

That's incredible.

Yeah.

I mean, and, you know, I want to ask you this, Pat, because I was thinking about this over the weekend.

There's so much to think about in this case, and we could honestly talk about this the whole time, I'm sure.

But

would this, could this have happened in the era where Democrats sounded like that?

Like when Democrats were pitching the safe, legal, and rare thing, when they were saying, look, it's always a tragedy.

This is a, essentially, a necessary evil was their case.

It's a terrible, terrible thing.

We all hate it, but gosh, sometimes these circumstances require it and we wish they didn't.

Now

it's, it's like it's an amusement park.

Yeah.

Abortion is fun.

It's fun.

Shout it.

Shout your abortion.

We went from the safe, legal, and rare era to the shout your abortion era.

Yeah.

And we see how well that worked for Democrats.

I very well.

I think that that's part of what caused this.

I think so, too.

I think they played their hand.

They overplayed their hand.

Yeah.

And it went the other way on them now.

The pendulum swinging back the other way.

Because of some of that craziness, you could argue that's why Trump got elected in the first place.

Right.

You could argue that was why Republicans were more apt to go along with justices who were.

who they were really confident would overturn Roe versus Wade.

I think you can argue, you know,

remember, Republicans had enough justices to overturn this in place many times.

And the reason why it didn't happen was because of people like Anthony Kennedy who

would flake at the last minute and decide, oh, well, we've got a compromise position.

You know, Casey is a terrible, both Roe versus Wade and Casey versus Planned Parenthood were terrible decisions.

Yeah.

And a lot of it, especially Casey, seemed to be fueled on this.

Well, we can't really shake things up that much.

I don't think it's right to shake things up that much.

We've obviously seen that sort of behavior from John Roberts.

We even saw it in the Dobbs

opinion.

And I think.

Yeah, he just wanted, he wanted the narrow ruling.

Yes.

Right.

Just on Dobbs.

He didn't want to rule on Roe v.

Wade.

Yeah, if it was up to him.

And again, he even essentially says in his concurring opinion, yeah, these guys are pretty much right, but

it seems mean.

You know, it seems a little upsetting, and I don't want to be mean.

I mean, it really does seem like he even is clear how bad it is.

So his opinion would have been, okay, Mississippi can keep their 15-week thing, right?

We're not going to overturn Roe versus Wade, but 15 weeks is rational, and there's some sort of rational position.

He wanted to do essentially what Casey did, which was come up with some new standard that,

as Alito pointed out, Neither side in this case even asked for.

It wasn't just like it was the conservative side saying, hey, let's get rid of this.

And the liberal side was saying,

just 15 weeks

or give us some other new standard that we can all work with.

Roberts just invented that himself.

He's like, what if I, what if we do this?

And that's what he does.

That's what he does.

Right?

He's done it

time after time.

He did it with Obamacare.

He's done it multiple times.

He's agonizing.

He really is.

Agonizing.

But I am still shocked.

You and I have said many times: there's no way they're going to overturn Roe v.

Wade.

There is no way that's going to happen.

This court will not do that.

Do you have any confidence this court will do it?

No.

Nope.

I don't have any confidence this will do it.

The Democrats all thought, yeah, oh, they're going to, and they were right.

Fortunately, it turned out they were right.

The one time I will be very pleased to admit both they are right and I was wrong.

I did not think I'd ever see that day.

No way.

Nope.

Especially not right now.

I mean, and to be clear, in some ways, the same things we always worried about, one of the conservative justices flaking, occurred.

It occurred with Roberts,

who didn't go along with this.

And it sort of occurred with Kavanaugh, who wrote a concurring opinion that basically said,

I don't know.

I mean, I'm going along with this, but I'm a little wishy-washy on it.

You know, like, it almost didn't happen this time.

Right.

But thank God it did.

Thank God.

It was 6-3 on Dobbs, right?

Yeah.

But But 5-4, I think, on overturning Roe v.

Wade.

Yeah, the way they say 5-3-1, essentially, like

when it comes to Dobbs,

he went along with it, but

he did not want to overturn Roe v.

Wade, which is incredible.

He's terrible.

And it's incredible to step back at how many times Republicans missed

with these Supreme Court justices.

I mean, they just missed and missed and missed and missed.

All of them missed.

The only person you'd say we don't have evidence of them missing on this particular case is Trump, who seemingly went three for three or at least got three for three on this.

Three home runs.

And he pointed that out.

Oh, yeah.

Obviously on Friday.

He pointed that out.

And he's right.

He's right.

He deserves a lot of credit.

He deserves a lot of credit.

Especially.

A lot of people have fought for this for a really long time.

Yes.

But President Trump deserves a lot of credit.

He deserves a ton of credit for it.

You know, he said he would come.

And interestingly, he said he would come in and pick off a list of 21 Supreme Court justices basically hand-selected by the Federalist Society.

And so the Federalist Society also deserves a lot of credit on this.

But

it's interesting.

He picked Gorsuch from that list and then expanded the list.

So his other two picks, both Kavanaugh and Barrett, were not on the initial list.

People forget this.

He did not actually pick all three justices from the list.

He picked one justice from the list.

The other two were expanded.

And the belief is, particularly with Kavanaugh, that Kennedy was just not going to step down unless he had the guy he wanted to step in for him.

Anyway, long story short, he picked three and they were all right on this one.

And honestly, like, we could talk about elections.

We could talk about future appointments.

All of that,

none of it.

I mean, like, Kavanaugh could suck from here on out and it would be disappointing.

But the fact that this came through is already Trump's legacy, right?

It's already done.

Right.

Now, which is huge.

You know, look, people, and we bash him all the time.

And we also, Mitch McConnell deserves credit for this.

Yeah, because he does.

He delayed that for, which is why they call it illegitimate, illegitimate Supreme Court.

Why?

Because they waited for the next.

No, that's perfectly constitutional.

Yeah.

They did something they're perfectly within their rights to do.

You're talking about the Merrick Garland delay.

Merrick Garland.

Delay.

Yeah.

No.

Waiting until Trump became president.

And that's part of it.

He waited until Trump became president, which gave us Gorsuch.

Although I will point out, the Republicans held the Senate at that time.

So even if there was a vote and he didn't hold the line,

they likely would have rejected whoever it was, which would have been okay.

But I mean, he also pushed through, you know, he got all three of these through the Senate.

You know how shady the Senate can be at times, with very small majorities.

They got them through.

And then the third name we really need to give credit to, Pat, is Harry Reid.

Because without Harry Reid upending the judicial filibuster in 2013,

now they wanted their power then.

And this is is a good lesson for Democrats.

You want to grab power however you can.

Elizabeth Warren's asking for packing the court.

Think of how this feels later on.

Think of it because you grabbed power with no justification.

And this is how that story ended.

Exactly.

And people forget that part of it.

Yeah.

All right.

Triple eight, 727BECK.

More coming up in one minute.

You know, the sooner you switch to Patriot Mobile, the sooner you can start paying less.

And I mean, way less than what you're paying right now with your major mobile company.

There's no reason to pay out the nose.

And you know how we're always telling you that the major mobile companies donate a portion of your bill to leftist causes, a portion of them right to this particular issue against the pro-life cause.

Well, Patriot Mobile doesn't do that at all.

In fact, they donate to conservative causes.

Wouldn't you rather get behind something like that?

Patriot Mobile has plans to fit any budget and their 100% U.S.-based customer service support team gives amazing personal service.

Patriot Mobile shares your values and supports organizations fighting for religious freedom, constitutional rights, sanctity of life, and our veteran and first responder heroes.

If you're paying too much for your cell phone service, make the important switch over to Patriot Mobile today.

You can call them at 972-PATRIOT or go to patriotmobile.com/slash back.

Get free activation with the offer code BECK.

Veterans and first responders save even more, so

make the switch today between the left, the media, the rhinos, everything.

We need to stick together.

Patriotmobile.com slash Beck, PatriotMobile.com slash Beck, or call 972 Patriot.

It's 972 Patriot for Patriot Mobile 10 Second Station ID.

Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

There were some protesters over the weekend, and some of them were making incredible points.

Here's a lovely young lady with a message about her uterus holding up a sign.

And I believe it says,

for those just listening on radio, if my uterus shot bullets, would it have more rights?

Oh, God, we have to talk about this point.

The left thinks this point is really good.

And it is.

There's no way your uterus can shoot bullets.

Well, that's true.

That's a good point.

Yeah.

That's a really good point.

It's kind of a moot.

It's a bit moot.

It is a bit moot.

Yeah.

It is a bit moot.

But there is a, there's a, this is a version essentially of a very viral tweet that went around that said,

now women have less rights than guns.

And like, you know, 500,000 retweets.

And you're just like, guys,

do you understand how dumb you are?

I mean, I'm not, I know you can't figure these things out, but I'm curious if you're just self-aware enough to realize how stupid you are.

How

that point does not, we should get into this point.

We should take on this particular point.

Yes, and we will.

Oh, good.

And we will.

Because there's so it's so many people

you get to these things and you're just like, gosh, you know, these, this isn't a game.

They really think these are good, these are good points.

They do.

That's fascinating to me.

It's inconceivable.

It's inconceivable.

That's what they do.

That is a perfect word.

And I might not think, I might not know what it means.

You know, in the Princess Bride sense, I may not know what that word means.

I keep saying that word, and I may not know what it means.

You're using the horse.

Right.

I don't know if it means what you think it means.

That's very possible.

Where I am at this point.

I know.

Because it does not seem plausible to me that half the country could believe such stupid things.

Again, some of the stuff we just disagree on, but some of it is just idiotic.

The ignorance that you see online right now on the social media.

Oh my gosh.

I pulled a full out Pat Gray this weekend.

I said, you know what?

Nothing good can come of me being on social media.

It's very true.

Nothing good.

Nothing good.

There's going to be a lot of people who I currently like that I will no longer like, right?

I will have family members I'll never talk to again.

I will have friends.

I had friends who were like, if you're pro-life, unfollow me.

And I was just like, you know, what's why would I, why would I go on?

Why would I bother?

Why would I subject myself to it?

What good could it possibly do?

It's really true.

No good at all.

No, it doesn't.

It doesn't help.

And,

you know,

there's a long battle ahead of us.

I'm trying to keep my head straight here.

The Glenn Bach program.

So guess how many data compromises have already happened in 2022?

We're not even, well, we're halfway through the year now, basically.

Not even.

And, well, if you think over 400 major ones, you're correct.

Maybe you should go to Vegas.

Data compromises

are up 14% from just last year and are impacting more than 20 million Americans.

Some of the most lucrative pieces of data cyber thieves want to steal are social security numbers, Gmail logins and passwords, and even driver's licenses.

It's important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives.

Every day, we put our information at risk on the internet, and that's why LifeLock is here.

They can't catch everything.

No one can.

But they can monitor things better than you can on your own.

And if you do become a victim, their restoration specialists can work with you to help you fix the problem quickly.

No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but you can help protect what is yours with Life Lock by Norton.

Join now and save up to 25% off your first year with the promo code VEC.

You can call 1-800-LifeLock or head to lifelock.com, use the promo code VEC for 25% off.

I mean, why wouldn't you want to protect yourself, especially with 25% off with a promo code back at lifelock.com or 1-800-LifeLock?

And don't forget to use the promo code GLEN for $10 off your subscription at Blazetv.com.

It's Patton Stew on Glenn Beck Program.

We were just kind of about to get into this

sign that was being carried by an abortion supporter over the weekend.

If my uterus shot bullets, would it have more rights?

It'd be a pretty special uterus at that point.

I will say that uterus sounds like a pretty awesome.

Yeah, I think it would.

I think we should make that the president.

I think if your uterus can shoot bullets, it should be the president of the United States, just automatically.

I would support a constitutional amendment to that effect.

That's just me, though.

Yeah,

that's me, too.

And here's the problem, Pat.

It's not currently in the Constitution.

And that's kind of the thing you bump into here with these brilliant points from the left over and over and over.

Gun rights as opposed to abortion rights.

Yeah.

One is in the Constitution, the other, not so much.

And this is the problem.

So this is the fundamental misunderstanding with your brilliance, guys.

When you tweet.

They really do think they're onto something.

They really do.

And the only reason they do, Pat, is because these two rulings came down one after another in two straight days.

So it's just in their very shallow brains still.

They remember the Supreme Court said something about guns they didn't like yesterday and then abortion today.

So they're like, what if we tie these two things together?

Guys,

why do women have less rights than guns?

Woo!

And then you increase your following by 100,000 and you get 265,000 retweets and 800,000 likes.

And everyone's like, that's amazing.

And then people take screenshots and they post them on their Instagram stories.

And everyone goes around and talks about what an incredible idea.

Do you believe this country?

Women have fewer rights than guns do.

The fundamental biggest part of the problem here, Pat,

and this is what the Supreme Court said, there isn't a constitutional right for abortion.

Alito absolutely specifically outlined that.

It was

egregiously wrong from the start.

Right.

Okay.

Not that it was a right and we took it away because we don't think women should have rights, but that it the right does not exist in the Constitution as has been admitted for decades by not only conservative legal scholars, but also liberal ones who say, hey, we really like abortion.

We really think it should be in the Constitution, but it's not.

Including Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a really long time.

For a long time.

Yeah, Ruth Ginsburg.

She was a little bit, I think, radicalized once she got into the Supreme Court.

It took a while, but

she turned around on it a little bit.

She was quite clear, though, at the beginning.

But at the beginning, she didn't like the law.

And Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

She wanted abortion, but realized it was not in the Constitution.

So, and the other side of this is the Second Amendment is in the Constitution.

So the thing you don't like is in the Constitution, and the thing you do like isn't in the Constitution.

This is why it's hard for you to understand these things, because the left has this understanding of constitutional law, Pat, which basically says, if I want it, it's in there.

If I don't want it, it's not in there.

And that's how they judge all, that's how Sonia Sodomayor makes every decision.

It's in there, I want it.

And then it's not in there.

So

I don't want it.

It's not in there.

That's the way they do it.

And just to put a bit of a fighter point on this one particular dumb argument about women's rights versus guns' rights, women can own guns.

So it's difficult to make the argument that guns have more rights than women when women can own them.

And shockingly to the left, they do own them.

Many women own firearms, Pat.

Wow, that's a thing.

Yeah.

And it's hard to say, like,

it's like arguing, you know, a slave has more rights than its owner.

It's like, if, if, if party one owns party two,

party two does not have more rights than party one.

That's kind of a good rule of thumb.

Yeah.

So this point in particular, while wildly popular in the left, is so stupid.

So ignorant.

So stupid.

So much of this went on.

I mean,

it really is difficult to overstate the emotional stupidity we witnessed over here.

It really is.

Really is.

I will say this, though, Pat.

We should give credit where credit is due.

Most, most.

Of the country is not on fire.

Right.

I mean, a lot of it is not on fire.

Now, we did, of course, see, you know, protests erupt into violence across the country.

We did see Fox News headquarters targeted.

We did see fireworks shot at police.

Yeah.

We did see a pro-life woman attacked.

We did see some journalists assaulted.

We did see pro-abortion protesters try to storm the Arizona state capitol.

Sure, we saw all that.

We did see a fire bombing or two, but generally speaking, The entire country is not on fire.

And that's just, wow.

Congratulations to the people.

What restraint.

Yeah.

All the restraint is incredible.

I mean, they got something they didn't like and for at least two days did not set the country on fire over it completely.

Some of it they did, but not completely.

And that's incredible.

What a great job.

Also, NBC News analyzed for abortion supporters the distance to the nearest open abortion clinic in major cities.

Yeah.

In 21 states

that either have pre-existing or pending state-level abortion bans.

Now,

get this.

For someone living in Salt Lake City, it will require driving six hours and traveling roughly 335 miles

to the nearest open clinic in Steamboat Springs, Colorado.

That's inconvenient.

No.

Yeah, they're going to be inconvenienced to kill their baby.

And

I can't have that.

You should be able to do it much easier than that.

I think so, too.

You know?

Yes, you should have an abortion clinic in every neighborhood, and it should be within walking distance, less than two blocks to an abortion clinic.

Well, I mean, I remember, I'm old enough to remember when everyone had an abortion clinic in their house.

You know, when you remember those days?

When you walk down the hall,

and this is before these conservatives got in control, but you walk down the hall.

This was pre-Reagan.

Yeah, yes.

I think he stopped it.

He tried to stop it.

I still have the abortion room in my house, though.

Oh, you do?

Yeah.

Just no doctor in there.

Sometimes, yeah,

I live in Texas, Pat.

Oh, yeah.

And they just won't allow this anymore.

But usually basically that the typical house would come with an abortion fund room.

And in there would be

the doctor would just live there.

Okay.

You know, there'd always be a doctor wet ready for the house.

Just in case.

Just in case.

Somebody in the house got pregnant.

You could just walk down there whenever you needed to.

You know what I mean?

You walk in, you get your abortion, you go back to the couch.

Now, this is men or a woman could get the abortion, right?

Of course, either one.

Well, can men or women get pregnant?

Obviously.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I mean, we're talking the men with the uterus, menstruating men.

Yes.

Menstrating men could walk right down the menu.

Or menstruating people would be more correct.

Menstruating.

I'd be more comfortable with menstruating people.

I don't even like men.

I don't like the men and menstruating.

I think we need to get that out of there.

People stradding.

Menstrating.

People stradding is better.

People stradding.

That's the way.

That's the way it used to be, Pat.

And now these conservatives are taking over and turning this into a handmaid's tail.

This is all.

I love

the handmaids.

There's another brilliant observation that people use every minute of every day on social media.

So I've watched Handmaid's Tale.

I've watched the series.

And it's very, very well done as

a production.

They spent a lot of money on it.

It's very well acted.

Okay.

You need to come up with another reference.

Any other reference?

There's been a lot of entertainment.

over the past, let's say, century.

Can you pick any movie, any book, any show, anything else, a song, anything other than Handmaid's Tale?

Are you saying Handman's Tale doesn't fit their narrative?

Is that what you're saying?

They think it does.

I know.

And it's bizarre to think that they would because, you know, like, for example, they're like, oh, we're going to go back to the pre-Roe days.

We're going to go back to pre-1973.

Actually, there was many more states that banned it then, which shows you it's not a constitutional right.

Right.

Because three, when they passed the 14th Amendment, that they based this ridiculous Roe versus Wade ruling on, three quarters of states banned it entirely.

And they're like, well, that's what they meant.

They wanted to have abortion as a right.

Really, did they?

Why would they not address that then when three quarters of states had banned it entirely when they passed the amendment?

I mean, of course, Gorsuch made that point very clearly.

But like, we're going to a place that we are still going to be.

We're going to have abortion available in this country at levels far more liberal, far more liberal than Europe.

It might not be available.

You might, as you point out, Pat,

have to get in a car.

Well, get this, Stu.

This will shock you to your core.

Okay.

Really?

Yeah, to your core.

From Boise, Idaho,

the drive is more than 250 miles to the Walla Walla Health Center in Washington.

Oh, my goodness.

Get this.

A patient in Idaho Falls won't even be able to get to the nearest clinic, approximately 290 miles away in Helena, Montana, without a car.

car,

meaning there is no bus service and you can't walk there.

Wait a minute.

Well, you could, but it would take a while.

Did they take our abortion in-house idea seriously?

How did people get abortions before?

Did they not drive to the clinic?

Now, I will say this, Pat.

Increasingly,

abortions are done by pill, many times through the mail.

So actually,

I joke about having the abortion in the house, but that is happening in a lot of cases right now.

Maybe the majority of cases and certainly the majority going forward in a lot of these states.

Where did you say the place was in Colorado?

Steamboat Springs.

Steamboat Springs.

Because I'm interested, because I don't even think that's true

because there is an organization.

Now, Steamboat Springs is, let's say, I mean, it's not really that close to the border.

of Colorado.

Looking at it now,

you know, you'd have to drive a while, Pat.

Well, 330 miles from Salt Lake City.

However, you don't know about the new mobile abortion clinics they're making.

No, I don't know about them.

See, that's the thing.

They'll come to you.

They will come.

They're literally doing this.

This is serious.

This is unlike walk down the hall and have an abortion in your house with a doctor who was there.

Serious.

That one wasn't serious.

This one is, Pat.

They are building like Winnebagos.

And they're driving them to the borders of these states.

So you can just hop right across the border, get your abortion, and go home the same day.

And they're doing it with pills and surgical abortions.

And in addition to that, Pat, they're arranging charter bus transportation and flights, free flights for people to go to these areas.

But they're charter bus, in theory, they're just setting these programs up now because it just happened this weekend, but they're setting up

charter buses to go from wherever you are.

You get on the abortion bus, you know, the wheels of the bus go round and round and you drive with all your abortion

receiving friends, and you make lots of new friends.

Hey, we're all getting abortions together.

We got something in common.

And you go and you just wipe out an entire generation of children and then come home.

Wow.

On the same bus.

That's really convenient.

It's really convenient.

That's great.

That's going to be available soon to you.

I know the test program for this happens to be in Colorado.

That's where they're starting it.

So if you happen to live around Colorado, fear not.

Fear not.

You can just wipe out an entire football team of kids on one bus.

It's going to be great.

It's going to work out wonderfully.

Triple 8727BECK.

More coming up.

This is the Glenn Back Program.

It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glen Pack program.

You know, we're just talking about the availability of abortions and NBC News, in fact, trying to help people find where they can get an abortion in the nearest city or state and all of these things.

But the other thing that's going on is companies are going to cover your travel costs

for employees to get an abortion.

It's like abortion tourism now.

So

some of the companies that have already said, look, we'll pay for your abortion and we'll send you to the nearest place, give you airfare.

I mean, Amazon is promising people $4,000 to get an abortion.

It doesn't cost $4,000 to get an abortion or to even fly to get an abortion.

Somebody's going to be making money on that.

I know that's funny too, too, because I doubt they're going to be direct payments.

They're going to go probably the employee who can say, yeah, it costs me $4,200.

Can you give me the $4,000?

That'll at least defray the cost.

And it'll be like $800.

Right.

Or they don't even get the abortion at all.

Because Amazon, I got news for you, is not going to be checking.

They're not going to ask for a note that says, I mean, this could be a new business for me.

I might say, I'm a man.

I got a uterus.

You can't check that.

You can't ask me about that.

So I'm a menstruating person.

Don't worry about it.

And I'm pregnant.

I need to go get an abortion.

I need to travel to Hawaii.

And

you're going to need to pay for that.

Hawaii is the only place where you can get an abortion from where I am.

Yeah.

And then I would go like 12 times a year,

once a month.

I'm in Hawaii for my quote-unquote abortion.

They can't ask me.

I'm pregnant again.

God, darn it.

I am just.

You got it.

I'm having so much unprotected sex.

I just thought it's just fantastic.

I love it.

And so I can't help myself.

So Disney will help you pay for this.

Dick's Sporting Goods

has offered their employees up to $4,000 in travel and expense reimbursement.

Amazing.

Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Levi's.

Of course.

What a hideous company they've become.

Of course, Amazon with the $4,000.

Starbucks, Citigroup, Yelp, Apple, Match, and Bumble.

And this is just a partial list.

I mean, it's going to be traditional.

Everybody's going to do that.

It's amazing, too, how many things are not covered by health insurance.

from these companies that constantly are in battles with their employees about when they have actual illnesses and they can't get them treated.

Yeah, here we are with something, they just try so hard to make this seem like it's health care.

And like, look, it's just, that's not what it is.

You know, I really do think the left, and I don't want them to benefit, of course, but they would, they would benefit by putting themselves back in the position that Joe Biden had in 2006.

They say, like, this isn't healthcare.

It's a terrible tragedy.

We can't stand that this has to happen, but sometimes we believe it should.

That's a bad argument in my view, but it's one that would connect with a lot of people in the country.

Unlike shout your abortion and we as a company will pay for your vacation to get one.

Yeah.

That's not a winning argument to the American people, I don't think.

Way too extreme.

Triple 8727-BECK.

More patents too for Glenn coming up on the Glenn Beck Purple.

Got no room to compromise.

We gotta stand together, it's the chorus of night.

Stand up straight and hold the line.

It's a new day of time to rise.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This is the Glenback program.

Wow, still so much to get into on this abortion situation and the reaction to the overturning of Roby Wade.

We'll get into that coming up in 60 seconds.

How would you like it if every time you picked up your cell phone, you're reminded not only of how much money you're saving every month because you switched to Patriot Mobile,

or, you know, but look, it's not only that, it's that you're doing something good.

What if you could actually be working with a cell phone company that was doing something positive?

Let me tell you this, this is behind the scenes stuff.

My wife does some volunteering for, she was doing phone calls for some of these local school boards in Texas.

You know, they've had these problems, there's been big debates, They've been national stories where there's this back and forth between

the CRT sort of side of things and the people fighting against it.

And we talk about Patriot Mobile donating their money.

You know, you subscribe to Patriot Mobile, they'll take portions of your money and it'll go to good causes like that.

But it's not only that.

She was there making phone calls on this topic and they were there too.

Like Patriot Mobile, they never announced it.

They never talked about it.

They were just, all these employees were there on I believe a workday.

They just, Patriot Mobile was like, you know what, today, let's just go make phone calls on this.

That's how important it is.

They care.

They believe in the same things you believe in.

And instead of supporting somebody who is giving money to Planned Parenthood, you can support a company that will give you the best service and also will help causes you believe in.

PatriotMobile.com slash Beck is the place to go to get that service.

972 Patriot is the phone number.

You get free activation with the offer code Beck.

Veterans and first responders save even more.

So make the switch today between the left, the media, and and the rhinos.

We need to stick together.

It's patriotmobile.com/slash Beck, patriotmobile.com/slash Beck, or 972-Patriot.

It's 972-PATRIOT.

Patton Stew for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program this week.

Um,

you know, something we talk about from time to time is

how passionate the left is about abortion.

It's fascinating,

it's like a religion to them, it's more of a religion, I think, than even climate change is.

They

love

abortion.

The fact that they can kill babies

is just so important to them.

And so

when they perceive that they've lost that right, which again, they really haven't lost the right.

There's still going to be places where you can get abortions if you really want it.

But the reaction is amazing.

Look at this woman who

throws a pillow down.

She's got knee pads on because

she's very animated about the Roe v.

Wade decision.

Oh, wow.

I mean,

I'm sorry, that's just a little irrational.

I don't want to be a flip-flopper here, but in her case, she should be able to report her kids.

You know, I just, I don't think any of us are arguing for her to be a parent.

That's unbelievable.

That's psychological.

It's not bizarre.

You know, it's so weird, too, the performative nature of it, because,

you know, if you're listening to radio, you can't, you can only hear the screaming and the bleeping.

She's in a leopard print, like, onesie thing, leotard deal.

Yeah, she's doing that.

And someone else, crucially, is holding the camera.

Yeah.

Right.

Like, this is a performance as if they think this is a good representation of their movement.

Hey, honey, you film me while I throw a pillow down and then just go ape crap on video.

How would that be?

I'll just start screaming and shaking wildly.

And people are going to love it.

They're going to love the response.

Yes.

Amazing.

Weird.

Hey, Pat, let let me break in here real quick just to give you a little news update.

We are now in the middle of

the Supreme Court time, and we have a very good one yet.

Again, more good news from this court.

Oh, wow.

As

Kennedy versus Bremerton, this is the case of Coach Kennedy.

I think, I don't know if you had him on, Pat, on Pat Gray Unleashed.

I had him on in Studios America.

We had him on here on the radio show.

A coach who

was praying at the 50-yard line after his games, never asking anybody to come join him.

They said that he got fired for this, and they said you're not allowed.

It's a separation of church and state issues somehow.

Again, something ridiculous.

Not in the U.S.

Constitution.

Another thing that isn't in the U.S.

Constitution.

Right.

But that one was written by Gorsuch, a 6-3 decision,

as you would expect.

Sodomior, Breyer, and Kagan on the wrong side of that, as they always are.

But that is a big one.

That was one of the three or four big ones remaining, and it goes the correct way.

How do you see that any other way?

than slapping that down?

It's not, I mean, if you're a Supreme Court justice,

you should know the Constitution well enough to understand separation of church and state is not really a thing in the United States Constitution.

The only thing about the church and state is that the state shall not establish a religion.

They shall make no law establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Yep.

That's it.

That's it.

I mean,

to the point, Pat, that they encouraged states to form their own state churches.

Yeah.

There were state churches in effect

when this went on.

One of the first acts of the Congress was to have a prayer.

It was a congressional day.

And of course, we still have congressional days of prayer from time to time.

They printed a Bible.

They printed a Bible.

They held prayer.

I mean, it's so over the top of the other way.

And this is not even that.

We're not even talking about like, oh, well, Congress should get together and pray every day on, you know, on the floor of, you know, of the Senate or whatever.

Which they do.

Which they do, by the way, and still do.

And they still have national days of prayer, and all this stuff still occurs.

Yeah.

But

regardless, you can't do that.

This is basically a coach who, after the games, because he had a crazy life.

and decided after

all these games would end, he said, you know what, I've had gone through so much.

I'm going to thank God every day.

And after these games, I'm just going to go to the 50-yard line, take a knee, say a silent prayer.

And you can only take a knee if it's in protest

of the United States flag.

That's amazing.

It's the only way that's constitutional.

Same people who will say that.

Amazing.

Colin Kaepernick

has a right to be able to.

Now, of course, in a private business like that, he doesn't actually have a right to do that.

Now, I don't care if he does it.

Now, he can't get on the field because he's such a terrible quarterback but if he could get on the field i don't necessarily care if he does it i don't take my political advice from athletes that's not the way i it works for me i try to come up with those opinions on my own so they can come up with their own dumb opinions all they want and express them however they want i don't care i'll just ignore them but the nfl has they can absolutely stop them from doing that if they want to uh but

However, like, I guess you're able to fire a coach for just taking a knee and praying.

That's just not true.

The First Amendment, the freedom of religion, does not stop at your door, does not stop at the door of the church.

It is something you're able to do.

Just like we just learned, or at least the left just learned with the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment also doesn't stop at your front door.

That's not where that right ends.

It is a right, and you can carry your gun around.

And they shall issue it to you, that permit.

So, anyway, long story short, that is a big case, probably one of the biggest ones remaining.

That you are apparently,

you do have some religious liberty.

This court, I will say, has been good on these issues.

And people, let me give credit where credit is due as well to First Liberty Institute, Friends of the Show,

all those guys over there, Jeremy Dice and the whole crew has done such a great job in being relentless.

pushing for religious liberty and for the court to respect it.

And this was, was, you know, this was their case.

I mean, they argued it in front of the Supreme Court.

They've shepherded this thing through all the way and did an incredible thing.

They've made a real difference.

You know, well, there's been a lot of criticism of conservatism, of originalism, of the conservative legal project in general.

Oh, we don't get enough results.

I mean, it's hard to argue with this right now.

You know, this has been an incredible achievement.

And I think you look at it, everybody from all aspects of conservatism has made this stuff possible.

You can look, we named a few of the names, President Trump, even people like Mitch McConnell, First Liberty Institute, the Federalist Society.

These are widely varying views in a lot of these groups, but all generally just wanted the Constitution respected.

And we're seeing that happen.

Yeah.

It's incredible.

And that's, I mean, another, as you mentioned, another great ruling.

Maybe we'll get one on climate change as well, which would be great.

Yeah.

They've got an environmental opinion coming up.

Is that going to happen today?

It may.

So we just got another one as Concepcion, which we'll go through here in a minute, but not EPA versus West Virginia is the, I don't know, maybe the biggest one I'm looking at right now because that one I think will.

They might save that till

Thursday or Friday or something.

You know, again, who knows?

I will say they are always up for surprises, aren't they?

Like Friday.

Yeah.

That was a big surprise.

I thought that would be the last one they announced.

And that's like a traditional thing.

They leave these sort of controversial ones to the last day.

but that's not a rule.

They can do it whenever they want.

We do know that we have at least one more coming here

as we're sitting here.

And it looks like this one was okay.

Well, we'll go through this whole thing in just a minute because we're running late already.

But

this was,

we at least have one more coming today.

There's eight remaining coming into the day.

We have two so far.

We're going to have a third one at least.

Now, does the coach, by the way, does the coach get his job back?

Did they

ask him that in the interview?

I can't remember what he said.

I think he was actually open to it.

He was an interesting guy.

I don't think I'd want my job back.

Yeah, I told him I would like I would hate these people.

Yeah.

Right.

And they, they, they, they screwed him over, I believe, in a big way.

Yes.

He had a totally different perspective on it.

Like, his perspective was, number one, he's not like a pastor.

This guy is not a religious zealot.

He is not the guy who is going, you know, who is like, like, every time you talk to him, he's got a new scripture he's quoting.

He's just like totally a normal guy who just believes.

Like it was, he's not like, you know, what you would think of when you think of a guy standing up at the Supreme Court.

Did they warn him or ask him to do this somewhere else?

Yeah, yeah.

So what initially he started, if I'm remembering the story right, I think I am.

He initially he started doing it by himself at the 50-yard line.

Oh, did the team join him?

And then the team saw him do it.

What a terrible influence.

And said, coach, can we come pray with you?

And he's like, yeah, sure, of course.

It's America.

So he went, took an eight, the 50-yard line.

Some of the players started gathering.

I remember over time, even the other teams would start coming and gathering at the center of the field.

It's unacceptable because you've got a whole bunch of people praying.

We can't have that.

Not on government school grounds.

Now, that's a terrible point and not true, but

that's what they said.

And the school came to him and said, look,

we know, we love you and everything, but you can't do it because people, everyone's joining, you can't bring other people involved because people are worried that you'll have influence over them.

And he said, you know what?

Okay, I will tell my team not to come out.

So he told them, look, you guys can't come with me and pray out in the center because it's a big controversial thing.

So then he went out and started doing it by himself again, and they still fired him.

Oh, man.

So he was only doing it by himself and specifically asked for other people not to join.

But his opinion seemed to be closer to, look, I don't think they wanted to do this to me.

They just felt they had to.

I think that was really how he took it.

I think he again

shows the ignorance in this country about things that are not in the United States Constitution.

There's such ignorance.

Such ignorance.

And just because people say it over and over and over

that there's separation of church and state, separation of church and state.

So people get into this little

world where, I'm sorry,

you can't bring religion into this anywhere on school grounds.

Well, what?

What are you talking about?

Of course I can.

But that's not the perception.

And the perception has been reality for a long time.

And hopefully this decision will change that.

Yeah, that's a big deal.

That's a big deal.

Religious liberty is really doing well right now.

And I think, you know, I'm hoping for, one of the big things I'm hoping for is that.

many more of these cases and hopefully a definitive one gets to the Supreme Court as it relates to not just

not just church, but churches specifically when it comes to all the COVID restrictions.

You know, the fact that they were trying to force churches to close down, you have absolutely not just trying.

They did.

They did.

They did.

I just don't think they did it legally.

And we've seen some lower courts have issues with them and get some of that stuff overturned.

First Liberty worked on that stuff as well.

But I would like to see one of these things go up.

to the to the to the Supreme Court level and have it be very clear that the government can make recommendations.

They can say, hey, this is what we think you should do.

Here's our best health advice.

Here's what our experts are saying.

And all that's fine.

They can do all that stuff.

They cannot stop you.

They cannot stop you from opening your business.

I don't think that should happen either.

But certainly when it comes to a house of worship, the government absolutely should not be able to do that.

And

look, most churches went along with the advice and just decided, look, we think this is the best thing.

And that's totally fine, too.

If that's what they believe the decision is, they can make that decision.

But the government cannot enforce enforce that.

Absolutely not.

It's insanity.

And the whole theory is so upside down.

Like,

the state needs to be protected from religion.

No, that wasn't the founders' problem.

The problem was religion being protected from the state.

That's what they were concerned with, and that's what they were trying to do.

And this ruling helps along those lines.

Triple 8-727-BECK, more patents, Stu for Glenn coming up.

American Financing, NMLS, 1-8-2-3-3-4, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Fascinating lineup on the second decision.

We'll get to it here in just a second.

Strange bed full of fellows on this one.

The country is facing an extremely significant slowdown as we move closer and closer to the brink of recession.

Everything costs more lately, and it's not going to get better anytime soon.

So what do you do?

Do you have a plan yet?

Do you know what you're going to do?

You need to be saving money anywhere and everywhere that you can.

And one of the best ways to do that is to give American Financing a call.

Let their salary-based consultants give you a free mortgage review.

Why not?

Once they do that, they'll know all of your options.

They can lay them out for you.

I've worked with them before.

That's what they do.

They say, okay, you got option A, option B, option C, what do you think?

You're talking about everything from paying off high interest debt, shortening loan terms, you can access cash from your equity.

Tons of possibilities.

And with the mortgage rates only going up from here, man, it seems like a good time to get this done if you haven't already.

If you start soon, you could close in as little as 10 days.

Why not learn more?

Call American Financing 800-906-2440, 800-906-2440 or go to AmericanFinancing.net.

It's AmericanFinancing.net.

10 seconds.

Station ID.

That's Patton Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

So another ruling is.

This is the Concepcion case.

Now, it's about sentencing guidelines, basically.

Can you sentence someone to a reduced sentence?

We don't really need to get into all the details on the case, but I will say the lineup is fascinating.

It is Sodomior wrote the opinion.

Okay, so

Sodomior.

Usually going to be terrible.

Sodomayor, Breyer, and Kagan, as you'd expect, grouped together, as they seem to always do.

There's never really much exception from that.

Every once in a while, you'll see Kagan stray, but that's

rare, but it does happen.

It does occasionally happen.

Who joined them?

What two from the conservative side joined the three liberals in this case?

John Roberts.

You'd think John Roberts and

Kevin.

Kavanaugh would be the two that I would say.

They seem to be the two centrist judges.

Yeah.

No, not in this one.

Sodomayor, Breyer, and Kagan, plus Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas.

Oh, my gosh.

Now, that is a weird five right there.

That is a weird five.

It is.

Wow.

Yeah.

So that's so that you got that one.

And we do have at least one more coming.

And

we know which one it is.

Do we have the next one yet?

No.

Oh, it's Ron.

This is one I looked at the other day.

And I'm going to have to refresh my memory on what it is.

Because honestly.

Did you say it's Ron?

Ron.

R-U-A-N is the name versus U-S.

This is about a physician alleged to have prescribed controlled substances outside the usual course of professional practice.

Maybe convicted of unlawful distribution without regard to whether, in good faith, he reasonably believed that his prescriptions fall within the course of professional practice.

This one's going to burn down the country.

Yeah, this is the riots.

This is starting on this one already.

I don't know if you if you look outside of the country.

I'm pissed that the ruling hasn't even happened yet.

Hold on.

Look for that sort of graffiti on all

walls of burned buildings here coming soon.

It does seem to be in a unanimous decision.

Unanimous.

Yes, Justice Breyer wrote it, and that is it for today.

Okay.

Looks like.

So, yes, so that'll give us down to, I think, five remaining for next week.

We will include decision DA one, which is a big one.

Also, Remain in Mexico Trump border policy is another big one on the docket.

Oh, that's another one.

Wow.

Because Biden wants to get rid of it, and so far the lower courts have said you can't.

You don't have any justification for that.

So, as of right now,

it remains a very controversial one and one that the left is really looking at closely, of course.

After this session, I think we're really going to have to fight off packing the court.

The court packing thing is really going to become an issue because they've lost several big decisions here during this session.

Oh, yeah.

So what they're going to want to do is add a whole bunch of liberals to the court and, you know, stack it with...

13 justices.

Oh, Elizabeth Warren said as much today.

Yeah.

Over the weekend, she did.

And, you know, this is what the left does.

When they lose the popular vote or win the popular vote, but lose the Electoral College, they call for repealing the Electoral College.

When they can't get their judges through with 60 votes, they say, let's lower it to 50.

Ask Harry Reid about that one in 2013, which led to what we saw on Friday.

You know, this is what they do.

When they don't get what they want, they just try to go around it.

They never try to just win within the rules.

But you look at this ruling, Roe versus Wade.

Conservatives won within the rules.

They just just used the electoral process over many years,

decades.

They fought with activism.

They did everything they could.

They,

at the very, you know, at least, you know, at law school, well, those levels, developing conservative legal scholars, and it finally paid off.

Amazing.

The Glenn Bank program.

So how important is your identity to you?

We know it's very important to so many people these days.

But your identity, especially when you're talking online financially, is a big, big worry.

I mean, it not only stands as a protective wall between everything you have financially and of course cyber criminals, it also says who you are in the community, what level of credibility you have.

With a tiny slip of information, it doesn't have to be much.

All of it can be taken away in an instant.

And it's important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives.

Every day we put our information at risk on the internet.

And that's what LifeLock is here for.

They can't catch everything.

Nobody can, but they can monitor things better than you can on your own, much better.

And if you do become a victim, their restoration specialists can help you work through all the craziness that ensues.

No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but you can help protect what is yours with Life Lock by Norton.

Join now and save up to 25% off your first year with the promo code BECK.

It's 1-800-LifeLock or go to Lifelock.com.

You can use the promo code BECK for 25% off.

Cybercrime is going crazy right now.

You need to protect yourself and your identity with LifeLock, 1-800-LifeLock, or Lifelock.com.

Use the promo code BECK for 25% off.

I would love it if you check out my show, Pat Gray Unleashed, every weekday from 7 to 9 Eastern

or anytime and anywhere you get your podcast.

Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

What are we, a week from the 4th of July, right?

It's next Monday.

Yeah.

Wow.

Wow.

Have it fast.

If you still have a chance to get the greatest cookie on earth,

if you want, by the 4th of July, we can guarantee delivery if you order today from kexi.com.

Today's the day.

Today's the day.

Yeah.

I will say I've had this last batch of cookies you've produced.

Yeah.

I mean, just with the salted caramel.

Yeah.

The one that I fell absolutely in love with.

Now, they're all really great, but the one that I had a special relationship with was the coconut cream.

Oh, my God.

I just love that thing.

I did not expect it.

I mean, it was just fantastic.

That's great.

It's the best one that I've had in a while.

I love it.

I got to stay away from them.

And by the way, that's available.

Just go to kexy.com to order.

We've been discussing the incredible insanity coming out of the left since the verdict.

And, you know, we were warned.

We've been warned for the last, how long has it been since the verdict was leaked?

Like three months?

A couple of months.

And we've been warned the whole time to expect violence from both sides.

And we were all, wait,

why would we on the right

go out and

overturn cop cars and set buildings on fire?

Why would we do that when we like this ruling?

Maybe you forgot about January 6th.

No, I didn't, but what does that have to do with anything?

That's just who you people are.

That's really, and that's one of the reasons why January 6th really pisses me off because now they have this thing to be.

Yes.

They've got two things.

They have Charlottesville.

Yes.

And then January 6th.

And that's pretty much it.

You know, I mean, like, concern, like, you know, obviously there have been over the years, unfortunately, a couple of high-profile abortion protester types that have done really terrible things and have been immediately

condemned by every single person I've ever known on the right.

You know, Eric Rudolph and, and

the Kansas abortion killer.

There's been a couple of incidents.

I would not deny that there have been a couple.

It's been very, very limited over the course of a 50-year battle to say very limited.

Especially when the stakes are 65 million lives.

You know what I mean?

Like when you think of

what a life and death situation this is.

I mean, in some ways, you're surprised there hasn't been more terrible behavior.

It's really been done, as we mentioned before the break, within the bounds of the system, exactly the way it's supposed to be done.

You know, you have, you elect people, you, you, but before that, long before that, there was a, a, a long-term grooming of conservative legal scholars, activists who fought every day, who did things like the

March for Life.

right?

Year after year after year, gathered when it seemed completely hopeless.

Yes.

And we believed it was.

When you'd turn on your favorite conservative talk show and you'd hear Pat Gray and Stuberge telling you, it's completely hopeless.

I mean, I didn't really believe it was that dire, but I never thought I would see the day

where Roe versus Wade was even overturned.

And there's a lot more to do

on this fight.

I mean, it does, you know, we really have prevented no abortions at this point.

It's important to be clear.

It just gives you the opportunity to argue for these things.

And in some of these states now, some of these abortions will not occur.

And that's great news to me.

That means there will be people who will be alive, will have a chance at life that did not previously.

And

I don't know how you can be fighting on the other side of that battle frame.

I don't either.

And they fight hard.

Hard.

They fight hard.

And

they make it an issue of race

when we want to prevent abortions in minority areas.

You know, 80% of abortion clinics are in predominantly black areas, black and Hispanic.

Yeah.

80%.

And to me, that's awful.

That says, okay, we want to abort and kill as many minorities as we possibly can.

I mean, we are saying, no, stop that.

Let those people live.

Let them live.

And somehow we're the racists.

It really is incredible how that

spun.

I mean, and you listen to

the coverage.

of this, which is every major media organization sent reporters to abortion clinics that found out about the ruling and then had to call quote-unquote patients to tell them they could not come in because Roe versus Wade was overturned and now abortions are illegal in their state.

And they're crying and sobbing about how they want to help these poor women kill their children.

Why can we not?

Please let us do it.

Please, it's so sad.

What a sad day.

And it's like,

is there no...

awareness in the press that the other side exists to this story?

I guess not.

They don't seem to have any interest in it.

And, you know, one of the reasons that the black population has stayed in this country between 12 and 14 percent for

100 years

is because of abortion.

It's very hard.

They're

disproportionately aborted more than whites.

And we want that to stop.

Yeah.

And you know,

and you know who doesn't want it to stop?

The left.

The left.

And Margaret Sanger at the beginning of all this.

This is why she started Planned Parenthood in the beginning, and it's been so successful.

Look how successful it's been.

And they love her.

They adore her.

They worship at the altar of Planned Parenthood and abortion.

It's freakish.

And there's just simply no way to get around it for the left.

That you can call us racists for a hundred different things, and they do.

They'll call us racist for affirmative.

There's a big case that's going to be coming in the next session on affirmative action.

And I think there's a good chance that that gets limited in a major way by this court.

And it should.

You should not be making decisions by skin color.

That's something that we used to all agree on and is now apparently wrong.

But you can call us racist for a hundred different things.

What we want the minimum wage level to be, what you think, you know,

voter ID, all these ridiculous things they call us racist for.

But the bottom line to all of this is if you implemented every single one of our policies, limiting welfare spending,

voter ID, affirmative action, all these things, all to the conservative utopia.

What the end result of all those policies would be is tens of millions of minorities alive today that are no longer

alive.

And thriving.

Some of them might not be thriving.

Some of them.

But more than are thriving now would be thriving because of the policies.

And they'd all have a freaking chance, right?

You know, like some of them will be doctors.

Some of them will be astronauts.

Some of them will solve

society's great problems.

Some of them will be crappy waiters at Chili's that screw up your order.

Some of them will be the guy that cuts you off in traffic.

Some of them will be career criminals, but all of them deserve a chance to live their lives.

You don't get to make this decision in advance for them.

They get to make those decisions.

They might wind up screwing their life up entirely.

A lot of us do.

But you still get that chance.

I'm fascinated at the idea that it's better for society that people should just be executed before they've done anything, before they've taken their first breath outside the womb.

Let's kill them because they might be a drain on society.

What the hell kind of philosophy is that?

That is freaking psychotic.

It's a eugenics philosophy.

Yeah.

And that's what it was based on.

That's created by Margaret Sanger.

That's what it was based on.

And you know what?

You look at white supremacy groups today and they are not pro-life.

White supremacy groups support the right to abortion, and they will explicitly tell you the reason they do is because they like the fact that black and Hispanic babies keep getting aborted.

Disproportionately.

Disproportionately.

They like it.

So if you want to be on the side of white supremacy and also not coincidentally, the Democrats, Because they've been lined up for generations,

hop on board to that pro-choice movement.

It's working out well.

It's working out well if that is your philosophy to life.

But in reality, I don't understand how anyone can support this craziness.

I don't either.

Especially see it as

the empathetic view.

There's a column in the New York Times today by someone named Pamela Paul.

She's an opinion columnist there.

And let me just give you this, how it starts.

As the 4th of July looms with its flags and its barbecues and its full-throated patriotism, I find myself mulling over the idea of American exceptionalism.

What,

if anything, makes this country different from other countries or from the rest of the developed world in terms of morals and our ideals?

In what ways do our distinct values inform how America treats its own citizens?

I land on a distinct absence of mercy.

Witness the ruthless evisceration of Roe v.

Wade and expand.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

So how about the ruthless evisceration of the babies inside the womb?

Yeah.

Up to and including a full-grown infant coming out of the birth canal and being torn apart and murdered right then and there.

I mean, it's incredible.

My God.

What lack of self-awareness could you have as a human being to literally define mercy

as the constitutional right for one person to kill another?

That's mercy to the left.

How on earth can you think that way?

I can understand you thinking the way of Joe Biden in 2006.

It's a terrible tragedy.

We don't want it to happen.

We want it safe and rare.

We want it safe.

We want it rare, but we don't want it to occur.

That's gone.

This is a totally different worldview than that person in 2006.

Now, by the way, Joe Biden now holds the same worldview that I just discussed from Pamela Paul of the New York Times.

But it's like this idea that murdering 65 million people is mercy is psychotic.

It is exactly the eugenic philosophy that led to what we saw in World War II.

It's exactly that.

It is what Margaret Sanger believed and has continued to try to carry out against this country through Planned Parenthood and other organizations all of this time.

And it is fascinating that that has been presented and continues to be presented as this empathetic thing.

We're supposed to listen to abortion clinic doctors who are unable to kill kill children for a day and hear them sob and feel, oh my gosh, these poor people now have to drive an extra hour.

That's supposed to be the empathetic side of the argument.

Yeah.

Incredible.

And just a reminder of what the left thinks of Margaret Sanger, who was a eugenics person, wanted to rid the country of minorities.

I

admire Margaret Sanger enormously.

Oh, wow.

Her courage, her tenacity,

eugenic.

Her vision.

Her vision was to eliminate black people in America.

That was her vision.

Great friends, Ellen Chessler, is here, who wrote a magnificent biography of Margaret Sanger called Woman of Valor.

Oh, wow.

And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, might be appropriate.

Taking on

archetypes, taking on

attitudes and

accusations flowing from all directions.

Accusations like that.

I am really in awe of her.

And there are a lot of lessons that we can learn from her life.

Well, yeah, and Hitler did learn some of those lessons from Margaret Sanger.

As a matter of fact, it's interesting to note.

Triple 8-727-B-E-C-K.

Stay informed.

Sign up for the free newsletter today at Glennbeck.com.

It's Patton Stew for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program, 888727BECK.

We've got four cases left now that the Supreme Court is going to decide this session.

One's on immigration.

One's basically a climate change sort of issue.

One has to do with Native American sovereignty,

you know, because

they took the whole Indian nation and they put them on this reservation.

How do they know?

They took away their way of life, you know, the tomahawk, the bow and knife.

They took away their native tongue.

Really?

Yeah.

What do they do?

Instead, they taught their English to our young.

Not mine, but speaking for the

Native Americans.

And, you know,

maybe the worst part of this, though,

all the beads they made by hand.

Yeah.

You know where those are made nowadays?

In Japan.

Or Taiwan or China, even more nowadays.

Yeah, Bangladesh, often.

Bangladesh.

Yeah, it's a big one.

Yeah.

Maybe, yeah.

So I don't know if they're going to rule on that aspect of it.

Yeah, I think they will.

I've always found it interesting because you've said something similar to that many times, Pat.

Yeah, I don't know if you know that.

I don't remember remember doing that.

And

I've always interested in how the Native American in this situation would define their way of life as a mohawk,

a tomahawk.

And a bow and knife.

And a bow and knife.

It just doesn't seem like that would be

a modern way to describe Native Americans.

Yeah, and probably not how they would.

Like, they wouldn't be like, hey, you know what defines us?

A tomahawk.

If I'm going to say one thing.

And what about your bow?

I had a bow and a knife.

That's a really, that's a pretty good point.

It is

odd.

Anyway, that is, of course, very much part of this case in the Supreme Court.

If that does not find its way into a dissent, I will be very surprised.

What was the fourth thing?

They're doing that.

I don't remember.

They'll either do this probably Thursday and Friday or maybe next week because it almost always ends in early July.

We don't know the day yet.

We don't know the day.

This is about

whether Congress has the power to authorize suits against non-consenting states pursuant to its constitutional war powers.

Honestly, it's not one of the following.

If that doesn't go the way I want it to, I'm going to be burning buildings down.

Really please talk about it.

Yeah.

Just thinking about it makes me angry.

This seems like a really good approach.

And I think it's working out well for the left.

They're reaping the rewards of this right now.

This approach.

See, I really do think, you know, you get, the more and more psychotic you get,

the more you wind up winning people over to your opposition.

And I do think that at times conservatives have that same issue.

And you got to be careful about it.

Because, you know, persuasion is still the name of the game here.

You know, you can change laws all you want.

You can get your memes, you know, and all your, you know, slam dunk tweets out there.

And that's great.

But persuading people who might agree with you is still the most important thing.

It's how you win these things long term.

And I think we saw a very long 50-year battle to achieve those ends here.

Got no room to compromise.

We gotta stand together, it's the chorus of night.

Stand up straight and hold the line.

It's a new day I'm turned around

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment This is the Glenback program

Still much more to share with you on this abortion ruling and the fallout in the aftermath

We will get to that and much more in 60 seconds.

Roe vs.

Wade, of course, just overturned the other day.

You might be thinking to yourself, you know, I'll believe I'll pack up and move to one of those red states I keep hearing about.

Seems like they got the right idea.

That's been kind of a common refrain over the past few years, since COVID, especially.

If so, we were happy to have you here in any red state, of course, but there's a whole matter of selling your home and then buying another one.

If you didn't know, it can be a complicated mess, which is why it's incredibly important for you to have a good real estate agent.

Years ago, our own Glenn Beck, who's not with us today, he will be back

after his vacation.

But he started a company called Real Estate Agents I Trust.

The whole idea was that they connect you with the best possible real estate agents, both in the area you're moving from and the area you're moving to.

Whether you're moving across town or across the country, the agents they work with will do everything they can to make sure you succeed.

It's a great service, and it has changed a lot of people's financial transactions.

And remember, this is the biggest financial transaction you may ever have in your entire life.

So it's really important.

Realestateagentsitrust.com.

The name kind of says it all.

Go to RealEstateAgentsitrust.com.

It's RealEstateAgentsitrust.com.

Patton Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

Just a quick note here about CNN.

Hopefully, things are going to change there.

I mean, that's the big rumor that they're going to get rid of, they're going to clean house.

All these biased so-called journalists

are apparently on their way out.

I mean, that's the rumor they keep saying.

And I heard it was going to happen in the spring.

It didn't.

Maybe it'll happen in summer.

Who knows?

But Jake Tapper, who used to be a pretty reliable journalist, kind of did the same thing to both sides.

He was just interviewing Boris Johnson, the prime minister in Great Britain, and seemed to be trying desperately to get him to bash the United States.

Tapper asked if he's worried about a decline of democracy in America.

How can there be a decline of democracy when we don't have a democracy?

This is just one of my pet peeves.

I can't take it.

But Tapper claimed his international friends are are voicing concern, and I'll bet he has so many international friends, but they're voicing concerns that American democracy is eroding.

Boris Johnson promptly dismissed these concerns, which kind of surprises me.

When I talk to friends in Canada, the UK, Australia, and elsewhere, people express concern about the United States, Tapper said, in terms of our ability and our institutions to thrive and continue after what happened with the election of 2020.

What happened?

Some people believe it's a fraud, and so our democracy is in trouble.

Well, then there was, of course,

1.6,

the day democracy almost died.

But Tapper said they're worried that democracy is on life support in the United States.

Are you worried at all?

No.

Johnson immediately replied.

You're not?

I want to say this to the people of the United States, Johnson said.

I'm not.

I guess

get back to what I've been trying to say to you throughout this interview.

I think it appears that the death of democracy in the United States grossly, grossly exaggerated.

America is a shining city on a hill.

That's the Ron Reagan description.

And it will continue to be so, he said.

That kind of surprises me coming from him.

Triple 888-727-BECK, let's go to Ryan in Massachusetts.

Hey, Ryan, you're on the Glenn Beck program with Pat and Stu.

How are we doing?

Good.

Very good.

I just wanted to comment, I know it's kind of late in the show now, but on the church situation,

we, you know, of course, we have a rhino for a governor here in Massachusetts.

And he had ordered that all worship services be ceased because of COVID.

Our church never did.

We maintained being open until we did have a

small little COVID issue.

We did, and then we shut down for two weeks to make sure that we were doing our part.

But

we weren't doing it because the government told us to.

And I have a good pastor friend of mine in Worcester, Mass,

who runs the Adams Square Baptist Church.

And they were going so far to shut him down as to having mounted police,

police cruisers, outside of his church before and after church services.

And of course, it didn't make national news.

You know,

why would it?

Why would a pastor standing up saying people need God, people need Jesus now,

not to sit at home by themselves, be isolated, where Satan can attack them.

But he took a stand.

Now, I also wanted to add that this pastor was a convicted felon.

And he's actually since had his entire slate pretty much wiped clean from the governor in New Hampshire.

And it's completely changed his life.

But his point was

people at this point still needed to be able to be in church.

And the government shouldn't be able to say whether churches could maintain being open or closed.

It was a...

a personal choice if we wanted to go into church and expose ourselves to other people who may have COVID.

Yeah, this is

basic, right?

I mean, this is when it comes to this country.

This should not be controversial.

The controversial decision might come from the church to stay open in a situation like this.

You might say, hey, you guys are not respecting your congregation.

You should take this thing online for a few weeks.

You can absolutely make that argument.

Many churches did, by the way.

Most churches did wind up taking some sort of delay and putting it online.

But like the idea that the government can step in and stop a worship service, I would argue literally under any circumstance, I don't think there's any circumstance whatsoever that the government can be involved in that.

They can take on behavior that's illegal.

Like if they're sacrificing human beings inside the church, they could do something about that.

But like,

that's really the extent of it.

You can't tell a church to not operate.

That's not something you can do.

It's un-American, unconstitutional.

Thanks, Ryan.

Appreciate it.

Now, I mean, there's exceptions to that.

There is.

Right?

Because

what if some people

enter the U.S.

Capitol building and start milling around and parading?

Then should you close churches?

No.

You'd agree with that, wouldn't you?

Because, I mean, that is a crisis that

almost can't overcome.

Really?

Because I feel like

you can overcome anything.

We have pretty well, actually.

It was a crisis for a couple.

I mean, a couple hours there.

Yeah.

That's pretty bad.

And then, you know, like three hours later, the government did its business anyway.

I've always wondered, okay, let's say that these insurrectionists were entirely successful in what they did.

Right.

How would that even overturn our?

No, it wouldn't.

Republic.

It wouldn't.

That's why I really don't like the word insurrection.

Yeah, it's stupid.

When it's talking about the riot specifically,

it's just not a good description of what occurred there.

What occurred there was a riot.

Yes.

You know,

it does seem like there were a few people in that crowd that had other aims.

And a lot of those people were probably Antifa douchebags.

Maybe.

I mean, I do think that there were people on the,

you know,

some people got carried away.

The Proud Boys sort of side of things.

And certainly not even all the Proud Boys, but like some of them, seemingly, there are communications that show that they really did want to try to do something crazy there that day and had some planning to it.

Although we just came out just this weekend, it came out that Tario, who was the guy who was running the Proud Boys at the time,

had a meeting with the Proud Boys and said, don't cross police lines.

Oh, wow.

Now,

it seems like some of the Proud Boys didn't agree with that or didn't go along with it.

Yeah, and they went anyway.

But went anyway.

But the bottom line was there may very well have been some people in that crowd that did have those aims.

But like,

what so?

But what does it mean?

Like, you know it i don't

those people should be prosecuted for that that's what it means the people who tried to actually overthrow the government whether they had any rational basis for success or not should still be punished people who attacked police officers 100 easy for me to say should be punished to the fullest extent of the law uh people who you know there were a lot of people who who meandered in and meandered out and didn't do anything.

Was that a good idea?

He still got prosecuted.

He still got prosecuted.

Is that a good idea?

No, I mean, I think you probably should have, you probably should have known, though, as many of them have pointed out, like, we walked up to the doors and the police officers were like standing there letting us in.

So we didn't think it was that big of a deal.

I can understand how that might happen in the middle of the chaos.

Some of it, I don't understand.

I mean, like, there's obviously.

video of people smashing through windows.

Those people knew they weren't allowed in, right?

We know some of this stuff would, I don't want to downplay the day it was bad, but the left has brought it to ridiculous, ridiculous lengths.

And what they're trying to do with this commission largely is silly.

Where do you stand on the idea?

Trump basically came up and said, hey, we shouldn't have abandoned this commission.

We shouldn't have taken the Republicans off the commission because now there's nobody pushing back.

There's nobody giving the other side.

There's nobody asking tough questions.

It does seem like that probably was a mistake.

I don't know at the time I remember Trump complaining about it, but at the time, it is a, it does seem to be a mistake here.

There's no, there's no other side.

There's no Jim Jordan.

Now they took Jim Jordan off the commission, but like there's no, there's none of those figures sitting there and being like, wait, what about this?

What about this?

What about this?

There's none of it.

There's no pushback.

That's probably not a good idea.

I know my group, Ashamed Men,

got our wires crossed a little bit.

And instead of going to D.C., we wound up in Pocatello, Idaho.

Really?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Ashamed Men as opposed to to the proud boys, really ashamed men.

Yes.

And you guys went to Idaho?

Yeah, Pocatello specifically.

Yeah.

And then suddenly realized, well, there's not even a Capitol building here because this isn't the Capitol.

So I think we got our wires crossed a little bit.

I will say, you guys are a pretty crappy organization.

I don't mean to be offensive to you.

But, you know, ashamed men have to have some outlet, don't they?

I don't know.

No, I don't.

You don't think so?

I don't think so.

I think they do.

It's just on the internet in the middle of the night.

All right.

Let's go to Dakota in Indiana.

Hey, Dakota, you're on the Glenn Beck program.

How are you guys doing this afternoon?

Good.

It's only morning work.

I guess it's still 11, so my bad.

Yeah, yeah.

All right, go ahead.

Calling about the Supreme Court case of Dubbs and Roe v.

Swade.

A lot of the states that have these trigger laws going on,

there are also states that state

that an abortion is also it's considered an abortion if you are carrying a baby and you miscarry that baby has to be medically removed and a lot of the people that I have spoken to since this case has come out are traditionally vote conservative but that's where they draw the line is because these states aren't and nobody's talking about that they still qualify that as an abortion but yeah it's not it's not

Yeah, obviously.

They need to be, appreciate the call, Dakota.

They need to be careful about that.

Yes.

Some of the laws do need to be careful about that.

Look, for example, I know for a fact the Arkansas law is written with that as a specific exception, right?

A miscarriage.

A miscarriage, and the removal, that's a specific exception.

In the Arkansas law, I believe most of these states are treating it that way.

There may be a state or two that is not,

not because they intentionally are trying to,

you know, make that a criminal activity.

They just didn't write the law as clearly as they should have.

And that will be corrected by these states.

I don't think they're going to have any problem with that.

But if they don't correct it, of course, that's going to be used against the right in this ruling.

This is what we're hearing right now, which is the fear-mongering on top of this, right?

A big focus of this is what Clarence Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion, which basically said, look,

what we did to come up with Roe versus Wade was insane.

We just created these rights out of thin air.

We've done this in a bunch of other cases as well.

And we should go back and address those, like contraception, like

gay marriage.

We should go back and address these, like the anti-sodomy law that was in Texas.

We should go back and readdress these.

Now, he's not making the argument that any of these things individually are bad or wrong or should not be legal.

He's just saying the case, as decided, was terrible legal precedent.

And we can't just ignore that.

However, we should point out they have one vote for that.

One.

Now, it might very, I think it is the correct legal argument without question.

You can't just manufacture law.

All those rulings were poor legally.

The judicial basis for it was poor.

But that doesn't mean that there's an appetite to go back and investigate those cases and overturn them.

The only literally, they got one vote for that.

They also got two votes of the six, basically came out and said, we're not doing this at all.

That was Roberts and Kavanaugh.

And in the main opinion, it said, this has nothing to do with those other cases.

Like, they specifically came out and said...

Only abortion.

Alito made that really clear.

Alito was very clear.

Thomas said, look, I agree.

It's only abortion in this case.

I think we should go farther.

He's the only vote on the Supreme Court for that.

The only one.

And I think, honestly, he's correct when it comes to a legal standard, but you know, that's, it's just not happening right now.

Yeah.

Triple 8727-BECK, more patent stew for Glenn.

Coming up.

You know, one of the things that the left is screaming about is, oh, okay, well, watch out same-sex marriages because you're next.

Watch out, trans people, because you're next after that.

They're just going to put you in prison.

Fear-mongering.

Fear mongering.

This is just fear-mongering.

You know, Clarence Thomas, again, is the only vote for this right now.

Again, I think he's setting this up and saying, like, look, long term, we should move this way as conservatives because we know every conservative legal scholar knows these decisions were decided improperly.

That doesn't mean the under

the

foundational policy there is wrong.

Like if we went back to the contraception case and overturned it,

what would happen is every state in the union would allow contraception.

Almost certainly.

I don't think there's any doubt about that.

Now, there's other, you want to talk about gay marriage.

It might get a little bit more questionable, but the state, the, the, the court, in and of itself.

They said they're not going back on any of the courts.

They said they're not going back to them.

And Kavanaugh.

They specifically mentioned it.

Yeah, they specifically said this has nothing to do with it and does not influence that.

Kavanaugh specifically said, no, we're not going there.

We know Roberts isn't going there.

You know the three liberals aren't going there.

So the idea that this is going to happen at least anytime soon is crazy.

It's just fear-mongering.

And most of these policies would, you'd have no problem with them, even if these legal cases, the case, the Supreme Court cases were overturned.

Now,

again, there'd be all sorts of problems that would arise from overturning them when it comes to paperwork and other things.

And that's part of the reason why they're not going to do it, honestly.

You know, when it comes to something like gay marriage, that's one one of the reasons they're not going to do it.

They know it's a terrible.

Obergefell was not a good decision.

It was not well argued.

It was judicial activism.

That does not mean

that they are taking a position on whether gay marriage is right or wrong.

They're just saying that there's no enshrined constitutional right to it, obviously.

I mean,

they could have written it into the Constitution if they wanted there to be one.

Right.

Obviously, there isn't a constitutional right.

That being said, it may or may not be right or wrong policy.

And a lot of states would just say, well, of course, it's finally, you know, let's go that way anyway.

You know, this is what, this is one of the real, and Alito hit on this in his opinion, one of the real crimes of

Roe versus Wade and several of these other opinions is it takes it out of the hands of the people.

It implements this sort of top-down judicial hierarchy.

where you can go to the people and say, hey, we think this is right, and therefore you do do it.

We want it to be in there and therefore it is.

And that is not how the Constitution, it's not supposed to be working like that.

It's really wrong for it to be working like that.

And look, the conservative movement has spent 50 years trying to prove that and now have come to the place where they have, at least for the time being,

until the liberals get control of the court and they reverse all of this, which I would not be surprised at all if they do.

I wouldn't either.

I mean, you think you get a 5-4

liberal majority in there?

You think they bring an abortion case really quickly and overturn it again?

Absolutely.

All of a sudden, all this starry decisis talk will be out of the window.

Out of the window.

Yes.

No longer do they care about precedent.

You know, I love my that's one of my favorite arguments on this, Pat.

This overturns 50 years of precedent of a legal right to abortion.

And so what did Roe versus Wade do then?

What did it?

It overturned 150 years of precedent, right?

It overturned 150 years of tradition and history, the rights of the states to manage this process.

You know, sometimes decisions are, quote, egregiously wrong from the start, end quote.

And that's what you do in those cases correctly.

Pat and Stew for Glenn of the Glenn Beck program this week.

We promised to show you some people who were very, very thoughtful over the weekend and had some brilliant things to say

about the Roe v.

Wade situation.

We've had videos of this guy before.

His name is Dash Dobrovsky,

and he's urging people to get out and vote.

That's his thing.

It seems to always be the thing, Pat.

Yeah.

You know?

Yeah.

It does seem to be the thing all the time, especially from the left.

When they come out and they say they have an issue,

how do you solve it?

It's always voting for them.

Vote for them.

You know, and then you say, well, what's the problem?

Well, it's racism or it's abortion access or whatever.

What do you do about that problem?

You vote for Democrats.

And then when Democrats get elected, did they solve the problem?

No.

No.

It's always, it's worse than we thought it was.

We thought it was bad before, but now it's even worse.

What do we do about it?

Better vote for Democrats.

Exactly.

Is it solved yet?

Well, no, it's even worse than we thought.

So what do we do?

We better vote for Democrats.

Oh, it's that circle of grift over Over and over and over again, these same idiots fall for the same things.

But this particular Dash is upset about Roe v.

Wade being overturned, and he's tired of the videos of women crying.

He's very sad about that.

And here's his advice: We knew this day was coming, people.

We knew it when Donald Trump appointed three Republican Supreme Court justices who actually would uphold Roe v.

Wade and lied under oath just so they could get confirmation and then overturn it once they came into power.

Are we going to say, no, it's over?

We're going back to the dark ages.

No, no, stop it.

We're going to show up to the ballot box in massive numbers.

We're going to make sure women's reproductive rights return to where they belong in the hands of women, not in the hands of six Republican Supreme Court justices.

Are you with me, people?

No.

Are you with me?

And are you with the Democrats?

If you are, you better show up to vote blue this November because everything's on the line.

Guess I'm okay then because I got with him.

That was like a caricature of every social media personality together.

I've never seen that guy before.

Who is he?

Dash Dubrovsky.

Holy crap.

Like the fake intensity,

the wild hand gestures, the crazy, like...

The eyes that are about to pop out of his skull.

Oh, my God.

Was that terrible?

Is this guy's a known quantity?

Like he's been out of the way.

Well, he's known to us because we've played a few of his videos.

Okay.

That's great.

That's a great find.

I got to say, that's a great find.

Yeah, he's something.

Some major problems with his thought process.

Yeah, you think?

Yeah.

I don't know that I can name them.

The one interesting part I always come back to on this is there's this idea that

women's reproductive rights should be back in the hands of women, not decided by a bunch of male Supreme Court justices, Republicans in the Supreme Court.

Now, of course, Amy Coney Barrett's new, so they don't include her.

Now they just say they're saying Republican justices.

But like, number one, the right of abortion, which is not a right and is not in the Constitution, was given to you by seven men.

Okay.

Many of them Republicans, by the way.

Right.

So that was, that's number one, a Republican appointed.

But it was seven men who decided on Roe versus Wade.

So the men gave that right that supposedly exists to women in the first place.

So if you don't want men's hands on it, well, it's a problem because then you don't have the right in the first place.

That's kind of a big problem for this argument.

And, you know,

I'm constantly like, I'm perplexed by these arguments in and of themselves.

They're just silly.

You know, they don't, they're not thought out very well, Pat.

They don't.

But they should take less time posting and more time reading.

That would be nice.

You know?

Yeah.

Become informed on the issue before you post it.

That should be kind of a thing.

Yeah.

And

learn, then vote.

The order is important.

You need to do that.

But I was fascinated by this because I talked to the person who wrote the bill that led to this decision.

Oh.

On the air, on Studos America.

It's a great interview.

You should go back and check it out.

And now you'd think, of course, this is obviously a white man

that has no interest in women's reproductive rights.

But no, it happens to be Representative Becky Curry, who is from Mississippi, who wrote the 15-week law, who is a woman.

You may detect that from Becky, but these days it's difficult to tell on how someone might identify.

But also was a nurse who worked in a maternity ward.

Okay.

And also picked 15 weeks partially because she once delivered a baby at 15 weeks who struggled for life.

And she she always remembered

this little

girl.

So it is the story of a woman who wrote a bill about a little girl, a baby girl, who she hoped would survive.

And that led to the overturning of Roe vs.

Wade that we are told is all about men implementing their will on women.

Jeez.

Incredible.

Very.

Wow.

Also, there's this CNN commentator who's talking about some issues in her own family and is seemingly saying that perhaps these people in her family should have been aborted from the start.

The mother before, during, and after the child.

And I am not anybody to tell you what you need to do with your life or with your uterus.

And because I have a family with a lot of special needs kids, I have a brother.

who's 57 and has the mental and motive skills of a one-year-old.

And I know what that means financially, emotionally, physically for a family.

And I know not all families can do it.

And I have a step-granddaughter who was born with Down syndrome.

And you know what?

It is very difficult in Florida to get services.

It is not as easy as it sounds on paper.

And I've got another, another step-grandson who is very autistic, who has autism, and it is incredibly nice.

And their mothers and people who are in that society, who are in that community, will tell you that they've considered suicide because that's how difficult it is to get help because that's how lonely they feel because they can't get other jobs

because they have financial issues because the care that they're able to give their other children suffers and so why can i be catholic and still think this is a wrong decision because i'm american you can't because she's catholic inside the church i'm catholic and it comes to me she's catholic inside the church inside the church

that is a great line and i'm not a Baptist.

And you have no damn right to tell them what they should do with their body.

Nobody does.

All right.

God, there's so much there.

Yeah.

The Catholic Inside the Church is probably my favorite line of all time.

I mean, Anna Navarro is continually idiotic.

I mean, she has not said anything of value, I don't think, in her entire life, but she's on these shows all the time to because she's, you know,

they put an R next to her name or they say she's a Republican strategist, which there's no real evidence she ever was a Republican strategist.

A Republican strategist.

Right.

She's one of these like Republicans that comes on and does nothing but criticize Republicans.

Like, you know, you know, the shtick, obviously.

It's something that.

She only has the R, so CNN will put her on to bash Republicans.

Right.

And obviously

she's terrible at this, right?

So they don't want to, they have better people to argue the liberal points, right?

You could find a liberal that will make points much more coherently than her, but she gets very, she does the same thing that your Dosh Dombrowski guy does.

She stares at the camera.

She gets really intense.

She screams over the guests.

She, I mean, she had a,

I want to say a battle, but it wasn't much of one considering the intellect difference.

But her and Jonah Goldberg, where she, I mean, she just says these things.

You're just like, no one could possibly believe these are good arguments.

She's just an idiot.

You know, she's a complete idiot.

She's been an idiot since day one.

CNN puts her on because she just keeps saying the liberal thing over and over and over and over again.

And here, the liberal thing seems to be she wants wants several family members executed.

Yeah.

Like, they were too much of a problem.

She wished she could get rid of them.

Her brother

and her, was it

nephew with, so her brother has the intellectual capacity of a one-year-old, and he's 57.

She's got a Down

and motor skills, a Down syndrome person in the family she wants gone, and a step grandson who just has autism.

All of them, I guess, should have been aborted.

Would have been a lot easier on her.

Right.

You know, and that's the most important thing.

Not that they get a chance at life, but that things are easier for her.

That's what's crucial here.

And that is the foundation of the argument, guys.

Everybody needs to realize that that is not some caricature.

That's just what they think.

They think it's more important for people to have easier financial lives

than...

for people to be alive.

And that's really the bottom line here.

That's not me coming up with some crazy character.

You heard her just say it.

That's really what they think.

And they're passionate about it.

How dare you limit

my life

to keep someone else alive?

Now, of course, all of these people could have been given up for adoption, right?

You could have done several other things with them and they could still get the chance of life and you could not be inconvenienced.

Like that is actually an option.

You can drop off any child at pretty much any fire station in America and they they will get to, it might not be the best life, but they will have a chance at a life.

And I will tell you, a lot of people who have lived bad lives would choose those bad lives over no life at all.

I think most of them would.

You know,

it really is a fascinating thing.

And again, presented as this moral, empathetic case.

We're the evil ones for trying to protect

it.

But they're the great, righteous people who, I guess, just want to kill children.

That's the way to go somehow.

Then we have this wonderful person on TikTok who had a message for the pro-abortion protesters this weekend.

This person,

I don't know their pronouns, but I'm guessing they, them,

something like that.

But they want everybody included.

Just a reminder, because it seems like everyone needs it.

Not just women get abortions.

Oh, yeah.

People with uteruses get abortions.

People with uteruses.

Trans people get abortions.

Trans men, non-binary people.

Binary.

People of all genders get abortions.

Oh.

All genders?

Even

traditional cis men get them now, too.

Yeah.

I didn't know that because I know that men

without a with a uterus, which are just women who are saying they're men, right?

They're trans men, as they're called.

Dare you?

I'm trying to explain to you.

How dare you spew your hatred

right in my face?

I just try to explain to them.

you?

We have a lot of right-wing listeners, Pat, and I want to make sure those haters out there understand

the categories.

I, of course, believe this is absolutely

legitimate.

It's a man who has a uterus.

Right.

But some people do not understand that.

So what I'm saying is these are people that are just women saying they're men.

Now, that is not how I feel at all, but I want to make sure the audience filled with hate-mongering haters

understands.

And so

so we can say that a woman who transitions to a man could have a baby because you know they they still have all the parts of a woman or at least many of them um then

but like can a man like i am a man

i have not transitioned from anything to anything and don't plan to in the near future pat yeah at some point you never know when that's going to change obviously very fluid At any point, I could be like, you know what?

I'm a chick today.

So would you consider yourself male fluid then?

I would just say male.

Okay.

You know, I don't think male fluid sounds all that appetizing, so I'm going to just skip over that and just go right to male.

So I'm a male.

Okay.

And my

continuing position throughout life has been I'm a male and I don't have any other aspirations to transition at any point.

But no matter what I transition to, I will never have a uterus.

You won't.

No.

So but now she's saying even men can get abortions.

Yeah.

All genders, she said, could get abortions.

All of them.

All 97 Facebook genders genders can have abortions.

So I can have one too.

Yes.

I'm interested in this process.

Not going to.

Your ignorance astounds me.

Even as you're trying to perform for the right-wing kooks that are listening,

still, your ignorance astounds me.

That hurts, Pat, but I think I deserve it.

I don't know if you do.

Exactly.

I think you do.

727.

It's 888-727, B-E-C-K.

The Glenn Back Program.

Patton Stew for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

He's on vacation this week.

I hear that today we get some incredible relief from the intense heat that we've been suffering.

It's going to be down to all the way down to 95 for the high today.

Oh, really?

Yeah.

Wow.

I hope you brought a sweater with you to work.

Utter paradise.

Did you bring a sweater?

Because, man, I don't know how we'll deal with that.

That's incredible.

It's like 114 degrees cooler than it was yesterday.

It really has been amazing.

Oh, my gosh.

We had a year like this, and I think it was 2011 when we first came down to Texas.

And we had, I don't know, something like 40 or 50 straight days in Dallas where it was over 100 degrees cooler.

There was one.

It was either the year we got here or the year before

where where Dallas had, I think it was 73 straight days of 100 plus.

Yeah, that must have been acceptable.

Sorry, that's unacceptable.

Even as a guy who continually complains about how cold Glenn keeps the studio,

it is a lot.

It's a lot to deal with.

And obviously, that means that the government should federally regulate all aspects of our society and economy.

Thank you.

Because of the fear that

it may increase another degree in 20, 30 years.

and that would be the difference.

You know, if it was only 107,

it would be fine.

But it's 108 here, and that is.

It's an extra temperature that global warming

is responsible for.

Unacceptable.

Yeah.

Unacceptable.

Hopefully, we can get the government to manage every aspect of our economy to deal with it, even though that still won't make a lick of difference because China's not going to care.

But.

Ignore that.

If you just ignore that, it makes it feel a lot better.

Yeah, it fixes the problem.

Yeah, really fast.

If you ignore it.

Really fast.

As with all problems, Pat, the best way to deal with it is to completely ignore it.

Ignore it.

And we will see you tomorrow to ignore more big problems in this country.

And on Studos America as well tonight, 8 p.m.

Eastern, don't miss it.

Subscribe to the podcast and Pat Gray Unleashed as well.

All part of Blaze TV.

You can get subscribed to Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

The promo code is Glenn.

This is the Glenn Back Program.