Fauci Has Explaining to Do | Guests: Sen. Rand Paul & Rep. Chris Stewart | 11/18/21

November 18, 2021 1h 59m

▶️ Listen to episode Download audio (MP3)

Glenn goes through the social media attacks his COVID special received. Senator Rand Paul joins to discuss Dr. Fauci and his gain-of-function cover-up. Glenn takes calls from viewers asking questions following his COVID special. Rep. Chris Stewart joins to discuss his “Fauci Act,” which would ban gain-of-function research. Kurt Gladfelter joins with his lawyer Jeffrey Schott to discuss why Kurt was permanently suspended for removing his mask, despite following the health department's rules. Glenn goes through the timeline of COVID and how it began way earlier than has been believed. Attorney Nick Rekieta joins to give an update on what’s happening with the Kyle Rittenhouse trial and what’s happening with the jury.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jump to transcript

Listen and follow along

Speed:

Transcript

At blinds.com, it's not just about window treatments.

It's about you, your style, your space, your way.

Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right.

From free expert design help to our 100% satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

Because at blinds.com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you.

Visit blinds.com now for up to 50% off with minimum purchase plus a professional measure at no cost.

Rules and restrictions apply.

Rough greens.

If you're a dog owner, you want to give them a happy, healthy life.

And so I recommend rough greens.

My wife wants me to have the same, so these are my rough greens.

Yeah.

I don't even know what's in it, but I drink it every day.

And it's now your dog would not consume that.

Much more delicious are the rough greens.

For dogs.

Do you think this might be rough greens?

She might.

She's like, he's a dog.

Why not?

Free bag of rough greens for your dog just to try out.

All you pay for is shipping.

Just go to roughgreens.com slash Beck or call 833-Glenn33.

833-G-L-E-N-N33.

Roughgreens.com slash Beck.

A big show today.

We begin in a minute.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This

the Glenbeck Program.

Hello, America.

Welcome to the Glenbeck Program.

Today, I want want to take your phone calls at 888-727-BECK.

If you watched the special last night, what did you pick up from it?

What were you surprised by?

I mean, I was,

we went through the research and I was shocked all the way along.

What did you learn last night?

I ask that you pass this on to as many people as possible.

We were pulled off of Facebook halfway through, demonetized on YouTube.

I can't wait to tell you the story.

It's crazy.

It's crazy what's going on.

And all of the evidence that we had last night, there's not a question on any of it.

On any of it.

888-727-BECK.

We begin with the sad little man, Dr.

Fauci in 60.

The Glenn Beck Program.

This holiday season, as you're spending time with friends and family, wouldn't you also like to look your best?

The answer is yes, you need the best in skincare from GenuCell.

Right now, you can save up to 60% off GenuCell's most popular packages at genucell.com.

You can treat yourself to customer favorites, which target things like forehead wrinkles, dark spots, droopy eyelids, sagging jawline, even the annoying bags and puffiness.

You can watch them disappear before your eyes, and you might say, well, I don't buy that.

That's not going to happen.

Well, with Genucell's immediate effects, you'll see results in less than 12 hours guaranteed, or your money back.

It's a great gift.

Don't worry about not getting your amazing GenuCell products in time like everything else in your life right now, because every product is manufactured right here in the USA.

From now until Thanksgiving, select your complimentary spa package, absolutely free at checkout.

Gift yourself a world-class spa experience with a luxurious Chamonix microderm abrasion treatment and a botanical infused cleanser and toner.

They're loading you up with all the gifts from genucelle.com.

Enter the promo code Beck35 at checkout for an additional $35 off.

Right now, 60% off Genucelle's most popular products.

Go to genucelle.com and enter the code Beck35.

It's G-E-N-U-C-E-L.com.

The code is Beck35.

A SARS-Light visa has now reached the United States.

This really came from a market that sold seafood and put the mask back on.

I want to tell you a little something about trust.

It may be the most important thing you can have in this life.

Can I not clearly explain the circle of trust to you, Greg?

No trust, no healthy relationships.

No trust, you're paranoid at work.

No trust in God, no faith.

No trust, and every institution will crumble.

We've lost trust, all of it.

And not just in America, throughout the entire damn world.

And it's really no mystery why.

They lied to us over and over and over and over and over again.

The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research.

We didn't give them this much power.

They took it with all those lies and they still are.

We did fight back.

We may not agree with them but the rules are the rules.

And we still are.

FDNY personnel who oppose the mandate are making their feelings known.

But they have so much control with blackmail, lies, manipulation, money.

Their slimy, evil tentacles

are wrapped around every institution, every avenue that could possibly lead us to truth.

Every avenue, but this one.

We're just one of the few that refuse to submit, refuse to bend the knee, refuse to let this COVID catastrophe go unanswered.

Because without trust, this nation fails.

And the only way to restore trust is with a little bit of truth.

It makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says.

Thank you.

History will figure that out on its own.

Truth is the only way to restore this nation and to restore every fiber of freedom that runs through.

So tonight, we expose the truth of what happened.

Not only the origin, the moves, the players involved in this entire pandemic narrative that is destroying us, but we'll show you the cover-up of all of it as well.

Tonight, crimes or cover-up, exposing the world's most dangerous lie.

Sad little man sitting deep in a lie.

He's dead in the soul, but he'll keep you alive.

Do what he says, not what he do.

Cause the truth is for him and the lie is for you.

Sad little man, but he's treated like a god.

As the faithless prey to a fake and a fraud.

Worship the man, pledge to his word.

One shot, two shot, now you get a third.

Sad little man, sad little man.

You better run now while you know you can.

Sad little man, sad little man.

You

Sad little man, gonna trap you like a dog.

Put your head in a net while they eat you raw.

Don't ask why, just comply.

Cause fear is the drug that the doct prescribed.

Sad little man, you can watch him on the news.

Preaching to his choir while they learn the rules.

Some feel safe and some feel healed But they'll all hold his hand as he makes the kill Sad little man, sad little man You better run now while you know you can

Sad little man, sad little man You don't fool me, you sad little man

Sad little man and he wants your kids Some might live while the rest get sick So put him to the test, listen for the yell.

When the truth comes out, he's gonna burn in hell.

Sad little man, sad little man.

You better run now while you know you can.

Sad little man, sad little man.

You don't fool me, you sad little man.

You can't fool me, you sad little man.

Sad little man, uh, by five times August.

You can find that on YouTube.

You can also find that on Apple Music.

Another protest song, another song saying that none of this makes sense.

And he's a sad little man, and he is, who is clearly caught in a trap that he himself built.

Last night on the special, and I want to talk to you about it at 888-727-BECK.

Last night, I think we made an open and shut case that Fauci and the NIH has been funding

gain of function research for a decade plus.

Would you agree with that?

I mean, like, no question, he's lying.

That is an open and shut case in my mind at this point.

I mean, they're trying to play a linguistic line and walk it carefully.

And, you know, it's helpful when you get to make the definition of what the term is.

I mean, you know, that's basically the way this thing is structured.

But

I mean, you presented evidence that I think even with the linguistic line they're trying to walk, I think overwhelms.

Still clear.

Yeah.

Still clear.

All the way from the beginning.

And I said at the beginning of the show last night, at the beginning, I don't want to assign

malevolent

feelings to anybody.

You went out of your way to say that.

Yeah,

and I don't think any of them, they thought they were doing the right thing.

There is a huge disagreement between scientists.

Some scientists, really led by Fauci and Dr.

Barrett and Dr.

in Wuhan, they really believe we should go out and find every disease we can possibly find in animals and then try to

make it jump into humanized mice or humanized animals to see if it will kill the the human being.

And if it does, well then we should come up with a vaccine.

Now,

their feeling is we're just going to save humanity.

The other half of science says, no, you could very well kill all of humanity because you're going to be dealing with these very dangerous things that have not jumped into people and may never jump into people.

But if you humanize that, if you get gain of function and you have this new disease that we're not prepared for and it escapes the lab, it could kill millions and millions of people.

This is something that is an honest debate, and honest people can disagree.

The problem is, is the arrogance of Fauci,

the arrogance that he doesn't care what anyone else says.

He doesn't care

what

the law says.

Can't do gain of function.

Can't fund it.

Okay, that's all right.

We'll just fund

EcoHealth

and they'll take all of the NIH money and they'll fund it.

They'll just go to Dr.

Barrett and Dr.

She, the bat lady, and Wuhan, and they'll fund it.

So Fauci can say, well, well, we didn't really fund it.

That was Peter Dasek.

And they're all in it.

I mean, what was stunning is the first 35 minutes of the special was just giving you the history of how we got here from 2002 to 2018.

And it's the same five people over and over and over again.

And it's all your money.

And the

gain of function research, that label is all over all of the documents, all over the documents from the NIH, from Fauci, from magazines, from the scientists themselves.

Yeah, that's one of the more convicting parts of this in that, like, they're basically saying, like, well, gain of function is defined essentially for the context of the ban on funding by Anthony Fauci.

So basically what he would do is say every time he funded one of these things, he would say it wasn't gain of function, even if it met the very well-understood definition of gain of function.

And because he knew that what they were doing would fit under gain of function,

they gave Dasek a waiver.

Yeah.

So they said this research.

And Barrick, right?

Yeah, and Barrick.

Yeah.

And she,

this research can go on.

It's fine.

It gets a waiver.

But what's convicting about all of that is that even if you want to have this line, and lots of government agencies do this type of thing, right?

But in their communications with each other, they actually refer to it as gain of functional function.

So it really, even the line they're trying to falsely walk doesn't hold.

It was pretty amazing.

Last night's special

was gigantic.

We were kicked off Facebook

about three quarters of the way through, which I found amazing.

Did you, though?

Did you find it amazing?

Did you read it?

No, no, yes, and no.

I mean, you know, I looked through,

I looked, I read, you know, I read the documents and everything else.

There was only really one time I think I speculated in that special, and it was towards the end.

Everything else was based on hard fact, and I had the documents.

And

I wasn't drawing conclusions or speculating on things.

I was giving people the benefit of the doubt.

I was just laying out a historic timeline.

That's all I was doing.

It's a historic timeline.

When you have to ban history,

you're in a different category, man.

This is documented history.

And they banned it.

Now, here's the interesting thing.

Before the show,

YouTube demonetized the show so we couldn't make any money on it.

Fine.

We want the information out.

But they demonetized us right at the very beginning.

Then, and by the way, I watched part of it on YouTube last night.

It's funny because they were running commercials.

We're not getting any of the money, but they are.

So they demonetized us and then we fought it.

And last night, after the show they said okay we'll remonetize it so you can get some profit off of it okay we get up this morning we've been demonetized again

all they if they can't shut you down they will make sure that you don't profit on it in any way shape or form and we're fine with that we're fine with that

You know,

we don't say this.

I was going to say very often, but I I don't think we've ever said this before.

Most people don't know.

The Blaze is the largest independent subscriber base in the world.

That's kind of a big deal.

And we will protect you, and our loyalty is to you.

Nobody else.

Last night, I have so many people to thank, and

I'm going to thank them,

you know, all of them,

personally and in tweets, et cetera, et cetera.

But it was remarkable.

One of the guys I really want to thank, we thanked at the end of the show, is Charles Rixby.

Charles Rixby is this guy that we've been following for a while who is part of this group that

some of them are scientists, some of them are former military, some of them are just, you know, research moles that are just like, I don't think that's right.

Let me look for this contract.

And they've been working hard around the clock for two years, two years.

And they were the ones that did 99% of all of the digging and research over a two-year period.

This is a lot of research.

And then they gave us stacks and stacks and stacks of all of...

all of these things.

And our researchers and our writers put this together in a way you could understand.

But these guys have to be thanked for what they've done.

And

I mean, they've done a great, great service to science, to

humanity.

When they were looking at

how this thing started,

you know, the lab leak thing was completely taboo.

And we laid it out last night.

Why?

When did that happen?

How did that happen?

The same five people.

And these guys hold the keys, the purse strings to all of the research money.

And when you see how they set out to craft a narrative and then destroy anyone who might say the lab leak theory.

You understand why nobody could say it for a year.

The power and the money is astounding, astounding.

But when you look at the lab leak theory and you put the facts on it that we had last night, is there any doubt in your mind that that's

most likely the way it happened?

Where it came from?

I think that's where the evidence points.

You know,

like they, there's not a lot of evidence going the other direction.

And there's a lot of evidence pointing in the direction of the lab leak.

And as you point out, like, you know, they start, they don't, this is not a story where they start out, how do we develop a weapon to wipe out the population of the United States

and the world.

It is, it's, they think they're doing the opposite.

And they are just arrogant.

They're just arrogant.

All right.

Let me tell you about rough greens.

Bart wrote in, said, my dog loves rough greens.

She's always been kind of skinny, doesn't eat as much as she should.

But when I received my trial bag, I dipped a small spoonful of rough greens and held it in front of her nose.

She immediately lunged forward like she does when I hold, you know, some sort of meaty treat out.

I dumped the spoonful on top of her existing food.

She watched me intensely as I stirred it in.

She ate everything in her bowl in five minutes.

Thank you, thank you, rough Greens.

Well, you're welcome, Bart.

Thank you for trying it.

Rough greens, not a dog food, it's a supplement.

You sprinkle it on the dog's food.

Dogs love it.

Tastes amazing, apparently.

Vitamins, minerals, all the things, probiotics that you need, your dog needs as well.

And you can get the free bag of rough greens for your dog just to try out.

All you pay for is shipping.

It's roughgreens, r-u-f-f greens.com/slash back.

Roughgreens.com/slash back.

Or you can call them at 833-GLEN33.

10 seconds, station ID.

We have Rand Paul coming up in just a second.

I've got about a minute.

Let me go to Doug in Virginia quickly.

Doug, you watched the special last night.

Yes, I did view the special last night.

Amazing job, by the way.

Absolutely amazing.

First time watching Blaze TV.

It was amazing.

Thank you.

I was tried just to watch the special, and I'm now terrified to be a human.

I do have a quick question for you.

Where do you think the authorization could be coming from above these five people

in our government or world government or whatever

allow this to happen to even to develop such a dangerous thing as what they've done?

I think this comes from Fauci, you know, and the scientific consensus.

You know, we didn't get into Wellcome, which is from England, but it's another large funder.

And these guys believed in eugenics.

I don't think they disavowed eugenics until like 1980.

These are these arrogant scientists that believe they're doing right.

And

because Fauci is such a big deal in the U.S.

government, who's questioning?

And, you know, the government is so big and so out of control.

You can shift money six different ways.

And if you just lie about it, if you have no problem testifying under oath, that's not it.

Brant Paul, you're lying.

If you have that kind of arrogance, most people will go, well, he's got to be telling the truth.

And you can get away with murder.

And that's

kind of an easy case to make here.

This is the Glenback program.

If, well, you don't have to be an expert.

If you watched me last night, you know that I'm an expert on the concept of having your cake and eating it too.

That's mostly with actual cake, but there is another way to look at this, and it's Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian conservative mobile phone company.

And they're going to save you a ton of money.

They're on the same towers as the big mobile companies.

The service is great, and they are so much cheaper.

And they donate to conservative causes.

They believe in the Constitution.

It's time to have your cake and eat it too.

Stop doing business with Big Mobile.

Too many of them are supporting leftist causes.

If you're with Verizon, you're sending money to Planned Parenthood every time you pay your monthly bill.

If you're with, I think it was ATT, they're teaching everybody that if you're white, you're guilty.

Stop it.

Patriot Mobile.

Let's stand together.

PatriotMobile.com/slash Beck.

Get free activation with the offer code Beck 972Patriot or patriotmobile.com/slash Beck.

All right, you can get the whole special on Blaze TV.

And if you want to support this type of research, please subscribe.

Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

The promo code is Fauci Lied to save $25.

The arrogance, the absolute,

unashamed arrogance of Anthony Fauci

is reason enough to have him removed from such an important position.

He is out of control with his arrogance.

And he is lying

every time, every time.

I mean, you watch Rand Paul, and as I said this the other night,

is there anybody that's actually looking out for you and really going after these guys besides Rand Paul?

I mean,

he's relentless on it and he's right.

As we showed you in the special last night, Fauci is guilty as sin on not only the

gain of function

and paying for that, but also for all of the cover-up, the phone calls and the meetings that happened to cover his butt right at the beginning of COVID is astounding.

Rand Paul is joining us now.

Hello, Senator.

How are you?

Good morning, Glenn.

Thanks for having me.

You bet.

So, you know, you've been on this for a while.

Last night I explained and laid out the

history of Fauci, all of the documentation, made the case.

It's truly open and shut.

Why isn't anybody else on this?

Why isn't Fauci

squirming?

You know, it is kind of amazing, particularly that no one from the opposite side of the aisle seems to care at all about the dangerousness of this virus and that it might have come from the lab, and in all likelihood it did come from the lab.

Not one Democrat is curious at all.

You know, you would think that Democrats have at least some sensibilities about the danger of things.

They tend to be the ones who want to regulate away things that could be dangerous in the workplace, but they don't seem to be caring about something that could kill millions and likely did kill millions of people.

You know, this virus has a 1% mortality and killed 5 million people so far around the world.

Can you imagine if the next one that comes out of the lab has 15% or 50% mortality?

And they are doing experiments, as we speak, with viruses that have 50% mortality.

And Fauci seems to have no problem with this.

He says we weigh the risks versus the benefits of the research.

And he comes down on the side that the risks are worth it.

But there are some dissenting voices.

I mean, in the Washington Post about a month ago, a professor from MIT, Kevin Espeld, wrote that these are risks to civilization that are not worth the gamble.

that was the thing that really struck me

as I was doing this special last night was,

you know, these guys are making these decisions, and

all of humanity could be wiped out if they make a tragic error.

This is not something that the elites should be the ones making the decision.

We should all be involved in this decision.

There's no bigger decision to make than should we

be playing around with things that don't exist necessarily in nature that have jumped to humans?

Should we be playing around with these things, making that so in case it jumps to uh humans we can we can kill it with a virus with a vaccine this is insanity insanity especially with arrogance coupled to it and we're not involved in any of these decisions none of us

yeah and i think the the real danger here is that fauci not only has a casual disregard for the science but also for individual liberty.

You combine the two, ignoring the science and then having no regard at all for individual liberty and you have a really dangerous situation.

But it's also dangerous because we've centralized the authority.

And what I tell people all the time is, look, I have opinions on where the virus came from.

I have opinions on how to treat it.

But they're my opinions and you don't have to take them.

It's through persuasion.

If you agree with me, you can listen to my opinions.

With Dr.

Fauci, it's not the same.

He has opinions, but he wants you to be forced to do as he says.

So it is the difference between coercion and freedom.

And in freedom, there are many choices.

But the real danger is as we centralize authority, ultimately you get authoritarianism.

And I think that's he could easily be a medical dictator if he were allowed to be.

Oh, yeah.

One of the things that we

found through our research, let me see if I can grab it here.

I have a,

I think it's a hundred and yeah, here it is.

It's like a 180-page

contract between the NIH and and Moderna.

Did you know that we are the co-owner of the vaccine from Moderna?

Doesn't surprise me, but I don't know all the details of the contract.

Okay, so the contract was,

they started negotiating this contract with Moderna.

The government said, we'll give you all the mRNA

stuff,

and you try to do make a vaccine for all the new coronaviruses.

In 2015, right after Barrick and she made their first Frankenstein COVID,

the NIH says, hey, we should get into bed and start making vaccines with Moderna.

That contract was negotiated in 2015, Rand, they signed the contract on December 12th, 2019.

That's a little odd, don't you think?

Yeah, that they had already begun the negotiations in anticipation of it.

No, no, no.

Several videos.

Five years or four years in advance, then they're not talking about it, and they rush to a signature on December 12th.

What did they know?

Why the rush to the signature then?

The other problem, too, with the government and Moderna owning is there's a huge stock of the vaccine now, and the current vaccine is not working very well.

And in fact, what I would be doing, instead of saying let's rush a booster of the same old vaccine, I would be releasing the newest one which is a Delta variant vaccine which might go back to a 90% efficacy this one may have only you know fairly soon it may only be a 30% efficacy almost you know a crapshoot as far as even taking it but the thing is is that a delta variant might be enough when when the vaccine was effective in April and May of last year It wasn't for lack of numbers that we didn't get to herd immunity.

I thought we were very, very close in April and May.

There were many doctors, Dr.

McCarry, Johns Hopkins, others saying they thought we were getting there.

I thought we were close.

We got down to less than 10,000 cases a day, and then it burst through because it developed resistance to the vaccine, basically.

unless you have a better vaccine, you keep using the old one, they're just going to keep boosting it.

And

if three is going to be mandatory, what about every month?

Maybe you need a vaccine every week, Glenn.

I mean, what are we going to dictate to people over time with this when in reality, probably what we need is a new vaccine each year like we get for the influenza.

But it still ought to be your choice to take it.

And for the high-risk people, you know, it probably is a reasonable thing to keep doing the boosters or to have a new one.

But a new one, I think, would be much better than the booster of the old one.

Let me ask you a question.

Let me go back to the federal government or the NIAID and NIH own the patent.

They share the patent with Moderna.

You can look at this a couple of ways.

Hey, good for the United States.

They negotiated a deal, and so they're making money on this.

If we are making money, you know, pay the taxpayer back.

That'd be great.

Get it for half price.

That's great.

I don't like the idea that we're in business like this.

I don't know of another vaccine like this, an emergency vaccine.

I mean, SALK didn't patent his work, the flu vaccine.

It's open source all the time.

This is the government forcing a vaccine that they co-own.

And

if we are getting paid, where's the money?

Why hasn't this been made public?

And my theory is, and this is just a theory, Brand, you'll probably be able to get to the bottom of it.

is if they are getting paid, the money is going to NIAID or NIH, and it's going to be funding more gain of function research, almost like a black ops.

I think that's one possibility.

We'll get a hold of the contract.

Now that I know a little more about this, we'll actually make some phone calls today and write some letters and see if we can get the contract.

But I guess my first suspicion would be that this is government we're dealing with.

They probably signed a contract where they co-own it, but profits only flow to Moderna.

I can't imagine any of the money's going to...

The government is so ineffective at trying to recoup costs on anything.

So you're right.

If they are getting the money, money, probably it's under Fauci's control and it just allows him to create more mischief.

But I would say that there's a reasonable chance that there's no profit going to us and it's all going to Moderna and maybe we take the liability.

If they lose money, we'll probably have to bail them out somehow.

That's unbelievable.

Unbelievable.

So for example, if there's about 100 million doses left and the variant comes out, that's why they're not wanting to release the variant probably, is they don't want it to compete economically with the one they've got out there.

And so if you have a self-interest and you already own it, you know, you might not want the new vaccine to come out because it would compete with your old vaccine.

These companies are going to be hesitant on putting it forward, too, because they want to sell all their old one before they get caught up in a new one.

This is why the government doesn't get into business with people.

You don't get into business like this because there's no police then.

When they're doing this,

the government has no interest in exposing this and saying, Hey, hey, hey, you've got a vaccine that you're pushing on everybody and it doesn't work.

There's nobody to run to because the government is the police.

They're the last stop.

Right.

You have to realize also that the big billion-dollar companies that have been bailed out by this are the health insurance companies.

So in normal times, if you have health insurance and if it covers your medications, your vaccine would have been covered and your monoclonal antibodies and all the different treatments.

Instead, the government put all this stuff, and now the government's in charge of distributing it.

But now you get into the conflict of interest.

Well, what if deplorable people need more of it?

What if Republicans need more of it?

The government has already indicated that these people are using too much of it, and they've talked about limiting the supply for Florida and Texas.

But you can see here how the real problems

get into play when the government's in charge of the distribution and the decision-making.

Rand, you can get the contract.

I can send it to you personally, or you can go just anybody can go to Blazetvspecial.com and all of the research from last night's show, including every page of that contract,

will be sent to you.

We want everybody to have copies of everything

so they know exactly what was going on.

So we'll get that contract to you.

You can go there.

What?

Yeah, and if there are questions that are murky, what we can do is then address them directly.

You You know, where does the profit go?

How's the profit divided?

Because it may be murky from the contract.

So we'll get to the bottom of it.

Yeah.

Come up for it.

Yeah.

Thank you very much, Rand Paul.

Appreciate it.

Thank you.

You bet.

Bye-bye.

That's Senator Rand Paul.

Paul.senate.gov.

I can't wait until he gets a hold of this and another chance to talk to Fauci.

Tuttle Twins book.

There is nothing more important than you can invest in than your children's education, especially right now.

If you are looking for a Christmas present for your kids, your neighbor kids,

your nieces and nephews, your grandkids, this is the one thing that you should have under the tree.

No questions asked.

The Tuttle Twins books.

They teach the ideas that created America.

And they teach things like the road to serfdom, which most people haven't read, but we should.

We all should know that.

Leviathan, we should all have read that book but we're not we're not reading it the tuttle twins make it really really easy uh to understand these concepts i mean for six-year-olds for teenagers and adults right now the tuttle twins they're having a black friday deal the biggest deal they've ever done it includes all the kids books for all of the ages activity books audio books guide books parent guides all of them 75 percent off the normal price Go to tuttletwinsbeck.com.

This is where you need to start Christmas shopping.

TuttleTwinsbeck.com.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

Lonnie in Pennsylvania, welcome to the Glenn Beck program.

Hi, Glenn.

Hi.

I want to say thanks for everything you do.

Thank you.

And I really appreciate that podcast.

Well done.

Thank you.

My question is,

do you think it's possible that the virus was intentional to help push the World Economic Forum and the futurist agendas?

You know,

I don't think so.

I mean, is it possible?

Yes.

I don't think it was.

You know, I haven't seen any evidence of that.

This just looks like it was arrogance on the part of Fauci, Peter Drazek,

Dr.

Barrick here from the United States, and Dr.

Shee.

It looks just like arrogance.

Um, I don't think it was, uh, I don't think it was intentional at all.

Okay,

okay, thank you.

Because I just thought, you know, because of the virus, so many of the things that they want to have happen are starting to happen.

Right.

Well, they've been planning that for a very long time, and it did give them the excuse

of, you know, the great reset.

So they're using an emergency, never let an emergency go to waste.

Yeah, that seems to be more of the case here.

I mean, remember, they had a lot of these plans

queued up to use global warming as the cause for them.

They were going to find whatever crisis they needed to try to push a lot of this stuff through.

Thank you so much, Lonnie.

Let me go to Ben in Washington.

Hello, Ben.

Yeah, so thank you for taking my call and thank you for that special last night.

Sure.

I was surprised that the NAIID and Moderna both co-owned the mRNA vaccine technology.

Yeah, weird.

Yeah, that was surprising.

My question for you is, do you think that they will hold Fauci and all the others that have testified before Congress in contempt of Congress?

I mean, they're doing that with Steve Bannon.

Yeah, here's Fauci's own email.

Here's my fear.

As Rand Paul just said, nobody on the Democratic side wants to go into this.

There's no interest.

So they have to control.

The Republicans have to control Congress to be able to do this.

In 2022, I think there's a good chance Fauci is going to pay a very, very high price for his lies and his cover-up and his involvement in all of this.

But that is with the understanding that the Republicans are not in bed with the big pharmaceutical companies

like Fauci is.

I mean, there's going to be a lot of people whose skeletons are going to be coming out of the closet.

And

I wonder if that's why Rand Paul is one of the only people bringing this up.

I'd like to see the Republicans actually stand up and start speaking out against this,

but we'll have to wait and see.

But the Republicans have to be in charge for Fauci to go down.

This is the Glenbeck program.

Hello, America.

Welcome to the Glenbeck Program.

Last night, we had our special on Fauci

and the origins of COVID-19.

I think it's a pretty open and shut case that Fauci is lying, and Fauci is so unbelievably arrogant.

Will anyone stop Dr.

Fauci?

Is there anyone in the government that is standing up?

Yes.

Representative Chris Stewart joins us in just 60 seconds.

The Glenn

So yesterday I told you everything we know about the three-hour conversation between Joe Biden and President Xi

out of China.

It happened on Monday.

Doesn't really look

particularly good,

especially if you're listening to me in Taiwan.

There is a computer ship shortage right now that is driving the cost of things like car repairs through the roof.

And that's without China having taken over Taiwan yet.

If that happens, we're up a certain creek without a paddle.

Get ahead of the curve on car repairs.

For a covered repair, Car Shield is absolutely necessary.

They'll handle everything from the mechanic of your choice, provide roadside assistance, and a rental car while your car is in the shop.

And they can save you a buttload of money.

I have Car Shield on my older vehicles that don't have warranty.

I have Car Shield, and they have saved me thousands of dollars, literally thousands of dollars.

Car Shield is a win-win.

They will help you just like they have helped me get back on track when you're in a pinch and you're not on the hook to pay thousands of dollars.

Get coverage today and see why CarShield cars go further.

Visit carshield.com/slash beck.

Save 10%.

Carshield.com/slash beck.

Deductible may apply.

Welcome to the program, Congressman Chris Stewart.

Hi, Chris.

How are you, sir?

Good morning, Glenn Beck.

Good to be with you.

Thank you.

Thanks for coming on and

talking about Fauci.

I don't know if you had a chance to see the special we did last night.

No.

I did not.

It turns out, Glenn, they don't broadcast your special on the House floor.

I think they should.

Were you on the House floor last night?

Yeah.

you are pushing through the Fauci Act.

What is it?

Well, I love the acronym.

Someone smarter than I did come up with this.

Fairness and accountability underwriting Chinese institutions.

But

it's basically it bans the funding of gain of function research in China, which is clearly important, but it does more than that.

It demands accountability for what happens there.

It demands honesty.

And then this should be blazingly obvious.

We should restrict government officials and punish government officials who intentionally mislead Congress.

And it's pretty clear that's happened.

And so it's just to try to tie these loose ends that, I mean,

a seven-year-old could look at the evidence and draw certain conclusions.

Everyone except for appears, apparently, Dr.

Fauci, who, when you challenge him on some of this stuff, he thinks you're attacking science.

And

yeah.

So look.

So, but wait a minute.

Hang on just a second.

How will this help?

Because what he did, he changed the definition of gain of function.

I mean, if you're the guy in charge, you can change the definition.

He granted waivers to Dr.

Barrick and Dr.

Shee

when they stopped the funding.

He said, yeah, that's right, except for this research.

And then when he couldn't directly fund, he

went through eco-health.

And basically, I think it's more of a money laundering system where they are taking the money from the NIH, they're giving it to Peter

Drazek, and then he is taking that money and he's funding the lab and the research in Wuhan.

So Fauci could easily say, well, I wasn't funding that.

I was funding this company and what they do with their money is their business.

Yeah, that's exactly right.

And there will always be people who find ways around the intent of law or legislation.

And unfortunately, that's just true.

But this will make it harder.

But more than that, Glenn, it shines a light on what you've been trying to do for a long time now.

It shines a light and exposes the truth and exposes the deception and helps the American people to see that at least some members of Congress see this and at least some members of Congress are trying to fix it.

But Glenn, I remember going back,

sitting on the Intel Committee early, early in this process.

and having agencies and other individuals come to us and telling us, yeah, we don't think it came came from the lab.

And I was so frustrated and angry with Sim.

How can you possibly say that?

How could you possibly know that already?

And for you already to draw the conclusion that it did not come from the lab when I, again, I think you could show this to a seventh grader and they'd say, well, the evidence seems to indicate otherwise.

Common sense seems to indicate otherwise.

And it was one of the great deceptions of Dr.

Fauci.

when he

scoffed at that and belittled and ridiculed anyone who would even propose it, when we now know that he knew that they were doing this gain of function research at the labs.

And he was deceptively presenting that towards American people.

And as I said, ridiculing anyone who would even suggest something he knew that was happening.

And the evidence or the behavior of the Chinese is so obvious.

Why in the world did the very first thing they do is go in and destroy these samples?

Other than they did not.

Chris,

you have to watch the special last night because

I have put together the timeline and Fauci absolutely knew what was going on.

It is so clear that it came from this lab and that Fauci then covered it up.

You remember all the Fauci emails that came out and they were all redacted?

Well, if you're smart,

you just FOIA the people who were on the CC list and hope that theirs wasn't redacted or it was redacted in different places.

And then you can piece all of the emails together.

Well, that's what we did.

And when you see,

it was in two days, Fauci went from a total panic to meeting with a guy from Wellcome, which is from England, a really spooky,

spooky funder of stuff.

Up until like the 1980s, They were still going for eugenics.

They disavowed eugenics in the 1980s.

And they are the second biggest funder next to the NIH.

And

they get on the phone right away, right away and say,

Fauci's on email, gain of function research.

And they start talking about what's going on in China.

We have to find out, but it's all off the record.

We'll talk about it in person.

They bring a meeting together and they decide

what the story is.

And the story is this did not come from a lab.

Some of the people that were involved in that were staunchly for the lab theory.

Say that this is not natural.

Well, what do you know?

They come out of that meeting and they say, nope, definitely not in a lab and we should discredit anyone.

The very next day, they begin to discredit anyone who says it came from a lab.

And six months later, those scientists that said they changed their mind, guess who got funding?

Millions of dollars in funding.

Those guys.

I mean,

this is a clear-cut cover-up.

And Fauci is at the center of all of it.

It's bad.

Glenn, I couldn't agree with you more, and you didn't ask a question in there, so I'll respond to say I agree with you.

And what you're saying is right.

If I could make two points, if I could.

For those on the left who DFI Dr.

Fauci, I asked him, why in the world are you doing that to an individual who has admittedly lied to you again and again and again?

And the CDC should not be politicized.

They should simply tell the truth.

And for example, early in the pandemic, if there aren't enough masks, then don't lie to the American people and say masks don't work.

When what you really mean is, hey, we don't want you to wear masks.

We need to save them for first responders.

And that was the first lie.

And then to lie about the origins, and then to lie about the funding, and it goes on and on.

Why would you deify someone who admittedly lies to you about something important?

And the other important point I'd like to make, and it's a sidebar, but it's, I think, critical to this, and that is the maliciousness of the Chinese Communist Party.

We were watching Wuhan, and they shut that city down hard.

You could not air travel from Wuhan to any other Chinese city.

You couldn't take a train, a car.

You couldn't literally not hike out of the city.

They shut down every trail, every dirt road, with one exception, and that is you could fly internationally from Wuhan to Los Angeles to New York to Paris and to London and a number of other cities.

And China essentially said, we know this is going to have enormous economic costs.

We know it's going to have enormous human costs.

And we're not going to suffer alone.

We're going to make sure the rest of the world suffers with us, and then we're going to use it to our economic advantage.

And

part of this effort is to hold China accountable as well for their maliciously seeding this virus around the rest of the world.

Well, I will tell you: in 2018,

Peter Dasek from EcoHealth, Dr.

Xi, and Dr.

Barrett,

Barrick from the United States, all

sent a proposal to DARPA, and they proposed doing

making humanized mice, taking coronaviruses from bat poop, and trying to get it into a humanized mouse lung to see if it would kill and then make a vaccine.

DARPA said no.

DARPA said no, not going to fund it.

But they already had funding.

And if you look at something that was published in 2020 by Wuhan, it's that experiment.

And that experiment was done in Wuhan by these people in the summer of 2019.

Then in September, you have the Wuhan data bank being shut down.

On September 12th, you have

security called in, and they beef up security and lock the place down.

The next day they

call out for bids and for an emergency air handling system.

They need to change out all the air handling.

Then two weeks after that they order an air incinerator

and then you have three

researchers in one hospital.

We have all the Chinese documents in Chinese in Chinese and translated.

You have three people that were working in that lab going for COVID-like symptoms in one hospital.

And in October, we have the records of 10 different hospitals in Wuhan and all of them, 10 hospitals had COVID-like symptoms and they were treating people who were dying of COVID in October.

And the same time they do nothing.

China allows the games, the World War games, to go on in Wuhan.

And they were checking the temperature of everyone who got off and on a plane in October.

Yeah.

Chris.

Well, Glenn, the research you've done on this is just a beautiful thing.

Thank you for doing it.

I mean, you've said things that I don't know anyone else in the country has said, and it wasn't easy for you to get this information.

Thank you for doing it.

The Fauci Act will help you and others as it does require greater transparency.

But more importantly, it forbids us from ever doing anything like this again.

You know what, Chris,

we have to, I mean, first of all, I don't know.

Can you get this through with the Democrats in charge?

Well, it turns out that's a bit of a challenge.

Yeah.

Yeah,

I figure.

And I don't really understand that, Glenn.

I mean, why in the world would the Democrats not say, hey, China was malicious in this.

we should hold them accountable.

And if any U.S.

persons or U.S.

organizations were complicit in it, we should hold them accountable.

Why is that a partisan issue to take?

Because of what is, you know, we all know is the deep state.

Fauci is part of that.

He does what he wants to do, no matter what the law is, no matter what the president says.

He just goes around it.

We have to root out all of these actors who just do whatever they want, no matter what you guys say.

Well, and what it comes down to as well is does anyone think that this administration is serious about holding China accountable?

Does anyone think this administration or that China, President Xi, is intimidated or fearful of this president?

No.

And there's a reason why he's not.

And I think that's a partial explanation as well as to why our Democratic colleagues in the House are not going to be helpful on this.

Chris.

The good news is

we're going to take the House and Senate in two years.

Or I'm sorry, in a year.

We're going to, and then we will do this work that they won't allow us to do right now.

Chris, you are so good on foreign affairs.

President Xi and President Biden had a three-hour meeting.

The reports from China says that President Xi said you're messing with fire with Taiwan and you will get burned.

Again, the news reports from China say that

Biden just wanted to talk about global warming, and he said he won't mess with Taiwan and China.

I don't know if I believe that, but I don't know what to believe anymore.

Have you heard anything on this?

Well, I think our readout is different than theirs.

There's no question about it.

And that's why they put their readout first.

But I will say this, too.

I don't believe for a second this is a three and a half hour meeting unless it included nap time.

I mean, this president, I just don't think anyone anyone engages for that amount of time.

But if you don't think those conversations took place, take a look at the conversations that took place up in Alaska, where the Chinese embassies or ambassadors came and just berated

our Secretary of State and others in a very public way, in a way that we've never seen before.

And then ask yourself, do you not think the same thing happened in this conversation?

Because once again, President Xi is not intimidated by this administration.

No.

Chris, thank you for everything you guys are doing.

Thank you for being one of the people that

you're actually standing up for the regular person.

I'd like to send you all this research so you have it because I think that will help you on the floor of the House with the Fauci Act.

Thank you very much.

Thank you, Glenn.

I'll look forward to that.

You got it.

Congressman Chris Stewart,

and please call your congressman and tell them you want passage of the Fauci Act, which will hold people accountable for what they do in China.

We are in a fight to save our children's

future and, quite honestly, our souls.

It may seem like we're overstating things when you say, we're saving souls.

No.

I'm telling you, we're saving our own souls.

If we lose the freedom of future generations on our watch, we have lost our soul.

We have.

Now, what are your kids reading there is nothing more important than the tuttle twins book they should be in every single library of every house these books are based on classic essays and books that we've all heard of things like i pencil human action crisis leviathan how many of those have you read these are the things that

put this nation together and we have to understand them and our kids have to understand them.

Well, the Tuttle Twins books will educate and entertain at the same time at many different levels, starting very young.

So, get early access to the special Tuttle Twins Black Friday deal.

It's the best deal they've ever offered.

It is 75%

off.

All of the kids' books for all the ages, activity books, audiobooks, guide books, parent guides, 75% off.

This should be your first stop for Christmas.

TuttleTwinsbeck.com.

10-second station ID.

All right.

Let me go to Jeff in Indiana.

Hi, Jeff.

Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.

Good morning, Glenn.

Hey.

First of all, I just want to say I appreciate you and all you do.

Thank you.

I don't don't always 100% agree with you, but that's what life is about.

That is America, man.

Thank you.

I can promise you, not 100% of the people agree with me either.

But

the research and the connecting of the dots last night was absolutely amazing.

And I would like to, a big hat tip to Steve Deese.

The follow-up program was amazing.

That really,

really brought a lot of important things out.

We're We're trying to, my wife and I are trying to get people to listen, which is difficult.

You know that as well.

I know.

My concern is some of the other things have been addressed that I wanted to ask and talk about, but the freedoms lost.

And you yourself have said, you know, when freedoms are lost, it's hard to regain them.

And how do we do that?

And your commercial just prior about the kids, and the kids need to know, well, if they are forced to be vaccinated for this, they've lost their bodily freedom.

It's not going to happen.

I honestly think, you know, there are

90% of Americans.

I talked to a guy who is from Hollywood.

He's a liberal.

And he said, I have the vaccines.

My teenagers have had the vaccine.

And I have no problem with that.

I don't like that it's mandated, but I think it's the right thing for the country.

And I said, and the kids?

And he said, oh, I will fight you to the death if you make my little kids have it.

I think when you are talking about something that has a,

is healthier for kids to get than the flu,

and you're forcing the vaccine on them, I think people are going to rise up and say, no way,

no way.

I also don't think that the court system is going to allow this vaccine mandate to stand.

It looks like it's falling apart quickly.

Quickly.

It's unconstitutional.

more in just a second.

The special is available now at Blazetv.com.

American Financing NMLS 1-82334.

www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Can you check?

Is it still up on YouTube?

It was taken off Facebook about three-quarters of the way through the special.

They deleted it and stopped the broadcast.

Let's see if it's still available on YouTube.

Yeah, you got to go to the Blaze TV YouTube channel.

It was there this morning, I know.

Yeah, we'll see.

American financing.

If you're like most Americans, you probably spend a significant amount of time thinking about how to make more money or at least save more money than you currently do.

Nothing wrong with that.

It's good to be aware of how your financial house is holding up and be about the business of trying to make it more secure, especially in this current economy.

I have no idea what's going to happen in the future with our economy.

I have no idea how this works out.

You could save, however, right now hundreds of dollars a month, maybe as much as $1,000 every month,

just by refinancing your credit cards and your mortgage without resetting your mortgage terms.

For over two decades, American Financing has been helping people just like you find ways to make their finances work for them.

So call them today.

It's American Financing, 800-906-2440.

800-906-2440.

American Financing.net.

10 seconds.

Station ID.

So there's 150,000 views of the special last night

from YouTube.

This thing is not going to come up in anybody's, you know, next view panel or suggested views.

You're going to have to go seek it out.

You can find it at

youtube.com slash the blaze.

And you go to the blaze TV's YouTube page and you will find it there on the front page.

And I urge you to take that and send that link to all of your friends.

Do it now while it is out and currently available on YouTube.

Send it to as many people as you possibly can, and let's make sure that everybody sees this.

I'm telling you, once you get 5 million, 8 million people to watch this, it is, it's in the system and you can't undo it.

People will know the truth and it will change things.

The first thing you have to do is have the information.

We didn't post the documents because we don't want Google and everybody else to ding us for the documents.

And then we'd have to go through all of these, you know, no, this one's true.

I'm sorry, you're a fact checker that gets everything wrong that happens to be conservative.

I'm sorry they disagree with it.

What we've done is we've asked you to go to Blazetvspecials.com.

You fill in your email address and we will send it directly to you.

That way they're not online and

nobody's changing algorithms or arguing with us.

You'll get them directly.

Just go to blazetvspecials.com.

And the special itself is at youtube.com slash blazetv.

Okay.

Thank you, Stu.

Yeah, well, you just, of course, said the wrong thing again.

So I figured I'd say the right one.

I mean, I just thought that was a little thing I could contribute to the program today.

Thanks for watching.

Say the correct address for the special you've been talking about.

That is a little something that you could do.

Yeah.

I mean, you know, some people will be able to see the work that you did.

Yeah.

And maybe they would be able to go to the correct web address to get there.

So I know, Stu, that we have talked about the cover-up of Fauci.

Yes.

And the

meetings that they had

and the

arm twisting that happened and the bribery that I believe happened to get all the scientists on board to say the right thing.

It was a little stunning to watch it happen on the chalkboard last night.

Wasn't it?

It really was.

Yeah.

I mean, there's a lot there.

And it's all backed up by documents, and you have the people's names.

And you can go there and form your own conclusions, I suppose.

But it's right there.

A lot of times in their own

words.

In the emails, in their own emails.

Don't miss this special.

And please tell a friend or 10.

This is the Glenbach program.

You know, with friends like that, who needs enemies?

Yeah.

That's kind of the way I feel about everybody in the Fed and the Treasury and this administration.

I mean, we don't need enemies.

They're destroying us.

The U.S.

dollar is weakening every single day.

No guarantee that it survives.

Everybody is betting on that there won't be something better that comes out.

They're going to switch to a digital U.S.

dollar, then they are still devaluing the currency, and that's apt to take everything that you have and reduce it by some huge percentage.

That's why you need to have some things not in dollars.

Invest possibly in a portfolio of precious metals.

10%.

You should spread your risk around.

10%.

If you have a 401k,

please look into this.

Call Goldline now.

They have a special on their U.S.

historic graded coins, the $5 Indian coins, sold in box at $20.

You're going to receive mind your business silver bars at no cost.

20 gold Indians, 20 free silver.

Mind your business at Goldline, 866 Gold Line, 866 Gold Line.

Call them now.

For the moment, you can watch the special at youtube.com/slash Belais TV or subscribe at BelaisTV.com/slash Glenn.

The promo code Fauci Lied.

So the Rittenhouse jury is still out.

This is what, day number three.

Do you remember how long it took to deliberate for O.J.

Simpson?

No.

Guess.

What do you think it was?

Was it a long time, short time?

Let me think back to that time.

I mean, the trial went on forever.

Eight months.

Maybe it wasn't that long.

I mean, the trial seemed to go on forever, but maybe it wasn't that long.

They were deliberately.

The jury deliberated for four

hours.

Four

hours.

Eight months, four-hour deliberation.

This is going on for three days.

Now, there has been a call for a mistrial now.

And because I was wrapped up in the special yesterday, I don't really understand what's going on.

It's about revolving around a video.

But we thought we would get Nick Ricada back on.

He's the host of the podcast, Ricada Law, and you can find that on YouTube.

He has been watching this along with his panel the whole time.

Can you bring me up to speed, Nick?

What's going on?

Yeah, Glenn.

First, thanks for having me back on.

Really appreciate it.

What's been going on is

I'll categorize it this way.

What I would consider a miscarriage of justice by the state attorneys in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Attorneys Binger and Krause have been

frankly, it appears, violating Kyle Rittenhouse's constitutional rights from jump.

And the particular motions for mistrial, they're actually two outstanding motions for mistrial.

One of them is with prejudice, and that's based on these constitutional violations.

The other one is for a motion for mistrial without prejudice that was raised orally by Corey Shirafisi yesterday.

And

they both kind of revolve around this drone footage.

The drone footage was

a piece of surprise evidence that was introduced on Friday after the trial had started.

So we'd already been going for, you know, four or five days.

They get this piece of drone footage, and it has become the linchpin of the case for the state saying that Kyle Rittenhouse raised his gun at Joshua Zaminski and that that constitutes provocation which would defeat or impair his self-defense claim.

the problem is this footage which came in, and

now we have allegations, and they appear to be true, that the state provided a lower resolution copy of this drone footage to the defense when they did their discovery disclosures.

And so the defense is operating on less information in preparing their case.

And they only got the full res version after

the the introduction of evidence was done, and they were arguing over jury instructions.

Okay, so

hold it just a second.

So, the jury saw this in 4K,

and the defense never had seen it in 4K.

And what does

go ahead?

Sorry.

Technically, they saw it in 844P resolution,

and the defense had a 212p resolution copy.

So,

you know, like the resolution of a 1998 cell phone screen.

So wait a minute.

So what did they not see in that copy with such low resolution?

What you can't see from the low res or the high res copy, in my opinion, is Kyle Rittenhouse raising his gun.

But the the the state says from the high res copy, which they then had the forensic crime lab enhance and enlarge images from, they say you can see Kyle Rittenhouse raise his gun, which would be that provocation, which would lead to the defeat of the self-defense claim.

But when the defense, if you look at it at, you know, one, I think it's one sixteenth the resolution is what we're talking about here, you can't see anything but tiny little blobs.

And it's important to realize that where Kyle Rittenhouse is in the video, On the defense's video, he's probably only 10 or 11 pixels high.

I mean, it's a tiny fraction of the screen because he's very far away from where the drone is at the time they allege he raised his gun.

Okay, so the judge is allowing the drone footage to be reviewed by the jury

in the jury room?

They had to come down to the courtroom for that, for that specific piece.

The rest of the footage they have been allowed to, that they've requested so far, they have been allowed to review in the jury room on on a sanitized laptop uh that that only has basically a media player and the uh the files that they're looking to review but the the drone footage they cleared out the courtroom they shut down all the technology that was in there they had bailiffs check all of the uh all of the benches and make sure no one like left a phone recording or whatever and the jury came in and everybody but the jury and one bailiff were were cleared out so that they could review that footage on a large screen TV.

Why did they have to go down?

Just because of the large screen TV?

It's technically Wisconsin law.

And this is the interesting thing.

There was a large argument over whether or not the jury could have the video,

the unfettered access to the videos yesterday.

There was also a previous argument in which the state said that allowing them unfettered access to videos, the state agreed, would be reversible error.

But then they changed their tune because they really want this drone video to be reviewed.

Now the judge does not agree with that law and he's inclined to allow them to have unfettered access, but he's been playing pretty careful in this case

and so I guess that's why he allowed the drone footage to be reviewed but only in the courtroom, whereas the other footage is not.

And

there's a legal dispute over where that is.

The case law isn't fully clear, but they had agreed a couple days before.

Now they're changing their tune.

So will the case, do you think, be dismissed?

Is this headed for a mistrial?

Glenn, it really should be.

And one of the frustrations I've had, and this is a personal opinion,

and several of the members on my panel have carried this same opinion, but I don't speak for everybody, of course.

I feel like the defense is not pushing hard enough on this issue.

We've seen a level of passivity from the defense on this where it seems like the judge is ready to grant a mistrial either with or without prejudice.

It kind of depends on the arguments that follow.

But it almost feels like he's waiting for the defense to just

push over the edge the question.

They keep raising the question and then the state will kind of filibuster and talk and talk and talk.

Any of your listeners out there want a really fascinating

approach to BS, You can go listen to the Assistant District Attorney Krauss give his explanation for how they sent a compressed video and they kept the full video yesterday.

It was phenomenal.

It reminded me of the scene in Chicago, giving the razzle-dazzle.

Wow.

It feels like the judge is just waiting for the defense to stand up and advocate for their client and say, no, judge, this needs to happen.

Our client has been prejudiced, and this is irreparable, at least in this case, but we would say forever.

Why do you say,

why do you think they're not doing this?

I don't know.

My best guess and my most deferential guess is that they have taken an approach that Mark Richards laid out the other day that said, Judge, we've had nothing to hide.

We've disclosed everything, and

they have not been objecting to the introduction of evidence.

They've been allowing everything to come out.

In fact, they put Kyle on the stand,

which was a controversial decision in a criminal defense case.

So they have taken the approach of we have nothing to hide, and they've made compelling arguments to the jury about that.

But

I feel like it's part of their grand strategy to kind of let this play out.

I think they think the judge really wants this to be decided by the jury.

I think he does.

What is it that they're asking for besides this footage?

Do you have any indication?

I mean, my gut tells me

that there's just a couple of holdouts that will just not, will not compromise.

And they're like, nope, guilty.

And because it seems like such an open and shut case.

What they've been asking for, what does it tell you?

Well,

I think I agree with you.

I think that's what it tells me as well.

It seems like there are

largely people who would say not guilty and a couple holdouts.

And we've had some unconfirmed sort of reports coming in

about

two to three people who have raised concerns.

And it seems like there may be those people just hanging on.

And that's your right as a juror to do.

No one can force you to vote one way or another.

But with those holdouts, the question is, are they requesting the videos as like a delay tactic to try and convince somebody else or reinforce their their position that they're not going to change?

Or is it the big group of people trying to convince a small group?

And we don't really know.

At first they didn't ask specifically for the drone footage, but then later that day they did.

And this is the problem with the drone footage and why I think the judge needs to resolve this via mistrial is because even the doubt that they had and the delay that they had in providing that drone footage,

it makes the jury ask questions.

Well, why do they need to talk about it, right?

This is in evidence.

We watched it.

Why do they need to talk about this drone footage?

To me, the entire thing needs to be either mistrial without prejudice and redone or mistrial and canceled forever, which is what I would prefer.

What do you mean that they would ask, why did they have to talk about this?

What questions would that bring up?

Well, so the jury sends a request to the court to review a particular piece of evidence.

And when they

there was a significant delay between that request happening and the,

you know, the judge had to have a conversation with the attorneys about whether or not this drone footage was going to be shown to the jury.

And so to me, if I ask a question early in the day and I get a response quickly, or if I ask a question later in the day and it takes me, you know, two hours to get a response, what's the difference?

What has happened?

Why am I going down to a courtroom for this video, but I'm stuck?

I get the other videos brought to me in the deliberation.

What do you think that

who does that play towards?

The defense or the prosecution?

That I can't know, just because

I don't know the actual minds of the jury.

But it just says to me, no matter where they are, a juror is going to ask extra questions about this evidence.

And with the drone footage, I think the evidence in the drone footage itself is prejudicial

in the way it was brought to the court, in the way it was argued in front of the court um they you know they're going to be looking at this footage more and more and there's that idea that if you keep seeing the same thing looking for something you'll eventually find it

nick ricada um from uh ricada law you can find that on youtube.com slash ricada law thank you so much nick i appreciate it

i really appreciate it glenn thank you god bless having me back in the back we'll talk soon thank you hopefully Hopefully, we'll talk soon.

Hopefully, there will be a verdict soon.

That's an interesting thing, though, because in a way, if you're the defense, you might think this trial is going so well.

We don't want to force it into a mistrial unless they can't bring it up again.

You don't want to just give them a chance to start it over.

And there's speculation they were doing that intentionally.

Yeah.

So it's a tough balancing act for the defense right here.

It's tough.

I mean, I just, I would, oh, I feel for that kid, man.

You imagine being Rittenhouse and the jury's out for the third day and you thought it was open and shut and everybody else said it was open and shut and they're still sitting there.

There is that thing where they did get a bunch of different options for lighter charges.

Like, hey, you don't have to go after the top murder charge.

Maybe it's something less or like this.

And those options didn't really appear until very late in the process.

So maybe they're going through to see if any of those apply.

Obviously, I don't think any of them apply.

Yeah.

Outside the doors of this studio, right down the hall in the main area where everybody works, there is a place where there are, and I'm not kidding, boxes of unguarded built bars.

I think it's wrong.

All sorts of flavors just sitting there.

I think people on my staff are keeping them there.

So if anyone needs a snack during the day, they've got something healthy yet delicious.

You know,

some people want something that doesn't taste like a doormat.

They're just sitting there.

The fools.

Now, some would say that in the trunk of my car, many of those boxes will be found later today.

Built has all kinds of flavors available.

They are all covered in real chocolate.

Flavor comes first.

They're a candy bar that's actually good for you.

It's a healthy snack, a secret.

And I got to tell you, they don't taste healthy.

They really don't.

They taste really good.

Built.com, built.com.

Get 15% off your order.

There are like 130 calories, usually, four grams of

carbs.

It's Beck15.

Beck 15, 15% off at built.com.

The Glenn Beck program.

It looks like the House is going to vote on the Build Back Better bill today,

which means Nancy Pelosi thinks she has the votes.

Call

your congressman, especially if your congressman was one of those 18 that voted with the Democrats last time.

Let them know in no uncertain terms that you will remember their name and you will campaign against them.

We cannot pass this bill.

If your congressman is on the fence,

call them.

You can flood the Congress with calls today.

That's the only thing.

Emails don't mean anything.

They say the only thing that matters is the phone calls.

If they see that everybody is calling, they get spooked.

And if they pass the Build Back Better bill, they have all of the tools they need for the Green New Deal,

for the Great Reset, all all of it.

All of it.

And it won't go well.

This cannot pass.

So do your best, Gandalf,

and

call him up.

You shall not pass.

Do it right now.

Also, if you missed the special last night, you can find it on Blazetv.com slash Glenn, promo code Fauci Lied, or while it lasts on YouTube, please tell a friend, tell 10 friends.

Make sure that everyone is watching this special while it lasts in the open on YouTube.

Do it now.

Facebook took it off last night, just stopped the broadcast three-quarters of the way through.

It is still on YouTube.

This is the Glenberg program.

Packages by Expedia.

You were made to occasionally take the hard route to the top of the Eiffel Tower.

We were made to easily bundle your trip.

Expedia.

Made to travel.

Flight inclusive packages are at all protected.

← Previous: Best of The Program | Guests: Sen. Rand Paul & Nick Rekieta | 11/18/21 Next: Best of the Program | Guests: Bill O'Reilly & Rep. Jim Jordan | 11/19/21 →

Fauci Has Explaining to Do | Guests: Sen. Rand Paul & Rep. Chris Stewart | 11/18/21

Listen and follow along

Transcript

More episodes from The Glenn Beck Program

Ep 267 | The Failed 'Assassination' of Katie Hopkins | The Glenn Beck Podcast

Comey Indictment & Soros Probe Prove Justice Is BACK | Guests: John Solomon & Ryan Mauro | 9/26/25

Best of the Program | Guests: John Solomon & Ryan Mauro | 9/26/25

Glenn's Tough Message to the ICE Shooter's Mom | Guests: Todd Lyons & Dr. Jay Bhattacharya | 9/25/25

Best of the Program | Guest: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya | 9/25/25