Best of The Program | Guests: Bill O’Reilly & Allie Beth Stuckey | 8/6/21

Only Murders in the Building, season five.

The hit Hulu original is back.

The Nightbuster died.

He was talking with a smobster.

Was he killed in a hit?

We need to go face to face with the mob.

Get ready for a season.

Ongiono signore.

This is how I die.

You can't refuse.

You're gonna save the day, like you always do, by being smart, sharp, and almost always find mistakes.

The Hulu Original series: Only Murders in the Building.

Premieres September 9th, streaming on Hulu and Hulu on Disney Plus for bundle subscribers.

Terms apply.

New episodes Tuesdays.

Now, Pat and I are not,

I would say we're not food scientists per se, although I am a doctor and you run kexicookies.com.

Yes.

And so we're pretty qualified.

But we have made a discovery that we test tried today

from thecakegirl.com.

It's cake in a cup.

It's a small business that...

We just tested it.

I mean, I didn't want to.

Did you want to eat all that cake?

Not at all.

Not at all.

No.

We tested that today, and perhaps you should too.

And speaking of small businesses that are struggling to make it, maybe you're in that boat or you're struggling to make the payments on your house because you are a landlord and own one house.

What is the government doing?

How is this all affecting us?

And what is the real thought behind it?

Oh, we'll tell you today on today's podcast.

And Bill O'Reilly has great insight on Governor Cuomo and what's going on in New York, all on today's podcast.

You're listening to the best of the Blanpec program.

Hello, and good evening.

I

am your local anchor that has been doing the news

here in your hometown for quite some time.

And I've just been drinking just a little bit because

I have to be able to tell you

the news.

There's a new Oregon...

Ore Oregon, the state underneath Washington, a ballot initiative that would criminalize hunting,

hunting and breeding livestock, even

even

even

you know, when you spray the cockroaches, even that would be illegal under a ballot initiative backed by the Oregon

animal rights activists and opposed by farmers.

Damn farmers,

the proposal, initiative

number 13 would lift virtually all exemptions to state laws related to

animal abuse, neglect, and sexual assault.

The vast majority would

sounds like a good idea,

would ban common farming practices

such as artificial insemination.

I don't want to be one of those guys, and used in targeted breeding and killing animals for meat.

In addition, IP-13 would further restrict hunting, fishing, trapping, and

hurting an animal

intentionally.

That would

also ban research labs from experimenting on

non-human mammals.

So,

is it okay to experiment on humans?

Non-human mammals, birds, fish, reptiles, and

fish that walk around.

All the activities listed would carry criminal penalties.

The organizers say

that

the

state's $5.7 billion farming industry would just have to adjust to the laws accordingly.

In other news,

President Joe Biden took a jab at one of his foremost critics and

somebody wants to run for president in 2024, Ron DeSantis,

passing off as if he didn't recognize who the Republican governor was.

Biden responded Thursday when asked

about the recent comments DeSantis made about battling the federal government's COVID-19 strategy.

He said, my response is

a governor who

which,

I mean, the man doesn't know the difference between his sister and his lovely wife Jill

Which I'm thinking might be a little bit awkward Honey, I wasn't cheating on you with your sister.

I thought it was you

And and that's and that's all the news I could I could I could possibly muster today

I have to tell you the Oregon ballot if this doesn't make everyone want to move out of Oregon what are you doing there?

What are you doing?

They are destroying the state.

You can't call pest control.

If this passes, you can't kill cockroaches.

You can't trap rats.

It's from the same city that has allowed absolute anarchy.

But this is for the whole state.

Yeah, that's true.

This is for the whole state.

That's true.

And

that's pretty conservative, too.

I know.

That's why half of the state wants to join Idaho.

And I,

as an Idaho part-time resident, so I don't want to speak for Idahoans.

Is that how you...

Idahoans.

I don't want to speak for them, but

the more the merrier.

The more people who understand freedom, the more the merry.

If you understand freedom, please move to Idaho.

If you understand freedom and are willing to stand for it and not like, oh,

we all love the Constitution, but, you know, but I mean, there are things.

No, no, move to Texas.

Move to Texas.

If you don't, get the hell out of here.

Get out of here.

You already have all those crappy states that you have destroyed.

Go fix those.

We could, but you won't listen to us.

So go fix those.

Make those your utopia.

Have you noticed they have all of the good places?

Have you noticed?

I mean, I'm not saying that, you know, conservative cities are crappy, but

the progressives move in

and they move into places like Jackson Hole and then they just destroy it.

Destroy it.

Well, we've got to have our sking lodge.

And it's just so beautiful and natural here.

We need to make sure that it's preserved that way.

Meanwhile, because you're preserving it, you're burning the damn state down.

Have you seen what is happening in California with the water situation?

No.

Okay, they haven't built a new dam or a new reservoir since like 1972.

Yeah.

Okay.

They won't do it.

We're not going to dam the rivers.

I'm loving.

So they have no water.

Now they're in a drought.

Now, what is their electricity?

What is the electricity that they all love?

Hydroelectric.

But if you're not building dams, you're not getting hydroelectric power.

And if it's not raining, you don't have water to fill up to run the hydroelectric plant.

They don't have enough water.

They think they may have to shut down all of the hydroelectric plants because of the drought.

You're not having rolling brownouts.

You're not going to have power.

You're not going to have power.

You're not supposed to run run generators for days and weeks on end oh yeah they won't have power oh welcome to venezuela welcome to venezuela and california all you people who have voted for all of this nonsense and bullcrap this whole time you deserve it you deserve every bit of it every bit of it you think we deserve covid

because uh texas isn't masking up no you know what we we actually believe that man is built to survive Man is built to survive.

Did you see the latest study?

Latest study shows that people who have had it have a better immune system than those who are taking the vaccine.

But you're never going to hear that.

You have more defense if you've had it.

It's why people had chickenpox parties.

Your natural immunity is much better.

No, not on this one.

No, no, no, not on this one.

Oh, it's it's that way on everything.

Everything.

Except this one.

Yeah.

Okay.

Yeah.

So you're saying that we're actually, you know, the people who have had the vaccine,

you know, good for them.

I'm glad they had it.

I would take the vaccine possibly if it wasn't, if I didn't already have it.

I had a bad, bad bout of it.

I'm pretty sure my body has the antibodies now that I need.

You know, I'm sorry.

I'm not doing your little vaccine thing, but I believe in nature.

And by the way, let me just say this.

My body, my choice.

Not with this.

No, not with this.

Oh, because your choice is affecting me.

Is it?

Yeah, it's like it's not affecting the little baby inside of you.

Exactly.

My body, my choice.

Except when

the government wants to put stuff into you.

Can you imagine if we go for this mandatory vaccine and we have vaccine passports, America?

Dear God Almighty, you will deserve everything you get.

If you go for the vaccine

mandates and passports, you will deserve the dystopian future.

Do you know what we have taught this government?

We have taught this government that we...

In fact, let me just say this.

We've taught them that we're sheep.

We have taught them that they can do anything to us and we will abide.

You know,

when the

when FEMA was first around and the federal government, before it was named FEMA, the federal government tried to come into a state.

It was one of the southern states.

And they were coming with all the rescue trucks and everything else because there was a bad hurricane.

And they were coming into the trucks.

The people of the state met the government trucks at the border with shotguns and said, turn your trucks around.

We don't need nor do we want your help.

You know what happened?

They fixed it.

Oh, by the way, another one, when they were first voting on giving federal aid to a state, the state of Texas, because of a hurricane, Texas went crazy and said, We don't, we don't want your aid.

Everybody's like, Oh, we've got to aid them.

We've to poor Texans, they're not going to be able to handle it.

You know what happened?

The private sector raised more money than the government was ever thinking about doing.

We are losing everything about us that makes us different.

This is the best of the Glen Beck program.

Melissa Bill O'Reilly is here from BillO'Reilly.com, the author of Killing the Mob.

Hello, Bill O'Reilly.

How are you, sir?

I have a suggestion for the Glen Beck program.

Yes.

So I think you should bring back the English lady who used to say, this is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

I like her better than the robot guy.

That's just my suggestion.

Well, I haven't had that opinion from anyone because, you know, other people are paying attention to things that might be slightly more important, but I will jot that down.

We will bring the English box.

English woman back.

I'm a two-tailed guy.

I like the English woman because it has this masterpiece theater aura.

Well, that's what we're all about here.

So,

this portion of the program, underwritten by the Ford Foundation.

Bill,

what was the big story of the week?

Cuomo.

Cuomo is the big story because it's not being reported accurately as usual.

And, you know, COVID, but we talked about COVID last Friday in great detail.

Not a lot has changed on that front.

So

the Cuomo story,

I think,

is

something people should pay attention to, even if you've never been to New York State and never intend to come here, which might be a good plan, but

now.

I mean, this is a guy who's born in New York.

It's wild to hear you say stuff like that, honestly.

Bill, you have been around these guys for a very, very long time.

My thesis is that Andrew Cuomo is very much, in a way, Harvey Weinstein in this way.

Everybody knew it.

Everybody knew he was vindictive.

Everyone knew he was nasty.

And everyone knew that he was a predator.

And nobody wanted to say anything because they were afraid of him.

I'm not sure that is fair.

I wouldn't make the Weinstein comparison to that.

Well,

I don't mean in gravity of crime.

Yes, I mean, look.

But the most important part of this is not

what the allegations are.

That might become the most important part when the courts kick in.

But it's the nasty hardball politics that not only take place in New York State, but in every state, and certainly in the federal government.

So let me just lay this out to you.

Andrew Cuomo was the most powerful man in New York for 12 years.

By far.

He was a dictator.

He was like Huey Long in Louisiana.

He controlled the legislature.

He controlled everything.

And as you rightly described him, he's a nasty piece of work.

Okay?

And if you got on his wrong side, he would try to hurt you.

So that's all true.

But somewhere along the line, the progressive left in New York, which has been gaining power for the last three or four years,

decided that he wasn't progressive left enough.

And they want Letitia James, the attorney general, to be governor.

So the only way that could happen is if you get Cuomo out of the way, because Cuomo is going to run for a fourth term.

So you've got to destroy him if you want Letitia James, who is way to the left of Cuomo, if you can even imagine that.

So Letitia James is the attorney general, and then Presto, all of a sudden, all of these people come out and they're saying Edu Como did this, did that, did this, did that, bump, bump, bum, bump, bum, bump.

And who's placed in charge of the investigation?

Letitia James.

Okay, so wait a minute.

Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait, wait, wait, wait.

So are you saying these are trumped-up charges?

I'm not.

No, no, I'm not.

Okay.

I'm not.

And I would never even get into that because I have no blanket idea.

Okay.

And neither does anybody else, by the way.

We will have an idea

when there is court hearings and if there is an impeachment.

Okay.

All right.

But the structure is Cuomo's got to go.

And as again, you rightly pointed out, there were whispers all over the place that he was.

Not a good guy.

Yeah, and that he was taking advantage of his power.

to set up his dating life or whatever you want to say.

Those rumors were around.

So what should have happened in a honest state is that it should have been investigated.

Absolutely.

But not by Letitia James.

Not by the person who wants to take his job.

It should have been the Attorney General of the state of New York says, I'm appointing somebody from outside government to do this investigation, and there's going to be due process, and the governor is going to have his attorneys present whatever he wants to present.

Well, but isn't that the wait, wait, wait, isn't that the job of the attorney general?

Yeah, but she didn't do it.

She says, I'll investigate.

No, I know, but isn't it?

She can, can she?

Can she what?

She can do that as attorney general.

She can take that on.

Of course she could.

And then, if the independent person came back, and it had to be somebody outside of New York State, by the way, no, but no ties to the state,

and said, Look, X, Y, Y, and Z,

then

we would have less intrigue and we would have less politics in this situation.

The second really important part of the story is that Cuomo is going to take everybody down with him.

All right?

He is that kind of guy.

The three most corrupt states in the Union are Illinois, number one,

California, number two, and that governor, I believe, is going to be recalled on September 13th, and New York State, number three.

These are like organized crime families.

They're run by like the mob.

And who knows more about the mob than me, Beck?

No one.

I will tell you this.

I will tell you this.

It is interesting,

and I would put Michigan on that list.

These are all...

These are all states that have been run by Democratic progressives and socialists forever.

Forever.

And you can throw Michigan in, but it doesn't rise

to Illinois, New York, and California.

So what is this going to mean to New York?

What is he going to

throw out?

He has stuff

on everybody.

And right now, his battery of attorneys is basically

going over

what they are going to put forth to the public.

That's what's happening now.

So he's basically going to send a message to the legislature.

If you impeach me,

then this is what we're going to put out about all of you people.

He's been in office for 12 years.

Yeah.

He knows.

So everybody's going to die.

And see, this is not reported anywhere back.

Number one, the investigation and how it should not have been that way has not been reported.

And number two, the consequences of going after Cuomo and destroying him, because at this point, Cuomo has nothing to lose.

He's not going to quit.

He's not going to admit any wrongdoing.

He's not.

Okay?

He's going to say, all right, you want to tango?

We're going to tango.

So what happens?

Do they tango?

Here's what happens, Back.

Here's what happens.

Okay?

There are four district attorneys now, and this is really interesting.

So Letitia James, the Attorney General of New York, comes out and says, Cuomo broke the law, committed a criminal act.

And that's all centered around the female state trooper,

which accused Cuomo of whatever.

Yeah.

Okay.

That's a serious person.

And I'm not seeing the others aren't serious, but that's his main problem.

Yeah.

The female state trooper.

So James says, he committed crimes.

He committed crimes.

And

I'm not going to indict him, though.

Why?

We're not going to charge him.

Why?

Well, wait, wait, wait.

If he committed a crime, or you believe you have evidence that he did, why are you not going to prosecute him?

Right.

Does that make any sense to anybody?

It does in today's world, but not in any just society.

I got you, but I'm just going down the corruption meter here.

Right.

I'm going down the corruption meter.

So she farms it out to four district attorneys, four different people.

You do it.

You investigated the criminal thing.

I'm not going to do it because I want to run for governor, and I don't want to be involved in this while I'm running for governor.

You see what I'm talking about?

All right.

So you got four guys.

including the unbelievable corrupt Cy Vance in Manhattan, okay, investigating Cuomo on criminal charges.

If they have it, if they have it, all right, then Cuomo might have to make a deal.

I'll leave if you don't, if you don't

prosecute him, criminal.

Yeah.

That's the only way he gets out of there

without a bloodbath as far as an exposition of, well, you think I'm bad?

Look at this one.

Look at that one.

Look at this.

And so that's possible that he'd make a deal because he doesn't want to go to a criminal trial.

But believe me when I tell you, Andrew Cormo will take this into civil court all day long.

All day long.

And you'll have one after another, after another, after another.

Now, the impeachment's another thing.

But don't be surprised if all of a sudden the New York legislature says, whoa, well, maybe we're not going to do it because he's only there for another year.

Let the people decide.

And the reason that I picked this on your program is the most important story of the week.

Okay.

Sorry.

Hold on.

Oh, vicious, vicious dog.

She will take your ankles and the tops of your feet down if you ever try to get close to Bill O'Reilly.

You there, Bill?

Yes, I'm here.

All right.

The reason why you picked this story is why.

The terror dog is so upset about Andrew Clark.

I know, I know.

You know, she just heard our discussion, and she's appalled because she lives in New York State, too.

I know.

She's a taxpaying dog.

Yeah, yeah.

And so she's here.

Holly, come in here and keep quiet.

And we're going to take care of Governor Cuomo.

Don't worry.

She's very, very worried.

Anyway,

I want your national audience and international audience to understand the level of corruption in this country

on the political side.

I mean, it's just staggering, and nobody reports it.

You know, I gotta read this in the New York Times.

You don't see any of this.

And the reason I can tell you this with certainty is, as you pointed out, I've been covering New York for decades.

I know all these people and I know what's going on here.

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

So yesterday, one of our own, Ali Beth Stuckey, was talking about

the

Olympics and Laura Hubbard, who's the guy who is competing on the women's Olympic team.

And she wrote, Laura Hubbard, failing at the event doesn't make his inclusion fair.

He's still a man, and men shouldn't compete against women in weightlifting.

Well, she was put into Twitter jail because she was violating the rules against hateful conduct, promoting violence and threatening and harassing people basis of race or

ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Well,

I would like to challenge you

because

this is,

if you don't push back now, If you're not willing to speak the truth because of, oh no, Twitter jail,

you're not going to speak the truth.

And

Allie does business and Twitter is important to her and Twitter is important to me as a business person, but not more important than the truth.

So I just tweeted two things and I invite you to retweet them or tweet them yourself.

Anyone who acts with hate and violence to lies or truth, I reject.

I stand with Allie.

on Laura Hubbard, hashtag Laura Hubbard.

Biology is clear.

It isn't hate.

It is science that states he is and always will be a man.

I will call him Laura to be nice, but scientifically he's a man.

And I also tweeted, because this is happening up in Harvard with a professor up there, a guest lecturer, Carol Hooven.

She refuses to say, you know, other gender.

She's like, you're a man or a woman.

I reject hate and violence and embrace kindness and the individual's right to be who they are.

But I also stand with Harvard's Carol Hooven biologically, scientifically, men are men, women are women, and that's the biological reality.

Hashtag follow the science.

I would love for you to retweet these or just make them your own words.

And if you're afraid to go into Twitter jail,

Imagine how afraid you will be when things really get tough and they're talking about real jail for speaking the truth.

I invite you to do that today.

Exercise your courage today.

Allie is on with us now.

Hi, Allie.

How are you?

I'm doing well.

How are you, Glenn?

So were you surprised by this or did you see this coming?

I was a little surprised because I've said stuff like this before.

This is an issue I care about.

My goal is not to be purposely controversial.

It's certainly not to purposely offend anyone or hurt anyone's feelings.

It's just to state a fact, which I think is important

when you are talking about the fairness, the protection, and safety, and the rights of girls and women.

And that's something that's really important to me.

Well, I think it's, you know, I've said this story a million times, but it is so true.

I talked to one of the righteous among the nations, one of the women who saved over a hundred Jews, and she told me basically, you cannot participate in the lie.

You don't suddenly become a superhero.

You just refuse to participate in any of the lies.

And they are moving us closer and closer to the edge every time we refuse to say, no, that's not true.

I don't hate you.

I'm not going to fight you.

But it's not true.

Exactly.

Exactly.

And I think that conservatives, obviously, we have a hard time with this because people on the other side are controlling all these major institutions.

And while it's not being put in actual jail yet that we have to worry about, some people do depend on outlets like Twitter to make money, to get their voice out there.

So I understand absolutely the fear.

And maybe a few years ago, I would have said, you know, pull back on some of your speech.

But I just think that we are in such an important moment right now

that courage is maybe more necessary than it's been in a really long time

in the United States.

And just saying that, which is objectively true.

Trevor Burrus, Jr.: I mean, you think of people who

went went to war all throughout our history for whatever reason.

They went to war, they lost a limb, they can't walk, they lost their mind, they lost their life, whatever it is.

The blood and sacrifice that all of those people made and we're too cowardice to actually speak biological scientific truth.

Wow, what a waste of lives.

Right.

And it's little things that I think that we acquiesce on that we think, you know, aren't that big of a deal.

Like you said, you know, calling someone by the names that they now have,

that's fine.

But

as long as I can and as much as I can when appropriate, I am going to use the pronouns that correspond with someone's biological sex.

I don't do that to be hateful at all.

I don't want to be controversial in that respect.

But if I am committed to not living by lies, if I am committed to speaking that which is true and not giving in to the absurdity, then I do have to be careful about the things I say and making sure that I'm in align in alignment with that which is true.

See,

I've always referred to Bruce Jenner as Caitlin Jenner.

And to his to his face, I would be saying, you know, I don't, the idea that Bruce Jenner, a hero of mine growing up,

was living in this, oh my gosh, this dystopian view and life that he had, that miserable.

If this is what makes him happy, I'm fine.

I'm not going to participate in it, but you know, I'd call you Caitlin Jenner and, you know,

you know, she and et cetera, et cetera, when I'm there.

But if I, if I'm having to tell my kids, if I'm having to go to the hospital, if I'm having to talk about science, no.

It's a dude.

It's a dude.

Is there a line there where we can

be truly

kind

and gracious and go the extra mile for people like Caitlin Jenner without

participating in the lie?

Yeah, I think that you draw a really good line there.

Obviously, it's difficult and people kind of have to make their own decisions.

But if our goal is to speak the truth in love, which I think it always should be, that means that if I am talking to someone, no matter how they identify, I'm going to go out of my way to be kind to them.

I'm not going to purposely make them uncomfortable.

But if that also requires me to just say explicitly, look, I believe you're made in the image of God and have incredible value and that, you know, I want you to have a happy and whole life.

Here's where I stand, though, on biological sex.

And this is what I believe.

And I'm not saying that to be hateful.

And I want to be your friend.

And, you know I consider you my neighbor that Jesus calls me to love but look I also believe that biology matters that sex differences matter and maybe it's just being that explicit and that open about what we believe

maybe that is the way that we can be both honest and loving so I think that drawing the line too as you said between public and private depending on the context that we're in and depending on what we're talking about and how we're talking about it I think that makes a difference in kind of the language that you use surrounding this kind of transgender issue Ali Basaki thank you so much by the way you're out of Twitter jail

I'm out of Twitter jail I'm free I'm a free woman okay did you did you have to retract your tweet

Well, I had to, they make you delete the tweets that they say violated their rules in order to get back in.

Now, I've said basically the same thing a thousand times in a different, you know, in a thousand different ways.

But those two tweets, they did make me delete in order to be able to tweet again.

So I don't know how long I'll last on the app, though, because they said that I could be suspended forever

if I keep saying that biological fact.

Your first tweet was, good morning, I'm out of Twitter jail.

Men are still men.

Thank you.

So

yeah, so we'll see.

Allie, thank you very much.

I appreciate it.

God bless.

So again, I just tweeted, I don't know if I'll go to Twitter jail.

Is anything,

what was it that they said about her that

it violated the rules against hateful conduct?

You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the races of base,

ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.

And her original post didn't do any of that.

Didn't do any of that.

Promoting violence?

No, it's ridiculous.

So what I just tweeted does that.

I mean, that states clearly anyone who acts with hate and violence to lies or truth, I reject.

I stand with Allie on Laura Hubbard.

Biology is clear.

It isn't hate.

It is science that states he still is and always will be a man.

I will call him Laura to be nice, but scientifically, he's a man.

I reject hate and violence and embrace kindness and the individual's right to be who they are.

I also stand with Harvard's Carol Hooven.

Biologically, scientifically, men are men, women are women.

That's the biological reality.

Hashtag follow the science.

Two tweets.

Do I make it through the day?

Why the hatred?

Yeah.

And there's no hatred, and I'm not trying to be controversial.

I don't think you do.

I urge you to go look at my tweets.

You don't have to retweet mine.

Go look at your tweet.

Go to your tweet.

Look at mine and copy it verbatim.

And you say it.

I mean, it is time to push back, and it is time to stand when the science is clearly on your side.

Isn't that the best way to push back?

Isn't that the time to push back?

Always told every single day.

We follow the science.

We follow the science.

We follow the science.

Well, we're following the science.

Following the science.

And no problem.

You just don't like this island, the science anymore.

Correct.

You don't like it.

Correct.

And, you know, the same with the science of

COVID.

Yeah.

If you have not had COVID and you had a vaccine, I had COVID.

Studies show that

I have stronger antibodies against COVID than you do.

That's a scientific fact.

Why I can't say that, I don't know.

But it's a scientific fact.

You know,

you get a vaccine and you're going to be safe from COVID.

No.

Science is showing now that about 35%

of those who had the vaccine or have the vaccine are getting COVID again.

Okay.

All right.

Well, that doesn't make the vaccine,

you know, bad.

It doesn't make it, you know, completely worthless.

It's just a fact.

You were made to occasionally take the hard route to the top of the Eiffel Tower.

We were made to easily bundle your trip.

Expedia.

Made to travel.

Flight-inclusive packages are at all protected.