Best of The Program | Guests: Rep. Michael McCaul & Spencer Lindquist | 8/4/21
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Listen and follow along
Transcript
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.
Fiscally responsible, financial geniuses, monetary magicians.
These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds.
Visit progressive.com to see if you could save.
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates.
Potential savings will vary, not available in all states or situations.
Let me say I'm torn today because
if you're just listening to today's podcast,
you're going to enjoy it.
If you are watching the podcast, you might enjoy it more or be horrified.
And I'm not going to explain it more than that.
But anyway, today we start with Andrew Cuomo.
Hey,
she was just taking dictation.
We have that also: how pedophilia is being normalized in our society, and a congressman who says the Wuhan virus is very clear it came from the lab, and he has evidence.
We talk about that in so much more
on today's podcast.
You're listening to the best of the
program.
Now, you know, it's a big day when somebody on this show has a vacation day and they decide I'm not taking it.
Stu was supposed to be on vacation, supposed to be leaving today, and he's actually going to leave the show early today, but he could not leave because today
is like his Pearl Harbor.
Today is
a big day for Stu, the man who has created Andrew CuomoisAwful.com
months ago.
And happy birthday, Stu.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
I want to be clear.
I did not come in off of a vacation because you had bandages all over your face.
Oh, no.
And I wanted to be part of all that.
No, I said.
I said to you yesterday, could you do the show for me?
You're like, I'm on vacation.
Okay, thank you, Stu.
So, Andrew Cuomo, it's interesting to watch.
I went through the entire report yesterday,
and there's a lot in there.
I mean, there were 11 different accusers.
There's a couple in there that were upset at certain comments and stuff that, you know, maybe you could brush off as not as serious as the others.
There's
some really serious ones.
One interesting thing that I have not heard anyone mention, if you remember the beginning.
of the sexual harassment stuff with Cuomo.
And I'm not talking about him, you know, murdering thousands of elderly people.
Oh, no, that's a totally different scale.
That's not as important as this.
Nothing in here about murdering old people.
That's not in this particular report.
This one is about the sexual harassment.
And the first thing we heard was Lindsay Boylan, and she came out and she wrote a long post about her interactions with
Governor Cuomo.
One of the first things she said that had any traction whatsoever was that she was on a private plane with Andrew Cuomo and others, and he started saying, you know, let's play strip poker.
Remember this?
Hey, hey, let's play strip poker.
I was talking about zip strip.
I was thinking maybe we
take the stairs in the executive mansion, take them down to the original wood.
That's what I was talking about, stripping the paint off, not stripping like she thought.
She completely
misunderstood.
However, there's an update to that story in the report.
It says,
Ms.
Boylan wrote this medium piece, and then they released a statement, if you remember, the Cuomo administration with multiple people signing it saying, we were on each of these October flights and this conversation did not happen, end quote.
But during our investigation, one of the individuals who joined the statement, Mr.
Zemsky, testified that he did in fact recall the governor making the comment about strip poker on the plane.
Listen, so we were on the plane, but I was talking about a Volvo,
the car.
That's what I was talking about.
See, I,
you know, look, Andrew Cuomo should step down for the well-being of the state and the country, but I would really miss your Andrew Cuomo impression if he does.
I don't want it to go away.
We can keep it going.
So they went through 74,000 documents, interviewed a couple hundred people.
The biggest accusation is 74,000.
74,000 documents.
Like tons of, they have tons of texts about all of these incidents.
People who were making these accusations texting their friends right after they supposedly occurred.
It's bad.
Yeah.
All of this is.
Some of it sounds like it wasn't a big deal, right?
Some of it sounds like just.
For example, there's a nurse who is, there was a statement made by Cuomo, kind of like, ah, you make that gown look nice.
Oh, look, is that something he should be saying?
No.
No, no.
As the governor.
But is that something to remove him from office?
No.
No.
Executive assistant one.
And it used to be something you could kind of say in society.
Right.
Sure.
Men could compliment women.
Right.
Here's the shit.
But here's the thing.
I mean, do you guys know anybody more huggy than me?
In real life, no.
You're pretty huggy.
What doesn't mean in real life?
Well, I've like Andrew Cuomo, I've seen him on TV.
He's more huggy than you.
Okay, so I'm a very huggy person.
Yeah.
No one has ever filed a complaint.
No one has ever filed a complaint.
That's not to say
because that's not what we're talking about.
What you do is not what we're talking about.
We're talking about a guy who's copping feels.
Right, but that's what he's doing.
That's what he's doing.
He's claiming that I just hug people.
Right.
No, you know, when you hug.
You know, I'm hugging, and so I've got Parkinson's, and sometimes my hands
vibrate on their body.
This is a well-defined strategy, what you're talking about, right there.
In the hug, in the moment of taking the photo, there was a lot of grabbage going on.
There was a lot of
multiple women said while they were taking photos, he would grab them on the rear end.
Well, there is one woman who claims he reached under her shirt and cupped her breasts.
Yes, you're talking about executive assistant one in the report.
And then they took a photo right after that.
Yeah.
So during
while they were taking a photo,
but because he did it, the photo was incredibly blurry.
It was a selfie in the mansion of the White House.
They eventually did get a photo that was taken.
And that's important because he denied taking the selfie, saying he'd never, he doesn't even like taking selfies.
I don't take selfies.
Now, multiple other people testified that he did the same thing.
Not only did he ask her to take the selfie, but he told her she could only share it with one person, another female assistant.
They go through
the timeline here.
It's very clear that he was trying to make the other one jealous.
Jealous.
And she knew that at the time.
And she knew that at the time.
They were friends.
And they're both in here as accusers, by the way.
Both the one who took the photo there, executive assistant one, plus McGrath, who's another one.
He is, he is,
I mean, when he asked, what was it, executive assistant number one?
I'm trying to remember who it was.
Who was the one that asked him, what kind of girlfriend are you looking for?
There were several.
He did that to several people.
He said to one of them,
someone who likes pain.
Yes, that was, I can't remember which one that was, but that was definitely in the report.
That's the girlfriend he's looking for.
Let me give you some of the, this is some of the worst stuff from the executive assistant one.
And this is the stuff that really crosses the line from creepy behavior to criminal behavior in many ways.
She talks about how he would hug in a way.
You know how you, I mean, you said you're a hugger.
There are ways you hug people that you're being friendly with, and there are ways you...
You're totally innocent.
Yeah, she's saying that he would intentionally hold her really close to feel uh her breasts against his body um then she says uh he would rub her back for long periods of time uh an inappropriate uh again this is a this is a governor of a state and an executive assistant here it's important to understand what this looks like uh inappropriate interactions um left her so nervous she ate you said she would break out in hives and i thought to myself that's you know i i don't know like is that that's why i was licking her face i thought maybe there was honey in those those hives
but Cuomo actually confirms the hives thing saying that he noticed her with this blotchy skin on her neck and assumed she was just being nervous because of his dictation which again I'm glad he finished that word I knew it had the word
anyway dictation in it
think about this for a second here governor Cuomo stood next to executive assistant one on her left as they took a selfie with the right hand this is the photo we were talking about as executive assistant one held up the camera the governor moved his hand to grab her butt cheek and began to rub it.
The rubbing lasted at least five seconds.
Now,
take a moment.
Look at your clock if you have a second hand in front of you and time out how long it would be to rub an executive assistant's butt for five seconds.
Here we go.
Hand on butt now.
Oh my.
Hand off.
That's a lot of rubbing.
That's a lot of rubbing.
That's a lot of rubbing.
Eventually, they get to a situation where they're in the mansion.
And
she,
and she's pretty credible here for a couple of reasons.
Number one, she does say the thing that you mentioned, Pat.
He goes in for a kiss.
He goes under her blouse, cups her breast, goes through all this stuff
against her will.
And long enough, by the way, that she said she
looked at him and then looked down and could see
his hand.
Yeah.
Yeah, she describes it.
She says, I mean, he was like cupping my breast.
He cupped my breast.
I have to tell you, at that moment, I was in such shock that I could just tell you, I remember looking down and seeing his hand, seeing the top of my bra, and I remember it being like a little even, even the cup, the kind of bra to the point that I had to tell you that it didn't fit me properly.
It was a little loose.
I remember seeing exactly that.
I don't even understand what that means, but I'm going to go with it.
Well, I mean, what she's she's saying is she looked down and she was like, oh, you know, this doesn't fit me exactly right.
It doesn't keep predators out.
It's funny that you're mocking it because it's, I actually thought of something you said a million times when I read that, which is when you have a big, important moment in our life, you can see the paint on your wall and remember the color of the paint and the texture of the paint and all the weird details around.
And that's what she's citing here.
She had a moment that was so traumatic, it froze in time.
It froze in time.
What's interesting is this woman, who is the biggest, probably the worst complaint.
I mean, there's multiple issues here.
What year was it?
This is 2020?
Oh, my God.
Yeah.
So then how old were you?
Oh, my God.
Yeah.
I was 12.
I was 12 in 2020.
After the Me Too era, right?
After
two times,
he not only passes or puts in legislation that says everybody's got to stop with this sexual harassment and defines it, then
he also comes out and starts to tweet and take a real hard stand on sexual predators.
Yeah.
Amazing.
And says there's a zero tolerance policy.
Right.
But the reason we know about this, which is interesting, is that she, after all these accusations start coming out, she talks to her executive assistant friends, two at number two and number three in the report.
And they believe, because of the New York State Handbook, they are required by rule to report this.
So executive assistant one does not report it.
She's not trying to sink Cuomo.
The other two women go to the authorities and report it.
And that's how this comes out.
It really kind of makes it more believable.
I think so, too.
And there's multiple people like this.
The other big one that kind of came out yesterday is one we did not previously know about, which was a state trooper who was assigned to Cuomo's protection.
Protection.
Now, when I say...
So he's assaulting the person.
There's no protection for the woman who's providing him protection.
Right.
And when I say assigned to her protection, she was assigned to his protection only because Andrew Cuomo basically saw her and thought she was hot.
So she is, and we know this,
at least most of this.
We don't have him on record saying it was because she was hot.
But we do have records of her not being qualified for the job.
So she did not have enough experience to qualify as someone on his protective detail.
And he forced it through because he wanted her on there.
He's claiming, oh, well, I wanted diversity.
I wanted more women on
the protection.
Right.
In fact, to the point of he asked specifically for her, this one woman.
There was other women there.
He didn't ask for them.
Ask for this one woman to come on his protective detail.
The person who was in charge of this.
said,
all right, well, I looked into it and she's not qualified, so I'm not going to do anything.
Cuomo approaches this guy again and says, Hey, where's my girl?
Basically, like, I asked you to bring her on.
Where is she?
And he said, Well, she's not really
qualified, she doesn't have enough experience.
The next day, senior aide from the
governor's mansion calls the same person and says, Hey, by the way, we need to bring her on.
We're adjusting the rules on this particular requirement.
Hey, listen,
look,
like I say to all the babes, I got protection.
You know what I'm saying?
Bottoming.
So Cuomo's defense is, I do it with everybody.
You know what I mean?
Oh, okay.
All right.
All right.
I mean, I guess that could have been Osama bin Laden's, look, I blow up everybody.
You know?
I sexually assault everybody.
Yeah, yeah.
How dare you hike me down for it?
That's who I am.
If you commit genocide, you can't be charged with murder.
Right.
I'm killing everyone.
Yeah.
That's a pathetic defense.
His defense was pathetic on so many levels.
So he was creepy, too.
He did a weird defense.
The way he delivered it was weird.
He's so strange.
Awful.
Well, I do have a dramatic
recreation of his apology coming up.
Oh, my gosh.
I can't wait for this.
See, this is a good day to skip vacation.
So this trooper.
Well, interesting part, there's a lot of interesting stuff that goes on with the media as well.
His office intimidates the media multiple times.
This trooper, somehow one of the Albany papers got word of the story and was going to write about it and the people in cuomo's administration got ahead of it called the uh i think it was the albany times union and basically threatened uh the reporter and said you can't say this about this officer because what you'd be saying is that she only got her job because she's attractive and they had a female aide do this.
So basically a female aide calling a reporter and saying, how dare you assume that because she was attractive, she got this job?
Women can do things.
And if you run this report, you are saying women can't do things.
They're only there because they're attractive.
Oh, my God.
Now, utilizing this gender stuff, the diversity stuff, multiple times, they use that as their defense.
It's almost like
they don't mean it.
It's almost like they don't mean it, Clay.
Did it work?
It did.
They got to squash the report.
That's why we didn't know about it until this thing came out.
They also went after Lindsay Boylan, who was the first accuser, the one that is the strip poker accuser.
They went after her and leaked
private personnel files to media sources to the extent, and there's a couple media sources in there, who actively rejected them sending it, said, do not send me her personnel files.
And they sent them anyway to reporters who said they did not want them.
They still tried to trash her to the point where they printed them out and hand redacted.
These files so that other people wouldn't be seen in them.
So this was not like, oh, gosh, I sent you the wrong file or, oh, gee, they actually printed them out, hand-redacted them so that only she would be targeted in these particular complaints.
I mean,
this is an operation, and
it is, in my mind, a criminal operation.
Not just from Cuomo, by the way.
All of his top aides are all over the stuff,
taking out and executing criminal requests on his behalf over and over and over.
Why is the state not going after him?
Well, I think they are.
I mean, they're going to impeach him.
They're not pressing any charges.
At least Stefanik yesterday came out and said she thinks he should be not only impeached, but arrested.
And I think arguably that's true.
However,
you know, I doubt, you know, look, we know the realities of politics.
The idea that he's going to get arrested,
I think it's a small chance.
I think it's right.
But yeah, but impeachment, I think, look, every Democrat in the entire state is basically out there saying now he should not only resign, but be impeached.
You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.
There is a new report out now from the GOP, and Congressman Michael McCall, a Republican from Texas, is here to tell us all about it.
He is the one that ushered in its release.
Hello, Michael.
How are you, sir?
good morning, Glenn.
Thanks for having me.
You bet.
Now, so your report, the GOP report, finds the Wuhan lab was carrying out some suspicious activity just before the start of the pandemic.
What is the suspicious activity?
Well, you know, it goes back to the summer of 2019, the Chinese CDC and the actual director of the Wuhan lab expressed concern about the safety of the lab.
Then they began these major renovations that took place with respect to the air quality waste systems.
In September the 12th, they had this genetic sequencing database that they took offline in the middle of the night.
Finally, they bring in the top general for Kim Bio,
the chemical biological expert, to really take over the Wuhan lab.
This is in basically September, October timeframe.
Also, Gwen, we had the 2019 Military World Games.
9,000 athletes travel from around the world to Wuhan.
And then they describe it as a lockdown sort of ghost town.
And many of them come back infected with a flu-like virus consistent with COVID.
Finally, satellite imagery.
It's shown a lot of cars going to the hospitals.
And guess what's right in the middle of all the hospitals?
The Wuhan lab.
Well, that wet market was also just a couple hundred yards away, you know.
I mean, it probably came from the wet market, don't you think?
Yeah, that's
the
classic Chinese diversion.
The Communist Party lies.
They want you to think it's coming from the wet market when it's really coming from somewhere else.
And that's why they silence.
the doctors who start talking about this SARS-like virus.
Remember, under international health regulations, they had to were required to report this after SARS in 2004, but instead they hide it.
I call it the greatest cover-up in human history.
I think it is, and I think it's the biggest
turning into the most disastrous thing in all of human history.
When it comes to tragedies, this is
the Titanic on a global scale.
You say that you believe it was leaked from the lab.
And how did we find out that they were, you know,
sending people in to change the air conditioning and all of that right before the leak was announced?
Well, you know, my team did a very thorough and exhaustive investigation.
We have a classified annex to this, but this is really coming from open source.
We dug into it on the internet quite a bit.
They actually did report some of this, and we found it.
I think, you know, Glenn, what's most disturbing is what was actually happening at the lab at that time and the lack of safety protocols.
Even our own State Department had two cables warning that the, you know, the safety protocols weren't being followed.
And it's just gain of function, genetically modifying coronaviruses
to basically
manufacture in a lab a superstars-like virus with an eye towards making a vaccine for it.
And then they tried to cover that up.
And Peter Dozick is the main culprit here, the doctor who published papers with Dr.
Xi, the bat lady.
Remember, these bats are about a thousand miles away in a cave.
The specimens get taken all the way to Wuhan.
This was not a naturally occurring event out of a cave.
It was manufactured in the lab, and we have the papers to prove it.
They published papers about this genetic modification process.
And they were doing genetic modification on the lungs of mice at the same time and injecting that coronavirus
into the lungs of mice,
we know,
over the summer.
I mean,
it is the paperwork and the paper trail is so very clear, and it leads to Fauci and Peter Dadzig.
I mean, they were clearly doing that.
They admitted they were doing this.
The question is,
is anybody ever going to be asked to pay for this?
Is Fauci and Peter Dadzik, are they at least going to be
marked as part of the problem?
Well, they need to be held accountable.
You know,
unfortunately, the Democrats are in control.
They need to be called to Congress to testify about this.
We need a real investigation into this.
You know, you talk about commissions.
Why aren't we having a commission on this?
Why aren't we holding China accountable?
Why aren't we given access to the Wuhan lab?
Those archive databases hold the smoking gun, the proof that we need to prove that what they were doing is directly related to COVID-19.
But if you look at what Peter Dozick does,
he conspires with, he's actually an agent of the Teeth Republic of China, writes this Lancet letter to debunk this conspiracy theory that came from the lab.
Remember at the time President Trump was talking about it, many Republicans like myself were pointing to the lab.
So he gets 24 virologists to sign off on this medical journal with his
science, which, and this will blow you away.
They were literally able to
They could take the man-made fingerprints off of this so it looked like it was naturally occurring, which is really sinister.
And that's what they did.
And so then they make this argument that it couldn't possibly have come from the lab.
They lie to the world.
And then Fauci is the one who endorses this and is complicit.
And then you get into the NIH funding,
going which we haven't talked about yet, but the idea
that Dowsic is getting funding,
American taxpayer money from NIH, going into into the Wuhan lab with the Batla monster.
Yeah.
With the Batla.
And I don't know if you have...
We should talk off air because we have been doing investigations of our own and we're about to, we're a couple of weeks away from releasing some information on the cover-up.
The cover-up is very, very clear.
And there's a paper trail on it.
And I don't know if you've seen it and all the players involved, but Fauci is at the top of this.
Well, we've seen the emails.
We want to know,
obviously, NIH is approving the grant.
There's a relationship with Dodd.
Even the other day, I think Fauci said, you know, we would be negligent
not to have invested in the Wuhan lab, almost doubling down on this.
And we are going to get to the bottom of this, Quinn, whether it's the Democrats have no appetite for this.
And I don't,
for the life of me, understand why, but they don't.
They don't want to know what caused this and what can we do to stop it from ever happening again.
But you and I do, and Republicans do.
And it's our duty to the nation and the world to uncover the truth.
So the American people are so tired of some people, you know, January 6th people who did wrong.
They're in solitary confinement.
And the people who were behind the riots all during the summer, the Antifa that has been doing things in Portland for two years, they get off scot-free.
Andrew Cuomo, anyone, anyone else would be out by now.
But I think he's actually going to fight it.
Luckily, on that one, at least the president has come out and said he thinks he should resign, not demand it, but he thinks he should resign.
We're tired of nobody being held responsible for any of the things that are happening.
Are these people
are they going to be held responsible?
Can they be held responsible
in a Democratic Congress?
It's going to be hard because they, again, I chaired the giant task force, Glenn.
They were going to participate in the beginning.
And then Pelosi called a diversion.
As we got closer to the election, she thought it would favor President Trump, so she backed out of it.
We've called for hearings on this.
They consistently deny our ability to have a hearing on this.
And that's quite frankly why we just wrote our own report on this.
We're in the minority, but we have a responsibility to speak the truth, come out with a report, and then to your point, hold those accountable and responsible for what they did.
We're talking about 4.5 million people dead now and tens of trillions of dollars in economic devastation, and yet no one's held accountable.
And you cited all the other events
and no one's held accountable there.
And I think that's what people are tired of.
And, you know, I hope good patriots
like you and myself, what we did with this report, finally telling the truth about what happened, will hold those accountable.
I hope so too, Michael.
Thank you so much.
This is Congressman Michael McCall of the great state of Texas.
You can follow him on Twitter at Rep McCall, K-M-C-C-A-U-L,
or you can find him at mccall.house.gov.
Thank you so much, Michael.
Appreciate it.
This is the best of the Glenbeck program.
Yesterday on the program, I spent this time, 20 minutes, talking about an article that I read in the Federalist, and I wanted to get the author on.
His name is Spencer Lindquist.
He's a college student from Pepperdine University and an intern at the Federalist, and he wrote a fantastic column that I think everyone should read: The Left Has a Pedophilia Problem, and it's Out in the Open.
Let's go to Spencer.
Hi, Spencer.
Hi, thank you for having me on today.
You bet.
I found your
article not just fascinating, but incredibly brave.
You're exposing things that the left does, I mean, it is part of their religion.
I really, truly believe.
It's part of their religion, and they don't want it discussed the way you did.
Well, thank you.
That's absolutely right.
And what we're seeing right now is that the left's ideology is completely devoid of any form of limiting principle.
So they have degraded the sexual ethic of our country and of our civilization ever since the sexual revolution.
And right now, the latest casualty in that revolution is going to be the innocence of children if the right does not put a stop to this.
So let me ask, Manzer, is there anything more degrading than that?
I mean, I think we're at the bottom of the slippery slope, the one that they said didn't exist.
I think it's turning out and the slope is less of a slope and more of a cliff.
And we are tumbling down to that breakneck speed.
And the way that we are seeing this attempt to normalize pedophilia, I mean, we're seeing this, and there's a New York Times article the other day that referred to the rape of a 13-year-old as trading sex.
This is a homeless 13-year-old.
And this was referred to as trading sex.
I've had conversations with people
through my YouTube channel called The Pendulum, where people have told me at Fride Parade that they are, quote, down for the kink with kids.
We are seeing horrible, horrible pushes to normalize pedophilia from outlets like New York Times, The Washington Post, Vice.
This is a coordinated push, and this is a top-down push from elite interests in our society.
I'm just looking at the articles from Vice.
Are they the worst offender of this?
Because there's, what, 10 articles here.
This eight-year-old drag queen doesn't care what the haters say.
Photos of the fabulous kids of RuPaul's drag convention.
Meet the child stars of the controversial new wave of drag.
A pedophile opens up about being targeted by vigilantes.
A child rape victim on why society should be more empathetic to pedophiles.
Most child sex abusers are not pedophiles, experts say.
I spent a year with a non-offending pedophile.
I mean...
How about this one?
The current misconception is that every pedophile is a child molester, and if they're not, it's just a matter of time.
It's important to show the world that that is just not the case.
Those are all from vice.
And in one of those articles, they were discussing the idea of non-offending pedophiles.
And one of the pedophiles who they cited in that piece had actually been a foster parent and had been accused of raping a young girl.
So what they are doing is not only irresponsible because they are well aware of the consequences.
And this is not about tolerance or acceptance or love love is love.
Those are all rhetorical tools that are being used to advocate for the normalization of pedophilia.
And if we conservatives grant them that frame that this is about tolerance and acceptance, then we are not going to do the exact thing that conservatives are tasked with doing.
If we cannot conserve the innocence of youth, we have no business calling ourselves conservatives in the first place.
I don't know what's happening to my fellow Americans.
All this stuff is going on, and
we don't seem to do anything about it.
We're just starting to, I guess, accept it as inevitable.
I think what we have to realize as a country is that these small bites that have been taken out of our ethics,
out of our belief in really just basic decency,
let alone religious faith
in the wave of secularization, is that these small bites will never stop.
And one day we will wake up and we'll see exactly what's going on right now happening on an even larger scale.
I mean, we have academics in Ivy League institutions.
There is an associate professor named Joe Fischel, and he, in a piece called Keep Pride Nude, he argued that children should be exposed to adult nudity, to indecent exposure at pride parades.
So we are seeing this from some of the most powerful institutions in our society, from powerful media outlets like the Washington Post and the New York Times to the premier academic institutions like Yale, Ivy League institutions.
And we need to understand that this is a top-down push.
The American people do not want this.
There is no grassroots desire for this.
This is something that has been foisted on us by the elites in our country.
And it seems that they have some sort of vested interest in quickly normalizing pedophilia.
As the GQ writer over in the UK, someone needs to create porn for children.
Hear me out.
Young teens are already watching porn, but they're finding hardcore, aggressive videos that give terrible views of sex.
They need entry-level porn, a softcore site where everyone asks for consent and no one gets choked.
Absolutely, absolutely disgusting.
And the one thing I think that we can be thankful about is that they are so out in the open about this.
They are so out in the open.
They have become emboldened and they believe that this is something that the American people are going to accept.
But what it is, is it's a humiliation ritual, quite frankly, because they think that if we'll accept this, then what won't we accept?
What agenda will we not accept if the degradation of our youth is allowed to continue?
I don't think there's been a time in American history where the youth have been
in more danger than right now.
You send them to school where they're supposed to be taught the things that we all supposedly believe in.
They're taught to hate their country.
They're taught to either say they can't make it because they're not white, or if they are white, that they are responsible and should be guilty all the time.
Then they get online
and
they can see and engage in anything.
Pedophiles are now openly coming out and we are being the society is being numbed to the point to where we're not standing up about this.
And I have to tell you, I just, I mean, I don't, can you think of a time in American history, any time in American history, where our children were in this much danger.
None whatsoever.
I can't think of any time in our history that children have been in so much danger.
And quite frankly, what we need to do, and one of the first steps of this solution, is to cast off any form of belief that the insults or the framing that the left uses is legitimate or in good faith in the slightest, because it isn't.
When you're called a homophobe or a bigot, you have to understand that these are buzzwords that are used to try and threaten your livelihood, threaten your career, threaten your reputation.
But there's a whole lot more at risk than just our reputations or our careers.
The future of our country is at risk.
The innocence of America's children is at risk.
And if we don't stand up for that, then we have, once again, we have no business calling ourselves conservatives.
It is one of the defining fights of our time.
One of the things in your article that I was not aware of was the San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus.
And they performed a song with,
I thought, pretty revealing lyrics.
You think we'll corrupt your kids if our agenda goes unchecked?
Fine.
Just this once, you're correct.
Then they followed up with we'll convert your children happens bit by bit, quietly and subtly, and you'll barely notice it.
Now, they say that this is a joke, but I think the left always does this.
They'll say, this was just an academic paper, or this was a joke.
But in this case,
You seem to
present evidence that it is definitely not a joke, at least to a lot of people in this choir.
It very much seems that it is not a joke in the slightest.
The two people that actually wrote the song,
they recently wrote a play that's all about Bachabazi, which translates to boyplay.
And that is a very, very disgusting, disgusting tradition in certain areas of the Middle East.
Can you, without becoming graphic,
explain what that is?
So, Bajabazi translates to boy play,
and essentially, there are young boys who are groomed
to dance for men, and it goes farther than just dancing.
But they built an entire play around this, and then these are the people who are writing this song.
And we're supposed to believe that this is just a joke, this is not a joke, this is not a joke, and there is a consistent trend of this happening in society.
So, once they got called out on it, they tried to walk it back.
We cannot let them walk it back.
This is disgusting.
We have to call it out for what it is.
So
who is the main source?
Who should we be
looking at to, I don't know, boycott, speak out?
What should we do?
Because it doesn't seem like anybody in Washington is doing anything about anything.
The first thing that we have to do is for all the parents out there, you have to understand that your children's mind, your children's safety, your children's future is at risk.
And our first responsibility is to our youth and to defending the youth in your life who you have the ability to guide and protect.
And past that, there is no way around this other than to engage in social shaming.
People who say that we should be sexualizing children, they should have no seat at the table.
If there's any, any use for a cancel culture, it is for people who are pushing for the normalization of pedophilia.
This is completely intolerable and has to be treated as such.
Why do you feel so passionately about this?
I mean, you know,
there's a ton of things going on, and you don't hear a lot of people talking about this.
Is it just because nobody's talking about it?
That really is a huge part of why I'm so passionate about this.
And also, it's just about,
I mean, what do we want our future society to look like, right?
The people who are going to shape our society are the young men and women, young, you know, boys and girls who will eventually be the men and women who lead this country.
And if we allow the left to poison them,
whether through things of a sexual nature, like I discussed in my article, or through critical race theory that teaches them to hate themselves and each other, if we allow the youth to be completely captivated and controlled by the left, we have a very dark future ahead of us.
If we do not defend them, then everything else, every policy disagreement is completely erased.
You are chief of staff of the California College Republicans.
Just a real quick comment on how you think things are going to work out with Gavin Newsom.
And I saw the poll numbers today.
It looks like it's getting very, very close.
And one Republican seems to be standing out.
Well, the California College Republicans, our board just unanimously voted to endorse Larry Elder.
So I'm very, very excited for his campaign.
And the California College Republicans are very, very excited to take a role in supporting him.
Newsom has absolutely, his administration has been trainwreck for California.
And we've seen a state that
has already been struggling, just absolutely, absolutely decline at a breakneck pace.
I've seen San Francisco, and if you look at it, when I was a child, when I went there on family day trips versus now, it has gotten immeasurably worse.
And the Newsom administration is largely responsible for a lot of the decline that we've seen in recent years.
Spencer, thank you so much.
God bless.
Keep up the good work.
An intern at the Federalist college student at Pepperdine, Spencer Lindquist.