Best of The Program | Guests: Bill O’Reilly & State Rep. Cezar McKnight | 3/26/21

For a limited time at McDonald's, get a Big Mac extra-value meal for $8.

That means two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun, and medium fries, and a drink.

We may need to change that jingle.

Prices and participation may vary.

You know,

I just have to tell you, Stu.

I uh.

Different check.

I think you started out the last hour of the podcast trying to make fun of me.

And I think by the end, I turned it around and everybody went, Wow, Stu is a loser.

What a great point!

Hmm, that's that's how you saw that one, huh?

Yeah, that's unfortunately how I saw it.

Okay, welcome to the podcast.

Uh,

you'll have to listen to that last part of the podcast yourself, and you decide uh, you know, how big of an idiot Stu really is in the end.

Um, we talked to Bill O'Reilly, we go over all of the uh clips from Joe Biden last night.

What

What a circus.

No, what a sad state the country is in when our president speaks like that.

That does not instill confidence in anyone.

It's terrifying to watch.

I mean, if you think about your president, whether you like him or not, this is still the guy who's running

the executive branch of this government.

Just think, and this is not going to happen, thank God, but just think.

Let's say the Russians decide to launch missiles,

this could happen, into, you know, someplace, Ukraine,

and they are threatening missile launch, and somebody runs into

the Oval Office and says, Mr.

President, we have to make a decision right now.

Oh, my gosh.

Do you feel comfortable with that?

Watch Russia.

They know this.

Wow.

So anyway, we go into that.

We also talk to you a little bit about the gun control that's happening.

And like I said, Stu looks like an idiot by the end of the podcast.

What a better way to end it.

Bill O'Reilly, as well.

Don't forget.

Blazetv.com/slash Glenn is the place to go.

The promo code is control right now.

You can get 20% off your subscription.

By the way, I said Bill O'Reilly at the beginning.

It shows that Stu never listens to me.

Yeah, and you'll learn that at the end of the podcast, too.

I could say that Scott Atlas was also on the podcast.

Scott Atlas is also on the podcast.

I don't know if

anyone knows that.

But you could check that out.

Don't forget to subscribe to this podcast, Rate and Review, as well as the podcast Stu Does America available right now for

self-promotion.

Here's the podcast.

You're listening to

the best of the Blenbeck program.

And now, things that don't suck Friday.

Yes, yes, indeed it is.

Things, not everything sucks.

Not everything.

I mean,

yeah,

I'm going to go go out on a limb.

Not everything.

Not everything sucks.

There are some good things that are happening.

We just told you about what was happening in South Carolina and all over the country for people who are trying to stand for the Second Amendment.

And there is a big push now, and everybody is

going back and forth on transgender

issues with...

people competing against women in women's sports who used to be a man, yada, yada.

And it's been very, very divisive.

And of course, if you are on one side, you're a homophobe bigot.

If you're on the other side, you can do no wrong.

How do we get past all of this?

We get past all of this by people just having some common sense and looking at some issues with common sense.

The fact that you can have, that the state will allow your child

to have

life-altering drugs.

When there, what was the last one I saw that the parents lost the right at like eight years old

and the child decided they wanted to be a different gender and the state said, yep, sorry.

And the parents are like, wait, wait, wait, what?

Eight, twelve, fifteen.

If you want to do something to your body, that's fine.

But once your your brain has fully developed is probably a good standard.

There is a Democrat that is pushing a trans surgery ban for minors.

Now, he's a black Democrat, and I want to start right away.

First of all, welcome to the program, Cesar McKnight.

How are you, sir?

Good morning, Glenn.

How are you?

I'm good.

I first want to start by giving you the opportunity, and

I so despise that this has to be done.

But you're not homophobic, you're not transphobic, you're none of the phobics, correct?

You're absolutely right.

And in fact,

to further display

the fact that I'm not phobic in any way, I was one of the chief persons on our judiciary committee fighting to put in protections in our hate crime bill for transgender, for LGTBQ people.

I mean, there was a, they stripped it out in the beginning in the subcommittee, and in the full committee, we were able to put it back in.

So I have to tell people, are you going to, why don't you judge me by what I've done?

And that is, I've worked hard to make sure that transgender people are protected from acts of violence.

Right.

So when I hear someone tell me I'm transphobic, I laugh at that.

Right.

And it's crazy how, no matter what you did in the past, does not matter unless you're 100% on board right now.

So tell me what you're

what you're trying to do in South Carolina.

This becoming a South Carolina doesn't suck hour.

Well, what is it you're trying to do?

Essentially, what this bill does is House Bill 4047 says that no child in South Carolina will be able to undergo transgender surgery or transgender hormonal therapy under the age of 18.

So if a person's under the age of 18, they cannot have transgender surgery.

Anyone older than 18, they can.

That's all it does.

And why do you think, why are you giving 18?

I mean,

why are you coming up with that?

Well, actually,

science says that people don't fully develop with regard to their brain until they're 25.

Right.

But

I wanted to reach a compromise.

I knew 25 would be a bit extreme.

We allow kids to smoke cigarettes at 18.

We allowed them to get tattoos at 18.

Right.

So, okay, I see this as a compromise.

Yeah, I saw you say that, you know, it's a little unreasonable that you can't get a tattoo until you're 18, but heck, you could go have, you know, hormonal blocking drugs, you know, when you're 12.

Go ahead.

It's ridiculous.

It's simply ridiculous.

And I want you to understand that I've gotten some significant blowback, but I've also gotten some significant support, particularly from people who are transgender and LGBT.

They're just some people that have a political agenda, and if you aren't 1,000% with them, you're their archenemy.

I've been in the state legislature now for going on eight years.

I don't deal like that.

That's not how you get things done.

I compromise with people.

The things that I can work with you on, I work with you on, and the things that I can't, I won't work with you on, but I won't demonize you at the same time either.

You know,

it's interesting to me that because I think I know a lot of gay people, I don't think, no, I don't have any transgender friends, but wouldn't be opposed to it.

But

it's amazing to me that

usually the ones in the gay community that I know are,

you know, they've pushed for gay rights and gay marriage, et cetera, et cetera.

But then

after that pass, they're kind of like, what is the rest of this?

What is happening to us?

And it is those few that have this extreme agenda that are pushing it.

And I, quite honestly, I see that from a lot of white people on the African American community.

Yeah, and what I've tried to tell my white progressive friends is that African Americans tend to be much more socially conservative than their white progressive counterparts.

I'll give you an example.

In my legislative district, I've got nothing but overwhelming support from this bill.

I've had people who are the head of my ministerial alliance reach out to me.

They are all supportive of this.

And my legislative district is almost almost 65% African American.

And even the white evangelicals that live in my community have told me, We never voted for you before, but we will vote for you now.

So to me, this issue is a win-win issue at home.

And my job, number one, in the legislature, is to take care of home.

So they're happy, I'm happy.

Let me ask you this:

because we just had Tom Corbin on from South Carolina, be interested in what you thought of his

unorganized militia bill.

I haven't really had an opportunity to study that bill in particular, but what I will tell you is where I stand on the Second Amendment.

I'm very much so pro Second Amendment.

I'll just give you a brief history.

My parents ran a nightclub, liquor store, a bail bonding company, and a taxicab company.

It's the most dangerous business

you could have.

It's like, and we did it well in war.

I mean, that's a wow.

And

I said all that to say this.

I'm not going to put any American citizen in a position to where they can't protect themselves.

I wouldn't do it to my parents, and I'm not going to do it to anyone else.

So that's where I, I'm an avid hunter, I own firearms, I ski shoot regularly, and I think that we have, you can have responsible gun ownership in this country, and that's where I stand.

And I'm not going to support anything that's going to take away the rights of citizens to bear arms.

I'm not.

As a Democrat, how do we speak to other, you know, Democrats that have not gone all woke and crazy about the modern sporting rifle?

It's an AR

is what people use to hunt now.

How do we explain an AR looks spooky, but it's not any different?

It's kind of hard for me to explain it to anyone.

I was in the Army, so I know how to use an AR-15.

I mean, that's what you learn in basic training.

And I think that all the people that are giving the most, you know, the most forceful blowback of talking about the AR-15 have never used one.

They've never been to a rifle range.

And they're trying to put this one-size-fits-all gun control thing on all of America.

What works in New York City does not work in King Street, South Carolina.

So I think it's a local issue, and you need to let your local legislature speak to those issues.

So in your district,

how is Biden doing?

How are the national Democrats doing?

Is there

well vice president,

pardon me, President Biden is very well liked in my legislative district.

They really like President Biden.

They know him.

They trust him.

Speaker Pelosi, Leader Schumer,

they're not as highly regarded.

Again, you're talking about San Francisco and New York City.

So there's not a lot of commonality there.

I mean, this is the land of barbecue, macaroni, and cheese, and various other southern dishes.

There ain't no tofu in Praetory, South Carolina.

So

they're not as well regarded as Joe Biden is.

Representative Cesar McKnight from South Carolina, a Democrat.

And a Democrat,

I'm glad you're in office.

Thank you so much.

God bless you.

Thank you.

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Good golly, Mr.

Bill O'Reilly.

How are you, sir?

I'm okay, Beck.

Thank you for asking.

Thanks for having me on.

You bet.

We're going to have to

have to cut our time short today because we're just so jam-packed with things to do.

But I want to get through all the things that you think are important.

Let's start with the president's press conference.

Okay.

First of all, I think you should take a listener poll on whether you should cut me short.

I think I've already taken it.

Why do you think you're cutting me short?

I got nothing after you.

I've got to do that.

Okay.

Okay.

Presidential press conference, I am going to quote Dion.

Okay.

All right.

All right.

Remember Dion?

Dion the Belmont?

Barely.

Barely.

I know.

All right, Barry.

Okay.

I'm quoting Dion.

Ready?

Yes.

They call me the wanderer, the wanderer.

I roam around and around and around.

Unquote, Dion.

That is, it is amazing how bad it was yesterday.

Well, I'm nicknaming President Biden the Wanderer

because he gets up there and he just goes wherever he wants to go.

He ruminates, word of the day, ruminates for stew.

But the problem is that many times when he's ruminating and wandering, he forgets what his train of thought is.

He can't bring it back.

So I'm talking to Glenn Beck now, everyone,

and we're having a discussion about the presidential press conference, and I'm making some wise guy comments.

But,

you know, if I forget my train of thought,

then the whole thing crashes.

He's not able to bring it back.

All right.

And that is a little troubling.

And the other thing that was troubling yesterday is that he misstated facts.

I mean big,

big facts.

Now, I got a whole bunch of mail here in my lap from billorilly.com viewers because we do TV every night, as you know.

And they, oh, he's lying.

He's lying.

He's lying.

I don't think he knows what he's saying.

Oh,

may I give you an example of this?

Can we play the part on infrastructure?

This is from the same press conference, literally 60 seconds apart from each other.

Here's cut one.

I still think the majority of the American people

don't like the fact that we are now ranked, what, 85th in the world in infrastructure?

I mean.

Okay, stop.

85th in the world.

60 seconds later, here he is.

We have somewhere

in terms of infrastructure,

we have we rank 13th globally in infrastructure.

Wait a minute.

We live in such a high-tech age, it just whipped right in 30 seconds up from 85 to 13.

You are agreeing with me, Beck, that he doesn't know.

He doesn't know.

He has no idea.

Here's the important part of this.

Okay?

He said, I'm quoting President Biden.

There is a significant increase in the number of people coming to the border in the winter months of January, February, March.

It happens every

year.

Okay?

So he's denying that there's a border surge.

That's unusual.

The truth is that between February 20th, that's Trump in 2020, and February 2021, Border Patrol apprehensions are up 174%.

Yeah, but only 174.

Yeah, actually.

I mean, that's only 13%.

So you get the President President of the United States looking into the camera going, hey, you know, this is not any problem.

This always happens.

It's not any worse now.

Total

lie.

100% lie or 174%.

Right, right.

Okay.

So.

Which is only 3%.

You would think that the press corps would know

that this was fallacious.

Another word of the day.

Right.

And because they come armed with the facts, the press corps does.

You know, everybody knows how good and brilliant they are.

Not one challenge to that, and not one stat quoted by the nine reporters who were called upon.

See, you interview a president in a fact-based way.

You don't give them room to run like Yamachi El Cindo, what is her name, that PBS person?

I mean,

she should be the PBS correspondent and Biden spokesperson.

Just run from seat to the podium and run back.

Okay?

I mean, is it, and she was second.

Oh, yeah, Muccia.

Where did we find your mind?

Oh, you're the greatest.

Okay, thank you.

But it's disturbing for me as an American, not just as a journalist, all right, to see the president of the United States, and Biden believes it.

And people don't believe me when I tell you this.

He believes there's no problem down there.

Oh, no, no, no.

You've said this for the last couple of weeks, that you think he is so out of touch that he has really, truly no idea what's going on.

Along with Elvis, he's left the building.

Okay?

He does.

Well, but he's had a good, I mean, he's had a good long run.

Could you please

play Biden enter the Senate?

This is him yesterday.

Do you have it?

Biden enters the Senate.

Yeah, we have to.

With regard to the filibuster, I believe we should go back to a position of the filibuster that existed just when I came to the United States Senate 120 years ago.

If it holds near and dear to the state,

that was a joke.

That was a jest.

No, it wasn't.

Yes, it was.

No, it wasn't.

Yes, it was.

No, it wasn't.

That was a jest.

Okay?

You think so?

Yes.

Yes.

He was trying to be funny, but he didn't pause and smile because he doesn't know what he's saying.

I'm telling you,

look, he came in with 150 pages of notes, giant crayon written notes, giant notes.

All right?

Yeah.

He doesn't know.

Wait, wait, wait, wait.

Have you ever seen in a press conference

Wallace said last night, who's not a, you know, he's not exactly anti-Biden.

He came out and said...

This is the same Chris Wallace that said that Biden gave the greatest and honorable speech of all time.

Yes.

Yes.

Okay.

So he came out and he said last night, I covered Reagan, and I've never seen a president come out with talking point notes like Joe Biden did.

Do you agree with that?

Yeah, and they were written in crayon, John.

No, they were not.

They were not.

They were typed out.

No, he comes out and

he should say it.

He should just say it.

Hey, I got a whole bunch of notes here because I don't want to screw up.

If he said that, most Americans go, okay.

Yeah.

Okay.

You know, I understand.

You don't want to screw up, so you're going to be precise and read off the page.

Because he knew the China question was coming.

And so the China question comes.

He looks down.

He reads the whole answer, and that's that.

But this, I just want to make one more point because this is clearly,

clearly.

should be worrisome for the American people.

And this was the absolute nadir, third word of the day, of the press conference.

He looks into the camera, the president of the United States says, you know what?

Here's how we're solving the border thing.

And remember, we have hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals pouring into the United States.

Hundreds of thousands.

All right.

Here's how I'm solving it.

I'm going to send Vice President Harris down to Central America with $700 million and get to the root causes of why the people are coming here.

I'm going,

does anyone on earth think that this is going to solve the problem?

Does anyone on earth not know

why millions of people in third world countries want to live in the United States?

Does anyone not know that?

We have to spend $700 million on root causes.

Here it is, Joe Biden.

If you live in Honduras, you don't have anything.

You will never have anything.

If you come here, you could work hard and build a good life.

That's it.

We don't need Kamala Harris to go down there and tell us that.

You are not going to solve a problem that's been underway since the Aztecs.

Do you get it?

Oh, my God.

I'm sitting there.

It's just, it's almost like third grade again.

I'm flashing back to St.

Bridget's School.

It's third grade.

This guy is at that level.

Bill, tell me how you think we're moving on gun control.

What do you foresee happening here?

Well, it's not going to be a issue that's resolved

because the Second Amendment is fairly clear and the Supreme Court, as comprised, is not going to ban, allow any bans or confiscation or anything like that.

So all the people who want their guns and love the guns and that kind of thing,

you don't have to worry.

But what could happen

is you could have public safety compromises.

For example, if you buy an AR,

then you would register the AR so that people would know if it's stolen,

if you are a lunatic, all of a sudden that you have a heavy weapon in your house.

I don't think that's unreasonable, but you're never going to get it unless the progressive left, the Democratic Party,

compromises on gun crimes themselves.

See, the stats are that mass murder, like in Colorado and Atlanta, comprise 0.02% of all gun homicides.

And that comes from a University of California Davis study, not exactly a conservative bastion.

So this is not the essential problem of gun violence in America.

The problem is criminals selling narcotics or holding up stores using guns.

That's where 76%

of the homicides occur.

But the progressive left doesn't want to do anything about that.

In fact, they are letting gun criminals out of jail in Chicago and New York City.

Do you know that?

Which is why, Bill, quite honestly, I don't buy into your first theory, because I believe you on the second.

I know those stats are right.

Your first theory is that you don't have anything to worry about.

They're not doing this for common sense.

They can't overcome the Supreme Court.

So

when you say they, yeah.

Might it pass the House?

Yeah.

Could it they jam it through the Senate?

I doubt it.

But it's possible.

But as soon as they do and Biden signs it, there'll be a federal

court challenge, and it'll be stayed, and the Supreme Court will hear it.

It wasn't the last time they had an AR ban.

Well, that was way back in what, 2008?

2004 is when it slipped through.

The Supreme Court is,

Beck, as you know, the court is much different now than it was back then.

And the country is so polarized now, way more than it was back then.

I mean, Bush, he wanted that.

The Republican president wanted that.

Remember?

Now,

Republicans don't want any part of the progressive central government telling them what they can and can't do.

Am I correct?

Yes, you are.

There's not one traditional conservative that wants the federal government to have more power.

Not one.

So we're living in a totally different country now.

Let me go to the filibuster.

Last night, here's what Joe Biden said about the filibuster.

The one I asked for is.

50 votes

so that the Vice President of the United States can break the tie, or I get 51 votes without her.

And so I'm going to say something outrageous.

I have never been particularly poor at calculating how to get things done in the United States Senate.

So the best way to get something done,

if it holds near and dear to you, that you

like to be able to,

anyway,

we're ready to get a lot done.

And if we have to, if there's complete lockdown and chaos as a consequence of the filibuster, then we'll have to go beyond what I'm talking about.

What does he mean by that?

Well, he means that he's going to do what he's told to do.

That's what he means.

So if they tell him they being Susan Rice and McClain, Ron Klain,

the chief of staff, they tell him, you know, Mr.

President, we got to really knock the filibuster out.

So you got to get behind that.

And

he will.

I mean, he's going to do what he's told to do.

He doesn't have any principles.

That's gone.

This is a guy who is in the White House, who is absolutely incapable of making an independent decision.

Would you agree with me?

Sadly, I would.

Sadly, I would.

That's where we are as a country.

And I'll tell you what, next year, 2022, if Americans don't wise up and it's not the Republican Party is so great.

They're not.

They're not.

But these people are dangerous.

These progressive left people are dangerous to your freedom, to your family.

And if you don't get it now by watching what's happening in this country, if you don't get it, then you're going to lose your country.

And I'm not saying that with any exaggeration.

You're going to lose your personal freedom.

You're going to lose your money.

They're coming after your assets.

You want that?

Continue to vote Democrats into office.

Yes or no question here, Bill.

I just did what the Washington Post did,

the Washington Post Reports podcast, which was covering this?

They then never mentioned the huge gaffe where he completely lost control of his faculties in the middle.

Is that worth covering or not?

No, I'm not for the Washington Post.

That's not a newspaper.

Okay, all right.

Bill, we've got about

60 or 80 seconds left.

All right.

Okay, Beck.

Here we go.

Ready?

Yes.

Get a pen, get a paper.

I got it.

Pre-order killing the mob on billorilly.com.

You get 50% off killing crazy Crazy Horse, which just passed $500,000 and a half million in sales last week.

Pretty good because there are no bookstores open.

Killing the Mob.

I sent it to Beck.

Someone will read it to him.

No, you have not sent it to me.

Yes, I have.

Okay, Pinocchio.

Anyway, you'll love it.

You're going to read it.

You'll like Crazy Horse.

Bing.

And then please consider premium membership on billorilly.com.

You just heard Beck and I.

All right, we gave you the truth, the unvarnished truth, which you're not going to get in the the Washington Post or on cable or on network news.

Okay, consider it premium membership to billoreilly.com.

Always a pleasure to have

a conversation with you, Beck.

Thank you very much, sir.

Mr.

Bill O'Reilly.

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Normally, on Friday we continue with Bill O'Reilly

and that's always entertaining and important.

However, there is something that is happening in the podcast that has been downloaded yesterday for Blaze TV subscribers.

It will be available for everyone tomorrow wherever you get your podcast.

But I urge you to listen to it.

Now, this is not something that is going to be mainstream.

And the reason why is because this is kind of like when I talk about Woodrow Wilson.

Now, everybody, and it might have been you, at one point, if you're a longtime listener of mine, you'd go, Why is this guy continually talking about Woodrow Wilson?

And then all of a sudden, you got it, and you were like, Oh my gosh, that's so important that I know that.

Now I understand the progressive movement, right?

They are now saying that they are looking for for right-wing extremists.

And the media and everybody else is saying that they're Christians,

that they're white supremacists, etc., etc.

And you and I both know that's not true.

However, what I know that you most likely don't know is that there is a global movement that is now here in America.

And I've been warning about it for how long, Stu?

At least a decade?

Years and years and years for sure.

Years and years and years.

And it has fallen on deaf ears.

And I'm begging you, please listen to this podcast.

This is going to play a role and it will be a very dangerous road.

It is capital T traditionalism.

And if you've ever heard me talk about Alexander Dugan,

this is what he is pushing.

And it is happening in Europe, and it is now here in America.

There are three leaders, global leaders of this movement.

Two of them now live in America.

One, I don't think, really affects us because all of his influence is in South America.

Some reason or another, he's decided to move here to America, but he still is influential in South America and Brazil in particular.

The other one is very involved here, and you you will know the name.

First, let's go to

what is traditionalism.

Listen from the podcast.

If the average person was asked to define what a traditionalist is, I might define myself as a traditionalist.

I believe in the Constitution.

I believe in the founding fathers.

I believe in America.

I go to church on Sundays.

I believe in

God and mom and apple pie and Chevrolet.

But that's not what we're talking about.

Everything that you just described, I think, could be labeled traditionalist with a lowercase T.

And that's the only little bit of help that we get here in identifying what this is.

When we talk about an uppercase T traditionalism, we're talking about a very, very small spiritual and eventually political movement that really comes into existence in the early 1900s.

And yes, they might share with you a belief that things used to be better or that maybe the principles that we should live our lives through today

and which we should hold to in the future were established in the past.

And therefore that we should be critical of the notion of progress, right?

But they wrap all that in something far more arcane and esoteric.

And they wrap it all in a sort of worship worship of the past and also a belief that where we are headed right now is going to lead us to destruction, and that that destruction is good and necessary.

And Dugan describes this as, and we'll get into who Alexander Dugan is in a little while, but

I don't know if this is the way the American traditionalists, and we'll explain what that means here in a minute,

Dugan describes this as

the apocalypse or the end of the world as described biblically, but they're working to bring it on because it's good.

Yes.

Okay.

Yes.

And that's the way it is with traditionalists all around the world.

It is really the biblical apocalypse.

Not quite.

Okay.

So maybe right here is where we start to see a distinction between, let's say, a conservative Christian and one of these capital T traditionalists.

So

the way, let's say in the apocalypse that you would hear about in the Bible, in that biblical tradition, it tends to be followed by some sort of heavenly utopia.

Right.

Right.

A rapture.

Right.

The traditionalists instead see an earthly apocalypse as being the prelude to an earthly utopia.

And it's in this that might seem like a small difference there.

So there's no Jesus returning on this one.

Not in the sense that they are talking about.

No, they are talking about human society, secular, political, worldly, material society, returning to a utopia.

And again, that might seem like a small difference, but it means that

destruction can become the tool of a politician.

This is

heady stuff.

But it is critically important.

I have studied this for a long time.

The podcast is with Benjamin Teitelbaum.

And he is a guy, I swear to you,

he's a professor,

but he's not a crazy professor.

And he also, I don't think he agrees with me on, you know, all of the policies, but we agree on principles.

And

he is not crazy, nor is he wrong.

And

when I found him months ago,

I was like, you're my brother.

Man, I feel like I found a brother because there's only the two of us that are ringing this bell.

And he has spent 10 years studying this.

And it is critical that you understand because as he says in this,

This is not a biblical apocalypse.

This is a mystical apocalypse.

They believe that there was this great spirituality.

We're talking about paganism.

We're talking about

the Druids and things like this, that there was this great

understanding of spiritualism in the time of the Vikings, etc., etc.

And the only place that still has this, see if this sounds familiar to you, Stu, the only place that really still kind of has this is India.

And India is the home, they think, of still this original people.

The original people, they left India and they kind of went north into Europe.

They became the Vikings and

all of the Tessarek and all of that stuff.

Is this any of this sound familiar?

Sound familiar, yeah.

Okay.

Who else did this?

Who else talked about this?

Who else centered their entire movement on this?

I mean, this was the Nazi movement.

Exactly right.

Everyone thinks that the Nazis were Christians.

No, they used Christianity.

They believed in this kind of stuff.

And what this movement is doing is infiltrating in our churches.

And it is traditionalism.

Look,

who's your, for instance, in Russia, who's the biggest defender of the Orthodox Church in Russia?

The Russian Orthodox Church.

Putin.

Who's the one standing up against,

you know, lesbian marriage?

Putin.

Who's the one standing up against transgenderism?

Putin.

How's he doing it?

Because the church teaches it's wrong.

He images himself as the defender of the church.

This is

in Brazil and South America, and it is in here in America in our politics.

And it is a stealth foreign body

that conservatives, if you don't pay attention, you will get swept up and you will stand with people that you think are on your side because

we're against big state.

We think the whole thing should just be shut down and rebooted, restarted.

They don't believe in individual rights.

They believe in a global movement.

You have to go beyond the surface.

And if you don't know this,

chances are you could go down the road and you will be on the wrong side.

This is dark,

dark stuff.

This is really evil stuff.

I got to listen to this one.

This is this weekend.

Does it come out tomorrow?

No, it's out now for Blaze TV subscribers.

Oh, I canceled my subscription.

Oh, did you really?

Yeah, it'll come out soon.

Who Does America was very I didn't like that you'll come out of tomorrow.

But you know who the leader is here in America.

And I intentionally don't say who the leader is

until about a half hour or so into it because I need you to understand it first.

And when you, by the way, it's not Donald Trump.

When you hear who the leader of this is and who is, who sat with this guy

on record and talked about it in detail

and

had no problem hiding any of it,

it will show you

how

deep this already is in America.

And you are going to be blamed for all kinds of things if you don't cut this out.

If you have, and I'm telling you, American churches have already taken financing from these people because

they don't know the difference.

They don't know the difference.

Now, this is not what the left is talking about.

It's not what the media is talking about.

This is a real threat to the right.

And

I can only ring the bell.

What you do with it is up to you.

But

you need to watch this.

You need to understand this and take it for more than just the podcast.

Do your own homework after and do everything you can to make sure that those around you who believe in small government and the Constitution,

the people involved with this, do not believe in the Enlightenment.

They think that was a mistake.

Does that sound familiar?

That's also on the left.

That's why this is traditionally not a right movement in America, but they are piggybacking onto it like a leech.

And you need to understand it.

It's available now for subscribers to Blaze TV.

If you're you're not a subscriber,

we take,

we're out front.

We're the largest right-leaning subscription service in the world

because of you.

But even that, the forces that are arrayed against us, Google, Facebook, the federal government, everybody,

You are the last line of defense.

And if you find the information that we provide for you in our research,

if you think that is important

and you benefit from it, or your children or grandchildren benefit from it, I urge you to join our team and become a subscriber at blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

We'll save 20 bucks for you right now if you use the promo code control.

That's up after today.

So please go to blazetv.com/slash glenn promo code control.