Merrick Garland’s Real Job | Guests: Bob Woodson & Robert Charles | 2/23/21

How does PwC take your company to the leading edge?

They bring the sharpest minds in tech to your team so you can bring the ideas that will transform your business.

They're passionate about your industry, so you can walk into any room with every advantage.

And they're with you every step of the way so you can know you're headed in the right direction.

PwC builds for what's next so you can get there now.

Get started at pwc.com/slash us slash leading edge.

Rough Greens is our sponsor this half hour.

I have a completely different dog in Uno.

I mean, a completely different dog.

I don't know if you've seen as much as I have, but it's way beyond eating.

It is his energy level.

It is his coat.

It's his attitude.

Yeah, I wonder.

Part of me thought the other day, like, what if we ate vegetables?

Would that help us?

Let's not think that hard.

I think this is,

I think this is not vegetables.

This is this is

only for dogs.

Yeah, this is probiotics and stuff.

That's science, man.

Are you a doctor?

No, I am.

Okay.

Get your bag for your dog of Rough Greens.

Right now, you can just try it out.

Make sure your dog loves it as much as mine.

All you'll pay for is the shipping.

So it's the first bag is free.

Just pay for shipping.

Go to roughgreens.com/slash Beck.

R-U-F-F greens.com/slash Beck or call 833-G-L-E-N-N33.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This

is

the Glenbeck Program.

From behind my cardboard microphone with talent on loan from Lenny.

Don't ask any questions, but he didn't eat his talent today.

This is the Glenbeck program.

We've got stuff on Merit Garland.

We're going to do our best to curb our whiteness.

for a little while at least today.

Also,

who

is the fascist?

Who is the dictator?

The latest from the Democrats in Washington.

That'll chill you to the bone.

But let's start with your whiteness.

We do that in 60 seconds.

Racist

money.

The Glenn Beck program.

That's me.

I should talk about Relief Factor.

Susan lives in Texas.

She suffered with pain in one of her legs for 30 years due to injuries she sustained from working out.

See, I told you.

Why work out?

It only leads to injuries.

She was in 30 years of pain.

Man.

At any rate, Susan being in pain was just part of her life until the day she started hearing me talk about Relief Factor, decided she would at least give it a try.

I want you to imagine what it would be like to go from having pain in your legs for 30 years and then in a course of a couple of weeks weeks, taking Relief Factor, all of a sudden you have none.

Susan is, well, I mean, she's like an idiot savant.

She took Relief Factor, she got well, and now she's exercising again.

What the hell?

That's the idiot part.

What are you doing?

Anyway, Relief Factor, not a drug.

It was developed by doctors, and 70% of the people who try it go on to buy more.

So just try it for three weeks.

If it doesn't work, you're going to know by three weeks.

If it does, excuse me, if it does, you got to go on and order more.

I am turning into my grandfather.

I am just like, oh, I've got gas today.

Like you wouldn't believe, help me.

Help me.

Go to relieffactor.com or call 800-500-8384.

800-500-8384.

It's relieffactor.com.

Oh, my goodness.

Okay, racists.

Listen up.

It is very, very important.

I'm going to give you a quick survey here.

It was

from New York University, the Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development.

And now, to build a more informing environment, I need you to ask a couple of questions.

Well, I'm going to ask you, well, I'm going to ask you one question,

but it has 30 answers.

Now, I think that's limiting myself,

but

you know, apparently, apparently, not for the people at

NYU, racists.

NYU would like their students to take this right before, you know, we have to just know who everybody is.

So which gender do you identify with?

And I should say, parentheses, there's an S after gender.

So

parenthetically speaking, you could have more than one.

What do you identify?

Select all that apply.

Ages.

Is there an upper limit of how many genders I can?

Okay.

No.

Agender.

Agender.

What does that mean?

Well, I mean, the asexual means ick, right, to everything.

So this would be ick.

Well,

but this has nothing to do with sexuality, right?

Right, nothing to do with sexuality.

This is just gender.

Right, I'm just saying the A before

sexual

means ick.

Yeah, you're opposed to it.

Right, right.

So I'm opposed to gender.

Okay, so denoting or relating to a person who does not identify themselves as having a particular gender.

Okay.

So you're just against gender basically as a construct or something.

Okay.

Maybe.

I don't know if that's philosophical or internal.

Then there is allagender.

Like

Ali.

Maybe it's like I'm the gender of Muhammad Ali.

It's A-L-I

A-G-E-N-D-E-R.

Hmm.

it.

Spell it one more time.

A-L-I.

A-L-I

A-A.

G-E-G-N-D-E-R.

Okay, yeah, here it is.

Okay, that is

a gender experience which is other

or stands apart from existing gender constructs.

Ah,

so if I say, wait,

Demaboy

is

kind of me, but not exactly me,

then I would be allegender.

This is like the catch-all of this.

This is May I.

This is Paul talking about the unnamed god.

You guys have all these gods.

Well, there's one that covers everything else.

I think that's what it is.

Okay, so allegender is a catch-all.

We're in a catch-all.

Okay, all right.

By gender, it would be two genders.

Wait, at the same time, right?

But I mean, select all that apply.

By gender, you know, I guess you're limited to only two.

Like, it seems like these are so specific, you don't need catch-alls.

But a lot of these seem to be

denoting, relating to a person whose sense of personal identity encompasses two genders.

So you're both at the same time.

Boy, but it's spelled with an I, not a Y.

So B-O-I.

B-O-I.

Yeah.

Boy is.

I think that's a.

Okay.

Yeah.

So it's a, I see a slang term.

Would they put a slang term in one of these?

I hope not.

Because that's what they keep.

It's also the Bank of Ireland, by the way.

So in case it could just be like

identify as the Bank of Ireland.

That's all.

Okay, that's good.

All right.

Butch.

I think we know that he was with the Sundance kid.

Dema Boy.

Dema Boy.

Well, no, I'm not familiar.

I.

Maybe that is.

D-E-M-I?

Yeah.

Okay, D-E-M-I.

I'm a boy that likes Demi more

in the heyday years.

Right.

At the peak.

At the peak, yeah.

A demi-boy is a gender identity describing someone who partially, but not wholly,

identifies as a man.

So you're a partial man.

A partial man, basically.

But I don't know why it's boy.

Yeah.

Okay.

Feminine of center.

Feminine of center.

That's a gender?

Feminine of center.

This is like someone who's just non-committal.

This is like feminine of center.

This is like somebody who didn't like Biden or Trump.

I'm just in the center.

Okay, I have a definition.

A phrase that indicates the gender identity and gender expression of persons who understand and present themselves in a generally

feminine way without necessarily identifying as a woman.

So then what would a femme be?

Because that's the next one.

F-E-M-M-E.

Because that would be an effeminate man or a effeminate woman, right?

Okay, so femme would be a lesbian whose appearance and behavior are seen as traditionally feminine.

Okay, so maybe feminine of center.

But

I was told very specifically that gender has nothing to do with sexuality.

So why would a gender have a definition to lesbian whose appearance is...

Why couldn't a very flamboyant man, very feminine man, be a femme?

I don't know.

This is, I would say this document's hateful.

It is.

And not inclusive.

Gender apathetic, which I claim I am that.

I'm, well, I'm actually binder.

I'm gender apathetic and male.

I'm sick of talking about it, so does that make me gender apathetic?

Yeah, I think it does.

I think it does.

Gender apathetic.

Yeah.

I mean, I guess you don't really care.

But isn't that, wasn't that

everyone of that That was no agender.

That was a gender.

That was a catch-all.

Oh, yeah.

Okay.

So this one is kind of like, I'm a little hostile.

No, I'm not hostile.

I don't care.

I'm going to be

hostile if you keep asking me these questions.

I think that's what that means.

So gender apathetic, also called as apgender.

So if you were out there going like, where's apagender?

How come you haven't mentioned that?

We're just using that under the other phrase for gender apathetic.

But you know that.

When a person really doesn't identify or care about any particular gender.

Yeah, okay.

All right.

Okay.

Gender non-conforming.

Now, again, that's a catch-all.

That's a catch-all.

Yeah.

Gender non-conforming just means

I'm not conforming to any of these terms.

Right.

Again, there's a lot of catch-alls here.

Right.

Gender questioning.

I think that's again, that's a catch-all.

Gender fluid, which is also a.

Well, no, gender fluid is different, isn't it?

My understanding of gender fluid is you're kind of changing all the time.

You do care.

Gender fluid, denoting or relating to a person who does not identify themselves as having a fixed gender.

So you're kind of all over the board.

All over the board.

That's that you can kind of move like a liquid, like a fluid.

You can go anywhere you want kind of thing.

Right.

Anywhere it'll take you.

Now, that's different than transmission fluid.

That's not an actual.

No, it is a gender.

Transmission fluid?

Yeah, yeah.

It means I was made by God herself, spelled with an I, uh, to lubricate your driving machine.

That's what I'm saying.

I don't think transmission fluid.

is.

Well, it should be.

I think this is a

hateful thing.

It's fair.

Okay, so

we're down to

gender queer.

We got that.

Do we know what gender queer is?

I don't know what gender queer actually means.

I've heard it.

Look it up.

Denoting or relating to a person who does not subscribe to conventional gender distinctions,

but

identifies with neither, both,

or a combination of male and female genders.

That's just everything.

That doesn't mean anything.

That is just a catch-all.

Again, genderqueer, catch-all.

Gray gender.

Gray gender.

Yeah, that is

Jay Leno.

I think that's Jay Leno.

No, I don't.

You don't think so?

No, okay, gray gender.

Yeah.

Oh, God, this is really confusing.

I could be considered gray gender.

Is it old people?

Is that what it is?

Okay, a person

who identifies as at least partially partially outside the gender binary.

So they're not black or white.

They're kind of in between.

They're kind of gray.

And has a strong natural ambivalence about their gender identity.

Right, which I think, again, first of all, we've already covered that.

This is kind of a catch-all, but it's also the same as gender apathetic, it seems to me.

Yes, it does.

Except apathetic is you really don't care.

And gray gender is I kind of don't care about my gender.

Correct.

Okay.

Correct.

Got it.

Okay.

Then intergender.

Intergender.

Yeah.

This is, I mean, this was not supposed to take us this long.

This is good, though.

I'm really learning things.

Yeah, intergender.

Intergender is a variation in sex characteristics, including chromosomes and or genitals that do not allow an individual to directly be identified as male or female.

That's a hermaphrodite, then.

I guess that's the new term for that.

However, I've been told very specifically that these organs have nothing to do with your gender.

So again, why is that in here?

This is the only scientifically based one.

Right, right.

Because they're talking chromosomes.

This isn't like a feeling that you have.

This is about your parts.

But again, I was told that had nothing to do with it.

Here's one you have to look up, and I'm dead serious.

I have no idea what it means.

Man.

M-A-N.

Man.

Are you sure it's not M-A-N-N?

No.

M-A-N-N-E.

Nope, it's M-A-N.

Man.

Look it up.

Man.

It's got to be a new dialogue.

I don't think I want, you know what?

I'm going to stop myself.

I don't really want to Google man.

I just feel like I don't I feel like I don't know what that what alarm that may

give me.com.

I don't feel like that's you don't really okay.

Well I go to at work somebody knows what that means like for instance the next one's Martian

Martian Martian but it's M-A-R-S-H-A-N shut up Martian Martian M-A-R.

That's somebody who feels like they're

Marsha from the Brady Bunch.

I think that's that's not a real no it's not

I

I think these are important to include.

Don't know why you don't.

I think they are mocking people who are Martians.

I know a lot of people who are Martians.

All right.

Masculine of center.

That's like feminine of center.

So you're like, Yelene.

Maverick.

Maverick.

Maverick.

Maverick of gender is.

That's John McCain.

Maverick, my friends.

Is that a real one?

Yes, it is.

Okay, Maverick is a gender.

Okay, here we go.

Oh, no, I'm sorry.

We should point out.

It's pronounced Maverick.

Oh, Maverick.

Maverick.

A specific...

What is that cologne you're wearing?

Maverick.

This is so confusing.

Like, it's so confusing.

How can it be the thing that everyone gets so mad about if you screw it up?

Like, it's such a confusing thing.

Maverick is a specific non-binary gender identity characterized by autonomy and inner conviction regarding a sense of self that is entirely independent of male masculinity, female femininity, or anything which derives from the two while still

being neither

without gender nor of a neutral gender.

That didn't make any sense, what I just said.

You know what this is?

I'm being serious.

You know what this is?

Is you just,

if you say, you know, it's neither male nor female, you can just go,

this is ridiculous.

You know, I'm non-binary.

Okay, whatever.

But when you take, if you're really trying to make something meaningless,

you flood the system with all of these other choices that are all meaningless.

So people will eventually go, it doesn't matter.

I don't care.

It doesn't matter.

And you take away the choice of man and woman because it's included in this.

Yeah.

So man and woman included, I'm just a man, I'm a woman.

But when you start to look at at all of these genders and you realize none of these mean anything,

I mean, so many of these mean the same thing.

Or not Mad Freak.

No, Mad Freak is different.

But there's so many of them are just like basically outside of the normal, what they call normal gender identities or traditional gender identities.

And it's like, well,

you have 26 names for people in that world.

All right.

So multi-gender is next, which I don't, we don't have time for.

I want you to look up,

it must be neutra.

Wait, how do you spell it?

Well, because it's darn close to, well, I'll spell it, N-E-U,

T-R-O-I-S.

Neutra.

It's got to be.

Otherwise, it could be mispronounced as like

neutrosis.

Just.

Okay.

Neutra.

Neutrois.

Neutrois.

Neutrois is a non-bi binary gender identity, which is often associated with neutral or null gender.

So why wouldn't I just call it neutral gender or null gender?

Well,

it also may be associated with genderless.

I am.

There's like all these things had, we've already talked about other things that describe the same thing.

Yeah, but for instance, I'm binary.

I'm binary.

Oh, my God.

Okay.

I know.

Well, but it's not really.

My binary means I only speak in ones and zeros.

Oh, okay.

And so.

Wow.

Yeah.

So

that's not what I...

So let me tell you about 1, 1, 1.

1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0.

1.

0, 0.

I'll dumb it down for you.

You guys aren't binary.

Day 54 of my weight loss regime, dear diary, today I decided to eat right out of the gate.

I was going to eat healthy, you know, after breakfast, of course.

And I did.

Yesterday for lunch, I had a sensible salad.

I mean, I had some lettuce on my burger, but I took that off and threw it away in the trash where it belonged.

I mean, who eats that besides bunny rabbits?

Anyway, it's all good because, despite the enormous number of calories in that delicious, juicy, fat burger, I put a Bilt Bar on top.

And let me tell you something: a blue cheese burger with the hint of chocolate chip mint, delicious.

Delicious.

If you haven't tried a Built Bar yet, you're missing out.

You take out the hamburgers and it will actually help you stay fit and trim.

Low calorie, low sugar, high protein, high fiber.

It's great.

It tastes like a candy bar, but it's healthy for you.

It's healthier than your average protein bar and it doesn't taste like a doormat.

It's unbelievable.

Don't give up on your resolution.

Built bar is the answer.

Go to builtbar.com.

Use the promo code Beck.

Get 20% off your next order.

Promo code Beck, 20% off BuiltBar.com.

10 seconds station ID.

I haven't even gotten to the.

Can you see if...

Can you see if gender second gear is in there?

Shut up.

That's not.

No, second gear should be in there.

Gear.

Yeah.

Second.

Gender second gear.

It's like general.

It's like gender neutral, but it moves a little faster.

See,

I don't think that one's real.

Would you know?

You looked it up.

You actually looked it up.

That's what we should do.

We should take the rest of these and say, which one's real, which one's not.

If you would have said allegender, I would have thought that that was fake.

If you would have said

gender apathetic, I would not have believed gender apathetic was a thing.

Yep.

Like, isn't there a part of your life where you stop and you think, I'm spending too much time on this?

Like, whether you think it's right or not, how can it dominate your life like it does for seemingly so many people?

At some point, step back and like, I don't know, do the dishes.

Like, do something productive.

Do the dishes.

Who are you talking about?

I'm only talking to the allegender people out there.

Gosh, what a sexist.

Okay, post-gender.

Oh, post-gender.

I think that I'm going to go with real on that one.

I think post-gender is a real thing.

Yes, okay.

Post-genderism is not concerned solely with the physical sex or its assumed traits.

It is focused on the idea of eliminating or moving beyond gendered identities.

In a traditional gender construct, one is either a man or a woman, but in post-genderism, one is neither a man nor woman, nor any other assumed gender role.

Again, that's a catch-all.

So that means nothing.

That's not what it means.

I actually beat that one up.

I didn't think anybody would.

Oh, right.

I didn't think that was real.

So, post-gender is: I'm evolved beyond gender.

I'm also a breakfast cereal.

I can believe that's a real thing, though.

Okay.

All right.

People who believe they're breakfast cereals.

I mean, who are breakfast cereals?

Because all you have to do is believe it, and you are it.

Right, right.

Let's see.

How about

two-spirit, distilled to-spirit?

Two-spirit is real.

Two-spirit is real.

Now, when I say it's real, I use that in quotes, but I do think it's an actual thing that will come up.

Yes.

Yeah.

Modern man,

pan-Indian umbrella term used by some indigenous North Americans to describe.

This is the distilled.

That's that's the regular.

This is updated.

This is the distilled two spirit, also known as the bender gender.

And it just means I'm vodka and vermouth.

Really?

That's what it means.

Yeah.

Two spirits.

Wow.

And

it's nice.

Completely different than oxygender, which means I'm high as hell all of the time.

That's really

detergender.

This is a good one.

Detergender.

Detergender?

Yeah, yeah.

Means I'm a laundry soap.

So

I'm legitimately fooled by all of them.

I don't know.

Let me tell you about Car Shield.

Here's something super affordable.

Customize coverage plans with Car Shield.

You know what's not affordable?

Out-of-warranty cars that that go kaput in the middle of the road.

Car repairs are no joke, and if you're not covered when you have to get a car repair, you might as well take out your wallet, kiss it goodbye.

So don't do that.

It's Car Shield.

I've had my truck covered by Car Shield for a long time now, and I can tell you from personal experience, it has saved me a buttload of money.

And if you've seen my butt lately, it is big.

That's a lot of money that they've saved me.

Car Shield.

Drive with confidence and see why Car Shield cars go farther.

Call 800-665-2157.

That's 800-665-2157.

Mention the promo code Beck or visit carshield.com.

Use the promo code Beck, save 10%.

CarShield.com.

Promo code Beck.

A deductible may apply.

Whether you're man, woman, gender non-conforming, gender questioning, allegender, or Maverick, you can still join Blaze TV.

Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

The promo code is Glenn.

30 bucks office.

Not Mavericks?

This is the Glenn Beck program.

In about 30 minutes, it's the one-year anniversary of the 1776 Unites project.

You remember we talked about that?

I can't believe it's been a year.

In some ways, it feels like it's been a decade.

Bob Woodson, the founder and president of the Woodson Center, started this to counter the 1619 project.

We're going to talk to him not about that, but reparations.

And it's really important that you understand what we just did a few minutes ago was might have been funny, but it was dead serious.

The point of that was nothing means anything.

Nothing means anything.

It's deconstruction of meaning.

I think it goes to that postmodernism stuff that we talked about a couple of years ago a lot.

So

they're deconstructing all meaning and everything.

And so I want to to have a serious conversation with Bob Woodson, who is against the reparations.

He's a black guy, against the reparations, and has a good case against it.

But I want to play the postmodernist.

I'll show you why your argument doesn't work anymore.

That's coming up.

Also, news on Merritt Garland.

There is a very specific reason he was picked for the

Attorney General.

Very specific.

And

if he's confirmed, trouble.

And I'll tell you about that coming up.

Was he picked because he's the best possible candidate?

Oh, of course he was.

Of course he was.

I mean, there's

a respect.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, sure, sure, sure.

So we have that coming up also as well.

Pat Gray joins us now.

Pat, your wife and you started a new cookie company,

which is a delicious.

What's the name of it again?

Kexi.

Kexi.

No.

Used to be Scrumptious.

Yeah, but you couldn't spell that one.

But everybody can spell Kexi.

What the?

K-E-K-S-I.

It's real easy.

It's real easy.

Kexi.

Once you know it, it's really easy.

I would say, like, I wouldn't.

I was thinking there was an X.

And I like that.

There's not an X.

Well, if you do the X, it'll redirect.

Oh, okay.

So Kexie.

Okay, so anyway, I don't know if you know this.

Now, there are some things in political correctness that are ridiculous, but I think this is one of them.

Or is it?

In Dutch supermarkets, they have just gotten gotten rid of a cookie.

It's apparently a very big deal.

It's like our Oreo.

No cookie aisle can be without Oreos in America.

Would you agree with that?

Yeah, of course.

Chocolate chip cookies.

In Dutch supermarkets, it's the Jodenkoken.

Jodenkoken.

Jodenkoken.

Jash or Jodenkoken.

It's a good name.

It's a shortbokenken.

You should name your Jodenkokenkoken.

Yeah, that's easy to joke.

Jodenkoken.com.

I'm surprised you didn't take it.

They're shortbread discs,

and apparently,

Jodenkoken translates to Jew cookies.

Okay.

How have they gotten away with that?

Yeah, well, I guess

their ADL over there, which is the

Watchakov group for...

I don't know.

Dutch Jewish Watchdog Group on Anti-Semitism.

I don't know.

And then the Jewish

study, the Dutch Watchdog Group on Anti-Semitism.

And then the Central Jewish Board of the Netherlands.

They have spoken out and say, we don't have a problem with Joden cookies or Joden coconut.

So their version of the ADL is saying, like, we're cool with Joden cookie.

It's cool because we like it.

Joden coconut is cool.

This is exactly what's happening all over.

I can guarantee it.

Well, I mean,

they're Dutch.

So it's white people who are like, we know better than the Jews.

We're taking Jodenkoken off because it's offensive.

And the Jews are like, no, it's not.

We don't have a problem with that.

It's like the Redskins thing here in America.

Yeah.

Where like the Native Americans were like, yeah, actually, we really like it.

We're fine.

But I mean, when you say it, when you're like, hey, pass those Jew cookies over.

I mean, it just doesn't sound good.

It doesn't.

It doesn't sound good.

No.

So we got that going for us.

We also are having the, did you guys see the,

now they're asking for the Jeep Grand Cherokee, the Jeep Cherokee to change their name?

Of course they are.

Of course they are.

Which was interesting.

And if you read the article,

what I thought was fascinating about it, it, because they're like, the Native Americans are now saying they want no more, they don't want Jeep to be calling it a Cherokee anymore.

And it was ahead of the Cherokee Nation, the Cherokee tribe.

The so proud to live.

The ones that are so proud to die.

They didn't start him on that 70s.

They took the whole Cherokee Nation.

And they put them on that reservation.

Yeah, took away their way of life.

You know, the tomahawk.

And the bow and the knife.

Cherokee people.

Okay.

But when you read the article, it seems to be that the journalists just like called up the Cherokee Nation and go, hey, guys, are you mad about the Cherokee thing?

Like, it wasn't like, it didn't seem to be started by the Cherokee Nation.

It never is.

The journalists are like, hey, shouldn't you guys be pissed about this?

And then a guy was like, yeah, we're pissed about this.

It seems like it was like generated from the side of the media.

Of course it is.

Which is amazing.

Of course it is.

I mean, of course it is.

By the way, did you notice scattered showers of journalism yesterday in the State Department briefing?

Yes.

Did you?

Yes.

Do you have that audio?

I have it here.

I don't think I do.

Okay.

I don't think we have it.

Yeah, let me

you have it.

No, she doesn't have it either.

Okay, hang on just a second.

I have it.

Just bring up my computer.

Here it is.

This is fantastic.

Now, I want you to know.

That's amazing.

Yeah,

this is audio from an AP, an Associated Press journalist.

And I think that demonstrates State Department's

strategy, including the legislative strategy, the strategy that, of course, Congress

has been behind, has been working to good effect.

So we'll continue to work closely with Germany.

We'll continue to work closely with our other allies and partners in Europe to uphold Europe's own stated energy security goals.

It seems a bit disingenuous to claim credit for the 18 companies winding down.

All of this work was done under the previous administration.

You guys have only been in monthly.

What?

I mean, only been in office for a month.

Right?

Are you telling me that in the last

four weeks, these 18 companies all of a sudden decide to say, oh my God, we better not do anything with this?

I am speaking for the data.

I am speaking.

You guys are taking credit for stuff that the previous administration did.

I am speaking for the Department of State.

The people who have been working this, the people who are working this now were the same people a month ago, were the same people.

Three months ago.

So I.

He got him to kind of admit it.

He got him to admit it.

He got him to admit it, which is nice, but

that'll be the last shower that we have today.

Yes, it will.

Is anybody watching

WandaVision?

I love it.

Oh, my gosh.

Is that the most creative show on television?

I'll see after the first episode, how many people panned it?

And I was like,

I don't understand it, but I wouldn't pan it.

Yeah, me too.

They're too smart of a company to do something this bad.

Well, the first two episodes were so weird because they're just a 50s and a 60s sitcom with a laugh track.

And you're like,

I don't know if I get it or not.

Yeah.

But it all ties together.

And you know it's going to because it's Marvel.

And it's so good.

The way it ties together and what they do with it is so creative.

I've never seen anything like it.

Now, I have a 15-year-old son who is way deep into all the hidden clues.

Oh.

So it's really fun to watch with him.

Because they leave a lot of Easter eggs, right?

Yeah, lots, lots.

He's stopping it all the time.

Do you know what that means?

You know what that means?

That means it's really a very cool show.

If you're into the Marvel thing, which

are in-house.

A little black rain cloud stupid gear is not.

No,

I had Spider-Man underpants when I was like four.

I liked a men.

And now I've

now an adult.

By the way, The Simpsons, Harry Shearer.

I've got the Spider-Man into the universe into the Spider-Verse underpants now.

Okay, that's much more.

I have the Depends.

Do you?

I have the Depends.

Those are nice, too.

Yeah.

So The Simpsons.

They have spider webs on them?

So anyway, Harry Shearer has said that he's not going to play Dr.

Hibbert anymore on the Simpsons.

Has he said it or did they just announce it?

Because he came out.

According to the rap, Harry Shearer, who who is white, will no longer voice the black character of Dr.

Hibbert.

He will be replaced by Michael Richardson.

Bless the hearts.

Thanks for this episode.

It's been so offensive.

Shearer had voiced, does voices of Ned Flanders.

Is he a Christian?

Really, honestly, is Harry Shearer a Christian?

Why should a non-Christian play that role?

Shouldn't a Christian?

Yes.

And principal, is he a he plays principal Skinner?

Is he a real principal?

Is he a real principal?

No.

No.

That's where we're getting.

So there is no quote from him, at least in this story.

So I don't know if they just took him off of that.

Well, no, because I remember covering this just a few months ago, and Harry Shearer was asked

about all of this because Hank Azaria had stopped doing Apu.

That was what started this.

Right.

And he was ⁇ he said he goes speaking to Times Radio, he said, quote, I have a very simple belief about acting.

The job of an actor is to play someone they are not.

That's the gig.

That's the job description.

Right.

He said.

Anymore, though.

Yeah.

So I don't think he was in favor of this.

I mean, this was August of last year, so this is not a long time ago.

Would it be great when

the cameras start to roll on people who are just normal people and nobody's really extraordinary at anything?

And the movies are kind of

more like

real life.

Yeah, kind of like those conservative movies 10 years ago.

Yeah.

Kind of like that.

That'll be good.

When only dead people could play dead people.

I like that.

He's not Winston Churchill.

Yeah.

He's not.

So no Churchill movies from here on out.

I mean, can the person drawing Apu be white?

Can the person drawing Dr.

Hibbert be white?

Well, you wouldn't have a white person do that because they're yellow.

Well, Dr.

Hibbert is brown.

Yes.

Yeah, but Homer and his family, there are no white people in that.

It's just the voice, though.

That's the only thing that matters.

Like, obviously, this is going to be expanded afterward.

It doesn't make sense.

None of this makes any sense.

We sit here and we talk about these things

that mean nothing.

Yeah, all the time.

And it just keeps getting worse.

Well,

let's talk about not making sense.

I think Joe Rogan said it all when he talked about Ted Cruz.

Ted Cruz, did you see a mariachi band showed up in front of him?

So asinine.

I would have.

And they're demanding that he resign.

Because he went to Cancun when it was cold.

Really?

This is what Cancun said.

This is what it was developed for.

This is what Joe Rogan said, and I think this is right.

What was he supposed to do?

What was the reason for him staying?

Quote, can he make it warm outside?

He cannot.

Because of global warming, yes, he can.

Oh, he can now?

Yes.

He's hurting our environment.

He didn't, Rob.

But he didn't before he left.

There are no, I can guarantee you.

No one is hiring that mariachi band that is a conservative or a Republican.

Oh, no way.

No, this is no way.

All this controversy is all them trying to do their best to destroy him.

Yes.

Try desperately to get him on.

I want to talk to him about this.

He should not be apologizing for it.

Nobody who is a supporter of Ted Cruz cares about this.

He's a smart enough politician to know this is going to cause him unneeded pain in his career, which I understand.

Stupid political mistakes.

Exactly.

And if you looked at his Instagram feed all weekend, it was just non-stop him.

He's just got cases of water.

He's walking around every place in Texas.

And to me,

that looks weak.

To me, it does because it looks like he did something wrong and now he's trying to make up for it.

And he didn't do anything wrong.

He's done that stuff for a while.

But you know what?

There's a lot.

Yeah,

he's been working those things.

He was fantastic

at the border.

He was fantastic on the hurricanes that have rolled through Texas.

He's fantastic.

This one is: I don't have any power.

We don't have any water.

What do you say we leave here?

Because there's nothing we can do.

And I have a telephone

that I can keep in my pocket and it works on the beach or any place other than space.

I believe it was our own Elijah Schaefer who said that Ted Cruz was just working remotely like all the public school teachers.

Oh my.

Which is a good,

that's apparently okay.

It's a great line.

That's fantastic.

All right.

Thank you, Pat.

You can watch Pat Gray, Pat Gray Unleashed live before this broadcast, or you can get Pat Gray Unleashed wherever you get your podcasts.

People look forward to all sorts of things.

When the weather starts to warm, some people dream of jumping into a swimming pool on a hot day.

Others just want to sit around to the edge of that pool sipping a cold drink.

Astonishing, some people actually look forward to the heat of summer.

I am not one of them,

but I live with one of them.

One of the things that people sometimes either either love or dread is mowing the lawn.

I actually dread mowing the lawn if I have to push the mow or anything else.

Love mowing the lawn.

I love being on a tractor.

I love, you know, mowing.

I don't care how much lawn you have as long as I'm in a, why are you doing this?

What are you saying?

Oh, I just, you're just a big tractor guy.

You know, when I think of Clenn Beck, I think, I just think a good idea.

I'm not saying I'm good at it.

No, ask my wife.

I mean, don't ask her about if he's good at it, but I mean, that's obvious.

But I love it.

You like to sit and play tractor like, you know, like a four-year-old.

Yeah.

And then when I'm done, I get out and I'm like, boy.

My son runs out.

Finish this off.

I actually like it because it's quiet time that I can just listen.

Anyway, Hustler Zero Turn Lawn Mowers.

This is the best lawnmower out there.

It turns on a dime.

It cuts the grass.

perfectly.

Riding on a hustler turf mower is a real pleasure.

Named after the Air Force's B-58 Hustler bomber, hustler mowers are made in the U.S.

They offer a hero's discount for veterans and active military.

Plus, they are a supporter of the Folds of Honor.

This is just the best mower out.

They invented the Zero Turn Lawnmower years ago.

Before you buy another motor, make sure you do yourself a favor.

Find a hustler dealer.

Go drive a hustler.

Check out hustlerturf.com.

That's hustlerturf.com.

Tomorrow night on Glenn TV, Texas's Texas's power failures provided America with a disturbing and deadly preview of the Great Reset.

But Bill Gates, AOC, and other Democrats say we don't need less green energy, we need more.

Is this really about saving the planet or keeping you in check?

Glenn reveals the level of control green elites are pushing for in almost every aspect of your private life.

Green control freaks ruining your life.

Tomorrow night, 9 p.m.

Eastern at Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

You do not want to miss a second of today's show.

Coming up, we're going to talk race reparations.

Then we are going into Merritt Garland.

There is a reason, and it's very important for you to know to be able to see the landscape ahead.

Then we're going to go over Clarence Thomas' dissent yesterday, but they're saying that that is

part of the disinformation campaign.

The Supreme Court Justice dissent on the election yesterday, and lawmakers are asking cable companies, are you planning to continue Fox News, OAN, and Newsmax on your platform both now and beyond the renewal date?

If so,

why?

The attack to silence these

people are the Mussolinis of our lifetime.

They are the dictators and the fascists.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

It's another beautiful day in the neighborhood.

And I want to talk to you about something that'll make you healthy, kids.

It is Built Bar.

Built Bar is the secret for me of keeping both of my New Year's resolutions.

I'm going to eat healthier, and I'm going to try to

eat better and lose some weight.

Built Bar.

It is healthier than your average, your favorite protein bar.

The bars are low calorie, low sugar, high protein, high fiber.

They are great for keto diets.

You can lose and maintain weight while indulging in in something that really honestly tastes like a chocolate bar.

It is the healthiest thing you'll probably do today.

It will be the healthiest thing I do today.

If you work out, well, you're on your own.

Good luck with that one.

Don't give up your resolution.

Stop showing off.

Don't give up your resolution.

Built Bar is the answer.

Go to builtbar.com, use the promo code Beck, get 20% off your next order.

They are really, really good.

Use the promo code Beck for 20% off at builtbar.com.

Try them out now.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This

is

the Glenback program.

Hey,

from behind my cardboard microphone, welcome with talent this hour on loan from Agnes.

She borrowed it from Lenny.

I thought last hour I had Lenny's, but I was actually using Agnes's, so I want to credit her for this hour.

That's where I get all my talent from.

We have Bob Woodson going to talk to us a little bit about reparations and what's going on in Washington.

Also, we want to talk a little bit about Merrick Garland.

His hearing was yesterday.

He's going to be confirmed as the

new Attorney General.

He was selected for a reason, and one that you should be aware of.

We begin in 60 seconds.

The Glenn Beck program.

All right.

Patriot Mobile wants to remind you that you can save money.

You can get the same great service that you're getting elsewhere, but you are not going to be paying things for, you know, like

Planned Parenthood.

I mean, in your wildest dreams, do you want a dime of your money going to Planned Parenthood?

I don't.

So if you have Verizon or some of these other big mobile companies, why are you doing it?

Why are you because they're taking some of their money, their profits that they get from you, and they're sending it to places like Planned Parenthood or places that are working against everything that you hold dear?

Don't do it.

Stand with the people who are standing by the principles that made this country what it is.

Well, what it was, the freest nation on the planet, the only place where it doesn't matter who you are.

You can start from scratch and you can do it and change not only your life, but the life of your children and your grandchildren.

Only in America.

Only in America.

And Patriot Mobile is fighting for those things.

Now,

first things first,

they have a great service.

They're on the same cell towers as everybody else they have a great service they have better customer service and lower rates so please just check them out this month get free premiere activation well they'll set up the phone for you that's the hassle that usually like i don't want to lose my number and everything you can keep your number You can get a new phone, keep your number.

They'll do all of it for you.

And you get a special gift with the offer code Beck.

Same service, lower price, and the values you believe in.

Go to patriotmobile.com slash Beck.

That's patriotmobile.com Beck or call 972 Patriot.

One of the greatest men that I know who is just

so brave in today's society, he is the founder and president of the Woodson Center and the author of a great book, Lessons from the Least of These.

Bob Woodson is with us now.

Hey, Bob, how are you?

Pleased to to be with you again, Glenn.

It's great to talk to you, sir.

Time has gone by so fast, I can't believe it's been a year since you started the 1776 Unites project.

We're really happy with the progress we've made so far in just one year.

That's great.

That's great.

So, Bob, I want to talk to you a little bit about reparations, and I want to

play the

other side to see how you would answer these things.

Right now, the country going through

all kinds of change, and the White House and the House has started hearings and a committee on reparations.

What's the problem with reparations?

Well, first of all,

the key liberator for black folks in the past have been preparation, not reparations.

And also, the whole issue of reparations is really to deflect attention away from the critical problems.

First of all, just going into it in detail, who pays?

Did you know that

the

five Native American civilized tribes, they had thousands of slaves.

There were free blacks who also owned slaves.

Do they pay reparations?

And so it gets complicated.

But also, we have had reparations in the last 50 years in the form of poverty programs, the $22 trillion we have spent that was supposed to be targeted to these communities, where 70 cents of all the dollars went to people who serve the poor.

We created a commodity out of the poor, and now we're getting ready to create a commodity out of race

blacks

who will

see what's happening.

Let me play devil's advocate here

and push back on who's going to pay.

It's really not about slavery, Bob.

It's about the

inequality and the system that has been racist from the beginning.

So it's not really about slavery.

It's about the disadvantages that minorities, in this case, African Americans have had from the beginning.

Well, first of all, they make the incorrect statement that the problems facing blacks today out of wedlock, birth, crime and violence, and income inequality is

related to the legacy of slavery and discrimination.

That is just not true.

And the fact is that blacks thrived during the periods of Jim Crow, building banks, hotels.

The median income in Durham, North Carolina, in 1940,

because of the Black Wall Street, was comparable to the income of whites throughout the country.

So, and also today, Glenn, 3.5 million black Africans and Caribbeans, they live here.

If racism were the biggest barrier, why do they have incomes comparable to, if not higher than whites?

They have a higher education level.

Why is it that these blacks who look like any other black, how is it that they were able to thrive and outperform blacks and Asians in terms of education?

If racism were the culprit, then how do you have this as an anomaly?

Well, but if you could just give African Americans money, they would be able to change

their way of life.

They'd be able to pull themselves out of poverty.

If you just gave them a big check, they would be able to use that to create a different life for them and their family.

Okay, let's just, as if the problems,

let's just take an example.

You have black men are 6% of the population, but they're 80%

of the NFL and the NBA.

Two years after these men leave basketball and leave professional football, they are bankrupt.

80% of them are bankrupt within two years.

If money, if wealthy men are able to, so it isn't a matter of having income that defines your status, it's how you use money.

And black Americans,

historically

like I said there are examples of when when we have the right attitudes in in place we were able to achieve against the odds in Chicago in 1929 there were 731 black owned businesses and a hundred million in real estate assets

even at a time when we were being redlined So if we were able to build medical schools, dental schools, our own hospitals, our own hotels, our educational systems in five major cities where we had crumbling buildings, overcrowded classrooms, half the budgets as white schools, we out-tested every other white school in five major cities at the turn of the century and up until 1940.

So, Glenn, if racism were the sole culprit, how is it that under worst circumstances, the de jure segregation, blacks were able to perform in ways where we had no control of the cities?

So, Bob,

in all sincerity,

I mean, we know that there are problems in the country and there's growing problems, I think, within the system of racism, and it cuts in all directions.

But the thing that really disturbs me is that we are telling people, we're telling white people that they are racist, they're born racist, they can only be racist till the day they die.

And we're telling black people, you can't do it because these people are in your way and you need a third party to keep them at bay so you could accomplish something.

I think those are both so dangerous to teach people.

They are, but Glenn, let me say that those people who are supposed to represent black people are not their representatives.

If you look at the polls, 80% of blacks are against defund the police.

According to a Pew poll, 60% of blacks do not believe racial discrimination is a principal barrier to their being able to achieve.

So it is a lie that the people you see on television and those that are in the media supposed to be representing black people,

they are part of the race grievance industry and

we have, again, monetized pain and suffering and injustice.

They are the ones that white America are paying to give racially race audits, equity audits.

They are the ones that

corporations are paying millions of dollars to do equity training.

You ask yourself, they should be compelled to answer the question.

Look at the out-of-wedlock births.

Look at the violence in these cities.

Tell me how spending money

on

equity training is a solution to these problems.

What we're doing at the Woodson Center is that we are mobilizing people within those communities to represent themselves.

And we're raising money so we can demonstrate to people that the real answer to decline is not to demand that white people liberate us from ourselves, but that black America has to be agents of their their own uplift.

I just, in case you don't know who I'm talking to, this is Bob Woodson.

He's the founder and president of the Woodson Center, author of the book Lessons from the Least of These, which is fantastic.

He has been a community organizer in the best sense of the word for a long time,

trying to bring people together and teach principles that actually empower people for quite a long time.

And

he has stood

in the same place unflinching.

And it's going to get harder and harder for him to stand.

I got to believe that the pressure you guys are facing right now, I have to believe, is enormous, Bob.

Yeah, but it is, but

I really think that that's one of the best of people.

Jack Dorsey, the founder of Netflix, is spending $4 billion on race grievance.

We need to mobilize our people to spend on the other side to empower people.

For instance, Glenn,

we're not going to do this by just complaining about what the left is doing.

We must have a ground game.

And what we're doing is we are mobilizing two point, I mean, 2,500 low-income black mothers called Voices of Black Mothers United.

They are standing up with the police against those who want to defund the police.

And so I really think we've got to mobilize indigenous organizations, people who are paying the price for this race grievance

narrative that is being pushed.

We must let the people speak for themselves.

If you want to donate, I'm going to send them to Woodson Center.

Is that good?

That'll be good.

Yeah, WoodsonCenter.org.

Yeah, WoodsonCenter.org.

A really

important work being done at the Woodson Center.

And we all have to stand together.

We have to put race aside.

We have to, you know,

I was pushing back on Bob on the

reparations just to show that it doesn't...

It's not going to stop.

It doesn't have to make sense.

They have ways around all of your traditional arguments.

Arguments are not going to work.

You need to stay informed, but we need to get active and we need to be seen together working to solve problems in all communities.

And Bob is a great, great example of working in underprivileged communities and empowering people.

And I am proud to stand by his side and I would urge you to get involved, even if it's just a donation.

I know money is tight, but this is really important work.

You're frustrated, you don't know what to do, reach out to thewoodsoncenter.org.

Woodsoncenter.org.

Bob, thank you so much.

We'll talk again.

Ben, thank you.

And your listeners have been very generous in the past, and I want to thank them.

They are a good group of people.

And

whenever you need a community to come out and work side by side with you, anytime we can do anything to help stand side by side, not just be a wallet, but also be hands, you let us know.

We'd love to work with you.

Well, I'm going to take you up on it because we do need hearts and hands

and wallets.

You got it.

Thank you so much, Bob.

You let us know.

All right, thank you.

Woodsoncenter.org.

AMAC, when the time comes to choose the advocacy group that is right for you, where do you turn?

There are lots of options out there, some of them good, some of them not so good.

Let me tell you about one of them that I believe in.

It's called AMAC, A-M-A-C.

It stands for the Association of Mature American Citizens.

Now, if it might apply to you, then you need to take a little time today and check AMAC out for yourself.

They represent courage, faith, reason in trying times.

These are people that are going to give you the benefits that you're going to get from other senior organizations or mature American citizen organizations.

But you also get a group of people that are fighting with you.

This is so important that we put our time and our money into things that are working with us, not against us.

They are standing up right now against HR1.

In fact, I have one of the guys from AMAC on in about an hour to talk about what's happening with HR1.

It is a total bastardization of our voting system.

It is unconstitutional.

And if they get a fraction of it passed, we're in deep trouble.

You'll never win another election in your life.

AMAC is standing against them.

You want to join their growing ranks.

Stand with AMAC as they fight the good fight by becoming a member today.

Benefits are great, but the cause is greater.

It's AMAC.

A-M-A-C-S.

I'm sorry, A-M-A-C dot US slash Beck.

That's AMAC.us slash Beck.

Better for you, better for America.

It's AMAC.

10 Second Station ID.

I want to talk to you about Merrick Garland.

Merrick is the guy that everybody will remember.

He was the judge that the Republicans refused to confirm.

And that was what the whole Supreme Court thing was about, they say.

They also said that he's not a guy that would have a problem with the Second Amendment.

The conservatives are freaking out.

This is a very moderate guy.

Okay, let's forget about what he

said and what was happening with the Supreme Court for the moment.

I'm going to tell you that there is a reason he was selected as the Attorney General.

We are entering a very, very dangerous time in America.

You know, I've noticed that the left, not the Democrats, the left, they self-diagnose all the time.

They say they're doing something, or they say the other side is doing something.

It's usually them.

When they were accusing Donald Trump, you know, over the summer of going to play hanky-panky with all of the vote totals and that

he was using all the tools at his disposal to change the way and make sure that people weren't voting.

What they were doing at the time was changing all the rules to make sure that they could open up the coffers and all of the ballots that they wanted to come in would come in.

They changed the rules at the last minute.

I'm going to tell you about the Supreme Court and Clarence Thomas, what he said yesterday about it.

It is really important that you hear his dissent.

And immediately the left is coming after him saying that this is extremist talk.

It's absolutely not extremist talk.

Also, you need to know that

next hour I'm going to be telling you about

what the House has done.

The House Democrats

have they are now pressuring cable news outlets and also Amazon, Google, Facebook to cancel any of the right-leaning organizations like Fox, OAN, US, Newsmax, not just on cable, but they are talking about going beyond cable to Roku, which would include us,

and Google, Apple.

They're talking about that now, and it's getting very serious.

So, what does this have to do with Merritt Garland?

Merritt Garland was selected because

he is,

we are going to see, you know how we've been seeing a replay of the 1960s.

We're now going to start seeing a replay of the 1990s.

And the 1990s, if you remember right,

as soon as Oklahoma City happened,

what did they do?

They not only got the bad guys, but what else did they do?

Within 24 hours, Bill Clinton was talking about Rush, Limbaugh, and talk radio and trying to get that off the air.

Well, we've had our Oklahoma City bombing now.

It's January 6th.

And Merritt Garland said yesterday that this was worse.

What happened on January 6th was worse than what happened in Oklahoma City in the 1990s.

Let me explain who he is and what his background is and where he's going if confirmed.

This is the Glenbach Program.

American Financing NMLS 1-82334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Historically low mortgage rates that we've been experiencing will not last forever.

The market is tricky.

We have put in

26%

more cash into the system in just the last 12 months.

The reason why we don't have hyperinflation now is because the velocity of money is almost at zero.

People are not spending, but you're seeing where big money is spending the stock market.

That's inflation.

There's so much money, they're putting it into the stock market.

The market is tricky,

but I'll tell you that when you have to pull those things back, you raise the interest rates.

So please get yourself out of risky

speculative mortgage rates that might be adjustable.

Lock this low interest rate down right now with American Financing.

Refinance your mortgage with a much lower interest rate right now and save hundreds of dollars.

It's AmericanFinancing.net, 800-906-2440.

And you can can save 30 bucks on your Blaze TV subscription.

Go to Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

The promo code is Glenn.

You'll get that 30 bucks off now for a limited time.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

All right, I want to give you some of the answers from

Merritt Garland.

Merrick yesterday

said that he was going to vow to prosecute white supremacists.

Listen to this.

150 years after the department's founding, battling extremist attacks on our democratic institutions also remains central to the department's mission.

From 1995 to 1997, I supervised the prosecution of the perpetrators of the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building, who sought to spark a revolution that would topple the federal government.

If confirmed, I will supervise the prosecution of white supremacists and others who stormed the Capitol on January 6th, a heinous attack that sought to disrupt a cornerstone of our democracy, the peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government.

And that critical work is but a part of the broad scope of the department's responsibilities.

This is why he was selected.

He was selected selected because of his work in Oklahoma City and the Unabomber.

He has a lifelong pattern of going after extremists, which I am for.

I was glad we caught the Unabomber, really glad we caught him, but he wasn't a right-wing extremist.

He was a technophobe.

He was warning against technology that would take over everyone's life.

Even a stopped clock can be right twice a day.

But he wasn't a right-wing and white supremacist.

When it comes to Timothy McVeigh, Timothy McVeigh was starting a revolution.

And he was trying to topple the American government.

He was saying that the IRS

was growing too big, the government was growing too big, they were spying on their people, et cetera, et cetera.

Stopped clock.

But they, both of them, both of them were violent.

That's what made them extremists.

Their violence.

They thought it was better to blow people up.

There's no difference between them and John Wilkes Booth.

John Wilkes Booth wanted to kill President Lincoln because of his hatred, his hatred of the North, his hatred of blacks, his hatred of the peace treaty.

He wanted revolution.

He wanted to defeat the North.

When

Garland said yesterday

that today is more dangerous, what happened on January 6th is more dangerous than Oklahoma City.

That should be a wake-up call to people.

Here he is.

Well, Mr.

Chairman, I certainly agree that we are facing a more dangerous period than we faced in Oklahoma City

than at that time.

From what I have seen, and I have no inside information about how the department is developing its work, it looks like an extremely aggressive and perfectly appropriate beginning to an investigation.

all across the country in the same way our original Oklahoma City investigation was, but many times

more.

I don't yet know what additional resources would be required by the department.

I can assure you that this will be my first priority and my first briefing when I return to the department if I am confirmed.

Do you hear his priority?

They have yet to

define

right-wing extremism.

They have labeled them terrorists.

Now, if it's a bunch of Nazis,

well, let's look at the Nazis.

This is highly controversial and a horrible thing to say, but I'm an American and I believe in the First Amendment.

If these Nazis are sitting around with a book reading party and they're just talking about how great National Socialism is,

I'm sorry, gang, but they have to be allowed to do that.

I hate it.

I wish those people would go someplace else.

I wish that they would

wake up to what the reality is, that Nazism and National Socialism is evil.

But as long as they're not planning anything, as long as they're not working towards the destruction of the United States in the way that Antifa does,

you got to leave them alone.

People believe weird things.

People believe dangerous things.

But unless they are a danger,

they're not a terrorist, and they're not something that the FBI should or could do anything about.

If there are Nazis or any kind of white supremacists, the Klan, which was an arm of the Democratic Party, the Klan,

and they are holding their little meetings.

I absolutely hate it.

I hate it.

But as long as they are not hurting people,

using their power to intimidate, which is the reason why they have the hood, so it's a hard one to make a case that they're not trying to intimidate and scare people.

They are using, that is an act of terror by using violence or trying to use words that imply violence to scare people into changing their way of life.

That is terrorism.

If the Black Panthers

are not doing anything violent,

the Black Panthers should exist if there's an appetite for a group of people that want to do that if and

in the way that they do where they are truly fascists it's either my way or i burn it down

uh

it even if they want to just talk about fascism in that way and go out in the public square and have signs and have rallies and say, hey, this is what we're all about.

That's fine.

They have to be left alone.

But the minute they start trying to bomb or burn down a federal building or a police station, the minute they start beating people in the streets that won't comply, they've crossed a line.

Just like the Klan would, just like white supremacist Nazis would.

But here's the problem.

He's not talking about the violence that happened over the summer.

He is only talking about right-wing extremism

and white supremacists.

I am all for justice.

I am all for making sure we catch the bad guys as long as the bad guys are not defined to be on only one side.

Merritt Garland said yesterday that you could

that there was no comparison between what happened on January 6th and what happened over the summer.

That is because the Washington elites see themselves as better than somebody who owns a taco stand.

I don't.

The Constitution doesn't.

They are the same crime.

Yesterday,

He couldn't answer questions.

For instance, is congressional inaction a legitimate basis for Article II to decide it just must act because it wishes policy that were different and legislation doesn't want to move?

So can you just act because Congress doesn't?

Well, you're asking a really tough question about our basic constitutional structure.

Yes, weren't you a Supreme Court nominee, so you probably have studied the Constitution.

What's your answer to that?

Well, just because I'm upset that Congress hasn't done what I would like, obviously that's not okay.

But the president does have authorities.

And when he acts

consonant with Congress, he's at his highest power.

When Congress has not acted at all, he's left with only his own power, which is clearly available under the Constitution.

So you didn't really answer the question, but you sure led me to a pond that I don't like.

Should border crossings,

illegal border crossings, remain a crime?

I haven't thought of that question.

Really?

Really?

And you're going to be the chief law enforcement officer, and we have what's going on now at our border?

You haven't thought about it?

That's the answer.

Would you commit to publicly releasing Special Counsel Durham's report, just like the Mueller report was made public?

Well, I'm a great believer in transparency.

Although I would have to talk with Mr.

Durham and understand the nature of what he's been doing and the nature of the report, that will be one of the first things I do in office is to talk to Durham and find out what he's pursuing.

Oh,

okay.

What about Hunter Biden and that investigation?

Are you going to pursue that?

You know, I haven't discussed the matter with anybody.

I haven't talked to the president, but, you know, the president told me that I'm able to serve, you know, as Attorney General without any interference from the White House.

That's not an answer to the question.

How about should females have to be forced to compete with biological males in female sports?

Well, you know, that's a very difficult societal question.

Yes, it is.

Senator Kennedy said, I know, but you're going to be the Attorney General.

Well, but I may not be the one who has to make policy decisions like that,

but it's not that I'm adverse to it.

Look, I think every human being should be treated with dignity and respect, and that's an overriding sense of my own character and an overriding sense of what I think the law requires.

So you just gave us the answer without giving us the answer.

I want to tell you a really disturbing story about the left and transgenderism

they claim they are for transgender rights

what happened to somebody who was arrested who was transgender and voted Democrat

What happened to that individual is an absolute

abomination.

It might as well happened in a Soviet gulag,

but you're not going to hear the left talk about it because they don't care if you're transgender or not.

They'll allow anything to happen to you,

even if you're transgender.

You know, if if we don't agree with you or you're not useful to us.

I'll explain after the the break.

There's enough things that you have to worry about throughout the day with also

having to constantly be concerned that somebody is going to try to steal all of your information and your identity online.

Because of COVID, everything is going online.

How many purchases are you making online?

How many things are you now doing?

How many meetings are you having online?

Documents that you're sharing online.

No one can prevent all identity theft theft and monitor all transactions at all businesses, but

you can keep what's yours

with LifeLock identity theft protection.

I want you to consider joining now.

Save up to 25% off your first year at lifelock.com with promo code Beck.

You need to know if somebody is taking the identity of you or your loved ones and are using them in nefarious ways.

Call 800LifeLock, 1-800-LIFELOCK, or go to lifelock.com, use the promo code Beck and save 25%.

That's lifelock.com slash Beck.

Tomorrow night on Glenn TV, Texas's power failures provided America with a disturbing and deadly preview of the Great Reset.

But Bill Gates, AOC, and other Democrats say we don't need less green energy, we need more.

Is this really about saving the planet or keeping you in check?

Glenn reveals the level of control green elites are pushing for in almost every aspect of your private life green control freaks ruining your life tomorrow night 9 p.m eastern at blaze tv.com slash glenn

jessica watkins says she was mistreated after going on a hunger strike attorneys for the transgender woman charged in connection with the january 6th breach of the u.s capitol say that their client who voted for barack obama has been mistreated in jail I want you to listen to this.

The claims are among several cited late Saturday by lawyers who asked a judge to release Watkins to home detention in care of her fiancé.

Watkins was charged last month along with two others, Thomas Caldwell and Donovan Crowell, in an alleged conspiracy involving disorderly conduct and other violations connected to the January 6th breach.

In court filings, the Justice Department alleged that Watkins belongs to the Oath Keepers group, many of whose members have also been charged for their alleged part in the Capitol melee.

Notice they say it's a melee, that it's disorderly conduct and other violations.

If you're going to charge somebody with the overthrow of the United States government, you might want to charge them with that.

Now, here's what happened.

Jessica Watkins is transgender.

When she said that I have medical issues that have to be attended to, my arm needs medical attention.

They said, you're not seeing a doctor.

You're not seeing a doctor.

She said, my arm needs medical attention.

You're not seeing a doctor.

She said, when they brought her food, I'm not going to eat.

I'm on a hunger strike until I can see at least a doctor.

They deemed that suicidal.

So they stripped her naked in the cell block, stripped her naked, and left her lights on in the cell 24 hours a day for four days.

This is an abomination.

You don't have to like her.

You don't have to agree with her politics.

You don't even have to.

You can say she belongs in jail, but don't you dare tell me you care about transgender people or people at all when you do this to them and you don't have a problem with it.

It's immoral.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

I was warned

that anything that I say on this subject can and will be held against me

and I'm cool with it.

I'm still gonna say it in 60 seconds.

The Glenbeck Program.

When it comes to buy or sell a house or both, what's your game plan?

Do you have one?

Do you know how to find the best real estate agent to start the process?

We have no game face.

We don't have any idea.

Most of us don't have any idea what it really takes to even interview a real estate agent.

How do you find one?

My whole life, I've been like, okay, just let's call them and have them come over and look at it.

Okay, yeah, okay, where do we sign?

I mean, do you interview them?

We do at Real Estate Agents I Trust.

It's a free service to you where we connect you with the best real estate agents who are going to work with you to create not just a game plan, but the game plan.

These agents are tried and true.

They know the best practices to get you out of your old house and into the new one without the whole process just turning into a nightmare.

And they're going to work really, really hard to make sure at the end of all of it, you're not merely satisfied with the outcome, but you are instead delighted with the outcome.

And you tell your friends, these are the best real estate agents I've ever worked with.

Realestateagents I trust.com, a free service to you.

The name says it all.

Realestateagents I trust.com.

As God is in his heaven, do we have to hate each other to the point that people with less balance are stimulated to deeds of this kind?

That's what

Ronald Reagan said about the guy who tried to shoot him.

Now, if somebody tries to shoot me, I don't know if I'm like, hey,

we love each other.

We love each other.

So deeds of this kind, somebody tries to blow up something, I don't know if I say that.

Can't we just love each other?

Can't we find community inside of ourself again without forcing everyone to agree with you?

Can you not disagree with your neighbor anymore and live next to them?

The answer is yes.

but that is not the answer we are being pitched.

I want to give you what Clarence Thomas said yesterday, and Clarence Thomas is under attack, but what's new?

He wrote a forceful dissent from the Supreme Court's decision to refuse hearing a Republican challenge of a Pennsylvania state court decision, allowing ballots that were received up to three days after the election to be counted in November's election.

Now, I want you to understand, none of this is going to change the outcome.

If they found all of a sudden that all of the states had falsified stuff, there is nothing in the Constitution that corrects that.

So anything that you find now is to make sure you fix it for the next election.

This is the time where we don't have to have conspiracy theories.

We don't have to say, because it won't change anything.

It can't.

It will only fix it so we believe in the system the next time.

Now, this is exactly what Clarence Thomas said.

One wonders what the court waits for.

We failed to settle this dispute before the election and thus provide clear rules.

Now, we again fail to provide clear rules for the future elections.

The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling.

By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence.

Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.

I respectfully dissent.

Now,

what's the problem with that?

Is he a conspiracy theorist?

Is he saying Donald Trump won?

No, he's saying people don't trust the system.

What are we waiting for?

Because we did nothing before, it's made it worse.

Now we're doing it again.

That's not Donald Trump won and come hell or high water.

I'm going to make sure he's in office.

He can't do that at this point.

He is coming

under attack like

business.

He said, quote,

the decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election.

But that may not be the case in the future.

These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority, non-legislative officials have set election rules and to do so well before the next election cycle.

The refusal to do so is inexplicable.

Now, why aren't they doing it?

Because I think some of them want the rules to be fuzzy.

Some of them don't want to get involved.

They like their cushy little thing and they think they're saving themselves.

from

any kind of public outrage if they don't get involved, if they don't overturn overturn things, if they just would leave it alone.

But they're wrong.

See,

the government says that we have a lack of trust.

And that's the problem.

That the American people have been sold a bill of goods by people like me

and that has caused them to have a lack of trust.

And so now there's a bunch of anti-government people.

No,

we are not anti-government.

I'm not an anarchist.

The anarchists wear black.

They are here and on our streets.

They are talking about tearing down the United States government.

Now,

you are also not protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States.

If you are saying this is a racist country that the whole system needs to be dismantled

and replaced with what?

You're denying rights under the Bill of Rights.

I am for the Bill of Rights.

I am not for tearing this government down.

I'm actually for your secession, not mine.

I'm not leaving.

Why would I leave?

I've got the

Constitution's in the National Archives.

It's right there, in front of everybody to see.

I agree with every word there.

So that's the government I'm fighting for.

If you're fighting for that government too, if you believe in those rights,

why would either of us leave?

That's the government.

But you want to silence us because you want to try to make us sound like we're unreasonable.

What he just said was completely reasonable.

You want to repair trust, this is what you do.

You just let it be heard.

People who,

I found this

because of a flaw in me.

I was my most pompous

when I was the biggest doubter of me.

People who have huge egos,

sometimes, many times, are the ones who in the quiet of night and the quiet of their car when their radio is broken and they can't turn it up are constantly questioning themselves

the people who tell you i'm the best at this probably are not

it's the people that are quietly just going up stepping up to the plate and doing it They don't have to tell everybody they're the best.

When you defend yourself as Jesus did,

you're walking with the ultimate knowledge of eternal truth.

You're walking with the knowledge of what you really do know.

And you have, you don't have to

beat everybody up and silence everybody.

I don't want to silence anyone.

I don't, I really don't mind that Antifa

is

present and talking and being online.

I have a problem with their violence.

More speech, not less.

And anyone who tries to take away the right of the First Amendment

under any guise

is, by definition, a fascist.

If you are banning books, if you are silencing people, if you are cutting them off and isolating them because they don't agree with your political point of view, you, by definition, are an authoritarian.

You are a fascist.

My way or the highway is fascistic.

Now, I want to tell you

why this is so important

that you follow in Clarence Thomas' shoes.

The time to argue if Donald Trump won or not is over.

It's over.

It doesn't matter at this point because there is no way to redress it.

You can't come in now and change things.

So it doesn't matter.

You can vote for him in 2024 if he runs.

You can vote for him in 2024.

You can campaign for him in 2024.

You can

make sure that it doesn't happen again.

And that's what Clarence Thomas is doing.

If there was something wrong,

then we need to find it and address it.

If there was nothing wrong, we should still have a hearing open to the public.

Because secrecy and strong-arming only leads to more trouble.

But who's the fascist now?

Before a hearing set for this Wednesday, tomorrow, Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee

Now,

energy and commerce,

what do they have to do with cable news?

The Democrats in a hearing

of the Energy and Commerce Committee asked cable companies what they did to combat the spread of information,

disinformation.

Three months ago, federal lawmakers Grilled Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook chief executive Jack Dorsey, Twitter's chief about the misinformation that had appeared on their platforms.

In advance of the Wednesday hearing called Fanning the Flames, Disinformation and Extremism in the Media, members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee sent a letter on Monday to Comcast, ATT, Spectrum, Dish, Verizon, Cox,

Eltis, ask them about their role of the spread of dangerous misinformation.

The committee members also sent the letter to Roku, Amazon, Apple, Google, and Hulu, digital companies that involve themselves in what's called OTT, over-the-top distribution.

That means

the Blaze.

This is what the letter said.

To our knowledge, the cable, satellite, and over-the-top companies that disseminate these media outlets to American viewers have done nothing in response to misinformation aired by these outlets.

By the way, the outlets, Newsmax,

you have

OAN

and Fox News, the cable outlets.

Congress can raise the issue of what cable providers bear responsibility for the programs they deliver to millions of Americans, but it may have no way to force them to drop networks that have spread misinformation.

And unlike the broadcast world, they don't have control over the cable industry.

They don't have control.

They're not using the public airwaves.

They're using cable.

So the FCC has no jurisdiction.

The lawmaker's letter asks the company, what steps did you take prior to, on, and following the November 3rd, 2020 elections and January 6, 2021?

The attacks to monitor, respond to, and reduce the spread of disinformation.

What did you do?

Including encouragement or incitement of violence by your channels, your company disseminates to millions of Americans.

The next question

in the House of Un-American Activities asks this:

Are you planning to continue carrying Fox News, OAN, and Newsmax on your platform both now and beyond the renewal date?

If so,

why

they are sending a very clear message to these businesses.

You either cancel them, you either stop them.

Now, remember, they're going to Amazon as well.

You either completely de-platform these people,

or we will come after you.

Who is the fascist now?

More in a minute.

Ah, you remember that awesome vacation that you were talked into when you were on vacation, and that guy was like, Oh man, you could have an I'll have an awesome vacation just like this every time because you're gonna own a piece of it.

It's a timeshare, it's great.

Oh, the swimming pools, the palm trees, the little tiki bars every so feet.

And the one you like, you like that one?

Oh, we're going to put you in that one every time.

Until they didn't.

Until you finance, which they said, oh, no, the banks can just, they'll just, they'll do another loan.

I know this is, this is like a credit card loan.

It's 14%

mortgage interest.

But you'll go to your bank and they'll be able to take care of that.

Okay.

No, banks can't do that because you don't own anything.

It's time to end the madness and get out.

100% guaranteed exit strategy is offered now by Timeshare Termination Team.

Get the process started.

Don't keep putting it off, getting stuck with another year of timeshare that you won't use, or because of COVID, you can't use.

You'll get 20% off when you terminate your timeshare if you tell them that I sent you.

Call them, 888-GETYOOUT.

888-GETYU OUT.

If you don't have letters on your phone, it's 888-438-8688 or visit them online at timeshare termination team.com.

That's timeshare termination team.com.

10 seconds station ID.

Unbelievable.

Unbelievable.

They are coming after anyone that disagrees with them.

And they are building.

This is why Merrick Garland scares me so much.

He couldn't answer any of the questions.

And his first thing that he said he's going to do is go after

right-wing, violent extremists and white supremacists.

That's his specialty.

Yeah, it's his specialty.

That's why he was selected.

That's why he was selected.

And now you have a meeting of House members and sending a threatening letter.

It's hard to understand why the Clarence Thomas position isn't sensible, as you mentioned.

It's like

there's a disagreement about whether you can do these things, right, without, you could change these laws without the state handling it a very certain way.

Didn't happen last time.

As Clarence Thomas clearly points out, wouldn't have changed the election results.

He says it

straight out in his dissent.

It's not about changing the election results.

It wouldn't have changed the election results, but it might next time

be on that band and learn and have these things, these rules set so we don't have these problems next time.

But he also says in there, and I think this is just as important,

we must restore the trust.

We have to have an open hearing and an open forum on this and go through all of it.

Yeah, and I think that's, I mean, I don't understand why, again, you have some very good Supreme Court justices that did not agree with Thomas on this.

And I assume that that's their issue here, is they don't want to, they don't want to introduce this idea that the election was stolen or whatever, and they don't want to give it any credence, which, okay, I mean, you understand that at some level, but at the other side of it is like, we do have future elections.

I don't know.

Like, maybe we should sort this out so this isn't an issue for every future election, especially when a good chunk of the country thinks the last one was unfair.

You have to knock as many of these issues out in advance as possible in a point when there isn't a partisan disagreement about it.

We're past the election.

Here's a safe time to take up a case like this.

I don't know what the issue is.

Here is, I want you to listen very carefully to what exactly I'm saying here.

There is no way to change the election result now.

No way.

The Constitution is very clear on that, and I'm a constitutionalist.

There is not enough evidence that has been presented in

a courtroom to convince me that this election was stolen by the machines or anything else.

However,

there is enough smoke in the air to say,

you know what?

I just I don't believe

that if they wouldn't have changed all the rules, they wouldn't have played just just all in the margins everywhere, I don't believe the election would have turned out the same.

Now, I could be wrong,

and you're not going to convince me by telling me to shut up.

That only makes me more suspicious.

You're going to convince me by having a reasonable conversation with real evidence in front of a real body that is balanced.

This is the Glenback program.

I want to talk to you a little bit about Goldline.

Right now, holding dollars

is going to punish you.

We have inflated the money, and I got to talk about this probably tomorrow.

Would you write this down?

I've got to talk about velocity with money tomorrow.

Man, everybody's riveted to their seat on this.

Wow, this is at your calendar.

I know, but this is why you worry about them printing 26%

more than they have the year before.

In fact, this is the largest money printing since 1946.

You might want to consider gold or silver.

Right now, call Goldline, find out why allocating just 20% of your retirement portfolio in precious metals is prudent and a wise investment.

Nobody is saying

put your portfolio entirely in gold and silver.

That's ridiculous.

But have some in your portfolio in precious metals.

Right now, Goldline has a couple of offers.

One of them, 6% promotional medals delivered directly to you with a qualifying purchase of your self-directed IRA or 401k or other retirement account.

Call them, they're waiting, 866 Goldline, 866 Goldline.

And go to Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

The promo code is Glenn for 30 bucks off your subscription to Blaze TV.

We need conservative media now more than ever.

It's blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

This is the Glenn Beck program, and this is why shows like this, podcasts, networks like OAN, Newsmax,

Fox News, even if we don't agree with each other on many things,

it's important to have differing points of view.

These are the kinds of things that when the government comes to squash us, you will no longer hear.

The for the people bill is now in the House.

It's H.R.

1.

It is anything but for the people.

It is for the oligarchs.

And it is a federal grab of power, unconstitutional power, of the voting process.

Clarence Thomas wrote his dissent yesterday.

It was pretty clear what has to be done,

but not according to Congress.

They're going another direction.

I want to introduce you to Robert Charles.

He's a spokesperson for AMAC.

Full disclosure, AMAC is a sponsor of this program, but I don't have sponsors on just to have sponsors on.

This guy has worked in national security and criminal justice for more than three decades, including Reagan and Bush 41 on the

U.S.

Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Staff Director, Chief Counsel to the U.S.

House National Security, International Affairs, Criminal Justice Subcommittee, unanimously confirmed by the Senate in 2003.

He was Colin Powell's Assistant Secretary of State, INL, managing a $2 billion bureau focused on the rule of law, international police training, blah, blah, blah.

I mean, I've only given you a third of his resume.

This guy has credibility, and he is a spokesperson for AMAC, and they have been very, very involved in stopping HR1.

Welcome to the program, Bobby.

Hey, Glenn, it is a privilege to be on your program, and I appreciate the intro, and of course, encourage anybody to join AMAC.us.

AMAC has 2.3 million conservatives out there, fastest-growing conservative organization in the country.

But, boy, I am so glad you're on the air and happy to be with you.

Tell me what HR1 is.

HR-1 is a travesty.

It's an abomination.

And you hit it pretty hard right on with

your sort of soundbite there.

The bottom line is it is the Democrat effort to reach for one-party control and essentially take all the bad things that occurred in the 2020 election cycle and institutionalize them by pulling the election process, which the founders, as you so brilliantly have written about, but that the founders put at the state level.

They want to pull it to the federal level.

And what would it do?

It would do about 10 really horrific things.

It would ban voter IDs.

It would allow mail-in ballots to become the standard.

It would create same-day and online registration for voters.

It would make a one-party FEC so you'd never be able to reverse it.

It would create mandatory early voting, DMV

automatic registration, so all illegals would be automatically registered.

It would give you

felons would be able to vote, 16-year-olds would be able to register.

Jeez.

It would allow, yeah, it's just crazy.

And in fact, you know, the irony is both the Wall Street Journal and the ACLU, who agree on almost nothing, agree that this HR1, which will pass the House and could pass the Senate, is really an abomination.

So,

oh my gosh.

I'm not concerned.

Well, they put everything in there.

So I am concerned that the whole thing passes.

But I'm also concerned about a reconciliation where the Senate says, oh, we can't pass this, and they water it down.

Any of this stuff,

correct me if I'm wrong, is unconstitutional.

The federal government has no role in the way states vote.

Well, that's exactly right.

And actually, you know, you're right to be worried about the Senate.

Right now, the reason that it is likely not to immediately pass the Senate, but we've got to be fearful is that you have two senators, Democrats, who are moderate Democrats, Joe Manchin and Cinema, who say, hey, we don't want to get rid of the filibuster.

Well, yeah, we don't want to get rid of the filibuster.

And the filibuster means you need 60 votes in order to get a vote of closure and get a bad thing to get out.

If you drop the filibuster, this bill would almost certainly get out of the Senate.

And the sad part is it's not only unconstitutional,

it drives, it actually hits political speech too.

It actually tries to, it reveals all the details of any conservative groups, contributors, right down to addresses, so that people can be doxxed, they can show up on your front lawn.

It really intends, it's an intimidation bill is what it is.

And I think, I guess I am fearful because normally a bill like this wouldn't have a prayer of getting out of either chamber.

But right now we live in surreal times, as you so often say.

And we're in a tough moment right now.

H.R.

1 1 could get out, along with other bills like H.R.

127 that tries to confiscate guns.

I mean, these are significant impairments to the Constitution.

Tell me about that one.

I mean, honestly, I saw H.R.

1 come out the first week, and I thought this is a Hail Mary Pass.

They'll never.

They will.

They will get it through the Senate.

Well,

let's pray and let's also work that they don't get it through the Senate.

And if the filibuster holds, I don't see them getting it through the Senate, just like H.R.

127.

But, you know, these are stealth, you know, we have all this impeachment distraction.

These bills were being crafted behind the scenes to get out as fast as they can get them out.

And they will both pass the House.

The second one, this H.R.

127, allows confiscation of guns, but it does much more than that.

It says you can't buy a gun in the future without giving every detail about your home, including where the gun is stored.

They'll all be made public.

You have to have a psychiatric evaluation.

You have to

mandatory minimums up to 30 years in prison if you don't get the license.

So we're in an environment right now.

I mean, there's a lot in that bill that people can be afraid of, and I am.

But we're in an environment where conservatives need to stand up and speak out.

And you're a historian, and you know that Edmund Brooke was really right.

All it takes for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.

And we are in a position now where we have to not be those people who do nothing.

So here's the problem, Bobby, is that people feel as I mean, they've been worn out.

They've been worn out

and they feel as though the Republican Party doesn't hold their values anymore.

I mean are the Republicans going to actually

mount something and actually carry through with their mission and do they have a plan smart enough to actually pull it off?

Well, the bottom line is that we the people have to give spine to those that pursuant to the Constitution are supposed to be doing our bidding.

And we know that 75 million Americans voted for Donald Trump.

We also know that probably another 40 or 50 million sat at home on their couches thinking all would be well, and they love America, but they didn't vote.

So the vast majority of Americans, I think, are on the right side of history.

The problem is history will make itself if you don't help make it.

And, you know, I'm an old Norman Rockwell Republican.

I'm a Ronald Reagan Republican.

Strong defense, good moral compass, smaller government, lower taxes.

If we don't speak up for those things, they will be taken away from us.

I thought you said at first that you were

a Rockefeller Republican.

I was like, that's not good.

No, Norman Rockwell.

Yeah, I get it.

I get it.

Yeah.

So

let me, again, full disclosure, he works for AMAC.

AMAC is a sponsor, but you know me well enough to know I ask this of everybody who talks like this.

What are you guys doing about it?

What can people in this audience do?

Unbelievably, and this is why I love AMAC.

I think it's the natural extension.

The reason I work for them is that they are the natural extension of the Reagan approach.

Yes, you get economic benefits like other organizations for those over the age of 50, but the main mission is they fight every single day.

When I say fight, I mean they are submitting petitions, they are sending tens of thousands of emails, they are making phone calls around the clock to try to defend the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Tenth Amendment.

I write every day on AMAC.

I don't write every day.

I write every week, three times a week on AMAC.us.

They push their publications out.

We're on radio.

We're on television.

I mean, I'm regularly on Fox.

Bottom line is, this is an organization that is trying to stop bad things from happening with detailed.

In fact, people can become delegates.

They can become actively involved.

I mean, at the end of the day, you know, De Tocqueville was right.

At the end of the day, Americans are unique because we do get involved in the civic process and we do try to fix problems.

And I am an optimist.

We can fix these problems.

And the natural law principles that are all embodied in the things AMAC defends, the Bill of Rights, those things aren't going away.

They're given by God and they're out there.

But we've got to fight for them because there are government people.

I mean, you know the list of names that at the national level are trying to strip us of these rights.

And these really are the precious rights that make everything else possible.

I urge you to join AMAC.

They are, I mean,

I've watched this organization from the very beginning.

They got into it when Obamacare was going, and they realized what the competitive, the competitor to AMAC was doing.

And I talked about it on Fox, and I'm like, this is crazy.

Look at what's happening.

They're selling old people.

They say they represent old people, and they're selling them down the river.

And AMAC came out of those days, and they are relentless.

So join them.

Find them at AMAC, A-M-A-C.us

and

join them if you can.

Thank you so much.

Appreciate it, Bobby.

We'll have you on again.

Thank you.

You bet.

Bye-bye.

It's really scary, isn't it?

I mean, I think most people I know are still not paying attention.

They're just not paying attention.

And a lot of conservatives I know, they're just like, I don't know.

I mean, it's just all crazy.

Yeah, there's a tendency after, especially like a big election that you come out on the wrong side of, that you just don't want to even engage for a while.

And this is when they roll over everything.

These, these 100 days are changing America, fundamentally changing America.

Just this $1.9 trillion bill they're forcing through has all, I mean, yes, the $15 minimum wage has had a lot of attention on it, but I mean, you know, there's tons of other stuff in there to go through.

It's scary.

And they're going to be able to do basically whatever they want with it.

Terry lives in Georgia.

By the time he heard about Relief Factor on my program, he had been living with lower back and leg pain for a number of years.

You know, the great thing is, Terry, after a while, the legs just go numb.

And I think that might be bad.

I should talk to the doctor.

Anyway, he tried a lot of things to remedy the pain, and some of them even worked for a little while, but nothing worked permanently.

So when he heard about my experience with Relief Factor, he decided it was worth a shot.

Well, Terry now tells me that within a few weeks, of just starting to take it, Terry discovered that he was no longer in pain.

He said it melted away.

And like me, Terry wasn't content just to keep the news to himself.

He tells everybody he talks to now about the relief that he has received from Relief Factor.

He got his life back.

He wants you to get your life back.

I want you to get your life back.

I mean, don't live in pain.

70% of the people who try this go on to order more month after month because it works for them.

And you'll know within the first three weeks.

That's why they offer the three-week quick start.

Just try it for $19.95.

ReliefFactor.com.

That's relief factor.com or call 800-500-8384.

800-500-8384.

So everything I had planned for today kind of went out the window

as we started the show because there was so much to talk about and news today, but I still need to get...

I need to get through a couple of things.

I want to, again, talk to you about Disney,

you know, now labeling all of, I don't have a problem, you know, play Song of the South.

There's nothing wrong with that.

My

20-something daughters who, you know, are like, dad, dad, I mean,

you know, you're not for black lives.

You're saying black lives don't matter?

No.

Okay, so they keep me honest.

They push me and push me and push me.

They even watched Song of the South and went, what's the problem with this?

And I said, well, the whole slavery thing.

And they're like, yeah, obviously the whole slavery.

It's a historical piece about that era.

No,

no, it's about, really, it's about the 1940s and its look at that era.

Right, right, right.

But again, it's a look at that era.

But all of it is important to understand how these things develop, I feel like.

Exactly right.

So now that one's banned.

You can't watch that one, of course.

But Disney is not only saying, hey, some of these historic stereotypes are wrong.

What they're saying now is this was wrong then

and it's wrong now.

Does anyone have standing?

I'm not an attorney.

Does anyone have standing to go after Disney?

Because they were pushing things that they just admitted they knew was wrong then.

It's one thing say

it was the time that we were living in, it was perceived as okay then.

Right.

And they didn't say like we knew it was wrong then.

They said it was wrong.

It was wrong then.

Because the Trump administration sort of did a little bit of this with one of the universities who came out and made a big statement about how racist they were.

And then the Trump administration was like, oh, you guys are racist?

Well, we weren't going to, we didn't know that.

You guys are admitting it and it's against the law.

So if you guys actually were racist,

then we'll come after you.

And then, of course, they reversed course on that one.

Because it is, I don't know.

I mean, it's like they're doing this on the Muppet show.

Like, did the Muppet?

I don't remember.

I mean, I watched the Muppet Show.

It ran from 1976 to 1981.

It's easy being green.

Right.

My gosh, this guy is for

Pasaki

and he has no problem with it.

Pretty much that's that.

I don't think that's how you pronounce her name.

Yeah.

You know why?

You know why?

Because her family has demanded that the P remain silent.

And I say the P should not remain silent any longer.

Not on my watch.

P needs to stand up against the Pasaki family.

Enough is enough.

For generations, they've been keeping that letter down.

I'm glad you stood up finally.

Thank you.

It was wrong then.

It is wrong now.

And they knew it.

But is there, was there overt racism on the Muppet show?

Like, I don't remember that at all.

Oh, my.

Seriously, was it?

Was that a problematic name?

It's a easy

green joke.

It ain't easy.

He was green.

He was a person of color.

He was a POC.

He's a frog, Glenn.

His name is Kermit the Frog.

He's a frog.

Frogs are usually.

Or if you want to go down that road.

They're all puppets.

Yeah, thank you.

They're all puppets.

But like, none of of them.

None of them.

But like, there were cartoons of like

overt,

terrible, racist characterizations of black people and Asian people from our past that I can understand saying, okay, that was wrong then.

It's wrong now.

But like, was there an issue with the Muppets?

Like, I've never even heard a complaint about the Muppets before.

I'm not going to dignify that with a response.

Has there been?

I'm not even.

Oh, stop it.

You know there was.

What?

So I'm not going to dignify that.

What character did it?

I I wanted not knowing

speaks volumes.

They went after the Swedish chef.

They made him completely

a white guy.

You're talking about the oppression of a Swede.

Oh my gosh.

And I suppose you want to keep the pee silent as well.

This is the Glenn Beck program.