Is Unity This Far Off? | Guests: Andy Ngo & Heather Mewshaw | 2/10/21

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.

Fiscally responsible, financial geniuses, monetary magicians.

These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds.

Visit progressive.com to see if you could save.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates.

Potential savings will vary, not available in all states or situations.

All right, let me tell you about keeps.

You want to keep your hair.

I mean, look at the hair I have.

For 71 years old, that's pretty good.

Yeah.

Now, if I was like 57,

it's still pretty good, though.

You get the hair.

You're not having that issue.

No, I haven't.

I haven't had that issue since I was in my 30s because I started losing my hair and I started taking, you know, propecia at the time.

Now I get the generic brand and it's a lot cheaper.

And that's exactly what Keeps does for you.

K-E-E-P-S.com slash save.

If you go there now, you don't have to go to a doctor.

You don't have to go to the pharmacy.

They do all of it online.

You take some pictures of your head.

A doctor looks at it, decides which is the right prescription for you, talks to you, sends you a prescription.

They fill it out for you at Keeps, and you save 50% off your first order for the hair loss treatments.

That's Keeps, K-E-E-P-S dot com slash save, keeps.com slash save.

Buckle up another spooky show.

The spooky dude makes an appearance.

Blah blah blah.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This

is

the Glenback program.

So the Biden administration has

now signed

52 executive orders in 20 days.

52.

And he wants us to unite because he's just getting rid of bad laws and putting good things in.

That's almost a damn quote.

Okay, all right.

Sure.

So let's look at some of those things.

And before we go anywhere,

I need to tell you what's happening in the banking community and build off of what I said yesterday with the International Monetary Fund.

And to tell you why I am not breathlessly covering the impeachment trial like everybody else.

We do that in 60 seconds.

The Glenn Beck program.

So John lives in Kansas for the past several years following an injury.

He suffered from daily awful back pain.

He found it was pretty hard to do much of anything that he used to do, and it was getting him down.

I mean,

I was

remodeling a house.

Oh, gosh, must have been 30, 32 years old, something like that.

And I fell out of a second story window.

And I am,

I remember laying on the ground.

I couldn't move, but I remember laying on the ground thinking, I'm surprised I'm not dead.

And I couldn't walk for a long time.

I mean,

my kids were coming home and I had to drag myself by my hands on the ground off the driveway and into the kitchen where I thought it'd be better for them to find me on the kitchen floor than on the driveway.

I don't know if it was any better, but it screwed up my back and I've had a bad back ever since.

I know what John was going through.

He decided to give Relief Factor a try.

He heard me talking about the relief that I have received.

And he said within 10 days, he was noticing a reduction in pain.

And after a few weeks, he said he felt better than he even did before the injury.

He got his life back.

This is

an inflammatory reducer.

It reduces all the inflammation in the body.

And yeah, I mean, I've even been on ibuprofen 800.

I know.

I'm a heavy drug user.

I've been on ibuprofen 800.

Didn't touch me.

This works.

70% of the people who try it go on to order more.

You'll know within the first three weeks.

Relief Factor.

It's not a drug, but developed by doctors to get you out of pain.

1995 to try it for three weeks.

Do it.

See if it changes your pain.

ReliefFactor.com, ReliefFactor.com, or call 800-500-8384.

ReliefFactor.com, 800-500-8384.

Tonight on Glenn TV.

And the question is, how are we going to really almost deprogram these people who have signed up for the cult of Trump?

Blacklists, purges, investigations, and arrests.

Is this the new red scare?

Unless we make sure that there's no infiltration, you will see a red world.

Glenn exposes the dangers and next steps of this anti-conservative movement.

Are you on the list?

Tonight, 9 p.m.

Eastern at Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

Hello, America.

I pray

that

my voice is heard for what I'm trying to say

and not what people want to hear on either side.

It is really important that you pay attention to the news.

And I know a lot of people in my own own life that are not paying attention to the news, and they've been really tired.

And I'm going to tell you a story a little later on about how Facebook has decided now they're not going to cover as much political stuff.

Oh, really?

So, when we're talking about 52 executive orders, you don't want to talk about political stuff.

It's going to be harder to pay attention.

And things are going to get more and more complex.

And it's going to be harder to understand what's going on because it is so foreign to us.

Tonight, I am covering

this activity now that is,

I think, the new McCarthy era.

Axios did a story yesterday, how to deprogram America's extremists.

The writer has called for keeping extremists out of the institutions where they could do the greatest damage, like the military, police departments, and legislatures, and providing help for those who have embraced dangerous ideologies.

You notice they don't put those in schools.

It's the police departments, the military, and legislature, but they don't even mention EDU.

And I think that's because they know no one with a dangerous ideology, i.e.

conservative point of view, is in EDU or ever going to get through EDU.

Now, it is unclear as to who will determine what is dangerous ideology and what will constitute such a defining term, but that's where big tech comes in the article continues to say online platforms are unwavering in their commitment to root out conspiracy theories and lies that undermines undermine the faith in democracy

axios spoke to experts on this

uh-huh

The article says, banning President Trump from Twitter was a major asset in the fight to slow or reverse radicalization.

The Axios article calls for a Marshall Plan, which would be implemented throughout Facebook and Twitter through censorship.

It claims the United States requires, quoting, an all-out national effort to dismantle all ideas that supposedly undermine faith in democracy.

It seems the writer of the newsletter doesn't understand

the word democracy, or maybe they do, and they don't understand that we're a republic.

Democracy is not failing us.

The republic system is.

A republic.

You can't have a democracy.

You can't.

Do you want to vote on the banking rules that came out yesterday?

Did you even know?

banking rules were coming out yesterday?

There's too much for the average citizen.

And that's why democracies always go to an authoritarian or a dictatorship because they just

overwhelm the people.

The people say, I don't know, he looks good.

He can handle this.

And you have democracy,

votes by the public, voting in dictatorships.

So there's a democracy until there's not.

That's why we have a republic.

But what is failing us now is our republic.

Do you believe on either side, Republicans or Democrats, that your elected congresspeople

really, truly are reflecting what you and people in the country actually believe?

Are they carrying out the things that you believe

are right and righteous for this country?

Term limits.

How about they can't all get rich on insider trading?

Are they carrying these things out?

Do you think it's cool that we're just printing money and nobody's doing anything?

How about this?

Do you think it's cool that we haven't had a budget for this nation,

the largest, richest nation in the history of the world, that we don't even have a budget and haven't had one since 2008?

The Republic is failing us

because we are not

that they actually do their work.

Big tech now is the arbiter of truth.

And I'm not sure what a dangerous ideology is anymore as it is being defined by those in power.

The idea of a conservative and a conspiracy theorist,

that line is being blurred.

The New York Times just last year started to refer to me, it used to say,

a well-known conspiracy theorist or an alleged conspiracy theorist.

Now it's just Glenn Beck,

conspiracy theorist.

I told you yesterday that the IMF had an academic paper out.

And they are suggesting now that non-financial data should be used when financial institutions

determine customers' credit worthiness for loans, various kinds,

by non-financial data.

That means things like the type of browser and hardware that you use to access the internet, the history, I'm quoting, the history of online

searches and purchases.

So

what kind of computer and phone I have?

And the past purchases?

And what I'm reading, what websites I'm going to?

I want to just read and go over, we went over this yesterday, but I want to go over it because there's new news.

The most transformative information innovation is the increase of the new types of data coming from the digital footprint of customers' various online activities, mainly for credit worthiness analysis.

Credit scoring using so-called hard information, income, employment, time, assets, and debts is nothing new.

Typically, the more data is is available, the more accurate is the assessment.

But this method has two problems.

First, hard information tends to be procyclical.

It boosts credit expansions in good times, but exacerbates contraction during downturns.

The second most complex problem is that certain kinds of people, like new entrepreneurs, innovators, many informal workers, might not have enough hard data available.

As well as even a well-paid expatriate moving to the United States can be caught in the conundrum of not getting a credit card for lack of credit.

FinTech, Financial Tech, resolves the dilemma by tapping various non-financial data, the type of browser hardware used, yada, yada, yada.

This, of course, is a financial

social credit system.

We have been warning about this for years.

This is one of the most dangerous parts of what is being called the great reset, and this is just the beginning.

In the same article from the IMF later, the same authors then say the central banks need to get more directly involved in economic activity and that more money printing in downturns is likely going to be necessary.

The environment, I'm quoting from the article, the environment for monetary policy will change too.

New monetary policy transmission channels will be need to be fully understood as the new players make banks less relevant for the financial system.

Central banks may need to adjust their monetary policy implementation toolbox, potentially allowing non-bank access to liquidity lines and incorporating them in their operations.

Okay, so that's what I told you about yesterday.

Do you remember when

Cuomo told the banks in New York,

you can give loans to gun manufacturers, but if you do, there's just going to be more regulations on you guys, and we're going to have to have more state inspectors because we just think there's something wrong with these gun manufacturers and gun stores.

We think, you know, that there's some violation of some law.

So, you know, we're not telling you not to loan.

We're just saying that it's going to make your

state

assessments

every year.

It's going to be more and more difficult for you because we just don't trust the people who are dealing in guns.

Oh, okay.

So, what did the banks do?

Banks started saying, you know what,

we're not going to, we can't carry your loan anymore.

Well, Donald Trump, through what's called the OCC,

the office of the comptroller of the currency,

he wrote in in that office that banks cannot discriminate.

They cannot say, we're not going to make a business loan to guns.

You can't do it for ideological or political reasons.

Well, people have been watching this back and forth because

the OCC changed hands and people have been saying, I don't think this is going to stand.

I think they're going to take this out.

Well, they made their decision yesterday.

I will read from the OCC, the Office of Currency Comptroller, and the new rule on banks, on what they can and cannot do to individuals and to service industries in 60 seconds.

That might be too sexy a tease.

You think so?

I will read from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in 60 seconds.

It is really sexy.

Yeah, that's all fame stuff right there.

Yeah.

Let me tell you about Timeshare Termination team.

Right now, if you have a timeshare, it's hanging around your neck, choking the life out of you.

There is a legal and affordable way to get completely out of that thing.

It's called Timeshare Termination Team.

And they can give you 100%

guaranteed exit strategy for getting out of that

timeshare.

No more maintenance fees, no more hassle, no more disappointment, no more pain in the butt.

Get the process started right now.

Call Timeshare Termination Team and get the process started.

Don't keep putting it off and and get stuck with another year of timeshare that you're not going to use.

You're going to get 20% off when you terminate your timeshare if you tell them that I sent you.

So make sure you tell them that you'll get 20% off.

Call 888-GETYU OUT.

That's 888-GETYUOUT or visit them online at timeshare termination team.com.

Have the peace of mind with Timeshare Termination Team's 100% money-back exit guarantee.

Learn more at timeshare termination team.com.

10 seconds, station ID.

Oh, yeah, it is.

Ooh, yes.

Oh, talk to me about the OCC.

Oh, say Comptroller again.

Say it.

All right.

They released yesterday the finalized rule to ensure fair access to banking services provided by large national banks, federal savings associations, and federal branches and agencies of foreign bank organizations.

Now, I've read a lot about this this morning, and it seems to be in direct conflict.

Some say who I respect, that doesn't mean anything.

And others, whom I respect, say,

this is really bad.

So if you're in the banking industry, if you can help figure this one out, I'd sure like to hear it.

I'm going to be doing more research on it today, and I'll get back to you tomorrow.

But you need to know.

The rule codifies.

Now, listen to this, because this is from the OCC.

So this is what they're saying.

This is the government speaking.

The rule codifies more than a decade of OCC guidance stating that banks should conduct risk assessment of individual customers rather than make broad-based decisions affecting whole categories or classes of customers when provisioning access to services, capital, and credit.

Now, all of these rules were put in, you have to understand, in 2008 or 2009

with

the Dodd-Frank bills.

Okay, what did the Dodd-Frank bills do?

Basically, no matter what they said, they were to protect the banks, the banks that were too big to fail.

So you guys have to do certain things.

You can't take on risks because you're too big to fail.

So

all these rules were put there to protect the banks, in many ways, from themselves.

Okay.

When a large bank decides, I'm quoting, when a a large bank decides to cut off access to charities or even embassies serving dangerous parts of the world or companies conducting legal business in the United States that support local jobs and the national economy, they need to show their work and legitimate business reasons for doing so.

Okay, that's good.

Show your work.

As comptrollers and staff in previous administrations have made clear in speeches, guidance, and testimonies, banks should not terminate its services to entire categories of customers without conducting individual risk assessments.

Okay?

So they can't just say no loans to gun manufacturers.

They have to say it individually and make the case with each individual, right?

All right.

It is inconsistent with the basic principles of prudent risk management to make decisions based solely on a

categorical ascertation of risk

without actual analysis.

Okay, so all of this is good.

Now let me tell you what the actual ruling was yesterday, and I'm reading from the document.

In finalizing the rule, The agency considered more than 35,000 stakeholder comments.

Red flag anyone?

As a result, the final rule excludes section 55.1b3 of the proposed rule, which would have required that a covered bank cannot deny any person a financial service that the bank offers when the effect of the denial is to prevent, limit, or otherwise disadvantage the person from entering or competing in a market or business segment.

So in other words, the rule was that they can't do do it.

They can't say, I don't want Glenn Beck in the media, so we're not going to give him any money.

Or because the bank had a loan in some other business activity which they have a financial interest, so they're part of Facebook and I want to open up Parlor.

They can't do that.

Okay, they can't say, No, Parlor, you can't have any money because we have money in Facebook.

But I want to go back to the first part of that sentence:

the final rule excludes that.

The agency determined that the requirement would have resulted in regulatory burdens without contributing to the primary objective of the rule.

So now the Biden administration says we're trying to cut down on the red tape.

There'd be too many burdens on the banks.

Based on that analysis, the agency eliminated that requirement to focus on the rule of fairness, another key word, of the covered bank's decision-making process and prudent risk management principles, as well as to facilitate the OCC's administration of this rule.

Okay, what if the bank says, you know what,

if we go into business and give Exxon all these loans,

we're in trouble because of the cancel culture.

They're going to start canceling us as a bank.

We can't afford that.

Help me out here.

This is the Glenback program.

You see the conundrum here that we're in, Stu?

And I don't know an answer yet.

Welcome to Andrew Cuomo's restaurant, where your Valentine's dinner comes with a smile

and a cough.

We're getting clever around here, calling it a dead and breakfast.

Huh?

That's where I'm sending my mom to a dead and breakfast.

Ha ha ha ha.

You still love birds can share a table with some friends of mine from Wuhan.

Nothing happened in Wuhan.

Now, if that doesn't sound appealing to you, may I suggest a romantic restaurant-style dinner at home with one of the best steaks known to man from Omaha Steaks.

This is America's butcher for over a hundred years, and they have great packages like the Butcher's bestsellers grilled pack.

They have Valentine's Day packages as well.

It's really good and all the way to the dessert.

So, man, you just pop it in the oven, you put some steaks on the grill, and you look like a genius.

Go to omahosteaks.com in the search bar, use the keyword back, and you'll find all the specials.

It's omahosteaks.com, keyword beck.

And head over to blazetv.com/slash glenn.

The promo code is glenn.

30 bucks off your subscription to blaze TV right now.

Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

This is the Glenn Vec program.

So Jeep took a swing in the Super Bowl ads.

Did you see the ad, the two-minute ad from Jeep with Bruce Springsteen?

Oh, this is the Bruce Springsteen Unity commercial?

Yes.

Seems an odd messenger.

It does.

It does.

Now listen to this.

In the poll by Ad Week

on social media on Super Bowl Sunday,

they found Instagram, 50% of respondents say they love the ad, 50% hated it.

Twitter, 33% loved it.

33% hated it.

33% said, nah.

So Unity, that message depends on your POV politically.

So

that means that when we were saying unity and we should all come together, it went on deaf ears because no one in the media, no one on the left, nobody in the Democratic Party wanted to hear it.

They didn't want to hear it.

Now,

when

they're calling for unity, we don't want to hear it.

And why?

Because we have nothing in common anymore

what do we have in common research will show that we don't even buy the same packaged food anymore we don't we can go to the grocery store and now algorithms can tell if you're a conservative or a liberal based on the products you buy in the same grocery store

What's up with that?

How is that possible?

We are so different fundamentally now.

See, America used to be a melting pot.

But what did we, what did we melt into?

We melted into a society that said, I don't care what you do, man.

I don't care.

Just don't tell me what to do.

We didn't even have marriage license.

We didn't have a marriage license until

The progressives.

The progressives wanted to make sure that we weren't breeding defectives and that we weren't having interracial marriages.

So the progressives put in the marriage license to control the population.

And so instead of having the argument that there should be no marriage license that comes from the state, the state has no place deciding that.

We instead decided to have a religious argument,

which

we wouldn't have done that when it came to the government before.

Remember, our founders went from courtroom to courtroom to courtroom after the Revolutionary War to defend people's right to not have to believe what the rest of the community believed.

We were a melting pot of people that came here because we've been screwed by governments elsewhere.

And we saw this as a place, hey, man, they'll leave you alone.

They'll let you do your own thing.

Well, we don't.

I mean, look at, you can't build a house the way you want to build a house.

You can't do the things you want to do.

Do you know that Houston is the only major city without any kind of zoning?

Every large city has been convinced by progressives that you have to have zoning.

Otherwise, they're going to build a McDonald's in your neighborhood.

And I mean right next to your house.

Well, you know what?

It doesn't happen in Houston.

Why?

Because people figure it out.

People at McDonald's say, you know, it's a really nice neighborhood.

They're not going to want one here.

It'll be more convenient if it's over here and I'll do better business.

But now everything is controlled.

And yet we're still, and this is disappearing quickly.

I'll tell you about what France just said.

This is disappearing quickly, but we still are one of the best in the world.

But that's gone.

Unless we can come back together and say, look, you live your life.

I'll live my life.

And we'll get along.

We're fine.

I'm not going to force you to believe something, force you to do something.

Like, I don't really care if there are Marxists here.

I really don't.

I don't care if they're people that believe in critical race theory.

I don't.

I would never shut them down publishing a book.

They have a right to do it.

And if they can make the case, but see, here's the problem.

I'm no longer being allowed to make the case on the other side.

Educational institutions will not allow me to go in and teach if I were qualified, and I believe I am, to teach against progressivism or whatever.

I'm canceled.

And so it's a one-way street.

And so it has become unify under these ideas or get out.

Well,

In America,

we unify

on these ideas that we hold self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

And that governments are instituted among men to protect those rights.

That's what we used to agree on.

We used to agree on the Bill of Rights.

You can't come into my house and just take stuff.

You can't come in and search my papers.

You can't do that.

You can't

deny me work because of my color, my creed.

You can't do it.

Well, now we can.

And the people who are doing that

and reversing those laws

are calling for unity.

Well, I call for unity as well.

There needs to be unity in our land,

but it cannot be blind or senseless or irresponsible unity.

It's not a unity for the sake of unity.

And unity can only be built on sound principles.

Morally, constitutionally, historically.

We can't have unity on slavery.

It's not moral.

It's not constitutional.

And historically, we see what it leads to.

No, I won't unify under that.

Now, that's an obvious one.

But all of our Bill of Rights,

our Declaration of Independence, those things were self-evident.

And we're in trouble because America knows,

the average person knows.

That our way of life is being threatened right now.

Both sides.

But they blame it on each other.

The blame needs to be placed squarely where it belongs.

The lack of unifying principles.

Our way of life is being threatened.

You damn right it is.

France

just came out and said that the misguided woke culture coming from America

is a threat to the Western society.

France.

What do you say we unite on what you've always said we should unite on?

Be more like France.

Anyone who tries to equate the love of constitutional principles,

and they want to equate that to mean hatred of our national leaders.

You are engaging in massive deception.

It's not hate.

It's attempts to do the people in Washington a favor.

It's well-meaning citizens.

There are bad-meaning citizens, but they're in the minority on both sides.

There is

a ton of well-meaning citizens who want and wanted to prevent our government from making serious constitutional, moral, and historic mistakes.

So the opposition that we have based on those things is rooted in love and respect, not hate.

Speaking out against immoral, unjust actions, things that violate the things that we've always believed and unified on

speaking out against those things always been tough.

Nobody wanted to hear Moses.

All of the apostles were killed, stoned to death, crucified,

persecuted,

some of them burned alive.

Why?

Because no one wants to hear the truth when it really matters.

But our guts tell us the truth.

And those who are watchmen on the towers, and that would be you.

You are required to speak up.

I'm sorry.

I can't be silent.

I can't be.

God told Moses, Proclaim liberty throughout the land unto all inhabitants thereof.

That's what it says on our liberty bell.

It's from Leviticus.

Proclaim liberty throughout the land unto all inhabitants thereof.

Why?

Because truth,

decency, kindness,

charity,

responsibility,

accountability.

The only way any of those things can happen

is when people are unified on freedom.

All right, American Financing, if you've worked hard to get where you are today, and I'm assuming that you have,

unless

Hunter, is that you?

Then you almost certainly know the value of a dollar.

And if you're like me, you hate to spend more on something than you really need to.

And probably also love the feeling that comes with saving money.

If you're a homeowner and you're paying 3, 4, 5% interest, you are way overpaying, way overpaying.

If you are paying 15% for your credit cards, what are you doing?

Roll that into your mortgage without resetting the loan.

You will save hundreds of dollars every single month.

American Financing, 800-906-2440.

Call them now, American Financing at 800-906-2440.

If you've been listening the last couple of days, you know it's going to get harder and harder for you to get a loan.

Do it now.

800-906-2440.

AmericanFinancing.net.

American Financing, NMLS, 1-82334.

www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

We are not covering the impeachment breathlessly like everyone else.

We covered it yesterday.

We'll cover it again today.

Talk to you and tell you what's happening.

But I'm not going to spend hours and hours talking about A, news that you can get elsewhere,

and B, something that I believe is really important,

but a distraction for me.

I need to stay focused on

the net that is being laid out all around

America.

It is a net of the great reset.

It is a net of these

crazy executive orders, 52 executive orders in 20 days.

And this is all really well planned.

And like I read to you today, you know, in changing the banking lobby, the banking policies from the office of the comptroller of the currency here in America, that's an official government office, they changed the policy and a couple of words stuck out.

Fairness and stakeholders.

These are the words of the great reset.

And that is extraordinarily dangerous.

Also, I gave you an Axios article today that is,

again,

truly frightening.

How do we deprogram American extremists?

Well, what they're talking about are Trump supporters.

And they are talking about

a key part of breaking extremists' rising mainstream influence will be making it unacceptable for white nationalists, anti-government extremists, and conspiracy theorists to serve in the military, police forces, or as lawmakers.

But experts worry the GOP tactic and sometimes explicit approval of extremists will hamper efforts to keep police forces and legislatures free of conspiracy theorists.

Yes, a purely

punitive, security-minded approach alone is likely to prove ineffective and invasive at best, experts say.

At worst, it will only fuel extremists' sense of persecution and push them closer to violence.

Instead, experts agree serious resources must be mustered toward providing an off-ramp for people who have been drawn into extremist ideologies.

New federal programs would likely doom to fail, experts say, because of, this is so important.

Remember, I told you about the trust implosion, because distrust and hatred of the government is already a core tenant of far-right extremism.

Instead,

public-private partnerships

developing programs are more likely to be effective because they're able to get the endorsement and funding from federal and state governments, but it's private industry doing it.

That is the definition of the Great Reset.

And there's a whole article on the IMF saying that they need the public, the private institutions to go into the business with the government to be able to legitimize the government because people around the world don't trust their governments.

I need to stay focused on this.

We will give you the information on the impeachment, and it is really important.

Mike Lee is going to come on and talk a little bit about that later on in the program, as well as some other things.

But I have to stay focused on the bigger picture.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

Well, between the news, appointment TV, endless scrolling on our phones, we're looking at our screens, unfortunately, more than ever.

But how do you rest your eyes without feeling totally unplugged?

Well, put on a pair of Raycon wireless earbuds and listen to something great.

Whether you're listening to your favorite podcast, an audio book, or working out to a pumped-up playlist, Raycons are built to perform anywhere, anytime with water and sweat-resistant construction and seamless Bluetooth pairing.

There are no dangling wires or white stems that are poking out of your ears.

They're really comfortable, come in a variety of colors for maximum style and six hours of playtime.

So you can unplug for a good long while.

Best part, Raycon Wireless Earbuds start at half the price of premium audio brands like Apple.

So you can pick up a pair and a spare.

Right now, get 15% off Raycons at buyraycon.com slash Beck.

That's buy, B-U-I-Raycon.com/slash Beck.

15% off Raycon Wireless Earbuds, buyraycon.com slash Beck.

This is the Glenbeck program.

Let me tell you a little bit about Built Bar.

Keeping your New Year's resolution to eat healthier and to eat better food and to get healthier and to possibly lose weight.

I've lost about a pound a week on the diet that I'm on, and I'm trying to change the way I eat entirely, not a diet diet.

And I'm feeling good about it.

And one of the things that keeps me from eating things like my staff just brought me a hostess cupcake.

A happy birthday, Cupcake.

Happy birthday.

By the way, happy birthday.

Thank you.

I instead will have a Built Bar

because I'm dedicated.

That's you.

Dedication, self-restraint.

Because it's my birthday, Built Bar, which tastes tremendous.

I'm going to have a Built Bar.

And then the hostess, Twinkie, as well today.

Of course.

Don't give up on your resolution.

Built Bar is the answer.

They're great.

They'll help you keep on your plan.

They taste good and they're really healthy.

Check them out.

Builtbar.com/slashbeck.

Builtbar.com.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This

is

the Glenback Program.

Well,

hello, America.

I can't tell you how many people

have reached out to me and said, Glenn, I can't find a publisher.

Can you help me find a publisher?

And does Mercury still have Mercury Inc., the imprint that we published a lot of people's books, Michelle Malkin,

gosh,

fiction, David Barton books all kinds of books no those were published through Simon ⁇ Schuster and we don't have the imprint anymore because I left Simon ⁇ Schuster my my death sentence with Simon ⁇ Schuster was ended last year and

you know what's weird is a lot of people are no longer with Simon ⁇ Schuster or or with any of the five big publishing houses.

In fact, it seems as though the big publishing houses in New York City don't really want to publish any conservative books, especially if you were a MAGA supporter.

And those that are being printed are not being printed by the big publishing houses, and I say, I don't really care.

I'll find my own way.

But those who are being published, like Andy No's book, is being boycotted by Antifa.

We told you about that.

But now,

an amazing smear campaign started by the Los Angeles Times on Andy No and his book has begun.

So I wanted to make sure that you heard the response from Andy himself.

Andy No's book on Antifa.

The book is called Unmasked.

You need to get it in paper, hardback form, not digital.

Andy will explain next.

The Glenn Beck program.

Never been a bad idea to be prepared for worst-case scenario.

In the days when we had the Boy Scouts and they meant something, it was one of the things you to lift up three fingers and you say Boy Scout is always prepared.

Oh, but those were in the days when people thought things through.

You could move out of the country, start a subsistence farm, you could stand guard with a shotgun and a pack of wild dogs for anybody who walks across.

You come across my bravery.

Actually, what you need is food that you can stock up and keep in case of emergency situations and then zip your mouth about it.

I mean, these, if you go to my Patriot Supply, they're coming and they're discreet.

It's not, you know, big food supply on the side of the boxes.

So nobody will know that you have them because some people think you're an extremist if you prepare for the future.

I don't.

25 years in proper storage, that's how long this food will stay fresh if you get it from mypatriotsupply.com.

Secure a four-week, three-month, even a year emergency food kit, 2,000 calories every day.

It's all fun and games until somebody puts an eye out.

So don't, I guess, lose your eye.

Or if you do, yeah.

You get my Patriot supply.

Go to mypatriotsupply.com.

Get the food storage you need before somebody puts an eye out.

Food gets shipped in one to two days.

Arrive discreetly at your door.

Don't wait.

Mypatriotsupply.com.

That's mypatriotsupply.com.

Man,

I read this review from the LA Times about Annie No's new book, and

holy cow,

Andy, you are an extremist and a liar, and you're making things up and you think that Antifa is bad.

I agree.

I agree.

You are everything except you are a liar.

You think that Antifa is bad.

This report says,

Let me just give you a bit of the review.

I know you've read it.

There's an alternate universe out there in which we never have to ponder, let alone read Unmasked, Provocateur Andy No's supremely dishonest book.

on the left-wing anti-fascist movement known as Antifa.

In that other world, far, far away, Marjorie Taylor Greene remains a nutty CrossFit

enthusiast from Georgia, not a member of Congress, and we know nothing about her musings on Jewish space lasers, the execution of Democrats, or false flag school closings.

If you find that universe, please send directions.

So they say that your book is part of that universe.

Andy, can you respond to some of the charges in this?

Sure.

Well, first, happy birthday, Glenman.

Thanks for having me on again.

You bet.

So I'm not surprised by the ad hominem attacks in this review that was published in the LA Times.

I wrote in my book, as you recall, about the useful ideas and fellow travelers for Antifa in journalism, and I would include...

this writer as part of that.

I was, as a journalist myself, I was just surprised at the really unprofessional invectives that he used against me, considering he works as the White House correspondent for the Yahoo Doos.

So

it was very, quite despicable.

It doesn't really counter any of my arguments.

Instead, there's a line where he said that I wouldn't make Herr Goebbels proud.

He says my book is, he compares my book to what the Nazis did and their propaganda.

It's a very disgusting, nasty

smear, as you would expect to see on a blog, not by somebody who works as a White House correspondent for a news site.

So, let me give you a couple of things.

Andy No is singularly focused on inflating Antifa's importance in his black-clad white whale, his mark-spouting Moby Dick.

Do you believe you're inflating their importance in what's going on?

No.

And this writer, Alexander Nazarian, he probably wouldn't think that either if he ended up in a hospital with a brave hemorrhage by anti-fucks.

Well, let me give you what he says about that.

No claimed that he was, that a milkshake was thrown on him and it contained concrete, but far more likely, it was a vegan blend heavy on cashew butter.

right yeah so he doesn't say it was he said it was more likely can you tell me andy do you know the difference between concrete and cashew butter so he's trying to downplay my injuries um if he had doubt about my uh diagnosis he could have reached out to me and i would have provided the documentation from the hospital so he could see and he could look at the ct scan as well well my brain was bleeding i don't think he i think he knows that it wasn't he wrote no was punched and kicked as well He claims to have suffered a cerebral hemorrhage.

So,

I mean, doesn't he know better than you?

Because what he goes on right after he says, what goes unmentioned is that Noah had a history of embedding with right-wing groups.

Now, I don't know what that has to do with your claim of a cerebral hemorrhage, but he says you had a history of embedding with right-wing groups, including, according to persuasive allegations he has denied, the white supremacist outfit, Praet Patriot Prayer, that provoked Antifa into very fights that he then films.

Yeah, so he's thinking of these smears that were printed in a local publication in Portland where

one of the far-left reporters there had interviewed somebody who was given a pseudonym, and he

was an anti-front person who claims to have embedded in Patriot Prayer and put out this absolutely false claim that i had a partnership with patriot prayer for mutual protection now um my lawyer ended up writing a letter to the publication asking them to retract it because these were lies they chose not to and they're protecting the identity of this anonymous person if he even exists and so i can't even confront my accuser and then that smear gets laundered into bigger and bigger publications like a Wikipedia page, like the LA Times Times Review.

I mean, you know how it works.

You've been in the, in the media spotlight for years and years.

So they do this type of stuff to try to, they slip these stuffs in that has nothing to do with the book to try to discredit and smear in the most disgusting of ways.

He says,

distortions and untruths hover like flies around every shred of confirmable fact.

The same section of a mask that ends with no

statements on the United States portrays a mid-November Stop the Steel rally in Washington as peaceful and celebratory, with no mention of the Proud Boys amassed there.

The counter-protesters, meanwhile, are a marauding gang.

The nation's top mainstream Antifa scholar, Mark Bray, wrote in the Washington Post that Antifa is not an organization, rather, it is a politics of revolutionary opposition to the far right.

So that line where he quotes from Mark Bray is particularly telling because Mark Bray, as I write in my book, is an anti-Fur extremist who works in academia.

His antifur handbook, which is what he's most infamous for, actually raises funds for the Anti-Fur International Defense Fund.

So I don't know how he can criticize me for being biased or whatever, and then he's quoting from somebody who's actually part of Antifa as a sort of legitimate

historian perspective.

He continues, the right is always reminding us that facts don't care about your feelings, so let us set out some facts.

Andy No writes that the numbers and influence of right-wing extremists are grossly exaggerated by biased media, while Antifa poses just as much, if not more, of a threat to the future of American liberal democracy.

He frequently references last summer's anti-racist protest, conveniently alighting the point that 93% of those were peaceful, according to a study from Princeton.

A brief published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, hardly a lefty outlet, found that Antifa had a minor role in what violence did occur, most of which was driven by local autonomous actors, and that organization's threat was relatively small.

January 6th, the ministered the coupe de grace to Noah's already teetering thesis.

It should not have taken this long, however.

Trump's own Department of Homeland Security warned last October that white supremacist extremists would remain the most persistent and lethal threat to the American homeland.

Yeah, so I hear that, I mean, that 93% were peaceful.

It's another way of saying mostly peaceful.

What does it matter if it's 93% peaceful, if the other 7% resulted in several dozen deaths, the destruction of countless livelihoods, the damages of billions to our economy.

And as for,

I don't know why he's downplaying the role of Antifa.

If you read in my book, as he said earlier in the review, in meticulous detail, I outline how in some major American cities like Portland and Seattle, Antifa have the principal role in organizing the riots.

And so,

I mean, this seems, again, it's going back to what many journalists and mainstream media do, to always

deflect from the extremism on the far left, to go to the bogeyman that they have on the far right.

I don't argue that the far right doesn't exist.

I'm arguing that the Antifa and the far left are also a threat.

And here,

as I lay out in an entire book, this is what they actually did.

This is how much money they raised.

These are the people they killed.

These are the injuries they caused.

What

is the motivation here

just to continue to protect?

I mean, I have no problem.

And he says in the article that you were forced to admit that Antifa wasn't in charge of the January 6th,

you know, attack on the Capitol.

Andy, if I recall right, you weren't forced to admit.

You were the first

to admit.

You were the first to say,

I don't think this has anything to do with Antifa, weren't you?

It's the way I remember it that day.

That's right.

I came out on my own

and I was interviewed and I've always maintained that.

I was never forced and

I wasn't begrudgingly required to say what I said either.

I think these people, they want to paint a character, caricature of who I am.

They think that I am this, as this review

writer illustrates elsewhere, that I'm this really wicked fascist propagandist who's taking tactics from the Third Reich in my propaganda.

And they're really surprised if I manage to tell the truth.

It's

I mean,

it's it's a disgrace that the editor ran this piece in the way it is.

You know, I I can accept criticisms for my writings, my analysis, et cetera, But

describing me in such disgusting terms to people who,

to a political party that was involved for genocide and Holocaust,

like that's

it's too bad that that that is a norm to be expected in a piece of legacy.

Andy, I appreciate it.

And I wanted to give you the chance because I think personally

that kind of advertising you can't buy.

When somebody like that does does such a hatchet job on you, it just makes me want to buy your book even more.

And the book is called Unmasked by Andy No.

It is the book that pretends Antifa is the real enemy.

You can find that wherever you buy your books.

It came out, what, this week?

Yeah, or last week.

It came out last Tuesday and has been number one on the New York Times bestseller list.

Andy, thank you so much.

Appreciate it.

Thanks for having me on.

You bet.

Bye-bye.

Margaret lives in Pennsylvania.

Let me tell you, she is loud and proud about Relief Factor.

For a long time, she was suffering from pain in her leg so bad that she could barely walk.

Then Relief Factor came into her life.

And when that happened, everything changed.

Within a few weeks, she said, she was walking completely pain-free.

These days, Margaret tells anyone who will listen how much it helped her get her her life back.

I am exactly the same way.

I'm like one of those obnoxious anti-smokers that are like, now they're Nazis on anybody that, you know, or vegans that gave up meat to now they're just Nazis on it.

Relief factor.

It changed my life.

It changed Margaret's life.

And there's a 70% chance that it will change your life as well.

70% of the people who go on to try it for the three-week quick start just to see if it makes a difference Go on to order more month after month.

Why would you do that?

You do it because it works for you.

It worked for me.

Get your life back.

ReliefFactor.com, 800-500-8384.

It's relieffactor.com.

10-second station ID.

The right to petition, assemble, and protest your government, the First Amendment,

used to be something sacred, used to be something that we all believed in.

But now it depends on your point of view.

You have that right.

You can say anything, anything about anybody,

as long as it's the right point of view.

Did you hear about the,

you hear about

oh, what's her name that was had her confirmation hearing yesterday?

And she and she

said she's really, really sorry.

She deeply regrets what she said about the GOP.

She said, I recognize the concern.

I deeply regret and apologize for my language and some of my past language.

It was

not right.

Well,

she said,

let's see, that Susan Collins

in the Wayback Machine, she purged a thousand tweets.

Oh, yeah, because she's a very known actor.

She's a Twitter troll for years.

She called the Maine Senator pathetic for voting for

Brett Kavanaugh.

How dare she.

She said Mitch McConnell, she always referred to him as Moscow Mitch.

She said, I'm really sorry, but Biden would never put up with that.

Then she called the GOP as a whole evil and morally and ideologically bankrupt.

Okay.

All right.

So are we going to give her forgiveness, but when Marjorie Taylor Green said, I don't believe those things, I'm really sorry.

I apologize.

There's no forgiveness for her?

Of course not.

Right.

The standard is clear.

Right.

Is it not?

I like the, you know, again, you talk about incitement language.

Calling an entire party evil.

I mean, it's the ultimate thing you would want to fight back against.

And it is one of the things that I have tried to avoid.

I mean, I've really worked hard not to call things evil because you don't want to misuse that word.

And the only thing I can really call evil in politics right now is the effect

of critical race theory, the effect of the division that's going on, the effect of telling people, you're nothing without me, you can't make it without this program, the discouragement and the division that is going on.

The results of that are evil.

It's only destruction.

And, you know, people, people, there are a lot of really good people that I think are really, really misguided.

And then there's a lot of people that are just quiet about it.

And you can't be quiet.

And they are going to do everything they can.

That's what this impeachment is really all about, making sure that Donald Trump is never in office.

He lost half of his fortune, $2 billion, according to Forbes.

Lost $2 billion

during his administration.

Ain't going to get that back.

They're not going to let him do anything anymore.

They want to make it very clear, shut up and sit down.

You don't want to be labeled a right-wing extremist, do you?

Well, tonight on YouTube and Blaze TV, my Wednesday night special, The New Red Scare and our Reality Czars.

You don't want to miss this episode tonight at 9 p.m.

Eastern, only on Blaze TV and YouTube, Blaze YouTube channel.

This is the Glenback program.

Ah,

blinds.com.

Blinds.com can help you make some differences.

Oh boy, I remember the days when I said maybe we should just change out the blinds.

No, let's move that wall.

But if we move the wall, we have to do the floor.

If we do the floor, we might as well do the stairs.

And if we're going to do the stairs, then we should really do the upstairs.

Oh, my gosh!

Change the blinds.

Never will end.

Never.

Just do the blinds.

Ends.

Do the blinds.

You can change everything about a room with just what you put on the window treatment.

And you know what?

Indoor shutters are unbelievable.

Oh, I love them.

They completely change the look and feel of your home.

Stu has done it with blinds.com.

I've done it with blinds.com.

And there's a sale going on now till February 16th.

So you need to act now.

Take advantage of blinds.com's incredible savings.

It's blinds.com.

Do it right now.

Save up to 40% on all blind shades, interior shutters, and so much more.

Now, until February 16th, rules and restrictions may apply.

It's blinds.com.

Tonight, back to back, brand new Stew Does America and the aforementioned Glenn Special.

Go to Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

The promo code is Glenn for $30 off.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

I really want to talk to Heather Mushaw.

She is the former White House Sign Language Interpreter

and I just saw this story on theblaze.com and it is, I mean, if this doesn't tell you everything you need to know about unifying,

She served in both the Trump and the Biden administration.

She says the Biden administration humiliated and canceled her after reports emerged that she is a Trump supporter who formally translated speeches for conservative social media groups.

Let me say it this way: hang on, hang on,

she was a Trump supporter who formally translated speeches for conservative social media groups.

Sounds way worse now, doesn't it?

Yeah.

She's a 41-year-old married mom of four from Glen Bernie, Maryland.

She's got four.

She's got to be a religious extremist.

She says she's been offered a return engagement at the White House.

She has not been offered a return engagement at the White House after Time.

You know, they're so great.

Time magazine published an expose, an expose

on her personal politics titled Joe Biden's

Sign Language Interpreter Has Ties to the Far Right.

Oh my God.

I wasn't worried about it until I heard that noise and the laughing, but.

I mean, I was just.

Man, it's scary now, isn't it?

She says that

she has been the subject of harassment and threats following the release of the Time Report, prompting her to fear for her own safety and her family's safety.

The Post reported that the harassment is because she provided American Sign Language translation for the Hands of Liberty Facebook group.

They don't even know what that is.

Oh, I know what it is.

I'm reading about it right now.

Okay, tell me what it is.

Are you ready for this?

Yeah, I'm ready.

I'm ready.

They provide American Sign Language Interpreting Accommodations upon request to the deaf community for inaccessible online video content.

That's scary, too.

That sounds like stormtroopers coming in.

That's stormtroopers, Nazis.

This service is provided by volunteers.

Now they have this little disclaimer they throw out there.

You know they don't mean it.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Any hate speech, trolls, spammers will be banned immediately.

They then add on censorship and sorry, just the dog whistle alert.

Dog whistle alert.

A full-fledged dog whistle alert.

We all know what they really mean.

Censorship and prevention of access to information that is readily available to the hearing community is considered violence against the deaf community.

Don't think I understand that one, but still, it does seem to be basically

people request, hey, I want to watch this video, but I'm deaf.

I can't understand what's going on.

Can you give me some sign language to go along with it?

And they say, okay,

that does seem to be the purpose of the group, which does not seem to be anything that deserves your evil laughter.

She is a far-right radical.

She's a far-right radical.

Now, she says the goal of my activity at the White House or with groups like Hands of Liberty is all about access.

The thing is, I was canceled and

humiliated publicly, and it was unjust and unfair.

She insisted that while she is a Trump supporter, she just translates to provide information access for deaf people.

She said perhaps her critics don't want this content to be interpreted because they don't believe in it.

But, quote, deaf people just want a chance to decide for themselves what information is out there, end quote.

Now, she is certified for doing this.

She works as an independent contractor.

What I would like to know is why this woman

has been let go.

Why they have fired this woman.

Have they fired her because she was secretly signing?

Don't.

Trump actually won the election.

Don't listen to these people.

Run for your lives.

Is that what she was doing?

When she was doing that, she probably should be fired.

When Jen Pesak or Pasaki actually

started talking, if she was like, don't listen to her, she's an evil witch.

Maybe she should have been fired.

But she didn't do that, did she?

She was just

or she'll, she'll, she says she didn't.

But you don't know sign language, so you don't know

right.

But there's no accusation she did anything wrong.

The accusation is she associated herself with 50% of the nation.

Yes.

Okay.

Yes.

And you can't do that.

Now, let me ask Time magazine, who you are so brave.

You are so brave.

You are as brave.

Let me think of somebody in history that you are as brave as

Senator McCarthy.

Man, he was brave, wasn't he?

He stood up and said, we've got to root these people out because of their dangerous ideology.

We got to get them out and expose them and don't let them work anywhere.

Oh, man.

I remember how brave that was when they took the Hollywood 10 and they made sure that no one could work ever again.

Oh, that was so brave.

And you guys are just like him.

Wow.

Have a celebratory drink.

At least he had the excuse.

He's an alcoholic.

What's your excuse?

This woman, you know, I want to have her on.

I want to translate.

I mean, nobody's listening to the radio show for the deaf translator, but I want her to translate for the deaf one of our programs.

I just want to give her, you know,

a job for a day.

Nobody will see her.

No,

but the show gets on, well, lots of it gets on YouTube.

And I'm Blaze TV.

Yeah, but I mean, if you're listening on radio, you know.

You can go to Blaze TV and watch the sign language if you need it.

Sure.

How are you going to get the word out on that?

So anyway, great question.

So I don't have an answer to it.

So anyway, but

this is the McCarthy era.

This is exactly what they did.

They went out and they persecuted people.

I mean, look, I believe that

there were communists.

in the United States government.

We know that now.

We know some of the things that they were saying was not true, a conspiracy theory

that was true.

McCarthy wasn't, and he was an embarrassment.

But what happened?

It went from, hey, is there somebody trying to subvert from the inside of our government to if you believe any of these things or ever believed any of these things, you either go to jail

or you just can't work and you're a pariah.

I'm against that.

I've been against that my whole life.

You have a right to believe these things

unless you've ever voted or were for Donald Trump.

The average American can do very little.

They must depend upon those of us whom they send down here to man the watchtowers of the nation.

And if you see anybody within that cabinet, in a restaurant, in a department center,

we're at a gasoline station.

You tell them they're not worth us.

Everyone goes stamped about these people.

Once again, we honor their oath of office.

We're performing a public duty to protect and defend the Constitution.

A public trust.

I am pursuing this investigation.

I've seen firsthand Donald Trump's disrespect for facts.

In order to develop the facts.

It's really bizarre, isn't it, when you think about how AWOL so many of these members of Congress have gotten.

If we, unless we, make sure that there's no infiltration of our government.

Donald Trump is a clear and present danger to our country.

Then just as certain as you sit there, in the period of our lives, you will see a red world.

What I'm concerned about is the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives.

The enemy is within the House of Representatives.

What is the exact number of Trump supporters?

And the question is, how are we going to really almost deprogram these people who have signed up for the cult of Trump?

By cutting off their social media.

First, Google and Apple delisted Parlor from their app stores.

Then Amazon cut the servers.

Now House Democrats are trying to blame the free speech platform Parlor.

This stuff related to big tech censorship is the issue of our time.

Will Smith appearing to call for the country to purge itself of Donald Trump supporters?

We get to know who people are, and now we get to cleanse it out of our country.

There's a proposal to have a commission to investigate Republican colleagues.

Democrat senators have filed ethics complaints against two of their Republican colleagues.

The left is trying to push these businesses to shame them and threaten them into shunning and silencing Trump supporters and conservatives.

They're pushing them to fire people, even.

Council culture is a wildfire that you cannot contain.

If you pour gasoline onto it, don't be surprised when it finally reaches you and you get burned.

Every business needs to stand up for every American.

Otherwise, eventually they'll come for you too.

For you too.

Someday,

in the distant, distant, distant, way

out there,

future, we will all have a little chip implanted under our skin.

I don't know, somewhere in our forehead, maybe the forearm, I'm not really sure.

And it will carry everything, all of our personal identifications.

Meanwhile,

you know, we could get vaccinated for coronavirus, and we can just get that digital passport.

And that is not the, that's not the stairway to hell.

It is not.

I want you to know that.

Anyway, the point is, it's way easier for cyber criminals to steal your identity than it will be when we have that happy, glorious future when everything is just embedded into us.

Won't that be...

So now...

Live for today.

Get Life Lock.

Important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft affects your your life.

Every day, we put information at risk on the internet, and cyber criminals keep finding new ways to steal identities.

You know, Media Matters is going to probably write something up and say, Glenn Beck believes that this is the mark of the beast.

Anyway, you might miss certain identity threats if all you're doing is monitoring your credit.

Fortunately, there is Life Lock there to help you protect yourself and your family.

Check them out today.

No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but you can keep what's yours yours with Life Lock Identity Theft Protection.

Join now, save up to 25% off your first year at lifelock.com.

Promo code back, lifelock.com, or call 1-800-LifeLock, 1-800-Lifelock or Lifelock.com.

Promo code BECK SAVE 25%.

That MAGA extremist.

She's really the woman who we were just talking about, you know, did sign language and no longer welcome at the Biden administration because time, thank goodness time was there, to expose her witchcraftery

and

her witching that she was doing.

And she wasn't looking for water.

She was looking for people that she could throw into chains.

Really?

Yeah, she had divining rods, and that's what she was doing.

And of course, she was, you know, when

the Biden administration were talking, she said she was translating word for word, but she was saying things probably like, don't listen to them, run for your lives, things like that.

She's going to be on with us just in a few minutes.

She's going to be on with us right after the top of the hour.

So about 10 minutes from now, she'll be on with us.

And

I think we'd have to do the water test with her.

You know what I mean?

I think it's time we bring this back.

If we throw her into a lake and she stays down at the bottom,

she's not a MAGA extremist.

But if she comes back up to the top, she is, and then we'll have to burn her.

That's the only solution.

Well, that's the best way I know.

I mean, you know,

it's science, man.

It is science.

This is essentially what they're doing.

Yeah.

You know, I mean, a little less violent version of what they're doing right now.

What are you talking about?

I mean, they're just, they don't even give you a chance to argue.

I mean, providing sign language

access to deaf people who want to watch videos that might lean a little to the right, that is not something to lose your job over.

Yeah, I don't think so either.

You know, that was really, that's the whole foundation of the economy and our free society.

The reason why you have, let's say, a currency, right, is that you don't have to find members of other tribes that you might hate to barter with, right?

You have a currency that you can have free exchange with people you might despise.

That's the whole point of capitalism, of our society.

Ah,

So now we're here.

The free exchange.

So it is the hate, the systematic hatred and the systematic racism built into capitalism that you're now defending.

What I am defending is

that you can't get a colour.

I got to throw him in.

I got to throw him in.

If you float, you're not an extremist.

Or no, if you float, you are an extremist.

This is a foundational aspect of civilization.

You're supposed to be able to do the kind of people you don't have to do.

What kind of civilization?

What kind of civilization?

Western.

Modern?

Not even Western.

It goes way back before Western society was even a thing.

This is a foundational aspect

of all human interaction.

In China, they know who the enemies are and they put them in camps.

Yes, I don't want to be China.

I don't think that that's a good thing.

That's the new model, Stu.

Yeah, not for me.

It's not.

Oh, well.

Well, it will be soon.

Here's the

witchcraft.

When I'm looking at those really high walls from the inside, I'll say it's my model.

And will we have someone to translate for us?

Oh, I don't know.

Say, yes, yes, I'd like another scrap of bread.

Because it'll fall.

You've heard the expression, falls on deaf ears.

That's what's going to happen where we're in the camp.

We need a translator.

We're interviewing her next.

This is the Glenback program.

The Glenback program.

Oh, my.

Oh, my goodness.

Oh my goodness.

President Joe Biden's White House communications staff has emphasized the importance of truth, transparency, and the trust in the opening days of his presidency as they resume regular press briefings and distance themselves from the combative style of the Trump administration.

So when Press Secretary Jen Vasaki began her briefing on Monday by announcing that American sign language interpreters would now be present in all White House news briefings, many deaf and hard of hearing Americans celebrated this historic first.

But it turns out

that the first ASL interpreter chosen was not such a change from the previous administration after all.

Time magazine was there

to expose the witchcraft that was happening on Monday in the White House.

And the

she's with us

I pray to the little doll that I found in the woods that nothing evil will bewitch us when we talk to her

but she's out on her own now and she's mad and she could make me do or say anything she wants God only knows what she'll be doing with her hands during this interview.

Luckily, the Biden administration,

through Time magazine, rooted her out, found out who she really was, and now

she can't find a job.

We'll see if she sinks to the bottom of the lake or if the witch floats in 60 seconds.

So it's the final week for Shamoni's Valentine's Day sale.

You only got a few more days to get the brand new Zotique Deep Correcting Serum for free when you order GenuCell for bags and puffiness.

With Zotique, you're going to kick adult acne, redness, and stress breakouts to the curb while saying hello to increased firmness and smoothness.

You're going to be visibly younger, you.

Why not embrace that?

My wife, my mom, they've been using Shamoni's products for a while now.

They both love them.

Zotique Deep Correcting Serum combines the purest vitamin C with brightening benefits of lactic acid for a younger, healthier, happier looking appearance.

And with its immediate effects, you're going to see results in 12 hours or less.

Now, Shamoni says, okay, you might be a little bit skeptical of that claim.

I can understand it.

Well, how about we give you your money back guaranteed if you don't fall in love with it?

800-577-8709 or genucelle.com.

It's G-E-N-U-C-E-L.com.

From now till Valentine's Day, you can get the classic Genucelle Jawline Treatment and the luxurious Genucelle anti-wrinkle moisturizer free with your order.

Every order gets upgraded to free priority shipping.

Don't wait.

Order now.

800-577-8709.

It's a great gift.

Genucelle.com.

G-E-N-U-C-E-L.com.

Okay.

All right.

We're going into a dangerous situation now.

We're going to talk to this woman, if you could even call her that.

who has been at the White House interpreting for Donald Trump.

And I want to just give you the news up front so you know the evil that we we are dealing with.

Time Magazine reports that she

translated for Hands of Liberty.

We need more spooky music.

That was, I mean, that really kind of, we're talking about a witch.

The Hands of Liberty, she actually interpreted some of the videos.

And while the group frequently, according to Time Magazine, frequently solicits requests from the public, the vast majority of videos it has chosen to interpret, with the notable exception of the recent White House press conferences, are right-wing or pro-Trump in their sentiment.

John Henner was interviewed by Time magazine.

Thank you.

See, it's much scarier now, isn't it?

John Henner, an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro, who studies ASL and is deaf himself, said in an email, I was honestly surprised.

For me, it would be problematic for someone who has aligned herself with alt-right discourses to be the public face of the White House for the deaf communities and people who are curious about ASL.

I don't know about you, Stu, but I've come out as ASL Curious myself, and

I will not hear any of the hate speech because I am ASL Curious.

Sure.

So

be careful.

Be careful.

We're going to have somebody on who has a different point point of view than half the country, but we're going to do it anyway.

We're going into the darkness to see

what we can get out of Heather Mushaw, professional sign language interpreter and in league with the devil.

Hello, Heather.

Welcome to the Glenbeck program.

Hi, Glenn Beck.

Thanks for having me.

I think we're so evil that we would interpret a video about Operation Underground Railroad with Ken Ballard.

And he actually mentioned you.

Oh, my gosh.

Oh my gosh.

So you did that interpretation.

Why would that organization associate themselves with somebody who worked in the Trump White House?

I don't know.

Human trafficking obviously isn't an issue, right?

Yeah.

So Heather,

tell me about yourself and, you know, are you a, are you an extremist that wanted to storm and kill all the congressmen yourself?

Absolutely Absolutely not.

I'm just a regular American, just like anyone else.

I'm a mom.

I have four kids.

I work.

My husband has a job.

We're just trying to live the American dream, as everybody says.

And I've been an interpreter for 21 years, certified with the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, which is a credentialing system that kind of gives you a seal of approval so people know what they're getting when they hire an interpreter.

We're all required to meet a minimum standard.

And I've worked in the DC area my whole career, and I've worked in a variety of settings.

I mean, you name it, I've been there.

So I have a lot of experience, and I'm trained to be neutral.

So all this talk about perceptions of individuals and so forth, I mean, at the end of the day, I worked at the White House for six briefings, and I've proven myself to be a professional in every aspect of the word.

Notice how good she is at her witchcraft.

She sounds reasonable, but don't let that fool you.

So,

Heather,

tell me what happened and

how you found out that Time magazine had done this expose on you.

Well,

obviously, I went and did my job.

The White House called me and I came in and interpreted the briefing.

And in my mind, I'm thinking the White House is a neutral entity.

They're there to convey information.

The press is there to ask questions.

And at the end of the the day, the deaf community wanted this access.

They fought for it and they got it.

And since I had been there five times previously, I already knew where to go, what to do, yada, yada, yada.

So it was just like, here we go.

And was everybody kind to you?

And I mean, when Jen Pasaki, or Saki,

I only say the P, do you translate when you say her name, do you translate it?

A silent P?

That's a different story.

She,

when she said, and we're now going to carry, and this is our translator for today,

everything was fine with all of you guys.

I mean,

you were fine.

Nobody said anything beforehand or anything, right?

Or did they?

Yeah,

everything was great.

I mean,

the staff was like, we can't wait to see you.

We're going to be watching you.

We're going to be rooting for you.

I mean, it was a very positive.

It is a very positive environment.

So I never got any.

negative slack.

And it wasn't until after I got home and I started looking at social media and a prominent deaf person in our community named Niall DeMarco, who's like a celebrity, he was on Dancing with the Stars and so forth.

And he's a huge advocate about language deprivation in the deaf community.

Like he doesn't want people to go without language, but yet he retweeted this Mr.

Henner's tweet and it just went crazy.

And

a lot of people wanted to cancel me.

And what was Mr.

Henner's tweet?

He made a tweet.

It was like a thread and it was was like, gather around folks.

Here's this interpreter, and here she is wearing a Trump hat and a Trump pence t-shirt, and she's interpreting.

And he never said my name, but it caused people to dox me.

It caused people to start sending me hate emails because they found my professional website and my email address was on there.

And I ended up having to tell my contact at the White House that, you know what, I probably shouldn't come back right now

because of the mob.

So So

they didn't say, you're out.

No.

You called and said, I can't do it.

Right.

Okay.

Well, that's good news.

Do you think you're going to be invited back?

I think that if I did, if they did invite me back, that

there would have to be a discussion and they might have to come out with some sort of statement or something because right now I think it would be too controversial and it would just take away from the the intent of why the interpreter is even there in the first place.

So, but isn't that one of the things that a White House should do is to

say, look,

she's doing her job.

She's never interpreted it incorrectly.

And this is information that everybody should have.

Do you think they should stand by you or they should just move on?

It's a good question.

I don't know.

I feel like

they have a lot of bigger things on their plate right now than to deal with this.

So

I really don't know the answer to that question.

Holy cow, are you kind.

But that's the way witches are.

That's the way witches will do.

You notice she didn't say one of her children's name was Damien.

And she'd probably deny it if I asked her if that was her son's name.

Probably.

So tell me one last thing.

The idea of

you being an extremist because you translated these things and you voted for Trump, Time Magazine says that

you are a Trump supporter and that you have done interpretation for or interpreting for

right-wing political things,

which none of those, none of those are illegal illegal or immoral.

You say that this is all this is all started with you because you have deaf parents.

And this means more than politics to you.

Right.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I mean, it's, it's hard to have discussions with my parents when they don't have the same access to information that I do.

So whether it's news clips on the internet or a radio show like yours or whatever,

it's like I'm constantly having to explain things or whatnot.

And then one of my colleagues who's deaf was like, you know what, I just want to get access to the other side of the story.

Like I get a lot of the left liberal side, but I don't hear a lot about the conservative side.

And

the biggest push that he said was like, we just need somebody to just give us the access, someone to help us get the access.

And over the summer with COVID shutdowns and everything, a lot of people were isolated, especially the deaf community when they're used to being together and communicating they were home and so with the riots and the protests there were a lot of tick tocks and live videos that were being posted on social media and they're not accessible and so he asked me to help out and I thought well this is a noble cause I mean I'm a conservative I could help out I wouldn't I wouldn't be skewing the message or anything so he started this group my colleague Hands of Liberty and we just took requests from the deaf community and they request things they like Terrence Williams they they requested tim ballard's videos they would request uh trump rally videos i mean you name it they would request that so you guys didn't you guys didn't put out a list you just requested what the the community wanted

right right and we would accommodate them so we did do that big um frontline doctors video with with stella emmanuel and dr simone gold at the um

at the um

supreme court that happened last summer yeah okay and that was a huge video, right?

Like it went viral.

Like YouTube kept taking it down.

Facebook kept taking it down.

They kept putting it back up.

And the deaf people didn't have access to that because, of course, the networks weren't going to show it.

So there wasn't closed captioning access like you would have on TV.

So we were like, okay, we'll interpret it.

And we started getting strikes on our pages.

And our YouTube channel got taken down eventually because we were interpreting

is misinformation per se, which is what this Time article talks about too.

And it's like, well, you know what?

Like it's on the internet.

So if a person like you and I can just click a button and listen to it real quick and make our own assumption, why can't a deaf person do the same thing?

So it's really, it's, I mean, it goes again to who has a right to tell you what to watch and not watch, except, you know, hearing people,

they are enabled to listen to anything and they can hear it.

But deaf people, they're watching a video and unless they can read lips and unless it's it's really clear, they can't get the information.

So they can't say that's ridiculous, or I believe in that.

They can't make a judgment.

They have to trust other people.

Do I have that right?

Right, right.

And then they have to read the comments or and kind of see what people say.

And you know how comments are, they just evolve into craziness.

So there's no real information there.

And then all they go off is the views.

So a lot of deaf people say, well, this got like 700,000 views, but I can't access it, but it's popular.

Or their cousin sends them a video on Messenger and they're like, well, I don't know what they said.

So this allows them to have that dialogue with their friends, with their family, just like we do.

Like we start, we're like, look at this crazy video.

And it's just one way to get them

accessibility.

And it's protected under the American with Disabilities Act.

If they request it, they're supposed to have it.

And then because I'm working as an advocate for them, I'm also protected.

So So

it's just unfortunate that people get triggered by the hat because

when I wore it, I wore it for a specific video, which is when he was dancing.

It was a compilation of him dancing to the YMCA.

And a lot of deaf people didn't even know that he did that because the news channel didn't show that and they don't hear music.

So they don't really associate it.

They just might have seen random clips of him dancing and they're like, oh, okay.

But I think after interpreting the requested video, they were like, oh, wow.

Like this was a phenomenon.

Like it took off.

And now I understand why there were TikToks of people mimicking him.

So it's just,

they just want to be part of the culture.

And a lot of it is online now.

So.

Wow, that's evil.

Heather, but we'd like to hire you for the day.

We'd like you to translate the radio show.

Would you do that?

Sure.

Yeah.

Okay.

So

I'll put you in touch with our producer and then maybe you can translate tomorrow and you do it from home because we are COVID compliant here.

And so we'll just put you in a little box and you can translate tomorrow, which I'm going to come up with a whole bunch of really difficult words tomorrow.

I think I can handle it.

I've worked for rocket engineers, so I think I can handle it.

Yeah, but you haven't heard me mispronounce those difficult words.

So we're in for a whole new experience.

Heather, thank you so much.

And we'll talk to you probably tomorrow.

Thank you.

Okay, thank you.

God bless.

Thank you so much.

I had to say things like the being nice and stuff because I was afraid she would put a hex on me.

Did you hear what she was saying about people have a right to hear things?

Oh, my gosh.

That sounds bad.

Oh, my gosh.

Plus, you never know when she's putting a hex on you because you don't know sign language.

Exactly right.

Exactly right.

And you notice she, I mean, she is, well,

I'll talk more about it tomorrow.

Let me tell you about Life Lock.

Life Lock,

the internet is a huge place, and Life Lock knows that.

You'd be amazed how many items which make up your personal identity are just floating around in cyberspace, waiting for some criminal to come along and take them.

And they collect pieces and they put this whole puzzle together.

Keeping track of all of those pieces is nearly impossible.

But that's why Lifelock is there, to help you keep as much of it possible out of the cyber criminals hands.

You can't do this on your own.

Life lock has been there from the very beginning of, I remember when they had your social security card, somebody, and I was like, dude, you got yours on a bus?

I don't really care.

Who's going to steal my social security card?

Remember that back in the early 90s?

Now,

holy cow, it's a good thing that they are on the watch.

They can't prevent all identity theft, but they monitor all the things that they can, and they are going to hit the things that you might miss if you're just monitoring your credit.

Join now.

You'll save up to 25% off your first year at Lifelock.com.

Promo code back.

Use the phone number 800 Lifelock, 1-800-LIFELOC, or head to lifelock.com.

Use the promo code back, save 25%.

10 seconds, station ID.

Can we do some happy news today?

Yeah, sure.

I've got an update on the gorilla glue lady.

Oh, this was a terrible story yesterday.

What do you mean?

I mean, she had some difficulties with the gorilla glue.

Yes, she did.

And why did she have those difficulties?

Because it wasn't listed on the, it said, don't put

gorilla glue in your eyes.

Don't put it on your skin.

Don't even get it on your clothing.

But it did not say, don't put it in your hair, like hairspray.

Very true, and clearly the fault of the gorilla glue people.

Exactly right.

Her name is Tessica Brown.

Her hair's been stuck solid now for a month.

You know, you wouldn't have to worry about, you know, having the window down and your wife going, don't, it's messing up my hair.

Gorilla Gorilla Grue Glue will take that up.

She said yesterday that she's going to see a surgeon to get get her hair unstuck.

She says, I know.

Surgeon.

Okay.

She says, I know everyone is concerned.

Well, not really.

Not everyone.

No, not everyone.

I'm sure there's some people.

Have no concern.

I'm really not.

She's going to a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon who has offered his help free of charge.

That's nice.

He said he could fix her hair using medical-grade glue remover in a procedure that could take three days.

What?

Yeah.

Is it pasted to her scalp or is it just an I'm not sure?

I don't know why you just wouldn't shave it off.

Could you, though, if it's pasted to your scalp?

If it's pasted to your scalp, probably not.

Yeah, probably not.

If not, because eventually it would just grow out and you could just kind of cut it all off at once and one

of them.

Yeah, exactly right.

But she's now raising money online.

$13,000 was raised, so now she can fly to Los Angeles and

get her hair fixed.

This is the Glenbach program.

And where is Gorilla Gulglue?

Nowhere.

I can't even say it.

Where are they?

If you're considered joining a

50 and 60 older group, which group do you, you know, you could join other places that you've heard of, or you can go to AMAC.

AMAC is the...

Association of Mature American Citizens.

It has over 2 million members now.

It's growing every day.

And it'll give you all the discounts and everything else, all the services you need and you want from a seniors group.

But they are also extremely proactive in representing the kind of American values that you hold dear.

They are fighting for the First Amendment, the Second Amendment.

You know, they're fighting really for all of the amendments.

And they are fighting...

big time.

They are really helping lead the cause against HR1, which we'll tell you about in a few days.

But they're standing and the cause is great.

The benefits are really great too.

It's AMAC, A-M-A-C.us slash Beck.

Join them now.

AMAC.us slash Beck.

Tonight, starting at 8 p.m.

Eastern, it's back-to-back Stu Does America and Glenn Beck.

Make sure to check it out: Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

The promo code is Glenn for 30 bucks off.

Well, Mark Cuban has announced that here in Dallas, Texas,

the Mavericks will not be playing the Star Spangled Banner anymore.

He has made a decision to eliminate the tradition of playing the anthem before games.

It wasn't even noticed through the first 13 games for the combined preseason, regular season games at American Airlines.

There's been no people there either.

Which is part of the reason why people don't notice.

Right.

Cuban has been very vocal in his support for those who wish to kneel during

the playing of the national anthem.

Last July, he told ESPN,

he said, if they want to kneel during the anthem, if they're taking a knee

and they're being respectful, I'm proud of them.

And he said, and I love this quote,

he would hope that he could join them.

Well, you're the owner of the team.

You don't have to hope.

It's not like you have to, well, I have to to invite myself.

You can go down and take a knee.

Why didn't you?

He later tweeted in response to what he called the national anthem police, that if critics of the nonviolent protest of systematic racism in the United States took issue, they could complain.

You could complain to your boss and ask why he doesn't play the national anthem every day before you start work.

So I'm kind of torn on this because

I've seen like mixed, like I saw one report that said they've been playing God Bless America, which is worse, which is more jingoistic, more and religious.

God Bless America, Irving Berlin, during, I believe,

the Wilson administration.

And, you know, I mean,

it's got God in it.

It has everything they, and everybody's like, oh, that's good.

That's good.

But wait, the Star Spangled Banner's not?

Well, I mean, you could argue that maybe he's just trying to avoid the controversy.

Now,

another report says says that they played God Bless America previously, not this year.

The other thing to point out, too, is they haven't had fans in the stadium.

So

maybe, you know, like Cuban was asked about the report.

The report came from the Athletic.

They said that

they initially said they're not playing the Star Spangles banner this year.

Cuban said in an email, that is incorrect.

We have given no comment on what our plans are.

Now, is it possible they stopped playing it because there's no fans there to hear it?

Like, obviously, that's a situation you normally would do with everybody in the stadium, but no team has people in the stadium really in the NBA.

Fans in the NBA.

In the NBA, they've been really restrictive, unlike the NFL, which obviously has had

a lot of people.

How'd that lady get down onto the floor then that was yelling with What's His Face in, I think, Los Angeles?

Did you see that last week?

I didn't see that.

The lady who was

sitting next to her husband and she got, you know,

who's the guy you hate?

LeBron James?

Yeah.

That's all you need to do.

I'm pretty sure it was LeBron James.

And he made some

comments.

I think they've opened it.

So last year they had no fans at all across the NBA when they came back and they went to the little bubble.

This year, I think some places have had some fans.

The Mavericks, I know,

still have basically none.

They had a few health care workers there at this last game, which may be why this is being reported because it's kind of the first time.

We have someone who works here who is on the drum line for the Mavs, and

the last game they played was the first game they had been there since the pandemic started.

So I guess they're just starting to let a few people in.

But it is a

situation.

It's not defensible in any way.

I wonder what his motivation is.

Is it just, I'm super woke and I don't want the national anthem, which is possible with Cuban, though.

I don't think he's an

I don't know.

He's.

Yeah, he's not, he's not like, you know, he's not LeBron James.

No.

But he's also, every once in a while, he gets described as like a conservative or a libertarian, which he is not at all,

even though he sometimes indicates he is on some things he is.

He's not.

But

it's possible.

I mean, like, I can understand the motivation of just not wanting the controversy at this point.

But, you know, I mean, I still wouldn't endorse that view, obviously.

I mean,

isn't that actually giving you more?

Now he's stuck in the controversy anyway, right?

Like, because you can almost say, like, I always argue with the, when we were talking about the NFL, they're like, well, what is the NFL going to do?

What, how are people going to kneel?

Are they going to kneel?

Are they going to stand?

It's like, well, more than anything else, forget the league.

Forget the players.

Why, as a television network, am I seeing what they're doing during the anthem?

You're not playing the anthem for me in every game.

Right.

Like, when I watch a coverage of the game, they don't cover the anthem.

They only cover the anthem for the controversy, which is like, well, who's really the problem problem here?

The television networks are really a part of the problem.

You never see the anthem at a basketball game.

The only reason you ever see it on television is when they want to inflame the controversy about who's kneeling, who's standing, who's turned their back, who's still in the locker room.

It's just a dumb soap opera that

people love to follow.

And I, you know what?

This is, we can't get bogged down in the soap operas.

I think that in so many ways, the national anthem and that controversy is important.

It is important.

But it is also exploited as a soap opera.

Yes, totally.

Both sides.

The impeachment of Donald Trump.

It is important.

It's really important.

But it is also a soap opera.

And we have to stop looking at the soap operas.

We have to pay the correct amount of time

with those soap operas and then apply the rest of the time talking about things that are important and valuable.

You know, there's so much happening right now.

Biden has just signed 52

executive orders.

52.

Are you aware of what's in those 52 executive orders?

Because you're not seeing that anywhere.

Yeah.

You know, I was there.

Obviously, the...

The motivation of the Republicans when it comes to the impeachment trial has been to say, like, look, let's do this quickly.

Let's get this out of the way.

I actually think they should expand it.

I think they should go beginning of the day to the end of the day for the next two years all about impeachment of Donald Trump.

So they can't pass any other crappy laws.

So they can't do anything else.

Because, like, for example, Nira Tandon, who you mentioned earlier, who is testifying, you know, she's doing her sort of confirmation hearing.

They want to vote on her.

Well, they're taking only half the day to do these votes.

So they're going super slow.

All the things they want to do are being slowed down by this by this impeachment trial.

I think the Republicans should come out.

You know what?

We need witnesses.

We need people coming in here.

I need to hear more.

I have a follow-up question.

Can we extend this even longer?

Unfortunately, they have agreed to these rules, so it's going to go quickly.

I understand how everyone wants to push this away.

This is doing nothing right now, but delaying.

Everything the Democrats are trying to do.

What is your opinion on why this is happening?

Why the Democrats are doing it?

Yeah, because, you know, when they didn't have anything on Donald Trump towards the end of the election, they knew that that would not be good for them.

Another impeachment, in theory.

An impeachment, the first impeachment, and they had nothing.

But they, all of a sudden, she had all the stuff that she could have impeached on earlier.

And then she, you know, in theory.

And then when they came up with nothing burgers,

that's when she said, you know what?

That phone call, we need to impeach him.

What?

And it seemed weird.

Yeah.

And now they're doing the same thing.

Is it just because Donald Trump, they don't want him to be involved and run again in four years?

Is it to send a message that, you know, don't even think about, we will destroy you?

What is it that they're doing?

I think the thing with this one is that everybody recognizes what happened that day was really bad.

So what they're trying to do is tie it directly to the Republican politicians and people in, you know, I mean, it's Trump's party at this point.

So essentially, you're tainting the entire party with

the actions of a few hundred people who were in that crowd.

So everyone, it's like everybody recognizes, like if they could say, well, you know what?

Those police officers were incited to kill George Floyd by Donald Trump.

They would do that if they had any rational way because everyone recognizes the George Floyd thing was bad.

So any way you can can tie this universally

revolting sort of activity to your political opponent, that's great for them.

And I think like in some ways people are like, well, they want to get them to 67 votes.

They know they're not getting to 67.

But I think in some ways they wrote

this impeachment, especially the wording of it, in a way that almost guaranteed they wouldn't get Republican votes.

I think they want no Republican votes on this thing.

So they can blame

everyone.

They want to kind of...

Yeah, they don't want it to look bipartisan.

They don't don't want it to...

I mean, because

if you wanted bipartisanship, they could have come up with a censure type of thing.

Easy.

Where you would have probably had a lot of Republicans coming up and saying, yes, his activities were bad.

Instead, they put it at the highest level, the highest standard to clear.

It's like when, what's his name, in Minnesota?

Keith Ellison, when he made the charge from second-degree manslaughter to premeditated murder.

Remember when the cop,

I don't remember which cop was doing what to whom, but it was, they, they said, they don't have this, they don't have that proof.

You can't make that case.

And we talked about it at the time.

They want that guy to go free.

They want the judge to say,

you can't, you can't put him in jail.

So they can twist it and make people, you know, use it as, see, the justices system is all screwed up here.

Yeah.

I mean, they use the word incitement, which is, you know, obviously there's a criminal sort of standard that everyone recognizes that it goes along with that.

And to say that, you know, you liked everything that Donald Trump did is different than saying, I don't think

it rises to the level of incitement.

Every political speech in the country has at some point, we need to fight for what we, you know, we need to fight and take this country back.

That's been said by every, and we played the montage of the Democrats saying things that are much, much worse.

Yeah.

And specific.

Yeah.

And so like, it gets to the point that, of course, you can't, it's going to be almost impossible to get a Republican to go along with that.

And I swear that's intentional.

I mean, I think that they want,

they could have also passed three or four different articles, right?

Some with saying, you know, incitement, some saying, well, we just think that he didn't tell the truth about the election and that was putting the democracy at risk or the transfer of power at risk.

They could have done a bunch of different things if they actually wanted those votes.

They don't want those votes.

They want to be able to say, even to people who,

you know, in a purple state that might be more moderate, you know, they want to be able to say, look, he wouldn't even vote for that.

The Capitol was overrun and they wouldn't even hold this president accountable.

They want to be able to use those arguments much more.

They know they're not getting to 67 votes.

And Donald Trump is valuable to them.

Like, Donald Trump is somebody that a lot of Republicans really, really like, but a lot of Democrats really, really hate.

And a lot of people in the middle really, really hate.

And they're able to use him as a fundraising tool.

He's the Hillary Clinton

of the Republican Party.

He is the Newt Gingrich of the party.

And the best thing for, yeah, that's another one.

Hillary Clinton is really valuable to Republicans.

We don't want Hillary Clinton in power making decisions, nor do they.

They don't want Donald Trump in power making decisions.

But having Donald Trump as a perimeter sort of character that they can blame everything on to people who might vote for them.

The same thing that, like, it's nice for it was easy for Donald Trump to win, right?

Because we were able to say, Hillary Clinton.

That, that, even people in the middle were like, I don't want Hillary Clinton.

I disagree with you a bit on this, and I want to go into that in just a minute.

Stand by first, let him take a quick commercial break to pay the bills.

American finance.

Sorry, man.

I know.

American financing

is

not our commercial.

Who's our commercial here?

It's gold line.

Oh, gold line.

Listen, if you have been watching what's going on, if you've noticed the price of Bitcoin, Bitcoin is digital gold, they say, but I don't know what's going to happen with Bitcoin in the end.

You know, if you have some money in it, okay, but I don't know what's going to happen in the end.

Gold line, I know gold will be the standard that the entire world returns to.

Everybody says every time, well, this time is different.

Well, every time since the beginning of time and Moses, every time there's a problem, the world returns to the gold standard.

Please put yourself on a gold standard.

Call gold line now.

They've got a couple of things going on.

They have the special of

6% of promotional medals delivered directly to you with a qualifying retirement account purchase.

They also have the special special on graded liberty coins, which

they are going really, really fast.

The ones I buy, they're independent grading agency for weight and purity and condition.

Inventory is very, very limited.

Call them now, goldline at 866 goldline, 1-866Goldline or goldline.com.

So I want to disagree with you, and I don't think we actually disagree.

I think the emphasis is just slightly different.

Stu and I were talking about the impeachment and what it's really all about.

And he said, you know, they want the boogeyman.

They want a Hillary Clinton, etc., etc.

And I somewhat agree with that.

I think that is, but I don't think that's their primary

source, a primary motivation.

Just like I don't think it's their primary motivation to make sure that he can't run again.

I don't think it's their primary

motivation to teach everybody a lesson.

Don't do this or we'll destroy you as well.

I think those are all benefits.

I think the main benefit to them that they see is that Donald Trump and the GOP voting against the impeachment can be used later

to justify the dracodian silencing

of

people who are in the GOP, people who voted for Donald Trump, people who they claim are anti-government or political extremists.

I think,

personally, I think that is the deal.

We tried to stop this.

They wouldn't stop it.

Now we have to, I mean, we have to develop some programs to deprogram these people who believe in this stuff.

I think that's a great, great pickup there.

I think that, you know, that's almost taking what I'm saying and going even further with it, right?

I mean, it's

not going to grab power.

Yeah.

I totally think that's part of it.

I mean, I think that they see this as a way,

you know, like Joe Manchin says, I'm not going to vote for the filibuster.

Well, who's to say that we couldn't even get, you know, what, four Republicans to vote with us on this?

I mean, they're obviously crazy, and maybe I should reconsider that vote on the filibuster.

There's always, there's these, this, this web of justifications that is needed to do these extreme things, and they're building that case.

It usually begins with people who say, I love the Constitution or I believe in the same things, but

when it comes to immutable laws, there is no but.

This is the Glenn Beck program.