Best of the Program | 1/7/20

Hey, welcome to the podcast.

We've got a great one for you today.

You don't want to miss a single second of it.

Also, want to remind you that we're doing Restoring the Covenant.

That is a big event on July 4th in Gettysburg.

It's kind of like restoring honor and restoring courage and restoring love that we did.

Dallas Cowboys Stadium was sold out, 500,000 people on the mall in Washington, D.C.

This one has a limited amount of space.

There's only about 30,000 people that can come.

It's free.

You don't have to buy anything, but you do have to register if you want to come.

And if you do want to come, there's all kinds of other events that you can attend, other things that you can get your family into that do have a price to it.

It's a seven-day or a one-day event, depending on what you want to do.

Camp, stay in a hotel, you know, whatever you want to do.

It's Gettysburg July 4th weekend.

And the week preceding that, just find out all the information at glenbeck.com/slash restore.

I'll give you a couple things coming up in the podcast.

We go into the media's unbelievable coverage of what went on with Sulaimani in Iran.

It's just so despicable.

We go into.

It's your opinion.

Well, that's true.

It's also my opinion that men

are men and women are women.

There's a couple genders and

just because of, and you'll understand, Punjab.

That's the only reason.

That does explain a lot of it.

It does explain a lot of it, and that and so much more on today's podcast.

You're listening to the best of the Benambak program.

You know, I was not a fan of the statement that President Trump made that the American press is an enemy of the people.

However, today I'd say I don't think he went far enough.

And I'll explain as we go to Iran with ABC News in one minute.

This is the Glenbeck program.

It is a good thing we have the media on the case to show us what's really happening in Iran.

Martha Raditz, she's an ABC News reporter.

She was in Iran

and she had just

great coverage of what was really going on.

Let's listen in.

A powerful combination of grief and anger with shouts of death to America echoing through the streets around us.

This morning, mourners filling the streets of Iran's capital of Tehran for the funeral of General Soleimani, killed by that U.S.

drone strike last week.

Aerial images capturing the sea of Iranians hacking the streets to pay tribute to a man revered by many here.

Trump made a big mistake.

He killed our hero.

Soleimani's image everywhere.

The impact of his death profound.

The crowds are massive and emotional.

There are many tears here, many signs with Soleimani's picture on them, but the message is also very clear.

These people want revenge.

Are we human human or not?

As we made our way through the streets of Tehran, people surrounding us, shouting death to America.

We will have very hard reprints of Mr.

Trump.

Inside the funeral service, the emotion just as powerful.

The supreme leader of Iran weeping and praying over a coffin draped in the Iraqi flag.

No, no.

Man, I feel bad about this.

Okay, for let's just

play a personal game.

Let's say,

let's go in a time tunnel.

And let's say this is 1941, 42, and the United States kills Himmler or Goering.

And the news goes to Germany.

What do you expect to find?

What would you expect to find?

I would expect, perhaps,

many, many people mourning the death of their hero.

And calling for the death of America.

Yeah.

Okay, now, Solomoni, I mean

Gehring, yeah.

Himmler, yeah.

Uh-huh.

I mean, I could look at Himmler and I could say, well, let's just, let's just go to, let's go to

Himmler,

Heinrich Lutpold Himmler.

Lutpold, it's a solid middle name.

It's a solid, yeah, it is.

Okay, he was one of the most powerful men in Nazi Germany.

Okay.

Main architect of the final solution.

Well, this guy's the main architect of the destruction of Israel and the destruction of all Jews.

So it's kind of the same thing.

A member of the Reserve Battalion during World War I.

He didn't see active service, blah, blah, blah.

But then he developed the SS.

What is that?

Stormtroopers.

What do you think you see?

What do you think that is?

I mean, he's Himmler.

Now, would we be mourning the death of

Himmler?

Would we expect to see Hitler weeping over the coffin?

Of course we would.

Would we expect Hitler to be saying, oh my gosh,

this is a travesty?

This is absolutely wrong.

The question is,

would the American press

play along with it?

Or would they have the guts to say what was really going on?

Well, let me answer that question for you.

Christian Science Monitor.

The train arrived punctually,

not long after Adolf Hitler's rise in power, and traffic was well regulated.

Germany has policemen in new smart blue uniforms that keep order.

I have so far found quietness, order, and civility.

There are not the slightest sign of anything unusual afoot.

Christian Science Monitor.

As for the harrowing stories of Jews being mistreated, they seem to only apply to a small portion of the Jews, but most of which were not in any way molested.

Let's see,

let's go to the Philadelphia Evening Bulletin.

There have been indications of moderation on Hitler's part.

The Cleveland press on January 31st of 33 said appointment of Hitler as the German chancellor may not be such a threat to world peace as it appears at first blush.

Because there's a new moderation in Hitler on his rise to power.

The New York Evening Post,

they report that there is an indeterminate number of Jews that have been killed.

Hundreds of Jews have been beaten and tortured.

Thousands of Jews have fled.

Thousands of Jews have been or will be deprived of their livelihood, all because of Germany's 600,000 Jews that are now living in terror.

Okay, that there's one that's telling the truth.

Yeah, but the New York Times said

German violence has been spent.

Prosperity and happiness is soon going to prevail.

The New York Herald Tribune's Berlin correspondent asserted that while the situation of German Jewry was an unhappy one, the atrocity stories are exaggerated and unfounded.

The American press did exactly the same thing with Nazi Germany.

They listened to the propaganda because they listened with their American ears.

Now, that's not what's happening today.

They're not listening with their American ears.

They're listening with their ears that hate Donald Trump.

Donald Trump said that the press is

an enemy of the people.

And I didn't like that

because I don't like anything that smacks of going against the First Amendment.

I just don't like it.

However,

today,

I don't think he went far enough.

Let's look what the American press is for.

The American press,

many of them, up until the very end, were for Hitler.

They were for Mussolini.

They were for Stalin.

They were for the Russian Revolution.

They were against America

with the Soviet Union.

I grew up in the 70s and 80s.

I remember hearing from the press how great the Soviet Union really was.

How it was Ronald Reagan who was the real warmonger and was going to get us all killed.

Gee, something else happened.

I've heard from this press how great Chavez is.

I've heard from this press, Castro was a hero to his people.

I've heard that about Ahmadinejad.

I've heard all of the bad things that we did to Iran that, yeah, we did.

We put the Shah in and we helped him stay.

Should we be involved in other people's countries?

No.

But wait a minute.

Then why is it you have such a hard time?

Because that's what they would say.

We did all these horrible things all around the world.

I agree with you.

We should butt out of other people's business.

However,

why won't you look into what Caramella and everybody else involved in the Trump phone call are actually doing in the State Department?

Why won't you talk about how the Arab Spring was pretty much run from our Oval Office?

How come you didn't have a problem with what happened in Libya?

The only time you seem to be for anything is when it means big, oppressive government doing something to the people or to the people of a foreign country because your leader is there.

I don't think Americans feel this way.

I think Americans,

I hope, I don't even know who America is anymore right now.

I know who a good portion are that are silent.

But I think a good number of silent Americans who better not be silent much longer,

they feel like,

for instance, we got to get out of Iraq.

We got to get out of Iraq.

Let's stop this war.

I think most Americans feel that way.

Now, I'd like to throw a wrinkle in that.

You cannot get out of Iraq today.

You can't.

Why?

Because what did Ronald Reagan do?

Because he listened to the State Department buffoons.

What did he do when

the Marine barracks in Beirut were bombed?

He was told you'll make things much, much worse.

So just pull out, just get out of there.

Well, what did that do?

We now know that Osama bin Laden saw that and went, whoa, you can make this giant move.

If we move out of Iraq today, six months, eight months, a year from now, maybe different, but if we move out of Iraq, because there's nothing more I want,

you got to get out of Iraq.

Don't tempt us to do the things that we want to do.

Because I'd like to get out of Iraq.

You know, if the Iraqi people decide America's a problem, fine.

You won't see us in your neighborhood again.

That's my feeling.

Buh-bye.

Too much blood, too much treasure, and you don't want freedom.

So go ahead.

However, what we're talking about today

is teaching the Middle East and especially Iran that they can move us.

We've already taught them that they can take our embassy.

They did it in 1979 until Reagan was sworn in.

Then they did it in Benghazi.

The guy we killed is responsible for Benghazi.

That was his plan.

You didn't know about it.

Why?

Because the press never reported it.

They just went with the big state guy that they just love, and the big state woman, Hillary Clinton, who they just love.

Then they attack our embassy in Iraq.

What are we supposed to do?

Just take it?

They have somebody, a Himmler or a Gering, who is planning on killing our troops and has a record, a long record of killing our troops beyond the misery and the torture that he has provided all over the Middle East.

And our press mourns?

Our press gets there right away to cover this funeral, as they should cover the funeral.

Let me ask you this, Martha.

Are you a strong woman?

You believe in equal women's rights, and you believe in all of that, and you believe that you can do anything, girl power.

I bet you do.

Then why are you wearing your headscarf?

You know you're in a group of people.

If your headscarf blows off, they kill you

Because you're not really fully a person.

You're just a woman.

And you're making excuses for these people.

You're not an enemy of the American people.

You are an enemy of anyone who stands up for freedom.

You should cover that.

And I'd even give you a break if you were covering it just without any kind of commentary on it.

You were just covering it as long as ABC News was saying beforehand, we had to make special deals to get in here so we could cover this and special deals so we could get her out afterwards.

We'd understand.

But you are an organ for evil.

And that's all of the press.

You've done it before.

This is nothing new.

America, wake the hell up.

Where was the press?

Where was Martha Radditz and ABC News when millions of people all over the country

were protesting their oppressive government?

Where were they?

They couldn't even,

they didn't go there and cover that.

And for good reason, you'd be killed if you were there covering it.

But where were they when the cause was freedom?

I have no doubt that millions of people in Iraq are religious zealots and believe that the Islamic way of life is the way to go.

Well, good for them.

They're wrong when it comes to human rights.

You want to do that yourself?

You go do that yourself.

But don't oppress anybody else as you're doing it.

And that's what this is.

This is a state that oppresses people, kills people.

Where were they when the Islamic regime just last year again was hanging people because they were gay?

This is who you are standing up for.

Now, let me tell you what the real people in Iran feel.

And I know this because I read from the dissidents,

not today,

but over the years.

Suleimani is a popular guy with

the zealots.

Yes, he is, because he's spreading this ideology all around the world, and he's doing it with force, brutal force.

So, yeah, there's a lot of hardliners that love this guy, millions of them, perhaps.

But the average person, just like the average person here in America, just wants to be left alone, just wants to have a better life, just wants to be able to pursue their dreams.

You know, they just want a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

That's what they want.

That's ingrained in all of us because God gives it to all of us.

And they see Solomoni as the guy who's taking the bread out of their children's mouths because he was getting a billion with a B, a billion dollars a month to do what?

To go foment foreign wars, to foment

terror all around the Middle East.

And the average person is looking to their government and saying, you're spending a billion dollars?

Do you know that it costs me 70% more now this month to be able to buy bread for my children?

We could use some of that money, just like we say, but it's not nearly as bad.

Just like we say, hey, can we stop with these foreign wars?

We got things we have to fix here.

Imagine if bread and milk cost you 70%

more today than it did just a few weeks ago.

Do you think we'd all be up?

And even the greatest hero in our war machine, we would be like, look, dude, stop it.

Stop.

That's what's, that's the reality on the streets.

And it is also the reality that millions of people were to, even those who were part of the 79 revolution,

do not want

the Ayatollahs running their life anymore.

They don't want the religious police squads.

How can the press say anything about me and my religion or you and your religion and any of our churches when this is going on?

See, the press doesn't have perspective.

That's the problem.

They've lost all perspective because in their arrogance, they think that they are right.

They think that they are smarter than everybody else.

And they think that anyone who disagrees with them on anything is a moron.

You couple that arrogance and that belief.

with the hatred for Donald Trump and you have a press that you can't trust anything that comes out of their mouth.

Oh, I mean, unless it's Brian Stelter, I mean, because he is just, I mean, he's a reliable source.

The best of the Glenn Beck program.

Hey, it's Glenn, and you're listening to the Glenn Beck program.

If you like what you're hearing on this show, make sure you check out Pat Gray Unleashed.

It's available wherever you download your favorite podcasts.

Welcome to the program.

We're really glad that you're here.

I don't think there's a reason I don't watch the news anymore.

I don't watch the news anymore because they don't have anything to tell me that is true.

Do you,

what do you get from the news other than just frustrated and pissed off?

Well, lots of material to criticize the next day.

You get that.

Yes, yes, yes.

I mean, look, you know, that is the problem.

It's not even that they never give you anything.

It's just that you don't know what to trust.

So much of it is just flavoring.

Garbage, you know, so dramatically with

opinion and propaganda and spin.

I mean, what would you call their coverage now of impeachment?

They were all in for impeachment.

They couldn't go to the courts to get anything done because this had to be done right away.

Now they voted on impeachment, but Nancy Pelosi won't turn the impeachment over to the Senate so they can finish the job.

They don't seem to be minding this.

There's no real criticism of it.

No.

I mean, it is bizarre to hold both of those viewpoints, as you point out.

I mean, the John Bolton thing came out yesterday where Bolton said if asked, if subpoenaed in the Senate trial, he would testify.

And Bolton was one of the main guys.

They wanted to get to testify in the House.

And they could have subpoenaed him, and then he would have taken it to the Supreme Court because, rightfully so, one branch cannot force the other branch to do something.

So it should have gone to the Supreme Court, but they were in such a hurry.

This has got to be done right now.

We'll work this out when we get to the Senate.

Well, now they're talking about making sure that John Bolton is heard.

Well, you can't do anything until you file the impeachment with the Senate.

And there is one thing that they can do, which is the House has all the power still to this moment.

to call John Bolton to testify in the House.

They could still have him do it.

And would Bolton Bolton say yes to that?

I mean, he indicated it.

He's talking about the Senate, but I mean, if he's willing to testify, if he's subpoenaed, you'd assume he'd go to the House.

They're all complaining about what the Senate's doing when they could still do that if they really wanted to.

I mean, it's so obvious this is a game.

And, you know, I think we acknowledge that all the time.

You know, Republicans play games too.

We know that.

But what Democrats are doing here is considerably more, I think, offensive.

And what makes it worse, at least to me, is the fact that the press press automatically auto-adopts what the left-wing narrative is as credible.

You know, that is the automatic, that's the default position.

So there is so much to push back against.

Why bother getting it from these sources?

What's the point?

When they will not,

even when it's obvious, will not tell you what the truth is.

The Washington Post has blasted CNN for its track record on the infamous anti-Trump dossier following last month's release of the Justice Department Watchdogs report on the foundation of the Russia investigation.

Demanding the network CNN.

This is the Washington Post demanding the network come clean on its faulty reporting.

This is the latest and ongoing series tackling the media's handling of the dossier.

Washington Post media critic Eric Wempley took aim at the anti-Trump network on Monday.

This is a Blaze story, I believe, for continuing to stand by its past reporting on the salacious document that was used in the highly controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA application, blah, blah, blah.

Wempley singled out CNN, their anchor, Allison Camerada, who claimed December 2017 that

the Intel community has corroborated all of the details of the Yassi compiled by the British ex-spy Christopher Steele.

This is the Washington Post, the Washington Post

trying to throw CNN under the bus now saying, what happened to your reporting?

Yeah, I mean, it's been embarrassing.

I mean, you know, you go back and listen to, we had a montage a couple of weeks ago of the coverage of the dossier.

And Allison Camerado in particular comes off looking terrible.

I mean, you know, there were things in the dossier that were accurate.

The problem was that they were publicly available.

You know,

there was nothing dramatic.

They didn't break any news.

And all of the things that were not publicly available, as reported

in detail in the IG report,

showed that those things were just made up.

In fact, they even talked to the sources, the sources of the claims, who didn't even try to say that they were accurate.

Oh, we were joking.

Oh, this was hyperbole.

These weren't things that were credible at any given moment.

And to go on the air and to essentially, what camerada did in that one clip you just mentioned is cite um

a some level of of knowledge that you can't have like i'm an anchor

and i know these things are true you have to just understand that i know that they're true they've said them they've said them to us we have reporting that indicates these things are all are all confirmed they wouldn't be reporting them if they weren't confirmed And to now know that none of that was true, there's never a moment where they have to go back and say, wait a minute, guys.

Like, I understand that we think Donald Trump's a bad guy and a bad president.

What is this, though?

Why would you say that?

You can even report the stuff that's in the dossier and say that it's unproven, but to go ahead and say that it's all confirmed is not just a minor mistake.

It's a massive journalistic failure by dozens of people, many of them on CNN.

That's inexcusable.

I mean, it was systemic.

If you cared about the truth, but I don't think that they care about the truth.

ABC, as we talked about last hour, has their reporter in the, you know, in the Islamic scarf so she's not killed or raped in this crowd.

What kind of deal did ABC have to make to get her to be able to get into Iran, cover the funeral, and leave Iran?

What kind of deals did they have to make?

But she was there just to report the one side, and the one side is that there were millions of people on the streets saying Soleimani was the greatest guy ever.

Whatever.

What about ABC's coverage of the millions on the streets that were risking their lives standing up against Soleimani

and his Quds force

and the restrictions that the Ayatollah puts on the average

Iranian.

Where was the ABC reporter on the streets

talking about, hey, I've got to wear this head scarf, otherwise they'll kill me and rape me because I'm not fully human because I'm a woman.

Where is that reporting?

As we said last hour, the press has become not an enemy of the people of America, an enemy to freedom.

I challenge you to show me the time when they are really being the champion of truth on both sides.

A consistent truth.

Well, you got to stand up to power.

Well, you didn't when power was being abused by Barack Obama.

You now call that the

purest

administration ever that had zero

scandals.

Are you kidding me?

Abusing the power of the the IRS.

You didn't care.

Going after the phone records and tapping journalists' lines.

You care about Donald Trump, but you didn't care about

Barack Obama.

You say you care about women's rights and homosexual rights, but you really don't.

Because where are you when it comes to Russia?

You only care about Russia now

because Russia

is somehow or another working and colluding with Donald Trump.

And so you have to be the enemy of Russia now.

But you were for Russia and Putin.

You wanted a new open door with Putin.

You never said boo about how bad Putin was until Trump got in.

You wouldn't pay attention to the warnings that we gave you for two years leading up to the the 18 election

two years you paid no attention

only when it became about donald trump did you care

pulling out of iraq that's all you could talk about all you could talk about under george w bush

Barack Obama promised he was going to do it.

He never did.

You didn't say anything about the lives lost.

There was no daily accounting of how many lives were being lost in Iraq.

There was no talk about Iraq.

You were cheering on

this administration's policies of destabilizing the entire Middle East while you threw George Bush under the bus for destabilizing the Middle East.

I mean, think about this, the Daily today, the podcast that you've listened to before, Glenn, and mentioned a couple of times, big podcast from the New York Times.

This is their tweet promoting their episode today.

Quote: Knowing General Suleimani was out there made me feel safer, said a student about the commander killed in the American drone strike.

He was like a security umbrella above our country.

Listen to today's episode.

Oh, that's a good, good balance to take, I think, on the Suleimani life.

Life and Times.

That's basically the obituary.

A security umbrella above Iran.

Making it feel safer.

I mean, I don't know what the hell that government is telling the people.

Obviously, they're lying to them constantly.

But I mean, is that the appropriate level of coverage of this person who, again, was torturing children as if it was his

favorite thing to do?

It was a hobby for the guy.

Torturing children, murdering people, murdering U.S.

soldiers.

But let's talk about the security umbrella he was for Iran.

It's very important.

They claim that they are for the people and they are for rights, but they are not.

They are not for rights.

They do not care about the rights of women.

If they did, they would be consistent on their coverage of the Middle East.

But they're not.

They say that they care about gay rights.

They don't.

They execute people for being gay in Iran.

Remember when Ahmadinejad came and gave his speech at Colombia and he said, we don't have any gays.

We don't have any gays in Iran.

And everybody just kind of laughed that off.

No, you know why they don't have any gays?

Because they kill them.

And whoever else left is afraid to say it, obviously, because everybody else they know was killed.

So

what is our American press really for?

Well, we just wanted to make sure we covered, Well, that's not journalism.

Just covering what the other side says.

Well, how come you don't do that with Americans who love their country, who believe in the Constitution?

You editorialize all the time about them.

You'll cover them, but you'll call them extreme right-wing zealots because they believe in the Constitution.

So you don't just cover, you don't cover Americans who have have a different opinion, fairly balanced.

And quite frankly, you're not doing that in Iran.

You are becoming a propaganda arm

for a government we know is evil.

Last year, I tried to swear off the word evil and not use it

for everything.

This is evil.

If you can't admit what the government of Iran is to its own people, let alone the rest of the world, as being evil,

what is your definition of that word?

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Hey, it's Glenn.

And if you like what you hear on the program, you should check out Pat Gray Unleashed.

His podcast is available wherever you download your favorite podcast.

Hi, it's Glenn.

If you're a subscriber to the podcast, can you do us a favor and rate us on iTunes?

If you're not a subscriber, become one today and listen on your own time.

You can subscribe on iTunes.

Thanks.

I want to go through a montage here of the way the U.S.

press has been covering

the funeral and the loss of the Iranian terror leader.

Listen.

He was a war hero, the commander of Iran's feared Quds force.

Qasim Suleimani was no ordinary general.

The U.S.

officially classified him as a terrorist, but in Iran, he was a national hero.

He's regarded as personally incredibly brave.

The troops love him.

I was trying to think of somebody, and I was thinking of De Gaulle.

A revered figure in Iran and some other places in the Middle East.

Smart, charismatic, ruthless, strategic, and bold.

Qasim Suleimani was an evil genius.

Suleimani was in charge of spreading Iranian influence influence around the world and he was extremely good at it.

He is the think of the French Foreign Legion, you know, if you will.

By killing Qasem Soleimani, the U.S.

has stripped Iran of an inspirational military leader.

The crowds are massive and emotional.

There are many tears here.

Thousands of mourners on the streets in Iran.

Symbolic caskets aloft, weeping and chanting.

I am Soleimani.

The supreme leader of Iran, weeping and praying over a coffin draped in the Iraqi flag.

It's difficult to convey how revered he is.

There was talk in Iran.

Suleimani might be a future president, or perhaps even a supreme leader.

Might be a future president.

Democrats are like, yeah, right?

He'd be great.

No, no, I'm not Trump.

No, Iran.

Oh.

It's almost that level of it.

It really is.

It really is.

Let me ask you that.

If he could beat Donald Trump, I contend the Democrats would consider it.

That is the one qualification you need.

Yeah, that's just the next president.

I mean,

no, not to be the next president, but to be the next

candidate.

Yeah, I mean, they just have to believe that.

I don't think America would vote for this guy, but if he convinced them that he could beat Donald Trump, they'd all be for him.

They'd all be for him.

I mean, Bernie Sanders is a socialist

who is in second place, I guess you'd say, right now.

He seemed to be leading Iowa, maybe leading

New Hampshire.

And

he's, you know, on Anderson Cooper last night,

you know, blabbing on about

how this is, you know, he's completely assassination.

Yeah, this is Putin.

Basically calling Trump Putin the same way Putin kills dissidents.

There isn't a tie to the two situations you're describing.

Like, they're just not even close to the same.

There's people involved in both.

That's one similarity.

They're not even close to the same situation.

One, the dissidents are dissenting against Putin and his regime.

And while this guy may be against the United States of America, he's engaging in actual death.

He's killing our soldiers.

He is spreading horror all throughout the Middle East.

We, as we've said like three times on the day show, we know one of the children who his squad went through and drilled into his leg as a torture practice just to torture his family after killing the mom in front of them.

I mean, this is.

This is not a dissident.

This is not somebody who's like, oh, you know what?

I have a different agreement with Donald Trump.

And I, you you know, I really think we should maybe open up free and fair elections.

This guy's not for free and fair elections.

This guy is a religious zealot.

What part of this goes with anything that you state you believe?

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Like listening to this podcast?

If you're not a subscriber, become one now on iTunes.

And while you're there, do us a favor and rate the show.

So,

can we get to

the

woman now?

Thank you.

That still has all of her male junk.

Well,

look, there is a transition going on

in a physical sense, but she's always been a woman.

Of course she has.

So

she went into a salon and said, I want my junk waxed.

And they were like, we don't do that

for guy parts.

Guy parts?

These are women parts.

Dare you.

Jessica Yanive.

Yes.

She is up in Canada.

And she went to get her.

junk waxed and they said no and they they said we don't really do that for for for men and that was a big controversy she filed a a claim uh in uh in the british columbia human rights tribunal because when the human rights you think of don't i have a right a human fundamental human right to waxed junk waxed uh and of course the answer to that is yes but this particular dumb court this is surprising this is coming from canada because they're really extreme on this stuff bad really extreme i mean they've done terrible things to people for just speaking out i mean look what they were trying to do to Jordan Peterson.

So this

was a surprise in which they actually threw

the case out.

She wanted to get something like $500,000,

but

that did not happen.

In fact, Yaneve was actually ordered to pay $2,000 to each of the three to three of four clients represented because of improper conduct.

So that's how that case wound up.

And look, the Jessica Yaneve parts of our lives was over.

It's over.

We don't have to think about it.

You know, that's good.

I really don't want to think about it anymore.

However, there's a new development in the story.

Now, this is where it gets complex.

This is where you're not sure which way to go.

You tell me, think about this as we go through the story.

Which way does the media go on this?

They do.

Which way does Alexandria Casio-Cortez go on this story?

See, we're consistent.

We say we're against it.

Yeah.

It's easy.

It's just easy.

It doesn't take any thought.

Imagine the wood and coal that needs to be shoveled into Cortez's head

just

to have the power to compute all of the possibilities.

So, Jessica Yaniv went to the She Point Beauty Salon.

The She Point.

She went in there, wanted some waxing done,

and asked to get her legs waxed in private.

And she wanted, obviously, to have her pants down during this procedure.

Now,

the waxing situation, again, I would not like to force you to think about anymore, but it's important to the story because of the reason that the Salon refused to do it.

Because now there's a new case she's brought, Jessica's brought in front of the court.

The reason was a religious objection.

So they said they would not wax

her.

I'm sorry.

I thought we were talking about Jessica.

Yes.

Yeah.

Hers.

Oh, sorry.

Hers.

Would not wax them in this way because

it violated their religious principles.

So now you have the media who's saying, okay.

You've got this wonderful transgendered woman who just needs some waxing done and is against some evil Christian bastard religious extremist who won't help them.

Correct.

We know what side

AOC is.

That's not what this is.

However,

it's not a Christian.

Is it Islam?

Is it Islam?

Because that would make their heads pop.

If it was Islam,

they very well might be on the side of the salon owner.

Right.

Because that religious

extremism is an extreme.

That's normal.

It's okay.

And should be respected.

But

it would be really difficult.

They would really have to choose.

But this is the complication.

Here's the thing:

the salon owner is of the Sikh persuasion.

So now you have India being a capitalist country.

Oh, yeah.

You know what I mean?

But a person of color, person of color,

versus

transgender and transgender

man-to-woman.

Right.

And

you also have them from

the

Poonjob area.

It is the Poonjob.

That's a good point, Glenn.

I'm glad you brought up Poonjob because it is from the Poonjob area.

That's what.

And there's something incredibly relevant to the story when you talk about Poonjob.

Right,

I'm asking you for a...

And you're from Poonjob, right?

So, I mean, I would think that that...

It actually feels like a good name for, like, on the menu of selections, you can get, like, waxing the legs.

stop

stop

i'm just saying the name of the right i got it i i got it that's a whole

in the region right the whole region there of the punjab and uh so of the so where do you come down when it's jessica yanni versus the people of punjab all right now if you're in the media who knows who knows i don't know okay Now let me add, let me take you back to an earlier story from earlier on the program.

Okay.

Remember, I told you about the British astronaut that, yes, take a moment to process that.

Who knew?

But

the British have an astronaut, or maybe even two.

And one of them said, there are aliens and they're living among us and they're invisible.

Okay.

Okay.

Now,

what about the possibility of aliens living among us and they're not invisible?

Okay.

What

would you say

if I suggested to you that perhaps everyone in the media is an alien?

Everyone in the media?

Well, maybe not everyone in the media.

But they just look like

just like us, but they're not alien.

Right.

Now, if I said to you, and I could show you photo, I could take you to it and I could prove that it was otherworldly.

Okay.

If I could take you to the site of a giant spaceship

that had room for a thousand aliens,

and in there were nothing but books about journalism.

I have no other proof.

There's nobody at the ship.

It crashed maybe 40 years ago, 20 years ago, and it crashed, and we just discovered the ship and riddled with journalism books.

Would you be willing to accept pretty quickly

that explains it?

Oh, yeah.

I mean, we haven't even found the ship.

I'm pretty much there.

Exactly right.

Exactly right.

So I have a thesis here, and I'd like to get your

percentage of possibility on this particular thesis.

Jessica Yaniv.

We really have to go back.

No, I'm not going.

We've already

gone through the entire situation as it revolves around the waxing and pumaja moofar thing.

Yes, go ahead.

What is the percentage of possibility that the whole Jessica Yanieve thing is performance art?

We're going to find out in six months there's a documentary or reality series of this person who actually is trying to show how ridiculous this is and continues to file a loss.

Zero.

Really?

Zero.

Yeah.

I'm at least 10%.

I mean, not only is she, it's the most extreme and ridiculous thing you can do To cry for help.

But it may very well be.

That's why I'm only saying 10%.

Yeah.

But you don't think there's any percentage possibility that this is like, let's say, almost a conservative activist who's

living this life to prove how ridiculous this is.

We're not that creative.

Really?

We're just not that creative now.

It would be a good series.

Yeah.

Well, I mean, you know what?

Think about this.

Our own Steven Crowder.

Now, I don't believe he's asked for any waxing.

We'd have to ask Steven if this has happened.

He went in for a pregnancy test.

But he did go in for a pregnancy test dressed as a woman while clearly a man to us a Planned Parenthood, wasn't it?

Yeah.

And I believe, if I'm not mistaken, he actually acquired actual pregnant urine.

Yeah, he tested positive for pregnancy.

And tested positive for pregnancy at a Planned Parenthood.

Yeah, now, that's not possible for a man.

No matter what anyone says to you, that is not possible for a man.

I can't believe you have to say that.

Did I have to say that?

I can't just say that.

I know, it's crazy.

By the way, that's not possible for a man to be pregnant, and I want people to know that.

Can you imagine if I'm a time traveler, all I'm doing is I'm going and I'm playing my show back to my audience 20 years ago.

Oh, yeah.

That's all I'm doing.

You want to know how bad it's going to get?

Listen to this.

This is my actual show in 25 years.

Nobody would believe it.

Nobody would believe it.

Nobody would believe it.

So you don't think there's any chance of that.

No.

I mean, it would be a great, it would be a great series.

It would be.

This is a cry for help.

It's a cry for help.

This person is.

I think it would be much more likely that we find this person dead by their own hand sometime in the future.

Oh, gosh.

I mean, that's

turned that little bit a little dark.

I was having some fun with it, and you kind of brought it to

the darkest.

Always ends with a bullet to that.

It does with you.

It does.

No, I mean, I just think there are some really sick people right now.

Some really sick people.

And some people that are really, really miserable.

Did you see the guy who has, I think he had 6,000 plastic surgeries to look like the Ken doll?

Yeah, yeah.

And now he's like, I'm a woman, and I've always been more like Barbie than Ken.

Now, sweetheart, no.

Yeah, you're not Ken or Barbie.

You have

some sort of disorder that is causing you to think that you will find your

happiness

in looking a different way.

But once you complete from going from Ken to Barbie, you're going to be just as miserable.

And I just, I feel like we are a society that is just cruel.

We're being cruel to people.

By allowing them to live these lives where, oh yeah, I'm a man and I can get pregnant.

Oh, yeah, I'm a man with all my junk and I can't go swimming today.

I'm upset a little bit because I can't go swimming today because if you're menstruating, you can't get in the pool and I'm menstruating.

Dude,

if you're bleeding from downstairs, okay,

with male junk, go see a doctor.

You're not menstruating.

Go see a doctor.

I'm going to have a lacerated kidney.

Yeah.

I mean, really,

really bad.

And we're just doing so much damage to people.

We've gone on from our children, giving them all trophies and saying they're all special.

Now, some of them suck.

Oh, yeah.

A lot of them do.

Yeah.

A lot of kids are terrible.

Yeah.

And some of them in our own family.

I mean, I got four.

I got four.

Do you want to name names?

I don't think I need to.

I think they know.

So,

you know,

we're giving them hope, false hope.

We're telling them that, oh, they're spectacular.

Oh, yes, you could win on American I.

No, you can't.

You suck.

Now, you don't don't have to say it that way, but we don't tell our children the truth anymore.

We don't teach them the truth.

And gee, we wonder why suicide is going up.

You're going to be incredibly disappointed when you realize, you know, you're not Rihanna.

That's not you.

And it shouldn't be you.

You be you.

Rihanna is Rihanna.

You be you.

And, you know, it started out as, hey, I got to be who I am.

Okay, be who you are.

But if you're like, I'm actually a woman and I'm menstruating, even though I haven't had any junk removed, dude, that's not you.

That's not you.

That's a lie.

And it's a dangerous lie.

And we are enabling really dangerous things for very sad people.

Stop it.

We're not helping.

We are not helping.

We are hurting people.

You say you have compassion.

Compassion requires truth.

The Blaze Radio Network.

On demand.