Person of the Year: Greta Thunberg! Seriously? | Guest: Col. Carlyle Harris | 12/11/19

It's because I've talked to them.

Welcome to the program.

So glad that you're here.

Thanks, Hillary.

We have kind of a big story that

nobody really is paying attention to that I think is ginormous.

Ginormous from Jinna.

It's actually actually from Time magazine.

You know, that very, very conservative magazine.

I mean, that's just a right-wing,

this is a right-wing rag, quite honestly.

And

they've published kind of an interesting story that

I think makes news.

Nobody's really reporting on this from Time magazine.

We will

next.

Also, best thing I've heard for Donald Trump, Joe Biden says a second term will put a death grip on the federal courts that will have two generations before we'll be able to have any kind of progressive movement on the courts.

Thank you.

There's my new bumper sticker for Donald Trump.

I voted for the court death grip on progressivism.

All right.

Back in just a second.

Stand by.

Oh my gosh, I...

I am so happy today.

I am so happy today because not only do I have unbelievable news on the impeachment front,

but also,

let's just listen to this headline.

I'll give you the full story in a minute.

Man whose deadly farts can kill mosquitoes, hired to create mosquito repellent made from his intestinal gas.

The reason why I'm so excited?

I finally have hope that my 15-year-old son has a future.

This is the Glenbeck program.

All right.

Remember that Xbox you bought for your kid for Christmas?

Yeah, that was a mistake.

The one that you were going to play with the volume muted after he goes to bed?

That's one of the first things a burglar burglar takes as soon as he breaks in and the TV and everything else that is handy and expensive.

It's a very Merry Christmas for people who break into houses.

This is why you need to invest in home security.

Right now is the best time of the year to get a SimplySafe home security system for the holidays.

They're giving you a huge discount.

Excuse me, I sounded like I was a 13-year-old boy there.

Huge discount.

They're giving you a huge discount on your system and a free security camera.

If there is a break-in, Simply Safe can give you real-time video confirmation so police will respond up to three and a half times faster.

No contract, no hidden fees, or fine print.

Prices are fair and honest, and they start at 15 bucks a month.

Go to simply safebeck.com right now.

Take advantage of SimplySafe's amazing holiday savings and get a free HD security camera.

The offer is limited for a limited time only, and it's ending soon.

SimplySafeBeck.com, save big, and get a free security camera.

It is simply savebeck.com

Yeah, welcome to the program.

There is a big scandal going on now in

Las Vegas that I have to bring you.

Somebody's putting little teeny cowboy hats on pigeons.

And

we'll get to the bottom of that coming up in a second.

First, I want to give you some amazing news and ask you why you haven't heard this everywhere.

I want to read this story from Time magazine.

Time.com came out yesterday afternoon.

Since the start of the public impeachment hearings in Congress last month, Andre Yermak, a top advisor to the president of the Ukraine, has heard his name come up again and again in witness testimony.

He took part in many of the events at the center of the impeachment inquiry.

I want you to listen to that.

His name has come up again and again.

In fact, his name is mentioned in the impeachment inquiry dozens of times.

He was at many of the events that were quoting at the center of the impeachment inquiry.

And a 300 page report last week by the inquiry mentions Yermak by name dozens of times.

But in his first interview about those public hearings, Yermack has questioned the recollections of,

this is Time magazine, of crucial witnesses into the impeachment inquiry, into Donald Trump's alleged abuse of his office for political gain.

So the guy who is at the center

of the events that make the impeachment inquiry,

the guy who is quoted

the guy who is they say all of them said oh no he was there

he's now saying I

don't think the witnesses remember this correctly your mack told Time magazine in an interview on December 4th listen I want to tell you straight Of course now when I watch these shows on television my name often comes up and I see people there whom I recognize whom I have met and whom I know, he says, referring to the witness testimony.

That is their personal opinion, especially the positions they expressed while under oath.

But I have my own truth.

I know what I know.

The most crucial point at which Yermak's recollection contradicts the testimony of the inquiry's witnesses relates to a meeting in Warsaw on September 1st, when Ukrainian President Zelensky met with Vice President Mike Pence.

Do you remember this?

The story is that they were meeting, and all of a sudden, Mike Pence just ended the meeting quickly, and they walked out.

And the ambassadors,

they all had to quarter Mr.

Yermak and say, I am sorry for that.

I don't know.

I mean, look, you just have to do what the president says, or you're not going to get any of this aid.

That's what the witnesses said.

This was the only time that we have anybody

saying quid pro quo.

Most crucial point is his recollection that contradicts the testimony of the inquiry's witnesses.

The meeting was part of an ongoing effort by the Zelensky administration to improve ties with the Trump administration.

One of the American diplomats who attended that meeting, Gordon Sondlan, the U.S.

ambassador to the European Union, testified before the inquiry last month that he, quote, pulled Yermak aside after the meeting and delivered an important message.

U.S.

aid to Ukraine would probably not resume until Zelensky's government announced two investigations that could implicate President Trump's political revivals.

Quote, I told Mr.

Yermak that I believed that the resumption of the U.S.

aid would likely not occur until Ukraine took some kind of action on the public statement that we had been discussing for many weeks.

End quote.

That's the testimony.

Now let's see what Mr.

Yermak says.

This statement was allegedly intended to announce two investigations, one into the discredited claims that Ukraine helped Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Notice, this is not a friendly article to Donald Trump.

Notice they say the discredited claims that Ukraine helped Hillary Clinton's campaign, and another related to the work that Hunter Biden, the son of the presidential candidate Joe Biden, did for Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings.

Based on testimony from Sondlin and other witnesses, the final report from the House Intelligence Committee concluded last week that Sondlin made this offer of a quid pro quo clear to Yermak that day in Warsaw.

Following, quoting, following that meeting, Ambassador Sondlin pulled aside President Zelensky's advisor, Mr.

Yermack, to explain that the hold on security assistance was conditioned on public announcement of the burism of Biden and 2016 election interference investigations, quoting the report.

Yermack, however, according to Time Magazine, disputes this.

Quote, Gordon and I, the ambassador from the U.S., were never alone together, he said when Time magazine asked about the Warsaw meeting.

Quote, we bumped into each other in the hallway next to the escalator as I was walking out.

He recalls that several members of the American and Ukrainian delegation were also nearby, as well as bodyguards and hotel staff, though he was not sure whether any of them heard his brief conversation with Sonlin.

And I remember everything,

quoting Yermak, and I remember everything.

Everything is fine with my my memory.

We talked about how well the meeting went, and that's all we talked about, Yermak says.

Still help me out here.

That's kind of a big deal, don't you?

I think so, yeah.

I mean, they even say these comments cast doubt on an important moment in the impeachment inquiry's reconstruction of events, specifically the only known point.

at which an American official directly tells the Ukrainians about the link between U.S.

aid and the announcement of specific

investigations.

They have said the whole time, we didn't know this.

They didn't say that this was tied together.

And Sonlin, remember, changed his testimony.

He changed his testimony.

And that's when he said, okay, I did tell Yermak this.

And that was the only thing that the impeachment inquiry could hang their hat on as someone who was firsthand doing it.

It was Sondland.

Now Yermak says, and I think this is really important,

and I remember everything.

Everything is fine with my memory.

We talked about how well the meeting went, and that's all we talked about, end quote.

In a statement, Sonland's lawyer said Ambassador Sondland stands by his prior testimony, I'm not sure which one that was, and will not comment further.

In his initial testimony to the impeachment inquiry in October, Sondland said he never knew the U.S.

aid in Ukraine was conditional on the investigations that Trump wanted.

But the following month, Sondlin amended his testimony with a sworn statement in which he described the conversation with Yermack in Warsaw.

Oh, now I recall speaking individually with Mr.

Yermack, where I said the resumption of aid would likely not occur, and we had been discussing that for many weeks.

So, was he lying the first time, or was he lying the second time?

And this is not a rhetorical question now.

This is perjury.

Because the guy who he said he talked to says there's nothing wrong with my memory.

I never had that conversation.

Well, one of them's lying.

I mean, it could also be the guy from Ukraine,

undoubtedly.

And, you know,

there's an argument, and they make it in this story, that it makes sense.

You know, they're still dependent on the U.S.

for...

for funding.

I mean, the same thing that would have made them do this in the first place, which was to please Trump Trump and to get the funding, would make them do this this time.

So, let me say, however, we don't have evidence of that, and it certainly brings up a massive question.

And, you know, if let's just say you came up with this idea to impeach a president and actually did an investigation and did a legitimate inquiry instead of the crap that they did the last couple of weeks, you'd have to have this, they'd be able to sort this out.

Instead, they're just jumping to it and assuming the worst in every single circumstance to get their political answer.

So, I thought about that.

I thought, okay, well, so what they're doing is they're relying on aid, blah, blah, blah.

We're just a few months away from an election.

Okay.

If you thought that Donald Trump was going to be impeached and removed from office,

you would shut your mouth.

You would not start taking this case apart.

You just shut your mouth because I need aid.

So best case scenario is he's making this up because he's seen what the case is and sees this case is going nowhere.

He's not going anywhere.

And beyond that, the Democrats are so weak, they will not win in the next election.

Otherwise, you just shut your mouth until someone asks you in an authoritarian.

Yeah, why do an interview with Time magazine about it?

Why do it?

Why do it?

You are undermining the Democrats.

Yeah, I mean,

and you just don't do that unless you know who's going to win, or you think you know.

Yeah, I mean, we did see this with some of these officials who said things on both sides of it.

But, I mean, this is a this is pretty damning.

I mean, like, how do you go through an impeachment inquiry without knowing this?

How has this come out after you've issued articles of impeachment?

Think of how pathetic that is.

This is a guy in the center of the story, the one, as they point out in time, the one point of contact that would actually illustrate that there was a quid pro quo for financial aid.

And they have they even talked to the guy?

And they didn't even talk to him.

And look, here's Yermack.

Now listen to this.

When Time asked him whether he ever felt there was a connection between U.S.

military aid and the request for investigations, Yermack was adamant.

We never had that feeling, he said.

We had a clear understanding that the aid

has been frozen.

We honestly said, okay, that's bad.

What's going on here?

We were told they were going to figure it out.

And after a certain amount of time, the aid was unfrozen.

We did not have the feeling that this aid was connected at all to any one specific

issue.

I think that's totally reasonable and goes completely with everything

except what Sondlin said.

as he changed his testimony.

It goes completely with everything that we hear from everyone, including Sondlon, until he updated a month later his own testimony to say, oh, I...

Oh, yeah, I did do that.

Now, they're saying that it's absolutely reasonable that Sonlin, I mean, that Yermak would say this

because of,

you know, politics.

They need America.

But you don't do that unless you think they're not going to impeach this president and remove him from office, and he's not going to lose the next election.

So if you take the Democratic point of view on this,

it makes no sense unless the president's going to steamroll the Democrats.

You just stay quiet.

Don't make it any worse for yourself.

You know, just play.

We didn't say anything.

So if President Trump is removed from office or the next president comes in, it's a Democrat, you can say, we didn't pick sides on this.

We could have, but we didn't.

We didn't pick sides.

They're picking sides.

This is Zelensky.

This is his number two guy.

So this is the president of Ukraine picking sides.

That should tell you something.

That should tell you something.

Now,

you can accept that as, well,

Ukrainians are just doing this for their own personal gain because they have pressure points.

Why is it unreasonable to look at Sonlin and say, well, he testified testified the exact opposite way, and then he suddenly remembered something.

What was his pressure point?

What happened in that month in between?

Was there anything, any calculation?

Or did he just wake up one morning and go, oh, you know what?

I completely forgot.

That doesn't sound reasonable to me.

Hey, if you're one of the 83% of us that are shopping online for holiday gifts, keep in mind the FBI received nearly 300,000 online theft complaints last year alone.

The reported losses are $1.4 billion.

So, before you hit the buy button this holiday season, remember some websites are created by people who just want your credit card data and other personal information.

Make sure up in the URL there's a little padlock in the URL.

If it's not there, don't hit buy.

Make sure that this is, if you're going to shop at Macy's, that it's Macy's.com.

Make sure you look at it because they can get very, very clever.

And you think you're at Macy's.com, but you're not.

It's important to understand how cybercrime is affecting our lives.

Identity theft is a very serious issue.

Somebody's identity is stolen every two seconds, and it's not good enough to only monitor your credit because you can miss things.

That's why there's Life Lock, they detect a wide range of identity threats, like your social security number being for sale on the dark web.

Nobody can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, and Lifelock can see the threats that you might miss on your own.

So, join now and save up to 25% off your first year.

Call 800 LifeLock or visit lifelock.com and use the promo code Beck.

That's promo code Beck at lifelock.com.

Save up to 25% right now.

Lifelock.com.

Promo code back.

We break for 10 seconds.

I mean, I think this guy is.

Did you read the whole article, Stu?

Yeah, I have.

I do not intend to publicize what I wrote to anyone.

These are my principles.

I'm not going to comment on what we wrote to each other, whether it was incomplete or something else, but I remember very clear what I said, what I did, whom I wrote to, and I can tell you 100%

and can answer for this, that everything I did was right.

Everything I did was within the law, and I never crossed the line.

I never violated legal norms or moral ones.

I mean, you can make the case, just to play devil's advocate, you can make the case that the same types of pressures that the Democrats are accusing Trump of to try to get

announcements from public officials in Ukraine to say that they're investigating something or saying the right thing that will help Trump is happening here.

And I'm sure that's what the Democrats will say, right?

They'll say, well, this is probably just another example of him just going and saying, well, you need to announce that that meeting didn't happen.

You know, like it's not completely implausible, especially if you look at it from the Democratic view.

However,

throw that away for a second, whether it's true or not.

How do you file articles of impeachment without knowing, without at least interviewing the guy, without how is time doing this interview and not you?

If you're doing an impeachment inquiry, do you not submit these questions to Ukrainian authorities so that they are answered?

Because it is not an actual look for truth.

It's not.

That's the problem.

And this is where the

Democrats are really, really going to hurt themselves.

This is a disaster, Glenn.

I mean, mean, they are hiding this around Christmas because it's pathetic.

Yeah.

It is pathetic.

I honestly was thinking about this last night because we talked about this for a while.

There is absolutely no legal pathway for the second article of impeachment,

which is

obstruction of Congress.

Basically, they're saying, like, they didn't give us the documents.

They didn't give us

the aids to testify, and we're pissed off about it.

That is absolutely the right of the executive branch.

Everybody knows that.

Well-established.

There's seven or nine different presidents.

Nine different presidents, including Obama and Bill Clinton right they have all fought this and they've all won they've all won this is very well established because they're supposed to be on the same level you can't have one branch overwhelming the other so why would they do that my belief here as I've been thinking about it a little bit is

it gives Democrats and red states an opportunity to vote yes on that article of impeachment and no on the other one.

So they can say, look, we didn't think it was going, we didn't think they had enough here.

We're with you.

we're looking at this seriously but the other one they absolutely did obstruct congress

that's because it's their right to do it they're the executive branch and they're in there on the same level generally speaking so they're able to say yes they did do that one whether it's impeachable or not is already settled it's an it's an article of impeachment they already said it was So now you're voting essentially on whether you believe they did it or not.

And they'll be able to make the case to their people.

Look, I would have loved to have a full investigation, but they wouldn't go along with it and now they have this kind of mid-ground where they can say to some people yes we voted to impeach but on the other side they can say well look we we were reasonable about this but they just didn't play ball and it gives them sort of a background back backdoor way to play both sides of their issues i think you are i think you're you're wishing and hoping like the democrats are and you might be thinking exactly the way the democrats are but i don't think that's going to work even with their own people no i'll tell you why next

It takes one major disaster to remind us how life is so very fragile, how easy the well-oiled machine of society can break down.

Life can change in a minute, and when it does, it does without warning.

When emergencies strike, are you prepared for days without electricity and stores being damaged or closed?

I have to tell you, I just found out that up in the mountains here,

it's snowing from every day

today, at least the forecast, every day up until Christmas.

The last time I was up in the mountains just for Thanksgiving, the power was out because of the snow.

I mean, the snow all across the country is really changing things.

Are you prepared for a very rough winter?

Please check out my Patriot Supply.

Right now, save $70 off a two-week food kit with guaranteed two-day delivery at preparewithglenn.com.

The offer is not going to last, and here's the good news: my Patriot supply will, and they'll get that food to you.

If you don't think you can afford to prepare, think again.

Payment plans and options that will fit any budget.

Just go to preparewithglen.com and go to Blazetv.com, use the promo code Glenn, and then save 10 bucks off your subscription.

The big things coming as far as the impeachment goes, we'll talk about it tonight.

Right,

right, that's huge, right?

We're just uh, just Pat just walked in.

He said, I love this Yermax story from Time magazine, and it's nowhere.

It's nowhere to be found.

Yeah, they released it yesterday afternoon.

It takes apart the central part of their case.

Sure, does their star, really?

Who is the star witness?

Who is the only guy who even spoke to Trump?

Sondland.

Right.

And

this disputes what he said.

Yeah.

And this takes apart what he said.

Sondland even had to testify that Trump never told him that.

Trump, in fact, said the opposite.

Trump never said that it was quid pro quo.

But then he said he interpreted that.

as quid pro quo.

And so he told the ambassador, I'm sorry, the President Zelensky's number two guy that this was quid pro quo.

Well, the number two guy just came out and said, he never said that to me.

We never had that conversation.

We never felt that it was quid pro quo.

I think this shows what a sham hearing that was.

Wow.

What a sham that was.

I mean, when you only present one side of the story, what are you going to come up with?

That's not due process.

I mean,

even with all of that, I just saw a Quinnipiak poll.

Did you see?

Did you see?

Did you read about that?

Quinnipiac Pi at the end of the paper, Dave.

a Quinnipiak poll just had the numbers of whether or not people support impeachment.

51 to 45

against impeachment.

Even after, that's after only hearing one side and having the media continually, you don't like

your ass cuts.

It's kind of choking me.

I'm getting a little claustrophobic.

Shut up, you jerk.

Hey, I got this for you.

Yeah.

Yeah.

It's a just.

Oh, nice.

Yeah.

perfect for Christmas.

Just shut up.

That is the perfect Christmas gift.

You can buy that at blendneck.com and that's beautiful.

In our blaze,

I didn't really mean I got this.

No, I just realized that, and so I put my hand back.

Yeah, okay.

When you said, hey, I got this for you, you didn't remember this.

No, I didn't really.

You didn't really mean, hey, I got this for you.

No, of course I didn't.

Of course I didn't.

It's you.

But I think this proves why we must have a Senate trial to expose all of this crap.

I mean, we're already against the impeachment.

Let's just show what a sham they put up and how un-American the Democrats are.

I'm telling you, this, if they do the impeachment trial properly,

this is

the end of the Democratic Party as we know it.

I think I agree with that now.

I think I agree, especially after the Earmac thing.

I mean,

you will see that it is nothing but a twisted

web of lies and manipulation.

It is the death knell.

Everyone said, I just want Donald Trump just to burn the whole damn thing down.

I'm telling you right now that if they do this right in the Senate and they really dig in,

it is going to burn everything down.

It will.

I believe that.

And it will free us of so much.

It will free us of so much.

And Donald Trump will be

the president that will be remembered for all time.

Like him, hate him.

He will be known for all time for exposing more corruption than ever before.

And I think it's worth noting that this is coming from three people who are not, we're just not total Trumpophytes.

We're not on the Trump bandwagon.

We're not.

I mean,

we have stepped back and watched what he's done, and much of it has surprised us in a really good way.

Right.

But we were not all Trump all the time.

And

we don't disagree with him on certain times.

We were Tony tonight Trump before he was elected.

And then we said at that time, we'll watch and judge.

He's our president now.

We'll watch and judge for what he does.

I hate a lot of the stuff that President Trump does personally.

Personally, I don't like it.

But what he's doing in office, some of it I don't like with a trade balance, but I will tell you this.

I think he's going to win with China, and somebody needed to play a different game with China.

Hopefully, hopefully, that's true.

But it could turn around and bite us in the ass, and it could be the reason why he loses the next election just as easily as him winning.

You know, if it torches the economy, he's in trouble.

But I will tell you,

if he exposes this, I read a story last night, which is exact opposite of what the story was I read yesterday.

They're saying now that

Turtlehead

McConnell,

that

he wants to stick his head back in the shell, and he just wants to do this over Christmas.

He can't do that.

And Trump now is the one who is saying, apparently, according to this article, that Trump is the one saying,

we have to move forward.

I want all of this opened up.

Evidently, both sides of the story have come out in the last 24 hours.

Yesterday, they were saying that Trump wanted to get it through on Christmas and get it over with, and the Senate Senate was like, no, we're doing this in January.

We've cleared the entire legislative calendar.

That's when we're doing it.

Today, the story is out that it's the Senate that wants to happen over Christmas, and Donald Trump who wants to stretch it out longer because he wants the show of it all.

Don't know, don't care.

Don't know, don't care.

They should stretch it out.

Everyone should tweet.

If you agree with us, you should tweet.

If you don't agree with us,

may I remind you, you can get this just shut up t-shirt now at Glendeck.com perfect for Christmas.

Look,

this is the ultimate nutcracker.

Donald Trump has them

exactly where you want them.

He's got them over a barrel.

He's got them.

This is the first time I've ever said

that, oh my gosh, you have them exactly where you want them.

You can crush them right now.

And they may be knowing, they may not, they may understand that now, too.

I think they're starting to get a little nervous about their case.

Rudy thinks so.

I mean, look at what Rudy said.

Rudy said he's going to come out with some stuff, and I don't know if he's actually coming out with stuff.

And, you know, I don't look to Rudy Giuliani as the end-all-be-all.

But if they have more stuff, if they just have anything like what Yermack

was saying, that's huge.

Yeah, and that's almost enough.

I mean, that might be enough.

And it just shows

that it was an un-American hearing that they held.

Oh, it was a

Soviet witch hunt.

It really was a Soviet-style witch hunt.

Yeah, it was bad.

To not call anybody from the other side of this thing, that should show Americans, okay, they're not after the truth.

I think that shows, I mean, look, it was 45%.

You know, there are more independents and Democrats than just 45%.

That shows some independent and Democrats saying a lot.

This was bad.

Because it was flipped just a couple of weeks ago.

So they're doing worse now after the two hearings than they were before.

It's amazing.

It just,

it's really something.

And the Senate trial

would be the final nail in the coffin, I think.

I'm telling you, first of all, let me ask you this.

They say that

Donald Trump was using the power of

his office.

This is the first charge, using the power of his office for personal gain.

And that personal gain, they claim, was

to

destroy Joe Biden

in the next

election.

First of all, does anyone think that Donald Trump actually believes he needs any help destroying anyone?

I think he is, and I say this with, you know, I would say this to his face.

He thinks he could beat Jesus, okay, if Jesus was running.

He doesn't have a problem with thinking that he is really good and he has done many miracles.

Jesus, the last thing he did was raise himself from the dead.

It's been a while.

He's busy since then.

Makes it feel like

he thinks highly of himself on the debate stage.

So I don't think he thinks he really needs all that help.

Let me ask you this, but let's just say he does.

That was his motivation

he also talked about something else and he talked about it for uh probably 15

sentences before that one sentence about joe biden okay and in that 15 sentences what he was going for was hey we've heard that you know they were

the DNC was was rigging the last election, blah, blah, blah.

He mentions CrowdStrike, which is discredited.

That one is discredited.

But he talks about a lot of other things in there.

Let's just talk about Donald Trump and his personal gain alone.

Do you think

that him trying to destroy Joe Biden in the next election is more important to him

than exposing the collusion of the Democrats to try to hurt him to then claim that he was an illegitimate president and he colluded with Russia.

Knowing what I do know about Donald Trump, there's no way

Joe Biden and the next election is a little teeny blip on a radar screen in comparison to that gigantic weather storm that is coming his way, where all he wants is, I'm a legitimate president, I didn't collude with Russia, I didn't fix the election, and in fact, the people who did fix the election did it in such a way where they set me up to look like it.

And they've been persecuting me since the day I got into office.

Oh, he wants nothing more than to prove that.

Nothing more.

He would give up the next term, I believe, if he could just prove that.

I think so, too.

But he knows he doesn't have to because he believes he'll beat whoever it is.

Right.

That's in the national interests.

Yes.

Even if it is the thing that drives him, that is in the national interest.

If you had somebody who just hated Nazis and

hated Adolf Hitler personally because he personally

insulted me and I'm your president and I'm going to get that Adolf Hitler.

But we were in World War II.

I kind of want that guy as long as he's emotionally stable and not doing crazy things.

I want want that guy because he's personally driven to expose him and knock him off.

Donald Trump is personally driven to show I did not have anything to do with Russian collusion.

In fact, it was you guys that did it.

And I want to expose the facts.

I think these things need to be so clear.

This isn't the biggest thing you can do, right?

And when impeachment is not a minor thing you throw out there, this is a big deal.

And so it's.

You're removing the president of the United States.

But look at Nixon, for example.

Nixon,

okay, we have the whole break-in.

He's hiding it.

This is for his political benefit.

There's no argument that this benefits the United States of America.

If Donald Trump today, we found out that he was using his presidential power to silence Stormy Daniels, right?

Let's just say that happened.

That would be something much clearer when it comes to personal benefit, right?

He's pushing down some citizen who might have something bad to say about him.

This, while it might also

presidential powers.

While that might, this might also benefit him in theory, right?

Like it may be, I mean, I don't know.

To me, I think I'd love to run against Joe Biden, but maybe he didn't want to.

Let's just say, in theory, he didn't want to.

He thought Joe was so tough as he bumbled his way through every sentence.

If that was real, it also coincides with massive amounts of national interest.

And, you know, this has been a problem with, I think, the defense of the White House at times, and that they haven't talked about how important it is for us to make sure foreign aid, which is one of the least popular things that our federal government does, one of the things that the president ran against,

that if we're going to do it at all, it better be done right, and we better not be losing $8 billion when we're doing it.

I don't know who's going to be heading this thing up, but I'm telling you, this is the biggest win of any president of any time

if they do it right.

And this is the and at the same time, it is the biggest win against a bloated, corrupt government of any time in American history if it's done right.

If they blow it, they have blown an opportunity bigger than Barack Obama.

Barack Obama, I've said, made the biggest

passed on the biggest opportunity any president has ever had, and that is to be a true uniter and come in and just honestly play to the middle, post-racial, right, and say, Look, there's nothing, and he could have healed this country for all time.

He missed it and went the other way.

If Donald Trump misses this, it's a bigger lost opportunity than that one.

Thanks, Matt.

All right, you then.

All right.

Oh, marbled, fatty steak, how do I love thee?

Let me count the ways.

I love thee at breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

I love thee wrapped in bacon with a potato at thy side.

I love thee with sides of buttery, warm bread.

By the way, bread is just a butter delivery system.

I thought I'd let you know.

Omaha steaks.

The best, the best, especially their fillets.

Now, those are not

fatty, marbled steaks.

This is the most tender part and the least fat of any steak.

But I'm telling you, I don't know, I don't know how they get their cows to be this tender with their fillets.

You can cut it with a fork.

And right now, Omaha Steaks, if you enter the promo code Beck, you'll get the favorite gift package.

It has everything in it a meat lover might like for $69.99, four six-ounce bacon wrapped fillets,

four premium pork chops, four Omaha steak burgers, four potato ogratin, four made-from-scratched caramel apple tartlets.

This is a great package.

Plus, you get the seasoning, you get the six-piece cutlery set, and a cutting board, and it's all $69.99.

Where?

It's at Omahasteaks.com, Omahasteaks.com.

Make sure you put Glenn Beck or just just Beck in the search bar to find this special search bar, BeckOmahasteaks.com.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

How incredible is this?

The Democrats have four different people who are rich businessmen spending their own money on their campaigns.

White, rich businessmen.

Yeah, three out of four are white at least.

Delaney spent almost a million dollars of his own money.

White, old, rich.

Andrew Yang, who is a millionaire, but has, you know, he's gotten a lot of donations, too.

Yeah.

Then Tom Steyer.

White, rich.

To give you

a hint of how this is going, Elizabeth Warren has spent 8.8 million more than any other candidate outside of the top two.

Tom Stiers spent 50 million.

Okay.

Oh my gosh.

50 million.

That makes me happy.

Michael Bloomberg, who's been in the race for less than a month, has already spent 95 million of his own money.

Oh my gosh, that makes me even more happy.

I love that.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

Thank you so much.

All right.

Have you thought about consolidating your debt?

You should.

You should consider this.

Monthly budget.

How much of it is going to credit card bills?

They're charging you

double interest rates, double-digit interest rates.

That's crazy.

It's crazy.

All kinds of fees in there and everything else.

They're getting the money for close to zero, they're charging you double interest.

I mean, that is why they are just making money hand over fist.

Get out of that.

You don't have to be strapped with that.

It'll be impossible to pay that off.

AmericanFinancing.net can consolidate that debt with the lowest interest rate possible, and you can have that debt gone and not a worry anymore.

So please, just a 10-minute phone call can show you how much money you can save each and every month with your refinancing of your mortgage, getting a new mortgage, or consolidating that debt, go to Americanfinancing.net or call them at 800-906-2440.

It'll take you 10 minutes and it could change your life.

Hello, America.

Welcome to the program.

It's the Glenn Beck program, and it's Wednesday.

And you'll never guess who the Time magazine person of the year is.

Oh, this is going to be...

This is going to...

Is it Adam Schiff?

Is it the whistleblower?

Is it Donald Trump?

Is it you?

Hmm, the American people.

You, you're the person person of the year.

No?

Mm-mm.

They didn't go with any of those.

Wait until you hear.

In one minute.

This is the Glimbeck program.

In the business world,

it's often the people who are trying to get their hands on all of the details that usually die at about 45 because you just can't keep up with everything.

High blood pressure, stroke, you just die out.

Because if you're trying to manage your business, business, and as gangly as these businesses are now with

sales and shipping and

internet sales and incoming, outgoing money,

how do you do it?

If you don't have something that

can answer all of your questions in one place, if you don't know your money, if you don't know what your business is doing, you don't know your business, if you don't know the numbers.

When a business has a dashboard, a central software that acts as as a merger point for all of the departments and all of the systems, you know, if you're a small business person or a large business person, you know.

You should check out NetSuite by Oracle.

NetSuite is a cloud-based business management software that gives you the visibility and the control that you need.

You can save time, money, and unnecessary headaches by managing sales, finance, accounting, orders, HR, payables, all of it instantly from your desktop or your phone.

Schedule your free demo right now and receive their free gift guide.

It's seven key strategies to grow your profits at netsuite.com/slash bet.

Beck, sign up for your free demo right now, netsuite.com slash beck.

Hello.

Welcome to the program.

We're going to have an intellectual discussion about who the person of the year

is and all of the glory that this individual brings now, person of the year.

Time magazine looked at everyone.

They, according to the BBC,

looked at people who made a real impact in people's lives.

And when I ask you that, think of this right now.

Who made a real impact in your life?

Who was it?

Globally?

Who changed your life this year?

Who made the impact that you were...

This, if this year had to be summed up, it would be summed up with this name.

Who would it be?

Who would it be?

Now, I can't honestly think of anybody except Jesus and my family that truly impacted my life.

They truly impacted my life.

Now, you go out of that, and I think about the business people who I work with.

Stu.

He's made my life a living hell this year.

But I've impacted your life.

But you impacted it like a car wreck, like a T-bone car wreck.

Right, that would impact your life.

It would impact.

Right.

So you look at, but you have to go

to the global scale or at least to the national scale.

Who really impacted your life?

Who sums up this year?

Oh, I think it's clear.

I mean, I think it's

clear.

Go ahead.

We know what a problem climate change is, but it's the massive

biggest moral challenge and scientific challenge of our time.

And if you don't think so, how dare you?

Greta Thunberg is our time personality.

As we were all discussing climate change and how we're all going to die miserable, horrible deaths from either drowning or a fiery death of some sort, starvation or too much food, not enough CO2, too much CO2.

All those things are in our future in about nine years now.

According to Dame

Emma Thompson, she said just last weekend: as we all know, your house pet has a lot of protein in it, and you should remember that because soon, very soon, perhaps, we will all be forced to eat our pets.

That's just how bad things are going to get.

And this, of course, is the BBC.

I mean, is this.

Think about how ridiculous this is.

And I know every year we have to do the same.

I feel like we do the same segment, right?

There's always some dumb person they've named Time Person of the Year.

And I don't know why we give any attention to it.

All that being said,

Greta Thunberg, okay,

what has she done?

She came out and she complained about the climate, okay?

Has she solved the climate?

No.

What has she done?

She's alerted people that there's a problem with the climate and she's 16 years old.

She screamed at all of us and said how bad we are because we've taken this world, which, by the way, I don't know if she noticed this, if she grew up in previous generations, her life's a hell of a lot better at 16 years old than it was for every previous generation before her.

She could have grown up in

just beautiful, beautiful peace and comfort in the World War II generation.

Oh, that was a glory time, right?

Right where she was there, maybe she could have, maybe she could have been rounded up, you know, by a government official because she was saying controversial things against the government.

Here she is, a 16-year-old who reads the world the Riot Act, blames us for stealing her future.

This is a person who we have,

whose parents and who the media has made her into.

Monster.

A person who, I mean, listen to this statement.

You have stolen my dreams and my childhood.

Say it like her, though.

Say it like her.

No, no.

You're the only one that can even get close to her yeah i know

do we have how dare you

how dare you yeah

we'll see if we find it stolen my dreams in my childhood with your empty words

think about that though like this person believes that a 0.9 degree temperature rise over 100 years destroyed her childhood we've ripped away any positivity she can think of in her entire life you know who stole

less than one degree Celsius.

Do you know who stole her future?

Her parents.

Her parents stole her future.

Not her future.

Her childhood.

Stole her childhood.

That's when you look at your child when they're 10 years old and they're like, oh, mom and dad, I cannot slay you.

And you're like, guys, we're going to make it.

It's all right.

We're going to make it.

I know because my kids at one point watched a few of my shows and went, oh, yeah,

I got to not make it.

And I said to them, we're going to make it.

It's It's fine.

We're going to make it.

It's going to be tough.

Come on, let's go to Auschwitz.

I'll show you how tough it's going to get, but we're going to make it.

My kids are, my kids are adjusted.

My kids are fine.

My kids don't think that I stole their childhood or that anybody stole their childhood.

You could say, well, you've really impacted my future because we're not going to have anything.

Think of what she's saying.

You stole my childhood.

I mean, that's just sad.

It was legitimately sad.

I mean, she's 16 years old, you know, and she's been so indoctrinated that she believes this craziness to the point of like she won't take a flight across the ocean to talk about it.

She takes a boat in which they have to fly the captain of the boat across the ocean to take her back on the boat.

Which doesn't make any sense.

It doesn't make any sense.

She's not making any difference.

She,

let me say this clearly, has made no

difference.

There is not one thing that is different today that was different that was happening yesterday.

She has not saved any emissions.

She has not done anything to do this, to affect this problem in any measurable way.

And we give her person of the year because what?

She's yelling at adults about the thing that she's complaining about.

Like, just from the perspective of being a parent, like, this is the behavior you want to encourage in children.

Like, I get that.

It's just the media.

You you want to encourage kids to be so self-absorbed and so self-important that

they are looking at all adults at 16 years old and saying, get out of my way.

Yeah.

And I got news for you, everybody on the left who's saying, no, she wants something important for the climate.

She's doing a great thing.

This is a wonderful thing.

First of all, encouraging activism as an end is not a positive.

This is something that's happened over the past, I would say, 20 to 30 years where we started rocking the vote.

And, oh, look, look at what kids are doing.

They're volunteering for X cause or Y cause.

That's not an end.

If they're volunteering for something beneficial and great, well, that might be an end.

But we've come to this point where we're just praising activism as a thing.

And the things she's suggesting in the speech where everyone remembers how dare you.

Everyone remembers that where she's just yelling at the adults.

That's all there was.

Everything else was common sense.

What she's suggesting are things that are far more extreme than Bernie Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

She, when, you know, everyone claps for her in the speech.

They're yelling at them.

She is yelling at the people in the room, the leaders who haven't been able to get these things done.

She's talking about, no, think of how dramatic this is, Glenn.

This is not a normal proposal that like a left-leaning candidate would bring up.

She's talking about in 10 years, a 50% chance a 50% reduction in emissions.

50% in 10 years.

That's like AOC's fever dream.

And you know what she says about the 50% reduction in 10 years?

How dare you?

She says, How dare you?

How dare you?

She says, she says,

the popular idea of cutting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a 50% chance of staying below 1.5 degrees Celsius and the risk of setting off irreversible chain reactions beyond human control.

50% may be acceptable to you, but those numbers do not include tipping points, most feedback loops, additional warming hidden by toxic air pollution, all the aspects of equity and climate justice.

They also rely on my generation sucking hundreds of billions of dollars and tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely exist.

How dare you?

How dare you?

Thank you.

But she's saying that thing that I just was talking about as AOC's fever dream is so unacceptable.

That's what motivated her to say, say, how dare you?

She's not talking about, this is a person who has lost all ability to keep things in perspective, very common among 16-year-olds, and she's being rewarded for it in dramatic fashion, is becoming one of the most

popular people.

And, you know, again, I think these awards should go to people who have accomplished things.

She has talked about the climate.

Talking about the climate does nothing for the climate.

How dare you?

This is one of those things where you're getting

it is today.

If you've just

made

a video that went viral, you haven't created anything.

Right.

You know, you haven't really created anything.

No.

And you're just becoming famous because you're the person.

that was seen on this saying that.

Fame is not a goal.

Getting the word out is not a goal.

If it was a goal of getting the word out, I'd be one happy man all the time because I've gotten the word out.

On a lot of things.

On a lot of things.

That's not the goal.

The goal is to make a case to where it changes people's vision and hearts.

And quite honestly, I think she's done the opposite.

Anybody who thought, well, you know, I want to be reasonable, you listen to her.

And you realize.

And you're like, I don't want my child to be like that.

I've got to be a better parent and make sure that I keep my kids from seeing that anger.

This is everything that they said the Tea Party was doing to their kids.

Scaring them to death.

They're losing their childhood and they're indoctrinating them.

That's what Greta is a result of.

How dare you?

Thank you very much.

More in just a second.

How'd you like to end up with an extra $1,000 this holiday season?

By the way, I think you're going to know who the man of the year is for 2020, and I think it will be Donald Trump.

And I'll tell you why here coming up in just a second.

Luckily, the USCCA wants to make the dream of having some extra cash a reality.

Next thing you have to do is just text the word, BECK, to 87222 and claim one of the 19 free chances to win $1,000.

They're giving away $1,000 bucks nineteen different times,

and you could win.

You're registered 19 different times.

Just contact the USCCA.

That's the United States Concealed Carry Association.

They give away prizes like this every month because they believe in preparing and protecting defenders like you.

So don't wait.

Seize the day.

Do it now.

Just text the word Beck to the number 87222 and find out more and claim your free entries.

It's quick, it's easy, absolutely free.

Your information is always kept private.

Confirmation text is going to be sent.

Text the word Beck to the number 87222 right now and claim your free entries to win $1,000.

But don't wait.

You'll want to hurry right now because this giveaway ends December 31st.

Text the word Beck to the number 87222.

Standard message and data rates do apply.

We break for 10 seconds, station ID.

Can somebody turn the TV over here in the control room to CNN?

Take the top television, turn it to CNN.

I just want to see if CNN is covering the

IG report hearing

or not.

Or if they'd be like, well, you know, we've had enough hearings.

Darn it.

We don't need any more of those crazy hearings.

Yeah, now

that's a little bit old news.

We don't need to hear about that.

That didn't come out the way.

And by the way, they don't, the right,

certainly the White House isn't exactly thrilled with the IG report.

No, it does help them, I think, and really show the case.

I think it does more than help them.

I think what the White House is upset about is

you didn't tell us why they were doing these things.

Right.

You told us what they did, and you called these 19 irregularities

or what do they call them, inaccuracies.

Errors.

Errors and inaccuracies.

Those weren't errors and accuracies.

You don't, as an agent, file a Pfizer report

and have an agent change a line in an email to make it the exact opposite.

So you can present that to the FISA court and say, look, in his own email, he said this.

That's not a mistake.

That's not a mistake.

That's not an error.

That's forgery.

That's like the story we did a few years ago where it was, I think it was like a prince or something in one of these Middle Eastern countries who was accused of rape, and he said he tripped and fell into the woman.

Remember this excuse?

Yeah.

Let's be honest about it.

That's just not an error.

You don't, by mistake, rape someone.

Not a thing.

Right.

Right?

This is one of those, a similar situation.

You're deleting something and adding in something to make it the meaning of the email the exact opposite of the actual meaning of the email.

That's not a mistake.

It's not an error.

That's an intentional deception.

And that is what we saw through a lot of this.

And I think that's the most important takeaway from what the media is saying as opposed to what is actually in that report.

This is, you know, when you're tasked with something very

specific and you're writing a report as an inspector general,

you're going to think about this differently than the average person.

The only way you say that there's political bias in the report is if you have a text, or an interview, or evidence or testimony of people saying, yes, this was done.

Hey, let's go get Donald Trump.

He can't win.

We've got to, we've got, I don't care what it takes, we've got to overturn this election.

You need something like that as an inspector general to be able to claim that there was political bias because you're reading into the minds of the people who made these errors.

There's no actual explanation for the reason why they made so many errors, all in the same direction, to this one person who they didn't seem to like all that much.

Now, you can pretty easily, as a human being, put the pieces together here and say there probably was some political bias.

Okay.

But that's not what the Inspector General is going to say because he's looking at it in a legalistic sense, not in a normal human.

This is, okay, I understand what happened here.

That's not the way they're looking at it.

So there probably was political bias.

It's just not proven political bias.

Well, you sure don't get that from anybody's report on Donald Trump.

But, but that's a different story, neither here nor there.

Listen, here's what apparently McConnell said yesterday to Donald Trump, that we can't take the Senate hearing and make it into a circus.

Don't make the Senate into a circus.

Mr.

Trump, do not listen to that.

I don't care if you promise people sword swallowers during it.

Make it into a circus.

Make sure the proceeding is buttoned up and make sure that it is absolutely rock solid and constitutional, fair, constitute, all of it.

But make sure that you are doing what you do best, and that is getting eyeballs on it.

Just go sit in the Senate for the hearings every day.

Just sit there every day.

They will cover it every day, and everyone in America will watch it to see if you're going to go,

This is crazy, and here's a man who swallows fire.

Okay?

Do it.

Do it.

They have destroyed you, and

everyone says that no one will watch it.

Really, President Trump?

Because it seems to me that you're the only guy I've seen in history that can draw the crowds that you draw.

And still, after you're president, you're still drawing those crowds four years later.

You know how to draw a crowd.

Let them open this up, do exactly what I read a story where you were saying that McConnell wants to shut this thing down.

Open it all up.

You will go down as one of the greatest presidents in history.

If you expose this, you will destroy the Democratic Party.

And if it means that you have to text things from your seat and everybody is watching just to see what you're going to do, is he going to throw a peanut?

Is he going to throw a bag of peanuts at somebody down below in in the Senate?

Bring all the peanuts you can find.

Let them do an honest and just trial, but open up and turn over every nasty rock.

And people will watch it because you, sir, know exactly how to draw a crowd.

This was meant for you.

This is,

you are in this position for a reason.

You can change and drain the swamp in January.

That's my Christmas miracle that I'm praying for.

Beg Donald Trump to go down that road.

We'll send this clip out.

Please retweet it and send it to him and everybody else.

American Financing Corporation, NMLS 1-82334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Okay, in January,

there's so few houses on the market.

January is the perfect time to buy a house because

you can really get a good deal on a house.

It's a good time to sell your house in January.

If you are looking for a new home and you want a good mortgage, please call the people at American Financing.

I will tell you that, you know what impresses me is they not only...

They not only bend over backwards to get a good deal.

I have several friends who have said that they have been told by them: you know what?

I think if you ask this other bank for this, this, and this, they'll give it to you.

If they don't, come back to us because we'll give you that deal.

I mean, they're not in it.

It's really honestly the Macy's versus Gimbal's Miracle on 34th Street kind of attitude because they work for you and they're a family-owned business and they got you covered with any kind of mortgage finance that you might need.

It's so worth a 10-minute call.

AmericanFinancing.net, 800-906-2440.

800-906-2440.

Go to Blazetv.com.

The promo code is Glad to get 10 bucks off with your subscription coming up tonight.

More on the impeachment and the latest.

The ultimate disruptor will be the it is possible to be the person of the year next year for 2020, and that will be Donald Trump.

If

he does the impeachment trial in the Senate right, and if he does what he does best and gets people to watch,

he will disrupt the Justice Department, the DOJ,

intelligence community.

He will destroy the credibility of the DNC.

It is all happening in January if they do it right.

And he will be the ultimate disruptor of the year, possibly the disruptor of the last 100 years.

And there's been a lot of disruption, but this one could give your country back to you.

Greta is on the phone.

Hello, Greta.

Hello.

Hi.

Hi.

How dare you?

I didn't mean to make you whole.

but how dare you make me wait?

I didn't I'm sorry, I

I'll be watching you, Mr.

Beck.

This is all wrong.

I shouldn't be on this phone.

I should be back at school on the other side of the ocean.

You really should, but you're Time magazine person of the year.

All of you have come for me and my generation.

How dare you?

What what was that?

How dare you?

I woke up this morning

and I specifically requested

birthday cake, mini muffins,

and I was I was supplied with banana nut banana nut

how dare you right okay well I when I woke up this morning

my mom she had put out my clothes laid them out for me today

and she laid out my plain gray sweater

when I specifically requested my other plain gray sweater

yeah well has it wrecked your childhood I mean let's have some perspective here it has wrecked my childhood.

It has ruined my life.

It has destroyed all human existence.

Right, I don't think it.

I don't think it.

I had chores.

You had what?

Chores to do today.

Chores.

Chores.

Chores.

Chores.

Chores to do.

Chores, okay.

And I was required to do them, but I did not want to do them.

I wanted to yell at parents about the climate.

And I was supposed to make my bed.

And I was supposed to clean my room.

How dare you?

I asked for help and mom said no.

Right.

And I said I want an envelope now.

The envelope will help me.

How dare you give me the envelope?

We've got to run.

Thank you so much, Greta.

I appreciate it.

Greta Thurnberg, who is, of course, the person of the year here on the

flip back program.

So the most Googled things in America.

Number one, what do you think we Googled the most?

Most Googled in the entire country.

In the entire country for the year.

Well, it's obviously a Kardashian.

Which one?

Probably.

Nope.

Nope.

I was going to break it down in that way.

No, I don't know.

What is it?

Disney Plus.

Okay, yeah, a lot of hype.

Amazing, though.

Disney is going through.

I mean, they are the first company to ever have a $10 billion

year on just 10 movies.

No, so six movies that have already gone to a billion dollars.

Right.

It does not include Frozen 2, which is, if it hasn't already hit a billion dollars.

And it does not include Star Wars, which obviously is going to hit a billion.

So there are going to be over 10 billion for the year.

And that's just in their movies.

And we should point out the only movie, I think, in the top nine movies of the year that isn't theirs is Spider-Man.

And that one is kind of theirs.

It's partially theirs.

They own, there's like

an agreement with Sony, who actually distributed it.

But they actually have part of that piece too.

I mean, they are completely dominating.

They are completely remaking Epcot.

Completely remaking it.

Really?

Yeah.

Completely remaking it.

It's going to be

a theme park with rides and everything else.

And they're just blowing it up.

As a Disney nerd, how do you feel about that?

Oh, I'm thrilled with it.

It's been Yesterday Ville for a long time.

Because Tomorrowland was like 1985.

Yeah.

And Epcot, I mean, Walt Disney said, you know, it should always be in an ever state of change.

And always ahead of.

And they have missed that mark, you know, back when they opened the doors in 1980.

Maybe they'll get it.

Maybe they'll get it now.

But anyway, so Disney Plus was the number one.

Number 10 on what is,

what is, number 10 is what is a Mandalorian?

Wow.

And that just happened.

Star Wars, Disney Plus.

Right.

So think about all the things we asked, what is

over the year, in the last month, there's been enough people saying, what is a Mandalorian that it has put it on its top 10.

And the number one baby search is Baby Yoda.

Number one.

Holy crap.

Yeah, they are just dominating.

dominating everything.

I mean, there was a time, not all that long ago, that Disney really kind of seemed like they were on the down swing.

And, you know, it didn't seem like.

I remember when I was 19 years old, and I couldn't afford it, but I remember reading about Disney being being on the outs and Michael Eisner was rumored to be coming in and their stock was just tanking and I wanted to buy one share of stock and it was like $10 or something like that.

I just wanted to buy one share because that's all I could afford.

You were a cool kid, huh?

Oh, I was so popular.

Yeah, I thought so.

So popular.

I'm 19 and I'm dreaming about buying one share of Disney stock.

Could there be a bigger loser sentence than that?

Especially in the days when it was a loser.

It wasn't like it was like Apple.

You know, it's going, no, I'm telling you, it's going to take off.

This was, everyone was saying, it's over.

And I'm like, no way.

What would it be worth, though?

Have you done the calculations?

No, let me do it.

No, I don't think it's going to be a good idea.

It'll be good.

I think it'll be good for the show.

No, it will be very good.

It will be very big.

It'll just be another long list.

It's going to be fine.

All right, number two on the list of what we Googled.

Cameron Boyce.

That's

the guy who died, what, July 6th.

Then Nipsey Hussell.

That was another one that was shot and killed.

Then Hurricane Dorian.

Then Antonio Brown, the NFL player with the rape accusation, then Luke Perry, who died.

I mean, we are just, we're morbid.

When we're looking for news, we're looking for who died today.

Who died and why should I care?

Then it was Avengers Endgame, Game of Thrones, the new iPhone 11, and then Jussie Jussie Smollette was number 10 of the big things that we Googled.

I think it's interesting also,

they looked at different things like

trips.

The number one thing that people were looking into

on going places

is, shoot, what did I just say?

I can't find this particular page.

Yeah, The Maldives,

which

no need to Google.

No need to Google.

The Maldives, my wife has wanted to go to the Maldives forever,

and she just likes the sun and everything else.

I don't even know where the Maldives are.

And so I Googled them.

Where are the Maldives?

What are the Maldives?

And it's beautiful.

And then I Googled

how much is a ticket to go there for airlines.

It takes you 36 from Dallas.

It takes you 36

hours to fly there.

No place, the moon is not worth 36 hours in a plane.

36 hours, and then you got to come back.

I mean, if you're moving there, you're like, oh, well, I'm moving to the Maldives.

And so, okay, maybe you spend 36 hours, but to visit for a week, 36 hours,

and because I was looking around Christmas time, no, this is a few months ago,

the coach ticket was, I think, $24,000,

and first class was like $56,000.

And I'm like, who's going there?

Who's taking 36 hours and 24 grand to sit next to the toilet

and go into the Maldives?

I'm so relaxed.

I'd be freaked out the whole time.

I've got to spend 36 hours next to the toilet and coach in just a few days.

I'd be too stressed out.

So don't Google it.

You don't want to go.

that seems like a really long time unless you're going for like what a month i mean what was the appropriate seriously though but what would it feel like you're going coach no legroom

36 hours between two big fat people

i'm one of them and you're sitting there and you're like for the last few days of the vacation i'd be like i don't want to go back not because it's so beautiful here I don't want to get on that plane again.

Yeah, I don't want to go.

I don't want to go.

I don't want to go.

That's where drugs come in.

You drug yourself heavily for the flight.

And maybe you take enough that it's questionable whether you wake up or not on the other side.

That's about how much you should take.

Yeah, if you could put me down, you could freeze me or do whatever you have to do to get me to Mars.

You know, okay, I'm okay with that.

I don't think they're freezing people to get to Mars, by the way.

By the way, we never talked about the Mars thing that came out earlier this week, where you can't have, if you're, if you decide, you know, hey, Elon, I'm going to go.

I know you've been begging, but I'm going to go.

And I'm going to live on Mars.

If you live on Mars, and we don't know how much time this will take,

but at least

the next generation, so if you have children on Mars, those kids will be Martians, and they will not be humanoids.

They will not be, I should say it this way, they will not be earthlings.

And so you will be having relations with

another species,

something,

an alien, an alien.

And they say now that

the people that will be coming back and forth from Mars, if you find a hot Martian and you're like,

I mean, it's, hey, what happens on Mars stays on Mars.

They say you can't do it because it might kill you.

I don't know.

A,

there's so many questions I have.

A, how do they know that?

B, why would they want to know that?

C, what is the reason?

There are questions you would have to ask.

You're sending humans into space for the rest of their life.

Can I just, I got a question.

How's sex work up there?

I mean, that's one of the obvious questions.

How do you know that you're going to die because did you see the movie for the, what was it, for your stars or I'm your star or whatever that one was.

That sounds great.

The way you see that.

Where that kid was born on Mars and then he had to come back for some surgery or something.

Remember?

And he could only stay on.

That's how they know.

They saw it in a movie.

Telling you.

I mean, it sounds riveting.

No, it's because

of

mutations, basically?

Yeah.

There'll be mutations in your DNA just so you will be more...

You will adapt.

And so you'll adapt to the gravity.

You'll adapt to everything.

So your body will work differently.

And so you won't have the strength to be able to live on Earth because your whole system will be made for a different atmosphere and a different

gravity.

No, I mean, I guess it's something to be concerned about because we're right around the corner.

I mean, we'll be there any day.

So we better figure out that.

You don't think we'll be there by the time 2030?

2030?

10 years?

How long does it take to go to Mars?

Oh,

should we say

we'll launch by 2030?

People towards Mars.

Yeah.

I don't know.

Elon Musk says 2024.

Yeah.

And he says it might even be earlier than that.

Think of that.

He could probably.

That'll be.

Think of that.

That would happen then in the next Trump presidency.

She, if he had another term,

if he has another term,

sending a group of people to Mars will happen

in that term.

I mean, Elon Musk has also told us Tesla was going to be profitable.

So, I mean, he's not always reliable.

Did you see his court case?

How did he get out of that one?

Well, it was an offhanded comment on Twitter.

You're going to get, call the guy a pedo guy.

Who knows?

You know, I mean, it seems like a, I don't, you can't sue everybody for every insult you get on Twitter.

Let's not be ridiculous here.

By the way, six to eight months to Mars, and you would have made 280 times your money, which is nice, but also is not going to change your life.

$280 with a $10 investment.

Is that with the split?

That's with all the dividends and everything.

Oh, that's no big deal.

Well, I mean, it's a nice amount.

If you put $1,000 in, it would have been really nice.

I probably would have put maybe $200 into it.

Okay, well, that would have been pretty nice.

That would have been pretty nice.

Because $100 would be, what,

$28,000?

Shut up, $28,000.

Shut up.

So you're talking about

$50,000.

Shut up.

I don't know why you're yelling at me.

How do you do that?

Because shut up.

Here, there's a new t-shirt available at Glenbeck.com or in the Blaze shop, and it's right here.

Just shut up.

How dare you?

Thank you.

It's a nice holiday message, by the way.

I want to talk to you about Rek Tech Grills.

Rek Tech Grills, if you like cooking and smoking with a grill, it uses 100% real wood, the kind of food that gives you real flavor.

Propane doesn't do that.

With far less mess than charcoal, this is a great, great

grill.

Check out their website and look at this thing.

It is built like a tank.

I have one, and it is 80 pounds heavier than its nearest competitor.

Why?

Because this one's built with real steel.

This is not,

there's nothing cheesy or cheap about this grill.

This is amazing.

Built like a tank.

And this holiday season, give the gift that is sure to bring you, your family, your friends closer together.

It's the gift of a RekTech Grill.

Check them out right now.

Ultimate, Ultimate Grill.

It's R-E-C-T-E-C Grill.

Do the research.

People in the know, choose the RekTech.

RekTech far and away, the best bang for your buck.

RekTech.

Built by grillers for grillers.

So go to RekTechGrills.com.

That's R-E-C-T-E-C Grills with an S.com.

RekTechgrills.com.

This is the Glimpack program.

You know, it's surprising.

They're holding hearings hearings today on what the Inspector General found about the Mueller report and how all that was put together.

And

what's weird is

CNN

not really covering it.

I mean, they're covering it, but they haven't taken any commercials during the impeachment hearings.

They just wall-to-wall coverage.

They're taking commercials today.

They also didn't cover Lindsey Graham, but when Diane Feinstein stepped to the microphone, all of a sudden they were there.

They were there.

They wanted to make sure it was covered.

I think that was MSNBC.

Was that MSNBC?

Yeah, CNN's not even airing it at all.

But they're not even airing it.

They're currently airing a story about murder victims' relatives want to spare killers' life, which I'm sure is an interesting story.

It sounds intriguing.

However, it just seems they do have in a little tiny box with no sound they have

at the Justice Department hearings.

Well, that would be, yeah, that would be.

Well, at least they're covering it.

They know it's on.

It was on the whole time.

Well, not in the commercials, but it was on the whole time.

We had it in that little box.

You can almost see it.

If you have a magnifying glass near your television and your lip reader and your lip reader,

you could see it.

Maybe they put it on secondary audio, you know, where they air the Spanish translation sometimes.

If you listen over there, maybe they're playing it.

So maybe you have it, but it's in Spanish.

Right.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

We have,

you know, it's my goal to talk to people that have done remarkable things before they die

because we have that opportunity.

And we have a guy

who

you should know.

He was an Air Force pilot, Smitty Harris.

He was shot down in Vietnam in 1965, and he was

from 65 until I think 73, he was in the Hanoi Hilton.

And the things that he did and saw to keep going, here's a guy.

Do you think you're having a bad day?

You think your life sucks?

You think, how dare you?

My life has been stolen from me.

Try meeting this guy.

And we're going to talk to him.

He did something important.

In fact, he's written a book called Tap Code, the epic survival tale of a Vietnam POW and the secret code that changed everything.

It's an amazing story.

We're in for a wild ride here.

Coming up next.

The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

In case you haven't heard, Greta Thurnberg, the little 16-year-old girl, how dare you?

You've stolen my childhood.

How dare you?

She's person of the year.

How dare you?

Yeah, well, how dare you?

I'm going to show you a real hero,

somebody who

had multiple years of his life stolen from him, and yet he not only survived, he thrived.

An amazing story of heroism in one minute.

This is the Glenbeck program.

You know, the people who get furthest ahead in life are always the people who are capable of feeling the most gratitude and feeling

grateful for the things that come their way, even the bad things that come their way.

Mike Lindell, I think, is a guy who lives this story.

He was a guy who's had a really, really tough life, screwed his life up every way you possibly could.

And then he gets his life straight and he invents MyPillow.

And then he builds this company and

he builds it on great products and appealing to great people.

Now, he could take all the credit, but he has decided that he wanted to say thank you for everything that you've done.

And he is grateful for the world that you have provided.

If you're a MyPillow buyer, or if you've ever even considered it and gone to the website, he is grateful for that.

So what he wants to do now is just offer these unbelievable deals for the holidays to say thank you.

My pillow has Gaza, or sorry, Gaza.

Those would not be good.

Giza dream sheets.

Giza dream sheets are really super, super soft.

They're the world's best cotton, ultra-soft, breathable, durable.

They're just great.

You buy one set and get another one free, plus free shipping, but you have to use the promo code Beck.

Remember, all my pillow products come with a 60-day money-back guarantee.

Take my word for it, you're not going to want to send these back.

Look for all of the specials under New Radio Listener Specials.

To buy one pair of Giza Dream Sheets and get the other one free plus shipping, it'll be under New Radio Listener Specials.

There's also deep discounts on all other MyPillow products.

Make great Christmas gifts.

Enter the promo code Beck at 800-966-3117 for these specials and more.

And thank you from somebody who's truly grateful.

Mike Lindell, mypillow.com.

It was April 4th, 1965, when Colonel Carlisle Smitty Harris's plane was shot down over Vietnam.

He was captured and sent to a POW camp.

For eight years,

2,871 days, he was held in one of the most notorious

prisoner camps of any war, the Hanoi Hilton.

He endured torture and abuse.

He was confined in horrible conditions, and yet, somehow or another, he managed to find a way to survive and give others hope.

Smitty is on the phone with us now.

Hi, Smitty.

How are you?

I'm just fine.

How are you?

I am great, sir.

I am

interested for you to lay out the story that is in your new book called tap code um before we get to what the tap code is tell us the conditions i mean what were you how old were you when you first went down in 1965

i was 36.

you were 36 years old and you go down your life you were you were married to your uh wife louise you have children yes You had children?

We had two daughters, and she

was to deliver our third child in about a month after i was shot down oh my gosh so you crash how long before you were captured

it was almost immediately uh

unfortunately when my chute opened at fairly low altitude i was right over a vietnam village and was only able to uh

slip the chute slightly to land just outside the village and there were people looking up at the sky and saw me.

I was overcome by

people there, some with guns, most with hose and sticks, but I was captured immediately.

And did you have any idea what was in store for you at all?

I knew I was going to be in North Vietnam for quite a long time.

I

would not have thought eight years, but at any rate, I knew I was going to be confined, and

I knew little beyond that.

So when you get there, it's now called the Hanoi Hilton.

And it was...

Tell us about what life was like for everybody at the Hanoi Hilton.

Well, we lived, there were several parts of the Hanoi Hilton,

and

they were separated enough that we did not have good communication between groups and the north vietnamese did not let us communicate even with people in the next cell and they tried to

use everything including torture to keep us from communicating

we were mostly held at first in solitary confinement and then as the

more shoot downs were brought in, I think due to pressure of numbers, we had a cellmate sometimes.

And

the food was awful.

Well, it was meager.

We lost about 20% of our normal weight in the first three or four months that we were there.

Fed twice a day a watery soup and some rice or sometimes bread.

And what was your cell?

How big was the cell?

The cell was

about seven feet by seven feet, and there were concrete bunks on either side with a narrow aisle in between.

Sometimes heavy wooden planks

were used as the beds.

And the only

thing in the cell besides us were some heavy stocks at the end of the beds

to hold our ankles and also

a bucket and that was it.

And Smitty, we know what they did to John McCain.

I mean they pulled his arms out of his sockets and

I mean the torture that you guys went through is

horrendous.

What did you what were they trying to get out of you?

Well, initially they were trying to get military information like the capabilities of our aircraft, targets, organization,

anything that would help them from a military viewpoint.

But after, you know, a few months, they found that

they had exhausted their efforts to get that kind of information because we would not cooperate with them at all.

We'd give them name, rank, service, summer, and date of birth, and were punished accordingly, but they didn't get any good military information.

So then they tried to indoctrinate us by telling us the history of Vietnam and everything that was wrong with the United States, and then

get us to write some statement that was favorable to the North Vietnamese.

And if you were unsuccessful in that.

If you were alone and you didn't have anybody to talk to,

how is it that that didn't work to some degree on somebody

well it did uh at first

we had no communication between different parts of the hanohilton

and some of the guys were told that uh everyone else was cooperating why didn't they and uh that you know using one the heavy against the other but as soon as we got communication we cleared that all up and started working as a military unit.

And so, you did as individuals.

And that communication was tap code.

And you created this.

And what was it?

How did it work?

Well,

really, I did not create it.

I had learned it before I went over to Okinawa, to my duty station there.

And

when I was shot down,

it was not

any of the services.

So I

guess I was the only POW that knew the tap code.

And

is it like Morris code?

Well, no, it was a five by five matrix of the alphabet.

We left out the letter K.

And

the

first line was ABCDE, the second, F-G-H-I-J,

and the third, LMNOP, O P and so on.

So you would tap

the first column was A F L Q V

and you would tap one of those letters

just by tapping identified

and then pause and then over to the letter that you wanted to send.

For instance,

an L would be A

tap tap tap tap

uh

i'm i'm yeah no that's all right i i think i get it i think i get it so um

did you you began to communicate with each other and how did that change things

well

it was uh

a morster for one uh misery loves company but the biggest thing was that we were able to communicate what was going on, what they were trying to do to each of us, and we could find ways to try to counter what they were

attempting to learn from us.

And we all,

being military,

with any communication group, no matter how small or how large...

that group might be, we would find out who was a senior ranking POW in that group.

And

he would make decisions for us.

We felt comfortable with that because,

for instance, if we would discuss what was the best answer to some of their questions, and

there would be several approaches, but he would say,

we are going to respond this way, and everybody's going to be consistent.

And

it really helped us

avoid giving the North Vietnamese any advantage whatsoever.

Do you know who Hugh Stafford is?

Commander of the U.S.

Navy, Hugh Stafford?

You remember him?

I know the name.

Okay.

I was given by his family all of his records from his time there.

And it was,

I've never read anything, I've never read anything like it.

And part of the things that he said was,

towards the end, I'm afraid of rescue, and I'm afraid of going home because I'm afraid of how I'll react, because I know people had to move on with their lives.

They don't know if I'm alive or dead.

And I'm still where I was when I was shot down and went through all of this, but everything has changed when I get home, I'm sure.

Were you worried about that

Louise and the children and without any communication?

I was not worried at all.

Louise and I had a, I'm going to say, a perfect union, and we trusted each other and knew each other.

And I also knew that Louise was a very strong person who could take care of our finances, our children, and make decisions.

for our family.

And I knew that when I came home, I would walk through the door, and it would be as if I'd walked around the block.

And did she know the whole time?

I know she sent 100 packages over.

You only got two, but so she knew you were there and alive.

Yes, she found out in August, I was shot down in April, that I actually was alive as a POW there.

But she believed from the very beginning

that

even though

my squadron mates have seen my airplane go down and ball fire and did not see me eject.

Smithy, my best to Louise.

Thank you for sharing some of this.

This book is epic.

It's the epic survival tale of a Vietnam POW and the secret code that changed everything.

And it really goes between his story and Louise.

You really have to hear Louise's story as well because she played a big role for all of those

whose husbands were missing.

And these two together are amazing.

It's called Tap Code, a true story, Tap Code.

It's available everywhere.

Would make a great Christmas gift for people.

Smitty, thank you so much.

And my best to Louise.

God bless.

Thank you.

You bet.

Bye-bye.

All right.

Got a great stocking stuffer for you from Goldline.

Told you about Goldline for a long time, how they can help you provide for yourself a solid hedge against inflation, how it's a good idea to have a percentage, maybe, you know, 10%, 5%.

I have 10 in mine in precious metals.

It's just a hedge against insanity.

Well, this holiday season, Goldline is offering both a Silver Snowman holiday greetings coin and a Santa silver bar.

Each is a full ounce of silver, and they are really, I mean, I just looked them up on Goldline, is really great.

It's Santa next to the Christmas tree.

It would make a great stocking stuffer for your grandkids.

And I remember that my

grandfather used to give me coins and they were silver.

And I wish I had them, but that's it wasn't like they were old or special.

It was that was what was in circulation at the time.

And I wish I would have saved them because the memories that they created.

You can get these now at Goldline.

Go check them out, shop.goldline.com.

Search for Santa or Snowman.

I think you're going to love them, and they make a great stocking stuffer.

Go there now, goldline.com.

Call 866Goldline.

By the way, they're also offering a five years, five-year plus IRA fees in bonus silver for the qualifying self-directed IRA purchases.

Just ask them for the information.

You can call your Goldline account executive right now at 866Goldline.

866Goldline.

If you just want to get the Santa stuff and the Snowman, just check them out at shop.goldline.com and search for Santa or Snowman.

We break now for 10-second station ID.

All right, welcome to the program.

It's interesting because reading the IG report and they're doing the hearings on it now, I get the sense that it worked out really well for the Trump administration.

It showed

real problems at the FBI and various entities looking into the president.

And

with the exception of the headline of there was no political bias, I mean, I'm not even sure that the political bias means all that much because if they screwed with these people's civil rights, whether it was complete incompetence or political bias, it still happened.

Everybody should be fired that was involved in this, that made any of these so-called

errors or inaccuracies, because there's no way, as we talked about this yesterday, there's no way that all of these things fell in one direction.

Yeah.

You know, if you're going to make a mistake, you're going to make it, and sometimes it benefits one side, and sometimes it benefits the other.

All of them benefit against Trump.

And we should point out that the political bias argument here is actually better than the alternative, which is they just do this to everybody they want to get a FISA warrant on.

I almost would rather have it as they didn't like Donald Trump and were going after Donald Trump.

If they're doing this against everybody, it's even worse.

The whole system has to be dissolved.

But Barr is Attorney General Barr is

not happy with the report.

He's not done.

And he's not done.

He was interviewed

yesterday on NBC.

And here's what he was talking about when he was talking about the evidence as it relates to Russia.

Listen.

Harshest criticism yet of the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign.

Attorney General Barr said the FBI started with the thinnest of suspicions and kept pushing even after the investigation went nowhere, calling that a threat to democracy.

There has to be some basis before we use these very potent powers in our core First Amendment activity.

And here,

I felt this was very flimsy.

I think probably from a civil liberty standpoint, the greatest danger to our free system is that the incumbent government use the apparatus of the state, principally the law enforcement agencies and the intelligence agencies, both to spy on political opponents, but also to use them in a way that could affect the outcome of the election.

I mean, Barr is a real asset to this White House.

I mean, he's

buttoned up, he buy it, knows what he's talking about, and all the, I mean, he does a great job.

Here he is talking about the investigations on the Trump campaign

and, you know,

was there bias in these investigations?

Listen.

Barr suggested he believes the FBI was biased.

The core statement, in my opinion, by the IG is that these irregularities, these misstatements, these omissions were not satisfactorily explained.

And I think that leaves open the possibility to infer bad faith.

I think a lot of people will hear what you're saying here and think, well, that's just Bill Barr defending Trump.

Your concern about the FBI's investigation is what?

Civil libertarian?

I think our nation was turned on its head for three years.

I think

based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by an irresponsible press.

And I think that there were gross abuses

of FISA

and inexplicable behavior that is intolerable in the

FBI.

The abuse that has been going on with the press and with the Democrats on this investigation, I think

any more of it, and

it is

what we faced after FDR.

FDR had so much power, and everyone just kowtowed to him.

And right after he died,

the House and the Senate passed

a new amendment to the Constitution.

Well, you don't get that passed quickly, but it went through quickly as soon as he died.

That can never happen again.

It was such an abuse of power.

I think we're looking at those kinds of things again.

The abuse of power here with the press and the house and the parties is just obscene.

This is the Glenbeck program.

All right, let me give you a personalized gift for Christmas.

A DNA kit.

Now, this DNA kit is a health health and ancestry kit from 23andMe.

It's not just an ancestry service, it's ancestry and health.

And you'll get more than 150 personalized genetic reports, including insights to your health.

They also have now more than 1,500 geographic regions that they have tagged with DNA.

So 23andMe is the most comprehensive ancestry breakdown on the market.

And one of the things they have is this really great automatic family tree builder.

So it uses your DNA to start building your family tree.

Now, nobody can see you.

You don't have to contact anybody.

They can't contact you.

But you can see anybody who has opted in and said, I want to meet my relatives.

It's really amazing.

Get it.

You can get it before Christmas

and really start to look at your family.

It's a great thing as a conversation starter around the tree and around the Christmas dinner table.

It's available at 23andMe.com/slash back.

23andMe.com slash back.

Join us at Blazetv.com.

Use the promo code Glenn and save 10 bucks off your subscription.

This Horowitz IG report is just absolutely incredible.

If you want to know how

corrupt our FBI is,

all you have to do is listen to these hearings, and there's more of them tomorrow.

And Lindsey Graham is currently trying to get FBI agents to testify.

And I think that's important.

And here's why.

They knew that the Russians were going to try to screw with our elections.

We all knew that.

We talked to you about that in 2014.

Putin was clear on it.

Many of his advisors were clear on it.

I mean, they were talking about it on YouTube, for heaven's sakes.

So we knew that they were going to try to influence the election, and we knew that all they wanted was chaos.

They didn't care, really, who got in.

They just wanted chaos.

So they briefed Hillary extensively with

FBI higher-ups to make sure that Hillary and all the campaign knew that Russia was going to try to infiltrate and they were also going to try to screw the elections.

They didn't give that briefing to Donald Trump, nor his team.

In fact, every time that they had information about somebody possibly working for the Russians or working with the Russians or having contacts or maybe meeting with some unscrupulous people.

They didn't warn the Trump administration, hey, I don't know if you know this, but we have intel.

This guy might be meeting with so-and-so.

They didn't do that.

In the end, they decided to send in an FBI agent to give him a minimal briefing on what Russia was doing.

But when they sent that FBI agent in,

it wasn't the briefing that Hillary got or any of the other candidates might have gotten.

It wasn't from the same people, even.

Instead, the FBI decided to send in an FBI agent that was investigating Donald Trump's campaign.

And they sent them in with minimal information to warn the Trump administration.

Their main goal was to get information so he could get in and spy on and see how things were working in the Trump administration.

I don't know.

That doesn't seem like an inaccuracy.

That sounds like somebody had an agenda.

I'm telling you, when this stuff all comes out in the end, it is bad.

It was bad enough what we found in Ukraine.

This IG,

this report is devastating, devastating, not to the Democrats.

But to the Obama administration and the Obama DOJ.

Now, we've known this for a lot.

No, we've suspected this for a very long time because of the way the DOJ was handling things.

I mean, look at the way the DOJ handled the IRS.

I mean,

there was clearly abuse of power.

They never did anything about it.

Okay.

So we've known the DOJ was a mess under Obama.

Now you have proof.

Now you have proof.

Look at how this is coming apart.

And, you know, Stu just played a little bit from Bill Barr.

He is, his report and his investigation on this says

is going to come out in springtime.

This is going to be a bloodbath.

It's a bloodbath if Trump.

does the right thing and doesn't shy away from this and says we're opening it all up.

And I'm sure he's hearing both sides of that, right?

Like he's, he, I

would expect, wants to get this out in front of the people and

draw attention to it, where surely there's people in the White House saying, look, get this over with, get your campaign thing going, get out there, do your rallies, why make this into, I mean, this is an accusation, still an impeachment, even though we think it's BS.

Why do we want to be talking about impeachment for the next half of the year?

Which I can understand the idea there, but I don't think it's the right thing to do here.

If this president can expose the DOJ, the State Department, the Intel community, and show the corruption that came from the Obama administration, came from Hillary Clinton, came from George Soros,

plus show how corrupt the Democrats really are and how they've abused this system, knowing these facts

and hiding these facts.

He shows who's involved, how they perjured themselves, how they lied and manipulated, how they used the FBI, how they denied, denied, denied.

And then when you find out all of the facts,

it shows that, oh, no, it looks like that is what happened.

And they spent three and a half years and God knows how many millions of dollars of our own money.

And they colluded with the press to do it.

that is a job that only Donald Trump can do that is a job that only he is qualified to do he's the only guy with the balls to do it he's the only guy with

with the ability to do it

and everybody's gonna try to talk to him and say it doesn't matter nobody will watch he's Donald freaking Trump they can't help themselves they all it is they will all watch every freaking tweet he puts out there is in a news cycle for three months he should take they say don't make the don't make the Senate into a circus.

He should have them put circus fabric on the ceiling and the walls of the Senate chamber, but make sure that the process is not a circus, but everything around it, Don,

make it a circus, man.

You're the only one that can bring every eyeball on the planet.

It will be as big as the moonshot.

And this specifically is more important if Biden is the nominee.

Because all of the stuff that goes around, yes, I know it's bigger than just Biden, but

the fact that this would be investigated in a venue where it would be very difficult to be completely ignored, where Biden and the people around Biden and the people around Obama, because remember, the Obama White House, you know, Joe Biden was the vice president in that White House.

He's not just a candidate or a guy who has a son who is doing these things.

He's very closely involved in all of this.

And while it's not just about him, he's a big part of this.

And he leads, you know, he still leads in the polls.

He's still the frontrunner for the Democrats.

And if he remains the frontrunner, having the American people's eyes on this is even more important.

And here's the problem.

If he doesn't do it,

it will split the American people even more because the American people will, they know this isn't right.

They know something's wrong.

But if it's all swept under the carpet and it's just moved on and no answers are really given.

It will make the Democrats and anybody who wants to use this system for their own political reasons more emboldened.

It will happen again next term, guaranteed.

If it's Donald Trump, guaranteed if you don't, if you don't go in and turn on all the lights and remove the fridge and kill all the cockroaches, they're going to come back even stronger next season.

It will happen.

But he'll be able to do that.

It will clean the DOJ up.

It will clean a lot of this stuff up.

And if you don't do it, the American people will go into conspiracy theory

because they won't understand why.

Why didn't this happen?

Why didn't he just do this?

Why didn't he just go for it?

He's our guy.

And all kinds of conspiracy theories will prop up on both sides.

You think this is a real risk?

I mean, I'm not as concerned about them not doing it.

I'm concerned that they won't do it right, but I don't think they're just going to push this under the carpet.

I think there's enough people out there that wanted this stuff exposed.

Plus, there's that secondary

institutional concern, I think, for a lot of the Republicans who think, you know, look, we're the Senate.

We have to take this seriously.

We have to have a trial.

We can't just ignore it.

I think both of those things working kind of together will at least get you a trial.

Now, whether the trial is good or not is a whole other story.

Yeah, so

they're going to do a trial.

How do you mean you're not sure they're going to do it right?

I mean, are they going to go into the things that we think are important to expose at any level of competence, right?

Are we going to see Chalupa testify?

Are we going to see Hunter Biden testify?

Are we going to see

these?

Because, again, the central point here, the thing that gets Donald Trump off the hook for all of this is proving that this is in the national interest.

The only way you can prove this is in the national interest

is to expose all of it.

You have to go down these roads and say, look,

this corruption was real.

It was affecting the United States taxpayers in this way.

And this is why I was going after it.

And if you can prove that case, then people will say, well, I understand why you'd go after Zelensky and say, I don't.

And I understand why they would try to impeach him with nothing to go on because they needed to shut him up.

It destroys the Democratic Party.

It It destroys the credibility and restores the credibility of the system.

Because for as much of a sham as it was in the House, you know, you have the Supreme Court justice presiding over this.

So you have John Roberts presiding.

I think the Senate, there's enough serious people in the Senate.

They're not going to screw around with this.

Now, they may not want to go into everything, and that's a huge mistake.

That's

That's the thing that President Trump needs to understand.

He's the only guy that can do it.

He's the only guy that now has all the goods.

He's the only guy that has the balls to do it.

And he's the only guy that can make America watch that

because he knows how to drum up, you know, eyeballs.

Mr.

President, you have a once-in-a-lifetime chance

to become one of the greatest American presidents of all time.

You clean this up,

forget about Reagan, you begin to move into the land of the truly iconic great presidents,

and you're the only one that can do it.

Let them make a great case and expose all of it.

All of it.

And become

a new great emancipator, somebody that will free us from all of this corruption.

Because it is the corruption, is that is it obvious what I'm doing?

The corruption is that bad.

You can do it.

Be amazing.

Please do it.

And I like your hair.

hair.

Clock is ticking Christmas.

A couple of weeks away.

You still have a little shopping left to do.

If there's one person in your life who is really hard to shop for,

I know, I know.

I've got something that's impossible to shop for.

Why not surprise that person with the gift of the X-Chair?

Yesterday I went to Steven Crowder, gave him an X-Chair.

Oh, yeah, how did it go?

He was all excited.

Yeah.

Yeah, he was very excited.

He said it and he was like, first he said it and he was like, I feel like I just opened a present and I have to like it.

And, you know,

and I said, no, if you don't like it, I'll take it back because I love it.

And he sat in it and we sat and we talked for, I don't know, about 40 minutes.

And every once in a while, he would just stop.

This is a great chair.

This is really a great chair.

I'm like, I know.

Anyway, patented

dynamic variable lumbar support, 10 settings.

The X-Chair is what you and those around you need for a comfortable workday.

The next generation of office chairs, it is X-Chair.

30-day, no questions asked, guarantee of satisfaction, zero risk.

X-Chair.

Go to XChairbeck.com.

It's on sale now for $100 off.

XchairBECK.com or 1-844-4XCHAR.

XCHARB.com.

Use the promo code Beck.

You're going to receive a free set of the new X-Wheels with your chair.

It's XCHARB.com.

Promo code Beck.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

Someone is putting tiny little cowboy hats on pigeons in Las Vegas.

Animal rescue workers are working now to remove them.

Dadline Las Vegas.

Someone, they don't know who, is putting tiny little cowboy hats on the heads of Las Vegas pigeons.

And while you might be asking yourself why, one local onlooker has only one explanation, the rodeo is in town.

Now, I have to tell you, my first question is not why.

Someone is putting little teeny rodeo hats on pigeons, and they're flying around in these rodeo hats and landing at people's feet.

Let me give you this one.

The first time I saw one, the first time I saw one, I was like, oh my gosh, that's cute.

Then I was like, wait a minute, how did they get those hats on there?

How dare you?

I would, I mean, the first thing I would think of is

how.

Before why.

Before why, you'd say how.

How?

And

who?

And then maybe why.

I think it's quite damaging to you and your character to not assume that the pigeons did it themselves.

Why are you not even assuming that they made a fashion choice?

They may identify a little bit differently than you.

I mean, I have another question.

I have another question.

Where?

Where?

Where is this happening?

And where do you get the little teeny cowboy hats?

Because they're appropriately sized for pigeons.

So they're not full-size cowboy hats.

No.

They're pigeon-sized cowboy hats.

And I mean, look at the monitor.

They're red, they're orange, they're perfect.

They're perfect for the heads of pigeons.

Do you think they were specifically designed for pigeons or are they only adults?

That's a question.

There's another question over who.

Now, we'll get to who because they're the only ones that can answer these questions.

But,

okay, so let me read.

Let me read on.

Hillman, the guy who said, oh my gosh, that's cute.

And then, wait, how did the hats get on there?

Hillman runs the animal advocacy organization whose slogan is a pigeon positive movement.

Wait a minute.

What?

Their slogan is a pigeon positive movement?

Yeah,

it's a bad slogan.

It's not a good slogan.

But it's a pigeon advocacy group, okay, whose head

who's head of the organization

saw the cowboy hats on the the pigeon and his first thing was, oh my gosh, that's cute.

Okay.

Well, he's being positive about pigeons.

I mean, there's a lot to be, there's a lot to talk about here.

He said, then I had to ask myself, who did that?

Who made them?

Is it going to impede their flight or attract predators?

Did they glue the little hats on or tie them on?

What kind of predators?

Is there a bird that's attracted to cowboy hats?

Is that a...

Are there predators that are...

Well, they're very...

They're red and yellow?

They're bright colors.

So anything, you know, like a cat, it'll drive a cat crazy.

And if

the camouflage pigeon not wearing a hat is in the same area, the cat's going for the red-hatted pigeon.

Red-hatted pigeon.

This is the Glimbeck program.