Impeachment Mania Day 2: Yovanovitch Lied! (And Trump Hurt Her Feelings?) | 11/15/19

How are you?

Good, good.

How are you?

Oh my god.

You excited for Impeachment Mania today?

Huh?

Impeachment Mania.

Are you kidding me?

It's starting in just a few minutes, isn't it?

I know.

We're gonna be covering it.

We have to get the transcript of the first Zelensky-Trump call.

It's just been released.

Oh, the full transcript?

Yeah, the full transcript of the first one.

Of the first one.

I want to play Trump.

I gotta play Trump.

I gotta play Trump.

Trump-Zelensky phone call just been released.

Yes, we're gonna do what the Congress is doing and sit around the table and read a script as the impeachment hearing continues in just a few.

The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

Hello, America.

It's Friday and what a Friday it is.

But the impeachment hearings are continuing.

Did you read that people in the gallery were actually falling asleep during the impeachment hearings the other day?

They had nothing going on, but we're going to give you all the coverage that America deserves.

So don't miss a second of it because

the new

transcript between Zelensky and Trump, not the first perfect call, actually, not the perfect call that you've heard before, but the more perfect call that happened before that perfect call.

You following yet?

It's like their testimony.

No, I didn't hear it, but somebody else heard it and they told that person and that person told somebody else and that person told me about it.

And that's when I said, this has got to stop.

Okay, so that phone call

and the hearings of the ambassador, that was fired

in one minute.

This is the Glenbeck program.

All right, you thinking about selling your house?

Thinking about buying a new one?

You need a great real estate, a great real estate agent.

I mean, you know, you go to a new chiropractor, you get an adjustment, your neck's been killing you the past few weeks.

You know, you got got to do something about it.

And as he's preparing to adjust you,

you're just making some small talk.

And

he's got your head in your hands.

And he's getting ready to do that really freaky move where they're like,

and just before he does that, you say, so how long have you been doing this?

And he's like, oh, this is my first time.

Are you freaking out?

Oh, I only do this part-time.

I freak out.

I don't know about you.

That's why you need the best real estate agent.

Have you done this before?

Oh, yeah.

I mean, not really.

I mean, I've seen it done.

My folks bought houses when I was a kid.

I just do this part-time.

Get somebody who knows how to price the house that you're either buying or selling, who knows how to sell your house, knows how to get the most amount for your house, and is the expert in your neighborhood.

Do it now.

Just go to realestate agentsitrust.com.

Really, They have experience.

Realestateagents I trust.com.

Gosh, Stu, there's Adam Shifty.

There he is.

The nickname, Trump's nickname, has invaded your head, I've noticed.

And like when you really want to say Adam Schift every time.

Well, no, I just

stuck in your head.

Yeah, it is.

I do.

But he is.

He's so shifty.

Lied a couple of times already himself in the testimony.

Well, he has no idea who this whistleblower is.

He has no name.

He has no name.

She's the only one.

She's the only one.

It's all over the internet, and it's all been reported by multiple sources.

Every single person in Congress and the Senate know who this person is.

It was in testimony, which they released.

And this whole thing started with the whistleblower coming to Adam Schiff's staff.

Him.

But he has no idea.

He's got no idea.

I've never met the guy.

Okay, so he's going to be, he's going to be interviewing and doing the testimony of the ousted Ukrainian

ambassador.

Now, here's why she's important.

She's the one that said to the

good inspector general, or what do they call him?

General prosecutor or prosecutor generals.

Remember, Joe Biden fired the bad one.

And then, in his own words, they they put a good guy in there that we can trust.

Well, that guy said the same thing that the quote-unquote bad prosecutor said.

So at some point, he went bad too.

But he's testified, you know, not in this hearing because

you're not getting the other side.

But he's testified that he went to Ambassador Jovanovich and he said, hey, I've got all this evidence I need to send.

And she said, no, we're not sending any of that to the DOJ.

All of that is barred from going into America, as are your people.

And something else.

You're not to prosecute or look into George Soros or any of these NGOs.

And she gave a whole list.

Now, the media says, that's been taken back.

That guy, he took that back.

No, he didn't.

He clarified when somebody said,

So she gave you a list.

And he said, no, no, no, she didn't actually give me the list.

She spoke it and I wrote it down and that's how the media is saying she never gave him a list even he said she never gave him a list that's how dishonest these hearings are so we're going to hear from her and her story on how she's just a great ambassador even though even zelinsky on the call with donald trump said Yeah, you know, your ambassador's really not good, right?

He's like, yeah, I know.

Yours isn't either.

And they both fired the ambassadors because they were both working for the DNC.

It's insane what's going on.

And the Democrats' case here is basically, you know, Giuliani is over there trashing this ambassador because Giuliani has ties.

These two guys that were arrested at the airport a few weeks ago,

those two guys were over in Ukraine.

They had started a smear campaign against her because she had come in and

targeted their business interests in Ukraine.

So Giuliani was assisting these two guys that they do have a close relationship business-wise, at least at some level.

He writes that

they write it, and they've donated a bunch of money to Trump, and there's a bit of back and forth there.

The argument from the Democrats is those guys were there trashing her, trying to get her thrown out so that they could get someone in there that would not target their business interests.

Has nothing to do with it.

Nothing to do with it.

That's what they say.

I'm just bringing up their case.

All right, I know that.

I know that.

And I appreciate that.

That was episode number two of Ukraine.

If you didn't watch it, that's what we went through.

And

I can't tell you about any of that.

Might be, might not be.

Might be that he's just, he has

these two clients, and he's representing them as all

attorneys do.

They choose.

Rudy Giuliani has become a little bit of a mob lawyer from time to time, which is surprising.

He is, you know, at the request of Hunter Biden in, where is it, Macedonia?

He's representing somebody that Hunter Biden said, hey, could you represent this guy?

Who's a bad guy?

But the Bidens said, would you represent him?

So he's representing them too.

I mean, that's what he does now to make his money.

But the only thing that we know happened with Giuliani is that these guys introduced him to the two prosecutor generals because the prosecutor generals were desperate to get this information to America, to somebody who would listen.

And so they said, hey,

we have the proof.

The prosecutor generals, they want to get it.

And he said, well, can you line up a meeting with me?

And so it was that guy, those two guys that are bad news, that put Rudy Giuliani in touch with

the Biden, I've got to fire, prosecutor general, and the Biden, oh, this is the good guy, Prosecutor General.

Those two had several meetings with Rudy Giuliani, and that's where he got all this information.

And it is interesting that both the person that Biden wanted to replace initially and the person that Biden replaced them with, both of them now are still saying things that are very critical of the storyline the Democrats are presenting.

Correct.

Both of them.

You know, that's,

you'd think normally, in a normal story, that would be a pretty big deal.

Mm-hmm.

Right?

Like when you have the person that Biden's basically hand-chose to put in there as the good guy, and that guy is not agreeing with the left-wing storyline.

Oh, no, but they've turned.

They've turned because they just want to keep their jobs.

They don't have jobs.

I mean, there is this thing where basically

because there's so there is so much corruption in this country.

Yeah.

They can kind of just say, well, I mean, we just, we picked another person.

We thought they were good and they were corrupt too.

Yeah.

And it's like, well, that is

believable at some level in Ukraine because seemingly anyone who goes within 100 miles of Ukraine turns into Mr.

Corruption.

Yes,

which brings us back to the Ambassador Yovanovich, who is

more than 100 yards closer to Ukraine.

She was actually in Ukraine.

She is the

key.

Let's take Devin Nunes here and his

opening statement real quick.

Yep, it's coming up here.

Coming up in just a second,

they're getting ready to introduce the ambassador who is going to testify.

And

she's the one who was coordinating

with the

ambassador in the United States for Ukraine to get information back and forth about Donald Trump and the last campaign.

Everything that America thought they were going to find on Donald Trump and Russia, it's right here.

I'm curious.

I mean, Schiff is finishing up, and here comes Nunez.

Does think Schiff is good at this?

Schiff?

Yeah.

I think he's horrible.

Continue engaging in the Democrats' day-long TV spectacles instead of solving the problems we were all sent to Washington to address.

We now have a major trade agreement with Canada and Mexico ready for approval, a deal that would create jobs and boost our economy.

Meanwhile, we have not yet approved funding for the government, which expires next week,

along with funding for our men and women in uniform.

Instead, the Democrats have convened us once again to advance their operation to topple a duly elected president.

I'll note that five,

five Democrats on this committee had already voted to impeach this president before the Trump-Zelensky phone call occurred.

In fact, Democrats have been vowing to oust President Trump since the day he was elected.

So Americans can rightly suspect that his phone call with President Zelensky was used as an excuse for the Democrats to fulfill their Watergate fantasies.

But I'm glad that on Wednesday, after the Democrats staged six weeks of secret depositions in the basement of the Capitol, like some kind of strange colt,

The American people finally got to see this farce for themselves.

They saw a sit-through hours of hearsay testimony about conversations that two diplomats who had never spoken to the president heard secondhand, thirdhand, and fourthhand from other people.

That's literally what they were testifying on.

Rumors.

Hearsay.

The problem of trying to overthrow a president based on this type of evidence is obvious.

But that's what their whole case relies on, beginning with secondhand and third-hand information cited by the whistleblower.

That's why on Wednesday the Democrats were forced to make the absurd argument that hearsay can be much better evidence than direct evidence.

They actually tried to make that case as well.

In case you didn't know, committee Republicans received a memo from the Democrats threatening ethics referrals if we out the whistleblower.

Out him.

As the Democrats are well aware, no Republicans here know the whistleblower's identity because the whistleblower only met with Democrats, not with Republicans.

Chairman Schiff claimed not to know who it is, yet he also vowed to block us from asking questions that could reveal his or her identity.

Republicans on this committee are left wondering how it's even possible for the chairman to block questions about a person whose identity he claims not to know.

The American people may be seeing these absurdities for the first time,

but Republicans on this dais are used to them.

Until they secretly met with the whistleblower, Democrats showed little interest for the last three years in any topic aside from the ridiculous conspiracy theories that President Trump is a Russian agent.

When you find yourself on the phone, like the Democrats did with Russian pranksters offering you nude pictures of Trump, and afterward you order your staff to follow up and get the photos, as the Democrats also did,

then it might be time to ask yourself if you've gone out too far on a limb.

Even as they were accusing Republicans of colluding with Russians, the Democrats themselves were colluding with Russians by funding the Steele dossier, which was based on Russian and Ukrainian sources.

Meanwhile, they turn a blind eye to Ukrainians meddling in our elections because the Democrats were cooperating with that operation.

This was the subject of a July 20, 2017 letter sent by Senator Grassley to then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

The letter raised concerns about the activities of Alexander Chalupa, a contractor for the Democratic National Committee, who worked with Ukrainian embassy officials to spread dirt on the Trump campaign.

As Senator Grassley wrote, Chalupa's action, quote, Chalupa's actions appear to show that she was simultaneously working on behalf of a foreign government, Ukraine, and on behalf of the DNC and the Clinton campaign in an effort to influence not only the U.S.

voting population, but U.S.

government officials, unquote.

After touting the Steele dossier and defending the FBI's Russia investigation, which are now being investigated by Inspector General Horowitz and Attorney General Barr, Democrats on this committee ignore Ukrainian election meddling, even though Chalupa publicly admitted to the Democrats' scheme.

Likewise, they are blind to the blaring signs of corruption surrounding Hunter Biden's well-paid position on the board of a corrupt Ukrainian company

while his father served as vice president and point man for Ukraine issues in the Obama administration.

New banking records have been released.

Democrats' media hacks

and the media shows he got all kinds of money

from Barisma, making direct payments.

Of course, he didn't make a dime.

We should also point out when they're bringing up Chalupa here, Chalupa is someone that, of course, the Republicans really want to talk to about all of this.

And of course, obviously, you'd think, well, the Democrats don't want her to talk, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

And so they're not letting her be called.

She herself, though, is saying she wants to come testify.

She wants to.

So they're actually not only rejecting the Republicans, they're rejecting her request to come testify.

Unbelievable.

Unbelievable.

Unbelievable.

Okay, we'll come back to this and

give you all of the important stuff.

I think it's worth listening to the ambassador.

It might make your head explode.

But really listen how the

embassy and the State Department are spinning this.

If you watched our specials, you already know who these people are.

If you watched Wednesday night and saw our special Wednesday night, you know why the State Department and why Schiff and everybody else is working so hard to control this because one misstep on this and

literally the State Department and the DNC fall apart.

We'll go more into that in just a second.

Standby.

So what kind of chair are you sitting in right now?

So I get a text yesterday after I read this commercial.

I say, makes a great Christmas gift.

I get a text from my wife.

I'd like one for Christmas.

And I'm torn because at least I can get a present that she likes and wants.

But then she takes all the fun out of Christmas because

what if I was going to get you one anyway, honey?

You don't think I know that?

So now it's, now

I can never win on Christmas presents or giving print.

I never win.

Anyway,

that's what it's about.

Christmas is about winning.

That's what they always say.

It is.

I just want one time that I give a great Christmas present.

And she goes,

that is so thoughtful and so

that thank you, honey.

She doesn't say thank you.

No, she says thank you.

She likes it, but then it never, she doesn't really like.

Anyway.

How do I get her something that you know she's going to love, like the extra?

Why not?

Because she just asked for one.

But that's a win.

You got to come to my side here.

I just get links sent to me at this point.

I get a link sent to me, buy the thing, wrap it up.

She's happy.

That's how it works.

Merry Christmas, honey.

You're getting an X-Chair.

X-Chair on sale.

I went to bed last night and she even said, Did you get my email?

I said, Yes, about the Christmas present.

You know, it's $100 off.

I know.

I read the commercial.

You know that because you listen to me.

Anyway, $100 off makes a great Christmas present.

Uh, it's an X-Chair, Xchairbeck.com.

That's X-Chair, B-E-C-K.com, 1-8444XCHAR.

Get it now.

Use the promo code Beck.

You're gonna receive a free set of the new X-Wheels with your chair, Xchairbeck.com.

We break for 10 seconds.

Oh my gosh,

he's still going on, huh?

All right, so Nunez is

still going on, but I enjoy the first part because he's

looking forward to your visit, to the visit of a high-level delegation, but there's no words that can describe our wonderful country, how nice, warm, and friendly our people are, how tasty and delicious our food is, and how wonderful Ukraine is.

Words cannot describe our country, so it would be best for you to see it yourself.

So if you can come, that would be great.

So again, I invite you to come.

The President, Well, I agree with you about your country, and I look forward to it.

When I own Miss Universe, they always had great people.

Ukraine always very well represented.

It was always very well represented.

When you're saying

that,

this is the transcript that

we need to start that one from the beginning.

I get to play Trump.

Have you given me the copy of the transcript?

They're very complimentary of each other.

I've just looked at that a little bit.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

This is what these calls apparently are, which is everyone.

Yes.

You don't have the presidents do the heavy lifting where the president is just like, oh man, and Mr.

Gorbachev, you're the best.

What spot on your face?

I've never seen a spot on your face.

What are you talking about?

You're a handsome, handsome man.

And then it's the underlings that are like, he's not coming to your, to visit to meet you unless you get that spot.

That's right.

It's not happening.

And then he'll be like, what?

They said what?

That's not even, you know what?

Let me talk to those people because that's an insult.

You have a beautiful, beautiful, spotless, perfect face.

Look, I mean, we all know we're in a situation where we have spies in every one of these countries and all of this.

That's if there's one legitimate criticism of Trump is that he's not supposed to be the one saying these things.

That's exactly right.

That's right.

You don't mention Biden.

Let some other guy mention Biden.

That's exactly right.

He's just like, I'd love to have you there.

And then somebody else picks up the phone and is like, he's not going to have you in the White House unless you do this.

That's the way it's supposed to work.

But I digress.

We'll give you the perfect,

perfect phone call that happened before the last perfect phone call in just a few minutes.

And then we get to hear from this really great ambassador.

This is the Glenbeck program.

So Thanksgiving is only a couple of weeks away.

You want turkey at Thanksgiving.

You don't want turkey neck.

at Thanksgiving.

You want to get rid of the turkey neck and sagging jawline.

You can get rid of that and you can get the compliments around the table.

If you haven't tried Genucelle's Breakthrough Jawline Treatment with MDL technology, then pick up the phone and go to genucell.com right now.

If you order today, Shamani is going to include their classic Genucelle eye bags and puffiness, absolutely free.

And you'll receive their immediate effects or results that you can see in 12 hours.

For Thanksgiving, they're just loading it on for you.

You got the top-of-the-line Genucelle eyelid lift for sagging, droopy eyelids, absolutely free.

And that takes 10 years off your appearance.

And if you don't buy that, all right.

Well, the money back is guaranteed, 100%.

Thanks to Shamani.

Go to 800-577-8709 or genucelle.com.

From now till Thanksgiving, you'll also get the Genucelle Anti-Wrinkle Treatment for Fine Lines and Wrinkles as your third free gift.

Shipping is also free.

So it's 800-577-8709.

800-577-8709 or go to genucelle.com.

genucelle.com.

G-E-N-U-C-E-L.com.

You missed my special, The Democratics Hydra.

The Democrats Hydra.

How did you miss?

What is wrong with watch it for free on YouTube?

Send it to your friends or go to Blaze TV, use promo code GB20Off, and become a member.

I got to take Judy real quick because she claims she understands my pain, I think.

At Christmas time, Judy, hi, welcome.

Hi, dear.

Hi.

Did you listen to yourself right after that commercial?

I thought you were going to support my pain.

Oh, I'm supporting you.

Okay.

But

listen, do you realize how lucky you are your wife actually listens to you on anything?

No, she's not listening to me.

She's listening to Stu or Pat.

She's listening to you read the commercial Take the Win.

Take the win, boyfriend.

Okay, all right.

Number one.

Yeah.

Buy her what she wants.

What she wants.

All right.

She wants the chair.

Get her the chair.

Then buy her something

that will surprise her and delight her.

I have always found personally it will be gold.

No.

Or a gemstone.

But you know your wife better than I do.

Yeah, no.

Okay.

I've already given her me.

I mean,

I know how much

I know.

And listen, Dolly,

after I yelled at you for the painting that you gave her, or the one with the tape, the portrait that time, the Valentine's Day.

No, with a tape.

That is like, yes.

That's a very good, expensive piece of artwork.

Yes.

Is it in the barn, as you predicted, or is she actually hanging it in the house?

No,

she let me hang it

on the staircase, which she says, I don't want a big picture of me.

And I'm like, yeah, but I do, and the kids do.

Okay.

So it's for you.

Well, at least it's in the house.

Not in the barn.

Yes, it's in the business.

Don't tell me to shut up.

No, not you.

I was telling Stu to shut up.

All right, all right.

All right, so

buy her something that she will love, okay?

All right.

In addition to this.

Okay, all right.

Thank you.

Get to your shopping plans later.

I know.

Well, she was supposed to just support me and say you're the best, and then hang up the phone.

That's what I was wondering.

So, anyway, we have the ambassador who is now testifying about what a hardship

she's had to move 13 times for

by approving the provision to Ukraine of anti-tank missiles known as javelins.

Yes.

Supporting Ukraine is the right thing to do.

It's also the smart thing to do.

If Russia prevails and Ukraine falls to Russian dominion,

we can expect to see other attempts by Russia to expand its territory and its influence.

Could I ask a question?

How can he be so pro-Russia

if he was reversing the Obama policy

and supporting and sending military equipment to Ukraine?

Yeah, what you said right there, Obama never did.

No, Trump did.

And the Ukrainian people understand that.

That's

They did.

Demanding to live under the rule of law.

They did.

Ukrainians wanted the law to apply equally to all people, whether the individual in question is the president or any other citizen.

It was a question of fairness, of dignity.

Here again, there is a coincidence of interests.

Corrupt leaders are inherently less trustworthy, while an honest and accountable Ukrainian leadership makes a U.S.-Ukrainian partnership more reliable and more valuable to the United States.

A level playing field in this strategically located country bordering four NATO allies creates an environment in which U.S.

business can more easily trade, invest, and

what does this have to do with anything?

We all know Ukraine is important.

We all know that level playing field.

I just keep asking, so

why then would you say you can't investigate things in your own country?

Why can't you, wait a minute, so

you like the shadow justice system of George Soros and Barack Obama?

The State Department, you want a level playing field.

Well, then why wouldn't you let the prosecutors who you invited over to America to train them how to find corruption,

why wouldn't you let those people go to America to talk to our DOJ

to inform America about corruption

in the way of a desire for profits.

Oh,

okay.

All right, I got it.

I got it.

I got it.

It comes into focus now, doesn't it?

It does.

What amazing

is that they found Americans willing to partner with them and working together, they apparently succeeded in orchestrating the removal of a U.S.

ambassador.

Oh, my gosh.

How could our system fail like this?

How is it that foreign corrupt interests could manipulate our government?

Which country's interests are served when the very corrupt behavior we have been criticizing is allowed to prevail?

Such conduct undermines the U.S.,

exposes our friends, and widens the playing field for autocrats like President Putin.

Our leadership depends on the power of our example and the consistency of our purpose.

There's a fiery pit for an open pitch.

Ladies and a fiery pit for gents.

With that background in mind, I'd like to briefly address some of the factual issues I expect you may want to ask me about.

Yes, yes.

Starting with my timeline in Ukraine and the events about which I do and do not have first-hand knowledge.

How about we just stick to the ones where you do have first-hand knowledge?

There are a number of events you are investigating to which I cannot bring any first-hand knowledge.

The events that predated my Ukraine service include the release of the so-called Black Ledger and Mr.

Manafort's subsequent resignation from President Trump's campaign

and the departure from office of former Prosecutor General Viktor Shokhin.

Several other events occurred after

my return from Ukraine.

These include

President Trump's July 25th, 2019 call with President Zelensky, the discussions surrounding that phone call, and any discussions surrounding the delay of security.

You cannot also tell us

the universe is linear or circular.

As far as during my tenure in Ukraine,

I want to reiterate first that the allegation that I disseminated a do not prosecute list was a fabrication.

Mr.

Lutsenko, the former Ukrainian prosecutor general who made that allegation,

has acknowledged that the list never existed.

Oh my gosh!

I did not tell Mr.

Lutsenko

to Ukrainian officials who they should or should not prosecute.

Instead,

I advocated the U.S.

position that rule of law should prevail.

And Ukrainian law enforcement prosecutors and judges

are critical that you understand what she just did.

Also untrue are unsourced allegations that I told unidentified embassy employees or Ukrainian officials that President Trump's orders should be ignored because he was going to be impeached or for any other reason.

I did not, and I would not say such a thing.

Such statements would be inconsistent with my training as a foreign service

and my role as an ambassador.

Yeah, I've never even heard that allegation.

The Obama administration did not ask me to help the Clinton campaign or harm the Trump campaign, nor would I have taken any such steps if they had.

Partisanship of this type is not compatible.

Sweetheart, you just said that you weren't there at that time, so why are you offering your opinion here?

I have never met Hunter Biden, nor have I had any direct or indirect conversations with him.

I think you would.

And although I have met former Vice President Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service,

neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me.

With respect to Mayor Julian,

I have had only minimal contact with him, a total of three, none related to the events at issue.

I do not understand Mr.

Giuliani's motives for attacking me, nor can I offer an opinion on whether he believed the allegations he spread about me.

Clearly, no one at the State Department did.

What I cannot is that Mr.

Giuliani should have known those claims were suspect, coming as they reportedly did, from individuals with questionable motives and with reason to believe that their political and financial ambitions would be stymied by our anti-corruption policy in Ukraine.

Oh my gosh, which is a

George Soros organization

and those two sources

that he is quoting

is not these two that went to jail,

but instead the two prosecutor generals of the United States.

In the wake of the negative press, State Department officials suggested an earlier departure, and we agreed upon July 2019.

I was then abruptly told, just weeks later in late April, to come back to Washington from Ukraine on the next plane.

At the time I departed, Ukraine had just concluded game-changing presidential elections.

It was a sensitive period with much at stake for the United States.

We were not correct.

We called for all the experience and expertise we could muster.

When I returned to the United States, Deputy Secretary of State Sullivan told me there had been a concerted campaign against me, that the President no longer wished me to serve as ambassador to Ukraine, and that, in fact, the President had been pushing for my removal since the prior summer.

As Mr.

Sullivan recently recounted during his Senate confirmation hearing, neither he nor anyone else ever explained or sought sought to justify the president's concerns about me, nor did he.

They don't have to.

And the question is, why were you still serving?

I had done something a year later.

I appreciate that Mr.

Sullivan publicly affirmed at his hearing that I had served capably and admirably.

Although then and now I have always understood that I served at the pleasure of the President, I still

understand

that foreign and private interests were able to undermine U.S.

interests in this way.

Individuals who apparently felt stymied by our efforts to promote stated U.S.

policy against corruption, that is, to do our mission,

were able to

control

you and the DNC and George Soros of deep corruption, and we have all the evidence, sweetheart.

Is that too demeaning?

No, I think you mean sweetheart with all the love and respect she deserves.

Yes, yes.

I thought that was

important to clarify.

These events should concern everyone in this room.

Yes, they do.

Ambassadors are the symbol of the United States abroad.

They are the personal representative of the president.

They should always act and speak with full authority

to advocate for U.S.

policies.

If our chief representative is knee-capped, it limits our effectiveness to safeguard the vital national security interests of of the United States.

This is especially important now when the international landscape is more complicated and more competitive than it has been since the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

So I haven't heard a lot of stuff, you know, besides the lies,

a lot of stuff on principle that I disagree with.

You know,

she does work for, you know, at the will of the president.

So why wasn't she fired a year before?

Why when the president first came to the State Department and said, I want you to change her out, did they not change her out?

That's the sort of stuff that Trump's been complaining about, where he wants things carried out and people don't carry them out.

That's what Haley has in her book.

Yes.

I mean,

that's why, honestly, he looks to be erratic.

He just did this in Ukraine.

No, he's been trying to fire her for a year and they wouldn't fire her.

You know, a guy, at least me,

somebody just said this to me the other day.

You're going to speak this into existence.

And I said, yes, I'm going to.

Because sometimes when you're up against a whole mob that just doesn't see the vision or doesn't want to go there, then that's the time that you just say, I'm moving forward with or without you.

I'm moving forward.

And that's what Donald Trump did because the State Department thinks they run

the foreign policy.

They don't.

They work for the president.

I also am fine with all the stuff that she said about we have to have stability and we don't want corruption.

Yes, however,

as we have shown you the deep state corruption and what they were actually doing in Ukraine, for her to say, I would never work together with anyone that was trying to throw the election, you weren't there.

You started by saying, I can't comment on those things and then you comment on those things just to try to smear.

And when i come back i'm going to tell you why what she said when she said lucenko uh has withdrawn that why that is such a lie and she should be held for perjury

uh when we come back stand by

thanks pat pat gray unleashed the podcast you can listen to it uh wherever you get your podcast every day it's it's great great show

thanksgiving christmas right around the corner if you haven't already thought about it might be the time to consider preparing your home for holiday guests with brand new blind shades or plantation shutters from blinds.com.

If you haven't tried blinds.com before, now is the perfect time to do it.

People are, you know,

I don't know,

because I don't think anybody likes to go to like Home Depot and sit there and wait for the guy in the orange apron.

I mean, is anyone like that?

Blinds.com, you do it from the comfort of your own home.

You can set up an appointment.

And I mean, setting up an appointment is not hard.

I got an appointment right away, and it was my wife.

They didn't use my name.

We didn't use my name.

We used Tanya.

And we got an appointment like on the spot and we took care of it right away.

It was really, truly unbelievable.

The service is great at blinds.com.

And their 100% satisfaction guarantee means that if you're not totally satisfied with the style, the color, the quality, anything that you're buying from blinds.com, they are going to replace it for free.

Blinds.com, now through November 17th, save up to 40% on everything, including blind shade, shutters.

Plus, you'll get an extra 20 bucks off with the promo code back.

So get 40% off everything and an extra 20% off blinds.com promo code back.

Rules and restrictions do apply.

You're listening to Glenn Back.

Welcome to the program.

Well, it's the same kind of feeling, though.

Stu and I were just talking about this

with the ambassador, Ambassador Jovanovich,

and she just said

the Inspector General general took back his words and said, I gave him a list.

She said, I never gave him a list.

And when you track this down, because everybody is just quoting each other, and you actually have to go back to the Ukrainian papers.

And when you track this down, what he said,

the interviewer got very, very specific and said,

so she gave you a list.

And he said, no, no, she stated it.

And then I got a piece of paper and I wrote it down.

And

she said, you want to give a list?

She said, no, that's not what I mean.

And he's like, I usually get this from, you know, Ukraine, never from

the embassy.

That's why this is a lie.

And we'll go into it at the top of the hour.

Stand by.

Is the Glenbeck program a program?

Thank you.

All right.

Tell me, tell you about Relief Factor.

Okay.

What is it?

Relief.

factor.

Why, why, why?

I'm just curious as what it is.

Relief factor is something you take in case you have pain.

Something that I take?

I can be more specific.

It's an all-natural remedy created by doctors, and you take it four times a day or three times a day, and your pain, your inflammation is under control, and that causes the pain in our body.

This seems interesting, so tell me more.

Let's say that you have

a pain in

your ass.

Okay.

Okay.

Now you can fire that person.

You can

surgically remove them, maybe?

Well,

you can fire them, or you can

realize that it's always going to be there, and there's nothing that will help that.

Or if you have pain in your joints, or you know, just pain anywhere, inflammation is the cause of much of it.

I want you to go to relieffactor.com.

It will help relieve that pain.

Some pain can never be removed, apparently.

The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

Ah, here we are.

Ambassador Jovanovich

has just, I believe, perjured herself.

And we have the document to prove it.

I'm writing as fast as I can to anybody I know that's on the committee.

Could you go back and ask her to clarify this?

We're listening to her and her reason why we must impeach this president and how there was nothing hinky going on.

Even though she wasn't there and she can't comment on it she's commenting on it uh

of course she is we'll go there in one minute this is the glembeck program

remember the uh in alice in wonderland and the cat says we're all a little mad here

yeah well that's uh that's america except we're the we're alice

And some

and some Americans are even forced to wear a dress now.

Anyway, here we are, Alice.

And we're like, can you tell me how to get out of here?

Yeah, drink this bottle, it'll make you big.

No, I just want to get out of here.

Well, drink this one, it'll make you small.

I want out.

We're all a little mad here.

Welcome to America.

Right now, when you make a phone call and you're on, you know, one of these mobile services, ATT, Verizon, any of them,

many of these people are actually sending money to help abort babies.

We're all a little mad here.

Now, the excuse is, well, I need my cell phone service.

Well, I've got another one for you that doesn't involve killing babies or supporting Laraza.

And that's Patriot Mobile.

You get the same great service and coverage because everybody's using the same cell towers, okay?

Patriot Mobile is going to save you money.

You'll have the same great service.

They're going to make it easy to switch.

You can keep your phone number.

You can keep your phone, get a new phone, whatever you want.

They make it super, super easy.

Plus, they have a special going on right now where you can get $25 a month.

You'll get

unlimited talk and text, plus free activation on up to two lines if you use the offer code Beck.

So

if you really would like to not be surrounded by crazy people where everybody's a little mad,

just switch your phone service now.

Stop Stop being part of that system.

Patriotmobile.com/slash back.

That's patriotmobile.com/slash back.

What is serious?

Is this what I think it is?

Bring up

Ambassador Jovanovich in her testimony.

We're listening to the impeachment attacks on me by Mayor Giuliani and others

and Mr.

Lutsenko in Ukraine.

Brookers see that Founding Fathers Ice Creaming Flavors

just sent to us.

What's the note say?

If they can.

Basically, it says, if you've got to deal with this impeachment, you're going to need ice cream.

So

I love these people.

They think like me.

This will make it better.

Please let me invest in your company.

I believe in you.

Number two,

when other

countries are

other countries, these new flavors.

That private interests, foreign interests can come together and get a U.S.

ambassador removed.

What's going to stop them from doing that in the future in other countries?

Often the work we do, we try to be diplomatic about it.

But as

you're a diplomat, of course, that's what you're trying to make.

You know, sometimes we get people really angry with us.

It's uncomfortable.

And we are doing our jobs,

but sometimes people become very angry with us.

And if they realize that they can just remove us, they're going to do that.

How did the Deputy Secretary respond?

He said those were good questions, and

he would get back to me.

Did he ever get back to you?

He asked to see me the following day.

What did he say to you then?

He really the conversation was more,

and you know, again, I'm grateful for this, but really more to see how I was doing

and,

you know, what would I do next, kind of, how could he help?

But he didn't address the dangerous precedent that you flagged for him?

No.

Now, you understood, of course, that the President of the United States.

This is Daniel Goldbee, the Democratic Council pleasure of the President, is that right?

That's right.

But in your 33 years as a Foreign Service officer, have you ever heard of a President of the United States recalling another ambassador without cause based on allegations that the State Department itself knew to be false?

No.

Those allegations were about the State Department.

You testified in your opening statement that you had left Ukraine by the time of the July 25th call between President Trump and President Zelensky.

When was the first time that you saw the call record for this phone call?

When it was released publicly at the end of September, I believe.

And prior to reading that call record, were you aware that President Trump had specifically made reference to you in that call?

No.

What was your reaction to learning that?

I'm famous.

I was shocked.

Absolutely shocked and devastated, frankly.

It's weird because President Zelensky wasn't shocked by it.

I was

shocked and devastated that

I would feature in a phone call between two heads of state in such a manner, where President Trump said that I was bad news to another world leader and that I would be going through something.

And the other world leader said.

It was a terrible moment.

A person who saw me actually reading the transcript said that the color drained from my face.

I think I even had a physical reaction.

I think,

you know, even now, words kind of fail me.

Yeah.

Why didn't you ask about what President Zelensky said about it?

I'd like to show you the excerpts from the call.

And the first one,

where President Trump says, by the way, the former ambassador

founding flavors, ice cream,

I think it's only in the Salt Lake area

and in Utah right now.

so I just want to let you know

even makes the impeachment better what was your reaction when you heard the President of the United States refer to you as bad news you just asked you just couldn't believe it I mean again

appalled devastated that

the case is hey you know this was such a devastating accusation against you and you must feel terrible about it let's go through every piece of it now on national television and just have you relive it real quick like if they actually believed it was this damaging why would they be doing this to her?

The next excerpt, when the president references you

and who cares how she feels.

But he said, Honestly, we're talking about

something huge.

What did you think when President Trump told President Zelensky and you read that you were going to go through some things?

I didn't know what to think, but I was very concerned.

What were you concerned about?

Maybe that it would all come out.

I was gonna go through some things.

It didn't sound good.

It sounded like

a threat.

Did you

feel threatened?

I did.

Who cares how she feels?

Oh, that's a great question.

It felt like a threat.

Did you feel threatened?

What the hell do you think these words mean?

Do you understand the language we're speaking?

I think.

It didn't feel like I was.

I really don't know how to answer the question any further except to say that it kind of felt like a vague threat and so I wondered what that meant more questions about her feelings more questions about her feelings, please

now in this same call where have you ever felt like a man

as you just said threatens you

to a foreign leader?

How does that feel?

He also

praises the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor who led the false smear campaign against you.

I want to show you another excerpt or two from the

transcript or the call record rather

where the President of the United States says good

because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair.

A lot of people are talking about that.

the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved.

And he went on later to say:

I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly, and he was a very fair prosecutor.

So, good luck with everything.

Can we read the responses from Zelensky?

Because it's not like Zelensky's prosecution.

Yeah, he agrees.

I know.

I know.

And Zelensky's brand new, by the way.

He's not part of this corruption.

No, it was not.

And in fact, really rather corrupt, is that right?

That was.

Have they ever filed charges?

Have they ever investigated him?

A long-running problem in Ukraine, is that right?

Yes.

So, how did you feel when you heard President Trump speak so highly of the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor who helped to execute the smear campaign to have you removed?

Well, it was

disappointing.

It was concerning.

It wasn't certainly based on anything.

Corrupt.

You want to talk about not based on anything.

Corrupt how?

They've never made any charges.

They've never done any investigations.

They just call him corrupt.

When Mr.

Lutsenko came from

very hopeful.

And Lusenko was their replacement.

Right.

That's the one that Joe Biden said is very, very good.

But that did not materialize.

So this was not the uniform position of the official U.S.

policymakers.

Is that right?

Right.

Now let's go back to the

smear campaign that you referenced and in March when you said it became public.

And you previously testified that you had learned that Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's lawyer and representative, who was also mentioned in that July 25th call, was in regular communication with the corrupt prosecutor general in late 2018 and early 2019.

And at one point in your deposition, you said that they

was it had plans to, quote, do things to me.

What did you mean by that?

I didn't really know, but that's what I had been told by Ukrainian officials.

Did you subsequently understand a little bit more what that meant?

Well, you know, now, with the advantage of hindsight, I think that meant removing me from my job in Ukraine.

Who did you understand to be working with Mr.

Giuliani as his associates in Ukraine?

Well, certainly Mr.

Lutsenko, Mr.

Shokhin.

The two prosecutors.

I believe that there were also Ukrainian Americans, Mr.

Parnassa and Mr.

Freeman, who have recently been indicted.

Those are the two who have been indicted in New York.

Southern District of New York.

For something that Rudy Giuliani was not involved in.

At the end of March, this

effort by Giuliani and his associates resulted in a series of articles in the Hill

publication that were based on allegations in part from Lutsenko, the corrupt prosecutor general.

Going after

the case,

do you want to talk about a smear campaign?

One category included the attacks against you, which you referenced in your opening statement, including that you had badmouthed the president and had given the prosecutor general a do not prosecute list.

There was another that included allegations of Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election.

And then there was a third that related to allegations concerning Barisma and the Bidens.

Is that accurate?

Yeah.

Yes.

She said you were not going to be able to do that.

Were these

earlier promoted by others associated with the president in the United States?

They seem to be promoted by those around Mayor Giuliani.

I'm going to show you a couple of

exhibits, including a tweet here by President Trump himself on March 20th, which was the first day that

one of these articles was published.

It appears to be a

quote that says, John Solomon is the author of the articles, colon, as Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges,

unquote, at Sean Hannity at Fox News.

How could this possibly be a problem after everything that all of everyone in the Democratic Party

has tweeted

about

Donald Trump and Russian collusion?

How is this any different?

With an exception that there is actual evidence

and witnesses of this crime.

Yes.

What was your reaction to seeing the calls?

What were your feelings?

Well, I was worried.

Oh, my God.

What were you worried about?

Getting fired.

This didn't seem

like a brain surgeon doing the prosecution or

he is not I would say he's not a prosecutor but he did stay at a holiday inn last night

yeah so uh real quick let me just take a quick break and then we're gonna get right back to you know how she felt uh on last Tuesday when she heard that it wasn't Friday how did she feel

all right um

you know are you a defender of your family uh because if if you are a protector of your family you have to be responsible, right?

And you're a responsible human being.

Right now, the USCCA is giving away 19 free chances to those responsible Americans who are protectors of their family and, quite honestly, their country to win $1,000 for the gun of their choice, the military gun of their choice.

Now, what gun could you get?

Here are some hints.

Each one is used by the brave men and women in the fighting forces like the U.S.

Marine Corps, the Special Forces, Army, and much more.

All of them are known for their accuracy, their reliability, and for being guns that Americans can depend on.

You want to know what they are?

Just text the word Beck to the number 87222.

Reveal the guns and unlock your 19-free chances to win.

That's the word Beck to the number 87222.

It's 100% secure.

Confirmation text will be sent.

Don't miss your opportunity to protect like the best.

Text Beck, BECK, to the number 87222.

You'll have to hurry because this giveaway ends Friday, November 29th.

No catch.

Just text the word Beck to the number 87222 and claim your entries.

For more rules, go to protectandefend.com.

Standard message and data rates do apply.

We break for 10 seconds and then back to the impeachment.

Yes, after

the tweets that you just showed us,

I mean, it seemed to me that if the President's son is

saying things like this, that it would be very hard to continue in my position and have authority in Ukraine unless the State Department came out pretty strongly behind.

However,

may I ask an honest question?

What do her feelings have to do with anything?

And I guess she's saying that she couldn't do her job because people were tweeting about her.

Well, sweetheart, and I mean that with all the respect that you deserve,

welcome to my job.

Welcome to the president's job.

Welcome to everyone in politics' job.

And I said, you know, it's really important.

What are you doing to his?

All the downfalls of free speech, but

he's a rewrite of the Constitution.

Talk to the Secretary.

I mean, that's my recollection of the call.

That may not be exactly how it played out, but that was

my recollection.

This is David Hale, the Under Secretary of Political Affairs, who's the number three person at the State Department.

Yes.

Did he indicate to you that he supported such a statement of support for you?

I think he must have, because I don't think he would have gone to the Secretary if

he didn't support it.

I mean, you wouldn't bring a bad idea to the Secretary of State.

And your general understanding is that you did have the full support of the State Department, is that right?

Yes.

Can you tell me what Civil Society 2.0 is and how it worked in Ukraine?

As a service officer, did you ever hear of any serious concerns about your job performance?

No.

Was this statement of support ultimately issued for you?

No, it was not.

Did you learn why not?

Yeah.

Yes.

I was told that there was a concern on the seventh floor that if a statement of support was issued, whether by the State Department or by the Secretary personally, that it could be undermined.

How could it be undermined?

That the President might issue a tweet contradicting that or something to that effect.

Oh, no.

We are legitimately being governed by Twitter.

This is amazing.

This is

senior diplomats in the

what are we adults here?

What is this?

Tell me what she has said that issue a statement.

Anything here.

Anyone being criticized for their job performance has this performance, right?

You say, how many times have I gone through this or anybody else?

I mean, literally you.

What she's saying is, I had one boss who liked me, another boss who didn't.

And the big boss wanted me fired.

But my first boss didn't want me fired.

Well, guess who wins there?

Right.

The big boss.

Trump is the CEO in this situation, right?

Right.

He gets to fire you if he wants to fire you.

I mean, there's nothing here.

How did that go?

Here's Adam Schiff.

He goes on to say

later in the tweet: is a U.S.

president's absolute right to appoint ambassadors.

First of all,

Vash Ivanovich,

the Senate has a chance to confirm or deny an ambassador, do they not?

Yes, advise and consent.

But would you like to respond to the President's attack that everywhere you went turned bad?

Well, I.

It's amazing.

I mean, I don't have to do that.

How are we talking impeachment about this?

Seriously.

This is completely ridiculous.

This is

ridiculous.

They're trying to legitimately build the case that Donald Trump is mean.

That's what they're trying to do.

They made her feel bad.

And she feels bad.

And no wonder he should be impeached.

He made this woman feel bad.

Unbelievable.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

I mean, as frustrating as it is to listen to, you have to listen because then you realize how stupid this really is.

E-Skaming, jackpotting, key reinstallation attacks.

These are the things right now that cyber criminals are doing to separate you from from your money, your credibility, and your identity.

You work really hard for what you have, and you're responsible for your good name.

But somebody can come in and take your good name.

It's important to understand how cybercrime is affecting our lives because somebody's identity is stolen every two seconds.

Now, LifeLock is there to detect a wide range of identity threats and alert you if a threat is detected.

If something does go down, because nobody can catch everything and monitor all transactions.

They have a whole team there that goes to restore your credibility and your name.

Give them a call or visit their website now at 1-800Lifelock.

If you use the promo code Beck, you're going to save 30%

or more off of your first year now until December 8th.

1-800-Lifelock, 1-800-Lifelock, or Lifelock.com.

That's Lifelock.com.

Make sure you use the promo code Beck and save 30% or more.

If you don't know the background of all these players and this impeachment saga, you got to go to YouTube, Glenn Beck's page, watch all the specials, or subscribe at gb20off, blazetv.com.

We are watching a Soviet show trial.

This is absolutely incredible.

The U.S.

ambassador is testifying in a public hearing,

and the Democratic Council is

speaking now and asking questions.

Go ahead and go to it.

It's there now.

And in fact, when Vice President Biden acted to remove the former corrupt prosecutor in U.S., I want you to remember, as these questions are being asked,

the GOP has been told they are not allowed to talk to testimony or ask questions about the 2016 election or Joe Biden because they're discredited rumors.

And yet the Democrats have spent the last 10 minutes talking about him.

And in fact, if he

helped to remove a corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor general,

who was not prosecuting enough corruption, that would increase the chances that corrupt companies in Ukraine would be investigated.

Isn't that right?

One would think so.

And that could include Burisma, right?

Yes.

Now, at the time of this call, Vice President Biden was the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination for president

and President Trump's potential next opponent in the election.

She doesn't know because she doesn't know.

Is your understanding that President Trump's request to have Vice President Biden investigated was that part of official U.S.

policy as you knew it?

Well, I should say that I had, at the time of this phone call, I had already departed Ukraine two months prior to the UK.

Right, but you're familiar with it, it didn't change that much in two months, right?

It certainly would not have been the policy in May when I left.

And

were these two investigations part of the anti-corruption platform that you championed in Ukraine for three years?

No.

And these investigations, do they appear to you to be to benefit the President's personal and political interests rather than the national interest?

Well, they certainly could.

Now, just returning to the allegations in the Hill publication in March that were promoted by Mr.

Giuliani, the President's lawyer, were those two allegations similar to the two allegations that the president wanted President Zelensky to investigate?

Yes.

Again.

So ultimately, she wasn't there for any of those things.

In her opening statement, she said she couldn't speak about it.

She had to do the same thing.

Is that right?

Yes.

I yield back, Mr.

Chairman.

Mr.

Chairman, I have a parliamentary inquiry, please.

The general suspend.

Votes are fairly imminent.

We're going to take a brief recess.

I would ask everyone to remain seated to allow the witness to exit the room.

And we will resume after votes.

Mr.

Chairman, I have a parliamentary inquiry.

All right, so we are going to take a quick break and give you, tell you exactly what just happened.

It is, I think, stunning.

If this is what they have, this is stunning.

And I don't understand

how the Democrats expect not to go down the road in

cross-examination,

how they expect not to go down the road of the 2016 election.

She was asked directly, do you know of any rumors or had you heard that there was a collusion to throw the 2016 election towards Hillary?

She said, well, there were rumors, but, and then

the counsel said, but no,

no facts, leading, Your Honor, well, no, not that I know of.

How could you have been the ambassador in Ukraine when on the front page of the Ukrainian newspapers for a very long time was a trial of two people, one of which was the head of the anti-corruption bureau that she says was so clean.

That person that for that organization that she was touting as something that she was proud of doing, that person was on trial in Ukraine and was convicted of colluding with Hillary and the DNC to throw our election.

And a big part of that conviction, of course, was an audio tape.

that has them talking about doing correct

there is no way possible that a ambassador to that country who is touting this wonderful anti-corruption thing, there's no way that that person didn't know that the head of that anti-corruption was being tried in a court of law, a serious, serious courtroom proceeding that ended up

getting the conviction and then thrown out on the technicality that you can't put in jail a

parliamentary figure on this because there's no law.

There's no

what was it, Jason?

There was no punishment or there was there was there was

some technicality about that person being a

multiple technicalities and they were all ridiculous.

One was that parliament members couldn't convict each other.

Another one was that the statute of limitations had run out.

That's right.

It was all there was one more that was equally ridiculous, but they were all, you know, they were all just

technicality.

Yeah, none of them had to do with the truth of the matter.

Now, you have somebody in parliament being tried for

messing around in our elections, and one of the two people being tried-one was parliamentary, the other one was the head of the council that you were running and help running and protecting.

You didn't know

then, she is, she has Alzheimer's.

She should not be in

government in any capacity because this woman has a serious problem with

memory because there's no way other than Alzheimer's someone in her position wouldn't know that happened.

And every,

it's one thing to say, look, yes,

there was a conviction.

I don't believe it was accurate because I believe it was corrupt.

Now, there's no necessarily evidence of that, but at least you'd have

to be able to acknowledge that it occurred.

They are now on record saying, I, well, there were rumors, but I didn't.

There wasn't anything.

There was a tape.

There was an undercover tape that had them bragging about it.

And how can, you know, look, the reason they can say they didn't know anything about it is because most people in America don't know anything about it.

That's why she can see it.

We did that tape, what, four weeks ago, eight weeks ago?

We released that tape.

We were shocked when we found it.

We have yet to hear anyone in the mainstream media play this tape.

No one.

In fact, do we have it still?

And we would need it with the translation.

Look on TV to see if we still have it because

I'd like to play it because America's not hearing it.

This is the head of the Anti-Corruption Bureau.

All right, go ahead.

Here it is.

Did they, I'll translate, those Russians helped Donald Trump, your people?

I think they did.

They helped him too.

Well, we helped, not him, but Hillary.

I helped her.

Right.

Then her position tottered.

Yeah, this is how they write about it.

Hillary's humanitarian aid.

Okay, the Clinton Foundation.

Well, I'm about the commentaries.

At that time, they were not in Indiscernible.

No, no, there was.

Trump, his purely inner problem issue.

They dominate over the external matters.

While Hillary, she is, how shall I put it?

She belongs to the cohort of politicians that comprise the hegemony in the U.S., both in the U.S.

and the entire world.

And for us, sort of better.

For the Americans, what Trump is doing is better for them.

Well, we have lots of those American experts here now.

Well, there, you see why Hillary lost elections.

I was in charge of investigation of the black accounting records.

We made the Manafort data available to the general public.

So what?

Well, he was imprisoned.

Manafort was then the head of the Supreme Headquarter of Trump, right?

And then he was dismissed, including due to the black accounting.

After that, he was sentenced to 80 years.

But how did Trump...

How about Trump?

Did he not give a crap?

They have their system working there.

Everybody works somewhere.

And then they carried out the elections.

A week before the elections, the FBI reopened the investigation in respect to Hillary, so her ratings dropped.

Okay, so now here's the guy, the director of

the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, which this ambassador was talking about.

There he is on tape saying, I helped Hillary Clinton.

I worked with them to release the black accounting

to the press, and

that's why he got a prison sentence

and convicted of interfering because it was illegal to do.

The head of the anti-corruption illegally put this in front of the press.

He admits that he did it for helping Hillary.

And then he admits the only reason why it didn't work is because the FBI came out and said Hillary, just a few days before the election, Hillary was still under investigation.

He also says she's part of the, she's part of the politicians, that political group that that is the American hegemony that that really kind of tries to control the world.

So I guess she's better because we got a lot of those politicians over here and a lot of those American politicians.

This is what we just revealed on Wednesday show.

You may not have understood that two months ago, but if you watched Wednesday's special, you know exactly what he's talking about.

The corrupt politicians and the corrupt State Department that was telling these people exactly what to do.

I mean, this is not

something we're making up, right?

Like,

this is a story from U.S.

media.

Two Ukrainian officials meddled in the 2016 U.S.

presidential election by leaking a secret ledger showing $12.7 million in payments between Ukraine's pro-Russian president and Trump chairman Paul Manafort.

A Ukrainian court said Wednesday, Wednesday, this is back from 2018.

The district court ruled that the National Anti-Corruption Bureau director and legislator broke the law by revealing Manafort's name and signature appeared on the ledger.

The disclosure, quote, led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state.

I'm reading from the hard right-wing source of The Daily Beast.

Okay, this is not something that we're making up here.

All right, I got to take a quick break, and then I want to bring Jason into the conversation.

He is our head writer and chief researcher on all of this.

I can't wait to hear what because

blood is starting to run down.

You know, it's starting to shoot out of your eyes.

We'll get to Jason and the things that you must know.

I want you to know, because you listen to this program,

it kind of goes on to your shoulders because you're the only ones that know all of this.

You're the only ones, if you don't watch the TV show and didn't see these specials, which by the way, please join us, Blaze TV, join us, please become a member.

It helps us pay for all of this stuff.

You get 20% off.

Use the promo code GB20OF, Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

Anyway,

you have a responsibility to tell all of your other friends and use the evidence.

If you go to Glennbeck.com, all of the evidence is there.

All of the papers, all of the transcripts, that tape, everything

is there.

Just go and look for the big giant chalkboard.

You can click on all of the chalkboard and it gives you all of the evidence to make this case with your friends.

And you have to do it because nobody else is.

The media won't.

You know this and you understand what's happening right now because you listen to this program.

And I thank you so much.

But please don't forget, your role now is to get this out with your friends.

All right.

American financing say you want to buy a house sounds like a good on a good idea on paper but then you're crunching the numbers and you're not really sure you need some good advice and you need some advice from people who are not trying to jam you into a loan so go to american financing.net or you can call them they're waiting for your call at 800-906-2440 and talk to them and say look this is what i'd like to do

this is how much i have you know in debt here's what i have for a down payment If you don't have a lot for a down payment, it's not going to spook them.

You just tell them, this is what I have.

What can we do?

They're going to customize a loan for you, but only if it's the responsible thing.

These people

weathered the 2008 storm because they don't do that to people.

They don't jam people into loans.

AmericanFinancing.net.

They are not getting kickbacks from the bank.

They are salaried employees.

So, AmericanFinancing.net, go there now, 800-906-2440.

American Financing dot net.

American Financing Corporation, NMLS 1-82334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

This is the Glenbeck program.

Welcome to the Glenbeck program.

It's Friday.

We're going to need a couple of days to recover from the hearing that

we just heard.

People are going, everybody is hardening their positions.

This is not changing anyone's heart because I don't think people see this as fair.

At least half the country doesn't see this as fair.

You know, one of the main things that they really started with was: well, she's the president really hurt her reputation, and how is she supposed to do her job overseas if she doesn't have a reputation and a good reputation?

Well, what about Donald Trump?

The same thing can be said about what the media has done, what the left has done to Donald Trump.

So, why are we talking about it for the little fish if it doesn't apply to the big fish?

Jason is with us.

He is our head writer.

He has been the lead guy on assembling all the evidence on

all of our

specials.

Give me one minute.

At the top of the hour, we're going to really go down your list.

Give me the big thing that stood out to you.

Well, the thing that just kind of go on to what you guys were just talking about with there being no evidence, it was based on a rumor.

They're focusing on the crazy right there, and that was the crowd strike stuff.

That is crazy.

But this is not a secret over in Ukraine.

They've already convicted in court.

So that's not a rumor.

It was a conviction in court that these people meddled.

But it goes goes much, much deeper than that.

And you really need to watch on Tuesday, I believe, next week, because we're going to show you how deep this does go and why they're diverting.

This involves the FBI.

The FBI was in bed with the Anti-Corruption Bureau from the very beginning.

We've already showed you that, but they also insigned an actual agent to work inside Ukraine.

We're going to name that person, show you who they are, what they were working for, and who they went to work with after they retired from the FBI.

This goes much, much deeper, and the U.S.

Embassy was right there in bed with them right from the beginning.

It's no wonder why they're trying to hide this.

Back with more in just a second.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

Hey, before we get to the podcast, I want to talk to you about the 2 million burglaries that are reported every year.

And what's crazy is that only one in five homes have security.

I mean, burglaries are happening happening all the time.

And I think the reason why people don't have a security system in their home is because the security company sucks.

You've got people coming into your house.

They're going to drill holes in your wall.

Hello, Mr.

1972.

That's why Simply Safe is just tearing this business apart.

It is growing so incredibly fast, and it is the best in industry.

There's no contract, no hidden fees, no fine print, no drilling holes or stringing wires.

Around-the-clock monitoring is $15 a month and you can cancel any time.

When other home security systems are triggered, police assume it's a false alarm and it goes to the bottom of the list.

But with using SimplySafe and their video verification technology, they can visually confirm that the break-in is happening and that gets the police there from 45 minutes instead to seven minutes.

SimplySafe.

They have a huge deal going on right now at simplysafe.com slash Glenn.

You'll get a free HD security camera when you order.

It's $100 value, and you'll get the 24-7 monitoring and video evidence if somebody's trying to get into your house.

So get your free HD security camera at simplysafe.com/slash Glenn.

That's simply safe.com slash Glenn.

Sorry, I'm trying to do a little bit of everything right now.

I need you to send me right now the information on how the thing was overturned, that court case was overturned.

I need to get that to somebody in Washington, like right now.

All right.

Do you know what I'm saying, Jason?

All right.

It's realestate agentsitrust.com.

Realestateagents I trust.com.

They are going to help you sell your house, sell your house fast and for the most amount of money.

If you are looking to sell your house, now is not a bad time.

The best time to sell your house, actually, is in January.

The best time to buy a house is in November.

So don't listen to people.

Well, they don't buy houses.

Yeah, people do buy houses right now.

You need a great agent who really, truly knows how times have changed.

You know, not somebody who's just using algorithms either, but they have a great system and a great marketing campaign for you.

That's RealEstateAgents I Trust.com.

We'll find the best agent in your area to help you buy or sell your next home.

It's RealEstateAgents ITrust.com.

Go there now, RealEstateAgents agentsitrust.com.

The fusion

of entertainment and enlightenment.

Welcome to the program.

We are going to lay out

the

questions that need to be asked by the Democrats when they go into their

cross-examination.

When the Republicans are in their cross-examination here in the next few minutes, they have critical questions that they need to ask because she perjured herself, I believe, at least a couple of times.

And you're going to hear those questions.

We're going to present them next.

One minute.

This is the Glenbeck program.

Okay, our sponsor this half hour is a gold line.

Look, the world is on fire.

It is absolutely crazy.

If you listen to the New York Times, I listen to it so you don't have to.

I listen every day to the New York Times, The Daily.

Jason,

you helped do all the investigation for the special we did on Wednesday.

You'll never guess

what the daily was today.

It was 30 minutes from the New York Times on the spontaneous

indigenous popular uprisings.

Uprising in Chile.

Oh, my God.

And how they were just demanding justice.

And this is spontaneous, and it's happening all over the world.

And it's just the people are having enough.

No,

this is part of what I'm begging the Republicans to bring up.

This is why the State Department cannot allow the whistleblower to be heard.

Why they have to do what they're doing right now and lie all around.

Because they are protecting something called civil society 2.0.

If you want to know what the deep state really is, watch the special.

And then join us in January because we're doing another special in January.

It's here, man.

It's here.

They're doing it internally in the United States.

And it's going to end up eventually exactly the same way it's ending up everywhere else, including Ukraine.

You know, it wasn't a spontaneous

indigenous

rise to revolution in Ukraine.

We trained those people.

We showed you pictures Wednesday of the people from the State Department down handing out cookies

during those riots.

Anyway, the only reason why I bring this up is because

your dollar

is going to become worth less because the Fed has announced they are going to dump buckets of money back into the system.

They're going to be gassing this thing up even more, printing and digitizing even more money.

And it would work for the short term,

but

it's not going to work long term.

So good luck with that.

I'm sorry, I'm just really frustrated because I know these people, I wish I could get on the phone with these people who are on the committee right now.

But I'm trying to get some information.

There's some people who are trying to ask questions in this committee.

And I just don't know who's, I don't even know who in Washington, who even gets this.

Who really understands this?

Who is running the GOP

defense?

And I think it should be offense on this.

It's insanity.

Anyway,

because of that,

please diversify what you have.

Please, somebody has to have

something.

So we don't all fall into

the clutches of a George Soros

constitution.

Goldline.

Go to goldline.com right now.

Call the people at Goldline.

They're waiting for your call.

If you don't think you can afford gold, you're mistaken.

Ask them about the accumulation thing that they have.

I asked them to put this together just for you, the accumulation special that they're running.

Also, they're running a special on

if you put your money into a self-directed IRA,

you can do that as well.

They'll help you, and and you're going to save a lot of money right now.

Goldline, call 1-866-Goldline, 1-866-Goldline or Goldline.com.

All right, Jason, tell me the things that

you think they have to do right now.

I tell you what, I really do wish they had phoned a friend like who wants to be a millionaire because we would be calling in nonstop.

I've been rapid-fire tweeting Jim Jordan just in the hopes that someone from his staff sees some of this stuff.

But right from the get-go, the opening statement was exactly what we were talking about in our special the other day.

And that was pretty much, you know, in a nutshell, in summation, we know better than you do.

The president does not know what we know.

We're going to do what we want, regardless.

So you can just, you know, shove it, basically.

But right from the top, right after the opening statement, that, you know, there was the claims that Shoken was corrupt.

He asked her very specifically, is that the case?

And again, she said she wouldn't comment on things she didn't know.

But she right from the get-go commented on whether Shokin was corrupt and was like, yeah, I believe so.

Right.

That's what she said.

I believe so.

Based on what?

Exactly.

They have never, ever made a charge against this guy.

No one has.

They say he's corrupt, but no one has ever made a charge.

They've never done an investigation.

He's never, I mean, how do you go to jail with, I shouldn't say this with Soros around.

How do you go to jail without an investigation?

He still doesn't know why he's being called corrupt.

And we've talked to members of his staff that have court that have, you you know problems

yeah and had problems with it didn't like his policies yeah left his employees because they didn't agree with what he was focused on but when they said he was corrupt they were like he wasn't corrupt look i not i have nothing to do with this guy i i don't i have no love lost here but he wasn't corrupt He wasn't corrupt.

So questions for, I think Jim Jordan, the Republican, should be doing is, okay, you say he was corrupt.

Tell us why he's corrupt.

Tell us the specific charges.

Oh, were none officially brought up?

Then show us the evidence that you gathered to come to having a foreign

leader fired from his job.

Right, that's a big deal.

And replaced by a guy that

when years later, when Biden said, and we had him replaced, was he was bragging

with a good guy, what's changed since then?

You want to talk about a smeared campaign?

Tell me the evidence on what Shoken did to get fired and how the guy who, Joe Biden, years later, when he's bragging about it,

how that guy is suddenly corrupt, like to see the evidence, like to see the charges, like to see anything that anyone filed.

And why doesn't that seem like that should corroborate the person that the information that you got fired when the second prosecutor, one of your guys that you signed off on, basically said the same exact things?

When they corroborate each other, doesn't that put more, you know, a little bit more evidence that what they're saying is both corrupt?

They're both corrupt and shouldn't be listened to.

That's so ridiculous.

And if they, but it wouldn't be if you had made the case.

They just say he's corrupt.

No one will make the case.

There's never been any charges.

There's nothing, nothing, nothing.

You know, it's like the

part that drove me nuts is when she was saying

that list,

you know,

Yovanovich, he said, or not Yovanovich,

Lutsenko, the

prosecutor general that came in to the embassy, and she apparently said, here's a list of people you can't, I don't want you touching George Soros or these NGOs.

And

she says he retracted that.

He said that didn't happen.

No, that's not what he said.

What he said, it was an answer to a very specific question.

So she handed you a list and he said, no.

I said, oh, you're giving me a list.

And I got a piece of paper out.

And she said, no, no, you misunderstand.

He said, no, I don't misunderstand.

I know exactly what you're saying.

Now, a first meeting with a brand new U.S.

ambassador.

You as the prosecutor general, who you know, those people just got the last guy fired, you're going to go in and just kick up dirt with this nice, sweet lady.

You're just going to go and say, no, I don't misunderstand I know exactly what you're saying I'm used to this getting this from the politicians here but it's it's great now to see that I'm also getting it from the U.S.

Embassy he was calling her and the embassy and the United States of America more corrupt than his country

Explain that.

That was the second big thing I had put down, and

my head almost exploded with myself because we have directly debunked this whole whole thing.

That entire thing.

And granted, this meeting happened within days of him officially being sworn into that position.

So this is one of the good guys.

This is the guy you just signed off on.

Now claiming that he's, well, whoa, what are you trying to do to me?

Now he's seeing what they did to Shokin.

I'm going to make this offer to the Republicans, and I'm going to call them.

I, on my own dime, will send Jason and the boxes of evidence that we have so you can have him sitting right underneath the desk there.

Nobody will see him, and it'll be like, hey, ask her about this one.

I mean, has no one done their job?

If they don't ask these questions,

I'm telling you, these people should be impeached for incompetence.

Jason, just a warning, getting under desks in Washington, not always.

That was so blatant because he asked her.

It was so leading.

He was, and that was redacted, right?

He redacted that do not prosecute uh claim and she straight up said yes now we've we've traced that you can go back to the special I think we're actually cutting something I just talked to one of our producers now to show you the back and forth on that but that originated in a Bloomberg article it originated from there it then got copied in every single fact check saying that it was recanted now we traced it all the way back we found the actual interview where they claimed that shows that he recanted and just like you described he did he he didn't recant on it he said she didn't hand me a physical piece of paper she

who I could or could not prosecute, and I wrote those names down.

I turned the paper around and put it in her face.

And that's when he said, This is what we got under the Russian-controlled government.

Now we're getting it from the United States Embassy.

That's their big recant.

Now, this Jim Jordan should be asking that right off the top.

Right off the top.

Right off the top.

And the other, the other that right off the top is he should say, Excuse me,

you have a serious,

serious

question about your abilities.

If you tell me that you don't know

that there were two people, one of which was the head of the Anti-Corruption Bureau, that you keep touting as this clean operation, that you keep saying is the guardian against corruption.

You can't tell me that the ambassador of the Ukraine did not know that there was a trial

and a

hidden recording

of that guy who run that bureau admitting to being the guy who snuck the information about Manafort to Hillary Clinton and the Democrats and he was convicted and so was someone else you you honestly didn't know that

come on it was plastered

There's no way, Jason.

There's no way.

No way, because it was plastered all over Ukrainian press.

It's not plastered in our press.

It's nowhere here.

They think they can get away with it because no one...

Look, if the New York Times didn't publish it, it didn't happen.

Really?

Because there were other papers and there were other institutions that did publish that and all of them Ukrainian.

And yes, you do have to take the extra step and have it translated.

We had to have it translated ourselves.

We found it on the front page of the Ukrainian papers.

But we had to have it all translated because no one in the U.S.

had done that.

How is that possible?

And how is it possible for this woman to say that, well, I know, I've heard rumors of that, but nothing, no facts,

nothing tangible.

Really?

Because Ukraine convicted the guy you keep touting as running the great anti-corruption league.

They convicted him.

Just those two things.

It's done.

Just those two things.

And you can subpoena most of that information.

Like for the do not prosecute list, we know for a fact that Lutsenko claimed that there was multiple U.S.

State Department people in the room.

There was multiple Ukrainian prosecutors and assistants in the room.

You can subpoena them all.

Have the people come over from Ukraine.

Have the U.S.

diplomats.

They're not like every, I don't think every single U.S.

diplomat is going to be in agreement with what Yovanovich is saying here.

No, but you know what?

Here's the thing.

Here's the thing.

If you are asking me to believe

that this person

didn't mean this,

didn't mean to give you a quid pro quo, okay?

If you're asking me, to to believe her when she says I didn't give him any list.

Well, I've got one hurdle.

The guy who was the first time meeting the new ambassador, first time.

And these are the people that just got his boss removed.

He goes in and he just flies off the handle and says, No, I'm used to this.

I'm used to this.

You know, we used to get the cram downs all the time, but I didn't expect it from America.

Really?

He said that?

And

your response was, no, you misunderstand.

And he says, no, I didn't misunderstand.

And then after, when asked about it again later to make sure it was all clear in the press, he said, no, she didn't give me a list.

She verbally gave me that list.

And I wrote it down.

If you're asking me to believe her, I'm having a hard time because of all of the other evidence.

But if I'm forced to believe that,

wait,

how come

I have to believe the opposite of Donald Trump?

When the president of Ukraine, when the people who they were talking to didn't say, they all said, I didn't think that was going on.

I didn't think that's what was going on.

It was only the State Department that felt that that was going on.

How is that?

Why do I I have to believe the State Department both times, but for the opposite outcome?

Doesn't make any sense.

There is no logic and no reason behind this.

The

Republicans are going to pick this up soon.

Those are the questions that they should stand on.

We'll give you more here in just a second.

First, our sponsor this half hour is My Pillow.

I want to tell you about a great pillow, great sheets, great towels.

I want you to go to mypillow.com.

I don't want to sell you on this.

I just want you to just, I just, you know, they have a, what is it, a 30-day or 60-day, 60-day money-back guarantee.

So try their sheets.

Their sheets are great.

Their pillow is great.

The towels are really great.

Just try them.

If you don't like them, send them back.

It's no big deal.

60-day money-back guarantee.

You got to love them.

I have to tell you, I love them.

I think they're really, really good.

It's good quality.

The sheets are so soft.

And they're a fraction of what you would pay for really good sheets.

And they're just as soft as any really good sheet I've ever slept on.

Mypillow.com.

Mypillow.com.

Click on the new radio listener specials.

Try out their new towels.

There's what is 30% off their six-piece piece towel set.

You know, if you're anything like my mother, if people are coming for the holidays, you have to have set out the nice towels.

Well, these are the nice towels, and you can get them now 30% off.

Just click on Radio Listener Specials at mypillow.com, enter the promo code Beck, and you're going to get 30% off and great savings all the way through mypillow.com promo code Beck

and Second Station ID.

I'm sorry, but I need my

blood pressure to go down here for a few seconds.

Can we talk about a couple of fun things for a second?

Ford versus Ferrari is out this weekend.

Yeah, that looks good.

Oh, that looks so good.

So good.

Is the Mr.

Rogers thing out this weekend or not?

No, the red carpet, I think, is next Wednesday.

That looks really good, too.

That looks really good.

Really good.

We're getting to that time of year.

You're not a car guy, are you?

Are you a real good big car guy?

Or blow your car away?

Oh, you want to try it?

I would love to.

Let's do it.

Oh, it's on.

Okay.

Where do you want to?

We have to do it someplace.

Anywhere anytime.

It's safe and legal.

Where?

Anywhere, anytime.

I don't even need it to be safe and legal.

You're the one that said that.

I'll go unsafe and illegal.

I'm all over it.

Really?

Yes.

Okay.

All right.

I want to do that.

Okay.

I want to do that.

All right.

We have to find some drag racing strip or something.

It has to be illegal.

Yeah, there's, I mean, we have Texas Motor Speedway very close.

I'd be more than happy to

show you.

So you want to do a lap on that or do you want to

drag racing?

They also have a lot of straightaways we could use.

I'm fine with this.

I like this.

I am absolutely, totally cool with that.

Good promotion.

I'll show you the strength of American engineering.

Oh, really?

As opposed to a little...

Where's it come from?

I don't even know.

Is it Ukrainian?

It's probably corrupt.

No, it's not.

It's not.

We'll see how that goes.

Yeah, I'll do it.

All right.

You find that...

I always shake on this.

I always shake on this.

Do you want to do this, though?

Do you want to?

Do you want to reconsider?

You've got one more minute before we go to commercial.

I'll give you that time to reconsider if you'd like.

I don't think I need to reconsider.

I know you don't think you should.

I'm giving you an opportunity to reconsider.

You're saying I should.

You're saying I should.

I ain't saying you should reconsider.

Wait a minute.

Is this the competitor in you, or is this for some reason the producer in you?

It's the person in me who knows how to read numbers off of performance guidelines.

I'll race you.

All right.

I'll race you.

Because I think my big, huge, heavy sedan.

Just run me off the board.

I don't know if it will.

It will at least be close.

So, what do I get if I win?

The satisfaction of winning.

I already have that.

Oh, no.

My whole life is just a non-stop collection of the satisfaction of winning.

No, you don't.

I'm an Eagles fan.

I think you know I don't.

You'll beat me 0 to 60.

You will beat me 0 to 60.

Yes, I will.

Yes.

But you won't beat me in a long strip.

Yes, I will.

No, you won't.

Yes.

Pat is going to live stream this.

Pat isn't a live stream this.

Pat, who are you betting on?

I'm betting on the stew car.

Thank you.

He's betting on the stupar is what Pat just said.

Have you ever driven my car?

No.

But

he may have seen my car.

American engineering as opposed to British.

Yeah.

I'm both.

British engineering over.

All right.

All right.

And Pat may have seen the performance of my car in a situation that was unsafe and illegal.

So, yeah.

He's got a little more information.

Have you seen mine unsafe and unlegal?

No.

No, we've never raced.

At 60 miles an hour.

At 60 miles an hour, I can step on it and not even floor it, and it blows past people like they're standing still.

All right, we'll do it.

We'll do it.

I don't even.

How did this even happen?

You're listening to Glenn Back.

125 and blowing people.

Yeah, there's rumors of 153 and blowing past people.

Anyway, anyway, anyway, these are all nasty rumors.

What am I supposed to talk about?

X-Chair.

Okay, look, here's what I'm going to tell you.

If I wasn't telling you the truth about X-Chair, do you think my wife would have emailed me yesterday and said, that's what I want for Christmas?

It's $100 off.

That's not helpful, honey.

That's not helpful.

First of all, I don't feel like I actually get credit for like sending her flowers because we have a flower client.

Even though I pay for them, I just feel like she just thinks like, ah, I just call them up.

No, that doesn't work that way.

So, anyway, she sat in my chair before.

She sat in my desk in my office.

She loves the X-Chair.

It's everything I say it is, and it's a 30-day money-back guarantee.

And it's $100 off, as she told me last night.

Yes, honey, I did get your email.

Last night, she's laying her head down on the pillow.

Did you get my email?

You know, it's $100 off.

I know.

I read the commercials.

8444XCHAR, 1-844-4XCHAR or X-Chairbeck.com.

And go to BlazeTV.com.

Use the promo code GB20Off.

You can save 20 bucks off for I think a day or two more.

Access the special now.

All right.

Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.

It's Friday.

I'm glad you're here.

Thank you so much for listening.

I'm just talking to the future loser of

the Beck 500, Steve Regier, who's got some information now on the impeachment.

Well, the coverage of the impeachment.

Yes.

I thought you might be interested to see this.

This happened on, I think it was Fox Business, where a guest brought up the name George Soros in regards to the impeachment hearings and how he had.

Oh, is this the guy who's now Soros is saying he has to be fired?

Yeah.

And so is the ADL.

And all of these,

the Anti-Defamation League is saying that it's an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.

Seemingly, whenever you bring up his name,

I think that's the standard.

If you say George Soros,

it's an automatic anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.

And I don't know how.

He's a person.

So

it's not like you're saying all, I don't, it's like the left wants to set this standard that any criticism of one of the largest Democratic funders in the nation is automatically anti-Semitic.

Now, I can see how that benefits Democrats, obviously.

You're basically saying, well, our guy can't be criticized, which is a fantastic place to be.

Because you just sit there, it's like saying, well, you can't ever investigate Joe Biden and his dealings in Ukraine with his family because he's your political opponent.

Well, that just gives immunity to everyone's political opponents.

Correct.

You can't have a standard like that.

No.

It has to be taken on the merits.

And so you can say you don't like the Biden stuff.

You can make arguments for that, but you can't say it's off limits to investigate a political opponent with the apparatus of the United States

Department of Justice or whatever other department you're talking about.

So here, We have a situation where a guy comes on, and I don't know who the guest was.

I don't know what his motivations were or whether he's well-versed in these particular things, but basically he's being

the Soros

organization has written to Fox News to say ban him.

Now, if Fox News listens to the Soros companies and organizations, I don't know.

Now,

I don't know much about this guy.

I don't have his name.

Do we have the audio of it?

I don't think we do.

But I don't know.

So I don't, you know, maybe they'll they'll come up with some other thing he's done that's terrible.

I don't know.

But what he said on the air was basically his name.

He said he's, you know, look, George Soros has, he has created organizations that have connections throughout the FBI and the.

Look, he is, George Soros and his connections, I think, banned in what, Hungary?

Is it Hungary?

They just, one of those, one of those Eastern bloc countries has just banned him, and for good reason.

He and the State Department, as we showed you in our last special, he and the State Department went in and flipped Macedonia.

It was a great country.

Flipped it, set it on fire.

He's doing this country after country.

It's what he does.

It's a little game to him, in his own words.

That's kind of fun.

It's just fascinating to me that they go down these roads.

Now, who knows if...

This will be responded to by Fox.

But also, it's not just the Soros organization, who you could see writing a letter to anybody to ask for people to be banned that are critical of their guy.

But we're not supposed to believe that the ambassador,

the ambassador with the State Department, who was partnered with George Soros, the State Department that is paying money, your money, to these George Soros anti-corruption bureaus in Ukraine, we're supposed to believe that the ambassador didn't say,

hey,

you can't do this to George Soros.

It's all plausible that George Soros calls Fox and says, you have to ban him.

How dare him say anything bad about George Soros on television as a commentator?

But George Soros doesn't send his State Department minions out to tell the prosecutor general in Ukraine, lay off a George Soros?

That makes no sense.

Look,

I don't understand, honestly, all of the things that have gone on with every detail of anti-Semitism.

It's not something I'm particularly interested in.

I don't want to learn all the crazy things anti-Semites say.

So I don't need to go down every one of these roads.

Maybe I'm missing something here, and it's possible.

With this guy?

Yeah, this is what they said.

Now, again, Fox Business has come out and condemned the rhetoric by the guest on Lou Dobbs tonight.

So

Fox has taken a stand here and said that it was wrong.

Here's what he said.

This is, and of course, the Washington Post says, you know, this this guest

goes on an anti-Semitic rant.

This is what they say.

A lot of these folks have affiliates or are getting money from Soros Occupied State Department, and that is a great concern.

We need to start cutting money, start cutting money there.

Yes.

Anything else?

That's the problematic part of it, apparently.

Now,

that's the problematic part?

I guess Soros Occupied?

Like, I mean,

look, we have all of the documents that, and we laid this out the other day, that Soros is absolutely, as he said on television multiple times, very interested in overturning situations in nations he feels are wrong and unfair.

We have

documents that show that U.S.

AID money was going to George Soros.

We have those documents.

We have his own document in his plan that went to the State Department on how to overthrow the government of Ukraine.

And they were co-funding that.

Okay.

All right.

So

here's a longer context.

Now, sorry, it took me a minute to find that.

So the one I just read

was another example they were giving.

Here's what Dijanova is his name.

Do you know him?

I don't know.

No, I think I've heard his name.

We may know of him.

I don't know.

This is what he said.

And I'm reading it.

Well, there's no doubt that George Soros controls a very large part of the the career foreign service at the United States State Department.

He also controls the activities of FBI agents overseas who work for NGOs, work with NGOs.

This was very evident in Ukraine.

Kent was part of that.

He was a very big protector of Soros.

The truth is, George Soros had a daily opportunity to tell the State Department, through Victoria Nunland, what to do in Ukraine, and he ran it, and so Soros ran it.

He corrupted FBI officials.

He corrupted foreign service advisors.

And the bottom line is this: George Soros wants to run Ukraine, and he's doing everything he can, using every lever of the United States government to make that happen for business interests.

All true.

Not for good government.

Is this the guy who wrote Shadow Party?

I don't know that.

Look it up real quick.

Like, you can look at that and say, I don't agree with it.

You can say there's no, you, I mean, I know this isn't true, but you can say there's no evidence that George Soros is even interested in these things.

But how is that anti-Semitic?

Because he's Jewish?

Because one, like, I don't understand.

He's just, it's just a criticism of a very rich man.

And this is, by the way, the entire platform of the Democratic Party, which is criticizing very rich people trying to influence national events.

It's their whole strategy.

And we have evidence of all of that.

Wait until you see what we dug up yesterday.

And it'll be on Tuesday show.

I'm going to be out of town on Monday.

I will be here Monday, and it's a show you do not want to miss.

But I'm going on location for something, and I'll tell you about it on Monday.

But

don't miss this show on Monday.

On Tuesday, when I get back, I'll show you, I'll prove to you some of the things that he just said with the names and positions.

It's unbelievable, it'll blow your mind.

Stu, find out if he is the author of that.

Because if he is,

how is this guy anti-Semitic?

Just tell me.

I've got something great if it's who I think it is.

And what was the book again?

The Shadow Party.

Let's see.

The Shadow Party.

His name sounds familiar.

All right.

Let's see.

Shadow Party is written by.

No, Shadow Party is written by David Horowitz.

And Richard Poe.

Oh, it's Richard Poe.

Okay.

I thought it was this guy.

Maybe I don't know this guy.

Yeah, I wasn't familiar with him.

But the point, though, is like...

I mean, David Horowitz has done a lot of this legwork.

He's Jewish.

Yeah.

I mean, how is it anti-Semitic?

First of all, how is it anti-Semitic, period?

Right.

You're not saying this about all Jews.

You're saying this about George Soros.

And it's provably true.

And you set up this bizarre standard.

And I mean this honestly, as someone who wants to look at these things in an honest way, and

they don't.

I did that.

What do you mean by that?

You set up this bizarre standard, which every single person, a Republican or conservative, wants to criticize, you have to, like, look up to see if they're Jewish first.

Like, you have to, like, oh, wait a minute, before we release criticism of this person, we better check to make sure if they're Jewish or if they're, uh, if they, if they went through some, you know, tragedy in their life or if they were, you know, abused as a child, because you have to, like, know

the complete non-sequiturs they're going to hit you with afterward.

Here's the thing.

George Soros' number one man came to my number one man or number two guy at the time, number one on television, and and threatened us, what 11 years ago and i didn't understand it until ukraine broke

he said you tell your employee what what your employer is doing is hurting mr soros and it's going to stop no it's not going to stop mr beck has a right to voice his opinion about your boss

Well, it's going to stop.

You don't understand.

It's hurting Mr.

Soros.

You don't understand.

Freedom of speech, freedom of the press.

If he said something incorrect, we will correct that, but you got to give us the details on what's incorrect.

That's when he said, you tell your boss, the ship has already been built and sailed, and you're either on that ship or you're not.

When my guy said back to him, I can tell you right now, I don't need to tell that to Mr.

Beck, Mr.

Beck will say, he doesn't want to be anywhere near your ship.

Now that's what happened 11 years ago.

And you want to know what ship had been built and what has already set sail?

Then watch Wednesday's special.

I didn't even realize it until we were deep into it.

That's what he meant.

And it has nothing to do.

I won the Defender of Israel Award.

The presentation

was given to me by Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel.

I'm anti-Semitic?

No, I'm not afraid of you, Mr.

Soros.

And more people

need to stand up.

All these Democrats who, as Stu just said, oh, these rich people that control, George Soros, and our State Department have formed a hydra.

And they're not alone.

And they are setting the world on fire.

The New York Times, you people are so blind.

Today, they did this whole story about how these civil society groups have just stood up spontaneously and they set Chile on fire.

No, no, it was the State Department and George Soros.

Look it up.

Go to Glenbeck.com and just look up the Hydra show

because all of the evidence is there.

George Soros, a written memo that was leaked, a written memo to the State Department from George Soros himself, not his organization, from him.

It's anti-Semitic to say this is what the man said he's doing and how he's doing it.

Insanity.

Stop with this.

Stop before it's too late and people start to die.

You can watch the special for free.

If you want to share it with a friend, it's at YouTube.

I beg you to watch it because somebody has to defend it.

Somebody has to know the truth.

This is the only show that I'm aware of that is doing this research on a daily basis and bringing it to you.

Now it's your job not to get tied up into conspiracy theories,

not to be involved in any of that.

Just be involved in the truth with the actual documents and stand for that no matter what anybody says.

But we need you by our side.

And if you can afford it, we would ask that you would join us so we can continue to do this.

We've been under attack before and we're going to be under attack even bigger this year.

This coming year is going to be a tough, tough year

because we know who the enemy is and we also know the answer and I think that's going to cause more trouble.

Listen Monday, you'll get a drift of where I'm going.

But I think that's going to cause even more trouble.

Join us at theblazetv.com.

Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

Use promo code GB20OF and you'll save 20%.

I think today is probably the last day for that.

So please join us.

Become a member of the team.

We need you.

Jury has just found Roger Stone guilty on counts one through five.

We'll give you more on that coming up in just a second.

Car Shield.

So you're sitting at a stoplight, minding your own business, when suddenly a cold chill goes down your spine, terror sinks in as you realize you've forgotten something terribly important.

There was something absolutely crucial about today.

It's your wife's birthday, anniversary?

Nah.

Your stomach does that slow roll as you realize it's much, much worse.

Today's the day your warranty on your car expires and your hands begin to shake.

And sure enough, as you look between them and the dashboard,

boop, the check engine light comes on.

That's the way of the world.

But you can make that pain go away.

The process of fixing your car for a covered repair is amazingly simple with Car Shield.

Car Shield provides 24/7 roadside assistance and rental car while yours is being fixed either at your favorite mechanic or at the

dealership.

Get covered by the ultimate and extended vehicle protection.

Call 800 CAR6000, 800-CAR60000 or CarShield.com.

Make sure you use the promo code BeckcarShield.com or 1-800-CAR60000.

This is the Glenbeck program.

Lord, we would ask that you would watch over our president and and our country, our democracy and our people, and please hear the cries of people

who are saying, forgive us.

We have gone astray.

We need

a much higher power, and we need to admit that we are powerless over this situation that we have gotten ourselves into,

and that we need to humble ourselves

and

look back to to the source of our success in the first place.

Join me on Monday, a show you don't want to miss.

Monday on location.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.