Schiff’s ‘Made for TV’ Impeachment Hearings Have Begun! | Guest: Sara Gonzales| 11/13/19
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Listen and follow along
Transcript
Definitely the big show today.
Definitely the big show today.
Definitely the big show.
Oh, we have.
Oh, I'm so excited.
We have the actual impeachment hearing.
Yeah.
So, this is like the table read, getting ready for the big show in the Senate.
You know, they wrote it in secret.
Now they know the script, and so they're going to do the table read in front of the people today.
And I'm so excited about it.
I'm very, very excited.
That begins in about an hour from now.
And tonight at eight o'clock, Facebook, YouTube, our big impeachment special.
Biggest show of the century?
Is it possible?
I think so.
That might be an oversell, but I'm willing to go there.
Yeah.
No, you have to oversell things.
Do you?
That's the way it works.
Jesus comes back in the middle of our special today.
You won't believe what he has to say.
It is our impeachment special.
We'll tell you more about it coming up in just a second.
The fusion
of entertainment and enlightenment.
Hey, welcome to it.
It's the big show today.
Oh, this is
double the big show because it's our big show and it's the Democrats' big show.
It's impeachment.
Oh, the table read is going to happen in about an hour from now.
Now, they've already written the script, they've gotten all of the actors, they've gotten everybody that they need,
and
they've already had everybody vomit in private for a while.
So now they've just taken the best parts and they're getting a table read together for the American people to see: do you want to see more of this play?
Would you like to see this show in the Senate?
And the reason why it should go to the Senate, all coming up, oh, including genderless ginger men, ginger people.
America has gone insane, and we're here to cash in on it.
This is the Glenbag program.
You know, when you spend your money, there's lots of, you know, there's a few things that you might expect.
First, you expect to get a fair deal in America.
An unfair deal means I'll go down to the road and just buy somebody else's stuff.
Second, you expect a really good product for the money.
Fair enough in a free market, right?
That's the way it works.
Third thing you might expect isn't something quite so obvious as the first two.
You could expect that the people you're handing your money to aren't also going to turn around and give it to some causes that you don't believe in.
Patriot Mobile.
Let me give you one on Patriot Mobile.
Where is it?
One of the guys that works for me
just got
a really interesting thing from, shoot, where is it?
From Bernie Sanders.
And it was like, hey, you want to vote for Bernie?
This is great.
You can vote for Bernie.
You could donate to Bernie.
And
it was a text message.
And he deleted it.
And it came back.
And he said, please unsubscribe.
And it was a real person.
No, no, no.
Who are you going to vote for?
The only person he knows of that could have given out his text message address is the phone company.
Are they doing that?
I don't know.
Probably.
I mean, they're doing all kinds of stuff for the left, including financing Planned Parenthood.
Do you want that when you're on your phone and you're paying your bill?
Do you want some of your money to go to Planned Parenthood and to the socialist programs?
Because that's what's happening if you're with a big phone company.
That's why you have a choice, Patriot Mobile.
You know, fair deal, good price, good service.
And the third thing, they're not slapping you in the face.
They're not working against you.
Patriot Mobile, switch now.
PatriotMobile.com/slash Beck.
Switch now.
PatriotMobile.com/slash Beck.
Stu,
before we start in on the impeachment, I just have to, have you ever been offended by gingerbread men?
Offended by gingerbread men.
Yes.
I have not.
You you have not because they want gingerbread men now to be gender neutral and so I've had to I don't mean to be crass here but
I've had to cut all of the Christmas balls off of the gingerbread oh no yeah because they're very very offensive it's okay if they if they identify that way though well I ask each of them as they come out of the oven do you want the Christmas balls or not?
And some of them are like, I'm fine with that.
Others are like,
I am an octopus.
And you're like, you're not an octopus.
You're a gingerbread man.
Don't call me that.
I want to be called an octopus.
And so we now have to stop using the name a gingerbread man.
This actually might help.
It might be helpful with the new education that we're learning about is going on on sex education.
Oh, really?
Have you heard this yet?
Because I think there's some things in here that you might not even know.
Okay.
Yeah.
It's a video
for kids from questioning LGBT slash CSC education.
LGBT CSC.
CSE.
What is that?
I'm not going to justify that with a response.
If you don't know what to do.
Pretend I'm a ginger person.
Look, let's get you up to speed on the actual content here first.
All right, okay.
And then we'll try to bring you along on the initials.
Because if you don't know the basics of human anatomy that they're about to explain to you,
here it is.
Okay.
A bunch of kids watching.
Hi, I'm Nadine, a sex educator.
And I'm Eva, a sex researcher.
I use the pronouns she and her because I'm a woman, and when I was your age, I used to be a girl.
Gender is how you feel on the inside about whether you're a boy or a girl, a man or a woman.
If you're not binary, feel like neither or both.
People can also be fluid, feel more like female, more like male,
based on a different day or time.
It's really individual.
Absolutely.
Everyone born with a vulva is a girl.
True or false?
Or identifies as a girl.
It's mostly saying true.
No.
Not everybody is sure, and that makes sense.
But our genitals actually don't determine our gender.
So some people born with Volvas can be boys.
What do Swedish cars have to do with this?
No, Volva.
Oh, Volva.
Yeah, it's a different genital.
It's a different model.
I was like, I know plenty of guys.
I mean, you know, if you can call them that, they're driving Volvos right now.
They're very safe cars.
They are very safe cars.
Listen, I mean, this is
the way what I find fascinating most about that is the way it's communicated in like legitimately a really loving, explaining way.
Like, that is, you could, you could convince a child of anything in that tone of voice.
Oh, actually, did you know that the Volva is for boys?
Oh, let me go upstairs and get the German textbooks for teachers on how to explain how your friend who was here yesterday is now gone because they're the enemy of the state.
I have that.
I can show it to you.
You can make anything look great in a classroom.
Why not?
I mean, this is crazy.
Play the audio of
who is it that was on the campus?
Will Witten, right?
And Will was out and he's asking people, how many genders are there?
How many genders.
Prague are you?
Here it is.
I mean, I've been talking about Ukraine for a year.
How many genders are
there?
Infinite?
Infinite.
I think there are infinite genders.
Why do you say that?
Because I think,
I don't know, you can't put things in boundaries.
You can define yourself as whatever you want,
and I don't have a number for it, so it's infinite for me.
What do you identify as?
I identify as female.
I identify as male.
How many genders are there?
Um,
God, I don't know.
Like,
I identify as a guy, but if someone's gonna be happier not following that binary thing, do you?
How many genders are there?
Stop, stop.
There's a spectrum of gender.
Stop.
None of these people, none of these people would have said this four years ago.
Also, just did a quick addition.
None of these people believe what they're saying.
Nope.
They're all like, wait, what am I supposed to say?
Wait, what is the none of them believe this?
This is like a or they, I think the first person kind of believes it because she wanted to be, she wanted to show off.
She wanted to virtue signal.
You know what I mean?
The guys, especially the guys, are like, I don't know
what gets canceled.
I mean, what will get me closer to the hot girls here?
I mean, I don't care.
I'll say anything.
That's all that is.
None of these guys would have said this until they go to a university where they are teaching them.
You're going to, you're a moron.
You're an absolute moron
after you get out of college.
Don't send your kids to college.
I just had a conversation with somebody who runs a college, a university, a prestigious university, just left and said, I got to the point where
I can't look at parents anymore and say, yeah, no,
this is money well spent.
He's like, we're indoctrinating your kids.
It's awful.
It's awful what's happening.
And the price keeps going up and up and up and up and up to lose more and more and more and more of your soul.
Who do you think has the time to go, you know what?
We need to take on gingerbread men.
People in universities.
Yeah, right.
And
it is taking advantage as well of people's good nature, right?
Like
the reason why I think 99% of people that get asked these questions on the street would answer this way is because they see it as something, well, I don't really understand it, but I don't want to judge somebody else and be a jerk.
So, yeah, there was a million genders.
Yeah, because I've, you know, people say that they want another gender, right?
Like, it's like a
polite sort of thing.
It's in a way, you used to describe this with political correctness generally, where people would say handy capable instead of handicapped.
And he'd be like, well, yeah, I guess say handy capable because it's nice.
So here's, so here's the thing: the guy said, I don't know, I don't know the number.
It's limitless, I guess.
I mean, I identify as a
male, a guy, but you know, do you?
And that's that is America.
Do you.
Just do you, man.
But
it's not available.
Like, you can't overwhelm facts with your feelings for good, right?
To say, like, oh, well, look, I just think that, you know, that team won instead of lost is not a thing you can do, yet it's something we continue to attempt here in this country, and it's not the right road.
Okay, let me
give you this: Tim Robbins
has now taken on Ellen DeGeneres
because Ellen Ellen has developed a friendship.
I mean,
they went.
They just sat next to each other at a football game and spoke kindly to each other.
He said that Ellen DeGeneres and George W.
Bush is not cute.
He is now calling her out for making peace with the former president.
How dare you?
Listen,
I'm all for going across aisles and making peace with people, but there's certain people that are walking around right now that are responsible for a lot of death.
That is, for me, something Bush has never reckoned with, never taken responsibility for.
He said that Bush and Ellen live in an elite bubble where you can do whatever the hell you want to in life and pay no ramifications.
Excuse me.
I believe this is the yes, I believe this is the opposite of what Tim Robbins used to say when George W.
Bush supporters, not George W.
Bush, George W.
Bush supporters were like, dude, shut up.
Just shut up about this.
You didn't talk about it on your own time.
Don't talk about it in this particular setting.
And he gave this speech.
There's a chill wind blowing in the air.
There is a menace that is trying to shut people up.
At Cooperstown and Clear Channel.
That's right.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
He was blaming because he got canceled from the Hall of Fame or something because people found him too annoying.
Yeah.
There's a chill wind, clear channel,
and Cooper's Town silencing people.
What the hell are you talking about?
That's what you're doing.
The left has just become everything they despise.
Why are we even talking about this?
Because I just wanted to do something.
I mean, all I wanted to do is just a quick thing on cut the Christmas balls off of your gingerbread.
I know.
And then we got into the 9 million genders.
Here's the thing, Glenn.
You've got two straight weeks of non-stop impeachment fun.
We're talking
super exciting and really honest debate about whether the impeachment
is real and whether these charges are serious.
And you know who's going to lead the seriousness of that?
Adam freaking shift.
That's who's going to do it.
So you've got two weeks of Adam Schiff telling you what's important.
We might as well start out with a little gingerbread story because it's going to be not a lot of cookies for the next couple weeks.
Okay, now if you're looking for impeachment coverage, we're, of course, going to carry the impeachment hearings for as long as I can possibly stand it.
Okay, so I might have to take a break from time to time.
I might have to just blurt something out from time to time.
Where is a...
Do we have any rope to make a noose?
I might have to fashion a noose for myself at some point
because this is nothing but a show today.
And it begins in 42 minutes.
I'm pretty excited about it.
I can't wait to see what they have on tap for today.
I wonder if any of them are going to make speeches before they ask any questions.
Some of them may even get to the level of exasperation over all of this.
You can't believe what the president has done.
But they just want the facts, Glenn.
That's it.
Well, not that fact.
Not that fact.
Not that fact.
Don't say that.
Oh, Oh, you know what?
That's right.
Schiff came out yesterday and said there will be an ethics probe into anyone who tries.
I hope all of them do.
I hope every Republican starts with Charamela.
Charamela.
This is a good point.
Rand Paul came out in the hallway and said, look,
I mean, this is not the law.
The law is not that the, it's about the IG releasing the name, and they need to be protected in their jobs.
It has nothing to do with whether a congressman or a regular citizen can say the name.
And
while I think that's true, it's my reading of the story as well.
Why haven't any of them had the balls to actually do it?
Why are they all hinting and linking to other sources and coming?
Why not come out and do it?
If you believe it's true, which it doesn't seem like there's any denial that it's actually true, that this is who the whistleblower is.
I think the reason is nobody wants to go through all of that hassle and just tie their office up with that.
But if they all do it,
if they all do it, what are they going to do?
You're going to ethics probe half of the house?
Have at it.
I mean, they will, but yes.
Yes, but have at it.
Because we're all in it together and we'll all go.
If it's one person, but
I think every Republican should say today in the hearing, Chiara Mella, and just get it out there.
Must they opera sing it?
Yeah, they must.
I think that's right.
Yeah, I mean, what's the problem with that?
No, I think
either that or they could say, hey, are we going to break for lunch?
Because I'd like some Leguini Charamella.
Chicken Charamella.
I would, oh, I'd pay big money to hear them work charamella in in different ways.
Yeah, they tried to goad them into saying it in the testimony.
If you read the testimony, there's a couple times Republicans are like, who's that guy that you used to work with?
He was in this position, and it was like three months ago.
Order, order, order.
You are not going to go the witness into saying Charam.
So, tonight, uh, we have our impeachment special.
Yeah, you could watch all of this stuff all day and uh make your head explode, or you could watch our special tonight and figure out why this must go to the Senate.
I think you're going to like it.
Well, you're going to actually hate it.
What I tell you, you're going to hate,
but it's going to be so
deeply satisfying.
Watch it with your gingerbread, man.
Let me tell you about e-skimming.
Now, e-skimming, jackpotting,
key reinstallation attacks,
lions, tigers, bears.
Oh, my.
It seems like every few days we're hearing about some new scheme that cyber criminals have.
Lions, tigers, bears.
Oh, my.
Stay out of the woods.
You could worry about it, or you could just understand how cybercrime is affecting your life, that somebody's identity is stolen every two seconds, and realize that you're not going to catch these guys because
it's not just monitoring your credit that counts.
Lifelock detects a wide range of identity threats, the lions, the tigers, and the bears, and they alert you when and if a threat is detected.
Give them a call or visit their website today.
Nobody can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses.
But LifeLock can see the threats you might miss on your own.
Now, until December 8th, you can join and get a special radio discount.
You'll save 30% or more off of your first year by using the promo code BEC.
30% or more.
1-800-LIFELOCK.
Or visit lifelock.com, use the promo code BEC.
Save 30% or more off your first year at 1-800-LifeLock or Lifelock.com.
We break for 10 seconds.
Station ID.
And now the Glenn Beck program presents quick impeachment facts with steeper gear.
MSNBC will be covering the impeachment, and I'm sure doing an incredibly fair job.
Of course they will.
So who are you going to bring on in your coverage?
I mean, look, they're looking for the people who are going to be the most antagonistic to the president.
You want judges?
Right?
No.
Constitutional scholars?
No.
No, shockingly, no.
They've looked to find the person who is the most antagonistic to the president possible, because, of course, this is MSNBC, right?
On their impeachment coverage is going to be George Conway, husband of Kellyanne Conway.
Are you kidding me?
How on earth are these two people still married?
What, like, do they have the greatest sex of all time?
What the hell is going on?
I don't understand that.
Can you imagine that?
Can you imagine that?
I mean, I always had a problem, or not a problem.
I never understood
James Carville and Mary Madden.
But they're both decent people and can stop.
Not everything is about politics with them.
Then Mary's better than a decent person.
She's awesome.
No, she is.
But I mean, you're right.
It's like it's one of the things that I'm saying.
One of those things I think is a space alien.
So I'm not sure he speaks English all the time.
You know what I mean?
But when you come to the
Kellyanne thing with her husband, now remember, Kellyanne has at least twice, at least twice, maybe three times, mistakenly not been on the record and trashed her husband, trying to leak things to the press about her husband and how bad of a guy he is.
It's happened two or three times.
Now, of course, because she's a Trump,
she's a Trump official.
They don't give her any breaks.
They're like, oh, well, you didn't say, you know, off-record fast enough.
So they just print the comments.
Whole other question as to whether that's a journalistically good practice.
But this has happened because she's constantly going to the media to plant negative things about her husband to major publications.
And he is going on Twitter and destroying the administration that she works for.
And every report says that she desperately wants the chief of staff role.
She's trying to advance in her career while her husband is undercutting her publicly now going on MSNBC to get an impeachment thing.
I honestly, I would not trust her.
I couldn't trust her.
If I were the president.
Right, okay.
and she was on my, I don't care how good she is, I'd have to say, look,
I don't understand this.
Where is your loyalty here?
Your loyalty should be to your husband and his, to his, to your wife, but you have that going on.
If you don't have that going on, how could I trust your loyalty?
What?
I have no idea where you're coming from.
Your husband's killing me.
And he's killing your reputation.
Right.
And really, like, he doesn't have enough impact, I don't think, to affect the president.
No, but he does have enough impact to affect her career.
And
he has enough impact to
anybody question her and him.
What the hell is this game that you guys are playing?
How does that work?
How does that work?
Because to me, that just is a Washington game.
You know, either that or just a psychotic, you know, it's one assassin for the Russians dating another assassin from America.
And they're like, ah, yeah, we're just not going to kill each other.
Mr.
and Mrs.
Today.
Yeah.
You're listening to Glenn Beck.
So, you wouldn't buy a bed that was just a slab of concrete covered in shards of glass, would you?
You wouldn't buy a car that, you know, was a saw-off bar stool for the driver's seat.
So why would you get an office chair if it wasn't the very best, the most comfortable thing you could sit in?
After all, you're in it for the majority of your day.
Why not get the best?
What you want is an X-Chair.
With the patented, dynamic, variable lumbar support and 10 different settings.
The X-Chair is what you and those around you need for a comfortable workday.
Truly the next generation of office chairs.
And thanks to X-Chair's 30-day no-questions asked guarantee of satisfaction, you have zero risk.
Now, most companies can't make that kind of offer, but most companies aren't X-Chair.
So don't settle for less than the best.
Get the X-Chair today.
Also, X-Chair is on sale now for $100 off.
Just go to X-Chairbeck.com.
That's X-ChairB-E-C-K.com or call 844-4xchair.
xchairbeck.
Go there now, use promo code Beck and receive a free set of the new X-Wheels with your chair.
It's xchairbeck.com.
Promo code Beck.
Tonight's tonight, the new special on the Democrats and Ukraine and the impeachment.
Go to Blazetv.com.
Promo code is GB20Off.
Save 20.
Welcome to the program.
Today is the day of our impeachment broadcast.
Tonight at 8 o'clock, it is live and it is free for everybody on YouTube or on Facebook.
We ask that you would subscribe to Blaze TV because your subscriptions help us afford to do these things.
But tonight
you're going to see something that I am convinced the Democrats are already preparing for.
They're already setting up.
You remember,
we needed to talk to this whistleblower.
This whistleblower needed to be heard.
You had to know about the whistleblower.
Then we do our first episode, and I'm not saying that these are connected, but it is suspicious timing.
We do our first episode on the Democrats in Ukraine.
Five days later, Schiff has completely changed his story.
This whistleblower is not that important.
We got another whistleblower.
And that whistleblower, you need to really hear.
But this one, we just, you know, hey, let's not release the name of this one.
Why is that?
You're going to see why all of these, you're going to see the whistleblower's name.
And you're going to,
yeah, and you're going to see his name on memos.
Yeah.
On internal memos.
You're going to see his name everywhere.
You're going to understand why you need to hear from the whistleblower and why this needs to go to the Senate tonight.
Don't miss it.
The Democrats Hydra.
That's happening tonight.
You can save 20% with your promo code GB20Off if you go to blazetv.com slash Glenn.
Or you can just have all of your friends watch it for free on YouTube and on Facebook tonight.
May I just say something about the impeachment trial?
I love the fairness of it because Schiff has opened this up for Republicans to call anybody they want.
They can call anyone at any time.
He just says no once they say what they call it.
Yeah, we want to hear from Hunter Biden.
No.
We want to hear from Joe Biden.
No.
It's like Hotel California.
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.
That's right.
They can call anybody they like, but they can never testify.
That's great.
So I think the big thing that I'm feeling about this impeachment that we're going to hear, the impeachment hearings, coming up in about 20 minutes,
this is just a show.
They went and they did all of the stuff.
They've edited now all of the stuff in that didn't help.
And they've compartmentalized everything so they can put this show on for you today.
It's Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney.
Let's do a show.
That's what this is today.
So I think the thing that really comes to mind that I think has to be said, and today is probably
the biggest day for it as far as the impeachment goes, is
have you downloaded Disney Plus yet?
Yes.
Yes.
The answer is yes.
Yes.
I have.
What did you think?
I really liked the selection.
My wife and the kids really loved the, you know, the vault and all the shows that are available that they remember from growing up and all of that stuff.
And I actually liked The Mandalorian.
I watched the first episode.
Only the first episode is available.
This is the new Star Wars spin.
Yeah, the new Star Wars spin-off.
I thought it was good.
I didn't feel like it was great, but it was
good.
Enough to get you to
the next one.
You don't know any of the characters and everything else.
Because I watched the first 30 minutes of it.
And
as I'm watching it, I'm like, okay,
it's it's okay.
Here's what I really discovered is
they used to have spaghetti westerns.
This is a space western.
This is exactly what I said to my wife last night.
This is Guns.
Yes.
This is a Western.
Yeah, that's all it is.
From our childhood.
And even, I mean, the imagery of it is a western.
Even some of the sounds and the music is, they're very reminiscent of the first 10 minutes of very much.
I mean, just had a lot of that.
It is a Western set in space.
It doesn't sound too enticing, but luckily I only paid for two years in advance of the membership.
Is that all?
Well, no, let me tell you some of the good things.
They also put a warning before Dumbo and Lady in the Tramp about horrible ancient stereotypes.
Right, cultural
trigger warnings.
Okay, good.
So we got that going for us, too.
What I do like about it, though,
all the Disney movies you recognize are there, pretty much.
All the Pixar Pixar stuff is there.
All of the
single one of Marvel
stuff.
Marvel.
Phantom Menace.
Yes.
Okay, good.
Yes, you can watch Phantom Menace as many times as you want.
Whenever you get out, Jar Jar.
No, whenever you want, you can see Jar Jar.
Can you get double the Jar Jar?
Yes.
They do have the double the Jar Jar feature.
You could watch it over and over and over.
It's more, though.
They are, it's more per month.
Yes.
I'm starting a Twitter campaign to get them to add Jar Jar in all of the episodes.
Right.
Right?
Yeah, even the tasty.
Yeah, and even the Western here.
What I did like about it is in Mandalorian, there didn't seem to be any characters like that that are just going to turn you off from the thing.
It's just, fortunately, they didn't do some dumb four-year-old hero in this thing.
So, I don't know.
Maybe that'll still come, but they didn't have anything in the first episode like that.
Yeah, I thought it was okay.
I thought it was okay.
And
it's a nice presentation.
Are you doing the Apple TV Plus thing?
Do you know there's there's only nine shows available on that?
Yeah.
Nine.
Yeah.
There's like nothing there yet.
I will tell you that the two things that I have seen, and
I've seen the morning show.
That looks really good.
That is really good.
And I think that there is a lot of soul searching going on there.
Really?
It is almost.
Yeah, it is almost the NBC story.
With Matt Lauer.
Yeah, Matt Lauer.
Oh, wow.
Carell plays Matt Lauer, who is this guy who was like, it was all consensual.
It was all consensual.
Yes, I was cheating on my wife.
That's bad.
I know, but I'm fired.
I lose my entire career.
No one will talk to me because of consensual affairs.
So he's out, and it shows him trying to talk to other people who have been outed.
And there's this one director, and it looks very Harvey Weinstein in a way.
And he's like,
you know, I want to do a documentary on this.
And I just, I have to ask, what did I do wrong?
And the other guy's like, I know, right?
And so they're talking back and forth.
And then the Harvey character is like, you know, because I mean, women like it anyway.
And you can see
the Matt Lauer character go, oh, dear God.
No, no, no, that's not it.
So it's dealing with that line.
And
it's worth seeing that.
It's the first time I've seen it okay to even have that argument.
And then the women in the morning show, like his co-host, Jennifer Aniston, they had an affair.
She also knew about things that were going on in the next dressing room, but it was all consensual.
Now she's having to act shocked on the air.
Oh my gosh.
It's amazing.
It's really amazing.
And I think funny, well done, smart.
It's good, actually.
And then my daughter watched
C
with me.
Mary watched C.
She said the advertising is everywhere, Dad, and I haven't seen it.
But this is
a legend, and it comes from the guys who did Planet of the Apes.
It looks very Planet of the Apes.
Really, really well done.
And it's a legend of, you know, centuries in the future, there was a plague and man went blind and killed most of the people but the people who survived were blind and so there there's it's there's no sight on earth and uh it's just legend people think that it's heresy to say that people could see in the past and it it opens with this these two groups going to war with each other and they're both blind and it's unbelievable i've never even it's a completely new concept that sounds pretty good it's really good it's really good better than the impeachment hearings?
Come on.
No, well, no,
nothing can top that circumstances.
And that's the impeachment is starring Adam Schiff.
He is very exciting.
They tried to get Schiff.
What a supporting cast he's got.
Yeah, they tried to get Schiff for
I think it was maybe even the new Star Wars movie,
Rise of Skywalker.
Couldn't get him.
Couldn't get him.
He had to be on the impeachment thing because he had already written the script.
Yeah.
He was already involved in the project so heavily.
So, you know, what's nice is this is a script that is written today, and you're not going to see the final.
This is just the table reading.
It is what this is.
Remember, all of these people have already been interviewed.
We already know what their testimony was.
So unless they were like lying when in the first testimony are going to change their stories or come up with magical new details that they forgot to tell them last time.
All they're doing basically is reading the thing they've already said, right?
They're going to come out and perform for you the words we already have in print.
It is what happens when you have a script for a play, and then you come out and you perform the words that are on the page.
That is what's happening today.
Literally, no joke, literally, that's what's going on.
You're seeing something produced for television, and they are not going to let the Republicans take them off script.
Now, this happened with the Nixon, too.
It was the same situation.
They had them behind closed doors, and then they brought them out into public, and then they asked them the same questions to convince the American people.
Now, I think there's a part of this where where the Republicans may have held back
lines of attack behind the scenes so they could do it publicly.
That's possible.
But the Democrats, you know, they're supposed to be bringing out their best stuff here.
This is supposed to be their best day.
If they can't get some real damage today, they got nothing.
This is their day.
They got Taylor and
they have.
What are they going to have?
We've seen everything that there is.
We saw the transcript of the call.
What more do you need?
I mean, you can testify about your opinion all you want.
But these are the two.
It's still just your opinion.
I mean, they're two top witnesses, or at least two of the top witnesses, are going to happen today.
And Taylor's probably their biggest and best witness.
Yeah.
You know, and if they can't get anything out of it.
I mean, that was the one with the email fight.
Yeah, he's the one who was saying, like, are we really holding back money for a police officer?
For the temple or whatever that is.
Are we really holding back money for a political campaign?
That was the guy.
No.
And he was told no.
Right.
However,
the one asterisk to that little exchange is, because you're right, it was.
The person who told him no, no, has changed his mind.
Now has said, oh, no, it was actually yes.
And by the way, that person is a big Trump donor and a friend of the president.
So the fact that, look, and this is why we keep coming to the back because he's not a friend of the president.
He didn't campaign for him.
Not initially.
He came out of the blue, I think, after he won.
I mean, look,
this is the case with a lot of these guys.
A lot of them did not agree with Trump during the primary and came around to him and wound wound up giving lots and lots of money to him later on.
Did he donate a million dollars or whatever?
But
not to the campaign.
Inauguration.
Inauguration.
Yeah, you wouldn't be able to do that.
But you can,
you know, when you give a million dollars to the inauguration, you get a nice
job that
no one would understand why these guys get, right?
Like you're essentially paying for these ambassadorships.
And this is not just Trump.
It's every single administration going back for a million years.
Yeah, that's no secret.
Everybody knows he's done that.
Everybody knows that.
Including Obama.
Including Obama and every president.
I mean, everyone I can think of of beforehand.
The issue here, though, is, you know, he's not a Taylor isn't a known
Trump opponent to the level of, you know, he wasn't an outspoken, I hate Trump guy.
He was brought in by Pompeo.
So he was, you know, and Pompeo has been very loyal to Trump, and there's been no issues there that I know of.
Yeah, so how is Pompeo not being, I mean, Pompeo is in charge of the State Department.
So you've got all these underlings who are saying, they were changing policy.
They were doing this.
He was doing tit for tat.
Why is Pompeo not being called?
At some point,
you have to.
You'd think, at least in the Senate thing.
And by the way, none of that even matters.
So what if he was changing policy?
It's the president's policy to change.
It's not the State Department.
They don't set policy.
Conspiracy theorists.
United States does.
Conspiracy theorists.
And their case on that, and that's, it's a, I don't think it's necessarily a good case, but their case on that is: look,
you know, as Taylor said, I'm not going to take this job if we're going to change policies, or I'm going to leave.
And then they said they didn't change policies.
They were telling us to go along this one track and at the same time pursuing these other things.
And we kept hearing from people in Ukraine who are like, but Rudy Giuliani was just here telling me this.
Wait a minute.
Like, I thought you're saying it's A?
Well, Rudy Giuliani was just telling me it's B.
Which one is it?
And so there was this disagreement there.
And I think you can legitimately question whether the way the the administration has run the State Department is the best way to run a State Department.
That's not impeachable.
It's not a crime.
You can say, I'm going to vote against him in November because I don't like the way he's run the State Department, as if anyone has ever voted that way in U.S.
history.
But you can make that determination.
It's not a crime.
He can do whatever he wants on these things.
It's his staff.
The State Department works for the president.
Like it or not, elections have consequences.
And the State Department works for the president at his discretion.
That's the deal.
And tonight, you're going to see why this fight is really going on because the State Department has a very long history, about 100 years.
Guess what?
It started with Woodrow Wilson
of trying to be their own thing beyond the president.
And that's what this fight is really all about.
And when we show you what they're actually doing,
oh my gosh, you're going to be really upset and demand that this goes to the court in
the Senate tonight.
Pack Grand Leash to get his impeachment take every day, as well on Blaze TV and radio and podcast.
Very excited.
The impeachment hearings are starting in just a few minutes.
Can you feel the tingle in the air?
How much value do you put on good advice?
When someone gives you a good word to the wise, do you take time to fully appreciate that?
Let me give you an example.
Managing your debts and managing your investments.
These seem to be at opposite ends of the financial spectrum, but they're not.
The one thing that very often ties them together is your mortgage for your home.
And here's the honest truth.
Mortgages and mortgages refinances are complicated.
More importantly, they're not always the right thing to do.
So who do you trust when you're looking for good advice when you need it?
May I suggest American financing.
Give them a call today, and in 10 minutes, they'll know where you're at.
You'll know exactly where you need to be.
And here's the best part.
they just tell you about it.
There's no contracts, no upfront fees, just people who want to work with you to ensure that you're going to make the best, soundest financial decision you can.
So, here's my good advice: find 10 minutes today and give them a call.
It's American Financing at 800-906-2440.
800-906-2440, AmericanFinancing.net.
American Financing Corporation, NMLS 1-8-2334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.
This is the Glimbeck program.
Oh, we are so excited.
Do you have a comfortable chair?
Do you
turn off your phone?
Tell your boss, hey, hey, shut up, pipe down.
The impeachment's about to begin.
I can't wait.
And our coverage, our world-class Emmy Award-winning coverage of impeachment 2019 begins in just a few minutes.
Oh,
it's electric around here.
Adam Schiff, what will he be wearing?
Who will he be wearing?
All of that red carpet starts in just a few minutes, right here on the Glenn Beck program.
You're listening to Glenn Beck.
So did you see the story about the transgendered cyclist who is a biological male, but for some reason, that's inexplicable, was allowed to compete against women.
He crushed them.
Is that what really is, is this what we're doing?
There's There's something we can all do to fight against the destruction of our civilization by woke activists, and it is as simple as changing the phone service you use every day.
Switch your cell phone service to Patriot Mobile.
Patriot Mobile is the only cell phone service in America that donates a portion of the monthly bill to organizations fighting for the values you believe in and helping President Trump move forward with his agenda.
Right now, Patriot Mobile is offering you the chance to buy one line, get one line free for for six months when you make the switch to support freedom.
Keep your number, keep your phone, buy a new one, doesn't matter.
Get reliable 4G LTE
nationwide service for as low as $25 a month while helping to preserve the country that we all love.
It's Patriot Mobile.
PatriotMobile.com.
Switch now.
PatriotMobile.com/slash back.
The hearings are next.
The fusion
of entertainment and enlightenment.
Oh, so very excited.
Can you feel the electricity in the air?
We are nine hours, 54 minutes away from our impeachment special live tonight, but we are just seconds away from Adam Schiff taking the stage to talk to Ambassador Tyler in something no one knows what's going to happen it's not like this is all scripted out we join the theater impeachment day number one in just a moment this is the Glenbeck program
oh man if you don't have a comfy chair and you know you're not you're not ready for this I don't know what to do call my pillow right away and have them see if they can deliver it right now because you're going to need to curl up and just listen to Adam Schiff Schiff and the impeachment hearing.
It's going to be exciting.
Also, you might want to get one of their six-piece towel sets
because you might want to use the bad towels to clean up all of the vomit on the floor.
And then you're going to need a new good set of towels.
And the good towels are coming from My Pillow.
Made with USA cotton, extremely absorbent yet really, really soft.
Comes with two bath towels, two hand towels, two washcloths, 30% off right now with promo code BECK.
60-day money-back guarantee.
It's mypillow.com.
Click on the new radio listener specials.
Get 30% off this six-piece towel set, as well as deep discounts on all other MyPillow products.
Enter the promo code Beck or call 800-966-3117 for the great radio specials.
Okay, here we go.
Are you ready?
The impeachment trial.
You ready, Stu?
I'm so nervous.
I am too.
Adam Schiff is now
taking the stage, and they're having a conversation about are we all ready?
Will we join them already in
progress?
Dedicated to showcase
the impact that apprenticeship programs have on preparing us to do that.
That's the wrong one.
That's the wrong one.
Taking the wrong feed
from the hearing.
We have Adam Schiff now
saying that he's ready.
He's going to call the witnesses that they've already called.
They're going to...
Wow,
what a tease.
They're going to listen to the things that we've already read.
Whoa.
And the Democrats are controlling the whole thing.
So Republicans, you can call whoever you want.
You're just not going to, we're not going to allow them to testify.
That sounds like a fair process.
Doesn't it?
It does.
It's almost too fair.
Almost too fair.
Maybe they should take some more things away from the Republicans in this week.
Like, what else could they take away?
Their microphones.
Their chairs.
Their chairs, their microphones.
What if
they had to hold their breath underwater while asking the questions?
And as soon as they come up for air, their questioning time is over.
I like that one.
That's a nice, easy one.
I like that.
That's something we could easily.
I like that one.
We have the water.
We have the dunk tanks.
We can get them from any.
What if Democrats throw baseballs at a dunk tank when they're questioning?
And as soon as they go into the water, they have to stop.
You could reverse it and go that way.
So, right now,
as we're looking for the right feed, right now, the House has its impeachment hearings, and all that you're missing, you're not really missing anything, is Adam Schiff talking about there was this phone call, and it happened with a new president of Ukraine.
And we had a whistleblower, but we're not going to talk to the whistleblower because,
you know,
that's against the rules.
You know, here in America, you don't have a right to face your accuser.
Anyway, so there was this quid pro quo, completely unlike exactly what Joe Biden did.
This president was asking for investigations in corruption.
But we're not going to talk about what he wanted to investigate.
That's out of the scope of these hearings.
All we're going to talk about is that phone call and how uncomfortable people in the State Department really were.
All right, it's thrilling.
It's exciting, you bet.
Why don't we take a quick break while we look for the right feed and take the quick break so we can take it live all the way down to the bottom of the hour?
Okay.
When you spend your money chasing down the bad guys, you're bound to end up with some aches and pains.
And, you know, if you're somebody who works out a lot as well, like Heather, a police officer from Louisiana, the aches and pains tend to only get worse.
Heather knew about Relief Factor before she even started having frequent pains.
She was an early adopter.
You'd say she didn't get her life back because she knew enough not to lose it in the first place.
She ended up convincing one of her fellow police officers to try it as well, and it's worked for him as well.
I can empathize with anyone who has frequent pain, but Heather is a shining example of somebody who never let that keep them down.
She was smart.
She tried it right away before it got a hold of her.
When taken properly, Relief Factor attacks the inflammation that causes much of our pain.
It works for 70% of the people who take it, and it only costs $19.95 to start with their three-week
quick start trial.
So do it now.
If you want a drug-free, natural way to ease your pain and to get your life back, go to relieffactor.com.
That's relieffactor.com.
We pause for 10 seconds, station ID, and then to the impeachment.
Of an irregular channel in which Giuliani and later others, including Gordon Sonlund, an influential donor to the President's inauguration, now serving as ambassador to the European Union,
could advance the President's personal and political interests.
Oh, no.
Yovanovich's replacement in Kiev, Ambassador Bill Taylor, is a West Point graduate and a Vietnam veteran.
As he began to better understand the scheme through the summer of
2019, he pushed back, informing Deputy Assistant Secretary Kent and others about a plan to condition U.S.
government actions and funding on the performance of political favors by the Ukrainian government, favors intended for President Trump that would undermine our security and our elections.
Several key events in this scheme took place in the month of July.
On July 10th, Ambassador Sondland informed a group of U.S.
and Ukrainian officials meeting at the White House that, according to Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, a White House meeting desperately sought by the Ukrainian President with Trump would happen only if Ukraine undertook an investigation into the energy sector, which was understood to mean barisma and specifically the Bidens.
National Security Advisor Bolton abruptly ended the meeting and said afterwards that he would not be, quote, part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up.
You've only read these headlines, what, 1,000 times?
These are all the things we already know.
On July 18th, a representative of the Office of Management Budget, the White House Adams that oversees federal spending, announced on a video conference that Mulvaney, at the direction of the President, was freezing nearly $400 million in security assistance authorized and appropriated by Congress, and which the entirety of the U.S.
National Security Establishment supported.
One week after that, Donald Trump would have the now-infamous July 25th phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky.
Now infamous.
During that call, Trump complained that the U.S.
relationship with Ukraine had not been reciprocal.
Later, Zelensky thanks Trump for his support in the area of defense and says that Ukraine is ready to purchase more javelins, an anti-tank weapon that was among the most important deterrents of further Russian military action.
You did not approve in the last administration, we should point out.
I would like you to do us a favor, though.
Trump then requested that Zelensky investigate the discredited 2016 crowd strike conspiracy theory and even more
ominously look into the Bidens.
Oh my gosh,
you're skipping
all of the other things like the 2016 tampering with the
conspiracy theory.
Both, however, were in Donald Trump's personal interest and in the interests of his 2020 reelection campaign.
Just this.
And the Ukrainian president knew about both in advance.
You would.
Because Songlin and others have been pressing the brain for weeks
about investigations
of the 2016 election
and the Bidens.
After the call, multiple individuals were concerned enough to report it to the National Security Council's top lawyer.
The White House would then take the extraordinary step of moving the call record to a highly classified server exclusively reserved for the most sensitive intelligence matters.
Didn't they give up on this line of
argument months ago?
Yes, months ago.
As soon as there were leaks in the White House, they started moving all of these things over to that server.
Taylor texted Sondland, quote, are we now saying that security assistance and White House meeting are conditioned on investigations?
As summer turned to fall, it kept getting more insidious, Mr.
Sondland testified.
Mr.
Taylor, who took notes of his conversation, said the ambassador told him in a September 1st phone call that everything
was dependent on the public announcement of investigations, including security assistance.
President Trump wanted Mr.
Zelensky in a public box.
President Trump is a businessman, Sondland said later.
later.
When a businessman is about to sign a check to someone who owes him something, the businessman asks that person to pay up before signing the check.
This is their quid pro-quo argument.
It doesn't necessarily mean bribery.
Bribery.
They're going after that.
They're using that check analogy because they're going after bribery.
They are at a September 1st meeting in Warsaw,
quote, that resumption of U.S.
aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we have been discussing for many weeks.
The President's chief of staff confirmed Trump's efforts to coerce Ukraine by withholding aid.
When McMulvaney was asked publicly about it, his answer was breathtaking.
We do that all the time with foreign policy, he said.
I have news for everybody.
Get over it.
There's going to be political influence in foreign policy.
That is going to happen.
The video of that confession is plain for all to see.
That video confession?
Some of that's true.
That's what Biden did.
Exactly the same thing.
This guy's so dishonest.
There's going to be political influence in foreign policy.
That is going to happen.
Do you not think that that happens with the Clintons?
What about the Clinton Foundation?
Some people have argued in the president's defense that the aid was ultimately released.
And that is true.
But only after Congress began an investigation, only after the President's lawyers learned of a whistleblower complaint, and only after members of Congress began asking uncomfortable questions about quid pro quos.
A scheme to condition official acts or taxpayer funding to obtain a personal political benefit does not become less odious because it is discovered.
before it is fully consummated.
In fact, the security assistance had been delayed so long, it would take another act of Congress to ensure that it could still go out.
And that Oval Office meeting that Zelensky desperately sought, it still hasn't happened.
They met in another place.
Good argument there, Adam.
They met in public.
Yeah.
There are still missing pieces.
And by the way, would you as Zelensky want to be mired in all this stuff now?
No.
You come into the White House.
has suggested that those who do expose wrongdoing should be treated like traitors and spies.
These actions will force Congress to consider, as it did with President Nixon, whether Trump's obstruction of the constitutional duties of Congress constitute additional grounds for impeachment.
If the President can simply refuse all oversight, particularly in the context of an impeachment proceeding, the balance of power between our two branches of government will be irrevocably altered.
That is not what the founders intended.
And the prospects for further corruption and abuse of power in this administration or any other will be exponentially increased.
This is what we believe the testimony will show,
both as to the President's conduct and as to his obstruction of Congress.
The issue that we confront
is the one posed by the President's acting chief of staff when he challenged Americans to get over it.
If we find that the President of the United States abused his power and invited foreign interference in our elections, or if he sought to condition, coerce, extort, or bribe an ally into conducting investigations to aid his re-election campaign and did so by withholding official acts, a White House meeting, or hundreds of millions of dollars of needed military aid, must we simply get over it?
Is this what Americans should now expect from their president?
If this is not impeachable conduct,
what is
something else?
Does the oath of office itself
requiring that our laws be faithfully executed, that our president defend a Constitution that balances the powers of its branches
and setting ambition against ambition so we become no monarchy still have meaning?
These are the questions we must ask and answer.
Without rancor, if we can.
Okay, so Nunez is about to speak now.
He's about to take over from Schiff and
present the other side.
If we are true to our responsibilities,
Benjamin Franklin was asked what kind of a country America was to become.
A republic.
A republic, he answered, if you can keep it.
The fundamental issue raised by the impeachment inquiry into Donald J.
Trump is
can we keep it?
A republic?
I thought you wanted to recognize.
Ranking Member Nunes for any remarks he may wish to make.
I love the way they quote the founders because they love them so much.
I love them.
Joe Dead Whiteman.
In a July open hearing of this committee following publication of the Mueller Report, the Democrats engaged in a last-ditch effort to convince the American people that President Trump is a Russian agent.
That hearing was the pitiful finale of a three-year-long operation by the Democrats, the corrupt media, and partisan bureaucrats to overturn the results of the 2016 election.
After the spectacular implosion of their Russia hoax on July 24th, in which they spent years denouncing any Republican who ever shook hands with a Russian, on July 25th, they turned on a dime and now claim the real malfeasance is Republicans' dealings with Ukraine.
It really is amazing.
All the time we spent on the blink of an eye.
And done.
Nothing.
Forgot about it.
Forget about Democrats on this committee.
Russia's getting the Christine Blasey Ford treatment and circumstantial evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russians.
We should forget about them reading fabrications of Trump-Russia collusion from the steel dossier into the congressional record.
We should also forget about them trying to obtain nude pictures of Trump from Russian pranksters who pretended to be Ukrainian officials.
We should forget about them leaking a false story to CNN while he was still testifying to our committee claiming that Donald Trump Jr.
was colluding with WikiLeaks.
And forget about countless other deceptions, large and small, that make them the last people on earth with the credibility to hurl more preposterous accusations at their political opponents.
Hard strong to agree with that part.
Hard strong
with that part.
Here we are.
We're supposed to take these people at face value when they trot out a new batch of allegations.
But anyone familiar with the Democrats' scorched earth war against President Trump would not be surprised to see all the typical signs that this is a carefully orchestrated media smear campaign.
For example,
After vowing publicly that impeachment requires bipartisan support, Democrats are pushing impeachment forward without the backing of a single Republican.
The witnesses deemed suitable for television by the Democrats were put through a closed-door audition process and a cult-like atmosphere in the basement of the Capitol, where Democrats conducted secret depositions, released a flood of misleading and one-sided leaks, and later selectively released transcripts in a highly staged manner.
Violating their own guidelines, Democrats repeatedly redacted from the transcripts the name of Alexander Chalupa, a contractor to the Democratic National Committee who worked with Ukrainian officials to collect dirt on the Trump campaign, which she provided to the DNC
and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Sorry, the other food personnel.
Democrats rejected most of the requests.
Chalupa is though big, and she's saying she wants to come and testify
where the crucial witnesses are denied a platform if their testimony does not support the Democrats' absurd accusations.
Notably, they are trying to impeach the President for inquiring about Hunter Biden's activities.
Yet they refuse our request to hear from Biden himself.
Wonder why.
The whistleblower was acknowledged to have a bias against President Trump, and his attorney touted a coup against the president.
and called for his impeachment just weeks after the election.
Come on, say Charmella.
Charmilla.
At a prior hearing, Democrats on this committee read out a purely fictitious rendition of the President's phone call with President Zelensky.
They clearly found the real conversation to be insufficient for their impeachment narrative, so they just made up a new one.
And most egregiously, the staff of the Democrats on this committee had direct discussions with the whistleblower.
before his or her complaint was submitted to the Inspector General.
Republicans can't get a full account of these contacts because Democrats broke their promise to have the whistleblower testify to this committee.
Democrat members hid these contacts from Republicans and then lied about them to the American people on national television.
I've noted before the Democrats have a long habit of accusing Republicans of offenses they themselves are committing.
Amen.
Let's recall, for years they accused the Trump campaign of colluding with Russia when they themselves were colluding with Russia by funding and spreading the steel dossier, which relied on Russian sources.
And now they accuse President Trump of malfeasance in Ukraine when they themselves are culpable.
The Democrats cooperated in Ukrainian election meddling, and they defend Hunter Biden's securing of a lavishly paid position with a corrupt Ukrainian company.
All while his father served as vice president.
Despite this hypocrisy, the Democrats are advancing their impeachment sham.
But we should not hold any hearings at all until we get answers to three crucial questions the Democrats are determined to avoid asking.
Okay, we're going to stop it right there, and I want to pick up with the three crucial questions when we come back in just a minute.
You're listening to the House and the first public impeachment hearings.
All right, I'll talk to you about X-Chair.
There's just the best chair out there.
And you don't have to have a bad back for it.
It's just a comfortable chair.
It helps you stay comfortable and able to walk.
I mean, if you spend as much time in a chair as I do, I mean, I'm spending three, four hours just in this chair in this office, then I go to another one.
You need to be able to have good support and a comfortable chair, and that is X-Chair.
And they want you to try it for 30 days.
Try it for 30 days.
Money-back guarantee.
They'll pay the shipping back and everything else.
They can't do this if they didn't know that you were going to love this chair.
It has 10 different settings.
It makes a great Christmas gift for your home office, for your office, away from home.
It's xchairbeck.com or call 8444xchair.
8444xChair.
Get $100 off at xchairbeck.com.
That's xchairbeck.com.
Do it now.
All right, back to the points with
Congressman Nunez coming up in just a second as the impeachment trial continues.
And speaking of impeachment, the real story behind what was going on, we have in-depth coverage tonight.
BlazeTV.com use the promo code GB20Off.
All right, we're joining the impeachment in process.
You haven't missed anything.
You just missed the
introduction of William Taylor
and
also the Ukrainian Affairs Deputy Chief of Missions.
Yeah.
Now, the one thing that I do want to hit was Nunez said
we are here to answer three questions we want answered.
Depositions?
I'll give those to you.
Here's first, Mr.
Jordan, who's asking questions.
I'm just by our side and your side,
maybe ask.
And I would prefer that rather than it be your single decision, that the committee speak to that issue rather than just the chairman.
And I move that we
are
won't be friends.
It won't be my single decision.
Schiff said that he would be aware of the pressure.
We will entertain a motion to subpoena any witness.
He would stop
at an opportunity to testify.
The motion will be in order, but that motion will be suspended until after the witness is.
Mr.
Chairman, do you anticipate when we would vote on?
What purpose does Mr.
Jordan seek recognition?
Just to ask a clarifying question, do you anticipate when we might vote on the ability to have the whistleblower in front of us, something you, of the 435 members of Congress, you are the only member who knows who that individual is, and your staff is the only staff of any member of Congress who's had a chance to talk with that individual.
We would like that opportunity.
When might that happen in this proceeding today?
First, as the gentleman knows, that's a false statement.
I do not know the identity of the whistleblower, and I'm determined to make sure that identity is protected.
But as I said,
you have an opportunity after the witnesses testify to make a motion to subpoena any witness and compel a vote.
So, wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
He's actually stating that he doesn't.
Who does know?
No one knows, apparently.
I mean, so this could be, this could be Vladimir Putin that just showed up, and we have no idea.
Unbelievable.
Okay, I want to before they get into this,
more of this nonsense, let me just tell you what Schiff said: the three things that there can be no impeachment hearings that are fair unless we are allowed to find out what the full extent of the Democratic's
conversation was with the whistleblower prior to the IG being notified.
And who else did the whistleblower coordinate this effort with?
Two, the full extent of the Ukrainian
election
tampering with
Hillary against the Trump campaign, and why did Burisma hire Biden and what did he do for them?
Okay, we now go to Mr.
Kent.
Third generation of my family, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Public Service
has sworn the oath of office that all U.S.
public servants do in defense of our Constitution.
Indeed, there has been a George Kent sworn to defend the Constitution continuously for nearly 60 years, ever since my father reported to Annapolis for his plebe summer.
This is George Kentucky telling you how great George Kent is.
And he's gone full bow tie.
That's something you should note if you're listening on radio.
Full bow tie.
I think the full bow tie makes him look a little credible
for clouds.
People who are looking into that, nobody serious wears a bow tie.
I wear a bow tie.
Shouldn't that tell you everything you need to know?
Don't wear a bow tie.
At the time of the attack on Pearl Harbor.
He survived the brutal baton death.
We're not resume building on stage here.
He says, by the way, that he had no knowledge of any quid pro quo, and he was not on the phone call.
So I'm glad he's here.
Today, I appear before you once again, under subpoena, as a fact witness, ready to answer all of your questions about the events and developments examined in this inquiry
to the best of my ability and recollection, subject to the limits placed on me by the law and this process.
I will begin with some opening comments on the key principles at the heart of what brings me before you today.
Okay.
To wit,
principled public service in pursuit of our military
and the place of Ukraine in our national and security interests.
For the past five years, we have focused our united efforts across the Atlantic to support Ukraine in its fight for the cause of freedom and the rebirth of a country free from Russian dominion and the warped legacy of Soviet institutions and post-Soviets.
As I stated in my closed-door deposition last week,
you don't step into the public arena of international diplomacy in active pursuit of principled U.S.
interests without expecting vigorous pushback, including personal attacks.
Such attacks came from the Russians, their proxies, and corrupt Ukrainians.
That tells me our efforts were hitting their mark.
It was unexpected and most unfortunate, however, to watch some Americans, including those who allied themselves with corrupt Ukrainians in pursuit of private agendas, launch attacks on dedicated public servants advancing U.S.
incredible if you know the story.
In my opinion,
those attacks undermined U.S.
You must watch tonight's special at 8 p.m.
At 8 p.m., you're going to find out exactly what all these people were doing, and we're using their documents.
We're using their memos to each other.
You won't believe what these people wrote down.
And it's why this must go to an open hearing in the Senate.
World War II, U.S.
leadership furthered farsighted policies like the Marshall Plan in the creation of a rules-based international order.
Protected by the collective security provided by NATO, Western Europe recovered and thrived after the carnage of World War II, notwithstanding the shadow of the Iron Curtain.
Europe's security and prosperity contributed to our security and prosperity.
Support of Ukraine's success also fits squarely into our strategy for Central and Eastern Europe since the fall of the wall 30 years ago this past week.
Oh my God.
A Europe truly whole, free, and at peace, our strategic aim for the entirety of my Foreign Service career, is not possible without a Ukraine whole, free, and at peace,
including Crimea and the Donbass.
territories currently occupied by Russia, represented by the red in the map.
Looking forward, the Trump administration's national security strategy makes clear the global strategic challenge now before us: great power competition with rivals such as Russia and China, and the need to compete for positive influence without taking countries for granted.
In that sense, Ukraine has been on the front lines not just of Russia's conventional war in Eastern Europe since 2014 and its broader campaign of malign influence, but of the greater geopolitical challenges now facing the United States.
I have to tell you, when you watch the tonight's show,
you will want these people tried for treason.
And I know what that means.
I don't mean that lightly.
I know what that means.
That's the only thing spelled out in the Constitution.
What some of these people are doing, I'm not saying Kent, but what some of these people are doing and how they're presenting it here through Kent is obscene.
Is obscene.
We have the documents.
We have them on videotape.
When you see what they're doing tonight, technology professionals and medics,
your head will explode.
I have those.
Since then,
more than 13,000 Ukrainians have died on Ukrainian soil defending their territorial integrity and sovereignty from Russian aggression.
America's support in Ukraine's own de facto war of independence has been critical in this regard.
By analogy, the American colonies may not have prevailed against the British imperial might without the help of transatlantic friends after 1776.
In an echo of Lafayette's organized assistance to General George Washington's Army and Admiral John Paul Jones's Navy, Congress has generously appropriated over $1.5 billion over the past five years in desperately needed trained and equipped security assistance to Ukraine.
These funds increase Ukraine's strength and ability to fight Russian aggression.
Ultimately, Ukraine is on a path to become a full security partner.
Which they didn't get from the Obama administration.
This is so important for you to understand.
They didn't get any of this stuff from the Obama administration, particularly the missiles to take out the towels.
They were not, they were
neutering and they were begging
for it back in those days.
And all of these people that are going to testify today have admitted on the record that the Trump policy toward Ukraine has worked out better than the Obama administration policy.
So what is it they're changing?
They're changing the main thing was, can you make Ukraine stronger to stand up against Russia?
Yes, Trump did it.
He did it.
He gave that stuff to them.
So what is it that they're arguing about?
They're arguing about what the policy is and what the State Department was doing in Ukraine.
But Schiff will not allow any of that testimony in because he says that's all a conspiracy theory.
No, it's a conspiracy fact.
You go to jail on conspiracy to commit crime.
You go to jail.
That is a crime.
But it has to have facts behind it.
And we have the facts.
By the way, watch the, tell everybody you know, watch this special tonight at 8 p.m.
It's going to be live and free on Facebook and on YouTube.
If you're a subscriber, you'll be able to watch it at Blazetv.com.
It's the Democrats Hydra.
Tonight at 8 p.m., if you want to subscribe, you'll save $20 right now with the promo code GB20Off.
You cannot watch these impeachment hearings without understanding.
Right now, who's testifying today are the ambassadors, the people with the State Department.
Tonight, the the first 20 minutes or so, is just about the history of the State Department and Deep State.
It's all clearly laid out for you.
You have to understand the past.
Then we get into, so what are they doing?
What are they doing right now?
What are they hiding?
What are they trying to keep from you right now?
When you see their failures in the past over and over and over again, and people standing up saying, I don't want you to meddle in other people's business.
And you see what they're meddling with, how they're meddling, and what their goal is,
all in their own words, all on video, all through documents from the State Department, all from Freedom of Information Act documents.
This is a conspiracy fact.
And you have to know it because it needs to be exposed in the Senate because it's not going to to be exposed here.
What you're hearing is a combination of out and out lies and
nice spin on the story.
Without any downside,
you need to see the hydra that is being built right now.
Tonight, 8 o'clock, live, free, Facebook, YouTube.
Tell everyone you know.
Please help us defray some of the costs on these.
If you believe in what we're doing, please join us blazetv.com become a member blazetv.com slash glenn use the promo code gb20 off and save 20 off your year's subscription right now all right we're gonna take a quick break then we'll go back i don't know how much longer i can
i mean yeah
i mean they're gonna get to something interesting at some point in this right
i found that really interesting but only because i know the special tonight and i i don't think i can sit through it that's supposed to be his defense.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Quite amazing.
Okay.
Thanksgiving, Christmas, right around the corner.
And if you haven't thought about it, it might be time for you to consider preparing your home for holiday
guests with brand new blind shades, plantation shutters from blinds.com.
I get home last night after technical rehearsals.
I got home about 9 o'clock last night, and my wife and my daughter were already decorating the house.
My wife said to me, Wow.
Yeah, and I usually like to help, but no way.
And she's like,
When you get home tonight after the special, honey, I'll be done.
We'll walk into Christmas, and so you can really.
And I'm like, I kind of like that idea.
I know it's early, but I'm ready for Christmas.
Here's the thing.
If you are looking to upgrade the look of your house, because you have people coming over, blinds.com is the best.
Somebody wrote in and said, I was skeptical of making such a large purchase online, but they walked me through all of the measurements.
I bought the plantation shutters, they were very well made and are beautiful.
Thanks, plines.com.
Stu, you did the same thing with the plantation shutters.
They look beautiful.
Yeah, they're awesome.
And they were like really inexpensive compared to other plantation blinds.
Yeah, I mean, they talked me into kind of a one that was a little bit less money, but just as good quality, and it's been great.
All right, every order gets free shipping.
100% satisfaction means that if you aren't totally satisfied with the style, color, or quality, they'll remake them for free.
Blinds.com, now through November 17th, save up to 40% on everything, including blind shades and shutters.
Plus, get an extra $20 off with the promo code BEC.
Get up to 40% off everything and an extra $20 off at blinds.com when you use the promo code BEC.
Remember that promo code BEC rules and restrictions do apply.
This is the Glenbeck program.
We're currently in the middle of opening statements right now.
Taylor just finished his.
Not too much that was notable there.
Basically, he outlined how he would not bash other employees of the intelligence community and kind of set ground rules for his own answers.
He asked for guidance legally on what he should answer if there's something that is top secret or classified in some way.
He said he didn't get any guidance and said he wouldn't answer those questions.
This is kind of part one of
him outlining why he's not going to answer these questions.
Part two was if they ask about anyone in the intelligence community and out outing their identity, he will not answer.
That a clear reference to Shah Rabela, the
reported whistleblower.
If someone asks his name, he will not refer to Shah Rabela.
We now rejoin.
We have a little bit of time here to take
this.
That was Kent's testimony.
Now Taylor has just begun.
Most of this is just resume settings.
I am nonpartisan and have been appointed to my positions by every president from President Reagan to President Trump.
Let me summarize my main points.
First, Ukraine is a strategic partner of the United States, important for the security of our country as well as Europe.
Ukraine is on the front line in the conflict with the newly aggressive Russia.
And this, of course, we know Taylor has been this was very early from Taylor.
He made these points.
And this is kind of echoing again stuff we've already covered.
Taylor making the case that, look, Ukraine's really important, and this is why I wanted to take this job, even though I didn't necessarily want it initially.
And number two, why I oppose what went on with Giuliani.
Again, that's a nice opinion to have.
However, when the president is running the
foreign policy, it's a little bit of a problem.
We'll get into more of the details of that, and we'll get past the resume setting here in just a moment.
You're listening to Glenn Beck.
Hey, before we get to the podcast, I want to talk to you about the 2 million burglaries that are reported every year.
And what's crazy is that only one in five homes have security.
I mean, burglaries are happening all the time.
And I think the reason why people don't have a security system in their home is because the security companies suck.
You've got people coming into your house, they're going to drill holes in your wall.
Hello, Mr.
1972.
That's why Simply Safe is just tearing this business apart.
It is growing so incredibly fast, and it is the best in industry.
There's no contract, no hidden fees, no fine print, no drilling holes or stringing wires.
Around-the-clock monitoring is $15 a month, and you can cancel any time.
When When other home security systems are triggered, police assume it's a false alarm and it goes to the bottom of the list.
But with using SimplySafe and their video verification technology, they can visually confirm that the break-in is happening and that gets the police there from 45 minutes instead to seven minutes.
SimplySafe.
They have a huge deal going on right now at simplysafe.com slash Glenn.
You'll get a free HD security camera when you order.
It's $100 value and you'll get the 24-7 monitoring and video evidence if somebody's trying to get into your house.
So get your free HD security camera at simplysafe.com slash Glenn.
That's simplysafe.com slash Glenn.
Hello and welcome to the program.
Sorry, just
talking to Sarah here, who's going to be joining us in just a second as we talk about the impeachment process and our special tonight.
I want to talk to you a little bit about American financing.
American financing can help you whether you're looking for a new home, you're looking to refi, which I highly recommend,
or
even better,
if you are looking to consolidate a loan.
You've got to get out of the high-interest credit cards as soon as you can.
And as those credit cards are already charging double digits, they're going to go higher and higher and higher in the future.
It's going to get harder to get credit.
May I highly recommend the people at American Financing, AmericanFinancing.net, they can help you with your consolidation loan, loan, a refi, or a brand new mortgage.
It's AmericanFinancing.net, or just call them AmericanFinancing.net.
The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.
So we are in the middle of the impeachment hearing now.
The House is holding its Kabuki Theater.
It's all scripted.
The Republicans are not allowed to call the people that they want to testify.
This is...
Everybody knows exactly what these people are going to say, and they're saying it, and it's no surprise.
Although, if you know what is coming in tonight's special that is live tonight, Facebook and YouTube free at 8 p.m.
Eastern time
if you know what I know and you're gonna know tonight your head will pop I can't even I can't I can't even watch it because of the spin and the lies
we begin there in one minute this is the Glenbeck program
A good real estate agent has a ton of responsibility when it comes to helping you buy or sell a home.
They act kind of as a firewall of safety between you and the terrifying monstrosity that is the act of buying or selling a home.
There are the inspections, the pricing, the listing, the paperwork.
Spare us, please, for more paperwork.
When you have a bad real estate agent, one or any of these things could not end up being done correctly, and then it's a massive headache.
That's why I started Real Estate Agents I Trust, the network of real estate agents that are the top of the line.
We only hire those who have a good track record that aren't doing this because of, you know, well, it's my part-time job.
And if we don't have someone in your area that is the best in your area, we won't recommend anyone.
That's how seriously we take it.
These people have to be able to help you sell your house for the most amount of money or find the right house and pay the right price.
It's realestate agentsitrust.com.
That's realestateagents I trust.com.
Tonight at 8 o'clock, I'm going to teach you the difference between conspiracy theories and conspiracy fact.
You know, you go to jail for the conspiracy to commit murder.
Well, that's not a conspiracy theory.
That means you were a part of a conspiracy conspiracy to commit murder, and here are the facts that show you knew exactly what you were doing, and you colluded with others.
That's conspiracy fact.
That sends you to jail.
Conspiracy theories are something that somebody else can do.
Tonight,
the conspiracy we call the Democratic Hydra.
Tonight at 8 o'clock, yesterday we were on the News and Why It Matters with Sarah Gonzalez, and I asked her if she wanted to read part of the script
for
tonight's program to get a handle on it.
And she said, yes, please.
And she's here now.
We haven't spoken since you read the script.
What did you think?
It was unbelievable, Glenn.
I sat at my house last night going through all of it.
And
my husband is the director here.
And so he's...
been working with you on getting this all together and I just kept turning to him and asking him,
we really have this.
Do we really, are we really, really have this?
Are you kidding?
Are you sure?
Because what you have is just where we show the evidence, but you don't have the actual evidence.
Right.
I didn't see it on the paper.
I just have the words.
I don't have the actual evidence here.
So it was just truly shocking to know that all of this information is available if you just look.
Yeah, it's some of it is kind of hard.
Some of it had to come from Freedom of Information Acts, but a lot of it is out there.
We have video that they made of it.
We have letters from the principles written by them
that admit to all of it.
And
I was shocked.
I was shocked.
And that's not all we have.
That's not all we have.
I mean, even with the Freedom of Information Act, you would think if the media and democratic lawmakers care so much about influence and interference in the United States elections, that they would be wanting to go to those lengths to find out things that happened in Ukraine, things, you know, because I mean, we know already that people were arrested in Ukraine for interfering.
You would think that the media might want to go to those lengths to find out more information about it.
So I keep coming back to
not in my name,
that our money
is being used the way it is, and and the State Department is
doing what they're doing in our name.
I am disgusted by it.
Well, you know, the interesting thing to me is there's a whistleblower for Donald Trump,
Donald Trump's phone call, right?
But there was not a whistleblower on any of the things that you've uncovered that have been happening in the State Department for so long.
How is it that we have so many people involved in all of these corrupt dealings that are going on, and we don't have a whistleblower on any of it?
So, you know, what's crazy is listening to the impeachment, and this is why it was driving me crazy.
I just couldn't listen to it because they are framing this as Donald Trump, who gave them the javelin, gave Ukraine the javelin.
That's what they have been begging for for, you know, about a decade.
Help us.
We need tank killers because of Russia.
Obama wouldn't do it.
Obama wouldn't do it.
He was giving him blankets and band-aids and, you know, all kinds of
that stuff.
But what they really needed was a strong military.
So Donald Trump comes in and he gives that.
They all say that was good.
This is much better than the last administration.
He was really helping them.
But as soon as he starts to get into...
Yeah, now what, but wait a minute.
I thought we weren't nation building.
I thought we weren't doing all the things that always get us into trouble.
Then they all circle the wagons and they all start to come after him because they've got a good thing going on.
And it's not just in Ukraine.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, and that's why, you know, it's mind-boggling to think you have this entire group of people working, you know, in government, in the State Department, who it makes you wonder, do they go into it because they're already corrupt?
Do they get corrupted when they get there?
Are they all kind of brainwashed?
You know, it makes you wonder how are they all in on it?
I think some of them are brainwashed.
Yeah.
I mean, it's just the progressive thing.
Some of them really, truly believe that this is the right thing because they believe in that one world government.
And
but
to
really look at it, you know, if they, if they weren't involved in it, they would watch tonight's show and they would look at it and they go,
good God, that's not good.
You know what I mean?
But it's just normal for them now.
What happened with Clinton and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, what they set up is
insanity.
It really, truly is insanity.
If you think America is the place that is just, you know, look, we want to be there to help people.
We want to be there to support people,
you know, but we don't want to get involved in your politics.
We don't want to start revolutions.
We don't want to do that.
Because that has always been that's Bay of Pigs.
That is the Shah of Iran.
That is Benghazi.
That's Libya.
That's all of the Middle East.
That's Iraq, Afghanistan.
Tell me where one of these has worked out well.
Right.
And we're doing it, even it's not, it doesn't stop in Ukraine.
Yeah.
It's going on not only
in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, it's going on now in South America.
There were two revolutions going on right now.
What a surprise.
They were governments that were very pro-America,
very, very
pro-free market.
you know, conservative, really, nations.
And one of them, one of the leaders just had to leave to Mexico and and
be granted asylum.
Guess who was there stirring it up?
Our State Department.
And it's happening here.
Well, you know, the interesting thing to me, too, reading this was
they come off like they truly are passionate about these causes that they promote, right?
Climate change, you know,
the border crisis,
all of these issues that they want you to believe they're so passionate about because they care.
They're the ones who care.
And you look at all of these things that you're going to lay out tonight and you're like, they don't care about any of it.
They are using all of these people.
Yeah.
I mean, you want to talk about useful idiots.
They are building an army of useful idiots.
All around the world.
All around the world.
And, you know, I'm convinced that that's why the whistleblower is not coming.
I mean, did you see all the stuff of the whistleblower?
I mean, the whistleblower is, his fingerprints are all over everything.
He's like, he's not a, he's not a kingpin.
He's just, he's like,
he's Al Capone's accountant.
He just knows where everything is.
He's involved in everything at a lower level.
He's not the idea guy.
But that's why you can't have him testify at all.
You'll understand why.
This thing is so scripted and so tight, and no one is allowed on the Republican side to ask certain questions.
And it's because it all leads to this.
Yeah.
I mean, you know, it's interesting.
We are now in a world where you're not supposed to believe your eyes or your ears.
You're just so Adam Schiff is going to be there and tell us the truth, right?
But we've got all of this evidence.
No, no, no.
Adam Schiff will tell you what to believe and what not to believe.
They are, you know, I don't think it's a coincidence that you had
the whistleblower it had to be heard and then five days after our first special uh all of a sudden no the whistleblower can't be heard no we got to protect the whistleblower i don't even know who the whistleblower is said adam shift just a little while ago really
i thought he met with you yeah that's insanity it's insanity um and so
They all of a sudden spun on a dime, and I've been watching because I haven't said certain titles and names and things like that because I know what's going to be said.
And I am watching what the New York Times, what Adam Schiff, and everybody else has put out in the last week.
They know exactly what we're on to, and they are laying this groundwork down for the counter-attack.
And I'm telling you, don't buy into it.
And the only way you will buy into it is if you don't watch the special, if you don't see the actual documents, everybody who I have told, you're the second person that's been allowed to see this script.
Everyone that I have told, and I mean people in Washington, D.C.,
they've all said the same thing.
You can prove that?
Yeah.
Yeah, I can.
It's a conspiracy theory unless you have the documents that prove it.
And we do.
And it really puts into perspective how untouchable these people think that they are, that they would have this sort of a paper trail and not think that they will ever, you know, pay price for it.
Yeah.
That is, that, that was, we looked at documents where, and I said, okay, I know this is marked, you know, marked secret or marked, uh, you know, from this person or it's marked from a FOIA release.
Are we sure
that that's this, this is the actual document?
Because it's, it's so crazy.
It's so crazy that they would write this stuff down.
But they think they're right and they think they can get away with it.
And who's going to stop them?
And
that's what they're showing right now.
This is why I say, and I mean this sincerely, you have to watch tonight's special
because we must insist that this goes to a full open hearing in the Senate.
And the Senate calls to
witness Chalupa,
the ambassadors,
the whistleblower, and a few others that you will understand tonight.
And they must be called
because I swear to you, not in my name.
This changes my relation.
If this is what America is going to be,
then I don't want to be a part of it.
I'll go back to the Constitution and I'll live my life, but I'm not answering to a government that is doing this because it's everything that the Democrats say we are.
Well, yeah, now we are that.
Now we are that.
And it's not just our country that's in trouble.
It's the entire world that this is allowed to stand.
It's the entire world.
Okay, so Sarah, we'll be on your show, and I think you're going to help me on my show today at five o'clock, and we'll go over some more of this.
And then if you haven't seen the news and why it matters, you should.
It's available at blazetv.com.
Right now, if you use blazetv.com/slash Glenn, use the promo code GB20Off.
You'll save 20% off your membership right now.
Democrats Hydra free tonight, 8 p.m.
Eastern, Facebook and YouTube, free for everyone.
Tell everyone you know.
The Democrats Hydra tonight, 8 p.m.
Eastern live.
Thanks, sir.
So Sandra was having trouble sleeping
for a very long time because all throughout the night she'd wake up in pain.
The problem was the inflammation in her joints.
You may or may not know that
aching feeling that you can get throughout your body when you have the flu.
That is miserable, but there's nothing worse than that feeling is happening in your joints all the time.
Sandra was skeptical, but she was also desperate when she heard about Relief Factor.
She had little to lose and a lot to gain if it worked, so she took it for a few days.
She said, just within a few days, my pain began to melt away, and now I sleep like a baby.
Which, what?
You drool all over yourself, wake up screaming with crap in your pants?
That doesn't sound like...
Maybe she means something else.
Anyway, Relief Factor reduces inflammation, major source of most of the pain, and it works for 70% of the people who take it.
If you want a drug-free, natural way to ease ease your pain and get your life back, go to relieffactor.com.
That's relief factor.com.
We pause for 10 seconds, station ID.
All right, so we have now Ambassador Taylor, who is in the impeachment hearings in Capitol Hill.
And go ahead and play a little bit of this audio and Stu bring us up to specifications.
What's happening?
Yeah, basically, the main thing I think Taylor's trying to do is expand this from a conversation about one phone call into a pattern of months of behavior that led everyone in the department to understand this was acquitted pro quo, that this is what they were doing, and it was
a vast departure from established U.S.
policy.
Now, of course, the president gets to set U.S.
policy, so the departure might offend Taylor, but that doesn't mean it's illegal.
And it certainly doesn't even mean it's unethical.
If Trump has a different idea, that's it.
Right.
And if it was done in secret, too.
I mean, you don't commit crimes and announce what you're doing.
On television, do you?
You just don't.
I mean, their problem is Rudy Giuliani, and I can understand that.
You know, that he came in and did stuff, but he was very open about it.
He said on television over and over and over again, hey, this is going on, and nobody seems to be looking into it, so I'm going over and I'm going to meet them.
Hey, I went over and I met with them and I've got some information and I just gave it to the State Department and they're not doing anything.
They're not even looking at it.
One of the big things Republicans are talking about is that, yes, you know, you hear, Taylor, you're going to hear a lot of these witnesses say basically, yes, this happened.
The issue is none of these people actually talked to Donald Trump.
So without any witness that actually directly spoke to Donald Trump about these things and only got impressions down the great,
sort of down the line, it's going to leave a nice gap there.
Will they come up with a witness that has actually spoken to the president about these things?
That's one of the reasons they're focusing so much on John Bolton, because they think that he might be that guy.
But that is not confirmed yet, and Bolton is saying he will not testify unless courts tell him he has to.
I have to tell you, I think that John Bolton is on the other side of this.
I think he's on Ambassador Taylor's side because he is a big state, big war kind of guy.
And when you see the special tonight, you'll understand why that's kind of important.
You know, it's the State Department doing all kinds of spook stuff, doing all kinds of black ops
in your name with your money that you would never approve.
That's why they can't let this out.
You find out what they're really doing,
you're going to be horrified.
Just horrified.
Bipartisan support for Ukraine in Washington was Ukraine's most important strategic asset, and that President Zelensky should not jeopardize that bipartisan support by getting drawn in to U.S.
domestic politics.
Oh, my gosh.
I had been making and continue to make this point to all of my official Ukrainian contacts.
But the odd push to make President Zelensky publicly commit to investigations of barisma and alleged interference in the 2016 election showed how the official foreign policy of the United States was undercut by the irregular efforts led by Mr.
Giuliani.
This is being led by
President Trump.
And he sets the policies.
So if he says,
I want you to look into these things,
he has the right to do that, and the State Department is supposed to back him up, not fight openly against the president.
He was not asking for a quid pro quo.
But President Trump did insist that President Zelensky go to a microphone and say he is opening investigations of Biden and 2016 election interference and that President Zelensky should want to do this himself.
Mr.
Morrison said that he told Ambassador Bolton and the NSC lawyers of this phone call between President Trump and Ambassador Solomon.
The following day, on September 8th, Ambassador Solon and I spoke on the phone.
He confirmed that he had talked to President Trump, as I had suggested a week earlier, but that President Trump was adamant that President Zelensky himself had to clear things up and do it in public.
President Trump said it was not a quid pro quo.
I believe this was the same conversation between Ambassador Sondlin and President Trump that Mr.
Morrison had described to me on September 7.
Ambassador Sondlin also said that he had talked to President Zelensky and Mr.
Yermak and had told them that although this was not a quid pro quo, if President Zelensky did not clear things up in public, we would be at a stalemate.
And is this a problem for anyone?
You've lost
$7 billion of our money.
You interfered in our campaign.
Is the Glembeck program?
Before I give you another dime, you need to clear things up.
Okay, e-skimming, jackpotting, key reinstallation attacks.
These are the things that are happening right now.
People are trying to separate you from your money, your credibility, and your identity.
When you think about how hard you have to work for what you have and how responsible you are,
these things are worth protecting.
But you can't monitor all of this stuff.
It's important to understand how cybercrime is affecting our lives.
Somebody's identity is stolen every two seconds.
Don't let it be you.
You can miss certain identity threats if you're only monitoring your credit.
But Life Lock detects a wide range of identity threats and alerts you if and when a threat is detected.
Give them a call today or visit their website.
Nobody can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses.
But LifeLock can see the threats that you might miss on your own.
And until December 8th, you can join and get a special radio discount.
Save 30% or more off your first year by using the promo code Beck.
Call 800Lifelock, 1-800-Lifelock or Lifelock.com.
Make sure you use the promo code back and save thirty percent.
Go to BlazeTV.com, use the promo code GB20Off.
Make sure you check out the special tonight.
We have more from the impeachment hearings in just a moment.
So there's such a thing in
stagecraft that's called a mic hog,
and that mic hog happens to be a shift we just heard from Taylor.
The media is promoting this as devastating, devastating testimony.
There is something new in it, but I don't think it's devastating.
Yeah, I mean, they're talking about a call that they, for this, has been disclosed for the first time between Trump and Sondland.
Sondland was the donor to the Trump administration and then also turned into the ambassador to the
EU.
And he is saying that call basically Trump was asking about these investigations the day after Zelensky and Trump spoke to see kind of what the details were.
And he believed that, you know, that Sondland said that Trump was very focused on hearing about Biden and
the Ukraine investigations in general.
Not a huge shocker, but it's something that's mildly new.
We didn't know about that call.
Sonlin will clearly be asked if the call actually occurred.
This is the first we're kind of hearing about it.
Now, if you happen to be one of these people who's listening to this coverage and you have your hand tightly gripped around a shot glass of poison, like the guy, the Russian, in the courtroom a couple of years ago, and are waiting for the right moment to take it, this might be the time, as Schiff has now recognized himself for 45 minutes of questioning.
Here he is with Ambassador Taylor.
And Ambassador Sonlin told President Trump that the Ukrainians were ready to move forward?
He did.
And I think you said that after the call, when your staff asked Ambassador Solmon what President Trump thought of Ukraine, his response was that President Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden, is that right?
And Burisma, yes, sir.
And I take it the import of that is he cares more about that than he does about Ukraine.
Yes, sir.
So he cares more about the missing $7 billion
corruption with the guy who's
Taylor
than he does.
Wow, that doesn't sound like an American president.
Sounds like America first.
Yeah.
with his stated policy.
The security assistance that we provide takes many forms.
One of the components of that assistance is counter-battery radar.
Another component are sniper weapons.
These
weapons and this assistance
allows the Ukrainian military to deter
further incursions by the Russians
against Ukrainian territory.
And did the Obama administration provide those?
Further incursion, further aggression were to take place, more Ukrainians would die.
So it is a deterrent.
He was against sending those.
Also, the ability, it gives the Ukrainians the ability to negotiate from a position of a little more strength.
Ah.
When they negotiate an end, you would think that's what the State Department wants.
Negotiating with the Russians is a strong,
independent Ukraine.
That would reduce the number of Ukrainians who would die.
Until you see the facts,
the provision of U.S.
military assistance would save Ukrainian lives, that any delay in that assistance may also cost Ukrainian lives.
Is that
true?
Yes, the eight years of the United States.
Chairman Corporation, it's hard
to draw any direct lines between any particular element of security assistance and any particular death on the battlefield.
But it is certainly true that that assistance had enabled Ukrainian armed forces to be effective and deter
and to be able to take countermeasures to the attacks that the Russians had.
And I think you said that a Ukrainian soldier lost their life while you were visiting Donbass.
We keep very careful track of the casualties, and I noticed on the next day
the information that we got that one was killed,
four soldiers were wounded on that day.
And indeed, Ukrainians lose their lives every week.
Every week.
Oh, my gosh, I can't take this.
This is
I expect Dudley Dewright to come up with Russia was making a lot of time.
Nell, I'll untie you from the track.
Why is that significant?
This is significant, Mr.
Chairman, because
the Ukrainians, in particular under this new administration, are what they're doing.
Please don't miss this special.
I have all the documentation.
We have them on videotape.
We have the documentation.
That testimony there is such doublespeak that you wouldn't even recognize unless you watch the special tonight.
When you know what these people are actually doing,
I don't know how to present this to you because I know the game that the media is going to play, and I know the game that Congress, the State Department, the intelligence community,
I know the players, and we announce the players tonight.
We show you the players tonight, and I know how they play.
They play for keeps, and
they are just going to
spend a lot of time
and a lot of money discrediting
but you have to know what is true
and
you have to rely on your own eyes and ears and common sense and look for documents look for documents
if I can't prove this tonight with documents you should dismiss it
but they are telling a story here that is,
I can't even, I don't even know if I can say half true.
They're telling you the part of the story that they want you to believe that that's who they are and that's what they do.
If this doesn't, when you see the full scope of this,
and there's one more shoe to drop, and it's going to drop after the new year, because we are working with law enforcement, and I'll leave it at that.
In an investigation that has been going on unbeknownst to anybody for about a year,
I was brought into this over the summer.
And as I spoke to these people,
I didn't know exactly how this fit.
I knew you would want to hear about it, and it is horrifying, but I didn't know how it fit.
I do now.
I do now.
What you're going to see tonight is happening here in America.
And I will, along with law enforcement, bring that story to you after the first of the year.
That's up to them if they can close it out.
But it's happening here.
And you see evidence of it everywhere.
Everywhere.
But it's red pill, blue pill time.
You're either going to go back to sleep and you're just going to accept this and you're going to accept that, oh, this is the story of Donald Trump going after Joe Biden, whatever.
I don't know what the president, I don't know what the president is doing.
He should not be using the quid pro quo.
There was no quid pro quo.
Yes, there was.
And for good reason.
And I don't know what he's doing there, but this is not about him at this point.
It's not about Biden.
I think the president did the right thing.
But he is a hand grenade and he blew down a wall that is exposing something much bigger that I don't even know if he knew.
And you have to decide.
You know,
there have been times in my life where I have thought to myself, do I want to pursue this line of thinking?
Because if it's true, then what am I going to do about it?
And if it's true, I have to change different things about my life.
One of the biggest things, honestly, is me.
I'm a Mormon.
People are like, do your homework.
What are you, stupid?
Wow, you're a freak.
Do you think I want that?
Do you think anybody signs up and like, I know that was coming?
I know what people say.
Do you think I was like, oh, you know what?
That'll be fun.
It's not fun.
It's a lot of work.
And as I started going into it, I'm like, okay, if I buy into this, my whole life is going to change.
And I don't want to necessarily change it that way.
But when you find truth,
You have to follow it.
Now, that may not be something that you are interested in.
That's fine.
That's what I found.
Religion and spirituality, that's all up to us as individuals, but not the truth that you find
on a trail of breadcrumbs
that lines up with corruption.
If you really truly believe in America,
then you have to ask yourself:
I hate to sound like Jack Nicholson, but can you handle the truth?
Can you handle it?
And don't take it from me.
I want you to take absolutely everything.
We're going to be live tweeting tonight, and we're going to tweet all of the evidence as it comes out.
As I'm talking about it, boom, you'll have the evidence.
Boom, you'll have the evidence.
Boom.
You'll have their testimony.
You'll have
things from FOIA, the Freedom of Information Act.
You will have their memos.
You'll have their emails.
As I talk about it, it will come out.
You you have to make a choice do you want to see this or not
free on facebook for everyone free on youtube for everyone tonight at 8 p.m and live if you want to join our team please join us at blazetv.com use the promo code um gb20 off and you'll save twenty percent with the code so make sure you go to glen uh go to uh theblazetv.com slash glenn glenn.
Blazetv.com slash glenn.
Use the promo code GB20Off.
Tell everyone you know tonight.
Survey conducted last year revealed 79% of smartphone owners used a protective case for their device.
But what about protecting what's on the inside of your device?
If you're not securing your Wi-Fi, cyber criminals can watch your activity on your device and steal all the information that you're sending and receiving, like your password, social security, or financial account information.
Plus, cyber criminals can attack your device with ransomware and malware and spyware.
With a growing number of types of cyber threats, antivirus is not enough anymore because it only protects a part of your digital life.
What you need is the new Norton 360, and Norton 360 gives you the layers of protection that you need, including a VPN to help block the hackers from watching and stealing the information you send and receive online, as well as real-time device protection against known and evolving threats now nobody can prevent all cybercrime but norton 360 is a powerful ally for your cyber safety and until december 8th you can get up to 60 off right now norton.com slash back norton.com slash back
you're listening to glenn back
I don't think we've ever had them dead to rights before like this.
We'll see you tonight.
We're eight hours and four minutes away from our special 8 p.m.
tonight.
Don't miss it.
The Democrats Hydra.
That's exactly what it is.
Tonight, Facebook, YouTube, and blazetv.com/slash Glenn.
This is the Glenbeck Program.
Programme, program, program, program,
program, programming.