The Algorithms Are THROTTLING the Ukraine Special! | Guests: Dr. Robert Epstein & Rep. Chris Stewart | 10/07/19

What a special, special day it is today.

We've got some interesting things to report today.

Can't wait to hear some news from that guy.

Yeah,

because you're special.

He's great.

So we'll explain that in a little while, probably.

Did you see the Joker?

Did you see Joker this week?

Did not.

I did not.

I did.

It's all incel violence, I heard.

It's just trying trying to get incels to shoot up movie theaters.

I don't even know what incels are.

But

if they mean get Antifa all riled up.

Yeah.

Yeah.

That's what I heard.

I heard the politics of it really are left-wing.

Oh, big time.

Big time left-wing.

But it is, it's not what everybody is selling.

It's not the most violent.

Reservoir Dogs is much more violent than this.

Is it the most violent or it's the most likely to get people?

mean, it's supposed to basically.

No, it's a very,

very

good look at, very smart look at what's happening right now.

What's happening right now.

I heard it's also the most realistic villain.

Yeah, you know, it's not a cartoon.

Genesis.

It's, yeah, it's, I thought it was, for a Genesis story, I thought it was absolutely fantastic.

He will get an Oscar, and if he doesn't, he's been ripped off.

Really?

He's that good?

It's that good.

It is really, really, really good.

He's weird, but he's good.

fucking phoenix no it's a weird

weird dude but he's good

the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment

You know, it's always a little weird

when

you have evidence that your your voice is being silenced.

And boy, silenced in a very big and obvious way.

That and my review of Joker,

which kind of go hand in hand.

In one minute, this is the Glenbeck program.

You and I both know that if you want to find out anything at all about guns, the last person you want to ask is a member of the mainstream media.

In fact, you should always treat a gun

as if it's loaded, unless a member of the mainstream media tells you it is.

According to the 1994 CDC survey, Americans use firearms to protect themselves and their loved ones over 1 million times a year.

So what does that mean?

That means that without

firearms, over a million more crimes per year would have been committed every year.

I cannot express in strong enough terms how bad of an idea disarming the public actually is.

That's why the USCCA is giving you seven free chances this week to win $1,000 for self-defense education and training.

Text the word Glenn, G-L-E-N-N, the number 87222, and learn more and claim your free entries.

It's 100% secure.

A confirmation text is going to be sent, but you'll want to hurry because this offer ends October 12th.

Text the word GLEN, G-L-E-N-N to the number 87222.

GLEN to the number 87222.

For more information and rules, go to protectandefend.com.

Standard message and data rates do apply.

So we have some news about our special last week.

We want to thank you so much for being a Blaze subscriber.

I just got some data points last night.

It is now the most watched video on the Blaze platform that the Blaze has ever produced.

That's in nine years.

This is the biggest video we have ever produced.

Most watched video we've ever produced.

That's saying something because it was a two-hour special

and just the chalkboard is 50 minutes long.

Now, here's where it gets weird.

If you go to

YouTube,

or if you go and look for it online,

it's not the biggest video we've produced.

Isn't that weird?

So, inside the platform, it is gigantic.

It is the biggest thing we've ever done.

But if it's shared off of the Blaze platform, all of a sudden it's like, meh, it's okay.

Now it's still big.

Still has almost 2 million views now on all of the different platforms.

But

really?

Strange, right?

I mean, usually, we've seen this a million times.

When we have something that hits with our audience here, it tends to hit with the YouTube audience and with the everybody with everybody with everybody very very standard procedure we're a media company we watch these things closely

and so we've noticed that it's like somebody shifted us into first gear now it couldn't be Google and Facebook could it

Now we have something last night or yesterday, I guess, Brad Pascal, who is the

I know he's the Trump social media guy.

big role in the campaign i believe now yeah okay so last night uh he tweeted investigate or this was 17 hours ago investigate glenn beck nails it the fake news media wants to ignore this if anything close to this existed the gop

uh would play 24-7 on every channel He breaks down the origin of it all and the real collusion against real Donald Trump.

Okay, then he embeds the link.

Then this morning he just tweeted, my average tweet gets 250 to 400,000 impressions.

A great tweet gets a million.

This tweet has 40,000, the lowest of any tweet since I became campaign manager.

Hmm.

Cards are so stacked against us, you won't stop me from getting this out, Libs.

Then Charlie Kirk last night wrote to me and he said, just saw the video, Glenn.

It's unbelievable.

He said,

tweeted it out right away.

Charlie just also tweeted, a typical tweet of mine will get 150,000 impressions and 36,000 engagements.

Yet when I shared the Parscal tweet about truth behind Ukraine, the video of mine, it only got 237.

237.

I choose to believe that Google, Facebook, Twitter are all innocent and people just don't like you.

Now, I don't know if that's possible.

There is a possible.

That is possible.

So if you look at this, this is, by the way, that's not engagements.

Okay.

Impressions, 159,000 is, you know, he just compared his average is 150.

So impressions, 159,453.

This is impressions, not engagement.

Impressions, 237.

That's not even possible.

Not possible.

It's not possible.

237 impressions.

Impressions.

So then Pascal just, or how do you say his name?

Parscal,

he just

tweeted this.

This appears that Glenn Beck's website URL is causing a conversation quality conversion.

No,

I'm sorry, what was that?

He says it's a conversation quality conversion,

which means impressions are not being shown on those links

one step within those that follow me.

So, in other words, if you follow,

you may get the link.

But if you are one step beyond,

the algorithm is stopping it and choking it right after those who

voluntarily said, I want your tweets.

So, not everybody's getting that, but no one's passing it on.

The algorithms are not.

passing it to anyone else.

Right.

It's not going to top tweets or, you know,

and they do that.

And look, it's probably their right to do it, but it's an interesting thing that they are doing.

And if you're going to get protections from the government, how is this possible?

Yeah.

I mean, this we should get Ted Cruz on.

We should get everybody else that's on with Google.

I'd like to talk to Robert Epstein and have him look into this.

Yeah.

Because

if he's seeing it happen as well.

There is absolutely no reason why this

video is not being shared.

There's no, by the way, it is, it's a banned video.

You know how they ban for that,

it's only 2%,

you know, where you can't watch it in

college, you can't watch it in a school campus, you can't watch it

in a library.

Yeah, right.

It's restricted.

Yep.

It's a legitimate idea, the restricted mode thing, right?

Where you would say, well, yeah, if it's

restricted, like, let's say, you know, there's content that,

yeah, they don't put porn on YouTube, I don't think, but they don't, but it's stuff like, you know, sometimes there's violent videos.

There could be, like, you know, sometimes the story with,

let's say, even the Holocaust, right?

But with all the imagery might be in restricted mode.

It's really meant more for parents

than anything else.

Correct.

But again, like

your video, while it has,

I mean, other than boring children to death, is not going to do anything harmful.

No, there's no swear words.

There's no swear words on it.

There's not even conspiracy.

I love the people who have been saying, oh, it's a conspiracy.

What conspiracy?

Everything we showed you was documented.

You can look into that.

Yeah.

I mean, in fact, I want you.

I engaged so many people who are just

haters, just haters that were like, ah, Claude Beck, you're an idiot.

That's great.

Thank you.

I appreciate that.

I accept that.

Can you just tell me where we got it wrong?

I engaged over and over and over this weekend.

Just stick to the documents, the court documents, the sworn affidavits, the audio recordings.

Let's just stick to those.

Don't make this about me.

Stick to those.

Can you tell me what's wrong with any of those?

Nope, not a word.

Audio recordings typically of officials on tape saying

they worked with the Clinton administrator, the Clinton people, to

hurt Donald Trump during the election.

This is a hidden uh recording, by the way, of them at dinner.

So it's not like they were like on stage for some reason to try to uh send a message or anything like that.

Play the tape again if we happen to have it still here.

It's it's it's in uh it's in Ukrainian, uh, so you won't be able to understand it, but maybe you'll be able to understand the word Clinton

in there.

And we had the translation, by the way.

We had to go through multiple hoops to get the translation from an actual Ukrainian translation company.

Right.

Um, because there wasn't an English translation that existed of the video, which is weird.

It's weird because it was on the front page of one of the papers in Ukraine.

This was part of a trial where they convicted two people

in Ukraine, two people,

I mean, you want to talk about closely related to the Obama administration, the guy who was running the anti-corruption bureau, really,

to run this bureau that they put in because they thought Ukraine was too corrupt.

Right.

Right.

And then they lost $7 billion.

And as the government was trying to investigate the anti-corruption bureau with Obama was like, no, no, no, no.

We don't need to investigate that.

Let's look the other way.

Wow.

Here's the video.

This is the audio.

Did those Russians help him?

Your people?

Speaking of Trump.

I think they did.

But I helped them too.

Not him.

I helped Hillary.

Yeah, right.

But then her position tottered.

Well, this is how they write about it, right?

Hillary's humanitarian aid.

Stop for a second.

What the hell does that even mean?

Her humanitarian aid.

They're bringing up, well,

her position teetered.

Yeah, well, her humanitarian aid.

Why would two officials in Ukraine be talking about the Clinton Foundation when they were were talking about how corrupt they were in helping win the election or helping Hillary try to win the election?

How is that?

I mean,

think of that.

It's very strange.

It's almost as if the Clinton administration wasn't really a charity.

Right.

Right?

Like, right.

I mean, you think about it.

How much?

I mean, maybe they're doing all sorts of.

incredible things right now and I'm just missing them.

Yeah.

But I haven't heard word one from any journalist about all the things the Clinton Foundation has done for people since the election ended.

I mean, it's been three years.

I haven't heard that.

Are they even in operation anymore?

I don't even know.

I honestly don't even know.

Are they still in operation?

Are they still accepting donations?

Are they still doing things?

You know, I heard word one about the elections.

It's really weird because all of you lost.

Wouldn't this be like your retirement thing to do if it was really a charity?

At least Jimmy Carter went and built houses.

Still building them now.

He's like 100 years old.

He's still nailing strings together.

It's strange.

It's almost like all those countries that gave money and then strangely got a meeting with the Secretary of State.

It's almost like that was the business.

Almost like it.

But definitely not.

Not worth looking into.

No, okay.

No, not worth looking into.

So here are these guys on tape saying that they helped Hillary Clinton

and they don't know about the Russians.

I suppose they tried to help Trump, but these are Ukrainians.

And they're admitting that they worked to help Hillary Clinton.

And the main guy who is speaking here is the guy who ran the anti-corruption bureau.

The guy who's like, yeah, I helped.

Yeah, you bet.

You bet.

That's the anti-corruption guy.

So here's the thing.

First of all,

I told you this a few weeks ago.

That it is really important that you sign up for

my newsletter at glenbeck.com because that's a way that we have to directly contact you with no filter.

Nobody's cutting our communication.

It is important that you are a Blaze subscriber.

I almost, almost

think maybe, possibly have the purse strings almost open to be able to get the

to get to be able to hire some investigative journalist and hole them up in a room like the New York Times does and really take this open because nobody's going to do it.

We're at the same position we were at at Fox.

Same place.

We have all the goods.

All it requires is some organization to take it on and actually do it, and no one will.

Well,

we just that's probably a million dollars to be able to do an investigation like this.

We need you to support us and and please subscribe to the Blaze.

And it is the only way that I can guarantee that you will see our videos.

Our videos are now being blocked.

They are being throttled even on Twitter.

The president's people are being throttled.

Why?

Why do you fear this story?

Tell me that, Google.

What is wrong with this story?

We haven't violated any of your standards.

There's nothing offensive on it.

It's all documented.

There's no conspiracy here.

It's all documented.

Why are you so afraid of this?

Why is the media avoiding this?

And why is Google and Facebook doing everything they can to make sure that this word doesn't get out?

Join us at the Blaze, Blazetv.com

slash Glenn.

Do we still have the 20?

I'm just going to say GB20 off.

I don't think that's still active, but

you can try it.

Give it a whirl.

Or use Glenn.

You'll get 10% off.

It's 10 or 20.

I don't know.

Try GB20 off.

See if it goes through because I think it should be 20 off.

It should be more than that today.

We want everybody to join us at Blaze.

Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

Try GB20 off.

If not, just try promo code.

What is it?

Glenn?

Yeah.

And that'll get you to the 10% off.

All right.

I want to tell you about Florence.

She is a longtime listener of this program, and she is the type of grandma who still loves baking cookies for her family when they come over to see her.

I love this.

Oh,

a house that smells like grandma's cookies.

Not any of the pre-packaged stuff that you buy in the store.

I mean, she makes them from scratch herself.

Well, that became really hard for Florence to do a few years back when her constant pain in her fingers and her wrists began to settle in.

For a long time, Florence was afraid that she'd never be able to bake cookies again.

Then she heard me talking about Relief Factor.

You know how the story ends.

If you walk up to Florence's driveway right now, you're apt to smell the

warm cookies

that are baking in her oven right around the time the kids come over after school.

Relief Factor.

It reduces inflammation, the major source for most pain, and it works for 70% of those who take it.

For $19.95, you can get

the three-week quick start.

Small risk for the potential of living the rest of your life with less pain.

If you want a drug-free, natural way to ease your pain, get your life back, go to relieffactor.com.

That's relieffactor.com.

And Florence, you can send us cookies anytime you want.

10-second break for station ID.

Oh, it does?

Yeah, I was looking at the Clinton Foundation to kind of close this loop here.

Yeah.

Unfortunately, you're going to be, you're going to be, this is going to be really sad.

If you're on the driving.

No, they're still open.

As far as I can tell.

They did have a precipitous drop in donations, though.

Huh.

Which is weird because, I mean, all they were doing was curing malaria and stuff.

That's all they were doing.

Yeah.

You would think that they're, just because she's not president, you would think that.

that it doesn't have to do with anything right nothing no in fact it's not about access it's about children yeah and so they their revenue was lower than any year it was in operation which is weird her profile is much higher wow you know people know she still is and they know the work that has been done by this clint by this organization and i think that may be why the uh uh the donations have dropped off because people do know the work yes of the clinton foundation uh they still brought in 38 million dollars in 2017 which is the most recent year.

It's available.

We are coming up quickly on the tax extension deadline.

So we may find out this new number, usually by the end of the year is when you get the previous year's number for charities.

But they brought in 38 million, spent 54 million.

So this is as far as I can tell.

They're cutting in like the government.

Yeah.

As far as I can tell, really, though, though, the first year they've had that issue.

Or they spent a lot more than they took in.

Stunningly, before they got so much money.

Like, for example, you know, in the run-up to the election, let's say 2014, 15,

they brought in $180 million and spent $80 million.

This is weird.

If you notice, the separation there.

Wait.

And then she began to run for president, had another good year in 2015, brought in another $120 million-ish, spent less than $100 million.

And then, if you remember the controversy boiling up, and all of a sudden, the donation started to go down.

And then 2017, even worse.

So

it's a sad story, especially for all of the children.

All the children

who have been helped by children.

All those faceless children.

And I mean faceless.

They don't have faces.

Yeah, because they're not real.

Yeah.

Well, no, these are real children without faces.

Oh, real children without faces.

They're born without faces.

Born without eyes, nose, mouth.

Identities.

It's a horrible.

Yeah, they have no identity.

So you can't track them.

You can't track them.

And their faces.

They're actual children.

You might think those faces are blurred out in all the photos.

No.

They just don't have faces.

That's what their face came out of.

So it takes a lot to feed these children oh because you don't even know where their mouth is no you don't know no you kind of just have to throw food in their general direction well you you might ship it there or you might just think about shipping it there right i mean well you have other things to pay for i telepathically feed these children with enough money i can do that You don't usually use telepathically in tax documents, but I believe they did in this case.

I think

they may have, oh, if you could just, you could hear the cries at night, but you can't because they don't don't have any mouths.

But the Clinton Foundation is there for them.

Best thing about these kids, too, is they don't inhale and exhale, so no CO2.

Oh, being exhaled.

Carbon neutral kids.

Oh, that's

American Financing Corporation, NMLS 1-82334.

www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Those kids aren't the kids we have to eat.

2019 has been the best year for mortgage rates since 2011.

Large part of that has been the result of the Fed policy and the trade war with with China.

Major updates on either front could cause could cause

kind of a volatile reaction in those rates.

I've been saying for a long time now is the time to get your financial house in order.

This is your chance to pay off any high interest debt or lower your mortgage rate while the markets are still in your favor.

Or if the time is right for you to purchase a home, now's the time to take advantage of the historically low mortgage rates.

You need to call the people at American Financing.

I've known these people for a very long time.

They are salary-based mortgage consultants who are going to talk to you.

And in about 10 minutes, they're going to be able to advise you on what the best options that you have available and how best to go achieving them.

No upfront fees, no pressure, just good solid advice on your financial future.

You could close in as early as 10 days.

It's American Financing at 800-906-2440.

AmericanFinancing.net.

Go to Blazetv.com.

Use that promo code Glenn.

You can try GB20 off.

Maybe it'll work.

But $10 off for promo code Glenn on your subscription.

Subscribe now.

Is it really?

Wow.

Okay.

That's major.

All right.

Missing something.

Welcome to the program.

Boy, we've got some major breaking news.

Corning to now, Stu and I don't think there's any big deal to this.

Of course, I noticed you guys were avoiding the real issue.

Second whistleblower.

Great.

Yeah, you talk about that special all you want.

Notice you're avoiding the real issue of the second whistleblower.

Welcome to the program, Pat Gray from Pat Gray Unleashed.

It's good to be here to finally tell the truth

about what's going on.

So the whistleblower, Stu and I both tend to agree that what's the point?

He's just regurgitating.

He's He's also,

he's another guy who also has second or third-hand information.

I notice he don't even talk about that.

No, but wait, no.

But he also hates Trump's guts.

Right?

No, but they're saying that he actually.

He wouldn't lie.

He wouldn't lie to this guy.

We don't know who he is, but we're pretty sure he wouldn't lie about it.

Okay.

Wait, I don't know.

Because my understanding was the big deal was this guy has first-hand information, which was part of the interesting story before the transcript was released.

It's not part of the story now.

I know.

Like, we already have the call in which these things were discussed.

We know exactly what was discussed.

So, we don't need a person with first-hand information.

Not to mention, Donald Trump has said many of these things publicly, which is we all kind of have first-hand information out of that thing.

Right.

When he says it publicly, and Giuliani goes on TV and talks about it, don't we all kind of get first-hand information?

Like, we're all hearing it, right?

So, I know the only thing we need to parse, really, is whether he did it for political purposes or whether it's in the interest interest of the country.

I think it's not both.

I think it's both.

I think it's both.

I think, look, I don't like.

I don't happen to be in the same alignment in this particular case.

Yes, yes.

I don't like the fact that he brought up Joe Biden.

I don't like the fact that he did that.

But I'm sure that happens all the time.

Don't you think

I don't want to go down there?

My dad, remember

what lesson did I learn

from my dad with Nixon's impeachment?

Do you remember?

Did they all do it, right?

Yes, my dad said they all do it.

He just caught.

Got caught.

And I hated that.

I do think that's

true.

Yeah.

But I do think that's 100% true.

The issue here is, you know, I don't think Barack Obama was on these calls saying these names in this way.

Like, there's a different way these things get communicated typically.

Yeah.

And it's because of the way Trump runs his organization, right?

He wants to be involved in

every part of the organization.

He doesn't care about finesse.

No, he doesn't.

So there's no finesse here, so it's a little bit more overt than you're going to find, I think, in other administrations.

But we all know these things happen.

Hillary Clinton.

Yeah.

I'm not sure she had a velvet hammer to her hammer.

Yeah, you might be right.

I think Hillary's much more of a person, though, that has underlings and

people doing these things for, as we see with the Ukraine thing, right?

Like the Ukraine thing is,

and we have the video of this, or excuse me, the audio tape translated, but you can, it's these officials talking about their dealings with the Clinton administration or the Clinton campaign.

There's not a recording per se of Hillary Clinton specifically asking for that, right?

And that is what I think the issue here is that they have Trump on record.

But again, Trump was on record before this call was out there.

Giuliani was on television saying he was going to Ukraine to investigate these things.

This is not a surprise to anybody who follows the news, but that is really the target here.

It's people who don't follow the news and didn't know these things were going on the whole time.

Well, it is

grotesque that he said,

and by the way, I want you to, but I think it is in the national interest.

And I wish you just would have left it with the, you know,

what, 541 words before he said.

Yeah.

You know,

because what he's what he said was, look, there's corruption, and there is.

There's $7 billion of your money that is missing.

$7 billion.

That's an issue.

That is a real issue.

Barack Obama.

Nobody's talking, except you.

Yeah.

And nobody's talking about that.

Barack Obama and

the changing of the embassy and making sure that we have an ambassador there that is blocking all of the prosecutors from coming into the country, our country, and telling us the truth.

I mean, there is real problems here.

That doesn't mean that you don't investigate Donald Trump as well.

Fine.

You want to investigate?

My personal opinion is Donald Trump should say, investigate all you want.

I've been saying this to the American people, and Rudy Giuliani has been saying it.

We told you we were going to do this about a year ago.

And you guys didn't want to pay any attention because you know what we'll find in Ukraine.

So I made a phone call.

Yeah, I did because there's a new president there.

I'm not talking to the old president because I know the old president was all set up by Barack Obama and his team, and they were all part of the corruption.

This guy's been brought in to clean up the corruption, and I'm not going to, quite honestly, I'm not going to give them a dime.

Now, he hasn't said this, and I don't believe there was quid pro quo for the money, but I wouldn't have a problem with it.

If he said, I want to know you're actually cleaning up corruption, I want to see what you're doing before we send you another dime because we sent your country seven billion dollars and

it was lost.

Lost.

Totally appropriate.

It's only not appropriate if you

can assign negative

motives to Trump.

Correct.

If it was only about his personal gain,

then it's bad.

But it wasn't.

I mean, look, this is clearly in the U.S.

interest to find out what happened with his money, what happened with corruption with a former vice president.

These are all things that are in the U.S.

interest.

Do you think,

I mean, is there a good argument to say that Donald Trump was partially, at least, motivated by politics?

Yeah, probably.

But again, these people are people.

It's not mutually exclusive.

If they can find something that is good for the country and they think it benefits them politically, they're all doing it, breaking news.

This is 100% of politicians that would do these things.

Now, here's my problem.

You know, we said during the campaign as advice to President Trump, don't piss off the intelligence community.

Don't piss off the intelligence community.

Yeah, he continues to do that.

Yeah, he made nothing but enemies.

Both of these guys are from the intelligence community.

Both of these whistleblowers are from the intelligence community.

We know the second whistleblower blower is a CIA guy.

Yeah, we know he's from the intelligence community.

Intelligence community.

So we know that.

And supposedly has first-hand knowledge of the things that we got the transcript of.

So think about that.

Right.

I also have first-hand knowledge of that because I read it.

Yeah.

Right.

I can testify to what was on that phone call.

I read it.

Yeah, I read the transcript.

Yeah, I can testify on that.

So, you know, but I think there's going to be, I think you are seeing, if you looked at the chalkboard, you saw the intelligence community, the State Department were both involved in this corruption under the Barack Obama administration.

You had William Brenner,

who was running, was it William Brenner?

Yeah.

Brennan?

Brennan.

William Brenner was the actor, wasn't he?

Or the director?

But anyway, you had Brennan running that place.

The guy who said that, you know, the Muslim Brotherhood is largely secular.

That was Clapper.

I had that.

I just checked on that this morning because I was confused as well.

Really are.

Yeah.

It was Clapper.

Brennan is the one who said that we can't call it Terra because Terra is a frame of mind.

We can't call it Giad because Giad is a

holy

struggle.

He's the one who did that.

It was Clapper who said the Muslim Brotherhood is largely secular.

Okay, well, you can see why I confused them because they sound exactly arright.

So they were put in by the Obama people, and you know they brought Obama people into the intelligence community.

And if you believe

that you're on the right side in the intelligence community and you have the philosophy that

many in the Obama administration had.

What,

you're not going to hurt this president?

You're not going to, I mean, it is a deep state operation.

And if you think that's a conspiracy theory, I want you to call me.

Please call me right now.

I want to be wrong.

I want to believe that the State Department and the intelligence community and the last administration were not doing the things that we have affidavits on, we have eyewitnesses on, we have text messages, we have emails, and we have an audio tape.

But just call me and just tell me how do I dismiss those things.

Everybody's trying to make this all about Donald Trump, and you're just trying to bail out Donald Trump.

No, I'm not.

I don't have a problem with what he did other than I think it was grotesque, but I don't think that it was

if Biden wasn't running, who would have a problem with this?

He should do this because that's a good point.

We lost a lot.

Would they do that with Cheney?

Would there be any if Cheney had some complications or some corruption allegation and they were checking on that, would anyone worry about this at all

if the Democrats were doing it or the Republicans were doing it for that matter?

Of course not.

I mean, it is they're they're inserting the politics.

Look, it's all part of this conversation.

I'm not denying that, but they they are denying that finding out where $7 billion of our money went is in the national interest, which is insanity.

You have to acknowledge that both are there.

And they're denying.

They're saying that there was no wrongdoing.

There's nothing happening in Ukraine.

Explain the affidavits.

Explain the court case.

Explain the audio.

Explain the text messages.

Explain the ambassador of the U.S.

Explain all of it.

No one ever will.

No one will.

You know, one of the more disheartening parts of this is that it's not going to stop either.

If it's not this, it's going to be something else, and they're just going to be relentless all through.

If he wins a second term, they'll be doing the same thing all through the second term as well.

They hate him so much, they're just going to keep going.

I think that is the hope that they are

going to paralyze him.

They think, though, no, I think they are hoping that the American people will come to the conclusion that that you just gave, and they'll say, We're not going to have anything done.

We can't have another four years of this.

Yeah, that's a definite possibility.

Yeah,

I think that's what they're doing.

It's just Cloud and Pivot at this point.

Just throw as much as you can at them until they just get tired of it.

You overload the system.

People say, Okay, I can't take it anymore.

Just vote for the other person, whoever it is.

Well,

look what's happening.

It's interesting that it is the year anniversary of the Kavanaugh hearing.

And what were they doing?

They were losing.

And so then they came at the last hour with a witness.

That witness didn't seem to be credible, so they didn't actually bring that witness up the right way.

And then

so then they bring her up.

They

parade it around, say he's got to go.

Trump doesn't fold.

The entire thing falls apart.

She's discredited, but there's more.

There's other whistleblowers on him, but none of them are credible.

This is the same movie.

We saw it last year.

They're still dragging out those

uncredible.

Exactly right.

Exactly right.

We know what they're doing.

And if the press would have ratted out this scam last year,

they might have had credibility this time, but they have no credibility.

Okay, our sponsor this half hour is Simply Safe.

When I heard about Simply Safe's video verification team, my

mind went someplace that I

it's we were probably alike.

It goes to bad places.

Wait a minute, if there are people watching cameras in my home when I'm away, making sure that someone isn't breaking in, what keeps them from watching when I'm there?

Okay,

Simply Safe has worked on this concern forever.

In fact, they they didn't come out with their video camera.

I think it was like two years late.

They spent almost two years developing this camera that has an automatic cover that audibly clicks into place when you're home and audibly opens

and they had to get the right metal to make the right sound so it wasn't irritating, but so you heard it every time that camera would open up because they know they're just like you.

I talked to the founder of Simply Safe and I said, what are you doing?

And he's like, Glenn, that's exactly what went through my mind.

I don't want a camera that's exposed in my house all the time.

He said, that's why we made it this certain way.

These guys think like you do and it's all in the small details that makes the difference.

This is why their round-the-clock monitoring and their system is top of the line.

It's $15 a month for the monitoring and it will reduce the time that police get to your house from 45 minutes to seven minutes.

And right now, they have a huge deal going on in the system: simply safebeck.com.

You get a free HD security camera when you order.

That's a hundred dollar value.

And you'll have eyes on your home 24/7.

Video evidence if somebody tries to get in.

You are safe.

It is simply safe.

Get your free HD security camera now.

It's simply safebeck.com.

That's simply safebeck.com.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

Welcome to the program.

There's a controversy going on with the NFL and the Houston Rockets.

Is it Daryl Maury?

Yep.

Tweeted, I stand with Hong Kong.

I know.

And now he's NBA, by the way, not NFL.

Yeah, sorry, NBA.

I was thinking NFL because I wanted to make the point that the NBA is doing this because

they need the viewership in China and they want the market in China.

And it's the same reason why the NFL, you would think, would not allow things to go like the kneeling, but that's because they're trying to expand their brand internationally as well.

America for these big corporations

has just become not their home,

just another market.

Yeah, I mean, the NFL is much more, I think, nuanced than that.

The NBA is outwardly defending the Chinese government and this country and the policies.

And it's incredible.

All I said was, I stand with Hong Kong.

And now the NBA, who pulled their all-star game out of Charlotte because they didn't like the bathroom policy of North Carolina, is now not just working with China, but outwardly defending the government in China that has killed 60 million people.

They are.

This is insanity.

Insanity, because why?

They want to recruit Chinese basketball players?

And the Chinese, you know.

It's a market.

It is, well, it's partially that.

And it's, you know, the Rockets are the most popular basketball team in China because they had Yao Ming, who was on their team for many years.

And they work very closely with China.

And like, look, a lot of U.S.

companies do, but it's a different story to come out.

And, I mean,

there are owners today writing long Facebook posts about this separatist movement that you don't understand.

Hong Kong, it's dangerous.

What the hell are you talking about?

They couldn't be more dangerous than killing 60 million people.

I'm relatively certain of that.

Unbelievable.

This is what, three times as many people that the Nazi regime was responsible for?

And we have a bunch of basketball teams coming out and defending them?

It's insanity.

It's sick.

It's sick.

We have forgotten who we really are.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

You know, it's interesting is South Park has more backbone than almost anyone else in business today.

I want to talk to you about Relief Factor.

Relief Factor is a way for you to be able to do the things that you love to do.

I was up in Chicago this weekend, had to give a speech, and

I would give speeches, and I would almost collapse after the shows

from so much pain.

And they would always have to, if I had to do something, they would always have to have a private room that they could whisk me into so I wasn't seen by anybody.

I got off stage and they're like, you need to go.

And I'm like, no, I'm good.

Let's stay and let's meet the people.

That comes from Relief Factor.

And I am grateful, grateful for the pain relief.

You will be too.

If you're in pain, start doing the things you love again.

Try Relief Factor.

It's not a drug.

It's just, it reduces your inflammation, which causes pain.

ReliefFactor.com, ReliefFactor.com.

Go there now.

Get your three-week quick start.

Get out of pain.

The fusion

of entertainment and enlightenment.

So it's fascinating to me that last week we did a chalkboard on what's really happening in Ukraine

and

everything on the chalkboard was was backed up by court records, affidavits,

first-hand accounts, texts.

We had emails, banking records, we had everything.

Nothing in that special of that 50-minute chalkboard has anything conspiratorial or anything that is not provable,

and yet

we seem to be blocked by Google and Facebook.

We are so throttled down.

Charlie Kirk wrote this morning and said, Glenn, I usually have 150,000 engagements and impressions on

my tweets.

I tweeted a link to this, and what normally is

150,000 this time was 237.

Only 237 saw this tweet.

Gee, you think we're being throttled?

More in one minute.

This is the Glenbeck program.

Our country is being embroiled yet again in a battle against corruption and wrongdoing.

The Democratic Party seeks to impeach the president.

I'm not here to defend the president or to impeach him.

I'm here to look at the facts.

Isn't that what we should all be doing?

Let the chips fall where they may.

Seems like in this particular case, the lion share of corruption happens to be on the other side,

in their own backyard with the Democrats.

And we have a hard time getting the voice out

and letting people actually see the facts.

The constant assault on conservative voices, the constant assault on our Constitution, rule of law, liberty, is subsidized by so many large corporations right now in the United States, and your cell phone company may be among one of them.

Patriot Mobile is the only cell phone company fighting this insanity and donating to causes that you believe in, freedom of speech.

The plans start as low as $25 a month.

You can get nationwide service with U.S.-based customer service.

And there's still time for you to get a Moto Z3 play for only five dollars a month, but they're running out, so don't wait.

And when you use the offer code BECK, they're going to waive activation on up to two lines.

So, switching is really easy.

You're going to save money, and it's the same great cell service that you already have because they're on the same cell towers.

Go to patriotmobile.com slash Beck.

That's patriotmobile.com/slash Beck, or call 877-367-7524.

That's 877-367-7524 or patriotmobile.com slash back.

So I want to go to Dr.

Robert Epstein.

He is a guy who we have had on several times.

He is a guy that was a Clinton supporter

and voted for Clinton.

He's from the other side.

The other side has eaten him now because he dare cross the line and say, hey, there's something going on with Google and their algorithms.

And he has been watching the election and

we've got to help this man raise enough money to be able to

document what this next election, what is happening with this next election, because Google, we know they have said we can't let this happen again.

And he's the only one that is in the position to document this.

And he is not a fan, I don't think, of either side.

He just wants the truth.

Welcome to the program, Dr.

Robert Epstein.

My pleasure, Glenn.

Nice to be back.

It's good to have you.

So I wanted just to touch base with you today because

we have some interesting things happening.

I produced the biggest video the Blaze has ever published.

It is a video that has more views on the platform by far than anything we've done in almost 10 years.

And yet on YouTube and Facebook,

it's performing well, but not like that.

We now have two people who have tweeted it, who have gigantic followings

and they can't, one had engagement of 237.

They have

millions of followers.

I have 2 million followers.

I can't get this thing over

2,000

likes.

How do we prove that we're being throttled here?

Well,

as you may recall, in 2016, I built a monitoring system which allowed me, with people's permission, to look over the shoulders of users around the country.

At that point, I had 95 field agents in 24 states and basically see what they were seeing on their screens as they were conducting searches on Google, Bing, and Yahoo.

So we preserved more than 13,000 election-related searches.

2018, we built a bigger system.

We preserved not only search results, but we also preserved search suggestions and answer boxes.

2020, we're going to build an enormous system with thousands of field agents, and we're going to preserve lots of things.

I'm not going to go through the whole list, but among other things, we are going to preserve tweets that will document, that will show without any doubt, that will quantify

what at Twitter is called shadow banning.

And that's what you and your colleagues are running into.

Basically, if Twitter personnel believe that you're violating any of their terms of service, which we're not,

well, you know, that's very subjective, though, on their part, very subjective.

What they do is they can either downrank you, and they admit this, by the way, they can either downrank you so people don't see you because you're not high in any lists.

You're popping up very, very low,

or actually shadow ban, which means you send out a tweet to your 2 million followers, but your 2 million followers aren't getting the tweet, period.

Or just a small portion of them are getting it.

But we now have a way of actually documenting this, recording it, quantifying it.

So we're going to have rock solid evidence in 2020.

If Twitter is doing this,

we are going to document it, prove it, and we're going to release our findings to the media and to a federal election commission and to various authorities.

So we're going to be tracking all kinds of things with a very large panel of field agents in all 50 states, including shadow banning.

So we also are having a problem with YouTube, and

it's not popping up the way it should in YouTube.

So

it's part of Google, right?

Yeah,

it's part of Google.

Are you going to be watching YouTube as well?

Positively.

We're going to be watching YouTube.

Many, many different ways in which, in fact, five different ways in which Facebook

suppresses material.

I'm not even going to tell you how many ways we're going to be monitoring.

No, don't.

Please don't.

Don't.

Google is the biggest threat there is to the free and fair election.

But I can tell you, I am positive that these companies,

if there's no monitoring system in place, these companies are going to go all out.

And together, I calculate that they can shift 15 million votes next year with no one knowing that they've done it and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace.

I'm having real problems getting my MySpace posts to even be seen.

No one's looking at them at all.

I don't know if you can look into that for me, Doctor.

So

the scary thing here is that this is such an obvious

shadow ban.

There's just no way these metrics are even right.

And they don't care.

They don't care that I'm on the air talking about them doing this.

They don't care that you're doing it.

They don't care.

I mean, well, they don't care.

In fact,

we learned a lot about shadow banning in January of 2018 from a Project Veritas investigation.

And let me just read you a quote from

a former software engineer.

His last name is Vadrevu, V-A-D-R-E-V-U, about shadow banning.

So here's a former Twitter software engineer.

Quote: The idea of a shadow ban is that you ban someone, but they don't know they've been banned because they keep posting and no one sees their content.

So they just think that no one is engaging with their content when, in reality, no one is seeing it.

End quote.

So

Project Vercas interviewed about half a dozen current and former employees of Twitter, and they all admitted that this occurs.

Then Forbes magazine did a fabulous piece.

I recommend people look that up, which is entitled, Is Twitter Really Censoring Free Speech?

where Forbes went to Twitter and asked, you know, asked these tough questions.

And in this wonderful article, they report Twitter's responses.

Twitter

like Google, like Facebook, they answer questions about content suppression, about censorship, in very creepy ways.

Because

Twitter said, no, we don't shadow ban, but oh yes, we do downrank

and we make decisions about how to protect

our users from content they shouldn't be seeing.

Right.

That is an amazing

quote.

I have it here.

Let's see.

Here you go.

Now my computer screen is a very good thing.

No external audits.

They will not allow any external committees

to come in and look over what they're doing.

They don't allow that.

And they will not release the demographic characteristics of the people they use to make decisions about suppressing content.

It's amazing.

That's very important, too.

Here's a quote.

Twitter does not shadow ban accounts.

We do take actions to downrank accounts that are abusive and mark them accordingly so that people can still click through and see the tweets if they so choose, which, of course, no one does, right?

Like, that's not the way people use Twitter.

They don't go, they don't click on the named accounts.

And we know this happens, right?

This is essentially their own mute feature.

I use it all the time.

I freaking love the mute feature, but I'm choosing to do it.

There's tons of people who are calling me a Nazi every single day that I don't see, but they think I see it.

Like they're wondering.

They tweet all the time negative things to me, and I'm just like, mute, mute, mute, mute, because I don't care.

But that should be something that the user does.

That should not be something that Twitter is doing for us.

Well, this is the problem, or I should say one of the big three problems.

The first one is the surveillance.

Second is the

censorship.

And the third is manipulation.

And here we're talking about the censorship problem.

And, you know, you don't know what you don't know.

So censorship is so dangerous because,

you know, if material is being suppressed, content is being suppressed, how would you know that?

And of course, what I what I study is how,

you know, these kinds of activities shift people's thinking, beliefs, attitudes, and of course, shifts their voting preferences.

And it is astonishing the impact that these kinds of manipulations have on people's thinking and behavior and on their votes.

And again, you don't know what you don't know.

You know, it's really interesting because I read the New York Times, I listen to the Daily every day, you know, because I want to be informed on what they are talking about.

I need to understand all sides of an issue, and I want to see

what they are publishing or what they aren't publishing or what their spin is when they do.

And it is incredible to me that there are many people who are on the right who don't necessarily know.

They'll blame the New York Times for never covering such a, and they will have, but it's the New York Times, it's not the mainstream media.

However, the mainstream media in bulk, they don't watch, listen, or pay any attention to what people on the other side are saying and report it as fact or even just this is the way half the country feels.

And after the last election, I had a friend come down who was was a liberal and paid no attention to the other side.

And we told him about all of the different things that had happened in the Obama administration, like the IRS investigation.

He had never even heard of it.

And so they can report things, but by the way they report it or by the way they downplay it, et cetera, et cetera, half the country

isn't even aware of what the other half thinks.

That's a real problem.

Well, this also is

a worse problem than any censorship in history because when these big tech companies suppress material, there's no way to counteract it.

In other words,

Google has no competition, has no competitor really anywhere in the world.

Neither does Facebook.

Neither does Twitter.

I mean,

if these platforms want to suppress material, you can't counteract it.

In other words,

if the newspaper published on one side of Pittsburgh wants to suppress something, well,

chances are there's a newspaper, something or other on the other side of Pittsburgh where they're going to bring that material out.

But

you can't counteract it when

Google, Facebook, or Twitter suppresses material.

There's no way to counteract it.

In fact, generally, unless someone like me builds monitoring systems, you can't even detect what they're doing.

Robert, I can't thank you enough for all of the hard work that you are putting through.

If you would like to donate,

please donate.

And if there happens to be wealthy people that are listening right now, please donate generously to mygoogleresearch.com, mygoogleresearch.com.

This is the guy who's actually just searching for answers and the truth.

It is legitimate research.

And

right now, he happens to be on the outs with the left because that's, you know, who's generally controlling these companies.

But you'd do the same if it was controlled by the right.

Please donate to mygoogleresearch.com.

Thank you, Doctor.

I appreciate it.

We'll talk to you again.

Thanks, Ben.

You bet.

So

we've been rebuilding

an old 1880s cabin.

And when I say we've been slowly doing it, I mean slowly because we're trying to do it justice.

And we're also trying, you know, it's not exactly on the top of anybody's hit parade to, you know, to spend money on an old 1880s log cabin.

But we have taken about 10 years to do it and the beds and the quilts and the stove, all of it perfect.

So when it came to window coverings, I wanted to make sure that I could provide, you know, the fusion of the rustic look and, you know, also a little contemporary, you know, and I say contemporary in the last century,

and yet have, you know, linen and everything else that was real natural and would look right in that cabin.

Tanya and I went to blinds.com, and here was the shocker.

When we were typing it, it was cheaper than other places that we had shopped around looking for blinds.

And so I was like, see, look at this.

And then we started to check out, and

promo code came up, and I said, did you put the promo code in?

And she said, no.

And I said, put the promo code in.

It was 50% cheaper than the lowest price that we had already seen anyplace else.

We were floored by how much money we could save and the quality of

the blinds.

Every order at blinds.com gets free

samples and free shipping, and they have 100% satisfaction guarantee, which means if you measure incorrectly, you pick the wrong color, they're going to remake your window treatments for free.

And they have 30,000 five-star customer reviews.

I'm one of them.

Blinds.com.

Go there today, save up to 40% on everything, plus save an extra $20 with promo code back.

That's blinds.com for up to 40%,

plus an extra $20 off with promo code back.

Rules and restrictions apply.

10-second station ID.

All right, so we know that we have been banned.

This is why we ask you, please,

please sign up for the Glenbeck newsletter.

Go to Glenbeck.com and sign up for my newsletter.

Also, if you can, become a subscriber to blazetv.com because you're not seeing everything that we're putting out.

Like I said, this is the biggest video we have produced in almost 10 years.

The numbers on the platform are dwarfing everything.

Now, that should translate to the general population, to the people that are not members of the Blaze, but at least members of this audience.

But if you're tweeting it, if you are trying to send it to your friends,

you're being squashed.

And the algorithms are squashing the release of this video that shows the facts on what is going on in Ukraine.

And I don't think that there is a more important message right now.

And I honestly, I don't care who gives it.

I was talking to somebody last night, and I was like, have them just take all of this information.

They don't have to credit me.

They don't have to say, just get this out.

This is really important.

We would ask that you would watch it if you haven't already and

send it to all of your friends but also ask your friends if they will uh ask your friends if if uh they would also join the blaze and become members i i really um

really want to hire an investigative reporter because nobody else is going to do this um

we we urge that you um support us because I want to take some of that money and I want to

hire somebody that will actually go over and

look into Ukraine and dig up the things that we already have, but then go even deeper and go to China as well.

So join us, please.

Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

Use the promo code GLEN and you'll save 10% now.

Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

Join us now because you're not getting the truth.

All right.

When we come back,

we have another way of getting things out.

It's a tweet storm today that we just started.

We'll tell you about it next.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

So over the weekend, I had to stay at a hotel, as I told you.

And let's just say the quality of sleep, not so good.

I don't want to, you know, besmirch the reputation of the hotel that I stayed at right at the airport.

There's nothing better than that.

Just listen to the planes fly over your head every night.

There's nothing great.

Anyway,

to suggest that maybe the pillows were actual burlap sacks full of cast iron skillets might be a little much because I might be just so

spoiled with my My Pillow that everything feels like that.

Right now, you can get great discounts on all my pillow products if you go to mypillow.com and click on the new radio listener specials.

You're going to see some amazing offers, including their buy one, get one free.

If you buy one pillow, you get the second one free.

MyPillow.com comes with a 60-day money-back guarantee, a 10-year warranty.

Just click on new radio listener specials at mypillow.com.

You'll get the deep discounts on all MyPillow products, including Buy One, Get One Free on their pillows.

Enter the promo code BEC, 800-966-3117.

All right, it's Blazetv.com.

Promo code is Glenn.

Make sure you subscribe and support the sort of research you're about to get from this tweet store.

We'll tell you about that coming up next.

It's Monday.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

And Congressman Chris Stewart joins us now as he's getting on an airplane to, God forbid, go back

to Washington, D.C.

Chris,

he's not on yet.

Okay, hang on just a second.

You know what it is?

Google, Facebook, screwing with their phones.

Yeah.

I'm curious to ask Chris,

you know, obviously these latest developments, what he's seen, what he can talk to us about, because he can't talk to us about a lot of it.

Right.

He's on the intell.

He's going through security.

He's taking off his belt and shoes.

So, yeah,

when he picks his phone back up out of the little round cup,

we'll have him on.

Because has he seen the second whistleblower?

He's seen the second whistleblower, and we want to talk to him about that.

That'll be interesting.

I don't know how much he can talk about with that.

I think he can, I don't know.

They say this is not only the smoking gun, it's the second smoking gun.

The first one wasn't really smoking.

Now, is the smoking gun when Rudy Giuliani was on television saying he was going to do these things?

I kind of thought that was a smoking gun that they were doing it.

That was kind of an interesting turn of of events.

Now, there is more to it, I guess, with the money being withheld, and maybe we'll learn more about that.

We still haven't, but there's still, you know, I do want to ask Chris if he's also seen the full testimony or was present of this person, of the people talking about Volcker and the other people involved here talking about the texts that came out last week.

Oh, yeah, yeah.

Because if you remember, this was like when some of the Trump officials were saying things like, look, you know,

is it my understanding that we're supposed to withhold this security assessment, the money, essentially,

until this investigation starts.

And then the other guy's like, oh, no, you misunderstand what the Trump administration would like to do.

We want to do only the best things with unicorns and puppy dogs.

It's like one of those things of where you could tell both of them are trying to get on record.

They're not actually talking to each other.

They're just both texting to get on record.

But predictably, after this testimony happened, the Democrats bring out.

everything that I would assume is the worst, most damning information.

And we haven't heard anything from the other side of it.

Republicans universally that have seen this information seem to be coming out and saying, if you see the full testimony, you're going to understand what was going on.

Why don't they release the full testimony?

And the Democrats haven't.

So that's interesting, and it's an interesting point, but you know, it's also predictably partisan lines.

This is breaking on.

I wonder if Chris has any more insight.

Obviously, he is a Republican, but he seems to be pretty honest.

He's putting his belt and his shoes back on right now.

Welcome, Congressman Chris Stewart.

How are you, sir?

I got to get my shoes here, Glenn.

Just give me another minute, all right?

All right.

So, Chris,

good.

Did you see the whistleblower report, and can you talk about it?

Yes, and somewhat.

Okay.

We've seen it.

I think much of it has been released.

There's been some redactive portions.

But this is pretty much in a public realm, so we can talk about almost all of it except for some small portions.

Okay, so go ahead.

Tell us your POV.

I mean, this seems like just another guy who's saying, yeah, that phone call happened.

Well, we know that.

Right?

You're talking about the second whistleblower.

Second whistleblower.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Well, no, it was obvious.

I mean, I said yesterday on some media that I thought this was going to come forward because it was obvious that this guy had been having some conversations.

This guy or girl had been having conversations and that

they were interested in talking about it.

But as I said yesterday, what difference does it make?

All they can say is, as you started to say, Glenn, yep,

I listened or I read the transcript.

And yep, that's a phone call.

Well, again, we already have that information.

You or any of your listeners could read that in seven seconds.

And other than that, what can he tell us that's helpful at all?

And the answer to that is nothing.

We can read it.

We can make our own judgment.

I don't need

some secret analyst who tells me what this means.

It's very simple what it means.

Anyone can read it themselves.

All right.

So tell me about,

if you can,

the text messages that were last week they were revealed.

Can you talk about those of them?

Yeah, although a little more limited because it was an executive session, and

we

have to be careful on it.

But this is just the bottom line on this.

And this is so malicious, and it's so deliberate because what they have done is they've taken little snippets of it,

not even an entire short text in its entirety, but little pieces here and there.

And they leak that because, once again, this is an executive session and it's not supposed to be released.

And it creates an impression that is absolutely 100% contrary to the facts or the entirety of this hearing.

And that is, Mr.

Bolker and others came and they said there clearly was no quid pro quo.

There clearly was no linkage.

He has very plausible, very, very reasonable explanations for the timing of the meetings,

you know, the timing of their intention to withhold this agent Ukraine that was based entirely on them trying to pressure Angela Merkel and others in the EU.

And these guys will take little pieces of it, they'll leak it to the media, the media, of course, runs with it.

And by the time the truth comes out, when they'll release a transcript that will show in its entirety what it actually means, the damage is already done.

So, Chris,

I did a special last week.

I don't know if you've seen it,

but I laid a chalkboard out, and it took me about 50 minutes.

Everything in it, we have verified sources on.

There wasn't a bit of conjecture or maybe this happened or whatever.

100%

based on fact.

And it outlines that the Democrats did in Ukraine exactly everything that they are accusing Donald Trump on.

And yet no one in the media cares to cover this.

We're being throttled like nobody's business.

It's the biggest video we have done in almost the 10-year history of the Blaze.

On the platform, it's gigantic, but we are being throttled down.

You know, Charlie Kirk said he gets

about 150,000 views of everything that he does.

When he retweeted this link, it got 237.

And I'm wondering where anyone is

on on

turning this around back on the Democrats.

Is there anybody who is on this trail?

Well, we're trying, Glenn.

I mean, there's a number of us who are trying.

And I was actually listening to you earlier as I was running and you talking about this 50-minute chalkboard and the lack of response on Twitter.

And I would ask, I mean, I'm not terribly surprised.

In fact, frankly, I would have been surprised if you wouldn't have had that kind of response from them and that kind of throttling.

I don't think it's muted, but it's clearly throttled.

But this is just one example.

And, Glenn, let me give you another one that we've been talking about for years that is ignored.

I mean, the Democrats are making this argument that the president needs to be impeached and removed from office because of one sentence in one conversation that he readily made available.

He released that thing within a few days of anyone asking for it.

On the other hand, versus this story, Hillary Rodden Clinton and the DNC paid a foreign agent who then worked with other Russian agents to do what?

To dig up dirt on their political opponent in order to affect the outcome of an election, which is the rumors you hear all the time regarding President Trump, what he said to Ukraine.

We know that they did that.

They did it far more brazenly.

And when does the media ever talk about that?

I just think it's one more example.

Your experience here is just one more example of them.

Look, to call them biased is an incredible understatement.

They're advocates now, and they're dishonest advocates.

And

I don't know what to say.

We just have to accept it and do what we can.

Well, so the only solution here is that the Senate, because you can't in the House, that the Senate

starts to look into this corruption

with the Democrats.

I mean,

why are we playing defense when we should be playing offense?

Why isn't the Senate taking this on and saying, you know what,

we'd like to find out exactly what was happening in Ukraine?

And you go ahead, investigate the president.

We're going to be investigating what was happening in Ukraine and why people went to prison or were convicted.

I think it was overturned, but it's back in court today.

But they were convicted for interfering in the U.S.

election.

We have them on tape

on the video.

We have a tape of the guy who is the head of the Anti-Corruption Bureau in Ukraine actually admitting to helping Hillary Clinton win the election.

Or, I mean, you know, tried to win the election.

Well, and as you said, they're in the House.

I mean, I'm as powerless as a kitten in the house, being in the minority, unfortunately, which is why we got to change that.

But as you said, the Senate, Lindsey Graham and others in the Senate do have the authority to investigate this.

And I think Lindsey's indicated more than a willingness to do that.

And there's one other tool that we have that I think may be more effective.

And that is Attorney General Barr.

Oh my gosh, this guy is a hero to me because he is fearless.

He's committed.

He's not out to make a name or a reputation.

He's been there, done that, doesn't need to do it again.

And I believe he is, as I said, committed to investigating not only the origins of the

FISA warrant and the other, as we know, the other activities going back to 2016 in Russia, but

I think you'd be surprised if he didn't look at Ukraine as well.

That FISA warrant is going to fall apart.

We have documented evidence, Chris.

Please watch

that video.

We have documented evidence that a DNC operative

put all of this information together

and sent it to Michael Issakoff.

Now, I'm not saying that Michael knew

that he was being used, but in that text message or that email, she's alluding to the steel dossier, which is one of the things, if I'm not mistaken, that was used

for the FISA report, was an article from Michael Issakoff.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure, Glenn.

I mean, look, this was talking about circular reasoning or circular life.

This was a FISA document based on the steel dossier, which I just described, the origins of that too.

By the way, painfully, painfully hidden under there was the fact that they knew that it was paid for by the DNC.

But in a footnote,

I defy anyone to read that footnote where they describe where they got this information and who funded it and to actually understand who did it.

It's a very clear effort

to be deceitful and deceptive in that.

But then, as additional evidence, what do they use?

As you just said, Michael Isakoff's reporting.

Where did he get his information from?

From Christopher Steele.

So, I mean, their backup is the same document.

It was just leaked to a reporter, and they claim that that is a secondary source, and clearly it's not, and they knew that it wasn't.

Chris, thank you so much.

We'll talk to you again.

Thanks for the hard work you're doing on this.

I appreciate it.

Thank you, Glenn.

I appreciate the opportunity.

Representative Chris Stewart, 2nd District, Utah.

All right, we're doing something to get this word out,

and

we're going to explain it to you on Twitter.

We need your help on it.

We're going to explain it to you here in just a second.

First, our sponsor this half hour is

Relief Factor.

I want to talk to you a little bit about Florence.

She is a

listener of this program, been a long time listener.

She loves baking cookies for her family when they come over to see her.

She's a grandma.

She's like my grandma, I think.

My grandmother used to make the best cookies ever.

And when you'd go to her house and it smelled like cookies, cookies, it was the best.

Well, that's the kind of grandma Florence was.

And she always believed in making them from scratch.

You know,

she didn't buy them at the store and then bake them off.

But it really became hard for her to do because she had constant pain in her fingers and now the risks and it began to settle in.

And she was afraid that she wasn't going to be able to make cookies again.

You know, she was like, it's not going to be very long before I just can't.

I just can't, I can't mix them.

I can't, you know, put them out of the tray.

I can't even pull them out of the oven.

Then she was listening to this program.

She heard me talk about Relief Factor, and you know how the story ends.

If you walk up Florence's driveway nowadays, you're apt to find the smell of worn cookies lifting you off the ground because she's back.

And this time, she's baking.

If you want a free, a drug-free, natural way to ease your pain and get your life back, do what I did.

Do what Flo has done.

And that's relieffactor.com.

Go there now.

Order your three-week quick start at relief factor.com.

This is the Glimbeck program.

We welcome to the program our head researcher, the guy who's done 99% of the work on our

Ukrainian special.

It's Jason Buttrill.

He's been so busy.

He hasn't watched any of the last two weeks of Cowboys games.

He's missed them both.

Thank goodness.

Yeah.

Same shocking.

How are you, Jason?

Doing good.

All right, so we're doing something on the Twitter feed today, on my Twitter feed, and we would ask that you would

retweet every 10 minutes today.

We are tweeting another fact

about

the chalkboard and what the Democrats did in Ukraine.

This Twitter thread might last for the next seven to eight months.

I think we figured it out.

It's what is it?

It's six hours.

Every 10 minutes, another fact from the chalkboard, and it takes six hours to go out.

And we should probably keep it open-ended, too, because there's no reason to to believe we will not be adding to this thread in future weeks.

For sure.

Yeah, no, we will be.

We will be.

So tell me what we're, so tell me how you've laid this out, Jason.

So if you've pretty much, if you watch the special, you've got kind of a general idea of how this is laid out.

But this will go back from, it's laid out all the way, it's a, it's about, what, five plus years of corruption, of greed, of coercion, of everything.

Strong arming, manipulating the U.S.

election.

It's all of that.

And it goes back a lot further than the July 25th supposed phone call.

But it goes all the way back to 2014.

So when you go through

this timeline or through this Twitter thread, you're basically going back in time, five years to 2014, and you're going to go sometimes month to month, sometimes week to week, sometimes the day after some of these things will happen.

But

you'll go all the way back then and you'll just kind of, it reads almost like an indictment, pretty much, on what everything the left has been doing since.

And we have included

the

documents.

All the background stuff, everything you need to show.

If someone says, what about this?

Then you can go and actually look at it and say, okay, well, how about this?

How about this?

Show them court documents, show them audio recordings for crying out loud, show them everything.

I'd like you to tweet this to Lindsey Graham and also to Barr at Justice.

I think

we need to concentrate

making sure that these people are paying attention to this.

I think Barr is aware of it.

Lindsey Graham, I think, probably is aware of it, but I don't know.

But they need to investigate in the Senate.

I wonder, because we know that there's some Ukrainian prosecutors that still haven't gotten to the United States.

I don't think.

Why not?

So they should be getting visas today and getting over, especially that part of the tweet thread.

When you read that, tweet that directly at the Attorney General or Donald Trump because they need to get over here now.

Okay, it's Glenn Beck at the the Twitter.

Just check my Twitter feed.

Please subscribe and you'll get all these tweets today and pass them on, please.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

Give me my review of

Joker here in just a second.

Stand by for that.

This half hour sponsored by RealEstate Agents I Trust.com over a thousand agents strong with another 5,000 who are on a waiting list to join.

They share my vision on how real estate should be done all over the country.

We named the company RealEstate Agents I Trust.com for a reason

because they are the people that we have found that I can trust and I trust sending them to you.

They show a very high sense of urgency.

My team will respond within minutes, not hours, usually five, ten minutes at the latest.

They'll show professional conduct at all times.

They return the calls.

They do what they say they promise to do.

They're experts in property evaluation.

They know the value of your home and the homes around it on the market.

They exemplify the truth here, lives here, and they have a long track record of performance and success.

There are no part-time agents or people who have poor history.

It's important to us that we send the right person to you.

When you're looking to buy or sell a home,

please please just go to realestateagentsitrust.com.

We'll send them to you so you can find the right real estate agent.

Realestateagentsitrust.com.

Get moving now with realestate agentsitrust.com.

The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

You know,

I am not a sports fan.

That doesn't come as a surprise if you've listened more than one day, but what's happening with the NBA is sickening.

And

the butt-kissing of China by these giant corporations

is absolutely un-American.

I mean, if you want to put the almighty dollar ahead, go right ahead.

But I think it's important that we know who you are.

You know, when you're saying, oh, you know, that's just, they're misunderstood over in China.

They killed 60 million people.

60.

They've got millions in concentration camps.

And you're saying this so you can make money off of basketball?

It's disgusting.

We'll talk about that and my my review of Joker in one minute.

This is the Glenbeck program.

So, you got a business to run, and it comes with the responsibility of hiring new people when positions open up.

And, you know, what's great about it is it's not a hassle, it never takes a long time.

The interview process is a piece of cake, or it's the exact opposite of all of those things.

We can change all that.

zip recruiter is now on the scene ziprecruiter.com does not depend on the candidates to find you it goes out and finds them for you they have technology now and i've been to the zip recruiter building it's enormous it's it's like how many stories was that building like five were you with me on that like five story building and one of them is just data analytics where they're just going out all these scientists are looking to find the algorithms that can go and specifically look for the people that you are looking for.

You get

qualified candidates super fast.

In fact, four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get quality candidates through the site within the first day.

Many times, it's within the first hour of posting.

See why ZipRecruiter is effective for businesses of all sizes.

ZipRecruiter.com/slash Beck.

Do it now.

It's free.

recruiter dot com slash beck zip recruiter dot com slash b e c k zip recruiter it's the smartest way to hire

so I went to uh I went to Joker and not it not knowing what to expect um but after hearing so many people talk about it, I was expecting the most violent movie ever filmed.

And I was quite surprised.

On the way there, I even

said to myself, if it turns out to be that kind of gratuitous violence where it's man's inhumanity to man, I'm leaving and I'll walk out

because I just don't want to put that into me.

I just don't, I don't like,

I just don't like watching, you know,

torture.

Pretty much any Mel Gibson movie.

There's a part where they're always just torturing Mel and he's hanging from chains, and you know, you're like, okay, I got it, I got it, I got it.

So I expected Joker to be really, really, really twisted.

And what I found was the opposite in many ways.

This

movie is unlike any superhero or any comic book movie I've I've ever seen.

This one is

realistic.

This takes place in the 1970s.

They even open with the old Warner Brothers logo from the 70s.

It looks like it's made on film, at least at the beginning.

I mean, it is really,

it's really, really well done.

Joaquin Phoenix is brilliant in this movie.

But what I didn't expect was that for the first three quarters of the movie,

I would find myself saying,

This is a tragedy.

This is so incredibly sad

because he's clearly disturbed, and Joaquin Phoenix really plays this very, very well.

And

he plays a character who is a clown.

And in the first scene, I won't give anything away.

The first scene opens with him getting, you know, mugged by some kids.

He's doing

a clown thing on the street.

And

he gets mugged and beaten.

by these kids.

And you come to find out that that's kind of the life he lives.

He has lived this life where he's always been picked on, always been bullied.

He's obviously, clearly, very mentally unstable.

He had already been

in Arkham

when he was younger.

He lives with his mom.

He has no real life, none whatsoever.

And nobody sees him and nobody listens to him.

And when they do, they beat him up.

And you will go through the first three quarters of this movie,

I think, feeling really bad for him.

And I don't like movies that turn the villain into the good guy and the good guys into a bad guy, which I thought was where they were going with it.

It's not.

And I was greatly relieved.

of that.

I don't know the director and the writer's POV.

I don't know what they were trying to do,

but

the Joker pretty much is leading, you know, in the end.

We all know that he, you know, becomes a leader.

Wait, what?

That's total spoiler alert.

I know.

And he hates Batman.

Oh, my.

Okay.

Thanks for giving the whole.

I don't have to watch the sequel.

But

this is

Occupy Wall Street.

This is Antifa.

Yeah.

I've heard that from several people who said the politics of this are not

as they've been advertised.

No.

Very left.

He's a left-winger, essentially.

Well, he's.

Or at least the group is.

He's stupid.

Here's where you could see it as left is if you think that the left cares about people.

But

really,

because

he is genuine on

just, can we be nice to each other?

The social media commentary that at least I got from it, they don't talk about social media.

It was taken in the 70s.

But

to me, his rant is about us.

Nobody's nice to each other.

Why is everybody mean to one another?

Why does everybody just say horrible things about one another?

That's not what the crowd is doing.

The crowd is getting, you know, the anti-rich,

hate the wealthy, hate those in power, disrupt the system, burn it all down.

That's not what he's saying.

And I would guess in future movies, I'm hoping he is asked to be playing the Joker again in sequels because I thought he was brilliant.

He deserves an Oscar for sure.

But

he's going to end up again, I think, just being used and beaten because he's clearly insane and not smart enough to be putting things together.

He's not like the Joker that we've all seen where he's this mastermind.

He's not.

He's not.

That's interesting.

I mean, it does seem like the media is ridiculous, right?

They make these fake controversies out of everything.

And this was the, you know, the initial push on this was, well, it's going to cause mass shootings.

Well, if it does, it'll be because of the left.

Because it is the message of the left, not the right.

It's antipha.

They keep saying it's incels.

This is going to make incels essentially

involuntary celibates, I believe.

Just used to be the losers.

Well,

it might.

I mean, look, if you are unstable

and you go to see this, you will relate to him.

It's the same way that people would relate to

Edward Norton in Fight Club, right?

There's these anti-heroes that wind up being heroes to certain segments of the society.

He's not a hero in any way.

But neither, I mean, could

Edward Norton, I mean, again, spoiler alert, was a terrorist.

It's impossible to see him as anything else if you actually watch the movie seriously.

Not Edward Norton, the person, by the way, I'm talking about his character in this particular movie.

And, you know, it's one of those things where that happens.

What's his face?

What was the one where

Anonymous was using it?

Guy Fawkes, right?

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Guy Fawkes was not a good guy.

But Guy Fawkes, that was 1600s.

But the movie was not 1600s.

The movie came out relatively recently and was used as a symbol for a lot of.

But he was for Occupy Wall Street.

And that fits.

They weren't good.

Well, but they,

every mass shooter says that they're heroic in some way, right?

Like, I know.

Everybody thinks, you know, Hitler thought he was heroic, right?

Everybody thinks they're heroic or comes up with a way to justify their heroic.

I personally think that if we all saw Joker and we could all be adults, we could have a very good conversation.

I think it's a great conversation starter.

You know, it's one that you can walk out of and say,

so what does that say about society?

Who's he talking about?

And have a real conversation.

Because it's, I mean, how many of these shooters do we know are crazy?

They're not getting proper care, you know, and they feel isolated and bullied.

Well, that's what's really happening.

Our society is sick.

It's sick.

And I think this is the movie of our day.

I really do.

I don't know what to

compare it to,

but it is.

I think it's the

maybe Saturday night fever of the 70s, where it was it just encapsulated that time, and it was like, That's that's that year.

This is now

so, two questions for you.

Yeah, number one, I like movies that do challenge me, make me think, maybe have conversations after however.

That needs to be paired with it actually being a freaking good movie.

Okay, so here's how I here's how I review it by itself.

Is it a good movie?

Here's how I reviewed it.

This is a great film, 100%

great,

One of the better films made.

It is also one of the best movies I've seen in a long time.

Wow.

Yeah.

Okay.

So it's not an do not go to it thinking that you're going to be preached to.

I'm not.

No, you're not going to be preached to.

You can take it if you want to find it.

You can add additional layers of conversation if you want to, but you don't have to.

You don't have to.

It's a good movie.

Yeah, it's a good movie.

Nobody's preaching to you.

It's still a Gotham movie, but it is the least Batman.

It's probably the lowest body count Batman, even on television.

I mean, from Adam West.

I mean, it's, it's a, for a movie in today's world of, you know, violent movies, this is a very low body count.

Okay.

My second question is more personal.

Yeah.

I find myself falling into a very familiar pattern, which is I don't like superhero movies.

And then everyone starts talking about a superhero movie, and I think, ah, maybe this one's going to be good.

And then I go to see it, and it sucks.

This one's not a superhero movie did you like the Batman Christopher Nolan Batman series I liked Batman begins I remember really liking the that was the is that the one before the one with Heath Ledger the the one before that okay very dark and I liked it right that's that's Christopher Nolan yeah Christopher Nolan

did the best Batman

you know, the Batman series.

It was very dark,

but it was realistic-ish.

You know what I mean?

Yeah.

This is,

you could say,

you could say that this is not in Gotham.

It's in New York City, and there is no Batman, and you could, you would be comfortable even the way he dresses in the outfit with the green hair.

You would go, I could see that.

It's like a realistic original movie.

It's the most realistic Batman

or any super movie that I've ever seen.

If you make me go see this movie and it sucks, I'm holding you personally responsible.

It's going on your record.

You will be noted.

I just want everybody else to know I'm only giving this review, so he will go to this movie.

It's awful.

It's awful.

Don't fool me again.

You always.

So you gotta go.

You gotta go to it.

I think you will like it.

All right.

But

it's not what they say it is.

It is, it's not even, I can't say, you know, Silence of the Lambs, disturbing.

Disturbing.

This one's sad.

This one's really sad.

Did you see it this weekend?

Yeah.

Really sad.

All right.

Bernie Sanders.

Speaking of jokers, almost certainly out of the presidential race.

Joe Biden.

Wait, is this an announcement?

Yeah, I think so.

Joe Biden.

Come on.

He did have a heart attack, by the way, with Sanders.

Now they're saying, yeah, oh, yeah, by the way, we know that thing we said he was going to rest for a day or two.

Yeah, it was a heart attack.

No big deal.

He'll be back on the stage in a minute.

Stay where you are.

Stay where you are.

Don't worry about it.

Keep donating.

I want to go over what you said about Joe Biden earlier today, Stu.

Okay.

And after the break.

After this commercial, we'll go to Joe Biden.

But I think Joe Biden, I think Stu is right on Joe Biden.

It's fairly obvious, I think, that Elizabeth Warren is going to be the Democratic nominee.

Oh, my gosh.

Wouldn't it be great?

Wouldn't it be great if the Democrats could find a way so everybody was really sick and tired of the scandals with Donald Trump that everybody would just eventually just go, yeah, I'd rather have the socialists than all this.

Yeah, if we have a social,

if Elizabeth Warren becomes our president,

warning, take your money out of the stock market, take your money out of the banks if she becomes the president of the United States.

I would highly recommend gold or silver, something physical that you had.

And I think that, you know, that this kind of stuff could be bad for the stock market and bad for the dollar.

If

she really looks like she's going to possibly win the election, it'll be bad.

Call Goldline now, right now.

Find out if gold or silver is right for you.

If you've never called them before, you've not thought about it before, just get their information.

Look at all the risk about it and everything else.

But get their information and really study it out in your mind and listen to your gut.

Listen to what...

Don't listen listen to these advisors who are trying to sell you stuff.

Don't even listen to the goldline people.

Just read the information and do your own homework.

I think you're going to probably end up like I did and put, I have 10% in gold.

I'm sorry, government, I have 1% in gold at goldline.com.

Goldline.com.

Go there now.

Call them.

They're waiting for your phone.

Call physical gold or silver.

It's where the world always returns after a bout of insanity.

It's 866 Goldline, 1-866-GoldLine or Goldline.com.

We break for 10 seconds.

All right, so Pat, I mean, Stu, you got to tell me

the what you got to tell the audience what you told me earlier today about Joe Biden.

Well, something's been perplexing me a little bit about Biden in that

when

the focus went to Ukraine and in the impeachment situation that we're dealing with now, there was a kind of a widespread, I would say, view that it would hurt Biden because Biden would be dragged into a scandal.

And I thought with some smart campaigning,

there would actually be a real advantage here for Joe Biden because Biden is essentially, think about this from the Democratic perspective for a second, not what we think about the Ukraine thing or none of that.

Take it just from the Democratic perspective.

The main thing they are voting on is who can beat Donald Trump?

Who is the most electable?

And I think there's a real argument to be made that Joe Biden should come out and say, hey, I don't know if you guys have noticed this, but the president of the United States was harassing foreign leaders to get dirt on me to try to beat me because I'm the one he's afraid of.

All these other guys have great policies.

You understand.

You know, I love Bernie, love Elizabeth.

And there is some evidence that maybe he did this with Elizabeth Warren as well, at least reporting on that he called China Elizabeth Warren, which I don't even know what that's about.

We'll maybe find out more about that.

But I might ignore that if I'm Biden at this point and say, look, none of these other people are getting called.

The president's not doing that.

Yeah, he doesn't like him.

He comes up with the little nicknames.

He'll come out and tweet about them.

But the president of the United States was making calls, risking his presidency to destroy me because he's terrified.

He knows that if I am the candidate, I will beat him.

And, you know, you can say, listen to all these guys all they want.

A lot of their policies are great, but there's a difference here.

The American people need someone who's going to beat Donald Trump, not just come up with different ideas and really exploit it.

Like, if I were Biden's campaign, that's what I would be doing.

Okay.

However,

he's played around a little bit at the edges with it.

He said things sort of in that vein, but not really going that far.

Could be, I guess, that his campaign is just really incompetent and not

maybe thinks that, you know, I don't know,

we shouldn't go crazy on this.

I don't know.

However, here's my actual belief at this point.

Biden is looking at this and not making a big deal about it because he is actually worried about what will come up if this is the defining campaign issue of this next election.

If the media, if everyone gets on board

into looking at what actually happened with Ukraine, not only with him, but also his son, it could not only hurt him dramatically and maybe destroy his campaign, but also really hurt his son's future.

And I don't think Joe Biden's a bad dad.

I think he loves his kids.

I think he wants to protect them.

And I think that's why he didn't run last time.

He convinced himself to go for it this time, but I think the media getting into this and the media diving into this full force actually legitimately scares him as to what outcome.

comes out of that.

So instead of using this as Trump would, right, Trump would be like, he would come out and say just exactly what I said if this happened with Obama and Biden.

He'd be like, look, they're targeting me.

They're targeting me.

They're not targeting Ted Cruz.

They're not targeting Marco Rubio.

They're coming after me because they're scared of me.

Because the number one issue these people are making their decisions on are not about socialism.

It's not about taxes.

It's not about the Green New Deal.

It's about who beats Donald Trump, period.

And the fact that he is not exploiting that shows either mass campaign incompetence, which is possible, or he's actually afraid about what comes out if people start looking under this, uh, under this, under this pile of wood.

There's been a lot of bugs down there.

I cannot wait to tell you about the recluse spider that is hiding in that stack of logs

because this is something that I talked about about six or seven months ago, and it's happening.

You're starting to see it now.

I will remind you here in a second.

This is the Glembeck program.

A good real estate agent has a lot of responsibility when it comes to helping you buy or sell a home.

The act is kind of a firewall of safety between you and the terrifying monstrosity that is the act of buying or selling a home.

There are inspections, the pricing, the listing, the paperwork.

I mean, spare us from the amounts of paperwork.

But when you have a bad real estate agent, any one or all of these things can end up not being done correctly, and it can be a real hassle for you.

That's one of the reasons why we started Real Estate Agents I Trust.

Our network of real estate agents is top of the line.

We only invite those who have a great track record to join us, and those who aren't, you know, doing this kind of as a lark, they're not invited.

If you don't have someone in your area that is the best that we have found, we won't recommend one.

That's how seriously we take it.

We want to make sure this is a real estate agent that I would trust.

It's a real estate agent you can trust.

Find the person that will help you buy or sell your next home now at realestateagentsitrust.com.

That's realestate agentsitrust.com.

All right, BlazeTV.com.

Use the promo code Glenn.

You can watch the special on Ukraine.

You can also watch that on YouTube and on Facebook, assuming they haven't banned it yet.

Welcome to the Glen Beck program.

Every 10 minutes at my Twitter account,

we are tweeting another piece of evidence on the corruption of the Democrats in Ukraine.

And it's not a conspiracy theory.

I love these people who were all over me all for the last four or five days saying, oh, Glenn Beck's crazy.

Just talk to me about the facts.

Okay, sure, I'm crazy.

I'm nuts.

I'm out of control.

I'm a liar.

Don't talk to me about me.

Talk to me about the facts that I presented.

Nobody seems to want to do that, and there's a reason for it.

And we're tweeting it out.

We are being throttled, shadow banned massively by uh facebook and by youtube massively by youtube and even twitter we got a couple of things uh today one from charlie kirk and the other one is from the um president's campaign uh man is he the manager campaign manager parscal

um that's right he said my average tweet gets 250 to 400 000 impressions a great tweet gets a million million.

This tweet has 40,000, the lowest of any tweet since I became manager.

Hmm.

Cards are so stacked against us, you won't stop us from getting this out.

And what he was talking about was he emailed or he tweeted the

50-minute monologue that I did at the chalkboard.

Charlie Kirk saw the same thing.

He said, a typical tweet of mine will get 150,000 impressions and 36,000 engagements.

When I shared the tweet about the truth behind Ukraine,

it only had 237

impressions.

From 150,000 to 237.

The algorithm is taking anything with my monologue on it, and they are suppressing it.

We need your help to get it out.

Now, this is the biggest video the Blaze has ever produced in almost a 10-year history.

It is gigantic on the platform.

This is why we ask you, please subscribe to the Blaze.

If you subscribe to the Blaze, go to Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

Use the promo code Glenn and you're going to save $10.

But we are being suppressed and throttled and shadow banned by the media trying to get this out.

The reason why is because when people see it, they connect with it when they actually watch it.

So what they have to do is they have to discredit me, call this a conspiracy,

train people not to watch it,

and while they do that, make sure it's not really available.

We need your help.

So today I'm also

tweeting every 10 minutes another fact from the chalkboard.

Every 10 minutes, we're just to go through the chalkboard is going to take us six hours today.

And I would ask that you would retweet this.

And if you will, just target Lindsey Graham

and the DOJ and

Attorney General Barr, because I think they need to see it.

Barr is, I think, working on this.

And Lindsey Graham needs to open up an investigation in the Senate.

If the press won't talk about it, fine.

Investigate.

They're the only ones that can.

By the way,

if you subscribe, I'm asking you to subscribe today because your subscription is what paid for this original video and investigation.

And I want to hire an investigative reporter to finish this because no one in the media, we learned this from Fox.

We did all that research and thought somebody in the media would pick it up and they never did.

Fine, not playing that game a second time.

I could really use your subscription because your

$9 a month, or I think it's $10 off, $8 a month, will go to pay for an investigative reporter that I really want to hire to finish this job.

But we need your support at blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

All right, I want to talk a little bit about this mess in the NBA.

I think this is sickening, absolutely sickening.

So is he the GM of the Rockets?

GM of the Houston Rockets, Daryl Maury.

Okay.

And if you don't follow the NBA, before we get into the China part of this, which is the big controversy, if you don't follow the NBA, you don't know who Daryl Maury is.

But he is no less than a legendary figure in the NBA.

He has essentially changed the way the entire sport.

has been played,

basically diving into analytics at a much higher rate.

It's very similar to like a money ball story

where he embraced this very early.

He's really one of the first people who embraced looking at the sport in a totally different way.

You know, and it's the reason why people shoot so many three-pointers now instead of two-pointers, why people stop taking mid-range jump shots.

I mean, he legitimately changed the way the game is played.

He is a legendary figure.

He is, I mean, maybe he doesn't get into the Hall of Fame because of China and his comments on China, but like he's a lock Hall of Famer, in my mind at least.

He's never won.

Imagine, you imagine

you don't get into the Hall of Fame and you've changed the sport because you stood against

China after they killed 60 million people and have probably another 10 million in concentration camps today.

Yeah.

And you saying,

stand with Hong Kong

stops you from being a valued legend?

Yeah, I mean, I'm not saying he

didn't even come out really against China.

He just basically came out with one short tweet

deleted quickly after.

Stand with Hong Kong.

Stand with Hong Kong.

That's it.

And now he's, you know, this has gone completely out of control to the point where

the Rockets basically attacked him immediately on it, his own team.

There is talk now that he may be fired.

This is a guy who took the Rockets from a middling team to

the verge of winning NBA championships.

He hasn't been able to pull it off yet, but they went from nowhere to...

Is there anyone within the sound of my voice that makes money in an international business that thinks that maybe we shouldn't be coddling communist China?

Is there anybody that has a problem?

Facebook, what are they doing?

They're helping find people.

Google, helping China find people to put them in concentration camps.

I mean, what are they doing?

And it's amazing, too, right now that this is happening because, you know, Donald Trump just took a beating, and I believe rightfully so, for congratulating China on its 70 years of communism or whatever he tweeted the other day when they had their 70th anniversary.

It was not a good moment for the president, in my mind.

And he got a lot of criticism, not only from the right, but also from the media as a whole, saying, hey, wait a minute,

is this the right thing to do?

Well, I mean, I hope this gives a moment of reflection here because the Rockets, just to give you the timeline here, Mori comes out and he says, hey, you know, stand with Hong Kong.

The Rockets take, you know, attack him immediately.

Listen, we are not a political organization.

You shouldn't say these things.

One of the reasons for this is they have a very close tie to China.

Yao Ming played there.

They are the most popular NBA team in China, which is obviously a massive market.

So they start pushing back on them.

He deletes the tweet.

He writes an extensive apology for it, which he should be embarrassed for.

Other owners have come out and said, well, what people don't understand when they're attacking the NBA for saying these things is that this is a separatist movement.

This is a separatist movement.

Yeah, against

for freedom of speech and freedom to be who you want against a communist dictatorship.

This is a government that currently, as you point out,

has millions, if not 10 million people

as political prisoners currently, and also is responsible for more than three times as many people as Nazi Germany killed, they killed in this government.

They also are responsible for organ harvesting today.

Oh, yeah.

They're also raping our country with intellectual property.

This is inexcusable.

Inexcusable.

And, you know,

this is an organization, the NBA.

Two things.

Number one, they pulled their all-star game out of Charlotte because they were so offended

by

the bathroom debate, the transgender bathroom debate, and that law that they passed that said you have to go in the bathroom of your biological sex at birth.

That was so offensive.

They pulled a massive event out of Charlotte because of it.

This is an organization that has banned the use of the word owner

because it's racially insensitive.

And yet, right now, millions of Uyghurs in China are imprisoned because of their political views, Christians as well.

And we know, I mean, we don't need to go through the list of human rights abuses with China.

This audience already knows the story, but it is completely insane.

And I actually had a moment of optimism, which happens very rarely for me.

A moment of optimism in which I thought, is this the thing that gets people, a couple of people in the media to have 30 seconds of reflection

to say, hold on, nope, to say to themselves, you know, nope, when we do stuff like this, like for an example, they talk about some

Muslim issue will pop up, like some Muslim is having some issue in some city and we're talking about hatred and something Ilan Omar will break up and bring up.

And conservatives say, hey, guys, you know, they're throwing gay people off of roofs.

You know,

you know, they're just executing gay people for no reason.

Maybe you should change your priorities a little bit.

Let's take care of that together.

And then we can worry, we can fight all back and forth about the bathroom thing, right?

And will there be a moment where this is so clear?

No.

Like, look at the way China is controlling the NBA.

No.

The NBA made a statement apologizing to communists because one general manager said they stood with Hong Kong.

That is completely insane.

Well, the NBA, Mike Bass, spokesman for the league, said that it was very regrettable that Maury's views deeply offended many of our friends and our fans in China.

You know, he has a right to

say it, I guess, but we have great respect for the history and the culture of China and hope that sports and the NBA can be used as a

unifying force to bridge cultural divides and bring people together.

I mean, and I think it was Clay Travis who made this point the first I heard it, but it's a great one, which is, where are all these players?

Where are the LeBron Jameses of the world who come out every time there's

a divisive issue here in the United States?

Where's he?

Where's Steve Kerr?

Where are all these guys that are lecturing us every single time there's a divisive divisive issue.

He wrote, Clay Travis wrote, will outspoken NBA woke activists Steve Kerr, LeBron James, and Greg Popovich stand up for

Darrell Morley and his support of democracy in Hong Kong?

They're awfully outspoken about Trump.

Surely they'll condemn the NBA for bending the knee to China over GM's support for democracy, right?

And I think the answer to that will be no.

No.

I mean, I hope I'm wrong.

I mean, you know, they haven't had enough chance to really probably come out and comment on this, give them a few days, but it is full.

I fully expect that they will not.

And there has to be some limit of this, right?

I mean,

the entire league is folding to communists.

That sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory.

It is happening in front of us.

They're making statements so that you know

that they're taking this stance.

They're not even doing it behind the scenes.

No, they don't think you mind.

They don't think you mind.

They don't think you mind that

we are in bed with.

I mean, and it's not even 2000, the year 2000 anymore.

You know, it's in the year 2000, you were kind of like, oh, well, China is kind of backward and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

No, then, you know, oh, and they're poisoning our dog food and they don't really care about it.

No.

Now they are literally rounding people up using American technology and American brain power to put their people behind walls in a concentration camp where many are reporting that they're being sterilized to wipe an entire population of people out.

A country that has already wiped out 60 million,

possibly many more.

And nobody seems to care.

Everybody's like, yeah, I know.

Yeah, no, I mean, look at that.

Social credit, that's crazy over there in China.

Hey, can we sell them some crap?

This is the kind of, this is the kind of capitalism that is grotesque.

All right.

Simply Safe, video verification.

Video verification, they want to make sure that you understand that nobody's watching you in your house.

This video verification does not have, just because they can have eyes on your home at all times, doesn't mean they do.

For instance, their video verification cameras, and these are the only ones that do this, they have an actual cover on the lens.

And I

talked to

actually the original owner of Simply Safe, the creator of it all.

And he said, you know, I'm so weirded out by cameras.

I just want to make sure that I know a camera is off and closed.

It's not enough for the little red light to go off.

I want to see that lens cover.

And so they delayed this camera for about 18 months because they wanted the sound of

the lens cover to be heard

and to be solid and for you to be able to hear it but not an irritating sound.

I mean it took him 18 months to come up with this.

So you know

when that camera opens and

when it closes because you don't want people watching you.

This opens up when somebody's trying to break into your house.

You have something on your back door, your front door.

That's when that thing opens up and people are monitoring and it takes your response time from the cops from 45 minutes to seven minutes.

SimplySafebeck.com.

Go there now, simplysafebeck.com.

Their coverage is $15 a month.

No strings, no contracts.

You own the system at simply safebeck.com.

You're listening to Glenn Beck.

Hey, don't forget, on my Twitter feed, all day today, I asked that you would

retweet it, and if you can, tweet members of the Senate and

Attorney General Barr, but specifically, I think, Lindsey Graham.

We are tweeting all of the facts from last week's chalkboard on what happened with Ukraine, all the evidence.

It's going to take six hours coming out every 10 minutes, but please retweet it and share it with friends.

This is the Glenbeck program.