Best of the Program | Guest: Bill O'Reilly | 10/4/19

Hey, podcasters, uh, we got a great show for you for Friday.

As always,

Bill O'Reilly comes in.

It is a great discussion with Bill O'Reilly.

Uh, also,

uh,

should we eat our children?

We have a different take on that.

I mean, no, I mean, the take yesterday was, yes, I guess we should eat our children.

We don't think so, but that's not the take that I think you'll appreciate.

All on today's podcast.

You're listening to the best of the blend back program.

When you ban words, you can no longer define right and wrong.

To ban words is to ban ideas.

It's just as bad as any book burning in history, and that is exactly what the left is doing.

Patriot Mobile was created to give conservatives a voice, literally and figuratively.

Their plans are as low as $25 a month and you can get nationwide service and US-based customer service.

It's a great service.

Thousands of people in this audience have switched.

Right now, if you make the switch, you can upgrade your phone, if you'd like, to a brand new Moto Z3 Play for only $5 a month.

It includes a six-inch screen, expandable storage, high-quality camera, and a whole lot more.

Switching is made really easy with Patriot Mobile.

PatriotMobile.com/slash Beck.

This is the only phone company that is run by vets, and it was started by vets.

They take some of their proceeds and they donate it to things like freedom of speech on the conservative side.

Your phone company right now is probably in bed with La Raza or Planned Parenthood.

Look it up.

You're giving your money to people who are fighting against your values.

You need a great self-company that gives you the same great cell service, uses the same cell towers.

It saves you money, costs you less, and it donates some of its proceeds to go and help stand for the things that you stand for.

Go to patriotmobile.com/slash beck.

That's patriotmobile.com/slash beck.

Go there now, patriotmobile.com/slash beck.

Switch today.

So, crazy eyes,

Ocasio-Cortez,

she is

in the middle of a speech yesterday and a woman stands up and she's a global warming activist and she says

we should all eat our babies.

I want to play the ex

I want to play the exchange for you.

Here it is.

We're not gonna be here for much longer because of the climate crisis.

We only have a few months left.

I love that you support the Green Deal, but it's not getting, you know, getting rid of fossil fuel is not going to solve the problem fast enough.

A Swedish professor is saying, we can eat dead people, but that's not fast enough.

So I think your next campaign slogan has to be this.

We got to start eating babies.

We don't have enough time.

There's too much CO2.

All of you,

you're a pollutant.

Too much CO2.

We have to start now, please.

You are so great.

I'm so happy that you're really supporting the Green Deal, but it's not enough.

You know, even if we withdraw Russia, we still have too many people, too much pollution.

So we have to get rid of the babies.

That's a big problem.

Just stopping having babies is not enough.

We need to eat the babies.

And this is very serious.

Please give a response.

All right.

Here's the deal.

I want to do, I invite her on this program.

I want to talk to her because she's not crazy.

She's a genius.

If you watch this, there's no way,

no way that's real.

I'm totally with you on this.

No way.

I think it's totally a right-wing troll, a conservative making a point of how ridiculous she is.

When she says, your next campaign slogan, and she's already taking off her sweater, it's the t-shirt that went too far.

Yeah, although it really worked.

Oh, no, it works.

The performance is fantastic.

It is.

It is.

But the t-shirt, a crazy person.

She's two together.

She also looks too crazy.

She's just, you know, the big clip in her hair and everything.

She's brilliant.

This is a troll.

And I just have to say, if that's true, if it's not true, I'm scared to death.

If it is true,

thank you.

Thank you for doing street art.

Thank you for doing such a, it's nice to to have somebody on our side who is such a brilliant performer.

Because that is a

world-class performance.

It really is.

To the point of that, Alexandria Casio-Cortez believes it.

I mean, she straight out believes it.

And her.

So she, I don't know, do we have a response to that or not?

Oh, no, I didn't see this.

Do we have AOC responding to that in this video?

We don't have that part of it.

So

she has a very, we should try to grab that because she takes it seriously and she's like, look, you know, we do have more than a few months.

and I know there's a lot of solutions out there.

We have more than a few months.

We have 10 years.

Yeah, I know.

Now, she,

now,

in,

you know, Alexandria Casio-Cortez,

everyone's like, she uses Twitter so well.

Does she?

What she does is she retroactively explains all of her bad moments on Twitter, and people give her credit for that.

In this one, she retroactively explains this, and she says, I just thought that maybe she was a troubled individual, and we shouldn't mock her.

And I think she really had some problems, and that's why I didn't say anything.

Oh, I wouldn't have said anything either if I were her.

I would have just come out and advocated for the policy.

You know what?

You're right.

They're really annoying.

They're loud.

They cry.

They smell a lot of times.

And I hear they taste like chicken.

I mean, there's no real...

I mean, the fact, though, that the entire room, generally speaking, looks at her and be like, well, I don't know about that.

That seems like it could be a...

half step too far.

Is it basically where the whole thing is?

It really was.

It really was.

They're not like, they're like, oh, shut up.

Get out of here.

There's none of that.

It's like, oh, wow.

Well, in today's world, when somebody says that, they might actually be serious.

Oh, yeah.

And you don't want to be the one that goes, okay, shut up because they might eat you.

It's true.

And I think this is another slight tip of the hand here as to why I think it's fake and not real, is she brings up a case of a Swedish professor

who said eat dead people, but that's not going crazy.

She's too crazy to know that.

And then she also says,

I mean, we could bomb Russia and kill all the people, but that won't be fast enough.

Like a person who has that worldview isn't advocating the bombing of Russia at the same time.

Yeah, because you would have nuclear fallout if you're smart enough.

Right.

She could be crazy.

I mean, you could have someone who's that crazy to believe those things, though.

Her performance, the way it's packaged.

Brilliant.

And the other part of it, Glenn, as a performer, as you've heard about.

Yes, yes, yes.

Is the reveal of the shirt.

She builds to it and times it.

She's saying, like, you know what?

I think this is so important.

And that's why I think you should have a new campaign slogan.

She slowly builds it.

She's starting to pull her.

Yeah, she's revealed to me.

You could tell there's a little performance in it, but it's a fantastic performance.

And the fact that she doesn't come out, I mean, think about where we are in society.

We talked to Ben Sasse a few months ago when he did the Born Alive Act, where we were, we couldn't believe that the government would not come together and say, look, of course, obviously, if a baby's born alive, we're not going to let it die.

We're not going to kill it.

And they wouldn't come together on that.

Here's a situation where, again, a government official is faced with someone saying, eat babies, and she doesn't have the spine to step up to her own side and criticize that.

You're in that situation, believe me.

I've been on stage

many times

and I've been in crowds many times where someone will say something that you're like, okay, that's crazy.

And you kind of feel like the whole room is like, don't piss them off.

Just let them speak and let them go away.

Don't piss them off.

I mean, there's a a line there, right?

Because you're right.

That's happened to every public figure.

We've seen this happen before.

You know,

the Kamala Harris had

a situation with this recently where she's on stage and a guy comes up and he goes, I want to see what you're going to do with this.

And you use the R word to use the

mentally disabled.

Okay, okay.

Right, okay.

I don't know if you're not going to be able to do it.

There's a different word for every letter.

I don't know if you know this, but there are

more than, you know, 24 words.

Yeah.

So 26, yeah.

26, thank you.

So, um, yeah, and

she laughed awkwardly and said, oh, well said, well said, and kind of moved on.

And then later on, they're like, well, why did you not criticize that person?

And she's like, well, I didn't hear it because she's a liar.

But she did hear it.

And

she wasn't sure how to deal with it.

And that stuff happens.

Like, people cross lines in crowds.

This is different.

But she's advocating for the

children.

Right.

Come on.

I don't remember what that was about, but I remember her saying saying that.

And it was some, she did, she, it was lock her up or something like that, lock him up or something like that.

It wasn't totally nuts.

Right.

It was, it was a, a situation where it was like the guy went too far on a point that they agreed on.

Right.

Right.

And so he just went too far.

But that's this too.

And at some point,

yes, it is.

No, this is

just too far.

This is insane.

That's why you have to, if you can't stand up and say, you know what, cannibalism isn't okay on infants.

Like, what the hell?

Why do we even talk to these people?

I mean, I'm not saying you have to sit here and give, let me give you a breakdown of why that's not morally acceptable in our society, but you mock a little bit.

You say, look,

I mean,

I agree with the global warming part of it.

The other stuff is obviously not, you know, you have to have some indication to your audience that this isn't inappropriate.

You have to have some guts to stand up and say, I want to concentrate on

the performer here.

It was a good performance, but it would have been a great performance if you would have peed on yourself at the very end.

And that would have been a brilliant performance.

That's commitment.

Although that makes her seem a little too crazy.

I think the fact that she sounded, she made the arguments in a relatively sane fashion helped pull it off.

We do have the response from AOC.

This is how she responded to the woman saying, we need to eat the babies.

So, one of the things that's very important to us is that we need to treat the climate crisis with the urgency that it does present.

Luckily, we have more than a few months.

We do need to hit net zero in several years.

But I think we all need to

understand that there are a lot of solutions that we have and that we can pursue, and that if we act in a positive way, there is space for hope.

You're right.

We are never beyond hope.

Okay, stop.

You are right.

She's being very reasonable here.

I didn't see her response.

She could be very reasonable and say, we have more, and there's always hope, and we should never cross the line into cannibalism.

Right.

You're exactly right.

But I do think that this is.

This would be an interesting freak jury type of question because I think a lot of people think this woman was real in the audience.

No.

I think the majority of people I've seen online think you believe this crazy leftist.

They want people people to believe that they want to this is one of those things that

if it's too good for your side

pause but you can't can't you on the other side on the other hand it's too good to check in some ways like I kind of just want to believe oh I would love to I would love to

because it's too good yeah it's really funny but again like you you step back from this and what's the difference right

Like, the difference from their real policy is what?

That they give, they want to say, you kill the baby before it's born, and this woman who's nuts is saying have the baby and then eat it.

Like, yeah, I see there's a separation there, but it's not as wide as you think it is.

No, it is not.

They both end in the baby dead.

Yes.

Yeah.

The outcome is not that much different.

And they're also saying, they're seriously saying, we got to stop having children.

Yes.

We have to stop having children.

Here's the deal.

Have you seen the birth rate?

Yeah, it's falling.

We're already below replacement.

And this has happened in every society as it's become more civilized.

The book Factfulness goes over this.

And it is not, we kind of think of like, well,

in this country, they're having this many babies.

And if that continues, then blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, this linear progression that this is going to go on forever.

When every single country that has gone through a modernization that we're going through now, that Europe's gone through, that China's going through now, every single one of those countries has had birth rates drop to around where we are.

In 50 to 100 years, Spain, Japan,

England, Russia, you're not going to have to worry about it because there's not going to be enough of them to have a country.

I'm killing you, in 100 years, do the math.

I think they're at 1.3 replacement.

1.3 replacement right now.

I just looked it up this weekend.

Yeah.

I mean, I tend to think that these things wind up evening out the same way that they don't stay too high.

Well, no, no society has ever, no society has ever turned the corner.

They've never gone below two

and then turned it around and went, oh, wow, we're going to have babies again.

I mean, the Japanese, when they figure out how to make a robot ovulate,

it's over.

It's over.

Gonna be like Clone Wars.

Yeah, oh, yeah.

The best of the Glenbeck program.

Hey, it's Glenn, and you're listening to the Glenn Beck program.

If you like what you're hearing on this show, make sure you check out Pat Gray Unleashed.

It's available wherever you download your favorite podcasts.

Pat Gray from Pat Gray Unleashed, the podcast that is heard right before this program on Blaze Radio Network.

And then you can find it at iTunes or wherever you find your podcast.

Welcome to the program, Pat Gray.

Thank you.

You know, with only months left before we start eating babies, I'm really glad I have this opportunity.

Thank you.

Thank you on the show talking about things.

If they taste like chicken.

Yeah.

Are you just going to go with chicken or still eat the baby?

No, I'd eat the babies.

Okay.

Because that's the only way you can fix this problem.

Right.

Eating the dead people, that's not enough.

It's just not enough.

It really is.

It was such a brilliant thing.

There was, yeah.

I thought it was, I still think, unless, you know,

the group that's taking credit really did do it.

Do you still think it's possible?

I think it's possible she was real.

No.

We talked about it quite a bit on the show this morning.

But, you know, I thought it was a radio bit or a YouTube bit, maybe.

But I leave open the possibility because they have created such hysteria.

I leave open the possibility of anything in today's world.

And that's the thing.

Yeah.

But I think that was a performance.

Did you see the special last night on Ukraine?

Yeah, the one that was only going to last an hour and a half because you had disciplined it down to that.

And I thought, no, I knew it.

Glenn thought he could do this in an hour and a half.

Have you met you?

Well, did you?

But two hours was less than I thought.

And it was all compelling.

It was really good stuff.

I love the tie-in that George Soros is involved with this

as well.

Is he crazy?

Of course, he's involved.

Of course.

It's a minor role, but you can't have a chalkboard without him in it.

That's unbelievable.

Yeah, unbelievable.

So, what were the things that stuck out to you?

I don't know if I can think of just one thing.

There were quite a few things that I wasn't totally aware of, but I think it just

cemented in my mind the fact that Biden's involvement

is

assured in this thing, that he knew about his son in a thing where

when he was asked the question,

what have you ever talked about with

Hunter about his business?

We've never talked about it.

You never talked about it?

And you've got all of these ties with your son and the prosecutor and the $1.8 billion.

And

the White House calling a special meeting of the prosecutors over in Ukraine, inviting them here to the United States.

Stuff you've never here.

I don't think I knew that.

No, nobody does.

Nobody does.

They came here for a strategy meeting on how we could all work together.

And all, according to the Ukrainians that were there, all the White House wanted to talk about was Hunter Biden, no go zone, and two,

can you give us any dirt on Trump and Manafort?

They went back going, that wasn't really a training session.

Wow.

I mean, that's incredible.

Now, the one thing I wasn't totally clear on,

you talked about the $1.8 billion in aid that disappeared into the guy's pocket or whatever.

And then you talked about another $1.8 billion.

Was that in addition to the first one?

Yes.

That was your tax.

Or that was lost as well.

That was the first one was your tax dollar in USAID.

We gave Burisma

$1.8 billion.

And it never went to them.

Or we don't know where it went.

No, it went to the oligarch's bank that was running Burisma.

He had his own bank, so it went offshore.

We don't know what happened to it.

Okay.

Guess is it's in the oligarch's pocket.

Chump changed like that, though.

You just don't worry about it.

No, you don't worry about it.

I lose that in my couch.

So then the other was an IMF loan that the United States guaranteed.

So that was IMF money.

That's what I was saying.

That's we're on the hook for it.

Okay, so we have to cough up another $1.8 billion.

So that's $3.6 billion.

Yeah, there's about just gone.

There's $5 to $7 billion

that the Ukraine tried to get their prosecutors over to speak to our Attorney General and our DOJ and say, look, I've got these five issues.

We have evidence that people were tampering for Hillary Clinton.

They were tampering with the election.

You've lost $7 billion.

We've lost $7 billion.

And we don't know where it went.

They had five different things that they outlined.

And our ambassador that was in cahoots with the Obama administration wouldn't let them in, wouldn't give them visas, even though the FBI and the anti-corruption

department in Ukraine had an open relationship to share everything.

It's absolutely incredible.

has to be an easy case to make to say that that's in the national interest to know about

rather than this is just a political maneuver I'm doing to try to discredit one of my opponents.

No, this is absolutely

the Democrats are all going to believe that, and I think Trump supporters are all going to believe it's in the national interest.

So, how does that eventually turn out?

So, what did you think about Chalupa?

I'm not sure.

Toasted Cheddar.

This just came out.

Right.

No, this is the woman that the Democrats hired, the DNC hired to investigate Trump through Ukraine.

And so she wrote,

this is a memo

from her at the DNC

to

Luis Miranda at the DNC.

Hey, a lot coming down the pipe.

I spoke to a delegation of 68 investigative journalists from Ukraine last night at the Library of Congress, the Open World Society Forum.

They put me on the program to speak specifically about Paul Manafort.

Now, this is before Manafort

was in trouble.

Or even was even with Trump at the time.

No, not with Trump.

And

she is looking for Trump.

She's the chalupa, that woman, is the one that first said that we can find, that first said there's a Russia connection.

Okay.

And her job is to dig up dirt in Ukraine and use the Ukrainian embassy, use the Ukrainian prosecutors, deeply embedded with the Ukrainians.

Okay, she said they put me on the program to talk specifically about Paul Manafort.

I invited Michael Issakov, who I've been working with for the past few weeks, and connected him to the Ukrainians.

More offline tomorrow, since there is a big Trump component you and Lauren need to be aware of that will hit in the next few weeks.

Something I'm working on, you should be aware of.

Now, you know what was crazy is the Issakoff article that came out

was stuff from the dossier from Fusion GPS.

Jeez.

So this shows that they were the DNC.

So do you think they set up Manafort with Trump?

No, I think, I don't know how that happened.

I mean,

to me, that's a possibility.

It could be.

Could be.

They also could have been spying on Trump and heard that Manafort was talking to Trump and was going to get in.

Because remember, if anyone cares to do the homework, this is why Tony Podesta shut down the Podesta group like on the day that Paul Manafort

was arrested.

As soon as they arrest him, The biggest lobbying firm, the Clinton lobbying firm, all of this, millions of dollars, he walks into the office in one one day and says, close the doors.

Not like, hey, at the end of the week or the end of the month, we're going to wrap things up.

Close the doors.

And he shut his firm down.

Well, why?

Because he's working with the same group of people that Manafort.

So you're expecting me to believe that Manafort

got money under the table, but the Podesta group didn't?

No way.

Yeah.

No way.

Yeah.

They only existed from 1988 to 2017.

So it's just coincidence.

They just happened to stop the thing right then.

It was a fly-by-night operation that was one of the biggest lobbyist firms in Washington for 30 years.

It was just a 20-year fly-by-night operation.

No big deal, though.

No big deal.

Okay, so

I want to play something.

This is from the guy

who

was tried and convicted for

interfering in our election.

This trial went on in Ukraine.

This is the first time that we know of that this has been translated in the media into English.

You tell me if this is important.

This is again the guy who

was convicted of

tampering with our elections.

American elections.

American elections.

He is a Ukrainian.

They caught him on tape talking about Trump and Hillary.

I'm going to translate.

Go ahead and can we roll this tape, please?

Okay, did they, those Russians, help Trump, your people?

He says, I think they did.

Yeah, they helped him.

Not him, but Hillary.

I helped her.

Yeah, you're right.

Her position tottered.

Well, this is how they write about it.

Then something about Hillary's humanitarian aid in America, something to do with the Clinton Foundation.

Well, I'm about the commentaries.

At the time, we were not in, and then you can't understand it.

Trump, his purely inner problem, the issue.

They dominate over the external matters.

Now, listen to this.

While Hillary, she is, how shall I put it, she belongs to the cohort of politicians who comprise the hegemony in the U.S.,

both in the U.S.

and the entire world, right?

For us, it's sort of better.

But for the Americans, what Trump is doing is better for them.

Yeah.

Well, we have lots of those American experts here now than Indiscernible.

Well, there you see why Hillary lost the elections.

I was in charge of the investigation of their black accounting records.

We made the Manafort data available to the general public.

So what?

Well, he was in prison.

Manafort was the head of the Supreme Headquarter of Trump, right?

Then they dismissed that too, including due to the black accounting.

After that, he was went to jail for 80 years.

How about Trump?

Did he not give a crap?

Everybody worked smoothly there.

And when they carried out the elections, a week before the elections, the FBI reopened the investigation in respect to Hillary.

So her rating dropped for 7%.

And that's why Trump managed to win the elections at a pinch.

I'm still unable to understand why he's fighting with the FBI.

They try to catch him on the hand.

If I were not the FBI, he would not have won the elections.

They torpedoed Hillary's ratings for 7%.

So here he is.

He's admitting to tampering with our elections, admitting working with the Hillary Clinton campaign.

He's actually convicted in the highest court in the land in Ukraine.

This is all front page news in Ukraine while we are saying, was there anyone tampering with the election?

Yeah,

that guy working for the DNC or working with the DNC

and a woman named Chalupa.

Think of that every time you hunger for Taco Bell.

Chalupa.

That's the name of the woman who is at the center of what really happened at

our last election.

How is it Fox isn't interested in this anyway?

I really think, I think they are.

You're starting to see things trickle out, but I really think, I mean, this is my skill.

Yeah.

You know, it took me an hour without commercials just to lay out the timeline.

It is complicated, and that's what they're counting on.

It's too complicated for people to really.

But did you follow it?

Yeah.

Yes.

I mean, I'm good at one thing, and that is making the complex easy, but you have to watch it.

Please go to YouTube.

If you're a subscriber to the Blaze, it's already on Blaze TV.

You can watch it on YouTube.

You can watch it on my Facebook page.

But please just search for

Glenn Beck

and Ukraine, and you'll be able to find the Ukraine special.

It's called the Democrats Russia.

You'll see things that you had no idea.

And I ask you, just do not trust me.

Just do your own homework.

And we have everything that was on that special is backed up by documents.

The documents are on glennbeck.com, plus a 30-second elevator pitch to your friend.

Hey, I just want you to listen to this because just open mind, just listen to this.

Then, like a five-minute argument you can have with

your friends and say, Look, this is, let me lay this case out.

And then all of the documents.

So we've prepared you to change the narrative to make sure that the correct narrative is out there.

We've done our homework and we've done our job.

Now, do not trust me.

Do your own homework.

And now you have to carry the ball.

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Hey, it's Glenn.

And if you like what you hear on the program, you should check out Pat Gray Unleashed.

His podcast is available wherever you download your favorite podcast.

Hi, it's Glenn.

If you're a subscriber to the podcast, can you do us a favor and rate us on iTunes?

If you're not a subscriber, become one today and listen on your own time.

You can subscribe on iTunes.

Thanks.

It's Friday, and Bill O'Reilly is joining us now.

Hello, Bill.

Hey, I'm having a bagel here.

You guys can't get real bagels in Texas, but I'm having one, and I wanted you to know it and Stu to know it.

If Stu works, Stu doesn't really work a lot, does he?

He kind of wanders in, wanders out.

Occasional.

What I call an occasional worker.

I'm a part-time worker.

Look, Bill.

I like that.

We're number three.

We're the third most listened-to show in America for a reason.

Number one, works too hard, always looking over his back,

because number two is right behind him.

And then number two is working even harder.

We learned that from rental car companies.

They have to try harder.

Number three, just skates.

We're just drafting behind one and two.

But I just want to say, the reason that I'm gloating about the bagel is I can't get chicken fried steak up here in New York, and it's driving me nuts.

Yeah, well,

when I lived in Texas, that was big for me.

Maybe you could eat babies.

Save the earth.

And that is an irresponsible comment, Back.

And if you had texted that to Ukraine, he would have been impeached.

All right, Bill O'Reilly, the author of the new book, The United States of Trump.

By the way, last week I was on the air saying and complaining about Bill O'Reilly not sending me a copy of The United States of Trump.

I didn't get a a hard copy.

Did you get a hard copy?

Well, here's the thing.

I happened to not check a part of my office where my wife sometimes sticks the mail.

And then not only was there one copy of the United States of Trump, there were two copies of the United States of Trump.

Were they signed?

Which was very nice.

And thank you for sending these Bill.

Now I do have an extra copy, so my options are, one, I send it back to you, or two, we give it away to a caller right now.

What do you think?

You can give it away to a caller, but Beck is whining.

He doesn't have a hard copy, even though I sent him one.

You guys are are so disorganized, I can't believe it.

No wonder you're number three.

Yeah, well, we get right, right?

Nobody, nobody really.

We're all drafting.

We're all just drafting behind.

Is it signed?

No, this one's not signed.

I kept the sign.

Thanks a lot.

Okay, Bill.

Thanks a lot.

Wait, you got to sign one?

Yeah, I got to sign one.

My other one was signed away.

You know, give that book to me.

I'm going to sign it, and then we're going to give it away.

I'm just going to sign Bill's book, and then we'll give it away.

888-727-B-E-C-K is the number.

Call up, and

we'll give somebody a book.

Give somebody a book, and I'm going to write.

I never

really

read this.

All right.

So we'll give that away to a caller.

So, Bill,

I know you're a busy man, and I know you don't know how to use YouTube or the Internet at all.

So

we'll have somebody walk you through it.

You need to watch the special idea.

I'm going to have at least a summary sent to me.

And if I can absolutely watch it, I will.

But you don't have to convince me, Beck.

You see, I know what you're saying is true because I'm doing my own investigation here.

And, you know, if you step back, and I want all the Beck listeners, just step back, or I get out of your I hate Trump or I love Trump mode.

Just

whip that away for a couple hours.

And if you know what's happening here, it is just atrocious for this country.

And I can't tell people

enough that there's so much danger, not that he might be removed from office.

He's not going to be removed from office.

All right.

And not that the press is a fraud.

We know the press is a fraud.

But it's the coordination now of the information flow to the American person.

I laid this out on a chalkboard, Bill.

The one thing I can do, it's the only skill I have, is I can connect dots and tell a very complex story simply.

And I'm telling you, Bill, I laid it out all documented.

We have all of the emails and everything else.

Everything I said was documented.

And we have the Obama administration and the DNC

tying the DNC to the DOJ, to the CIA, and to the Ukrainian prosecutors.

And they were running it all through our embassies.

It's stunning.

Stunning.

Everything they said that Trump was doing in Russia, all of the evidence is there.

That's what they were doing in Ukraine.

Let me just tell you something.

When I was researching the United States of Trump, I spent some time with the president.

And a lot of that time was off the record time, where he just riffs because I've known him for 30 years, and we just go back and forth.

And it's not stuff that I'm going to report because it's an understand, this is an O'Reilly-Trump conversation.

Okay?

But I think I can tell you this:

he is absolutely crazed that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden have, in his opinion,

gotten away

with all kinds of subversion, not only of the campaign 2016, but other stuff.

Seven

billion dollars.

Seven.

He sees the Intel report.

So he can call up the NSA and the CIA and go, send over this report.

So now he sees it.

So he tells me in one of our conversations.

But stop the music.

I'm going to get these guys.

I'm going to get these guys.

I'm going to expose them.

And I say, be careful.

Be careful.

Now, this is in the book.

All right?

So he says, I'm going to get to the bottom of this because I'm the only one who can do it.

And then I'm going to bring it out, and everybody's going to see

how these three individuals corrupted the process.

And I looked at him, I said, you're naive.

This is what I'm saying, this is the President of the United States.

I said, the press will never report that no matter what you have.

They'll never do it.

And they'll turn it around on you.

So be careful.

And that's exactly what has happened.

When you have Joe Biden saying, I did this,

I went to a foreign country, threatened them with withholding a billion dollars in loans unless they fired some guy that I, Joe Biden, having nothing to do with.

But he's looking into a company where my son is getting paid large dollars.

Stop.

Stop right there.

People have heard this.

People have heard this, and they're like, yeah, well, that's not what it is about.

I want you to watch the special last night.

We lay it out.

It is documented.

There is testimony on what he was trying to stop.

He was protecting a...

A foundation for anti-corruption, which lost $2.2 million.

The main funder of that was the USAID and George Soros and his son.

I have the sworn affidavit from the prosecutor who said he was angry with me because I wouldn't stop the investigation on Burisma.

They never said what I was doing wrong.

Joe Biden said he has to stop with Burisma.

So everything that Joe Biden says that, no, no, no, he was just corrupt, it's not true.

And it's documented.

It's documented.

Okay, so I assume that Adam Schiff has subpoenaed you, and you're going to go testify

in the house.

Is that correct?

No, no.

In fact, you're not going to see any of these documents in the mainstream press.

They're all, by the way, on Glennbeck.com today.

This is the story.

This is the story.

The story is there is not

a fair process, not only in the media, we know that's corrupt, all right, but in

the

annals of our government.

So they have hatched, the anti-Trump people, a scenario where they're saying there's an abuse of power because Donald Trump tried to undermine the election

of 2020 by eliciting help from Ukraine and China.

That's it.

That's what they have.

That's what they're going in with.

It doesn't matter whether Trump did it partially because he wanted to root out corruption.

It doesn't matter.

They're not going to even consider that.

However, the Senate will, and it'll get thrown out in two days.

That's what's going to happen because Trump has cover.

And the cover is he's the chief law enforcement officer of the country as president.

There is an active corruption investigation involving Ukraine, and all he did was ask the Ukrainian president to do him a favor and cooperate.

Okay.

That's a good question.

All right.

You're right.

You're right.

But let me share some

text messages that just came out from the testimony yesterday.

And let me play devil's advocate and read these text messages to you and then get your response because

it just,

the administration just cannot get out of its own way.

I want to get to the text messages.

Bill, have you seen the text text messages?

Some of them.

Okay.

The text messages

are between

the European ambassador,

who else is supposed to be.

U.S.

diplomats, largely.

Yeah, all U.S.

diplomats.

And I think there's one Ukrainian on the line.

And they're talking about...

The Ukrainians saying, okay, so what are we supposed to be doing?

And they're drafting

a press release for the Ukrainians saying that they are opening up investigations or they are continuing the investigation on Joe Biden.

And then it gets a little squirrely.

They say things like, I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

And the political security assistance being the money that's been talked about.

They say they're potentially withholding that.

Bill Taylor, who is the lead U.S.

diplomat to Ukraine, says, Are we now saying that security assistance and White House meeting are conditioned on investigations?

And then the other diplomat responds, call me.

And then the other, let's say we have,

we had a good lunch, thanks, heard from the White House, assuming President Z, the president of Ukraine, has convinces Trump that he will investigate, get to the bottom of what happened in 2016, we will nail down a date for the visit to Washington.

And this one, Bill Taylor, as I said on the phone, I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

That happens, then five hours go by in which Gordon Sundland apparently meets with Trump and then comes back and responds and says, Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump's intentions.

The President has been crystal clear that no quid pro quos of any kind.

The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign.

I suggest we stop the back and forth by texts.

If you still have concern, I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call and discuss directly.

Okay, what happened, Bill?

Nothing.

I mean, you have one guy who's interpreting it as a threat

and as a campaign play.

And then you have to do it.

There's two ways.

We know how the press will read this.

There's two ways of reading this.

But you've got to

talk about the press.

I know.

You've got to go to the Senate now.

So if you're a senator, you're looking at both of these things.

There's reasonable doubt.

Because the other guy said

he asked a question.

Are you telling me that this is what we're doing now?

He didn't say this is what we're doing now.

That's number one.

And number two, Sunderland, the guy who replies, said there's no quick, pro-quo.

Anyway, I'm not naive,

and Trump is not a Boy Scout.

So anybody who believes that Trump would not use

bad information against Joe Biden in the campaign is living in the land of Oz.

He would.

Okay?

Everybody knows that.

But

he has

the right as president to spur people to give him information about what he believes is corrupt.

And I'll go back to my original statement, which was

nine months ago.

He was railing to me.

I'm going to expose this corruption.

It had nothing to do with the 2020 election.

And there were three people involved, not just Biden.

So I know what happened.

I know what was in his mind because I discussed it with him at length.

I will tell you that I.

You don't have a lot of guests who can come in and say that on your show.

No, but I will tell you this.

I do have a lot of phone calls off the air and off record that will tell me the same thing.

I said.

Yeah, you're not doubting me.

No, I'm not doubting you.

You don't know I'm an honest man.

But I also have sources myself that tell me exactly the same thing.

One source told me last week, I said,

did somebody write this part down?

And, you know, it seemed like he wanted to get to the Hunter Biden stuff.

And he was talking about

the computer.

And it sounded like he didn't really understand what was going on.

And this person told me, Glenn,

have no doubt about one thing.

This president knows what was going on in Ukraine, has known about it for at least a year, probably closer to two, and is crazed about this.

There is one thing that he knows every single jot and tittle about, and it is Ukraine.

And I believe that.

Of course, if you read, and you did, the United States of Trump, he is obsessed,

obsessed with the people who tried to frame him up in the Russian collusions thing.

He's obsessed with them.

And you will see.

So that's what led to this phone call in July with the Ukraine president.

And because he's crazed about it, and it makes perfect sense.

There is a logic to it.

So last night in the special, we gave you the documents and the name of the DNC operative, Alexandra Chalupa, and what she did working with the press, Ukrainian prosecutors,

and through the embassies to get all of this dirt back and forth.

And that is the genesis.

I believe she is the genesis of the Russia thing.

This is long before Manafort, long before Carter Page or anything else.

There was no FISA.

There was nothing.

This is long before, at least a year before.

And she starts saying, hey, I think I know what's going on.

It's a Russia connection.

And that's.

It's a frame up.

It's a frame up.

It's a frame.

And the American people, I believe, will get the information, even though it's not going to be reported by the national media.

They'll get it.

They'll get it from you.

They'll get it from me.

They'll get it from other people.

It'll come out.

But here's what happened this week.

That's a big one.

So the whistleblower, who they've been trying to make into Nathan Hale.

Oh, what a, this is is a patriotic man.

He, oh, look at him, and he puts his life on the line for his country.

Well, again,

what did he do before he went to the inspector general of the intelligence services?

He took a little detour into Adam Schiff's office.

Oh,

what a surprise!

And all of a sudden, he's got three lawyers after he comes out of the meeting with Adam Schiff.

Does this remind anybody of Christine Blasey Ford?

He took a a little detour into Diane Barnstein's office

and emerge with this radical left firm from DC.

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Like listening to this podcast?

If you're not a subscriber, become one now on iTunes.

And while you're there, do us a favor and rate the show.

You wonder why Donald Trump wants to investigate what was going on in Ukraine?

Last night we covered it all on Ukraine, the Democrats, Russia.

You can find it, YouTube, Facebook, and it's also available now, commercial-free for Blaze subscribers at Blaze TV.

I want to hear from people on...

If you watched it last night,

what stood out to you?

Because it was a very complex timeline.

Did you understand it?

Did we

did we

should we go back and re-explain other parts?

Did you follow it and what stood out?

We start with Joseph in Illinois.

Hello, Joseph.

Hello, Glenn.

It's an honor.

Now you were spot on, but there's a big part of this whole story that you and the nation need to understand, and that's the fact that there was a deal struck between the Obama and Clinton camp that he would go first and she would go second.

And this is all the result of the guarantee that was made.

They weaponized the top end of the DOJ,

you know, all the unsundry intelligence services.

And these are all the things that, you know, that's why all this is happening.

You know, my evidence is Donna Brazil with the Democratic National Party.

That's why they did what they did to Bernie Sanders.

He was an unexpected blow-up that got some steam and some wind behind him, and they had to take him out.

And that's

how they did it.

I tend to agree with you, Joseph.

I don't know specifically what you're talking about, but generally, I completely agree with you.

And that's what we tried to show last night, is that they were building a machine.

And that machine was the most powerful machine.

I mean, imagine having

a never-ending reign of cash, $7 billion,

plus an intelligence agency from a corrupt

country that will do what you ask it to do, investigate what you want.

The power that was involved and the money is staggering.

And if that machine is not dismantled, we will not ever be the same.

Thanks, Joseph.

Let me go to Bill in Virginia.

Hello, Bill.

Good morning.

Hi.

Good morning.

Yeah,

I thought what was most astounding was the fact that the administration had people at different levels throwing

wrenches in the works to try to get the right people investigated and then trying to steer them away from you know

what was really going on.

Yeah, and not really trying to steer them, demanding that they don't.

And I think with your small team and limited resources, as you said

on the

podcast last night, but

you could do more with more money and the bigger organizations could investigate more.

I'm sure that

the DOJ and the administration is looking into this, and Trump did say the other day that more will come out.

Oh, no,

go ahead, Bill.

I think the Democrats are, this is a desperation move.

It is a survival move.

It is.

And it's trying to throw as much of a smokescreen up as possible.

I just said what's going on on one level.

Now I'd like to say what's going on on a wholly different level.

The last line of the Declaration of Independence.

That's what's going on.

Divine.

Divine intervention.

Bill, thank you.

I think

if we can come together, And we are all fair and just, I said this last night.

I believe America, Republicans, Democrats, independents, people who are not playing a game.

Just good, decent Democrats and good, decent Republicans who are neighbors.

We all get along.

We don't agree on politics right now because everything has been made about politics.

But we are a fair and just people.

And right now, we are being sold a load of crap from the mainstream media.

And

they're telling you, in fact,

do we have the place where I said, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip?

What cut is that?

I think that's cut number one on our audio sheet.

Ukraine special, nothing to see here.

This is what the media is doing.

Listen to this.

Forget about all this.

This is a conspiracy.

Concentrate here.

Trump made a phone call.

Trump made a phone call.

You see how this doesn't work?

You see how none of this is being talked about?

They're talking to you about Joe Biden and his son.

Skip, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip, skip.

And Trump made a phone call.

Doesn't work.

This was

when you watch this and you see and you understand what's on the chalkboard, that the media is telling you to skip.

It's not important.

It's staggering.

It's staggering.

And I do believe we have a chance to come together and say, okay, let the chips fall where they may.

If Trump goes down, if the DNC goes down, if they both go down, I don't care.

I just want this cleaned up.

And I want transparency, and I want our government to stop doing this.

This was the Obama administration's ace in the hole.

They built this machine, and I'm telling you what I said when I was at Fox: this man leaves, meaning Obama, you will see a scandal that will dwarf Watergate.

This is it.

But it's reliant upon you to know it.

A republic cannot be kept by a populace that puts their head in the sand.

Now, all of this information, including an elevator pitch, how to make the argument with your friends, and all of the documents, so it's not coming from me.

These are the copies of

text messages between the DNC and

the

Ukrainians.

They are sworn testimonies.

There is the audio tape, never been translated before.

We translated it.

Listen to how they're bragging that they helped Hillary win the election.

And so, you know, that was used as part of the evidence to convict two people of interfering in our election.

All of it's there at Glenbeck.com.

Please get this and share this.

Please.

The Blaze Radio Network

on demand.