Best of the Program | Guest: Amy Holmes | 4/29/19

Hello podcasters, it's a big week here at the Radio and TV Ranch.

We have a special coming up on Wednesday, Socialism, A Warning from the Dead.

It's a stark look at how close America is to the end game.

You know, and speaking of endgame,

we talked a little bit about Marvel and also the big battle that happened on Game of Thrones.

Don't worry, no spoilers, because none of us saw Endgame Endgame this weekend, haven't gotten to it yet.

And we had Stu review Game of Thrones.

And what was your big spoiler?

You said...

The Angry Elf was married to the Redhead.

That was pretty amazing.

I can't believe they.

I mean, you could tell they were near the end of the series when they reveal something like that.

So we also talked about the giant battle at the Democratic primary.

Yeah.

Which is potentially more bloody than the Game of Thrones as far as the intersectional violence.

I mean, they are going after each other.

They don't like it that, you know, it's almost like, hey, there's no dead people

up on the list.

How come?

I mean, it's a battle of, you know, all these different races, and you don't even have a single dead person.

No zombie candidates.

No zombie candidates.

They're very upset about white people.

Also, the New York Times, it's amazing.

On Wednesday, they published a horribly anti-Semitic cartoon.

Then they published another one two days later.

And not a word is being said about is this incitement from the New York Times and from Elon Omar and and also AOC because what the shooter said on Saturday at the synagogue in San Diego was the Jews are controlling America.

Well, that's what Elon Omar has been saying, and that is the political cartoon that the New York Times had.

We'll talk about that as well coming up.

Also, Amy Holmes, she did some homework on Elon Omar and found there seems to be some irregularities there all on today's podcast.

A home title lock, home title lock is the thing that you really need

for your home.

If you have a, if you own a home, you have a title.

No one is watching over that title.

There's only one company that stands at the gate, literally at the gate

of this digital vault where all the titles of the U.S.

go in and out.

So everything is kept, 90% of the titles are all kept in this one vault.

If your title goes in and out and you have home title lock, they verify that you are the one actually selling the home or transferring the title.

This is one of the fastest-growing crimes.

You lose your house, you lose everything.

It is really bad.

And only one company is at the place to where they can actually verify that title.

Get a hundred dollar search for free when you sign up right now at home title lock.com.

That's home-tidlelock.com.

Do it now.

Sign up.

And make sure that nobody steals your house.

An intense political debate broke out at a candlelight vigil on Sunday for the dead and wounded at the synagogue where mourners argued whether it was a lack of gun control or a lack of political self-control that led to this terrorist attack.

A 19-year-old nursing student who penned a virantly racist manifesto is is accused of opening fire on the congregation the day before killing a congregant who died when she stepped between the gunman and the rabbi effectively taking a bullet for her spiritual leader authorities say they're investigating this as a hate crime hundreds gathered in vale verde park less than a mile from the attack including janet seidel who came to the vigil to pay her respects uh and to question the absurdity of this senseless act I knew Lori, that's the woman who stepped between the rabbi.

Everybody knew her.

She was just such a big volunteer, and if you were ever involved, if you ever came to the shoals,

you knew Lori.

Seidel, who's not at the synagogue when Ernst opened fire, questioned yet why again anyone was allowed access to semi-automatic weapons.

We need to license every gun like a car.

Well, we do.

I don't know if you know that, but we do.

If you want to carry one around, you have to have a license.

Now, you can go out and buy a car without a license.

You just can't use a car without a license.

The same is true with guns, except we do a background check if you want to buy a gun.

You don't have to have a background check if you have a car.

So we go an extra step beyond the car.

Doreena Fagan said, thank God we had a Jew with a gun, referring to the off-duty border agent who is credited with helping chase the gunmen away.

Thank God for a Jew with a gun.

This guy happened to have recently discovered his Jewish roots and happened to be there.

So it wasn't the rest of the media is reporting this as,

well, look, he was an off-duty border agent.

No,

he was a congregant with a gun.

How many people would have died if this guy didn't have a gun and wasn't at the synagogue?

This wasn't some just, you know, bystander who was walking by.

Here's a guy who was at the synagogue, saw the problem, had a gun, knew how to use it, and used it.

If we wouldn't have had a guy in California who happened to be there, how many people would have died?

now?

They were, they started to argue about whether this was Trump, whether this was guns.

No, this was a sick individual, sick individual.

And I believe a sick individual that is being ramped up.

People are being ramped up right now.

And I believe on all sides, we can take our own responsibility for our own.

But let's talk about the responsibility of the left on this.

Because they always say that they blame it on us.

Well, who was this white supremacist?

Who was he?

Was he a Trump supporter?

It doesn't look like that.

Was he a Jewish supporter?

Ah, it doesn't look like that.

So who was he?

And let me ask the New York Times.

The New York Times ran a a picture internationally, a political cartoon, last Thursday.

It's one of the most obscene cartoons I have seen.

It is straight out of a Nazi propaganda room.

It's of Donald Trump wearing dark sunglasses as if he's blind, and the and the sight dog is a wiener dog with the face of Benjamin Netanyahu and his tag

is the star of David.

So it is showing that

the Jews and Israel are leading the blind president.

So what is that saying?

That's saying that Israel is controlling our government.

That's what that's saying.

Now I've heard that before.

I've heard that when they were talking about AIPAC, that that's the Jewish coalition, that's the Israeli coalition controlling our government.

Who said that?

Ilan Omar has said that.

AOC has echoed that.

The New York Times puts a photo out, a cartoon out last Thursday.

And what does the gunman say?

The gunman says that the Jews and Israel are controlling our government.

Now that's interesting, isn't it?

Did you see anybody in the newspaper talk about that?

Did you see anyone on cable news talk about that?

Not in mainstream media.

Of course they're not going to say, well, wait a minute.

Isn't this the exact point that Elon Omar was making just recently about AIPAC?

Hasn't this been the dialogue that the Jews are controlling the United States government?

Isn't that exactly what that political cartoon was saying?

Yes.

So wait a minute, it's the gun.

Because the gun was just minding its own business, sitting in a safe or sitting on a shelf.

It was just minding its own business.

I don't know if you know this, but most guns don't have an opinion about Israel one way or another.

Even the Uzi doesn't have an opinion on Israel one way or another.

So it's just minding its own business.

Now, this white supremacist, this white supremacist,

he decides to pick that gun up.

And he's doing it for the exact reason

that the New York Times and Elon Omar

had been called out recently.

Hmm.

I wonder if there's any incitement there.

I wonder if you could make a case of incitement.

Because I know if it was reversed, if the guy quoted me,

even if he wasn't actually a fan of mine, listened to me, knew that I had said that, that's exactly what would have happened.

Anti-Semitism is a socialist disease.

It always shows up.

Socialism and anti-Semitism are different sides of the exact same coin.

And the New York Times, you know,

a lot of people are saying because they, quote, apologized, they didn't apologize.

They said that that it was

some editor that, you know, didn't have proper supervision.

Proper supervision?

You didn't recognize that as something that could have been done by Goebbels?

You didn't recognize how anti-Semitic that was?

Boy, you got a problem from the top down if you've hired somebody who's that clueless to be your editor.

He needs supervision to go, hmm, that one looks like Goebbels.

I wouldn't think so.

But the New York Times has this history.

Out of the 23,000 front page stories between 1939 and 1945, 11,300 of them were about World War II.

Out of the 11,300 front-page stories in the New York Times between 1939 and 1945, only 26 of those mentioned the Holocaust.

26 stories.

That's it.

To cover the Holocaust, the armbands, the rounding up, the interrogations, the gas chambers, the camps, the ghettos,

only 26 in the New York Times.

When they...

When they finally shipped out the last of the Warsaw ghettos and cleaned them out, and no one was left,

the article headline was Warsaw Fears Extermination.

That's after they cleaned out the ghetto.

And by the way, it was a small story on page seven

next to an advertisement for new pianos.

The New York Times said, it was a bad judgment call.

you know it's interesting how the new york times seems to have many bad judgment calls and usually

when it revolves around anti-semitism

the best of the glenbeck program

like listening to this podcast if you're not a subscriber become one now on iTunes and while you're there do us a favor and rate the show.

I spent the weekend

trying to

work on this special that we have that is coming up on Wednesday.

I think this is the most important special that we have done,

maybe since we've been at Fox.

Would you agree with that, Stu?

Yeah, I mean, especially the way we're moving right now and how fast it's happening.

You need to know, you know, where

they're attacking and how to protect.

So

there's something that we found.

Jason Battrill is with us.

And Jason is our head researcher.

And if you will, Jason,

tell us what you found in research.

We're working on a book about socialism and we're all constantly looking for the influences outside.

Tell us about the blueprint you found.

So, and that's exactly what we found.

We found a blueprint for how to take over a,

do do it legally within the range of their own system, within the range of their own constitution, Congress, everything, take over a country.

And we saw how socialists and communists did this back

in the late 1940s.

And literally found this completely by accident.

And this document that you'll reveal later this week, I kind of broke it down by the different steps.

There was about five different steps that they needed to pull off, like do this, check, do this, check, do this, check.

And by the end of it, they would have completely flipped a country from capitalist

democracy to full-on socialism to communism.

And as I was looking at those steps, I was like, huh, you know,

let's just see what's going on today.

So I started filling in step number one.

Okay.

Okay, that's happening here.

Step number two.

Okay, I started getting a little nervous.

Step number three, then I started getting freaked out.

That's when I sent it to you.

And I was like, oh my gosh.

And what's frightening is this blueprint is how to flip a major free market republic to communist or socialist within three years.

Now, we're going to build this case so you know because

everyone feels it.

Everyone feels,

and it's funny because back in 2006 or seven,

I played a clip from Condoleezza Rice, and she was talking about what we were seeing in the news.

And she said, These are the birth pangs of the things to come.

And I remember saying, Well, wait a minute, that's A, very, very scriptural.

B,

that implies that they're going to get stronger and faster.

Things are going to start happening one right after another.

And the faster they get, the closer they get, the closer we are to giving birth to something.

and none of us even will recognize that we're pregnant but we are and we're about to give birth to something and i don't think you want to see what we're giving birth to and so your gut is telling you something is happening something's wrong and it's happening faster and faster and getting crazier and crazier that's what this blueprint describes and shows how it's done.

And it's all being done to us right now.

Everything makes sense when you look at it through this lens.

It's like a light will pop off.

Like you're like, wait, why are we arguing over 99 different genders?

Like, what sense does that make?

Like, why is that, why, this whole Me Too thing, this radical militant feminist thing, post-modernism, like, none of that stuff makes sense if you look at it, you know, just individually, like, out, you know, outside the entire grand scheme.

But that is, and I'll just kind of give that away, one of the steps.

Like that is one of the, I won't say which step, but that is one of the steps on this thing.

Check that off.

It was done before.

The exact same thing has been done before, and a country was flipped to socialism.

And then what immediately follows after that?

Communism and a dictatorship.

It is.

It is truly remarkable.

Now, we've making this special for free.

We're putting it on all platforms.

It will not be on TV.

It will be commercial free.

And we don't even know how long it's going to run.

I mean,

it's going to be maybe 90 minutes, but

we don't want to rush through this because it's really important.

So we want everyone to be able to watch it.

It'll be on YouTube.

It will be on Facebook.

It will be

on Blazetv.com.

We really could use your subscription because we are...

We are hiring more people and we are trying to do more research like this.

You know, when I was was at Fox, I was spending a million dollars a year of my own money to provide the research for that show, plus all of the research that, you know, was provided for Fox.

I lost money.

I'm the only person that ever has been on television and lost money.

We need your help to be able to do the kind of research that needs to be done, and we get that help by you subscribing to Blazetv.com.

And if you subscribe for this special event,

there will be a, it's a,

what is it?

I want to say $30?

$20?

$20.

$20.

$20

savings.

And you just have to use the promo code G-L-E-N-N.

I believe there's a special promo code that will run during the special.

During the special, and that's when you can sign up for that.

Obviously,

I wouldn't expect you to be aware of that or any of the details surrounding it.

But I believe what happens is they give you a special promo code during the special.

If you watch it and it's information and the type of of programming and research that you think is valuable, especially when you have a field of 20 Democratic candidates, 15 of which are outwardly running with policies that are essentially socialist.

The other ones are just kind of close to it.

You have all these new people in Congress that are doing this.

You know, this is more important than ever, I think, because the threat is real.

I mean, I think for most of the time we've done the show, Glenn, it's been more like, ah, communism.

It's more of a joke.

And there's, I mean, you know, there's parts of it that you have to take seriously.

And it wasn't as close as it It wasn't.

That's what I mean.

Yeah.

Yeah.

It's like it's never been a joke as far as, I mean, ask 100 million dead people whether it was a joke or not.

Yeah.

But I mean, as far as whether it could actually happen here, well, I mean, Bernie Sanders is leading polls in states.

Like, this is a socialist president.

We're that close.

So we'll show you what it takes to win and what's already been done.

Socialism, a warning from the dead.

A Blaze TV special Wednesday, 8 p.m.

Eastern.

This is the the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Stu is going to complete

his power rankings of the Democrats once a week.

We look at the power rankings, see what's changed.

Okay, so top 10 here, Julian Castro at 35.7 out of 100.

Kirsten Gillibrand has a 38.1.

Amy Klobuchar, number eight.

She is trying to run as a moderate

in the moderate wing of the Democratic Party, which would be better for her if

that wing existed.

I think if that was a thing,

that wing does kind of exist, doesn't it?

Isn't that the Barack Obama wing?

I know.

Now that's what it is.

I mean, it's crazy that AOC came out over the weekend and she was like, you know, Barack Obama is not the guy.

He kind of failed us.

This is the new, this is the new Democrats that look at Barack Barack Obama as tame, like an old stodgy

nothing.

Number seven is Elizabeth Warren, scored 45.3.

She's awful at campaigning, but her attempt to try to tie Game of Thrones into the campaign, saying it was an example of it's good to have powerful women, is one of the most disgusting pandering pieces of nonsense.

That's not the word I wanted to use there, that

I've ever seen in my life.

She is just terrible at this.

And, you know, it's just, you know, you're just waiting for her to say, can I go?

I'm not going to go grab me a beer and watch some Game of Thrones.

She's like at that level of just the game.

That is disgusting.

Corey Booker's number six.

And again, we talk about having a large field.

That's different than having a good field.

If Corey Booker is number six, you've got problems.

She had 40, he had 40 whole people at his appearance in Nevada,

which is pretty impressive.

And they noted that it was comprised of people of varying ages, which is different than most crowds because most crowds are contained entirely of people that just have the same birthday.

Right.

Not varying ages.

No, no.

That's totally different than most crowds.

Bob Franco Rourke has a 60.2 on our scale.

Or get to the big guys here.

He's still number five, even though it does seem like he's really all the pretty boy hype has faded away from Betto and gone to Pete Budijej, I think.

Pete Budijej knows who he is.

I guess.

I mean, he hasn't had any tough questioning.

We'll get to that here in a second.

But again, this is a guy who gave less than.

So Kirsten Gillibrand gave 2% to charity in the tax reports that came out.

Beto Rourke

gave one-seventh of that amount.

He was at 0.3%.

His wife's dad is worth somewhere between $500 million and $20 billion.

And this is what he's giving.

Oh, no, no, no.

He's giving his time.

That's true.

Yeah,

he said, my time on the campaign trail away from my family

so I could fight for you.

That's what I'm giving.

Oh, wow.

Brave.

Thank you.

Brave.

Pete Budigech comes in at number four,

62.9 out of 100.

He is, so far, again, hasn't been challenged, although there's been little bits of pieces now about him as a candidate and his sort of profile.

Barney Frank came out and said, look, the only reason this guy is getting this much attention is because he's gay.

Barney Frank came out and said that.

Another Democratic activist is saying, look, yeah, he's gay.

He's a gay man, but you know what that says to me?

He's just a man.

Another man.

Another white man.

It's not good enough on the intersectionality scale.

The issue is when you base your vote on a candidate's genitals, you wind up having issues.

This is a very confusing process.

Number three was number one last week, Kamala Harris, a 68.6 on our 1 to 100 scale.

You can view her campaign kind of one of two ways.

One, she had a big launch and she's faded.

Or two, she's playing the long game.

She's looking at this and kind of replicating the Barack Obama path.

She's lined up more Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton doublers, more than bundlers, more than double any other candidate.

Wow.

And she's got all these celebrities lining up behind her.

I think she's attempting that approach, whether it works or not.

She is also

going to be the vice presidential candidate.

She may, but let me give you this bit of.

If she's not the presidential nominee, she will be the vice presidential nominee.

I'm generally bullish on Kamala Harris.

Plus, she raises a lot of money, which someone would like who's running for president of their VP.

I will say, though, can a Democratic candidate in this news environment

win with this as a literal viewpoint that they're admitting?

This is from the Harris campaign communications director, Lily Adams.

She says, Kamala Harris's support for Israel is central to who she is.

Her support for Israel is central to who she is.

She's firm in her belief that Israel has a right to exist and defend itself, including against rocket attacks.

from Gaza.

So just admitting that they're attacks from Gaza and not some defensive measure is one thing.

But when you're saying that they're responding, you're actually admitting that the Jews are not every, you know, they're responsible for every single one of these problems.

I don't know how you get through that in this, in the Democratic industry.

It's a longer-term play.

Maybe, but that's risky.

Number two, Bernie Sanders.

Now, Sanders came out and called the Israeli government racist.

He has a 69.2 out of 100 on our scale.

He has been able to convince Cardi B to vote for him, which is interesting because she's already made these.

We played the rants where she says she hates taxes.

Right.

And now she wants to vote for Cardi.

Cardi B is going to vote for her.

I don't think Cardi B is following these things as closely as we know, but not.

You know,

I'm going out on a limb here, but I don't think people should follow Cardi B's advice on anything, quite honestly.

I mean, she might have good advice on some things.

I don't know what they might be, but it's not politics.

If you want to drug and steal your prostitution clients, you could go to Cardi B for example.

All right.

Because that's one thing you should get at.

And number one, and I want to point out 69.2 is the number for Bernie Sanders.

Number one with 78.8.

So this is a big gap

in this ranking.

Is Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.

You pointed out, Glenn, that Barack Obama, with a chance to make a statement about how people of different colors and races and maybe sexual orientations could do these roles, chose Joe Biden Jr.

as his candidate, an old white guy.

So that was what they did now.

Whether that's going to happen again, I don't know.

Is it okay to have one white guy on the ticket even for the Democrats right now?

I don't know.

They don't seem to want that.

I mean, at least the media and the, you know, and their puppeteers don't seem to want a white male.

No.

So you can get all the rankings up at Glennbeck.com right now.

And we should point out before we go, I didn't make it up.

Robinette is actually his middle name.

You're listening to the best of the Glendeck program.

Oh, no, nonsense.

No, please.

Last night...

What, six, seven years in the making, winter finally came last night to Winterfell, and it was an epic battle.

the good news is we are not gonna spoil anything because Stu knows nothing about this series he's only watched three episodes now he doesn't know who all of the characters are in fact doesn't know who any of the characters are

and it was an odd dark experience for our friend Stu Breer here he is with his Game of Thrones update some big reveals in this one really yeah I think there actually were some big things that happened and

you know I hope some of these aren't I don't think they're spoilers.

No, I'm pretty sure they're not.

Okay, I looked at your notes and they're definitely...

Okay, so there's an hour 25 on my DVR for this episode.

Yeah.

Approximately 45 minutes of that of the opening title sequence.

I don't.

It's impossible how long it is.

It's incredible.

I'm with you on that.

Okay.

So the fat guy is scared of battle.

Fat guy from one of the houses that we placed last week.

Yeah.

There's a little kid warrior who is not afraid.

Could be a boy or a girl.

I'm not sure.

The angry elf is not afraid of the battle.

The wheelchair backstreet boy is being wheeled towards battle, which seems like really misdirected bravery there.

I don't think that that's a good idea.

Really?

Yeah.

Everyone is kind of quiet and ready.

There's a lot of troops, but it's really dark and it's hard to tell.

I am.

I did not write the art of war.

That's not me.

However...

Aligning all of your troops in the most compact area possible seems like a bad strategy, which is what they did.

It was a different strategy.

Yeah, it was one that I had.

I have have not seen I I will tell you

Have you ever seen a battlefield like this?

Have you ever seen a battle scene?

Yeah, it was unbelievable unbelievable.

It really was it was I mean it was an impressive piece of of

whatever it was

I mean of television.

It was it was it was amazing.

It would have been a good film.

It would have been it was that quality.

Yeah Every major character is in the battle, but Jon Snow and the blondie queen lady are just watching from basically like a luxury box a mile away.

They're just checking it out.

I mean, I get that they're important, but they don't.

That was really, it was kind of hard.

You're like,

I mean, if I were down on the ground, I'd be looking up going, hey, we're down here.

Yeah.

10 minutes in, one sentence of dialogue.

That's really, it was 10 minutes on my DBR, and there was only one sentence of dialogue so far.

In a dramatic moment, a lady kind of looks like Andy McDowell.

You know, she's from Groundhog Day and many other things.

She makes all the swords light light on fire for the first group of battlers.

So the Andy McDowell character from Groundhog Day.

Yes.

She sets

the swords on fire, which

it seems like there's a limited advantage to this.

So your sword's on fire, but I mean, what good is that going to do?

If you stab someone, likely they're going to die anyway.

I guess you're lighting the way so you can see a little bit of a.

But it also could catch you on fire very easily.

Seems like there's significant downsides.

You missed a key element of what will kill the army.

Okay.

I don't know what that is.

I think they were honestly just set on fire because of the cool visual.

Because from the luxury box where Jon Snow is, it looked really cool as they all lit up.

I think that was the main reason it looked really cool.

And then when they were charging, it looked cool.

Yes.

The fat guy realized how smart he was to be scared of the battle because it was not going well.

The army attacks, but it's like super...

Did you get...

I mean, to me, it was so dark and so close up, I couldn't tell what was going on at all.

It was just a bunch of...

Occasionally, you'd see like scary faces pass in front of the screen and then someone gets decapitated.

Right.

That was essentially the entire battle.

It was kind of hard to follow.

Because it was going quickly and very close and you're right.

Very dark.

Dark enough to the point I thought

maybe the iPad had shut off.

Right, yeah, because I think also it's a way to lower your production costs.

They did this with the swords all on fire, right?

Yeah.

They had the scene where they all went into there and they all got to battle and you can't see what's going on.

You see a bunch of swords on fire and then they all just start getting extinguished one by one, and then they're white, get wiped out.

And it's a great way to just save the money of having to produce that battle, right?

Whatever happened over there, you didn't see it, you're too far away.

Sorry, go to this big empty studio and hold these Christmas lights, and we're gonna put them out one at a time.

That's it, it's nice and easy.

So, Frumpy Girl

gives the redhead a dagger and acts as if it could be useful at some point in the battle.

So, that's interesting.

I don't know what it means.

Okay.

How about this one, though?

Blonde Queen lady, the one who's the Siegfried and Reud of dragons.

She f flies in and just turns on fire breathing and wipes out like half the army.

Why didn't you do that before you sent the poor light up fire sword people over there?

Right.

They all got killed.

Well, they're why not just fly over there and wipe them all out with a giant dragon fire.

There was a strategic reason for that, and it was talked about while they were in the, as you said, luxury skybox.

Hmm.

I didn't catch that.

So.

This is is why I say don't worry about spoilers because he's not catching a lot of

things.

Okay, so it was a really bad storm and or a weapon that was used or happened that made it, I guess, tough for dragons to fly.

So the dragon thing stopped working at one point.

Then they started retreating, which was really bad, I guess.

And then, like,

you see the faces of them, and it's like, is this entire...

I honestly want to know this.

Is this a zombie series?

No.

No, it's not.

They're fighting.

This is essentially zombies.

Like, it's a Walking Dead episode.

It really, it did seem reminiscent of that.

Like in old-timey clothes.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Like a medieval

Walking Dead.

It's not.

It's not.

It's not.

The zombies have played a very minimal role.

You said this was the big battle they were building to the whole time.

Well, this is the battle.

This is the first battle.

The first line of the series, if I'm not mistaken, is winter is coming.

This is the battle of winter, but it's not

necessarily the final battle, it's just a big battle.

All right.

So then they try to light the trenches on fire with the flaming arrows, but it was too cold and windy.

That didn't work out very well at all.

No, that's not what.

And about a half hour in, you realize this battle is not going well.

They are not doing a good job in this particular battle.

That's when the big reveal happened to me.

Maybe the biggest reveal of the whole series that I've watched so far.

Oh, you're not giving away anything.

Not a big reason.

We've checked with this, right?

Okay, yeah.

We've run it by some experts.

They say this is somehow not a big reveal.

But the redhead woman,

she's talking to Angry Elf, and they revealed that they were once married.

Married?

The Angry Elf guy and Redhead.

Married.

Yeah, not a big reveal.

That's for me.

It just

did not look likely, I'll say.

Really?

I said this.

That would be a real surprise to me if I was in this community.

Right, okay.

Those two, really?

Yeah.

You know?

Every once in a while, you have those friends.

I happen to be that friend for a lot of people.

How much head did he get her?

That's me most of the time?

Kind of the same way there.

The dragon queen is referenced, which I think is Blondie because of her Siegfried Reut dragon situation that she's got going on.

The curly-haired guy apologized to the wheelchair backstreet boy who was out in the snow in his wheelchair again.

This poor guy is always out in the snow in his wheelchair, which is really terrible terrain for a wheelchair.

Why don't they understand this?

I don't know.

I mean, there's got to be a lot of people.

But it's not like he can escape.

But there's got to be a cart or something that can pull this guy around.

He seems important.

Right.

Well, he's having to wheel out in the snow.

They used to just drag him by his armpits for like a whole season.

They would just drag him around in the snow.

Oh, so he's excited about this.

Oh, a wheelchair is a big step up for him.

Okay.

The zombies beat the fire trench by laying on top of the fire and putting it out.

This was a solid strategy by the zombie people.

Yeah, I thought so, too.

That was a pretty good twist.

I didn't see that one coming.

Let's see.

The zombies seem to disintegrate when they're hit.

They're not like

people.

They just disintegrate into little pieces, maybe?

With fire.

Okay.

Swords.

Oh, okay.

Okay, that makes sense.

See, you're explaining that.

The young girl stabbed a very tall guy in the eye, and he...

He

not really...

And of course, it was one of those moments where he picks her up and looks longingly into her eyes instead of just crushing her like every other person they've come across.

Right.

Which allows her the opportunity to stab him in the eye, which is just, again, terrible strategy by the tall guy.

Right, okay.

The dragon fight happens, but it's kind of hard to tell.

They seem to be fighting at one point.

Again, this is about zombies this show.

That is what I've understood.

Really not.

The zombies can detect the dripping blood of the Frumpy girl while she's hiding from them.

They can detect that, and that's worrisome.

However, they can't detect any of her footprints as she's walking around the entire place over and over again.

They can't hear that.

They can only hear the dripping blood.

Right.

They did seem a little keen on the small things.

Yes, they did.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I like that.

That's a good way of looking at it.

Guy was using a flaming sword inside, which is just a fire safety hazard.

That's for outside use.

Right.

Well, if your house is made entirely of stone.

Well, that's true.

It's going to be helpful more.

But you still have curtains, probably.

Again, it could cause some serious damage.

The zombies have a dragon, too.

And that one breathes blue fire, which is the difference there.

Another big reveal.

I thought this was key.

The frumpy girl, who was just like standing on the side of the road, is the only other time I've really even seen her.

She seems to be very important.

Like, I would say she's a very important character in the show.

I'm going to say that.

Yeah, all right.

So she might be known to the audience as something else other than Trumpy Girl.

I feel like they that's probably her official name.

All right.

That is what she looks like.

At this point, my laptop

got down to 11% power, which was oh, that's not good.

It's concerning.

So, but this was a big change.

So, this guy, another guy on the opposition who seemed very important, his name was Zakarius, potentially.

And he was hit by the Blondie Dragon's fire, but then nothing happened to him.

Kind of like it reminds me.

It's

Dakaris.

You're saying Dakaris, not Zakaris.

I would say Zakarius is what I thought I heard.

And that was the name of...

The character.

The character.

Huh.

When you look at me, that does not seem accurate.

But Jon Snow was going to fight Zakarius one-on-one.

But then the zombies that were all there,

they just woke up, and they're all alive again.

Yeah.

Now, I couldn't tell if it was the zombies or

the other side that woke up.

All the dead people woke up, and then they were all on Team Zakarius somehow.

Right.

And then

the zombies were burrowing through the protected area where the important people were living in the castle.

Yeah.

There's a lot of, I would say, important people are about to die, but then are saved at the last second by some other important character.

Like, that scene happened about 60 times in this battle scene.

The curly hair guy learned he was a good man from the wheelchair Backstreet Boy, which was apparently enough for him to run at Zakarius in a pointless suicide attack and he failed spectacularly in this effort the dragon or the who is

he looked like almost like a like a robot superhero type of guy like almost like a like the Max Headroom maybe

all right we can call him Max Headroom if that makes you more comfortable but I think Zakarius is his real name so we should just use that okay well you're not getting a review like this anyplace else no and then as backstreet boy is about to die my computer dies first.

So I didn't write down anything else after that.

But something else happened after that.

But it doesn't matter because the big revelations had already occurred.

Number one, Frumpy Girl is an important character.

Number two, Redhead and Elf, Angry Elf, are married.

Those two are the big things to take away, I think, from this episode.

This

is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Amy Holmes joins us now.

Amy Holmes, who really was with the Blaze when we first started, and she did the Blaze's real news.

She has hosted MSNBC's morning news program way too early.

And now you'll see her on CNN.

She's in election coverage.

She's at the Situation Room.

Yada, yada, yada.

Welcome to the program, Amy Holmes.

Hi, Amy.

Glenn, thank you so much for having me this morning.

You bet.

So

I want to talk to you about this article that you wrote for a German magazine.

Tell me what you found about Elon Omar and AOC.

Yes, so I wrote this piece for the Swiss Weekly called Die Welsh.

I didn't have to write it in German, thankfully, since I don't speak German.

It was translated for me.

But I, you know, did reporting.

I dug into both of these women and Elon Omar more specifically, I picked up the phone and I called a woman named Phyllis Kahn, who was a Minnesota state legislator that Ilan Omar first beat in 2016.

Phyllis had served in the Minnesota state legislature for

44 years, the longest serving woman in electoral politics.

And along comes Ilon Omar and historically unseats her to become the first Somali American to serve in the Minnesota state legislature.

Well, in the course of, you know, discussing this with Phyllis, and I think I'm one of the first people that's called her even just to get her reaction to Ilan Omar now in Congress, and she said, you know, I asked her about the anti-Semitism, and Phyllis is Jewish.

She was born to Eastern Jewish, Eastern European Jewish immigrants in New York City and Brooklyn.

And I asked her about it.

and if she was surprised.

And Glenn, she said, oh no, not at all.

And that she had warned that Ilan Omar seemed to harbor anti-Semitic proclivities and impulses way back in 2016.

But prior to that,

the story that she told me that I have not seen anywhere in the national media, mainstream media, in coverage of Ilan Omar, is back in 2014, Ms.

Omar was a city council aide, and she was at a polling station, probably illegally, to campaign for her boss, for the state legislator, who was running against Louis Khan.

And at the polling station, a Somali American election judge was there speaking in Somali to Somali American voters in Minnesota, telling them that this candidate is our Somali brother and the other is the old Jewish lady.

And Ilan Omar was there.

Now Phyllis Khan had a Somali American supporter who understood Somali and understood what this election judge was saying.

he signed an affidavit that Ilan Omar was shouting instructions to the election judge and that

she was in cahoots.

Ilan Omar, of course, denies it, says that it's ridiculous.

But this was all going on sort of under the radar in Somali with these

And Phyllis, as she said to me, Ilan Omar does not deny that she was there.

She does not deny that there was communication in Somali.

She denies that she, that there, that

the woman said, and this is for the old Jewish lady.

Now,

Phyllis said, even if Ilan Omar did not actively participate in directing voters to vote for our Somali brother over the old Jewish lady, she was there and she could have put a stop to it, and she didn't.

And, you know, that's sort of the most generous reading of that situation.

So, well, the election judge was removed, was told not to work at that precinct because of the conflict.

The

Khan's campaign did file complaints.

So it's on the record, Glenn.

And if you dig on Google, you'll see some local reports at the time in 2014 about this incident.

But I have not seen it anywhere in current mainstream media news coverage of Ilan Omar's, you know, apparently fairly long history now when it comes to elections of either expressing anti-Semitic views or being tolerant of them.

She's clearly, I think, a

I want to be very, very careful here.

She is, to me, clearly a very

passionate woman against Israel.

And I

question her relationship deeply with care.

I think care is instrumental in her life.

And she does.

She's on the board.

She's done extensive fundraising for them.

And she's been deeply entangled with care for many years.

So tell me what you found out about AOC, because your article is two women on the verge of a party takedown.

What do you mean by that?

Well, you can read it two ways.

Either the party takes them down or they take the party down.

Which do you think is more likely?

Well, I think unfortunately that it seems more likely that they are pushing the Democratic Party in a very, at least to me, disturbing and concerning direction.

The fact that our House of Representatives could not clearly and specifically denounce anti-Semitism or, shall we say,

ugly views when it comes to support for Israel, support for the Jewish state, and the Jewish state itself.

The fact that our Congress could not do that, I thought was extremely disturbing, extremely telling about, I guess, what sort of euphemistically is called the new young energy of the Democratic left.

And I find it also extremely disturbing that AOC, she seems to be an absolutely loyal and vigorous defender of Ilan Omar no matter what Congressman Omar says, and that she will not take a step back and start to look more carefully and more critically at these

now multiple, multiple remarks that are being made by Congressman Omar in public.

That's very disturbing to me that this is.

And then, you know, if you criticize or critique these remarks, of course, the shield goes straight up of you're attacking a black Muslim woman or a woman of color.

Well, no, we're attacking the views that are being expressed that we know lead to very ugly chapters in world history.

I had somebody who was a former lefty, still very, very liberal, but is very concerned about

what's happening with culture and how we're denying reality and everything else.

And she said to me on Friday, she said, you know, this whole thing with

the Christians being called Easter worshipers, she said,

you didn't hear that?

No.

Yeah, no, the Christians that were bombed in Sri Lanka,

all of the reports from the mainstream media was this was an attack on Easter worshipers.

And so we pointed out...

Doesn't worship the Easter buddy?

Easter, I don't know.

I don't know, but none of them would say these were Christians.

It was all Easter worshipers.

They just don't know what Easter is.

They don't know.

I don't know.

But she said, you know, I heard all these conservatives get upset about that.

And she said, it's not like the reporters are trying to destroy Christianity.

She said, they're just afraid to

use language that looks like it supports Christianity.

And I said, well, I think that makes that worse.

Like afraid of

who?

Who are they afraid of?

Right.

The left.

Right.

So basically,

the result is erasing Christianity, which is the same as attempting to destroy it.

Correct.

If you can't say Christianity, and if you can't say that these were Christians who were killed, who were targeted deliberately for their faith, and now the press can't even say that?

So you write in your story about

Joe Lieberman and how that he came out and talked about AOC and she said, who's that?

That was her tweet.

And dismissed him as if he was completely irrelevant.

Right.

And in speaking to Joe Lieberman, he says that he thinks a lot of the people that he knows, the older line Democrats, that they are terrified of these two and

their cult.

Yes, I spoke with another,

so in researching AOC, I spoke with a former aide to U.S.

Senator Chuck Schumer

Michael Kaufman and I quote him in the piece and in our conversation I asked him you know here in New York he's based from New York how you know what are you hearing from you know Jewish Democrats Jewish donors to the Democratic Party and he said oh they're terrified they're absolutely apoplectic about what's going on and what they're seeing and the Democratic Party's apparent unwillingness and impotence in putting a stop to it because you know they don't want to risk

offending the young new energy of the Democratic Party.

It's extremely disturbing, but something that was a bit of a silver lining to me, Phyllis told me in our conversations that which I report that she's getting phone calls from Somali Americans in Minnesota who are asking her for her help.

in unseating Ilan Omar, that they too are very disturbed by what they're hearing from her.

And this is also, it's, you know, in terms of Somali Americans in Minnesota not liking it.

This has been reported in the New York Times and Washington Gross and CNN.

But she said, you know, she's going a step further.

They're actually calling her to say, how do we unseat her?

What is your advice?

How do we get rid of her?

And she said, well, the first step is you have to find a candidate.

And Glenn, I watched this documentary, Time for Ilon.

I watched it so you don't have to.

Right.

You can get it on Amazon Prime.

It is the softest, most glowing account of the rise of this mother of three children, et cetera, et cetera.

And the documentarist is actually Jewish, Nora Shapiro.

And she's been asked, well, what do you think about what you've heard from Ilan Omar?

And of course,

she stopped peddling it.

I'm like, what are you doing, lady?

You need to be reporting honestly about this person.

And she's like, well it is disturbing uh but anyway but anyway yeah

but anyway as phyllis points out elon omar has been very skillful in presenting at least to the minnesota public presenting this very attractive sympathetic uh figure to the voting public and she's very good at deploying you know, identity politics to make that connection.

You can follow Amy on Twitter at realamyholmes.com.

Real M.

Holmes.

Oh, Real Amy M.

Holmes.

Sorry about that.

My little initial.

Yep.

Yeah, Real Amy M.

Holmes.

Thank you so much, Amy.

I appreciate it.

Oh, thank you so much.

You bet.

God bless.

The Blaze Radio Network.

On demand.