'Pleas, Plots and Scenarios'? - 10/2/18

The Blaze Radio Network.

On demand.

Glad back.

You know, there's always two sides of a coin.

For every benefit of technology, there is another side.

There's a dark side.

There's a dark side.

Take social media and the internet.

Before that existed, journalists had a stranglehold on the mass flow of information and opinion.

If you wanted to have a voice, you had to go through your local newspaper, your local news, cable news, national publications like the New New York Times.

Your voice, really, the only place your voice could be heard in the past was on talk radio.

But social media has changed all of that.

And now you've got a hot take or, you know, maybe you just saw some breaking news and you can instantly publish and blast that information out into the entire world.

Good.

Except there's a flip side to that coin.

Let's say you work at a news outlet supposed to be impartial.

Well, anything you've ever blasted out on the interwebs is instantly available to check your impartiality or your

non-biased boda fites.

Let me give you an example.

New York Times,

Emily Baslon,

July 9th, she tweeted, quote,

as a Yale law school graduate and a lecturer, I strongly disassociate myself from tonight's praise of Brett Kavanaugh.

With respect, he's a fifth vote on the hard right turn on voting rights and so much more that will harm the democratic process and prevent a more equal society.

Okay, so in July, she came out and she let everybody know, I'm against him.

I think he's dangerous.

Now that was just three months ago.

She exercised her ability, as we all do,

to share with the world what our opinions are.

And then yesterday, she shared with the world her

independent viewpoint.

Emily exercised the other platform she has, the New York Times, with a holy crap bombshell on Brett Kavanaugh.

And I hope you're buckled in for this.

Or it says, sincerely.

The allegations are horrifying.

You'd ask yourself, what could be worse than attempted rape, Glenn?

Well, gang rape.

Yeah, but what could be worse than gang rape?

Well, here we go.

Emily in the New York Times reported that in September of 1985,

Brett Kavanaugh

threw a glass of ice at somebody.

Yes, yes.

I'm sorry if this is a triggering event for you.

If you're all of a sudden like, you remember somebody coming at you, Jack Frost, trying to stab you with the icicles.

I get it.

I get it.

I'm sorry I had to bring this up.

The New York Times is reporting on ice throwing.

Now, I heard this story originally from the New York Times.

I listened to a podcast, The Daily, which I don't recommend.

I listened to it so you don't have to.

But I listened to it this morning.

And in that report, and you know, he went to jail.

And I thought, he went to jail you'd think that would have come up no he didn't go to jail there were no arrests made the charges were not filed nothing neither of those things happen police were called because they got into a fight and the police said okay all right all right knock it off go home

oh well we can't have somebody like that on the Supreme Court can we

when he was hang on when he was in college, he was in a bar and some guy said something to him and he threw ice on him and the police were called and the police said, hey, knock it off, go home.

I mean, what kind of madman, what kind of Jack the Ripper are we putting on the Supreme Court?

Thank you, New York's New York Times.

This story does not live up to the...

even the editorial standards of the New York Times.

Someone threw ice in 1985.

Really?

God forbid you ever go to Philadelphia.

Now, Emily, the writer of this story, her tweets make it obvious that she's opinionated against Brett Kavanaugh.

So now the New York Times has been caught publishing a supposed journalist being an activist.

And this is not a mistake.

How did this story get through the editorial staff?

Well, easy.

I believe they're probably activists as well.

They're activists, and this just goes to show his temperament.

He might, you know, somebody might come in and say, Hey, I'm fighting for abortion in the court, and he might just take a glass of ice and and throw it at that person.

Get used to it, America.

We have a full week of this.

As we get closer to the vote,

the ridiculousness escalates to a full-on clown show,

probably by this afternoon.

Now, a clown show in the media leading up to a circus in the Senate.

You know what?

I guess nothing has changed.

But this time, can I at least get some cotton candy?

It's Tuesday, October 2nd.

This is the Glenbeck program.

All right.

So.

Stu.

I'm a little disturbed, but all right.

I know, I know.

The goalposts.

Man,

they just keep moving them.

I mean, they must be tired, don't you think?

Well, they're heavy.

The goalposts are getting heavier and heavier and heavier because the farther you move them, the harder it is to justify.

This is incredible.

Though I am very disturbed, of course, by these new allegations against Brett Kavanaugh that he threw frozen water at someone.

Frozen water, first of all, can be sharp.

It can be heavy.

You know what?

People are like, oh, that's not a big deal.

So what he threw ice.

Frozen water can't be dangerous.

Tell that to the people of Peru, where 22,000 people were killed in an avalanche in 1970.

Tell it to those people.

Tell it to those families.

See, this is why he's not on the Supreme Court.

Look at his temperament.

You don't have the temperament to be anywhere near that microphone, Mr.

Bregeer.

I do have the temperament to be on the Avenati team, however.

Oh, yeah, of course, you do.

I can jump right into that role.

Oh, yeah, dead dogs have that.

They spent, Gunn, 15 minutes on this bar fight on CNN this morning.

15 minutes where they talked about how, look,

it's certainly on its own.

This is their fairness.

On its own, it would not be disqualifying.

Oh, really?

A bar fight in which he's not charged or arrested with anything, and the accusation is he threw ice on someone wouldn't disqualify him 40 years later for the Supreme Court.

Thanks for all the wonderful

room you're giving him.

What leeway?

But here is a situation where they're just like, well, but what it does say,

what it does say is that it plays into a larger picture of this man.

He was in his anger when he was drinking.

And this shows that he's capable of doing these things.

So if he normally reach further.

I know.

If he would have come on and he would not have been angry,

I would have thought something was up.

Because nobody does that to me, my family.

Nobody is going to make those charges and smear my name without me at least responding forcefully.

And if you don't like the anger,

I want you to hear me clearly.

I did not have sexual relations with that one.

Same thing.

He looked and they praised him for being angry about it.

They praised him for his forcefulness.

You could tell the president was angry.

He wants to get back to the business of the American people.

So, no matter what he did,

it would have been a problem.

They keep moving the goalposts.

Now, here is

my plea to Donald Trump.

First of all, I don't believe any other president in my lifetime, with an exception of Reagan, and I'm not even sure Reagan would have done it.

No other president in my lifetime would have

stuck with Kavanaugh all the way through those hearings.

There's no way they would have said the cost is too high.

They just wouldn't have done it.

So, A,

points for Donald Trump for having a spine and going, this is garbage.

B,

we're in this situation now.

And if there is nothing, if there's ice fights,

don't give up the ship.

Do not move.

Because if you move now,

they are going to do this every single time and you cannot

cannot give any ground

with that being said

and i don't think this is a chance at all

if ford if those those charges turn out to be right you notice you notice the media is not furthering the ford testimony They're no longer on that.

Yeah.

It seems like she's been abandoned already.

Right.

She's done.

She's done.

She she served her purpose, she bought time,

they used her as a pivot to something new, okay?

So they're they're not, there's nothing new there, there's nothing new, or the press would be saying, You watch what's going to come out in this FBI.

They're not saying that, they're not, nobody has come out and said, you know what, I was so offended by how forceful he was,

and I wasn't going to say anything, but I know that that happened.

None of that is happening.

What is happening is people are saying, you know, I was for him and I wasn't going to say anything.

But in, you know, as soon as he started to say

he was an altar boy,

I remember him drinking.

So that's what's coming now.

And they're going to go after perjury.

You watch.

By the end of the week, that's what they'll be talking about.

If Donald Trump, please, please, Donald Trump,

the only chance you have and the only chance the Republicans have,

if this thing goes awry in any way,

you have to have a plan and announce it in the same press conference that you say, you know,

he, you know, quit or

vote went down and

went down, whatever it is.

Whatever it is.

Whatever it is, that press conference, you must say, and here's my next nominee, and we're going to have it done before the election.

Now, in my opinion, the only one that can stand that is Mike Lee.

Because you don't need, how long did it take to do the Jeff

Sessions vote?

Oh, I mean, he brought in January 20th, he was inaugurated, and then February 8th he was the vote went down.

So in four weeks.

Yeah, three, four weeks.

It probably could have been faster.

You had other things going on.

Okay, so you have four weeks to do it.

That's what you have now for the election.

You have four weeks.

The one who can get that, the one who doesn't need all the FBI checks and all of that is Mike Lee.

It's already been done.

He's the only one that can get done that quickly.

Yeah.

He's the only one that can be done that quickly.

Or another senator, but Mike Lee is the guy.

And Mike Lee's the only senator on the list.

Yes.

you've got Mike Lee.

You could select him.

Let's just say Brett Kavanaugh is hit by a plane tomorrow.

Which

is a strange accident, but it could happen.

It happened in Indiana Jones.

And one of them were the guy they were fighting on the tarmac, and the plane was turning around.

If that happens to Kavanaugh, well, this one they won't be delivering the Ark in that plane.

They'll be delivering the New York Times in that plane.

But anyway, so let's just say, and it makes him into sausage.

You need to announce that Mike Lee is the candidate.

We're going to have this done by the election.

They're, of course, going to go crazy because Mike Lee is uber pro-life, and he would vote.

Well, I mean, the bottom line is he cares about the Constitution more than anything.

He will vote the Constitution, and he will also vote for right of life.

He's not going to go in there with an agenda, but he is a to life guy.

So, Kavanaugh wasn't good enough.

Here's Mike Lee.

There's not going to be, there's no drinking parties with Mike Lee.

There's just no drinking party.

Maybe.

And it'll be like, Mike is like,

all right, I confess, I tasted beer in 1983.

I didn't really like it, but I tried it.

It was root beer.

Have you heard of this?

Root beer?

So, anyway,

he's the only one that you could push through

because if you don't, if you don't have a plan immediately,

then the Democratic plan works of delay.

Yeah, and that's the most important point.

Their strategy is not to say that Kavanaugh is a sexual abuser.

Their strategy is not to say anything about Kavanaugh specifically.

Their strategy is to delay this thing so they can get to the election.

And if they get past the new Senate coming in, they can potentially have a chance of stopping this.

Now, if you were to,

the day after this goes down, God forbid,

they find something terrible, right?

Let's say they find something terrible about him, right?

And everybody agrees, and it goes down 80 to 20, right?

Like, it's just one of those things they found something terrible about Kavanaugh.

We don't think that's going to happen.

However, you must be prepared for that potentiality.

You have to be ready for it.

And

if you tried to go down the other suggested road, we talked a little bit about yesterday, which was a Diane Sykes or an Allison Ide or one of the other.

You won't make it to January.

You could potentially have enough time before they seat the Senate, but I mean, it's going to be really close and you might not make it.

Lee is the only thing you'd have that you'd be able to get that through fast enough.

Lee also is the guy that everybody in the Senate has to look at after they voted against.

I mean, they will vote against.

Yeah, the Democrats will still do it, but would Jeff Flake vote against

Mike Lee?

I don't think so.

I don't think so.

You know, I mean, you know,

people have good relationships with Lee, even though they think he's he's too conservative for them.

And remember, it's advise and consent.

Now, I know the Democrats won't care about that, but there's a chance that you can get all of the Republicans on board.

If you don't,

I want to lay out some scenarios of

what we're looking at here.

And please help me with the good scenario.

I'll lay out five or six scenarios for you when we come back on what is headed our way.

So, hackers exploited security vulnerability at Facebook.

The guy didn't hack into,

you know, he said on Friday that he was going to hack into Mark Zuckerberg's and kick him off.

It didn't work.

Potentially, the hackers that did get in exposed the information of nearly 50 million accounts.

Attackers stole access tokens, which they can use to to take over people's accounts.

Their digital keys that keep people logged in so they don't need to re-enter their password every time.

Now, Facebook says they fixed the vulnerability and informed law enforcement, but this is your personal information.

Were you one of the 50 million?

It's a data breach.

Criminals can open accounts, file tax returns, buy property.

There's so many threats in today's connected world.

It takes one week link, and the criminals are in.

That's why the new life lock, identity theft Protection adds the power of Norton security.

It's going to help you protect against the threats to your identity and all of your devices.

Now, nobody can stop all cyber threats, prevent all identity theft, or monitor all transactions at all businesses.

But the new Life Lock with Norton Security can see the threats that you're going to miss on your own.

So go to Lifelock.com or call 1-800-LifeLock, use the promo code back, get an extra 10% off your first year plus a $25 Amazon gift card with annual enrollment.

That's promo code back, 1-800-LIFELOCK or Lifelock.com.

Terms apply.

Five different scenarios.

I haven't even counted them yet, but there are several different scenarios on how this thing ends that I want to go through with you.

And

tell me where I'm wrong.

Tell me how this is going to end in

a positive way.

I think, though, we should also get into, maybe we do this beforehand, get into the the idea that there are accusations that Kavanaugh lied in his hearings.

Yes.

And, you know, the New York Times laid them out in ridiculous detail.

Yeah.

And we should go through each one of them because I would like, because there's an idea that if there is, let's say, he perjured himself, which is one of the things a lot of people are starting to throw around now.

They're starting to say, well, he perjured himself.

He lied.

Instead of saying he was trying to paint himself in the best light possible, it was he perjured himself.

Now, maybe he did.

I don't know.

I mean, I haven't seen any.

Perjury about sex doesn't matter.

Oh, yeah, I forgot about that.

Yeah.

But

if he perjured himself.

Look, if he perjured himself for me, it's a problem.

Yeah.

I mean, I guess to me, it would matter on the context of it, I guess.

I mean, if.

What do you mean?

Like the boof thing?

Like, one of the things they're talking about is

the word boof, which is a word I have not heard since probably 1985.

But he, it was, what did it mean?

And he said it meant flatulence.

And there's...

I mean...

I'm pretty sure.

I could be wrong, but there was a word like that, and I thought it was poof that meant like smoking pot, that you were smoking pot.

See, that's interesting.

You in your school had a different meaning of it than I would have found in my school, which supports his flatulence argument.

It made, I feel like.

Yeah, we need to talk about it.

I mean, you do smoke pot in your butt, right?

Glenn, we'll just need to talk about something.

Glenn, back,

Mercury.

All right, I want you to think of some scenarios

on how this ends and the right way to deal with all of it and what it means

to the future.

We'll give those to you here in a second.

We want to go over some of the things that people now are saying about Brett Kavanaugh and not the ridiculous stuff.

I'd rather

focus on

two things.

This extra week was to find out if

the Ford thing was real.

I don't think that's real.

If it is real, if they come up with credible evidence that it's real,

he's out.

You agree with that, Stu?

Yeah, I mean, if somehow they were able to prove that he did something or really make you believe he did.

Yeah, I mean, if it's credible evidence,

if it is preponderance of evidence.

Yeah,

the details matter, but yes, generally speaking, yes.

Okay.

Perjury.

This is what they're going for now.

This is what Jeff Flake has bought.

And what he purchased was an extra week for the media and the Democrats to move the goalposts.

And now the goalposts are moving.

The goalposts now are: did he perjure himself?

Did he lie under oath?

And not about,

not about

Professor Ford,

but about what was written in his yearbook.

So here are the things that they are saying.

And you have to say,

is this,

would this rise to the level of perjury?

All right, go ahead.

And I want to warn you, we are about to use highly technical medical terms.

And if you are, this may be go a little bit over your head, that's okay.

Stick with us.

Okay.

Judge Kavanaugh's yearbook page included the entries, Judge, have you boofed yet?

Have you boofed yet?

And Devil's Triangle.

On Thursday, he said boofed meant flatulence, and that the Devil's Triangle was a drinking game in which three glasses were arranged in a triangle.

This is disputed according to the New York Times.

And I want to make sure that you understand that I'm reading

from what is supposedly the greatest newspaper ever created.

They are talking about whether the word boofed means flatulence or not.

Boofed in the 1980s was a term that often referred to,

well, again, technical terms, anal sex.

And this is how Judge Kavanaugh's classmates said they interpreted his comment.

They said they had never used it before as it referred to flatulence.

Okay.

Now, the term boofed, Glenn, was a term that I do remember from

my, I would say, elementary school days.

Oh, good.

Oh, well.

You know,

that was before clinical.

Middle school, maybe.

I mean, it was like, I don't think I necessarily knew what it meant, but I feel like it had a sexual connotation to it.

However, what I found is interesting is as I was

talking to you about this this morning before the show, and assuming that everyone would understand that as what it meant, you had a totally different understanding of the word.

Well, I wasn't the hippist,

so

I don't accused you of that.

But I seem to remember something

I don't recall, but I think we used to, you know, getting stoned

or something.

I can't remember.

The word boofed meant getting

stoned or getting stoned, something like that, Maybe.

Okay.

Have you ever heard the term spleef?

Yeah, maybe.

That was in the Richmond High.

Times at Richmond High.

Yeah, maybe.

I mean,

it's been a long time.

Right, okay.

Okay.

But I looked it up in the Urban Dictionary.

Okay.

Okay.

So this is, is this guy?

I mean, this is as close as you can come to like a founding document of the word boofed.

Yes.

Right.

This is like, if you go back to the Federalist Papers about boofed.

The Urban Dictionary.

That's what.

Okay.

This is what this is.

The Urban dictionary to abuse any licit or illicit substance via insertion into one's rectum that's the number one meaning that's the number one i have never heard it used like that butt funneling

now i don't again these are highly technical terms i don't know who says you know what i bet it's better if we drink beer through our butt

but apparently that's been done uh i didn't

i didn't know you could do that i didn't know you could do that either.

And I don't recommend it.

And it's not called really drinking if you do it that way.

It's called

learning here.

Poofing.

No.

I don't know if

you have butt blackouts.

If all of a sudden your butt falls asleep, I'm not sure.

I'm not sure.

Okay.

Okay.

So

there's the number one.

The next one is something that is whack, dumb, or effed up used to describe objects, people, or stuff you don't want to do.

So that, you know, that guy's a boof?

That guy's a boof.

I feel like that's maybe also how I heard it, now that you're saying it that way, because it was just kind of like an insult.

Yeah, that may have been.

Yeah.

Right?

I just don't, I remember the words, but I don't remember it connected to,

you know, sticking things inside.

Anyway,

here's one that kind of makes me feel a little better.

A synonym for weed.

Okay, yeah.

So, how would it, is there a sentence?

Smell.

Use it in a sentence, please.

Smell dat boof.

Now, I assume that's D-A-T is what you're saying.

Yeah.

Smell dat boof.

Okay, yeah.

That makes me feel uncomfortable.

Fifth, the act of lifting the

bow out of a whitewater kayak while going over rocks, waves, or waterfalls.

What?

In order to launch over hydraulics or rocks.

This entry is sponsored by Cabela's.

Yeah.

I've never heard that before.

Boof.

The low-toned noise a dog makes

typically when they are suspicious or unsure of whether they should actually bark or not.

Now, I haven't heard a flatulence one, but I have heard many things related to the butt, which I think.

If another term for having sex,

that'd be in the butt, Bob.

Okay, so.

Okay, so again,

I think this is the interesting point here.

They're trying to say this is essentially perjury.

There's no way that's perjury to me.

That is a bonker's claim.

The idea that that word probably meant different things at different schools, as mine and yours did, right?

As there are seven different definitions on urban dictionary for it.

Now, not just because flatulence didn't make it there does not mean that locally that was not the way people used it.

You do have the problem of people in Georgetown Prep now starting to come out and saying, look, I was for him, and I don't think he did this Ford thing, but

now that he was saying that this is what these words mean, come on, man.

And that he was never really fall down drunk.

Yeah, he was.

Okay, well, so we have that one too.

You want to go to this that?

Yeah, go to the next one.

All right, this is

again the lists of potential perjury from Judge Kavanaugh.

The next one is excessive drinking.

Judge Kavanaugh portrayed himself in his testimony as enjoying a beer or two in high school and as a college student, but not as someone who often drank to excess during those years.

I drank beer with my friends, end quote.

Then this is disputed, is what they say in the Times.

His statements are at odds

with some of his classmates and how they remembered him.

Nearly a dozen college classmates of Judge Kavanaugh said they recalled him indulging in heavy drinking, some saying, so now it's not, it's less than a dozen because some of them said heavy drinking, some saying it was beyond normal consumption,

parenthetical here.

To be sure, a smaller number of classmates said his drinking was unexceptional.

So again,

this is like judging yourself and how much you drink is notoriously difficult, as I would assume a Mr.

Alcoholic over here would be able to tell you.

I mean, the whole point is the toughest thing to do is admit you're an alcoholic, right?

It's very possible, and I would say likely, that most people who drink to excess in these periods would not necessarily say that they're doing something abnormal, even if they are.

Here's how I take this.

I took that testimony when I watched him talk about drinking.

It was very clear that he was getting drunk.

And he said, look, we all drank to drink.

We drank to excess.

We all did.

Haven't you done that?

I mean,

on the drinking thing, I don't consider this a problem because

I believe that he was, in effect, saying, yeah.

But there is a difference between a blackout,

okay?

And maybe he had blackouts and didn't remember them.

I don't believe that at all.

You have a blackout, you remember it.

You don't remember what happened.

You remember that you were.

But you remember, you were like, oh, crap, I don't even remember.

Now, maybe at 17, you know, you're like, oh, that was so crazy.

I don't even remember that.

Maybe you're at 17 and doing that, but you have to consume a lot of alcohol.

May I ask a, may I bring an expert witness?

Yes.

And Glenn Beck, please come to the stage.

You know, to me,

I'm going to make it a generalization, but with a specific accusation, 95% of people who say they drank to the point of blacking out are lying.

I believe it's 95%.

I believe that blackouts do exist, but it is extraordinarily rare.

I had to spend a week in France, which I can't believe my liver returned with me.

I thought for sure it was going to be like, you know what?

I'm staying on the beach here.

I drank.

I don't think that it would have been saying, I got to get back home.

I got to try out.

My point, though, is that I've had a lot to drink in my life at certain times.

I've never even been remotely.

The amount of alcohol that you have to consume in a very short period of time now i've done i i've i've done my homework on it uh and it's not exactly the way i have experienced it um apparently you can have blackouts if you drink a an enormous amount of alcohol if you well if you were boofing

Maybe.

If an enormous amount of alcohol gets into your bloodstream quickly, you can blackout.

I have read places where they say it's rare.

Some places say it's common.

I'm sorry, but I do not believe, I believe it's a movie trick that most people, you know, they're like, oh, we did one last night.

We had sex.

No way.

Right.

Shut up.

95% of the time.

95%, that's a lot.

I had a friend who had drank a lot in a very short period of time and

blacked out, fell off a stage, and had to go to the hospital.

And that was a legit, legit, this is in college.

And that was a legitimate, like, he drank way too much, nothing, he didn't do anything wrong.

He just fell off the stage and almost killed himself.

And didn't remember any of it.

And, and just remembered being there, but did not remember the falling or anything.

Okay.

And so I'm not saying it never happens, but like the idea that you would say to someone, oh, this guy's lying.

He did blackout is completely absurd.

You can't, you cannot.

You cannot accuse someone of lying about that.

Only they would know if it occurred.

You can say that, and this is what they they are saying, that he lied because he said, you know, he gave the impression that he wasn't ever out of control falling down drunk.

Well, okay, I don't believe that, but I also don't, I wasn't left with that impression.

No, he said, I mean, the quote is, I drank beer with my friends.

Almost everyone did.

Sometimes I had too many beers.

Sometimes others did.

I like beer.

I still like beer, but I did not drink beer to the point of blacking out.

He just said I didn't black out.

He didn't say he didn't drink to excess.

In fact, he said I have drank to excess.

And, you know, I mean, mean, I am not a big drinker in my life, but I've drank to excess several times, but never.

I mean, the idea that getting to black, blackout drunk,

you may be a different story, but getting to blackout drunk is, I mean, you've told me some of the levels of alcohol you've had in your life.

The levels are almost inhuman.

Like, I would definitely be dead.

I mean, you're dumping poison into your system.

Your body

your body can't handle.

A blackout is shutting your body down, saying, I can't keep you alive and run all of these other systems right i mean that's that's you know that's intense so um we have a couple more of these you can go through yeah if we need to but i mean i think you get the point this is the level of almost every one of these accusations so i don't think the drink rising thing i don't think the boofing thing

um what about the well let me take a break we'll come back there's two things that could pose a problem for him

And some people are asking, like, why are you giving up on Kavanaugh?

I'm not, not at all.

I still think there's a 50% chance, maybe higher, that he gets through.

The issue here is: if he doesn't, I mean, because if you have faith here, you're having faith not in Kavanaugh, in Collins and Murkowski, and Flake.

If you have faith in them, then fine.

Don't worry about it.

But if you don't, like I don't, then you better have plan B set up.

Yeah, by the way, I just want to make that really clear.

I'm not giving up on him at all.

I'm just playing this out, seeing where the Democrats are headed this week and how will that affect those three senators?

All right, July of 2017, Bitcoin was down 40%.

Tikatori came in and said, Palm Beach, in the Palm Beach letter,

there's going to be some activity.

It's going to bring enormous amounts of money into Bitcoin.

What's Bitcoin at today?

Bitcoin currently is $65.48.

$65.48.

Bitcoin was trading at around $1,850 a coin at the time.

We all know that it went up to $20,000 and it's crashed down to about 5,000 or 6,000 and it's still kind of hovering there.

It's gone up and down, but

it's been under 10.

I've been here for a while.

Tika

has come in and said we're in the same kind of horrific bear market.

And last time when he said this, Bitcoin hit 20,000.

This time he says Bitcoin

right now is the time to buy because some things are in the pipeline that Bitcoin will go up 10x or more.

Now, he says it's going to happen by the end of the year, but I mean, I've talked to him several times.

I buy into everything that he's saying on why it's coming, it's going to go up.

But the timing, I don't know.

I don't know.

But he's confident in the timing, but he is ultra confident in why.

And that's the part you need to know about.

We did a smart crypto course with Tika.

If you don't know anything about cryptos, you got to educate yourself.

Everybody should have 100 bucks in cryptos.

SmartCryptoCourse.com.

SmartCryptoCourse.com.

Take that course.

It's online.

You're going to learn a ton.

You'll be able to understand the future that we're headed towards.

877-PBLBA.

It's 877-PBLBC.

SmartCryptoCourse.com.

Glenn back.

You know, let me take Richard in South Carolina.

I think this is really important.

He can verify.

Go ahead, Richard.

Hey, Glenn, how you guys doing?

Very good.

Very good.

Look, I went to school in Virginia from 77 to 82, middle school and high school.

When you boofed, you farted.

When somebody said, ooh, you boofed, because of that smell, man.

Okay.

All right.

There you go.

So, and he's, you know, Virginia.

That's, that's, you know,

Washington

regional like that.

Yeah.

All right.

Thank you.

We do have confirmation that boofing is farting from that era in that region.

By the way, we now have one person who said it, so it's the same amount of confirmation as we have as the Ford accusations, which is interesting.

This is such a tough place, this is such a tough place because I think the average person,

not somebody who listens to talk radio all the time or pays attention to Democratic politics all the time, the average person is like,

why not just move on from this guy?

Because the principle of this,

you cannot move on, on or they are going to do this every single time.

You cannot live in a country where you are innocent until accused.

The country has been pushed to the limit.

Our political bonds have been torn apart.

We need a true leader who can save us from certain doom.

Unfortunately, we can only find this guy.

Hey, it's Glenn Beck.

Glenn Beck is coming live to talk about the right path forward and to make fun of the people standing in the way.

He might not be able to save the country, but at least we can all go down laughing.

Glenn Beck Live, the Addicted to Outrage tour, on tour this fall.

For tickets, VIP packages, and more, visit Glenn Beck.com.

Glenn Beck.

I'm going to just jump in on this one.

Georgetown University's distinguished associate professor, Christine Fair,

a professor of law, had an interesting tweet to share with all of us.

Quote, look at the the chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist's

aggregated entitlement.

Now, Kavanaugh is a serial rapist.

All of them, meaning men, deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps.

Bonus, we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine.

Yes.

this is an esteemed professor at Georgetown?

Pretty violent.

Especially for somebody on Twitter who's verified.

Her statements definitely seem to violate Twitter's terms of service, you know, for advocating violence.

Professor, who couldn't be named more incorrectly, Fair, her Twitter bio reads like a postmodern satire, scholar of South Asian Paul Mill Affairs, intersectional feminist, pit bull apostle, scotch devotee, non-theist, resistor.

Reviews are mine, no rubes, retweet does not equal endorsement.

Now, interestingly, she has worked at several places that have the word peace in the title, although she doesn't really seem like a peaceful type.

She also runs a blog called

expletive crap men say,

where she doxes people because it's all about accountability.

In response to the blackl backlash that she has received, she has now doubled down on her rhetoric.

I will not moderate my rage for your convenience.

As a victim of assault, I, along with millions of women, white will watch white males gather around a belligerent predator defending his and their privilege.

I will use my words that will make you as uncomfortable as I am.

Well, nothing says stable like putting random words in all caps, I'm just saying.

Then there is this gem, in which she rants about the patriarchy as if it actually exists.

Quote, I hope women understand we are all rapable.

Just because you shill for the patriarchy doesn't make you immune.

We are all potential victims every day.

And I hope it's clear to all American patriarchy that they don't care about your views.

They abuse us as a perk.

Can you imagine living your life this way?

Sincerely.

Something obviously has happened to this woman, and it must have been horrible.

But is there no healing?

You're going to let that define your whole life?

My father taught me a really important lesson because I was a pretty dark dude in my 20s.

I was not a happy camper.

I didn't like people.

I was kind of like, well, I wasn't like this.

Wow, I don't know anybody who's actually like this.

But I was an angry kid.

And my father taught me.

It's not what happens to you in life.

It's what you do with it that defines you.

What is she doing with it?

She's teaching, but what is she teaching?

With all the ranting she's doing, what is she teaching?

Hatred?

I feel bad for this woman.

I really do.

She goes on these rants quite often, by the way.

She doesn't like Brett Kavanaugh.

She doesn't like President Trump.

The reason why I bring her up is, well, A, Twitter.

Are you going to kick her off?

Are you going to kick her off?

If this isn't if this if this isn't the epitome of threats, I don't know what is.

But she really typifies the

insanity that has overtaken the left.

No amount in evidence in favor of Kavanaugh will change her mind.

And you know what?

I really.

I can understand how you might emotionally connect with her, especially if you were a victim.

I can

but she is possessed with this unending hatred and there is nothing anyone can say or do anyone who says I know Kavanaugh didn't do it

you're fooling yourself anyone who says I know he did it you're fooling yourself

You're filling in blanks that you cannot unless you're God.

Let me check.

Yep, nope, I'm not God today.

Might be your turn.

Unless you're God,

you don't know that.

You cannot know that.

I mean, this is one of those cases where it is so crystal clear to me.

Judge lest you be judged.

How you judge other people.

I'm telling you,

if he did it, he's out.

If he was perjuring himself, I don't want a guy on the Supreme Court that was perjuring himself.

But that requires evidence.

That requires

some sort of

case to be made.

Not accusations.

But a case to be made.

You're destroying a person's life.

See, here's the problem with this particular professor at Georgetown.

She's looking for social justice.

She's looking for wrongs

to be

righted somehow or another.

And it doesn't matter.

All men are guilty.

All men are guilty.

Well, I'm sorry.

Was Gandhi guilty?

Was Gandhi guilty?

Really?

Because he was a man.

Was Martin Luther King, was he guilty?

You know, both of those men were flawed.

Both of those men had things about them that I don't like.

Both of those men

had, one was an alleged philanderer.

The other was a clear racist.

Gandhi.

I still think they were great men.

They were just flawed.

When you go into social justice and you believe in collective salvation or collective justice, that I'm going to right the wrongs of the world because men are collectively evil.

Because of all of the wrongs that men have done in the past, they are collectively evil.

You go mad

and I am warning and begging people to calmly and rationally explain this to their neighbors

when you go down that road

you always

always

end up killing people

now

A few years ago, that was hyperbole

But today, if you don't think we're on the edge of a civil war,

of people like her

saying

we should feed their genitals to the pigs,

tell me the difference between that and Nazi Germany rhetoric.

And what a surprise.

Once again,

it's coming from the elites in the universities.

It's Tuesday, October 2nd.

This is the Glenbeck program.

It's really hard, really very, very hard to

remain

reasonable when the world is unreasonable.

But we must.

We must, because no one will listen to any message if we are just hurling insults.

If we are fighting fire with fire, it will change no one's mind.

If you don't believe me,

how many minds did we change?

Did we change the course?

2010, and I want you to know, I don't think that

we did the fight as much as the press tried to convince everyone we were these evil monsters saying X, Y, and Z and demanding violence.

So I understand that.

But because of that, which we don't necessarily have this time,

the media has changed.

It's not as important.

Social media is much more important than the regular media.

All right.

So

what's the best way

to get people to come on our side?

It's never to point the finger at them.

It's never to call them names.

And I know this from experience.

I know this because

I'm going to be honest with you.

I did that to you

because I was so convinced I was right.

That I did that to you.

I instead, I didn't listen to you.

I just thought you're crazy.

These are you're you're flushing down this and that, and blah, blah, blah, and you're wrong.

No,

no,

you saw things a different way.

And as I have said on many occasions on this program since the election,

I was wrong on multiple occasions.

But what

amazes me

is when I say those things,

the number of people

who just want to rub my face in it.

That's okay if that makes you feel better.

But I just want to tell you, that's foolish.

You do it to me all you want.

Please don't do that to others.

Please don't do that to others who say, you know what?

I think you were right.

Or, you know what?

I can't take my own side.

And while I don't like your guy that much, I mean, you guys are at at least making some sense.

Please do not rub their, oh, well, we told you so.

Well, really, remember when you fought?

Don't do that.

Please don't do that.

Welcome them.

If we're going to heal the nation, the first thing we have to do is heal the right.

If we're going to heal the nation, we have got to put our differences aside and begin to

open up our circle.

If I believe in 80% of the stuff you believe in, great.

I don't even need to do that.

I just need to know, do you believe in the Bill of Rights?

Do you believe in the Bill of Rights?

If you believe in the Bill of Rights and you'll stand for the Bill of Rights, I'm in.

I'm in.

We can disagree on everything else.

I'm in.

Because I think we're really headed for real trouble.

Let me just show you the ways this Kavanaugh thing can come down.

And Stu, I'd love your help on this.

I'm going to give you a few scenarios, and you tell me,

you tell me if they're crazy or not.

We'll do that in a second.

I only see one way.

I only see one way that ends

happily, kind of, for a while.

We'll do this in just a second.

Now, from hurricanes to earthquakes and cyber warfare, every American should have a plan to get through an emergency, a natural disaster, the power being out, whatever it is.

You know, civil war.

The government response to repair our infrastructure is not what we think it is anymore.

Hello, Puerto Rico.

And that had nothing to do with racism or anything else.

Our coffers were empty.

The United States and FEMA did not have any plan ever to have four major disasters in one year.

That's why Puerto Rico was screwed.

Now, the best thing you can do is store up some food.

Build a supply over time so you're ready.

I trust my Patriot supply for my food storage.

You can start small.

Here, everyone in your household minimum should have a 72-hour kit and then maybe a four-week emergency food kit.

The good news is, you can start right there at the four-week emergency food kit because right now, if you go to preparewickglenn.com, that's preparewickglenn.com, you're gonna save $100

on each of those food kits.

Four-week food kits,

$100 off right now, this week, ship fresh, discreetly to your door.

Do it now.

Call 800-200-7163-800-200-7163 or preparewithglenn.com.

Addicted to outrage.

The new book from Glenn Beck, Addicted to Outrage, is available everywhere.

Order it now at Amazon.com.

Okay, you're going to start hearings very soon.

This is the most important election of your lifetime.

It's the most important election of your lifetime.

Here are the scenarios that I see.

Kavanaugh, they're moving the goalpost now on Kavanaugh.

And if

let me just give you a couple.

Let's say he is confirmed.

Okay.

He's confirmed, but this kind of perjury stuff is percolating and they just make hay out of it.

We go back to normal and

the GOP loses the house to the Democrats.

The Democrats then are going to demand testimony from Donald Trump because they're going to try to impeach him.

They're going to demand his tax records because they're going to impeach him.

And the White House responds by going to the Supreme Court and says the president doesn't have time to do this, yada, yada.

And the Democrats then want

Kavanaugh to recuse himself,

which he won't do.

It doesn't happen.

And the House then moves to impeach Kavanaugh.

Okay, so we've got a year of fun.

Certainly plausible.

Plausible.

Let's say he's not confirmed because Flake or Collins or Murkowski or Heller.

They just don't believe him.

And the Republicans drop the ball.

They have no plan.

And they're just like, well, you know, and we need your vote because we're going to repeal Obamacare, too.

They lose the House and possibly the Senate.

Worst case scenario.

So they don't get him through.

They don't get him through because of the Republicans and because of this week with Jeff Flake.

People are just like, okay, the Republicans are worthless.

And they don't come out with a huge plan.

Yeah, I think you're right.

They'll try to turn that into a reason to get to the polls.

But if it's the Republicans that cause it, I don't know how that's going to work.

I don't think it'll work.

Okay.

Another scenario.

He is confirmed.

The House impeaches Trump.

The House impeaches Kavanaugh on perjury.

Think that is.

If they win the House, you know they're going to at least attempt Trump.

If they will at least attempt Trump and probably Kavanaugh, too.

Correct.

If you lose the House and the Senate, these things are happening and there's no chance of them being removed, but you will have the next two years of non-stop impeachment hearings of both Kavanaugh and Trump.

Okay?

The only one that seems good to me is

if Kavanaugh loses the vote.

The only one that I think works out is Kavanaugh loses the vote.

which could be really bad because it'll be the Republicans that do it.

However, Donald Trump comes out and while he says, yep, that's over, here's the guy, he ups the ante and you get a guy that all conservatives are rabid about.

Somebody who you just know, oh my gosh, that's a scalia.

Right now, Brett Kavanaugh has not been a lot of people's favorites.

I mean, they're okay with him, but nobody's willing to die in a sword for him.

And remember, Kavanaugh was not on the initial list of judges from Trump.

And there's lots of them.

He added them later.

I personally think the best course of action is to nominate,

let's say, Flake and Collins come out and go, you know what?

I can't do it.

I'm not going to vote on Friday.

I can't vote for him.

Great.

Donald Trump, within 10 minutes, should be on television and say, in my opinion, Mike Lee is the next nominee.

And you know what?

He's already been vetted for the FBI and every senator knows him.

So we're going to be calling for a vote next week.

Easy peasy.

You know,

that's the thing to do because then you have them battling just on abortion.

Right.

They're the same complaints they'd have about everybody.

Correct.

And that's not going to hurt conservatives getting to the polls.

If you put a staunch conservative, somebody who says, yeah, I think abortion is wrong.

And if it comes before me, I'll look at the case.

Of course.

But I think it's wrong.

I think it's murder.

And Roe versus Wade was a terrible decision.

You then have

Republicans running to the polls.

You'll also have Democrats, but I think that's your best case scenario if Flake or Collins flake on calendar.

Glenn, back.

Mercury.

You know, I was thinking about it the other day.

I was watching CNN and I saw three former Blaze employees sitting there and I thought, I have been so blessed to work with some amazing, amazing people,

you know, when they were young and before they got famous.

And it's just, it's,

I don't know, it's really satisfying.

One of the guys that I think of often, and I have no idea why I let him walk out the door,

but I think I would have had to block it with my own body, which he wouldn't have been able to move.

But

because he went to go become one of the founders of the Federalist,

which is a

great group of thinkers online.

He has just written a book called First Freedom, A Ride Through America's Enduring History with the Guns.

And his name is David Harsani.

Hi, David.

How are you?

I'm well.

Thanks for having me.

You bet.

I appreciate it.

You're a bigger guy than people think or know.

So thank you for that.

I think it was a fat joke.

I mean that in a good way.

Yeah.

David, before we go into your book here, just give me a minute on your take on Kavanaugh and what's going to happen.

I think he's going to get through.

And

I think this is one of the ugliest smears we've seen, at least in my life, covering politics and thinking about politics.

And I think it's going to backfire in that it's really brought together most of the never Trumpers and all the sort of disparate parts of the right, and rightly so.

And if not, I was listening to you before, I think that Trump has to be ready for that, and they have to push through someone else because the courts, especially when you have a divided political environment as as you do today, the Supreme Court's incredibly important.

And,

you know,

there's a rightful seat there

for a conservative, and Trump should do what he has to do to get it through.

What do you think about Mike Lee?

As everyone knows him, you don't need the FBI.

You could vote in a week.

I love the idea.

I mean, and you know he's not going to wander off.

No.

No.

No.

No.

He's hardcore, so I'm very happy with that.

Okay, so let's talk about your book.

The thing I like about your book is that you do not

shy away from America's gun culture.

Yeah, I think we talk a lot about the politics of gun and guns and obviously that's important, the ideology behind it, but I think a lot of people miss the culture behind it, the hundreds of years of embedded culture,

not just in war, but in commerce.

and in just the individual lives of Americans and how important it was and how that is in our DNA.

And that's why we talk about guns the way we do.

So, because I grew up in New York, and guns were sort of alien to my neighborhood and place I grew up on, unless criminals had them.

I thought it was important to try to figure out what that was about.

And that's what the book's about.

Wow.

So, how did you, I mean, what did you find?

I didn't know that you were

not part of the gun culture.

I grew up in the gun culture, if you will.

My grandfather and my uncles, you know, they'd go hunting and fishing, and we always had guns around.

and it takes on a different meaning to me and to people who grew up around them.

What did you find?

Right.

I mean, you know, where I grew up, every you know, if you mentioned guns or if someone had a gun, they'd immediately think about it in a negative way, not in something that would be positive.

So,

you know, just a personal story.

My dad had a little jewelry store in New York and it was robbed.

And right after that, my dad tried to get a gun.

And it was this you know, this painstaking process of trying to get one to protect your own property and your own work and your own family.

So that's, I think, when I started turning towards, you know, having a curiosity about what it was about.

And then when I moved to Denver and lived in Colorado and other places, I saw what it was really about and how people treated it and how an NRA member is the most responsible person on earth when it comes to guns.

So

yeah, and I don't know if that people...

No, they don't understand that at all.

Take me through some of the stories that you talk about.

Because what I like about this is it's not a gun.

this is not a book about um you know necessarily the laws and everything else this is a story about america and how

we we do i mean we're unlike any other nation on earth when it comes to guns in our history take me through like uh either sam colt or or buffalo bill two of my favorites well sam colt's just one of the most amazing americans that ever lived i mean not only was he an engineer and and just created this incredible innovation where a person went from firing one, you know, musket shot once a minute or maybe twice a minute to shooting five times in mere seconds.

He was also just an innovator in marketing, in selling himself,

in using the press to sell to other people and

using engineering to create something that he can make cheaper so the normal American, the normal man, the normal woman can get their hands on it.

And it changed the West.

It changed the way the relationship a person has with a weapon.

And he also had inter, you know, he was before Henry Ford, he was using interchangeable parts.

It was like the first Industrial Revolution.

So he was just an amazing man.

And almost, it was my favorite chapter to write.

I think he needs, you know, more, we need a few

on him.

Yeah.

So

here we are at the

one-year anniversary of Las Vegas and the shooting of Las Vegas.

Did you, in your looking through history, did you ever find another time in American history, and I should say,

you know,

pre-progressive,

where

guns had been viewed in America as anything but good?

No, I sort of actually, you know, in the 19th century, guns were sort of idealized and romanticized in books and things of that nature.

It wasn't until the 30s, really, when anyone started to think about,

and for some good reason, people were running around with machine gun shooting up places you know in Chicago and elsewhere so I mean there was a legitimate fear that some people had but before that time no one even thought to limit gun ownership in any way I mean certain places in the West maybe they had certain areas where you couldn't have a gun because everyone was drunk and fighting but generally no one had to go and ask the government the state for a gun I think in fact that when you think about the Second Amendment, how you think about the ideals behind it tells us a lot about how you think about freedom in general.

I think you're pretty authoritarian if you think that the individual shouldn't be able to defend themselves and rather should rely solely on the state.

Because you could have,

you could have had a Gatling gun.

I think you can still buy a Gatling gun

legally, but you could buy a Gatling gun, but we didn't have those, you know, the mass shootings.

One, it's a little harder to conceal a Gatling gun in a violin case, but also because the government's prohibition of alcohol led to the formation of these huge, terrible, and powerful mobs.

Yeah, and you know, they use Tommy guns, and you see them in the

movies, and you know, it's kind of

fictitious only in that the gun has

big blowback, and it's not that easy to shoot, and it was almost never really used in criminal activities.

It was more scaremongering by people who wanted to ban them.

I'm not saying people should have tommy guns and driving around in their cars, but I'm just saying

I am.

Yeah.

I'm okay with that.

If you're a responsible citizen, citizen, I'm fine with that.

That's true.

That's true.

Well, so,

David,

when we worked together, how long ago was it?

10 years ago?

I don't know.

Yeah, almost.

Yeah.

So 10 years ago, if I would have said to you, in your lifetime, do you think there will be a serious

move

that either comes close or does take away America's right to guns, you would have thought that was a crazy question, if I'm not mistaken, don't you think?

Ten years ago.

Actually, yeah, I do, but I do feel better about the Second Amendment than I do the first, the fourth, the fifth, and others ten.

Because there are 400 million guns out there, and I think that the people who are part of the culture that I'm writing about and talking about will not hand them over that easily.

So I'm less worried about them than I am.

Certainly the First Amendment, I think, foremost, but others as well.

Well, you lose the second, and you definitely lose the first.

I wonder, I wonder,

you know, I wonder what it's going to take before people wake up to the road that we're sadly on.

The name of the book is First Freedom: A Ride Through America's Enduring History of the Gun.

It is a great read.

It's David Harsani.

First Freedom.

It's out today.

You can get it at Amazon or wherever books are sold.

David, thanks so much.

Thanks for having me, Don.

So our sponsor this half hour is X Chair.

Now, I love it when a client is also somebody that I use and I love.

I have an X chair in my office, and I love it.

It is,

I'm kind of a,

can we go two ways on this one, Stu?

I'm a visual guy.

Yes.

And

I like the visual

when, especially in our studios here, I like things to be visual.

I've never noticed, but yeah.

I haven't noticed that.

Yes.

And so I remember we bought these chairs.

I can't remember what they're called.

Everybody knows what they are.

They're those really expensive chairs some big designer made.

I don't like them.

I do not like them.

The X chair.

is a design

beauty, if you will, but it actually is really, really comfortable and has like, I don't know, about 15,000 different adjustments on it.

I would do the show in a big bean bag if it was comfortable, right?

Like, I don't care about the look of it at all,

but it does look amazing.

But to me, much more importantly, it's very comfortable.

Yeah, it actually supports your back.

You don't feel like you're on like a bar stool and like you know, because you almost need abs to hold yourself up straight, which I don't have.

It's just a great, it's a great, you know, it's noticeably different than the chairs that we had in here just a couple of weeks ago.

Yeah.

So the X-Chair is the chair, and most of us spend more time in our chairs than on our bed at the office.

And usually, it's the last thing we think of.

It's like a staples chair.

If you have an office at home, you have an office at the office and you want to be comfortable, or if you're building an office and you need new chairs, please check out the X-Chair.

It is a beautiful chair and it is a great chair to sit in.

It is the X-Chair now on on sale for $100 off.

And if you go to XChairbeck.com, that's the letter XChair BECK.com,

it'll come with 30-day, no questions asked, guarantee of complete satisfaction.

So if you don't love it, send it back.

Plus, I think you get the

footrest as well for free.

All you have to do is go to xchairbeck.com and use the promo code Beck.

That's BECK.

Get the free footrest, $100 $100 off, 844-4XChair, or XCHARBEC.com.

I would love to talk to you, and maybe we'll do this on Thursday.

Anybody who has read the book and wants to talk about it, I would love to talk to you about it and hear your thoughts, where I might have missed it, what you may have not understood,

you know, what you think is crazy or what is good.

If you've read the book Addicted Outrage, can we put this on for Thursday?

I'd like to hear from you Thursday on radio, and we'll take calls on Thursday

just about the book.

You've now given people enough time to actually read it, which is nice.

Because I think you wanted to do this like the day after it came out.

I did, and not everybody reads that fast.

So it's been out for a week now.

And if you've read it, let's talk about it on, because there's a ton, a ton in there.

Well, I think it explains so much about what we're seeing with the Kavanaugh case right now.

I think it's absolutely in line with the Kavanaugh case.

Well, it's amazing because I think a lot of people, if you're trying to look at this and you're just playing teams, a lot of people would just be like, ah, the Democrats are the worst and they're insane.

But I mean, I know people who are Democrats, and they sound completely insane about this Kavanaugh thing.

Yeah.

Completely off the rocker.

These are people that I know, people who I'm friendly with.

And the extent that they'll go to here to try to take all male crime in the last 25 years and apply it to this one guy where there's no evidence that he committed any sort of crime.

That sort of jump is not, it's not just, hey, they want to stop this, or hey, they want to protect Roe versus Wade.

There is a different part of this.

It's about throwing

the entire efforts of logic off base.

It's based in postmodernism.

It's explained in the book.

And you'll see, because a lot of times I look at this and I'm like, I don't understand.

What are they doing?

Why are they saying these things?

This doesn't make any sense.

And there's easy political explanations for all of it, but it's not real.

The real basis of it, the foundation of

why are they attacking this in this way is all in the book.

And

I wish Kavanaugh would have happened while I was writing the book because I think it is the perfect example.

Maybe we should do that tomorrow.

Maybe we should take the book, The Theories in the Book, and just show exactly why everything is happening point by point.

You can find it in the book, Addicted to Outrage.

And the most important part is it educates you and shows you how the other side is fighting and why you must not fight that way.

And the reason why is because they are trying to create chaos.

Now, I don't mean your neighbor who is a Democrat.

I mean the people who are at the university levels and the upper echelons of politics.

They know what's going on.

They do not believe what they're saying.

They're doing it because they have a goal and their goal is to disrupt the hierarchy and the patriarchy and to collapse the system that we have.

Yeah.

And if you see this too, like if you've ever had someone who has an addiction problem in your life of subsubstance, you see them acting erratically and there's some reason and you don't understand it.

Why would they do this?

They blew their job.

Why would they do this?

They blew their marriage.

All of those things.

Why would the left act this way about this thing?

And it's, you know, if you know why they're doing it, and you're not just dismissing it as typical politics, you can fight against it much more effectively.

And, you know, you spend a lot of time in the book going through not just how and why this is going on, but how to push back against it and how to defeat it.

Yeah, it is not a

book about surrender.

It is a book about stand and fight.

Just fight the right way.

Just know who your enemy is, the tactics that they're using, and fight the right way.

It's called Addicted to Outrage.

We'll talk about it on Thursday with you.

So if you're reading it, try to finish it by Thursday.

If you haven't started yet, please do.

And then

join us on Thursday.

Okay.

We've dealt with the Kavanaugh scenario.

and it is that we are in an interesting place.

It's going to come down to whether the press and whether the Democrats can convince enough Republicans, not even about Ford, I don't believe, but now whether he perjured himself.

That's what's coming next.

We are going to take a stop in Las Vegas when we come back.

Hey, it's Glenn, and I want to tell you about something that you should either end your day with or

start your morning with, and that is the news and why it matters.

If you like this show, you're gonna love the news and why it matters.

It's a bunch of us that all get together at the end of the day and just talk about the stories that matter to you and your life.

The news and why it matters.

Look for it now wherever you download your favorite podcast.

Glenn back.

It's Tuesday, October 2nd.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

I am not one to issue trigger warnings, but this particular sound

has triggered one person.

She says that she gets this awful feeling like she's about to fall off a cliff.

She says, as soon as I hear helicopters, I fall back into that nightmare.

She even got the feeling one time while watching American Ninja Warrior because it was filmed in Las Vegas.

So it's American Ninja Warrior in Vegas.

It's helicopters and some of her favorite music.

In fact, her favorite, she cannot listen to, Jason Aldean.

Her name is Mega Panzera.

She said that even when she passes a food truck, that night will come back with a crashing intensity that engulfs her.

She's in the middle of the panic and she can hear the gunshots, one after another, after another, after another.

Like the sound that little boys make for machine guns, she said.

She can see the faces of the people as they sprint toward her.

Some of them fall, some of them don't get back up.

She can smell the crisp desert air of October.

In Las Vegas, the aroma of food fanning out of the food trucks with their motors that are usually so loud, stinking with beer that people dropped as they ran.

She can hear the screams,

the screams for her that never seem to stop,

and the feedback from the guitars flung onto the stage and abandoned.

Yet, despite all of that,

the engulfing terror of that feeling, it only takes one sound to bring her back.

It's this sound:

the tiny cry of her baby, her son, her hero.

Megan went to the Route 91 Harvest Festival.

It was October 1st, 2017, a country music festival that became the deadliest mass shooting in U.S.

history.

For Megan, though, it all started as a date with her then-boyfriend, Valdo Penzera Jr.

He was from New Jersey.

He was in for the weekend to visit her in Las Vegas.

She was working there as a teacher.

They had been looking forward to the weekend for a while.

No stress.

They were just going to go see some, you know, music, have some food, have a great time together.

Some of their favorite country musicians, they were all there for that same weekend, and they talked about it.

And more and more each day, they got excited.

But when the day finally arrived,

Megan felt a little gutted.

She was exhausted.

She really wanted to go, but she had been feeling sick a lot lately.

So the morning of that concert,

they went to the doctor, and by fate, that morning,

they found out that she was pregnant.

She and Valdo were going to be parents.

She said it was a strange realization to have.

She said, giving

the setting, and it happened so fast and I didn't expect it that

maybe it didn't fully kick in.

Either way, she was now tired and pregnant, and she had plenty of excuses to skip the up-close festival experience and, you know, just go sit in the bleachers at the back.

But the passes weren't cheap.

Something deep inside of her, she says now, kept telling her

it was the right thing to do.

It's the right thing to do.

Go.

She's returned to that assurance.

That assurance that put her in the bleachers.

The view and the sound wasn't very good.

She had paid for great spots.

But she thought, this would be a better place for me.

It's just, it'll be a little more relaxing.

I'll be back from the crowd.

I can watch them enjoy themselves.

And we're all together, after all.

There they were sitting in the bleachers, not where they had paid to be.

And then around 10 o'clock that night, during Jason Aldean's performance, it happened.

So many things happened.

Too many things happened all at once.

So many things at once that they continued to replay all the different things, one at a time to this day.

It started with confusion.

The firecrackers that turned into machine gun barrage, the screams.

They said they couldn't believe that all the screams just kept going, all of it.

Imagine the panic they felt as 20,000 people turned around all at once and started running directly at them.

Everyone ran.

Everyone was just trying to stay alive to protect themselves or someone near them.

The bullets were falling like hail in a tornado.

They looked down as the bullets were falling right where they would have been if Megan

hadn't been so tired and pregnant

and hadn't listened to her voice inside.

So their seats at the back saved them, or as they see it, their son saved them.

Because from the back, they were able to quickly escape.

Although as they sprinted to safety, Valdo felt a whip of air pass his head as a bullet flew past.

It was close.

And he knew what that meant.

He said, that was the moment I I realized, I have a family.

I've got to do what I've got to do to keep them safe.

And he's done just that.

It was a moment that redefined him, or at least strengthened a part of him that he had been putting aside for later.

Megan left Las Vegas and joined Valdo in New Jersey.

Several months after the shooting, they got married in a gazebo.

They did it in front of a body of water called Bueller's Pond at a park near their home in a procession led by their mayor.

They didn't have a reception.

They just went out for dinner.

They didn't have a honeymoon because they thought it was more important to focus on their baby so he would be born healthy to keep him safe like he had kept them safe.

A few months later, just eight months after the shooting, he was born.

They both say now that when they hold him, they feel the weightlessness of new life.

They've become immune to the dark moments they lived.

They say they feel hope.

The flashes of dark thoughts are still there.

Megan says she feels a sudden anxiety when she thinks about her son's first day of school.

I don't know.

I don't want to hold him back.

I want him to have fun, but The world is just so different now.

Valdo knows that.

Like everything they've gone through, like all that they've seen and felt and heard all the dangerous moments they barely escaped, it's just a matter of time.

The world is different,

yes.

But time is not.

Who knows what their son will be like when the day arrives for him to walk into the classroom alone.

Only time will tell, his father says.

For now,

time is fragmented.

It's kind of cruel sometimes.

Megan and Valdor are still painfully aware of their environments everywhere they go.

Things you didn't have to think about before, you have to think about now.

It's just different.

It's different, and we're raising him in a different world.

It's really scary, Megan said.

When she gets the feeling

that everything is just so much larger than her,

It's the world, how the world has changed into something explosive and scary.

Open spaces bring that feeling on that lights in your eyes panic.

Something else happens.

They haven't been to a concert since that day.

Seven going to the mall is enough of an obstacle.

But any time they're swarmed by that feeling,

it goes away the minute they look at their son

or they listen for his tiny sounds.

He is the future and they see the future that he will bring.

Valdo is now a dispatcher for the local police department, member of a nearby high school district school board, and in both positions, He is able to affect change in many ways, change that could save his son, could save anyone's son from nightmares like his and Megan's.

Because at the heart of it, nightmares of that kind are nightmares that we all feel.

They're all of ours.

851 injuries, 59 deaths.

We see the numbers, we see the frantic cell phone footage.

And it's all too easy to succumb into that debilitating feeling like Megan and Valdo have.

But just look for the tiniest things.

Look for the tiniest sounds.

Look for the stories like theirs.

Listen for hope.

Because it is there.

Much more than we even realize.

Hey, we want to thank our sponsor this half hour.

It's American Financing.

Stu was

buying a he was buying it.

Was that your first house or your second house?

Let's see.

You bought a house in

third house?

Wow.

He's moved around a lot.

Yeah, moved around a lot.

We all have.

We're in radio.

And so

Stu had to buy a house, and he really didn't want to because

you believe renting is the smarter thing to do.

I hate homeownership.

Yeah.

And so then he said, well, I'm going to buy a house, but

I want the loan my way.

Yeah, I want the loan before they realized the financial collapse was coming.

The ones they were giving away to like the really dumb people back in like 2007, I want that one.

Why does that make you feel better?

Those are the ones that collapsed.

Those are bad.

Again, these arguments were made to me over this time.

Right.

Okay.

And I understand them.

All right.

So he calls he is the toughest customer, would you say?

Yeah, when it comes to mortgages, yeah, the toughest customer.

And he, he is the opposite of me.

I'm like, they'll show me a bunch of, well, you're going to, you're going to pay this much and I'll say, no, don't show me that.

I don't want to know how much.

Just say, just show me the line where I have to sign my money.

Just let me sign this, okay?

Stu is the exact opposite.

So he called American Financing.

They are salary-based mortgage consultants, which the difference is in what, Stu?

Well, I mean, they don't care about selling me a loan.

They want to, I mean, they worked really hard to, you know, analyze several different options.

I called like 10 different places and go through all of it.

And I, you know, I went to them and I was like, well, what do you think about this one?

And can you match it?

You know, and they said, look, you know, we understand what you're looking for.

It's not really what we do or any other sensible company does.

Because we like to stay in business.

Yeah, right.

Yeah, we don't want to collapse the economy.

Yeah.

And they actually directed me to take a different loan because they thought it was a better fit for what I wanted, which is not easy for a company to do.

They don't usually do that.

They'll figure out a way to convince you that what they have is what you need.

The reason why I tell you this story is because he didn't eventually go with American Financing because he was asking for something they thought was nuts.

And they said,

Someone will give that to you.

Go ahead.

Anyway, AmericanFinancing.net.

AmericanFinancing.net.

They're just going to find out exactly what you want to do and then not try to talk you into something else.

It's AmericanFinancing.net.

This is the only mortgage company that

really does care about what your goals are.

Call 800-906-2440.

You want to refinance or you need a new home mortgage?

These are the people to call.

800-906-2440.

AmericanFinancing.net.

American Financing Corporation, NMLS 1-82334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Well, hello.

Welcome to the program.

We're going out on tour in, what is is it, three weeks, four weeks?

I think it's

three, four weeks from this week.

We're going to be out on tour, and we would love to see you grab your tickets.

You can find them wherever tickets are sold or, you know, at glembeck.com slash tour.

You can find the dates we're going to be out, but it's right around the midterms.

And so, you know, it's...

I think you might mention them.

Going to be fun.

Maybe you might be talking about what's going on.

I think I might have an opinion or two.

Could be a couple things to mock in the election process.

So I think it's the week.

It starts the week before the elections.

And then I think we break on election night, which I'm really bummed about.

I didn't even think of that.

And we break on that.

And then we come out a day or two after.

And I have a feeling we're going to have a lot to say about what happens after as well.

So

if you want a place where, you know, you can vent,

you can have a good time,

and you can also learn about where we're headed and the best way to make sure that

we preserve the Western way of life and, you know,

men,

you know, so we're not all exterminated.

You're going to have a great time.

Addicted to outrage, the tour, you can find it at Glennbeck.com.

Yep, starts in Texas October 25th and goes until the end of the year.

Yeah, San Antonio, San Antonio, Houston, and Dallas, I think, are the first weekend.

San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Richmond, Hershey, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Kansas City, Evansville, Tulsa, Tampa, and Orlando.

Grab your tickets.

It's going to be a lot of fun.

All right.

Stu.

They now believe, now this is Elijah Cummings.

They now believe that

Kavanaugh needs to take a lie detector test.

Oh, God.

First of all, the first thing you need to to do when someone mentions a lie detector test is to stop what you're doing and type in YouTube and then Penn and Teller,

I won't say the full word, but BS about lie detector tests and just watch that episode.

You will be stunned at how terrible the idea of ever giving anyone a lie detector test is.

And of course, you know, obviously it's Penn and Teller.

It's an entertaining presentation of the information, but it checks out.

I mean,

there really isn't science behind lie detector tests.

No, lie detector tests are not.

You can beat them.

And it's not, I mean,

it is not the end-all-be-all.

It's not.

What it is useful for in certain circumstances is the

idea of

intimidation, right?

If you are to say, I'm going to give you a lie detector test and you're going to have to tell me the truth, it's possible that the person tells you the truth because they're scared of the lie detector test, right?

And that's where it's most useful.

It's not to say that there's, you know,

there's almost literally nothing behind them.

I mean, it does not tell you when you lie.

It's not like there's no such thing.

There's no way to do that.

Think about it.

It's incredible.

And it's one of those things that I think most people take for granted.

If you pass a lie detector test, you're telling the truth.

That is not really the way it works.

You know, yesterday we had Larry Sharp on.

He's running for governor of New York.

And you remember how he had these out-of-the-box ideas?

You know, that like, nobody's talking about that.

Yeah.

I got an idea.

Okay.

Okay.

We administer sodium pentothal

to uh Ford, Kavanaugh, and the entire committee,

okay, okay, and then we just let the cameras roll.

This has nothing to do with getting to the truth, I just want to see it.

I want to see, oh, that's a little bad.

I was doing that in high school, I did that last week, yeah.

Would you love to see these guys?

Because

nobody is talking about Feinstein, really.

Nobody in the media.

It's despicable.

I mean, I don't want to just take one side because I'm not God, so I don't know what happened.

I happen to believe Kavanaugh on Ford.

And

most of that is because Ford has changed her testimony several times.

It's just

there's nothing supported, but maybe she's telling the truth.

I don't know.

I'm not God.

So if I have to put him in a room and choose one or the other, I'm going going to choose him because I don't think she has enough evidence for me to credibly say, yeah, he's a bad guy.

And even if I kind of believed her, I still would.

There's a burden of proof there that it's not on him.

It's not him to prove a negative.

Correct.

So I hope he didn't do it.

And I don't think she has proved that he did by any stretch.

And I don't mean beyond a shadow of a doubt.

I mean just a preponderance of evidence.

There is an inclination.

I mean, honestly, at this point, I do not believe he did it.

I frankly do not believe he did it.

I don't either.

Now, that's not to say, as you point out, we're not God, even though we're pretty cool.

So it's possible,

but I don't believe that he did it.

Right.

So we've plowed this field over and over and over again.

You know, how come nobody is plowing the field on how much they've destroyed her life?

Senator Feinstein has destroyed her life.

They lied to her several times.

Lied to her.

She requested anonymity.

They released the letter anyway, causing a chain of events that would obviously reveal who she was.

Obviously, they lied to her about the Democrats or the Republicans not willing to come out and take her testimony in California.

She was surprised by that.

I mean, look, to be frank, I mean, she's told many lies in this process as well.

And, you know, I don't know.

How do you know those are lies?

What lies?

Well, things like, you know, she never flies.

That's why she can't make it to the hearing.

And then, oh, well, yes, I do fly often.

Yeah, I'm not sure sure if that was her lie or if that was a lie coming from her attorneys.

I mean, it's got her name on it, so yes.

But I think there were those around her that were also willing to help her

discover some of those fairy tales.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

All right, we have a background check.

Trump has just okayed the expansion of of the FBI background check on Kavanaugh, which,

yay!

So we have that going for us.

And

really, I mean, let's be honest.

It's important that someone who is going to be wielding a lot of power, especially where the law is concerned,

we look at every single accusation because the worst thing that could happen is, you know, he gets in and he's a judge and he is, you know, looking at some case before him,

and he himself

was a serial rapist.

Thank you for bringing this up.

It's very important.

It's so important.

It's very important.

If you're abusive to women, you should certainly not hold a role that relates closely to law enforcement.

It doesn't make any sense.

Right.

Right.

Right.

Like judge or

attorney general.

Attorney General.

Attorney General would be a good one.

Yeah.

Yeah, that's a great point.

And I'm glad you brought that up because there's a certain candidate who's running for Minnesota Attorney General

who's been credibly accused by a woman he was dating.

Now, there's an interesting, there's a little bit of a separation, and we should be fair on this.

There's a separation between the Kavanaugh case and the Ellison case.

The Kavanaugh case happened 36 years ago.

The Ellison case was pretty much ongoing until very recently.

Okay.

All right, so there's a difference.

That's one difference.

But

Professor Ford, she had a spotty memory.

Yeah, she had a very spotty memory.

Now, the accuser who we we know, now remember with Ford, we have no even sense that there was a relationship of any sort between Ford and Kavanaugh.

We do know that a long-term girlfriend of Keith Ellison has accused him of sexual abuse and physical violence.

Okay.

Okay.

All right.

So we got both of those.

So there's a little difference.

Does she remember where they happened?

You know, she does remember when they happened.

Okay.

And she does.

She probably doesn't have notes from her doctor, you know, from the, when she was talking to her doctor, when the doctor gets it wrong, of course, like you did in Ford's case.

They both have notes from their doctor.

Oh, they do, actually.

In both cases.

The Ford case was something that was 30 years after the incident, in which she referred to an attack by four people, which is different than the story that she's telling now and never named Kavanaugh.

The notes from

Ellison, Keith Ellison's former girlfriend's doctor, do name Keith Ellison as the reason why she's getting medical attention for physical injuries.

And that's kind of a difference, too.

You might notice a slight distinction between those two things.

Yeah, one has notes that

don't actually name the accuser.

And it was, you know, many, many, many, many, many, many years before.

And this is, I'm going to the doctor to get medical treatment because this guy is accusing me.

Yeah.

And so, you know,

in one case, you have a woman who has photos of the incident and has photos of bruising on her.

The other one, of course, does not.

Being Ford, she doesn't have that.

Now, there's a witness situation we need to deal with, though, of course.

Ford has named several people who were at the parties.

None of them can remember it happening.

The people Ford named

cannot say that they were actually at the party.

Some of them have said, I was not there.

Some of them said, I don't remember any party like that.

So there's a

wide berth there between those two opinions.

But she has named witnesses.

Just none of them have corroborated her story in any way.

Keith Ellison's girlfriend has also named sources.

Those people say the exact same thing and say they've seen evidence of the actual crime going down,

including things like texts,

writings,

pictures.

Those are things that she showed to co-workers in real time.

In real time.

And has several people she told about it at the moment.

Again, we have no one that Ford told about it at the moment.

In fact, in any moment, up until at least 2012, where it does not appear she actually said to Kavanaugh or said the name Kavanaugh even at that time.

Yeah, but listen, I mean, you

I mean, you don't have videotape.

Well, there was videotape.

Now, we haven't seen it yet, though.

Now, there is allegedly videotape that exists somewhere of one of these physical altercations.

Allegedly.

We have not seen it yet.

Of course, there's no video.

of the Kavanaugh thing because, you know, that wouldn't be a thing that we're going to have.

Well, we have to take her word that there is video with the

Ellison.

With the Ellison case.

That's right.

And we don't have that evidence yet.

We have a ton of evidence.

In fact,

I don't know, hundreds of times more.

There's really no evidence in the Ford case.

So we have

a 3D amount more evidence.

It's almost like we have a preponderance of evidence.

In the Ellison case.

However,

what's interesting about this is that 56% of Democrats believe Christine Blasey Ford's allegations.

56%, only 8% say they believe Kavanaugh.

56 to 8 is the split there.

So you'd assume that if you ask people, and it wasn't a partisan situation, what do you think about the Ellison situation?

What do you believe from her?

Because she's got a more recent allegation.

She's actually brought it to the attention in real time to multiple people.

People around her have seen evidence of this.

There's text messages.

There are medical notes.

All the evidence that we just talked about, there's an infinity amount times more evidence in the Ellison case.

Yet only 5% of Democrats believe Ellison's accuser.

We are told over and over again that women are to be believed, yet only 5% of Democrats believe the allegations against Keith Ellison.

And here's why this is really important.

Just like I don't want an abuser on the Supreme Court,

if there was the amount of evidence on Kavanaugh that there is on

Keith Ellison, I would not be for Kavanaugh, would you?

If there was a mount on Kavanaugh.

no, I would not.

Yeah, I would not.

If the evidence was the same,

but

we still have a standard here in this country,

called innocent until proven guilty.

And preponderance of evidence is

a lower level than that.

And I understand that.

My issue here would be

you can, once there isn't a legal standard, because people will say, well, this is just a job interview or this is just a, this isn't a legal proceeding.

Once you have the absence of a legal standard, you have to choose the standard you apply.

I choose to apply a very high standard because people who are in relationships, many, many times when the relationships break up or someone feels jilted, say things that are not true.

It happens all the time.

So I would say

in this case,

Keith Ellison should have the right to defend himself.

And

we should assume his innocence unless we get to a point in

he is, and especially with a case like this, where it's very recent, that should just go through the legal system.

And when he comes out and he's guilty, then he should get thrown out of that job.

And you can factor that in in your vote if you wish, but I don't think he should lose any job because of this at this point.

He needs to, you need to be able to see whether this case goes through and claims are proven.

Someone has said they have video.

We need to see the video.

We need to see everyone

investigated.

We need to see an actual police investigation go through

and see whether the evidence leads us to a belief that he actually committed these acts.

If we do not get that, you do not ruin people's lives over it.

I mean, think about the amount of times of evidence that there is with Keith Ellison over Roy Moore, which everyone, I mean, even a lot of people on the right were like, look, Roy Moore really looks like he did these things.

His answers are really bad.

Well, there's much more evidence for Keith Ellerson.

Much more.

Keith Ellerson.

Much more.

There's people you can interview right now.

Yeah.

Children who went through traumatic moments where they had to read about their mom being abused.

You know, her telling other friends at the time.

That being said, however,

you enter this process with a presumption of innocence.

I agree.

So, but what I know about Keith Ellison's, the evidence against him, okay.

Assuming this was not current day and it was 35 years ago, if Ford would come with that evidence,

I have letters, I have a photo of the bruises on my arm, I have,

I can tell you where it happened.

I told my friends, and here they are.

They verify that I told them after the party,

would you not

go, okay, I think that's good.

Yeah, I mean, I think that would be enough, and it would be the only way we could judge the situation.

Correct.

Right.

Correct.

Here Here it is with Ellison.

And again, this is why it's important.

Just like I don't want to have a Supreme Court justice that is an abuser or a liar or whatever,

I also think it's extraordinarily dangerous to have a guy who

may have beaten his girlfriend.

may have mentally abused his girlfriend, assuming the evidence is real and checks out.

You can't have him as

the chief law enforcement of the state.

Right.

And does anybody care?

No.

This shows you that nobody in the media cares

an iota for this woman and her story.

They don't care if she was abused.

They don't care about any of it.

What they care about is stopping Brett Kavanaugh.

If they cared, they would be just as passionate as a guy.

Let's not just throw him out as the Minnesota Attorney General.

This is a guy who's second in charge of the D, what, the DNC?

Yeah, DNC.

This is not

a peripheral figure in politics.

He's one of the most powerful Democrats in America and is now going to be a chief law enforcement officer for a state.

And you could say, oh, well,

what you're doing is whataboutism.

No.

No, it's not.

It's not whataboutism.

I apply the same standard to Ellison that I apply to Kavanaugh.

You weren't doing this to Kavanaugh.

I would still be saying this about

Ellison.

Yeah, I mean, go back to why is Barack Obama?

Why was Barack Obama president?

Right?

Barack Obama was president because he won a presidential election in 2008.

Previously, he made a heck of a speech in, what, 2004?

And that 2004 election, he won a Senate seat, a Senate seat that would have been incredibly close if he was going against not Alan Keyes, who they flew in the last week to start a campaign, but it was Jack, I want to say Jack Ryan, but I may be thinking of John Krasinski at this point.

I've been seeing too many Amazon commercials, but Ryan was his last name.

And he was a legitimate challenger to Barack Obama in that Senate race.

It was a close election, and he may have won it as a Republican in Illinois.

Wow.

And what they did is they went through

his sealed divorce

hearings and paperwork, outed it to the public.

And in there, there were accusations by his wife, the actress, who had said they went to swingers' clubs and all this sort of shady stuff.

Do we know if that was true?

I don't know.

In a divorce proceeding?

In a divorce proceeding, people make all sorts of claims.

And that's why you don't just believe them.

That's why they're sealed.

Because they went and got them unsealed in a Democratic state, and

Ryan eventually dropped out.

There was no real opposition for a Barack Obama, and you got eight years of him.

That sort of thing should be always viewed skeptically.

Every claim of a crime should be viewed skeptically by people on that side.

You're supposed to give the presumption of innocence, and it's supposed to start with skepticism of a claim.

On any side.

On any side.

On any side.

Of all people who are accused.

And here we are in a situation where Democrats overwhelmingly believe the accusations against Kavanaugh with almost no evidence.

And

only 5% of them believe the woman who is a Democrat, who does not want someone

ideologically opposed to

Keith Ellison to have that job.

She's a Democrat.

And only 5% of people believe her.

The platitudes you hear from the media and the left mean nothing on this story.

They do not care about whether Ford was abused or not.

They don't.

And this shows you how fast that standard is applied and

how your life could be destroyed.

You are on the wrong side of an issue.

And by the way, I think you've seen the issues change and positions, what's politically correct changes.

And if you don't abide 100% and you're not on the right side, they'll destroy your life.

Well, they'll let somebody else be fine.

This is why we must have a standard.

We must have a standard.

It's getting dangerous.

to be an American.

That's a frightening thing to say.

All right.

I've been telling you about Goldline's new silver maple flex bar that the maple flex bar.

Here, Stu, can you open this up and

break some pieces off?

What it is, is

it's a bar of silver,

and it's made by the Canadian Mint.

And what you do is you take it and you break it apart, and it's in one tenth of an ounce, one quarter of an ounce.

I couldn't get that one open either.

It usually eases to open.

I think it's a trick one.

I think they glued that one.

This is like the fake birthday candle.

Yeah, I got it.

There you go.

Okay, so what you do is you take it, and you can, it's like a credit card size, and you break it apart.

It feels weird breaking this beautiful satin thing.

I know.

You break it apart.

And you can break it into smaller pieces.

Now, this is for silver.

Don't forget the importance of small gold bars as well.

They have

the Maple Flex bar in silver.

They also have, from the Canadian Mint, gold bars, little teeny gold bars.

Gold and silver, credit card size holder containing five individually sealed 1/10th ounce gold bars

minted by the Canadian Mint, and now these legal tender silver bars, also the Maple Flex.

The only place that sells these is Goldline.

Learn more about these gold and silver bars by calling 866Goldline.

Go to goldline.com.

You don't think that gold or silver or barter, you know, that's crazy.

Really?

Has the world gotten more sane in the last eight months?

No, no.

What happens when the Democrats win?

If they win the House, God forbid they win the Senate.

Do you think we're going to see anything in the next two years except impeachments and its obstruction?

866 Goldline, 866 Goldline or Goldline.com.

Well,

it's another day.

It's another time to look at our world and look at our time and decide what is the best way to spend it today.

What is the thing that I can make a difference in?

Last night

we watched a movie.

I've seen it before and I wanted my wife to watch it because it's becoming one of my favorite movies quickly.

And it's it's called About Time.

And I think Rachel, is her name, Rachel McAdams?

She's in it.

It's a love story, but it's also a great father and son

story.

I just love it.

And

I don't want to blow it for you, but

it puts time in perspective.

It really has a great lesson about time and how we spend it.

If

you're looking for a fun movie to watch, it's called About Time.

Glenn, back.

Mercury.