Best of the Program TGIF with Bill O'Reilly | 9/21/18

The Blaze Radio Network.

On demand.

Hey, welcome to the podcast.

It's Glenn.

Stu is now on a plane winging his way towards France.

Yes, for anyone who thought he was a traitor to our nation, it is very, very clear that that's exactly what he is.

He's on vacation in France.

Who does that?

Oh.

But on the podcast today, really excited to share it with you.

We have Spartacus, you know, sowing the seeds of love, desperate to be president of 2020.

Although I think that Ohio may have a different idea for president, there was one man that changed everything just last night.

The breaker of chains, the freer of beers.

We'll talk about that coming up.

Also, every Friday, we have Bill O'Reilly.

We talk about Kavanaugh versus the media, the Salem witch trials.

It's crazy, crazy stuff that is going on.

Can you even question allegations anymore with Bill O'Reilly?

And another victory for tone-deaf feminist mansplaining is on the decline here in America.

Of course, things for women around the rest of the world are kind of bad.

And we bring our Frankenstein jury.

We dig up old women from the past.

that might have a thing or two to say about, yeah, let's not listen to the accuser or let's listen just to the facts.

We all have that coming up on the podcast.

And don't forget that on tomorrow, on Saturday, another podcast, it's a commercial-free, uninterrupted special.

I think this one runs almost two hours.

It's Michael Reckinwald.

This guy is, he is one of the bravest people I know.

He was a communist.

He was a he's a guy who

was all into postmodernism.

He now sees postmodernism becoming social justice, and it terrifies him.

He started speaking out, and he was removed from the faculty of NYU.

That's on tomorrow, his first nationwide interview.

It is an amazing tale.

You'll learn an awful lot, and it's kind of a companion to my book

that just came out this week, Addicted to Outrage.

Okay, let's get started.

It's the Friday podcast.

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

It's Friday, September 21st.

Glenn Beck.

Well,

it's Friday, Americans.

I'm glad you're here.

So we can talk about Sparta.

So we can talk about Spartacus.

I looked for a dead whale story that was put into a dumpster and didn't fit, but I couldn't find anything, so I had no choice but to start with Spartacus.

Corey Booker, of course.

He's got to be exhausted.

I mean, all week.

No, I'm telling you, I am Spartacus.

And all the sacrifices that he's making.

I mean,

I am glad I have in today's world a chance to point to my kids, real heroes.

Son,

he is Spartacus.

And

And see that guy, you know, in the Nike ad?

He's practically Martin Luther King.

The sacrifice today is incredible.

You know, but Spartacus is doing it for the greater good.

You know,

someone who's willing to step up and lead.

But first, you have to create that I am Spartacus moment.

And Corey Booker, I think, has done it.

He's got to be exhausted between all of the grandstanding that he's been doing during the Kavanaugh

hearings and now out on the campaign trail.

Laboring, laboring, dare I say it, laboring in the fields for the Democrats, which is

really the way the Democrats like that.

But anyway, Democrats, he's out there for you in Nevada, bringing out, you know, the rubbing of elbows, you know, with the common folk.

You know, all of them, I'm sure, wearing a bracelet that says WWSD.

What would Spartacus do?

Well, I think we know

Spartacus would run for president.

Now,

Corey Booker, now this, I think New York magazine had to pull this out of him.

They asked him, brave, brave question.

So,

would you think about running for the presidency?

What is the humble, the humble Corey Booker, the man who

you had to practically drag the IM Spartacus out of him.

What was his response?

Quote,

of course, the presidency is something I would consider.

I mean,

it would be irresponsible not to consider it.

It would be irresponsible not to consider it.

You know, when the people speak like this, I mean, and you are graced with

being Corey Booker, it is really irresponsible for me not to consider leading the peasants out of their plight.

You know what I'm saying?

There's nothing quite like old-fashioned virtuous martyrdom.

I haven't seen it since Jesus.

And

when it's authentic like it was with Jesus and Corey Booker, it's...

It's stunning.

Now, if you're Corey Booker,

I don't think you need to paint yourself as such a responsible, sacrificial guy when you get the New York magazine profiles,

especially the one like this.

The actual headline is,

Can I get a hug?

Corey Booker's got a lot of love to give,

and he's betting

that's what it's going to take to win in 2020.

Oh, my gosh.

So he has responsibility.

He's Spartacus,

and he has a lot lot of love.

I mean, Democrats, you've got to just skip the whole convention process and hand the nomination to Corey Booker right now because

I think he's the one.

I think he's the one to beat Donald Trump.

Oh, it's going to work.

Take that again.

Stations edit that part out.

I think it's going to work.

After all, he's Spartacus.

Now, the New York magazine magazine puff piece doesn't stop at the headline.

It goes further.

It compares Booker to Mr.

Rogers.

And Booker, I'm quoting, Booker is radically, almost comically out of step with Trump's kind of politics.

On a human level, being a human being level,

he's an unlikely person.

I mean, he is

unlike anybody else who has made this serious bid for the presidency,

in our lifetime,

he's probably the most genuine.

Wow.

I don't think he's Spartacus.

He may be God.

So, in addition to being the most responsible pro-hug human being ever to grace the campaign trail, ever, ever, at least in our lifetime, Booker also has the amazing vision for the country.

He wants to legalize marijuana nationwide, which I think is on the top of everybody's list.

Go ahead, say it.

Try to deny it.

You can't.

He wants to provide

Medicare for all, which is what we said that Barack Obama was leading us into because Obamacare wouldn't work, and so we would be stuck with universal government health care, you know, Medicare for all.

And they called me a racist for saying that.

I don't.

Well, maybe it's because I was in Spartacus.

He also wants to guarantee federal jobs for every American that needs one.

Now,

as a junior senator, that is not easy to pull off.

But as Spartacus,

as President Spartacus,

last night, I believe, even Spartacus wept.

Most wept with joy.

But I think he wept without out and out fear because of course we all know the only one that could possibly beat Spartacus

just might be the next president of the United States,

Baker Mayfield.

Somebody in the Democratic Party before they realized he was from Texas.

Somebody in the Democratic Party that didn't see that last night went,

he could win Ohio.

Put him on

the wall.

Throw him on there as VP.

Yeah, let's talk to him.

I bet they were on the ground they had that chair of the chain off of the Bud Lights.

Yeah, I think they were on the ground.

Nancy Pelosi is like, get me a plane.

Get me a plane.

He wouldn't constitutionally qualify, of course, but when has that ever stopped a Democrat before?

Why wouldn't he constitutionally qualify?

No, he's qualified.

Right?

He's got to be 35 to be president of the United States.

Oh, we don't care about stuff like that.

Oh, okay.

That's good.

No.

What we care about is.

He's the guy who can lead us out of the darkness.

Oh, we see that.

So, again,

I think he's from Texas, but then again, you know, for the,

you know, just, you know, for the heck of it, I throw in so is

what's his name?

Robert Francis.

Oh, Robert.

Betto Francis O'Rourke?

Yeah.

Oh, yeah.

Yeah.

We don't like to call him Betto on this network.

A wee little Roberto Francis Betto.

Corey, I'm so glad you brought up Corey Booker to start the show.

I am absolutely fascinated by the way he is handling the current situation with Brett Kavanaugh.

Because here is a guy who is currently saying we must find out the truth about this accusation that has been made against Brett Kavanaugh that he may, back 36 years ago, have groped a girl when he was a teenager.

And that's a serious accusation.

We must know the answer to it.

Now, there's no evidence supporting it, right?

Right, right.

But there is like her accusation, and it should be aired out, and we should know exactly what's going on.

And he's being the one at the top of the list calling for this and harassing

Kavanaugh to try to get him to be pressured into saying something stupid or stepping down.

Now,

is he saying that if you did something like this, you can't, of course, serve in a position of power like Supreme Court Justice?

Yeah, right.

Because, I mean, how could you, Glenn?

I mean, you're one of nine there.

You understand?

You're one of nine in a very important role.

And if you can't show the judgment to stop groping people when you're a teenager, obviously you should not be in a position of power.

One of nine would be that.

One of nine would be bad.

One of nine.

One of nine would be bad.

Now, it's an interesting thing, as he

everybody expects, even he's basically telling you he's running for president in 2020, which is one of one.

I just want to one of one, right?

It would be

a higher-level gig than the Supreme Court.

He

himself

has

admitted to groping a 15-year-old girl when he was a teenager.

The exact same thing Brett Kavanaugh is accused of, Corey Booker has admitted to in his own writings.

Not only has he admitted to them, he's done it more recently than Brett Kavanaugh is accused of doing it.

Oh, my God.

Which is kind of interesting.

The other thing that's interesting.

No, it's interesting to you as a conservative.

It's interesting to half of the country.

It's a racist smear to the other half.

Really?

And completely irrelevant.

You know, it's a little like Keith Ellison.

Is it?

Yeah.

Well, exactly.

I think I can understand how Democrats look at these stories.

When Corey Booker does it, you know, of course it's racist to point it out.

If Keith Ellison does it, there's no evidence of that.

I mean, except for the

text messages, the videotape,

the documentation from the hospital, it looks like now.

Documentation from the hospital.

But other than that, other than that, it's not credible.

Right, exactly.

Now, when Brett Kavanaugh, there is no indication outside of her saying it this year.

Remember, people are like, oh, well, she said it in 2012.

She said something happened in 2012.

She did not name Brett Kavanaugh in 2012.

And it was also recorded with the wrong number of accusers in 2012.

So the idea that that story is the same is highly questionable at all.

But it's okay.

Let's say it's happened in 2012.

Corey,

excuse me, 1982.

Corey Booker in 1984 wrote about a story.

It was New Year's Eve, 1984.

He said, as we fumbled upon the bed, he's dealing with a girl here.

I remember debating my next move as if it was a chess game.

With the top gun slogan ringing in my head, back to that in a second.

I slowly reached for her breast.

After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my mark.

He goes on to say: next week in school, the girl, he groped,

told me she was drunk that night and didn't know what she was doing.

Remember, she's 15 at the time of this incident.

He also then later on wrote in 1992 about this incident.

He had written, I raised my noble pen.

He was Spartacus even back then.

I raised my noble pen to address the issue of date rape.

And then I realized that the person holding that pen wasn't so noble after all.

Again, he's essentially admitting to date rape in the column.

With this issue, as with so many others, a dash of sincere introspection has revealed to me a dangerous gap, a gap between my beliefs and my actions.

Spartacus

tell me it's not so.

Say it ain't so, Sparty.

It's interesting to look at this, too, for multiple reasons.

And I think, you know, look, would you say,

the only difference here would be, in theory, if Brett Kavanaugh had done this, well, Corey Booker's admitted it, and maybe he had dealt with the problem.

Of course,

we all know if in 1992 Brett Kavanaugh had written a story just like this about how he groped a woman, this would be a huge issue, and he'd be in real trouble in the Supreme Court because the Democrats would take that standard that they're not applying to Corey Booker and apply it to Brett Kavanaugh.

But this is the Democrats, hang on just a second.

That's not necessary.

You don't know.

I do know.

No, you don't.

100% certitude.

Because

the Democratic leadership might have been so busy beating their girlfriend and parading her that they may not have noticed.

That's certainly possible.

I think we have to keep that possibility open after the news.

But here's another thing that's really bothering me about the story.

Corey Booker says,

I remember debating my next move as if it were a chess game.

With the top gun slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast.

What on earth is the top gun slogan?

Does anyone have any idea what the top gun slogan is?

If you were to say, what is the top gun slogan,

what would be ringing in your head?

I mean, maybe he meant the theme.

I don't know.

You'll never, right?

You'll never age.

You'll never age like that guy on the screen.

It's possible.

I think he's made a pact with the devil.

I don't know.

That is the talk.

What is the top gun slogan?

As far as I can tell, there's no such thing as the top gun slogan.

I'm thinking he might have meant the top gun theme, right?

The kind of

that sort of 80s guitar solo played while they're like walking towards the plane.

Maybe that.

I don't know.

Or Highway to the Danger Zone, which apparently could be that as well.

The problem with Corey Booker's memory here, and it's interesting, is we claim this woman in 1982 remembers this incident perfectly.

She, of course, knows everything.

Now, she doesn't know where it was.

She doesn't know what house it was at.

She doesn't know how she got to the house.

She doesn't know what month it was in.

But she remembers this so vividly.

This vivid recollection is what it's been called.

Yes, I know.

Right.

You remember this?

Now, this is only, this is not 36 years after the incident for Corey Booker.

It's eight years after the incident.

1994, and he's writing about it in 1992.

With the Top Gun slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast.

The minor issue here in 1984, Top Gun would not come out for 18 months.

Top Gun came out in 1986.

He couldn't have possibly known what the Top Gun slogan was because it wasn't.

That might have just been literary from his noble pen.

That's true.

He had a noble pen and sometimes noble pens do that.

They do.

He's an, you know what?

The pen is really not his weapon of choice.

Spartacus uses a spear.

The pen is mightier than the spear, Glenn.

I think we all know that.

Okay, all right.

His noble and autonomous pen essentially made all of these mistakes and admitted to date rape.

But no, let's hear his criticism of Brett Kavanaugh, who has not admitted to anything.

Well,

I'm sure he's going to as soon as he answers to all of the charges and her testimony,

you know, before her testimony.

They are saying, by the way, she may testify next week now.

Yeah, no.

I know, and we've got to go over the conditions that she's laid out because I think they're very reasonable.

Uh, he's got a he has to answer to her testimony before she speaks and testifies, which I think goes first.

That's how Trail always wants.

Of course, it does.

Can you answer the charges that have not been stated yet?

No, I can't.

Your Honor, he cannot answer to the charges.

The best of the Glenbeck program.

This week we've been in the City of Angels, broadcasting directly from Los Angeles.

This is Southern California.

As I grew up in Seattle, Washington, I always wanted to live in California.

I still kind of do.

If

Sacramento was not part of California, if they would just take all of the politicians and the politics and Hollywood and move them to New York, I would love to live here, but I don't know how people do it.

I really don't.

God bless you.

There's so many conservatives here

that just don't admit that they're conservative.

Just

keep it quiet.

This is home to some of the most virtue, you know, pompous virtue signaling liberals in the entire nation, maybe the entire world.

The virtue signaling here is off the charts.

Even the French say, oh, they're a little little snotty, huh?

They don't just talk about how incredibly awesome and more virtuous than they are than the rest of us.

They back it up by regulating the crap out of everything.

Some of the most ridiculous laws you've ever heard.

Some of my favorites, it's a crime to ride a bicycle in a swimming pool,

which is kind of a you know, bummer because I like to swim and bike, and I don't have the time.

So I like to do it both at the same time.

You know, there's nothing like riding your, you know, your, your, your BMX in a pool.

It's, it's, you know, just for people who are super, super athletic like me.

Two, illegal to curse on a mini golf course.

Is it possible to play golf, any form of golf, and not curse?

Three, dogs are not allowed to mate within 500 yards of a church or a school.

I know, I've been talking to my dog.

Do you realize how close we are to a school?

Stop humping that other dog.

You break this law.

You break this law and

you face a $500 fine and or six months in prison.

By the way,

Your Honor, I wasn't humping near the school.

The dog was.

Why am I going to prison?

If you're a pooch trotting along, you know, near a church or a school and you happen to hear the sweet melodic sounds of Barry White, and all of a sudden that poodle is walking in slow motion, stay away, man.

Run for the cold swimming pool as long as there's not a bike in it.

This is California.

The biggest and probably most

economically challenging and damaging laws are the environmental laws.

Kind of like the new law that makes it illegal, illegal to take a shower and do your laundry on the same day.

Oh,

this is great.

Don't laugh.

That's a real law.

How about the stringent emission laws that corporations have to deal with?

But it's kind of funny for all the fierce rhetoric that comes from everybody in Hollywood, you know, to the

San Fernando Valley regarding the climate change and militant environmentalism.

Because

I'm here this week, and this place looks like a crap hole.

I mean, it, it really, I mean, it's dirty, nasty, garbage everywhere.

Have you walked down, you know, Hollywood Boulevard?

Wow, that's lovely.

I mean, if, if you can make it by, honest to God,

in Hollywood, doing some business this week, walking down.

Everybody's like, is that guy smoking crack?

Of course he is.

Of course he is.

Everybody's smoking crack.

Try taking a drive down the 405 or any freeway in the LA area, bumper to bumper.

It's a mess.

You want to roll your windows down because it's so nice, but no, you really don't because of the, you know, all of the earth-saving chemicals that are being pumped out of the back of that bus.

So.

What is the after-effect of all of these virtuous laws?

It's making things better, right?

Several years ago, the state of California offered drivers of low or zero emission cars for the opportunity to drive in the carpool lane.

All they had to do was just do one thing.

They wanted to encourage more people to buy electric cars, saving the environment.

Now, it just happens that they also gain some revenue by, you know, having to buy those cute little zero emissions carpool eligible permits that they put on the car.

But that didn't have anything to do with it.

California is not looking to bilk its people.

No, it's not.

Which brings me to the

newest law, the California.

Remember those little stickers that you had to buy so you could you know, so you could you could buy a really expensive car,

overpay for it, and then uh and then drive in the carpool lane.

Well, the legislature has just passed a new law stating that the low-emission carpool decals that you purchased,

yeah, those ones are no longer valid.

And so don't use the carpool lane unless you want to come back to the state today because they have a brand new low emissions sticker for your car.

Now, again, I mean, they're doing this just because it saves

something for the environment.

It has nothing to do with the state making more money.

You know, has absolutely nothing to do with that.

More money on the registration fees, which are coming,

are now the highest in the country, coming from a state with the highest taxes.

The money on the new low-emission car pool permit, yep, they like that.

And the sales tax if you buy a new car?

So the state's getting richer, Californians are getting poorer, and all in the name of environmentalism and climate change.

But it's all for the virtue, right?

Has anybody noticed that the cities that are run by progressives for decades are hell holes?

Has anyone ever noticed that?

It's hard not to when you're in some places in California and don't even get me started with pooperoni on the streets of San Francisco.

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Like listening to this podcast?

If you're not a subscriber, become one now on iTunes.

And while you're there, do us a favor and rate the show.

So, Bill, I have

the American people have just been a Huffington Post poll has been taken of the American people.

28% of men

believe her.

Only 25% of women believe her.

Out of that number, of the 25%,

how many do you think are

only saying this?

How many actually do you think actually believe her?

And how many are just political zombies?

That guy, I can't possibly answer that.

I mean, it's speculation, but what I can tell you is this.

You mentioned the virtuous left out in California.

And that's who's driving Judge Kavanaugh's guilty, even though they have no blanket clue whether he's guilty or not.

But because

they feel good about destroying Kavanaugh, primarily because of abortion,

they can say whatever they want to say.

Due process, no, no, no, no.

Did you hear the other night, Beck, that Chris Cuomo and CNN said, you know what?

Due process, presumption of innocence, that's just in courts.

That's not really in American society.

That's not in our...

Where do you think?

Where does Chris Cuomo think we got the laws?

We codified what society feels is right and just, wrote it down and said, this is who we are.

It's worse than that.

The founding fathers fought a war because they wanted a just society because King George wasn't just in their opinion.

And part of the just society is, unlike France, which has a Napoleonic code that you're guilty until proven innocent, you're innocent until proven guilty, not just in a court of law, but in society.

You can't be pointing fingers at people going, prove you're not a rapist.

I mean, it's but this is what it is.

You're on CNN, and there he is at nine o'clock.

And he's a lawyer.

You know, don't give me that we should be giving anybody the presumption of innocence.

Oh, no.

No, we want to be a Stalin-esque society that if Joseph feels that you're disloyal, he can put a bullet in your head.

That's what we want to be in America.

I just started reading the trial by Kafka last night.

And I only picked it up because, if I remember right, the trial is about a guy who all of a sudden is accused of something, stands trial.

He doesn't know what he's even accused of.

And he's going through a trial.

This struck me last night as I saw one of her conditions was that Kavanaugh had to answer to the charges before she testified.

Right.

I mean, this is a very important thing.

How is that even

out of control?

And this is what you see in colleges when you had

any

student who was accused of anything had to go before a star chamber, and they would basically thrown out

before any evidence was presented.

Right.

And this is what Chris Cuomo wants.

And I'm going to read that CAFTA book right after I finish Addicted to Outrage.

Wow.

Well, I...

So, Bill O'Reilly, what do you think about the woman who

has really no evidence at all, no one backing up her story?

Her friend that said, oh, I heard a buzz about this.

later the next day said she was empowered by the internet to say those things.

She doesn't know if

it's true and she doesn't want to talk about it and she deleted the tweet.

That's as good as it gets.

You have a he said, she said, and this woman is coming on and she is demanding that the GOP

does a few things.

She said Kavanaugh has to testify first.

There are no outside counsels that can question her.

She wants them to subpoena Mark Judge.

And she has to have her safety guaranteed.

First, the last one?

Okay, fine.

What do you think of the other ones?

Ridiculous.

Look,

I appointed all of my viewers on BillOreilly.com as jury members for a civil case regarding the Kavanaugh situation.

I said the preponderance of evidence is what you have to rule on.

And here's the evidence.

When this happened, allegedly happened,

36 years ago, was anybody told about it?

Okay.

who would be told about it?

The parents?

Of course, right?

If this happened in the way she describes it, you would tell your parents.

You would assume, or your brother, or your sister or your best friend.

You start there.

Why was no one told?

No school,

nothing.

You could make the case that, you know, a woman, especially a 15-year-old girl, is embarrassed.

I brought it on myself.

I don't want to tell my parents because I don't know.

I don't know anybody.

I have a 15-year-old.

I don't know anyone, anyone being assaulted who wouldn't tell anyone.

I'm sorry.

I just don't.

It's just not human nature.

And then all those years, you don't tell anybody.

Nothing happens until a marital session, a counseling session, where the therapist writes down that the Dr.

Ford said there were four boys in the room.

And now Dr.

Ford says there were two boys in the room and says the therapist made a mistake.

Therapists don't make those kinds of mistakes.

That's an amazingly traumatic experience.

They don't make those kinds of mistakes.

So I'm presenting evidence, evidence that Dr.

Ford herself has confirmed, not evidence that Bill O'Reilly's pulled out of the air.

And I'm just saying to myself, if you look at the pattern, of what she says happened, and then you look at who she has hired to represent her the most and who she is

progressives in the country.

You can't not draw a political implication.

It's impossible.

So you did

the civil court, which convicted O.J.

Simpson.

The standard

in civil court is just a preponderance of evidence, not

beyond a reasonable level.

I don't want my listeners to evaluate.

Because in criminal court, you can't do it.

Number one, there were no charges filed.

All right.

And number two, there isn't one shred of evidence from that night.

She doesn't even know where it happened.

So how could you possibly have an

investigation?

How?

And you also have a pattern in

recent history

of

one woman saying something, which opens up the floodgate for all these other women to say something.

There hasn't been any.

Did you see the Hollywood ad put out by Move On?

Did you see those actresses, Julianne Moore, and those other people?

I mean,

that just depressed me.

I go, are you American citizens or what?

I mean, what are you doing?

And everybody says Salem, Witch Hunt, Salem, Salem.

This is Salem.

This is exactly what happened there.

Bill O'Reilly,

just would like to know if this is one of those days that you say,

man, I wish someone would take the president's phone away from him.

He has just tweeted.

I have no doubt that if the attack on Dr.

Ford was as bad as she said, charges would have been immediately filed with local law enforcement authorities by either her or her loving parents.

I ask that she brings those filings forward so we can learn the date and the time and the place.

Should the president be tweeting and getting involved involved in this?

I'm not sure.

I think that

with all modesty, he did that because he read my message of the day yesterday, which said exactly the same thing.

Yeah, I know they're

believe you're right.

They monitor me.

May I read you two paragraphs of today's BillO'Reilly.com message of the day?

May I?

Just very short.

Sure, sir.

And I'll read it slow so Stu can keep up.

Okay.

All right.

okay.

The Judge Kavanaugh-Christine Ford case is now expanding to the midterm election.

There is no question that Dr.

Ford's lawyers, working with the Democratic Party, are trying to embarrass Republicans and bait the party into denigrating the accuser.

So this situation is no longer solely a possible criminal act designed to derail a nominated Supreme Court justice.

Now it has become a national election issue designed to cripple President Trump.

And that's exactly what's happening.

Now Trump took the bait.

He took it.

Now you have to ask, is that a good or bad thing?

I believe that the tide of public opinion is turning against Christine Ford at this point, Friday.

That could change by Monday.

But right now, I think that people are saying, you know what?

We've had enough of this.

We have had enough of the accusations, and there are so many holes and arrogance.

We won't do this.

We won't do that.

You have to do this.

Americans don't like that, Deck.

They don't.

They're standing back.

They want to know what happened.

They want the truth.

But I'm telling you, I'm feeling the winds change here.

Okay, so I would agree with you.

I just had dinner here in Los Angeles with somebody last night who

is a liberal.

Everybody here is a liberal.

And he said, this Kavanaugh stuff is nuts.

It's crazy.

I don't believe her.

He said, the Democratic Party, if they continue to do this kind of stuff and run left, he said,

I don't know who I'll vote for.

He said, if they run Corey Booker, Kamala Harris, or Elizabeth Warren, he said, I can't vote for him.

I can't vote for any of those people.

He said, so I don't know what I'm going to do.

And this is coming from a guy who works in Hollywood and he's a Democrat.

He better not say anything.

No, no, no.

He's

right out the window in that totalitarian thing out there.

Look, what you're having now is I would never say that I don't believe Dr.

Ford.

I would never say that because I don't know.

And I'm a fact-driven guy.

So far in this conversation, which I think has been excellent between you and me, we have presented facts.

We have stayed away from speculation and politics.

Facts, okay?

And that's what everybody needs to see.

But once you get into a position where your radical left attorney, all right, a woman who disparaged Paula Jones and stuck up for Al Franken, when that woman is telling the Senate Judiciary Committee, look, this is what you're going to do.

You're going to do this, or we're not showing up.

Once you get there, fair-minded Americans are going to say, you know what?

Blank you.

And that's what's happening.

So, Bill,

what are the ramifications if, you know, she put all of these ridiculous restrictions, you know, that Kavanaugh has to testify before her.

Yes, I mean, it's.

That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

But they're shrewd in the sense they put Grassley, the head of the Judiciary Committee, in a real vise.

Because if Grassley says, you don't tell me what to do, then he doesn't want to know the truth.

Then he's persecuting the victim.

Then the Republican Party don't care about women.

You see?

Right.

Set it up that unless you do it my way,

that you don't care.

about

here's what i would here's what i would like everybody in washington to start caring about and that is the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, which boils down to care about all humans.

Care about every single American and their rights.

This has huge, huge ramifications.

Because I think personally, we are down now to the whole country is going to watch.

If she cries and is sympathetic,

the sympathy will change.

She doesn't need any more evidence.

It's now just down to which one is more sympathetic, which one

puts on a better show.

And coupled with which one will the media get behind?

We already know the first one.

That's going to be.

That's a good point.

But I think there's a little bit more to it than that because I think the battle lines are hardened.

And I think a lot of people have already made up their minds, even though I think they should keep an open mind on this.

But I think a lot of people have said, you know, he's making it up or he did it.

But you have a situation that is out of control and being used now, not only to derail Kavanaugh, but to get Trump.

And that's what people ought to know.

That connection is now being established.

I'll go back to the first thing I said.

Who is paying Dr.

Ford's lawyers?

Who is paying them?

And of course, the press would never ask that question or bother to look because when you find out who's paying, you'll see that it is an arch

leftist group and big money's going in.

All right.

Let me change subjects.

Kind of.

Let me go overseas.

This story broke yesterday, and I saw an op-ed from Jonathan Turley on it.

The far-right political leader Maureen Le Pen has been ordered into psychiatric evaluations after she posted graphic images of bodies of people executed by the Islamic State.

She was accused under French laws, criminalization, different forms of speech, laws that

are rolling back free speech all over the continent.

Posting the pictures meant she was charged now as circulating violent messages that incite terrorism or pornography or serious harm human dignity.

And that can also be viewed by a minor.

She also posted pictures after the Paris terror attacks of

the images of the US journalist that had been desecrated or decapitated in that attack.

And she wrote, Daesh, this.

She's now being brought in

to see if she knows the difference between right and wrong and can answer questions truthfully if she knows what reality is,

then she's going to go to trial and she could receive nine years

for posting accurate pictures of what Islamic extremists do to people.

Any thoughts?

I think it's a great opportunity for Ms.

Le Pen.

Um, you know, because people are gonna say um

it happened and she's she's warning us of what this group is capable of.

So why are you making her a martyr?

So if she wants to be Joan of Arc, you know, I'm keeping in France, thank you, she can be.

So you use the insanity of, I see what they're trying to do over in France and other countries.

They don't want to incite people against Muslims so that they're not beat up on the streets.

I understand.

It's almost like our legislation here, our hate crime legislation here.

But Le Pen, and she's a shrewd person,

she'll use this for her benefit.

Okay, so wait a minute, hang on.

It's not like it is over here because you could post pictures of the Klan lynching people, and as long as it's clearly marked, this is what the Klan is,

nobody's going to do anything.

No, no, no.

But there are laws on the books here where you cannot threaten somebody.

That's what I meant.

So if you're walking down the street and there's a Muslim person and you go over to the Muslim person and say, you're a member of ISIS and you ought to get out of here and I don't want to hurt you or something like that, you'll be arrested.

You can't do that.

So that's what the law in France is designed to stop.

They don't want that kind of

confrontation to take place.

Britain has it too.

Britain has it too.

So you're in a position now where, yes, are they impeding impeding freedom of speech and expression?

Certainly they are.

They don't value that on the continent as much as we used to.

I don't think we do anymore because our totalitarian left is wiping out free speech.

You know, if you, to go back to the Kavanaugh for a second, if you speak out and say, you know, I may not believe this, then you are attacking women.

All women deserve to be believed.

I mean, that crazy senator from Hawaii, Maisie Hurano.

Oh, no,

Kavanaugh did it.

And don't you dare say he didn't do it, because if you do, then you're attacking women.

I mean, come on.

That's where we are, and that's where we're heading into that area where you can't even question an accusation or an allegation anymore.

And if you do, then you should be punished.

If you question it, you should be punished.

And Maisie will be the first one to try to do that.

It is

truly frightening to see how close we are to being dragged over the threshold back into the dark ages where

people, they don't understand

that in a totalitarian society, you are not allowed to dissent.

And in Hollywood, Beck, you're sitting in Hollywood.

Are you allowed to dissent if you work in the show business industry, Beck?

Are you allowed?

No.

Okay.

No.

If you're in the Democratic Party, are you allowed to vote for Judge Kavanaugh without having your campaign funds cut off by Chuck Schumer?

Okay?

No, you're not.

No.

You're not.

You're not allowed.

That's Stalinism.

You're not seeing that on the right.

As crazy as some of those right-wingers are, you don't see that kind of you're not allowed,

but you see it on the left and it is openly accepted by the media.

You are not allowed to walk into the New York Times newsroom if you are a reporter wearing a Make America Great Again hat.

You are not allowed.

Everybody should know what's happening here.

It is fighting and it's going like a speed train.

It really is.

It's picking up speed, going faster and faster.

Bill O'Reilly from billo'reilly.com.

Thank you very much.

Appreciate it.

And killing the SS out October 9th.

Buy it with Beck's book.

Get those two right in your house.

Thank you very much.

Appreciate it, Bill.

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Well, here's another victory for the tone-deaf feminists here in America.

Manspreading is now on the decline.

Meanwhile, Muslim

women in India have just been given the legal right to have a say in their own divorce.

If you're a Muslim woman under Sharia law,

you can use the triple, I think it's talak.

And what that means is,

I think it's pronounced talak.

Excuse me if I'm hitting this wrong, but it's talak, talak, talak, talak, which means I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you.

You say it three times, Betelgeuse shows up, and you are divorced.

But it is, it's only for the men.

Well, now, Indian women have been saved from the

triple talak.

It's now been outlawed as a form of instant divorce in Islam.

Until now, Muslim men have been legally allowed to instantly divorce their wives just by saying, Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse.

How's that for women's rights?

How's that for human rights, for that matter?

By the way, just so nobody is upset, I just want to break in with the news again.

Man spreading is down here in America.

It's down.

Men are not sitting like they used to in Aminez as much.

as they used to.

It's still happening.

Yes, you're still oppressed.

Things are horrible.

But it is on the decline.

Why haven't the fourth wave feminists like Linda Sarsour taken to the streets to protest the vile treatment of women

in places like India?

I know.

It's such a stupid question because we all know.

We all know she knows.

Everybody around her knows.

But it is worth mentioning that the bill faced a lot of opposition, both among the public and within the government, meaning that there is a problem of widespread systematic misogyny in India.

You remember Hillary Clinton speaking to the people of India and talking about how racist and sexist we are here in America?

Widespread systematic misogyny in India seems like something that protesters from the Kavanaugh hearings should be, you know, riled up by on account of their convictions to fight the patriarchy and the oppression of women because they are concerned about those things, right?

Because I can tell you, a country, a region, really with habitual government-wide oppression of women, I think is much bigger than a problem that we're now facing this week of he said, she said with Brett Kavanaugh.

You know those dramatic outfits that the protesters are wearing, you know, for the Kavanaugh hearing?

You know, they're dressed as the

handmade tail?

That took a lot of women, a lot of work from women here, and it's shameful.

It really is.

And of course, they're all convinced that it's coming here in America.

But do you know that Muslim women throughout the Middle East, Asia,

they have to wear those?

And in fact, it's much worse, and they have to wear it on a daily basis, and it's starting to spread all over the world.

See, the difference is here, you went to a costume store and you rented that, or maybe you made it yourself and you didn't have to ask your man to take you to the fabric store to get the fabric.

You just made it.

It's not dress-up time

in other countries.

It's actually a living hell for women.

Millions of women.

Tens of millions of women.

Does anybody in the feminist movement

actually care about women?

Or do you just want to use women

so you can gather enough people to flood the streets so you can all scream, Orange Man, bad?

The Blaze Radio Network

on demand.