'The End of The Beginning?' (Buck Sexton joins Glenn) - 3/13/18

Love, courage,

truth,

Glenn Beck.

President Trump has ousted Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, replaced him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo.

This is a major change to the national security team,

and it is coming on the heels of the announcement that we may be going to North Korea for talks.

Trump apparently asked Friday for Tillerson to step aside

and move on and cut short his trip to Africa and return to Washington.

Pompeo is going to replace him at the State Department and Gina Haspel, she's the deputy director at the CIA, will succeed him at the CIA.

She will become the very first woman to run the spy agency if she is confirmed.

The president said that it was important to make a change now as he prepares for the talks with North Korea.

He said, I want to thank Rex Tillerson for his service.

A great deal has been accomplished over the last 14 months, and I wish him and his family well.

Rex Tillerson, on his behalf, said, I am deeply grateful to President Trump for permitting me to serve as director of the Central.

Oh, no, I'm sorry, that's Pompeo.

Pompeo said, I'm deeply grateful for letting me serve as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency and now for the opportunity to serve serve as Secretary of State.

That

just broke this morning,

and it's coming at an interesting time.

And

I have a feeling this all came because Tillerson was like, what?

Because Tillerson last week was saying, we're not going to North Korea.

We're not going to North Korea.

We're not going to North Korea.

Yeah, what, an hour before Trump said we're going to, well, we're not going to North Korea, but we're going to meet with Kim Jong-un.

Right before that, Tillerson said, oh, we're a long way away from direct talks.

Right.

Which was, that long way was 60 minutes.

Right.

You know, that's a long

time.

It's a lot of face news cycle.

My kids think an hour is a long time.

Right.

Are we there yet?

Are we there yet?

So the

speculation is that this was the big falling out.

This was the final straw.

Tillerson was shocked by it.

He said right after the statement last week that he had absolutely no idea.

The president didn't consult with anyone.

It's not his, I mean, it's his prerogative.

He doesn't have to consult with anybody.

The only problem with the North Korea thing, and I'm willing to give it a whirl, but

the only problem from

a Department of State

stance would be that once you have the two big guys talk, there isn't anything else left.

So So if

you try to hold that off as the last possible option when the deal is really getting close to push it over the top, you don't want to do that before you've exhausted every other option.

Because once they've met in person, there's nowhere to go from there except for missiles start flying.

At least

that's the theory.

That's the theory.

Yeah, and this is interesting.

Pompeo moving into that slot, you know, first of all,

pretty stable guy.

You know, people, it would be, this is not like a, there's not a controversy over, oh my gosh, Mike Pompeo.

Like this guy is, he was the CIA director already, former congressman,

you know,

generally well-respected.

One of the interesting things about Pompeo is he's been one of the harshest voices about Russian meddling in the administration.

He said that they absolutely were meddling.

in the elections.

Now, again, that does not mean Russian, doesn't mean collusion with Russia.

It doesn't mean that the administration's outcome of the election.

It has nothing to do with that.

But he's been very harsh on Russia and what they have done in the past year or two.

So that's kind of an interesting point.

Yes, and that's been a positive that he would.

I think that's a real positive, especially for the deadline that we are waiting for in England.

Don't know about it?

Yeah, probably because the news has been so focused on other crap that you didn't hear.

There's big developments between the UK and Russia.

And we'll talk about that as the morning progresses.

It's Tuesday, March 13th.

You're listening to the Glenn Beck program.

Do we have Teresa May's audio?

Here's what happened last week.

In case you, in case, no, you know, in case you have a life.

And you're not paying attention to news all the time, and especially when you are paying to the news, paying attention to the news, if they happen not to be talking about some scandal.

Was it last week?

I think it was last week.

There was a Russian spy that was killed in the UK.

Now, this isn't the first time.

What was his name?

Lavenko?

Do you remember him?

That was when we were at CNN, I think.

There's a huge list of these.

I mean, I was reading this just the other day, the list of Russian poisonings outside of Russia of various

former friends

or enemies of the administration in some way or another.

I mean,

it's scary.

I mean, they've been doing this for a long time.

So, but the last one like this, I think, was Lavenko.

And he was a

he was

Putin was not a fan of his.

And he was in England, and he was eating at a restaurant.

And they believe that

about the size of a grain of salt,

enriched, what was it, uranium, it was

polonium, 221, 212, something like that.

You'll have to look it up

if you really want to know.

But it's very rare.

There's only two places that it could have come from, and that's deep in the vaults of the United States or deep in the vaults of Russia.

It's extraordinarily dangerous and very, very rare.

So it was used to send a message to the world.

I can get you anywhere

because it clearly came from Putin.

So they killed him on English soil and the English didn't do anything about it.

They were just like, you know, it's a spy dead and, you know, spy versus spy, whatever.

So they just moved past it.

This time, however, there was a chemical weapon released in England, and it's put 22 or 21 people in the hospital.

It's killed two people so far.

There are people that are in critical condition.

This is a chemical weapon released in England by Russia.

Now, when we told you this last week, we've speculated that it was Russia, and we said, but

they're never going to say that.

They're never going to come out with any of that.

Because what are the options?

Are you going to go to war with Russia?

Because that, remember, chemical weapons used on your civilian population?

I think that's a red line.

So what are they going to do?

We supposed they would do nothing because you don't want to escalate things at this time with Russia.

That's not what Theresa May did.

Here's a speech yesterday in the House of Commons.

Listen to this.

Mr.

Speaker, on Wednesday, we will consider in detail the response from the Russian state.

Should there be no credible response, we will conclude that this action amounts to an unlawful use of force by the Russian state against the United Kingdom.

And I will come back to this House and set out the full range of measures that we will take in response.

Mr.

Speaker, this attempted murder using a weapons-grade nerve agent in a British town was not just a crime against the Skripals.

It was an indiscriminate and reckless act against against the United Kingdom, putting the lives of innocent civilians at risk.

And we will not tolerate such a brazen attempt to murder innocent civilians on our soil.

Okay, so what she said before this was we now have identified the nerve agent and it's like VX,

but it is only made in Russia.

So the only perpetrator could have been Russia.

And most likely, this came through in a diplomatic bag.

I mean, it's not something you're going to smuggle across, you know, the, uh, in through customs.

Uh, so they don't know how, at least they're not saying how it got into the country, but they are saying that it is from Russia.

Now, she used some interesting language here.

She said they had 36 hours to respond,

and that's Wednesday.

And if they don't respond in a credible way on, what were you doing?

What were you thinking?

How did this happen?

Oh, you guys didn't do it.

Really?

Tell me about that.

If there's not a

credible

response from Russia by Wednesday, they will declare it an unlawful use of force.

That sounds kind of legalistic.

She then goes back and she says, this was weapons-grade,

a weapons-grade nerve agent, and it was an act against the United Kingdom.

Article 5

is something that all NATO countries have signed on to.

An attack on one is an attack on all of us.

It's possible that she is setting up Article 5.

against Russia and uniting NATO.

Now, there a country that wants to take Russia on, but there isn't a country I think in Europe that isn't tired of Russia's meddling because they are meddling in all of our affairs.

They are meddling with all of our elections.

They are meddling in by funneling money and all kinds of things into what are called conservative movements.

But over in England, conservative is not conservative.

Conservative is usually a national socialist organization.

There are are 66 of these that are being funded and advised and helped by the Russians.

I think there's a possibility that the NATO countries are going to say,

yeah, okay, what do you want?

And Teresa May,

she may kick out all of the spies.

I mean, I think the least that they would do is,

apparently we all know who's got spies where.

which is bizarre.

But we let their spies in our country and they let our spies and we just kind of like, what spies?

I don't know what you're talking about.

But there's a possibility that the least offensive thing she could do is say, we're going to kick your spies out.

The next step would probably be, we're going to kick your ambassador out, and we're going to apply sanctions on you.

If she invokes Article 5, she could say,

I would like all NATO nations to kick their spies out or kick their ambassadors out.

And if we moved as a bloc, that is

a big, big, ballsy move.

But what is England going to do?

I don't know.

And it's insane that they just continue to do this, Russia.

There's huge lists of all these poisonings, and one of them comes from the New York Times, an article they wrote in 2016, and it just goes through all of these poisonings that they've done.

This is paragraph 10 of the story, paragraph 10 of the story.

Other countries, notably Israel and the United States, pursue targeted killings, but in a strict counter-terrorism context.

No other major power employs murderers as systematically and ruthlessly as Russia does against those seen as betraying its interests abroad.

Killings outside Russia were even given legal sanction by the nation's parliament in 2006.

Wait.

What?

Killings outside Russia were even given legal sanction by the nation's parliament in 2006.

So

the parliament said...

At least they're open about it.

At least they're like, yeah, we're going to kill people overseas that are our enemies.

That's, I mean, it is legal in the Russian government.

Now, they've never claimed that they've used that law.

Of course, they deny every one of these killings.

Though they...

These people tend to die in ways that you can only trace it back to Russia and that is intent.

I remember when that happened with Lavinko and it was polonium and I had never heard of polonium before.

And it was explained to me by several experts.

You would only use this if you wanted everybody to know.

And that's what he's doing.

Why would you use a nerve agent that is only made in Russia?

Why would you do that?

I mean, you could use VX.

That could have come from us.

It could have come from Syria.

You can use VX.

You pick the one.

You got all those on the shelves.

You pick the one that is only used in Russia.

That tells you that you either have a rogue state, somebody inside that is stealing things from a lockdown situation to make Russia look bad.

False flag.

Or you are sending a message to the world.

I don't care.

I don't care about you.

You're not going to do anything anyway.

And that's usually the way it's taken.

Yeah.

I think that we follow the trail of bread comes here from Vladimir Putin and his interview with Megan Kelly.

Was it the Jews?

We have not even considered that I was going to say that.

You know what?

Thank you for saying that.

There was, there, what was the name of the guy that ran the

deli/slash chemical nerve agent shop in Manhattan?

You remember him?

Good customer service there.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Great bagels.

Buzz.

Some lucks.

Maybe a nerve agent or two.

All right.

More bad news.

The huge data breach with that major credit bureau that happened.

Remember, it was 2.4 million Americans were impacted.

That brings, I love this number.

That brings the total number of Americans impacted to 149.9

million Americans.

Oh, well, that's only half.

It's only half of us.

That's not a big deal.

How many of us even know if our name was on that list?

It is the largest breach in

human history.

Now, the original number was 145.5,

but then the company came out and said, oh, you know what?

We misplaced a couple of other names.

So now it's

149.9.

The additional 2.4 million had their names and driver's license numbers stolen.

So even more information is out on you.

Does that affect you?

There are so many ways today, because we are all connected to everything, that it takes one weak link and they can have everything and destroy your life.

They have your identity.

New Life Lock Identity Theft Protection.

Now, adding the power of Norton security to help you protect against the threats of your identity and your devices so you can easily see or fix

these things.

Now,

you're not going to be able to really follow follow them because you have a life.

You don't know how to fix them.

Yeah, hey, you fixed that?

Yeah, okay.

Yeah.

And I'm going to fix the defibrillator on my car, too.

If you have a problem, they're going to fix it.

Now, nobody can stop all cyber threats, prevent all identity theft, or monitor all transactions at all businesses.

But now, with the new Life Lock with Norton Security, they're able to uncover the threats that you're going to miss.

Call lifelock.com, lifelock.com, or 1-800-LifeLock, 1-800-Lifelock.

Use the promo code Beck, get an additional 10% off your first year.

That's promo code Beck at lifelock.com.

1-800-LifeLock.

Glenn Beck Mercury.

Glenn Beck.

Okay, there's, as the Rex Tillerson story was filed this morning, there was another story that came out

shortly after it that

just bothers me.

At 8.18, so the Rex Tillerson story was released, what, about 8 o'clock Central Time?

A few minutes before 8, yeah.

And so all of the news agencies were on that.

And then the White House at 8.18 Central released another story, and it is about the president's personal assistant.

Can you read this, please?

Yeah, so he is

his personal assistant, seen as kind of the last of the original group with Hope Hicks leaving, kind of the last of that original close group.

President Trump's personal assistant, John McIntye, was escorted out of the White House on Monday.

Two senior officials, administration officials, said the cause of the firing was an unspecified security issue, said a third White House official with knowledge of the situation.

Okay, so that's not going to get any coverage, but I think it's interesting that it is released.

released.

It happened last night, and it was released after

the Rex Tillerson.

So nobody is looking there.

I don't know what he did.

I have no idea, but this is the personal assistant to the president, who, by the way, have you ever heard of John McIntyre?

I have.

I have not.

Apparently, he's a trick shot quarterback.

Which is what I, if I'm the president, that's what I'm looking for.

Dude, perfect, man.

He's got a gig.

He can probably need to.

I know.

So, you know, I have no idea why he was escorted, but for a personal assistant to be escorted on security issues is pretty significant.

Yeah, I mean, could it be tied to the whole controversy that's been going on with the temporary versus permanent security clearances?

Maybe, but for a personal secretary or a personal assistant, that would be kind of a strange line to draw.

I mean, you can keep other people in the administration on temporary security clearances.

You wouldn't be asked.

Read that again.

Sure, I'd love to.

President Trump's personal assistant, John McEtee, escorted out of the White House.

It also says in here that it was such a fast situation they had to send somebody in for his jacket.

Yeah, there's something I know.

Strange.

The cause of the firing was an unspecified security issue.

Yeah.

Yeah.

You had to leave so fast that

you forgot your jacket?

Yes.

McEntee was removed from the White House grounds without being allowed to collect his belongings he left without his jacket yeah something bad happened there

glenn back

mercury

You're listening to the Glenn Beck program.

So the news today is that Trump has has fired Tillerson.

And

Rex Tillerson is now coming out and saying the quote is, I don't know why I was fired.

I never talked to the president.

I'm sure Rex knows why he was fired.

And

I'm guessing that, and the president just did a press conference a second ago as he's getting ready to go on a Marine One.

And he sounded very presidential in it.

He gave Rex Tillerson all kinds of, you know, kudos and support and said,

I admire him.

I think he did a great job.

We just had different views on things.

He mentioned specifically the Iran deal,

saying that Tillerson wanted to keep it in place.

He wanted to blow it up.

And I think there's a, I mean, I don't think Tillerson was terrible, but I think there's optimism that Pompeo will actually be better at that job.

Well, Pompeo, the thing I do like about Pompeo is that he has been outspoken on Russia, and Russia is a big, big threat.

And the president went on on to say that he's going to speak to Teresa May this afternoon.

He said, my understanding is, is that they believe that Russia was behind this chemical weapons attack on UK soil.

He said,

and if that's what they tell me, I would take that finding as fact.

He said, but I will speak to her this afternoon.

And if that is true, we will, of course, condemn Russia for it.

That's good.

That's a very good way of looking at that.

It'll be interesting to see what the pushback is because they keep promising, and we do this all the time, every country does this all the time, serious consequences if X, Y, or Z and the next Y or Z happens, and the serious consequences are just that you say yet again there will be serious consequences in the future.

I mean, if you had a chemical weapons attack on your soil, regardless if it was some operative from another country that was targeted, I would think you actually would make sure there were serious consequences.

I mean, can you imagine if 21

American

red line

chemical attack on your soil?

I know.

But what I'm saying, though, is, can you imagine that happening on our soil?

Yeah, I can.

But when the president says it's a red line and then you do nothing, things get worse.

So Teresa May has to be really careful and

the NATO countries have to be really careful.

What are you prepared to do?

Now, I didn't think they would say anything because I didn't think anybody is prepared to actually go to war with Russia.

And I don't think that they want war with Russia.

I don't think that's on the immediate horizon, but this is a step towards it, depending on what they do.

If it's a slap across the wrist,

then we go back to normal and he continues to kill people

on UK soil.

We have Jason, and Jason is our

head of of national security.

He watches this for us and has been watching Russia now for the last five or six years with me.

What do you think?

What are the options here, Jason?

Very limited, and the Kremlin knows that, which is kind of infuriating because I think that, I mean, just the fact that they use this nerve agent over there was really the equivalent of, you know,

Putin signing his signature to it, you know, putting in the acronym LOL, you know, and then cracking up because he knows that there's not a lot we can do.

The minor things we could do, like, so this is called the very low end.

Theresa May and Boris Johnson, their foreign minister, could say, okay, fine, we're going to react like we did with Lit Venenko, who was another spy that was, that Russia took out on UK soil.

They could do that, and they just expelled a few Russian ambassadors or a few Russian diplomats and pretty much called it a day.

It was very minor slap on the wrist.

Big difference in this case, though, is that 21 UK citizens were hospitalized.

A lot bigger blowout, a lot more collateral collateral damage.

It didn't happen in the Led Veninko case.

And the language that Theresa May is using kind of sounds like you could make the case that they're trying to set up Article 5.

Yeah.

Now,

she's calling it an illegal attack,

an illegal attack on UK soil.

No, she said it's an unlawful use of force and

weapons-grade

nerve agent, which is an act against the UK.

Those are your exact words.

Those are scary words because you definitely could, and you know that they're coordinating and reaching out to other NATO members.

I would almost call them Secretary of State Tillerson.

Former Secretary of State Tillerson said yesterday that, okay, yeah, it was obvious that Russia did this and a response is incoming.

So you know they're talking to each other.

So it must be a collective NATO thing at this point.

The question is, how far are they going to go?

Now, the second option would be that they go a little bit more strict.

They go a little more hardcore.

Let's say the rest of NATO bands together, and it's a collective action against Russia, and they all decide to significantly downsize their diplomatic embassies and consulates all over

everywhere they have inside of a NATO country.

The extreme end would be they just boot out the Russian ambassador altogether and say, find us another ambassador.

That would be huge because it would be mutually a sheer destruction because the Russians would do the exact same thing, and we'd be at the lowest of low.

I can't, I don't think even during the Cold War, when relations between NATO and Russia would have been that low,

that would get scary.

That's only the Russian ambassador to the UK, or are you saying the Russian ambassadors to all NATO countries?

Well,

that is what I that would I'm saying to all NATO countries.

Yeah, okay.

If they do do an Article 5, that would be how they respond, not militarily, but more like a diplomatic Article 5.

Now, let me ask you this.

How does this play

into the hands of

people that they are funding

with the world national conservative movement where they are funding people like Golden Dawn and Jobbix in Hungary and

in France and all over, these nationalist neo-Nazi kind of groups that love Russia now?

How is this going to play?

You know,

it really is all connected.

You know, the more chaotic Western Europe and the United States is, the more that their job is basically just to make people doubt their governments.

The more that these people will say, look, look, this is, you'll probably hear this word a lot, russophobia.

You'll probably hear that a lot.

And it'll be coming from those far-right groups.

You'll hear that from the alt-right here in the United States, russophobia, rusophobia, rusophobia.

And you'll hear that all over the identitarian

far-right groups over in Europe.

But the scary part is that a lot of these groups, especially not so much here in the United States, thankfully, but CPAC is starting to change that.

But a lot of those groups in Europe have a strong foothold in mainstream government.

So

they hold significant seats.

So they'll start using their influence to try and change things.

And

are we seeing actual funding going to any of these groups, Jason, or is it mainly advice, counsel, and social media support?

No funding, and we'll never see funding.

I mean, that's just the way that, you know, it's

what Russia calls cutouts.

They've been doing the same thing since the Soviet Union.

It's very, very difficult to actually attach.

So what you like, for instance, when they did find the funding that went to the Front National, the far, you know, the Marine Le Pen's group in France, that was through a bank that is in Moscow that was basically a cutout, and it had random ties that eventually led back to the Kremlin.

But it's so like wishy-washy, it provides easy, plausible deniability.

The World National Conservative Movement, which was a conglomeration of all these far-right groups in Europe, again, the perfect cutout.

But again, the people that started that were from the Russian Rodina Party, who had

their leader at the time, is now the deputy vice premier or president or whatever, or whatever they have.

He's like deputy prime minister.

That's what it was, yeah.

Who was right there under Putin?

So you,

all these people are connected, and they all had their tentacles into mainstream government.

It's just they're very, very good at concealing it.

Yeah.

Well, not concealing it, but making sure you can't prove it.

That's true.

And that's what makes this chemical weapon so interesting is

you don't have to work hard to prove it.

This is the only place

that that chemical nerve agent was made is in the Soviet Union or Russia.

The ultimate autograph.

He autographed this and then laughed and knew that we couldn't do anything.

And just another quick point, Glenn.

It's been two, so the Brits figured this out in what, three, four days?

What happened to,

it's been 14 days.

It's been two weeks since the attack on the military base base on where our Marines got hospitalized.

We still haven't been told the chemical agent that we use, that was used.

We haven't been told if there's any leads.

Why?

Why?

Are the British that much better at investigating than we are?

Same type of thing.

They're speculating it was a nerve agent that attacked our U.S.

Marines 14 days ago.

They won't tell us a thing.

I just reached out to them again this morning to get confirmation.

They won't tell us.

What's going on?

False flag.

Interesting.

Thank you, Jason.

Keep following those stories for us, will you?

We have a quick statement from the State Department.

It's an odd day today, Glenn.

This is attributable to the Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy from the State Department.

The Secretary, Tillerson, had every intention of staying because of the critical progress made in national security.

He will miss his colleagues at the Department of State and the foreign ministers that he's worked with throughout the world.

The Secretary did not speak to the President and is unaware of the reason.

This is an on-the-record statement from the State Department.

He's grateful for the opportunity.

Wait, wait, this is not a this is a

this is not a reporter calling somebody in the State Department.

This is an actual statement from the State Department.

It's an official statement from the State Department.

Yes, on-the-record statement.

What the hell does that mean?

This is not something leaked from someone who, like Taylor said.

This is an on-the-record statement from the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy, if I may say, at least currently, he is the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy.

That may not be.

No, let's check check back

in an hour.

What the hell do you think that means?

I mean, he's clearly saying that this, I mean, signaling that this was not handled the way that the other people in the State Department are happy with,

and obviously also saying that it was a surprise to Tillerson.

Now, there's reporting all over the place that they had, you know, Trump said that they had been talking about this for a while, which had been widely reported.

Also, that

Trump had been, been or the tillerson had been asked to leave on friday um however this makes it seem like it was a much more of a surprise you know i just don't i wish i trusted the state department but i don't i don't trust the state department at all uh and they may be you know they may be uh afraid of the cia director uh coming in i i don't know we'll just take it for what it's worth nothing at this point

all right let me tell you about blinds.com.

I want to thank them so much for their sponsorship of this program over the many, many years.

But Blinds.com is a sponsor of this program, and I am proud to be a spokesperson for them because they are the best at what they do.

You know, the blinds, the shades, the shutters, the drapes, everything that they do is top-notch, and their customer service is unparalleled.

Blinds.com

is having a special, and I think it ends, when is it?

Is it tomorrow?

I think.

Let me look here.

March 14th.

Is that today?

That's tomorrow.

It's today the 13th.

Yeah, tomorrow.

So tomorrow is the last day.

You can save up to 20% site-wide when you go to blinds.com.

If you've been thinking about doing any kind of work on your house at all, the least expensive, most, the biggest impact and least expense is changing the window coverings.

So whether you need blind shade, shutters, or drapes, the people who will do it for you and do it right, and you're going to save a buttload of money is blinds.com/slash Beck.

Go there now, you get 20% off site-wide.

Blinds.com/slash Beck.

Rules and restrictions to apply.

Glenn Beck Mercury.

Glenn, back.

Notice you won't talk about the real story today.

I don't even know what the real story is today.

There have been three pretty big bombs dropped in my lap in the last 30 to 45 minutes.

Let's talk about Rex Tillerson.

Let's talk about Russia's chemical attack.

You want to talk about anything real?

What am I missing here, Stu?

Well, there's a new report that's a posthumous memoir from her former husband.

Judy Garland may have been sexually harassed by the Munchkins on the Wizard of Oz set.

Oh, my God.

Oh, I can't.

They would make...

I can't know.

I don't think I'm strong enough.

I don't think I'm strong enough to handle this.

Really?

They were drunks.

They were drunks.

Said Judy Garland in a 1967 interview with a TV talk show host, Jack Parr.

They put them all in one hotel.

They got smashed every night, and the police had to pick them up in butterfly nets.

You won't talk about this.

I wish I would have

led the hour with this, though.

I really do.

This is the latest step in the Me Too movement.

Apparently, the Munchkins from

the Wizard of Oz were going after Julie Garland.

They're saying, I mean, some of it, they were 40 years old, and they were

making her miserable on set by, quote, putting their hands under her dress.

Those dirty little bastards no one will talk about this because they everyone wants to protect the munchkins everyone is trying to protect them they've known this all the time everyone knew all of Hollywood knew you know who I'd like to talk to today I'd like to talk to that bastard that made the hobbit that's who I'd like to talk to there's a reason he lives in New Zealand

there have been many rumors about the debauchery of the munchkins

really

oh don't act like you don't okay all right so I'm typical of you.

I heard the rumors, but I didn't want to believe.

You definitely don't want to believe this.

They had reported at the time, quote, they had sex orgies in the hotel.

They had to have police on every floor.

This is insane.

There were a lot of them who liked to go out and have a few drinks, but nothing got out of hand, said one of the Munchkins when she was 15.

What would you expect her to get out of the Munchkins?

The Munchkins are going to defend other Munchkins.

That's what happens with Munchkins.

You know, it's like the thin Munchkin line.

Yeah.

You know, they're not going to cross it.

No one's going to cross it.

No one's going to cross it.

I'm just glad finally you allowed this story to be told.

I've been trying to get this story on the air since 1939.

And no one would listen to it.

Who is the source on that?

What news?

This is from the Daily Wire.

From the Daily Wire.

From the Daily Wire.

Well, Ben Shapiro.

I mean, he's got balls.

He is not going to be silent.

I guess not.

Yeah, he's like, damn it.

I'm going to stand for the truth.

It's got to be told.

We applaud his bravery in this matter.

Oh, my gosh.

I mean, oh, by the way, also, Rex Tillerson fired.

Yeah, and the whole Russia thing was a scam.

And

also the chemical attack on U.K.

Yeah, well, that's a different Russia thing.

Yeah.

And then a personal assistant for the president escorted out for a security issue yesterday.

Yeah.

It was so quickly that he wasn't allowed to take any of his stuff, including his jacket.

They had to go back in and get it.

Have you heard about the munchkin?

The munchkin?

Yes, you heard about this.

You heard about it.

Me too, damn it.

Me too.

Glenn, back.

Mercury.

Love.

Courage.

Truth.

Glenn,

A serial bomber is terrorizing the residents of Austin, Texas.

Three package bomb explosions have killed two people and injured three others.

The first package exploded March 2nd, killing a 39-year-old man.

The second and third packages both exploded yesterday, killing a 17-year-old boy and wounding two women.

A boy went out to his

front porch, picked a package up, brought it into the kitchen with his mom.

It blew up, killing him.

The second package exploded just a few hours later, about five miles from the site of the first.

This time it was a 75-year-old woman.

She stepped outside, picked up a package, and it exploded on her porch.

She survived, but she is in critical condition.

Police don't know if the victims are specifically being targeted yet.

However, the stepfather of the man killed on March 2nd is close friends with the grandfather of the 17-year-old killed in the first explosion yesterday.

Both men, one a retired pastor, the other a dentist, are well known in the black community.

Police are not ruling out this as a potential hate crime.

The two victims have been black and one was Hispanic.

Austin's interim police chief told the media that police see similarities among the three explosions.

They believe they are related.

Austin police are warning residents, don't touch any suspicious packages.

How many times do you come home and there's packages on your doorstep?

You don't even know what it is.

I mean, you're getting so many, at least we are because of Amazon.

We get so many things from Amazon that I don't know what the hell it is.

Oh, it's soap.

Oh, it's a bomb.

So far, police have not released any information about the suspects or the motivation.

They do not believe the attacks are tied to the South by Southwest Music and Media Conference that is going on now in Austin.

Investigators also don't believe the packages were delivered by the post office or other delivery services.

They appear to have been left on people's doorsteps overnight.

Our governor, great governor of the great state of Texas, Governor Greg Abbott, announced $15,000 reward for any information leading to an arrest.

And we keep our fingers crossed that we saw the last two yesterday.

The explosions are tragic.

The FBI will catch the vicious murderer behind them.

In light of the other recent tragedy that has dominated the national conversation, it's apparent in this case that packages are just as dangerous.

But you'll notice nobody's really covering this one.

And nobody's saying we have to do something.

Packages are killing people.

It's not the package,

it's the person behind the package.

It's Tuesday, March 13th.

You're listening to the Glenn Beck program.

You know, if you saw the movie The Darkest Hour with Winston Churchill, about Winston Churchill, you didn't really realize

how

much trouble England was in with the Nazis.

I mean, I have always known it was bad.

I didn't realize it was days before a collapse.

And the British people stood and they stood their ground and they didn't act like the French, who just kind of ran away.

They stood against all odds.

And in 1942,

things started to really turn around, and the British routed Rommel's forces in North Africa, drove the Nazis out of Egypt.

And it was a huge turning point, but it was nowhere even close to the end.

The darkest days were still ahead.

And Winston Churchill

stood

in front of colleagues at London's mansion house,

and he talked about the rat or the rout,

and he broke the news to the British people, and he said this:

Ah, this is not the end.

It is not even the beginning of the end,

but it is perhaps the end of the beginning.

The end of the beginning.

I want to talk to you about the end of the beginning here.

We have always found a way to

butcher each other.

We have always found a way to devalue people.

We talk about the sins of America all the time.

African Americans enslaved,

the Chinese, the Irish.

If you're different,

but it's not an American thing.

It's a human thing.

It happens all the time.

And

the more we make it into stories just to get each other elected or get somebody to lose,

or quite frankly, as Hillary Clinton did in India yesterday in a shameful way, calling Americans racist and sexist, the more we...

The more we try to make this into a tool instead of something that we we should learn from.

We're going to continue to slide down a hill.

In 1973, the Supreme Court made the devaluation of human life a protected law.

The beginning

of the end of life.

Roe v.

Wade.

Most people see the legalization of abortion as the ultimate endgame, but it really isn't.

One side sees it as a huge victory.

The other side says it's a huge defeat.

But it is really

Act II out of a three-act play.

Act one saw the rise of the eugenicists after the turn of the century, and those eugenicists were here in America.

We taught Germany after Germany taught us.

They taught us about better living through science.

And then we taught them about sterilization.

We taught them about let's get rid of let's get rid of the undesirables.

That is the real birth of planned parenthood.

In fact, it was the West, it was George Bernard Shaw, that was the one who came up with the idea of the gas chamber.

You know, a humane way to rid yourself of undesirables.

The audio of George Bernard Shaw, the beloved playwright.

He spoke and said,

I just, I think we should line people up and ask them.

Can you explain and justify yourself?

But there are an extraordinary number of people whom I want to kill.

Not in any unkind or personal spirit, but it must be evident to all of you, you must all know half a dozen people at least, who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth.

And I think it would be a good thing

to make everybody come before a properly appointed board,

just as he might come before the income tax commissioners, and say every five years or every seven years, just put him there and say, sir or madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence?

If you can't justify your existence, if you're not pulling your weight in the social boat, if you're not producing as much as you consume, or perhaps a little more, then

clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive.

How is George Bernard Shaw still a hero in this world?

I know at least half a dozen people that we ought to kill.

He's not joking.

He's serious.

It was this group of people that Margaret Sanger was with, and Margaret Sanger that saw sterilization and abortion as a way to achieve a master race.

Now, that's what the Nazis did.

But we've changed the word murder now in America to choice.

I read an op-ed in the Washington Post over the weekend, and it just won't leave me alone.

Margaret Sanger led her crusade on what she called, quote, the rising stream of the unfit.

Now, who

was unfit?

Well, many times that was meant as as the African Americans.

She was a horrible, horrible racist.

79% of Planned Parenthood's abortion clinics now are in black or Hispanic communities.

36% of all abortions in the U.S.

were performed on African Americans, and yet they only make up 13% of the population.

It's worse with Hispanics.

21% of all abortions are performed on Hispanics, and they only make up 7% of the population.

If Margaret Sanger were alive today, she would cheer at this.

But it wasn't just immigrants.

It wasn't just people who weren't white.

It was also, and I quote, the feeble-minded idiots and morons.

Surely you know half a dozen

feeble-minded or idiots or morons.

So, in the Washington Post article over the weekend,

one of the editors

admitted that people with Down syndrome live happy and fulfilled lives.

But four paragraphs later, she says, most children with Down syndrome have mild to moderate cognitive impairment.

Down syndrome is a life-altering situation for the entire family.

It's limited capacity for independent living and financial security.

So, if I can translate,

someone with Down syndrome is a burden on the wallet.

Somebody who is consuming more than they can make, or perhaps a little less.

And the new shocking justification for murder is the expense on the family and the government is a cause to end the life.

This is breaking out all over the world.

Last night on television, I showed you just a horrific television scene that is brand new that came out from the Dutch National Institute for Public Health.

And they're explaining to a man with Down syndrome how much he costs society.

And he is comprehending,

but I don't know if he's comprehending that they're talking about you should be liquidated.

And he says, I I didn't realize I was costing so much money.

Then they ask the expert, who else is a drain on society like him?

With him standing there?

Well, the elderly.

This is the same argument that is made by Ruth Marcus in the Post.

North Dakota, Ohio, Indiana, Louisiana, and Utah have proposed legislation to stop Down syndrome abortions.

But legal groups are already gearing up to invoke Roe v.

Wade and crush it, and they'll be able to do it.

But does life have any value?

When life has no value,

it's more than just the unborn that become expendable.

And who are we going to wipe out next?

By the way, they're saying that

they're going to cure Down syndrome.

No, you're not curing it.

You're just killing all of them.

Hitler didn't...

wasn't curing

Judaism.

He was killing all of the Jews.

Who should we go next?

How about the autistic?

How about the autistic?

Who's next on our list?

How about those who are, you know, we just talked about this just the other day, that maybe Christians should start really taking something on.

And maybe we should go in and become foster parents.

All of us as Christians, all churches should start to really push being a foster parent because there are all these kids in foster parent, waiting waiting for foster parents and aren't getting homes.

So they're in the group homes.

And if they grow up without a good foster parent,

they're destined for a life of crime.

Why don't we just kill all of them?

I want to play Frank Stevens.

He has Down syndrome.

He lectures at universities.

He's spoken at the White House.

And this is audio of him speaking in front of Congress about the value of his life.

Listen.

And members

of

the committee,

just so

there is no confusion.

Let me say that I am not

a research scientist.

However, no one knows more about life with Down syndrome than than I do.

Whatever

you learn

today,

please remember this.

I am a man with Down syndrome and my life is worth living.

Forget the part of my life is worth living.

What he uttered were the same words that Martin Luther King uttered, the same exact words that broke the back of slavery.

I am

a man.

You know, the Germans started executing those with Down syndrome in 1939.

Hitler made a case that it was compassionate.

And he executed the first baby that was born deformed in 1939.

And then they marched into Poland, and he used that as the time to exterminate all the undesirables.

And so he did.

He started a program, and it was in the hospitals, but the people of Germany, the same people that voted for Adolf Hitler, found it so offensive that they rose up in 1941

and caused the government to claim, at least, that they would not do it anymore because they found it abhorrent.

At least the Nazis were trying their evil scheme to make a master race.

We're just aborting kids because it's going to be hard.

That's the thing.

I didn't want that as a parent.

I wanted something fun.

I wanted something easier than that.

It's going to be hard.

I think if we let this stand, we are on the road

of outdoing even those who voted for Adolf Hitler.

Simply Safe is a home security company that is just this great company.

I've watched them grow from 10 employees now to the home security company that is protecting over 2 million people.

And they've just released a brand new home security system.

It's the all-new Simply Safe.

The system has been completely rebuilt and redesigned, and they've added new safeguards to protect against power outages, downed Wi-Fi, cut landlines, bats, hammers, you name it.

The all-new Simply Safe, redesigned to be practically invisible.

This is the remarkable part.

They have done all of this work.

They spent years rebuilding this system, and they've added so much, but you still get it at the same fair and honest price: 24-7 protection for $15 a month.

And there is no contract.

It's smaller, faster, stronger than anything they've built before, but supply is limited.

So visit simplysafebeck.com now to order.

That's simply safebeck.com.

Protect your home and your family at simply safebeck.com.

Glenn Beck Mercury.

Glenn Beck.

I'd love to hear from you

on this issue.

I'm hoping that I'm not the only one kept awake by this

story from the Washington Post and this growing disturbing trend.

The New York Times even took offense to now something that is being called

creating singletons.

And what that is, is killing the twin, the perfectly healthy twin, because you don't want twins.

And so if you have twins, you go in and you have to choose which one do you want?

Sophie's choice.

It's just like that.

Isn't that great?

You have to choose which child dies and which one lives, but you're not killing them.

You're just creating a simpleton.

You're a simpleton.

That's it.

They're just a

simpleton?

Back in a second.

Glenn back.

Mercury.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

Buck Sexton, a good friend of ours, and a guy who served as a CIA officer in the Counterterrorism Center, the Office of Iraq Analysis, tours of duty as an intelligence officer in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He also has briefed senior U.S.

officials, including the President of the United States, and also served as New York Police Department Intelligence Division working on counterterrorism issues.

We welcome Bu Sexton, who is way overqualified to be on this program.

How are you, Buck?

Glenn, great to be with you.

Thank you for having me.

You're welcome.

So,

I forgot to add one thing.

Also, now heard on over 100 stations across the country in the Buck Sexton's show, and you can hear him on the Blaze radio network as well.

And we're thrilled to have you.

So, let's just kind of tick down a couple of things that have broken.

And it broke during the show, so I wasn't able to really wrap my arms around all of this.

Rex Tillerson is leaving, and it's kind of a crucial thing.

At this time, we have two things happening: possible meeting in North Korea with the president.

Also, Teresa May said yesterday, giving Russia 36 hours to explain this use of a nerve agent that has taken down 21 people in the U.K.

And if you don't have a good explanation, we're going to look at this as unlawful action against the U.K.

Tell me, first of all, what it means to lose Rex Tillerson.

I think that part of what the official explanation has been so far is true.

And I think that part of it is just personal.

So I'll start with the part of it that has to do with policy, because I think that's what people

are.

Yeah, that's what people actually care about.

And we can dispense with the other one pretty quickly.

But first off, on North Korea, you need to make sure that you've got somebody who is on board with the vision that the President has here for this negotiation, which is a huge risk, Glenn.

And there's no question that sitting down with Kim Jong-un could have negative diplomatic ramifications, but I would just say that up to this point, we've had multiple administrations try to stop the North Korean nuclear and missile program, and they've all failed.

They haven't even really done much to pause it for any meaningful length of time.

So something different has to be done, and a disruption to the continuum of North Korean negotiation and failure has to occur.

And so Trump is, whether you think it's a Hail Mary or you think this is a strategic brilliance or whatever it may be, he needs somebody who's on board.

I don't think he believed that Tillerson fit into that category.

On Russia, Glenn, I know people are pointing this out because the timing, given that you just had what was almost certainly Russian poisoning, Russian agents poisoning a former Russian intelligence officer and his daughter, and Theresa May has come out, as you pointed out, and this is a major diplomatic and international kerfuffle.

But Pompeo is no slouch on calling out Russia either.

So I think that is less of a factor than it may seem at first.

Pompeo was on the Sunday shows actually just 48 hours ago, really taking it to Russia.

So I don't think that is what happened here.

And then just real quickly, Glenn, because folks know about this, but yeah, on a personal level, I think it really bothers Trump that he heard that Tillerson, his Secretary of State, called him a moron.

And I think with Trump and in Trump's world, that matters a whole lot.

Oh, I think it does too.

Yeah, I don't think anybody wants an underling calling you, if you're in charge,

in the public,

a moron.

I think that was foolish of Tillerson

and not helpful at all.

Go ahead, Glenn.

Bucky, this is Stu.

Hi, how are you?

I hope you're doing well.

Get hearing from you.

You mentioned this briefly, and I wanted to see if it fair to say that Pompeo is one of the harshest people on Russia in the administration.

It's an interesting choice.

I think it is fair to say that.

And that's been a good idea.

That's a good thing.

Yeah, that's been clear for a long time.

Mike Pompeo is first and foremost a patriot.

I can tell you the people that I know from inside and outside of government say he's the real deal, and he really cares about what's going on, and he cares about the country first and foremost.

He's not a Trumpist or a Trumper or a Trump bot or any of that stuff.

He takes his job with deadly seriousness, which he should because of what he's been dealing with as CIA director and will be dealing with, particularly going into these North Korea nuclear negotiations as Secretary of State.

So yes, Stu, there's no question that if you were trying to do this for some reason to appease Russia, Pompeo would be the worst choice that you could come up with from within the administration.

And despite what everyone says, there are a lot of people who want these jobs.

So it's not like he has to pick

the nearest name that he knows.

The Pompeo choice, I think, is a strong one.

Trump gets along with them, and they're aligned on policy, and that really matters.

And we all want them to be aligned on North Korea.

This is one where partisanship should really go by the wayside because Stu, if they don't figure this thing out, I really worry that the only two options become learning to live with the North Korea with nukes that can hit America and more and more nukes that can hit America over time or a military strike, which is honestly pretty terrifying.

So

that was the main concern from Tillerson is you've got to expand every other option before you go to a sit-down with the president of the United States.

However, I think we've pretty much done that over the years.

I mean,

I'm willing to do this, but people have to understand that once that meeting is over, if nothing is solved, we either live with it or we go to war.

I don't see a third option, Glenn.

I think that that's why at this point,

it's also tough to look at what's being said.

And you feel this whiplash because originally it was Trump is the warmonger.

His tweets are going to force a nuclear exchange with North Korea.

This is terrible.

And now it's, whoa, what's with Trump doing all this crazy diplomacy all of a sudden?

Right, right.

You know, the shift shift has happened really quickly.

It does seem to happen quickly.

It does.

Fuck,

you mentioned this too.

Because a lot of people, I think, look at this and say, hey, look, we've had this multi-decade issue with North Korea.

Why not go and just talk to the guy and see what happens?

What is the negative of that?

What happens if this doesn't go right?

Well, I think that the negatives are honestly a little overstated.

And people keep saying, and I've seen the most common criticism level against this, other than by people who just have a form of Trump derangement syndrome and they think that Kim Jong-un was part of the conspiracy with Russia or something.

I mean, there's crazy stuff.

But from the realistic objection side, they're saying that this confers a degree of legitimacy on a regime that deserves nothing of the sort.

And I completely agree with that.

However,

you've got a couple of differences here.

We don't really have time on our side.

You know, because of the failures of the previous, which have really been pretty consistent policies by different administrations leading up to this, but only a few have only a few presidents have had to deal with the possibility of a nuclear North Korea.

And that is failure so far.

I mean, the outreach and the diplomatic efforts have failed.

So that Trump would shift from a failed strategy doesn't really surprise me.

And sitting down with Kim Jong-un and giving him more legitimacy, well, what's he going to do then?

Fire more missiles and advance his nuke program?

Yeah, I mean, already doing that.

Yeah, I think giving him credibility or,

you know, a world stage.

No, the nukes did that.

The nukes did that.

We're only meeting with him because he has nuclear-tipped missiles.

That's what gave him credibility to be on the world stage, unfortunately.

Let me just ask you real quick.

The president said today he's going to be, he's flying out to California to look at the wall.

And he said, Teresa May is going to be calling me this afternoon.

What are the options on the table

as you see it?

Her language yesterday, I don't know if you saw it, but her language

was very legalistic in ways and almost sounded like a setup for Article 5.

What do you think the options are?

You mean the response that the British Prime Minister is going to have to the poisoning of

two people, two civilians on British soil?

Glenn, I think that there'll be

strong

21 civilians.

I mean, there are people in the hospital that are still in critical condition.

Right.

Well,

it's intentionally trying to get two, and then the other one.

Yeah, this is I I think that it's going to be very rhetorically strong, but look,

we have limited options beyond economic and diplomatic

diplomatic versions of going after the Russians at this point.

We already have sanctions in place.

You could see the expulsion of diplomats.

I think, Glenn, that's the most likely scenario,

you know, which is from the diplomats world,

that's when everyone gets a bit huffy and upset.

I mean, that's a big deal.

But really thinking through it beyond that, I don't see a response that will be much more robust.

And I think the Russians knew that, and that's why the Russians, I mean, Glenn, what they did was reckless and open.

It's not the first time they've done this.

I know.

I know.

I know.

And it was a chemical agent.

It's a weapon of mass destruction.

This is what the red line was over in Syria.

And they brought it into the country, and they brought one that only is made in the former Soviet Union, so everybody knew exactly who did it.

I'm just wondering if she's going to be looking for

a unified NATO response that could go just beyond them kicking people out, but asking us to kick people out or take some additional economic sanctions.

Well, I don't think the Europeans, and there's a whole other complicated discussion of why, including how Germany gets very cold in winter and needs a lot lot of natural gas, which happens to come to it from Russia.

I don't think that there's going to be a response that's as unified as we'd like it to be on this one.

You mentioned the nerve agent.

They think it's Novichok.

So this is very clearly, this is the equivalent of leaving WMD fingerprints, in a sense, on an assassination attempt.

And it is terrible, and it's showing how brazen the Russians are willing to be.

But Klein, you look at the toolbox that we have and what we've done in the past, we've already put sanctions on Russia to get them to stop what they're doing in Ukraine.

We've already tried the diplomatic and economic approach.

And the truth is, we don't really have a will or a desire for a military approach of any kind, and the Russians know that.

And that's why they'll have agents smear Novichok, which is more deadly than VX gas, people say, on some person in a park in Britain.

So let me ask you one last question.

As a former CIA agent,

how dead is the Russian agent that I think screwed this this up?

I don't think it was the intent to put 21 other people in the hospital.

Is that guy

hiding someplace and not long for the world?

Well, the message was from Putin that if you betray us, we're going to get you.

And I think that message is actually received, Glenn.

There's a long history of the Russians doing this.

In fact, stretching all the way back to

Rice and tipped assassination with an umbrella.

That was back in the KGB era.

This is not new.

The Russians want everyone to know that there's an extra-territorial score settling.

I mean, this is a global ⁇ Russia operates as a mafia state, and it does so even outside of its own borders.

So the message is sent and received, I think, from folks who might either be defectors, speak out against the Russian regime, betray Putin and the Kremlin.

And I think that the sloppier and the more terrifying the chemical, the better the message is from their perspective.

So the fact that you're mentioning these additional casualties, that just shows what the Russians are willing to do to send a message.

And I don't think they have much in the way of regrets, Glenn, at least not at the Kremlin at the top reaches.

Buck, thank you.

All right, you need somebody great at your office, in your business.

You need somebody who really gets it and can drop in and really get to work.

Well, there's a great way to find them, and you need a better way than just posting your job online and praying for the right people to see it, and it is ZipRecruiter.

They have found a smarter way to find the right job candidate.

ZipRecruiter learns what you're looking for.

It identifies the people with the right experience, and then it goes out after posting your job on all 100 different websites.

It goes out and it looks for the people that are qualified, then sends invitations to those people.

That's why 80% of employers who post a job on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate through the site in the first day.

Yeah, something that happened today, I guess, if someone was looking for a job, Mike Pompeo popped up, and there you go.

And he was highlighting everything.

He was highlighted in everything.

He's the guy for the job.

You just never know.

They highlight the strongest applicants so you'll receive a great match and you never miss it.

Find out today why ZipRecruiter has been used by businesses of all sizes and apparently

other places too.

I didn't know that, Stu.

Right now, you can post your job on ZipRecruiter for free.

Just go to ziprecruiter.com/slash back.

Try it for free.

ziprecruiter.com slash back.

Glenn Back Mercury.

Glenn back.

Paul in Michigan.

Hello, Paul.

Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.

Good morning.

How are you, sir?

How can I help you?

I'm doing well.

Long time listener, man.

I'm a huge fan of your show.

Thank you.

But I got to say, after today, I'm even more of a fan

hearing you touch on the subject of Down syndrome.

Got to admit, it kind of brought a tear to my eye this morning,

you know, to hear you talk about how there's people out there that are for abortions with Down syndrome pregnancies.

And the other thing that brought a tear to my eye is really just hearing that there's people in influential positions such as yourself that actually care enough to touch on the subjects.

I'm a 39-year-old father of a 15-year-old boy with Down syndrome.

And

people just, I don't think they have any clue what capabilities these kids, these adults have.

And I really want to say, call to say thank you for,

you know, hitting on the subject this morning.

It

resonates with me.

You're welcome, Paul.

It's a shame that you feel like you have to call to say thank you.

I mean, to me, it is,

we are going down a very dangerous road to where we're saying now

people who clearly have quality of life,

clearly

are

functioning and are good and decent in society, and

if I may say, is imaged as the most gentle of lambs, that we are a society that is willing to say, yeah, let's get rid of all of them.

If we say that to those with Down syndrome, good heavens, who won't we say that about?

Exactly.

God bless you, Paul.

Thank you so much.

Let me go to Thad.

And do I have time?

Thad, real quick?

Hello?

Can you hear me?

Yes, I've got about a minute.

Go ahead.

Okay, hi.

I have a 26-year-old son with Down syndrome, and he has the same dreams.

He wants to go to college.

He has the same, he has a part-time job.

He wants to live alone.

He wants a family.

He wants ambition.

He has love.

He has emotion.

All the same things.

And he has an added benefit.

He has Down syndrome.

And I love every day of his life.

So those people who challenge that, to me, are just totally misinformed and idiots.

Thanks.

Thanks, Dad.

I appreciate it.

I honestly tell you, this has kept me awake over the last few nights, and I don't know how to help.

I've reached out to some organizations.

One of them, you know, and justifiably so, I guess, they don't want to get political.

I don't either.

I just want to help.

And I don't know how to help.

But

this torch has been litten,

has been lit, and I am moving forward in any way.

You have any suggestions on how I can help?

Please let me know.

Glenn, back.

Mercury.

Love.

Courage.

Truth.

Glenn Beck.

Hillary Clinton was in India yesterday, and she was giving a talk, and she lamented that

the United States voters are starting to, if you're white, are starting to pull away from the Democrats.

And she blamed that on all kinds of things.

Except she didn't perhaps blame it on the fact that many Americans in the center of the country are tired of being called racist and bigots and xenophobes and everything else.

Here's what she said yesterday in India about the election.

Look at the map of the United States.

There's all that red in the middle where Trump won.

I win the coasts.

I win Illinois and Minnesota, places like that.

But what the map doesn't show you

is that I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's gross domestic product.

So I won the places that

are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward.

And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards.

You know, you didn't like black people getting rights.

You don't like women, you know, getting jobs.

You don't want to, you know, see that Indian American succeeding more than you are.

Whatever your problem is,

I'm going to solve it.

So it was a symptom, but it was also a cause because having someone run for president who voices those

ideas, who rejects so much of the American story and our values, was also the underlying cause as well.

This is tragically sad that we have somebody like Hillary Clinton, anybody who would say this, left or right, to a massive global audience,

to the biggest free market outside of the united states is

tragically sad that's not who we are

i don't know people who have a problem with black people getting rights or women getting jobs

the reason why the democrats are losing the the regular person in the center of the country is because you continue to call us racist, sexist, and underachievers, and stupid.

We're not.

We're not.

Just because your voters live in Los Angeles and Silicon Valley doesn't make them better than the people in the center of the country.

We have different lifestyles.

We have different educational backgrounds.

We have different wants.

But we all are human.

We all have certain basic, inalienable rights.

Those who are running for president, those who want to serve as president of the United States, and those who are serving as president of the United States, please stop this.

Please be president of every citizen of the United States.

It's Tuesday, March 13th.

You're listening to the Glenn Beck program.

Have you ever heard the phrase, saved by a miracle?

It is going to take on an entirely different meaning to you.

And in a story that

is not miraculous, it's just somebody doing the right thing.

Sacramento.

Customer service agent with American Airlines.

Her name is Denise Miracle.

It was a normal Thursday,

Thursday afternoon.

Two girls come to her counter.

They're going to check in on a flight.

And immediately she started to have a feeling something's not right here.

Denise is joining us now.

Hello, Denise.

Hi, Mr.

Beck.

How are you?

I'm very good.

So glad to have you on.

Thank you for telling this story, and thank you for what you did.

Can you tell us that Thursday afternoon, these two kids come walking up and what do you see and what starts to happen?

Like you said, it was regular Thursday, but these two young girls come up and tell me that they want to check in for their flight and I said, oh, okay, let me see your ID.

And they kind of looked at each other and they said, oh, well, we don't have an ID.

And I thought, oh, okay.

I said, well, what about your school ID?

Because school had just started in our area, and most campuses here, you can't even, you can't be on campus without an ID.

IDs are pretty important.

It allows them to know who belongs on campus.

Yeah.

How old were these kids?

The young girl was 15.

She had just turned 15.

The other one was 17.

Okay.

And so they looked at each other and then they said, well, we don't have our school ID either.

and I just thought oh well okay that's kind of weird

and I'm kind of looking around you know for a parent you know is a parent standing off to the side allowing them to check in

and I said well

how do I know it's you how do I know this is your ticket you know

and one of the young girls, she had her phone in her hand and she put her phone up and she said,

look, you know, this is my Facebook account.

And I thought to myself,

not a legal form of ID.

Yeah, not real valid.

Right.

And the other the younger girl, she grabbed her phone and said, oh, look, look,

I have an Instagram account.

And I just thought, wow, this is, you know, this just isn't, this isn't good.

So

I said, you know, where's your mom?

And one of the girls said,

they know we're going.

She knows we're going.

And I just thought, well, that's

really what I asked.

I'm kind of looking around.

Like, you know, is a mom in the bathroom?

Is the mom coming in?

You know, like, she just parked the car and she's coming in.

And

there's no one with these young girls.

And they have a bunch of little bags, little tote bags, book bags.

They don't have a proper carry-on.

They don't have a proper check bag.

And usually when young people are traveling, you know, parents will bring them in.

And even if they're they're going by themselves, you know, maybe the parent's going to stand off to the side and, you know, let them

check in.

Yeah, as a parent, you stand off to the side freaking out.

Yeah, so I know that.

I've done it.

Yeah, but you have to let them grow and do their thing.

So again, I'm kind of looking around.

There's no parent.

And I just thought, oh, this is kind of weird.

So I said, well, hang on a minute.

And I went into the back behind the ticket counter and I spoke to the supervisor.

And I said, yeah, I've got two young girls out here.

They've got no ID.

There's nobody with them.

And,

you know, they're trying to check in.

I said, it just doesn't feel right.

Something's going on with these kids.

And my first thought was, maybe they're running away from home.

I kind of thought they're running away.

And

so I talked to the supervisor and she said, you know,

there's not too much you can do.

And I said, you know, I think I'm going to call the sheriff.

I'm just going to have somebody talk to them.

So

meanwhile,

I went out front and I was calling the communication center to see if they could send somebody over.

And another agent came by and said,

I guess someone else had tried to check them in while I was in the back.

And they said, those kids aren't going anywhere.

That ticket is purchased with a stolen credit card.

And

so I was like,

this is not good.

Yeah, there's just alarm bells going off.

Not good, not good.

Nothing of this is good.

So

I called the sheriff.

I called the comm center and I said, hey, you know, I got two girls here trying to get on a plane.

They have no ID.

There's no parent with them.

I said, and it's

the ticket was purchased with a stolen credit card.

I said, can you send somebody over here to talk to them?

And thank goodness,

they responded.

an officer came over and there's a Starbucks kiosk right by our ticket counter so the girls had stepped to the side and were sitting over there I could see them they were sitting there and

the officer came over and started to speak to them and and I would about you know my job I was checking people in and doing my thing but I could see them out of the corner of my eye and there was another officer and another officer and another officer and I thought oh wow something's something's going on

you know

and then um

later when the officer um I mean like an hour later the officer came over and at that point we found out additional information that these girls had

not even met this guy this this gentleman had had

sought them out on the internet by their postings hashtag this hashtag that and had befriended them on the internet with Facebook and Instagram And the older girl apparently had FaceTimed him and she thought she was doing

her due diligence seeing if this guy was real.

And there was a person with a face that was talking to her.

And this person bought them a ticket to go to New York and told them that

he was going to pay them to do something.

And they

were going to make some money and then they would come back home and go back to school and everything would be fine.

And the officer told them, You don't have a ticket home, you have a one-way ticket.

And he said, At that point, the girls kind of

shook them up a little bit.

And they said, You know, well, you know, we wouldn't have done anything we didn't want to do.

And the officer said, You probably wouldn't have had a choice.

You know, and he came, he told me later, he said, Those girls run a one-way ticket to nowhere.

They would be gone, they were never coming back.

Saved by Denise Miracle.

It's amazing

when we just

take the extra time and just go with our gut.

And, well, there's not much you can do.

Some people would have said, yeah, I thought that much I can do.

And you went the extra mile.

Thank you so much, Denise, and thanks for being willing to share it with us.

I appreciate it.

Thank you for having me on.

It's an important message to get across.

And like you said, just that one extra question: where's your mom?

Who's with you?

Thank you.

Thank God you did that.

And before you leave, Denise, if you could perform one more miracle and get me executive platinum, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks, Denise.

I'll put in a good word for you.

Thank you.

God bless.

I was hoping you let her respond to that.

That was the most important part of the interview.

Only Stu knows what I'm thinking right now, and I'm uh

and and and uh I just can't tell you um

I didn't I didn't know exactly how that story ended.

I thought it uh ended a little bit differently than it it did.

Um

and uh

I am telling you uh in the strongest terms possible, you have no idea uh the dangers of what is uh happening to our children online, and you have no idea how close you are

to losing your children to an event just like that.

Please,

please,

you know, get rid of all the phones and stuff in your house for your children, and your iPads, and your game systems, and everything else.

Get rid of them.

But if you won't do that, please,

please hold on to your children.

Our sponsor this half hour is Goldline.

With volatility in the stock market and wild swings in Bitcoin and the constant turmoil in Washington, you may not have known that gold has just come off its best year since 2010 and it is up since, what, mid-November, over $100.

Gold has been a safe haven for centuries, and it performs well in times of volatility.

Well, I don't know, Stu.

How many massive news stories have we had break today?

It's just a dozen.

Yeah.

I mean, it's like, it's crazy how fast the world is moving now.

Do you remember when we were on and we were like, hey, he's trying to overwhelm the system?

Yeah.

Yeah, because with Obama.

Yeah.

And trying to overwhelm the system so you can't keep up.

Oh my gosh, that looks like, you know, play date, you know, compared to today.

It's crazy.

Now, gold isn't an all-in strategy.

It's just

there to help spread the risk.

That's what you do.

You diversify.

And

when something goes down, other things go up.

As

the dollar loses its value, which what was it, Stu?

12% since 2016, the dollar has lost 11% or 12%.

That's extraordinary.

You didn't notice that, did you?

Maybe you did at the grocery store.

Your dollar has lost 11% or 12% of its buying power since 2016.

Gold is a hedge against that stuff.

Please consider Goldline and gold right now.

Goldline is offering $750 in free coins when you purchase $25,000 or more using the Express IRA program.

So look at your IRA and consider diversifying into gold.

Call 866GoldLine.

Call them now.

866Goldline or Goldline.com.

Glenn Back Mercury.

Oh, my God.

Glenn back.

There's yet another, there's another breaking story today.

I, wow, I don't recall a day like this.

We got in, we started the show, and Tillerson was fired.

Then Tillerson was,

then

the State Department came out and said, yeah, he found out about it from Donald Trump's tweet.

And then the State Department responded also saying

he was surprised by it, an official statement, an official statement, which was really quite interesting.

He found out about it through a tweet.

Yeah.

And then

18 minutes later, we find out that the personal aide to the president last night was escorted from the White House by Secret Service

so rapidly that he couldn't take any of his stuff.

And one of the Secret Service guys had to go back in to get his coat.

Not the Secret Service guy's coat, the guy they were escorting.

The personal aide to the president, they had to go get his coat.

One of the first people who joined the campaign with Trump.

He was, you know, a very close associate for a long time.

People, you know, were saying he was the last one of that really close associate.

golf coach after

Hope Hicks left.

Right, but he was a golf coach.

Right, right, right.

I mean, is there...

Yeah, and I know he was...

They described him as a trick-shot quarterback.

Isn't that a golf coach?

No.

A quarterback is nothing to do with the golf club.

My God.

Well, I didn't think of quarterback.

I thought it was more like a coach.

I just, I don't even trick you.

He wouldn't trick shots with.

What?

Are you doing?

You're throwing the football off of the rail?

This is of all the news that's broken today.

What just happened?

Okay, okay.

I'm sorry to make this worse.

I'm sorry to make this worse.

Okay, so anyway, so yeah, he's a

big close associate.

As you described, he leaves and no one knows why.

Initially, they indicate he's going to go.

They're saying, ah, maybe it's a security clearance issue.

We know they've had some issues with that.

And my radar went up because it happened last night, but it was revealed 18 minutes after

they revealed the big news.

And so it looked to me like, hey,

throw this in quick.

Yeah, right.

So now, so initially they were saying, man, he's going to go work for the campaign.

It's no big deal.

Now they are saying he's under investigation for serious financial crimes.

Oh, that's

yeah.

So we don't know exactly what the details are on that.

But I mean, again, that's not Trump's fault, but

it's just another moment of chaos potentially that they have to deal with there.

So there you go.

And by the way, a lot of people are.

How much time do we have, Sarah?

Do we have a minute to play this Pompeo audio?

Okay, yeah, let's play this quickly because a lot of people are saying this is, you know.

Oh, it's about Russia.

He's not going to...

Pompeo,

he was only going after Tillerson because of Russia.

He didn't want to have.

Tillershin was going to go after Russia, and Trump doesn't want anybody to go after Russia.

Because Tillerson said a negative thing about Russia yesterday, and they're trying to tie that in.

They put Pompeo in charge.

Does this guy sound like he's weak on Russia and WikiLeaks?

Listen.

Seek to use that information.

Individuals such as Julian Assange and Edward Snowden seek to use that information to make a name for themselves.

As long as they make a splash, they care nothing about the lives they put at risk or the damage they cause to national security.

Wikileaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service.

It has encouraged its followers to find jobs at the CIA in order to obtain intelligence.

It's time to call out Wikileaks for what it really is, a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia.

In January of this year, our intelligence committee determined that Russian military intelligence, the GRU, had used Wikileaks to release data of U.S.

victims that the GRU had obtained through cyber operations against the Democratic National Committee.

And the report also found that Russia's primary propaganda outlet, RT, has actively collaborated with Wikileaks.

Assange and his ilk make common cause with dictators today.

I mean,

that's stronger language than I've heard from anybody.

Especially Tillerson, he was criticized initially for not being tough on Russia.

The idea that the left is not trying to turn this into a, he's trying to get out of the Russia investigation thing is nonsense.

Pompeo's much tougher on Russia than Tillerson was.

And I thought it was interesting that right off the hip as he was going on to Marine One today, he was asked about Teresa May.

and what Teresa May said about Russia.

And he said, if they come back this afternoon with me and they say it is indeed Russia, I'll take that at face value and there will be consequences and we'll be dealing with Russia too.

So he's not going soft on Russia.

Glenn, back.

Mercury.

Welcome to the program.

Glad you're here.

We welcome welcome Pat Gray, just kind of going over the news of the day.

It's been kind of an active day.

Kind of, yeah.

Yeah.

How exposed do you feel, though, by the way?

I mean, Hillary just summed us up yesterday because

we don't like black people getting rights.

How much have we complained about black people getting rights?

That's been our number one complaint for quite some time.

About women getting jobs.

When did that start?

I hate that.

And obviously, we don't want to see Indian American people succeed.

One of our top priorities is to stop their success.

I feel like she's just looking right through us right now.

She sees us directly into our souls.

She sees directly into our souls.

This is one of the.

In this clip that you're going to hear, she talks about how the Democrats are losing white voters.

Now, play

Hillary White Women voted Trump, please, Sarah.

I should start by explaining that

Democrats,

going back to my husband and even before, but just in recent times, going back to Bill and

our candidates and then President Obama, have been losing the white vote, including white women.

We do not do well with white men, and we don't do well with married white women.

And part of that is

an identification with the Republican Party.

Okay, stop, stop, stop.

Okay, part of that is just this identification with the Republican Party.

It gets worse from here.

Let me ask you the real reason why you think, just off the top of your head, why do you think the Democrats are doing worse and worse with white people?

They continue to have extreme policies that resemble the Communist Party.

You know,

I think we have a problem with that.

I don't know why all Americans don't have a problem with that.

Yeah.

So

it's not only that, just the extremists.

Let's talk

white married women.

You're taking these extreme feminist positions that insult married people and insult married women.

You've assaulted what you used to say was the cornerstone of our democracy, marriage.

You are telling women that it's okay just because you want to to have an abortion, that's those, that just that,

let alone you constantly are telling us how bad white people are.

Why would we vote for you?

Well, and it's identity politics, right?

The way they're pushing these, the policies Pat's discussing is based so often on what color are you?

What minority status do you have?

What protected group are you in?

It's constantly that.

And, you know, so

they're almost not even addressing.

Right.

And only in negatives are they ever addressing

white people.

And again, like, it shouldn't.

And it's not like we feel like we should be singled out and helped.

No,

don't hurt us on purpose.

Right.

And the only time they single us out to help is unions.

And most Americans don't believe in unions anymore.

And here's a great example of what they do say when they discuss white people, is what Hillary is saying to the Indian American, the Indian Indian audience.

So listen to the rest of this.

And

a sort of ongoing pressure.

This is

why white people don't vote.

Really?

Vote the way that your husband, your boss,

your son, whoever believes you should.

And stop.

Stop.

So why is it that married white women don't vote?

Well, because they're too stupid.

They listen to, they just tell what their son even says to you.

Yeah.

Or their boss.

Or their boss.

Whatever white man is around them, they just follow them.

Those cute, that's how weak they are.

Those cute little women, they just don't get it.

How insulting.

How insulting.

How a feminist thing to say.

Good heavens, that's insulting.

That's so insulting.

Condescending, elitist.

But wait, there's more.

What happened in my election is I was on the way to winning

white women until former director of the FBI, Jim Comey, dropped that very ill-advised letter on October the 28th.

And my numbers just went down because all, and I heard a lot of anecdotal evidence about this.

People have written about it.

All of a sudden, you know, white women who were going to to vote for me and frankly standing up to the men in their lives and the men in their workplaces

were being told she's going to jail.

You know, you don't want to vote for her.

You know, it's going to be terrible.

You can't vote for that.

So it just, it stopped my momentum and it decreased my vote

enough because I was.

Stop.

Do you?

How many different excuses have we heard from her?

No, I know.

One after another.

I think she actually has gotten to a place to where she believes this.

I think so too.

Yeah.

And that's why.

Well, she can't accept it the other way.

She can't accept people just don't like her.

Not even Democrats.

Democrats don't even like her.

The vast majority, I think, of them, of Democrats, are kind of disgusted by her.

I think they find that, you know, she might be a weak woman because

she caved into Bill all those years.

I mean, still is.

Yeah, and still is.

And she's corrupt, and they know it.

And it's not white bosses, and it's not, you know, anybody but her that's kept her from visiting Wisconsin.

Right.

You know, it's like you ran a terrible

pain.

Do you remember when she rode around in that van and she was like Scooby-Doo?

And when she's solving mysteries, I do not remember.

Solving mysteries.

She's like, where am I?

This is America.

That's that.

I mean, remember, she was driving around in that van for a while and trying to be one with the people.

And she was just so

not

likable.

She's not likable she's not likable she doesn't like

you know and i don't mean it like i hate you know wisconsin she's just that's not her at all well but she's not at all i don't do you guys have where she talks about uh the fact that she pretty much loathes the white people in middle middle america and these are all the things she thinks about them we we don't like black people getting rights yeah We don't like women getting jobs, and we don't like to see Indian American people succeeding more than we are.

I mean, that's ludicrous.

It's preposterous, but that's what she thinks about us.

She hates Middle America.

I mean,

it is literally just a remix of her deplorables comment.

It is.

It's the exact same thing.

I mean, how many times does she have to say it before it finally sinks in, and we believe it?

She just hates average Americans.

She's an elitist.

She's a snob.

And

if you don't toe the line where when it comes to especially aborting babies on demand, then she doesn't have any time for for you.

You're beneath

you're beneath her to the point where she doesn't even consider you.

Not even human beings anymore.

You know, the amazing thing is

the,

I want to say it's arrogance, but it is the stupidity.

It's the self-imposed stupidity.

that you have to live live under.

Now, she may have, you know, oh, she went to Yale.

So she's not a a stupid woman.

She's in self-imposed ignorance because the more, at least with me, the more I learn, the more I know, I don't know, Jack.

The more I read, the more I learn, the more I say, I don't know.

I got to look at that again.

Let me talk to that person.

Let me talk to this person.

Generally speaking, the people who are ruling us,

they don't think that way anymore.

They're not interested in your opinion.

They don't really like you.

You know,

they're just like, I've got it.

And they're showing it every day.

Yeah, I've got it all worked out.

Me and my friends, we know what's going on.

We had a cocktail party about it the other night.

We wouldn't have a problem with all the riffraff in this country if we just didn't have all the riffraff in this country.

And that's the way kind of we feel.

That's the way it is.

Yeah.

And I think this is something that people feel all over the world.

And again, that's why Donald Trump.

Yes.

Yeah.

That's why.

And that's why Brexit.

And that's why so much of this is happening.

You know,

you look at things like Jobbix over in Hungary, which or the Golden Dawn, which are Nazi parties.

What's the language they're using?

They're identifying and saying, you know, I'm proud to be Hungarian.

I'm proud of my Italian heritage.

And there's nothing wrong with that, is what they're trying to tell the people.

And there isn't.

Right.

Unless you take it to an extreme.

Yes.

There's a difference between being proud of your country and nationalism.

And so nationalism is where it goes wrong.

But they're tapping into this thing that I think most people feel.

Look, I don't have a problem.

I don't have a problem with Canada or Mexico or anything else.

Have you been to Mexico City?

It is a world-class city.

It is great.

It's a great city.

Okay, that's fine.

I have no problem with that.

We're America.

I like being America.

I like being Texas.

We've homogenized all the states except for Texas.

And the only way that it's not homogenized is you go to California and it's just so damn weird.

But you know what?

California, celebrate your weirdness.

If that's who you want to be, you're just roping me into paying for it, which is pissing me off.

But you want to be weird?

Be weird.

I don't care.

I'm tired of everything being the gap and Ann Taylor, no matter where you go in the world.

Oh, wow, we're in Beijing.

Good.

Let's go to the McDonald's, the KFC, grab some jeans at the gap, and honey, you get something at Ann Taylor.

I'm sick of it.

There is something that makes us unique, each of us, and each of our countries.

And you don't have to be a nationalist

to tap into that.

But these elites up at the top just think they know.

They know and they know who you are.

We're not those people.

Yeah, and I think, you know, there's this weird desire by particularly Hillary, but we saw this out of John Kerry as well when he lost.

What are you talking about?

To come up with some excuse to explain to other elites why the Rubes voted the wrong way.

With John Kerry, it was like, oh, well, there were flyers and people were saying that

you had to vote on Tuesday.

I don't remember John Kerry sounding like that or ever saying things like that.

He did.

He did.

He did.

No, he didn't sound like that.

Pat does that.

Go ahead, Pat.

Go ahead.

Come on.

Come on.

It's because people thought they had to vote on Wednesday.

They were told Democrats vote on Wednesday.

That's right.

And he made that excuse after the election.

Hillary Clinton's making a career of it.

She's going to place after place after place, coming up with an excuse.

And it's like, well, you know, you need to adopt as a losing candidate, you need to adopt what you see Tom Brady.

Tom Brady lost the Super Bowl, by the way, to the Philadelphia Eagles.

I don't know if anyone caught that news.

It was their Super Bowl champions.

But he's done several interviews since.

Why didn't you mention that?

Yeah, I think you would.

Yeah, because they're my favorite team and they're Super Bowl champions.

And I got almost a whole year to celebrate it.

But in his interviews afterwards, it's not, oh, this call.

Oh, I mean, my defense sucked.

I mean, they did.

Todd Brady was amazing.

He absolutely could come to the point and say, my defense blew that game.

I threw for 500 yards and I lost.

We didn't punch one time and we lost the game.

What the heck is wrong with the defense?

He doesn't say that.

He says, you know what?

We tried our best, and it really hurts when it's over.

And, you know, because...

And they were just played better than we did.

And they played better than us, and they beat us, us, and we're going to go out and get them next year.

Yeah.

That's that, like, what you can't adopt anything remotely close.

So, here's the here's the bothersome part about this: is, you know, first of all, you're saying this in the country, and okay, you're just playing politics, and you're just dividing, dividing, dividing.

I got it.

I've, I've, we've lived it on both sides.

We got it.

You're doing this in India.

I, I'm, I'm so offended

that she's saying this.

The Indian people don't know us.

They don't know us.

So you have somebody like Hillary Clinton coming over.

You're sitting, if somebody came over and, you know, it was,

you know,

Joe Gandhi coming over here and he lost the last election because he's the 15th cousin, twice removed of the good Gandhi.

He's on the bad Gandhi side of the family.

And he comes over.

We know nothing about him except the name.

And he says, you know what the problem is?

The problem is all these Indians are racist.

We wouldn't know.

Yeah.

And you notice that never happens?

You notice nobody comes to America and badmouths the country they came from?

That never happens.

It only happens the other way around.

I know.

We've got to stop doing this.

This is a new 10-year thing, and we've got to stop doing it.

Pat Gray will be solving all the world's problems, including that one on this episode of Pat Gray Unleashed coming up.

I'd say two episodes.

okay is tomorrow cold fusion or is that today

that's friday friday cold fusion

good pat gray unleashed available on the blaze tv and radio all right you want your home sold you want your home sold on time and for the most money without all sorts of excuses

then i would like to recommend that you do what i would do I would go to realestate agentsitrust.com.

If I sell my house, that's exactly who I'm going to.

We've found, we have a thousand agents all across the country.

These people are fans of the show, which is not just like, hey, are you a fan of the show?

It is, it tells us, it's the beginning hurdle of what are your principles?

You know,

what do you really believe?

How do you treat people?

How do you run your business?

So we want to find out that they share the same sensibilities.

Then we put them through a vetting process.

They're handpicked for their knowledge, their skill, and their track record.

Thousands of families have already put realest agentsitrust.com to the test.

The results have been remarkable.

If you want your home sold, or you want to buy, or you're selling another home for maybe a parent or something, realestate agentsitrust.com will get the job done right quickly.

Realestateagents I trust.com.

Glenn Beck Mercury.

I am right.

You're totally wrong.

I am totally right.

And we're going to have it out on tomorrow's show.

This is one of the worst things that

we're having it out on tomorrow's show.

You're obviously wrong on this.

Stu just came in with MM caramel.

Oh, they're so good.

No.

My favorite car.

No, it's not Minim.

No, it's not an MM.

Yes, it is.

No, it's right on the back.

Right here.

No.

MMs have sold their soul to the devil.

They come out with all of these abomination MMs.

Oh, I want the crispy one.

I want the pretzel MM.

That's not an MM.

Yeah, it is.

That's straight from the bowels of the hell.

So you don't like innovation.

You despise innovation.

You can innovate.

Just call it something else.

It's not MM.

It isn't.

It's a variety of MM.

It's a very similar package, different flavor.

No, they have peanut butter, crispy, cookie, coffee,

mint, dark chocolate, white chocolate, almond.

Almond, red velvet, peanut butter.

We have a coconut pretzel.

This candy company, it's the whore of chocolate now.

They will sleep with any ingredient.

And I don't like it.

What do you think of when they hooked up with candy corns?

For candy corn, white chocolate MMs?

No, first of all, white chocolate.

I am racist.

No white chocolate.

Really?

That is, oh my gosh, that's awful.

It's poison.

It's poison.

Donald Rumsfeld, when he was at the Pentagon, I think started some sort of, and it's poison, white chocolate.

No, it's not.

Yeah, it is.

How about raspberry?

Or

I like all of these, but they're not MM.

Milk chocolate cherry?

No, they're not MM.

What about orange chocolate?

No.

I don't know about that.

That's not MM.

That's a good flavor, but you have to buy one of those orange things that break into a slice.

Then you get the orange.

That's not an MM.

Glenn, back.

Mercury.