Trump's backup options for tariffs

Speaker 1 NPR.

Speaker 1 This is the indicator from Planet Money. I'm Stephen Bassaha.

Speaker 2 And I'm Wayland Wong. You know, Stephen, the Supreme Court math is not looking so good for President Donald Trump's favorite tariff law.

Speaker 1 No, not based on my back of the napkin numbers. And you know, the law behind President Trump's reciprocal tariffs went before the Supreme Court last week.

Speaker 1 And three of the court's conservative justices had pointed questions for the government.

Speaker 1 If just two of them joined the liberal justices against the government, well, that's the end of Trump's favorite tariffs.

Speaker 2 Or is it? At the hearing last week, even the lawyer arguing against the Trump administration, Neil Katial, said there are other options it could use.

Speaker 3 I do think if you ruled, as we're suggesting you do, against the government, they can go and try and seek to use other authorities, whether it's 338, Section 122, etc.

Speaker 2 Etc.

Speaker 1 Etc.

Speaker 2 On today's show, we dig into, etc., some of the other tariff options the Trump administration still has no matter how the Supreme Court decides this case.

Speaker 4 This message comes from AT ⁇ T. America's first network is also its fastest and most reliable.

Speaker 4 Based on Route Metrics, United States Route Score Report 1H 2025, tested with best commercially available smartphones on three national mobile networks across all available network types.

Speaker 4 Your experiences may vary. Root Metrics rankings are not an endorsement of ATT.
When you compare, there's no comparison. ATT.

Speaker 4 This message comes from LinkedIn Ads. One of the hardest parts about B2B marketing is reaching the right audience.
That's why you need LinkedIn ads.

Speaker 4 You can target your buyers by job title, company, role, seniority, and skills. All the professionals you need to reach in one place.
Get a $250 credit on your next campaign so you can try it yourself.

Speaker 4 Just go to linkedin.com slash nprpod. That's linkedin.com slash nprpod.
Terms and conditions apply. Only on LinkedIn ads.

Speaker 2 So if there are so many tariff laws, why did Trump go with this one that's before the court? The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, also known as IEPA.

Speaker 1 The reason is that at least with how the administration is interpreting IEPA, it gives a president everything he wants from tariffs, no congressional oversight, target any country with a quick emergency declaration, rates he can change whenever and to whatever he wants, you know, the everything bagel of tariff laws.

Speaker 2 But the problem is it might not even be a tariff law.

Speaker 5 IEPA does not even mention the word tariffs, and several of the justices pointed this out.

Speaker 2 Phil Magnus is with the Independent Institute, a pro-free market think tank.

Speaker 5 President Trump is the first president in 50 years that IEPA has existed to ever claim a tariff power under it. So we had all his predecessors.

Speaker 5 They enacted tariffs through other clauses of the law that have more rigorous restrictions and procedures you have to abide by. They're much more limited.

Speaker 2 If the Supreme Court rules against using IEPA for tariffs, Trump will likely have to use more limited tariff laws instead. So let's dig into what those options are.

Speaker 2 The first, Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Speaker 1 And hey, the word tariff's actually in this one right there in the name.

Speaker 5 So the tariff act of 1930 is more famously known as the Smoot-Hawley tariff.

Speaker 2 Oh, the Smoot-Hawley tariff. We know all about this one.

Speaker 1 Everyone's favorite.

Speaker 2 Oh, yes, you know it from Ferris Bueller's Day Off, and it is also very notorious.

Speaker 5 Because it

Speaker 5 plunged the United States much more deeply into the Great Depression. It happens right on the heel of the stock market crash.

Speaker 2 Yes, so understandable why Trump might not want to hang his signature economic policy on a law with with Great Depression baggage.

Speaker 1 Yeah. Smoot Hawley also states that the president needs to find that another country is discriminating against U.S.

Speaker 1 commerce, though there's some legal debate about whether they need to prove that first.

Speaker 2 But once you get past all that, the law does allow Trump to set a tariff on that country up to 50%.

Speaker 1 It does seem to give him the power he wants, just maybe not as easily as he would want it.

Speaker 5 Exactly.

Speaker 5 It's the closest to IEPA as a backup option. And Scott Bessant and several people in the administration have pretty openly hinted that they're exploring that use.

Speaker 2 So to sum up Smoot Holly, troubled past, maybe not quite as speedy, but the likely backup pick.

Speaker 1 But it's not Trump's only backup option. Next up is Section 122, and this comes from the Trade Act of 1974.

Speaker 2 This law is untested, but it does appear to let the president use tariffs without needing an investigation first, so it's a quicker tool.

Speaker 1 But it can only be used for 150 days. Any longer it needs Congress's approval.
And that time limit would be a big change from Trump's IIPA tariffs.

Speaker 1 The Congressional Budget Office puts out projections, assuming these tariffs will be in place for 10 years.

Speaker 5 So it's 150 days versus 10 years. It's a very different picture.

Speaker 1 Yeah, and it's limited up to 15%.

Speaker 5 Indeed. So maximum rate, 15%.

Speaker 5 And you compare that with like the Liberation Day schedule had rates going up as high as 50%.

Speaker 5 So this would be much more constrained.

Speaker 1 So that's the speedy option. Likely no specific investigation needed, but limited time, limited size.
And Wayland, I believe that puts us in etc. territory.

Speaker 2 And to help us wade through all this, etc. is Inu Monik.
She's a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations whose stated mission is to inform U.S. engagement with the world.

Speaker 2 Inu tried to wait in line to watch the oral arguments at the Supreme Court in person.

Speaker 6 But it was too cold, and I went back to my office and listened to them on the audio.

Speaker 1 Oh, so you you did from the office you were like kind of cuddled up with a blanket and all that had some popcorn.

Speaker 6 Exactly. I'd rather just be in my office where it's warm and listen there.

Speaker 2 So our next tariff option, Section 232, this comes from the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.

Speaker 6 He actually already used Section 232 in his first term to levy tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.

Speaker 1 Okay, you might have actually caught the important difference here from the other laws, steel and aluminum. This option is all about tariffs on specific goods, not countries.

Speaker 1 Trump's also used it this year to target foreign assembled cars and auto parts. And ENU says Trump's got a lot more in the pipeline.

Speaker 6 So there's pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and so it's really wide-ranging.

Speaker 2 One restriction, though, is that it requires an investigation showing these imports are a threat to national security.

Speaker 1 But one thing it has in common with AIPA is Trump can set these tariffs at whatever rate and for however long he wants.

Speaker 6 There's no restriction on how high the tariff can be. And this is why President Trump has threatened everywhere from 25 to 100% tariffs on a whole range of products.

Speaker 1 Yeah, but he could go up to like 1,000% with this if he wanted to, right?

Speaker 6 Technically, he could. The law is very vague on that.

Speaker 1 Now, there is another important option that any president has when it comes to tariffs. And it is the oldest option.

Speaker 6 I mean, the obvious thing would be to go to Congress, right?

Speaker 2 Go to Congress. This whole debate before the Supreme Court is whether or not the president is overstepping and taking away what's supposed to be Congress's power to tax and regulate foreign commerce.

Speaker 1 During those oral arguments last week, Justice Neil Gorsuch grilled U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer.

Speaker 5 What's the reason to accept the notion that Congress can hand off the power to declare war to the president? Well, we don't contend that. Again, I would say that.
Well, you do.

Speaker 5 You say it's unreviewable. There's no manageable standard, nothing to be done.
And now you're, I think you, tell me if I'm wrong. You backed off that position.

Speaker 5 Maybe that's fair to say. Okay, all right.
That would be an abdication.

Speaker 2 Grisset is really putting the screws to the lawyer there.

Speaker 1 Oh, no, he had the boxing gloves on for this one. Enu says until the 30s, it was Congress setting tariff rates.
And even after that, presidents still often got Congress to sign off.

Speaker 1 So why not just do that?

Speaker 6 Well, the reality is that maybe members of Congress don't want to put these tariffs in place. If you're looking at the views of the American public, the tariffs just aren't that popular.

Speaker 6 And so if the president wants to enact and keep his tariffs in place, he's probably going to have to do that on his own somehow and not have Congress there to support him.

Speaker 2 Whether these alternative tariff laws are needed will come down to the Supreme Court's decision. That could come as early as next month.

Speaker 2 This episode was produced by Julia Ritchie with engineering by Jimmy Keeley. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez.
Kicking Cannon is our show's editor and the indicator is a production of NPR.

Speaker 1 And before we head out, have you ever considered rating us before?

Speaker 1 With the subject line, I guess I like economics, here's what listener Sonomo said about the indicator in a five-star Apple Podcast review. I'm not in the bag for any econ podcast, but I love this one.

Speaker 1 10 minutes for informed takes on relevant topics from hosts that seem to, for real, love this particular kind of nerdery. It works for me.

Speaker 1 It definitely is for real, and we will take kind of nerdy as a compliment. These kind of reviews really help new listeners decide if this show is for them.

Speaker 1 Please help us by leaving a review that tells other people like you why they might like the indicator too.

Speaker 4 They're designed for financial advisors looking to give their clients consistent results year in and year out. See the record at vanguard.com slash audio.
That's vanguard.com slash audio.

Speaker 4 All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation, distributor.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab with its original podcast on investing.

Speaker 4 Each week, you'll get thoughtful, in-depth analysis of both the stock and the bond markets. Listen today and subscribe at schwab.com/slash on investing or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 4 This message comes from NPR sponsor, Capella University. With Capella's FlexPath Learning Format, you can set your own deadlines and learn on your schedule.

Speaker 4 A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu.