Why the US chose not to have a passenger train system like Europe

N-P-R.

This is the indicator from Planet Money. I'm Waylon Wong.
And I'm Stephen Basaha. And this is one of my favorite sounds.

Chugga, chugga, chugga, chugga. Chuga, chugga, chugga.
That sound specifically, Waylon.

That specific train sound is the new Amtrak line between New Orleans and Mobile, Alabama.

I got to be on that first train ride this summer and looking out the window, you know, at the sparkling Gulf water, the marshlands, I couldn't stop thinking about this nagging question so many Americans have.

Why can't we have more trains like this? In other words, why can't the U.S. be like Europe?

And it's not just Europe, but also countries like Japan and India. They all all have extensive passenger train systems to get from city to city.
On today's show, why the U.S.

chose not to have the same. And we learn why U.S.
railroads could still be worth bragging about.

This message comes from Warpy Parker. Prescription eyewear that's expertly crafted and unexpectedly affordable.

Glasses designed in-house from premium materials starting at just $95, including prescription lenses. Stop by a Warby Parker store near you.

Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones. What does it mean to live a rich life? It means brave first leaps, tearful goodbyes, and everything in between.

With over a hundred years of experience navigating the ups and downs of the market and of life, your Edward Jones financial advisor will be there to help you move ahead with confidence.

Because with all you've done to find your rich, they'll do all they can to help you keep enjoying it. Edward Jones, member SIPC.

This message comes from Greenlight. Parents say financial literacy is the hardest life skill to teach.

Greenlight's debit card and money app for families makes it easy for kids to learn to earn, save, and spend wisely. Start today risk-free at greenlight.com slash npr

Our conductor into the world of railroads today is Alan Zaremski. He teaches classes on railroad engineering at the University of Delaware.

It sounds like you're going to be asking me the classical questions of how come the U.S.

railroad system is not as good as Europe, which is the sort of the classical misunderstanding of what's going on. Misunderstanding? Oh, I look forward to being corrected.

I get that question at the start of every one of my classes. Okay, so imagine I'm that young undergrad sticking his hand up being like,

why can't we have these nice passenger trains like Europe? Let's start off with the fact that the United States has the best freight railroad in the world.

Best freight railroad in the world. That's great news if you're a cargo container full of presents for good little boys and girls.
Or coal for all the bad ones. Oh, yes.

The U.S. has more railroad tracks than any other country, including China, which has extensive rail systems.
But those tracks are almost exclusively used to transport goods, not people.

Why do we have so much freight train traffic and business in the U.S.?

Okay, now we're getting into the underlying basis of your question. Okay, the United States, for a variety of reasons, has chosen to put its emphasis on freight transportation.

Europe has put its emphasis on passenger transportation.

So this was a choice. And one reason for that choice comes down to density.
Europe, by comparison, is packed in with lots of cities not too far apart. The U.S.
is vast and spread out.

A coast-to-coast train ride would just take forever. New York to Los Angeles is 3,000 miles.
Even if you're going at 200 miles an hour. Which our trains are not.

But even if you did have built an investor system, you're still talking about a day and a half to two days. Versus, you know, six hours on a flight.

Yeah, so you could have a multi-day train ride between LA and New York, or you could have freight trains. Or maybe we should call them money trains.
Freight railroads are extremely profitable.

And in fact, if you bought railroad stock, well, take Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett bought the Burlington Northern Santa Fe.
Now, Warren Buffett is no fool. The U.S.

freight train industry as a whole is worth about $80 billion.

That's nowhere near as big as the U.S. banking industry, but it is around the size of the U.S.
baking industry. The baking industry? How many loaves of sourdough can you fit on one freight train?

Anyway, these railroads are also owned by publicly traded companies, and it makes sense these businesses would pick the more profitable option.

But you know, couldn't they just share the railroads, passenger and freight trains, kumbaya, taking turns? The answer is yes, we can, but there's an inherent conflict. Okay, so not much kumbaya.

Like, take that Amtrak line between Mobile and New Orleans. Passenger trains stopped running between those cities because Hurricane Katrina damaged the tracks 20 years ago.

And it's taken until this summer to come back.

That's because during those past two decades, Amtrak spent a lot of time fighting and negotiating with railroad owners who said it would hurt their freight business.

You can't run as many freight trains as you can, which means railroads suddenly are losing money. You were telling me, though, that these freight trains are so profitable.

And yeah, they might lose some money if a passenger train is sharing the tracks. But is it really that much money that they're losing when they're making so much money, like you're saying? Okay,

now now you're getting into a classical

socialist versus capitalist argument.

I don't think I'm making a socialist argument here. Yeah,

what the railroads would say is it's our duty to our stockholders to maximize our profit.

What you're saying is that there's a societal benefit by you allowing to route the passenger trains. It has some value.
And how do you reconcile that?

Now, it is worth mentioning that pretty much every version of transportation in the U.S. is subsidized from cars to flying.

Yeah, and you don't hear many people tossing this socialism label at interstates. The U.S.
and state and local governments all spent just over $300 billion on highways in 2022 alone.

And when it comes to trains, there is some sharing of the tracks. Pretty much every Amtrak train is riding on private railroads.

And if you're one of those private railroad companies, one or two passenger trains on the line each day isn't that big of a deal.

But if you want to run a true passenger rail system, okay, like they do in Europe, which means you want to run a couple of trains an hour, you want a train running every half hour, then now you're not talking about two trains a day.

Now you're talking about 20 to 30 trains a day. And all of a sudden, you're talking about cutting the freight capacity maybe in half.
Okay, whole different option. Why not just build new railroads?

Leave the freight trains alone on their tracks. And while we're at it, let's make them high-speed rails too.
California has been trying to do that for nearly 20 years to connect San Francisco and LA.

But it's been bogged down with political issues like where the train should and shouldn't cut through and stop. Alan says there's also another serious challenge here.

One of the problems with California high-speed rail is that it's turned out to be much more expensive than anybody expected it to be.

Yeah, the California project was forecast in 2008 to cost $33 billion.

Last year, it was estimated to cost nearly four four times more, according to the Fresno B. So, summing all that up, it's a lot of reasons passenger trains just aren't as common in the U.S.

compared with Europe or Asia. U.S.
cities are far apart. Passenger rail is just expensive, and it would just slow down the money-making freight trains.

When you tell that young undergraduate with their hand up with the Europe versus U.S.

question about passenger train, and you give them all this, do they lower their hand and say, Thank you so much, Professor? My eyes have been opened. I understand.

they lower it and say we still need passenger trains we understand it's a business it's not it's not a simple issue

i'm i'm i'm not saying we don't need the passenger trains in fact alan would like more passenger trains he just doesn't agree with the simple idea that europe has great trains while the u.s has a lousy railroad system

where does that leave us the corridor approach the corridor approach a train corridor is a simple stretch of railroad connecting a few large metros, ideally not too far from each other.

We actually have a very successful passenger rail system in the Northeast Corridor, Washington, New York to Boston.

If you want to travel between Washington, New York, and Boston, you travel. The majority of the people still travel by train.
It's an efficient, effective system.

More than three-quarters of a million people ride part of the Northeast Corridor every day. And the project company Brightline is building a corridor between Las Vegas and Southern California.

The company already launched a South Florida line back in 2018. It's just not exactly profitable, at least not yet.
But Allen says passenger trains are almost never profitable, not even in Europe.

Those trains are supported by taxpayer dollars. So if the U.S.
really does want a big passenger train network, it has to be willing to pay for it.

This episode was produced by Angel Carreras with engineering by Sina Lafredo. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez.
Kay Kincannon is our show's editor, and the indicator is production of NPR.

This message comes from Vanguard. Capturing value in the bond market is not easy.

That's why Vanguard offers a suite of over 80 institutional quality bond funds, actively managed by a 200-person global team of sector specialists, analysts, and traders.

They're designed for financial advisors looking to give their clients consistent results year in and and year out. See the record at vanguard.com slash audio.
That's vanguard.com slash audio.

All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation distributor.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab with its original podcast on investing.

Each week, hosts Lizanne Saunders, Schwab's chief investment strategist, and Kathy Jones, Schwab's chief fixed income strategist, along with their guests, analyze economic developments and bring context to conversations around stocks, fixed income, the economy, and more.

Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com/slash on investing or wherever you get your podcasts.