Kaitlan Collins Is Not “Nasty”; She’s Just Doing Her Job

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible, financial geniuses, monetary magicians.
These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds. Visit Progressive.com to see if you could save.
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary.
Not available in all states or situations. Introducing Instagram teen accounts.

A new way to keep your teen safer as they grow.

Like making sure they always have their seatbelt on.

Alright, buckle up. Good job.

New Instagram teen accounts.

Automatic protections for who can contact your teen

and the content they can see.

Listener supported.

WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour.
I'm Claire Malone. I'm a staff writer and I cover politics and the media business.
David Remnick is off this week.

When I talk to longtime journalists about Donald Trump, I sometimes hear a kind of astonishment about how American politics changed so much so quickly.

You're probably familiar with what I'm talking about.

Even 10 years into Trump's emergence in national politics, we are shocked that a president could threaten to annex Canada, for example, or blame DEI for a plane crash. Trump is not outside the box, to use the old phrase.
He blew up the box. And it's instinctive for people who have covered politics for a long time to point out how far afield he's gone.
Not to mention, it's also part of our job. Caitlin Collins was only a couple years out of college when she became White House correspondent for The Daily Caller, the news and opinion site co-founded by Tucker Carlson.

Professionally, she's pretty much only known the feverish Trump media environment.

Collins went over to CNN during Trump's first term, and she's returned to the White House for

his second term. Now, Trump, of course, disdains CNN, and he's not a big fan of Caitlin Collins.
Can I ask you a question? No, not CNN, please. Go ahead.
The White House has not responded to these ballots. I told you.
CNN is fake news. Don't talk to me.
Go ahead, please. But he says he was retaliated against...
He called her nasty, and at one point, she was barred from a press conference. We've never had a White House so openly hostile to the press as we do now, and how journalists can actually report in this environment is something I want to talk about with Caitlin Collins.
We spoke last week. So Caitlin, you've said before that you have to get up before the tweets.
And I'm kind of curious, you have essentially two jobs. What are all of the things that you're reading first thing in the morning to help you prep for a day at the White House? There's just so much to look through with Trump because he doesn't really sleep that much.
You know, you wake up to a Truth Social post from him about how he's voiding all the pardons that President Biden issued. I do look at Truth Social as one of my first stops just to see what he has said.
Then I'll look at my email. CNN gets a ton of overnight email because we have so many international alerts.
But the benefit of being on TV until 10 p.m. Eastern is, you know, there's not a ton that I miss overnight anymore.
Like before there used to be, but because I work so late that I don't really miss that much, if that makes sense. Yeah, I was going to ask you what the biggest difference is, reporting-wise, between the first Trump administration and the second Trump administration.
A lot of the staff is actually quite similar. There's massive changes in the staff, but a lot of the core staff around him are the same people that have been around him for the last four years.
Trump himself, though, is unchanged in the sense of his schedule and how he operates. And so I think if you've covered it round one, it's not that it's any less chaotic or less busy, but you're just kind of more adjusted to it.
Doing the chief White House correspondent job and doing my show, knock on wood, has not actually been that much of a stretch for me because they're so intertwined. But I think it's because I know how Trump operates.
And, you know, he doesn't really do much in the morning. Maybe he'll be posting, but he's not doing a lot of meetings or press conferences or anything.
And then in the afternoons, it can be quite busy. And you could be going in there for a 45-minute press conference, and you've really got to be paying attention to what's the headline here.
So there's so much that's different, but so much that it is incredibly similar to round one. The White House briefing room in general, the back and forths, like, you know, an interaction between you and Carolyn Levitt became, you know, a New York Post story, right? You know, an exchange between CNN's Caitlin Collins and Carolyn Levitt.
There is a confrontational edge to how she interacts with you, interacts with other reporters. Here's a clip from the other day.
That would propose perhaps criminal or illegal behavior if staff members were signing the president of the United States autograph without his consent. But was he aware of his signature being used on every single pardon? That's a question you should ask the Biden White House.
Is there any evidence on that, that he wasn't aware of it? You're a reporter. You should find out.

Sean.

I'm curious how you think about strategically handling that kind of frision between you and the White House press secretary. If you watch the interaction, it's not as sensational as the New York Post makes it seem.
I think they just do that for clicks. Two, I think that there's a job to do for each of us in terms of her job is to spin for her boss.
I mean, people will disagree if you're the press secretary, what your role is. But as a Trump spokesperson, that is your job.
And my job is to ask questions and get answers. And there's always a natural tension between the press secretary for anyone and the press that covers them.
And Trump watches these briefings really closely. He handed Caroline Levitt, had someone pass her a note in the middle of a briefing the other day and asked her to highlight a poll.
And that was while she was out at the podium. And so that was notable.
But I think the third thing is, and this has always been my mantra kind of since round one, it's not about me. Like if you let them make it about you, I think you're losing.
And so whenever I'm in there, I'm not trying to get in an argument or engage in some kind of fight. You know, I'm going to ask my questions and I'm going to be persistent.
And so I think that's always important to remember is that, you know, it's not about you. But I'm curious if from first term to second term, the, I guess, the social media trickle down feels at all different when it comes back to you, right? The way that those clips are aggregated out.
Does that tangibly feel different to you? Like being on Twitter is a vastly different environment than it was when I was covering Trump eight years ago. And eight years ago, I found it to be more useful in terms of disagreement and engagement.
That's not the case anymore, really. It's certainly much more shifted to the right.
And so certainly the response I see on there is way different now than it was eight years ago. I know everyone says this, but it truly is not the real world because I'll see one narrative on there and then I'll be out living my life and talking to sources or random people in the airport and, you know, just anywhere.
And it's a completely different view and lens. It's really remarkable, actually.
So I use Twitter and Blue Sky, and it's really interesting to, and Blue Sky, you know, leans left, I think, right? So it's really interesting to toggle between those two apps and just see how certain stories are being digested by— And then you're on Threads, and it's like a different planet. Threads is about, like, middle school teachers being like, let me tell you a story about the worst student I ever had, and it's— Or it's like tips on cooking or something.
I know. It's like, there's so many, there's such different social media environments, but you do see how people can have their beliefs reinforced so easily by going online and choosing, you know, their platform.
My dad will see things on Facebook about me and then call me to ask if it's true sometimes.

It's, you know, it's just so funny.

My dad's like, I saw this.

And, you know, it just shows you that people can choose their own narratives.

Yeah.

Do you think the majority of Americans have an accurate understanding of politics based on the news they consume?

I can see completely different worldviews of something. The Zelensky meeting is a really good example.
I was in the Oval Office for that because CNN was the pool that day. And we knew it would be tense.
We knew it would be noteworthy. We had no idea that it was going to be like that.
In that room, a pin could have dropped and no one was saying a word except the three of them. And then hearing how other people saw it, either people who were on the left or not in touch with the news or on the right, it was remarkable just to see how people's views of it were from what they saw on social media, in the news, in the headlines, and whatnot.
The White House press pool and the way It's changed, obviously, the White House is now deciding who can travel with the pool. How has that changed how press briefings are, how even just like being in the pool is? What happened for people who aren't in the weeds on this is the White House took over the White House Correspondents Association, which is its own independent entity's responsibilities of determining the pool and the rotation every day, which is who's in it for TV, who's in it for radio, who's in it for print.
And the point of the pool is just that, you know, 30 reporters can't go with the president wherever he goes. What's different, though, is they're adding people in.
And so you'll go in and there are people from right-leaning broadcast

or outlets that are included in addition to the regular pool. The main difference, and one that I disagree with, is blocking the Associated Press from being part of that pool.
Typically, they would go in every single day with the wires, and they have not let them in. And as they're in their court fight, the AP is suing.
Trump changes the name of the Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America. They did not identify that.
And my question, as I asked at the briefing when this all happened, was it's retaliatory in nature. We reserve the right to decide who gets to go into the Oval Office.
And you all have credentials to be here, including the Associated Press, who is in this briefing room today. But isn't it retaliatory in nature, is the argument, because the reason that the AP was barred, which they said was because they're not using the phrase Gulf of America, they're using Gulf of Mexico in line with their standards.
And so the question here is, is this setting a precedent that this White House will retaliate against reporters who don't use the language that you guys believe reporters should use? And how does that align with the First Amendment commitment that you were just talking about? I was in the briefing yesterday, and the Associated Press reporter who was in there got a question. And so they're not, it's not a complete block on them.
The question is really whether or not the White House has changed since then, where they now control the pool, that is the question here in terms of whether or not they are ultimately successful here. And you've been pretty involved with that organization, right? The WHCA.
I was the president, technically. Okay, you were.
It is a serious organization, and they don't play favorites. And when I ran for president, you run, it's a three-year term.
You know, I had to run a really competitive race. And what you do as part of that race that actually was really beneficial to me was you have to call hundreds of members of the WHCA and solicit their views, get their feedback.
What do they not like? What do they like? It's a real race. I have like a newfound respect for politicians, which I don't generally say after running it because it was really difficult.
And so this would have been my year to be the president. I moved to New York for two years, and so I had to relinquish the role, unfortunately.
But the WHCA is not playing favorites or not blocking certain outlets. They just take it really seriously because the jobs of being in the pool are very serious.
You could be in the pool on a day like 9-11. You could be in the pool on a day that there's an attempted assassination.
I mean, these are not, and a lot of the days it's boring and you're just kind of hanging out in a van, but you have to be ready for those moments and you have to be ready to deliver for the rest of the press corps and the American people in that front. And so it's an incredibly serious position.
It's not just you're getting time in the Oval Office. It has very serious responsibilities to it.
You know, I love the White House press corps. I feel like professionally, I grew up with them because I've been part of it since I was 25 years old.
And I just, you know, I see how hard those people work and how they really are just trying to get answers and do their jobs. And so, you know, I have just a huge respect and appreciation for all of them.
Interviews for print and for broadcast are so different. The modes of them are so different in many ways.
And I'm curious how you think about fact-checking in real time. Is it truly possible or reasonable to expect that you can fact check everything someone says in your interview on air? You have to fact check.
And I think you have to do it in a way that doesn't derail your interview. What do they typically say? Is it true? And how can we correct whatever it is, but also continue with the interview? And so we want to make sure that it's going in the direction that we thought about and that we think is the best use of our viewers' time.
If someone I know is going to say something, because a lot of times politicians say the same thing over and over again, and I'll try to either correct it and press them on it if they've never been pressed on it, or if it's something that's obviously false, but is them kind of deflecting because they don't answer the question that I did ask, we'll correct it and then return to the question. But you're dealing with this and it's happening in real time.
You don't always know what they're going to say. And you've got a compressed timeframe.
You know, you don't have 20 or 30 minutes. Sometimes I go a little longer than my team would like.
They're telling me to wrap and I just keep going. But I think you have to do it because some people are watching and they don't know that that's not true.
And you've got to correct that and make sure that you're adhering to that. You know, you hosted a CNN town hall with Trump during his reelection campaign.
This was in 2023. And there's a moment when he calls you a nasty person.
The question that investigators have, I think, is why you held on to those documents when you knew the federal government was seeking them and then had given you a subpoena to return them. Are you ready? Are you ready? Can I talk? Yeah, what's the answer? Do you mind? I would like for you to answer the question.
Okay, it's very simple to answer. That's why I asked it.
It's very simple to, you're a nasty person, I'll tell you.

I'm curious for your reaction in that moment, both as a person that's happening to you, and also as a person who's hosting a live television program. Trump had not done a real interview with a non-friendly outlet, I don't think since he had left office and and so on camera.
I think he'd done a lot of book interviews, but he hadn't done anything like that. And so people had not seen Trump in a while.
And I think also the Republican audience, it was Republican and Republican-leaning independents in New Hampshire, they were really friendly and receptive to him. I think that was actually really prescient because he went on to win the nomination and then the election.
And we saw the numbers of that. And so I actually thought it was a really useful night because it was kind of a glimpse, if you were paying attention then, into what was to come.
We asked him about January 6th and classified documents, two subjects that I knew he did not want to talk about. it's kind of one of those moments where the question is more important and not letting yourself get, you know, turned off from what you're trying to ask or distracted.
And so that was my intent going into it. And I really didn't have a personal reaction to it.
It was just, okay, he's not answering the question, was really the thought going through my mind. I'm curious for your take on what the best way for TV outlets, TV news outlets to cover Trump.
Do we still not have a clear answer a decade later? I think we've gotten a lot better, actually, at covering Trump. When I was preparing for that town hall, I watched maybe five or six town halls that Trump did in 2016.
I watched a bunch of interviews that he did when he was in office in his first term. And if you go back and watch those town halls or those early interviews, the tone is so different and the approach is so different.
And I think part of it was a lot of people did not take him seriously and did not believe that he had the political power that we now, you know, his biggest critics will acknowledge that he has. Talk to any Democrat and they'll acknowledge Trump has the firmest grip on the Republican Party that anyone has had in decades.
I think right now how people are covering his second term in the last eight weeks so far in terms of fact-checking his speeches, how people ask questions, and just how they conduct that. I do think—maybe it's not perfect.
I won't—I would never say that. I think we can always do better.
But I do think that people have gotten much better at covering him. I'm talking with CNN's Caitlin Collins.
We'll come back to her time working for Tucker Carlson at The Daily Caller in just a minute. I'm Claire Malone, and this is The New Yorker Radio Hour.
WNYC Studios is supported by Pulitzer on the Road, the official podcast of the Pulitzer Prizes, now back with its second season.

Each spring, 23 prizes are awarded for distinguished journalism, books, drama, and music. Pulitzer on the Road is bringing conversations with many of those prize winners to you.
In each episode, guests reveal how much labor and risk, heart, and imagination go into creating their work. You'll hear from novelist Jane Ann Phillips, film critic Justin Chang, and columnist Vladimir Karamorza, and so much more.
Season two of Pulitzer on the Road is out now. Listen to Pulitzer on the Road wherever you get your podcasts.
WNYC Studios is supported by the United Nations Refugee Agency. is there to answer these questions and more by rushing them food, shelter, and protection.
You can help. Donate to UNHCR today.
Go to unrefugees.org slash donation to make your gift. WNYC Studios is supported by Quince.
I love the finer things in life, but can I always afford to surround myself with luxury goods? Not until I found Quince I couldn't. Quince has all the things you've longed for at prices you never thought possible.
Gorgeous washable silk pajamas, cool leather jackets, beautiful linens, adorable Mongolian cashmere baby sweaters, and so much more, all at 50 to 80% less than other luxury brands. How do they do it? Well, Quince partners directly with top factories, cutting out the middleman and passing those savings along to us.
And Quince only works with factories that use safe, ethical, and responsible manufacturing practices, along with premium fabrics and finishes. Honestly, my favorite item from Quince? The linen sheets.
I've always loved linen, but I could never justify the cost from other luxury brands. With Quince, I sleep easy.
Give yourself the luxury you deserve with Quince. Go to quince.com slash radio hour for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns.
That's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash radio hour to get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com slash radio hour.
Fox News tries to diffuse the scandal over a journalist invited on a group chat where top White House officials were high-fiving about real-time bombing plans.

Don't you hate when that happens?

You ever try to start a group text?

You're adding people and you accidentally add the wrong person.

All of a sudden, your Aunt Mary knows all your raunchy plans for the bachelor party.

On this week's On the Media from WNYC.

Find On the Media wherever you get your podcasts.

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.

I'm Claire Malone, sitting in today for David Remnick.

I've been speaking with Caitlin Collins.

Collins is the host of CNN's nightly program, The Source,

and she's CNN's chief White House correspondent, too. When Collins was hired at CNN, the news attracted some attention.
She was only 25 at the time, and she had been covering the White House for The Daily Caller, the news and opinion site co-founded by Tucker Carlson. It was described as a conservative answer to The Huffington Post.
You got your start at Tucker Carlson's new site, The Daily Caller. How are you imagining your career at that time? I certainly did not think that it would be where it is now.
Someone actually sent me a picture the other day from like 2016 when we were in The Daily Caller newsroom. And it was just so funny to go back and look at, like, one, I just look so young, but also just to think of all the things that I've reported on and experienced since then and grown so much as a reporter is remarkable to look at.
And it's around this time, eight years ago, that I got my job at CNN. So I'm also kind of more reflective in that sense as well.
But also I was on the campaign trail in 2016 with the Daily Caller and we would go out. Tucker thought it was important for us to go to caucuses and primaries and to kind of see all that stuff up close, which I had never done before.
And so I think I was 24 or 23 at the time. And so that was actually really helpful to me because when I started covering Trump, I had just a better understanding of that orbit around him and the people that were surrounding themselves with him now and what that looked like.
And it actually has been really beneficial to me, I think, as I've been covering him for the last eight years. The right-wing ecosystem in media is in some ways so much more hardcore and hard right than it was 10 years ago.
And Tucker, in particular, I think, exemplifies that. I'm sort of curious what you make of his career arc over the past decade.
Well, on just the right in general, I think they're emboldened by Trump's win. Tucker obviously was running the Daily Caller when I was there.
He worked at Fox, but he didn't have a primetime show and wasn't the king of cable as he became and had TV that the White House felt was must-see television because whatever he was talking about that night in his monologue, Trump would likely be talking about the next day. That's what I heard from senior staff in the White House the last time.
He is someone who has worked at every cable outlet, Fox, CNN, and MSNBC throughout his career, and now is in this moment using his influence in a different way. And I think that is something that I've been watching as well with Trump is his moving away from the traditional, you know, kind of Rupert Murdoch-esque level of influence to the Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, more right-wing podcasters kind of level of influence.
We saw that during the campaign, which I thought was fascinating because I think if Rupert Murdoch had called Trump, as he did this time in 2016, and said, you should pick this person as your vice president, Trump probably would have picked them. But he did that this time and said, you should pick Doug Burgum, I think.
Maybe not explicitly, but this is what we were told. And Trump went with J.D.
Vance. And I just thought that really said a lot about who Trump is listening to and how that landscape shift has even made it into his inner circle.
What was that transition like from explicit right-wing media to, you know, CNN brands itself as neutral. I'm curious what that was like.
I was nervous, less because of the ideology, because I'm not ideological. Like, I've always been a reporter, and that has always been kind of my, like, driving force.
And CNN is also just massive. But so quickly I realized, you know, these people only are interested in what I'm reporting.
They don't care like where I came from. They're like, how can you use that and your sources to bring scoops here and to get reporting and to do a really good live shot? And that was actually really refreshing to me because I was bracing for people to maybe treat me differently when I started at CNN.
And I remember like the announcement, people were like, what? And it just, you know, within weeks of starting at CNN, I realized how helpful it was and that the sheer size of it was big, but also the resources were really helpful. Do you feel like your sourcing relationships with people on the right changed when you got to CNN? No, because I think actually it helped because they felt, you know, from their view, they had someone who kind of understood them.
And a bigger platform. That worked at, well, that worked at CNN.
And maybe they didn't have a lot of relationships with people there. And also in the Trump White House, you know, the front pages of the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Journal, and cable news is like where his attention goes.
And so people would bring stuff to TV reporters because they wanted to get it on TV. You just described yourself as apolitical and you've done it before.
You've said, and I'm quoting here, it's not like I have a point of view of what's right and what's wrong, what I think is bipartisan and doesn't have a political lens to it. And I'm curious, do you really hold no political opinions or do you just avoid them for the sake of objectivity? I'm still a human, obviously.
Like, I have lived experiences and thoughts and views on things, but I don't think that I have strong ideological opinions when I go into a briefing or a press conference on certain things. And what I want to do is here's the reporting.
Here it is. And this is, you know, by apolitical and not biased, that doesn't mean that you're just saying it very mundane and straightforward.
I'm saying here's the context and here's, you know, if you're being bullshitted, here's the answer to that. And you take with that what you will.
You form your own opinion off of that. You're in regular communication with a lot of the same people Trump is.
Your show is called The Source. I think it tips to that nature of reporting.
How do you maintain those relationships, leverage those conversations into something useful to be reported when the administration is so publicly hostile towards media, when there's a little bit of like a sideshow that feeds social media about, you know, bashing reporters. Is it different behind the scenes with people? Certainly, it's a very different operating environment than I think covering Biden or covering any other president, because they're much more in your face and will publicly say whatever.
But I think, you know, as you're approaching that, you know, when you have these personal relationships with people, and a lot of them, again, I've known and reported on for eight years now, my perception is they're much more hostile publicly than they are privately. And I think that speaks to Trump himself.
I mean, he is that way as well. He's, you know, very critical publicly, but if he's doing it off the record or he'll come back to talk to the media, you know, his view is different and his attitude is different.
Now, does that mean they love us and they're telling us everything behind the scenes? No. A lot of what you're doing as a reporter is trying to discern what's real, what's someone trying to knife somebody else, and, you know, what's the most accurate version of events that happened behind closed doors? Trump criticized you for asking why he was blaming DEI for the fatal D.C.
plane crash earlier this year. Don't you think you're getting ahead of the investigation right now? No, I don't think so at all.
I don't think we're the names of the people. You mean the names of the people that are on the plane? You think that's going to make a difference? They are a group of people that have lost their lives.
If you want a list of the names, we can give you that. We'll be giving that very soon.
We're in coordination with American Airlines. We're in coordination very strongly, obviously, with the military.
But I think that's not a very smart question. I'm surprised coming from you.
What do you do when the president or the press secretary tries to make you specifically look biased against him? That collision happened right before my show. And so we were the first show to cover really getting an understanding.
That was when we found out that there were a lot of humans on board and probably none of them were alive. And we stayed on air until 2 a.m.
that morning covering it. I got home, I woke up, and Trump was calling a press conference.
And so, you know, people's bodies were still being pulled out of the river. And a lot of their loved ones that I had been like talking to or texting with, they were still very much in the middle of that.
And so for Trump to come out and immediately start blaming something when the investigation was hours old, I think those are moments where you have to have real clarity as a reporter of like, what are the people watching this feeling and what is important to be called out and kind of say what everyone's thinking. And that was what I thought I did in that moment.
As far as Trump, you know, I think he's someone who seeks the validation of the press as much as he criticizes them publicly. And so, you know, it doesn't really bother me when he gets upset at my question because, you know, our job is to ask the questions.
He can respond however he wants to respond. That is his prerogative.
And it shouldn't influence really what you're asking or how you're asking it, in my view. Many outlets, including CNN, have seen layoffs.
This is a little bit in the same point, but how does CNN stay relevant and how do you stay relevant in a time when, you know, there's a lot of talk about linear television falling apart, let alone with the political environment. How do you think through that changing medium? Yeah, I don't think it's falling apart just yet.
I think people are, their habits and attitudes are changing in terms of how they get their news. When there's a debate, when a war breaks out, when there's a plane crash, when there's something like that, or, you know, federal workers are being fired by the hundreds and thousands, people do tune in and they want to watch that.
But I do think people are changing their habits. And I see this because I have a little brother who's 21, and he watches CNN on his phone, or he'll like see my Instagram videos with my reporting from that day, or my tweets.
And that's how he gets the news. He's not watching the show every single night.
But I think it's like, you know, just meeting people where they are. And I think it's our boss's jobs to figure that out and how we get there.
Luckily, it's not my job. But I don't think that's a bad thing.
I think to adapt is natural. Kaitlin, thank you so much for coming on.
Thank you for having me. You can see Kaitlin Collins weeknights on CNN's The Source.
She's the network's chief White House correspondent. And I'm Claire Malone, a staff writer at The New Yorker.
David Remnick will be back next week. That's The New Yorker Radio Hour for today.
Thanks for joining us. The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker.
Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Louis Mitchell and Jared Paul. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul, and Ursula Sommer.
With guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Michael May,

David Gable, Alex Barish, Victor Guan, and Alejandra Deckett.

The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherena Endowment Fund. Do you know about these stories?

In 1933, Huey Long invented a holiday to prevent a bank from collapsing. In 1960, years before he was assassinated, someone tried to kill JFK with a car bomb.
And in 2014, remember this, there was a whole news cycle about President Obama's tan suit. On the podcast This

Day in Esoteric Political History, we talk about the forgotten stories that may teach us a lot

about the very strange moment we're living in right now. Check it out, This Day in Esoteric

Political History from Radiotopia.