Sam Gold’s “Romeo + Juliet” Is Shakespeare for the Youth

WNYC Studios is supported by CleanMyMac. A cluttered desktop isn't just an eyesore, it wastes mental energy, slows down your Mac, and hampers focus.
Since 2008, CleanMyMac has helped users optimize their devices, and the latest version focuses on comprehensive care, not just cleaning. With CleanMyMac, you'll boost both your Mac's performance and your productivity by easily identifying and removing large, unnecessary files, including cache files.
CleanMyMac finds outdated files that can be safely removed, so there's no need to worry about losing important documents or photos. Decluttering isn't just about speed.
It's about creating an environment that helps you work smarter, not harder. Your Mac will continue to run clutter-free with the Smart Care feature, ensuring your Mac stays in top shape.
With just one click, you can effortlessly free up RAM, manage processes, and even check for malware. Deep clean your Mac, scan for potential threats, and boost your performance all with one click.
Experience CleanMyMac for yourself. Try it for free for seven days and use promo code NEWYORKER to save an additional 20% off on your purchase at CleanMyMac.com.
WNYC Studios is sponsored by Intuit TurboTax. Taxes was feeling stuck trying to squeeze in getting tax help but never having enough time.
Now, Taxes is getting a TurboTax expert who does your taxes from start to finish. While they work on your taxes, you get real-time updates on their progress, and you get the most money back guaranteed.
Get an expert now on TurboTax.com. Only available with TurboTax live full service.
Real-time updates only in iOS mobile app. See guarantee details at turbotax.com slash guarantees.

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.

Do you ever think about switching insurance companies to see if you could save some cash?

Progressive makes it easy to see if you could save when you bundle your home and auto policies.

Try it at progressive.com.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates.

Potential savings will vary.

Not available in all states.

Listener supported. WNYC Studios.
This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.

I'm Vincent Cunningham, a staff writer for The New Yorker. There have been at least 37 different productions of Romeo and Juliet on Broadway, not to mention countless high school productions.
Maybe you were in one. I don't know.
But this new one by the director Sam Gold is kind of a dark, clubby, Gen Z Romeo and Juliet. It's as if the teens from Euphoria decided that they had to do Shakespeare, and this is what they came up with.
The two stars are Rachel Ziegler, who you probably know from the latest movie version of West Side Story, and Kit Conner, who's from the teen Netflix hit Heartstopper. I wanted to talk to Sam Gold partly just because I really admire his work, but also because I always have this question when someone does Romeo and Juliet, and the question is, why now?

Gold has famously directed five of Shakespeare's great tragedies, and it seems that he's kind of working through something about Shakespeare in public, in front of all of us.

So I wanted to understand why Romeo and Juliet, why now,

and how he came up with this totally interesting, totally bonkers production.

How does Sam Gold find his way into the middle of this mess? Like, what makes you decide to do Romeo and Juliet now? I want to think that in this moment, after the pandemic, and after people have had enough years like completely addicted to their phones, that young people are starting to really crave theater. I just was filled with the desire to make something for young people.
And I could see, you know, it was the spring and I was seeing November 5th coming, you know, we have this election. What if I tried to open a play around the election that was gonna sort of put a fire under young people about what's really, really hard about life right now? And I immediately thought of Romeo and Juliet, you know, two households both alike in dignity.
That's the first two lines of the play. It's like we're more the same than we are different.
Yeah. And theater becomes this place where we can come together.
Even if you feel really differently than the person sitting next to you about who you're going to vote for, you breathe that same air. And Romeo and Juliet's a play where Shakespeare is sort of sacrificing these two kids with the idea that maybe the adults would wake up a bit to the ways they're hurting each other unnecessarily.
That's kind of like the thesis of that play. Right.
Well, you know, it's funny that you framed the play in that way, right? And I've always thought of Romeo and Juliet as a play about young people, but not necessarily as one for young people. There were so many, especially young women in the crowd that I went to.
There was certainly like a sort of fan aspect of like, we know these people, we're excited for them. One sort of subtext of the play was, is Kit Conner's triceps are very prominently displayed all play along.
But, you know, it just seemed to have this like very populist feeling where the people in the audience are being interacted with are offering their emotions, their size, their sort of exclamations. What was your theory of audience in making this show? I was like, what if we make a show where that generation of audience member feels spoken to, feels like this is for me, feels like I can come to this, I feel oriented.
And then what you give them is Shakespeare. They want to be there and they want to take in this ritual that really reflects something deep about our society.
And they do. Sort of 18 to 25 is sort of our audience.
And they are laughing at 400-year-old jokes. They are hearing the wit, the poetry, the rhymes, the scansion, the sonnets.
And they are responding to the language. They're not laughing at Kit's triceps.
They're laughing at Shakespeare.

They're really hearing the play.

So that was the goal. It was never to be— I did not mean to denigrate Kit's triceps.
It's not to be cynical. I wanted the world on stage to reflect the world that that generation of audience member experiences in life, which is what Shakespeare did.
Right.

Shakespeare was a populist, and Shakespeare was putting plays on to communicate very directly with his popular audience. The jokes were of the moment.
There's a song referenced in Romeo and Juliet. The nurse's servant, Peter, after everybody thinks Juliet's dead, says to the musicians, because they're always live musicians in a Shakespeare play,

and they sort of break the fourth wall,

and Peter says to the musician that is underscoring the Shakespeare play,

will you play heart's ease,

because my heart is full,

and we need a silly dump to comfort us.

So I use a pop song from this generation's vocabulary, because that's what Shakespeare was doing. He was taking a song everybody knew and making a joke using it to lighten the mood on stage.
And that's what I'm doing. It's not cynical.
It's genuinely trying to do for a young audience now what I firmly believe is what Shakespeare was trying to do with his audience. How sweet, you're the man of the house to me.
I watch you from the window when I see you. The good in you, the good in me.
That's who you are and what I need. You, Sam, you've directed now all five of Shakespeare's tragedies.
Othello, Macbeth, King Lear, Hamlet, and now Romeo and Juliet. Has this been a project for you? Because you've also done, you've worked on Ibsen, you've worked on other things.
But has this Shakespeare sort of visitation for you, do you conceive of it as one project? Yes. And, you know, my sort of mentor coming up was the director, Elizabeth LeCompte.
And the way Liz would work is... From the Worcester Group.
Yes, sorry. The Worcester Group.
What she does is when she gets to the end of a project, she starts the next project sort of from there. Like the set from one project becomes kind of the raw materials to start making the next one.
Like they're all sort of flowing one to the next. On these Shakespeare's, it really goes back to a feeling I had when I was at school.
I went to grad school at Juilliard and there were these really young companies actors. And they, you know, they lived and breathed, you know, 24 hours a day, they were together.
They knew each other so well. They were all having sex with each other and breaking up and getting drunk at night in their dorm rooms and then getting up at seven in the morning to do fitness class.
And, you know, they were like, they were just so in it with each other. You know, that is ensemble.
And when I was at school, I just loved making these plays with these young ensembles. So I've been trying to do that with these Shakespeare's to bring these ensembles together.
And they all, all five of them come from that same place. They all were, I don't know, almost like kind of rough and ready school plays.
Does the makeup of that ensemble, who's in it, what kind of ideas and physicality and everything that they bring, is that something that develops in conjunction with that ensemble? Or do you, as a director, show up with a concept, I want to try this thing, let's see how this works. How does the idea develop? The thing that makes,

I don't know, your Macbeth different than other Macbeths? I'm really inspired by specific actors. So, you know, Gabby Beans came in to audition and all of a sudden it's like Mercutio and the friar.
And, you know, what if Gabby is kind of Shakespeare, kind of the storyteller, kind of like holding it down for us, the MC.

Yeah.

That idea of Gabby as a kind of the emcee of the evening, that's just Gabby. That's me responding to her talent.
We talked already about notions of sort of what is the popular or what is the sort of the broad audience. You mentioned earlier the Worcester Group, which is this downtown New York experimental avant-garde theater company.
Another, I don't want to say benefit that they have, but a particularity is the idea of a small audience that's coming for something that is self-consciously an experiment. Yeah.
And you working this stuff out on Broadway, which is a very different notion of what it means to be a director, very different notion of audience, very different prerogatives. How does it feel to do all the things that you're talking about on Broadway, which is the broadest audience possible? A lot of people falsely sort of label me as like a deconstructionist or something because like they're wearing street clothes.
Does that piss you off when people do that? It does piss me off because, well, it doesn't piss me off, but it's sad that they don't really know what they're saying when they're attributing that to me. I'm not deconstructing these plays.
I'm doing the play. I've done plays where I think Ben Brantley said the playwright was rolling in his grave, which is not the most original piece of criticism.
I think it's a gross misunderstanding of the difference between conventions and authentic engagement in a text.

Just because they're not wearing the frills or whatever does not mean that you have therefore

like sort of desecrated the play.

Yeah, we have conventions, right?

When you're going to go see an Ibsen play, this is what you picture it looking like.

Right.

And those things come, those expectations come from some other successful period of theater

history.

You know, Richard Ayer does enough beautiful Ibsen plays at the Royal National Theater

I don't know. Expectations come from some other successful period of theater history.
You know, Richard Ayer does enough beautiful Ibsen plays at the Royal National Theater in the 90s. And then we think of Ibsen as when we close our eyes, we see some Richard Ayer production.
But it's 40 years later, 30 years later, and that's a convention. It's not like that production was born in the mind of Ibsen.
Exactly.

It has nothing to do with it.

And I'm actually just reading the play and engaging in the play.

And I'm doing a ton of homework on what Elizabethan theater was like, what Elizabethan culture was like, what Elizabethan politics were like.

I'm understanding what's going on in religious battles and political battles of the time.

And then I'm thinking about what the playwright was trying to do vis-a-vis all those things and thinking about our own world and how that play could best affect the audience that doesn't have those politics from 400 years ago has a different set of politics. So, I mean, with Romeo and Juliet, there will be people that think I have the sound too loud.
You know? The sound is loud. It's loud.
It's fun. It's loud in there.
And there will be audience members that say that is too loud. Yeah.
That's fine with me because I have an interest in connecting this text to this specific audience that does not think it's too loud. And I'm willing to hear

the complaints because

I have a sort of risk tolerance

that I think has come from starting

downtown.

That's the director, Sam Gold,

talking about the new Broadway

production of Romeo and Juliet.

We'll be right back in a moment. by Pulitzer on the Road, the official podcast of the Pulitzer Prizes, now back with its second season.
Each spring, 23 prizes are awarded for distinguished journalism, books, drama, and music. Pulitzer on the Road is bringing conversations with many of those prize winners to you.
In each episode, guests reveal how much labor and risk, heart, and imagination go into creating their work. You'll hear from novelist Jane Ann Phillips, film critic Justin Chang, and columnist Vladimir Karamorza, and so much more.
Season two of Pulitzer on the Road is out now. Listen to Pulitzer on the Road wherever you get your podcasts.
WNYC Studios is supported by the United Nations Refugee Agency. This is an especially terrible time to be a refugee, because after fleeing war, violence, and persecution, it seems like the world's capacity for compassion is running short.

And as the numbers of refugees globally reach catastrophic levels, UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, needs your support.

In just 72 hours, your donation will deliver shelter, protection, and food to refugees when they need it most.

Your compassion today will make a life-saving difference. Go to unrefugees.org slash donation to make your gift.
WNYC Studios is supported by Intuit TurboTax. Taxes was getting frustrated by your forms.
Now Taxes is uploading your forms with a snap, and a TurboTax expert will do your taxes for you. One who's backed by the latest tech, which cross-checks millions of data points for absolute accuracy, all of which makes it easy for you to get the most money back guaranteed.
Get an expert now on TurboTax.com. Only available with TurboTax live full service.
See guarantee details at TurboTax.com slash guarantees. WNYC Studios is supported by Quince.

I love the finer things in life, but can I always afford to surround myself with luxury goods?

Not until I found Quince I couldn't.

Quince has all the things you've longed for at prices you never thought possible.

Gorgeous washable silk pajamas, cool leather jackets, beautiful linens,

adorable Mongolian cashmere baby sweaters, and so much more. All at 50 to 80% less than other luxury brands.
How do they do it? Well, Quince partners directly with top factories, cutting out the middleman and passing those savings along to us. And Quince only works with factories that use safe, ethical, and responsible manufacturing practices, along with premium fabrics and finishes.
Honestly, my favorite item from Quince?

The linen sheets. I've always loved linen, but I could never justify the cost from other luxury brands.
With Quince, I sleep easy. Give yourself the luxury you deserve with Quince.
Go to quince.com slash radio hour for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash radio hour to get free shipping and 365 day returns.

quince.com slash radio hour. I'm Vincent Cunningham, a staff writer here at The New Yorker, and I've been talking with the director, Sam Gold, about this latest new production of Romeo and Juliet.
We'll continue our conversation now.

Does staging something in the round

change your whole conception visually as a director?

What is the, just, I've always wondered, yeah.

The reason why I really love it is the proscenium theaters,

the Broadway theaters, they were built in the 19th century

with the idea that there was going to be an actor standing downstage center declaiming. I'm happy to see Ethel Merman stand down center.
Like if I could be taken back in time, I would enjoy going to those shows. It's not that I dislike it.
It's that it's an old convention. And because of technological advances, it doesn't really make sense for every play to be done that way.

A proscenium doesn't really speak to how a contemporary audience will best engage with storytelling live.

And the round is much closer.

You get this sort of over-the-shoulder shot that you're used to in a film.

And you get intimacy that film has given us to actors. Like after the close-up, it's hard to sit at the back of a 1,000-seat, 2,000-seat theater.
And at Circle in the Square, everybody's in a close-up. There are zero bad seats at Circle in the Square.
And so you get that experience because I'm trying to do these plays that I'm saying they're kind of grief rituals, right? We're trying to depict a trauma so that the audience can process their own trauma. That's sort of the basic idea.
And I think they work a lot better when you can have intimacy, when you can feel close to the actors, when you can feel them breathe. So to me, the smaller the theater, the closer you can be to the actors, the more I'm able to do my job.
People are increasingly engrossed in screens. Obviously, film precedes all the problems we think about with smartphones and everything.
But what is the primary relationship between what you do and what shows up on screens in terms of TV and film? I mean, mostly what I'm doing is I'm trying to tell a story live with people and use every tool I can to make it as powerful as possible. And film is now deeply embedded in our psyche.
But like there were all sorts of other kinds of popular entertainments, culture, storytelling that he's engaging with. So I'm just doing what I feel like Shakespeare's doing, you know? You know, wit.
This idea in Elizabethan England, it's like a game, a sport, a thing to do after school. How are we to understand that when they, when Romeo and Mercutio and Benvolio wit as a verb? How do we going to feel the sort of afterschool activity of it the way Shakespeare's society did? And so I'm trying to pull from a toolbox.
And one is film, you know. I kept referencing Quentin Tarantino during the Romeo and Juliet rehearsals.
That's a populist, a populist, adventurous artist, right? There's something about the way Shakespeare works that sort of reminds me a little bit about the way Quentin Tarantino works. They have some things in common about willingness to go from something serious to something funny and back quickly.
So you say like, oh, how am I going to do this? How am I going to go from this super sad moment to this funny moment?

And you think, oh, people aren't going to be able to do that.

They won't be able to ride that wave.

We don't do that anymore.

But then I think, no, we do.

Like in a Tarantino movie, we do.

Right?

So I use film that way. You know, one thing that Shakespeare has in common with, this is not something that I was ever primed to think about, that Shakespeare has in common with Quentin Tarantino is that they are both adept at using the stories of their time.
This is a long way of asking what it was like working with Jeremy Strong, who is like, appears in one of the great stories of our time succession when you worked with him on Enemy of the People. You know, you work with somebody that like like, comes from a world of reference.
Like, this is the guy who played Kendall Roy. Is that something that I'm using with this person? Is it something that I'm trying to strip away? I think I've maybe overemphasized that what we are making will stand alone, and people will just just enter they'll suspend their disbelief and

they will stop seeing kendall roy the second jeremy enters and they will start seeing thomas stockman yeah i don't know that that's always been successful because you can't rip that away from people and and listen theater is too obsessed with celebrity but it's you know it's also saving the theater from Financial Ruin

to be so

obsessed with celebrity and listen

Jeremy Strong was a brilliant actor 20 years before he was in Succession. He and I have done multiple plays together.
We grew up together. We've been friends since college.
I don't think of him as Kendall Roy from Succession at all. That's like very low on my list of references in my mind to the work of Jeremy Strong.
So maybe I underestimated that most people's relationship to Jeremy is much different than mine. And I didn't really think about Kendall Roy.
And maybe I should have. Yeah, no, I was thinking about this as I watched, again, in an amazing way, those young people who are at Romeo and Juliet at the end just like swarming the exits, waiting to receive Rachel and Kit.

And I wondered, what came into my mind is, you know, whether there is any difference, whether there needs to be any difference between sort of the function of the audience as we classically understand it in theater and the new word that we have, which is like fandom, and whether that at all is something that sort of is in the fringes of your consciousness as you make your work. I mean, I don't think it's new at all.
True. Yes, we have made this term.
You know, when Richard Burton was playing Hamlet and Elizabeth Taylor would sit in the balcony to watch, everyone would line up around the fucking block to try to see Liz Taylor. Yeah.
Right? They weren't coming for Richard Burton's Hamlet. They were coming to see Elizabeth Taylor.
Right. And that's always been the case.
And I think it was the case in Shakespeare's time. And there's nothing I'm enjoying more right now than the fact that there's 19-year-old audience members hearing and understanding the poetry of Shakespeare and then being so excited at the end that they want to stand for an hour to meet the person that delivered that language.
and I do think that's part of it. Part of it is that they love Heartstopper.

Part of it is that they're addicted to their phones. But part of it is that the play lit them up.
But I don't think it's a bad thing for the theater that these young people are, I mean, our stage door is crazy. I saw it, dude.
And I don't think that's a bad thing. No, it seemed like a sign of health.
It seems, you know, yeah, like if those people come see another play, people need theater. Yes.
We know we need to get in a room and tell stories. It is not good.
No one thinks, like the Surgeon General is telling you, it is not good to be at home looking at social media all the time. We are in a mental health crisis, teen suicide.
I'm doing a play about teen suicide, right? I'm doing a play

about teen suicide. And all those young people are coming.
And I think we can help them. That can be

good. Well, Sam, thank you so much for these interpretations, this work, and for talking to us.
This is great. Thank you so much.
That's the director, Sam Gold, talking about the latest revival of Romeo and Juliet, which is now playing on Broadway at the Circle in the Square Theater. And that's the New Yorker Radio Hour for today.
I'm Vincent Cunningham, a staff writer at The New Yorker. And by the way, I'm also one of the co-hosts of The New Yorker's weekly culture podcast, Critics at Large.
New episodes drop every Thursday. David Remnick will be back on Friday.
Thanks for listening. The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker.
Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Gar. WNYC Studios is supported by Articulated, a podcast from the Smithsonian's Archives of American Art.
This season, catch up with four trailblazing artists who have gone their own ways to create and chronicle community. From Anita Field's Osage Ceramics and Leo Tanguma's Chicano Murals to Lenore Chin's Communal Document and Pat Steer's bold paintings, you'll hear from legends who continue to push the limits of art.
Available wherever you get your podcasts. My name is Madeline Barron.
I'm a journalist for The New Yorker. I focus on stories where powerful people or institutions are doing something that's harming people or harming someone or something in some way.
And so my job is to report that so exhaustively that we can reveal what's actually going on and present it to the public. You know, for us at In the Dark, we're paying equal attention to the reporting and the storytelling.
And we felt a real kinship with The New Yorker, like the combination of the deeply reported stories that The New Yorker is known for, but also the quality of those stories, the attention to narrative. If I could give you only one reason to subscribe to The New Yorker, it would be, maybe this is not the answer you're looking for.
But I just don't think that there is any other magazine in America that combines so many different types of things into a single issue as a New Yorker. You know, like you have poetry, you have theater reviews, you have restaurant recommendations, which for some reason I read, even though I don't live in New York City.
And all of those things are great, but I haven't even mentioned, like, the other half of the magazine, which is deeply reported stories that honestly are the first things that I read. You know, I'm a big fan of gymnastics, and people will say, oh, we're so lucky to live in the era of Simone Biles, which I agree.
We're also so lucky to live in the era of Lawrence Wright, Jane Mayer, Ronan Farrow, Patrick Radden Keefe. And so to me, it's like, I can't imagine not reading these writers.
You can have all the journalism, the fiction, the film, book and TV reviews, all the cartoons just by going right now to newyorker.com slash dark.

Plus, there's an incredible archive, a century's worth of award-winning work just waiting for you.

That's newyorker.com slash dark. And thanks.