Rachel Maddow on the Fascist Threat in America, Then and Now

Parents of tweens, if you're familiar with far-off drop-offs... Dad, stop, stop, stop, right here.
...or get DMs about what's for dinner, you may be experiencing tween milestones. For your son or daughter, these can start at age 9.
HPV vaccination, a type of cancer prevention against certain HPV-related cancers, can start then too. For most, HPV clears on its own.
But for those who don't clear the virus, it can cause certain cancers later in life. Embrace this phase.
Help protect them in the next. Ask their doctor today about HPV vaccination.
Brought to you by Merck. Listener supported.
WNYC Studios. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.
A co-production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker.

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick.

The word of the day in this election is no longer vibes or joy.

It's a much darker word, fascist.

The retired four-star generals Mark Milley and John Kelly, who both served under Donald Trump, came out and said it. Rachel Maddow could hardly be blamed if she said, I told you so.
Maddow has been warning of authoritarianism at home for a very long time. This is not normal American stuff.
This isn't American at all. This is strongman, authoritarian form of government stuff, which our Constitution protects us from explicitly.
I mean, what Trump is proposing to do here in America to the media is what Putin, of course, has already done in Russia. Maddow's podcast Ultra and her book Prequel take the long view on far-right movements in America

going back to 1939

when a pro-Nazi group called the German-American Bund held a huge rally in New York City. What we are actively fighting for under our charter, first, a social trust white Gentile ruled the United States.

Second, Gentile controlled labor union free from Jewish Moscow directed domination.

I sat down with Rachel Maddow on stage the other day at the New Yorker Festival.

Rachel, let's start with something incredibly cheerful. About a mile up the road, at Madison Square Garden, I could tell because on the subway down here I was surrounded by people who were not going here, alas, but going to Madison Square Garden.
You could tell by the hats. Something very ominous is occurring.
There's a rally, a MAGA rally, a Trump rally at Madison Square Garden. I'd like you to describe what you think the resonances are of that rally at Madison Square Garden.
So lots of things have happened at Madison Square Garden. It is, I think, it's telling that when Trump announced it, immediately people started talking about February 1939 and the German-American Bund holding their rally there, which I want to it was infamous or their very famous rally there.
It actually wasn't that well-known. It wasn't sort of a cultural touchstone in American life until fairly recently.
There was a beautiful short film that was made about it that raised the raised awareness about it, but also people just started talking about it and citing it and incorporating it into our popular history of what's happened in this city and in this country in the past century. And that historical presence of that Bund rally is itself an interesting thing, because I think 10 years ago or 15 years ago, most Americans would not have known that that happened and now we find that Trump is doing one of these final closing argument rallies and he's doing it there and we all think of that so it tells you kind of where our heads are it also tells you I think something important about history which is that we tell ourselves the stories from our history that we think we need today um so we're talking a lot about authoritarianism fascism we're talking a lot about hitler we're talking a lot about stuff that was considered to be off the deep end in terms of mainstream electoral discussion not that long ago but we're doing it because we are trying to grasp and put in real context the threat that this very new type of American politician represents in 2024.
So I am not afraid of the Madison Square Garden rally. In 2004, Madison Square Garden is where the Republicans all wore band-aids as a joke to mock John Kerry's war wounds.

1964 was Republicans all wore band-aids as a joke to mock John Kerry's war wounds.

1964, actually this date, 1964, 60 years ago today, was Barry Goldwater's closing argument rally before the 1964 election in which he railed against desegregation, got a 28-minute standing ovation and proclaimed that he was about to win the presidency in the greatest upset in the history of American politics. He did not.
Ten years before that, in 1954, there was a huge rally, 13,000 people at the Garden, to try to head off the censure of Joe McCarthy.

And Roy Cohn spoke at that, and Gerald L.K. Smith,

one of America's all-time Hall of Fame anti-Semites, was there.

William F. Buckley was there.

Members of Congress were there.

It was organized, in terms of the crowd,

organized in large part by the National Renaissance Party,

which was a uniformed stormtrooper-style Nazi militia that wore swastika armbands. So Madison Square Garden is at its moments.
And you may choose one of these analogies instead of the 39 rally. But I think it tells you something about where our heads are at, that those are the kinds of things we're looking for.
We're certainly not thinking about the Knicks, that's for sure. But when you watch Marshall Curry's short film, I think it's about seven minutes long, and it involves the head of the German-American Bund speaking, and by the way, being attacked by a counter-demonstrator, and then this guy's beaten into submission.
What's amazing is the stagecraft is right out of what would be a Leni Reifenstahl movie. It was Nazism, people wearing armbands, doing the Nazi salute, the rest.
If you were to propose this to Donald Trump, he would say, oh, come on, get over it. I was president from 2016 to 2020.
This business of fascism and authoritarianism is just wildly overblown. What say you? I mean, the thing about Curry's film that I think made it land so viscerally is that it seemed really foreign, right? I mean, the film features Fritz Kuhn, who was the head of the German-American Bund, who did fashion himself, wanted to be America's Fuhrer.
Part of the problem, the reason he never did, is because he spoke with an unpenetrably thick German-American accent. It's kind of put people off a little bit.
It was very reassuring. It was reassuring in a way.
Oh, this is a foreign thing. But actually, if you look at Ken Burns's film on America and the Holocaust, he features not just footage of Kuhn, but also of other figures in the German-American Bund who did not have accents at all and who were preaching the same anti-Semitic bile.
And part of our dissonance there is, how is this America? seems like such a foreign thing the see but then you see the George Washington uh banners that are hanging on the opposite sides of the the stage actually the National Renaissance Party that group that I just referenced from the 1954 rally at the garden the the leader of the National Renaissance Party published a book titled Adolf Hitler, Europe's George Washington. So there's this effort to take foreign fascism and make it seem American.
And our dissonance there is in, you know, how can this possibly be homegrown? And when we talk about making America great again, and we talk about the threat of an authoritarian takeover in the United States in the form of trumpism it is not something foreign it is something that's coming from a fascist place that is a recurring ebbing flowing tide that we face in we've faced in multiple generations is donald trump a fascist yes um liz to reassure you liz cheney said the same thing sitting in that chair yesterday. Liz Cheney and I obviously have always agreed on everything.
I thought that was true. We go way back.
But if he's a fascist, is he a self-conscious one? I don't think it matters. I mean, I think that Robert Paxton's definition of fascism is the most useful.
And he describes sort of the messaging that brings fascists to power and then what happens once fascists are in power. And I think Paxton's key insight was to say, their policies don't matter.
Like what they say they want to do with government doesn't matter, and they never hold to what they say they're going to do with government. And so if you can sort of set that aside and look at the way they claim power, it's almost always the same messaging.
It is, we are a nation in decline. We used to be great.
We're no longer great. We have been humiliated.
Everybody's laughing at us. We've been victimized by traitors within, stab in the back.
Who has sold us out? Who provides the explanation for why we are no longer great? Well, it's an all-powerful enemy that is within that we need to root out. And normal tactics don't work against them.
It's a group that is among us and also above us, they're scheming against us and we need to turn our force against them the immigrants the liberals the jews whatever whoever you want your scapegoat to be and once you've defined this superhuman enemy that has ruined the nation that needs to be opposed well you can't do that with electoral politics. You can't do that with democracy because what is democracy? Democracy is the process by which we all as equal citizens participate in a group decision about what we want going forward.
You can't have that if there's an enemy among us who is subverting everything that's great about this nation. They can't participate.
And so therefore, we can't use democratic means.

We're in an emergency situation.

We need an extraordinary means.

Maybe we'll get democracy back someday,

but we can't use it now.

And you know what?

It might have to get a little bloody.

We might need a little bit of violence

just to save the nation just this once.

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. More to come.
Fox News tries to diffuse the scandal over a journalist invited on a group chat where top White House officials were high-fiving about real-time bombing plans. Don't you hate when that happens? You ever try to start a group text? You're adding people and you accidentally add the wrong person.
All of a sudden, your Aunt Mary knows all your raunchy plans for the bachelor party. On this week's On the Media from WNYC.
Find On the Media wherever you get your podcasts. You wrote a book called Prequel.
You wrote it with a purpose. You titled it with a purpose.
A little on the nose with the title, I know. That's fine.
And came out to some degree, I think, out of the podcast Ultra as well. Tell me about the generation of that book and it's your intent.
I want us to understand previous fights with fascism, domestic fascism in this country, not because I want to make us feel like, oh, we're never going to beat this thing, but because I want us to be proud that we have beat it in the past. And I want the Americans who were good at fighting previous generations of fascists to be famous.
And almost none of them are in prequel and in, um, ultra this podcast that I've done a couple of series of, um, almost none of the good guys are people anybody has heard, have heard of. And I'm, I'm just trying to, I'm their PR agent.
I'm going back and finding dead anti-fascists in American history who did good work. What's radically different between the history described in prequel and the history that we're living through now is that in prequel, the bad guys are plenty powerful.
Henry Ford, huge industrialist. Charles Coughlin, Father Coughlin had how many listeners on a given night? 30 million? I mean, in a time we only had 130 million people in the country, he was getting 20 and 30 million people listening to him weekly.
So more than Tucker Carlson. Oh, yeah.
I mean, I think inarguably the most dominant media figure there's ever been in American history. But they weren't president of the United States.
That seems to be the elemental difference between prequel and sequel. What are the origins of Donald Trump in your view? I'm going to say something that is not nice, which is that I don't care about Donald Trump as a person at all.
I mean, I care about him as, you know, I care about him as my fellow man. Like, I think we all, you know, need to recognize the humanity in everyone.
Up to a point. Well, yeah.
But I don't, I mean, you know, failed watercolorist or whatever Hitler was, right? Like, Benito Mussolini, like small fry journalist. Okay, you know.
Do I care? I don't care. I don't think it's the most important thing about them.
Are there things in their individual biographies that might explain why they developed the yen that they had to try to become strongmen leaders and oppressors maybe um what what i what i think is the importance of trump is his message so he's telling he's you know i i will i will protect you but if i can interrupt Rachelachel forgive me what i mean is the social conditions that allowed him to be in other words wait wait wait if you looked at it in this case of hitler there's the treaty of versailles the humiliation post the first world war economic conditions weimar all that what's the analogy here there isn't one. I don't think that authoritarianism rises out of economic conditions, Weimar, all that.
What's the analogy here? There isn't one. I don't think that authoritarianism rises out of economic conditions.
I think that there are complicated, difficult, and in some cases, incredibly oppressive economic and social conditions that give rise to all sorts of things. The question is whether or not authoritarianism will rise.
And authoritarianism rises because you get a talented demagogue who uses the constant grievances that are always there and channels them into a simple solution. I will take care of you.
I will be your protector. All of these things in politics that vex you and that you worry about and that we've been fighting about for so long, you will no longer have to worry about them.
You will no longer have to think about them. They will be settled.
You will not have to vote again. The people who annoy you and who make you uncomfortable and who disagree with you will disappear.
And the really vexatious ones, the ones who really bug you, we may execute them on television and it'll be fun. It is a future in which politics doesn't exist because the good guys won and they're going to rule forever.
And you can sell that to people who are in great need of relief economically or socioeconomically or who have faced various kinds of oppression, but you can also apparently sell it to billionaires. The richest person in the country, I think the richest person in the world, Elon Musk has already established his bona fides within MAGA, jumping up in the air, contributing tens of millions of dollars.
The other day, I think is the second wealthiest

person in the country in the world, Jeff Bezos decided it would not be a good idea for the Washington Post, which he owns, to publish a endorsement essay. What does that portend, not just for the Washington Post, but for the country, should Donald Trump win? I think if the plan is to count on the benevolence and wisdom and courage of billionaires, that's a bad plan.
I think it's a bad plan for any industry. I think it's a really bad plan for any country.
Yeah, I mean, I just, some of the stuff that I've worked on in the past year or so, some of the interviews and stuff that I've done, I just think about a person like Lev Parnas, right? Or a person like Stormy Daniels, or a person like Cassidy Hutchinson, Ruby Freeman, and Shea Moss. I think about people like that, Americans like that, who have nothing and who have no institution behind them and who have no one supporting them, no one backing them up.
They do not have bodyguards. They do not have protection.
They do not have money. And I think about those people standing up and saying, this is a truth that I know and that you all ought to hear about.
And Trump and his movement are going to be very angry for me to be sharing this, but you need to know. And I think about the bravery of those people, of those Americans, and then you contrast it with Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, these guys who have more than anyone has ever had in history.
And they're so afraid. They are so afraid of losing any tiny little bit of what they have that they, you know, being called and being universally recognized as sniveling cowards because they're so afraid that they might lose some of what they got.
So what do you do if you're a reporter at the Washington Post or you're on the editorial board? What do you do? Your fear is not helpful to anyone. And the power of the authoritarian is your fear.
It's a conscious choice to not be afraid. And ultimately, these authoritarians, their message is based on a lie, right? Trump is not going to be your protector.
The people who make you uncomfortable or disagree with you are not going to disappear. There isn't a secret cabal that we can scapegoat and blame for everything.
Doing something about immigrants, locking up tens of millions of people in camps, is not going to do anything about the price of child care. If it is going to do something to the price of child care, it's not going to be what he expects.
It's based on a lie. And these guys are just crooks and thieves.
And nobody's afraid of crooks and thieves. They're disgusted by them and want them done with.
And that psychological message of strength and refusing to play their game, refusing to be afraid, to me is what I've learned from all of those regular Americans I was describing that I've been trying to do projects with and trying to focus on and trying to interview and trying to showcase.

We're not going to be led here by whoever the good version is of Jeff Bezos, right?

Or whoever the good version is of Elon Musk. We're going to be led by regular people, by Ruby Freeman and Chey Moss.
We're going to be led by Rusty Bowers. We're going to be led by Liz Cheney, frankly.
By people who are willing to not be afraid and to act on it and to treat these guys with the disdain they deserve. Opposition matters.
I want to, so you're going to be on an election night panel and I want to know, and you've done this before, the stakes have been high before, but never so high as now. What are you feeling when you're sitting there with the little magic camera there and you're surrounded by your colleagues? What's in your, not just your brain, but in your kishkas? How are you processing this, as they now say? I left my body halfway through the primaries.
And I will not rejoin my body until Inauguration Day. So after we get done covering

Inauguration Day, I will go home and drink and cry, no matter who wins, because I have been holding my feelings at bay. I think this whole crowd's going to join you.
Four months now, yes. Rachel Maddow, thank you.
Rachel Maddow leads MSNBC's election coverage, and her books include prequel

about the fascist movement in America. I'm David Remnick.
This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.

At newyorker.com, you can find a timeline of the most consequential moments of this election,

as well as the magazine's endorsement essay on Kamala Harris. Thanks for joining us.
See you next time. The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker.
Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Louis Mitchell. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul, and Ursula Sommer, with guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, Alex Barish, Victor Guan, and Alejandra Deckett.
Special thanks this week to Catherine Sterling, Amanda Miller, Nico Brown, and Michael Etherington. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherena Endowment Fund.
Chloe, you know what I think the world really needs? What? World fashion. The people want it.
The people have asked for it. The people are getting it.
Yes, everyone's in luck. I'm Nicole Phelps, the director of Vogue Runway, and I'm excited to announce that the run-through is coming to Tuesdays.
The run-through is now going to be twice a week. Every Tuesday, join me and the Vogue Runway team as we dig into the latest fashion news.
Thursdays will still be Chloe and Shoma talking about the latest in fashion and culture per usual. And Tuesdays, more fashion,

fashion, fashion. The run through with Vogue is available wherever you get your podcasts.