War in 1941, Congressional Disruption, and Military Trim

Flu season is here and COVID cases are still climbing across the country.

When people start getting sick, medications disappear fast.

And that's why we trust All Family Pharmacy.

They help you prepare before it's too late.

Right now, they've dropped prices on ivermectin and mabenzazole by 25%.

Plus, you can save an extra 10% with the code VICTR10.

You'll also get 10% off antibiotics, antivirals, hydroxychloroquine, and more of the medications you actually want on hand.

Whether you're fighting off a cold, protecting your family from flu season, or staying ready in case COVID makes its way into your home, having a few months' supply brings peace of mind and control.

They work with licensed doctors who review your order online, write the prescriptions, and ship your meds straight to your door.

Go to allfamilypharmacy.com/slash Victor and use the code Victor10 today.

Hello, and welcome to the Victor Davis Hanson Show.

This is our Friday, sorry, this is our weekend edition and we have something special in the middle segment.

And this week Victor's going to be talking about 1941 in World War II.

So we know lots of the exciting things happened in 1941.

And most of all, I guess, for us Americans is Pearl Harbor is invaded in that year.

But before that, we'll talk a little bit more about the news.

We've got Ben Cohen of the famed Ben and Jerry's interrupting congressional hearings with RFK.

And Newsom has blamed Trump for a $12

billion deficit in California.

And then finally, Germany for our first segment has sent out police against a new party, the Kingdom of Germany, which is a nationalist party.

So we'll go with those stories first, but stay with us for these messages.

If you're a homeowner, you need to listen to this.

In today's AI and cyber world, scammers are stealing your home titles and your equity is the target.

Here's how it works: criminals forge your signature on one document, use a fake notary stamp, pay a small fee with your county, and just like that, your home title has been transferred out of your name.

Then they take out loans using your equity and even sell your property, and you won't even know what's happened until you get a collection or foreclosure notice.

So when was the last time you checked on your home title?

If your answer is never, you need to do something about it right now and that's why we've partnered with Home Title Lock so you can find out today if you're already a victim.

Go to home titlelock.com slash Victor to get a free title history report and a free trial of their million dollar triple lock protection.

That's 24-7 monitoring of your title, urgent alerts to any changes, and if fraud does happen, they'll spend up to $1 million to fix it.

Please, please, don't be a victim.

Protect your equity today.

That's home, titlelock.com/slash Victor.

Welcome back to the Victor Davis-Hanson Show.

So, Victor, I think the first thing I would like to talk about is your California, your local.

Apparently, Gavin Newsom has said that Donald Trump has responsibility for the $12 billion deficit that California has

with the May revision of his proposed budget.

And I was wondering your thoughts on the wonderful California governor.

It's entirely absurd.

I mean, we're speaking in the middle of May, and the stock market is right exactly where he was

shortly before he took office, January 10th or 12th.

It's

right where it was during the campaign.

It went up a little bit on news that he had won in November, and then it settled down.

So it's regained all of the losses that we were told by the Wall Street Journal and others were going to be signifiers of a recession.

You look at energy prices, they're near historic lows.

You look at inflation, it was 2.3.

You look at GDP, they're they're going to readjust the GDP higher.

You look at corporate profits, they're up.

You look at investment, Trump announced this week, and I think it's been reified, ratified too, that he's got $10 trillion

in commitments for

foreign investment into the United States.

So all of that hasn't even been digested.

So the economy is not responsible for Gavin Newsom.

What's responsible for Gavin Newsom having a $12 billion deficit is the following.

The highest income tax in the United States at 13.3 of any state.

I think it's the sixth highest sales tax.

The highest gasoline tax, the highest priced gasoline, the highest priced electricity, half the nation's homeless, nearly half the nation's illegal immigrants, 200,000 to 300,000 of the professional class and upper middle class leaving per year, schools that are rated in the bottom 10 of the 50 states,

a poverty rate about 21%,

like almost like Appalachia.

That is the problem.

And what caused that problem?

You have from La Jolla to Berkeley, about a 50-mile radius of the ocean, some of the wealthiest people in the world.

And you can calibrate that by real estate or zip codes or anything.

And they have created what they feel is heaven on earth, a utopia.

And they're not subject to the consequences of their own ideology.

So, what does that mean?

We shut down a nuclear power plant, we shut down some oil plants, we put all these solar farms in.

We have an excess of solar energy in the daytime, and then we pay expensive imported energy at night.

We thought we were going to store it at Moss Landing.

We had two catastrophic fires, cost over a billion dollars.

We've thrown down a rat hole, $30 billion

for high-speed rail, not one foot of track laid.

It's the most mismanaged and incompetent,

incompetently managed state in the Union.

It's not all Gavin's fault.

He inherited that from Jerry Brown.

Jerry Brown and all of these people, when they destroy the state, they all go off to a pleasant Diane Feinstein had a big, beautiful home on the shores of Lake Tahoe.

Barbara Boxer went down to Rancho Mirage and had a beautiful place.

Camilla Harris lives in Brentwood.

Gavin Newsom just bought a big, beautiful home in the Bay Area.

Jerry Brown is on his Grass Valley off-the-grid estate.

So that's what they do.

Nancy Pelosi can't decide whether she'll go to her mansion in San Francisco or her Palazzo in Napa Valley.

But they are the people who did this.

They did not care about the average California, whether their schools were safe and competitive.

They didn't care whether they could afford gas.

They didn't care whether they could afford timber and lumber.

They shut down the timber industry.

They're shutting down the refinery industry.

They didn't care that one quarter of the population does not, is not, or will not pay their power bill.

That's it.

He will not touch any of those issues, not one.

So he'll just blame Donald Trump and he'll kind of say, we can't afford to give any more free health care to illegal aliens.

That was his idea.

And

he will tinker around and he'll do his little jaw-jaw, jazz-jazz with his hands and his slick hair, and he'll say that he's going to the middle and he's preparing for 2,000, but he won't ever undo the damage that he and Jerry Brown and other leftists have done because to do that, they would rather be

ideologically orthodox and have everybody poor than to be unorthodox and have everybody well off.

To what extent do you feel that the California legislature is responsible for?

We have 52 seats in Congress.

I think we only have 11 Republicans.

We have a state senate and a state assembly.

They have super majorities.

So the Republicans are.

There is no statewide Republican office holder.

No state controller, no attorney general, no lieutenant governor, no governor.

And all of the court system, the appointees have been there now for what will be 16 years.

So the Schwarzenegger appointments are

well early, they're all retiring.

And so they have the judiciary, they have the legislative, and they have the executive branch.

And the only thing that's going to change are two things.

One, whether the Silicon Valley grandees who have $9 trillion in market capitalization,

and these are people like formerly of California, Elon Musk, David Sachs, Ben Horowitz, Andreessen, Larry Ellison.

Whether they divorce themselves entirely from the left-wing project, they're starting to.

And they just say, you know what, we're either going to move out of the state or we're not going to subsidize all this stuff.

You make it impossible to do business and you're hurting the middle class.

And then whether the Hispanic community, which as we've talked about, just polled 62% in favor of Donald Trump's 100 days,

get it and say,

all of these Latino elites that go to universities,

they're no different than these out-of-touch so-called white elites, and they're two peas in a pot, and all they care about is climate change, transgenderism, the New Green Deal, DEI, ESG, but they do not care about us.

They do not care to get timber here.

the material, rare earth materials, natural gas, gasoline, all of these rich things we could do.

They'd like to blow up dams on the Klamath River rather than use the money allotted for dams to build four or five more so we have water.

There's some signs.

So, if those two groups said we've had it with the progressive agenda, we could change, but so far they haven't.

Well, let's turn then to the federal level.

And

as Congress does, they were,

I don't know, questioning

RFK Jr.

about his budget for the HHS.

and for some reason the ben and jerry ben cohen of ben and jerry fame although he sold the business decided it was the moment to stand up and say what sounded very incoherent on the

on the video but on his

x account he said he was yelling at them because they were killing kids in Gaza by buying bombs and kicking kids off of Medicare here in the United States as a result of the low funds due to buying well his theory is like this for him to be coherent and he's never been a coherent and by the way he's a billionaire Ben and Jerry sold out I think to Lever Brothers what is that Lever Brothers concern so they took their huge amounts of cash and then they got even more huge amounts as consultants and then they endow left-wing causes so this group came in and dispersed in the gallery he was it was kind of a conspiracy he was one of them.

And then at opportune times, they each popped up like little toys, you know, jack-in-the-boxes.

And then they were really, the security is very different under this Republican Congress.

They get them out very quickly.

So then he watched everybody pop up and scream, and he thought that the security people were occupied.

Then he started in on his rant.

And his rant was, as always, with him and most of the hard left, was completely incoherent because he said they were cutting

aid to kids on Medi-Cal.

That was Gavin Newsom who said we can no longer give free health care because we can't afford it to illegal aliens.

And half of all births in California are on Medi-Cal, and 40% as it is is on Medi-Cal.

We have in the last 40 years had about 20 million illegal aliens.

Half of them are in California and we can't afford it.

So basically his argument is: well, if you're anywhere in the world, if you're in China and you're poor, and you're in Africa and you're poor, and if you're in Mexico and you're poor and you come across the border, we owe you health care.

Well, we don't have any.

I don't care.

We owe you health care.

Why doesn't he set up a clinic?

He's got a billion dollars.

If he's worried, would he lose 100 million?

No, he didn't.

He wouldn't even care.

Why doesn't he just go to Fresno and say, this is the Ben and Jerry's health clinic?

And he can spend, I don't know, $20 million on the building.

He can put 80 billion in endowment he can get i don't know 10 percent

maybe he can get five or six million and run it as a free health clinic he won't do that he'll go around and go well i got a new ice cream jerry brown uh jerry garcia cookie crumble lime peppermint twist who cares you're completely incoherent and irrelevant and i wish they had arrested him i mean and then the other half of his argument was for killing children we, we.

And that's because our ally, Israel, supply weapons to.

But he didn't say one word what caused this round of violence.

It's called October 7th, 2023.

It was at peace.

Jake Sullivan, the national security advisor for Joe Biden, he didn't know why it was true.

He just bragged in an NBC meet the press.

He said, oh, Middle East,

my portfolio in the Middle East is the quietest in two decades.

He didn't credit Donald Trump at all.

And then I guess it was six days, maybe it was three days later, it just blew up with a massacre of 1,200 innocent civilians.

And

then they came across the border and invaded a sovereign nation.

And then they

concentrated on women, the elderly, and children.

And they tortured them, they beheaded them, they burned them, they raped them, they took hostage.

They did everything out of the medieval handbook.

And you didn't even mention that.

And then Israel retaliated.

In addition to that, they sent they being Hamas and Hezbollah sent about 20,000 rockets.

What were those intended for, Ben?

Were they intended at military targets?

No, they were intended to kill whom?

Women and children, civilians in Israel.

So what you're complaining about is that your side that you side with, Hamas, Hezbollah, are incompetent.

They can only kill people when they're not looking or they're they're surprised, or their women, children, or elderly.

But when they get into a real war, Israel can beat them and knock down their missiles and do what they want.

And so you're angry that your side is incompetent because you would wish them to be competent so they could go into Israel and kill people.

But they can't unless the people are surprised at a rock concert or something.

He's a despicable person.

He really is.

Yes, and you forgot the fact that the Hamas put their bombs and their men and their military behind these kids that end up getting killed.

So

they put their own civilians in front at hospitals, mosques, and schools.

And then they hide because they're cowardly.

And then they expropriated probably over $2 or $3 billion in United Nations relief, American aid,

EU aid.

And what do they do with all the billions, 10, 30, 40 billion?

They build an underground labyrinth.

Why didn't they build hospitals and skyscrapers and parks?

Because they didn't want to.

They would rather be poor and destitute and kill Jews than be well off and leave the Jews alone.

That's their attitude.

And he doesn't get it, or he does get it, but he's so full of hatred that he can't be rational.

Let's turn then to the international

world and the Germany.

Apparently, there is a new nationalist party.

And I think this is my question actually: the whole idea of nationalism, but a new nationalist party in Germany that is called the Kingdom of Germany.

And the Germans have decided that it is an unacceptable party.

So they raided this last weekend.

800 police went out to basically decapitate it.

I mean, they raided the houses of the leadership in that party, and they banned the party in general.

And I was wondering not so much about the party itself, but the whole idea of nationalism.

I know what the German authorities are worried about.

They're like, well, the Nazis were nationalists and nationalism can be a dangerous thing.

But nationalism is not necessarily dangerous.

I mean,

Trump, in a way, is a nationalist because he's putting a priority on America.

So he's building a nation.

He was doing things for a nation, which is a nationalist sentiment.

So I was wondering if they have no confidence in themselves.

The Germans don't.

They are a very young nation.

They were formed in 1871 following the Franco-Prussian War.

And the people who formed that country

were

largely under Bismarck.

They were the Vaughan people

from

what was Pomerania, East Prussia, the eastern part, and the great state and the military orders.

Prussians.

And they gave up their sovereignty as a small kingdom to be German, but they dominated Germany.

They were the ones that surrounded themselves with Kaiser Wilhelm.

They were the ones who

during the Depression joined the Hitler group because he favored the military.

They were the ones that were the four-star generals in World War II.

And

in the German mind, even though they no longer exist, something like them will come back.

And so they feel they have to engage any means necessary necessary for a noble end, but they to

preserve democracy, but they're destroying it.

Because they can't say to them, you have a different paradigm.

You have a right-wing paradigm.

The alternative for Germany does too.

You can participate.

All we have to do is follow the same rules that we do.

And we have communist parties, socialist parties that are your

left-wing counterparts.

We just don't want to have violence, and we do not want you to try to to overthrow the and that's all they have to do and they didn't do that because they're terrified they have no confidence in their institutions so they never asked

two questions number one why are they so afraid of them and number two where did these comp parties come from and did they come during the german economic miracle in 2002 three four nineteen ninety they were maybe something like them but they had no no residence they came because the people the christian democrats the socialists all of them destroyed Germany.

How did they destroy it?

They dismantled their coal plants, they dismantled their oil plants, they dismantled their nuclear plants, and they went to wind and solar.

And their power is unpredictable, unreliable, five times more than

anywhere else.

And they ended up buying electrical power from France that's what?

Generated by nuclear power.

They've destroyed their auto industry, basically.

They have zero GDP.

They have no borders.

Yes, we can.

We can do this.

We can do this.

That's what Merkel said.

We can open our borders and bring in over a million people, 2 million, and get 16% of our population not born in Germany.

No, you can't, Miss Merkel, because you have no history.

None.

You have always been a blood and soil nation, going back to Tacitus's Germania.

You should know that.

If you want to change, you could have said the following.

We are going to integrate, assimilate, intermarried non-Germans, but we're going to do it very slowly because it's a new thing for us.

Instead, she just let them in and created these massive ghettos of people who were Islamicists.

They have no intention of accepting Western civilization or German culture.

And, you know, you go to Berlin and there's these conclaves of Kurds, Turks, Arabs, and they're not assimilating at all.

And that's what they've created.

And so that's why these countries, these parties are emerging.

They're saying, why don't we just cut back on immigration, make it legal only, start to be competitive again, deregulate,

build nuclear plants, and

get back into the game as the powerhouse of Europe.

And they can't do that.

All right.

So last thing before we go to our break.

The Ukraine talks seemed to have been moving along, but Putin has decided that he's not going to meet just with

Zelensky, apparently.

And Donald Trump has said that the reason Putin won't meet with Zelensky this Friday, so it's already passed by the time you're watching this,

but that he won't do it because Trump's not going to be there.

And so

I'm not sure what's happening, but an update on the Ukraine ceasefire talks.

Well, he understands

the situation, Putin does.

He's lost a million dead, wounded, and missing.

And he can't go back to the Russian oligarchic class, the apparatus and say to them, I invaded my idea, I preemptively invaded.

I didn't take Kiev, that was a failure.

But this is what I got, and it was worth a million dead, wounded Russians and the destruction of most of our military equipment that'll take us 10 years to rearm.

And here's what I got.

They're not going to be a NATO.

And people in Russia are going to say, I don't think they ever wanted to be a NATO anyway.

Or they weren't ever going to.

And now the Donbass is forever ours.

And they're going to say, well, it was sort of that way when you invaded.

And then he's going to say, Crimea now is Russian.

Everybody understands that now.

Well, yeah, that's kind of nice, but we already controlled it.

And then he's going to say, I'm 40 to 60 miles westward of where I was when the war started on February 22nd, 2022.

And they're going to say, yeah, you made a little progress west.

It's mostly Russian-speaking people, but that wasn't worth a million casualties.

So he knows that he can't, he's caught because he has enough power not to lose the war, depending on whether the Europeans or the United States, how well we arm Ukraine.

He does not have enough power to advance beyond where he is.

So he can't, and he can't, he's trapped, can't really, doesn't really want to continue the war because he doesn't have the, as I say, the wherewithal unless he goes nuclear or something.

He can't.

And he can't stop because he hasn't got enough yet.

And he can't have a ceasefire because people are going to get angry at him.

That's it?

So he thinks that Donald Trump gave him an opening when he criticized Zelensky and he would put pressure.

And he has put pressure.

But when he looked at what Donald Trump was offering him, it wasn't enough in his mind to

make a deal and still stay in charge of the president of Russia in the Federation.

So what he wants is Trump go over there and get him in a room and say, Zelensky is a monster and you've got to give me this.

And if he's not careful, Trump's going to put a secondary boycott on oil sales.

And when you look at what Saudi Arabia and Ghatr and the Emirates are talking about and what Trump's talking about, they're talking about.

And one of the reasons Trump has not been really tough as he could be on Iran, he wants their oil on the market.

So you have Iranian oil.

You're going to get more pumping from the Middle East.

The United States is pumping like crazy.

You're starting to see a rise in electric EV vehicles.

And

if that price starts to drop below 50, getting 50 barrels, Russia will have no income.

So he's desperate, and he wants Trump there so he can basically cajole him into giving him a couple more bones because he doesn't have enough, he feels, to survive as president.

It sounds like Trump is sort of a necessity in these cease talks, so Putin can also say, well, it was hard to stand up to the Americans.

Is that

I went eye to eye to Trump when I got came out of the room.

Rameo was ours, Donbass was ours.

They weren't going to be a NATO.

The new DMZ is to the west of where we were.

It was all worth it.

Good luck with that.

All right, Victor, let's go ahead and take a break and come back and talk a little bit about 1941 in World War II.

Stay with us, and we'll be right back.

Welcome back to the Victor Davis Hansen Show.

You can find Victor at his website, VictorHanson.com.

Please come join us there.

There is ultra material exclusively for subscribers at $6.50 a month or $65 a year.

We'd love to have you all.

And there is other work that Victor does.

American Greatness articles and all of the podcasts are available on audio and slowly we're making them available to subscribers as ad-free videos.

So another good reason for you to subscribe at Victor Davis-Hansen's website.

Also for you who are new, I forgot to state that Victor is Martin Annely Anderson Senior Fellow in Military History and Classics at the Hoover Institution and the Wayne and Marcia Busky Distinguished Fellow in History at Hillsdale College.

So those are his two affiliations.

So Victor, I'm excited to learn about 1941, in addition to actually the invasion of Pearl Harbor, the attack on Pearl Harbor.

We're making our way through this slow odyssey of iconic events of the 20th century.

It's been months ago, we started with the 1906 Russo-Japanese War, the Panama Canal, the income tax of 1913, the Great Depression, the events that led to World War II and on.

1941 was the key year in which the word World War II appeared.

So, as we said, 1939 and 1940,

there was the Great War, World War I, and then there was the Polish War, the Scandinavian War, the Danish War, the

Low Countries War, you name it.

But there wasn't a concept generally agreed upon

until three powers, big powers, got into the war.

And that was Japan

and

Russia and the United States.

And that all happened in 1941.

But as the war, as the year opened up, all the cards were in the hands of Italy and Germany and Japan, the Axis of steel, the Pact of Steel.

And what do I mean by that?

Half of China was under Japanese control.

There were no more colonial powers in the Pacific.

Japan had muzzled its way, nuzzled, muzzled,

broke into Southeast Asia and was controlling the Mekong Delta.

It was

preparing to take over the Dutch East Indies Shell oil field, and it was eyeing Singapore, the Philippines,

and the Marianas, Pearl Harbor, etc.,

all during that period.

So the United States then initiated in 1941 Linlease

as well as

Lin-Lease programs and that would to supply Britain

and after

June Russia.

So what was the geostrategic map say in February or March of 1941?

It was pretty good.

All of Scandinavia, the Finlish War ended in March of 1940.

So Helsinki was now

pretty much pro-German.

Russia had let it alone.

It was neutral.

And if you at

Copenhagen, it was occupied.

Sweden was pro-German.

Norway was occupied.

Paris, a great capital.

All of France was occupied.

Vichy

were doing the work of the Germans in parts of France, central and southern France.

Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands occupied.

No such existence anymore.

Their colonies taken over by the Japanese or soon to be the Germans.

You look at

all the Atlantic ports, the great ports that Germany had wanted so badly in World War I for U-boat operations.

They were all in the hands now of

Germany, and they were being developed into reinforced concrete submarine pins.

And then the only countries that were we would call free were Yugoslavia and Greece.

And as you know,

Mussolini had invaded in 1940 Greece.

In October, Metaxas the general said, no, okay,

you can't come.

And that war was going on.

And by May, Greece would be completely occupied, as was all of Yugoslavia and Crete.

The battle for Crete was over by May.

And then in North Africa, the Italians had collapsed and the Commonwealth troops had taken Tobruk, the key port.

in eastern Libya.

However, they had sent Erwin Rommel down with two divisions in February, March, April, and he had been spectacular.

And with just a very small force, he had pushed the British, and he would soon push them out of Tupuk the next year.

So what am I trying to get at?

The only country that was viable was

Great Britain.

The two countries that will decide the war were not going to enter the war in 1941.

The United States had already decided to rearm.

It was starting to rearm.

It was trying to build a huge fleet.

It had

weapon systems on the drawing boards that people were talking about.

Sophisticated radar, napalm, four-engine bombers beyond the B-17.

All of that was in this planning stage.

And then there was Russia, and the Soviet Union was on the side of Germany.

So then Hitler said, Well, the only problem we have is Britain.

And then Admiral Rador and Donitz came to him, the head of the fleet and the submarine fleets, respectively, and said, you can't take Britain.

There's no way we can get across the channel.

They've got 15 battleships, they've got eight

carriers, eight into ten, they've got about sixty cruisers, they've got hundreds of destroyers, they've got submarines everywhere.

You know, they had the Bismarck was sunk in the spring 1941,

and most of the British capital ships then were either sunk or they went into hiding in Norwegian fjords.

So what was he going to do?

So he had started the blitz as soon as he had unified his victories in Europe.

And all summer long of 1940, as we said, he couldn't affect anything.

He got very close by August, September, and suddenly, in anger that the British had had an inconsequential raid at Berlin, he switched his tactics.

And he no longer hit radar stations and British airfields and went into carpet bombing with incendiaries, killed 50,000 civilians, but that allowed the British air fleet, the Spitfires and Hurricanes to come back and the radar to come back, and then they started to inflict unsustainable damage.

So by February, March, April, the blitz was over with.

So then Hitler got together and said, well, we've won the war, and what do we do?

The United States is not going to enter it.

Japan is our ally and it's handling China and all of the European colonies.

And we've got the Soviet Union.

And what they should have done is just stopped, and they would have won.

They could have cut a deal with Britain.

I don't think Churchill would have accepted it.

So, what they decided was the way to defeat Britain and its empire is to invade a country with 240 million people that is 35 times larger than Germany

and is almost

4,000 miles long.

And if we do that and knock Russia out, then Britain will be isolated completely.

And we will have all the oil and we'll have all the wheat and food and everything.

And then we'll have a peace.

And some of the people were very worried about this.

And they started to bring up certain things.

Gwadarian said, Have you looked at the Russian tank?

They have a Stalin tank, but more importantly, they have this T-34.

They're better than anything we have.

And Hitler ignored him.

And then

Halder said to him, there are more divisions than you think.

They may have 400 divisions.

And

Hitler wanted to go in in May.

And then other generals said, you know what, if you look at our losses in Poland in 1939, in France in 1940, in the battle for Crete, they lost 1,000 logistical planes.

We are not yet back up to full strength.

And they had not been mobilizing yet fully.

They thought the war would be over very soon.

Hitler countered and said, We've got all this armament.

We've got the Skoda arms work from the Czechs.

We've got the entire armament from 3 million French army.

We have their airplanes and tanks.

We've stripped Europe bare.

And they said, Yeah, but it's a motley group.

They're not coordinated.

So they were bickering about what to do.

And finally, Hitler ordered on June 22nd a surprise attack on the Soviet Union with the largest invasion force in history to this day, somewhere around 3.5 million to 4 million.

And they were going to invade all the way from

the Baltic Sea.

all the way down to southern Europe and they were going to Army Group South was going to go in from Eastern Europe and go all the way the first year and take the Crimea and hopefully get all the way to the Don or Volga rivers.

Army Group Center was going to have about a million men and they were going to go take Moscow.

And Army Group North was going to go take St.

Petersburg, Leningrad.

And once they did that, it was about 600 miles, they were going to join in Moscow.

And then they were going to build a fortified line east of European Russia and declare victory.

And so they invaded on June 22nd.

In the first 11 days, General Halder, who was the head of

the Uber command of Germany.

Before you go forward from that, I just want to ask: to what extent do you think Hitler's decision was made on the fact that Stalin had done so much damage to his general corps in his purges and show trials?

I was going to get to that.

There was about six reasons why he did something so stupid.

Everything looks stupid in retrospect, but the proper historian has to not judge in retrospect with the benefit of hindsight, but ask what was the general knowledge at the time and what was the general consensus.

The general consensus at the time was that they could conquer them in three to four weeks.

And the answer was

why would they think something so stupid when you look at how huge the Soviet Union was and how big its armies and how...

Well, first of all, as you said, during the 1937 to 39 purges of the officer corps, they shot 30,000 officers.

Hitler said, see, they're leaderless.

But some of the problems were that some of the younger officers like Koniev and Rostovsky and

Zhukov were pretty good.

And when you wiped out the old guard, they got a chance.

And they proved after the first disastrous year they were pretty good.

That was one reason he did it.

The second reason he did it is he didn't know how to take Britain, Britain, as I said.

And he thought he needed the resources of Russia and that catastrophic defeat of the Soviet Union to force Great Britain all alone to capitulate or to make a deal.

And he thought that the United States might come into the war, but he needed to get Russia out of the war.

He felt if he got Russia out of the war, the United States would not come in, at least in the European theater.

There was a third catalyst for it.

He looked at the arithmetic or the calculus of World War I, and he said to himself, the war started in July, August of 1914.

And we fought from 1914 to November 1918.

And we never really got more than 80 miles west.

In other words, the indomitable French army and the British army held.

Even when this

newly created Soviet Union collapsed after the Treaty of, I mean, during the revolutionary fervor of the Tsar, the Tsar collapsed and the Communists took over and they were incompetent.

Even when he cut a peace in February 1918

and he put 500,000 free troops from the Eastern Front, they still couldn't win.

And that was because of the arrival of a million Americans.

So he said,

well, on the East, we fought for three years and defeated the Russians.

We defeated the Russians.

But on the West, we never defeated the British and the French.

But this time, we defeated the French and the British, you know, May 10th to June 27th.

we defeated them in six weeks.

And therefore, if we use the calculus of World War I,

two and a half years versus never, four years.

So if we defeated these guys in six weeks, we can defeat the Russians again in five weeks.

They're the easier.

And people said to him, yes, but they're communists.

And they're much more ruthless than the Tsar.

And they have stolen a lot of technology from the United States and from us.

And they're rearming.

The other thing that made him want to go in,

Molotov had visited Germany and he looked over the

arrangements of the

Molotov Ribbentrop.

And they said to him,

we just cut off 10% of Finland, and Germany was really mad about it.

They were pro-Finnish.

And they were also pro-Lithuanian, pro-Estonian, and pro-Latvian.

And they said, Molotov said, we're going to take the Baltic states.

And then they said to them, and there's parts of Bessarabia and parts of Romania and parts of areas of Eastern Europe that are disputed, and we're going to take them.

And we're never going to get, we carved up Poland and we're going to take Roman Catholic Western Poland and it's going to be called Ukraine, which it is today.

And

they kept demanding things.

And Hitler, you know, they were being bombed at the time.

And so Molotov said, well, if you're so successful, why are we in a bunker?

And not that the British were very effective.

So they got down to nitty-gritty, and after they left, Hitler said, I cannot stand those people.

They're not trustworthy.

They made demands on me.

How dare they?

I did all the heavy lifting in Poland.

They haven't done one thing.

They're parasitical.

And then there was a fourth thing.

They looked at their relative military capabilities.

And Hitler said to his generals, I invaded Poland.

I gobbled up two-thirds of it

25 days.

They came in late, they had trouble taking one-third.

I gobbled up the Scandinavia, I gobbled up all of Western Europe within a year.

And what did they do?

They invaded Finland, little tiny Finland, in November of 1939.

And November, December, January, February, March.

They couldn't even take Finland.

And Finns didn't get any armament from anybody.

And we kept out of it.

And they killed a half a a million Russians.

They are incompetent.

So they purged their officer corps.

They are incompetent.

And they're arrogant.

And they're making these demands on me.

And I'm looking at World War I, and they didn't do very well.

And we did very well in World War I,

even though we lost, but we're winning now.

So that's the decision to double-cross Stalin on June 22nd.

What no one can understand is how they were able to assemble three and a half million men right on the border.

And Stalin shot people.

Anybody who said they were going to invade, he had ordered them shot.

Even the day they invaded, he shot commanding officers.

Then we get to, so at that point when he invaded, it was no longer the Great War of World War I.

People began to

call

whatever this was the Second World War in the Anglosphere.

And in the United States, people were calling it World War II.

So the last Tessera

for this mosaic was what was the United States going to do?

So, we were panicking.

In January, we removed the 7th Fleet from the safety of San Diego and put it in an exposed position at Pearl Harbor.

We brought back MacArthur from retirement and put him in charge of the Philippines.

And he had a huge army.

He had over 100,000 Filipinos.

He had 20,000 Americans.

He had about 15 submarines.

He had a cruiser or two.

He had a huge Filipino force.

And he he was going to hold the Philippines, we thought.

He also had, I think it was 20-something

brand new B-17s.

He had 40 brand new P-40s, which weren't that bad of a plane.

So he was out there and so we were getting prepared.

And so then the Japanese looked at everything and they were angry that we had started Lin-Lease to

the Russians.

which were their enemy.

In fact, they wanted Western Russia.

They were kind of bogged down in China, and they were mad at the United States that cut oil imports, cut their oil and steel imports.

And then the other incentive was, as I said, they looked at all these rich territories that were orphaned, the Dutch East Indies, the French

Southeast Asia, and especially they saw the beleaguered British, the Great Harbor at Singapore and Malaysian rubber.

And they looked at the United States and they thought,

They're out they put their neck way out in the middle of nowhere, all the way to Pearl Harbor, and they don't have as many carriers as we do.

And then Yamamoto said, Everybody thinks Yamamoto was this poet.

No, he wasn't.

He was a war-mongering, militaristic, cutthroat guy.

He'd studied in the United States.

He was kind of utopian, cosmopolitan.

But he said to the Tojo government, if you don't let me attack at Pearl Harbor, I'm going to resign.

So he caused the war.

And then when he did, he said, I can only raise hell for six months.

And they will see it.

If we punish them enough, the Americans do not want a war.

So we'll just tell them, we'll call it quits.

They had no idea.

They should have studied Antietam or Gettysburg or Shiloh and seen the Americans don't give up.

At least that generation didn't.

And so then the Japanese looked at the geostrategic and they said, there's only three carriers in the Pacific.

We have 10.

We have a bigger fleet.

We have better pilots.

We have better planes.

And the Germans are at the subway station in Moscow on December 1st.

And they're going to take Moscow within days.

And Russia's going to collapse.

And we've got to get in this war so we can get some booty.

And

Germany was telling them, don't invade from the west, because Japan had said to them, maybe we should land at Vladislavik instead of attack.

And we'll come go east and we'll meet the Germans in the Ural Mountains and we'll divide up all the loot.

And we'll carve it up and we'll have kind of half of China and and half of Asian Russia.

And the Germans said, no, no, no, no, no, you're scavengers.

This is our stuff.

We get to keep the stuff.

A year and a half later, they would be begging the Japanese to invade from the.

So, anyway, at that point, they decided to go bomb us at Pearl Harbor.

They were right about that the fleet was exposed.

They were right about it was too far eastward without

reliable logistics.

But they had no idea about what America would react, the way they would react, and they had no idea of the ability of Americans to build a fleet within two years that was larger than all the fleets combined in the world, or to fight a two-front war.

Japan kept saying, they can't fight a two-front war.

We have, and the Americans said they can't fight.

They're fighting in China, and now they're going to be fighting the British and the Americans in the Pacific.

But they thought that they had pacified China.

They hadn't.

And so the war 1941 ended as World War II with the entrance of Japan, Britain, the United States for those reasons.

1942, just to give a little glimpse, the whole question would be: can the Axis powers very quickly end the war before the economies of the United States and the British Empire fully mobilize and the Soviet Union rearm?

And for a brief moment,

it looked like that was going to happen.

In summer summer of 1942,

the Germans had rebounded

and they were at Stalingrad.

They were right near the Caspian Sea.

They were just about ready to take Grozny and get the oil fields.

They were not that far from Moscow.

They thought they were going to come up from behind Moscow.

It looked like St.

Petersburg, Leningrad was going to fall.

When you look at Europe, Rommel had just taken Tobruk and he was starting to mobilize, and it looked like he could invade Egypt.

He was only 90 miles from El Alamein and he could go in and take the Suez Canal and meet up with Army Groups South maybe.

And

it looked like the Japanese for after Pearl Harbor, they had run wild.

And the Americans and the Dutch and the Australians had lost every battle and then they were coming up.

But right around May, June, July,

their luck ran out.

So at the Battle of Coral Sea and Midway, the Battle of Stalingrad, and the American landing, the Battle of El Alamein and late in fall.

El Alamein, Midway, Coral Sea, Stalingrad changed the whole picture.

And then it was curtains for Japan, Italy, and Germany.

So I probably missed this, but

did you explain the strategic interests of Japan?

What were they going to do, take

Hawaii?

Were they just trying to knock out the US military?

And to what end would that take them?

For example, why didn't they just turn around and go at Singapore, go at the Philippines?

Why go all the way out to Hawaii?

Just because Yamamoto had this desire?

Or is it just a matter of time?

No, because

if you look at the map

and you look at the

the strategic design of what they call the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, it had all of of these spokes, and it was all based on natural resources, and it had a propaganda to keep white Europeans out and let Asians be Asians under the Japanese, who treated Asians far worse than the Europeans and the Americans.

But the idea was to take India and Burma

and to take Singapore and Malaysia, to take Southeast Asia, and then to build a defensive ring around it.

And the problem was that right in the middle of it was the Philippines.

And the Philippines had a much bigger force than

anything.

I mean,

they had Corregidor, which was considered indestructible.

It was like Gibraltar, the island fortress.

They had a huge bomber fleet there, and they were sending stuff.

And they had MacArthur there.

So in their way of thinking, we can't tiptoe around the Philippines.

We can take Indonesia and get the oil.

We can take the rice belt and Vietnam.

And we can take the rubber in Malaysia.

We might even be able to take

parts of India and Burma and Singapore.

But ultimately, we're just going to be tiptoeing around the United States Seventh Fleet and especially the Philippines.

So why not just go for broke and take the Philippines and humiliate them and take Wake Island and take the Marianas.

And soon we will take Midway Island and then we'll take Hawaii and then we'll just say we want to quit.

And they'll have no ability to go.

Once they have no ports out in the Pacific, it's 3,000 miles.

There's no, they looked at the map and said all these islands are in the co-prosperity sphere.

When you look at San Francisco and San Diego, and Portland, Seattle, it's nothing for 3,000 miles till they get to Hawaii, or they get to the Aleutians, or they get to the Philippines.

And we're just going to make a big iron ring with our fleet and just say, anytime you want to quit, we're willing to quit.

We're not mad at you.

We just took your stuff and we're going to conquer China.

And we'll call it.

And they were very naive.

They didn't understand the American idea.

They had no.

Yamamoto, Tojo had taken a train ride through the United States

as early as General Tojo.

And Yamamoto had been two years

at

Harvard

and

the postgraduate school, Naval Post, as a foreign student.

And Mitsuka, the foreign minister who would resign,

he was

a visiting student in high school in Oregon.

So all of them knew the United States.

But Americans are so arrogant, they thought anybody

has been in the United States loves us.

No.

They think we're decadent and wealthy and that they could use our resources better than we could.

So Tojo and Yamamoto and Mitsuka, they all said to themselves, these guys are really rich and they're very powerful.

But if we hit them really hard, we'll shock them and they won't want to fight.

Because

they let Britain burn to the ground during the Blitz, and they didn't help them.

So they won't even help themselves.

They just completely misread the American reaction.

And they did not want to have a world war.

They knew they were not capable of it.

They were bogged down in China.

They were overextended.

They didn't have any natural resources.

They thought that's why they waged the war to get Asian resources without getting the United States involved.

That's what they wanted.

And when we got involved, they knew they were doomed.

The only way they thought they could win the war is kill so many Americans on the islands, Okinawa, Iwo Jima, Tarawa, Peilu, Philippines, that the United States couldn't take the casualties.

So the role that Hawaii played in the geostrategic

ambitions of Japan was they were going to hit that first.

They thought the Americans won't really do very much because they're just, they'll let themselves be hit.

And we'll turn around and we will take the Philippines, I think Guam too, and

Singapore.

And then they took the Philippines by April.

It lasted till April.

They took Singapore, and they took the Dutch East.

And they had everything.

They had the Marianas, they had Tinyan, they had Saipon, they took Formosa.

They had everything.

The only mistake they made was that when they went out there, they had had six carriers, and

they didn't re they thought they'd been discovered, but they had the ability to ruin

Pearl Harbor for two years.

So when they bombed, they only had two waves.

And they knocked out the airfields, and they did a lot of damage to the fleet.

But the battleships were 19 were World War I, 1918 battleships.

And if they had gone out there to fight the find the fleet, they would have all been destroyed at the high seas and everybody would have been killed because they had no ability to catch the carriers, and they would have been spotted.

And there were no carriers there.

The WASP was in Europe, and the Saratoga was on a mission to supply Waka Island, and the Enterprise was back, I think, back in the United States,

or there was only, and the Lexington was on a mission, so they thought there would be four carriers there, and there was none.

So they didn't even take out the carriers.

If they were wise, what they would have done is stayed there for a week and just kept hitting and knocked out all the oil supplies, all the repair shops, all the industrial, and knocked out the whole ability.

And later Americans said if they'd hit the oil tanks, we had a year's supply of oil there.

If they had hit the repair facilities, we would not have been able to operate.

They could have done that.

They could have even landed and taken the island.

But they were just afraid to.

All right, Victor, well, let's go ahead and take a break and then come back to talk a little bit about the United States military.

Welcome back to the Victor Davis-Hansen Show.

You can find Victor at X.

His handle is at V D Hansen and on Facebook at Hansen's Morning Cup.

So join him there if those are your social media outlets.

So Victor, let's turn to the U.S.

military.

I understand that Pete Hagseth has planned to reduce the number of generals in the U.S.

military.

And I was wondering if you thought that was a good idea.

Well, based on traditional calculus of the number of troops, enlisted men, versus the number of four stars, three stars, two stars, one stars, we are overstaffed, as we always are in peacetime, it seems like.

So, and that's going to be very controversial because an officer, I mean, it's I'm not saying it's easy, but major to lieutenant colonel is doable.

Lieutenant Colonel to colonel is doable.

There's a big jump from colonels.

Most of them don't make one star.

One star to two stars is kind of not easy.

I won't say to major general is easy.

But the next step from major general to lieutenant general, third three-star, that's hard.

And the three to four

is a little harder.

What I'm getting at is you're going to tell people who feel that they have done everything possible and reached the pinnacle of power.

Four-star generals are almost like deities in the military.

And you're going to cut them.

And they're going to cut a lot of them.

They're going to do other things that they're going to be very angry.

If you're a four-star general or admiral, I don't want to name names, I do not want to stereotype, but

that is a very good salary.

They get a wonderful pension.

But more importantly,

as they came up through the ranks, they have thousands of subordinates that they knew as a captain, as a major, as a lieutenant colonel, as a colonel, as a one, two, three.

They have a whole network of people.

And they ended up in the Pentagon at some point, four-star.

So when they come out of there,

They go to work for Raytheon or the Boston Arms Group or Northrop or Lockheed or General Dynamics, and they make a fortune.

They can make two or three million dollars a year, not even, you know, in a good year with stock options, they can end up fabulously wealthy.

So, what you're telling them, you're going to abort all that.

That's going to be very controversial.

And there's other things he's talked about, and one of them is procurement.

That we're not going, I mean, Trump announced the fifth-generation fighter.

Well, those are going to be $150 million minimum.

The F-22 was 170 million.

The F-35 is about 100 million.

And

we don't have a lot of those.

So he's looking at the Ukraine war and he's saying,

let's get drones.

Let's get a whole fleet of drones in the air, on the ground, and in the ocean.

And then let's have master drone ships piloted by people that can direct them in the air.

And as I said, I was listening to a lecture by a technocrat, probably the most famous

Silicon Valley person other than

Elon Musk.

And he pointed out that

why pay 70 to 170 for a pilot that can only endure a turn at 9 Gs when a drone can do 19 Gs?

So they're going to, that's what he's looking at, a whole new way of procurement,

cut down the whole basis of how the Pentagon functions.

I doubt, have you noticed another thing, to be quite frank?

I haven't seen one retired general

weigh in on Donald Trump.

And I won't mention names, but just a mere five years ago, we were told that he was like the people on the other side of the beach at Normandy, Nazi.

We were told that he was a Mussolini.

We were told he built cages on the border just like the Nazis built Auschwitz.

We were told that he was a congenital liar.

We were told that he should be removed the sooner the better.

And we were told by two lieutenant colonels that Milley should intervene and get rid of him.

We were told by General Milley that he had diagnosed as Dr.

Milley, professor of psychiatry.

He had diagnosed

his commander-in-chief as not too stable.

So he decided to call up his People's Liberation Army counterpart and said, you know, if it comes to existential tensions and I think that our commander is a little bit too ready to consider the nuclear law, I will call you first and warn you.

So all of under Article 88 of Uniform Code of Military, what I just delineated, were actionable offenses that, according to the statute, which recovers retired generals and active, they would be subject to court-martial for publicly disparaging the commander-in-chief or the main officers of the government.

This was all done after Douglas MacArthur said terrible things about Truman in 1951.

And they got together and they said, well, the Army says this, and this Army Air Force that's becoming the Air Force says this, and the Navy says this, and the Marines says this, and we need a uniform code for everybody.

And they put it so it involved everybody, but they also said we can't have another MacArthur.

Didn't Truman fire MacArthur by chance?

Okay, he did.

Sunshine.

He fired MacArthur.

MacArthur came a national iconic hero.

He had a ticker tape parade.

Everybody thought he was going to run for the Republican

nomination.

And then two things happened to him.

Number one, there was a guy called Ike, and everybody loved Ike.

MacArthur, they respected him, but he was vain, glorious.

Ike was just a Kansas, Texas guy, and he was just awesh.

And

he got along with everybody.

He was an administrator.

He worked for MacArthur.

MacArthur didn't like him.

He crashed him.

So once Ike, who was the president now of Columbia University, once he said he was going to run in the 52

convention, they gave a little speech for MacArthur.

And I think Wainwright, his subordinate, that he kind of abandoned on the Philippines and spent four years in a prison of war.

He was emaciated.

He gave this speech for MacArthur, and he got like 10 delegates.

And why did he not get popular?

Because after his ticker-take parade, he was the most popular general in history in the United States.

And they asked him, they brought him in there, and the Democrats asked him,

what's your plan for Korea?

And he said, there's no substitute for victory.

And they kept asking him, so how many troops would you need?

Well, I need this.

And they said, oh, my God, we're disarmed.

And then they said,

would the Russians intervene?

He said, no.

He said, well, you said that about the Chinese.

You said if you went out up to the Yellow River, they wouldn't

intervene.

And a million of them did.

And we had the longest, most humiliating retreat in American history back down to South Korea, and we lost Seoul.

Well, you didn't let me use nuclear weapons.

So, you think a commander should have nuclear weapons in the field?

Yeah.

And so he didn't do well in congressional testimony.

And by this time he was doing all this, Ike was saying,

when they nominated him, Ike, because you know, he was still a very powerful guy, MacArthur, kind of a tragic figure, really.

And then Ike was saying, I will go to Korea.

And they said, what are you going to do?

I will go to Korea.

Will you try to take all of Korea back like MacArthur wanted to do?

He wanted to reinvade again.

And, you know, a lot of people made the argument that after 1952, given Matthew Ridgway's genius, who restored all of South Korea, took back Seoul, and probably inflicted a million casualties on the Chinese, they were beaten.

And so if he had, at that point, had they invaded, they might have taken the whole thing.

thing back.

But Stalin said he would not let that happen.

And he had nuclear weapons at that point.

So, and Ridgway, the hero, was now in, he didn't, he didn't want to do it.

And so, he had, he said, you know what?

If you go back up there, the American people will be fickle and we won't have a lot of public support.

We'll have to completely mobilize to rearm, and we'll be right next to nuclear Russia on the border and China.

Let's just consolidate what we have and work with the South.

But every time they asked Ike, I'm going to go to Korea, what are you going to do?

I'm going to solve the problem.

So, when he came in in 1953, he took a look at it and he said, No, I'm going to invade North Korea and get in a big, endless, forever war.

I am going to solidify where we are.

And, you know, they had some six months of this and that.

And then he solved it.

And get a truce.

And that was the end of MacArthur as a political person.

Yeah.

What happened to all of these self-appointed American savers like Millie, who was willing to breach his, you know, his orders, his responsibility?

What happened to them when Joe Biden, who was really demented, did not

have not a word.

Isn't that weird?

Yeah, Milley had said that Donald Trump was non-composment and he would have to intervene.

He didn't say a word after that Afghanistan humiliating.

13 brave Americans were killed.

50 billion ammunitions handed over to terrorists, which are being on the terrorist mart right now being sold.

We gave up a billion-dollar embassy, a $300 million retrofitted Baguam.

He didn't say a word, but he did say a word all during the campaign.

Remember, he gave an interview and said that Donald Trump was a certified fascist.

And then he thought, hmm, if I keep saying this and he wins the election, this time around, he's going to court-martial, they're going to court-martial me because he'll get a defense secretary that won't be Jim Mattis, and they will court-martial me.

And they would have.

Pete Hexeth will court-martial anybody who breaks the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 88.

He will court-martial them.

And they know that.

So they're all quiet.

And we haven't heard a word out of General Hayden, and we haven't heard a word out of General McCaffrey, and we haven't heard a word out of General McChrystal, and we haven't heard a word out of Admiral McCraven.

And they were all very vocal.

And

I guess they either think Trump is not the existential threat that he was, or they believe that Pete Heckseth will institute court-martials about anybody who retired or active, disparages the Commander-in-Chief.

Yes.

I guess we have to write it all down to Trump derangement syndrome or something, because it certainly seems inconsistent.

I never understood why Andrew McCabe and Rod Rosenstein

discussed Rod Rosentein wearing a wire so they could go talk to Trump and then they could find him in an an embarrassing conversation and then they would have it on tape and then go in and play it and then to the Congress and then they would or to the cabinet and then they would vote for him to be removed on their 25th amendment.

And the same people didn't say a word when Joe Biden had that disastrous interview with Robert Hurr.

of which his own speechwriter destroyed the tapes of you know when he when he violated classified material talking about it with Joe Biden, but the point I'm making, that tape, they didn't want the tape out.

Now the tape is going to be released.

And where will those people be?

Will they come forward?

Will Andrew McCabe come forward and say, Oh my god, I listened to that Robert Hurd tape.

What was I doing?

I had the wrong president.

He is completely incapable.

Rod,

why didn't we go talk to Biden and trap him?

I'm not going to say a word.

Just like Jake Tapper the other day was on TV.

He's been on TV for all week saying that, well, you know,

Chuck Todd and

it wasn't just his handlers that lied to us.

It was the press.

So I've got a co-authored book coming out, and we're going to tell, but we're going to break it wide open and tell everybody how this somlin...

derelict media didn't do their duty and tell the truth that their president was unfit to serve.

And then people started saying, well, didn't you do an interview with Laura Trump and bite her head off when she said just that?

And then I think

John Davidson or somebody in the Federalist wrote, 11 times Jake Tappard attacked and ridiculed people who mildly suggested that

Joe Biden was not all there.

So

that's the story.

The media is utterly corrupt.

Yes, and so were the generals.

That's what I said earlier when people say, What is Donald Trump doing?

Well, he's cutting all these deals.

He's got foreign policy stuff galore.

He's got investments.

He's got trade wars.

He's closed the border.

But he also understands that the problems were caused by the Progressive Project.

And the Progressive Project does not rely on public support for their power.

They feel that even though people don't like their positions on transgenderism, on an open border, on massive illegal immigration, on DEI, on ESG, on the New Green Deal.

They don't care.

They feel we got these big foundations.

And they give stuff to all these groups that are suing, you know, to stop my.

And they run the bureaucracies.

The whole federal government is embedded with anonymouses that will pop up anytime.

Lois Lerner, a James Comey, Anthony Fauci.

They're everywhere.

And they have the media, a Chuck Todd, a Jake Tapper, and they they have the universities that train all these people.

So then they got together in their four years of the wilderness, apparently.

Trump got his little brain trust, and they said, well,

we can deal with the Middle East, and we can stop the Ukrainian war and we can get investment, we can cut down the trade deficit.

But the left is just insidious.

So somebody said, well, why?

Nobody likes what they have.

And then somebody must have said, go after the media.

Get rid of NPR.

Get rid of PBS.

Attack them like they attack you.

And then somebody said, well, these universities are utterly corrupt.

They take Chinese and Middle East money.

They don't report it.

They violate the Supreme Court decision.

They have racially segregated dorms, celebrations, safe spaces.

They raise their tuition higher than the rate of inflation.

This whole student boondoggle is a blank check for them.

They have Chinese people on their faculty.

They have people that are spying.

Stanford just has a big explose about it, the Stanford Review.

And they don't really, they're anti-Semitic to the core.

They don't listen, and they are racist, and they don't defend the Bill of Rights.

Go after them for that.

And you get two birds with one stone.

We're going to prune them back.

And so foundations.

They're going to have a new...

I don't know how it's going to affect the Bradley, a smaller conservative, but they're going to go after foundations and tax their endowments because they don't feel they're really non-they're deeply embedded in politics.

They're going after the universities.

And then I didn't mention gouging the government with 40 to 50 percent surcharges.

So they're going to go after the universities, they're going to go after the media, they're going to go after the foundations,

and they're going to go after the federal government bureaucracy and cut it with those.

So they're trying to say to themselves: all of these problems we're dealing with the symptoms, but not the root cause.

What caused the Biden administration to do these stupid things, to open the border, to flee Afghanistan, to turn on Israel, to get all these foreign students here.

Oh, I know.

It was these institutions, so we're going to bring them to account.

And I don't know if that's going to be, that's why it's a real, as I said, a cultural counter-revolution.

Well, maybe one symptom of this culture that you're talking about is in our judiciary and a case that we've been talking about in front of the, I think it's the Wisconsin

judge from Milwaukee, Dugan, who is now being indicted.

Her claim is she's pleaded not guilty, and she has, her argument is, is that she's immune from prosecution over official actions taken by her.

I was wondering your thoughts on that.

You know, when Trump was facing Letita James, Annie Willis, Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Eugene Carroll, remember how all of the

cable left-wing networks, they always had they got their talking points and then they all mimicked them and it was no man is above the law.

No person is above the law.

What do you think about the no person is above the law?

So here she is and she's committed felonies.

She's violated her oath of office.

She's actively in a conspiratorial fashion with the public defender

who alerted her deliberately tried to impede a federal officer from making an arrest and used in a

conspiratorial fashion her own courtroom, secret little passage, the door out, to liberate someone who would be arrested, putting federal agents in danger.

In addition to that, she was derelict.

She just walked out of the middle of a trial.

So she's got a lot of felony exposure, but she's not above the law.

She thinks she's above the law.

That's what's the weird thing about the left.

They always say that nobody's above the law, but they really do believe that they're above the law.

That's what these representatives did when they went in New Jersey and they attacked ICE officers and Border Patrol people.

They thought, I'm going to represent it.

And remember, AOC and Hichem Jeffries?

You know, Hichem Jeffries every day is revealing that they're going to have to get rid of him because he is an utter incompetent.

He just mouths the same old thing.

He has no imagination.

They ask him a question and his brain goes, What was the pre-selected talking points I got on email this morning?

Which one do I plug in?

Kind of like Camilla Harris.

He doesn't answer a question.

And,

I mean, AOC is a lot more adept than he is.

Even Jasmine Crockett is.

In a crazy way.

I don't know about that.

Yeah, maybe.

What did he say?

That's a red line.

They said, what do you mean that's a red line?

If they take them off committees, if the Congress punishes them, much less if they face criminals.

That's a red line.

And then they also say, you better not.

What are you going to do?

If they broke the law, they broke the law.

What if

Kevin McCarthy, when he was Speaker of the House, had said to, I don't know, the media, he said, listen, if you indict Donald Trump, that's a red line.

You better not do that.

They would have gone crazy.

They're basically calling for an insurrection.

And they already have when Chuck Schumer said, we're going to go into your congressional districts and disrupt.

And then Governor Fitzer said, we're going to go to the streets and be disruptive.

They were calling for what what we're seeing now.

Not one of them has ever said, got up in front of the Congress or went on major network news and said, we deplore all the street violence against Tesla.

I'm asking all of our supporters, do not take the law in your own hands and attack the Tesla brand in any shape or form.

I'm telling all of you students who are protesting against Israel, do not use violence or you will

not one of them has said it.

Just like not one of them has said, let's end the bloodletting in the Ukraine war.

It's a million and a half lives have been destroyed.

They're either so desperate or they lack leadership.

I think they lack leadership.

There's a great malady in the United States.

There's a third of the country, an affluent third of the country, and they feel that the country is too stupid for them.

And they made so much money under globalization.

They have so many titles and degrees that they deserve special compensation to run the country the way they think they should, even if the stupid stupid hoi polloi don't appreciate them.

That's who the Democratic Party is.

And then they have the subsidized poor.

The subsidized poor feels that I am a victim because of, I don't know what, history, my race, my gender, my sexual interest, and I deserve government support.

And anybody that doesn't do that is a ruthless SOB.

That's their attitude.

And that's the Democratic Party, those two groups.

Well, Victor, we're at the end of our show.

So we have a comment made on your website, on your most recent article, The Real Hundred Days.

And it's by Susan Winter.

She said, and it's very sweet to Trump.

So hi, Trump, out there.

Trump is attempting the nearly impossible task of turning the Titanic away from the iceberg.

It's sort of what we've been talking about.

God bless that man.

I hope he shakes things up just as much in his second hundred days.

So thank you, Susan.

We appreciate that comment, and we hope Trump hears it.

Remember that to Biden when Biden came in.

I mean, what is Trump not trying to do?

He's trying to solve the Ukraine war.

He's trying to solve the Iranian nuclear project.

He's trying to get the hostages and solve the Middle Eastern war.

He's trying to close the border.

He's trying to deport 10 million people who came in illegally under Biden.

He's trying to develop energy.

He's trying to reboot the entire world trade system.

He's doing all of these things.

He looks at him sometimes and you think, man, he's 78 years old.

He looks tired.

But who wouldn't be?

I have a tiny little situs infection and he's got 10 times the energy that I do.

I admire him.

Yeah, so do I.

He's indestructible.

He's that Nietzsche and anybody that doesn't kill him makes him stronger.

Anything, anybody.

Yeah.

There's nobody quite like Trump.

They've been seeing a lot of people saying he's the best.

president in their entire lifetime.

He's doing so much.

He certainly is.

The thing that's different about him is when he sees a problem and he thinks he talks to people he does consult calls people all the time on the phone jamie dimon you know elon uh mike johnson

the congress then he makes a decision he doesn't say well i'm going to get a committee a sober and judicious and they're going to report back to me in six months the pros and cons and then i'm going to have an audit body overlook them and then they'll get me a proposal and i'll consider it two years from now he doesn't do any of that, just does it.

And sometimes, you know, he gets in trouble, but sometimes, like his plane deal, he just gutter says,

you can't get your planes?

You don't have any planes?

That thing is too old for you.

Mimicking their accent.

The 83, that's befitting a president.

You need a new one.

We have a new one, don't we?

How old is the one with the Titanic interior?

Give it to him.

Trump says, I'm not going to insult these people.

We're going to do a big 200-jet deal.

And I'm going to say, no, I can't take your plane.

I'm morally superior to yours.

So he calls up everybody and says, you can't take anything from the Emolimans Clause.

So he said, okay, give it to the Air Force.

Can the government, yes, then I'll use it for four years.

And then they said, well, what do you do with it?

And he said, well, they gave us a base.

Nobody said anything wrong with that.

They remodeled it.

People give us stuff all the time.

Yes, but you're going to use this gift, this Air Force plane, after they have to go through it and make sure there's no bugs bugs in it and everything.

And then, well, Reagan got a plane.

When he left, they gave every, I saw it in the museum.

So then they said, yes.

Now, he's okay, everything I've said, except the plane goes to the Trump Library or Foundation.

At that point, it's so beautiful inside.

Mr.

President, I have a slight suggestion.

You have your 757.

It's got modern parts.

This thing is ancient, even though it's, I guess it's 10, 13 years old, but it's a 747.

You don't want to fly around the United States in a 747 as a private citizen.

It's a gas guzzler.

Take this plane and do just what Reagan did.

Just park it outside the Trump

library, and everybody would love to go and look at it because it's unlike any other plane in the world.

And that way you're not going to be criticized that you took something from a federal government.

So tomorrow, just say, well, they gave us the El Udaid Air Force Base, military base, naval base, and then they remodeled it for us, spent another billion, and it's handy, and people do all this, and they want to give this plane to the Air Force, and our planes aren't going to be ready.

And

frankly, this plane's 40 years old, so we've got to get a new plane, and Boeing let us down.

So we're going to use this plane for four years.

And then when I'm out of office, J.D.

Vance or Marco Rubio will use it until the new Boeing planes.

And when the new Boeing planes come, we're going to park it as a gift to the government.

And I was the happen to be the president, and it will go to the library.

And we'll take the keys away, and you can't fly it.

And he'll be a win-win-win-win situation.

That would be a win-win.

Nobody wants to fly this huge plane.

You know, one person in the United States that has a 747 that flies around with it.

That's why the left is so crazy.

He's going to take this plane.

He's a private citizen.

It'll take a year's salary to maintain it and fly it and put the gas in it.

Well, Victor, that's the end of our show.

And thanks to all of you for joining the Victor Davis-Hansen show.

And thank you, Victor, for that entertaining weekend episode.

I appreciate it.

Thank you.

And this is Sammy Wink and Victor Davis-Hansen, and we're signing off.

And thank you, everybody, for watching and listening.