Unmasking ICE

Way back in March, you might remember a Turkish graduate student at Tufts was approached on the street by ICE agents who took her away screaming.

It was unsettling, and it was made more so by the fact that those agents were wearing masks, which people pointed out was not normal.

But it is normal now.

We're seeing this more and more often.

Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked about it in a Senate hearing last week, and she was kind of like, oh, no kidding, they're wearing masks.

And, Senator Peters, that's the first time that issue has come to me about them covering.

You're saying the law enforcement officers, when they cover their faces.

Right.

But she recovered very quickly and she remembered something.

They're being threatened.

Their families are being threatened.

You know, it's, it's.

Again, I get that.

But they have to identify themselves as law enforcement.

But they don't have to identify themselves and they're not.

And why that concerns so many people is coming up on Today Explained.

Support for Today Explained comes from Adio.

Adio is an AI-native customer relationship management platform that Adio says is built for the next era of companies.

A powerful data structure that adapts to your business model, syncs in all your contacts in minutes, and enriches your business with actionable data.

Addio says it also allows you to create those email sequences, those real-time reports, those powerful automations, which they claim can help you build what matters most, your company.

You can go to adio.com/slash todayxplain to get 15% off your first year.

That's attio.com/slash todayxplained.

With a Spark Cash Plus card from Capital One, you earn unlimited 2% cash back on every purchase.

And you get big purchasing power so your business can spend more and earn more.

Capital One, what's in your wallet?

Find out more at capital1.com/slash spark cash plus.

Terms apply.

This is Today Explained.

I'm Noel King with Philip Bump Phillips, an opinion columnist for The Washington Post.

You've been writing about these videos that show masked agents grabbing people.

Who are they?

What is going on?

Yeah, so who they are is almost definitionally unknown because they don't identify themselves, right?

There's no reason to think they're anyone but federal law enforcement.

But one of the things we've seen in the second Trump administration is that a lot of other federal agencies have been looped into these enforcement actions.

So we know that a lot of them are ICE, Immigration to Customs Enforcement.

We know, too, that there are other agencies that have been working with ICE.

But the question of who the individuals are is an outstanding one.

We don't know who a lot of these individuals are, which I think is important, right?

I mean, it's not just that there's sort of a way things are done and it's not done that way anymore.

What we're seeing is a fundamental shift in the compact between the public and law enforcement.

And by shielding their identities, we lose an element of that accountability.

Beyond just ICE and the Trump administration having no interest in being held to account on this, these individuals, we don't know who they are.

So when we see videos of them assaulting someone, for example, there's no way to adjudicate that.

There's no way to say this person made these decisions because we don't know who these people are necessarily.

And that's a significant shift as well.

This is making people uncomfortable, I've noticed.

Even people who are pro-deportation of undocumented immigrants.

ICE Director Todd Lyons has been asked about this, and he recently said that people are out there taking photos of the names, their faces, and posting them online with death threats to their family and themselves.

So I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line and their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is.

So he's saying they're doing this because they have to.

Does your reporting suggest that ICE agents who are unmasked are facing threats?

That is what he's saying.

And he is also saying that there has been a 413 or more recently 500% increase in the number of assaults on ICE officers.

And I think it's important to recognize he's conflating three different things there.

It is the case that people are trying to document who ICE is and where they are so that immigrants can be attentive to the fact that ICE may be in their neighborhoods.

You know, this is something that we've seen, these sort of grassroots efforts to alert people to ICE presence.

There's a big gap between identifying where ICE is and who ICE officers are and issuing threats against them.

There have been some examples of ICE officers facing threats.

When I first wrote about this in May, Lyons actually wrote a response in the Washington Post and he said, oh, well, look at this case in Texas where someone had made these threats against ICE.

Now we are turning to a developing story.

A North Texas man is now in custody and accused of threatening the head of Homeland Security along with ICE agents.

Federal officials say he also threatened several Republicans and even taunted the FBI to come and get him.

So they did.

What's interesting about that case, as I wrote last week, is that in that case, the person appears to have been responding to the fact that the ICE agents were masked.

He was responding to the fact that the ICE agents appeared to be acting without accountability.

That's no excuse for issuing threats, certainly, but it's important context.

But then we get to this number, this 413% or 500% or whatever they're saying.

It's now they refused to give me any sort of rationalization for where those numbers came from.

But when you consider those numbers, it makes sense, it's not good, but it makes sense that if you are engaged in a lot more enforcement actions and you're encountering people and trying to, you know, physically detain them, you're going to have more instances in which officers are being struck or assaulted.

And we've seen that the definition of assault that's being used here is often very loose.

The city controller of New York City, Brad Lander, faced potential charges of assault after he was arrested.

And if you've seen the video of that encounter, it's very clear he wasn't assaulting anyone.

I'm not obstructing.

I'm standing right here in the hallway.

I have to see the judicial warrant.

But to conflate those incidents in which people who are being detained, and you know, there have been criminal charges filed for assault, but a lot of them are, for example, at ICE detention facilities where

the ICE officers don't need to wear a mask because they're, you know, they're obviously ICE staff at an ICE detention facility.

But to conflate those assaults and that purported increase in assaults with threats and doxing or identification simply is not logically viable.

Is it legal for law enforcement to wear masks as they're doing?

So this is a fascinating question.

And I think

people should recognize that it has long been the case that law enforcement is allowed to go undercover cops.

We're all familiar with undercover cops, right?

You know, so there are circumstances in which people are allowed to mask their identities.

And

I have not seen anything which suggests they are not allowed to do this by law.

We've seen some efforts to try and actually

create the legislation that would that would mandate that they have their identities known, but none of that just passed it obviously this is this is still fairly early on

so we have seen however some instances in which law enforcement officers who normally have standards about self-identification have been seen those standards change so in Florida for example there's an email that went out to state troopers who are participating in raids alongside ICE they were offered instructions that they did not have to maintain the standard the uniform standard that they usually maintain that includes having their names they were allowed to not display their names on their uniforms when engaged in operations with ICE.

So we've seen some changes to standards that are aimed at anonymizing these individuals, which I think is a remarkable shift.

What might accountability look like?

How might it look different if we could see an agent's face and know who they worked for?

Well, it depends on what the agents are doing, right?

You know, when I first reported on this, I spoke with Radley Balka, who's done, long done fantastic work in this accountability space.

And he pointed to an example in which there had been a DEA action that targeted the wrong house.

And there were two women that lived in the house that tried to get accountability from the DEA for that.

But the DEA, because the agents were not identifiable in that instance, the DEA was able to keep shuffling the cards and prevent them from being able to say, hey, you know, what happened here

and get any accountability on their own accord.

That's the challenge, right?

It's not the case that we need to know who every single ICE officer is necessarily.

It is that if something happens where there needs to be accountability, there needs to be a mechanism for that accountability.

And if people are shielding their identities, that mechanism becomes very, very difficult, particularly when you have the institution itself, ICE, and the administration, very obviously unwilling to hold themselves to account in any way otherwise.

I wonder then if there's any evidence that being masked is changing the way that ICE agents are conducting arrests.

No, it's a fair question.

And I think that it's very fair for Americans to assume that the understood lack of accountability, because obviously the officers are very aware that by being anonymous, that they have less accountability, whether or not that is leading to some of the heightened tensions that we've seen in these encounters.

It may simply be the fact that because there are more encounters, we're seeing more of these incidents, but it's a very fair question to ask.

Many of the downsides are predictable.

If a person wears a mask, the accountability is lowered.

Are there any unexpected downsides here, though?

Anyone can put on tactical gear, say they're ICE, and go up to people and try and detain them.

And we've seen instances of this.

I knew at 4:30, a suspect in jail after police say he robbed a 29-year-old man while impersonating an ICE agent.

Philadelphia police are looking for a man who they say dressed like a federal agent to commit a crime.

Here he is caught on surveillance as he walked into an auto repair shop right next to a police station.

He apparently shouted, immigration, and then zip-tied a woman who was working there and took off with about a thousand bucks in cash.

And it's hard for people to know, like, is this a nice officer that I have to listen to or is it not?

And, you know, I think everyone is worried about an occasion in which someone sees someone approaching with a firearm and responds in kind.

And, you know, maybe that's a legitimate law enforcement officer and maybe it isn't.

But this is what we're setting ourselves up for if these people are not identifiable as law enforcement.

And masking may be legal for the agents, but impersonating a federal law enforcement officer, is that a crime?

Yeah, that's bad.

Don't do that.

Okay.

Okay.

If there are two messages, don't enforce an end to law enforcement and don't assault law enforcement.

All right.

So

the Trump administration has a broad immigration strategy.

How do massed agents, how does mass law enforcement fit into that broad strategy?

Well, I think the strategy broadly is they just want to have as many immigrants out of the country as they possibly can.

We often qualify that by saying undocumented immigrants, but I don't think that holds anymore, right?

We're seeing the revocation of temporary protected status for groups, people who came to the country legally, interpreters who worked with our troops in Afghanistan.

People are now facing deportation who were not only not talked about on the campaign trail, but who were presumed to be in the country, you know, by following the rules and in accordance with American law.

So

in alignment with that, we are seeing that the people who are engaged in these deportation efforts are feeling completely unbound, right?

That they feel as though they have been given a mandate to sweep up as many people as they can.

And there's reporting that suggests they very literally have quotas of who they're trying to target, and that they are empowered to do that through any mechanism that they possibly can.

And that's bad.

That it is not good to have a law enforcement body in the United States, which feels as though it can act without account and sweep up as many people as possible, including citizens, including green card holders, including people who are here on legitimate visas.

You know, we have seen lots of people get caught in this dragnet who, by no definition, deserve to face any threat of deportation whatsoever.

But that's the challenge, and that's something that has been made very real by the Trump administration.

Philip Bump is an opinion columnist for the Washington Post.

Coming up next, a TV critic who started writing about those ICE videos and those bystander videos on what she thinks they tell us.

Support for today's show comes from Select Quote.

If the news these days makes you want to hide under your bed,

do you listen to our show from under your bed?

Let Noelle know, Noelle at king.com.

Anyway, you're probably not alone if that's happening, but honestly, there are better ways to protect yourself than with an old box spring.

Wow.

Oh, they brought it back to the bed.

That That makes sense.

Like term life insurance from Select Quote.

Oh, this isn't about beds.

This is about term life insurance from Select Quote.

For over 40 years, Select Quote says they've been one of the most trusted brokers in insurance and that they've helped more than 2 million Americans secure over $700 billion in coverage.

Those are some numbers for you.

You can get the right life insurance for you for less and save more than 50% at selectquote.com/slash explain.

You can save more than 50% percent on term life insurance at selectquote.com slash explain today to get started that is selectquote.com slash explained

support for today's show comes from hymns erectile dysfunction is more common than you think and with the right help it can be simpler to treat than ever through hymns you can connect online with a licensed provider to access personalized treatment options they say you can do it discreetly and on your terms.

They offer access to ED treatment options, including trusted generics that cost 95% less than brand names if prescribed.

And HIMSS says they bring expert care straight to you with online access to personalized treatments.

They put your health and goals first, with real medical providers making sure you get what you need to get results.

You can get simple online access to personalized affordable care for ED, hair loss, weight loss, and more by visiting HIMS.com slash explained.

That's hims.com slash explained for your free online visit.

HIMS.com slash explained.

Actual price will depend on product and subscription plan.

Feature products include compounded drug products, which the FDA does not approve or verify for safety, effectiveness, or quality.

Prescription required, see website for details, restrictions, and important safety information.

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start?

Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to.

Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin, or what that clunking sound from your dryer is?

With thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro.

You just have to hire one.

You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app.

Download today.

You're listening to Today Explained.

Hi, I am Catherine Vanerandonk, and I am a critic at Vulture.

I typically cover TV and comedy, although I also write about books sometimes when the mood strikes.

And one of the great things about working at Vulture and being a critic at Vulture is that you have a remit to cover basically anything that interests you if you can get an editor interested as well.

So

I also like to think of myself as just a culture critic more broadly.

So recently you talked an editor into letting you write a piece about Ice Raid videos.

Why did you think it was important to write about them?

This is something that I started seeing on my social media feeds earlier this year.

I know lots of people did.

And in the beginning of the year, actually it was one of the vulture editors who had come to me and said, hey, have you noticed this kind of ICE propaganda thing that seems to be taking over?

It looks a lot like reality television.

I write a lot about reality TV.

I think about it in a lot of different contexts.

And so, we were talking about the way that ICE and DHS had started producing these videos that really capitalized on how Americans watch shows like Cops and Live PD.

And

over time, what I started to notice is that there are all of these bystander videos of ICE raids that are capturing exactly the same kind of events, but that look different, notably different from how ICE propaganda presents them.

And so that became a much more interesting way of thinking about what it feels like to be an American on social media scrolling and encountering all of these videos.

What is the difference that you picked up on?

There are a lot of differences that are common.

In most of the ICE videos,

you can see the exact same thing that you would see if you were watching a bystander video.

You see guys getting out of a truck and they go to collect someone and they often handcuff them or zip tie them and then lead them off into some kind of van.

However, ICE videos have this sort of broad tonal range, right?

Like some of them are very straightforward.

They look look like news coverage.

Often they do repost local news footage of the ICE raids.

An illegal alien from Guatemala charged with raping a child in Massachusetts.

An MS-13 gang member from El Salvador accused of murdering a Texas man.

A Venezuelan charged with filming and selling child pornography in Michigan.

These are just some of the heinous migrant criminals caught.

because of President Donald J.

Trump's leadership.

But then there will also be these ones that are clearly trolling.

Like they are meant to be shared by people who think that this is awesome and that this is funny.

I'm conducting surveillance for all possible arrests this morning.

They will put the cops' theme music under it.

There's a video that was posted by DHS about a cartel party and they're like, we'll bring ice next time, baby.

And it's set to vanilla ices, ice ice baby.

You know, it's memeified.

It's trolling.

Obviously, bystander videos don't have any of that sort of quality to them because they are records of people being horrified.

You don't have to tell us.

It's unidentified.

You don't have to tell us.

You're kidnapping them.

Tell us we are taking them.

You cannot do this.

Tell us where.

But there is this one really important difference that I have seen that holds true through all of the ICE propaganda, which is that they never post videos where there are people around standing on the streets looking at what's happening and protesting.

Almost every bystander video, often it's the person who's filming themselves.

No!

Just because you guys won't!

Fucked up!

You guys need to fuck up, bro.

You wouldn't have fucking kids!

Often it's other people who have like come out of houses or come out of businesses on the surrounding block will be standing there around all of these vehicles, around the ICE agents, and they'll be expressing how furious they are, often with all kinds of terrible words.

And and they are screaming and they are yelling and they are trying to block traffic.

Your family was an immigrant too, you

none of you are

none of you are Native American.

You all started out as immigrants.

And remember that semem that what part of Europe are you from?

That's what never shows up in the ICE propaganda videos.

I was watching a lot of these videos this afternoon, both the bystander and the official ones.

And ICE clearly wants us, the official narrative clearly is this is happening effortlessly.

Yeah.

But then, my gosh, some of these ones that are taken in the streets, you see the fight, you see the person pushed down on the hood of a car, you see the person's kids screaming, somebody's being dragged away.

And notably, the ICE agents have their faces covered.

And you think, well, if it was effortless, y'all would not be wearing masks.

What do you take from

the attempt to get us to think that this is really simple versus the reality?

Yeah, they really seem invested in this image of deportation where the people who are being taken away are not complaining.

They are not fighting it.

They seem, in most ICE videos, people are led away very calmly.

Nobody's weeping.

It's not like there are people's family members surrounding them.

There aren't children crying.

But there are plenty of other ICE videos where you can see their masks.

You can see that

this is how they come into

spaces.

There's one pretty significant raid that happened at the Glen Valley Foods Facility in Omaha where the local news coverage, which was then reposted by ICE and by DHS,

you can see, you can see all of their masks and you can see the vests and you can see how inhuman and how terrifying, frankly, all of the ICE agents look.

But you can also see what they show you in that footage that they reposted is like calm people walking in orderly lines out of this facility.

There are bystander videos of that exact same event.

And they take, they begin much earlier.

They begin with people in the lunchroom crying, calling their loved ones,

shouting at the ICE agents.

So there's a man who's sitting down in one of the bystander videos and an ICE agent says, we have a warrant.

And the guy says, Here's my bag of fucks.

And like, this is not something that ever shows up in the ICE propaganda because they don't want you to know.

They have no interest in displaying how angry people are about this.

What is the utility of those bystander videos?

What are you seeing in them?

I think there's a huge utility.

And I was really,

I did not feel this at first.

As I was watching more and more of these, though, I was so taken with how many of the bystander videos actually don't show anything at all.

Like it will be a guy in a car and he's driving down the block and he has

spotted what are clearly ICE video or ICE trucks parked down the block.

No, fuck you.

Give me your badge on your name.

You guys have no warrant.

No probable cause.

Shame on you guys.

Shame on you.

And it's just people trying to say, like, I don't know what this is, but I hate it and I need everyone to be with me on it.

I think are also so powerful because it is so easy to watch how effortless this kind of thing appears to be when ICE posts it and to feel so powerless in response.

And instead, when you watch all these bystander videos, you feel like, all right, this is at least here is a thing I can do.

I can be mad about this.

I can yell at those guys.

Maybe I can try to block their traffic a little bit.

I can tell other people about how I feel about it.

And at least I will be less alone.

And we will all know that, like, this is a thing that you are not alone in feeling, that this is how people are responding.

And you can too.

You had to watch a lot of these videos for your piece.

Is there one of them that you're having trouble forgetting?

There are a lot I've been having trouble forgetting.

But the one that I

really struck on and sort of became the end point of that essay was a video that was not particularly popular yet, although it became much, much popular very shortly.

And it was a bunch of roofers sitting up on a roof line.

It was filmed by one of the roofers.

And it's like a beautiful, brilliant day.

He's in Lafayette, Louisiana.

They're in the middle of building this roof.

It's like in pieces around them.

And you can see him astride the roof line.

He's like way up in the sky.

And he points the phone down and you can see ice agents just waiting for them on the ground.

And

nothing happens in that video.

There's no, we don't see the results of it.

And you actually can go later onto his account and see later videos.

And what he says in the later videos is like:

we were all okay, they didn't take any of us, but thank you all for worrying.

And that has really stuck with me.

You can read Catherine Van Ehren Donk at Vulture.

Today's show was produced by Hadi Muagdi, Miles Bryan, and Peter Balinon-Rosen.

It was edited by Amina Elsadi, Andrea Kristen's daughter, and Patrick Boyd are our engineers, and Laura Bullard and Gabrielle Burbay check the facts.

I'm Noel King.

It's Today Explained.

Mama, Papa, my cupo crece a rimo alarmante, and the rope that me comprehended, I wanted very pequeña very promptly.

But

notine que suffrie por la moda con los precios vasos de la vuela clas de Amazon.

Amazon, dastamenos sonriemas.

Join Vanguard for a moment of meditation.

Take a deep breath.

Picture yourself reaching your financial goals.

Feel that freedom.

Visit vanguard.com/slash investinginyou to learn more.

All investing is subject to risk.