What the Gaza ceasefire really means
This episode was produced by Danielle Hewitt and Avishay Artsy, edited by Amina Al-Sadi, fact-checked by Laura Bullard and Hady Mawajdeh, engineered by Adriene Lilly and Patrick Boyd, and hosted by Noel King.
A bus carrying Palestinians released from Israeli prisons arriving in Khan Yunis, Gaza Strip. Photo by Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images.
Listen to Today, Explained ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members. New Vox members get $20 off their membership right now. Transcript at vox.com/today-explained-podcast.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Listen and follow along
Transcript
Palestinians and Israelis have lived about a decade in the last week.
The living Israeli hostages are now home.
Palestinian prisoners held by Israel have come home too.
Israel has agreed to a ceasefire in Gaza.
Both sides are already accusing the other of violating the terms, it should be said.
President Trump took a victory lap, well deserved, many people say, in a speech to Israel's Knesset.
Today, the skies are calm, the guns are silent, the sirens are still, and the sun rises on a holy land that is finally at peace.
Then met with more than 20 world leaders in Egypt and complained that Time magazine had used a quote super bad picture of him in a cover story touting his triumph.
Some big questions do remain.
Will Hamas disarm?
Who's going to lead in Gaza?
Coming up on Today Explained, peace and then the hard part.
Support for Today Explain comes from The Economist.
If you're like me, you're a little bit obsessed with The Economist.
And The Economist has a new feature for you.
Insider is a brand new video offering from The Economist that lets you feel like a fly on the wall of their editorial meetings.
With Insider, you get direct access to the internal debates that shape how The Economist makes sense of an increasingly complex and turbulent world.
Here, trusted voices debate the biggest global issues with Insider free at launch for all subscribers to The Economist.
Huh, learn more at economist.com/slash insider.
Support for the show today comes from Anthropic, the team behind Claude.
Today's news moves fast, but the most important stories deserve deeper thinking.
Whether you're trying to understand the implications of a policy change or connecting dots across breaking stories, Claude, your new AI collaborator, can help you go beyond the headlines.
Claude doesn't just summarize the news, it helps you explore the context, analyze the patterns, and think through what it all means together.
Try Claude for free at claude.ai/slash todayxplained.
You're listening to Today Explained.
I'm Noel King here with Nidal El-Mughrabi in Cairo.
Nidal is a senior correspondent for Reuters, who was based in Gaza until Reuters pulled him out about a month and a half after the war started.
Nidal, understandably, there's a lot of optimism about this peace deal.
You've been reporting even today on what Hamas is doing in Gaza.
What's going on?
Since the ceasefire came into effect, you know, like Hamas' forces have been deployed into the streets of Gaza Strip in areas where the army pulled back from in an attempt to reassert power and to fight back against like some of the armed gangs
and what Hamas calls also people who have collaborated with Israel to instigate like chaos and anarchy.
They have deployed like hundreds of security forces and fighters in some areas.
And
in the past three days, they have clashed with
several Klan members and armed groups, killing dozens, according to security officials from Hamas.
They're fighting in different places across the Gaza Strip.
Yes, the exchange of rockets or exchange of fire with Israel may have stopped, but Hamas has another kind of a battle, which is to regain control of Gaza which it has ruled since 2007
and maybe encouraged by you know like US President Donald Trump has said that you know like he they have given a nod to Hamas to do so where they are standing because they do want to stop the problems and they've been open about it and we gave them approval for a period of time so so Hamas is doing that in the so-called like
interim period with a nod from the White House.
Until when this is going to last, what kind of a window or like a timeline for this window given by the Americans to Hamas to still exist before they move to the next phase of disarming
the movement, which is going to be a very complicated issue and thorny issue in the negotiations.
When it comes to Israel, I think Israel is seeing what's happening.
I don't think that Israel is very much like what they see on the ground because the ultimate goal for Israel, as expressed by Netanyahu and
Defense Minister Katz, several times,
the next day in Gaza, there would be no presence for Hamas in the government.
Hamas must be...
disarmed and defeated.
That's when it comes to Israel's goals.
Over the last two years, many members of Hamas, including the group's leadership, have been killed by Israel.
How strong is Hamas today?
Hamas nowadays is not the same movement that was before October 7.
They have lost...
almost all of the top military commanders.
They have lost many of the political leaders of the group.
They have lost hundreds or thousands of fighters.
But in the past three days, they have shown some ability to control.
You know, they have shown a serious attempt towards reassertion of their control of Gaza Strip.
We are seeing hundreds of security forces on the ground.
We are seeing dozens of
the armed wing fighters, well equipped,
also touring the streets, raiding some places, looking for people on their wanted list for
what they said, instigation of anarchy and chaos and collaboration with Israel during the war.
Yesterday, there was a video that showed several armed masked men.
Some of them were wearing
green bandanas resembling the ones that Hamas fighters usually like wear on their foreheads, you know, killing seven people.
And according to one of like Hamas' security officials, he confirmed to Reuters the authenticity of the video and told us that it was an execution of alleged collaborators.
That's what he said.
What you're reminding us is that Hamas really did have a lot of control over the Gaza Strip and it exercised it at points through violence.
A key element of this ceasefire is that Hamas is being asked to disarm and give up control over the territory.
How likely is Hamas to actually do that?
Publicly, officially, Hamas leaders have been against that.
They have repeatedly rejected the idea of disarming.
Our weapons
are going to be handed over only to the hands of a Palestinian state, and our fighters can be integrated into the Palestinian National Army.
Before that, no one has the right to
deny us the right to resist the occupation by all means.
Having said that, there will be negotiations over Israel's and the United States' demands.
And actually, it's not only the demand now by Israel and the United States.
Since many Arab and Muslim countries, some of them are very friendly with Hamas,
welcomed the Trump 20
point documents.
I welcome your voice to Shalma Sheikh Peace Summit.
this historic milestones
we all together have witnessed the reaching of Shalma Sheikh
on ending war in Gaza
with the birth of a glimpse of hope
and that such deep ends
an agonizing chapter in the history of mankind.
So the pressure on Hamas is expected to be very high, huge, but in the same time Hamas is arguing that it has agreed to relinquish power.
They will no longer be in the governance in Gaza, and that they are accepting a government of Technocrat.
But they are referring to a Palestinian government of Technocrat and not to the international force or entity that the Trump blueprint is detailing.
So, Palestinians want Palestinian leadership.
They don't want outsiders coming in to rule over them.
How are civilians in Gaza feeling about the prospect of an end to this war?
What are you hearing?
Palestinians, especially
in Gaza and everywhere, but especially in Gaza,
they're joyful.
But
we shouldn't forget that this joy is not pure, because it's mixed by the feelings of despair, it's mixed by the feeling of loss, and
the loss of families, the loss of houses, the loss of an entire city.
It's actually stories of despair.
Somebody would
tell us, now the war is over, it is time to look for the body of my father or the body of
my son,
which is still under the rubble of our house
back in Gaza City.
Some people would tell you that
yes, the war is over, but when the rebuilding of Gaza will happen, are we going to continue to live in tents for years to come before they rebuild Gaza?
Because there is no timeline for when the reconstruction
will happen or ever will it happen because it's all dependent on whether the deal will succeed, on whether Hamas will agree to disarm.
It is conditional.
So
the lack of clarity torments
the people and also impacts the feelings of relief they are trying to hold on to.
I wonder how you are feeling today after covering decades of wars and peace treaties and more wars and more peace treaties.
Where is your mind at?
That's a tough question.
You know, I I've been with Reuters since 1996.
I have covered like numerous rounds of fighting,
in addition to the major wars since uh you know i covered uh the war in 2008
2012 2014 2019 2021 22 23 because there were some major rounds of fighting and uh you know like um here i am covering uh the um you know the biggest and longest ever war or fighting between the Palestinians and Israel.
Just like any Palestinian, I just
hope that the guns have gone silent forever and
that people
will have the opportunity to
rebuild their lives because it's not just homes that had been destroyed.
It's also
the lives of the people that had been torn apart.
People have
not even had a chance
to
comfort one another or even even to grieve
for the people they have lost.
Some of the people have not even had the chance to bury
their own people, their relatives.
So those deserve
some time of peace, at least even if they want only to grieve.
I hear people
telling me
that the thing that they want to do the most when this war ends is to cry.
Imagine.
So,
because
they had to contain
these feelings of sadness, of sorrow, and frustration for so long.
So, it is time for them to have some break, relief, and hope that this war is actually over and that's not going to be any resumption of the fighting.
It's what every Palestinian wants, and
I'm included.
Nidal El-Mughrabi of Reuters in Cairo.
Coming up, what lessons did the world learn from this war, and what if they are the wrong ones?
Support for Today Explain comes from Quince.
Sweater weather is upon us, and sweater weather isn't just about sweaters.
It's about all the layers in your fall outfits that keep you warm as the days get colder.
From the aforementioned sweaters to premium denim to luxe outerwear, Quince says they have everything you need to stay cozy this autumn.
And by partnering directly with top-tier factories, Quince is able to cut out the middleman, which is how they say they can deliver luxury quality clothing at half the price of similar brands.
Here's Nisha Chittal.
The cotton boyfriend crew neck sweater.
It's kind of just a good, classic, oversized sweater that looks kind of effortlessly polished and put together.
It's really easy to build an outfit around it.
You know, you can throw on a sweater and jeans.
and walk out the door in fall and it's it's a perfect easy outfit.
You can find your fall staples at Quince.
You can go to quince.com slash explained for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns.
Now available in Canada too.
That's quince.com slash explain to get free shipping and 365 day returns.
Quince.com slash explained.
Support for the show today comes from Bombus.
They have all the comfy socks, slippers, tees, and underwear you'll need for the fall.
And they're made from premium materials that actually make sense for this time of year, like merino wool, strong subpoena cotton, or durable rag wool.
Some of my favorites in that list.
Nisha Chital is our colleague here at Vox, and she's tried Bombus.
After a summer of wearing sandals for months, it does feel like sock weather again.
So I'm excited to, you know, start wearing regular non-sandal shoes again.
Boots, sneakers, flats, loafers.
And I think, interestingly, like I have a Bombus style of sock that could pair with each of those those types of footwear.
Bombus also wants to know about their mission, which is that for every item you purchase, they donate one to someone facing homelessness.
They say over 150 million items have been donated thanks to customers.
Plus, Bombus is available for international shopping to over two hundo countries.
You can go to bombus.com/slash explain and use the code explain for 20% off your first purchase.
That's bombb-as.com/slash explain code explain to checkout.
Support for Today Explained comes from Anthropic, the team behind Claude.
Every entrepreneur knows that moment when breaking news hits and you're thinking, what does this actually mean for my business?
New regulations drop, markets shift, geopolitical events unfold, and suddenly you need to understand not just what happened, but how it connects to everything else.
Claude by Anthropic is an AI collaborator that can help you work through information in real time.
You can upload docs, regulatory filings, or multiple news sources to help you see the bigger picture.
Need to verify claims or research background context.
Claude searches current sources and provides citations you can check.
It works through complex news stories step by step, asking questions that reveal deeper meanings and connections others miss.
See why the world's best problem solvers choose Claude as their thinking partner and try Claude for free at claude.ai/slash today explained.
You're listening to Today Explained.
Josh, go ahead, give me your full name and tell me what you do.
I'm Josh Keating.
I'm a reporter at Vox covering foreign policy and national security.
All right, so you over the past couple of days have written and then updated a piece about what you call the bleak lesson that Israel and the world might learn from the end of this war.
What is the bleak lesson?
What are you talking about?
Well, it's just, you know, there was a lot of discussion throughout this war that Israel needed a day after plan.
It needed to come up with some plan for governance of Gaza and that by killing as many civilians as they did in the process of wiping out Hamas, that they were undermining their own goals.
And I think, you know, with this war ended is what we have to say is about as successfully as could have been anticipated over the last few months.
You know, really, I think the lesson that a lot of countries are going to take is they don't have to take those things into account.
They can just try to win militarily,
don't have to think about post-war planning and kill as many civilians as they need to to accomplish their military goals.
And I think, you know, other countries, there are problems with that thesis, but they may see it as a viable solution.
Let's talk about how we got here, and let's talk first about the man taking the most credit, and that is President Trump.
How much credit does the president deserve here?
You know, I think the sort of Trumpian-style diplomacy did play a key role here.
I mean, I think what the sort of strength of this deal is they sort of put off the tricky long-term questions about, you know, governance and,
you know, whether Hamas was going to disarm and, you know, when Israel is going to withdraw to what point.
And they just said, no, Trump said, we need hostages released now.
We need a ceasefire now.
And when the two sides tried to wiggle out of it, he basically pushed them forward.
He did put pressure on Netanyahu in a way, it has to be said, Joe Biden never did.
And when Hamas basically responded to the deal with a yes, but, Netanyahu tried to treat that as a no, and Trump still pushed forward.
He said, you know, he basically treated it as a yes.
And so I think that that was critical in getting everyone on the same page.
I think the question we have to ask is whether this could have been done sooner.
I mean, I think people are, a lot of people are forgetting now that there was a ceasefire in place that was negotiated by the Biden administration when Trump came into office, and that lapsed in March when Israel resumed the war.
So could Trump have applied this kind of pressure back in February, March, and avoided
all the casualties we've seen since then?
It's hard to say, but we should give him credit for what we saw over the last few weeks.
Also, there are questions to be asked about whether this could have been done earlier.
What does President Trump get out of this?
What does this mean for the next three plus years of his administration?
Well, I think what he'd like to get out of it is a Nobel Peace Prize.
He didn't get it last week.
You know, there's always next year.
I think we'll have to wait and see.
I mean, you know, he's there's another thing I've written about that there's been a lot of discussion about whether you know the U.S.
is retreating from the world under Trump's presidency.
I don't think that's the right way to look at it.
I think Trump has taken a very activist stance on the world.
I mean, he says inaccurately that...
You've stopped eight wars, so that's never happened before.
But I think he sees himself as a peacemaker and a deal maker.
And, you know, I think that he will say that he's the only one who could have made this deal, that he's done something Joe Biden wasn't able to do.
And yeah, so I think he sees this as a legacy issue for him.
What does Benjamin Netanyahu get out of this deal?
Benjamin Netanyahu gets time.
For a piece I wrote, I went back to coverage of him in the first year he was prime minister back in the 90s.
And even then, you know, people were saying that he was this sort of serial bungler, that he was
on the way out, that his, you know, prime ministership was hanging by a thread.
And, you know, the guy's been hanging by a thread for about three decades now.
And I think, you know, what happens is he sort of gets in these dilemmas and he plays for time.
And I think he's done it again this time.
You know, this deal is about as probably good as realistically could be expected over the last you know year or so for israel um you know it has to be said i don't think a lot of israelis are giving him credit for it i think trump is getting a lot more credit for it you know if you look at the rallies and the statements that hostage families are making they're thanking trump thank you president trump for your courage Thank you, the Trump administration, for doing everything you can to bring them home.
President Trump basted in the praise of a country that credits him more than its own prime minister for today's long-awaited reunions.
The president's name echoing through Israel's parliament as he touted his landmark diplomatic success.
They're not thanking Netanyahu and it's pretty clear that he tried to wiggle out of this up until the last minute.
But still, you know,
elections are months, if not a year, away.
And I think what we've learned over the past three decades is that,
you know, as long as he has sort of time to try to find a way out,
you know, he usually does.
This war,
you know,
it may be over.
It may be a win for Netanyahu, the best he could have possibly hoped for, but we do know that it has damaged Israel's reputation internationally.
What do you think the ripple effect of this war is down the line?
I think the hope for Israel is that, or, or, you know, and I don't mean Netanyahu, I mean sort of average Israelis,
is that once the fighting stops, that some of the heat will be taken off.
That,
you know, we've already seen it, that, you know, governments in the Middle East were clearly sort of coordinating with Israel on this, you know, for all their public statements about the Palestinians.
They're still willing to play ball with Israel to a large extent.
And that some of the, you know, for instance, European governments that signed on to recognizing the Palestinian state at the UN a few weeks ago and are starting to talk about things like sanctions and boycotts, that some of that pressure will go away.
We'll be able to see Israeli teams participate in sporting events again that will, you know, maybe they'll be able to go to Eurovision.
Maybe there won't be the same kind of hostile atmosphere faced by Israeli citizens.
when they travel abroad.
I think that's the hope.
And I think to some extent that will happen.
I think public opprobrium can be pretty short-lived.
I mean, we saw Vladimir Putin walking on a red carpet in Alaska a few weeks ago.
On the other hand, you know, I do think there's something of a generational shift going on.
I think if you look at the politics of sort of, you know, Gen Z voters in most Western democracies, I think that
sort of solidarity with the Palestinian cause and anti-Zionism are becoming a lot more pervasive.
And, you know, even if these current governments will maybe look for a way out of the very staunchly pro-Palestinian stances they've taken over the last few months, I think long term,
unless we see some major shifts on the ground in the Middle East, that Israel is looking at a more isolated, both politically and economically isolated future.
So to take us back to your piece, your concern is that the lessons countries take from this war is we don't need to worry about civilian life.
We don't need to win hearts and minds.
And we don't have to have a plan for how to rebuild.
We just need to do a war.
Where does that leave us?
Where does that leave the world?
Well, you know, I think there's been a lot of discussion over the last few years of the sort of decaying of the so-called rules-based international order, which, you know, always had a lot of flaws and was frequently violated.
But there were certain norms that were at least held up as aspirations, even if not always met in practice.
Certain laws about the conduct of war, about the treatment of civilians.
And
I think we're moving away from that.
I think,
if you look at what Pete Hegseth said a few weeks ago in that speech at Quantico, we unleash overwhelming and punishing violence on the enemy.
We also don't don't fight with stupid rules of engagement.
We untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, demoralize, hunt, and kill the enemies of our country.
And so, you know, if the United States is,
you know, the government that
may more than others responsible for setting up a lot of these rules and norms is not even paying lip service to them anymore.
I think a lot of countries are going to take note of that, and it's going to affect the way other wars are fought in the future.
Vox's Josh Keating.
Avishai Artsi and Danielle Hewitt produce today's show.
Amina El Sadi is our editor.
Laura Bullard and Hadi Muagdi check the facts.
Patrick Boyd and Adrian Lilly are our engineers.
I'm Noelle King.
It's Today Explained.
I need a job with a steady paycheck.
I need a job that offers health care on day one for me and my kids.
I want a job where I can get certified in technical roles, like robotics or software engineering.
In communities across the country, hourly Amazon employees earn an average of over $23 an hour with opportunities to grow their skills and their paycheck by enrolling in free skills training programs and apprenticeships.
Learn more at aboutamazon.com.
The world is changing faster than ever.
Now, with The Economist Insider, a new premium video offering, we're giving you unprecedented access to the debates shaping our world.
I have sat around that table at NATO.
There is an incoming missile attack now.
Could you answer the question?
I'm sorry, we've got very little time left.
With a few surprises along the way.
I can't promise we'll have a cocktail every time, but we'll try.
So, don't just be an economist reader, get on the inside track with The Economist Insider.
Go to economist.com to join the conversation.