Anna Paulina Luna: Elon Musk's X Revolutionizing Free Speech | DSH #1451

CIA Director Ratcliffe and President Trump's executive order.

This was a bipartisan investigation that is decades long overdue, but after 60 plus years, we finally got the answers on who killed Kennedy.

And the answer to that is the CIA knowingly engaged in a cover-up.

They had connections with the people that likely pulled the trigger.

And what I would tell you is you can put together the rest of the picture on that.

All right, guys, we got Anna Paulina Luna back on the show.

She's been busy investigating a lot of stuff.

You've met on your show now.

Yeah.

Man, you've been busy.

Yeah, that's an understatement.

I know we talked about the,

you know, the breastfeeding stuff on the last one.

And now there's studies on depression, postpartum depression.

Yeah.

So last time we were covering down on formula and there's this like big movement within the big formula companies to encourage women to use infant formula.

And I get it because some women have issues breastfeeding.

And so for the health of the child, obviously use formula.

But there is correlation between postpartum depression and not breastfeeding.

And And I think that when we're talking about postpartum health, mental health even in regards to new moms, that's such an important thing because when you are breastfeeding, it releases, you know, these feel-good hormones that actually enable you to bond.

It relaxes you and helps to restabilize everything.

And so I wanted to put that out there because I just think it's really important, especially for new moms to know that to, you know, if you're being encouraged to use formula and you can breastfeed, you should probably breastfeed.

Yeah, I'm never using formula.

It's such a mom topic, but yeah.

No, I'm about to get married and thinking about having kids.

I'm never using formula.

Yeah, if you, if you can, um, breastfeed, obviously, you know, do it.

But I would highly encourage if you have the ability to, even if you're working, I was working and pumping and you should do it.

Absolutely.

What other investigations have you been busy with?

So we actually just had a bombshell revelation from the CIA in regards to the JFK assassination.

And so we're wrapping up our actual investigation in regards to that.

And what I will tell you is that, you know, we had this massive drop.

Like I'm talking tens of thousands of documents, multiple hearings have have gone through with investigators, people that have dedicated their lives.

I even had Oliver Stone in to testify to the committee.

We've been working with people like Roger Stone,

Jeff Morley, to actually uncover what happened.

And so the CIA actually admitted on Friday that an individual by the name of Joe Needies, who is a CIA operative,

psyop guy, really dark actually, he knowingly lied to Congress, undermined congressional investigations, was awarded by the CIA for his ability to

thwart Congress's efforts in regards to looking into that investigation.

And then also to had interaction.

The CIA had interaction with Oswald prior to the assassination of Jeff Kay.

So in addition to the testimonies that we've gotten from doctors that were actually in the room when Kennedy was shot, that testify to there being multiple entry wounds from the front and the back, that means that there wasn't a lone gunman.

Just on the admission on Friday from the CIA regarding Joan Edis, the lone gunman theory is now dead.

Wow.

We have evidence that the Warren Commission, which was the initial investigative committee from Congress, actually knowingly intimidated witnesses, omitted evidence, pushed a theory that was not possible in regards to the magic bullet theory.

So without a doubt, there's multiple shooters.

The CIA had definitely been observing Oswald, who I believe was a Patsy, who is, I believe, the person that they pinned the crime on.

We also were made aware of testimony from witnesses that never saw Oswald in the book depository.

So the question is, who did it?

Will we ever have the actual names of the shooters?

Probably not.

But do we know that the CIA engaged in a cover-up?

Absolutely.

That was an admission now put forward.

Thank you to the director, CIA currently, CIA Director Ratcliffe, and President Trump's executive order.

This was a bipartisan investigation that is decades long overdue.

But after 60 plus years, we finally got the answers on who killed Kennedy.

And the answer to that is the CIA knowingly engaged in a cover-up.

They had connections with the people that likely pulled the trigger.

And what I would tell you is you can put together the rest of the picture on that.

Well done.

Another conspiracy theory checked off.

Checked off.

Investigated and checked off.

And there'll be a final report to Congress in the coming months.

yeah they taught the lone government theory when i was in high school i remember and when i when i made that uh admission publicly they tried to say i was a conspiracy theorist and they actually brought on journalists to try to discredit what we were doing and then after attending the hearings they could never publish the reports and then ultimately now they're the atlantic actually just posted a massive story saying that yo the cia just admitted to having interaction with oswald so you know um starting at the assassination with john f kennedy there's been a big trust trust issue in this country with the american people and the federal government.

And I'm always going to continue to advocate through transparency.

That's the only way you're going to get trust back.

Respect.

And speaking of trust issues, I feel like this Epstein stuff has caused a lot of trust issues.

Most definitely.

You know, I know you're investigating that, but where do you stand on all that?

I will say that I've exhausted all resources at my ability as a member of Congress to be able to obtain any information.

Unfortunately, we were

not given really any information at all.

And then you saw what came out from the DOJ.

I would say that there's still information pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein, not regarding CSAM material, not involving victims' identities that they can release.

And you have, you know, the Daily Mail that's been able to obtain evidence publicly out there and available.

The way that the rollout happened, I think because of the conflicting amount of information, has contributed to a lot of anger and rightfully so.

And I will continue to advocate for transparency on that.

I think that when you're in a free and fair society, if you have double standards of justice, it's not fair at all.

And either which way,

you know, I will say that until that happens, I think people are going to continue to distrust the government.

I hope that there's not another task force in 67 years to investigate that.

I hope that the information comes out.

But again, I'm not at the DOJ.

And I will tell you that as far as we're concerned, though, we will continue to get answers for the American people.

So I consider that the JFK investigation has been a success.

You can actually look at all of those findings and documents online at the National Archives.

Our next investigation will be onto the assassination of RFK.

Oh, yeah?

RFK.

Nice.

What about the 9-11 stuff?

Do you plan on looking at it?

We've actually been simultaneously conducting information on 9-11 and then also UAPs.

What's interesting about 9-11 is we were made aware of some of the 9-11 families that are suing the federal government that MI6, which is the intelligent agencies from our friends of Cross Pond,

had given, I guess, information pertaining to individuals that knew about the attacks prior.

Obviously, foreign governments definitely involved in that.

But the fact is that the FBI, whether out of gross negligence or

intentional, did not do what they should have done.

And there's also incidences of individuals casing the Capitol potentially for attack that wasn't handled right by the FBI either.

So I will say that, you know, I look, as an investigator, there's a lot happening all at once.

But when you have these types of topics, especially at hand, you have terrorists that are very real, very, very alive, that are looking at bringing mass harm and

harm to the American people.

What ends up happening is

somebody needs to be held accountable.

Those people should have been fired.

They should have never been able to stay at the agency.

So, there's a lot of questions there, and I hope to get to those too.

Anything catch your eyes on the UIP investigations?

A ton.

So, what I can tell you is, without a doubt, I have seen stuff that leads me to believe that these things are not of human creation.

Aside from that, what I can also tell you is, you know, this thing keeps resurfacing on interdimensional, interdimensional beings, not necessarily extraterrestrial.

That's also an interesting topic if you look at it, depending on the lens and perspective.

It's definitely one of those things that was considered a taboo topic.

And the number one question that I get actually from other members of Congress or members that want to gavel into the investigations or go to briefings that we're having is, you know, I want to talk about this, but I don't want to be labeled crazy.

And I think this, it's funny, like the questions that I'm asking are the questions that everyone wants to know.

I'm just the one that's saying it.

Yeah, you do a great job of that.

Thank you.

It makes, I think it makes everyday people feel like they have a voice.

Yeah.

You know what I mean?

I'm like, I kind of am like a conduit, I guess.

Yeah, because you're so active on social media with the late night tweets and everything.

And you're on my best, my best stuff comes between the hours of like 11 and 2 a.m.

The late night ideas in bed.

Yeah.

No, you're great at that because there's older members of Congress that don't use social media, right?

As much.

Social media is a way it's, it's the public square.

And I do appreciate Elon Musk's contributions to the free speech efforts on X.

X has been a game changer until to date.

You know, I wasn't big on Twitter when it was Twitter because I was censored on it.

Right.

After he purchased it, I started using it.

Now it's actually my preferred platform.

Yeah, Yeah, your engagement's crazy on there.

Where are you at with his new party?

Do you think that's a good idea?

You know, Congress already functions kind of like a parliament.

What I would say is that there has been deep frustration even from members of Congress within our own party because there seems to be lethargy and

people that campaign and then break their promises.

So, you know, what I will say is, obviously I'm a Republican.

But I do think that what it's going to end up doing is it'll force Republicans to actually adhere to their campaign promises.

So, you know, just like I am with the free markets, competition is a good thing.

Yeah.

Do you believe in the uniparty theory, though?

Yeah.

You think they're all like in bed at the end of the day?

Well, it's not necessarily that they're in bed together.

It's the money that they're taking, or it's, it's where they're taking their money from that plays on both sides that contributes to the policy.

For example, you know, like one of the most frustrating things for me is why is it like, let's talk about what happened recently with the raids in California at the marijuana farm.

There's kids there.

That's not the first time, though, that kids have been found to be actually being hired or slave labor with corporation.

Tyson Chicken Farms in Purdue actually got busted for hiring children.

Some of these children were operating heavy machinery, I believe.

One of them was young as 14, I think, lost a limb in Virginia.

And there's no harsher penalties for some of these corporations.

So that's, you know, when you're advocating for people to come here illegally, they're working.

kids are involved.

I mean, they're never going to be paid a fair wage.

So there's a lot that people don't want to touch because they might be on the agriculture committee or maybe they represent big farm districts, but that's not right.

And so that's why I've been continuously calling it out of bus sets.

What do you think the fix is for that?

Because obviously we need donations to people running, but.

Well, you know,

I am a firm believer in grassroots.

I mean, there's still some PAC money I take.

Like, for example, I take money from like a beer owner's brewery, you know, so it's like, that's not bad.

But, you know, I think it's people getting active.

And by the way, I do think that there needs to be a certain level of campaign finance reform, though, because it shouldn't cost millions and millions of dollars to run for office.

That's just ridiculous.

Right.

Well, thanks for coming on.

We'll link yourself below.

Thank you.

Good luck with your talk today.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Check her out, guys.

See you next time.