Andrew vs Coach Greg: Outsmart Relationship Challenges: Expert Advice | DSH #1623

Speaker 1 What's going on?

Speaker 2 I'm Arch Manning, Viori athlete and college quarterback. Whether I'm running, training, traveling, or just unwinding at home, I love doing it in my core shorts from Veori.

Speaker 2 With a breathable boxer briefliner, they're quick to dry, super versatile, and stand up to even my most intense training sessions. Plus, they come in three inseams and a ton of colors.

Speaker 3 Ready to try a pair?

Speaker 2 Go to viori.com/slash arch and get 20% off at checkout. I think you're going to love them as much as I do.
That's vuri.com/slash arch and get 20% off your first order. Exclusions apply.

Speaker 2 Visit the website for full terms and conditions. Not only will you receive 20% off your first purchase, but enjoy free shipping on any U.S.
orders over $75 and free returns.

Speaker 3 Have a great day.

Speaker 5 If you used Babel, you would. Babel's conversation-based techniques teach you useful words and phrases to get you speaking quickly about the things you actually talk about in the real world.

Speaker 5 With lessons handcrafted by over 200 language experts and voiced by real native speakers babble is like having a private tutor in your pocket start speaking with babel today get up to 55 off your babel subscription right now at babel.com slash spotify spelled b-a-b-b-e-l dot com slash spotify rules and restrictions may apply if you get married you may get a divorce

Speaker 3 if this happens then this may happen we already looked at the statistics of it likely happened yeah so you want to go in order for your marriage to work they have to be white Christian, make money, and then also we live in a certain region.

Speaker 3 The black community, you have more divorces than the white community. There's going to be contributing factors for why that is.

Speaker 3 I don't think that like black people are just ontologically different than white people. For the black community, there's a bunch.
One, you have a distinction in economic certitude.

Speaker 3 The second one is you had a massive abortion rate. Another one is you use matriarchal structures in the family home instead of patriarchal.

Speaker 3 So you have multiple factors here which need to be addressed. I agree with that.
Nobody ever disagreed with that, though.

Speaker 1 Okay, guys, finally getting started. Thanks for being patient.
I know there were some delays. We got Andrew here versus Coach Greg Adams, aka the free agent lifestyle.

Speaker 1 We're going to talk about today, is marriage worth it for men in the West? So let's get into some opening statements. Who wants to start off?

Speaker 3 Yeah, man, marriage is a great institution. It was an institution that built the community of America.
Most of the better communities that have safety.

Speaker 3 Good children, good schools are typically centered around marriage. However, marriage has not progressed to the point where men could be safe legally.

Speaker 3 And a lot of men have experienced tremendous damage, collateral damage, as a result. And it has led to broken families, a lot of broken hearts, simply because the laws are not

Speaker 3 positioned to benefit both people in a divorce. Therefore, you have no-fault divorce.
You have opportunities for women to use the courts against men.

Speaker 3 And as a result, men have seen one, two, two, and three generations

Speaker 3 of men getting harmed, their grandfathers, their fathers, their uncles, their brothers getting harmed by this. So, Generation Z men are not positioning themselves for a positive marriage.

Speaker 3 So, at this particular point, if someone asked me, would I recommend marriage for them,

Speaker 3 and they were in a certain position in life, they weren't established, I would say no.

Speaker 3 There's no benefit for a person to get married today. Got it.
Your response, Andrew?

Speaker 3 Yeah, I didn't hear any

Speaker 3 anti-marriage arguments. I heard anti-divorce arguments.
So

Speaker 3 I'm with you on divorce. 100%.
Stream over. And we're, I guess, by the agree.
But it's a good thing that the topic isn't on divorce. It's on marriage.

Speaker 3 And it seems like you agree with my proposition then. And the proposition is that marriage, quote, is a great institution.

Speaker 3 And that right now your concern is that men can't be safe in marriage, but that's not actually what you're saying. You're not saying men can't be safe in marriage.
they can.

Speaker 3 You're saying that they may not be safe in divorce. So I have a counterproposition for you.
My counterproposition is, what if it's the case that

Speaker 3 you can use religious marriage institutions without the state?

Speaker 6 Did you know you lose 91 days a year to scrolling? That's your entire summer.

Speaker 3 Gone.

Speaker 6 So this summer, log off and show up with friends and some ice cold Heinekens. Then instead of commenting on your crew's stories, he'll be making memories with them.
Sorry, social media.

Speaker 6 The scrolling ends and the fun begins with cold Heinekens and good friends. Heineken, social networking since 1873.
Available at your local Heineken retailer or for delivery at Heineken.com.

Speaker 6 Must be 21 plus to purchase. Enjoy Heineken responsibly.

Speaker 7 Chronic spontaneous urticaria or chronic hives with no known cause. It's so unpredictable.
It's like playing pinball.

Speaker 7 Itchy red bumps start on my arm, then my back,

Speaker 7 sometimes my legs. Hives come out of nowhere

Speaker 7 and it comes and goes. But I just found out about a treatment option at treatmyhives.com.
Take that, chronic hives. Learn more at treatmyhives.com.

Speaker 3 And then we add the ecclesiastical structure of the marriage. That's what always kept them together anyway, before the state was ever involved.

Speaker 3 So what if instead we use the ecclesiastical church, the structure of the old churches?

Speaker 3 So that would be Catholicism and Orthodoxy, where you see the lowest divorce rates because the community puts pressure on the women to act right. That's what they do.

Speaker 3 Right now, the state applies no pressure on women to act right, right? You can just go and file whatever you want, get a divorce, and go be banging the neighbor by the next night.

Speaker 3 We totally agree on that. But to say that we should abandon marriage is silly.
It seems like you're completely pro-marriage. You're just anti-divorce.

Speaker 3 So why wouldn't you just throw your weight behind institutions where the divorce rate is the least and you have an ecclesiastical structure which can be appealed to to assist with that?

Speaker 3 That's what makes no sense to me.

Speaker 3 My response to that is if if we're fifths, we'd be all drunk. All right.
So that's a scenario that just isn't present. Can you explain the analogy for me?

Speaker 3 Well, if we use if, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when. If we say, if we have a situation where this is present, then this would work.
Well, that makes sense.

Speaker 3 If we had that, we do have that right now.

Speaker 3 Well, it doesn't doesn't necessarily work because, and I'm going to tell you why, because a woman can go to a divorce attorney and they can simply just say, Hey, listen, it was an off-the-cuff, off-the-state divorce, but you got married within a certain state or she filed in a certain state.

Speaker 3 So, therefore, the divorce goes on. Absolutely.
Yes, listen.

Speaker 3 I've been to with the divorce attorneys, and what they'll tell you is, Hey, listen, you can get married in a ritual, you can get married in the orthodoxy, you can get married off record.

Speaker 3 But if she files and that woman is hell-bent on saying we got married i don't care if it was a ceremony where we walked on coals with our feet bare that's considered a marriage you also have common law you have a lot of other ways for that woman to establish marriage how does your way eliminate common law i don't have any way to eliminate common law so what i have is a way for men to avoid well then the argument

Speaker 3 oh the argument is not silly so here's what you have you have a if proposition which doesn't exist for most men most men aren't religious most men aren't looking for to be under a religious orthodoxy.

Speaker 3 So it doesn't apply. So you're taking a moral standard or a religious standard to apply to people who aren't under that veil.

Speaker 3 So let's start with a couple of things you said, which are fundamentally untrue. Most men are religious, in fact, including in this country.
Most of them, not some of them. But they're not religious.

Speaker 3 I didn't interrupt. Hold on for a second.
I didn't interrupt. I understand, but you're maybe just take that point.
Most aren't under your religion. Okay.
You can agree with that.

Speaker 3 So here's the thing, though, but Catholicism and Orthodoxy is growing rapidly. And if it's the case that the ecclesiastical structure is already there, which it is, right?

Speaker 3 If you're going to cohabitate with a woman, the thing that you're offering right now is common law marriage anyway, if there's cohabitation at all. You're not protecting anybody from that.

Speaker 3 At least under my model, it gives an ecclesiastical structure that's designed to prevent divorce by applying community pressure. That was the way it was always done.

Speaker 3 apply the application of community pressure within the confines of the woman's social circle. Right now, do you agree with me, for instance, that many divorces happen because women like to yap?

Speaker 3 So you get a freshly divorced woman and she's free. You go, girl, girl, power.

Speaker 3 And she starts talking to her little friends and she starts telling them how liberating it is and how great it is and this and that.

Speaker 3 And this is why when women have divorced friends, their likelihood of divorce actually rapidly increases. It's for this reason.
Divorce is contagious.

Speaker 3 So if it's the case that this social contagion is eliminated because now we have an ecclesiastical structure, an ecclesiastical authority, which won't grant it because you get ostracized from that social group through excommunication, for instance, or not being able to participate anymore with that community.

Speaker 3 That's an application of a serious and significant social pressure, which can do the very thing you want.

Speaker 3 Bring back that great institution, absent the state, and it avoids this whole problem of common law marriage.

Speaker 3 Because if it's the case that you can be common law married anyway inside of a state, and they can get grounds for divorce on that anyway, anyway, then we actually need to have some social pressures to prevent them from doing that.

Speaker 3 So, it sounds like

Speaker 3 we agree marriage is awesome for men. Divorce is terrible for them.
So, it seems like we should be attacking the divorce structure here.

Speaker 3 And it doesn't seem like you actually have anything to do that other than just avoid the thing that's great for you because this other bad side effect could happen. Sure, that's why

Speaker 3 don't we attack the bad side effect when we have the mechanism to do it? It's not if we can do it now. Okay, so like smoking cigarettes is the same analogy you're saying.

Speaker 3 Okay, here, cigarettes in this situation, we obviously know it has negative side effects, so you would avoid it. Now, here's the issue that I have with it.

Speaker 3 It sounds great on paper, but we can't travel to the land of make-believe. It sounds great.
The majority of people probably wouldn't do it.

Speaker 3 And if you ask a guy, which this is an important part, they're not even prepared to even talk about that. They don't even know what divorce laws are.

Speaker 3 So you're asking them to travel to the land of make-believe a marriage system that small percentage of people use no one uses it today you might have said they used it to the past today that doesn't exist so we can't travel to the land of make-believe to make marriage work for you it might work in your marriage but it doesn't work for the greater

Speaker 3 your argument here contradicts itself because on the one hand you say men don't know enough about marriage but my assumption is that your mission is to let men know about marriage absolutely okay well then i don't understand how it's the land of make-believe make-believe if you can let them know about this, but I can't.

Speaker 3 Sure.

Speaker 3 So if I am, it sounds like I'm offering a real alternative to what you're offering. And here's what you're offering.
Men, marriage is great. It's a great institution.
It's the best for children.

Speaker 3 These are your words. In marriage, right? Men seem to thrive.
Their health seems to thrive. Everything seems to thrive.
You're saying,

Speaker 3 well, the problem is, is that divorce rates are high, and they are. However, there's a few things there that you haven't covered.
One, it depends on demographic too.

Speaker 3 For instance, if you're black, that's way, it's going to be way worse than if you're white. Correct.
Okay. Way worse.

Speaker 3 And also socioeconomics matters, right? Demographics in general matter.

Speaker 3 So you can do a lot, actually, including pre-nuptial agreements. You can have a pre-nuptial agreement with the ecclesiastical authority without the state even involved.

Speaker 3 And it seems like that would mitigate your risk to damn near nothing.

Speaker 3 You said if about 50 times. So did you? Now, here's what I'm telling you.
I'm telling you when. All right.
We're already in this system.

Speaker 3 You're going outside of the system to create a scenario for me to argue. What system are you going outside of?

Speaker 8 Shout out to today's sponsor, Quince. As the weather cools, I'm swapping in the pieces that actually gets the job done that are warm, durable, and built to last.

Speaker 8 Quince delivers every time with wardrobe staples that'll carry you through the season. They have false staples that you'll actually want to wear, like the 100% Mongolian cashmere for just $60.

Speaker 8 They also got classic fit denim and real leather and wool outerwear that looks sharp and holds up.

Speaker 8 By partnering directly with ethical factories and top artisans, Quince cuts out the middleman to deliver premium quality at half the cost of similar brands.

Speaker 8 They've really become a go-to across the board. You guys know how I love linen and how I've talked about it on previous episodes.
I picked up some linen pants and they feel incredible.

Speaker 8 The quality is definitely noticeable compared to other brands. Layer up this fall with pieces that feel as good as they look.

Speaker 8 Go to quince.com slash dsh for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns they're also available in canada too

Speaker 3 talking about marriage is typically done with the state almost everyone does it this way so now you're here's hold on for a second hold on for a second you've moved the goal post you've moved the goal post to a scenario of if, and you're arguing from the if.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second. You're arguing from the if perspective.
Is perspective. No, listen.
It is. Give me a chance to listen.
All right. Give me a chance.

Speaker 3 You're arguing from a very small percentage point. Now you're saying demographics, and we can talk about that, but you're still trying to get me to argue in your cloud of if.

Speaker 3 That's the land of make-believe. Most people.
by far are married to the state. Not only that, your land of make-believe still exists, the prenup with the ecclesiastics.

Speaker 3 You can write whatever you want in that prenup. It only matters in the divorce.
That's the reality. So I'm still dealing in reality.
You're in the clouds. Hold on for a second.
You're in the clouds.

Speaker 3 So let's take the demographics. Okay.
In your scenario, it sounds like, which would be fair, your primary concern is with white people. No, it's with.
Hold on for a second.

Speaker 3 You said with black people, the demographics, the chance is higher. Yeah.
So have you discovered the ecclesiastics approach to black people married within this? Yes. However,

Speaker 3 their demographics, economics, which all do affect marriage, has nothing to do in the land of the clouds or the make-believe with ecclesiastics. It's all going to boil down to in the law.

Speaker 3 And there's no church, Reverend, that's going to go into your household to make sure there's social pressure on your wife. Do you know any? Yes.
Okay. Do you know any that can cover all marriages?

Speaker 3 That answer is no. Yes.
By the way, when you keep... are we in reality here?

Speaker 3 I mean, we're, we're, we're not, we're not arguing anything.

Speaker 3 I was just trying to, this is, this is, this is an Atlanta make-believe. Well, when are you allowed to respond? Okay, give me a second.
Let me finish this point. Go ahead.
You're imagining.

Speaker 3 Your imagination is great. John Lynn, it would be great.
You know, you would be proud of you at this particular point. But I'm imagining all the people.

Speaker 3 You're imagining all the people under a situation and a structure that you brought in here. All right.
But the state highly governs this, and the state highly governs divorce.

Speaker 3 I'm dealing in the reality situation where I'm trying to counsel men to give information to. The best thing you've told me is that you're willing to give men the option to do this.

Speaker 3 Are they willing to all do this option? The answer is probably not, just like they're not willing to do what I'm telling them to do. However, we're both attempting, which is a good thing.
It's noble.

Speaker 3 However, your situation rarely exists. Can we talk about the reality of what exists? Sure.
Absolutely. So let's take your moral religious crusade out of it and talk about the reality.

Speaker 3 Are you willing to do that? Yeah, well, here's the thing. See, you're not willing to do that because it's all based on your reality.
Guess what? It's a debate, and I will argue my points

Speaker 3 from my view, how I see fit. It's not for you to go.
But what I'm not going to do is explain. It's not me arguing from the land of make-believe.
Yeah, but

Speaker 3 you know, all right, so anybody have

Speaker 3 my turn, right?

Speaker 3 Anybody have the sound effect for the

Speaker 3 television show where the train comes through mr rogers let me know because i want to be on i want to be on earth yeah let me know all right let's let andrew respond yeah so the thing is is it's funny that you bring up imagine all the people with john lennon which is an anti-religious song and uh hilariously enough was designed uh to assist with female empowerment isn't that hilarious but the thing here is you keep on saying that what i'm offering is make-believe but it's not it's been governing the orthodox and catholic church for 2000 years including in this country now uh here let me give you an example, for instance, the Amish, right?

Speaker 3 Do you know what the divorce rate is among them? It's almost non-existent, yet they're still governed by the same laws of the land that you're speaking to.

Speaker 3 So it sounds like if I give a counter, if I say, look, I can give you a way, a methodology in which you can utilize the religious ecclesiastical institution, which has existed for 2,000 years and has right now the lowest divorce rates right this second as we speak, not in make-believe land, not hundreds of years in the future, right this second, as opposed to the system you have of common law divorce which is sky high and you can't do anything about it that's what is true so pointing out what is true what is true is right now you can have a prenup that is true what is true is prenups are usually held up in court that is true what is true is that you can have a marriage outside of a state because it's a religious institution anyway you never have to have a license with the state it's never been necessary.

Speaker 3 And if you do, the only way that that can be done is if it's sacramental. And if it's sacramental, it's governed now by the church.
That's going to be the community the women are a part of.

Speaker 3 And so the thing is, it's like, that sounds like a real viable solution. What's yours? More fucking degeneracy? Go out and play the field? Hump a lot of chicks?

Speaker 3 How's that going to help anybody do anything? That's been the progressive mantra for 100 years. Isn't it wonderful?

Speaker 3 Your turn. All right, we're returning back to earth.
Now, first things first, when it comes to this, back in reality, there's no God in marriage. So Mr.

Speaker 3 Sky Daddy, God, religion, that's all great, but there's no God in marriage.

Speaker 3 At this particular point, when you go through a marriage, if one person decides to not obey the Holy Bible or whatever you're thumping, you have no basis to keep that marriage together.

Speaker 3 If she decides to leave the church and decides not to listen or excommunicate herself, she's now under the state. I agree.
Now, when you're getting divorced, which I'm assuming you've been divorced.

Speaker 3 Well, I mean, that's a hell of of an assumption to make. Have you been divorced? I mean, have you been married? Can you tell me, if you can tell me how that has any merit? Give me a second.

Speaker 3 Because if you've been through one, you would know that there's no God in the divorce court, in the family court. There's no God in there.
No one asked. There is the state in there.

Speaker 3 There is the state. So that's what we're arguing for.
That's when you get married. So you're telling me if, and I'm telling you, well, this is what's going to happen.

Speaker 3 Even if you took Sky Daddy into court with you, they would say you prayed to the judge. The judge is the authority in the court.

Speaker 3 So the God argument is a nice interesting argument and i probably am not going to stay on a conversation very long because that's your god that's your sky daddy that's your religion i have a different religion so who gives you the listen who gives you the authority to change the understanding the conversation to your religion that's your religion i'm not changing the conversation hey so it only works if we it only works if you believe in your sky daddy that's that's the only way it works and that's the only way you're going to advise men we're talking about mitigating risk no no no we're talking about can men get into a marriage today only under your sky, daddy.

Speaker 3 That's what we're assuming. Okay.
Now, can they do it otherwise? Yeah, you can have secular marriage. Okay.
Go ahead and explain. Okay.
Yeah. Make it work.
I just did. Make it work.

Speaker 3 The argument that you have is that marriage is great. It's a great institution.
We already covered this. Well, what made it great? We already covered this.
What made it great?

Speaker 3 Can we go into why it would make it work for your secular? That's the question I ask you. You're asking me questions back.
Go ahead and

Speaker 3 answer this question. So if you're talking talking about secular marriage, there's never been any point to it.
I'm sorry? There's never been any point to secular marriage ever.

Speaker 3 Never.

Speaker 3 What would ever be the point of secular marriage? It's always been a religious institution. That's what made it great.

Speaker 3 Now, when you say it's a great institution, what made it great for secularists other than the fact that Sky Daddy and God had all these enforcement arms and those things had to be enforced socially?

Speaker 3 Like, for instance, men weren't allowed to run away. And women, right, they had to show cause for these divorces and they had to be good causes.
They had to show it for things like infidelity, right?

Speaker 3 It was all biblically governed. It was all lawfully governed by this sky daddy guy you like so little.
But that's what made the institution great in the first place.

Speaker 3 And what you're talking about here, you're making a point

Speaker 3 that divorce is bad. And yet, I agree, divorce is bad.
So what we're really talking about is how do we mitigate the risk for divorce? And we have two different methods here. Well, the conversation

Speaker 3 is marriage good for men. That's the conversation.
But it is. We already said it's good for men.
That's not even a discussion. And now, how do we make it better since they're avoiding it?

Speaker 3 Oh, it sounds like men or women are avoiding it. It sounds like the thing that you think makes it bad is divorce, not marriage.
Correct. Then we need to make

Speaker 3 our divorce. We're 15 minutes in and we are in the land of reality.
You finally called up. Can you tell

Speaker 3 how we can get to the secular marriage? I mean, I've given you a chance. You're dragging your.
So again, secular, there's never been any point to secular marriage ever.

Speaker 3 Now, listen, marriage is for child creation. It would be great for child communities communities and all of these things.

Speaker 3 And now, listen, by the time the religious aspects got into marriage, they were chopping people's heads off and burning Bibles.

Speaker 3 So, listen, I know we want to take it back to the past and act like the past was better, but there's always a negative part of the past.

Speaker 3 If you go back and you look at the English, this has all been there. People were getting their heads chopped off.

Speaker 3 The Crusaders were doing their things across countries and they were spreading Christianity to threats and

Speaker 3 now that's what you're trying to uplift. That's what you're trying to uphold.
I don't even know what the hell you're talking about. You wouldn't know what I'm talking about.
I don't.

Speaker 3 That's where you're lacking. I have no idea.
Catch up. You're sitting in the crossroom.

Speaker 3 That was when your holy marriage was the best marriage that you're trying to go to. Now, listen.
In the 1950s? Were we crusading in the 1950s? No, no, no.

Speaker 3 What the hell are you talking about? You talked about the institution of marriage for 2,000 years. Yeah.
Sir, do you need me to catch you up on what you're talking about?

Speaker 3 You're having trouble peeping up with me.

Speaker 3 You're having trouble peeping up with me. You said 1,000 years ago.
True. And I told you 2,000 years ago, they were chopping people's heads off.

Speaker 3 Which has what to do do with anything i need you to catch up with me sir okay if you want to take things back to the past you have to accept everything as the past you can't just cherry pick wow here's the thing you're cherry picking if you want to take things back to tradition take it all the way back why stop at the 50s take it back to the to the 1890s what you're saying right now is so incoherent i actually don't even understand well that's what listen when you're

Speaker 3 when you're running out of bullets

Speaker 3 when you're running out of bullets and what the last thing you do is the shame all right i'm not even trying to free you it's just incoherent i need you to catch up with me. Okay, catch me up.

Speaker 3 Just say you're lacking if you can't keep it up.

Speaker 3 Now, here's the problem. It's coherent.
Here's the problem. Here's the problem.
I don't know what to tell you. Here's the problem.

Speaker 3 2,000 years ago, they were chopping heads off. Who gives a shit? What does Emma say anything? 2,000 years ago.
I'm coming up with yours. You're holy religious 2,000 years ago.

Speaker 3 It's been a part of life. It does have to do with this.
Exactly. Here's the problem.
You're cherry-picking. Cherry-picking what?

Speaker 3 Listen. I'm listening.
I'm going to slow you down. I'm going to slow you down because I see what you're doing here.
I'm going to slow you down. Okay.
because it's hard for you to keep up. It is.

Speaker 3 I understand. I understand because you I am in the crowd.
This is your toughest debate. Your audience knows this.
Oh, it's rough. There's no God in marriage

Speaker 3 in the United States. Can we agree to that? When you get to divorce, there's no God in marriage.
I can't agree to that. We need to agree to it because when you go into divorce court, there's no God.

Speaker 3 You can't bring in your God and your Bible. And at that particular point, none of your ecclesiastics marriage works.

Speaker 3 Period. So the thing is, you just said, can we agree that there's no God in marriage? And then you said, we don't have to agree.
But hang on, calm down. And then you switched over to divorce.

Speaker 3 There's no God in divorce. But those are two different questions and propositions.
Hang on, relax.

Speaker 3 The second thing is, is that me saying that what made marriage a great institution is this whole skydaddy character and that the institution has been in place for 2,000 years and has been

Speaker 3 calm down. 2,000 years.
And it's been a strong institution.

Speaker 3 I'm not actually sure how tying in that at the time they cut people's heads off, what that has to do with the fact that in the 1950s and 40s, you still had 95% of these marriages staying together.

Speaker 3 This is not ancient history. This is not even early American history.
That's, hang on. That's

Speaker 3 in your grandfather's lifetime, basically. And by the way, that was the case for black marriages as well.
Very strong institutions.

Speaker 3 But all of those institutions were that way because they followed that whole skydaddy thing.

Speaker 3 They were like, oh, that skydaddy's going to smite us if we don't.

Speaker 3 And so what you do here is you're giving the classic progressive argument, which is, well, you know, guys, it is true that it's a great institution.

Speaker 3 And it is true it's the best place in the world to have children for the continuation of the species. And also, it's fantastic for men's health.
It's fantastic for their mental health.

Speaker 3 It's great for them in almost every way. But that divorce thing is real bad.
And I counter. You're right.
That divorce thing is real bad. We have now a center of agreement.

Speaker 3 But now we're going back to the marriage in the West thing, which is that whole great institution problem. Well, if we agree that what made it good, which you just did, is, hey, that skydaddy guy.

Speaker 3 And then I point out that right now you can still utilize that skydaddy guy for an ecclesiastical marriage outside of the state. Hang on.
And the only thing you could do is say, what about common law?

Speaker 3 But you can't govern anybody from common law. And at least in the ecclesiastical institution, you have social pressures on women to stay married.
You can't offer a man anything like that.

Speaker 3 Give me a single social pressure you can offer that would actually keep these marriages together. One.
What? What? Just one.

Speaker 3 Can I answer something you just said? This would be interesting. I can't.
You said. But can I answer that question? Then

Speaker 3 before, before. Oh, the 1940s.

Speaker 3 You got to ask me a question. Because listen,

Speaker 3 I'm listening to you. You asked the question at the end.
If you would have asked it at the beginning, possibly I might have been able to address it. But let me address this point.
Okay.

Speaker 3 You said the 1940s and 1950s with this imaginary sky daddy controlling marriages.

Speaker 3 That sounds like enforcement because by the time the 1970s came around, the very first chance, women got to file a no-fault divorce without need for evidence, without need to have a private investigator to prove an affair.

Speaker 3 It was no fault. They did.
It was in the 70s. Yes, it was the 70s, started by Ronald Reagan.
Yeah, yeah. I'll educate you.
But hang on. It came along.
Hold on for a second. No, no, no, no.

Speaker 3 I got the floor here. I got the floor.
So you said the religious institutions governed it and made it great. The 1970s came along, and as soon as they did,

Speaker 3 women started to file divorces at record rates, which is back to my conversation.

Speaker 3 Soon as you remove the authority of Sky Daddy, now you're back with the state and now you have difficulty and now the risk is now greater. Wow.
So

Speaker 3 that's the issue that. And it sounds like men should be moving towards Sky Daddy then because it mitigates their risk.
The courts, the nation should be

Speaker 3 there. So how do you enforce that? What court? What courts?

Speaker 3 You're not getting a marriage from the state. What courts are involved in? Everything you told me is a make-believe scenario.
How?

Speaker 3 You can do it right now. How is it make-believe? How do you do that when people, the state of the marriage? Here's what changes through state.
I know. You want to go back to Ecclesiastics.

Speaker 3 This is going to be a problem. You can do it right this second.
Okay. You can do it.
You could go do it right now. You can do it at this particular point.

Speaker 3 However,

Speaker 3 here's a problem. Okay.
Can you get men to do it? Yes. Okay.

Speaker 3 You might be able to think you can get men to do it, but as soon as they do it, I want you to stick around for the average of eight to 10 years when these men start getting divorce.

Speaker 3 See, what you're doing is you're leading

Speaker 3 it so longer. You've been leading, you're going to lead men into a burning building.

Speaker 3 And the reason why, and this is a famous quote by Martin Luther King, is because the laws of integration didn't catch up fast enough for what he wanted for people to integrate.

Speaker 3 And what happened was it took him 12 to 15 years to realize that he led men or black people into a burning building in which integration was not possible at the time.

Speaker 3 You are also proposing the same thing. And I would like for you to stick around to see the results of what you're proposing because eventually you would have to pay the price.

Speaker 3 How did Martin Luther King pay the price? You would have to pay the price for the men that you misled. So Martin Luther misled men, and that's why he was killed.
I said he misled black people.

Speaker 3 You missed that part.

Speaker 3 He said, okay, let me repeat it because you're slow. You definitely are slow, Neanderthal.

Speaker 3 Let me tell you something. I'm drugging.
Martin Luther King said specifically, related to black people and civil rights, and I'll speak slowly slowly for you,

Speaker 3 that he believed at the end, he led them into a burning building. I'm going to speak slower.
The reason why is because the laws of integration

Speaker 3 did not catch up with what he would like to present. Black people weren't ready to integrate.
As a result, he said, I may have led my people, my people, that means his people,

Speaker 3 into a burning building.

Speaker 3 You were, I would like for you, under your scenario, if your movement takes off

Speaker 3 to see the results, because it took Martin Luther King 12, 15 years to see the results

Speaker 3 of his efforts.

Speaker 3 You're proposing something very extreme that the majority of people aren't going to do. But let's just say if, because you like to hide in the clouds of make-believe, if they did, this works,

Speaker 3 I would love to see you represent these men in a divorce when they get their head bit off by these so-called women that are forced by Sky Daddy to stay in these marriages, this is really like, I don't even understand how to respond.

Speaker 3 You don't understand. I know you have a hard time understanding.

Speaker 3 I don't actually even understand how to respond to a lot of this because it's so incoherent, but I'm going to try and. Oh, yeah, see, this is this is just

Speaker 3 this is his always incoherent when he understands. Perhaps you don't understand.
This is that might be what it is. And it's okay to say you don't understand, and I can speak slowly for you.

Speaker 3 I don't understand now, but I'm going to tell you why. I'm going to force it.
Dismissive. I mean, you know, I'm going to tell you why.
Okay, When you're losing, just say you're losing and I can speak.

Speaker 3 Let me know when I can talk and he gas out. Go ahead.
Okay. Go ahead.
So here's a typical tactic, but you can work that against these OnlyFans girls.

Speaker 3 You can work that tactic against those OnlyFans girls that you debate, debating 23-year-old ignorant women. They're smarter than you.
But now you're sitting across from a person.

Speaker 3 Yeah, you're sitting across from a person here. Oh, no.
That's looking at a Neanderthal saying you don't understand something very simple. Let me know when he gas outside.

Speaker 3 This is the simplest thing that you can understand.

Speaker 3 Your girl. Your go.
Are you sure? Please. You can actually do it this morning? Please.
Put me to sleep. Okay.
So put me to sleep.

Speaker 3 Here's why it's incoherent, and there's a bunch of this and understand. You keep on saying that these men are going to get divorced, and yet I'm proposing non-state marriages.

Speaker 3 How are they going to get divorced? Well, you can only say then via common law, but again, you have no defense yourself against.

Speaker 3 These are if scenarios. I don't mean

Speaker 3 that. I don't said I was going to debate somebody that's going to come.
Why are you celibusting?

Speaker 3 Give me your real scenario. I'll let you speak the entire time.
Give me something to speak about.

Speaker 3 I'm not asking you to speak, man. You're trying to invite me to your church.
I'm just

Speaker 3 telling you. Please give me a real scenario.
You have to shut up long enough for me to do it. Come on, please.
I've been here 30 minutes waiting for you to do it. All right.
Give me a real scenario.

Speaker 3 Okay, so what I don't understand here again, and I'm going to ask again. In your incoherent worldview,

Speaker 3 you keep on saying that these men who I propose this to are going to get divorced, but I'm not proposing that they get married through the state. The state's the one who does the divorces.

Speaker 3 So the only thing you could say is that there's a potential for common law here, but that's something you yourself cannot guard them from by your own admission.

Speaker 3 The second problem that we have here is that I don't have to stick around for 10 or 15 years because we can look at the numbers right now in religious marriage for what this looks like.

Speaker 3 And here's what this looks like. If you're a Catholic, you're way less likely to get divorced.
And if you're Orthodox, even less likely to get divorced.

Speaker 3 And it's because of that ecclesiastical structure. You're not ever going to be able to prevent all risks from divorce, not under anything.
Oh, God.

Speaker 3 That's the most realistic system. Not under any system.

Speaker 3 But not under any system. Correct.
Is that going to be the case? But why are Catholics getting divorced? How do they get divorced? They get annulments. They don't even get divorces.

Speaker 3 And it's a really long term. Christian, it's rare.
The Christians have a similar divorce rate than the secular. No.
So they have a very close. So how do they get divorced? I'm going to ask you.

Speaker 3 Christian's good.

Speaker 3 I'll answer. Please.
Please tell me. Because I know how to get divorced.
Right into the divorce court. Yeah, I know.
So because they got a state marriage,

Speaker 3 right, yeah. And I'm proposing that they don't do that, right? Okay, a land to make believe.
How's that a male and make believe? You can go fucking do it right now. Tell me what are you talking about?

Speaker 3 What percentage of people do this particular thing that you're doing, that you're proposing? Why would that matter? Let's say it's one person. Why would that matter? It's just one person.

Speaker 3 So you're taking a very small chance. You're arguing against me that has millions of people on my side.

Speaker 3 But you're telling me a small 20 people in the little house on the prairie

Speaker 3 that do these, that you govern people without electricity and you riding horse and carriages.

Speaker 3 You're telling me this small percentage of people are going to lead a movement of doing something you're proposing here on YouTube. This is going.
How many people are doing this? Okay.

Speaker 3 Why would it matter? It would matter because then we can use some data to determine. Do these people end up in divorce? Well, we can't likely.
This is great because we can look at the data.

Speaker 3 So let's look at it.

Speaker 3 Do you want to look at the Catholic data and Orthodox

Speaker 3 We're talking about your ecclesiastic proposal. That's what we're talking about.

Speaker 3 This is the ecclesiastical proposal. If you're using Catholic and Christians, their divorce rate tends to be very low.

Speaker 3 I'll look at us. It's very close.
Let's not look it up. Hold on for a while.
Do you need Christians? Self-ID Christians. Self-ID.

Speaker 3 No, no, let's just put Christians.

Speaker 3 Christian and Commonwealth.

Speaker 3 You have to actually want a Christian. He likes to dice up all of these people.
And listen, listen, I would love to go to your church one day. I would be a wonderful guest.

Speaker 3 And I would love to thump the Bible, and I would love to say a prayer with you.

Speaker 3 However,

Speaker 3 this conversation is entering because we pull up my screen. It's very much a Sky Daddy conversation, which

Speaker 3 it's about belief. You brought up Sky Daddy.
You.

Speaker 3 Oh, you brought it up a lot. We got the divorce race pulling out right here.
That's not how you're going to.

Speaker 3 What is that? So that is a religious argument. You're an atheist.
You should really

Speaker 3 contend with that.

Speaker 3 A lot of people would not want to do that. You're telling me a small percentage of people.
Who cares? We're talking about mitigating the rates of of divorce it doesn't matter how many

Speaker 3 move forward from this one we agree to disagree no we don't agree to disagree

Speaker 3 in your land of make i want counter argument i'm not going to argue in your land of make believe yeah because you can't because you have no counter

Speaker 3 you don't have one counter argument here's a here's a counter argument okay what is it there's no god in marriage how many times do i have to say that's an assertion it's not an argument you end up in divorce court god doesn't matter none of this matters that's real that's the realest argument that you can possibly hear soon as how do you end up in a divorce court without the situation?

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second. Hold on.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second. I'm going to tell you how.
Okay. In the 1940s, which you so love, I don't know why you don't live there.
You look like you live there. You're dressed like you lived there.

Speaker 3 They were

Speaker 3 a second. Here's the problem.
Okay. These people under your authoritative, godly marriage still got divorced at high rates once no fault divorce showed up.
It started at 25%.

Speaker 3 Then by the time you get here, it's close to 40 and 50%.

Speaker 3 It's still prevalent. I'm giving you the reality, guys.

Speaker 3 You're trying to drag me back over here to the little house on the prairie. It's not working.
It's not going to work with me. How about this? How about a counterargument? Traditional

Speaker 3 marriage. I gave you one.
What? Come on, man. What is the counter-argument? Come on, man.
It's not a counter-argument. What's the counter-argument? There's no God in marriage.

Speaker 3 And that's an assertion, not an argument. There's no God in divorce court.
God's not an argument.

Speaker 3 There's no divorce. Okay, well, there is a God in divorce court.
Argument defeated. Exactly.
Argument defeated. Oh, Oh my goodness, boy.
All right. Did you get your sandbox outside?

Speaker 3 Did you miss your tour? It's just ridiculous. Here's the problem.
I want to argue. This is the absolute argument.
Okay. You're trying to drag me to church.
I'm taking you outside of church.

Speaker 3 You can't combat it because you want to battle inside the church. I'm not letting you.
So let's get back to the state. I don't care if secularists get married.
Let's get back to the state.

Speaker 3 What do you mean? And that divorce rate. Did you find out the numbers? Yeah, I pulled it up earlier, but I'll pull it up again.

Speaker 1 It's up on the screen. Can you guys see this? Catholic, 19 to 25%.

Speaker 1 Mainline protestant 30 to 35 percent evangelical 26 to 33 that's up there now

Speaker 3 that's

Speaker 3 40 orthodox 33 34 30 that's pretty high orthodox divorce rate

Speaker 3 let's see

Speaker 3 17 to 20 i see average 33

Speaker 3 That's U.S. US average.

Speaker 3 All the Protestants, that's with the coalition

Speaker 3 ever divorced 17 to 20. U.S.

Speaker 3 average 33%. yeah so they're much lower

Speaker 3 in the u.s 33

Speaker 3 but orthodox ever divorce that's worldwide yeah they're much they're much lower rates okay but you're saying that they can't get divorced that's what you said oh bro you said is that what you said my the whole point is

Speaker 3 how do we mitigate the risk of divorce you can't ever completely mitigate it

Speaker 3 it can't ever be completely mitigated but you can mitigate the risk of divorce okay great it is lower

Speaker 3 much lower much lower okay all right so a chance chance of getting hit 30 versus 44

Speaker 3 this doesn't defeat the argument those it does force the argument those divorces happen in the court of law because no divorce cannot be reported in not

Speaker 3 the court of law actually what is the divorce that happens outside of the court of law if it's 33

Speaker 3 in the court of law with your orthodox ecclesiastic marriage what is it outside what is it within that it's even lower so add that 10 yes now we're at 40 he wouldn't add that he wouldn't add 10 that's the legal divorce.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second. When you say a divorce, those are reported divorces legally.
That means these people filed in the legal reported system. That's 30 plus percent.
Okay.

Speaker 3 You said there would be more that were outside of the duel. No, less.
Outside of the state. Less.
No, no, hold on for a second. Less.
There's additional

Speaker 3 outside of the marriage. Outside of the state.
Oh, there's none?

Speaker 3 So you're saying there's zero. Not really.
What are you saying? Okay, so let me explain. Please.
So that you understand. Additional to the 33%.

Speaker 3 But you have to, can you at least let me finish this time? Please do it because you're slow.

Speaker 3 So if it's the case, if it's the case, you're in an ecclesiastical marriage, you're still adding usually the state. These people are all adding the state, okay?

Speaker 3 The Catholics themselves, if you were to look at their annulments rate from the ecclesiastical authority, it's actually much lower than even the percentage that you're getting from the state because they add the state in, which means some people will ignore the ecclesiastical authority and get divorced anyway.

Speaker 3 That's exactly what I've been telling you.

Speaker 3 Nobody ever argued that. Exactly.
But so we're arguing about mitigating the risk.

Speaker 3 Mitigating the risk. It's still a risk.
No, it would mitigate the risk. So the risk is slightly lower.
Much lower. Okay, that's not that much lower.
It's much lower.

Speaker 3 40%, you're talking about 33% to 43%. No, we're not.
We're talking about 20% to 35 to 40%.

Speaker 3 Okay, so that's lower. Yes.

Speaker 3 Okay, that's all you got. Now, here's the...
That's all I need.

Speaker 3 That's not all you need because there's still risk. How do you say that? Nobody said there wouldn't be risk.
Exactly. You can't mitigate risk for anything, 100%.
It's not possible. Exactly.

Speaker 3 So now why are we telling men to get married? Because you have to, because everything is a cost-benefit analysis. Your issue is not marriage.
Your issue is with mitigating risk.

Speaker 3 At this point, it's not marriage.

Speaker 3 So only my, this, hold on for a second. Can I say this? Oh my God.

Speaker 3 Can you stop saying something so I can say something? At this particular point,

Speaker 3 you're telling me from this point, we haven't even got to the entire marriage because you're still over in the land of make-believe. We haven't even got to the other issues of marriage.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second. We still haven't got to the other issues of marriage.
I'm only going to be able to get it. So you're telling me about the mitigation risk, and we've wasted too much time on it.

Speaker 3 Can we talk about the other issues of marriage? Well, okay. Sexless marriage.
Let me at least wrap this up.

Speaker 1 Yeah, let Andrew finalize this and then suck it up.

Speaker 3 The thing is, is like, the problem is, is you said it was a great institution. If you say it's a great institution, even when it was a great institution, people were still getting divorced.

Speaker 3 So if that's the case, what you're really after is just mitigating risk. And I'm giving you a perfect way to mitigate risk, right?

Speaker 3 And the fact of the matter is, is that it is becoming more and more popular to do it this way.

Speaker 3 Prenup plus ecclesiastical authority almost mitigates your risk entirely, except for common law, but you can pick the state to live in for that.

Speaker 3 And you, by your own logic, can't defer from common law either. You can't protect men from that.
So the thing is, is like, you can't have it both ways.

Speaker 3 You can't agree marriage is good and the backbone for the West and you really like it and it's fucking great and it's a great institution, institution, but also don't do it because it's make-believe that you can mitigate risk, even though you can right this second.

Speaker 3 That's insane.

Speaker 3 Listen, all right, final point. I'm listening.
Final point. Let's get to the other risks that are associated with it.
We got that. We taped that point on this.
That is a make the final point. And then

Speaker 3 listen. I'm a grown man.
I'm not 22-year-old OnlyFans. I'm going to say what I want to say.
Listen to this. At this particular point, you got me on the floor.

Speaker 3 Listen, we're moving forward. Okay, we're moving forward.
At this point, what are the other risks that we want to guard against? We got the divorce.

Speaker 3 You're going to put them on the ecclesiastic paperwork. Less people are doing that.
Not a lot of people know how to do it. He just got married.
He didn't do it. All right.
I can almost guarantee.

Speaker 3 Probably not. Exactly.

Speaker 3 So now, less people are going to do this. Not a lot of people know that.
Not a lot of men are going to prepare themselves to do that.

Speaker 3 Exactly. So that would be a very tough scenario.
And most likely it's not going to happen moving forward. Okay.
There are other issues in marriage. Okay.
That typically, if

Speaker 3 depending on what authority you go under, are still a risk for men. Yes, it's great for the backbone, but a lot of men are in sexless marriages.
A lot of women are in sexist marriages.

Speaker 3 The percentage of affairs in marriages are still a big issue. That can't be addressed.
Those risks are going to be tough.

Speaker 3 And now you have an issue because now you're, whoever's your authority, has to mitigate that risk.

Speaker 3 Now, all of a sudden, they have to govern or socially pressure the women, and that's going to be difficult to do.

Speaker 3 20 30 of sexist marriages 20 30 of people having affairs this is not the intent of people who get married so yes we have the divorce we set that aside now what about within the marriage how do you mitigate the risk for that i'm assuming you're going to have the ecclesiastic come through the home and force the wives to fuck their husband oh that's quite the straw man

Speaker 3 but i'm assuming i'll go ahead i'll go ahead and answer uh actually the ecclesiastical authority does mitigate against this and here's my proofs Proof one,

Speaker 3 if it is the case that you get married to a woman who's a virgin, but she's a virgin because

Speaker 3 she's a Christian, hang on, let me get through the entirety of the arguments before you start freaking out. If it is the case,

Speaker 3 your chances of that marriage ending, very, very, very small, one. And two, they report that they have a happier sex life.

Speaker 3 This is actually the case with the decrease in body count, which generally comes with the more religious people.

Speaker 3 Meaning, the more that you take your religion seriously, the more that you pray, the more that you engage in that whole ecclesiastical authority thing, the less likely it is you step out of your marriage, significantly less likely, the less likely it is that you end up in a sexless marriage.

Speaker 3 You know why? Because there's a reinforcement in Christianity that men and women are not allowed to deprive each other of that, of sex when it comes to marriage.

Speaker 3 And you find the people who follow the traditional faiths generally don't. And so, yes, the ecclesiastical authority preaches that from the pulpit.
Sorry, lady, you got to fuck your husband.

Speaker 3 That's part of God's law. Yeah.

Speaker 3 What do you got for him? Go out and just fuck everybody. What? What is

Speaker 3 interesting? What are you going to do

Speaker 3 to mitigate, by the way,

Speaker 3 you're at the mercy of the same criticism? You can't mitigate guys' girlfriends from fucking around on them anymore than you could a person's wife.

Speaker 3 You can't mitigate them stepping out on them. You can't mitigate them treating them like shit.
You can't do anything. At least I have a mitigation.
You have nothing. You have nothing.

Speaker 3 Just liberal degeneracy. Give me something.
Something you could do that would give any sort,

Speaker 3 any kind of fail-safe against this.

Speaker 3 One thing: I don't know what communities you live in, but your church pastor is going to be very busy walking in all of these bedrooms, preventing divorce, and enforcing women to sleep with their husbands.

Speaker 3 Now, the first leap of faith that you have, hold on for a second. Oh, I heard you.
The first leap of faith is virgin.

Speaker 3 Okay, if we look at the stats, please pull up the stats of how many women qualify as a virgin.

Speaker 3 Virginity. You said virginity.
I'm just letting you know, you brought it up. In America.
In America, what women percentage qualify as virgins? All right. So you're going to say very few.

Speaker 3 So you know this.

Speaker 1 7%, aged 22 to 34.

Speaker 3 7%. Yep.
Okay.

Speaker 3 Do you know what? So now we have.

Speaker 3 Do you know what a baseline for an argument is? That was the baseline. Yeah.
You want to say now, do we want to base the body count? I mean, because you're looking.

Speaker 3 That was the whole point of the baseline of the argument.

Speaker 3 So right now, if we can pull up how many women in Gen Z, because this is marital a marital age women would have a body count lower than five no because we're also marriageably aged what do you mean millennials younger millennials okay because there's no point in older people getting married they're not procreating all right they're gonna have one or two kids that doesn't help us procreate not that much all right they're gonna have one or two kids all right listen it said in the bible in your bible it says be fruitful and multiply not add all right we're not adding one little autistic kid we're adding we're multiplying that would be multiplying it wouldn't be multiplying having one little bright ass kid Three, and you have one more.

Speaker 3 That's that's

Speaker 3 multiplying by one. All right, that's not an answer.
Okay, listen. We're multiplying by multiples.
You know what I'm talking about. Now, listen.
Yeah, that is.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second. Hold on for a second.

Speaker 3 You want to convince me that there's going to be women of low body count in this secular world we live in to make your scenario work to enforce women to have sex with their husbands from the pulpit.

Speaker 3 Do you see this is very strange? I have all the data past my show.

Speaker 3 From a very small percentage, I mean, it works in a Podunk town. I don't know where you're from.

Speaker 3 We're talking about the

Speaker 3 metropolises. We're talking about major cities.
How is your plan going to mitigate that?

Speaker 3 How is your plan going to mitigate?

Speaker 3 I don't know if you remember. I asked you.
All right. And I told you.

Speaker 3 And you came back with virgins. No.
And you came back with enforcing sex for the whole kid. Half the argument.
That's why you can't respond to my arguments. So let's do it again.

Speaker 3 If you want to mitigate, mitigate. Force women to have lower body.
You're not. Dude, how's it force?

Speaker 3 Go ahead. How's it force?

Speaker 3 You're the one enforcing sex. How is it? How? How are we using force? How are you enforcing sex to the husband?

Speaker 3 Do social pressure doofus the same way you would with everything.

Speaker 3 Gentlemen, your wife is going to have sex with you because a church reverend and forced her to have sex with you. Do you think? Okay.
Please pull up the chat.

Speaker 3 His suggestion is to have a church reverend enforce you to have burning desire to have sex.

Speaker 3 Force requires force. Enforce is a derivative of force.
You can't enforce absent force. No one's saying force.
This is how your sex is going to be had in his marriage. Uh-huh.

Speaker 3 It's through enforcement through the religious pool. No, it's going to be a lot of people.
I mean, this is 2025, and we're still here somewhere on Little House in the Prairie.

Speaker 3 If it's the idea, I would love to have this reality.

Speaker 3 If it's the idea that women have and men have both, that they're not supposed to deprive each other from this, because that is how they live the life of a Christian.

Speaker 3 The case of the matter is, is that they try to keep themselves sexually appealing to the partner. They try to keep themselves moving towards that state where they're found appealing.

Speaker 3 That's part of that. Why do you think, and by the way, you keep saying force.

Speaker 3 Can you demonstrate anywhere that I said that there would be any force involved with any of this or that it's even necessary? Enforce is force. Correct.
That's what's all. So where is the force?

Speaker 3 Where? Tell me. You're the one.
You're going to ask that question. You're the one that told me the church reverend is going to come and force marriage.
No, when, when? You said that earlier.

Speaker 3 No, I said they're social pressures. Social pressures.
That's not your wife. Fuck your husband.
No,

Speaker 3 making them do anything. Okay, to encourage them to fuck you.
Yeah. Okay.
Don't you encourage people's wives to fuck them? I probably, I don't need to be in their bedrooms that much.

Speaker 3 Yeah, I mean, if you. I can't encourage you anything.
I can't force a woman to do marriage. If a woman called you and said, I don't sleep with my husband.
He seems angry at me.

Speaker 3 Would you encourage him or her to sleep with him?

Speaker 3 I wouldn't encourage her to do anything, especially especially with you i don't mess with i don't i don't i don't mess with married women that's their brilliant so your solution is there nothing nothing my solution is very clear what is it you're telling me at this particular point that you're going to enforce through social pressure social pressure that's not hold on for a second social pressure enforces social pressure and forces women to be very promiscuous at this particular point uh-huh now You're talking about 7% of the population or better, maybe 10, that are going to fall under this category.

Speaker 3 And this is going to to lead a wave of women sleeping with their husband through social pressures when social pressure quite tells them the opposite.

Speaker 3 Let me have. I don't even know what the hell you're talking about at this point.
Exactly, exactly. It's very difficult.
I know. It is.
It's very difficult for you. I know, exactly.

Speaker 3 And very nice tactic. But listen,

Speaker 3 it's not a tactic. I really are applying my hardest to understand.
You're taking a very small scenario to make it the large scenario when I'm telling you the larger scenario is the reality.

Speaker 3 And you're telling me

Speaker 3 I do this. If I do that, this is a very small percentage.

Speaker 3 I'm telling you about

Speaker 3 marriage.

Speaker 3 You may get a divorce.

Speaker 3 If this happens, then this may happen. We already looked at the statistics of it likely happening.
Yeah, no, no. So that is likely to happen.
First of all, even the statistics.

Speaker 3 Can you pull out the statistics again?

Speaker 3 Yeah, pull up the marriage statistics, the divorce. For Christians, it's actually not likely, is it? In the United States.
Overall, in the United States.

Speaker 3 In order for it to work, you have to be white. You need to break it down.
Make a certain pandemic. Hold on for a second.
You need to.

Speaker 1 You want to break it down?

Speaker 3 And so and social media. So

Speaker 3 you want to go, in order for your marriage to work, they have to be white, Christian,

Speaker 3 make money,

Speaker 3 and then also probably live in a certain region. If it's the case, what if that's not the case?

Speaker 3 Because in the United States, I don't know where you live, but you know, in the case of the city, then we use the apparatuses. If you take the rest of the United States, they're highly not that.

Speaker 3 That is outside of those demographics. And don't want to taste that? What if they're outside of that? What if they're not white and Christian? Don't you want to change that?

Speaker 3 What if they're not Christian to make 100K? What do you suggest then? Yeah, so here's what I would suggest.

Speaker 3 If it's the case that in the black community, you have more divorce than in the white community, there's going to be contributing factors for why that is.

Speaker 3 I don't think that like black people are just ontologically different than white people, do you?

Speaker 3 Do you just believe like that at their core, they're just ontologically different? Or do you think that they're the same?

Speaker 3 Because if that's the case, if we're equal people and equal people groups, then there must be some other social factors which are relating to this that increase the divorce rate in the black community that doesn't exist yet in the white community.

Speaker 3 If that's the case, we would specifically target those issues to prevent that from happening, right? We're going to do this.

Speaker 3 We're going to do this across the board. Well, what would they be? For the black community, there's a bunch.
The one, you have a distinction in economic certitude.

Speaker 3 The second one is you had a massive abortion rate, which is super problematic. Another one is you use matriarchal structures in the family home instead of patriarchal.
Huge issue that you have.

Speaker 3 By the way, when it was Christian-based, it didn't happen. It was a patriarchal structure inside those black homes.
And And boy, they didn't put up with shit. Not the case anymore.

Speaker 3 So you have multiple factors here, which need to be addressed. I agree with that.
Nobody ever disagreed with that, though. What we're trying to do is look at the mitigation of risk.

Speaker 3 And even for the black community,

Speaker 3 if the black community moves in to these conventionally traditional churches, they still will have the same ecclesiastical authority, which will assist them in governing their marriage that white people would have.

Speaker 3 And it would still assist with the mitigation of risk. What's the alternative? It's just degeneracy, right? The alternative is just like, well, just hump them and never get married.

Speaker 3 Well, what good does that do for blacks? What good does that do? It just leads to more abortion. It just leads to more degeneracy.
It leads to high crime rates.

Speaker 3 And the single motherhood's out of control. So like, what are you doing to prevent any of that? Nothing.
Nothing. Tell me what.
What?

Speaker 3 Okay. Thank you.
You said things that people have known for the past 45 years, but I appreciate that. Hold on for a second.

Speaker 3 Thank you for contributing to a common conversation that people know, but you offer no other solution. that's great now here's a problem here's a problem with this

Speaker 3 it's an if scenario that would be great if we can go back to this it would be great if we can go back and look at and say that blacks when they were in the 40s and 50s they had more stable relationships and marriages than even white folks here's the issue okay why stop at the 40s Let's talk about 1863.

Speaker 3 Okay.

Speaker 3 Your tradition seems to always hit this point of 1940s where you shine this light of traditionalism that you've never lived in, that seems to be in a snapshot of something that you don't even know about.

Speaker 3 Then when I fast forward to-dude, again, you're not listening. When I fast forward to 1970, when it falls all apart with no fault divorce, based on what I've been arguing, what happens?

Speaker 3 All that traditionalism falls apart. Why don't we take it further? Why don't we take it back to ride prices? I mean, how far in tradition are you going to go?

Speaker 3 You're only going to bang your head around 1940 and 50 because you watched a couple of movies and I Love Lucy episodes. That's not tradition.
Okay.

Speaker 3 That was a snapshot in history that you're trying to achieve again. So take it back further.
There's no marriages in the black community. Let's say we'll take it.

Speaker 3 Let's say we take it all the way back to the 1700s, let's just say, just for the sake of it, right?

Speaker 3 And that I'm totally wrong about all this, just for the sake of argument, let's just say.

Speaker 3 What is your prescription to deal with any of those issues when you're telling men in the black community to not get married? How is that going to assist with abortion?

Speaker 3 How is that going to assist with strong fathers in the home? How's that going to assist with the only demographic population which can't reproduce itself? How?

Speaker 3 Can you give me a single prescription to any of that? Let me tell you something. I agree with you on this.
I just want a prescription, dude. Here's a problem.
I agree with you.

Speaker 3 And listen, if you had any ability to provide this prescription better than Louis Farrakhan or Martin Luther King, does that mean no? Give me a second. Listen to me.

Speaker 3 These men have tried to pretty much heal this issue, and they have nothing.

Speaker 3 So, Andrew Wilson certainly not to, neither will CGA. So, I don't have a prescription for the black community because

Speaker 3 the black community is pretty much doomed at this particular point. They have too much degeneracy.
They have single mother rates at the 70 and 80 percent.

Speaker 3 But I'm going to tell you something: you want to come in here and tell me something about ecclesiastics, and you're telling me about the reality of the black community, how to fix it.

Speaker 3 Nobody's been able to fix that community. So, there's nothing you can do, and I can't offer any solution for that.

Speaker 3 Now, at that particular point, you're saying the risk is higher. It certainly will be higher under those matriarchal conditions.
So you get no argument from me there.

Speaker 3 So at that point, where's your statistic lie then? Well, where's your solution then? I'll tell you, again. So I'm glad that.
He's going to solve the community problems here. I would love to hear this.

Speaker 3 Listen, again.

Speaker 3 I'm not saying. The black community problems solved by Andrew Wilson.

Speaker 3 Says the guy who literally just

Speaker 3 have zero prescriptions. Because nobody does.
The black community is here. But I would love to hear the black community solved by Andrew Wilson.

Speaker 3 Yeah, so let me tell you a bunch of things that can be done, which will help mitigate these issues. Please do.
Please do. The first is that you can accomplish.

Speaker 3 Not some pipe dream. That can be accomplished.
Here we go. That can be accomplished politically and already are beginning to be accomplished politically.
The first is you have to outlaw abortion.

Speaker 3 You have to. It has to be outlawed.
And not by state by state where you can just go to the next state and do another abortion, right?

Speaker 3 One of the biggest problems with promiscuity in the black community is that they use abortion as a form of birth control. Same problem that you see in the white community, by the way.

Speaker 3 It's just more prevalent in the black community.

Speaker 3 The next problem that you have there is the lack of religiosity where there used to be a really strong core religious base of based black men, and they were patriarchal, very patriarchal.

Speaker 3 And the thing is, is that it's the idea of these feminist raw-burning lunatics that told black women not to be under the evil patriarchy of their men. And yet,

Speaker 3 at this point, the men are rolling over and allowing the matriarchy to take over over in their own community. Is a return to traditional church ethics going to assist that? Of course it will.

Speaker 3 Of course it will. How do I know? Because it did then, just a few short years ago.
I'm not talking about hundreds of years ago. I'm talking about 60 years ago.

Speaker 3 By the way, there's other things that you can do too. Getting rid of EBT, getting rid of social programs, which are designed to keep people dependent.

Speaker 3 These are all things which can be politically accomplished. Just like abortion, the starting of banning that was politically accomplished in our lifetime.

Speaker 3 And the thing is, is like, you have no prescriptions. Fuck, at least I'm trying here, man.
Man, Andrew, you are Captain Obvious. This is the obvious thing.

Speaker 3 Then why didn't you obviously state it as a prescription?

Speaker 3 Because people have exhausted the means to be able to do this. Trust me, there have been people way better than you that dress better than you and shave their beard

Speaker 3 that can do this and they haven't been able to accomplish it. You have a Democratic Party that is highly influential.
92% of black women voted for Democrats.

Speaker 3 That's also possibly where most of those women go to church.

Speaker 3 most of the black churches are overwhelmingly women it's a woman's club and you're telling me about some traditional completely obvious that everybody has pointed out for 25 years you're not giving me anything new this is a completely obvious scenario and you believe that you've enlightened me over here and you're waiting for me to give you a solution let me tell you

Speaker 3 you certainly would never do that now at this particular point here the unsettling experience that men experience in divorce. All right, you're saying you're just going to mitigate it or eradicate it.

Speaker 3 What about the small percentage of men that experience it and go through issues like high levels of self-deletion, high levels of them not being able to recover financially ever?

Speaker 3 They're still going to experience this under your scenario. This doesn't disappear.

Speaker 3 What prescription do you have for those men that went to your marriage and they got divorced 33%?

Speaker 3 What do you do with these marriages? 33%. Okay, 20%, 30%.

Speaker 3 It still was at a high rate. I think it would be

Speaker 3 shorter than that. You would hope so.
You would hope so. But hope is not a strategy.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second.

Speaker 3 What scenario do you have for men that you let into the burning building when they experience separation from their children, parental alienation, high levels of self-deletion?

Speaker 3 What prescription do you have, sir, that you sold?

Speaker 3 You have all the answers. Please enlighten us.
What are you going to do with these men? Are you going to enforce them to have sex with other virgins that have on the sideline?

Speaker 3 I'll answer the question, Glenn. I want to make a deal with you that if I answer this last question of yours, that you'll actually answer when I ask you after that.

Speaker 3 We're not in a court of law. I don't have to answer anything.
I can state something. Yeah, I know.
I'm asking you if I can make a deal.

Speaker 3 That if I answer this letter, you'll answer any question that you ask me. I'll be right back.
So we're not going to make a deal on that? I don't have to make a deal. Listen, you don't have to.

Speaker 3 I'm asking you.

Speaker 3 Possibly. So go ahead.
Possibly. Okay, well, then I possibly will hold the debate hostage until you possibly make a deal with me.
All right, great. So that gives me the floor.

Speaker 3 So we'll just, so we'll just say here, stare at each other, or we just filibuster each other.

Speaker 3 At this particular point.

Speaker 3 Oh, you don't want to

Speaker 3 answer it. You want to answer it.
But you're not going to answer it. But you're not going to answer mine.
I just want that clear. You're not going to answer mine after.

Speaker 3 You're just going to filibuster the stone wall again. I ask you the question, put it on the table.
So this is pretty simple, right? What you're proposing here.

Speaker 3 Every policy prescription, which is made anywhere in any nation, with any people group from the tribal all the way to the national level is going to be a trade-off, no matter what.

Speaker 3 There's always going to be some people who are disaffected by it in some small percentage, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. We don't run societies based on outliers.

Speaker 3 The second thing is when it comes to suicide in men, particularly, one of the best ways to mitigate that is to begin the process of eliminating deployment of troops abroad.

Speaker 3 Because one of the biggest contributing factors to male suicide, including in marriage with divorce, is their veteran status. And it's because

Speaker 3 they really depend on their family to assist them with what's going on mentally from the fact that they've been deployed in these wars.

Speaker 3 And one thing you could really do that would help that, that's what the American first policy is, is we want to bring your troops home, no more foreign wars.

Speaker 3 That will greatly help and aid with this problem. And by the way, policy-wise, it's already been aiding with this as Trump has wound these wars down.
And by the way, let's go ahead and point out.

Speaker 3 That's a good one. I like it.

Speaker 3 I'll point out a few more things that you can do. Oh, please do.
Yes. So another thing that you can do is at the national level, right, from propaganda works.

Speaker 3 I'm sure you agree. Profit.
Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely.

Speaker 3 If at a national level, you had propaganda, which instead of showing LGBTQ flags, degeneracy, girl bossing, shit like this, which is what you see everywhere, you had institutional family units instead.

Speaker 3 Right. And that was what you saw everywhere that you went.
And that was where the social status was. At the top-down level, that would really help change people's psyches around.

Speaker 3 The same way they were indoctrinated towards the degeneracy, same way you can indoctrinate them out of degeneracy. That's how we got a whole nation to smoke.

Speaker 3 And it's also how we got a whole nation to quit smoking. So the thing is, like, there really are good prescriptions here.
And the only thing I get from you. Wait a minute.
Hang on.

Speaker 3 We're talking about self-delete. Almost done.
Almost done. Yes.
Yes. That'll help with self-deletion of men.
Yes. And it's one of the biggest contributing factors.

Speaker 3 Single motherhood, another huge contributing factor. These are all things which we need to mitigate.
And by the way, these are all great prescriptions. You said, I don't have none.

Speaker 3 No, no, no, for a second. That's what you said.
Now, here's the deal. These are great prescriptions.
I happen to live in the time that you're talking about when the FCC didn't allow degeneracy.

Speaker 3 And I was able to live through the time where they started to allow it. So I, unfortunately, was able to see a time where America was great and now we had dysfunction.

Speaker 3 So I agree with some of those things. That took place probably 40 or 50 years.
It would take a very, very

Speaker 3 unique scenario for that to occur when you have Cardi B and this type of music out here. And she's a single mother divorce aid with a man that is having babies.

Speaker 3 now that's a good argument okay so how that's an actual argument hold of course no that's that's something that you agree with that's okay no it's okay that's okay no it's a it's an agreement you disagree you can be humble enough to say you agree that's an actual argument no no listen you don't have to be you know you don't have to belittle or attempt to belittle well i'm here a grown ass man

Speaker 3 just say you agree

Speaker 3 hey listen listen just say you agree you want to be the same

Speaker 3 agreement with a matter of recognizing that

Speaker 3 hey sir

Speaker 3 i argue not used to somebody across from you no just say you agree you can humble yourself in a situation i don't agree it's just an argument you agree be a big boy be a big boy i don't agree but it's an argument here's a here's a second here's a second okay

Speaker 3 You're telling me it's going to take 50 to 100 years. I ask you about a man that's considering taking his life today.
You're telling me about propaganda machine.

Speaker 3 Okay, there are men here that have been abandoned from their kids. They've been alienated.
I'm talking about today. I'm not talking about in the church.
i'm talking about today

Speaker 3 you're telling me about some scenario where you're going to change liberalism and bring in righteous conservatism that's not going to work today we need solutions for men today not 50 years from the turning point meeting okay at this point Today, we have men that are in dire need of help.

Speaker 3 They're going through unsettling situations and divorces. This is who I speak to.
And you keep telling me obvious answers about propaganda and changing this and going to church.

Speaker 3 This sounds great on paper, but that doesn't happen today. You don't start that today.
Can you give me a one solution you got that starts today, mister? I got all the solutions.

Speaker 3 We can start today.

Speaker 3 If you fund, if you assist with funding MRA groups today.

Speaker 3 MRA groups today who are trying to legislate and get legislation passed today to create preventative measures for those men today.

Speaker 3 Now, if you ask me, can Andrew, can you do anything about a man who might be willing to blow his head off right this second because he's already going through the events of divorce, which I had nothing to do with, wasn't there for, could never do anything about, nobody can do it.

Speaker 3 Can you prevent it? Of course, nobody can. But that's built into the question.
Even your righteousness

Speaker 3 from the poll. Yes, but it's built into the question.
What you're building into the question is probably the, it's probably the worst framing ever.

Speaker 3 Andrew, if somebody right this second is willing to do something bad,

Speaker 3 can you stop them? It's like, here it comes.

Speaker 3 Look at the the scenario.

Speaker 3 But your scenario is to change MRA funding when women vote, outvote men 60 to 40%, and you have women lobbyist groups and zero men lobby groups. That's what you're telling us.

Speaker 3 We're going to change to fund MRA groups. Congress makes the law on not the voters, sir.

Speaker 3 When MRAs are on some terror lists. Yes.

Speaker 3 So you're telling me that they're going to start just switching funding. We're just going to switch funding over here to a terrorist organization

Speaker 3 according to some of these websites. Yeah, I would say this is just a pie in the sky.
All these your nations are completely different. Not only is it not pie in the sky, but I'll give you an example.

Speaker 3 I'll give you an example. The least possible situation that can be done.
I'll give you an example of where it's already happened.

Speaker 3 So I would argue that the traditional churches are MRAs, that they are men's rights advocacy groups, and that that's where traditional masculinity is mostly found today, where men are even allowed to be masculine.

Speaker 3 Oh, hang on, hang on, hang on. Let me finish my point.
And it is the case that those MRAs, in this case, the traditional churches, already got abortion rolled back, didn't they?

Speaker 3 They're already moving moving these things back. They're already at the forefront of fighting degeneracy.

Speaker 3 They are also the ones who are at the charitable forefront of helping those same veterans who are blowing their heads off when the government doesn't even pay any attention to them.

Speaker 3 When by the time the government was all done doing any of these reforms when it came to veterans associations, it was those pesky old traditional churches from Sky Daddy that you hate so much.

Speaker 3 They were the ones on the forefront who were actually assisting those people and not doing that. While you, you asked me this question.

Speaker 3 Andrew, what can you do right this second for a a guy who's going to blow his head off? Well, probably nothing, but neither can you. Of course.

Speaker 3 But at least we could do something about that not happening to others. Okay, so that's very easy to accomplish in red states.

Speaker 3 And red states overwhelmingly were the states that got those things passed. They were already going to get it passed without the interaction of these so-called righteous individuals.
That was like

Speaker 3 a state level. Now less than a state level.

Speaker 3 Yeah, through Donald Trump. Yeah, then a lot of federal levels.

Speaker 3 California, Nevada, these are all states that you can easily drive to and get it done because they're red.

Speaker 3 and they're blue. It's a federal ban, yeah.
And at that particular point, are we going to get a federal ban? Yeah, you believe we possibly could, yeah. Possible.
It looks good. It looks good.

Speaker 3 It looks good, but we don't have it today. All right.
So we don't.

Speaker 3 Again, we don't have it. So when you want to get it,

Speaker 3 more than likely, I'm going to tell you, you said it's possible, and I say more than possible, you're not going to get it. All right.
So at that point, that's when they said about Roe v.

Speaker 3 Wade, and they were wrong. They're wrong today.
They're wrong possibly. We possibly might get it, but California is, they're not doing it.
I can drive to California.

Speaker 3 When there's a woman I can drive and and i could take a woman to nevada yeah but it's already increasing the rates it's already working like what are you talking about it's already effective all it does is just send women to another place and it reduces the amount of abortions it reduces it so now we're not that's all we're talking about reducing it we're talking about now the unsettling experiences so do nothing we're doing something yeah doing something i'm informing people i'm informing people i'm giving people the information to do what and you're telling me what do you want this guy's solution that might take tell me what men should do i'm telling you but they're what all right at this particular point this is the question that you've been wanting to ask me all right i've been i put out a book called 52 things that men should do prior to considering marriage okay what it does is take it through a step-by-step approach of what they need to look out for just to detect what is that hold up for a second hold up for a second just to detect this man's considering i've had plenty of men that said they were considering marriage they found the red flags because of my book and they stopped getting married to a woman that eventually they saw would have been bad for them.

Speaker 3 That would have cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars. So I'm doing something very positive.
Now, watch this.

Speaker 3 You mitigate the red flags. You allow men to understand what the process of marriage is.
Mitigating the risk.

Speaker 3 And you're going into possibly telling them what the state is involved in, how your children are affected, parental alienation, the odds of self-deletion,

Speaker 3 and so forth and so on. So that's an opportunity.
I want to make sure I got this right. Opportunity for men to learn.
So I want to get this right.

Speaker 3 You're telling me it's not a possibility of changing that. Yeah, so what you wrote.
And women outvote men 60 to 40%. So you, you wrote, it doesn't, dude,

Speaker 3 you don't even understand the political process and how it works. Voting itself, when you're talking about

Speaker 3 lobby groups. Yeah, you're talking about lobby groups and

Speaker 3 what male lobby groups do they have? Traditional churches. Okay,

Speaker 3 we're back to church again. They're the ones who do all the lobbying on behalf of men.
They're doing it on behalf of the men that they that follow them. That's not on behalf of them.
It's for all men.

Speaker 3 This abortion ban helps all men it's not some their charities to men who are going to kill themselves helps all men not some it doesn't help all men in that situation yes it helps the men help because listen yes it does tell you where it doesn't there might be a woman considering getting an abortion and he wants to keep the kid he has no mitigating risks they're the only ones trying to change that exact who is the traditional church

Speaker 3 the traditional church yes all right at that point that doesn't help him yes it does help him so you're saying at that point it's only the traditional church when you have hundreds of female lobbyist groups and you have them out there.

Speaker 3 They're the ones combating those female lobbying groups. That's it.
How are they doing? Only the reds. They're doing great.
Only the reds. No, at the federal level, they're doing great.
You're wrong.

Speaker 3 You can still go to other states to get it done. Yes, but we've still managed to mitigate it even in those states.
It's a war. It's a political war.
That's how it works.

Speaker 3 And not only that, let me let's point this out. Your whole solution here, I wrote a book to help mitigate future events.
Oh, great. Andrew, what are you trying to do? Help mitigate future events.

Speaker 3 Oh, right now, right this second, what can I do to help? Andrew says, right this second, if a guy has a 357, his mouth is going to pull the trigger, can't do anything.

Speaker 3 You're totally right, but neither can you by your own admission. Correct.
So there we go there.

Speaker 3 When we're looking at the future, though, and I say, let's do all of these different prescriptions, which we can actually politically accomplish and move towards.

Speaker 3 You say, that's all fucking pie in the sky, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I ask, well, what can you do as far as future prescriptions? You say,

Speaker 3 blacks are fucked, and I have absolutely no prescriptions for it. No, I don't know about 52 things that men could consider to mitigate divorce risk.
The same thing I'm trying to do.

Speaker 3 They're marrying the right woman. So you're just

Speaker 3 mad that I have one solution, you have another, and we don't mind. We do better.
That's what you believe. I think yours is pie in the sky.
So that's just

Speaker 3 pie in the sky. It's not working way more men than your book has.

Speaker 3 No, no, my book actually has 15 plus thousand. You have, you have how many? Hold on.
How many?

Speaker 3 You have how many ecclesiastic marriages that your church pastor is going to go into the bedroom and enforce marriages at? You can't even

Speaker 3 produce that. You can't give such a number.

Speaker 3 You can't give such a number. You said that.

Speaker 3 Nobody said that the pastors are going to go in the bedroom and enforce anything. Social pressure.
Stop lying. All your social pressure.

Speaker 3 Where's your social pressure? How many people do you have in your ecclesiastic marriages? How many people got married under that? Millions? Please give me a number.

Speaker 3 Millions of people have an ecclesiastical authority up. That's

Speaker 3 people have an ecclesiastical marriage. They may have a statement.
That's under your scenario. What do you want me to tell you? Yeah, we don't know.
How many? We don't know. I don't know exactly.

Speaker 3 But you're sneezing at my number, but you don't know at all

Speaker 3 there's a lot

Speaker 3 even if it was the case that you never adopted the state you don't have any number even if it's the case hang on what's the number hang on even if it's the case that uh all they ever did was get a state marriage certificate and never even follow that portion of what i'm saying right the number is still lower by their own by the state's own numbers it's still lower here just give me a number of your marriages that you're proposing that we're all going to follow we don't know we don't have polls you don't have a number yeah we don't know for sure i would venture to say it's very little under 100 sure all right so now we got no it's not under 100 certainly under 100 no it's not all right i don't hear people talking about it other than you yeah well that's because you're not around traditional churches by your own admission but yeah there's people who have crowning ceremonies you get married by churches who don't get a state cert traditional churches in fact there might be data on that you should look please look it up there might be under your under your scenario Yeah, under my scenario.

Speaker 3 But the thing is, even if we grant, even if we were to grow it. So we got 125 million.
If we were to grant it,

Speaker 3 still from the state's own admission, the divorce rate's still significantly lower for a reason. 20 to 30%.

Speaker 3 Okay. That's huge.

Speaker 3 It is nice. Significantly lower.
It will be nice. You still have men under unsettling divorce conditions.
You still have men under state-funded divorce. You still have men under child support.

Speaker 3 You still have men under parental alienation. You still have sexist marriages.

Speaker 3 You haven't accomplished most of these things. Two out of 10.
Two out of 10, what? That would be two out of 10. It's 20%, right? Two out of 10 of those marriages, as opposed to your system.

Speaker 3 Four out of ten yeah in your five out of ten in your system it's much higher it's the system that exists no it's not but you're telling me 150 marriages this is no all of these scenarios i and i have to be i have to be honest with you um

Speaker 3 this wasn't much of a debate yeah i know a lot of you no no listen much of your scenarios were make-believe to be honest

Speaker 3 they were they were pretty make-believe you would have to have a an extremely considerable movement to be able to accomplish them like millions of millions

Speaker 3 you would have to have millions of people to do. Can you point out how many Catholic and Orthodox are in the United States? It's my turn to ask.
I can ask him to say that.

Speaker 3 Please do, please do, but that's not the number. Look how many.

Speaker 3 It is the number we're looking for. We're looking for ecclesiastic marriages under your scenario.

Speaker 3 No, listen, even if it were the way it works, even if it were the case, do you agree with me that if you take the state out of marriage, that that is going to assist in the reduction of divorce?

Speaker 3 You can't take the state out of marriage. Why not? That's what you're telling me.
Yeah, why tell me? How many people have done it? Yeah, but why can't you do it? Because no fault divorce.

Speaker 3 A woman can go into divorce you, even if, because

Speaker 3 you're not under her control.

Speaker 3 How if you're not married to you?

Speaker 3 By the states, you're not married. How can she take you to a divorce court? Can you explain that to me? I asked you this earlier.
Have you been through a divorce? It doesn't matter.

Speaker 3 Answer the question. That's a yes.
So you've been through a divorce. Why does that matter? What is pertinent because this is why?

Speaker 3 Can I finish? You've been telling me I'm cutting you off. You won't let me finish.
Bro, I want an answer to my question. Go again.
Can you answer my question?

Speaker 3 I mean, I can play the game you're playing. You just won't answer questions.

Speaker 3 All right, listen. I mean, I thought you were a tough guy.
Listen, under this scenario,

Speaker 3 a marriage, even if it's ceremonial, religious,

Speaker 3 it doesn't matter if she files for the divorce. You will still be going in court to fight that.
I don't care. You can never file for divorce if you're not married by the state, dude.

Speaker 3 Listen, can you answer my question?

Speaker 3 You're completely missing this. This is what tells me you haven't been through one.
Have you talked to a divorce attorney?

Speaker 3 A woman can file you have to respond and provide evidence that you were not married now you and your common law you living with your kids is going to be difficult i'm trying to give you some information

Speaker 3 law marriage okay that's different in some states there is no common law marriage so that's not common law marriage

Speaker 3 listen i'm treat california doesn't even have common law and that exists it could be ceremonial you could get married in fiji it doesn't matter soon as you get back here if you practice marriage, the whole institution, at that particular point, if she files, you, sir, will have to respond to that suit.

Speaker 3 If you do, I would hope and pray that the judge, not God,

Speaker 3 grant you your wish.

Speaker 3 At that point, your argument fails because you then would have to say, my ecclesiastic reverend on the little house on the prairie granted this marriage, but it doesn't count under the statement.

Speaker 3 I didn't want to make sure that she can do this and you have to respond. Can you help me with this? It's because I am actually confused.

Speaker 3 So, let's say a woman and a man went out to a field and declared themselves. You got a scenario.

Speaker 3 Let's say if, yeah, let's say if a man went out to a field with a woman and declared that they're married, correct. You're saying she can still go to a divorce court and divorce him.

Speaker 3 She can file for the divorce. How to respond? Yeah, have to respond.
Yeah, what does that mean, though? That doesn't mean

Speaker 3 I'm informing you. What does that mean? This is how a lawsuit works.
Okay. She's a petitioner.
She files. She says, We walked on Kohl's.
We went outside.

Speaker 3 This was a union. I consider it a marriage.
Everybody knows and addresses us as a marriage. This is a non-common law state.

Speaker 3 We receive mail at this place. We've been living under the same roof for this many years.
You will have to respond to these allegations. Now, you're going to have to say.

Speaker 3 on your petition,

Speaker 3 this is not true. We have an ecclesiastic marriage and a prenup under god

Speaker 3 and we lived together but we weren't married is this that's a response to the lawsuit and then you proceed to trial is a hearing is this a lawsuit or a divorce divorce is a lawsuit okay so i'm divorce is a lawsuit can you look this up

Speaker 3 can you file for divorce without ever getting married oh my goodness you are slow you can file a lawsuit for anything so then it's not a divorce can sue you for anything no can okay so if you go into there and she so they're just suing you yes it's a law that's not a divorce come on

Speaker 3 can we pull this up can you file for a divorce without getting married divorce is a legal process that ends in legally recognized marriage you never obtained a marriage license and your marriage was never registered summarized according to the state law the courts have no marriage to dissolve you're full of

Speaker 3 they can yeah you're full of shit they can just sue you for whatever you said they have no marriage to dissolve you still have to sue you no no no You still have to.

Speaker 3 You still have to respond to the law. Yeah, but you don't have to go to the divorce court.
You do. No, you don't.
You still have to file the response. No.

Speaker 3 That's not a divorce court. That is the divorce court.
No, it's not. It's a court of divorce.
It's the circuit court or some shit, not the divorce court. Listen, this is.
You got caught in 4K.

Speaker 3 You're fully. That's ChatGBT.
That's Chat GBT. You're fully.
In this situation here, we can bring a lawyer in town and say, can she file for a divorce? You're saying what the outcome is.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second. You're saying the outcome.

Speaker 3 they can't legally enforce it that's what you hope the outcome is you hope the outcome is you still have to respond all you're saying is that a woman can sue you for anything correct yeah but that's not the same as filing for divorce

Speaker 3 that's where they would file it no if they can't no they're not filing it in the divorce courts my gosh all right that's where they would file it in the divorce court they would file a lawsuit no they would file it in the family court trust me now who does the family courts did

Speaker 3 so that's the divorce court Wait a second. Wait a second.
The family court is a divorce court.

Speaker 3 Wouldn't you have to do that under specific criteria for family court, like a kid's involved or something? You can just. Correct.
So, in this scenario, hold on for a second. That's not the same as

Speaker 3 this is ridiculous.

Speaker 3 That's ridiculous. Listen, listen.
The family court is what people call the divorce court. There's no building that says divorce court.
You understand it. Yeah, I agree with that.

Speaker 3 So you have a woman with children

Speaker 3 that you say you're not married to.

Speaker 3 If she files,

Speaker 3 you still have to go under family score jurisdiction she could you still have to respond because there's children yeah because there's children at that point my point is made she has filed they may say the divorce doesn't count yeah but now how do we deal with these children yeah but that was

Speaker 3 that is a part of marriage did you not have children with the woman come on dude so if you're not that is a part of as long as you don't have children then yeah they can't do that correct that's what you're saying but you're saying no that's children i'm actually asking you're saying they're gonna have children correct yes you're gonna go to family court yes you could go to family court.

Speaker 3 Yeah. She files for the divorce.
Not for divorce. They could go films for support or all sorts of things.

Speaker 3 That's not the family court. Yeah.

Speaker 3 When we talk about what men deal with when they deal with marriage and the result is a divorce, one of the things they deal with is child support, also domestic violence, which falls under the family court.

Speaker 3 So you cannot be married.

Speaker 3 You have a problem here with this. Listen, so I agree.
You can fall under

Speaker 3 that if you have children, that that could go through the family court system. Nobody ever disputed that.

Speaker 3 So

Speaker 3 hang on, but that's the different one. That's different than filing for divorce.
You can't file for a divorce. You're never married.
That's one. You're going to child.

Speaker 3 And hang on. The second problem here is the reason that men usually lose their custody when it comes to divorce and divorce court is because women plot.
They plot escape hatches.

Speaker 3 So what they do is they go, okay. Of course they do.
Look,

Speaker 3 you know, I'm going to take two years, make sure that you're fucking destitute on the way out, and then I'm filing in divorce court. Correct.

Speaker 3 You're going to get hit over the head from what happens in divorce court. Absolutely.
It's a different ballgame, though.

Speaker 3 If it's the case that you have children with a woman and she goes and she files for custody, you're actually in a much better position to get custody at that point than if it was the case that you were married through the state, dude.

Speaker 3 Much better positioned. We don't know that.
No, no, 100%.

Speaker 3 You don't know that. You're guessing.
Give me some data on that one. There's a data on that one.
Okay, go ahead and look it up. But we don't know that.
Yeah, it's just a case.

Speaker 3 If it's the case, hang on. If it's the case, if you're not positioning that.

Speaker 3 And that men who fight for custody correct right that's correct but they're in a better position to fight for custody if they're not going to the divorce court if they're only getting motions for child child support or well you know actually actually i'll tell you something if you are not married to them you actually fare a little bit worse if you're not legally married that that's true if you're not legally married let's just take a baby mom baby dad situation

Speaker 3 If he's not legally married to them, they typically fare a little bit worse in custody cases. I just said that.
Right, correct. So

Speaker 3 at that point,

Speaker 3 they're still faring worse.

Speaker 3 Now they're marrying better,

Speaker 3 right? If they're not married. Yes.

Speaker 3 No, they would actually fare worse. How?

Speaker 3 Well, ask any guy that's been in court. We can look at this.

Speaker 3 When they are not legally married to a woman, they go through a custody battle. Yeah.
When they're legally married, they do better getting better custody.

Speaker 3 Yes, men get better custody.

Speaker 3 That would be a better outcome. If they're not legally married,

Speaker 3 typically they fare worse getting custody. Why? Because they're not married to the woman.
This is typically, typically, it just depends on jurisdiction. Because of the unplanned nature of it.
Correct.

Speaker 3 Exactly.

Speaker 3 But if it's planned, we don't know. No, we do know.
The judge doesn't know. Hang on, hang on.
How do they know? We do.

Speaker 3 So now you're saying you're going in and they're used that we're not legally married, but we're married.

Speaker 3 Here's how we can logically, I think I can actually logically demonstrate this, and I think you'll agree. Okay.

Speaker 3 So the reason that men tend to fare bad in custody disputes and in divorces is because it's unexpected. So usually they're getting hit with it and it's unexpected.

Speaker 3 Even if it should be expected, because it's unexpected, they have time to plot, they have time to plan, this kind of thing. Right.

Speaker 3 So they can, yeah, they can hit them with it. Right.
Right. That's, I mean, and it's normally what happens.
Yeah. That's normally.
You can't mitigate that.

Speaker 3 Are you suggesting you just? You can. You can mitigate it.
You can mitigate it. Here's how you can mitigate it.
If you're in a church, you have to. You can see two things.
Go ahead. Yeah.

Speaker 3 If you have the, if you have an ecclesiastic, if you have the ecclesiology, the ecclesiastic community, the community actually supports you when you're going through these problems of they're not going to be in court with you.

Speaker 3 No, they actually help you with funding. They help you with everything.
Yes.

Speaker 3 They're not going to be able to. They don't need to go

Speaker 3 work with you.

Speaker 3 Money is what talks, man, and bullshit walks. Exactly.
I agree with that. That I can agree with.
Yeah. They're not going to be able to fund that together.
They do all the time. Listen, they assist.

Speaker 3 These small marriages, I would love to see these out. They should do a documentary on them.
They do. All right.
So we could say we do have stats on this.

Speaker 3 Most people aren't under these, so we can say that's clearly the case. But in those situations here, under those situations, you have men that are not under this veil of i don't know what it is okay

Speaker 3 that do fare worse when they're not married okay that's typically what's gonna happen because it's un because the the childbirth itself is unplanned but if they're with a woman long term yeah as a partner they actually do have early and i was even if they're not married

Speaker 3 even if they're not married typically typically typically yes that's that's but some so it's no better outcomes you're just talking about the unplanned nature not necessarily not necessarily i mean they're mostly they're having because there's a lot of factors here.

Speaker 3 I mean, we can make things black or white. The guy doesn't have the ability to maintain the custody.
He lives in another city. Because there's so many other factors.
Because there's something.

Speaker 3 I knocked her up. That's not different than I was with her for her.
We were in a relationship. They were in a relationship.
All right. But knocking her up usually happens early.
It could.

Speaker 3 It typically does. Because that's

Speaker 3 at that point. Now they were raising the kid for two or three years.
They were together. But this goes together.
And it might happen. But it also goes to my point.

Speaker 3 In this situation here, right here, we have a lot of things that we like to make black or white and easily sell. It's all nuanced.
I agree. Okay, very much nuanced.

Speaker 3 At that point, then you're just telling us, oh, I'll just throw this

Speaker 3 aspect of religion on top of it and it'll fix it or it'll middle gate. It'll mitigate it.

Speaker 3 It'll mitigate. It doesn't eliminate it.
It just makes it less. You're not can't eliminate it.
But even if it makes it less likely, but they're still going to,

Speaker 3 once they go through it, what do you do? But when you said America or a marriage was a great institution, right? Did that eliminate all divorce? It was very low. Well, right, right.

Speaker 3 So it's just, you're only talking about mitigation. You're only talking about mitigation.
It was actually lower than the percentages that you're showing me.

Speaker 3 Way lower. I agree.
Way lower. But, but you're still talking about mitigation.
But we're also talking about white people were least likely to get married under these scenarios, too.

Speaker 3 Yeah, but we're talking, we're still talking about mitigation. Exactly.
And so if you say it's great and it's mitigating, and I say, okay, I want to move towards mitigation. We can never eliminate it.

Speaker 3 You can't hold that against me. I can't.

Speaker 3 And you can't hold it against me for telling men to avoid the situation, especially since, and I'll add this on, especially since we can know statistically women are getting married at an older age.

Speaker 3 That is increasingly high. We can look at

Speaker 3 40 years ago, it was 20 years old. We can look at today, it's roughly around 28 and 30.
There's some new ones there, too. There's a lot of new answers.
Hang on, there's a lot of money.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second, but I was completing a point.

Speaker 3 Okay. At that point, you're seeing a lot of women choosing to not marry.
You're also seeing a lot of men choosing to not marry those women that are older.

Speaker 3 So how do you get those people to have an ecclesiastic marriage

Speaker 3 when you're telling telling them these people are saying, I'm not marrying that woman. She's a stepmom or so, no, she's a single mom, she's older, she's past her prime.

Speaker 3 How are you getting that marriage rate up? This is the ecclesiastic marriage. So I think that that's a great question.
It's one other than saying that they got to be virgins.

Speaker 3 And it's one that I need, and it's one that I do need to answer to. So here's the answer to this.

Speaker 3 The reason that women are getting married older is because they're deferring their childbearing years for college. That's why.
That's obvious. Okay.
I mean, literally, that's the only reason.

Speaker 3 And one of the prime reasons that the birth rate is collapsing is because they're having children older because they defer those childbearing years

Speaker 3 later and not fool full and multiplier. I was just adding.
So we can, so we can look at this and we can, well, it is still multiplied.

Speaker 3 The point is, is

Speaker 3 when we're talking about, we go back to this whole propaganda thing, right? You're not going to get a disagreement on this. Hang on.
The idea is,

Speaker 3 should we have propaganda that says, women, you go to school, we'll give you student loans, right? We'll back the entire thing for free, and we promise you a lucrative STEM career, right?

Speaker 3 When the opposition is actually true. Or do we run campaigns that say no STEM funding, you got to pay for your own fucking college, okay?

Speaker 3 Or you can choose the more traditional path. How likely is this to happen? It's actually pretty likely.
If you look at the idea of STEM fund or funding for college, right?

Speaker 3 The idea of student loans and things like this, women are already trying to check out in the worst way because they can't have kids later in life. They're not getting married, though.

Speaker 3 They're not getting married. They do.
They do. They just turned it back.
They do college first. And this is, by the way, where the body count comes from.

Speaker 3 The big body counts are coming because they spend all this time in college getting fucked. Very obviously.
It shows it's obvious.

Speaker 3 And then afterwards, right, they get their little lucrative career and then they want to settle down. They find this.

Speaker 3 But it seems to me very obvious that if you wanted to do something about this, you would want to create the incentive for women to not go to college and instead use their childbearing years to get married because that's what we always did.

Speaker 3 I've actually created this scenario before, and it's very

Speaker 3 opposed to where society is going.

Speaker 3 society really not showing that they're showing trends of this you might have the little spatters here and there but if you have a woman that says okay i can't afford to go to college she becomes a walmart here's why here's like a child becomes a walmart clerk and assistant manager i'm looking at those particular demographics they're not jumping into marriages all right maybe in tuscaloosa yeah alabama they're still out here hoe hopping all right they're still finding a variety but here's why is so women are getting they're getting more college degrees than men because men have a viable option for making income which is easy correct i mean it's actually harder but it's easy for them.

Speaker 3 We can survive. And the idea is, if you're a tradesman, you're going to make a lot of money, okay? Especially in modernity, because there's an incompetency crisis in the United States.
Absolutely.

Speaker 3 So if you're good at what you do, you're going to make a lot of money. And that's just it.
Women are less likely. And even if we're not bad at it, you'll make a lot of money.

Speaker 3 But the college thing created a situation we were not aware was going to happen, even though I could easily have predicted it, which is oversaturation.

Speaker 3 Women only go for a couple of things, and they're sociological related mostly.

Speaker 3 They're not really really for STEM fields, and that's who's hiring the big STEM fields. Everything else oversaturated.

Speaker 3 That's why women end up in government NGOs and government think tanks and psychologists because the overage has to go somewhere, but that's saturated too.

Speaker 3 So you're seeing actually a trend begin to emerge. of that trending down because of oversaturation.
So if that's the case, these women don't want to go work at Walmart as the assistant manager, right?

Speaker 3 And if you had said propaganda plan, and the propaganda plan is simple enough, the idea here is just don't defer your childbearing years for college instead we'll help you with incentives so that you have children younger and you get married younger you will almost eliminate this entire problem and yes not only is it viable this is this not only is it viable but we should be moving towards that this idea that you should get married rather than just create the conditions for which marriage is great is exactly what we should be doing and under those conditions it would make sense because you're getting women that can multiply that can but it's only the churches that can hold a more significant not not really.

Speaker 3 But in this situation,

Speaker 3 I agree with that scenario. I proposed that many years ago.
However, you're going to be hard pressed for women to actually pick that, although they're not going to college.

Speaker 3 They're trending down in college. They're probably not going to complete one of these liberal arts degrees.
What you're probably going to see them do, they're still going to Coachella.

Speaker 3 They're still selling Coochie. They're out here being sugar babies.
They're going to OnlyFans.

Speaker 3 Exactly. And so it'll get oversaturated.
Now you you kick the can down the road to what the next thing is.

Speaker 3 I don't see the women seeing that college is prohibitive to them jumping into traditional marriages. I don't see that.

Speaker 3 But that was the same argument which made in the 90s to men that they would not see that the trades were going by the wayside and they all needed to get a college degree when in fact the opposite ended up happening.

Speaker 3 Now they're all moving towards trades in lieu of the college degree because of oversaturation. Because of oversaturation.

Speaker 3 There's no reason for us to believe that if it's the case that women have the option and the propaganda behind it for them to get married at a younger age, right? Defer that with incentives.

Speaker 3 We can give all sorts of incentives.

Speaker 3 Oh, man.

Speaker 3 First of all, you can give tax exemptions, for instance. You could say.
These women don't pay taxes, even when they make millions on the taxes.

Speaker 3 Yeah, but the thing that's that'll catch up to them, but they don't pay the taxes. Yeah, so

Speaker 3 well, they do have to pay property tax on the houses they get from their husbands when they divorce them. So if they

Speaker 3 didn't, the thing is, is

Speaker 3 what you could do is in Poland did this, and they had a pretty good degree of success, up almost a half a percent, moving in training towards almost 1%, which is huge in such a short amount of time.

Speaker 3 They gave tax exemption, and you can pull this up if you want. They gave tax exemption if you had more than X number of children.
I think it was three for life.

Speaker 3 Tax exemption for life. Now, the thing is, is that's huge.
Now, from a woman's perspective, why would a woman go for that? Because she's tax exempt for life, too.

Speaker 3 And the thing is, it's the same reason they're going to college, which is they want the money, the same reason they're selling their pussy online, because I want the money, is also a thing which you can incentivize them to do the other direction.

Speaker 3 You could, because it sounds nice. They want the money.
It sounds nice, but and it's worked. It's worked.
It's worked in Poland. Yeah.
Well,

Speaker 3 in the places it's been tried, the incentives work. Is that a comparable nation to the United States who highly depends on women being taxed? Well, so did Poland.
It's not the same size.

Speaker 3 Well, I mean, we were very large.

Speaker 3 We were very large. It's all scalable.

Speaker 3 It could be scalable. It's all scalable.
That's kind of like when people said Sweden did this and yeah, I'm out of million people versus versus

Speaker 3 a million people. I understand.
We're going to look at the models where they exist

Speaker 3 to see how they compare. Yeah, and it's a better model.
Yes, it's a good model. It would be a good start.
It's a start. It would be a good thing.
It's a starting.

Speaker 3 Kid, you think people would probably try to manipulate that? You said they have three kids from the same dad or from different dads? You have to be married. You would have to be married.

Speaker 3 Okay, so this would be a nice opportunity for us to bring something that Poland has tried

Speaker 3 to a place where we don't have that same structure. They're somewhat democratic socialists.
No. They're somewhat

Speaker 3 They're very conservative. They're conservative.

Speaker 3 But yeah, they have that, but they're also. No, they're very capitalists.
Okay. Yeah.
So, but typically we're a lot more capitalist than them.

Speaker 3 I don't know. I don't know.
They're a lot more capitalists than Poland. Eastern Europe has become very, very based.

Speaker 3 Eastern Europe has become right, but we can probably say 200, 300, 50 million people versus Poland size. It's much smaller, yes.
12 million. But that's what scalability is for.

Speaker 3 I mean, this would be the size, not even half of California at this particular point, but that you're scaling to. Yeah, scalability works that way.

Speaker 1 It's good. 38 million in Poland.

Speaker 3 38 million, quite more than I thought. That would be the state of California plus Oregon, maybe, or something like that.
Well, and California is bigger than a lot of countries. It is.
That's the case.

Speaker 3 It's the fifth largest GDP. So in this scenario, I'll give you that one.
This is a little bit of a reach, but I'll give you that. Not just that.

Speaker 3 If we look at the Chinese model, Chinese model really fucked this up. They decided that they were going to do the one-child policy.
Remember that? And they screwed that up.

Speaker 3 Well, not only do they screw it up, but they have almost given themselves imminent doom because their birth rate has dropped down so low. Now, what are they doing?

Speaker 3 They're giving incentives for women to have children. Exactly.
Now, we do it here too, to a legal degree with tax credits, right?

Speaker 3 But the tax credits, you're not going to incentivize a woman who can sell her pussy on OnlyFans to have a child to have a child for $3,000 a year.

Speaker 3 And sometimes they even go on EBT and WIC and they still use the system. So you're still finding ways where people will manipulate the system.
And we're seeing people that are asking manipulation.

Speaker 3 We would try to get rid of it. It would be a nice try.
I'll give you that one. That might be a ball.
No, it's possible. More than possible.
And it's better than the idea of just continual degeneracy.

Speaker 3 Well, I'm not promoting degeneracy. However, sex outside of marriage?

Speaker 3 Well, who is that degenerative to? I mean, that's your, that's your bill. That's your Bible.
I mean, most, most of your Christians, your traditional, hold on for a second.

Speaker 3 Let me see your traditional Christian women that are getting married to these simps are blindsided typically by women that were promiscuous.

Speaker 3 So that sounds like normal. So it sounds like sex out of of marriage is bad.
It sounds like it's really bad, but those are your women you're trying to marry, not the virgins that we're going to have.

Speaker 3 Do you think that this is mitigated by you being a secularist versus a Christian? Give me a break. I mean, you're not going to mitigate women throwing their pussy around the internet.

Speaker 3 You can hardly mitigate that. I mean, you haven't done anything at this particular point.
They're busting it wide open on OnlyFans. Yeah, we can put

Speaker 3 on women. He cannot lie on OnlyFans.

Speaker 3 I mean, every one of your scenarios is a big, big, major swing at they're not happening. All right.
It's not happening. Do you know that the people versus Larry Flint?

Speaker 3 The people versus Larry Flint was not long ago when the normalization of

Speaker 3 used to be outlawed. Okay.
It used to be outlawed. It was outlawed all over the United States.
And guess what?

Speaker 3 The effects that it had on the psychology of men and the effects it had on marriage were negligible. You could still get it to some degree underground, but it was tough and it was illegal.

Speaker 3 Why do you think? And people still went to the,

Speaker 3 I don't know if you remember this, if you're old enough. They still went to that VHS area or the area of the the magazine.
That was after the plant. All right.
But

Speaker 3 that was the result. That was kind of weird.
That was

Speaker 3 legalized it. Before they legalized it, those sections didn't exist.
Exactly. So now it's wide and open.
It's in the open. Yeah, so we need to eliminate it.
Yes.

Speaker 3 We didn't eliminate Playboy and Penthouse. That's still eliminated.

Speaker 3 Larry Flint was Penthouse. I understand that, but it's still here.
I mean, he won the case. Correct.
So

Speaker 3 I want to be the OnlyFans. We're unwinding and have been unwinding.
That's what Roe v. Wade was.
The idea of Roe v. Wade was to be

Speaker 3 OnlyFans, the damage is done. I'm going to just let you know.
Yeah, you know what? The damage is pretty much done. That would take 30 or 40 years.
Okay, well, after a war, the damage is done.

Speaker 3 It might take 30 or 40 years, but you know what? The thing is, is we don't quit because it might take some time. I didn't ask you to quit.

Speaker 3 What I'm asking you is, you're trying to solve the problem today of getting traditional

Speaker 3 today, tomorrow. I understand that.
Tomorrow, tomorrow will be a better day. But at this point, you're looking at traditional conservative women that have thrown their Punanis out.
Sure.

Speaker 3 Them are single moms well they're not traditional all right but yeah and they're not but this exists and unfortunately the traditional conservative movement or

Speaker 3 and it's full of feminists

Speaker 3 yeah these women come in as feminists liberals and they cosplay trick these men into marriages say that they're going to marry them not in the secular and then they follow you and then they run right back to the corner now

Speaker 3 this does happen quite a bit even in the christian church not from us well i don't know how many you are we still haven't determined but it's funny this still happens.

Speaker 3 So a lot of men get caught off guard because they see her thumping a Bible. Oh, she's one of us.
And these women have figured out how to copy. And again, I think this is a good question, right?

Speaker 3 And notice I've answered all of yours. You haven't answered any of mine.
But the thing is, I answer. Yeah.
Can I ask a couple? Go ahead. Okay, great.

Speaker 3 So the progressive mantra is that sexual liberation, this is what feminism was based around was sexual liberation. That was the big one.
Correct.

Speaker 3 That their bodies were being controlled, not just from abortion, but from who they chose to have sex with because they were attracted to them, this and that. Marriage was a complete trap for women.

Speaker 3 It was self-destructive to them, this and that.

Speaker 3 What is the distinction in your message and that one to men? What's my message?

Speaker 3 Well, it seems to me that your message is that marriage is simply too dangerous and that if you want to sleep with women outside of it, it's perfectly fine.

Speaker 3 And it's actually liberating for you because you're moving away from the trappings of marriage itself. And it would say, hang on, hang on.

Speaker 3 That seemed like the same exact message that we got in the 70s from feminists. If you frame it that way, it would be.
So you're a a feminist? Hold on for a second. It would be two different outcomes.

Speaker 3 You're protecting wealth, access to children. You're actually being able to control who has your children.
That's what they wanted. Exactly.

Speaker 3 Well, no, they want to be able to kill their children and abort them. They want to be able to determine what they are.

Speaker 3 We're trying to figure out where we have the control legally. They're having the control over their body.
These are two different. But it's

Speaker 3 outcome. So what's the legal outcome

Speaker 3 that men are trying to figure out? From a 1970s feminist to your messaging right now, what is the difference? They're trying to control their bodies. So are you.

Speaker 3 I'm trying to control legally, financially. These are two different things.
Those are your body outcomes. You're controlling your body.
No, no, no. Don't just make it a body outcome.

Speaker 3 It's the same thing. It's financial.
These aren't not my outcomes. That's the same arguments they made.
It's financial. You're trying to make it the same.
I know you're trying to say, no, no, no.

Speaker 3 You're trying to cram that in. Oh, finances are your body.
I'm trying to control the legal outcomes. So related.

Speaker 3 Related to finances, not related to me being liberated and sleep with who I want to. The first goal was to control what happens to me financially.

Speaker 3 It was never never the goal for men to avoid marriage to sleep around. That's the feminist goal.
Those are two different things. They make the same kind of claim.

Speaker 3 They make the same claim. Their claim is...
was financially

Speaker 3 that they need to go sleep those are two different we're not telling women they need to go sleep around we're just telling them they can if they want to isn't that the same as your message if they want to some men don't sleep around yeah some men don't sleep around it's just feminism for men dude that's what you want to call there's no prescriptions it's just feminism for men how's that not a prescription i get to control who who i'm with.

Speaker 3 I get to control where the law is.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second. And I get to control where my finances are, not the state.
Said the feminist. No, no, no, no.
That's not. No, no, no.
That's not. It's not the way to do it.

Speaker 3 We don't have a bank account. We can't decide what to vote.
We can't decide what to do with our children. We're men's property.
That's a secondary. That's a secondary issue.
That is a secondary issue.

Speaker 3 You tried to compare it. You try to compare it and then say, finances is body.
I mean, come on. That's what I'm saying.
I mean, you're really trying to fight it. You're really trying to cram this.

Speaker 3 They were like, we want to credit our narrative. We want to be able to control our bank accounts.
We want want to be able to control our secondary, tertiary issue. We're talking about what you frame.

Speaker 3 It's the primary issue. The primary issue for you is finances.
It's not to sleep around.

Speaker 3 That would be two different things. But I'm not maintaining my independence and staying single so I can sleep around.
That's not the primary issue. I understand.
It is for finance.

Speaker 3 So those are two different arguments. No, they're not.
I'm going to make it the same for you. Go ahead.
Let me give the explanation. Please.

Speaker 3 If every single argument you make, even if you say these ones over here are tangential, but I agree with them, is the same exact argument of the 1970s bra-burning feminists.

Speaker 3 Whether or not it's your primary, that's what they believe. Whether or not it's the primary goal.

Speaker 3 Make it work for you. Make it respond, man.
Make it work for you. Even if it's the case, it's not the primary goal.
It's a secondary goal. They're still the same goal.
You'll spray

Speaker 3 the number one. Can we at least make the argument before you respond? Reach on in there, bro.
So the thing is, dig deep. Is if you say, hey, man,

Speaker 3 this is about financing. It's like, okay, well, you know, the 1970s feminists, we can't have credit cards.
We can't control our bank accounts. We can't control our own financial independence from men.

Speaker 3 That's That's what they're fighting for. You want the same thing.
Independence from women to control your own finances. What are you talking about? Promiscuity.
Almost done with the argument.

Speaker 3 Then he can rebut it. Next thing is when you're talking about promiscuity, sure, sleep with whoever you want, right? It's under your purview because you can do whatever you want with your body.

Speaker 3 Same exact argument that they were making. They're not the property of men, right? They should have complete sexual liberation, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

Speaker 3 All of these are the same degenerate structured systems, which led us to where we are currently right this second, except you're just providing them for for men instead of women.

Speaker 3 It's like, can't we at least at some level look at this and say, look, just because these crazy women are doing these insane things, we can actually as men do something about this prescriptively without adding the degeneracy.

Speaker 3 Can't we do that? Okay, let's go back. Okay.
So, such thing as, you know, medicine, you might take a medication to solve one issue and you get side effects.

Speaker 3 You're telling me the side effects equals what the men wanted as to solve the problem to heal. That's the reason they took the medication.
Now you're telling me about all these side effects.

Speaker 3 A side effect of feminism being able to control their body is to also have finances, blah, blah, blah. Same thing with the men.
The men didn't intentionally go in there to say, this is for our bodies.

Speaker 3 We went in there to say this is for to control our finances. Then as a result of that, there could be some other things that happen as a result.

Speaker 3 But if the results are the same as feminism, it's not the same. What's the

Speaker 3 result outcome? Because at that particular point, at that particular point, the man has controlled his finances. He's outside of the safe system.
That's what the feminists argued for themselves.

Speaker 3 There is, that's a completely different reason. You can have

Speaker 3 you can have the same outcome, and it could be for different reasons. All right.
You're saying the outcome

Speaker 3 pretty much says it's a reason. That's not true.
You can have two different reasons and have similar outcomes. So we have the same outcomes for 1970s progressive

Speaker 3 for men because you intended it to be different.

Speaker 3 You wanted to, you wanted to compare. You just simply wanted to compare it as the same.
It is the same. It's apples and oranges.
It's apples and oranges.

Speaker 3 It's apples and oranges because you didn't mean it that way. I didn't mean it that way, even though that's the same result.
You framed it that way to

Speaker 3 your narrative. That's your narrative.
It's not my narrative. That's your narrative.
You just agree. Listen, that what I said is true.
I didn't agree with anything. You did.

Speaker 3 You just said that's the same. It's the same comparison.

Speaker 3 This is the outcome. If I choose to do something for different outcomes, it's not the same.
Just why? Just because certain things line up. It's just the way you want.

Speaker 3 And you're cherry picking, by the way, and you're very good at it. You're cherry picking the good things.
You're

Speaker 3 the good, the bad things. And do you want to reframe traditionalism and call up the traditional church? Well, the traditional church also had the Ku Klux Klan in the 1950s.
No, that wasn't.

Speaker 3 Is that what you were doing? It's a Protestant church. Okay, well, it's the church.
And at that particular point, you want to go ahead and cherry-pick what's good and what's good.

Speaker 3 By the way, they were Democrats. Great snapshots were Democrats.
Exactly. And of course, they were Democrats.
And certainly not a Republican. Okay, well, now where are we at?

Speaker 3 There's going to be Democrats in your church? No Democrats.

Speaker 3 So I also divorce. Of course, there there will be.
So they're going to be people that have to do with the same thing.

Speaker 3 Have to do with anything. You're snapshotting traditional world that literally you can just pinpoint 10 years.

Speaker 3 And if I go back 10 years before, it was non-existent. You're reaching, you're creating a pie in the sky.
And then if I fast forward 15 years later, it don't exist.

Speaker 3 Now you're trying to bring it back out of the air like you're Billy Graham. I know

Speaker 3 that doesn't exist.

Speaker 3 It is not the normal traditional church.

Speaker 3 You're screenshotting things. You're picking out a period of history to say we need to take it back from here.
That period.

Speaker 3 I'm trying to give a holistic view, not just of

Speaker 3 a religious view. Not a holistic view.
It's very religious. Most of history is full of religion.
I'm saying. And a whole bunch of religious people killing people.
But go ahead.

Speaker 3 Go ahead. That accounts for it.
Keep it going. That accounts for you.
All right. A lot of people can't.

Speaker 3 A lot of ordination. Not four to six percent of all wars were religiously based.
How much? How much? Or to six percent. You can look it up.
All right. I don't care what.
That doesn't matter.

Speaker 3 They kill each other at mass rates. All right.
Listen. Religion is not the order to 6%.
You guys, you're

Speaker 3 degeneracy and feminism for minutes. Didn't say it was.
You didn't have to live degeneracy if you're not religious. That's your world.

Speaker 3 You always make it fit what you want to fit. Because it does fit.
It is the truth. That's what you guys advocate for.
You're only good if you're religious. That's ridiculous.
All right.

Speaker 3 You only make good decisions because you're religious. That's ridiculous.
That's what you hope. And that's not the case because a lot of people that are in you.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second.

Speaker 3 Why do you say, oh, hold on, hold on. A lot of people.
I'm talking about outcomes being a child. You just admit it.
You just admitted that there are women that are feminists in your church. Of course.

Speaker 3 Okay, so there's your solution there.

Speaker 3 You're telling me it's always better. It is always better.

Speaker 3 What you're doing is selling men a fantasy of them. And you're selling them feminism.
I'm not, well, we can agree to disagree on that, but just telling them a feminism. I disagree.

Speaker 3 You're just selling them feminists. And you're selling them a fantasy.
All right. A fantasy that I have data to sell.

Speaker 3 Matter of fact, most people will be dead by the time you get even one inch closer to whatever you're proposing. Well, most men will be dead as a dormitorial.
dormitorial under your

Speaker 3 you have assured that black men will be dead you said so yourself there's no fixing it they will be

Speaker 3 that's your prescription well that's the prescription that you heard what i told black men is to leave that community the community is not are they doomed or not like you said the black men leave the community they thrive yeah i know are they are black men doomed like you said earlier black men that leave the community they thrive yeah i know you know very well are black are black men doomed like you said earlier under the matriarchy of the black community yes under under the scenario that i'm proposing for black men absolutely not they thrive but that's in the future what about right now so that's what about right now no they're they're they're thriving right now under your degeneracy model all right they're thriving right now under the generacy who oh yes they who you're looking at one right now you're what you're looking at

Speaker 3 so that's who so let me get you're looking at the notorious one right now that's who you want an example

Speaker 3 give me your numbers yeah so men you didn't give me your numbers the whole damn stream but you're telling me i gave you tons no give me your numbers of your your ecclesiastic marriage where your pastor on the little house on the prairie is going to prevent that

Speaker 3 give me them numbers again okay you're asking me for a hundred times i have to explain this come on man so again when you're talking about just because they don't have polling data for the united states specifically we can definitely look at other nations where there's ecclesiastical marriages and the divorce rates that's one you could do it right now no no no the second the second is this you can even if i grant the goal polls even if i grant that just because polling data for that specific thing doesn't exist right this second the polling data for people who even who are engaged in state marriage is still lower makes my argument much more compelling.

Speaker 3 That's all fine and dandy when you're comparing the 125 people to millions of people. No, these are millions of people.
What number in the state? What's the number of that participant? Of what?

Speaker 3 Which thing? I keep asking you this. You never give me.
I've already told you 50 times. There's no polling data.
Exactly. You don't have a number.
But I do have numbers.

Speaker 3 It's a fantasy, dude. I've been selling people a fantasy.
Do you realize that... I love it, though.

Speaker 3 Listen,

Speaker 3 you make my point stronger, not worse. A fantasy?

Speaker 3 If it's the case that people are engaged in state marriage right this second and are part of traditional churches and their divorce rate is lower, it has to logically follow that if they were not engaged in state marriage, the divorce rate would be even lower.

Speaker 3 You're talking about getting hit over the head 30 times, 30% to 50%. Okay, that's great.
It's

Speaker 3 that's huge. I'm going to give you that.
That's the difference between 150,000 people. Yet you're telling me you have a better solution.
No, it's mitigating 150,000. Hold on.

Speaker 3 You're giving me a mitigating better than that 30%. That's a humble way.
That's more than 150,000. Where's the solution for the better than the 30%? I've been asking for it.

Speaker 3 You can't tell me how many people that you got under these notorious contracts that aren't. I can logically demonstrate it for you.
There's no polling data for that. So what? Get that number.

Speaker 3 That would be a great instance. When I asked you, you can tell the audience.
Hold on for a second.

Speaker 3 You can tell the audience how many people that you're going to prevent from busting out this ecclesiastic contract with your little household

Speaker 3 contract.

Speaker 3 Whatever it is that you're doing, if you could tell your men how many people you have doing it and you prevented them from getting divorced and losing their kids under custody please tell us yeah so otherwise it's a fantasy oh let's let's respond again do you have the polling data for how many of the black men you've personally helped absolutely okay let's see hundreds of thousands right now hundreds of thousands

Speaker 3 hey everybody in the chat where's the polling data we're gonna do it right now live that do scientifically

Speaker 3 press one that's polling data hey coach greg adams

Speaker 3 that's polling data if you follow me for the last you don't have hundreds of thousands press on your chat dude give me a break press one if you can see you. Look, look.
You see that?

Speaker 3 Yeah, where's your

Speaker 3 polling?

Speaker 3 You don't want to look. Look at this.
Where's the polling data? Coach gang represent.

Speaker 3 Do you have scientific polling data? That's more than your ecclesiastic contracts. I guarantee you that.
Okay. Everyone in the crucible chat who Andrew Wilson has helped put one in the chat.

Speaker 3 That's scientific polling data. Says Coach whoever.
I know. You don't want to hear it.
I thought you was going to let it happen. Now all of a sudden, you don't like the numbers.
Come on, Andrew, man.

Speaker 3 That's not polling data. I thought we were better.
That's not polling data, doofus. Okay, what are you talking about? You're going to call me a doofus.
Polling data?

Speaker 3 Where are you going to call me a doofus? Yes, that's doofus shit. Yo, man, that's crazy because I asked you for a number and I'm the doofus.
You can't even give me a number. I gave you a hard data.

Speaker 3 Wait,

Speaker 3 where's your army at? What's the name of your group?

Speaker 3 What's the name of your group? The Crucible Chat. The Crucible Army.
Go ahead and pull them up and tell them. Tell them, tell them.
How many of them are under your

Speaker 3 Ecclesiastic contract? Let's make sure we got this straight. How many people are in his live chat right now?

Speaker 1 He's got 3,060.

Speaker 3 And see how many people are in mine. Let's go.
Pull it up.

Speaker 3 They should beat me in your Ecclesiastic contract.

Speaker 3 They should floor us in the ecclesiastic contract. Committee Fulbright.

Speaker 3 Oh, 4,800. Most likely not even double.
Just one. We're both doing well.
Just one, please.

Speaker 3 Just one, please.

Speaker 3 And now that means I win. Where are they at? That scientific polling.
There's crickets over there, okay? Just ones. There you go.
All I got to do is one. And that's why

Speaker 3 there's a couple of twos in there.

Speaker 3 I want the ecclesiastic contract marriages. Oh, no, no, no.

Speaker 3 You said, who have I helped? Oh, wait a minute. That's different.
No, no, no, no.

Speaker 3 No, you ask who, for me, who's followed my prescription. Yeah.

Speaker 3 There you go. Yeah.
Okay.

Speaker 3 That's not polling data, dude.

Speaker 3 I ask you for the ecclesiastic contracts, Andrew. This is very simple.
What part of this is. You don't have the polling data, but I can logically demonstrate it.
Do you not understand?

Speaker 3 You're selling a family. We do have the numbers.
You're selling a fan of it. Oh my God, dude.
This is so low. It's here.
And I think what you need to do is. I'm talking to a fucking ball.

Speaker 3 And I hope that all those cancer sticks that you've been smoking will help your ass live long enough to see how far you've led men astray. I would love that for you to survive.

Speaker 3 And I would bless you by the name of God and the Jesus Christ and Latter-day Saints that you survive all them goddamn smokes. You don't follow Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Speaker 3 All those smokes you have so you can come out here and live and see how many people are. Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
You follow Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Somebody does.

Speaker 3 More people than that.

Speaker 3 More people than the Crucible. The LDS.
Well, that you've

Speaker 3 the LDS church more people more people than you have under your ecclesiastic contract I can guarantee you that all right all you have to do is agree to one proposition is it the case that you personally think that if there is no state contract you're not win a state contract your chances of getting divorced are going to decrease is that true or false if that's true Even if you don't get married, correct.

Speaker 3 Your chances of getting divorced goes to zero.

Speaker 3 And that's the same thing I said. Don't get married, you don't get divorced.
The number one cause of divorce is marriage.

Speaker 3 Not what sounds like a state contract. No, the number one cause of divorce is marriage.
Hey, Andrew, let's just say this, man. Listen.

Speaker 3 I thought they could divorce you even if you weren't married to them five minutes ago. No, you went through a ceremony.
You went through a religious ceremony. So at that point, they can.

Speaker 3 But if I never went through a ceremony, they can't. They can sue you for anything by your logic.
Whether you went through the division. Well, no, no, no, no, no.
Don't move the goalpost.

Speaker 3 I said you went through a ceremony. I didn't.

Speaker 3 all right those are two different things sir which part of i don't really again i don't understand if it's the case that you say he's scrambling and scraping for yeah if it's the case that you say he's scrambling and scraping for right now

Speaker 3 by the state we got him scrambling if you're married by the state if you're married by the state your chances of marriage or divorce you don't get married your chances of divorce is zero yeah okay wait a second i'm sorry your chances of if you don't yeah unless you're cohabitating right divorce unless you're cohabitating depends on where you live yeah so then it's not zero so you just lied It's not zero.

Speaker 3 So then it's not zero. But about if you don't cohabitate.
Yeah, again, now you're moving the goalpost. No.

Speaker 3 If you read my book, man, I bet you can't read. Did you write a book? I'm pretty sure you didn't.

Speaker 3 I wrote a book. My wife's totally gay.
And I take all her money, though. Good.

Speaker 3 That tells me the type of man you are. Holy mackerel.
You're pipping your wife out now. What's next? To write.

Speaker 3 What's next if those, how many books that she sold? Now, let me get back to this. I'm pipping my second.

Speaker 3 Hold on for a second.

Speaker 3 My prescription. My prescription for men is no.
Hold on for a second. No, no, no, no.

Speaker 3 Yeah, well, I guess YouTube's going well if you're living off your wife's books. All right, what's her name? So we can give her some shine to sell some books.

Speaker 3 Oh, her name is Rachel Wilson, the author of Occult Feminism. I guarantee it sold more copies than yours, sir.
All right, let's, well, we can look it up. Let's over that.
Now we can look it up.

Speaker 3 Now, watch this. Watch this.
All right, go ahead. I want to look it up right now.

Speaker 3 Now, at this point, what have you done? You're living off the backs of your wife? Oh, my goodness. Is this traditional marriage? Yes, absolutely.
Boy, oh, boy. Men have fallen.

Speaker 3 I'm going to tell you that. Absolutely.
Men have fallen. It's a disgrace.
All right. Damn.
You're living off of what? Is this traditional marriage, by the way? Yes.

Speaker 3 Your wife is into traditional marriage and you're living off her finances. God damn.
All right, boy. The crucible is falling apart at this particular point, bursting open at the scenes.

Speaker 3 Gentlemen, what's your book called? Free Agent Lifestyle.

Speaker 3 You got me, man. Yeah, I did got you.
I take all, it's true. I take all of her money.
It's true. Well, that's what you said.
I mean, I do. You said that.
I do. I mean, I'm not saying something.

Speaker 3 All of it. And I spend it on guns.

Speaker 3 Every traditional marriage sounds great, guys.

Speaker 3 Traditional marriage sounds great. Does that sound bad?

Speaker 3 Who would be upset by that? I take all of my wife's money and spend it on guns. He says traditional marriage falls traditional.
That's traditional marriage. That falls under traditional marriage.

Speaker 3 Sure. Oh, boy.
What's on traditional marriage?

Speaker 3 That's a great traditional marriage. It sounds like a great traditional marriage to me.

Speaker 3 Yeah.

Speaker 1 I can't find the numbers, honestly.

Speaker 3 Oh, well, it's too bad. This all happens.
Shit happens. But, you know, it's a bestseller, trust me.
You should read it. So it's hers.
It's just sold. But what have you done? She's sold more.

Speaker 3 But what have you done? I take her money. Zero.
Exactly. Boy.
And man, you hear this? Yeah. This is the traditional patriarchy masculinity here.
Um, in live and in living color.

Speaker 3 But you can follow him. You can follow me.

Speaker 1 I mean, your book is ranked higher on the charts and it has more ratings. Oops.
Can't find them sales numbers on either.

Speaker 3 The sales numbers or what matters. Oh.

Speaker 3 Oh. Let's see the numbers.
Oh, numbers. Uh-oh.
Numbers. Uh-oh.
Numbers.

Speaker 3 Oops. Numbers.
I'm higher ranked. More people have.
Let's see the numbers. Come on, man.
I don't know. I don't keep the data.
I don't know what. I don't know how many books you've sold.
Millions.

Speaker 3 So millions of books. Give me a fucking break with this shit.
How many books you sold? Zero.

Speaker 3 You sold zero goddamn books.

Speaker 3 Listen, I'm higher ranked. I'm higher ranked.
Hey, sold millions of books.

Speaker 3 Look at the numbers. The numbers don't lie, Mr.
Numbers Guy.

Speaker 3 Where's the numbers? Higher rank. More people rated.
I want to know how many

Speaker 3 more people have rated the book. Yeah.
Free agent lifestyle for life. And guess what?

Speaker 3 You can definitely brigade your own age on shit. You challenge me.
Show me the numbers. Challenge me.
Where's the numbers?

Speaker 3 Numbers are.

Speaker 3 You saw the numbers. No, I didn't.

Speaker 3 I asked you for the sales numbers. How many of you sold? Numbers.

Speaker 3 Free agent lifestyle for life. Everybody go out and buy the free lifestyle.
Yeah. Free agent never, never.

Speaker 3 I don't know how many you sold. I'm higher ranked, Ben.
So what?

Speaker 3 I got more people. That doesn't mean shit.
Sean Michael. Yeah, you see that?

Speaker 3 I'm higher ranked uh-huh i'd imagine with the ranking algorithm sales does play a factor come on man we already know that though it is what it is what are the numbers i don't know my numbers my probably better than hers but i i know it's better than yours that's true i've never written a book i just take that i mean i just take the authors you come up with obvious solutions to to scenarios that i mean anybody can you're anybody come up with i don't have a solution free agent life solve a solution that's not a solution anyway it's not in short it's just a generous solution that you don't like it's just go for

Speaker 3 shut up that's what you think all right it's a solution that you didn't how's it gonna help how's it gonna help with abortion? How's it going to help with anything?

Speaker 3 Well, that's what de-evolution is for. Read

Speaker 3 de-evolution. Go ahead and pull that up.
All right. How does de-evolution? De-evolution.
Go ahead and look.

Speaker 3 How about you read the book and then come back? Do you know your research? How does de-evolution help you? I figured you were a better debater than this. Can you answer the question?

Speaker 3 No, be well prepared next time because I don't have time. You can't answer any questions.
But I'm going to sell some books. Just know that.
Creation lifestyle and de-evolution.

Speaker 3 The link is in the description box below. All right.
I did my work. I don't have to explain it.
I wrote a book. Your job is to do the work.
All right. And that's what we teach men to do.

Speaker 3 It's not about degeneracy. We teach men to do the work and not come up with pie-in-the-sky fantasies that don't work.
All right. The captain obviously.

Speaker 3 Your solutions are very obvious. Control propaganda.
All right. Jesus Christ, man.
Look, anybody could do that. Here's your solution to whatever you want.
Fuck the free agent lifestyle. Fuck whoever.

Speaker 3 Just fuck whoever. It's fine.
We're not feminists, though, guys, even though we have all feminist propositions. I bet you your wife's body count is higher than yours.

Speaker 3 Yeah, I bet your wife's body count was higher than yours.

Speaker 3 No, I'm not married. I'm not married.
And your wife, you living off of her, I bet you her body count higher than yours.

Speaker 3 You think so? Oh, I know so. Oh,

Speaker 3 just like you know your wife. She's a traditional conservative.

Speaker 3 I know she'd have got ran through more times in the Holland Tunnel. So that's it.
It's just now Absolutely. Now I'm going to bet my wife.
Is that what we want to do? That's where you went.

Speaker 3 No, you brought it up. Did I say a word about

Speaker 3 your wife? Did I say a word? I heard about your wife. I don't doubt one.
Yeah, if you did, do you think I would have? You brought her up.

Speaker 3 I brought my wife.

Speaker 3 Did I attack her? I didn't attack her.

Speaker 3 You just said she had a high body count you lying sack of shit show me the proof I don't have any proof yeah you're just making shit up traditional conservative women lost a debate so you went on

Speaker 3 debate you've been losing debate for a long time your wife has a whole border crawl i bet you she does that's the number what's the right proof

Speaker 3 traditional conservative have higher body

Speaker 3 men she's not a bad con dude you don't even know what you're talking about if you're not a tradcon and you married i'm not a tradcon you didn't do your homework what are you i'm a christian ethicist a christian ethicist yes all right very good all right right.

Speaker 3 And you still don't know the numbers. How many people follow you? Follow what? Follow your prescription, your master solution.
No numbers. I literally have

Speaker 3 a lot of number after number after number of the fact that the traditional churches' divorces are lowered. We got that.
But how many men follow you? We don't know the polling data. No.

Speaker 3 We don't need to. We know that even if they're with the state, it's still lower.
Coach gang. Coach gang, one in the chat.

Speaker 3 All right, Coach Gang, one in the chat. You bought the free agent live stuff.
I didn't hope you. Put one in the chat.

Speaker 8 All right. It's been two hours.
You guys want to call it?

Speaker 1 Yep.

Speaker 8 All right, guys. Check them out.
That was a fun debate. We'll let Chat GPT decide who won this thing.
We'll throw in the transcript and there and link it in the video. See you guys next time.

Speaker 8 I hope you guys are enjoying the show. Please don't forget to like and subscribe.
It helps the show a lot with the algorithm. Thank you.

Speaker 3 Next up is a little song from CarMax about selling a car your way. You wanna sell

Speaker 3 Wanna take a sec to think about it. Or like a month.
Wanna keep tabs on that instant offer. With OfferWatch.
Wanna have CarMax pick it up from your driveway.

Speaker 3 So, wanna drive? CarMax.

Speaker 8 Pickup not available everywhere.

Speaker 3 Restrictions and fee may apply.

Speaker 4 This holiday, discover meaningful gifts for everyone on your list at Kay. Not sure where to start? Our jewelry experts are here to help you find or create the perfect gift in store or online.

Speaker 4 Book your appointment today and unwrap Love This Season, only at K.