1802 - "Stimming"

We're going to the moon.

Adam Curry, John C.

Dvorak.

It's Thursday, September 25th, 2025.

This is your award-winning Gibbon Nation Media Assassination episode 1802.

This is no agenda.

With free speech on sale and broadcasting live from the heart of the Texas Hill Country here in FEMA, region number six.

In the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry.

And from northern Silicon Valley, where we're noticing that they're shooting up to place in Texas, get out while you can.

And I'm John C.

Dvorak.

It's Craig Bottom Buzzkill in the morning.

You know,

I'm getting a little annoyed by bullet etchings.

It all began with that one guy.

Well, it started with Luigi.

Well, did Luigi have bullet etchings?

Yeah, he had no...

Deny, defend.

Okay, well then

one guy said it.

Once one guy did it, all these other guys have to do it now.

It's like, is this the modern-day version of manifesto?

I just want a good old-fashioned manifesto.

I don't want it.

Listen, here's the story.

You can hear the gunshots.

Denise Robleto was waiting for her mother at the Dallas Ice Field office and started filming.

I was with my sister praying, she said.

At least three people shot.

Multiple people shot.

Police say the gunman perched on a rooftop, killed one detainee and wounded two others before taking his own life.

No ICE officers were injured.

DHS calling it an attack on ICE law enforcement.

The FBI releasing this image of shell casings found near the shooter, engraved with the words, anti-ICE.

Tom speaking with the acting ICE director.

There were some brave men and women on the ground that went into those vans, were pulling those detainees out while they're under fire.

And they were all shot while they were in the vehicle.

They were shot while they were in the vehicle.

Right.

So the shooter obviously didn't know who was in the vehicle.

He was just randomly shooting at windows into vehicles that he'd already seen down there.

The agency releasing images of bullet holes in a window and American flag inside the facility.

Authorities say that gunmen fired multiple rounds from the top of that building into this ICE facility a few hundred yards away.

Tonight, NBC News has learned the shooter is 29-year-old Joshua John, according to multiple senior law enforcement officials.

John's brother described him to NBC News as unique without elaborating, saying he didn't have strong feelings about ICE as far as I knew, and that he was not a marksman, that's for sure.

Now,

this is all very troubling.

First of all, the etched shell casings, I want to hear from our ammo experts,

and we have them out there.

I'm surprised no one has said, has come forward, stepped forward.

Our producers are out there.

How do you etch on casings?

Do you put it in a vise?

And do you use, what do you use?

Is it safe to do this?

Is it easy to do?

I haven't etched any shell casings myself.

And

how do we know that this was an attack on ICE?

Maybe there was someone who needed to be taken out in the van.

We don't know anything.

It's just assumed.

And unique individual, is that code for trans now?

I mean, I'm just asking questions.

Well, those are all good questions, as a matter of fact.

And you have to go by the

classic

movie script where this is

bull crap and there was somebody in the van that had to be killed.

We never are, nobody's told us who the dead guy is.

Well, they just, oh, the dead guy, no.

Could be a gang member.

Could be someone.

We don't know.

We don't know if it's

a woman or a man

or a young person or an old guy.

We know nothing.

We have no idea who it is.

They've just completely glossed that over.

Zero.

Zero information.

Then that's it.

And then there's three others injured, I suppose, and we don't know anything about them either.

So that, and it's peculiar that, you know, that he killed a detainee instead of, you know, he's shooting in the windows.

He's doing all this other stuff.

But then that detainee gets, that's a good point.

I like it.

No, but these are all very perfect, no agenda material.

This is very irritating things to me.

Why is this guy dead?

Another one is like

we have hundreds of thousands of producers.

And I know that when I make the call, they'll show up.

But I want people to get back into the habit of, wait a minute, they're talking about something that happens to be my field of expertise.

Maybe I should weigh in.

By the way, if you're tuning into this, to the No Agenda show

to talk about, to hear some talk about who or how Charlie Kirk was killed, about entry and exit wounds, strange characters at the scene,

people sending baseball-like signals or ballistics.

This is the wrong podcast for you.

Bushes with guns.

Yes, this is the wrong podcast for you.

Go listen to Megan Kelly and Candace.

We're not doing that here.

We have other things to do that

may actually make a difference to your life.

What a conspiracy hole everyone's been pulled into.

It's like,

yeah, well,

I think it's I know people like answers.

I know.

People like answers.

They like puzzles, it seems to me.

We like puzzles.

Yes, that's people love puzzles.

Well, so where are our producers who are experts in escalators?

I would have expected at least three emails on this topic.

We have people who are experts on everything, including elevators.

But is there some magic kill switch on escalators that I'm unaware of?

There is a kill switch at the top.

At the top.

And I think at the bottom, too.

But that's a.

Yeah, somebody up the top could have just stomped on the switch.

They claim somebody is walking up backwards, taking pictures or some, you know, a staffer.

They're blaming it on Trump now.

Oh, yeah, no, it's, of course, it's Trump's.

And he walked up backwards and accidentally stepped, which is, by the way, I don't know how easy it is to accidentally step on that big red button that's at the top of the stairs.

He stepped on the, they were on two rungs and the thing stopped.

Anyway,

here's everyone's favorite.

We haven't heard from her in a long time, although I saw her in a pro.

No, it wasn't a pro.

She was doing a hit on the primetime hours out there on MSNBC.

And she looks like an old dude now.

I'm talking about Jen Saki.

So Trump passed through the security barricades.

He then walked up to the escalator and stepped onto with the first lady, at which point, and you'll see in a second, okay, there it is, the escalator abruptly stopped, leaving Trump flummoxed for a few seconds.

Flummixed, I tell you.

You can see the first lady just walking up the stairs as one normal person does.

He ultimately decided to just walk up the immobile staircase himself.

Now, basically, everyone who has ever used an escalator ever has had some version of this exact same experience.

No,

I've never had it happen to me.

I've never had it happen.

I've had to walk up escalators that weren't working.

Everyone's had to walk up escalators, which I think is what she's trying to say.

That's just the way she put it.

She's not trying to say that.

She's being very clear.

Trump is stupid.

That's what she...

He was flummox.

He didn't know what to do.

Oh, my God.

My escalator doesn't work.

Now, basically, everyone who has ever used an escalator, ever, has had some version of this exact same experience.

Sometimes escalators malfunction, and you are left to just treat them like a regular staircase.

Not a big deal.

It happens.

But for Donald Trump, the brief inconvenience of having to walk up a non-working escalator while on camera was enough to provoke outrage on the world stage.

All I got from the United Nations was an escalator that, on the way up, stopped right in the middle, and then a teleprompter that didn't work.

These are the two things I got from the United Nations: a bad escalator and a bad teleprompter.

Okay, so that's real.

That was the president of the United States lashing out at an especially gathering of leaders.

Lashing, lashing out.

He's not lashing out.

Is she an insane person?

You have

an insane person that looks like an old dude.

Yes.

So that's real.

Did you get, was this?

I didn't get this clip.

Did you get this clip on right off MSNBC?

This is right off MSNBC.

Yeah.

Well, they must have new makeup people or something because they used to at least make her look presentable.

No, no, when I saw her in the,

it was non-presentable.

Was she was a guest and she was

she, I think she was actually dialing in from Zoom.

So that didn't help.

Although Zoom has all

culling in, so

she didn't have the thick coat of baseline makeup.

Yeah, that's correct.

Blaster on her face.

That's it.

So she looks like hell.

Is that what you're saying?

That's the one.

So that's real.

That was the president of the United States lashing out at an assembled gathering of world leaders because the escalator.

C-Mike, troll C-Mike says, gingers go bad fast after their expiration date.

How rude, C-Mike.

Apparently didn't show him enough respect.

It was, to say the least, a ridiculous thing to bring up over and over again.

We showed you a couple of examples of that in a speech the United Nations.

But the escalator crisis, believe it or not, it did not end there.

Just a few hours after that speech, White House press secretary Caroline Lovitt posted on X, quote, if someone at the UN intentionally stopped the escalator as the president and first lady were stepping on, they need to be fired and investigated immediately.

Oh, yes.

Yeah, absolutely.

So that, of course, is the headline, which is probably the whole point of it.

I see

you teased in the newsletter clips of his UN speech.

And I,

as we know, I don't listen to any of your clips, but I saw only one labeled UN, so I figured I'd pull a couple short ones.

But what is your BBC speech?

I decided that there were so many clips that the people played of Trump berating the members that everyone has seen these by now.

There's no reason to really be redundant about it.

It wasn't that remarkable.

He was telling them that global warming is bull crap and that they better get their act together.

And it wasn't that remarkable for me to clip it.

So I clipped nothing from the speech.

I promised and didn't deliver.

Yeah, so I

have done many a time, by the way.

Continuously.

It's your speech.

Yes, continuously.

It's your brand.

I talk about it, but then I don't have to do it.

It's your brand.

I clipped a couple things.

Well, good.

Well, I'm glad you did.

But again, I found the speech to be

relaxed.

I didn't see that he was lashing out.

She's nuts, this woman.

And he was pretty funny.

Kind of laid back, and

the prompter went down, which is a bad idea with him

because he can do two hours without the prompter.

The prompter keeps him in line.

So that was a mistake.

He went over

an hour, and he's yaking away without a prompter.

He doesn't need a prompter.

He doesn't.

No, he doesn't.

He doesn't.

The prompter is to keep him from going, getting carried away with his long diatribes.

And so they kill the prompter.

You're going to get Trump.

All right.

I have a couple of clips, and I feel that all I saw was teleprompter escalator clips.

So I'll just play the ones that sent, that was really his entire message centered around

those two points, as you said.

And here they are.

Not only is the UN not solving the problems it should too often, it's actually creating new problems for us to solve.

The best example is the number one political issue of our time, the crisis of uncontrolled migration.

It's uncontrolled.

Your countries are being ruined.

The United Nations is funding an assault on Western countries and their borders.

In 2024, the UN budgeted $372 million in cash assistance to support an estimated 624,000 migrants journeying into the United States.

Think of that.

The UN is supporting people that are illegally coming into the United States, and then we have to get them out.

Your No Agenda show, of course, has been on this continually, showing the UN International Migration Office doing exactly what the President is saying here, which no one ever says.

The UN also provided food, shelter, transportation, and debit cards to illegal aliens.

Can you believe that?

And phones.

On the way to infiltrate our southern border.

Millions of people came through that southern border.

Just a year ago, millions and millions of people were pouring in, 25 million altogether over the four years of the incompetent Biden administration.

And now we have it stopped, totally stopped.

In fact, they're not even coming anymore because they know they can't get through.

But what took place is totally unacceptable.

The UN is supposed to stop invasions, not create them and not finance them.

In the United States, we reject the idea that mass numbers of people from foreign lands can be permitted to travel halfway around the world.

trample our borders, violate our sovereignty, cause unmitigated crime, and deplete our social safety net.

And believe me, that this message was heard around the world, and there are citizens in Europe and in the UK going, yeah, how come we don't have that message?

And this one for that matter.

Global warming, not happening.

You know, it used to be global cooling.

If you look back years ago in the 1920s and the 1930s, they said global cooling will happen.

How about the 1970s, Mr.

President?

Leonard Nimoy, 1978, they were saying

right up to 1980.

He needs,

someone needs to adjust his script on this.

That annoyed me that he said, oh, how about all back then?

No, sir.

Up to the 1980s.

Kill the world.

We have to do something.

Then they said global warming will kill the world.

But then it started getting cooler.

So now they could just call it climate change because that way they can't miss.

It's climate change.

Because if it goes.

When I hear this, I'm like, we could be president.

We could do this.

We don't need a prompter.

We can walk up with the broken escalator.

We can do this.

This is our material.

Higher or lower, whatever the hell happens, this climate change.

It's the greatest conjob ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion.

Climate change, no matter what happens, you're involved in that.

No more global warming, no more global cooling.

All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong.

They were made by stupid people.

He needs to add the snow globes, man.

That have cost their countries fortunes and given those same countries no chance for success.

If you don't get away from this green scam, your country is going to fail.

And then he said something remarkable, which, and it's not the first time he said it, but it's the first time we've clipped it about Germany.

And it's patently not true, which is just interesting.

Europe, on the other hand, is a long way to go with many countries being on the brink of destruction because of the green energy agenda.

And I give a lot of credit to Germany.

Germany was being led down a very sick path,

both on immigration, by the way, and on energy.

They were going green and they were going bankrupt.

And the new leadership, new leadership came in and they

went back to where they were with fossil fuel and with nuclear, which is good.

It's now safe.

And you can do it properly.

But they went back to where they were and they

opened up a lot of different plants, energy plants, energy-producing plants, and they're doing well.

I give Germany a lot of credit for that.

They've said this is a disaster, what's happening.

They were going all green.

All green is all bankrupt.

That's what it represents.

And it's not politically correct.

I'll be very badly criticized for saying it, but I'm here to tell the truth.

I don't care.

Now, this is just not true.

Germany has definitely been talking about reopening their nuclear plants

and that they could reopen coal plants, but it hasn't happened.

I'm as baffled as you are about this.

I think he's trying to signal to the non-monarch member state of the European Union: hey, don't let

those bloodlines kill you

because

they don't have a royal family.

I can't think of anything.

First of all,

the whole immigration and

clean energy, Green New Deal is a shot across the bow at the elites of Europe because

that's what they've been talking about for decades, for as long as we've been doing this show.

They've wanted to kill people.

They want to kill people.

Yeah, well, they they want a smaller population so they can

and a population that they have under total control, i.e.

immigrants who will have to do what they say or they get thrown out.

So, but

it's not true.

There's a lot of talk.

I'm not sure.

Yeah.

Well, there's got to be some rationale for this.

It should be,

I think,

we demand an explanation.

We demand an explanation.

Germany isn't doing well at all.

We want an explanation in that regard.

We want an explanation from the president.

This is not true.

Why are you saying it?

Why is no one?

I mean, what a perfect opportunity for the green zealots to say he's lying.

That I don't hear that either.

So something's up with that.

Hmm.

What's your BBC UN clip?

Let's play it.

President Trump has demanded an investigation into what he called triple sabotage after an escalator, teleprompter, and sound system all malfunctioned when a teleprompter?

Is it like a teletubby?

He addressed the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday.

In a lengthy social media post, Mr.

Trump described the three incidents as very sinister and called for anyone responsible to be arrested.

The UN has said the events were accidental and suggested White House staff might have been responsible for the problems with the teleprompter and the sound system.

The teleprompter, teleprompter?

Oh, the teleprompter.

The analysts that came on different shows that were security-oriented said this was a disaster because

set Trump up for being for an assassination and the Secret Service did nothing.

I didn't even see Secret Service anywhere near him when that happened.

I didn't even see them near him when

they came in.

Yeah, there was just a group of, yeah, I agree.

But there was areas along the sides there that they could have been because there were stair steps that were next to the escalators.

And

there was a Secret Service failure.

Well, then we need to take a slight diversion and go to the

Secret Service doing well.

We know what they were doing.

Popping this up on your screen, it is a live look over New York City as we are following some breaking news at this hour.

The U.S.

Secret Service saying it dismantled a network of electronic devices located throughout the New York tri-state area that were used to conduct multiple telecommunications-related threats directed towards senior U.S.

government officials, which represented an imminent threat to the agency's protective operations.

This protective intelligence investigation led to the discovery of more than 300 co-located SIM servers and 100,000 SIM cards across multiple sites.

In addition to carrying out anonymous telephonic threats, these devices could be used to conduct a wide range of telecommunication attacks, and this could include disabling cell phone towers, enabling denial of services attacks, and facilitating anonymous encrypted communication between potential threat actors and criminal enterprises.

Again, all of this information here just coming in from the Secret Service moments ago, and they did post this image here showing some of that equipment.

They said the Secret Service dismantled a network of more than 300 SIM servers and 100,000 SIM cards in the New York area that were capable of crippling telecom systems and carrying out anonymous telephonic attacks, disrupting the threat before world leaders arrive for the UN General Assembly.

Now, this story immediately, here's where the dude's name Ben came in.

They're like, what is this nonsense story?

This is, yes, you could use this not temporary.

Clearly, someone went through a lot of, just looking at the picture, someone went through a lot of work to make this a permanent thing.

This is typically used for those text messages that you get that are scams.

You know, the girlfriend you have in

China who wants you to invest in Bitcoin.

My favorite.

Can you

use it to have encrypted communications?

Yes.

I guess.

You know, the answer is yes.

Can you

flood a cell

site?

Yeah, you don't need hundreds of,

you don't need a sim farm to do that.

This whole thing was weird.

I'm going to use the W word.

The thing was weird.

It's like, why is the Secret Service all of a sudden doing it?

And isn't this typically the FBI?

This is an FBI thing.

Oh, no, now it's Secret Service.

And it endangered everybody within

all the world leaders.

Yeah, it had a 36-mile radius sure that's all of manhattan

so and and then they bring and right away we've got uh sam spook did you see this guy no

sam spook from the secret service shows up he's got glasses on that just just yell i'm a spook And he has an important announcement.

They already have the PR press release good to go.

Well, the president's teleprompter and escalator are failing.

This is Matt McCool, and I'm the special agent in charge of the Secret Service New York Field Office.

We are making this announcement as a matter of public interest given timing, amount, and concentration of material recovered during a recent Secret Service protective intelligence investigation.

Following multiple telecommunications-related imminent threats directed towards senior U.S.

government officials this spring, the U.S.

Secret Service began a protective intelligence investigation.

So, this spring, so they've been on this for a while, but now today is the day that they have to do this.

And they didn't hand that to the FBI.

They take care of it themselves.

I didn't know they did this kind of stuff.

Threats directed towards senior U.S.

government officials this spring.

The U.S.

Secret Service began a protective intelligence investigation to determine the extent and impact these threats could have on protective operations.

This was a difficult and complex effort to identify the source of these fraudulent calls and the impact on the Secret Service protective mission.

Oh, so difficult.

Just triangulated, man.

During this period, we leveraged technical assistance and support of federal partners, including Homeland Security Investigations, the Department of Justice, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

We also received phenomenal support from our state and local law enforcement partners, to include the NYPD.

The investigation led us to the New York tri-state area, where investigators discovered tens of thousands of co-located and networked cellular devices capable of carrying out nefarious telecommunications attacks.

These devices allowed anonymous encrypted communications between potential threat actors and criminal enterprises, enabling criminal organizations to operate undetected.

This network had the potential to disable cell phone towers and essentially shut down the cellular network in New York City.

These devices were concentrated within 35 miles of the global meeting of the United Nations General Assembly now underway in New York City.

Given the timing, location, and proximity and potential for significant disruptions to the New York telecom system, we move quickly to disrupt this network.

Yes, citizen, you may return to your harpsichord.

I mean, come on.

Well, I have a question about this.

Yeah, sure.

Who got arrested?

Nobody.

Wait, there's just a bunch.

They found these banks.

I mean, the pictures I saw, there were like these ridiculous banks of phones.

Yeah,

you can buy that setup for, you know, like

$1,000.

Yeah, it reminds me of the old BBS days we talked about before.

Exactly.

A bank of modems.

Yes, exactly.

Bank of modems.

It's like, so you had these, you know, thousands of phones all hooked up

in a very nice rig.

Let's put it that way.

And they don't know who owns it.

There's probably involved.

Well, of course, everyone immediately says, oh, that's Israel Mossad.

No, dude.

This is your Chinese girlfriend.

These things are all over the country.

This is what they use to do scam text messages.

That's what this is used for.

The telecom industry knows this.

So it's just like,

so they cracked down on this thing and then nobody got arrested.

And so this is a,

in other words, they have no clue about anything.

And meanwhile, the president appears to be completely unprotected on the escalator.

A stopped escalator in the midlands.

Stopped escalator with no one.

People just going,

no one's like, okay, this is an issue.

This thing stopped.

Might be a reason.

Let's go.

Move, move, move.

The eagle needs protection.

No, none of that.

Very bizarre.

And this is NSA.

This is FBI.

Why the Secret Service?

Yeah, the NSA should know exactly who's behind the whole thing.

But nothing.

And this spook comes out, Sam.

The spook comes out right away with this, you know, with this announcement.

Yeah, this is bull crap.

That they had breaking news and then they went straight to this.

They already had it.

It was given to them.

Breaking news here, play this.

Anyway, I have a version of the BBC UN report that just, I was like, wow, I can't believe that they did this.

No, actually, I can because, you know, it's the Brits.

He pitched as an alternative a new world order.

No, he didn't.

They're saying that Trump pitched the New World Order.

Yes, listen.

He pitched as an alternative, a new world order centered around his United States.

I've come here today to offer the hand of American leadership and friendship to any nation in this assembly that is willing to join us in forging a safer, more prosperous world.

And his own.

Where's the New World Order in that part?

That's just bizarre.

Offering a helping hand nowadays indicates that you are

trying to implement a new world order.

Yes, meanwhile,

while this was taking place, Queen Ursula was in the starship, the mothership of the European Union, giving the state of the Union and listen to what she said.

Europe is in a fight,

a fight for a continent that is whole and at peace, for a free and independent Europe, a fight for our values and our democracies, a fight for our liberty and our ability to determine our destiny for ourselves.

Make no mistake, this is a fight for our future.

I thought long and hard about whether to start this State of the Union address with such a stark appraisal.

After all, us Europeans are not used to or comfortable with talking in such terms, because our Union is fundamentally a peace project.

But the truth is that the world of today is unforgiving, and we cannot varnish over the difficulties that Europeans feel every day.

They can feel the ground shift beneath them.

They can feel things getting harder, just as they are working harder.

They can feel the impact of the global crisis, of the higher costs of living.

They feel the speed of change affecting their lives and their careers.

And they worry about the endless spiral of events they see on the news, from the devastating scenes in Gaza to the relentless Russian barrage on Ukraine.

We simply cannot wait for this storm to pass.

This summer showed us that there is simply no room or no time for nostalgia.

Battle lines for a new world order based on power are being drawn right now.

Hold on a second.

She's the one talking about a new world order.

Battle lines are being drawn for a new world order.

Do tell me more, Queen Ursula.

For no time, for nostalgia.

Battle lines for new world order based on power are being drawn right now.

So yes, Europe must fight.

Now, I take this to be,

I'm just going to say it, this is the North Sea Nexus.

We've got the BBC saying that Trump was out there talking about a new world order.

And then we have Ursula saying,

she doesn't say Trump, but she's saying Trump's making a new world order.

This is collusion.

Pure collusion.

Set up.

Battle lines for a new world order based on power are being drawn right now.

Yeah, we're power.

So, yes, Europe must fight for its place in the world in which many major powers are either ambivalent or openly hostile to Europe.

A world of imperial ambitions and imperial wars.

Imperial ambitions and imperial wars.

Who could that be?

A world in which dependencies are ruthlessly weaponized.

And it is for all these reasons that a new Europe must emerge.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes, Queen.

Yes, Queen.

A new Europe must emerge.

They're afraid.

They do not like what Trump is doing.

It has to be it.

I would say that little snippet was unhinged.

And if you want to hear what her solution is, I mean, I can tell you, it's basically 2 trillion euros of borrowing to invest in.

I'll just tell you, it's boring to listen to her.

2 trillion euros of borrowing to invest in

quantum

quantum and clean energy.

Quantum and clean energy.

It makes nothing but sense.

Two dead ends.

Yes.

So,

now

I think the president is really trolling them to an unbelievable degree, and he wants to kill the European Union.

And I think it's evidenced by this truth.

This truth.

Also known as a tweet.

This truth.

You know, I'm going to have to go get an account on that thing because everybody, it's like it's worse than it was back in the early days of Twitter where the news media kept, you know, instead of doing any reporting or any phone calls or sitting at the desk and trying to do some work, they just look at Twitter and then they quote and they run it on the 6 o'clock news.

And somebody tweeted this and he tweeted that.

What kind of work is that?

That's not work.

Well, here's the truth that he posted.

This is from

the Global News.

We're now on our top story story and what appears to be a significant shift in U.S.

President Donald Trump's approach to Russia's war on Ukraine.

A short time ago, Trump posted a statement online, which reads in part: After getting to know and fully understand the Ukraine-Russia military and economic situation, and after seeing the economic trouble it is causing Russia, I think Ukraine, with the support of the European Union, is in a position to fight and win all of Ukraine back in its original form.

With time, patience, and the financial support of Europe, and in particular NATO, the original borders from where this war started is very much an option.

So this is a troll, and everybody took it as, he's turning around, he's coming to our side.

Yes.

And I hate saying this, you're totally correct.

This is a complete bull, because the angle is right there, right in front of you.

Just blocking it.

If Europe does this, if Europe does that, if Europe gives us money to sell them stuff that they then give to Ukraine.

Well, even worse, even worse than that,

here's my boy, Andrew Soulis.

Now, he breaks it down.

He doesn't understand.

It's just one clip by him.

He doesn't explain the nature of the troll, but he does explain exactly what this is and what it isn't.

What do you make of the new post by Donald Trump?

What do you make of it?

Untrue social.

It's a sounding.

The only logic one can infer is that it's economics

because militarily the Ukrainian forces are in no position to defeat the Russian forces and push them back to the 91 borders.

The last time the Ukrainians tried this in earnest was the summer, August 2023, when they launched a fully equipped offensive with NATO weapons and NATO tactics, and they managed to breach eight kilometers into the Russian line, where they needed to breach 60 kilometers to reach the Sea of Azov.

Now,

the Ukrainians also did a surprise attack in Kursk in Russia last year, which was an undefended area or lightly defended.

And since that time, the Russians have pushed the Ukrainians back to their own borders.

So militarily, it's inconceivable that the Ukrainian military could defeat the Russian militarily.

unless you actually destroy the Russian economy.

And I think this is now what's turned Trump's mind to this

statement today.

In the sense the argument being that if everybody pulls together and sanctions the Russians more than they've been sanctioned in the last three years and they're the most sanctioned country in the world, that somehow the Russian economy will collapse.

The Russians will give up their

gains and put up their hands and basically walk back to the Russian borders.

A highly improbable outcome because Ukraine or China still supports Russia.

So even if everybody in NATO, you're talking now, Hungary and Slovakia would have to come around as well.

They're not there yet.

And Turkey, too.

So this is all astounding and highly improbable.

So of course it's astounding and highly improbable because what the president is saying is,

you know, what you need to do.

is you need to

stop buying Russian oil and gas products, which would be hilarious, because then the EU will die.

And so they're never going to do it.

He knows it.

He's just saying it's your fault.

Your fault.

I think he even said somewhere in

his UN speech: he said, you know, until I found out that they were still just buying Russian oil, so you should stop buying Russian oil.

They can't.

They can't with the green scam.

The whole thing is a troll.

And

the world news media is going, oh, yes, zelensky convinced him oh yes it's so oh it's fantastic i think even fox is suckered into this oh it's so dumb like don't you don't you see it here um i think i have yeah fox is all in on this oh well he's changed and they and they're doing it in such a way that it's well it's a smart move or i mean it's like uh

it's just they're completely missing the point

yes of course it's missing the they they're dumb they're so dumb and then here's my favorite I got a lot of reports about this.

There's no evidence of this being Russia.

And I'm going to play this 55-second clip so that I can tell you what I saw in the 55-second clip.

Drone incursions caused temporary closures at Copenhagen and Oslo airports Monday evening.

It came just days after a hacking operation led to problems at three European airports, including London Heathrow.

For officials, whoever is behind the latest attacks has one goal in mind:

to disturb, create unrest, cause concern,

see how far you can go, test the limits.

Speaking on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York, Ukraine's President suggested there was little doubt of Russia's involvement.

The comments from Vladimir Zelensky come as the war at home grinds on, a conflict where drone technology has been pushed to the limits.

So he uses different types of long-distance drones

to

understand

how Europe is ready.

Okay.

So he, Putin, uses different kinds of long range drones to see if Europe is ready.

So I'm looking at this video, all the video from the Danish broadcasters, from Euronews.

These drones have big red flashing lights.

What kind of reconnaissance drone is that?

Hi, I'm I'm a drone, big red flashing light.

I'm a drone.

I'm a drone.

Come on.

This is either some Dane who's sitting on the ground laughing his ass off.

Like,

I made the news.

World news, baby.

This is stupid.

Long-range drone.

It was a quadcopter with a red flashing light.

Stop.

Oh, the incursion.

An incursion.

I have have the aviation clip from Denmark.

Okay, let me see.

This is a BBC report.

I got it.

Reports from Denmark say drone activity has been detected over four airports in the Jutland region.

The airport at Aalbor was temporarily shut down after drones were identified, but it's now reopened.

The incidents come two days after Denmark's main airport at Copenhagen was shut down over drone sightings that rattled European aviation.

That's all they had.

That's all they had.

Hold on a second.

They want me to reconnect the stream?

That's odd.

Okay, I'll reconnect the stream.

See if that helps.

Hmm.

There we go.

Yeah.

Now, oh, it's big news in Europe.

Oh, the Russians, they're flying drones everywhere.

They're coming to get us, the Russians.

And meanwhile, what wasn't discussed at all, there was kind of on the sidelines of the United Nations,

Putin made a little announcement.

Russia says it will adhere to nuclear arms limits for one more year after the last remaining deal with the United States expires in February.

Russia's President Vladimir Putin told members of his Security Council that Moscow would expect the U.S.

to follow Russia's example and stick to the treaty's limits.

The new start deal, first signed in 2010 by then-Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev, limits each country to no more than 1,550 deployed nuclear warheads and 700 deployed missiles and bombers.

On-site inspections under the deal have been dormant since 2020.

In February 2023, Putin suspended Moscow's participation in the treaty, but stopped short of withdrawing from the pact altogether.

Together, the US and Russia hold 90% of the world's nuclear arsenal.

The future of the New START treaty has taken on increased importance at a time when Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has pushed the two countries closer to direct confrontation.

No, no one really reported on that,

which is, I guess, kind of a good thing.

Yeah, should be.

Yeah, we're not going to increase any more nuclear weapons.

That's good.

That's it.

That's good.

They're just going to modernize.

They're going to do that.

They're going to be better.

But, you know, the other thing that they don't deal with is this constant drumbeat.

And I hear it on every of the networks from the right to the left: is the Russian economy is in the shambles.

There is absolutely no evidence of this.

No.

And if you watch YouTube videos, because there's plenty of them in Russia, and they get posted, everybody looks happy as a clamp roaming around, they're nightclubbing, and the stores are stocked.

It's not like during the days of communism when everything was, the stores were, shelves were empty, bare.

It's ridiculous.

So, yeah, this is,

I think your analysis about this is

with the

fake EU thing and the head fake by Trump is all on the money.

Yeah.

And he's going to,

but

my takeaway from Queen Ursula is she sees it.

And she is actually, she's not middle management like the Clinton.

She comes from bloodlines.

You can tell by the way she handles herself.

Yes.

And the reason she's there at all, unelected.

I think that says it all.

She comes from bloodlines and she's part of the North Sea Nexus elite and they know what Trump is doing.

And that's why she's saying, well, when she says imperial powers, well, no, imperial powers are being crushed.

That's what's happening.

That's you.

We're not an imperial power.

That's ridiculous.

And then to have the same verbiage as the BBC saying a new world order, and then she says they're trying to create a new world order,

that's too much coincidence for me.

No one said the term New World Order.

Certainly the president did.

The last guy who did the American president who said that was

Bush.

Yeah.

George H.W.

No, wait, Clinton said it too.

I don't remember that, but I do remember George H.W.

saying it, and he made a big point of it.

Let me see.

But he was

kind of an elite.

Let me see.

I thought I had Clinton saying New World Order.

Maybe not.

Yeah.

Well, George H.W.

for sure.

So we have

climate China bullcrap.

Now, I want to play a couple.

I got three clips here.

There should be four, but clip two,

I didn't post properly, and I would just explain what he said or what this woman said in clip two.

But start with the background.

This is climate X China L O L.

The world's largest carbon polluter, China, says it will cut carbon emissions by 7 to 10 percent by 2035.

The announcement came as more than 100 world leaders gathered to talk about increased urgency and the need for stronger efforts to curb heat-trapping gases.

International climate negotiations are set to begin in Brazil in six and a half weeks.

Now, if I'm not mistaken, and it is in the era of the show,

and it was about about four years ago, I believe, when it was a big deal during one of the climate meetups

where China said, oh, okay, we're going to implement the whole program in 20 by 20, and 2030, we're going to begin.

Do you remember this?

Yeah, sure.

And it was 2030, 2030, 2030.

We're not going to do anything until 2030, and then we're going to be on board.

And everyone's all jacked up.

Oh, China's getting on board with the climate agenda and they're going to be on board in 2030.

And now they're going to, now the latest is they're going to cut 10%, 7 to 10%,

by 2035.

And not one of these reporters has mentioned this other promise about 2030.

They're just, oh, this is great.

China's just,

China is just running circles around these idiots.

Let's listen to, this is the BBC report.

This is Climate Change BS, BBC.

Yeah, it's the the first time, China has made a commitment to cut its carbon emissions.

No, it's not the first.

Hold on.

That's not the first time.

We just discussed this.

They said by 2030 in one of the climate meetups.

But now all of a sudden, this is the first.

Video address, the United Nations in New York.

President Xi Jinping said that greenhouse gases would be reduced by between 7 and 10% from a peak in the next decade.

He said that all parts parts of the economy would shift away from fossil fuels.

China is the world's biggest source of planet warming gases.

So that is some hope that this is a major step forward in the fight against climate change.

Well, just a few minutes ago, I spoke to our China correspondent, Laura Bicker, and I asked her why it's so significant then to get a pledge on climate from China.

If the world is to try to commit to reducing carbon emissions, if the world is to try to limit global warming to to 1.5 Celsius, then it needs China.

China is one of the world's biggest emitters.

Around a third to a quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions come from China.

Now, if China commits to this 7 to 10 percent, it's the first time that it has actually said, actually committed to a number.

No,

that's the tricky part.

The number.

yes.

I'm looking at it.

That was part of the Paris Agreement.

That's when I said

when they said 2030.

Yeah, I'm trying to see if I can find a clip from it.

So far, no luck, but I remember it distinctly.

And so, okay, well, now this is the first time they, so they're twisting it a little bit.

And now, clip two, which I don't have, and I'm sorry that I screwed this up, but I'll tell you what she said.

This woman, she said, the good news is that China always over-delivers.

Whatever they promise, they over-deliver.

And I'm thinking,

when does this ever happen?

Tell that to the WTO.

Exactly.

Where they've promised this and they promise that, and

they don't over-deliver.

They don't deliver anything.

No, it's not what they do.

No, it's not what they do.

So here we go to the final clip, which will be clip three.

She kind of, it's wrapped.

It went through mass urbanization.

You know, they have huge, towering, concrete skyscrapers in many of their cities.

That is something they're going to try and reduce, and they're going to make new energy vehicles the mainstream in new vehicle sales.

Oh, yeah.

More battery cars.

That's always a good thing.

Okay, I didn't get to the whole other part of that other clip.

What China's going to do is they're going to build more electric cars, which of course require electricity, which is inefficient in itself compared to, you know, to send electricity down the transmission line, which loses energy and it gets to the car, it fills the car up, as opposed to fossil fuel gasoline, which is the most efficient way to power a vehicle.

But we'll get into that.

But the other thing is China is going to do it's going to be a big deal.

They're going to plant trees.

Well, I thought they already agreed to that.

Well, they're going to agree again.

And do you have a clip on the tree?

More trees.

Do you have a clip of the tree planted?

No, that was

the part two.

Well, so the UN climate change

gambit.

By the way, you know who was in the UN when all this started?

That was Maurice Strong.

Remember Maurice Strong, Al Gore's buddy?

They were the ones that he's dead now.

They were the ones who were setting up the carbon exchange.

Oh, right.

The carbon trading

bureau, or whatever the hell it was going to be.

Yeah, it was going to be like the Chicago Board of the CBOE where it trades at commodities.

Yes.

Now, that, you know, the carbon trade is happening and there are trading desks.

But that was always the Al Gore idea with Maurice Strong, his partner.

And then Strong got in all kinds of trouble.

I can't remember exactly what it was, but eventually he died.

But he was the guy in the UN who was pushing this early on.

And it always came down to, well, you know, if only we had less people, that would be better, which led to the U.S.

population bomb.

You remember that more distinctly than I do.

Was it a report?

Was it a book?

It was Ehrlich's book.

Ken Ehrlich?

No, not Ken.

It was Ken Rich.

He was the director of the Oscars.

No.

You could think it was somebody else.

It's either Ehrlich or Ehrlichman, the guy that's a Stanford professor.

He's still there.

You can look him up.

Somebody in the chat room can get it straight and get his first name.

But Ehrlich did the population bomb.

And then he in 1970, and that's when that all began.

And we're all going to die by the year 2000, and we should stop having babies.

And that

Paul Ehrlich.

Paul Ehrlich.

Paul Ehrlich.

And then Paul Ehrlich, because of that book, I believe a number of, and people I know,

men, had vasectomies

at a young age

so they would not have,

so they would not contribute to this disastrous population explosion.

It was going to kill everybody by the year 2000, by the way.

We run out of material, everything.

No food.

We're all going to die.

And

Ehrlich also did a book, which is harder to find because it's been kind of suppressed about the race.

I can't remember the exact name of it.

Again, somebody might look this up.

I think it was called The Race Bomb, and it was about how bad it was to have too many blacks in the country.

Yes, he had a racist book that kind of, but that got put aside

real fast.

The race bomb, 1978, the race bomb.

The race bomb.

Okay, so he is trying to capitalize on the population bomb and the race bomb.

Nice try.

And they buried that baby like there's no tomorrow and kept this guy propped up.

He's still around.

Yeah.

Well, he was in Obama's administration.

Remember, he was the climate czar, wasn't he?

For a little bit of time?

I think he may have been, yeah.

Let me see.

Amazon.

It's almost a comedy to watch this, by the way, at this point.

The race bomb.

Let's see.

Do we have a little blurb on this race bomb?

The population by the author of

street crime, failing schools, decaying cities, high unemployment, soaring welfare costs, the fuse is lit.

The race bomb: skin color, prejudice, and intelligence.

Wow.

Yeah.

Yeah, get a hold of that book, people.

They don't even have a wiki page for like, shh, shh, we can't.

No, they, they, they keep that.

This is one of the, what I would call a major suppressed work.

Wow.

I got it.

I got to order a copy.

It's available on Amazon, people.

Oh, that's interesting.

Anyway, it all comes down to that.

And so now,

and I understand, now I understand this report because I've been reading about

the EU

and other countries starting to tax shipping.

So ships.

get a carbon tax for ships because, you know, the ships are polluting the oceans.

And I think we're going to hear, this will be the new tactic, the new attack surface, if you will, for the climate zealots.

It's the greatest kanjab ever perpetrated on the world.

Less than a day after U.S.

President Donald Trump delivered this opinion on climate change.

Opinion.

Yeah.

It's an opinion.

An opinion held by many podcasters, including the No Agenda Show.

Perpetrated on the world.

Less than a day after U.S.

President Donald Trump delivered this opinion on climate change.

Then they said global warming will kill the world.

All of these predictions were wrong.

They were made by stupid people.

Some of those informed and experienced scientists

were also at the UN, warning against imbalances on our planet, now getting more dangerous.

Johan Rockstrom is the director of the Potsdam Institute.

We fail unless we safeguard the world's most powerful carbon sink and planetary cooling system, a healthy planet.

The latest health stressor in that Potsdam report: how acidic our oceans have become.

Because they've been absorbing the carbon humans have been burning.

Just like when we add carbon dioxide to coke, that makes the soft drink more acidic.

Chris Harley teaches oceans.

Hold on a second.

Is that true?

If you add,

listen to what he said.

Just like when we add carbon dioxide to coke, that makes the soft drink more acidic?

Chris?

Does it?

Makes it more acidic?

Yeah.

Well, it's carbon dioxide creates carbonic acid, which is acidic.

Okay.

And then they double up on it with Coke to make it more acidic than that.

They add phosphoric acid to that.

So it's very, it's an acidic drink.

So that's killing us, basically.

No, it's not.

It's delicious.

Chris Harley teaches ocean science and climate change at the University of British Columbia.

He says the latest report shows the soaking up of that carbon, it's changing the chemistry of the ocean,

leaving fewer building blocks for corals, oysters, mussels, and crabs.

It makes it harder to build shell.

And you need to add shell if you want to grow bigger.

Sort of like building a house, and all of a sudden, the building materials become more costly.

You're either going to build smaller homes or not as many.

Explain that analogy to me.

I don't know what the calcium cycle looks like because it's calcium that makes the shells.

And I don't know if the acidity

retards that process or not.

So I can't explain it.

But a better analogy would have been, you know,

your concrete is no longer strong or your rebar is weak.

No, instead he says your building materials became more expensive.

So then we build less houses.

In his mind is something about

by expensive, I think he meant scarce.

And when you bring in boatloads of seafood, size matters.

Consider BC's dungeness crab industry, estimated to be worth $250 million annually.

Cassima Porteus at the University of Toronto has studied those crabs.

These kinds of levels of ocean acidification were affecting their sense of smell, reducing their ability to find food.

So we potentially could see smaller animals that could produce...

fewer eggs and offspring.

Not only affecting the food we eat, but the food our food eats.

And keep in mind, the oceans protect us by absorbing all that CO2, but too much, and that ability to absorb weakens.

Ocean acidification is a global problem with vocal impacts.

Iria Jimenez studies acidification's impact with the Hakai Institute in British Columbia.

With oceans covering 70% of our planet, there's only one solution.

We're predicting that the conditions in the ocean are still going to deteriorate for at least 50 years, if not more.

So absolutely, it's urgent that we drastically reduce our emissions.

The carbon footprint is a hoax.

But as the ocean grows more acidic, it seems the toxicity in climate discourse might stand in the way of the progress needed to save it.

Progress.

It's amazing.

Whatever President Trump says, just do the opposite.

It's not true.

Stop.

You're crazy.

Don't listen to him.

My favorite thing of late is the fact that that all these TikTokers.

I don't have any TikTokers.

I actually have one.

Of the women?

Yeah, taking all the Tylenol.

Tylenol is going to give me my baby autism.

Bull crap.

I'm going to eat all the Tylenol I can.

Yep.

The lot of women.

What idiot.

I mean,

whether it can be proven or not, why would you do that?

What kind of a lunatic are you?

Well, these are all outstanding questions.

So instead of pulling a clip of one of those lunatics who was there with a big pregnant belly saying, watch me pound this Tylenol, like, oh, wow.

I took this one.

I watched Donald Trump's entire autism press conference and took four pages of notes.

Big takeaway, he says Tylenol causes autism and that you shouldn't take Tylenol if you're pregnant and you shouldn't give Tylenol to your child.

Trump says that we need to wait until 12 to give our children the hepatitis B vaccine because it's a sexually transmitted disease.

So there's no reason to give it to an infant.

Other parts of the world don't have Tylenol who also don't have autism first time in the press conference he says don't take Tylenol there's no downside to not taking it when you're pregnant he's going to issue a physician's notice and a safety label change to Tylenol and initially what I like about this lady is she believes that Trump is doing all this it's all Trump she doesn't he barely even I don't think she even brings in RFK Jr.

It's all Trump.

Trump is an idiot.

Why are you listening to Trump?

He says you shouldn't give a baby hepatitis B shot because it's sexually transmitted disease.

She's saying it as if she's like thinks this is crazy.

What he's saying.

It's really, it's sad is what it's saying.

Very strange.

It's sad.

He had a propaganda campaign that's basically a series of infomercials telling parents not to take the drug.

Other fever-reducer alternatives, and you should only use Tylenol when the treatment is required.

He says that in children, you could actually prolong viral illnesses if you give them Tylenol.

He said it could also be a folate deficiency.

Let's not forget, this is all Trump, not a doctor.

RFK claims that the model that they're currently using for medical research is going to yield results in the future for all other chronic illnesses.

The NIH will use machine learning to help find the cure for autism.

Machine learning, aka AI.

No, no, AI rebranded machine learning, but it's not your chat GPT.

That's what she's saying.

Machine learning is a real thing that does actually work.

It's just not sexy, and no one wants to pump $2 trillion into it.

To help find the cure for autism.

We will not delay as scientists often do in this medical research.

There's a historic shift in medical culture that we are about to see in the United States.

They're going to be sending letters to doctors to warn them of the dangers of recommending Tylenol to their pregnant patients.

An overwhelming body of evidence pointing to an association between Tylenol and autism exists.

The mindless practice of treating a fever is pointless, and that the body's natural way of ridding a virus is healthy for a pregnant mother and for a young child.

We should just let them have a fever instead of giving them Tylenol.

That is an unnecessary drug.

So I grew up in the Netherlands, and I remember moving there when I was just seven years old, and I had a fever.

I had, you know, flu, whatever it was.

And my parents were,

you know, they were like, okay, something's wrong.

I was not, I was sick.

And so they find a doctor.

And the doctor, yes, I speak some English.

I will come and take a look with your child.

And he comes in and my mom's like, give him an antibiotic.

And the doctor says, no, we don't do that here.

It's good for him.

He needs to sick it out.

Sick it out.

Outsieken.

Sick it out.

And my parents were like,

he's suffering.

He's suffering.

I said, no, we don't do that here.

He'll be fine in a few days.

And of course, I sicked it out and I was fine in a few days.

And

that was for most things in the Netherlands, my entire youth growing up there.

Really,

I mean, antibiotics?

No.

They would not prescribe that.

And I think that has changed throughout the years.

I think that the Dutch were much healthier back then.

They had healthy bodies.

And by the way, if you look at the Dutch from World War II to probably the 90s, mid-80s, 90s, man, these were like big, strong, healthy people biking.

And it's because they really were biking.

Once they got their bikes back, they were biking again for decades.

And they really, they were healthy until it kind of crept in and, you know, World Health Organization, just the globalization of medicine.

And

I guess they finally gave into it.

But that is true.

The thing that just that just saddens me is that what do these women think that the president is purposely doing this as a joke?

Or like, you know,

he wants to hurt you?

Wouldn't you at least think about it or investigate it?

And of course, their diet, their media diet, as you've been pointing out for the past few episodes, is so restrictive, so restrictive to certain news programs and news papers and news outlets,

as well as the, in general, pharmaceutical funded media because of the advertising.

By the way, I got a note from someone saying, You sound like anti-vaxxers.

You're anti-pharma.

I work in...

No, we're not.

We've had a bunch of people like that right at bitch.

But we're not.

No.

We've said, again, we could be president because we've been.

You in particular have been talking about the hepatitis B vaccine for as long as I can remember.

Like, it makes no sense.

Well,

when that first came out, which was some years back, I had a doctor at the time who retired long since, but he was the one who gave me two clues.

One, I said, I went in and I asked for, I said, is this new vaccine?

Should I get it?

This is like 30 years ago.

And he says,

what would you want that for?

Are you going to start working with blood?

Are you going to become a drug addict?

What do you want this vaccine?

What are you planning, Dvorak?

What are you planning?

And he's scolding me for even considering it.

And this is as an adult, not as a four-month-old baby.

And he, some years later, mentioned, just out of the blue, he says, you know, I think people are, it was during some flu thing when he, he's the one who gave me the D3 tip that the insider, doctor insiders use, which is the mega doses of D3 if you're feeling sick.

Yes.

He says, I think people are over vaccinated.

It's just a problem.

Yes.

Well, of course it is.

And we're not anti-vax, we're not anti-big pharma.

I mean,

I got a, in fact, I did get a vaccine

during the era of the show.

I got a shot for, I got Prevnar 13.

You've never been quite the same, to be honest about it.

So this is just an example of how the big pharma fund.

And if we have any qualms about this, is we don't like the fact that there's no honest reporting or conversation in news media because of their It's dishonest.

Exactly.

That's the problem.

And the pharma guy who wrote to you should realize that, you know,

yes.

We're not going to be part of

some scheme to just keep promoting their products.

Which they can happen.

And they shouldn't be advertising either.

Which is happening.

They're moving to podcasts now.

There's a lot of pharma advertising happening now on podcasts.

So this is ABC.

We are joined now by ABC News medical correspondent Dr.

Darian Sutton with more facts and myths about Tylenol use in pregnant women.

Dr.

Sutton, thank you so much for being here.

Let's just get right to it.

Can Tylenol use in pregnant women cause autism?

The leading evidence and the strongest evidence shows us that there is no association between the the use of Tylenol in pregnancy and the outcome of autism.

Okay, so this is a great response.

This is right from Hillen Nalton.

This is

your crisis management.

The leading evidence and the strongest evidence.

Isn't that just evidence?

There's evidence or there's no evidence.

But it's the leading and strongest.

Well, that's all very subjective.

Very good.

Yeah.

Very subjective information.

Tylenol use in pregnant women cause autism.

The leading evidence and the strongest evidence shows us that there is no association between the use of Tylenol in pregnancy and the outcome of autism.

Just to backtrack in terms of where this all came from, there was a recent study done by Harvard in collaboration with Mount Sinai, and it found that there was an association in the rate of Tylenol use or acetaminophen use during pregnancy and the outcome of autism.

Important to note here, the authors of that study went on to state that that does not state that there is a cause and effect relationship.

Reasons why are because, for one, there are many reasons why a pregnant mom might take Tylenol for a fever, an infection, for pain, all of which we know are directly associated with poor outcomes in terms of neurodevelopmental disorders.

So it's important to understand that association does not mean cause and effect.

So what he's saying is it's not the Tylenol, it's the infection you got.

It's the fever you had.

It wasn't the Tylenol.

It was...

whatever you got that made you take Tylenol, which is just an amazing conclusion.

Having said all that, the diagnoses for autism have increased in recent years.

Certainly.

To what do you attribute that?

I know it's tremendously complex.

Yeah.

But get into it.

You're absolutely right.

Neurodevelopmental disorders are tremendously complex.

And we understand through research and data that up to 80% of cases of autism are related to genetic changes.

Important to understand there.

Genetic changes.

What does that mean?

They're related to genetic changes?

What genetic changes does the human genome as a whole changed somehow from something or other?

What could that be?

Are tremendously complex, and we understand through research and data that up to 80% of cases of autism are related to genetic changes.

Important to understand there.

In terms of the increase, there are many reasons why we can look to number one: the increased awareness of more people understand what autism looks like, the reduction in stigma, the increase in screening for parents, and then also the broadening of the diagnosis.

We are a long way from 1910 when the earliest descriptions of autism were diagnosed or determined, and now we are here today.

It looks very different from when it did.

And also, more adults are diagnosing themselves with autism.

All of these are reasons why we're seeing the raising, the rise in the rates.

Also, with that being said, with that rise in the rate, there's a reduction in vaccine participation.

There's also a reduction in Tylenol use in pregnancy.

And those two things do not go consistent with the president's statements.

There's a reduction in vaccine, therefore more autism, is what I just heard him say.

But he threw out the, and I've fallen for this as well.

The, well, there's more diagnosis,

there's more understanding.

So, of course, the number goes up and

the spectrum is so incredibly wide.

And this came up with the Cuomo kid on whatever that network he's on.

What's he on?

Newsmax.

Newsmax.

No, not Newsmax.

News Nation.

News Nation.

I forget what's so many of them.

He's on, is General Flynn funding that one?

Okay, News Nation.

And he had.

No, that's the News Nation is the Chicago Tribune.

Okay.

Well, so used to be WGN.

Oh, really?

Oh, I didn't really.

Okay, so.

The World's Greatest Newspaper is what that's called, signed is.

WGN.

World's Greatest Newspaper.

I didn't know that.

WGN World's Greatest Newspaper.

Good to know.

So Cuomo Kid has RFK Jr.

on and uses this exact phrase and RFK Jr.

Slaps him down.

One answer is, well, Bobby, the reason we get a lot more now is because everything gets a diagnosis these days.

Every kid has at least two diagnoses for what we used to just call behavior.

So now they're putting all these kids on the autism spectrum because

that is kind of like the fashion of the moment.

That's the answer to why we're seeing more.

Do you accept that?

No, that is nonsense.

It is an absurd

industry-driven canard.

There's been study after study after study in high gravitas journals by the best research organizations and institutions and universities around this country that shows that the autism epidemic is real and Chris it's also just common sense if it was just a matter of better diagnosis or better recognition you would see it in older people You don't.

The epidemic is taking place in a specific generation and it's kids who were born after 1989.

That's what you see.

You don't see, you know, it's not, not, you don't see autism of one in every 31 people my age.

I have never seen somebody my age, 71 years old, with full-blown autism.

That means profound autism.

That means non-verbal, non-toilet trained, head-banging, the stimming, all the stereotypical features of the disease.

You don't see that.

And

these are not people who are locked in some institution somewhere.

There are no places for people like that.

And so why,

if it was anything other than an epidemic, why would you only see it in a single generation?

Right.

Fair point.

Fair point.

Yes.

And I had to look up stimming.

Stimming.

What is stimming?

Stimming.

Yes.

Stimming is three behaviors of stimming.

Motor movements like flapping hands, twirling hair, rocking back and forth, spinning.

Remember spinning?

Yes, spinning.

Kids spinning, verbalizations like repeating phrases or sounds, and object manipulation, such as repeatedly spinning an object.

So stimming, stimming.

Let's look at what the FDA actually published, which will give us a little more information.

Then I have some producer feedback.

FDA says, evidence in recent years has suggested a correlation between acetametophen used during pregnancy and subsequent diagnosis of conditions like autism and ADHD.

Multiple

large-scale cohort studies, including the Nurses Health Study 2 and the Boston Birth Cohort, find this association.

Some studies have just, so that may not be the leading

data or the leading research, but that's what they're quoting.

Some studies have described that risk may be most pronounced when acetametophen is taken chronically throughout pregnancy.

It is important to note that while an association between acetametophen and neurological conditions has been described in many studies, a causal relationship has not been established, and there are contrary studies in the scientific literature.

It is also noted that acetametophen is the only over-the-counter drug approved for use to treat fevers during pregnancy, and high fevers in pregnant women can pose a risk to their children.

Additionally, aspirin and ibuprofen have well-documented adverse impacts on the fetus.

So they're a little less firm in their written documentation as it came across what the president said.

So that's a give-im.

Rob, the constitutional lawyer, checked in and he said, Well, it is very interesting that there has been a multi-district litigation proceeding in federal court in New York in which the plaintiffs have long been alleging that Tylenol and other acetametophen makers failed to warn pregnant mothers that the drug may cause autism, ADHD, and other things.

The Trump administration's announcement this week has thrown major drama into the case, and he has a whole, he has a recap for us.

A bunch of folks sued the acetaminophen manufacturers in a wave of failure to warn, which is basically what the president was saying.

We're going to warn everybody about this.

Product liability cases.

These were not class actions, too many differences in the individual facts, but they were similar enough to be grouped together and sent to a single court efficiently to efficiently handle various common pretrial matters.

So he doesn't really know if that's going to have, if this announcement is going to have any bearing on that case.

But then one of our litigator

attorneys checked in and said, here's my take.

I thought this was good.

From what I've seen, it's Tylenol in conjunction with vaccinations that is producing brain damage.

The vaxes have statutory immunity, and those cases get shunted off to the Federal Court of Claims Vax Court Division.

The Federal Vaccination Court is basically a board of adjustment that pays some compensation, but it's not a real adversarial process, and there's no discovery.

With this move, he says, Tylenol is going to get sued in federal court as the product doesn't have immunity.

The insured plaintiffs need to prove that Tyl either alone or in concert with vaccination caused the autism.

Ken View and Johnson Johnson's position to escape liability will have to be: it was the vaccine alone that caused the injury.

So, both sides are going to subpoena the vaccine manufacturers for research and data.

Both sides will put on experts about vaccination interactions.

At the end of the day, both sides are going to make it public that the vaccinations are not always safe and effective.

I think this is the goal to cause the public outcry as a reason to rescind vaccination statutory immunity.

Wow.

Isn't that good?

Letter of the day.

Isn't that good?

That could be a workaround.

If that's what they're doing, Kennedy's the kind of guy,

he's an attorney.

He's a lawyer.

And I think he's a litigator, too.

Yes, he is.

But Kennedy's been in the business forever and he knows the tricks.

Yep.

This was a trick.

And I'm like, yeah, that sounds right to me.

A total trick.

Yep.

That's what I'm talking about.

That's what I'm saying.

And that's why the No Agenda Show is worth your time and money.

Exactly.

It is.

Nobody comes up with this really is and all we do is use our producers yes well we're not that you know we're we're we have kind of collective knowledge but it doesn't it doesn't get the

not to that level that i was i mean it's something i could see you could kind of maybe think of it now no

it's better to get it from some guy who's think actually literally thinking yeah we don't have the uh the cred we don't have the paperwork well it's not no it's not even the credit it's that we don't have the mindset we're not sitting thinking about how to sue somebody 24-7 because that's our job

So I haven't shared that yet with with Rob our our in-house legal staff But I'm sure he's listening and he'll he'll because I think he has now switched to the litigation side

He used to be defense.

I think he's now he's a shark.

He's a shark that's what he

has to write.

He's he's a good guy.

He's going where the money is.

Yeah.

He sent me

or told me about who to send my list of books to to get 3,000.

And I actually did, you know, I've actually done 27 books.

Holy mackerel.

Does that include the vinegar book or is that?

No, not including the vinegar book.

No, 27 books.

So that potential for $3,000 a book, of course.

Exit strategy.

You're going to retire.

Oh, yeah, I'm going to retire on that.

I don't think so.

But it'd be nice.

I'd get a couple cases of wine.

Yeah, that would be.

And I, because I've seen the emails go back and forth until I got dropped, which is appropriate.

You're getting a lot of

nice gratis legal advice there.

I mean, it's value for value, obviously.

Yeah, but

it's because.

It's because

the crowd,

we're crowdsourcing everything and they want us to succeed because we represent them.

Amen to that.

There you go.

Speaking of the world's greatest newspaper, here's a quick report from WGN.

Medical experts issued a warning about rising cases of a nightmare bacteria, a type of infection that does not respond to most antibiotics.

While the number of cases are still low, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control found infection rates rose 70% from 2019 to 2023.

Difficult to treat bacteria with the NDM gene drove the sharp increase.

Doctors say overuse and misuse of a number of antibiotics could be to blame because bacteria can develop resistance.

They also say there are likely a number of unrecognized carriers of the bacteria, which could lead to community spread.

70%.

What is that in numbers?

Yeah, who knows?

It went up 70%.

How many is that?

Is that seven?

Who knows?

I just like nightmare bacteria.

I like nightmare Bacteria.

It's a little long for

a show title.

I wrote it down.

I wrote it down.

That's gruesome.

I wrote it down.

It won't get through.

It won't get through the filters.

So

there's a little problem that I want to recognize with the show.

And the problem is this.

And it started because you said on the last episode, you said,

I'm coming over to your side now.

I don't think we went to the moon.

I'm paraphrasing.

You were very careful about it, but that's kind of what you said.

Right?

I take it back now.

Don't take it back.

Wait until I'm finished.

Don't you can't.

This Indian giver can't do that.

So what happened?

Indian giver.

I know I'm racist.

Where does that even come from, Indian giver?

Were the Indians people who gave and took back?

Were they horrible people?

No,

no, I think it had, I think it really is an insult to the whites.

Because they gave to the Indians.

Here, you can have this land.

Now you don't have it anymore.

Let's ask the road.

So you're giving to the Indians, but you're not.

Let's ask the robot.

Error.

Where does the term Indian giver originate from?

It comes from colonial times when Europeans noticed that Native Americans often expected goods given as gifts, like in trade or treaties, to be returned or reciprocated.

Indian was a catch-all term settlers used, and the phrase got twisted into meaning someone who takes back what they give.

Pretty unfair label, honestly.

More about cultural misunderstandings than actual behavior.

I don't know if I like that answer.

So it's just a twisted misinterpretation of the ritual phrase.

Yeah, racist.

Okay.

Racist.

So here's what happens.

So we doesn't really even matter.

We have a conversation, and people come out of the woodwork telling me, don't you know about the Van Allen belts?

Don't you know this?

Don't you know that?

Oh, God, we've talked about the Van Allen belts for decades.

This is the problem with the show

because

we are responsible for raising a new generation.

I mean, we're so old.

How old are we?

We're so old.

We are now raising a new generation.

And we have discussed these things ad nauseum so many times that we don't even bother talking about them anymore.

No, we are assumed, we

assume.

Oh, yes, a very dangerous thing to do.

Yeah.

We assume that that people have heard our 18 years of material.

So.

Yeah, and it's only maybe, I would say possibly 100 people total have listened to every show since episode one.

It's a small number.

All the rest are dead.

It's a small number.

Yeah.

So what I would recommend is go to bingit.io

before you jump on us.

You might actually learn things because we have fleshed out these things so many times.

And bingit.io, built by Deanonymous, you can get your own for your own podcast.

All this information is when you go to B-I-N-G-I-T.i.

Bingit.io.

You can search all 18 years of transcripts.

When you click on where you want to be, it plays the audio, the clips are in there, show everything is in there.

So check there before you jump down our throats.

Now, the latest news from NASA is very interesting Here, as

because I don't know if you heard, but

we're going to the moon.

We're going back to the moon.

Victor, Christina, Jeremy,

we're going to the moon.

They've been together as a crew for two.

To the moon,

but the excitement is still there.

Every day that passes puts them closer to flying an Orion capsule to the moon and back.

There is danger, but it's outweighed tenfold by anticipation.

For me, I actually feel completely 100% bought in.

When I get an Orion, it's like climbing into my bed and I'll feel warm and tucked in.

A metal and plastic bed.

That camaraderie is going to be important on the mission.

It's short, only nine and a half days, but it will be in very close quarters, basically a week and a half in a space about the size of a minivan.

The Canadian on board, by the way, takes up more space than the others.

Yeah, Canada did get more than its fair share of the volume on this mission.

I've heard it acknowledged many times.

So I'm getting a little bit conscious about my size.

Artemis II won't land on the moon.

It's very much a test run for missions that will.

Everything they'll do from launch to landing is to make sure it works.

We do all of this training, all this preparation.

We're buying down all this risk, always thinking about what are we handing off to the next crew?

Is what we're developing going to help them achieve that objective?

Now, a couple of months ago, the crew says they locked themselves up to brainstorm a name for their capsule.

They wanted something hopeful that spoke to their values.

When NASA gives the okay for the crew to launch, they'll do so in the spacecraft integrity.

Okay,

so once again, we're not going back to the moon because we're not going to land on the moon.

Which to me is dubious.

And here's a note that I must read in that voice.

So Adam, let me get this straight.

You believe that a sandals-wearing guy died on a cross and then came back to life, but you can't believe humans walked on the moon?

The former being documented in an apocryphal bunch of papyrus leaves and a light apocryphal, apocryphal

the former being documented in an apocryphal bunch of papyrus leaves and the latter being actually televised?

You also believe that some 100,000 people who worked on the program just made it all up?

It would have been easier back in the 60s to just do it than fake it.

We didn't have AI back then.

I almost had to stop pod midstream after hearing this crap.

My reviews do not reflect those of my employers, but I'm sure they'd also call bullshit on your hoax hypothesis, says Zach.

Well, isn't it interesting, Zach, that yes, a bunch of papyrus leaves are still printed in the millions today as proof.

While NASA could not keep track of 700 cases of tapes and

telemetry data, lost all the blueprints to everything.

Why, yes, isn't it amazing what documentation is still here?

It is unbelievable.

Well, I think you've gotten by the balls with that argument because the fact is that, yes, there is a Bible, which is what you're referring to for people that don't understand what you're talking about.

I think they go.

And

that still floats around and it keeps being reprinted, and it's been passed along.

It floats around.

And half of the information from the moon landing is gone.

What happened to it?

Yeah.

It's just that.

And so if you're going to be presenting yourself as a NASA employee, although you're not representing NASA, you should be ashamed of yourself.

Exactly.

How do you lose all this good data?

Also, I'd like to point out that it was not televised.

What we are told is that they beamed down television signals and a television camera filmed the monitor and broadcast that on television.

And then he goes on to say, yes, amateurs can track missions and the associated Doppler shift of moon missions.

Yeah, I know they can.

The fact is, NASA is calling on them to do it because they need help from amateur radio operators.

That's strange, particularly when President Nixon called the astronauts from the White House, hey, how are you doing?

No delay.

Doing good, Mr.

Prez.

No delay.

Okay, good job, everybody.

How about that moon rock we gave to the Dutch?

That wasn't a moon rock.

I can go on forever.

I just pray that these poor astronauts don't fry in the Van Allen belts on their way up there.

And I'm not quite sure what they're going to do for fuel, but we'll see.

Because they're going to make it all the way.

And yes, it'll be very easy to fake it these days.

So I don't know why you're still in denial, Joe.

I don't think that

because

at some point, you've got to trust

the experts who told us that it happened.

And I watched it.

I was a little kid.

I watched it too.

My dad got a lot of money.

I watched it.

I saw landing on the moon.

I saw the jumping off the spacecraft and saying one small step for man, one large step for mankind.

He could have said womankind.

You could have said person kind of giant leap.

People kind would have been better.

He could have rewritten that.

I met Neil Armstrong years later.

Yeah.

And did you say, hey, did you really walk on the moon?

The funny thing about, you know, I think the problem, I've mentioned this

of all, I won't say who called me the other day, but some famous person called me and said that they now don't believe they went to the moon.

A person with a big ego that probably would like to be mentioned, but I'm not going to say.

And

I mentioned that I met Neil Armstrong and he gives off an air of not wanting to discuss it.

No, of course he doesn't.

He doesn't want, he's sick of that.

He doesn't want to be.

He knows.

He knows.

He knows.

Well, all I remember is the press conference after the moon, after they got back from the moon.

Yes.

And they were not, they didn't look like a bunch of happy campers or anyone.

And you'd think after making that trip and then getting back safely, you'd be very happy.

Yeah, no, there was none of that.

I remember that.

Well, they were happy when they got those corvettes they liked that part

shut up shut up and have a corvette

here's a rolex shut up

just a rolex and a corvette all you have to do is shut up can you do that yeah sure we're military we know what to do yeah you know you'll you'll have a you'll be writing books you can you're gonna do star trek conventions for the rest of your life it's gonna be fine it's gonna be fine

actually he did respond because i responded very similar to uh what i just said and he said okay

doubting Thomas.

Yes.

Oh, doubting Thomas.

That's a biblical reference.

Yes.

Well, Thomas actually then put his finger in the nail holes in Jesus' hand and in his side and went, oh, okay, chief.

So another poor follow-up by NASA.

Is this the level of NASA people working at NASA?

This is.

Shush, shush, shush, shush.

That's why Musk is doing so well.

Yeah, no kidding.

And what a scam that is.

I'm going to Mars.

There's more chance we have an exit screen.

Isn't Musk the one who said that they need a refueling station?

You need a refueling station on the way to the moon.

Yeah, isn't that what he said?

Yes.

Well, that doesn't make any sense because his rockets are bigger than Saturn V.

I think it's 240,000 miles to the moon, if I'm not mistaken.

It might be 239.

I don't think we have much evidence of people being higher than 400 miles.

People.

Yeah, I believe the space,

unlike you, I believe the space station exists.

Oh, no, but there are people floating around in it.

Yes, but the space station is not that high.

No, it's not.

It's not that high.

Error, error.

How high is the space station?

The International Space Station orbits about 240 miles above Earth.

There you go.

240 miles.

No big deal.

So it's 1,000 times

closer.

Yes.

So

good luck.

Because the moon is 250,000, basically 250,000 miles away.

That's quite far.

Yeah, well, you can see it, so it can't be that far.

Well, you don't know how big it is.

We don't know anything.

And it could be hollow.

It could be hollow.

We don't know it.

You know, I am kind of a believer in the hollow moon.

Yeah, I'm with you.

Remember they bonked the nuke against it and they heard a dong.

Yeah.

Wasn't that recently?

And it's in a perfect, and it's one of the few, it's one of the only moons in the entire solar system.

I think it's the only one that is in a perfect orbit.

Oh, is that?

Is that so?

They're all elliptical, or they all got some, they're off a bit.

You know, they're just kind of lopsided.

No, ours is

around perfectly.

I wish I knew about the.

I wish I could find that clip of the

of the hollow moon.

The donk.

The donk.

Wow, I heard a bell ring.

And then, of course, there's Operation High Jump, which no one wants to talk about.

Okay, talk about it.

Oh, Operation High Jump?

That's when they,

well, hold on.

Here we go.

Error.

Give me a synopsis of Operation High Jump.

Operation High Jump was this massive U.S.

Navy expedition back in 1946, right after World War II.

Thousands of troops, ships, planes, all heading to Antarctica.

Oh, she's so annoying.

I said synopsis.

You give me those long things.

They basically tried to shoot through the.

No, I can't remember the term now.

I have a t-shirt even.

The firmament.

The firmament above us, which doesn't allow us to actually go that high.

And they tried to blow it up with nukes, and it was unsuccessful.

That's That's the story.

I'm not going to trust Wikipedia on it.

What she got the year on that, there was no nukes.

Yeah, but this is...

They were big enough to do.

There were rockets to do that.

That doesn't make sense.

I don't think she's correct.

I think you got this wrong.

No, I don't have this wrong.

Operation High Jump.

Okay, I'll get back on the next show.

I want a report.

Yeah, you'll have a report.

You'll have a report on Operation Hijo.

This is part of

the nuttiness of some of the stuff you come up with.

Call it nutty if you will.

Okay, so while we're on nutty,

while we're on nutty, I'm apparently as nutty as one of Putin's top advisors, supposedly.

Who knows?

And I don't even know if this is a current report because what would we know?

Because of the number, but I think the Russians are onto the stablecoin gambit.

In case you missed it, Anton Kobiakov, a senior advisor to Russian President Vladimir Putin, made a bold claim this week at the Eastern Economic Forum stating that the United States is preparing to reset the system, using crypto and gold to erase its massive debt burden.

America is trying to change the rules in the gold and cryptocurrency markets.

Remember how much debt they have: $35 trillion, driving everyone where

into the cryptocurrency cryptocurrency cloud.

Right now, they have a $35 trillion currency debt.

They move it into crypto, into the cloud, devalue it, and start from scratch.

Yeah, baby.

That's the gambit.

That's the gambit right there.

Well, that's a pretty good way of putting it.

Yeah.

Hey, whatever works.

I mean, although, see, what's disappointing is the guy talks about 35 trillion.

I think it's 37 trillion.

It might be, but I think it's, no, I think the new limit is 37.

I think it's still 35.

But I could be wrong.

But that wasn't about stablecoin.

I think stablecoin is the kicker here.

Well, no, but

he's a Russian.

He doesn't know what he's talking about.

Stablecoin falls under crypto.

They're just calling stablecoin crypto.

I don't get that.

What do you mean you don't get it?

It runs on blockchain, so that's why they're calling it crypto.

Oh, blockchain.

Okay.

Well, as long as it runs under blockchain, I'm good to go.

It's safe and effective.

I'm waiting for the blockchain meets AI, and then we got some, we got action.

Well, what's going to, what, how do you see that?

What do you see?

I don't.

I don't get it.

I mean, when somebody sees it and puts it together and you have blockchain AI, boom, moneymaker.

All right.

So here's the latest since you bring it up.

Still trying to figure out how this is all going to work.

How is this going to make any money?

Especially with the most recent report that came out of,

let me see, who did this?

This was a big, this is CNBC reporting.

AI-generated work slop is here.

It's killing teamwork and causing a multi-million dollar productivity problem, say researchers.

This came out of Stanford.

That

people are just being inundated with AI-generated work content, masquerading as good content, but lacks substance to

meaningfully advance any given task.

They're calling it work slop.

40% of people say they've received work slop in the last month, which means emails that are just written by AI,

where you basically have to pull it through AI on the other side on the receiving side to understand what they're saying.

People taking more time, having to read through,

what is this PowerPoint that you've created for me?

That is a time waster.

Yeah, of course it is.

And people are just throwing stuff into AI and throwing it into the workplace.

Well, once it started happening in the legal world where they had, you know, people would throw case law and it was all bullcrap.

They're just making stuff up and the judge had to go through.

This is a huge waste of the judicial system's time.

So I'll remind everybody of the Bain and Company report, which actually, no, this,

no, what I'll remind you of is that Sam Altman at one point said it's going to take $7 trillion.

Remember that?

He was talking to the

to

like the Saudis.

You know, we need some of your sovereign wealth fund because we really, I really need $7 trillion to scale this thing to work.

Now, Bain and Company, no slouches in the money business, their report says, $2 trillion in new revenue needed to fund AI scaling trend.

This is from their sixth annual global technology report.

Headline.

Even with AI-related savings, investors are still $800 billion short in annual revenue required to profitably fund the data centers of 2030.

Agentic AI innovation is unprecedented, but most companies remain in experimentation mode before taking their hands off the wheel.

And finally, here we go.

Quantum computing could unlock as much as $250 billion in market value across industries.

So, how are we funding all this?

Well, wouldn't you know it?

Now we have NVIDIA putting $100 billion

into OpenAI.

This is officially a circle jerk.

Jensen, step back for me.

I mean, a few days, you're all over the place, literally.

I mean, you're in the UK.

I saw the white bow tie and all that.

The talk

is very nice.

But you're also doing a lot of investments.

The Intel investment announced last week, quite a bit smaller than this one, but seems significant also because it's weaving NVIDIA technology in the PCN data center level in a way that perhaps it wasn't before.

Where do these kinds of investments fit in?

How do you think about the value of the ecosystem to NVIDIA?

The Intel Partnership is about recognizing that accelerated computing and AI's day has arrived.

Remember, general-purpose computing was invented practically 60 years ago.

And for the last 60 years, we've been following that basic blueprint, that basic architecture.

You know, to build the ecosystem, the computing ecosystem, the world, stop, stop.

You have to back it up.

He said, what was invented 50 years ago?

I think what he's saying is that AI, the concept, going back to

the guy at MIT, that the whole concept of how this works was invented 60, 50, I think it says 60 years ago.

Well, I was an editor of InfoWorld in the 80s when this cropped up.

Right.

Well, it comes back every decade.

No, it's not a decade.

It comes back every 30 or 40 years.

Well, it takes that.

It was this people.

No, this is the same.

People lose their shirts and they're all out of business.

It takes forever to rebuild your wealth.

Yes, then we get an AI winter.

That's a term.

But.

Okay, so what do you remember?

Well, I remember a couple of things.

One, the guy out of MIT, who I think you're talking about, could be a couple of different guys.

I have to think of some names.

I'll give you the name.

And there's a guy at Stanford called McCarthy, and the guy at MIT was

the Eliza.

Well, Minsky and the guy from the Eliza computer, Weisenbaum.

Oh, that predated that by a lot.

Eliza was way before

Minsky.

No, Weisenbaum worked with Minsky.

I'm pretty sure.

No, I know, but I'm saying that Eliza was like in the 70s.

60s.

60s, 60s, 2000s, 60s.

And the AI thing that Minsky and these guys were all dealing with really started in the 80s.

That was Lisp.

Well, Lisp was part of that, but it wasn't the whole thing.

It was just one element.

But it was built on the ELISA scripts.

I've looked at this history, so I'm just saying.

Yeah.

Well, okay.

Whatever the case, Minsky and these guys were off the mark, and there was a guy out of Stanford called Vavatsky, who was the one who was pushing the neural network idea, which is what's finally evolved.

And he's given no credit, mysteriously died in Australia.

And

I hate it when that happens.

Wrote a thesis that had a bunch of interesting stuff in it,

which I had to kill.

He has the model for war, for who can win a war as an algorithm,

which is used by the Pentagon, I'm told.

And he has a bunch of other screwball information about

psychology and a bunch of things in this thesis he wrote at Stanford.

And he was a professor there, and he's the one that was in the neural networks.

And neural networks kind of came and went because

they couldn't get them to work.

I mean, the idea was good.

Intel had a chip, which I have a copy of,

one of the first neural network chips, and they dropped the ball completely on that.

And then now it re-evolved into what we have today, which is the neural network, which is which talks to the large language model.

And you need that neural network in the middle to do the work.

And so

this whole thing is a mishmash, but there's issues, and

it still doesn't think.

No, it doesn't think at all.

And by the way, can we hook that chip up?

Well,

finding the chip.

Can you put it on a breadboard and hook it up to the internet?

You probably could if you could find some specs

where the pinouts, what the pinouts do.

Run some GitHub stuff on it?

I don't know.

It's a good question because that chip is pretty.

I don't even know what Intel.

See if you can find it.

I think I know where it is.

But what difference does it make?

Unless I can find specs for it.

It doesn't just a chip with a bunch of pins coming out of it.

Well, let's continue with this nonsense, this hundred billion dollars.

The Intel Partnership is about recognizing that accelerated computing is.

This is the term.

There's a subtle shift in the marketing speak here.

Accelerated computing.

They're taking the intelligence out of AI and they're calling it accelerated computing,

which to be fair is actually a pretty good

name for it.

Because

there is some accelerated computing components to it.

It allows me to vibe code something, you know, kind of.

There's no intelligence, no memory capacity, but it's accelerated.

It's accelerated my capacity to sling some Python scripts.

Yes, I like accelerated computing.

It definitely accelerates the art generator.

How do you think about the value of of the ecosystem to NVIDIA?

The Intel Partnership is about recognizing that accelerated computing and AI's day has arrived.

Remember, general purpose computing was invented practically 60 years ago.

And for the last 60 years, we've been following that basic blueprint, that basic architecture, you know, to build the ecosystem, the computing ecosystem of the world.

And so all of a sudden, accelerated computing's time has come.

And we're fusing, if you will, the Intel architecture with the NVIDIA architecture to bring them into the world of accelerated computing and AI.

So that's what that partnership's about.

I mean, this is, you know, monumental in size.

There's never been an engineering project, a technical project of this complexity and this scale ever.

And it really just says that AI was in the early adopter phase in the labs, and finally it's breaking out into just about every single industry, every single use case we can imagine.

It is very soon where every single word, every single interaction, every single image, video that we experience on, you know, and through computers will somehow have been reasoned through or referenced by or generated by AI.

It's going to be touched by AI somehow.

So all of our computing experiences throughout the day, everywhere in every industry, will be powered by AI.

This is the first 10 gigawatts.

It's surely it sounds like an enormous, enormous undertaking, but there's no question that AI is transformational for every industry.

But the important thing is the AI infrastructure will be everywhere and it will power computing experiences for everyone every day.

And it's going to be just everywhere.

Yeah.

So accelerated computing, computer experiences.

This is, to me, the never-ending battle between personal computing

and

mainframes.

This is just an attempt to get the desktop computer hooked up to something else so you don't have any real autonomy.

The autonomy is what you want.

You want desktop AI.

I mean, this is no good.

What everything they're talking about is no good.

This is an NVIDIA term, accelerated computing.

So what is...

And by the way, NVIDIA is in for a big surprise when they deal with the corporate culture at Intel and the arrogance of that company and it's just built in.

It's in their DNA.

It's in their case.

It's just they're arrogant and they're assholes in a way that's unbelievable that they will not be able to deal with it.

Because NVIDIA guys are just all cool.

Leather jackets and stuff.

Yeah.

Everyone I know that's ever worked there, including my son who worked there for a while.

They're all just laid back.

It's nothing like Intel.

So what is accelerated computing?

Here's the NVIDIA NVIDIA blog.

Accelerated computing is the use of specialized hardware to dramatically speed up work using parallel processing that bundles frequently occurring tasks.

It offloads demanding work that can bog down CPUs, your little poor CPU at home, and processors that typically execute tasks in serial fashion.

Cloud.

Because accelerated computing on NVIDIA GPUs can do more work in less time, it's energy efficient.

Oh, yeah.

Wow.

Consuming less energy than general-purpose servers that employ CPUs.

We need nuclear power plants for these systems, but

they're so efficient.

That's why accelerated computing is sustainable computing.

Users worldwide are documenting energy efficiency gains with AI and accelerated computing.

Wow.

This is great.

Who wrote this?

Born in the PC, accelerated computing came of age in supercomputers.

It lives today in your smartphone and every cloud service.

There it is.

And now companies of every stripe are adopting it to transform their business with data.

Accelerated computers blend CPUs.

Blend them.

They blend.

Will it blend?

No, I could do that with my blend tech blender.

Will it blend?

They blend CPUs and other kinds of processes together as equals in an architecture

sometimes called heterogeneous computing.

Oh, geez.

This is...

I mean, even if they asked us to, we couldn't write this bullcrap.

We'd be embarrassed.

It's too.

Yes.

We'd be embarrassed.

AI wrote it.

We'd be in.

Oh,

HPC.

What is HPC?

High-performance computing.

Ah, there you go.

High-performance computing plus GPUs equals

accelerated science.

Yeah.

That's a good one.

This family of GPUs destined for the data center expanded on a regular cadence with a success.

This is definitely written by AI.

Expanded on a regular cadence with a succession of new architectures named after innovators like Tesla, Fermi, Kepler, Maxwell, Pascal, Volta, Turing, Ampere, Hopper, and Blackwell.

These guys are smoking crack.

It's unbelievable.

But you can watch it.

It's AI Smarts of DoorDash and Domino's.

It's improved our food delivery systems.

It has it now.

Yeah, it has.

So anyway, so now the money is, you know,

no one is, they need 800 billion more.

Hey, you want your money back?

You got to give us 800 billion more.

Yeah, it's almost like a racket.

Yes, it's a Ponzi scheme.

Like, oh, we need to, and how we're, oh, just a little bit more, man.

Just a little bit more.

I just need 800 billion more.

We know Sam Altman said it was going to be 7 trillion.

I think he's right.

I don't know what you get for your

$7 trillion.

How much money do you have to make to be profitable on $7 trillion?

I don't know.

So we had a, I got a couple of funny stories.

Well, I don't know how funny it is.

Well, then we'll see.

Are they funnier than my

Boots and BBQ story from the last show?

Oh, the one that went 17 minutes?

Yeah, that one.

Yeah, well, that doesn't take any skill.

Okay.

Okay.

It was a local news story.

I'm trying to find it on my list.

Fremont murder?

Yeah, the Fremont.

Now, this is a crack.

Okay, the only reason I hate, you have to imagine this.

The reason I picked this story up, this local story from KTVU, it's a murder in Fremont.

This is a long clip.

This is a long clip.

Well, how long is it?

252?

Oh, well, play it.

I'll cut it off.

But

you have to imagine the murderer is an Indian guy who looks exactly like Cash Patel

with those stupid, those eyeballs.

You know, Cash Patel's like, he's not quite cross-eyed, but what is wrong with his eyes?

I'm bugging out.

You don't know

what the deal is.

So, this guy is

a murderer.

And it brought me to another clip, which I have to follow.

Let's play this first, and we'll see what I did wrong here.

Disturbing new details.

In a deadly stabbing in Fremont, tonight, a man is accused of tracking down and murdering his victim, a registered sex offender.

Police say the suspect was motivated by the criminal past of his victim.

Court documents also suggesting that 29-year-old suspect wanted to find someone someone he considered, quote, easy to kill.

New attend, KTV's BettyU, dug through those documents and is live outside of the Fremont Police Department with more.

Betty?

Claudine, the details here are chilling and they've really shaken this quiet Fremont community.

We've learned that the victim and the suspect did not know each other.

In fact, police say that the suspect picked his murder victim that morning and then killed him that very afternoon.

29-year-old Varun Suresh is accused of stabbing and killing 71-year-old David Brimmer last Thursday.

According to court documents obtained by KTVU, Suresh told police he had wanted to kill a sex offender for years because they, quote, hurt children and deserved to die.

He allegedly said he found Brimmer on the Meganslaw website and picked him because he was a quote old guy and easy to kill.

Brimmer had served nine years in prison after a 1995 conviction for committing lewd acts with a child.

Police say Suresh Suresh posed as an accountant, going door to door before approaching Brimmer's home on Solstice Court.

He allegedly attacked Brimmer at the doorstep.

Brimmer ran down the street, eventually forcing his way into a neighbor's home on Upper Vintner Circle.

But Suresh caught up, stabbing him in the neck and ultimately killing him near the lawn.

I'm shocked.

I don't expect something like this happen in Fremont because I have never experienced something like this in the last 30 years.

Police say Suresh Suresh stayed on scene, and court records show he told police he didn't plan to escape and even said, I'm hoping that because the victim is a pedophile, like everyone hates pedophiles.

So like it should be cool.

I know that a lot of people are.

Okay, he was, but that was the end.

That was the punchline.

I don't know why I didn't get cut off.

He thought, don't worry about it.

I'm going to kill a guy, but everyone's going to love me for doing it.

But he doesn't realize that everybody hates murderers, too.

It's a Luigi thing.

Yeah.

It's a Luigi thing.

So, but that brought me to it.

It was really a pathetic story, but that brought me to an old clip that just happened to show up

floating around.

I love it when that happens.

Yeah, it's funny.

It's just happened.

This is a Shirley Temple on the Shirley Temple Black.

The most abused actress in history.

Well, maybe to some extent, but if you listen to the story, maybe not.

But this is her talking to Larry King, probably.

Oh, I remember this clip, sure.

This is a great clip.

When I left Fox, I went to MGM for one picture.

Thank goodness, only one.

And when I got there with my mother, we were separated.

She went into the office of Louis B.

Mayer, and I went into the office of Arthur Freed.

He was going to talk to me about a movie he wanted to put me in.

I'm 12 years old, you know.

And I'd thought he was a producer, but instead he was an exhibitor.

And I'd never seen anyone naked before except myself.

So I had no clue about what was happening.

So it struck me so funny, I laughed at him.

And I laughed uproariously.

I had tears, you know, and he got infuriated.

And he said, out, out, out, go.

Did you tell your mother?

Well, I went down.

It was very quiet.

I went down and met her in the lobby of the administration building.

She came up very quietly from Louis B.

Mayor's office, and we walked hand in hand silently to the car, which was unusual.

We got in the car driving home.

I said, Mom, you won't believe what happened to me.

And I told her what happened, and she got kind of quiet, and she said, Well, you don't know what happened to me.

Louis B.

Maire wasn't as bad as Freed was to me.

He came onto my mother.

And so we both decided that we didn't like MGM much.

It was better at Fox.

It's a horrible story.

It's a horrible.

But it's like, if you're going to, you know, that Hollywood, unbelievable.

Well, speaking of Epstein.

Hey-oh.

Yeah.

So I've heard this story in Fredericksburg, but one of our producers actually wrote it down, and I want to read it to you because this is doing the rounds.

It's about the Trump card.

The Trump card.

And this is a gossip in Fredericksburg, too.

Yes, it is.

Okay, so we can assume there's military intelligence involved.

The Trump card for foreigners is to buy their way into the U.S.

So the world's blackmailed elite who are on the Epstein and similar lists are given an opportunity to get out from under their blackmail and start over.

So they flip on the blackmailers, cooperate with U.S.

authorities, and are given the opportunity to buy their citizenship, aka safe passage, and bring their wealth with them tax-free.

That's the platinum card.

Not a bad price for the truth and the evidence.

This is also why the release of the Epstein list has been delayed as these agreements are still taking shape.

See, the Trump card is a little delayed, but it took him a little longer to get it all together.

Cash Patel is embedded with this process through his Vegas ties as the liaison between both worlds.

Because Cash has a storied past relating to all these blackmail operations, making him the perfect middleman.

That's why he's been stalling and acting shady.

Now you know the true story.

Oh my God.

What a contrived story.

That is a good one, though.

I love it.

So, in other words, what we're witnessing here is instead of the Epstein list, it's a blackmail scheme.

Of course, the FBI has always been blackmailers.

We know that.

Goes back to J.

Edgar Hoover.

And the CIA.

CIA does it too.

And the CIA does the same thing,

but they're not as well known for it.

And so this is just part of the long-term, the big, the long arc of blackmail.

And so they have the list of the bad dudes that were involved with Epstein, and they're making him pay up.

Basically, is that about?

Yeah, that's the idea.

Pay up or else.

The world is fantastic.

It's so fun.

It's a good one.

It's totally fun.

Speaking of Epstein.

Look at this.

A big statue popped up on the National Mall.

It's President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands and skipping.

The plaque in front of it says, quote, in honor of Friendship Month.

At this point, nobody has taken credit for this pop-up display.

And this is just one of many temporary statues that have appeared on the mall recently.

A few others were a big bunch of bananas and one of President Trump holding up a Bitcoin.

Whoever is behind this most recent statue got a permit from the Park Service.

The permit says the statue can stay up until Sunday.

That's the best part.

They got a permit for it.

Yeah, well,

at least they went through channels.

I think that's a plus.

We can get a permit for a Curry Dvorex statue on the mall.

Skip it.

You know what bothers me to this day is that if you recall during 2016,

during the show era,

there were all these naked

fiberglass statues of Trump that were

put all over the place.

There was one in San Francisco.

And

exactly why I didn't orchestrate, you know, all you have to do is get the right gear, a hard hat, a clipboard,

an orange vest and a pickup truck.

There it is.

Orange vest, hard hat, clipboard, pickup truck optional, and you're good to go.

And you go drive it with a couple of dudes and you go grab one of those things.

That has got to, as someone who is an archivist, gets to the bottom of the corner.

That has got to be one of the great

collectibles ever made.

Yes, get some dudes from Home Depot.

It's a broad material.

Yes, it is.

It's perfect.

Yeah, yeah.

Why I didn't grab the one in San Francisco, I'm not absolutely sure where.

It's beyond me.

It's beyond me.

It's beyond me.

I feel very disappointed.

You could have put it next to your

next to your AI chip.

It would have been a perfect addition to the...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, in the closet.

By the way, I'm going to call Glenn Beck and suggest that we have a Dvorak wing to his library because the stuff you've got, I'm sure Beck would be like, wow, this is like that chip, he'll love that.

You've got a money.

I'm kind of like, yeah, that chip might be something.

I think you've got a treasure trove.

And I think that if we.

Well,

he would really like the Trump statue.

Oh, he would love to have that.

I mean,

where did they all go?

I mean, they made about 20 of them.

Yeah.

I mean, we should have Jay.

We'll pay Jay to catalog.

But by the way, to do that, she needs a hard hat and a clipboard because she might die under a deluge if anything.

And the yellow vest, you need that just in case.

You need to cordon it off because, man, it's a danger zone.

No, it's actually, I'm sorry, it's an orange vest and a yellow hard hat.

That's it.

I'm telling you, Glenn would be happy, happy with your stuff.

Happy.

Happy, I tell you.

Oh, man.

Well, actually, I can talk about the Kimmel stuff or we can go to Bright.

No, let's do Kimmel's stuff for a second because that is worth discussing.

So, yeah, Kimmel was taken off the air for four days or something.

They made a big fuss about it.

And, of course, nobody wants to talk about Kimmel's commentary during when Roseanne was taken off in 1980.

We actually

looked it up, and

she was taken off the air because she tweeted that Valerie Jarrett, then

President Obama's handler, looked like an ape.

Well, she looked like

one of the actresses in Planet of the Apes.

I think she just said she looked like an ape.

I don't think she was.

Well, she was an ape.

I mean, the Planet of the Apes is about apes, so yeah.

And then

she went all soft and was like, Well, I was on Ambien and like, come on, Rose.

Yeah, she wimped out.

Yeah, she wimped out big time.

And so that was the reason she was fired.

But Kimmel went on, and I put one of the memes in the newsletter has what he had to say.

And it was largely that, well, ABC has every right to take her off the air.

ABC is a business, and ABC this and ABC that.

And so he defended her getting kicked off the air.

And now, of course, when it happened to him, he's whining and he's expecting everybody to, you know, keep him on the air.

And

he's back for a moment, got 6.2 million viewers on the show.

His first show back, which is, of course,

stop right there.

0.8% in the demo.

Yeah, the demos.

So the demo.

Yeah, he's got nothing in the demo.

Not even 1% of the advertising demographic.

What's the demo?

It's 18 to what?

40 to the number.

1849.

1849.

Now, 0.87%

is much higher than he usually does.

And that equates to about roughly about a million people in the demo.

So if he had that every single night, I think that, you know, looking at the numbers, numbers,

so that's a thousand CPMs.

So a CPM has got to be pretty high.

They could do much better if he had a 0.87 in the demo.

But it's still, as the demo goes, it's pathetic.

You can put your money elsewhere as an advertiser.

Yeah, and that's the problem.

So they're losing, they say, 20 million a year on the show, and they're probably not going to, nothing's going to change.

And by the way, all those

viral pictures and video.

Look, they're dismantling his set.

Guess that was bull crap.

No, I'm sorry.

What?

Oh, there was everyone like, it's over.

Look, they're shipping a set out the back door.

No, they weren't.

Oh, I never saw any of that.

This writing, you know, it's like a Candace Owens level thing.

Well, we've done some sleuthing.

I have the receipts.

Snooping.

Candace Owens.

I have the receipts.

Yeah.

All right.

Yeah, she's definitely a menu for herself.

So we have, these are clue.

This is, I think I've got four clips of Kimmel acting.

I caught it because this first clip is acting for sure.

And then he does some material.

Basically, the whole show is a monologue.

He brought in, he did skits and bits.

He had

Merrill come on.

You watched it.

You're in the demo.

You're one of the 6.2 million.

Yeah.

Yeah, I watch it.

I have a show to do here.

Okay, let's listen to Kimmel Acting One.

Cannot be allowed to control what we do and do not say on television, and that we have to stand up to it.

I've been hearing a lot about what I need to say and do tonight.

And the truth is, I don't think what I have to say is going to make much of a difference.

If you like me, you like me.

If you don't, you don't.

I have no illusions about changing anyone's mind.

But I do want to make something clear because it's important to me as a human.

And that is, you understand that it was never my intention intention to make light of the murder of a young man.

No, this is not acting.

That's real.

He's a crybaby.

He cries all the time.

He is a crybaby.

He cries all the time.

He's a crybaby.

But he starts it off by saying the government has no right to tell broadcasters what they can and cannot do.

That's bull crap.

These are licensed.

These licenses, you know,

they're standards and practices.

But ABC.

Have you ever heard of standards and and practices?

ABC had nothing to do with it.

I mean, it had nothing to do with the broadcast license.

They have a small amount of owned affiliates.

They have a lot of ONOs.

Yeah, but the big boys are out there.

But okay, fine.

It's a mute.

But the point is that he can't just do and say whatever he wants.

And he never does apologize for saying that it was the MAGA guys who killed Curry.

No, he said it was all about the joke, that the president was.

It's about the joke, and Trump can't take a joke.

In fact, I think maybe that's in clip two.

Should the government be allowed to regulate which podcasts the cell phone companies and Wi-Fi providers are allowed to let you download to make sure they serve the public interests?

Wow.

I hadn't heard this part of it.

That's really interesting.

Why?

No.

But that has been argued many, many, many times, all the way up to the Supreme Court level as to whether the telephone network is a

equivalent to broadcast spectrum or if it is an open resource that you should be able to do everything you want on it.

We have separate laws for that, known as wire fraud and RICO.

But this, no, no, Jimmy Kimmel, this has been argued a long time before we were born.

You think that sounds crazy?

10 years ago, this sounded crazy.

Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, telling an American company we can do this the easy way or the hard way, and that these companies can find ways to change conduct and take action on Kimmel, or there's going to be additional work for the FCC ahead, in addition to being a direct violation of the First Amendment, is not a particularly intelligent threat to make in public.

Ted Cruz said he sounded like a mafioso.

Ted Cruz did himself no favors with that, because Cruz, as a lawyer, should know much better than that.

What a dope.

He's a dope.

The other thing is that's interesting here is that I don't, I've said this before because I worked in the government long enough to know one thing.

Don't start prodding bureaucrats.

Bad idea.

It's just not, and it's not going to work out for you.

They've got nothing better to do than because they're usually bored.

They're in there.

There's nothing to do.

But if they get, and the word, the term for the novices out there is hard on.

They get a hard on for you, and they go at, they find some ways to make your life miserable.

By the way, they do it because there's nothing, it's more fun, it's fun.

It was a veiled reference to Joe Rogan, I think, is a good point from the troll room to say that about podcasts and should they be allowed over this cell phone network.

I'm sure he's got a hard-on that Rogan has a much bigger audience than he has.

Well, it's not even comparable.

And probably a bigger paycheck.

And And he gets a bigger question.

Well, I don't know.

I mean,

Rogan gets a big paycheck.

He divvies it out.

You know, it's gross.

But, I mean, Kimball gets $16 million

for a show that loses $20 million.

I mean, it's ridiculous.

Right.

Right.

All right.

So here we go to the third clip.

The FCC has a tradition of meddling where they shouldn't under many administrations, but it wasn't always like this.

There was an FCC commissioner back in 2022 who worked under Joe Biden who was spot on.

He wrote, President Biden is right.

Political satire is one of the oldest and most important forms of free speech.

It challenges those in power while using humor to draw more people into the discussion.

That's why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship.

You know who wrote that?

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr.

Yeah, but it wasn't about the satire, but that's okay.

Whatever.

I thought that was a good bit.

Yeah.

And he,

again, is prodding a bureaucrat.

Yeah.

You know, which is well, but yeah, but this is what you do.

Howard Stern

made a career out of doing this.

And it was disingenuous because he would say, the FCC won't let me say these words.

The FCC won't let me talk about this.

That is factually not true.

It was the station owners and the broadcast licensees who wouldn't let him do that because they knew that if they, with broadcast license spectrum, there's certain words you can't say before the watershed moment, 10 p.m.

And Stern made a whole big thing about I'm the man, it's against the man.

And once he didn't have the man, when he moved to Sirius and he could say whatever he wanted, it fell apart because he didn't have that anymore.

So Kimmel is doing a smart thing here, despite you thinking it's don't prod the bureaucrat.

It's the only thing he can do.

And I probably would have done the same.

From a

what?

If I were in that position, that's what you do.

You go against the man.

This will

look this will

garner popularity for Kimmel.

It will work to him.

No, it won't.

Yeah,

you know, his numbers will go down every night ever since.

Yeah, of course they will.

It was a good bid.

I mean, I think it's funny.

I think overall he did a decent job.

He never apologized, and he blamed Trump for the whole thing.

Yeah, that's what you do.

That is the only thing that's not.

But

it's generally speaking lame.

And here's the final word.

Truth to power, man.

I'm speaking truth to power.

We're under attack here.

And I think unjustly, this puts them at risk.

The President of the United States made it very clear he wants to see me, and the hundreds of people who work here fired from our jobs.

I thought it was going to say, me and the hundreds of people who watch, but no, it was who work here.

The President of the United States made it very clear he wants to see me, me and the hundreds of people who work here fired from our jobs.

Our leader celebrates Americans losing their livelihoods because he can't take a joke.

Say, there he screws it up.

No one cares about you losing your job.

No one cares about that.

Oh, and the hundreds of people who work here.

You do an entertainment show, bro.

No.

By the way, the biggest loser of the night was Gavin Newsom, who went on Colbert's show the same night that Kimmel comes back.

Yeah, well, again, that's...

And Newsom, of course, made a fool of himself.

Here it comes.

So, look, I just think it's important to have those civil engagements.

I think it's important to dialogue.

It's important to learn from your opponents.

And it's important to reconcile your weaknesses.

As a Democratic Party, we have a lot of work to do to make up for our failures in the past.

We got crushed in this last election, And now we're in a position where we are struggling to communicate.

We're struggling to win back now the majority in the House of Representatives.

And that's a big part of what I'm doing, not just today in terms of the work out here, raising money, but also raising awareness around how Donald Trump is trying to rig the midterm elections and how I fear that we will not have an election in 2028.

I really mean that.

In the core of my soul, unless we wake up to the code red what's happening in this country and we wake up soberly uh to how serious this moment is yes yes yes applause

very serious moment

we're not we're not going to have elections in 2028 wow he could move to fredericksburg

that is great

Of course, not really mentioned in any reports of actual government censorship is this little diddy.

YouTube will soon reinstate users who are banned from spreading misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 election.

YouTube's parent company, Alphabet, disclosed the move in a letter submitted to the House Judiciary Committee.

Republicans are investigating whether the Biden administration forced tech companies to restrict speech on their platforms.

In the letter, Alphabet's lawyer wrote, the administration pressured the company to remove content that it said did not violate YouTube's policies.

Gee, yeah, that got no coverage.

No, why would it?

Why would it?

It needs no coverage.

No, Kimmel got all the coverage.

Yeah, because he's awesome.

He's a hero.

He's awesome.

He's the Robin Hood of late night is what he is.

And with that, I want to thank you for your courage and say in the morning to you, the man who put the C's in the accelerated computing.

Say hello to my friend on the other end, the one, the only, Mr.

John C.

DeMorth.

Yeah, well, in the morning to you, Mr.

Adam Curry.

Slue boots on the ground, feeding the air, steps in the water, and all the names of nights out there.

We're pretty close back to our normal 1800, 1768, the peakage, peak trollage.

So that's good.

Trolls are here.

Trolls are willing to hear what's happening.

They want to know.

They are not interested in ballistics or exit wounds.

They just want to hear what's really going on in their world.

We're going to the moon.

We're not going to land, but we're going to the moon.

All of it here on the No Agenda show.

We're going to the moon, Alice.

And of course, you can listen to, can join the trolls

in the troll rooms, noagendastream.com, trollroom.io, and always be listening on a modern podcast app, which you will get an alert when we go live on the show.

Because we do this live before a live studio troll audience, which is actually quite beneficial to the show because we get real-time feedback, lots of trolling, 60% trolling, and

good one-liners.

People look stuff up sometimes, sometimes they don't, but yeah, it's good.

And your modern podcast app, which you can find at podcastapps.com, is better than your legacy app for a couple of reasons.

One, when we go live, you get the bat signal, and it'll give you an alert on your phone, on your supercomputer, in your pocket.

You tap it, you're listening live in your podcast app.

It's amazing.

And then, of course, if you can't and you're just a subscriber to the podcast, which means you want to get notified when we post it, you'll get it within 90 seconds of the show being posted.

We run value for value.

No hoops, no,

oh man.

I've been hearing some

horrible things about some of these advertising deals.

You know, if you're on,

well, so like

people should go unmentioned.

But if you're, if you're on Rumble, Rumble will offer you an advertising deal and they'll give you 500 bucks a month.

And every show, every show, you have to read this whole thing about some vitamins and you have to pretend that you're taking them and you feel great.

I'd rather be poor.

I feel great.

I've been taking these vitamins and I've never felt better.

I'd rather be poor.

It's amazing.

No, we don't want.

$500 is not worth it.

I'll tell you what, I'd do that in a minute if it was a million dollars.

No, of course.

A show.

Yeah, a show.

Hey, I'll dance naked for a million dollars a show.

You heard him.

Send us your Bitcoin.

Only 10 Bitcoin, everybody.

And then you're good to go.

We'll come to your house.

Yeah.

Yeah.

So, no, we don't.

Sweetening the deal is what we call that.

We're not interested in that.

And really, we started off, we had no interest in having meetings with advertisers.

That's the worst.

That's worse than pretending that you like the vitamins.

None of that takes place here on the No Agenda show.

So you're telling me, hold on,

that when I'm listening to to these podcasts, where they're talking about one thing and then they quickly jump into something else, that

they're not taking these vitamins that are making them feel so much better?

They're probably also not buying gold

for their retirement.

I'm just saying it's probably not true.

That's my favorite.

You know, whenever I buy gold, John, where do you buy your gold?

Where do you buy your gold?

I mean, I buy my gold from the gold guys over here because they give me a fair price and they give me these doubloons, which are very exclusive.

They're hard to come by, and they are of numastic quality.

Yeah.

I could do it.

It's a pneumastic.

That's a new word.

Numasticist?

What is it?

What is the word?

Oh, and yeah, now as you say that word that

mispronounced it so badly, I can't think of how to pronounce it.

Well, then.

Yeah.

Numismatism or something like that for new, new, numismatics, I think, might be it.

Well, what is the term we're actually trying to describe?

Coin collecting?

No, I mean.

Okay.

Error.

What is the term for a coin that collectors think is of great value?

A sleeper.

That's the term.

Sleeper.

Okay.

That's not what I meant.

How do I pronounce pneumasticism sickasism?

Pneumasmatism.

That'll trip anyone up.

It's actually P.

pneumatitis with a T in there.

Close, though, English loves sneaky letters.

What?

P.

pneumatitis.

Does a P pneumatis?

That's some other word.

It's P.

pneumatitis.

I never even heard of that one.

Well, P.

pneumatitis is something you don't want, okay?

Unless you buy these vitamins, because then you're going to feel great.

No P.

Makes it burn when you urinate.

No P.

menatutis for you.

Error clearly hallucinating.

So the way it works is we just give you all the value.

It's open.

It is the definition of free speech.

All right.

It's free.

It's free to you.

It's free.

It's just free speech.

No, it's just free speech because there's freedom of speech is something I have been given by God and the government's supposed to protect that, which they don't.

And free speech is what we give to you.

It's a podcast.

The government protects it pretty well.

They put Kimmel back on the air.

He must.

They're good.

They are so good.

So we give you the free speech in MP3 form, and then you can decide if you got any value out of that.

We find it very valuable because we put a lot of our life and our energy and our time into doing this program.

We do it as a public service.

We're happy to do it.

And we're happier when you return some value, time, talent, or treasure.

And we want to thank some people who gave us, well, obviously our producers, even the guy from NASA is appreciated.

It's still value he's returning to us.

I think we give more value to him, but it's valuable.

I appreciate it.

Even negative value is still value.

It just detracts from all the other value somehow.

And one way that people can give us value is by typing in words on a keyboard to create art.

It's not a lot of value anymore, but we do appreciate people doing it.

And the artwork for episode 1781, which we titled Hate of Speech, perfect, got a lot of traction.

People liked it.

This is by Darren O'Neill, so you know it's AI.

And it was John and Adam in a little rocket ship

cruising through

the cosmos.

And people loved it.

People really liked it.

This is where you say, yes, people liked it.

We're going to the moon.

We were going to the moon, and it was amazing how much people liked it.

Now, we did look at a whole bunch of other AI-generated pieces of slop.

And let's see what we came up with.

Well we have to admit that when we get when it comes down to Darren O'Neal is the is the I hate to say this he's like the parachute he's the ballback guy

he's the injection seat like he always has a piece or two that's he rarely does a piece that's not usable yeah

yeah this is it's always usable so sometimes it's really good and sometimes it's the one that wins and he's won two or three times in a row every so often he's got a lot of numbers Now, was this his hat-trick?

It may have been.

I think it is.

I think he had a hat-trick.

I think he might have.

Let's look at the list of winners.

Yeah.

I think he has a hat-trick.

Now, other pieces that were submitted, Jimmy Kimmel dead instead of Jimmy Kimmel alive.

Yeah, it's a hat-trick because he did the robot.

The future is now.

He did the

street signs and he did the rocket.

And we made a point of discussing this: that we were not going to allow him to get a hat-trick.

No, we didn't.

We're like, whatever we do, we're not choosing Darren.

And he gets it anyway.

It's uncanny how that happens.

So let's see.

What else was there?

There was some really bad orange from Darren Graymerica.

Orange, lots of orange stuff.

More orange, Jeffrey Rhea.

You got to find the different model, Jeffrey.

It's too orange.

Oh, just filter it.

That is too much work.

A lot of Trump cards, which I just didn't see.

It wasn't really funny.

Was there anything else that we even discussed kind of liking?

The 1984 Awakening was a cute idea, but really too small, honestly.

Like the Apple commercial girl running up the aisle.

Ice.

You actually said, oh, the ice with the mask is funny.

I'm like, no, it's not.

Which one was that?

The ice guy with the medical mask.

It's called ICE.

It's a police officer with a medical mask.

You thought it was funny.

I was like, no, that's not funny.

I can't even find it.

Oh, there it is down at the bottom.

Yeah.

I didn't say anything about it.

Well, I said it was, yeah, I like it.

You did.

You did say it.

It was cute.

Yeah.

And it was subtle.

It was funny.

We're going to space.

Jeffrey Rice.

Jeffrey, whatever.

Jeffrey Rice.

Rhea.

Rhea, Ray.

Anyway.

We're going to Space was the winner and well deserved.

And I see lots more work slop has been submitted.

So we'll have another depressing time looking for artwork.

Although, I, you know, there are some real artists who are trying.

What's always sad is, so I'll get a new artist, hey, man, I submitted handmade art, no AI.

And you look at it, it's like, oh,

oh, that's too bad.

Because

the AI art is just funnier.

They can't help it.

A lot of it's funnier.

I'm starting to use,

I'm going to make some AI songs now.

Do what?

AI songs.

I'm going to get some, I'm going to get me, become an artist on something.

Oh, yeah, you can do it.

Yeah, for me.

You've always wanted to be in the music business.

Because it's so lucrative now.

Yeah, now's the time to get in.

Yeah, you can make $3.

Buy low, sell high.

You can make $3.

$3 is not a problem at all.

Part of the value of a value system is, of course, the monetary, the treasure that people support us with.

Anything is appreciated, any amount.

Anytime you feel that you got the value, just go to noagendadonations.com and send it off to us.

Put a little note in there.

We love reading the notes.

We always thank everybody $50 and above.

We're pretty transparent in that way, and you can see everything.

You can see how we're doing.

Make your own decision.

Never seems to thwart anybody from wanting to support us, especially our executive and associate executive producers.

If you're fortunate enough to be able to support us with $200 or more, you get an official Hollywood credit of executive associate producer, and we will read your short note.

If it's 300 or more, you become an executive producer.

And these credits are real.

They are accepted and recognized by Hollywood.

Go take a look at INDB.com where you can start an account if you don't have one already as an executive producer.

Put on your LinkedIn, your X profile, your Blue Cry, whatever makes you feel good.

So let us start with.

Now, we got a lot of notes today, which is kind of nice.

A lot of written, typewritten,

handwritten.

And there he is.

And we start with Sir Tommy Hawk.

He is from Iowa City, Iowa, and sent us $500 and a handwritten note with interesting.

Interested on a card, too.

Oh, is it a card?

Yes, nice.

Well,

I only see the handwritten part.

Yeah, well, I got to take the whole picture.

Well, but then I don't know it was a nice card.

Now, do I?

ITM, gents.

I need to do now.

I told you.

ITM, gents.

Today is my 19th birthday.

Hey, we got a Zoomer here, John.

We got a Zoomer.

Yeah, we do have a Zoomer.

Of course we do.

Zoomers are good business.

We like our Zoomers.

Let me get everything ready here.

Today is my 19th birthday, and I decided to give myself the gift of a new title.

Secretary General of the Heartland.

Sounds good to me.

Please play a little R2D2, Karma, and wish Nolan, best son in the universe, a happy birthday.

Sir Tom, does he have a kid already?

You think it's him?

Well, that guy's advanced.

That's pretty pretty amazing.

Hold on a second.

Where's my R2G2?

Thank you very much.

Here it comes.

You've got

karma.

Thank you, Sir Tommy.

All the top donations are

sent in as checks, which is good.

That's cool.

Garrett.

What is it?

Garrett?

No, it's Gansett.

Gansett Boomer in

Saunders Town, Rhode Island, which is, I've never heard of that one.

You might have.

No, not for me.

333.33.

And he has

a computer doubt.

Printed notes.

Yes, very nice.

Printed note.

Nicely printed.

Dear John and Adams, 33333.

ITM, this donation is overdue.

Way overdue.

I am a first-time appearance.

I am a first-time appearance of.

What does it make no sense?

Well, read the whole sentence.

I am a first-time appearance of Adam on Joe Rogan Listener.

you go.

Yeah, that makes sense.

You both saved me from thinking.

Oh, I'm sorry.

You both saved me from thinking I was going crazy during the pandemic when nothing was making sense.

Yes, this is what we do.

I have learned so much about media deconstruction and narratives from you guys.

I humbly request a dedouching.

You've been dedouched.

Have you noticed how

no one attacks us anymore for the Ukraine nonsense?

Because we were right.

We told everybody it was nonsense

and how it was set up and it wasn't just evil Russia.

You notice how that's kind of gone away?

Remember that.

It happens all the time.

But they did the same thing with VAX.

Oh, yeah.

Oh, yeah.

Remember the hate we got?

Stooges.

Dame Patricia.

That's the guy.

That's that same guy.

That's that guy.

Dame Patricia is in

Merced, California, 333.33.

She has a note as well.

Dear John Adam, thank you so much for the entertainment on my daily walks.

Double birthday celebration for me and my son, Brian Lewis, on September 20th.

Plus, an outrageous plug for Brian's business: Brian Lewis's surface painting, featuring Italian plasters and specialty

finishes in

Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County, California.

Text Brian.

All right, write this down.

Text Brian at 850-470-9917 so he knows you're a real person and not Yelp or Google trying to sell some advertising space.

Claim your no-agenda discount.

Is there an area code involved here?

850-470-9917.

That is the area code.

She's doxing her son.

It's interesting.

Yeah, well, he's going to get some messages.

Now he gets some phone calls, too.

Hey.

Hey.

ITM, baby.

God bless you both and keep well, says Dame Patricia with the practically perfect penmanship in Merced, California.

Oh, thank you very much, Dame Patricia.

Good to hear from you.

Nice to meet you.

Mr.

Saab.

Sab.

Saab, S-A-B-B of the Silver Valley.

Yes.

333.33.

And he has

printed paper.

Here's some long overdue treasure for the invaluable and ongoing amygdala mitigation that you two provide.

I've also been out hitting people in the mouth on the regular.

Which hit them closer to the middle.

I often listen to the best podcasts in the universe while on my runs.

And the combination of

M5M deconstruction and a good physical workout is something I highly recommend.

Not uncommon for me to burst out in laughter as I'm running down the path.

Yeah, that's a great idea.

It looks looks like somebody falling with a butterfly net.

So, if anyone seems or sees that they probably think I'm nuts, as part of the treasure, I'd like to specifically recognize Adam's amazing production.

Oh, there we go.

There we go.

Thank you.

It's about time.

Yeah.

The technical part is amazing, but the wisdom, wit, and humor are next level.

Boom!

One that stands out in the quite recent episode, 1796,

when JCD says, this guy, I think it's the AL Hunt.

No, Al Hunt.

I think it's the L.

Oh, AI.

Every time I see

Al, I'd now say AI.

It's the Al Hunt in his name.

I'm not absolutely sure.

I can't remember.

I sure can't remember.

And Adam

instantly mutters, yeah, Mike's brother without hesitation.

Absolutely fantastic.

You didn't catch that one.

A lot of people caught that.

It was one of those little Easter eggs I slipped in.

Yeah, yeah, I do them all the time, too.

Yeah, but I feel that.

Yes, sure.

On a more serious note, I could feel the weight of the Charlie Kirk assassination in the first segment of episode 1798.

I'm still deeply saddened and also sick of it all.

So, as you aptly put it, Adam, it makes me even more grateful for your faith, your voice, and also for the two of you having been able to deconstruct and try to make sense of it all.

By the way, these lines are too long.

There's not enough letting, and typeface could be up at two points.

No jingles, no karma, but prayers for all, Sir Saba the Silver Valley.

Okay, yes, complaints, complaints, galore.

And Franny Knutson, Knutson, Knutson, 333.31.

Also, a note, the final note that we have.

Dear John and Adam, with 333.31.

No, hold on.

That's the wrong one.

Here it is, 333.31.

Hi, guys.

With this added donation, I would like to take the title, Dame Freefree of South Florida.

Donate, people, and while you're at it, support Turning Point USA for the future of this amazing country.

I beg of you.

Thank you for your courage.

I hope this note finds you well.

It says Dame Free Free.

Oh, very nice.

Thank you, Dame Freefree.

And we're with Brandon Johnson in East

Hadam, Connecticut, 333.00.

Dear John, Adam is not a crackpot on British puppeteering.

You're also correct about us having the hating.

Oh, us hating.

Jeez.

Hating.

If I can clear the frog in my throat.

hating the British.

They infiltrated our education system and revised our books and curriculum so that would not be, so we would not be on guard against them.

Yes, I've pointed that out because of the older Pearson.

That's Pearson.

Pearson, the publishing company Pearson.

This is a British company that does a lot of our educational material.

Pearson.

Yeah, that's been going on, though, since World War II.

I know.

Well, hello.

And then we have Agent 99 in LaGrange, Texas.

I've been to LaGrange.

I interviewed ZZ Topp in LaGrange, Texas.

It's not LaGrange.

It's not LaGrange.

It's LaGrange.

I interviewed ZZ Top there in 1985, I think.

Did you have beers then?

Except for Frank Beard.

They certainly did.

And they were all alive, and now we've lost one.

$2.10 and $60.

Was that in 1985?

I think so, yeah.

It was the Sharp Dressed Men.

It was the Eliminator album.

Sharp Dressed Men.

Yeah, I heard of him.

I'll forgo all the other things I said.

Thanks for providing media media deconstruction and demonstrating the mission of independent podcasting.

Well, podcasting was never, you know, I take issue with the podcast industrial complex saying, oh, yeah, we need more respect for the indie podcasters.

Screw you, podcast industrial complex.

Well, because if you're not, you know, trying desperately to be at the top of the iTunes chart and trying to make Joe Rogan money, then you're an indie.

You're an indie pod.

No, we're podcasters.

We were here from the beginning.

You are the infiltrators.

Podcasting was always meant to be independent of anything.

And you're now all captured, captured by running after downloads, which are phony.

And you're phoning your download numbers for money.

You're phoning.

And I hope you sleep poorly from it.

Really going to get sick from the vitamins.

That too.

All right, Eli the coffee guy's up and he came in with 209.25, which is the date.

Fall is finally here.

Enjoy the last gasp of warm weather.

Actually,

here where we are, now the warm weather begins.

In fact, it was like 99 yesterday, the first day of fall.

Oh, no, it was really hot.

It's 80s here.

It's 80s now for us.

It's beautiful.

This is the best.

This is the time.

It gets warm.

It stays warm through November.

Finally.

I still have green grass.

It's never happened since I've been in Texas that you have green grass throughout the entire summer.

It has been beautiful.

Go climate change.

Global warming.

Go climate change.

I love it.

And take the opportunity to visit your local farmer's market.

The harvest is in, so there's a wide selection of things available.

Support farmers and other small businessmen in your community today.

He sells there too, by the way.

At least in Illinois, I think.

If you don't have a market

or are short a local coffee roaster, we got you covered.

Gigawatt has some of the best coffees you've ever had at a great price.

So visit gigawattcoffee roasters.com and use code ITM20 for 20% off your order.

And by the way, we don't fake the fact that we drink this stuff.

We drink it.

We drink the stuff.

We actually drink it.

And it's improved my health.

Snake affinity.

My libido is really coffee up.

My libido is up.

I'm telling you.

Gigawatt Coffee Roasters.

It'll get you laid, people.

William Lankford is in Negany, Negany, Negany, Michigan.

I think it's Nagoni, it looks like to me.

Maybe Nagoni.

$200, Associate Executive Producer Credit for not for you, William, but

Switcheroo for Marge Langford.

That's Marge with a J.

Happy birthday, my love, my lust, my passion flower, my little chickadee, et cetera, et cetera.

I wonder what he did.

Wow, you're in big trouble, bro.

Okay, we hope that helped.

We hope that helps.

Oh, Linda Lou Patkin's up.

She's in Lakewood, Colorado.

She's in Lakewood, Colorado.

200 bucks.

Jobs Karma for

competitive edge she writes.

With a resume that gets results, go to imagemakersinc.com for all of your executive resume and job search needs.

That's ImageMakers Inc.

with a K.

And work with Linda Liu, Duchess of Jobs and writer of winning Resumes.

Now, unlike Gigawatt Coffee, we have not abused Linda Lu Patkin's product, and we hope to have a lot of.

No, but I have a test out there.

She's working with Brennan.

Oh, oh, oh.

And we'll see what happens.

Oh, guaranteed success.

When did she start?

How long ago?

About a month ago or so.

Okay.

Oh, I'm very excited to see how that goes.

Awesome.

Well, thank you, Linda and your fellow associate executive producers and the executive producers for episode 1801, 18 years of podcasting of indie podcasting.

We'll be celebrating that in October.

And of course, these titles are real, except at anywhere where podcast titles are recognized, or any Hollywood titles for that matter.

And we'll be thanking the rest of our supporters $50 and above in our second segment.

I got to give Linda her jobs, karma.

Jobs, jobs, jobs, and jobs.

Let's vote for jobs.

You jobs, karma.

Support the No Agenda Show with your value in return for the value, go to noagendadonations.com.

Our formula is this.

We go out, we hit people in the mouth.

Get us through.

Orders.

Order.

Shut up slaves.

Shut up, slave.

Uh, NetNed says JCD has a right.

Negany.

Negani.

Negany is how I should have pronounced that.

Thank you.

I'm I'm very appreciative of the pronunciation correction.

Negany, negany.

Very good.

Let's see.

Well, we got that note about Charlie Kirk, and

I think we have a, you know, we had TDS, Trump derangement syndrome.

Now we have CDS, which I think is a new thing we can categorize.

CDS is Christian derangement syndrome.

This is Tina Nguyen on MSNBC, and it's obvious I'm a Christian nationalist.

What you are seeing here is a movement called Christian Nationalism that merges Christianity as it's been practiced in America for centuries with a very specific interpretation of what the founding fathers wanted, what Aristotle wanted, going all the way back to the ancients.

You saw Larry Arne, who is the president of Hillsdale College and a proponent of this strain of interpretation of the Bible, Bible, merged Christianity and protecting the Western civilization values into one and the same thing.

It's a very somewhat convoluted argument, but if you distill it into the right talking points, it really hits you in the patriotic heart area, as it were.

Well, I learned something.

What's that?

I didn't know that Aristotle was a Christian.

I think Aristotle got burned at the stake, didn't he?

Or poisoned by Hemlock or something, hard to say.

I can't remember.

But the thing is, he wasn't a Christian.

What is she talking about?

Well, this is so the idea here, and this is what was evident at the Charlie Kirk Memorial.

I know you didn't watch it, but I did.

Is that the country was founded, the founders, the signers of the Declaration of Independence,

many of them were Bible scholars.

And the MSNBC can't open a history book to see the truth of what the nation was founded on.

Like Sam Adams said, suppose a nation in some distant region would take the Bible for their only law book, and every member should regulate this conduct by precepts that are exhibited.

What a utopia.

What a paradise this region would be.

The Bible is the best book in the world.

He signed the Declaration of Independence.

I mean, it goes on and on and on.

All of these guys were all about the Bible.

But now, MSNBC is like, this is some weird books.

But there are a bunch of atheists over at NBC.

I don't know why you're obsessed with this.

This is like my TikTok videos to you.

Now,

I will say this: I had a history professor at Cal,

a very famous one who won the National Book Award that year with the book that he just came out with, which was a white over black, a

famous book.

White over black.

Yeah, white over black.

It was about

pre-Civil War race relations.

And

he said that if you're going to study American history, you should read the Bible

because you won't get it otherwise.

And he wasn't like a Bible thumper.

No.

Like you.

So let me just get this right.

My talking about my faith and the Bible irritates you in the same manner that your TikTok videos irritate me?

No.

That's what I thought I heard you say.

Do my TikTok videos irritate you?

Yeah, they kind of do.

But I put up with it because I love you.

Well, there you go.

Same thing.

Okay.

Oh, they're good to go then.

Now that we have that straight, let's

go to

we have Comey

Comey.

Yeah.

You're going to arrest this guy.

I'm looking at it right now.

This is sealed indictment.

What?

It's sealed?

Joe DeGenovo was right.

Finally, a sealed indictment.

No,

let's do this.

This is the, I think, now we've been through this in the lifetime of this show.

I want to say

15 to 20 times.

We're going to shut down the government.

It actually did happen once.

Yeah, I've got clips on it.

Well,

I think it happened more than once during the 18 years.

Well, give me your clips.

What do you got?

I got one clip.

Well, this is the bull crap.

I mean, this bothers me more than anything.

More than me reading the Bible.

No, you can read the Bible.

It's better than this.

It's this.

It's the non-first of all, they passed a big, beautiful bill.

I was convinced.

Oh, no, that's for 2026.

So we got the government checkout.

Here's the boring old story.

This goes on.

You're right.

We've talked about this to excess

every year or two.

This is government shutdown one.

This is the NPR report.

Congress has less than a week until federal funding runs out.

If lawmakers cannot come to an agreement by Tuesday, there could be no funding for federal services.

Let's get an update now from NPR congressional correspondent Deirdre Walsh.

Hi, Deirdre.

Hey, Scott.

Hey, Scott.

So the deadline is coming up next week.

For the Republicans controlling the House and the Senate, what are they proposing to avoid a shutdown?

Well, they're pushing a bill that would continue the current levels of funding for federal agencies for seven weeks through November 21st.

The House narrowly passed that proposal last Friday, but it didn't have enough votes to advance in the Senate.

All right.

So what is happening on the Democratic side, specifically Democrats in the Senate?

They have their own plan, yeah?

Right.

Democrats did

roll out their own proposal last week.

It advanced current levels of funding through October 31st, but it also attached several health care provisions to it.

Democrats want to extend subsidies for the Affordable Care Act that help middle-class, working-class people buy health care, make it more affordable.

They want to extend those.

Those are due to expire at the end of December.

They also want to roll back a lot of the Medicaid provisions that were sort of the core of the Republican tax bill that the president signed back in July.

Republicans have said that proposal is a non-starter.

Initially, the president agreed to meet with the two top Democrats, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, tomorrow.

But he abruptly canceled that meeting yesterday.

And he called these demands unserious and said a meeting with Democrats at this point would be sort of non-starters.

So we're really at a stalemate and there's no negotiations going on.

Yeah.

No negotiations.

So, first of all,

the Medicaid thing is a scam.

It's only to provide more free medical care for illegal aliens.

Yes, and in fact.

So we know that's a bullcrap.

But the other thing is when they say they want to make the Affordable Health Care Act affordable.

Wait, I thought it was affordable.

It's called affordable.

It's anything but.

We went off of our insurance because we literally could not afford it.

I mean, you're lucky because you're over 65.

Yeah.

I mean, literally.

Oh, one

advantage.

Well, I'll say lucky in the air quotes.

But I mean, yeah, we were looking at like $5,000 a month with an $8,000 deductible.

Are you kidding me now?

And so we got, you know, crowd health.

But it says affordable in the name.

Yeah.

Oh, yeah.

It's so affordable.

You get a bronze, a bronze.

No, no Cadillac plan for us.

Bronze with three wheels and no hubcaps.

It's not affordable and it's lame.

It's useless.

And you got to fight everything.

Yeah, you do have to fight everything.

Yeah.

Yeah.

There's part two.

So, Deirdre, and we've asked you this before: if there's no spending approved by October 1st, the government shuts down in practical terms.

What does it mean for, say, federal services, for federal workers?

Right.

In terms of federal services,

some functions of the federal government are deemed essential.

Things like border protection, the Social Security

program, its mandatory spending.

So, those Social Security checks would still go out if there was a shutdown.

Defense programs, border security programs would continue, airport security would continue.

But federal workers,

you know, a lot of them will be furloughed and they won't be getting paid.

There was a law that was passed back in 2019 that ensures back pay for federal workers, but it's unclear how long a shutdown could last.

And in the past, we've seen TSA agents who weren't getting paid not show up for work, and there were delays at airports.

Yeah, there have

been more than a dozen partial shutdowns over the past four decades.

I guess this time...

Is it unusual that the two sides are not really negotiating?

I mean, we're a week before.

Sometimes things happen very quickly, right ahead of the deadline.

You know, Congress can work quickly when they're up against a deadline.

But this time, the two sides are really far apart and very dug in.

It seems very likely that we are headed towards a shutdown and sort of unclear what it will take to get out of it.

And, you know, I think right now we're sort of in the middle of a messaging war that could go on for some time.

Well, I've got some.

Well, hold on a second.

Who are, you know, the only reason this is happening is because there's a couple of Republicans in the Senate that are voting no.

Who are they?

Why don't they tell us who they are?

Well, hold on a second.

That's not true.

I think you're wrong on that.

This needs a supermajority.

This needs 60 votes in this.

I don't know that it does.

I don't think so.

I do because I have the CBS report.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is speaking out this afternoon after President Trump canceled an Oval Office meeting with Democrats.

And this was to discuss the looming government shutdown set to start one week from tomorrow if no deal is reached.

It's clear that Donald Trump and House Republicans and Senate Republicans are running scared,

Which is why

they refuse to even sit down and have a conversation

to discuss the Republican government shutdown and the health care crisis that is going to cause people in the United States of America to die.

We're all going to die!

And for more on this, CBS News congressional correspondent Caitlin Huey Burns joins us now from our Washington Bureau.

Caitlin, very good to see you here.

Can you talk about what stood out to you in that press conference and how much weight do his words have at this point?

Hey, Nancy, it's great to see you.

Well, in just over a week, the government is poised to shut down if there can't be a deal reached to move forward with funding the government.

And what is on the table right now is something that passed the House of Representatives with Republican support.

It's now over in the Senate side, and it's just essentially an extension of current government funding for the next seven weeks or so, and also includes new security funding for members of Congress in light of the Charlie Kirk shooting.

Democrats, however, want to use this as a point of leverage.

Now, you may think, don't Republicans control the House and the Senate?

That's true, they do.

But in the Senate, they have to get 60 votes.

Republicans don't have 60 votes to pass something, and so they're going to need support from Democrats to get any of this through.

And so Democrats are using this as a point to say, this is what we want out of this if we're going to give you these votes.

Yeah, and notice the subtle, not so subtle, this is a Republican shutdown.

Okay.

You know, at some point, I believe the American people will get tired of this.

However, I will equally say, just looking at TikTok and Instagram, you are so right that

people

who have a different media diet, and that includes podcasts, they really believe these things.

They really, truly, honestly believe these things.

They believe Charlie Kirk was a racist and that it's actually, you know, he said in order to protect our Second Amendment, some people got to die.

So that's, there you go.

And every report, every single report has cut out the trans question just before he got shot.

That is the most dishonest thing I think the media has done in a long time.

Where it just sounds like he's talking about gun violence and not trans gun violence.

And so people don't know.

And what they don't know, they don't know.

You know, the people who were yelling that Trump's going to take away

my disability, taking away my social security, taking away my Medicare, hasn't happened to anybody.

But they still just believe it.

And,

you know, maybe they should be taking more Tylenol.

I don't know.

I think these problems will solve themselves.

They won't be making more babies.

They're taking Tylenol, so they'll kill everything they got.

It's going to be a bunch of blithering idiots running around.

It'll take a generation.

We're going to have to sit through it and watch it, but maybe

we'll emerge victorious and a better country for it.

That sounded kind of dark.

Well, that's a depressing

piece of analysis.

Well, what?

Hey, I live in Fredericksburg.

Everybody's pretty happy here.

We're just worried about the Trump gold card.

That's all we're really concerned with here.

And the grid going down.

The grid's going down any minute.

And actually,

today, the rapture is supposed to start today.

No, it was yesterday.

I thought it was the 25th.

My understanding, it was like either yesterday or the day before, according to the maniac in South Africa.

This happens all the time.

There's some guy gets a vision.

Next thing you know, he's talking about this happening.

It never happens.

I wonder why.

How about this clip?

A little bit offbeat, but something

worth talking about.

This is the.

Where is this thing?

I just had it.

I don't know.

You know, you talk about the.

There it is.

Fake Ali Boo-Boo.

Or Al Boo Boo.

You know, the Boo-Boo dolls?

Have you heard about these?

Are you there?

Oops.

I wanted to see how you would respond if I got raptured.

Oh, that would take a while.

And I'm not expecting that, so I'm not worried about it.

Don't worry.

Eventually.

Maybe the dog.

Yes,

the boo-boo.

The boo-boo dolls.

Yes, I'm very familiar with

the,

I think it's luboo boo, not al-boo boo, but

al-boo boo sounds like like maybe the Middle Eastern version.

UK border officials have seized nearly $4 million worth of fake toys this year, most of which were copies of the highly popular Labooboo dolls.

More details from Charlotte Edwards.

Research for the Intellectual Property Office found that nearly half of the people who purchased counterfeit toys reported problems, ranging from toys breaking to unsafe labeling, toxic smells, and even reports of illness in children.

75% of fake toys seized this year failed safety tests.

Experts testing the goods found banned chemicals linked to cancer and choking hazards.

Despite the dangers of fake toys, shoppers suggest cost remains the biggest driver when deciding what to buy.

Only 27% considered the product safety.

You know, can we short these dolls?

It would be great to short them.

I mean, we should be able to make money on the way down.

I don't know.

I mean,

these dolls are horrible.

But it's like garbage pail dolls and, you know, laughing Elmo or Tickle Me or whatever the hell it was.

Furbies.

Yeah, all of it.

Furby, that was a big deal.

For her, these things become fattish and they catch on, and then the Chinese or some, or the Koreans, it could be either one,

make copies of them and they flood the market with them, which is probably good.

It's just a sad state of affairs.

And then they go on about, oh, they're unsafe.

Why?

What?

They're toxic.

What?

Were the kids eating the dolls now?

What's going on?

There was

a hilarious moment with

former vice president Kamala Harris doing the rounds for her book, 100.

Oh, yes, if people haven't caught her on the

Rachel Maddow show.

On the circuit, yes, she's on the Rachel Maddow show,

talking about gays, which was funny.

Here we go.

I wonder if his reaction to that since this part of the book has come out, if you've had any reflection on that, or

I guess I'd ask you to just elaborate on that a little bit.

It's hard to hear

with you running as, you know, you're the first woman elected vice president, you're a black woman and a South Asian woman

elected to that high office, very nearly elected president.

To say that he couldn't be on the ticket effectively because he was gay is hard to hear.

No, no, no, that's not what I said.

No, no, no.

That's not what I said.

That's that he couldn't be on the ticket.

That's exactly what she said

because he is gay.

My point, as I write in the book, is

that

I was clear that in 107 days, in one of the most

hotly contested elections for President of the United States, against someone like Donald Trump who knows no floor.

See, now this is interesting.

I don't know if people caught this, but she is basically saying that against Trump, he would just make fun of him for being gay, would say that gay people have no place in American government and that she's a black woman who isn't a black woman and he has no floor.

He's a horrible, horrible man.

To be a black woman running for president of the United States and as a vice presidential running mate, who's gay.

A gay man

with the stakes being so high,

it made me very sad, but I also realized it would be a real risk.

Because the American people wouldn't want to vote for that ticket?

Are you now saying the American people wouldn't accept accept you, Ms.

Harris?

Is that what you're saying?

No matter how, you know, I've been an advocate and an ally.

I'm an ally.

Oh, I'm an ally.

You know me.

I love the gays.

Of the LGBT community my entire life.

So it wasn't about, it wasn't about, yeah, right.

So it wasn't about any prejudice on my part.

No.

We had such a short period of time.

So people could understand that a gay man can do it.

It's okay.

Gays are the same.

You know, I didn't have time to explain that.

And the stakes were so high.

I think Pete is a phenomenal, phenomenal public servant.

And I think America is and would be ready for that.

But I need more days.

But when I had to make that decision with two weeks to go.

Two weeks.

You know, and maybe I was being too cautious.

You know, I'll let our friends, we should all talk about that.

Maybe I was.

But that's the decision I made.

And I'm, and I, as with everything else in the book, I'm being very candid about that.

Yeah.

With a great deal of sadness about also

the fact that it might have been a risk.

It might have been a risk.

I'm so sad.

What a horrible woman.

She's horrible.

These are great.

This is what identity politics gets you.

It's like, oh, well, you know, I can't choose him because he's gay, even though I want all the gays to vote for me.

And then, you know, well, you know, hey, I didn't have a choice because he's gay.

I mean, this is.

I know it's classic.

It's so sad.

And of course, great choice.

How'd you do with Waltz?

That really worked.

Who is more gay?

Probably.

Like, we didn't care.

We cared that he's a nut job and that you're insincere and can't speak.

And you drink a lot, we think.

It sure seems like.

Well, that's what everybody thinks.

Sure, seems like so.

She threw everybody under the bus.

She said, in the book, she says, well, I got to get

a PDF of this book.

Why don't you just go and buy it?

If you can still get it, because it's a hot book, it's hard to get now.

It's hard to get a copy.

Yeah, sure.

According to Rachel.

It's going to sell a gajillion copy, she said.

Rachel should be incensed.

Yes, of course.

She should be incensed, but no, she can't quite be incensed.

She should have said, as a gay man myself, I'm very incensed.

Exactly what she should have said.

So

she's gone off and she's thrown everyone out.

She threw Shapiro under the bus for being vain.

She threw her running mate under the bus for being fat.

She says he's fat.

Now I need to buy the book.

This sounds like a doozy.

According, you know,

Jesse Waters likes to read from the book because he thinks it's a great book because it's all gossip.

Tell me you have a clip.

No,

I didn't get a clip, but he's reading, just reads randomly from the book, and it's all nasty gossip about this and that.

It sounds entertaining if you're, you know, and it looks like a short read.

Is it big type?

Big type.

Yeah.

So, no, I don't have any clips of anything.

She's been floating around.

She's here and there.

She went down the view, and they asked her about her screw-up on the view.

And she says, I don't think that hurt my campaign.

And she says, I didn't think there was any.

You know, I thought I didn't have to answer that question because everyone knew there was a difference between me and Bite, and they could just look.

It was obvious.

Yes.

Wonderful.

All right.

You got one last clip?

Take us out here, Johnny Boy.

Well, let's see what we have.

We have the,

if it gets one last good clip.

Well,

I have one that I can make some comments on, which I think it'd be good, which is the Newsday.

Now, this is a teaser

from

BBC,

the BBC show Newsday, and I want to comment on the teaser and then we can leave.

News, and welcome to Newsday on the BBC World Service with James Kopnall and Catherine Byarahanga.

In the programme today, China sets its first ever target to reduce carbon emissions, a major step in the fight against global warming.

Ah, that was part of my other presentation where I bitch and moan and complain about.

So let's not play that as the last clip.

Doesn't work.

Whoa.

I'm just going to play a clip and let it.

I'm going to play a clip and let it stand.

Almost.

I got to do my epic fail.

There we go.

Okay.

Epic fail.

It was an epic fail, I agree.

Yeah, yeah, totally.

So I want to play.

This is a standalone.

This is from

Carl Reiner was on with Bill Maher

on his podcast.

Okay.

And this came up in the conversation, and I'm just going to play it and let it stand.

And then, you know, maybe after the show, we can talk about it.

But I found this to be a very peculiar exchange.

And what clip is this?

Oh, Danny Thomas.

Groom for daddy.

Call me daddy podcast.

Call me.

Oh, well, that's a big

groom for daddy kids.

Danny Thomas.

And we don't want to go there.

And if you don't remember all in the family, you really

remember that show.

You're going to remember me.

Groom for daddy.

Was your father friends with Danny Thomas?

Oh, yeah.

Danny Thomas was friends with me.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Danny Thomas and his production company and Sheldon Lemon produced the Dick Van Dyke show, which was my dad's show.

Of course.

Did you know Danny Thomas?

Oh, yeah, yeah.

I mean, I was friends with, you know, I mean, Marlowe.

I'm friends with, you know, Tony Thomas

dated my sister in high school and stuff like that.

Yeah.

Was that true?

The rumor that always went around about Danny that he was a plate man?

You know, I don't want to go there, Bill, because

I don't have hard evidence or loose evidence.

Or evidence that

makes you hard, certainly.

Okay.

Okay, but that was always the rumor.

Yeah, who knows?

You know, he had, you know, he was.

Back then,

Jerry Lewis, I mean, all those guys, it was a different era.

People were weirdos.

Yeah.

A plate man?

Yeah.

That took a little research.

I'm going to show my support by donating to No Agenda.

Imagine all the people who could do this.

Oh, yeah, that'd be fabulous.

Yeah,

on no agenda

in the morning.

The answer to these questions and many more will be not be answered today on the No Agenda.

Yeah, you can do your own research.

Do your own research on the definition of plate man.

And you can do that.

I would say your best bet if you wanted to do this research, which I don't recommend.

Urban dictionary?

No.

Curiously, no.

Okay.

Grok.

Grok?

Really?

Yeah, I know.

It had me buffaloed until I finally went through.

Grok.

Hey, Grok.

What is a plate man?

No, don't, no, no, no.

No, here we go with it.

We got it.

Ah, Plankman.

She says Plank Man.

All right.

All right.

Never mind.

John is going to give us the

names and amounts that our supporters, Value for Value, have supported us with for today's show.

$50 and

first,

I want to thank Cassandra Fair, F-E-H-R.

She's in Texas, one of the Texas women.

Okay.

For sending me

two exact same packages with different items inside, plus the $100 check, which was mentioned in the last show, I believe.

And I didn't mention,

I put it aside to mention the stuff she did.

She sent me some jokes that were carefully packaged, and a couple of bottles of Colgin,

including the

hickory smoke, but also the rare mesquite smoke.

Colgan.

I think it was some sort of a, you know, she's Texas, so the mesquite.

But she sent these, she sent a lot, a couple of things, and it was, it was

signaling to me that this is what, this is one of the, I've only run into a few women like this.

She sent a package of gags that were in envelopes, and they were exactly, it was just unbelievable.

The packaging and everything, including the boxes she sent everything in, was, you have to just say it was precise.

Okay.

And I've only run, and I can't even explain what that means, but I can tell you this.

If you find a woman who's precise, you want to keep her.

No, she wants to go into sales.

The most successful women I've ever run into are in sales, and they all exhibit these qualities.

I don't know if you want to keep her because precise women are precise.

I think they're probably great wives.

It probably for a slob like me, it might be a good idea.

But

I'm just as a recommendation to the women out there that are this way.

Go and go, Sales, plastics is for you.

You will make so much money, and I can't explain all the details of why I know this, but it's a fact.

Anyway, I want to thank her for this, for the cute stuff she sent.

Now, we go on to thank people like Dame Rita in Sparks, Nevada, who came with 109.25, and she's at the top of the list again.

Jessica Beeson in Houston, Texas, 105.35, and got a birthday shout out to

Kim, keep her the nutty fluffers once again.

She's getting a lot of attention.

Well, and well deserved.

Yeah, it's after sending us a show donation.

Sir Sean of KDH in Moyok, North Carolina, 105.35.

Thomas Key in Lansing, Kansas, 105.35.

Ian Field, 100.

Anonymous in Miami, Florida, 100.

Kevin McLaughlin, there he is, 8008.

He's the Archduke Luna, lover of America, lover of melons.

Carrie Rosenbarker in Fayetteville, North Carolina.

I was listening to a recent episode, and I agree with Adam.

It is freedom of speech.

Brother.

Yeah, the constitutional lawyer checked in on that as well because I said, you know, what do you think?

And here's what he said.

He said,

at the risk of alienating you,

the term free speech.

Alienating me?

No, you.

Me.

The term free speech has never bothered me personally.

Yeah, it never bothered me either.

It bothers me to no end because I'm telling you what's going to happen is free speech will be something that the government can control.

You watch, it's going to happen.

Film at 11.

Very good.

That is, I would say that's Fredericksburg talking.

You just, no, that's Adam Curry talking.

Fredericksburg is talking about.

Nicholas Leary in Columbus, Ohio, 7272.

Matthew Elwert

in Weatherford, Texas, 6006, along with Dame Liberty Mom in Vista, California, 6006.

Aaron Newberry in Littleton, Colorado, 5809.

Dame J of the Angry Clouds for its Unknown, 5110.

Mart, Mart, Mart, Matt,

Bolke

in Minnetonka, Minnesota, 5272.

Matthew Dropko, hey, there he is.

Elria.

I don't know how to pronounce that.

He's in Ohio, 50.53, and his 53rd birthday is coming up.

He's on the list.

Today.

Yes.

Forrest Martin, 5005.

And now we have the $50 donors, and there's not a lot of them, but we have them.

Starting with Alex Delgado in Aptos, Melissa Alvarez in Pontavedra Beach, Florida.

Brett Denton in Boise, Idaho.

Jacqueline Connolly in Green Bay.

Go

somebody.

Packers.

Packers.

I don't think they're going to make it.

George Wushett in Lavernia, Texas.

Sir Gregg in Newport, North Carolina.

Michael Myers in...

or Mayers, I guess.

Mayers or Myers, one of the two in Mandeville, Louisiana.

And then Parts Unknown,

Ox Utherix,

which doesn't sound like a real name to me.

These are all $50 donors, and they're all contributors to the show 1802.

Yes, thank you all very much.

And thank you again to our executive and associate executive producers.

If you're looking, by the way, go to Grok and you might want to try Plate Man or Plater, and you will find the true meaning.

I don't know why you're so concerned about telling people what that is.

Well, I don't like to sit here and besmirch people.

Well, then it's just a rumor.

But they started it.

They're the ones that talked about it.

And why would they know this very obscure term unless they might be plate men themselves, is my question.

Yeah, exactly.

Noagendadonations.com.

Go there, support the show value for value.

You can now walk around the office and say, hey, what are you?

A plate man or something?

People go, what is that?

Well, you know, if you only listen to the best podcast in the universe, you know exactly what that is.

Know what I'm saying, Son, Noahgendadonations.com.

It's a birthday birthday.

Oh, noah.

Jane Patricia wishes her son Brian Lewis a happy belated birthday.

He celebrated on the 20th.

Sarah and Cora and Jessica Beeson, and they said happy birthday to Kim, the keeper of the nutty fluffers.

We know her birthday was on the 22nd.

Matthew Dropko turns 53 today.

Sir Tommy Hawk, happy birthday to his son Nolan, who turns 19.

And William Langford, happy birthday to Mars.

And he gave her her a switcheroo for her birthday and we say happy birthday from everybody here at the best podcast in the universe

and we do have one secretary general to congratulate and we're going to get him out here now and prepare for his coming

Yes, we do actually need a new jingle because, of course, the plural of Secretary General is Secretaries General, but that makes it that much more fun.

You have something to complain about.

We congratulate Sir Tommy Hawk, who today supported the show with $500.

That makes him an automatic Secretary General, and he becomes Secretary General of the Heartland.

Congratulations to you!

All hail to the Secretary Generals, because they are the ones who need hailing.

All hail to the secretary generals on the no agenda show.

That's right.

Go to noagendarings.com.

People really want to see what those certificates look like, John.

How's Joe doing?

We finally got everything in order to start shipping.

I am excited.

I'm excited.

So somebody complained about the Secretary's general.

Am I hearing that right?

Yeah, I'm sorry.

I was letting the dog out of the studio.

Oh, I thought you were on the rapture.

I was raptured again.

Yes,

it's correct.

We've moaned about it when we hear someone do something incorrect, and here we are doing it ourselves.

The plural of Secretary General is Secretary's General, not Secretary's General.

Now, is that true if it's a hyphenated word?

It's Secretary-General.

Would that be true in that circumstance?

Is there any grammarian out there?

Answer that question for us.

Well, it is, of course, because the general describes the Secretary, so it would be the plural would be secretary's general.

I'm quite sure that's correct.

No, I'm sure that's correct if it's not hyphenated.

People are still looking up plate man.

They don't care about secretary general

at all.

At all, at all, at all.

Hey, we got a dame to welcome up onto the podium.

If you could bring out your sword, please.

Here you go.

Very good.

Franny8.

Hey, Franny, Franny Knutson.

Thank you very much for supporting the No Agenda Show, the best podcast in the universe, in the amount of $1,000.

And hereby, I'm very proud to pronounce the Kate the as

Dame Freefree of South Florida.

That's right, and we have some goodies at the table here for you.

We got Hookers and Blow, Rent Boys, and Chardonnay.

We got Harlots and Haldol, pepperoni rolls and pale ales, redheads and rice, beers and blunts, cowgirls and coffee varnish.

It's coffee and varnish, not coffee.

Rubinesse, Louis and Rose, gases and sake, vodka, vanilla, bunghits, and bourbon, sparkling cider, and escorts, ginger ale and gerbils, breast milk, and pablum.

It's very male-oriented, this list.

And, of course, some mutton and meat.

We need something for the dames.

I need to add a few things to the roundtable.

Yes, yeah, but that's.

And Chardonnay, that's.

Yes, yes.

But, you know, we got bong hits and bourbon.

Oh, that's pretty good.

Yeah, I guess it's pretty even.

But if the women need to ask for what they want.

And so now we have a brand new dame at the roundtable, Dame Freefree of South Florida.

Welcome to the roundtable.

Go to knowagenda rings.com.

There you'll see your very svelte-looking dame ring.

All we need is your ring size.

There's a handy ring size guide on the website and tell us where to send it.

And thank you very much for supporting the best podcast in the universe.

A couple of meetups happening this week.

Saturday, the Fort Wayne 3rd Annual Club 33 meetup.

That'll be at noon Eastern in Cebala's Mexican Grill in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

And next show day on Sunday, two meetups.

We have the Indiana Tribal Welcome Back Meetup.

That's right.

We've got Dame Maria and Sir Mark returning from the European trip.

And of course, he was injured.

So we need some pictures to see that he's really there and okay.

And we love the meetups we get from this.

Like 150 to 200 people show up to those.

Blind Owl Brewery, Indianapolis, Indiana, 3 o'clock on Sunday.

And also on Sunday, meetup number 67 of the Flight of the No Agendas.

That's Leo Bravo at El Cholo Restaurant this time in Los Angeles, California.

Many more meetups coming, including the October 11th extravaganza in Fredericksburg, Texas.

Many luminaries will be there from the

Fredericksburg, Texas, San Antonio area.

Come join us there.

I'll be there along with the keeper.

That's the No Agenda Fredericksburg, Texas meetup, October 11th.

Go see all of them.

Find everything that

is a meetup near you, around the world, actually, at noagendametups.com.

If you can't find one near you, there's a solution to that problem.

Start one yourself.

Noagendameetups.com.

Always a party.

Sometimes you wanna go hang out with all the nights and days.

You to be where you won't be triggered on hell lame.

You to be where everybody feels the same.

It's like a party.

And before we get to John's tip of the day and some brilliant end of show mixes that are not AI, Those are coming up.

I'm very excited about those.

Whenever they're not AI, we need more of your mixes, please, people.

End of show mixes.

Play them at the beginning for the pre-show as well.

We always like.

Before Adam starts making them with AI.

Oh, that's going to happen.

That's going to happen.

See, that's a threat.

It is a threat.

Clip collector Steve, he said, he gave me a couple of ISOs, and they were Alex Jones ISOs.

And he said, you know, sometimes I find stuff and I clip them from

the Our Big Dirty Mouth podcast, OBDM.

And he says they were complaining that

they weren't getting any credit.

And so I figured those complainers, I'm not going to use them.

They're complaining.

What did we ever use from them?

Well,

we played an ISO and he got them from the OBDM podcast.

And it was just some guy saying good die.

They were only five, ten words.

No, but

they want credit that they found these ISOs.

And

I was not giving anybody credit, but they want credit.

They want credit, man.

They want credit.

For a two-second ISO at the end of the show.

There's no agenda shows, man.

They're ripping us off, man.

All right.

Well, we don't have to use them.

We use AI.

I should say, enjoy our live stream for free, boys.

That's what I would say.

And people are so ungrateful.

We give away everything to this show.

Everything.

All our clips.

People use all kinds of stuff.

Yeah, people steal from us constantly.

And we never credit us.

They steal our clips, they steal our ideas, and they never credit us.

They've stolen all kinds of stuff.

They steal everything.

Our fabulous humor, our banter.

You watch Plate Man become a title somewhere on some show.

You watch.

So I don't have any Alex Jones ISOs.

I do have these, however.

Something's coming next.

Yeah.

Thought that was kind of good.

And I really like this one.

Big government sucks.

That is good.

I like that one a lot.

What do you have?

Let me guess.

Well, I have more that are.

I have more along the lines of the

idea.

Let's start with.

Okay.

Okay.

So 11 labs, I use that.

I admit it.

But they've changed the interface and they've changed, and they've took half my voices away.

And they put a bunch of new voices.

I'd never seen these before.

Because you don't pay for it, you're on the free plan.

Yeah, well, that's your problem.

They're on to you, bro.

It's annoying.

Well, then pay for it.

Pay for your

when I have to pay for it.

Here's the ISO hoist.

Hoist a pint, mates.

Great show again.

Well, that was probably no wonder.

That sucks.

That was no good.

I don't like that one.

Hoist a pint.

Hoist a pint, mates.

Great podcast, as usual.

It's so vanilla, man.

It's vanilla.

This is big government sucks.

Okay, we can use that.

That's what I call an ISO.

Now, nothing's vanilla about John's tip of the day.

Great fast for you and me, just the chicken with JCD,

and sometimes Adam.

Okay, so this is a screwball tip that came about because I,

first of all, Mimi started reading this book, and then I had one of our producers write, are you there?

Any history books I should read?

Because I would lecture about the.

Oh, that guy.

Yeah.

British.

That guy.

I know that.

The British books

are the history changing for the Brits.

And it's a, it's written.

You're going to have to dig this one up, but I'll give a little lecture about the book.

It's one of the greatest books ever written.

Oh.

That very few people probably have read because it was written in 1918, so that kind of limits the exposure.

But it's very readable, it's written in a modern style, so it's not written in some old-fashioned way.

And it's The Decline of the West by Oswald Spengler.

Oh, I think.

Volume one.

I think we've discussed this book.

Yes, we have.

Yeah.

Because

Michael Savage used to promote this book constantly, and he'd always say, Yeah, I remember.

And the reason that we said it because I always got a kick out of the fact that Michael Savage, the erudite intellectual, always said Otto Spengler.

And I think he does to this day.

He thinks the guy is Otto Spenler.

It's Oswald Spengler.

So Oswald Spengler's book, The Decline of the West.

And I would say, before you read the book, read his wiki entry.

It's quite interesting about Spengler.

He's like one of these kind of a super genius.

And this Decline of the West is a two-volume book.

Do not bother with volume two.

Volume two came out about three or four years later, and you could,

as a writer, immediately start reading volume two, and I can hear it in the tone of the book.

It goes like this.

Oh, the publisher made me.

I promised I was going to do a second volume, and I'm going to have to do it, and I'm going to write it.

And this is it right now.

This is the second volume I'm writing.

And it's kind of a rehash of the first volume, but I hate the fact that I have to write this book.

So that's what the second volume is all about.

So forget it.

Just read volume one.

When was this published originally?

This book?

1918.

So you think that the publishers back then were already a-holes?

Back then, they've been a holes.

That's the job, the publisher's job.

There you go.

No a-holes here, though.

That is John's tip of the day.

Create a mask for you and me, just a tip with JCD.

And sometimes Adam.

Created by Dana Bernetti.

I don't know how he did it.

How do we do three and a half hours all of a sudden?

That's too long.

Back off.

It was the plate man thing.

That's what got me all flustered.

Plate man.

Hey, coming up next on the No Agenda stream, it's the Millennial Media Offensive.

Those guys aren't complainers, but they sometimes slip in little Easter eggs.

That was one of the funniest things I've ever heard, by the way.

So, thank you all for.

Thank you all for being here, for joining us for another extravaganza of media deconstruction.

End of show mixes.

We got some good ones.

Nick Heron, Bonald Crabtree.

We've got Agent Cooper.

I think it wants to be called Agent Looper today.

And Jeffrey Crocker.

I incorrectly titled, I credited him as Corker, but it is Crocker.

And

that's it.

Those are the end of show mixes.

We'll be back on Sunday, and we'll bring you more deconstruction of your world and what's going on because most of it that you see on TV is bull crap.

And online, too.

It's all placed there by Plateman.

Coming to you from the heart of the Texas Hill Country, Fredericksburg, Texas.

In the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry.

And from Northern Silicon Valley, where I remain, I'm John C.

Borak.

Remember us at NoahjinThonations.com.

Until next time, Adios, Mofos, a Hooi, Hooey, and such.

Hey there, all you boys and girls, out and get the world.

Listen to the no agenda show.

If you want to know what's really happening,

listen to the no agenda show

in the morning

If you got no agenda in the transgender son I got 33 problems but the soy ain't one He wears him girly clothes on that homo patrol Brought a date to dinner was a migrant from Lowe's Yesterday in the morning punched a fat lady's mouth I told her shut up slave put your mouth on my south If the furry's trying to hurt you I feel bad for your son.

I got 33 warrants, and I'm low on funds.

I am not a fed, turn a furry to a pet, man.

But I'm the spookiest rapper that you ever met.

Matt, if you ain't a chicken, put some curry on that bird.

Noah's arc, neo-gender, no agenda, fool.

You heard 33, pager number 33.

Your freedom of speech is ready.

33, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3.

Put that on your agenda and smoke it, you clank a hoe.

Man, stop the cat.

Stop the cat.

Ladies and gentlemen, it is time to rebelize.

Israeli airstrikes across Gaza City continue.

The situation is deteriorating rapidly for civilians unable to get out of Gaza City.

75% of central water wells have been destroyed or damaged by Israel.

The first phase of urban renewal in the strip was done.

The demolition,

the time to build a real estate bonanza,

was coming.

There's a plan on President Trump's desk.

Palestinians living in the enclave would be moved out, at least temporarily, while billions would be poured in to develop the territory as a tourism resort and high-tech manufacturing hub.

The Riviera of the Middle East.

I don't want to be cute.

I don't want to be a wife's guy, but the Riviera of the Middle East.

Dance, peasants, dance.

Remember when you ran away and I got on my knees and begged you not to leave because I told you, you, sir.

Be quiet!

You left me anyhow, and then the days got worse and worse.

And now you see, I've gone completely out of my mind.

They're coming to take me away, ha ha, they're coming to take me away.

Ha ha!

You thought it was a joke, and so you laughed.

You laughed when I had said that losing you would make me flip my lid.

Right?

You know you laughed.

I heard you laughed.

You laughed.

You laughed and laughed.

And then you left.

But now you know I'm utterly mad.

The best podcast in the universe,

Mofo, Dvorak.org slash n a

big government sucks.