Cook vs. Zuckerberg vs. consumer privacy

Support for this show comes from Nike.

What was your biggest win?

Was it in front of a sold-out stadium or the first time you beat your teammate in practice?

Nike knows winning isn't always done in front of cheering crowds.

Sometimes winning happens in your driveway, on a quiet street at the end of your longest run, or on the blacktop of a pickup game.

Nike is here for all of the wins, big or small.

They provide the gear, you bring the mindset.

Visit Nike.com for more information.

And be sure to follow Nike on Instagram, TikTok, and other social platforms for more great basketball moments.

Say hello to the next generation of Zendesk AI agents, built to deliver resolutions for everyone.

Loved by over 10,000 companies, Zendesk AI agents easily deploy in minutes to resolve 30% of interactions instantly.

That's the Zendesk AI Effect.

Find out more at Zendesk.com.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher, and I'm here in Freezing, D.C., where the government is back up and running for the moment.

And this is Scott Galloway coming to you from the polar vortex of Delray Beach, Florida, where it is 65 degrees.

It's unbearable, Kara.

You know what?

Stop.

It's unbearable.

Don't because people in the Midwest are dying.

Don't make no, no, no, no.

The white walkers are coming.

Not allowed.

I just rode.

Okay, I just rode a scooter here to get here on time.

I rode very fast.

I was leaving the house fast.

You got to stop the scooter thing.

Lovely.

It really did.

I love the scooter thing.

Gotcha.

I wear a helmet.

It's good.

You're going to slip and break a hip.

People our age shouldn't be on scooters.

We shouldn't be on scooters.

You should be home watching murder.

Shake for yourself.

I'm very fit.

No, I am very fit.

I'm very fit.

I do soul cycle.

I had a lovely soul cycle yesterday.

It was great.

I'm very good at it.

You know what I did this morning?

I did CrossFit.

Oh, did you?

Do you like that stuff?

All the internet people love that stuff.

Well, you know how you can tell if someone does CrossFit.

How?

They tell you.

Damage.

They tell you.

It's total sick.

Oh, they tell you.

That's right.

It's like going to Harvard.

Okay.

Yeah, that's right.

There I go.

I went to school in Harvard.

All right.

We got lots of stories this week.

We have so many stories this week.

There are so many.

Let's start.

Like, I know we have to get to Facebook again.

Once again, we had Apple beginning the week by doing something that was not good, by having, it wasn't a bug.

It was a mistake

in the

FaceTime, which caused a lot of people to listen in.

So a privacy snafu, right?

And then they didn't tell about it for a week.

They But they did talk about it.

They did

turn it off.

They did all the things you're supposed to do and that admitted it.

It just took them a long time.

And they're right in the middle of that, also announcing pretty, you know, earnings that people were not thrilled with.

And then Facebook is at it again.

And this time they were caught paying teenagers to collect their data on an app.

And

in doing so, even though they got consent of teenagers, I don't know how that works to start with, they violated Apple's very strict terms of service on the kind of certificate they were, it's called an enterprise certificate.

I'm not going to go into it's technical, but

they were using it in a consumer-facing way.

So Apple shut them down, including internal apps that Facebook uses

on their staff's iPhones.

Like I went on a parking app or cafeteria.

I don't know what apps they're using, but there's a whole bunch of internal apps that these companies use, and now Facebook isn't allowed to use them.

And so Apple pulled all their rights to do that, which was

making Apple sort of the regulator of Facebook.

So what do you think about that?

Let's unpack both of those.

So the first one was the Apple bug, where on Facebook you got to listening to the conversation before people actually answered the phone.

FaceTime.

I'm sorry, FaceTime.

Excuse me.

Thank you.

Not Facebook.

I think it's actually kind of a little bit of a nothing burger.

And the only thing I take away from it is that there's kind of a universal karmic response that when you go on an indignant tour about privacy,

you're going to start violating people's privacy.

It's just, it's sort of.

Yeah.

they kind of had it coming.

I don't think it's a big deal.

I think they fixed it.

I don't, I really, I think it makes for an interesting headline, but I don't, I think

it's a big nothing.

They act appropriately when it happens.

I mean,

that battery thing.

The thing, the fight between,

I mean, the other stuff,

I actually think Facebook, what they, Facebook didn't, as you know, neither of us, I think, are big, huge fans of Facebook.

Companies do this all the time.

And it was about 10% of the people were were teenagers or under the age of 18.

They did get parental consent.

Right, research.

What's more interesting.

No, it's not clear they got parental consent.

Oh, I thought that they've shown that

parents did were, in fact, contacted and that there was a consent flow was the term they use.

I love the terms that Facebook puts out.

But it's not, I don't, I don't know.

They're doing research.

They're doing basic things.

They're not what they do every day.

I don't.

No, no, they all do them.

And Facebook does a lot of it, obviously.

They want a lot of data.

They all do.

Google does them.

What you have is, and what's interesting is that, so the analogy I would use is in the 80s and 90s, if you were black and sold white people marijuana, you got stuck in jail.

And then when you got out, you were on probation, and anything including having pornography on your computer was a reason to put you back in jail.

And that's where Facebook is.

Facebook is on probation.

Nobody believes them.

Everything they do that is slightly questionable, everybody assumes is really malicious and covert and awful.

And this management team has absolutely no credibility.

And everybody always assumes the worst.

And I don't think it's going to end.

But breaking the TOS is not, should we care that they do that?

Because Apple has slapped other companies.

And in fact, had slapped Facebook before for an app they had called Inovo, which was a data collecting app that they had bought many years ago.

And I remember when they did it, I'm like, oh, they're trying to collect data on lots of different app usage.

That's what they're doing it for.

This is the worst celebrity deathmatch.

This is Ollie Frazier turned hall monitor past work between Zuckerberg and Tim Cook.

This is personal.

There's nothing here except two people who hate each other, and they're going after each other and all being indignant.

It's not, so what?

I don't think it's a big story.

I think the backstory here is the Zuck and Tim Cook hate each other, and they're now fighting in public.

Yep.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Which they have been doing.

I got Tim to say those things about Mark on my interview with him this March and March.

And Apple, I mean, Facebook slapped back about it being indignant, Apple for being indignant.

And it just goes on.

But I think it still is getting to that.

There was a really good thing that I tweeted.

It was a thing of what they did.

And when others do it, Apple hits back harder.

And most people feel that Apple didn't hit back hard enough.

Others feel like, wow, this was really sort of screwing up their internal systems was a nice little dig.

But it's very clear, Apple's always been super strict in its app store.

And for Facebook to do a go-around because they didn't like the rules just seems like, I don't know, they can't not like the rules.

They shouldn't operate on the platform.

They can go over and use.

So I think Facebook, I think the more interesting story, Carol, whatever.

And this wasn't in our notes, but I think the most underreported story in tech right now and the bigger deal that no one's talking about is Facebook's integration of their back end among WhatsApp, Instagram, and the core platform, Facebook.

Yes, 100%.

Please go on.

Please keep going.

Okay, so I would like to give Mark Zuckerberg and Cheryl Sandberg broader reach and a more robust platform, said no person ever.

And that's what's going on here.

We have these giant dials.

It's like, if you think about Einstein, I love the Einstein quote.

They said, how will the Third World War be fought with what weapons?

And he said, I don't know, but I know the Fourth World War will be fought with sticks and stones.

And I'm beginning to believe that the Third World War is going to be fought with likes and retweets, that we have figured out a way to create these giant dials that if you put a hand on it, you can create rage.

from one community to another.

And I think that Russians have been able to get their hands on these dials and are literally breaking us apart, these Western democracies.

And I know that that sounds paranoid, but just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean I'm wrong.

What we've done here is we've allowed, we've decided to let Facebook create bigger, bigger dials.

And I know that some politicians listen to this show.

The most important move, I think, long term for the health of the Commonwealth right now would be for either Senators Bennett or Warner or someone from the FTC to basically fire a shot across Facebook's bow and say, look,

if you integrate these three things, be careful.

We can still break your ass up.

And what they're clearly doing is they're trying to create what I would call a Siamese triplets defense.

And they're going to be able to say, look, if you break us up, if you try and separate us, the whole thing's going to die.

And the notion that they're going to have.

He saw this.

100%.

And also the guys

and the guys at WhatsApp.

The guys who knew what was going on were disturbed by this.

And yet nobody's talking about it.

Right.

That is a very fair point.

But this is something they're going to do.

They want, you know, the main Facebook business is so lagging among young people and others that they have to sort of bring them together.

I think it's a bloated, the big blue app is bloated, essentially.

And so they're trying to be dynamic in other parts, but control it all from a centralized thing.

Now, if you're Mark Zuckerberg, this is precisely what you would do, right?

I mean, what else do you have to do?

You'd get consent from teenagers and you would do this because you need as much data as possible.

Even though today they turned in, or last night they turned in amazing results

because there's nowhere else to go.

But we've been saying this, despite all the headlines.

When is that over?

When is that over?

Despite all the headlines.

I'm just saying it doesn't matter.

I don't think it is over.

Look, in the 80s and 90s, tobacco companies were killing half a million people a year, and they were fantastic stocks to own.

And that's what we have here.

We have a fantastic stock.

This company is massively undervalued, even as we speak today with it up 13% today.

There is absolutely no evidence of the deceleration in the business because it's a duopoly and because these, I mean, these tools on Facebook, if you ever want, I think all marketing classes should force their kids to go on Facebook and use their ad tools just to see how incredibly robust and powerful this platform is.

And if you look at their numbers yesterday, I mean, this company literally, from a business standpoint, is a juggernaut.

And we'd like to think that all this bad behavior translates to a reduction in their power in the business community.

100% not.

This is tobacco in the 80s and 90s, killing people and growing earnings massively.

Well, there you have it.

I didn't think someone asked me earlier this week.

I was on a stage, how do you think they're going to do it?

I said, great.

I said, 100%.

Analysts and stock market, they own the digital advertising market with Google.

And so why wouldn't they be doing it?

It doesn't matter any of this.

I think eventually it does matter, though.

In the end, is how products get less and less interesting.

And if they embarrass

people who advertise there, that's really where

that's.

But so far, they haven't embarrassed them.

We'll see if they can continue to do so.

And you're right, but their trust is way down.

I don't think that's a great place to be.

That's how it started for Microsoft.

I don't know.

People overestimate the power of trust.

Everybody at DLD was talking about trust.

I think the majority of the products we use and love, we don't trust the companies.

I don't think it matters.

Yeah.

All right.

Well, we'll see.

Speaking of people, people like someone and people having a lot of feels, we'll finish up with Howard Schultz, the former CEO of Starbucks, very tech-savvy guy.

I've known him for many years.

He says he's running for president.

There have been a lot of feels.

Let's play a clip from the event that he spoke at that kind of sums up the whole thing.

Well, let's begin with what I said on national TV last night so I can frame the answer.

What I said last night is that I am seriously considering running for president as a centrist independent.

And I wanted to clarify the word independent, which I view

merely as a designation on the ballot.

Help elect Trump, you egotistical billionaire ass!

Go back to getting racioed on Twitter.

Go back to Davos with the other billionaire elite who think they know how to run the world.

That's not what democracy leads.

Okay, someone doesn't like Howard Schultz.

And there was a fantastic column in the Washington Post where, you know, there's going to be a latte trouble with this guy.

And it was tons and tons of trouble brewing.

Everyone wants DeVenti and stuff like that.

There's tons of coffee jokes that make it.

He's running for president of Venti Venti 2020.

Right, exactly.

That's my coffee joke.

You know what, Kara?

You know what I think we should do?

We should do what Gary Vee does and have a camera follow us around all the time.

Although you and I, I think, have been together in the same room twice.

I'm thinking you and I go into a Starbucks and start handing out cups to the employees saying, what the fuck is your boss thinking?

Yeah, he's not their boss.

You know how they had those.

The former.

Their boss is Kevin Johnson from Microsoft.

But yes,

he made it into a big thing.

What do you think of this?

He's running against the Democrats, which is fascinating because he's all mad about taxes and Andre Ocasio has gotten under his skin in some fashion.

So what do you think?

What do you think about this?

I know him pretty well.

Look, Ross Perot, Ross Perot and Ralph Nader both handed the presidency to

Ross Perot gave it to Clinton and Ralph Nader gave it to Bush.

And that's what independents do.

They're spoilers.

And so the notion that he's going to create some great centrist centrist movement, I mean, it's very idealistic and it's unrealistic.

And the guy kind of summed it up perfectly.

Look, you billionaire asshole, you're going to re-elect Trump.

I mean,

that's a pretty heavy dose of truth, I think.

It's too bad.

My sense of him is he's a very thoughtful, civic-minded guy.

I think he's a principled guy.

I think he could do a tremendous amount of good.

I think what he should do is what Sheldon Adelson does, and have this agora in Seattle and basically hand out a couple hundred million bucks to the people he likes and promote

his values and then go be ambassador to Britain or something.

But running as an independent, it's just terrible.

He doesn't give away a lot of money.

He's very thoughtful.

You're right.

He's written me several thoughtful emails about what he wanted to do.

And so.

I don't know.

It's interesting.

You're right.

You don't want him to be the spoiler here in a situation, given that there's 412 Democrats running for office, including Bloomberg, who's moved sort of over to the Democratic Party.

Anyway, it's going to be fascinating to watch as we move forward.

We're going to take a short break, and when we get back, we'll be talking about wins and fails and all the other people who got ratioed this week.

And I have to give congratulations to Scott for another fantastic prediction.

As a founder, you're moving fast towards product market fit, your next round, or your first big enterprise deal.

But with AI accelerating how quickly startups build and ship, security expectations are also coming in faster.

And those expectations are higher than ever.

Getting security and compliance right can unlock growth or stall it if you wait too long.

Vanta is a trust management platform that helps businesses automate security and compliance across more than 35 frameworks like SOC2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more.

With deep integrations and automated workflows built for fast-moving teams, Vanta gets you audit ready fast and keeps you secure with continuous monitoring as your models, infrastructure, and customers evolve.

That's why fast-growing startups like Langchain, Ryder, and Cursor have all trusted Vanta to build a scalable compliance foundation from the start.

Go to Vanta.com slash Vox to save $1,000 today through the Vanta for Startups program and join over 10,000 ambitious companies already scaling with Vanta.

That's vanta.com slash Vox to save $1,000 for a limited time.

Support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you $100 credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply only on LinkedIn ads.

Okay, we're back to our show.

Scott,

we're going to go to wins and fails.

We're going to go to predictions at the end because you are clairvoyant again.

But obviously, Nancy Pelosi and the people going back to work

was a big win for Nancy Pelosi and the workers.

Thoughts?

You're right.

Huge win for her.

I think a lot of people doubted her leadership.

She had, you know, there was some noise about her not being the best Speaker of the House, and she's been outstanding.

I mean, she's really kind of, you know, say my name, Nancy Pelosi.

This is the Heisenberg of, I don't know if you watch Breaking Bag, but she's just an incredible, she's shown incredible leadership.

And if you're a Democrat, you were really excited to kind of see her basically just, you know, body slam the president.

If you go in the middle of the country and the rest of the country, it's not about political victories.

It's about the fact that the greatest democracy and experiment in the history of mankind was shut down.

And I don't think it's any accident that Russian bombers are trolling our coast or that Venezuelan politics are being infiltrated by foreign entities because I think people are bumping us now.

I think they see us as weak.

I think when the government shuts down, it reflects weakness to the rest of the world.

So I think it's generally which is bad for America.

Yeah, I would agree.

I would agree.

And it also,

when even the Republicans are arguing with each other, which they are today about Syria and all kinds of things about shutting down the government.

We're going to get to your prediction in a minute, but they, you know, the fighting now between Trump and the entire Congress, which is interesting.

I'm not so sure the problems are that fighting with him, but they're at least pushing back on certain things.

He yelled at his spy, his spy chiefs this week because they disagreed with him on the facts.

His were made up.

Theirs were actual from actual doing work.

So it's going to be, it should be a very interesting couple of months, I think, going forward, especially in the next few weeks when they have to decide on this immigration stuff, which doesn't look like it's going anywhere fast, pretty much.

Are there wins in Fail Scott?

Anything else?

So I always feel, for me, you're like me living in San Francisco.

Again, I'm a progressive, but living in San Francisco is enough to turn me into almost a conservative because I just got.

So I always like to bring up a win that you would never in a million years say as a win.

I was on Fox on Tuesday.

I was in the green room with Chris Christie.

Who were you on?

Were you on?

Yeah, I,

oh, you know, I was on Stuart Varney.

I love Stuart Varney.

All right, okay.

Yes, I went Varney.

Okay, yeah.

He's a gentleman and a scholar.

I like Varney.

I really like Neil Cavuto, too.

Anyways,

I'm equal opportunity.

I'm a total media whore.

I'll pretty much go anywhere you ask me.

We all understand that, Scott.

Anyways, I was in the room with Chris Christie, and I actually think Chris Christie, his media tour around his book,

I think it's been a win for him.

I think he comes across as smart.

I don't like his politics, but I do think he comes across as smart and a straight shooter.

And I don't think his career is over.

What I don't understand is how naive he was that he thought he was going going to get a job in administration where he put a family member's father in jail.

I mean, was he really shocked he didn't get a job?

I know.

People have a tendency not to forget when you put their dads in jail, which you did to Jared.

Yeah.

But I think that's he doubled down on it, too.

He's like, that was the most disgusting prosecution.

I was glad I did it.

Like, he's not even backing off that in a lot of time.

Yeah, he's not, he's not, yeah, he's not apologizing.

But if you've, have you seen any of the media interviews he's done over the years?

Yeah, he's good.

He's always very, he's a smart man.

Although, you know, and I don't, I don't love his denials of what happened in wherever the heck when he was stopping up the traffic on the bridge.

Bridgegate?

Yeah, Bridgegate.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I think he's a liar about that.

I think

all his people did it.

I don't, I think he did.

Anyways, my win.

Yeah.

Governor Christie.

Okay.

All right.

Your win.

My win is historian Rutger Bregman, who called out the billionaires at Davos for not talking about tax avoidance.

And he got a back and they had him and Winnie Bayana from Oxfam had a back and forth with someone I know very well, the former CFO of Yahoo, Ken Goldman, about it.

Let's listen to Mr.

Bregman talk about this.

The answer is very simple.

Just stop talking about philanthropy and start talking about taxes.

Texas, taxes.

We need to, I mean, just two days ago, there was a billionaire in here.

What's his name?

Michael Dell.

And he asked the question like, name me one country where a top marginal tax rate of 70% has actually worked.

And, you know, I'm a historian.

The United States.

That's where it has actually worked.

In the 1950s, during Republican President Eisenhower, you know, the war veteran, the top marginal tax rate in the U.S.

was 91%

for people like Michael Dell.

You know, the top estate tax for people like Michael Dell was more than 70%.

I mean, this is not rocket science.

I mean, we can talk for a very long time about all these stupid philanthropy schemes.

We can divide bono once more.

But come on, we got to be talking about taxes.

That's it.

Taxes, taxes, taxes.

All the rest is bullshit, in my opinion.

Thank you.

So here he is making the salient point that we had it in this country for years.

This is not,

and I love we can talk for a very long time about all these stupid philanthropy schemes.

We can invite Bono once more.

That was my favorite.

What do you think of this?

He's taxes, taxes, taxes.

You don't like taxes, I'm guessing.

Well, it's

complexity favors the wealthy in our tax system slowly but surely, whether it's capital gains on stocks, the top 1% own 50% of the stocks.

So capital gains, tax deduction is nothing but a transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich.

Even I would argue mortgage tax, mortgage interest tax deduction is nothing but a transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich because who owns homes?

Old rich people, who rents, young middle-class people.

So our tax system slowly but surely has been nothing but an elegant transfer of wealth.

from the poor to the rich.

I would love somebody to do an analysis.

I believe the most valuable company in the world and the wealthiest man in the world, Amazon and Jeff Bezos respectively, have not only not paid any tax, but I believe they've been subsidized by the government.

I think when New York gives $3 billion in subsidies to Amazon as a function of this incredibly depth gamification of the Commonwealth, with Bezos owning 16% of the company, effectively the government has written a check to Jeff Bezos personally for $500 million.

And if you look at what Bezos has likely done with his wealth, he never sells shares, so he never incurs a tax liability.

He just borrows against his shares from JP Morgan at probably a 2% interest rate and keeps rolling, but never actually pays taxes.

And then he'll put all his wealth in a trust and it'll be transferred without taxes.

So he's basically building a dynasty that's been subsidized by taxpayers.

The wealthiest man in the world, the most valuable company in the world, not paying any taxes.

Yeah, but we can invite Bono once more.

That's what we can do.

There you go.

I think this does resonate with a lot of people.

Or someone from Brazil who paints with their feet.

You've got to find someone who paints with their feet.

You know, I think it does resonate in this election.

I think this topic is going to be a bit, what do we do about the rich kind of thing?

I think it's not an attack.

It's really interesting because the Silicon Valley people, all of a sudden, they're like, wah, taxes.

Like, it's really fascinating because I think they're sort of in the know that they're not really paying their fair share and how it ruins innovation.

And

they'll trot out everything else.

But it's a really interesting thing that it's

being discussed as much as I don't know if it'll go anywhere because it's not just Regman, it's Ocasio and others, the marginal tax rate.

And we'll see if it goes anywhere.

It will certainly affect tech given how much money they all have.

So it'll be interesting where different tech people come down on this issue

and what taxes they're willing to pay or what's willing to go through.

So it should be an ongoing story.

It's going to be an ongoing story.

And some people will think of it as an attack, a class war kind of thing.

I'm not so sure that's the case.

I think a lot of people are laying out very good arguments for what's going on.

But we'll see if that matters.

But what's interesting about it, it's a nuanced argument because you know who gets really screwed, Kara, is what I would refer to as the workhorses, and that is people who earn, call it, between $100,000 or $150,000 in a million dollars a year in current income.

If you live in New York or California, you're paying an effective tax rate of between 48 and 52 percent.

So the kind of what you call the wealthy current income workhorses, the partners in law firms, the entrepreneurs, but the people who don't pay their fair share are the people who get the majority of their income to capital gains.

Basically the investors and kind of the capital owners.

But the people who do get, who do, who do, I think, pay an unfair share

to the high-end are who a lot of people would deem as wealthy, the workhorses.

So I think it's a nuanced argument, but we should have it.

I think the Democrats are screwing up by proposing, even using the term 70%, that we should go back to a super tax.

I don't think that's a winnable.

I don't think that's whether it's right or wrong, it's not a winnable argument.

And

they can twist it back to the Republicans now.

Yeah, they can twist it because that's what they do for a living.

They'll just put the number 70 on the screen and go, okay, your choice.

Is this what you want?

You want 70% tax rates.

All right.

We're going to get to predictions how we get to run out.

We're not going to even talk about Roger Stone's back tattoo of Richard Nixon.

I just didn't want to go there at all.

That guy.

I just want him in jail.

That's all I want.

Gangster, though.

That causes some conversation.

He's such a weird.

I'm sorry.

He needs to just

go wherever Kato Kalin's gone.

That's where he needs to go.

Anyway, all right, Scott,

someone on Twitter called you clairvoyant with your predictions.

But last week, I predicted I'd never buy a new car.

And later that day, it was announced that Apple laid off 200 employees in their project Titan division, which is working on autonomous cars.

So cars are over.

I get a little credit for predictions.

No, I actually don't.

I think there's going to be autonomous cars, and I'm going to be in them.

But

you were predicting

that the...

that the government would reopen.

Now I need some more predictions about the national emergency, et cetera, et cetera.

So go for it.

Let's hear your predictions on this.

And you can take a run around, like a big cheering run around

whatever you run around when you cheer.

You're so jealous of the big dog's prediction.

I just have one word.

You call yourself the big dog?

Come on.

Who called it?

Who called it, Kara?

Friday morning, we said you wouldn't.

The great Dane was right.

But go ahead.

Okay.

Friday afternoon, they announced it.

So my predictions are pretty boring.

I made a prediction earlier in the year or late last year.

that Facebook would be an outstanding stock to own.

And I think this is a company that is going to

just rock it up in the next three months.

Be clear,

bad for our democracy, bad for the planet.

But

this stock and this company have a supernova business model.

I think it's up 13% today.

And I think it's just getting started.

And it's dangerous to make stock predictions.

So I won't make a stock prediction, but I think the underlying business results.

of Facebook are just incredible.

Amazon reports.

Amazon comes out tonight.

Look for Amazon Media Group to all of a sudden be the third player in the Facebook-Google duopoly.

Right, with advertising.

Now the fastest-growing media company in the world, over a billion dollars.

Advertising.

That's true.

All right.

So that's your prediction.

All right.

Anything else about the next government shutdown?

Do you want to go there?

Is there going to be one?

It won't happen, Kara.

There's no way either party wants to go there again because I think if they

if we went to another shutdown, people would just move to, okay, let's vote them all out.

And the one thing that scares all of them is the notion of not being re-elected.

So, no, the government won't be sharing.

So, what about the national emergency?

Are they going to declare it?

You know what?

I don't have a viewpoint.

What's your view?

I don't know.

He'll probably try to declare it, then he'll go to, it'll never happen.

You know what I mean?

Like, the lawyers will go to a town and it'll go on, and then he either is not going to be in office or he's not going to control either the House or the Senate, something like that.

I think he's kind of

never getting that wall.

And Mexico's definitely not paying attention.

In terms of negotiating,

what is it, Sun Tzu?

In terms of negotiating, you don't want to

unless you give your your competitor absolutely no out if you give them no out you what you're basically saying i'm going to slaughter you and i think the democrats and pelosi have won and i think for them to give a little bit whatever that little bit might look like such that the republicans and specifically potus can sort of declare victory or at least not be

five they're never going to give him the five they'll give him some drones a bunch of people they'll give him something yeah but he's gonna he wants that wall he's obsessed with the wall he's got ann coulter on his back you know yelling at him about that.

So he seems to respond to whatever.

Talk about where Kato Kalin goes.

Why do we even use the word Ann Coulter?

Like, what qualifies her for us to care?

Because she says that.

You know, I was at a dinner party and someone said this, and someone else correctly said because the president listens to her, and he happens to be the president of the United States.

So there you have it.

You know.

What do you think is going to happen with the national emergency?

I think he's going to try to declare it.

I do.

He likes the idea.

I think he's going to declare it.

It's like it's a little Mussolini move and he'll do it and then it'll go nowhere.

I think eventually he'll end up indicted somehow.

I just do.

He's a sloppy criminal.

So I don't know.

That's where I see it.

Yeah, the Southern District.

Except he's a sloppy one.

Like, I think about all these other, you just eventually run out of tricks.

Well, when everyone around you has an ankle, and you know,

an ankle monitor, it's not a good sign.

Yeah.

But have you seen, have you, you have two teenage sons.

Have you seen Honey Badger Just Don't Care, that video about Honey Badgers?

Of course.

Honey Badger Don't Care.

Honey badger don't give a shit it just takes what it wants whenever it's hungry it just ew and it okay so i think the new honey badger is the southern district i just don't think they care i think they're going after the guy it's like southern he's the president this is these aren't high crimes it's like southern district just don't care yeah they don't care they are coming for him they don't care yeah i think that i think we're gonna hear that those two words southern district a lot over the next one it'll be interesting to see what happens with his tax tax

his taxes when they come when they finally reveal them which i think eventually it will will out itself.

But we'll see.

We'll see.

He's always also shown himself to get out of things, get out of jams.

So we'll see.

We'll see if he can keep getting it.

I think you eventually do not get out of jams,

no matter how much.

You know how he gets re-elected, Terry?

How?

Well,

this should be another lose.

I think the

politically correct beliefs that went after Tom Broca with his comments, which I thought were wrong, but I thought the other journalists on Meet the Press handled it really well and basically said, no, you're wrong.

He had said essentially that the Latino community needed to have a conversation around assimilating better, which was a wrong, which is just factually wrong.

But

the level of hate that came out against him on Twitter, forcing him to apologize, I feel as if we're at a point where people are so sick of this indignance on both sides that the way Donald Trump gets elected is he says, he basically runs on a campaign of like, you know, screw you, Snowflake.

And I think we have to be better about

being a little bit more generous with people and saying okay let's have the conversation and you might be wrong but the the just the response again i even we talked about this last week with some of the stuff that yeah between you and fox this gotcha culture it really hurts I think it's hard to say except he started it.

That's the thing is he started it.

I do think people are.

All my Trumpy relatives, I'm going to see some Trumpy people this weekend.

They are tired of him.

It's like the show.

I watched that show for years.

Again, I'm the only person who's watched every episode of The Apprentice.

And I got tired of it after a while.

I think the show gets boring and it gets ridiculous.

And the stuff that you liked about it gets tiresome.

I think tiresome ratings is going to take him down.

That's what's going to happen.

People are sick of it.

And I know I can see my Trumpy relatives already being like, oh, shut up kind of stuff.

So that's what I think.

That's interesting.

They're sick of it.

It's just like, oh, shut the hell up.

That's exactly what they're like.

They don't want to hear it.

They don't even want to defend it saying, oh, it's just him.

They're just like, oh, God, stop talking and go away.

I think that's one of the things that i think and if the democrats have an

who is kara swisher supporting for president or who do you like out of the gates did you see by the way did you see kamala harris this time kamala harris yeah i like her i thought she did a great job i thought she was great on the cnn thing i think she's gotten very appealing i've interviewed her many times

and i thought she's she's improved drastically in her interview style i have to say because i she was a little flat when i interviewed her um so i think she's if she's she plays it right she's she's uh very appealing in lots of ways also who do you like?

Her.

Who does Kara Swisher like?

I like Kamala Harris.

I do.

I do, I do.

I like, I like all the women.

I like

Amy Klobucher.

I have hopes for her.

We'll see.

One of them.

Yeah, you're always been a fan of Senator Klobucher.

I think it is time to elect a lady.

I know I don't like Beto, as you know.

I'm not a Beto fan.

You don't like Beto?

Stop it.

Stop it.

How can you not like Beto?

Because he's a man-child.

Oh, he's a man.

He's a man-child.

No, he's not.

He's He's not.

Oh my God.

Women are

don't agree.

Well, no, not women.

A lot of women like him.

What am I talking about?

Anyway, we will go on to this later.

If he and Beto at South by Southwest, we would slay him.

Oh, my God.

Oh, my gosh.

Little text max.

He's like every boyfriend that made me a lesbian.

I don't know what else to say.

He's just like the boyfriend.

Every boyfriend that made you a lesbian.

Oh, this is getting better.

Can we go another half?

No, we can't.

No, we're stopping.

Okay, Scott, let's see.

Oh, my gosh.

I'm looking forward to seeing what next week brings.

Rebecca Senanis produces a show.

Nishat Kurwa is Vox Media's executive producer of audio.

Thanks also to Eric Johnson.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from Vox Media.

We'll be back next week with more of a breakdown of all things tech and business and whatever screwed up thing Facebook manages to pull in the next seven days.

If you like what you heard, please subscribe on Apple Podcasts or wherever you're listening.

Bye, Scott.

I'll see you soon.

Stay warm, Carol.