Sawbones: Renaissance Medicine

38m
Sawbones brings you a studio version of the show at the ye olde Harmony House Renaissance Faire. Justin and Dr. Sydnee talk about how medicine evolved in the Renaissance beyond what passed for scientific theories during the middle ages including the four humours, alchemy, and the real cause of syphilis (insulting the sun god).

Music: "Medicines" by The Taxpayers https://taxpayers.bandcamp.com/

Center for Reproductive Rights: https://reproductiverights.org/

Listen and follow along

Transcript

Sawbones is a show about medical history, and nothing the hosts say should be taken as medical advice or opinion.

It's for fun.

Can't you just have fun for an hour and not try to diagnose your mystery boil?

We think you've earned it.

Just sit back, relax, and enjoy a moment of distraction from that weird growth.

You're worth it.

All right,

Tom is about to books.

One, two, one, two, three, four.

We came across a pharmacy with its windows blasted out.

Pushed on through the broken glass and had ourselves a luck around the medicines, the medicines, the Estelle and Macau

Hello, everybody, and welcome to Sawbone.

Hello, everybody.

Hear ye, hear ye.

Hear ye, hear ye.

Welcome to Sawbones, a marital tour of Ye old Misguided Medicine.

I am thine co-host, Master Justin McElroy, his liege, Duke of science.

And I'm Sidney McElroy.

Wow.

Wow.

You absolutely left me to dangerous.

I did.

I did.

I'm sorry.

I was.

I was literally spin in the wind.

Well, I'm not in my costume, so I just, I wasn't feeling it.

Wow.

Wow.

Justin, we were at a Ren Fair over the weekend.

Not just any Ren Fair, Sydney.

The Harmony House Ren Fair, which was such a wonderful event.

My brothers and my dad came down and we did pictures and signings.

We did a live sawbones there.

We did sawbones signings and photos.

It was just a blast.

And it was a wonderful fair.

There was so much to do and see.

There were horses and donkeys and

crafting and sword fighting.

Mary put in a Herculean effort and basically soloed

this Renaissance fair for

no pay.

So she's a hero.

And sold, I think they sold every giant turkey leg, I think, that they brought.

Yeah, they brought early.

Next year, come early if you want a giant turkey leg, apparently.

They're going fast.

But we did do a live Sawbones there, and it was a Sawbones that was about Renaissance medicine.

Right.

And obviously the conditions were not ideal for recording that episode, but we didn't want you to miss out on all that great stuff.

We were in like an outdoor amphitheater at a Ren Fair, and it was raining.

And it was a big tent.

Just to clarify.

It was a giant tent.

It was still great.

I mean, it was still a wonderful thing.

It would be hard to.

Yeah.

Yeah.

It was an hard part to watch a live podcast.

It was a hoot.

Excellent.

It was a hoot.

That was our first.

Is that our first outdoor?

Have we done Sawbones?

I don't think we've ever done Sawbones.

I don't think I've podcasted out of doors before.

Yeah.

That was.

Well, anyway.

Well, this is probably the first ever outdoor podcast, actually.

So that's huge.

Well, we are making history.

There is no way.

There's no way it's the first outdoor podcast.

I guarantee.

I'm the first.

Justin, everybody has a podcast.

History has its eyes on me right now, and

I'm staggered.

Everybody has a podcast.

I'm sure there are outdoor podcasts.

The fact that you are quoting the title of my flop of a podcasting.

It was not a flop.

You signed a copy of it this weekend.

Yes, that's true.

That's true.

I sold a copy of that book to everyone that would want me to personally sign my name in it.

So I think I got my key demo locked down.

That's not true.

So Renaissance medicine.

I think

it's really fun to think about this specific era of medicine.

And we'll cover some topics that we've sort of talked about before on the show.

But I wanted to put it all together in kind of like, what, what did this time in medical history look like?

Because prior to this, and we talk about like the medieval period a lot on the show, that like

we didn't forget everything we knew, but we

thought about other things, I guess, for some years.

We put other priorities in front of logic and science.

Well,

we found Excalibur and we all got got very excited about Excalibur for many years and then eventually we were like listen we love Excalibur we I think we lost it we got to get back to science it's really interesting because the dominant medical theory that persisted prior to the Renaissance is the humoral theory of medicine the meaning that we believe there are four humors in the body and that all health and and wellness or illness either way is based on how well balanced those four humors are yes it's essential to keep those in place.

They're phlegm, poo,

pee, and snot.

No.

We've talked about them so many times.

Black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, phlegm, and blood.

Good.

Yes.

Very good.

I'm glad that you have mastered a theory of medicine that

has been debunked fully and is

but that's the only way, Sid, that's the only way that you could spot a phony.

You got to know him, right?

So somebody tries to pot it off on you.

It's like, hey, wait a minute, minute that's the humoral system of medicine nice try and they didn't come up with that in the in the middle ages but it just it like we didn't grow from it we kind of like I mean, that goes back to Hippocrates, right?

But we just didn't change anything.

We were like, yep, four humors and treatment is usually like either getting rid of a humor or putting more of a humor in there.

And then eating or drinking certain things to balance those out.

And then there was a lot of sort of spiritual and religious understanding of disease during those intervening years.

You know, it's a, you're sick because you upset the gods.

This is a punishment in some way.

And the gods or God, as we're moving, you know, in a lot of these traditions, we're thinking of more like a.

Whoever's up there, they're mad at you.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Like a monotheistic kind of God is mad at you until you're sick, or God is pleased with you, so you got better, or you're possessed by demons, perhaps, and maybe the ways that we treat you have more to do with our spiritual beliefs and praying for you and that sort of thing than any kind of medicine.

And certainly as we moved into the Renaissance period, it's not that all of this went away.

We didn't abandon all of those ideas all at once and go, never mind, science is back.

But we started.

Science is back.

We started to lay the groundwork for a better, more reason-based understanding of these things during the Renaissance.

You still see all of these other ideas persist, but great thinkers are beginning to question them.

And as is typical, as we've learned on Sawbones, just because a really smart person does a lot of really hard work to introduce a new idea and say, hey, I think this new idea might be right, doesn't mean that anyone listens to them.

In fact, most people won't listen to them.

And many people will get angry and throw things at them and maybe like run them out of town.

So, so, but the seeds are being planted.

So I want to talk about some of the thinkers of the Renaissance that started to change our idea of

medicine and science and our understanding.

As our ideas of everything were changing, hence the Renaissance.

Right.

It's a very exciting time.

Just like they cover in the hit song, Welcome to the Renaissance from the hit musical, Something Rotten.

Now, on the way to the Renaissance Festival, I tried to liven up the car with a few bars of Welcome to the Renaissance via the music app, and it did not go over well in the car.

There was a lot of tension there.

Well, okay, to be fair, we were running late.

Yep.

I was very stressed.

We were running late, and we go on tour and do shows all over the place.

And we're not late for those shows.

And we might be traveling hundreds of miles.

And we're not late for those.

We had to drive 10 minutes from our house to this Ren Fair.

Yep.

And we were running late.

Yes.

Now, to be fair, to get to those shows, we don't have to get our kids out of their bedrooms.

And that usually takes four hours.

And into costumes.

And you have to find them too.

They hide.

They hide like mice and then you have to track them down.

So anyway,

let's talk about Fracastoro.

Okay.

Science from the Renaissance era, scientists, not science.

He's not science.

He is not the concept of science.

He is a scientist.

1546, he proposed an idea.

So as I said, up until now, our primary understanding of disease is based on the four humors.

The idea that you catch an illness, that you get sick from someone else or from something else was not...

That was not really understood or appreciated.

So he proposed a really radical idea that maybe there is something that could pass an illness from me to you.

And he called this

thing, this particle, a spore, which isn't what we would necessarily call that today, but it's the beginning of the germ theory of disease being introduced in the 1500s.

It's like how you would explain it to a kid, right?

It's a very rudimentary, the basic structure is there, but we just hadn't zoomed in enough.

And well, and he didn't know when he said spore, he didn't necessarily know if this was some sort of living organism that went from, so so like a bacteria or, you know, viruses, as we've discussed, they're somewhere living, unliving, dead, undead.

You know what I mean?

Or if it was maybe some sort of chemical thing that got transmitted from me to you, a toxin or something like that.

He really didn't know that, but he knew that, or he believed that it was possible that that's why people got sick, is that there are tiny things that we can't see that we pass between each other and make us sick.

Forgive my ignorance, but what kind of like magnification are we working with at this time period?

Is he he working a lot in theory, or is he able to like use a magnifying glass and like look at so?

He is primarily working in theory because this is before we think of the Dutch scientist Leewenhoek as really the like the father of microbiology and the person who like took microscopy to a point where we could look at small things.

So this is more a theoretical understanding than anything he's visualized, but it's impressive, right?

Like the because the my like Leewenhoek didn't come around until the late 1600s, early 1700s.

So, you know, we are, we are

easily 100 years, over 100 years before we're going to be able to see these things.

We're basically swindy at this point.

Yes.

Compared to the there's a lot of science that happens with us not being able to see something, but we do a series of experiments that prove that it's there.

And I think that's really cool.

Yeah.

So there's my pitch for science.

I'm going to tell that.

I think I have to talk to Charlie's class about STEM.

I think I'm going to say that and see if that gets anybody excited.

So anyway, he also proposed the idea of a fomite, which if you work in healthcare, you know that a fomite is anything that can carry disease.

We talk about that a lot.

It's why, for instance, the classic white coat, especially with like, you know, your classic physician white coat has long sleeves is not great.

Because if those long physician sleeves are touching the patient when you're examining them, if they're like rubbing against their clothes or the bed sheet or whatever, then they can get germs on them.

And then you go touch another patient and now you're wearing a fomite, something that can carry disease from place to place.

And he was the one who coined that term and talked about that concept of a fomite, something that I could touch and it would make me sick because it touched someone that was sick.

Again,

we can't see what the thing is, but we're beginning to understand that it might be there.

Now, none of these ideas really caused a big stir in the science world.

They were interesting.

And certainly I'm sure there were people who also believe that way, but they didn't really shift public opinion.

What Frocastoro did that I think he was most famous for among like the general public was writing an epic poem about syphilis

in 1530.

It was in three books.

It was called Syphilis or the French Disease, and it's excellent.

It is about a shepherd boy.

You'll never guess what his name is.

Well, this is cheating, but syphilis.

Syphilis.

It is about a shepherd boy who is named Syphilis, who, um, his job is to tend the flocks of the king, uh, and he accidentally insults the god of the sun,

which you don't want to do.

You don't want to do, especially if you're named syphilis.

No.

And he is punished for insulting the god of the sun with syphilis.

Syphilis.

I mean, it couldn't be more predictable.

It got him right there.

I mean, it's absolutely, it's, it's syphilis that got him.

He gets syphilis.

And so I think, again, this is like a really great little kind of all-in-one description of this era of medicine.

So here we have someone who is using, who is going to describe a disease and like coins, like now we call it syphilis.

It's named for the shepherd syphilis.

And we understand what the disease does.

He has developed the early beginnings of the germ theory of disease, but in the poem, he writes about it.

It's a punishment for insulting the sun god.

And also he does it in the form of a poem.

You got to add a little drama, right?

You got to add a little bit of

pizzazz to it because otherwise it's not going to stick in the public consciousness.

You can prattle on forever, but unless you got a little bit of a story.

I mean, that's sawbones.

That's sawbones, right?

That's sawbones.

You got to have a little bit of a story.

That's true.

And I will say that doing it in the form of an epic poem led to syphilis always being called syphilis.

That is why we call syphilis syphilis.

Because you kind of locked it in.

You don't want to mess with the meter at that point, right?

The poem already rhymes.

You got to find a name that rhymes with syphilis.

No way.

Hi, my name is Diphilus, and I shouldn't have insulted the sunga.

Another big thinker from the Renaissance period that changed the way we started to look at the human body was Vesalius.

So as we've talked about on the show before, there was a long time where there was really no like ethics or morality around the idea of

doing an anatomical dissection after someone has died.

Like this was something that...

doctors and thinkers did, and we didn't worry so much about it because we understood we're trying to learn things.

There wasn't some sort of like religious connotation to that.

And then we went through a long period where absolutely not.

That would be defiling a corpse and it would be very disrespectful and we wouldn't do that.

And it took a long time.

Even in the Renaissance, everybody wasn't necessarily on board with it.

It would be a very long time.

We had doctors' riots, as we've talked about.

We're talking about basically a cultural change, right?

This is not a legal shift.

This is a culture.

This is a long, it's a cultural shift in how we think about,

at least in this culture, right?

Because it's always varying around the planet.

Is it okay to do an autopsy?

Right.

Or certainly beyond an autopsy to do something just purely to learn about the human body, to do an anatomical dissection?

Is it

okay

morally, socially, ethically?

During the Renaissance, it was more common again that people would do this as a way of understanding anatomy.

And Vesalius specifically wanted to look at all of the everything Galen had written down about the human body to see, okay, well, let's check it out.

Let's actually look and see if this is accurate.

You know, we can't just take your word for it.

And it's, again, we're questioning.

That's important, right?

We're looking at the four humans and saying, well, let's look inside and see if they're in there.

Surely we could find them all.

It's sort of like when the first time I got the internet set up and we're like, well, what website?

Like, we should try these websites we've been hearing about.

We should look at all the websites.

We should see if Nintendo.com really works.

And that was the first website we went to.com.

Just a big picture of Mario's face that took 20 minutes to load.

I just remember AOL all the time.

I was just so excited to be in in chat rooms and instant messaging.

Yeah, we used to instant message record.

So anyway, he discovered over 300 mistakes that Galen had made.

My favorite of all, and I mean, again, this, this advanced our understanding of anatomy.

My favorite mistake is that men indeed do not have one less set of ribs than women.

There's a very controversial

mistake to point out.

Just because he's contradicting the Bible.

Yeah.

I mean,

that's right.

Sorry, the Bible.

You guys could have checked that one.

You did have skeletons.

Sorry.

Sorry.

You could have double-checked that.

You have skeletons.

Another doctor, William Harvey,

was one of the first to start to describe the idea of a circulatory system.

Prior to this, we didn't really understand

how blood moved in the body.

There was a concept for a long time that we were just kind of bags of blood.

Squish, sloshing around.

Sloshing around.

Sloshing around.

You know, which, like, I mean, we've talked about other animals with different sort of circulatory systems and like open circulatory systems like the horseshoe crab so like that does happen like it just kind of sloshes around ours doesn't work that way and and harvey was the first one to talk about that and like start to describe like build on the work that avicenta had done you know centuries before but build on that to talk about the heart it pumps blood through a circulatory system through the human body we're not bags of blood And then we also see Paracelsus, who we've done a whole episode on before.

But Paracelsus was a really important figure during this time period because we see the concept of alchemy, where we're trying to, you know, turn stuff into gold or whatever precious thing we're trying to turn things into, start to turn into chemistry, where we actually could make something in a lab.

We could make a substance that would benefit us.

And this doesn't sound like a revolutionary concept because that's, you know, medicine, the vast majority of medicines.

But at the time, the idea that you would put this new substance that you synthesize, that you've created in your body instead of some sort of herb or natural remedy or just like eating or drinking certain things, you know, this concept of a chemical that would make you better was brand new.

It sounds kind of like you can have, like we had ingredients before, and this is like a recipe, right?

So we used to have carrots and hummus, and that would be what you would would have for but then later we were like wait a minute if we mix the carrots and hummus together we put it in a bottle sell for a hundred dollars then it's medicine you get the idea it's like a different like a recipe if a recipe that had hummus and carrots in it so that wasn't a good example no because carrots and hummus are kind of fine the way they are a plate with carrots and peas and corn on it and you're like oh i like all these things but then medicine is like succotash it's like wait a minute what if you cut it all up and mix it all up a thing and now it's it's a thing.

Yeah.

Well, and also.

And succotash can cure your records in this example.

Well, the idea of putting a chemical in your body at all.

Like instead of, oh, you're sick, eat more potatoes or eat less potatoes.

Or something.

Any potatoes you're eating is the wrong amount.

Or, or you're sick, I've made this tincture out of things that I found naturally in the earth.

The idea that we make things to put in our bodies, not just pick things.

Right.

You know, this is where we start to see that.

So, Justin, those are some of of the ideas that were permeating.

What were some of the illnesses that we were trying to treat with these ideas?

Well, I don't know.

Oh, I'm going to tell you after we go to the belly moon.

Well, okay, well then let's go.

The medicines, the medicines that escalate my calves for the mouth.

You know, we've been doing my brother, my brother, me for 15 years.

And

maybe you stopped listening for a while.

Maybe you never listened.

And you're probably assuming three white guys talking for 15 years.

I know where this has ended up.

But no, no, you would be wrong.

We're as shocked as you are that we have not fallen into some sort of horrific scandal or just turned into a big crypto thing.

Yeah, you don't even really know how crypto works.

The only NFTs I'm into are naughty, funny things, which is what we talk about on My Brother, My Brother, and Me.

We serve it up every Monday for you if you're listening.

And if not, we just leave it out back and goes rotten.

So check it out on Maximum Fun or wherever you get your podcasts.

All right, we're over 70 episodes into our show.

Let's learn everything.

So, let's do a quick progress check.

Have we learned about quantum physics?

Yes, episode 59.

We haven't learned about the history of gossip yet, have we?

Yes, we have.

Same episode, actually.

Have we talked to Tom Scott about his love of roller coasters?

Episode 64.

So, how close are we to learning everything?

Bad news, we still haven't learned everything yet.

Oh, we're ruined!

No, no, no.

It's good news as well.

There is still a lot to learn.

Woo!

I'm Dr.

Ella Hubber.

I'm regular Tom Lum.

I'm Caroline Roper.

And on Let's Learn Everything, we learn about science and a bit of everything else too.

And although we haven't learned everything yet, I've got a pretty good feeling about this next episode.

Join us every other Thursday on Maximum Fun.

All right, Sydney, I have a cure in search of a disease.

You're telling me what we're fixing up with this stuff.

So

the hard part as they started to employ these new ideas is that we had some illnesses that were pretty rampant that, I mean, even to this day can be very challenging.

For instance, smallpox.

We don't have smallpox around anymore, thank goodness.

But if we did, that would be bad.

Yeah.

Smallpox was very deadly.

And so even as we are starting to understand like anatomy and the circulatory system, that doesn't really help us.

fight smallpox.

Leprosy, the plague, we didn't have antibiotics.

So these were big deals.

Huge deal.

Yeah, we don't really have a lot of options to deal with stuff.

The plague in particular.

So

during, if you were at our live show about Renaissance medicine, you would have seen I was dressed as a plague doctor.

I should go ahead.

Now I could lie about this.

You should lie about it.

No, I'm not going to.

I don't do that with our listeners.

I could lie to you and say I was fully costumed as a plague doctor.

But the truth is, and this is part of why we were late, I have lost my plague doctor mask.

I have the rest of the costume because I had a moment where I thought, do I not own this?

I know I own this.

I know I've worn it.

And I have the rest of the costume in a pile in my office.

Where is the mask?

I don't know.

No.

So I lost it.

But you had a good backup plan.

So I thought you looked really cool still.

Well, thank you.

Yeah.

So, and I will, I will explain what my backup plan was.

So the plague was one of the biggest problems throughout a lot of history, but certainly during the Renaissance period.

And

there were a lot of treatments that still relied on the humors as the theory, you know, how we were treating it.

But a new idea that arose during the Renaissance was called miasma theory, which is where...

It's in the air.

It's in the air.

It's just something in the air.

Yeah.

It's like, it's like a bad, and you, and it might be represented by like a bad smell or something.

Like it could be associated with that, or it's just, it's in the air and it's around you.

And so.

Plague doctors in particular would be outfitted in a way to protect them from the miasma is the plague.

So the plague mask, as we've talked, and I think we've talked about some of this on the show before, but just to reiterate, the plague mask, you would have

usually a bundle of herbs or incense, something that smelled nice called a pommander that would sit inside that big long beak part, and that would help you not breathe in the miasma.

Your long wax coat.

would protect you from any sort of like fluids or substances.

And then there were

red gems usually or or some sort of red color over the eyes in the mask because red could ward off illness.

Now, okay, the red, I don't know.

I don't know what to tell you.

I will say this.

I can understand if you're an old-timey person that doesn't have all of my incredible knowledge of science that I've gotten from Google, that you might think, well, the stinky air around here is making people sick.

And the only way to know if it's bad air that's going to make you sick is like a filter, right?

They're filtering with good smells, or the assumption that is the smell is a good indicator.

Like somehow the smell is mixed up in it, right?

Which isn't, I mean, some of these things are, again, you're right.

We're getting there, right?

We're getting in the neighborhood.

Well, it's like,

it's like a KN95 for old-timey cats.

It's like we've talked about like, why is it important that we experience, this gets into the movie Inside Out.

Why is it important that we experience disgust?

Because it protects us.

it protects us and so if something grosses you out if a bad smell grosses you out it on some level it may be you're we're trying to your body's trying to get you to move away from something that could harm you let's also just acknowledge the fact that these are human beings not biologically and evolutionary so far removed from us if they're like listen I don't know if it's making me healthy or not, but I'm loving not smelling all of the sewage in the street.

I'm wild about it.

Let's just roll with it.

Let's leave it up in the beak and just, because I love it.

It's, yeah, I want to make this an all-the-time thing.

Uh, so because I did not have the plague doctor mask, I did, I wore red sunglasses to this event.

Yeah, the glass, the red glasses, I can't get them, I can't give them any old homie points on, unfortunately.

No, but I did, I felt like it was a good combo because, like, we're in the Renaissance, so we're starting to move away from these ideas, but we're still, and I think that this is like a good lesson about humanity.

We were starting to understand that like a spiritual basis, like the idea that disease was punishment, the idea that these red glasses ward off evil, so I'll wear them to protect me from the plague.

We're starting to know that that's not true.

But when faced with something really scary, we revert back to those things because we're desperate for anything.

And I think we have seen echoes of that in real world situations today.

all through the pandemic.

You know, we have seen people revert back to things that perhaps we know logically aren't very helpful because we are so afraid.

Yeah.

Right.

Fear makes us do that kind of thing and feeling helpless.

So anyway, and the thing about plague doctors too is that they generally would carry a big stick to examine you with.

A medical stick.

A medical stick.

I like to call it an examining stick.

And that we'll just examine you with this stick and then we don't have to worry about touching you, which again, we're like, We know something's going on with being around people with the plague and you get the plague because the fleas are biting you.

But anyway.

But anyway, we didn't understand all that yet.

And, you know, because obviously this isn't the best way to examine people and we really didn't understand the plague very well and we didn't understand disease very well.

We were still sort of throwing out a lot of the same ideas of like bloodletting.

puking, peeing, pooping, things to make you purge, that kind of thing.

There was a whole field of pestilence medicine that arose that was like, I mean, very akin to, I think, some of the,

it almost sounds like some of the wellness stuff that you hear today.

Like, I have become a special, I have become a specialist in like alkalinity.

I'm going to tell you how to alkalinize yourself.

And I have a variety of products you can purchase to help you alkaline.

I'm a hydration specialist.

Yeah.

You know,

I mean, I think you see this again echoed today.

And like in the field of pestilence medicine, you would get, I mean, basically a bunch of sort of folk or herbal or just straight up fake stuff we put together to try to make money off of people.

Like eggshells crushed up into a powder with like some marigolds, and then you put them in some ale and sugar.

And these are a few of my favorite routes.

Yeah, I mean, really, it feels that way.

It feels that way.

And so, like, there was still all of that around the plague, even as we were also creating pest houses, which were quarantine facilities.

So we did, again, we were starting to do things that probably would impact the spread of plague.

At the same time, we were doing a lot of stuff that didn't.

During the Renaissance, we also see the English Hippocrates, Thomas Sydenham,

introduce the idea of diagnosis.

You know, maybe we would make people better if we diagnose them before we try to treat them.

Worth a shot.

Instead of just saying, like, you are sick,

there are 10 things for sick.

try one did you try tea we also have oranges and honey wine wine's always there what about eggs

and if nothing else we'll we'll bleed you oh wait did you wait come back what about owl vomit Wait, what about owl vomit?

So Sydenham said, I think we should start trying to tailor a treatment to what's wrong with you.

And you see that using that sort of concept,

we start doing things like treating pain.

Well, you're hurting.

Well, we know that we have laudanum.

We have opium that helps with pain.

Why don't we treat your pain?

He proposed that malaria could be treated with cinchona bark.

He noticed this specific cyclical.

Yep, yep, it has quinine in it.

So he noticed these cyclical fevers, responded really well to the specific bark.

So he would diagnose the malaria before.

prescribing the bark, which again doesn't sound like you say that.

And you're like, well, yeah, that's what doctors do.

Well, that wasn't what doctors did before you know i mean that's the thing this this idea of what is medicine what is healing what is what is the profession of physician what do you do was really starting to change in a way that um i mean echoes what we do now we're talking about this is the beginning of that you're really talking about it seems like a lot of this is interesting because what you're talking about is cultural shifts which is not as much of a sawbones thing, I think, because eras are rarely the purview.

You know, we're normally talking about a large chronological span of time, but it seems like what we're really looking at is a reordering of like priorities, a reordering of the culture that like enabled the progress rather than like individual

discoveries from the time period.

Right.

Like reordering how we think about it.

Exactly.

That's you have to shift everybody's thinking first, and then you can start building on that with actual practices and stuff that people accept.

And obviously, during this time period, we also have the development of like the printing press.

And so like you have have people who are like

instead of every book having to be hand copied, you have ways to distribute information in a brand new way.

You know, I mean, like where more people can access it too.

But it takes a long time.

Even now in the age of the internet, it takes a long time to change a misinformed position or idea if it has been held for, you know.

centuries prior to that.

Obviously, we still with all of this information, even with Sydneham making these advancements, we still really didn't have great cures for things just because we hadn't made a lot of them yet.

Even as we were starting to figure out, like, that herbal thing seems to work well for that.

It would be

so, you know, it would be decades and decades before we would start synthesizing the actual compound, right?

Like, there's a reason we don't give people tree bark for malaria because now we can make the thing, the active compound that makes you better.

We can make that in a lab.

And it's just the thing you need and not all the bark.

It's like they'll sell you cinnamon toast crunch dust now in a jar and you just buy the dust so that you don't actually need the cereal because you have the dust concentrated that's actually a decent analogy yes it's why it's why the the uh astound astonishment

well no it's really good because i mean people will say like why do we need digoxin we've got foxglove and it's like yes that chemical in digoxin was originally synthesized from the plant foxglove but now we just make you digoxin like the thing you need and you don't have to eat a plant yeah and that's better it's better because then the you don't the leaves probably taste gross, whatever.

Anyway, um, but we still didn't have great ways to cure things.

So we, we, you know, we were still doing some things that didn't make sense.

Uh, for scropula, which is also called the king's evil.

The reason it was called the king's evil, and we've talked about this extensively on the show, it's because you would cure it by being touched by a king.

Oh, yeah.

It was like a tuberculosis-like illness.

And the way that you got it better is you had to have someone in the monarchy touch you or touch something that you touched.

Transference was still a popular theory of disease, meaning that one treatment for the plague, for instance, would be to take a live chicken and strap it to one of your boobos, your big and large lymph nodes, so that you could give the chicken the plague and then you'd be better.

Poor chicken.

I know, poor chicken.

You also, there was also the idea of color theory.

So you treat things with things that are the same color.

This isn't too far from the doctrine of signatures, really, right?

Like the idea that like cures like.

This would have been similar.

So we, you know, could cure your jaundice with turmeric or your smallpox with wine, similar colors.

But I think the big thing to take away is that as we're starting to understand diagnosis, the beginnings of germ theory, the idea of what is inside the human body, anatomy, you know, all of these ideas are really flourishing.

We're understanding how to make chemicals that might impact the way we feel.

As all of this changes, it leads us to sort of the end of the the Renaissance period where I think we have the greatest contribution.

After all this, after all that, even with all of that.

All that, which is truly great.

The greatest contribution comes at the very end of the Renaissance when Edward Jenner, an English doctor and scientist, said, you know, I've noticed that milkmaids who get cowpox

don't get smallpox.

And cowpox doesn't kill you, but smallpox does.

Maybe

if we gave people cowpox they won't get and die of smallpox and obviously that's not that wasn't the final solution that wasn't what we arrived at at the end but that was the beginning of the vaccine so we made the first vaccine against smallpox um and that really like if you think about kind of the apex of the renaissance moving into the next period of scientific understanding and medicine what greater thing could you point to than vaccines than the beginning of hey instead of waiting till people get sick and scrambling to try to save them, let's stop them from ever getting sick in the first place.

Hey, thank you.

That's beautiful.

Thanks again, vaccines.

Yeah.

Thank you, vaccines.

Hey, anything you want to mention about vaccines, also here?

I did want to mention something.

I feel like that as

RFK Jr.

continues to just like

throw

a lot of misinformation and uninformed scientific, I don't even want to say scientific opinions.

They're just uninformed opinions about science at the general public.

It can be helpful for us to sort of debunk some of them.

First of all, I will say that a lot of the statistics that he's throwing around about like diabetes, for instance,

are completely wrong.

I don't know, like none of these numbers make any, like half of people in China don't have diabetes.

He said that 50% of people in China have diabetes.

That's not true.

I think you probably knew that, but.

That's not true.

Anyway, but one thing in particular that he said is that he wants to reintroduce placebo trials of vaccines.

And I know if if you listen to our show, or if you're somebody who is science-minded, you may have a moment where you think, like, well, a placebo trial is not a problem,

but it is.

It's a giant problem that he's throwing out there.

And I just wanted to highlight why.

So, right now,

let's talk about the measles vaccine because that's the one he seems to have the most difficulty coping with.

Understanding.

The measles vaccine prevents measles.

Okay.

We have a ton of data that the measles vaccine prevents measles.

If we were going to try to use something else to prevent measles,

we would not test that against a placebo

because we have an excellent thing that prevents measles already.

It's the measles vaccine.

That's how we do research when it comes to, especially like deadly, life-threatening,

or even just diseases that where people are already sick.

We don't say, hey, we have a treatment for what you've got

and we could give it to you because we know it works pretty well.

But we have something over here in the lab that may work better.

So we're going to test placebo versus this thing in the lab.

We're not going to do that.

We're going to see if the new thing works better than the old thing.

Right.

Because we have a, we're not starting from zero.

We're not starting from zero and we have something that already works.

And to start from zero,

well, one, it wouldn't be very scientifically helpful because we really want to compare it to what we already have, right?

We don't want to compare it to zero.

We want to compare it to what already exists.

So it doesn't make sense.

But two, it it is wildly unethical.

It is, I mean, it will absolutely endanger the lives of children to start from placebo with vaccines.

So

what he is proposing is putting our children's lives in danger with absolutely unethical, irresponsible.

pseudoscientific studies.

And that really, that's just to, just to really highlight.

We do, we would not do placebo testing because we have something that works

and human lives matter.

Yep.

And you are not experimental subjects.

You are people.

So tell everybody you know about that.

Okay.

Thanks.

That's going to do it for this week on Sawbones.

Thanks again.

for being here, for hanging out with us.

That's going to, oh, thanks to the taxpayers for use.

Their song medicines is the intro and outro of our program.

We are going to have, I think, some extra

shirts for like the from the Renaissance Fair.

From the Renaissance Fair.

If you would like to get one of those, we'll let you know when you can because I don't know yet.

But they will be, I believe we're going to put them in the merch store.

So macronmerch.com.

Go check right now to see if they're there because

even if they're not, you can get some sawbone stuff.

Yeah.

And we'll put up pictures.

They're really cute.

They were red and purple and got all the Ren Fair stuff on them.

You're going to love them.

And buying them will support Harmony House.

So thanks.

And thanks again if you came out.

It was so nice.

That was such a good turnout.

And I hope that if you did make it this year and it happens again next year, that you'll come out next year.

That's going to do it for us for this week on Solve Bones.

My name is Justin McElroy.

I'm Sidney McElroy.

As always, don't drill a hole in your head.

All right.

Maximum Fun, a worker-owned network of artist-owned shows, supported directly by you.