Arch Manning, NFL Announcers, a New Deal for 'PTI', the Ballmer Scandal, and a Crawford-Canelo Megafight With Van Lathan Jr., Bryan Curtis, and Chris Mannix

This episode is brought to you by Miklob Ultra.

Cracking open a cold one on a hot summer day is one of the best feelings, but it's even better when it feels like you earned it, like in a friendly little competition.

It's always better when there's something worth playing for.

And Michelob Ultra, a superior light beer, is a pretty great prize.

Hmm.

I would, I mean, I would be all tennis for Mikk Loboltras because that's what I do all summer because

tennis is an actual sport, unlike pickleball.

So tennis, doubles, singles, whatever.

Let's play for an ultra.

Fill your fridge with Michelo Beltra this summer at DoorDash.com.

Enjoy responsibly copyright 2025.

Anheuser-Busch, Michelobeltra Light Beer, St.

Louis, Missouri.

The Bill Simmons podcast presented by FanDuel Sportsbook.

We're also brought to you by the Ringer Podcast Network, where I put up a new rewatchables for you on Monday night.

We did Legend of Billie Gene.

It came out 40 years ago.

It was a one for us, for me and Chris Ryan.

It's an absolute cable classic.

It was on for 25 straight years.

You can find it all over the place on 2B, other places.

But we had a lot of fun talking about that movie because it created the internet.

A lot of people don't realize.

I was also on the Prestige TV podcast with Joanna Robinson and Rob Mahoney talking about episode one of Task on HBO, a show that we really like.

It's a murder mystery.

So we did a recap.

We made some predictions.

So if you like that show,

you can check that out.

Don't forget about all of our football content because football season started.

The Ringer Gambling Show going every day now, noon ET.

You can watch it live on YouTube.

And you can also listen to it as a podcast.

The Ringer Tailgate with Van and Joel and Tate.

We're doing that on Wednesdays and Saturdays.

Saturdays live.

Mick Shea is going to be live on Saturdays too during the college football season.

So we got a lot of good stuff going on.

Coming on this podcast, Van Lathan is here.

We tried something with the studio where he joined me almost almost like it's a TV show.

And we brought Brian Curtis on to talk about some college football, University of Texas, media stuff, the new NFL college, all the media storylines that are happening, non-players versus players.

We talked about PTI, a whole bunch of media things.

And then after that, Chris Mannix,

we had to talk more about Balmer Clippers, Aspiration, Kawhi, a scandal that I am now finding a lot of humor in.

But Manix gave us an update of where we're going with that.

But then the big reason, Ban requested this.

We want to talk about Crawford and Canelo, which has a chance to be one of the biggest fights of this decade, if not the biggest, if it's actually a good fight.

But a lot of great storylines with that.

It's coming up this weekend.

So this is an action-packed one.

Let's take a break.

Let's bring in Pro Jam.

And then we're going to talk to Brian Curtis.

It's the Bill Simmons podcast presented by Fandu.

And the NFL is back.

And thank God, Fando has everything.

They got an awesome app.

They have SGPs.

They have great futures.

They have good prop bets.

Live betting, your way bets.

Clean app.

It's great to use.

Been using it for a few years.

Every time I go back to Boston or any place that has Fando and I get to use it, I'm always excited.

I'm on an airplane runway.

Have you done the airplay runway?

Yes.

Everybody.

Airplane runway.

There should be a button, the runway.

I'm on the airplane runway.

I got to get this in.

Get your bets in.

Build something bold.

Make every game feel bigger.

Download the Fando app or head to fando.com/slash BS to get started.

The ringer, committed to responsible gaming, please visit rg-help.com to learn more about the resources and helplines available.

And listen to the end of this episode for additional details.

You must be 21 plus in president select states or 18 plus in president in DC, Kentucky, or Wyoming.

Gaming problem, call 1-800-GAMBOL or visit rg-help.com.

Call 1-88-789-777 or visit ccpg.org/slash chat in Connecticut.

Paid endorsement.

All right, we're taping this on Tuesday afternoon.

We are in the Aspiration Studio, Van Lathan, and I, our new sponsor.

They just, Brian, they just gave me $7 million out of nowhere.

I don't even have to do anything, but I decided to name the studio after them.

It's really nice.

You got a no-show job too out of this.

I did.

My no-show, I just have to remember to say the thing.

This is your kind of season.

Football just started.

College football just started.

Absolutely.

Announcers are back.

University of Texas in the mix.

Let's start with our guy, Arch Manning.

Let's try to to have a calm conversation.

You're talking about this

ring or tailgate all the time, measured.

Curtis, what were your expectations going in and what are your expectations now?

Well, first of all, when I was in Texas, Chris Sims got recruited by the Longhorns.

This is actually my second Nepo quarterback.

I've never felt older.

This is the story.

Chris Sims comes over.

A guy named Major Applewhite

was the quarterback before from Catholic High in Baton Rouge.

And they feel like they have to play Chris Sims because he, at that point, was the godsend Nepal QB.

It's the second time it happened at Texas.

And he came out and he looked like Arch Manning did in his first game.

He really did.

He looked scared.

He looked like he didn't know how to play quarterback, which was the weird part.

And Bill, of course, now that we're in the NIL era, We're watching Texas, Ohio State, and it goes to commercial and there's a Warby Parker ad starring Arch Manning.

You're just like, wow, the world's really different now.

He had like three commercials.

At a point, he had more commercials and he had completions.

People were like, what's going on?

He had, there was a couple commercials that were coming on.

You think he shakes back from it, though?

You think that the best from Arch Manning is yet to come?

I do.

The only thing I'm worried about is I don't know if he's.

That seemed very positive, Curtis.

Yeah, I do.

I mean, I think, look, he's got like three cream puffs in a row, so he's going to get a bunch of stats.

And I think he'll get better as the year goes on.

The one thing I want to make sure that Conspiracy Bill knows, fan, is about the videos that are out there.

Because there's like a bunch of Abraham's approveders of college football, and there was one of Arch throwing a pass this last week, and he was grimacing like he had a terrible shoulder injury.

Was it like an AI thing?

No, it was real from the broadcast.

And they asked the Texas coach about it, and he gave this really weird, defensive answer at the press conference.

So that's kind of where Texas fandom is.

Like, I think still in on Arch, high on Arch, but a little worried.

What is the

the Texas football, Reddit, Twitter?

What are the other sites that Texas fans would go to?

They got all kinds of medicines.

Rivals, Mess West.

Rivworth.

Everybody's got messages.

What's the number one people going nuts post?

I think it's just the Arch.

What the hell was that?

Because I think there was with quarterbacks in college, you always think, you know,

they're off in 18, like Michigan.

last week against Oklahoma.

You know, he was like, these are young kids.

They're playing in front of the big lights, but Arch is a junior or he's been in the program for two years already.

Yeah, that sounds true.

He played football last year.

He had starts last year.

People talking like it was his first start.

It wasn't his first start.

He played a lot last year.

It wasn't against great teams, but he played.

So there was just this little bit of like, are we sure?

Are we sure he's the chosen one?

Yeah.

Were we putting too much into the surname?

Are we sure?

Are we sure, Van?

No, we're not sure of anything.

But you know what?

We're not just not sure of Arch.

We're not sure of Arch.

We're not sure of DJ Lagway.

We're not sure of Drew Allard.

This was supposed to be a quarterback class that had as much talent as any quarterback class

in recent memory.

And we're watching these guys play.

Not just Arch.

We're watching these guys play.

As I say this, LSU has to play Florida.

So watch DJ Lagway come out and throw for 4,000 yards and run for another 2,000.

But

we're watching all of these QBs and a lot of it, we're not seeing it show up quite yet, which says two things.

Number one, it's early in the season.

Let everybody get into their offense a little bit and figure out what it is that's going on.

Number two, it's probably best to evaluate a quarterbacking prospect on the games that they've played and not on the trajectory of their talent.

Now, even Kay Klubnik, who was supposed to be a QB that for all intents and purposes, figured out his game last year, took Clemson to the playoff.

He was supposed to come out there and light it up two games, hasn't done it.

So maybe Kay Klubnik is who he is, and maybe we should let these guys figure out how they're going to to be successful as football players before we make them the next John Elway.

Roger.

I agree.

Didn't Texas recruit Raja's son?

Yeah.

Isn't he coming next year?

Yeah.

And Arch might just stay off four years?

Yeah, I think that was a plan all along.

Yeah.

I think that's what they were always planning on.

And

quarterbacks, like, I don't know.

I didn't think Ohio State had a quarterback who win the national championship last year until the national championship game was over.

Right.

I mean, you know, like college seasons are weird.

It's really long now.

Texas also had all these hidden things like an offensive line with a bunch of new starters skill position players that were new or not broken in yet and so there's like it could be long i i still would bet on texas long term because the schedule is not terribly hard for the sec and i think they could be in the playoff did you feel like you know arch comes out and obviously they obliterate san jose state And if you look at the stat line, the stat line looks good.

But if you looked at the actual game, if you looked at the tape, which now that I'm one of the foremost experts in college football in the entire world, that's what I do.

I grind tape.

I have Joel number one, but Joel is right there.

I'm coming for a spot.

I grind tape.

If you look at the tape, a lot of those throws were into gigantic windows, and those balls weren't really on the money.

So there's still people asking questions about, even in the game where he seemingly played well, whether or not Arch has it.

Absolutely.

I mean, I looked like I was covering some of those Texas receivers like Parker Livingston on Saturday.

I mean, it was, you know, I was, I wouldn't have been in the frame and neither were the San Jose State defensive back.

So yeah, it's weird.

I mean, it's college is a weird game.

I mean, it's just like, you know, you get games like that.

Like, what do we do with something like a win like that?

You're happy.

If you're a Texas fan, you're a little relieved because if you'd come out and struggled in that, you're like, oh, my God.

But you also don't really, it's very, very hard to project all the way through the season.

It was funny how good the first weekend and how interesting all the storylines were.

And then last weekend, they basically kind of punted on the weekend.

See, this is the theme.

I was watching.

So this is casual college college fan Bill.

That's just telling you for the casual like myself.

I wish that you guys could ever, I wish you guys could like be connected to Bill's college football fandom.

I remember when Bill was the world's greatest Colorado football fan, he was really

enjoyed that.

That was a really fun year.

Last weekend,

last weekend was the weekend for the diehard college football fan because you have to think about some of the stuff that happened.

You had USF go on the road to Florida, beat Florida.

You had Arizona Arizona State lose in Starksville to Mississippi State after some of these games weren't even on.

I would have had to get like a new bundle subscription on the ESPN.

Weren't on.

There was like an ACC network I would have had to subscribe to.

All of these games were on.

Yeah.

No, but they were on these bundles.

Actually,

casual Bill only watches CBS and Fox and NBC.

You saw the thing, Bill, with the ESPN app, they're trying to do college red zone or some form of college red zone.

Yeah.

For the casuals, college red zone is absolutely the thing you need because you have an idea going to starkville right now

oh i'll then start doing that yeah college red zone will work because like now and then you get to kind of see you don't have to get into i watch every part of it i was upset that they did not televise the halftime show of the grambling band at oio state i wanted to see that matchup the matchup of the oh state band versus the grandling who won that matchup did we did we ever find out i didn't see it but i'm telling you already that i know gremlin won um but it just

i didn't have to see like minus 500 favorites yeah i didn't have to see it but no it you know it's a really this was one of the more interesting seasons because at the top of the sport there's no dominant team there's no dominant program dare i say the playoff which everybody hated and resisted forever has actually sucked in people like me because i think it has I think so.

I was a little skeptical because I was, you know, the old school, the regular season is so cool.

It's the only sport where you have to be perfect.

Now, I love it.

I mean, it's like, yeah, there's so much.

And it was, it did feel a little long last year.

It felt weird to have that final on a Monday after a huge NFL weekend.

But man, this, the regular season felt great last year.

There were so many big games, and we're already off to a really good start.

It's a, you know, I'm going to name drop.

You know, Larry David hates field goal kickers.

And he hated that the Jets lost on a 60-yard field goal.

He just doesn't, he doesn't think that he's talked about this on a million shows.

He doesn't think those people should decide football games.

And so we were talking about like

if they just got rid of kickers, people would be like, oh my God, they got rid of kickers.

And then I think within like four weeks, people would be like, this is fucking awesome.

Everyone's just going for it on every fourth down.

I fucking love this.

Why do we have kickers?

And I think the college football playoff is kind of like that.

Where people are like, oh, we can't do this.

It's going to ruin him.

And now we're here and it's like, eh, it's pretty good.

So much of the sport is about tradition.

I get it.

It's about, that's, that's, I think, that this was the trepidation.

That's what I'm saying.

So much of the sport is about tradition.

It's about rivalries.

It's about, this is the way we've always done it.

This is the way we've always done it.

This is, these are cultural fights that are playing out on college football fields.

This is parts of Alabama.

So somebody told me something.

It's like most graduates, most fans of, I was talking to a guy and he said, most fans of the University of Auburn, most fans of Auburn, they went there, right?

And he goes, most fans of Alabama, they go to Walmart and Quick Trip and all of those places.

Basically,

that's the rivalry between the two places.

And

there's no way to really talk about Michigan versus Ohio State.

There's really no way to contextualize.

It's about emotion.

And people were wondering.

if those games and those moments would lose their emotional resonance if you had a playoff where essentially Ohio State could lose to Michigan and then win the national championship.

What we didn't realize was it's extremely interesting to think about whether or not it's a successful season for Ohio State if they lose to Michigan and then win the national championship.

It put their fan base and us as college football fans in conflict.

conflict that we wouldn't have if we didn't have the playoffs.

It turned into a yeah, but yeah.

We won the title, but

so what is your take that being immersed in this?

So, so you're pro for the most part, but like now we've shit the con the conference disaster and all the moving around seems like it's had,

I think that's been what's been the negative impact has been.

Yeah, I saw on Twitter today, Michigan State's playing UCLA.

That's a conference game, that's crazy, just as a reminder, and it starts at 11 p.m.

in East Lansing.

A conference game starts at 11 p.m.

at night.

Are you serious?

Yes.

Yes.

So who gave us the top three Texas rivals have stayed the same or has anything shifted?

Yeah, so it's Oklahoma, it's Texas AM, and it's Arkansas.

But because of all the conference moving around, they kind of got separated.

Now they're back in the SEC, and now they're playing more of their old rivals than they were before,

which is kind of weird.

Now we play all three.

We weren't playing all three before.

The one thing I am a traditionalist about is

regional conferences.

The conferences should be set up by region.

Well, I mean, this is college sports, and this is why we had conferences where all the schools were near each other.

So student athletes wouldn't have to travel too far to play sports against each other.

Right.

And that has been just tossed out the window.

And not just for football, but all the sports.

It's ridiculous.

Even from a competitive standpoint, though, I remember I watched the game, I think it was last year when Penn State came to SC.

If you watch the first half of the game, Penn State's walking in quicksand.

Yeah.

They haven't adjusted yet.

And it puts them at a competitive disadvantage.

I mean, you know, you have to travel for these games.

Playing on the road is always hard to travel all the way across the country to play them.

Right.

And then SC, look at some of the losses they had last year.

Some of those losses is because like that's a lot of travel time and to get ready and to turn all of that stuff around.

So it actually changes the game on the field as well to me.

I don't like it.

It was funny.

Old ways, you used to get like, only get a big vacation to the West Coast if you made a bowl.

It's like, we're going to the holiday bowl.

This is awesome.

We're getting to go to San Diego.

Now it's a conference game.

Give Van your top Texas moment of all time.

My junior year, 1998, Ricky Williams was one class ahead of me, and I was in the stadium when he broke the rushing record.

That's crazy.

Against Texas AM.

At Ricky.

And then Mike Dick had traded this whole draft for him.

Yeah, I remember that.

I think no limit was the agency at that point.

I think Pete was.

I don't think they're still.

Yeah, I think they

right

Ricky left, but he was that I know that's like a boring answer besides Major Applewhite who came from Baton Rouge, watching him run the ball at Texas.

That's Ricky.

Yeah.

He was fantastic.

Casual Bill was all in on the Ricky games.

Give us the media overview of the college football scene,

and then we can do NFL too, but college football, like the pregame shows, they've just...

beefed up now and they've tried to turn in.

It seems like it's worked whether you like what you're watching or not, but it does feel bigger.

Yeah, i mean it's what a world where lee corso is escorted off the stage at game day and barstool is brought on at the same time right i mean that happened the same week right and in the same place because they're outside the same stadium in columbus for ohio state texas i mean that was weird i feel like the whole thing is really in flux but in a good way like people are trying stuff you know And it's funny, you know, for game day, for people like me who watched that show for 20 years, the relationship on that show was Corso, the coach and Herbie the player.

And, you know, Herbie was a young guy, and then he got older, and Corso got older, and he was helping him on TV.

And it was just, it was a very interesting relationship just to watch.

And now that's been replaced on game day by Sabin, the coach, and Pat McAfee, the young guy, or comparatively young guy.

And that's obviously a completely different vibe.

I mean, it's, it's a weird time.

How, how are we feeling?

You have anything on that?

No, I was just saying, I cannot believe how good Nick Saban is on television.

I would have never thought in a million years that he would have been as good on.

And I think that's.

That's the number one thing he's good at, in your opinion.

To me,

he is good at teaching the game the same thing that would have made him a great coach.

He's good at giving the reasons that he feels like why a team will win, not just from like an X's and O's standpoint, but let me tell you about college football.

And he's just a great ambassador for the game.

It was the thing Belichick never totally figured out how to do in his one-year media tour last year.

Like, clearly, they have the same DNA and they're trying to do the same things, but Sabin seems more accessible.

Belichick always was kind of going to Ed Reed.

He was an unbelievable player.

Well, I mean, last year, Belichick didn't have any energy left over for that.

Well,

he's getting wiped out.

Yeah, he's like all night long.

He's every night.

Literally drained.

Yeah.

So, like, he's just going to.

Yeah, maybe Saban.

Maybe if Saban have a 25-year-old girlfriend, it's not too late.

Could happen.

Yeah.

You agree on Sabin?

yeah don't tell that to miss terry by the way nick saban very happily married

very happily married i apologize to miss terry um

i do and i also think nick saban committed to being in television right and didn't care

didn't want to be bill belich wanted a coach yeah like he was like here's something to make me kind of smiley and happy for a year and then i can go back to doing what i want to do The Bill Simmons podcast is brought to you by FanDuel football fans.

Every NFL Thursday, it's your chance to hit the jackpot on FanDuel.

FanDuel's Thursday touchdown jackpot.

You can win a share of $2 million in bonus bets each week to get in on this Thursday's action.

All you have to do is place an anytime touchdown score bet before the game between the Commanders and the Packers.

Kickoff, I have the Packers.

If your player scores the first or last TD of the game, you'll win your bet plus a share of bonus bets.

So you could go Tucker Kraft for first TD.

You can say, hey, Washington's going to get blown out, but at the end of the game, Terry McLaurin's going to score the last TD.

Put those together, go nuts.

Fando.com slash BS for your chance to win a share of $2 million in bonus bets.

Play your game with Fando, an official sports betting partner of the NFL.

Must be 21 plus president in select states or 18 plus in president in D.C., Kentucky, or Wyoming.

Opt-in.

Must apply profit boost token on select market prize pool to be split equally among all eligible participants who made the correct first or last TD pick.

Bonus issued as non-withdrawable bonus batch, which expires 21 days after receipt.

Restrictions apply.

See terms at sportsbook.fandle.com.

Gambling problem, call 800 GAMBOR.

Visit rg-help.com.

Call 1-888-789-777 or visit ccpg.org/slash chat in Connecticut.

This episode is brought to you by NFL Sunday Ticket, my friend.

NFL Sundays are back.

You won't want to miss the action.

NFL Sunday Ticket and YouTube TV, another friend of mine, lets you catch every game every Sunday all in one place.

And now,

get NFL Sunday Ticket month to to month and cancel anytime.

Head to youtube.com/slash BS and sign up now.

Local and national games on YouTube TV.

NFL Sunday ticket for out of market games excludes digital only games and commercial use.

If you cancel YouTube TV, you will lose access to NFL Sunday ticket.

Terms of barges, device, and content restrictions apply.

Commercial use excluded.

Renews every month during the 2025 regular season.

Cancel anytime.

Belichick leaves.

Who's the big NFL media story?

What's the number one thing?

Last year we had Brady joining.

We had Belichick doing NFL.

And I was was like, oh my God, look at this, look at this.

What is it this year?

I think it's JJ Watt after week one

on the number two team, yeah.

Because you know, you know how this goes, Bill.

Yeah, it's like the backup quarterback when your quarterback's struggling.

Everybody looks over and go, ooh, what about that guy?

I mean, I was like, I was talking to Shoemaker on the press box, and I was like, how soon are we going to get people calling for Tony Romo to be replaced by JJ Watt on the number one team?

And then I looked on Twitter and and it basically had already happened.

Wow.

I was like, oh, I was like, it was like the first quarter of week one.

Like, oh, this guy's much better.

So you don't feel like Romo got rented the ship at all in the last two years or no?

I'm not saying that's correct, but I just think when you put somebody in the number two slot, I mean, look at the Olson Brady stuff, and that's a different dynamic, but you're always going to have that.

And this is something a network guy told me this when the whole Romo salary explosion happened.

I was like, what did you take away from this?

And he was like, always have a number two, always have a backup plan so you don't get held up by your number one guy.

Interesting.

Olson did the San Francisco-Seattle game.

He's really good.

He's

really, really so glaring, though.

Yeah.

That's so glaring.

After a while, I was about to say, actually, I can't say that.

I was about to say, it makes me almost feel bad for Tom Brady.

Nothing can make me feel bad for Tom Brady.

Well, what about his wife?

dating a jiu-jitsu instructor.

That's what I'm talking about.

That's good for her.

You know, he knows how to do all the different poses and stuff.

But

like for me, nothing can make me feel bad about talking.

But that's a glaring one.

The

Watt situation, that's interesting to me because I actually do think that Romo, who started off on fire and then kind of obviously became a character, caricature of himself.

I think Romo's kind of got it back together now.

Yeah, I thought he was better last year.

I definitely, he slipped, there's no question, but I thought

he seemed a little more locked in.

I just thought Aikman and Buck are the best right now, and I don't even think it's arguable.

You know, Brady was better week one.

Yeah.

I don't know how much we didn't do the audio for that.

I didn't hear any of it because it wasn't on our multi-view.

That game was complete trash.

Yeah.

So, like, there was a moment right before the half.

He just sounded like, first of all, he just knew what he wanted to say.

He was making one point instead of trying to make five points, which is the rookie announcer mistake.

But he had this moment right before the half.

Jaden Daniel's about to go in and score again.

And he throws the ball away.

And Brady's like, that's going to be intentional grounding.

10-second runoff.

Half is over.

And you can feel like Kevin Burkhart and Dean Blandino were like, wait, what?

And then the ref comes in, and he was right.

And it was one of the first moments I've heard because you know, this announcers can give you good information, but what you really want is them to be in control and to be like five to 10 steps ahead of you as a viewer.

Bring up something that I hadn't thought about yet.

And that was one of the first moments that Brady did that for me, where I was like, oh, wow.

He saw that way before anybody, even in his own booth, did.

Were you surprised Inside the NFL basically died?

So you mean it's on X?

It's on Twitter as like a

short video show.

I thought that, to me, Inside the NFL would last, I'll be dead, and it'll still be on.

It was one of those shows.

And then

something started to happen with it.

And maybe, what is it?

Is you think it's just the era we live in now where everything's so fast?

I think a couple of things happened.

Number one,

I think the Fox Studio show market corrected Inside the NFL a little bit.

I know that it

was podcasting as well.

I know it's not the same thing, but when I was growing up, the coolest bunch of guys, the coolest football discussion was happening on Inside the NFL, the way those guys were talking about the game.

I wouldn't agree, boy.

Then it moved to Howie and Terry and all of those guys.

And that was the coolest one.

And they had all kinds of other stuff.

Jake Glazer was on there.

What was the lady that used to come on there when it first started?

It's like a really beautiful woman that used to come on there.

Oh, Jillian Barber?

Jillian Barbary.

Jimmy Kimmel.

He used to come on.

Yeah, so like all of that stuff, they became kind of the cool football show.

Yeah.

And that inside the NFL to me was never the same.

And it was still on HBO at that point, which also was different for a lot of people.

You know what?

I think part of what killed it was all the clips are just online now.

Yeah.

Like I watched yesterday, last night after that Viking game with J.J.

McCarthy throws the pick six, has this dramatic comeback as Caleb's cratering on the other side.

And he makes some big throws, but they had the locker room.

I love the locker room stuff.

And

Kevin O'Connell giving him the game ball, being like, everybody in this locker room knew what this guy was going to do and he did it.

And then they cut to JJ McCarthy and he's like, yeah.

And he gets the ball and they're all mobbing him.

And it's like, that's the kind of thing I would watch inside the NFL for on Wednesday nights because they would have those things.

And now I'm getting them instantaneously on wherever.

So once I think they lost that, plus, you know, it's just the discourse is just constant.

It makes sense it went away.

I'm still surprised, though, Curtis.

I felt like that was a staple.

Yeah.

And the NFL films footage was always really cool.

I mean, that's something that you really couldn't replace.

Even if you watched the whole TV game, even if you saw the clips on Twitter, it's still really awesome.

The guys talking shit to each other, the wide receivers getting into it with the debacs.

I ate it up.

That still, though, is better than anything that's coming out football related.

It's seven o'clock in the morning at Commander Stadium on Three or whatever.

And then the guy with the music comes in.

And then all of a sudden,

the player comes in.

We're going to get riled today, baby.

We're going to take them all the way.

And then after that, and then the whole way that that would come out would be fantastic.

There's nothing like that now.

But even that now is.

Bro, there's too much of it now.

What do you mean?

Like, there's no one that i don't feel like is putting that type of production value oh yeah i see that that's putting that type of production value into coverage does it need production value if it just exists all the time if i'm getting it 24 7 why do i need it to be a produced version of it yeah we got a bad feels like we're in no man's land but what vance talking about that camera coming out of the tunnel into a stadium with the music oh man that's i mean that just that gives me chills certain things we just did and it's really weird because the technology is better the people are smarter and the equipment's better and yet like sometimes you'll see on instagram they'll have like

i don't know they'll do an intro to the afc title game from 1997 here and it's like this is awesome it just got you more hype why i don't know why we kind of peaked with this stuff 15 20 now it's like too elaborate well brent musburger 40 years ago going you're

game five the lakers didn't realize that they you know and they just it would get you ready to go for the game

a couple of things have changed.

Well, obviously, technology is one of them.

Right now, we have a camera that's zooming all over.

That's the draw.

It's not the actual guy setting up the game for you anymore.

It's the next-gen stats.

Say he's running at 25 miles an hour or whatever it is.

All of that stuff is kind of the stuff.

And I'm a little older.

I'm a little older.

So that was the way.

I'm nostalgic for the nostalgic for it.

That's the way I can.

Curtis and I are constantly nostalgic.

Oh, my God.

You know, the thing I didn't miss that you're talking about is the tease before a big game.

And Bob Costas was incredible with the tees.

And I don't know why they don't do the tease anymore.

Because, like, if you are a casual fan coming in for the NBA Finals or for a big football game, you need to know who the players are, right?

You need to know what the stakes are.

But if you're somebody like us, the three of us, you're like, hell yes, I'm even more fired up than I already was.

I swear it used to be better.

YouTube tried to cover a football game.

How did that go?

Oh, not so well.

We got Derek Carr out of the deal.

Derek Carr was good.

Were you surprised about that, Vin?

Yeah, I'm surprised that he's good at anything.

Derek Carr was a good studio guy.

Like, shocking.

Good for him.

It'll take some time.

Yeah, Vanilla.

It'll take some time.

I'm happy for him.

I'm happy for his family.

Everything went well.

It'll take some time before I'm okay with it.

What do you think YouTube learned from their first YouTube experience?

Well, it was weird because, you know, with Netflix, when they get to do these little one-offs, they basically have their pick of any announcer.

You know, so they can put like a cool team.

It's like, what if we got

Greg Olson and Noah Eagle and put them together?

And you're like,

that sounds good.

YouTube had a weird one because every NFL announcer had a job that weekend.

So they could not go around and be like, let's pick a dream team.

Let's put together who we want.

So they just have to find people.

So I think in a way, it's probably just a one-off if YouTube had.

more NFL and they probably will have more NFL when the NFL tears up these contracts in 2029.

I think they'll be better at it.

I think it was just kind of weird, but it was so strange.

We're sitting there on a Friday night.

Everybody's focused on it, right?

It's day two of the NFL season.

It's kind of like, huh, in Brazil.

You know what I think?

Kay Adams and Cam Newton in halftime.

I like that.

You like Cam.

Yeah, I think Cam is making a fantastic career for himself post-playing days.

I think he's a lightning rod.

He's not afraid to stick his nose in there and give an opinion.

I like Cam.

You know what?

I thought that they should have, especially

interesting take.

I like it.

I like Cam.

Fourth and one, especially.

Cam on fourth and one, especially.

Just watching him,

he's got a lot of charisma.

It's going to work out.

It's going to be great.

You know what?

I think they should have.

I think they should have us, since the games are going to go to YouTube, we know that this is going to happen eventually.

They should have it where

you can call the game.

on YouTube like you and your friends alternate streams from from your house and then people can watch you call the game you should be able to be you should be able to NFL should have a system where they let you call the game.

I think all this stuff's coming.

I actually think we're going to have all this in 10 years.

People can watch, they can go, oh, I want to go watch Van and Jomie call the game.

And then me and Jomie call the whole game, and then we build subscribers based upon us as a little unit calling football games.

I actually think that could happen.

Democratize it.

You know, Van and I

didn't play in the NFL.

And neither did non-Curtis.

We're non-players.

Are non-players qualified to discuss sports?

Because that kicked up again.

Is this there's these cycles of the same stories that happen with sports media.

And we've had, what is this average?

Like once every 18 months this happens?

For the last hundred years?

Yes.

It's like every 18 months.

Yeah.

And said, and the player, how could you possibly understand?

Because you didn't play the game.

I thought there were two layers to that.

One is the whole, you know, you are disqualified.

You don't get to have an opinion here because you couldn't possibly understand part of it, which, as you say, is like as old as time.

But then, if I may infer a little bit, there's the, there's only so many reps to go around at ESPN part of the equation.

There's something underneath it, you say.

Well, and I don't know that.

I haven't talked to Ryan Clark about that, but here comes this guy, new guy, who's Peter Shrimp.

He starts in the spring, my friend.

And you're like, oh, he's getting run on Get Up, first take.

Shiny new toy.

Right.

He's getting on some shows.

Yeah.

So I'll say this:

This is the question, if anybody cares to ask.

We've seen this go back and forth.

Like when JJ was on first take, he never outright said this, but he did carry himself a lot of times with the air of, let me tell you what happened and how the game was actually played.

Yep.

Right.

And you see, guys.

I understand this better than you because I played.

There's got to be a level where that's true, right?

By the way, that is 100% true.

It's maybe not in the way that Ryan expressed it to Peter right there, but at some point, the players are on these shows because they actually

did it.

I remember one time, Kevin Durant, who's notoriously,

he's notoriously, he doesn't talk a lot to people on social media.

He doesn't really use it that much.

But that's a joke, but he actually said something that was very funny.

He took me a second.

He said something that was very funny on social media.

He was like, you shouldn't be, if I can't, if you can't hit seven elbow jumpers in a row, you should not be able to talk basketball with me.

And that seems like a dick thing to say.

Yeah.

But I, on a level, I get it.

Like on a level, I

do kind of understand someone saying that if you're going to tell me what I need to be doing in the game and how I need to be moving the ball and getting to my spot, shouldn't you have at some point in some way

either had enough skin in the game, covering it over the course of decades, or have done it yourself.

I had this when the year that I did TV with Magic Johnson, where we'd be arguing, like you and I would argue.

But at some point, he's Magic Johnson.

And he's just,

like, at some point, I probably lose if we're like diametrically opposed on an argument because he's just going to know more about basketball than me.

But I think the thing you can do is do as much homework as you can, be prepared, come up with ideas and takes.

What I didn't like about what Ryan did, and I don't know him, you know him.

Yeah, he's good.

When you're on live TV with people,

there's a nakedness to that.

You really have to trust everybody you're with.

And I've been in situations where you completely trust the people you're with and it's great.

And I've been in situations where I did not trust at least one of the people I was with.

And it sucks.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Because

if somebody tries to flip something on you or make you look bad in some way or screw you up on live TV and either they're doing it intentionally or unwittingly.

Intentionally is worse.

It's just fucked up.

And I felt like that moment, whether Ryan intended to do that or not, he was doing it in a way to

put Peter on his heels on live TV.

And live TV is a we thing.

It's not a zero-sum game.

Like you're on a show.

Everybody's got to win if you're doing this show.

And once you bring that element into it, I think it's really hard to put that genie back in the bottle.

That was my take.

I like, and he apologized for it.

And he obviously knows, like, hey, man, that's not where I want to be when I'm doing television.

Let me tell you what, another thing that I'm kind of about.

And obviously, it's something that's regrettable.

And he regretted it.

He apologized for it.

You know what else I'm about?

Because I'm this toxic.

I'm about just sometimes

having the fucked up interaction.

Right.

I'm for actually, hey, I said the wrong thing.

I did the wrong thing.

Because in that saying, what people don't talk about was Peter defending himself on live TV.

He said, yo, don't belittle me like that.

Right.

So, which I love.

I think he has to do it.

So, in that situation, we could all say, hey, that's not what we will want to do to one another.

But I don't mind making the mistake and getting up right to the level of what's appropriate and being able to set that boundary with a coworker.

I think the real thing is, do you leave with more respect for that person?

And that was the issue.

And that's the, do you leave with more respect for that person and an understanding of why you shouldn't do something like that or why it's not good for the viewers to see it?

It was the, and the thing is, Curtis, like, I actually thought what Ryan was trying to say was pretty interesting.

He was basically like, I see your point.

Here's why you're wrong.

And I'm just saying this as somebody, like, there was a way he could have said it.

It was like, I'm just saying this as somebody who played.

I don't care if I had a good game.

If I made the play that fucked up the game for my team, that's all I would think about that night.

And none of this other stuff would matter it's just the way he said it but i actually thought it was a really interesting point you know what it reminded me of remember when uh lamar jackson and the ravens lost the bills in the playoffs last year and every smart football person you know got on twitter and was like this is not lamar jackson's fault this is not it's mark andrews fault it's not his fault and then if you actually listen to lamar jackson in his press conference he was like i didn't play well enough to win today yeah like he wasn't thinking like that he didn't want football nerds to be like no no we're defending like he's he had a very personal reaction to the game.

And I think that's what Ryan was actually trying to say, right?

Right.

CeeDee Lamb balled out for 95% of the game, but he didn't for the last 5%.

He's not going home looking at his stats being like, I did great today, you know?

But again, I think that's a good thing.

I think it's other baggage coming into it that had nothing to do with what they were talking about.

It felt

TV.

De Van's point, I think if it was a podcast, you would actually just lean into that interaction.

Be like, wait, let's talk about this for the next time.

You're not throwing in a commercial.

That's a good point.

Well, and also Mike Greenberg did nothing.

He just sat there.

Like host should actually be like, whoa, whoa, wait a second, guys.

Let's, let's, let's, let's reign this in.

And, you know, you're it's funny.

I do live TV every now and again.

I go on CNN.

Bill loves to see me on CNN.

I get it.

It drives me crazy.

He loves it when I go on CNN.

I do too.

Abby Phillip, man.

That's a great show.

Look at that.

Look what it's doing for me.

Don't explain.

I'm getting brian.

So, but

and there is a very delicate dance that you're doing with people, even at that table where we all have these

opposing political points and points of view, there's still a way that you want to make sure you don't cut people off too much.

You don't want to come across yelling at someone.

There's still, we're on TV right now.

So let's try not to make each other look bad.

We can try to make each other look stupid because we're throwing out intellectual points, but now let's not bully each other and make everyone look bad.

You can undermine.

It's so easy to undermine somebody when you're doing any kind of show with them.

Right.

You can undermine somebody's point in all these subtle ways.

You can do it with how you're sitting, what your demeanor is, no selling.

Like we always talk, it's like professional wrestling.

You're doing your, you're doing your move, your pile driver on me.

I'm going to act like it hurt.

And then I do a move, you're going to act like it hurt.

And that's how you do it.

And some people on TV, especially now is like the louder and louder you get.

on TV, the more people notice you.

The professional wrestling selling part seems to be going out the window a little bit.

And it's something something I think Stephen A is still really good at when he's with the right people.

Like when he's with Mad Dog, he sells the shit out of Mad Dog.

That whole thing, it's like really fun to watch because it's because he gets it.

And that's why Stephen A is really good at what he does.

PTI is another one.

Koenheiser, the best person I've ever done TV with, they just re-signed

for three more years.

Koenheiser is technically contractually signed to do PTI

until he's 80 years old.

Wow.

And this show started, I I think, what, 2002, Brian?

2001.

2001.

It makes really no sense with anything else at ESPN at this point.

It's on for a half hour.

I don't even know who leads it in.

It just seems like it's going to go on forever.

They'll never cancel it.

It's those guys' show.

They should be the ones who decide whether it goes away or not.

And Koinizer's for 10 years has been like, I'm too old.

I called him today to make fun of him.

I'm too old.

I look like a Muppet.

I shouldn't be on TV anymore.

He'll never leave that show.

That show will go on forever.

But what was your reaction when you heard it was coming back?

I think the reason we're happy it's coming back is because it's one of the last links to old ESPN.

Yeah.

That company's changed so much over the last couple of years.

And I think you can argue for the better.

They had to change.

You know, the world's changing so rapidly, the whole media world.

But you look back, it's like, it's 2001, right?

That's what old ESPN counts as now, not the 90s, not the 80s, 2001.

And, you know, what else?

Maybe Berman, you know, doing primetime in the form it's in now.

Dicky V still around.

Like, what are the other links to that world?

Oh, 2001 was when I got to ESPN.

It's 2001.

People who were born the year that show existed are now getting married and having kids.

Yeah, a little early.

They need to go out and experience life more, but yeah, they could.

Good advice.

But, you know,

I look back at PTI or I look at PTI.

PTI is the best version of

the sports two-man because

the sports two-man went from PTI and then it went to first take.

And first take is a groundbreaking show, particularly the iteration of first take that I'm talking about is Skip and Stephen A.

It's a groundbreaking show.

But we have to be honest about first take insofar as first take is a show that you can make an argument broke sports media in a way because it took this it changed discussion from having a take

and it

what was the slogan was literally embrace debate embrace debate and people hated it for years when you are always doing that it becomes not the ethos of your show, it becomes the shtick of your show.

Sometimes Kornheiser and Wilbon, they have completely awesome conversations about things that they agree on.

Yeah.

About things that they are, sometimes they're going against each other, but sometimes they're just yes and in each other.

And it's in the curation of the topics and the actual them opining on sports culture that is the interesting thing.

It's not the fight itself.

Well, you know what's interesting about what you just said?

They've earned that because you know they'll also disagree if it's time to disagree

when it's time to disagree.

So when they agree, it's almost like what Siskel and Ebert had.

We were like,

oh, yeah, these guys both like this movie.

They're not going to like try to take, try to zag against each other.

I still think it's a really good show.

I think it's the most important thing anyone created this decade or this century from a sports standpoint.

It certainly is the most ripped off of any show, right?

I mean, there's nothing,

I don't think there's anything that comes close.

You have to go back to 2001.

Like, we're all kind of in the same business now in the media.

We're all in the TV, audio, right?

It was one business.

Back then, it was not one business.

It was writer or television.

Yeah.

And all of a sudden, those two guys go do TV and everybody who's in writing, took us a while, but everybody's in writing is like, I could do something like that.

That looks appealing to me.

That looks like a version of what I would be talking about in the Washington Post newsroom or talking about at home with one of my best friends.

And I think that's still the magic of PTI.

It's you can still look at it and be like, man, if I had a show like that, that would be the most fun thing in the world.

I think all roads lead from Mike and the Mad Dog and PTI for all the shit that everybody is doing with sports now.

It's like, whatever,

even like what we're doing right now,

whatever that is of like, I'm hanging out with somebody I like and we're arguing about shit.

It starts with that, with Mike and the Mad Dog and PTI.

And PTI was way more structured and better and like tighter.

Here are my opinions.

They'll go back and forth.

The format was just perfect.

people could step in and host it for them, but it was never quite the same if they weren't on it.

And I don't know, I always call them my uncles, but

they're just like the two of them together.

I still get a fucking kick out of it.

And it doesn't make sense because it's 20, it's almost 25 years.

You would think like you would even get tired of like hearing your two uncles argue about sports after a while, right?

Well, now they're almost the only game in town doing it that way.

So you're, if you want what they do, you kind of have to go to them for it.

So it's almost made them more valuable in a way now than even they were.

Cause, you know at some point esp and it flipped i remember pti came out pti was this gigantic deal hit from the beginning but then at some point it flipped at some point you know the cold pizza remember when it was cold pizza and all of these shows they come along and pti becomes more like the the consistent show there well now it's a lot of these shows are going away these personalities have changed and it exists and it's still kind of the only way place you can get what it is that they're doing so it's even more special did you believe burke magnus when he he said the show lasts as long as they want to do it?

Like, I wonder,

once they don't want to do it,

does the show still exist?

I believe him when he says as long as they want to do it, because I think they're in that handful of

at ESPN who have the lifetime contract.

Phoebe had it, Dick Vitale had it, Lee Corso had it.

They walk away when they want to walk away.

Yeah.

It's a really tiny list, as you know.

Most people don't leave ESPN under their own power.

I didn't crack it

but i was about to go there and you beat do you want pti to exist post no tony and mike i think the show should leave it

the show should leave just like inside the nba like

they are the show that's it's you can put other people in it and guest host it but it's not the same

is there anyone out there

anybody out there right now that you could see filling in for those two guys just create a different show just make it something slightly different and do it that way and keep most of the elements you like.

That show should end with them.

And they shouldn't.

I don't know.

I just, that's how I feel, but we'll see how it goes.

Anyway, Tony's going to be doing it till he's 80.

How old was Kosel when he lost his mind in the mid-80s?

Like mid-60s?

Yeah, I don't think he was that old.

People looked older in those days.

I'm excited for Tony to start getting a little like gamey on the air.

We'll get the next step.

Be like, whoa, Uncle Tony.

Let it fly.

You know, our rebels start letting them fly at the table.

Everyone, but I mean, it's not like he hasn't gone to the edge of controversy before.

No,

it's happened.

He's not afraid.

Yeah.

All right, Curtis.

Anything else we have to cover?

Are we good?

I think we're good.

We did it.

It's great to see you as always.

It's Curtis and I.

This is our 15th year working together.

That's insane.

Yeah.

15th year.

We're going back to Grantland?

Yeah, 2000.

Hired Curtis in spring of 2011.

So yeah, we're like Mark 15.

How has Bill changed?

God, I think almost less than anybody.

Yeah, I mean, like Bill, the person.

Pretty stable.

Yeah.

Well, Curtis interviewed me for the first time.

What was it, 04?

He did a piece on me.

That was when we met.

You reached out.

The Red Sox book came out.

Yeah, yeah.

I don't even know if that piece is on the internet at this point.

I think it is.

It's called The Lord of the Red Sox.

Oh, interesting.

Yeah, that was how I met Curtis.

And then always kind of monitor him.

And then

when I was thinking about Grantland, I had this list of writers.

And I was like, if I ever, they ever let me do this site, I have this person and this person.

And he was always on that list.

And now we're still working together.

And so the press box with your guy, Joel Anderson, you share custody.

Yeah, I did.

And with Shoemaker as well, but with Joel as well.

I did press box with Joel.

It was fantastic.

Me and Joel, you have to listen to Bringer Tailgate.

Me and Joel's dynamic.

Me and Joel might be the new PTI with Tate there as a referee.

Joel is

any worries about Joel being comfortable on the show were erased in about five minutes.

Done.

Yeah.

He's into it.

He's

aggressive with it.

It's a great show.

Oh my God.

He's the best.

And I'm fortunate enough because Joel just trolls me all day on a college football Saturday, just texts me all this shit over and over again, especially when the longhorns look bad.

And I'm like, he's a natural for this.

I guess you didn't make that thread.

Excuse me.

I like this.

I'm good to know that he's not just doing it to me.

Yeah.

Because this is just his personality.

Because the first time he shares the wealth.

The three of us are on the podcast and we're all talking about college football.

And Joel comes out at the end.

He goes, you know what?

Fuck LSU.

I'm like, what?

What are you talking about?

Why would you fuck me?

Why did you say this?

And now I know, because this is what he does on Ring of Telegate.

Now I know he does it to you too.

And that makes me feel better.

I thought he had some kind of problem with me.

I was going to go let the air out of his tyranny.

Every week, he loves it.

Curtis, a pleasure as always.

Good to to see you.

Welcome, Bill.

This episode is supported by FX is the Lowdown, starring Ethan Hawk.

Allow us to introduce you to Lee Raybon, a quirky journalist/slash rare bookstore owner/slash unofficial truth seeker who is always on the tail of his latest conspiracy.

This time, his most recent expose puts him head-to-head with the powerful family that rules Tulsa, meaning only one thing: he must be onto something big.

FX is the Lowdown premieres September 23rd on FX.

Stream on Hulu.

This episode is brought to you by NBA 2K26, a favorite of my sons and me.

All right, quick break.

NBA 2K26 stacked this year.

Gameplay, new motion engine, smoother catch and shoot.

The rhythm shooting is dialed in.

My team added the W's.

Now you can get Caitlin Clark pulling up from deep.

Larry Bird talking trash mid-game.

Jokic casually dropping triple doubles.

It's absurd in the best way.

My career has a whole new storyline.

The city's tighter and you're on the court way faster.

I've been playing video basketball games.

I think the first one was early 80s.

I'm stunned.

Like when I go and my son's playing with his friends, and I go in, and I barge my woman and I start playing with them, I'm just amazed by how good, how detailed all the games are.

How they really look like NBA players.

2K26 is finally here.

And yeah, it is absolutely loaded.

If you care about basketball, even a little, you're checking it out today.

Ball over everything.

Hey, I'm a big fan of FanDuel's new Thursday touchdown jackpot promo available every Thursday night football game.

Here's how it works.

Place a $5 anytime TD bet on the game using the promo PBT.

In addition to the chance to win your bet, you can win a share of the $2 million in bonus bets FanDuel is giving away if your player scores the first TD or the last TD.

Fun things to root for.

If your player scores the first TD, you just put $1 million in bonus bets with everyone that bets the same player.

There's another $1 million jackpot for the last TD score.

So I would go Tucker Kraft for both.

I think he scores a touchdown in this game.

Just double up.

Do first TD, last to D.

If you can only put him on the first TD, maybe put like Terry McLaurin as the last TD because I think the Packers are going to win this one going away.

Be sure to check out the TD jackpot promo for Thursday night football this week and each subsequent Thursday over at our friends on FanDuel Sportsbook.

All right, we're taping this.

It is Tuesday afternoon Pacific time here with Van Lathan.

We have Chris Manix on the TV.

I feel like this is like a real TV show, Van.

Yeah, bringing in, Chris.

Van called for this.

Van texted me last week.

He said, I've been studying Crawford and Canelo nonstop, and I just want to go into it on the pod.

I'm like, okay, that's fine.

But first, we have to talk about this Clipper scandal, which I know you've covered a bunch.

Did you get up to speed on this, Van?

I have.

Okay.

Manix, you have been on the side of, maybe this is the Massachusetts in you,

very suspicious of the Clippers story.

I would describe you as a skeptic of the Clippers being like, I don't know, how did this happen?

What have you learned the last few days?

And are you still as much of a skeptic?

Well, my skepticism,

it really flows from the idea that if it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck, chances are it's a duck.

And it also flows from the belief that

stuff like this is not

uncommon in the NBA, that we see teams

doing

some kind of deals that provide sweeteners to players.

What has astonished me and what's astonished most of the league types that I've talked to is the sheer magnitude of it, the amount of money that appears to have been,

well, that was given to Kawhi Leonard and may have been directed his way.

I mean, $7 million per year is not nothing.

I mean, I don't know what Kawhi's deal is with New Balance, but is it $7 billion per year?

Like, and Kawhi is up there doing commercials for New Balance.

He's wearing New Balance gear.

But this company, he did absolutely nothing.

So I wouldn't say that I've learned anything new over the last few days.

It's just that every NBA person I talk to is deeply suspicious that this is some kind of, you know, rogue outfit that on its own paid Kawhi Leonard $7 million per year to do nothing.

And that's the key, man.

He didn't do anything.

He didn't even do like local ads.

Yeah, I guess the question is that part of it, everyone knows.

But I saw Cuban.

He went on.

Pablo's show and they duked it out for what Pablo said was three hours that they cut down to like an hour and 15 minutes or whatever.

And the question, the central question is, how much of this did Steve Ballmer and the ownership of the Clippers know?

Right?

There is a world where you could make up a scenario where this is Uncle Dennis going around trying to get what he's trying to get from the Raptors and then from the Clippers.

But if that's not the case, then what you're saying is that all of this is taking place.

Somebody runs it up to Steve Ballmer and Steve Ballmer goes, yes, go ahead and do that, which I could believe, but it does seem like Ballmer is going going to have a lot of space between what happened and him being involved in it to say, I didn't know anything.

And what is the smoking gun to prove that?

Can we talk about, you know, this has been such a digger?

One thing, like, the one thing that gets, and I think Howard wrote about this on the ringer today, like, there doesn't need to be a smoking gun for there to be punishment.

Like, there,

you don't, this is not a court of law where they have to have an email from Steve Ballmer that gives like the thumbs up emoji to go and do this underhanded deal between Kawhi and Aspiration.

The NBA just has to believe it.

There has to be enough circumstantial evidence for the NBA to believe something like this happened.

I think that needs to be taken into account.

This is what I've been hearing from execs.

I mean, like,

look, I think Adam Silver would love to have that smoking gun.

Remember, the Minnesota situation, there was the smoking gun.

There were actual emails between the two agents that outrun the particular gun.

It was all down on paper.

But as much as Adam would like to have that, he doesn't need that to bring the hand of God down on the Clippers.

Can I say something real quick just to that?

So

let's say he doesn't have it.

Think about how destabilizing it's going to be to enact a punishment against the Clippers.

It's almost to me, it seems as if if you didn't have that smoking gun, you'd almost want to punt on it because

the hand of God that comes down on the Clippers for engaging in this type of malfeasance would have to be so severe that if you don't have the smoking gun, would you even want to do that based upon circumstantial evidence?

I don't know that this league office is going to have the appetite for it.

Um,

because especially with the all-star game coming in February,

a lot of variables.

I don't know if this league office is going to have the appetite for it, but man, use the word destabilizing.

How destabilizing, though, is it to do nothing?

Like, theoretically, there are people that wholeheartedly believe that the Clippers skirted ironclad rules.

And if they did, look what they were able to do with it.

Number one, they were taking some money out of owners' pockets because if they had paid Kawhi the full max the second time around, then that would have added to their tax burden, which would have meant more money flowing out of the LA Clippers.

They also were able to do things, you know, cap-wise or signing players wise, like guys are able to pick up because they had more flexibility.

So I would would turn it back to you on this, man.

Like, how destabilizing it would it be for a league to have the richest owner in the NBA

allegedly, theoretically, just flaunt the rules in order to keep some money in his pocket, but more importantly, be able to build the kind of team he wanted to?

Yeah, I mean,

there seems to be common knowledge that everybody's doing this.

Like, I haven't heard about it on this level.

Not at the number that's what I'll say.

I definitely believe, I don't think there's any way, and it was interesting to hear Cuban and Pablo go back and forth because Cuban almost seemed like he was defending his own reputation.

Like, these are my guys.

Like, remember, blue chips.

Yeah, Tony's my guy.

My guy.

He wouldn't do that.

He wouldn't do that.

He wouldn't do that.

Tough-ass kid from Chicago.

That's what Cuban was doing.

It seems to me very unlikely that

Steve Balmer didn't know about this.

It seems impossible, right?

That he didn't, that he didn't have anything else.

Chris made the big point, though.

The suspension or whatever,

whatever can happen, losing draft picks, voiding the contract, whatever it is.

This is basically the OJ civil trial versus the OJ trial.

You only need to kind of think something happened and have enough evidence to be like, I think that happened.

So we're doing this.

The question is, how much is an actual trial?

We're like, we are proving this indisputably that you did this.

I don't think they have to do that for the lead to crack down and be like, dude, something smells with this.

You gave 50 million to these guys.

He's getting 28 million to do nothing.

Like, you can say there's no smoking gun, but something happened here and we're punishing you.

And I think that's how this plays out.

It's the 28 million and it's the nothing.

Like, if he had just gone out there and done one of those stupid HEB commercials that the Spurs did back in the day, or if he had posted once a year about his love for eliminating the carbon footprint, we would not be having this particular conversation.

And I think it comes down to

it, either has to be a Timberwolves-like hand of God God punishment because they believe that the Clippers circumvented the cap, or it's got to be nothing.

They cannot find a middle ground.

There can't be like, okay,

I disagree.

I think they can still punish them for some pieces of a second-round pick?

No,

I think it's somewhere between Joe Smith and nothing, would be my guess on this.

It's too much.

You got to lean closer to Joe Smith, though.

But if they do that, then

it's like them trying to say that you can get a little bit pregnant, right?

Because

either you did it, and if you did it, it's such a shot at the competitive balance in the league.

Can you imagine them not doing anything now?

That's what I'm what I'm saying is

the choice is for the league is whether or not to make this story right now, which is a huge,

a huge sports story.

The choice is whether or not to make this the biggest sports story of the decade, which is what you is, which is what like a Donahy level 10.

Right.

Donahue is way worse.

Which is what you.

Let me put it on something up.

Like the one thing that Stern did well, and it's always going to come back to what would Stern do?

We are verily going to make those.

It'll be a secret to your retirement.

Well, Stern,

Stern liked to make examples, right?

He liked to throw an elbow.

You know, in 2000, you know, the Timberwolves did it.

He came down with the harshest punishment he possibly could.

Malice in the Palace, he said to Ron Artest,

you're out.

You can't do this.

This is the harshest punishment we could possibly come up with.

Even something on a smaller.

Remember when the Spurs were like benching guys, DNP old and stuff like that?

Like they handed out one of the largest fines ever for something like that.

Like old NBA was willing to throw an elbow and to come down with swift punishments and severe punishments to make an example of someone.

It remains to be seen whether this version of it is willing to do the same.

Can we talk about how funny this story is?

I know it's not supposed to be funny, but let's be honest.

Nobody got hurt.

Rules were broken, but it didn't help the Clippers.

Nothing really happened.

They've won three playoff series in six years.

First of all, Aspiration is that, that's what it's called, right?

Aspiration.

I've lived in LA this whole decade.

They were allegedly a sponsor for Clipper Games.

I'd never heard of the company.

I don't, I'm not saying I have to hear about everything, but it was like this.

We're trying to make the environment safer, but they're somehow funneling all this money.

And it's basically a Ponzi scheme slash, let's just try to take as many money, as much money as we can from people.

Kawhi getting 28 million for four years to do nothing.

And then my favorite part of this, Uncle Dennis, who was a hilarious character in 2019.

We all heard these stories.

It became like that Bill Braski SNL sketch where it's like, I heard Uncle Dennis asked for a yacht and an elephant.

And you just never knew what was true and not true.

And now Uncle Dennis is back in our lives just asking for shit.

I just think, I think this is almost a funnier story than

people are taking this so seriously.

And it's like, yeah, if they did it, they're going to lose all these picks, but this is like crazy that they thought they could get away with this.

I'm almost like in awe of how stupid this is.

You know what I mean?

Yeah, I know what you mean.

I'm interested more, though, in the ripple effects of what a punishment could be.

Like, if I knew the punishment was just going to be some money in a second-round pick, I probably wouldn't care quite as much or be quite as invested in finding out exactly what the truth here is

but the reality is that the outcome could be a catastrophic for the clippers and b in like the nuclear scenario could put like a top 10 player on the open market to be signed by somebody if they decide to void the contract of kawhi letters so that that to me is the most interesting angle of all this what the what the fallout could be if the nba determines the clippers did this Is that like the worst thing in the world if they avoid it, though?

And had him go back?

I mean, they don't have to pay him $50 million a year.

I don't even even know if he can play 50 games.

I mean, I know it's not great.

They have title aspirations.

You're talking about it from a basketball space.

I would say losing the draft picks would be the thing that killed me.

But there's also something else that's going on here, and it's like a social thing, right?

Steve Ballmer's one of the richest men in the world.

Yeah.

Right.

And so when you watch these interviews or watch these people talk, it seems like this is a situation where there are some people that are looking at this.

It's like, shouldn't he have to follow the rules too?

Shouldn't Steve Ballmer have to follow the rules too?

There are rules that are put in place so that mega-rich guys can't just go spend whatever they want on any player that they want so that there is some balance.

You know, I get deeply into way too deeply into Twitter, much to the chagrin of a lot of people around here.

Including this guy.

There you go.

But there are people who went, yo, man, I just want to let you know, this balmer clipper situation, this is a microcosm for our whole society where rich people feel like they could just do whatever they want and make whatever rules they want.

And the rest of us just have to go along with it.

So there are people that are looking this are saying, hey, if Kawhi is on no-show jobs or if he's getting no-show jobs to the tune of, what is it, $50 million, $30 million?

$28 million and $20 million.

$20 million

to circumvent the cap, they want to see their basketball gods like reign their hand down on this and kind of nip it in the bud.

I almost want it to be more money than it was.

It's right in that middle zone of like the 28 million.

Sure, that's great, but Kawhi was making 50 plus million a year, right?

And it's, it's like, all right, a lot of money for the rest of us.

No, but you got to grease them up with extra money, but it's not worth, it's not enough money to risk like his reputation for the rest of his life.

Ballmer being suspended, but with seven draft picks.

It's not like he's funneling $200 million worth of stock or some crazy thing.

It's like, it's like he's wetting his beak.

Here's a little extra for you, Kawhi.

Here's 8% extra on top of your salary um that i'm going to funnel your way so you'll stay with us but here's one of the things i don't understand kawaii was hurt when this happened he had torn acl so why did they have to pay him beyond the salary cap to make sure he stayed on the clippers where was he going he was hurt well i i'm not focused on that first contract i'm more focused on the second contract well that's what i mean three year well that was less than max it was he hurt then like three years ago yeah he was hurt three years ago

he's been hurt so many times.

It was very hurt.

It was less than max, but what, but what does that less than max allow them to do, Bill?

Like, what did that less than max?

Did that open up avenues for them to do certain things?

They got them Russell Westbrook, who helped them lose in round one.

I mean, it didn't really

matter.

That's why I think the story's funny.

Like, first of all, if they did do it this way, where they're like, hey, Uncle Dennis wants more money, Bomber's like,

all right, let's use that aspiration, that weird tree site.

I'll give them money and just have them give half of it to Uncle Dennis, and then, and nobody will find out.

This fucking random company.

What's the worst thing that could happen?

Oh, nothing.

This will never come out.

Like, that I just think this is so stupid that that would be what actually happened, and yet it might be what actually happened.

The funniest thing about the story to me is the

two people that could give a shit less about any of this are Uncle Dennis and Kawhi.

Oh, yeah.

Dude,

I would be so surprised if Kawhi Leonard's heart rate or blood pressure went up one beat or one point.

Is he going to apologize to his fans?

None of us.

I'd like to apologize to all the Kawhi Kawhi believers out there.

I'm sorry.

Never.

He's

the one in the middle of this.

It's all about and over him.

And I can guarantee you he couldn't give a shit about any of this that's happening.

In the worst case scenario, if he is back on

the free agent market, him and Uncle Dennis get to go to another team and ask to be environmentalists somewhere else.

So, like, maybe he could go to another city and he could teach him about climate change and help him clean up the city.

Well, do you even blame Kawhi in these circumstances?

No, because guys ask for stuff all the time.

Like, that's been something that I've had conversations, even just a couple hours ago with the GM.

Like, guys ask for things constantly.

It's like, if it's almost the analogy, would be like if you have like a young, you have a young kid who is up at 10 o'clock at night, says, Hey, can I get a candy bar?

Right?

I want to go.

I want a Snickers bar before bed.

You don't blame the kid for eating it.

You get blamed for giving it to him, right?

Like the kid, it's the kid's job to ask.

It's almost, it's Kawhi's job.

It's even Frankie Uncle Dennis' job to ask for as much as you can possibly get.

It's the general manager's job, the owner's job to say no.

And if it, there's a possibility, at least, that they didn't say no.

Mannix, how many, if what's what's the over-under of players,

owners, and front office executives who are sweating fucking bullets this last week with all the chicanery that happens in this league and all the, yeah, use our team plane to go to wherever and then just make sure you bring it back.

And oh, yeah, you, your buddies, you guys want to go to Vegas?

Take the plane.

Oh, here's this.

Oh, here's this little endorsement thing.

Like, there has to be people sweating bullets.

Look.

If over the last 10, 15 years

your star player took less money.

You know that if the Clippers get punished, you're going to wind up in somebody's crosshairs.

You're going to wind up, you could wind up being investigated.

Look, that's the humorous thing to me about the Cuban defense.

And I have no knowledge of what was going on with his teams, but like, you know, who in the history of the last 20 years has taken less money to stay with a team than Dirk Davinsky did years ago?

Like, I mean, it was a, it was a huge,

I was on this podcast when Dirk had that documentary and Cuban's company bought it.

And I would made multiple jokes on multiple pods about how he spent like Iron Man level money on the Dirk doc.

Here's 48 million for your diet.

Like, who knows what he spent, but it was technically legal, whatever he spent, right?

Magnolia buys the dock.

Sure.

There's just a lot.

There's a lot of things that you can do that.

maybe don't necessarily pass the smell test.

So I think that's season tickets.

How about like the guys, the best friend of the guy who's always sitting courtside?

I I wonder how he got those tickets or that's the suite or just whatever.

Like, what do people think happens?

Look, it's they think this stuff happens.

It's just this would be $28 million.

Well, this would be, again, that's the big thing: the number, the number, and the fact that he did nothing.

That keeps coming up.

The fact, you know,

stuff like this, like, you remember the DeAndre Jordan stuff from 10 years ago?

That was like 200 or 200 grand or something like that.

Some kind of endorsement deal that the NBA caught them trying to do.

Like, those kind of things, things, I'm sure happen on a regular basis.

Here, borrow my jet.

Here, stay at my private estate in Aspen, whatever that may be.

$28 million

is a number that people can't seem to come off of.

Well, and then the other thing that's funny is Bomber's defense is basically.

I have a bunch of idiots working for me, and I guess I fully realize.

Yeah, and I got scammed, and I have a bunch of dumbasses.

That's your defense.

The funniest part to me is imagining just like, you remember the Sopranos episode where they're all sitting around, all the mobsters are sitting around, and Finn walks up and they tell him, Finn, sit down.

You don't have to do anything.

You know what I mean?

Before he gets sexually harassed by one of the capos and the family.

And just imagining Kawhi in that situation.

Kawhi, essentially, a part of

illegal by the NBA standards scheme.

No show job.

He's a part of the scheme.

He's a part of the racket.

That's hysterical to me.

That's funny to me.

Well, how about aspiration?

Nobody at any point during any of the meetings is like, I mean, he's got to film a commercial for us, right?

Like, no, no, no, it's fine.

It's fine.

Just

make sure the check clears to Uncle Dennis.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I mean, they didn't even try to fake some sort of like, uh, like the flower shop in the town.

It's like, yeah, no, Kawhi opened a flower store.

Kawai opened a karaoke place in Koreatown.

Like, none of that.

It's lazy.

All he would have had to do

was take one flight

build one basketball court i'm kawaii landing for us all he would have had to do is one thing and it'd have been like he earned the money

i and the fact that i think i think you're

i think you're even overestimating what he would have had to do just tweet one time like a season like give yourself some plausible deniability here like that you know that is one area where it looks like if if it plays out like it looks like that Kawhi might have screwed the clippers over there by not doing literally anything for this company and having a contract that spells out that you don't have to do anything.

Like it's just, it's so implausible to believe that this is not what it looks like.

So the only case that I could come up with for Balmer, and I think Michael Rosenberg at Sports Illustrated made some variation of this, but basically this place is trying to hustle Balmer.

They're trying to get as much money out of him as possible.

And they think if we just give Kawhi this huge thing, that'll tie Balmer to us even more.

He's already given us 50 million.

We'll give 28 back to Kawhi and maybe we'll be able to get like 300 million from Balmer.

And this was like some sort of long play Ponzi scheme thing.

I was like, all right.

I test drove that for a couple of minutes and was like, that's interesting, but it doesn't add up to him not doing any work whatsoever for $28 million.

I just can't figure it out.

The thing that makes the most sense, which is always how these things are litigated in people's minds.

I don't know the investigation that the NBA will do will have all these different steps, but the thing that makes the most sense is that Steve Ballmer's and the Clippers and the Clippers tried to go around the salary cap to pay Kawhi Leonard more.

That's the thing that makes the most sense.

Well, it's like that Amy Bradley, where she falls off the cruise ship, that Netflix thing, and there's like 17 theories of what happened.

It's like, or maybe she just fell off the cruise ship.

Yeah.

And that might have been what the answer was.

Well, we'll find out.

I have reached the, I think a lot of this has been pretty funny.

Like, even, even ESPN yesterday, they were talking about it and and they were going through all the sponsors that, like, Joe Ellen Biade, well, he, I think McMenamin was doing it.

Joe Embiid, the team had to deal with this.

And Joel McD.

He also did a thing.

It's like, no, but none of those people were making $28 million to do nothing from a team sponsor.

And they did something.

That's the whole thing.

Like, Jason Tatum's got to deal with the Celtics sponsor.

Like, he's in all these commercials.

Like, they're all doing something.

It comes back to the fact that he did absolutely nothing and got paid $7 million per year.

That, I don't know how you explain that away.

That to me is going to be the hardest part.

You're saying that Tatum's involved in something.

Hey,

Pablo,

make some calls over to the.

That's what I want to see.

That's a war with me and Pablo.

I want to see part two.

If he goes after Tatum, I want to see.

That's it.

I want to see that's that's the franchise that we really need to be keeping our eye on.

No, that's that's someone that

regularly appears in NBC Sports Boston.

There are lots of Tatum commercials doing that stuff.

So he is that is he's providing services.

He's putting in the time.

All right, we're taking a break and then let's talk about the fight.

This episode is brought to you by McAfee.

You want to live your online life worry-free, but with all those identity thefts and data leaks we all keep hearing about?

It's not easy.

Choose McAfee's award-winning protection to keep those scammers away.

Keep your data and identity safe.

Plans start at just $39.99 for your first year.

All you have to do is find out more at mcafee.com slash keep it real.

Cancel anytime.

Terms apply.

This episode is brought to you by Viore.

Look, I'm not a big, let's hype up workout clothes guy, but Viore, I got to say, total game changer.

Been wearing a lot.

If you see me power walking around Los Angeles, probably going to see me wearing some Viore.

Sunday performance joggers that they have.

It's made with four-way performance stretch fabric.

One of the most comfortable things you own.

You will wear them everywhere.

I promise.

All you have to do is go to Viore.com slash Simmons and you get 20% off your first purchase with Viore.

V-U-O-R-I.com/slash Simmons.

Enjoy free shipping on all U.S.

orders over $75 plus free returns.

Exclusions apply.

Visit the website for full terms and conditions.

And now it's time for a special part of today's episode brought to you by NFL Sunday Ticket on YouTube TV.

I know technically there's no such thing as too much NFL,

but on 1 p.m.

on a Sunday E.T., 10 a.m.

in the morning.

on the on the Pacific coast here, you're flipping through the channels, you're trying to follow these games.

You don't need to to do it that way.

It's the whole reason NFL Sunday ticket and YouTube TV is basically must-have from September to January because of multi-view, but we'll get to that.

It's the only way to impose order on the chaos, get every game, every Sunday, all in one place with features that help you stay on top of all the NFL action.

Local and national games on YouTube TV.

NFL Sunday ticket for out-of-market games, exclude digital only games and commercially use terms, embargo supply.

No refunds.

Okay,

so we have week two.

We have nine early games, as we call it out here, because it comes out of 10.

And I'm going to give you the four to put on your multi-view.

I think Jacksonville, Cincinnati, weirdly is a must.

Cincinnati's offense needs to get going.

Jacksonville's offense might have a chance to get going against Cincy's defense.

I'm in on that one.

I'm in on Chicago, Detroit.

What are we getting from Caleb?

Two-on-one teams.

Whoever loses that game is in a lot of trouble.

I think I'm in on Buffalo and the Jets.

The Jets looked good last week.

Buffalo, obviously, coming off an amazing game.

And then, last but not least, Seattle-Pittsburgh, two teams that I think both have a chance to be playoff teams.

Seattle, probably not if they lose this game.

Notice how I didn't put the Pats and Miami in there

because I'm an honorable guy and it's not one of the best four games.

Sorry.

Sorry, Pats fans.

Just remember with NFL Sunday ticket on YouTube TV, 1 p.m.

should be the best part of your Sunday.

You're in the driver's seat.

Pick every game every Sunday all in one place.

Control that chaos.

Trust me on the multi-view.

For a limited time only.

Get $36 off NFL Sunday ticket using BS36 at checkout.

New users only while supplies last ends 922.

Go to youtube.com slash BS to sign up now.

Local and national games on YouTube TV.

NFL Sunday ticket for out-of-market games excludes digital only games of commercial use.

Device and content restrictions apply.

Terms and embargoes apply.

No refunds.

All right.

Canelo, Crawford, Van text me last week and he's like, I got to talk about this fight on your pod.

You've only invited yourself on the pod like three times.

Yeah.

And you're like, I'm watching these clips.

I have real takes.

And I was like, well, I'm going to talk to Manix about it.

So we'll do it the three of us.

I'm going to start here.

The biggest fights of the 21st century, which I was like, oh, I'll be able to rattle these off.

Like if I go back to when I loved boxing in the 70s and 80s, I could just rattle off all the biggest fights like instinctively.

The 21st century gets a little bit hazier, right?

Like I felt like Mayweather Canelo was like a, like a big fight.

Mayweather de La Joya.

I mean, Mayweather de La Joy.

I'm sorry.

Mayweather de La Joy was

a big fight.

The kind of press that like Hagler Leonard or Hearns Leonard or the kind of fights from the 80s.

We've had some heavyweight stuff.

Tyson Lewis was big, but

from an interest standpoint and a legacy standpoint, this might be the most interesting of the last 25 years.

And I don't know if I'm I'm in the minority on that, but there's so many ways this could go.

And yet I don't feel like anyone's talking about it.

I don't, I wouldn't say it's the most interesting.

Like top of my head, like my list of

like Roy Jones, John Ruiz was, I think, an 03.

That was a good thing.

Oh, and he moved way up.

He moved to heavyweight.

Way up to fight at heavyweight.

But Ruiz wasn't like George Foreman, you know?

Yeah, but that had never been done, I think, at that time before.

Like, that was like the real test of Roy's greatness.

I remember buying that on pay-per-view back in the day.

Delahoy Mayweather, of course, Delahoy, Pacquiao, not quite on that level, but it was still pretty big.

Delahoya, or sorry, Mayweather, Canelo was big.

And then the biggest is Mayweather Pacquiao.

Like that

was a cultural event.

I mean,

you had CNN that was there.

You had CNN, ESPN, the New York Times.

Everybody that covered sports, even on a nominal basis, was there covering that.

This is up there in terms of...

marketability because you have two very different fan bases and you have the Netflix fire hose involved, which which is going to lead to the biggest viewership number that a traditional boxing match has ever seen.

But

it's on a very short list of the biggest fights of the 21st century.

You know one thing I love about it?

It's a good fight to argue about.

Yeah.

Where you can really make strong cases for each side and you could, like, I still don't know who I'm betting on.

I have a sense, but I could still be swayed four days in.

It's a fight to me where the traditional wisdom and the boxing knowledge, the traditional boxing wisdom and the boxing knowledge hardcore are like butting heads.

The traditional wisdom says the bigger skilled man wins this fight if you're jumping up two weights and that's Canelo Alvarez.

However, most of the hardcore boxing people are so amazed at the skill and toughness of Terrence Crawford that they really feel like he can beat this version of Canelo Alvarez.

They really feel like that's the key thing, this version of Canelo Alvarez.

Right.

And that's the tension in the fight.

I guess for me, it's also an interesting fight because it's a fight between two guys that are all-time greats in their sport.

But in my opinion, and maybe I'm wrong about Canelo Alvarez, it seems like they failed to become all-time cultural pop culture greats.

Do you know why that happened?

Because neither of them really had the awesome fight.

Like Leonard had the Hearns fight, right?

And he also had the two Durant fights.

And by the time he got to 1982, he felt like

you still have to have like the memorable something.

Even in the NBA, you still like Bird and Magic needed the 84 finals to elevate.

And I like if you ask somebody like,

what's the most amazing Canelo fight?

They'd list stuff, but it's not something like you would be watching 50 years from now.

Crawford has that fight.

Crawford has that fight.

Crawford's just

Crawford killing Spence.

Yeah, that's one of the topic I've ever seen before.

But Canelo doesn't, do you think he has a fight like that?

I'd argue that the second Golofkin fight was up there.

I think most people believe Golofkin was going, you know, most people believe Golofkin won the first fight and he was going to win the second fight.

And then Canelo not only won, but the way that he won, taking the fight to Golofkin, who at that time was the predator at 160, was at or near the peak of his powers.

It was such a long time ago now.

What was it, six years ago, seven years ago at this point that

we kind of forget?

The Crawford stuff is interesting to me because I think a lot of people are looking intently at Canelo Alvarez's last fight, which was lackluster.

I was there in Saudi Arabia for that fight, but they're not looking as intently at Crawford's last fight.

And look, you bring up Spence, fan, and that was awesome, but that was two fights earlier.

That was at 147 pounds.

When Terrence Crawford made the jump to 154, mathematically, he was life and death with Israel Madrimoff.

Israel Madrimoff is a good fighter, but I encourage people to like to look at the statistics of Terrence Crawford as a welterweight versus the statistics that he had at 154, the one fight he had there.

At welterweight, he was a volume power puncher.

He was a guy that hunted you down.

Against Madrimoff, the number of right hands he threw dropped precipitously.

The punch output per round dropped precipitously.

The landed punches per round dropped precipitously.

Like he was a very different fighter at 154 against a good, solid B, B plus level opponent.

Now he's jumping up two more weight classes.

And look, people have done this in the past.

I mean, Sugar Ray jumped up two weight classes to fight.

Done in the land.

Yeah.

It's a big,

they did something kind of in between there.

And he did it for Hagler, sort of.

He was kind of

Hearns jumped up two divisions.

Hearns did it, of course.

Roy did it against John Ruiz.

But more often than not, size ultimately matters.

And look, I'm not trying to compare Terrence Crawford to Jamel Charlo, but Jamel Charlo, because Terrence is a better fighter, I think.

But Jarmell Charlo jumped up two weight classes two years ago against Canelo and got blitzed.

Didn't win a single minute of a single round, got knocked down.

Now, I think Crawford can have more success, but I think it's wildly dismissive of what we saw from Crawford the last time out to not take that into into account.

Well, that's the other thing.

He's only in one fight a year for five years.

Yeah, he's getting older.

What I would say about the Madramoff fight, and what I think some of those people would say about the Madramoff fight, is while Madramoff is a B to B plus fighter, that he does present to Crawford, who is jumping up.

I thought the matchmaking was bad in that fight.

As far as if you're going to move up to 54, the first fighter that you fight should not be a fighter that's as awkward and stylistically as hard to figure out as Madramoff was.

And there is a boxing part to that.

Like the weight is one thing, but then when you look at the style that Madramoff

presented to Crawford, he muted a lot of his offense because I think it took Terrence a while to figure him out, right?

And maybe he figures him out easier if he can overwhelm him at 47 or one of the light, the

lighter weight classes.

Maybe it wouldn't have been as big a deal.

But at the higher weight, with there being more on the line, more that can come back at him, I think it took him a second to kind of figure Madramov out.

The question that a lot of people are asking is the fact that Alvarez right now is so meat and potatoes.

I mean, he is now, he still has great head movement.

He's still very tough, but he is a seek and destroy boxing machine.

There's not going to be a whole lot of movement from him.

Like even in the skull fight, when we talk about people's last performances, he could not cut the ring off against him, which in past versions of Canelo Canelo Alvarez would have cut the ring off against that guy and put him to death.

But he seems to not be able to do that anymore.

He seems to be meeting potatoes.

And if Crawford shows up and the size is a less of an issue for him, it seems like he would be able to fight his way to a victory.

And that's what I think a lot of people are thinking.

You agree with that?

Well, no.

I'm sorry.

I danced.

The school fight had a couple of things going for it.

One, you had a guy that ran as much as any fighter at a championship level fight I've ever seen run.

It's pretty good.

He was on his bike from the opening bell.

And could Canelo have done more to cut the ring off?

Absolutely.

But this guy was a Cuban-trained, you know, undefeated boxer who fights like that.

I mean,

he was on the move.

The other variable that doesn't get talked about enough is the fact the fight was at 6 a.m.

Like the fight was early in the morning in Saudi Arabia to make it prime time in the U.S.

And yes, Canelo did everything he could to acclimate his body towards that type of start time, but there's only so much you can do when you're talking about getting up at midnight.

He told me he got up at midnight, jumped into a cold plunge to get himself awake to get ready to go to the arena.

These are all things that you don't see a fighter do

ordinarily to get ready for a fight.

I also think there's a lack of motivation there in fighting Williams School.

Like Canelo, he wanted to fight Jake Paul that week.

Like he had was on the one-yard line with Jake Paul to do that fight on that day before Turkey Alashik came in with all that money and said, you got to make this fight.

We want it to be undisputed against Terrence Crawford.

You got to do it.

You got to do it.

So I think all those played into the fact that Canelo didn't look as good as he did.

That's a long way of saying I don't think he's anywhere near as bad as he looked that night in Saudi Arabia.

Maybe he's not the guy that was running through super middleweight between 2018 and 2000 and what, 22.

But I think he's maybe 80, 85%

of all that.

The other part with Crawford is and i've said this a lot about canelo opponents to beat canelo alvarez you have to throw right hands look at the guys that have either beaten or were successful against him gennady golofkin threw a ton of right hands dimitri beevil threw a ton of right hands you cannot jab your way to success against canelo alvarez many have tried You wouldn't say that Beeville jabbed his way to

the numbers.

Beevil boat raced him.

Beevil pressured him.

He was bigger.

He was stronger.

He was in his face.

He backed him up all night long.

That's what Beebo did.

I know, but the jab in that fight was, I can't believe I'm going back and forth with boxing with Chris Mess.

I'm having a great time.

The jab in that fight was

Bebol's, to me, Bebo took a couple of rounds to really jab, use the educated lead hand to put Canelo where he wanted him to be.

And then later on in the fight, when he saw that Canelo wasn't going to give him anything, that he hadn't figured out, that's when he started opening up up against Canelo Alvarez

with Crawford.

I'm fully expecting him to come into this fight and fight it Southball.

Like to me,

it wouldn't make a lot of sense for him to come in and fight this fight orthodox.

I'm fully expecting him to fight the Southball.

So it's going to be the lead hand that we're going to see kind of whether or not he can use that to mute Canelo a little bit and whether or not he can use his feet a good enough to stay away from him and maybe tire Canelo out a little bit.

I think you made the point, though, that Beebold did eventually open open up, right?

And that was a big reason why he came out on top of that fight.

The guys I've seen jab and then not open up, Cale LePlant for the undisputed championship, Sergei Kovalev, who threw a million and one jabs that night.

Buddy McGurt was like in training camp.

Buddy McGurt was literally tying Kovalev's right hand to his body to make him throw jabs out there to keep throwing it over and over again.

Like there's a belief that you can score on Canelo with the jab and you can, but I don't believe you can beat him without throwing right hands.

And the Crawford that I saw against Madrimoff, statistically, did not throw a lot of right hands, or at least nowhere near the number of right hands, or I should say, forget the right hand, power shots.

Let's go with that.

The power shots that he was throwing in that context.

He did not throw anywhere near as many as he threw against Errol Spence.

So I think that's going to be a problem.

If Bud comes out and tries to jab his way to success, yeah, he'll have some moments there, just like Kovalev did.

Kovalev was in that fight.

It was close until he got knocked out.

I think he'll have some moments, moments, but I have yet to see someone, band, jab their way to a victory over Canelo Alvarez.

So, well, I will say this real quick.

Somebody did, and they robbed him.

Golofkin jabbed his way to a victory over Canelo Alvarez.

Oh, not even that, but he was throwing rights, too.

But if you go back and look at the fight, he controlled that fight with the jab.

And even the second fight.

That was a bad decision.

Even the second fight, I'm going to be honest with you, man.

I think Triple G won that fight.

It was close.

Yeah, I think Triple G won that fight.

But anyway, I digress.

so crawford's only gone above 147 once in the abmot fight now he's jumping 21 pounds past that

i always like i've been watching boxing a long time i always get nervous when the guys jump 20 pounds

should that just seems like a lot of weight man

yeah

it's just there's a physicality that you just have now like Canelo is supposed to be around the weight.

Like, what's he going to come in at?

Like 175, 174?

He might gain 10 pounds.

He might, yeah.

But he's kind of naturally built that way.

Now, I've read all this stuff about Crawford's been gradually trying to add, and he's doing it correctly.

He's not just.

What do you think Crawford weighed fight night against Matchamoff?

What was it?

169.

He looks slow in that fight, though, for him.

By the way, this is not me saying that Crawford will beat Canelo Alvarez.

This is not me saying that.

But what it is me saying is that like,

if Canelo was going to lose a fight of this magnitude, this would be the guy that he would lose it to.

This guy is a dog.

He has tremendous power.

He's got skill.

Well,

that's his, the Spence thing is his resume because that was a violent,

vindictive fight.

Like, just really wanted to, like, snatch the guy's soul.

And that's why, so one of the things I wrote down, because this reminds me of the Hagler-Leonard fight.

But if Crawford was both Hagler and Leonard,

he's moving up, he's moving up weights, right?

Like Leonard did, where it's like, oh shit, you're going to go all the way up there?

Oh, man, I'm nervous for you.

But then he has the Hagler side.

He's got that kind of fuck you to him that I don't know if Canelo has.

Canelo's like, he's, he's cemented.

He's one of the most famous fighters of this century.

I don't, I know Crawford is in the boxing community, but like my mom doesn't know who he is.

I don't know if he's had his moment yet.

And I wonder, like, I hate to do the first take, you know, like the

morning sports show thing, but because obviously the fight means more to both, but it really means more to Crawford, I think.

Oh,

way, way more.

More point,

legacy-wise, everything.

Way, way more.

He could become the first three-time undisputed men's champion in the four-belt era.

That would be something.

And he would also, I'd argue, add the first Hall of Fame fighter to his resume.

You look at Canelo's resume, loaded with Hall of Fame.

Yeah, he's that awesome.

Some he won, some he's lost.

Crawford, like, what's the best opponent on the resume of Crawford?

It's Aerospence, right?

Like Aerospace.

Yeah, he fought Sean Porter, Jeff Horn.

But none of, I mean, I think you can make a case that Spence gets in the Hall of Fame.

It's an arguable one.

I don't think it's a first down.

Do you feel like Spence was damaged goods in that fight?

I did.

I did.

But that takes nothing away.

I don't want to take away from Crawford there because

he tried to make that fight for years.

He tried forever to make that fight happen.

Well, and a lot of the guys that you would, in terms of like at 47, a lot of those guys were with Heyman in them.

And like, he had problems getting to those fights.

So it's, but I'll also say this, man.

So the Canelo's Hall of Famers, we would say are Miguel Cotto.

We would say they're Sergei Kovalev.

We would say that they're Triple G.

All of these fighters.

I could look at all of of them.

Laura, they may be.

Laura.

Maybe, well, if Laura's a Hall of Famer, then.

I don't even know if Kovalev is.

Kovalev's kind of.

But yeah, but Kovalev and Bival were like guys.

I don't know if that would be Hova.

But Bivol, he lost.

But by the time he fought, by the version of Sergei Kovalev that Kanelo Alvarez fought, like the name mattered.

I lost money on that name.

But the version believed in the Zari Kovalev.

Sergei Kovalev that like that Kanelo Alvarez fought.

We're not talking about Kovalev of 2014 or 2015.

But he's been fighting relevant guys now, really.

And he fought when he fought Floyd, he fought Floyd pretty early.

You know, in his career, he was like, I went to that fight, ironically, and he just felt like he was two years away from it, but took it anyway because it made sense for him to take it.

But he's been taking big fights for 12 years.

I don't, some of this isn't Crawford's fault necessarily because, like you said, he was trying to make that Spence fight forever.

Sometimes he just didn't kind of have his class that came with him, but he's 41-0.

he's 31 KOs.

And I was thinking, like, if you're talking best fighters of the last 25 years, there's been all these last 25 years list.

And Floyd has to be the best fighter, I think, of this first quarter century, right?

I think everyone would be like, it starts with Floyd.

And then you could kind of talk about all these different people.

But Usuk, Andre Ward, and Crawford, I think would be two, three, four for me in some order because none of them ever lost.

And then you move into that.

I don't like the lost part.

Like, you know, Canelo lost, but he never lost at a low level.

He lost to elite guys.

Do you agree?

I'm just saying, like, those guys have to be after Floyd mentioned.

I would have

right now I'd put Canelo ahead.

I'd put Canelo ahead of Crawford at this point, just based on resume alone.

Yeah.

But that's why Crawford needs to fight.

He needs it.

The two things that you guys touched on there that I think most, one thing you've touched on is most important is the weight.

Like muscle is heavy, and Crawford looks fantastic.

He looks like a bodybuilder, but this will will be his first time ever fighting other than 168 pounds.

It'll be his second time ever fighting above 147 pounds.

I have this argument with Sergio Moore all the time.

I feel like I'm on crazy pills where he doesn't think it's that big a deal.

He drives you crazy that, Sergio.

It really bugs you.

I listened to it.

It's very, you guys are golden married.

You guys are a good crew, man.

We try.

But he's like, the weight doesn't matter all that much.

You can't convince me of that.

Like the second half of the fight, when Crawford is moving as much as he's going to have to move, trying to be as reflexive as it's going to have to be, that the added muscle isn't going to matter.

Muscle is heavy.

Muscle is going to wear on you as a fight progresses.

And Canelo, well, me neither.

And Canelo has been fighting at this weight for so long.

He's fought 12 rounds at this weight so many times.

He's not going to have any problems.

We don't know yet what kind of issues Crawford's going to have with that extra weight.

The other reason I like Canelo.

is that Canelo can be kind of a spiteful body puncher.

And one of the little areas of weakness that Crawford has had over the years has been some of those body shots.

We saw Agis Kavalaskis at 147 catch him with a body shot that bothered him.

Madrimoff in that fight caught him with a couple of body shots.

I thought they bothered him.

One of the reasons guys do not let go of their power hand against Canelo is because they know what's coming back.

They know that if you overextend on that power hand, you're leaving yourself open to a big body shot.

I guarantee you, Canelo, Eddie Reynoso, their entire team, they're they're looking for counter to the body against Terrence Crawford in this fight.

And if they land it, that's going to be the first time, Van, that Canelo gets hit or Crawford gets hit with that kind of speed and that kind of power in this kind of weight class.

The thing that bothers me the most from the Crawford side of it is

his fight tendencies, the way he likes to fight.

Even when he is the clearly more talented fighter,

he enjoys a firefight.

There are times when Crawford doesn't use his athleticism and his feet to get out of situations like he should.

Crawford will take a couple of shots.

He likes to show you the dog a little bit.

A Philly fighter, even though he's not.

You already said that, but the Philly fighters.

He has a fight tendency to engage in firefights and to feel his opponent a little bit and want to return.

One, because that's his mentality, but also because he believes in his power.

He's not just a powerful puncher, but he's an extremely precise puncher.

The coordination and the quick twitch of Crawford is insane, and he believes in that.

Yeah, I don't think that that would be smart to do in this fight.

I don't think it would be smart.

He would have to fight this fight to me a little bit more like a Floyd, a late-stage Floyd, would fight a fight, which is be there, not be there, punch, punch, work, get out.

Yeah.

And if he, I don't know if that's in him, but I'll tell tell you one thing.

I don't know why.

I have

a feeling that he's going to win.

And I know I'm on one of the biggest sports podcasts in the world saying that it's, I have a feeling that he is going to win.

I was shocked by the line.

Because I'm with you.

I was leaning a little toward Crawford.

Canelo, at least I'm fano, was like minus 190.

It's like almost a two-to-one favorite.

And Bud's like plus 152, something like that.

I wonder if we get closer to the fight.

But were you surprised by that?

I know the Lions, they put them, you know, they're trying to balance the action, but you weren't surprised.

No, it's to me, it's about respect for Crawford and everything he's done and a belief that after the skull fight, Canelo has lost a step.

I think that's what

everyone right now is looking at.

I'll tell you,

the good bet so far is Canelo by decision.

That's at like plus 130, I want to say when I looked at it there.

He isn't

since, what, 20 or

And I don't think Crawford's going to get knocked out.

Like, I think Crawford's even jumping up this much in weight is too mentally tough and too skilled to get knocked out in a fight like this.

I just think that Canelo's,

I don't think Canelo's lost as much off his fastball as people think.

Also, getting a decision against Canelo Alvarez in Vegas, it's not going to happen.

Like, it's,

I mean,

one of the judges, one of the judges in the Mayor of the fight

scored the fight for Alvarez, which or or the it, you, which which is impossible.

It's impossible if you watch.

I think it was a draw.

No, he scored a draw, right?

I think it was a draw.

It was a majority decision for.

Yeah, so he scored the, that's impossible if you watch that fight at all.

Question for you.

That judge I saw had stock and aspiration.

Same thing, right?

Do you think that Alvarez, you say he's not going to knock him out?

Will Alvarez hurt Crawford?

Oh, I'm going to vote yes.

Yeah, I'm going to say yeah.

The body punch.

He always gets all at least one body punch in.

Even though he hasn't knocked out anybody over the last, what, five or six fights, he's hurt everybody during those fights, or at least knocked them down.

Like John Ryder in Guadalajara had a busted nose in the fifth round.

Jaime Mungia was knocked down, and I thought he was out cold in the final round.

Canelo just kind of carried him all the way to the stretch.

Edgar Berlanga, you know, had a parade because he went the distance with Canelo, but he got knocked down

in, what, the third round of that fight.

So he always, especially early on, he always has some moment because guys don't really get the speed and power combination that he brings to the table.

He cruises a lot more than he used to.

And you can even go back to the third Golofkin fight to where you started to really notice that.

Like he was up six zips, seven zip on Golofkin.

Then Golofkin mounted a little bit of a comeback in the second half of that fight.

So that's eroded from his game.

But the first half of a fight, he's dangerous, and I do think he's going to catch Crawford with something that buzzes him.

Could you give us the because i'm sure you've spent time around crawford yeah

give us the vibe you've been around a million nba players you've been around a lot of famous athletes what's the what's the vibe with him how would you describe him

i mean he's he's ruthless and i say that in a complimentary way like he's singularly focused on on winning and believes that there's nothing that can stop him from from doing it.

And I see that in some of the all-time great NBA players in Kobe.

He's got kind of a Kobe vibe to him, if we're being honest.

Like he's got that relentlessness, the belief that he can

do anything.

He's also,

I don't think Kobe had this because Kobe wasn't really around as much during the social media age, but Crawford's got rabbit ears.

Crawford sees and hears everything people are saying about him.

He claps back on Twitter, not quite in a Durant-like way, but

he's been known to jump on Twitter and fire back at his skeptics.

He and I have had issue over.

He and I started having an issue after I scored the fight close for him against Madrow.

He was upset at how I scored that fight.

So he sees everything.

Does he actually get upset with you online?

Or like, how did he go?

Not online, but like when I see him and run into him, and I've run to him several times,

it's fine.

Like, it's not acrimonious, but it's, you know, he, he, he, he sees skepticism and he puts that in the old fuel tank and absorbs all of it, no matter where it's, it's coming from.

That's the difference.

But in terms of like the comparison, I think Kobe's a good one.

Like, he's, he's relentless.

He's a killer.

He believes that his talent and his willpower is enough to do anything in the boxing ring.

I'm, I'm into him.

I actually just really like him as a character.

I don't feel like he's gotten his just due.

Of all the fighters that I've loved at the lower wage Reggie Dahl,

he loved Reggiendale?

Loved him.

Wow.

I've never heard that before.

Loved him.

You know why I loved him?

I just, he was not an aesthetically pleasing fire to watch yeah he was not that's not what he did however you remember him against whatever i don't want to start going back to old fights but it i loved rigging dial i loved lomachinko the guys at the lower weights that i really like i used to like paul the punisher williams like he was one of my high volume puncher at like 6'1 at at 47.

but then he got knocked the out he did when he went when he went up in weight right wasn't that at 160 that that was

by the way his but him going up to 160 was what he was what was he was never the same after that right well he got into a motorcycle accident and that was that happened but he got that was by the way he got knocked out in I think it was the rematch against Martinez if I were if I remember no was it not I can't

I was there it was in Atlantic City I was there and you could you could see the eyes open on the canvas when he got knocked out kind of face first like that.

That was one of the best knockouts I've ever seen.

You only have one of those.

can't, you're never the same.

I don't feel like Pacquiao was ever the same after he got sent to next year by Marquez.

What I'm saying, though, is of all the guys at the lower waist that I've liked, obviously, Lomachenko in his heyday was like a ghost.

He was, he was

an apparition.

He was there, he wasn't there, he was all around you.

It was something like I had never seen before.

Crawford is the one that carries himself to me more like a heavier, I'm going to throw my weight around the ring and impose my will on you type of fighter.

He's the guy that steps into the ring with you.

And like every single part of that ring, it's like you're in a lion's den.

Like he is a stalker, like a freak.

And so I think there's a mentality there to that.

What he did to Arrow was actually like tough to watch after a point.

No, it was like Ali Cleveland Williams type, like Floyd Patterson, just like tortured

everywhere.

Yeah.

Just he could do nothing.

We're going to see how far that goes.

And that's what I love about boxing.

What I love about boxing is always when

everything that the fighter has, not just their skill set, but their cultural presence, their identity, who they think they are,

when a fighter is fighting and you get to see the moment in the ring that he realizes he's not who he thinks he is against this particular guy on this particular night.

And does he run from that or does he push past it?

That is why this fight is so interesting to me because that's the type of challenge that Canelo Alvarez presents to Terrence Crawford.

Well, the funny thing is, Netflix had that horrific Tyson fight.

I mean, one of the worst,

worst events that's been put on at least this decade, right?

Now, this is the opposite of that.

Like, this is a gather together, and this could be like a generational fight potentially.

I don't know.

That's the thing, too.

Like,

I think it's an incredible fight.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's not aesthetically pleasing in the ring.

I don't believe that you're looking at Hagler Hearns.

I don't believe you're looking at Hagler-Leonard.

I think you look at two guys that have proven to be judicious with their punches, especially Crawford as he's moved up in weight.

Canelo, you know, more selective with his shots as his career has gone on.

Both these guys are kind of information seekers in the ring.

They feel guys out over the first one, two, sometimes three three rounds before they really start to engage.

I wouldn't be surprised if this is a very cagey fight with kind of limited spurts of action in between.

Well, you left out two pieces with that.

One is one guy's 35, the other guy's 37.

So it can't be Hager Hearns.

The other one is both guys have made a lot of money boxing.

Crawford, which changes the desperation variable a little bit.

You brought that up.

That's good.

Crawford, notoriously slow starter, like legendarily slow starter.

Can he afford to do that in this fight?

I don't think so because I think the longer this fight goes, the more it favors Canelo for all the reasons I laid out there.

The wave.

Physicality, wave.

Physicality of it all.

I think he's got to try to find a way to build that early lead.

And Canelo has given opponents opportunities in the past.

Like there have been a couple of rounds of fights of Canelo that I've called where he hasn't landed a punch or he hasn't even thrown a punch.

Canelo Callum Smith first round didn't do anything.

Canelo Billy Joe Saunders first round didn't do anything.

Like he just

he eases his way into a fight.

I think Crawford and his team have to find a way to take advantage of that and at least

squeeze out some statistical wins in these early rounds.

Can you sell us on the co-main event?

I have no problem with it.

It's probably not the kind of sexy co-main event you're expecting to see on a Netflix show.

I mean, last warmer.

Last time we saw Katie Taylor Amanda Serrano as the co-made event of the Tyson Paul fight.

This one, look, I think it's going to be really entertaining.

I think both these guys are bangers.

Like, I think Fernando Vargas is one of the Vargas brothers.

I'd probably put him at like number two or three on the list of the top Vargases out there.

I think Emiliano Vargas is probably the best of the bunch.

You know, Callum, Callum's a good fighter,

shown he's a banger, shows he's willing to engage.

So I think it's going to be a really fun fight.

If that's what you're looking for, I don't know if you're looking for high-level,

meaningful, impactful championship-level stuff, this probably ain't it.

If you're looking for a banger, you're probably going to get it between these two guys.

I don't know why they did the co-for that.

I do.

Well, you may know.

All right.

Callum.

I mean, look, well, Callum is, you could say it.

Callum's a TKO fighter.

Callum is effectively co-managed by Dana White.

He's been fighting on UFC Fight Pass for his last six or seven fights.

So it's all who you know, Bill.

It's all who you know.

Real quick, as far as that, just big picture, where are we?

There was a thought that we talked a little bit earlier about the

Mayweather De La Jolla fight.

I remember when that fight came out, that was when that fight came out.

When that fight happened, that was the fight to save boxing.

After a lackluster couple of fights, and you're going to put these two guys in the ring, Mayweather then becomes the A-side for the rest of his career in a big, big way.

And he carries boxing through the next decade.

He leaves, and then the sports in the wilderness for a little while as the business changes, as the zone comes around, HBO boxes and leaves, and then everybody runs to different promotions, have different relationships with different streamers.

We have some really interesting fighters right now.

Usik is on an all-time run.

He might be Dunson right now.

We have some guys, a lot of different personalities, but it's hard to gauge where the sport is right now.

Turkey, the last couple of years, has really come in and consolidated the matchmaking.

But is the sport healthy with all of this stuff happening?

It seems like there's a new business move made every week.

It seems like there's a new app you have to get.

Is boxing healthy right now?

I think it's in a challenging spot right now.

I think there are healthy aspects to it, but I think overall it's still challenged.

The Saudi effect has had positive and negative effects, right?

Like the positive impact.

is that we're getting fights that we either were never going to see or we sure weren't going to see twice.

Like Bebo Betterbev is a great example.

I can tell you, we were never going to see that fight.

There was no money in it anywhere.

Both those guys have no fan bases and no ability to sell pay-per-view.

So you needed Turkey Al-Ashik and the Saudis to come in, pay for that fight.

Getting Fury and Usik twice in the same year is the kind of thing you'd never get.

So you get a lot of great mega events.

as a result of the Saudi influence in boxing.

Among the problems, though, is that a lot of these fights are taking place in a different part of the world, which means that people are being asked to watch it in the U.S.

at like three o'clock in the afternoon, often when college football is on or the NFL is on or whatever's on on a Saturday.

You're going to the beach in the summertime.

So there's a challenge.

And I think a bigger issue is that because these Saudi purses are so

big, fighters are willing to wait around and not fight with the hopes that they'll get one.

I'll give you a quick example.

Teathimo Lopez, still one of the bigger names in boxing.

By all rights, Teofimo Lopez should be fighting a guy named Richardson Hitchens at Madison Square Garden in November or December.

Two New York area fighters, 140-pound title holders, the both of them.

That is an excellent fight to make at MSG.

Instead, Teofimo, who would probably make like two or three million to fight Hitchens, is sitting around hoping that Turkey Al-Ashik will come forward and give him $6 million to fight someone like Shakur Stevenson

over in Saudi Arabia in January of this year.

So I think that's.

And Aspirations offering him $7 million not to fight at all.

Aspirations.

We always come back to that.

But

the point is,

for boxing to thrive, it needs activity.

UFC thrived because it put on great event after great event.

Boxing still puts on great events, but you can't have a great event and then four months of nothing.

You need to be putting on great events twice a month to get some momentum for the sport.

Well, I mean, look at Crawford and Canelo.

Those guys are fighting once a year now.

Oh, Canelo's different.

Canelo's been pretty active for a guy of his status.

But how many fights has he had in the last four years?

He's at least two fights a year.

All right, two fights a year, and Crawford's one fight a year.

And these are two of your four biggest stars.

Usik will, he'll pull this,

he'll still get out there, hopefully, at least once.

Wait, maybe

two times a year, maybe, hopefully?

No?

I think Usik's probably got one fight left.

If Joseph Parker beats Fabio Wardley, I think that's the fight he'll take.

And then, look, if I'm Usik, like, then I'd call Jake Paul.

Like, I think then if I'm Usik, then I'd try to get the facts.

Yeah, why not?

He's fought so many tough ones over the years.

He deserves that.

He earned it.

He cleaned out his whole division on an all-time run.

Why not get the

Mount Rushmore for the century before we go?

And Floyd's on there and Usik's on there, who are your other two?

Andre Ward would have to be on there for sure.

He was to be the fighter of the decade between 2010 and 2020, even though he retired in 2017.

He had a tremendous run.

And Pacquiao's got to be on there.

So that's your four?

That would be

for the 21st century.

First 25 years of this century in boxing.

So that's your four.

That would be my four, yeah.

With Canelo looming right there.

Probably those.

I would think about Bernard Hopkins.

I looked at him.

I would think about Bernard Hopkins in that situation.

And maybe even maybe even on an outside level,

just honorable mentions, Tyson Fury would be there as well.

Tyson Fury,

however, his career has played out since then, ended one of the greatest runs in heavyweight boxing history.

Like,

when he beat Klitschko,

people will underrate Vladimir Klitschko because

it talking about guys that didn't have a lot of

gigantic names because of the era that they fought in.

He was the most consistent,

technically pure fighter at heavyweight for that long run always came in in tremendous shape added more levels to his game changed it up stayed relevant and the guy who ended that run was was tyson fury and then you know he had it for a little while until you know uset came along so i give tyson fury a little bit of of of uh i have the klitschkos on a different list what's the list the You guys ruined boxing list.

It's like 20 people.

The Klitschkos?

Vitalis?

Heavyweight Klitschka.

The heavyweight division just felt like it was

a problem.

I know.

I look back at that era now.

I'm like, I don't even

remember.

I'll give you this.

I'll tell you this.

I'm not convinced Vladimir's done.

I'm not.

Oh, my Lord.

I think, look, Vladimir, Vladimir, I think, is extremely happy.

for his countryman, Olegenda Usuk.

But if Usuk had been beaten by Tyson Fury in one of those two fights, I think Klitschko would have come out of retirement and fought Tyson Fury.

And I still don't take that off the table.

I still don't even

consider.

No, no, he wouldn't do that.

Yo, you know what fight would go hard right now?

A Klitschko AJ rematch.

Why not?

AJ's got, why not?

Why not?

That's a winnable fight for him.

Bill hates AJ.

Bill's down.

Bill's not big on AJ.

I'm lost on one side or the other of this last night.

But see, here's the thing, though.

I know we're going long, but here's the thing about AJ, though.

AJ gives you a good example of kind of the precarious situation that boxing gets into aj was a draw is a draw remains a draw if he was as dominant a fighter in the ring as he was a personality and sort of a business machine outside of it you might have seen if he could have won a couple of these fights he doesn't lose to andy ruiz like you you see in that situation somebody who could become a major worldwide boxing megastar but it just doesn't happen for the sport.

Was Anthony Joshua the Joel and beat of the heavyweight division?

We'll discuss that next.

Is Bacoli, give me, can I get a Bicoli update before we go?

You need to know what me?

Oh, Bicoli.

The texts I get from Bill, there's usually

two.

It's Celtics related or it's Martin Bacoli.

Yeah.

This is God's topics.

It's not over.

He's dealing with some promotional issues over in the UK.

His promoter, Boxer, lost its TV deal, and now is kind of sort of getting

one back.

But he's like, he'll be back.

He's in the Saudi pipeline.

And because he did Turkey Al-Ashik the favor of taking that fight against Parker on like 24 hours' notice, flying in from Africa to take that fight, there'll be another opportunity for him to there's a weight limit that he cannot go over.

That's it.

It's, I don't know whether it's 277, 280, whatever it is.

He cannot go over that weight.

If he goes over it, he can't fight.

When he fought Anderson, he was in the shape and he was a monster.

The best version of himself.

That's it.

You know, that's the way.

There's still a lot of questions on the table for Macaulay, but when he fought Anderson, he looked like just a pure force.

Do we see Jason Tatum next season?

Oh, shit.

No.

I just think they're going to be

so

mediocre.

that there's probably going to be people wondering why bring him back.

They're like one three-week stretch injury from Jalen Brown of being, you know, way outside the play-in mix.

Like, who's the starting center right now?

Who's the starting power forward right now?

As bad as the East is, they're, I just think there's going to be no appetite to bring him back.

I think, honestly, I think they should just contract.

He looks so happy about this.

I think they should just get rid of the franchise.

You just went to Boston.

Talk about how great it was.

I loved Boston.

I loved Boston.

He's in a Boston.

Yeah, what people have to keep remembering is that they have control of this draft pick.

Like,

what is the best thing in the long-term interest of the Celtics?

What's the best outcome for next season to get a lottery pick?

The coach, and I say this in the most complimentary way possible, is an absolute psycho.

And I don't see him rolling over during a season and being like, yeah, whatever.

He's a maniac.

He's not doing it.

There's no way.

Sometimes you just don't have the horses, though, man.

He'll figure out

73 is a game.

Chris Mannis.

Chris Mannis, good luck at the tables in Vegas.

Say hi to our guy, bud.

So your pick is Canelo.

Canelo decision would be my pick.

Yeah.

All right.

Great to see you.

Thanks for coming on.

You got it, man.

All right.

That's it for the podcast.

Thanks to Van Lathan for sitting here the whole time.

Thanks to Brian Curtis.

Thanks to Chris Mannix.

Thanks to Gahal and Eduardo and Cerudi.

And I will be back on Thursday on this feed.

We'll have a guest, and then we're going to do some Ringer 107, which did not go well in week one.

This might be my worst idea ever ever because we're one and four heading into the second week.

So I'm going to be trying to turn it around.

I will see you on Thursday night.

Must be 21 plus in president select states for Kansas in affiliation with Kansas Star Casino or 18 plus in president in DC, Kentucky, or Wyoming.

Gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLBRE or visit rg-help.com.

Call 1-88-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat in Connecticut or visit mdgamblinghelp.org in Maryland.

Hope is here.

Visit gambling helpline ma.org or call 800-327-5050 for 24-7 support in Massachusetts or call 1-8778-HOPENY or text Hope NY in New York.