Best of the Program | Guest: Jeremiah Johnston | 1/31/25

and Alyssa are always trying to outdo each other.

When Alyssa got a small water bottle, Mike showed up with a four-litre jug.

When Mike started gardening, Alyssa started beekeeping.

Oh, come on.

They called a truce for their holiday and used Expedia Trip Planner to collaborate on all the details of their trip.

Once there, Mike still did more laps around the pool.

Whatever.

You were made to outdo your holidays.

We were made to help organize the competition.

Expedia made to travel.

Tulsi, RFK Jr., take on senators in their confirmation hearings yesterday, and I think put them in their place.

But I have a few comments on it.

What Tulsi, RFK Jr.

Cash should say to the senators that are trying to silence them, I cover that as well.

And the Shroud of Turin, what is it?

Is it possibly God's first selfie?

All on today's podcast.

First, let me tell you a little bit about Rob, who wrote in a while back about his experience with Relief Factor.

Besides working on his regular job, Rob built houses on the side for years.

Man, it's a nice side job.

That led to horrible hip and back pain.

He heard about Relief Factor, decided to give it a shot.

Within four days, his pain pretty much had subsided.

He continued to get better over time.

Rob summed it up saying, being pain-free is indescribable.

Thank you.

I know the feeling.

Relief Factor is a daily supplement that helps your body fight pain naturally by fighting inflammation, which is the source of most of our pain in our bodies and, frankly, a lot of our disease.

It's 100% drug-free, developed by doctors to help reduce or eliminate pain, and over a million people have tried Relief Factor's Quick Start Kit.

70% of them have gone on to order it again and again.

So make 2025 the year of feeling good and living great.

Get their three-week Quick Start for only $19.95.

That's less than a dollar a day.

1-800-4 Relief.

1-800, the number 4 Relief.

ReliefFactor.com.

You're listening to the best of the blend back program.

Hello, America.

It's Friday.

We're glad you're here.

I want to take you through some of the testimony yesterday, some of the audio,

and then I'm going to give you the big picture view of all of it and what's really going on and what I think needs to be said in America.

That's coming up in just a second, but let's continue to go through the audio and what was said yesterday at these hearings.

It was Cash Patel, which we just went over.

Then it was Tulsi Gabbard and RFK.

And I can't,

let me take you through it gently here.

Cut one of Tulsi.

Cut five, please.

Before I close, I want to warn the American people who are watching at home.

You may hear lies and smears in this hearing that'll challenge my loyalty to and my love for our country.

Those who oppose my nomination imply that I am loyal to something or someone other than God, my own conscience, and the Constitution of the United States, accusing me of being Trump's puppet, Putin's puppet, Assad's puppet, a guru's puppet, Modi's puppet, not recognizing the absurdity of simultaneously being the puppet of five different puppet masters.

The same tactic was used against President Trump and failed.

The American people elected President Trump with a decisive victory and mandate for change.

The fact is what truly unsettles my political opponents is I refuse to be their puppet.

She was very, very, very, very good.

Then she continues on in her opening statement.

For too long, faulty, inadequate, or weaponized intelligence have led to costly failures and the undermining of our national security and God-given freedoms enshrined in the Constitution.

The American people elected Donald Trump as their president not once but twice, and yet the FBI and intelligence agencies were politicized by his opponents to undermine his presidency and falsely portray him as a puppet of Putin.

Title I of FISA was used illegally to obtain a warrant to spy on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page using a Clinton campaign-funded false dossier as their so-called evidence.

Biden campaign advisor Tony Blinken was the impetus for the 51 former senior intelligence officials' letter dismissing Hunter Biden's laptop as disinformation specifically to help Biden win the election.

Former DNI James Clapper lied to this committee in 2013, denying the existence of programs that facilitated the mass collection of millions of Americans' phone and internet records, yet was never held accountable.

Under John Brennan's leadership, the CIA abused its power to spy on Congress, to dodge oversight, lied about doing it until he was caught, and yet has never been held responsible.

Under Biden, the FBI abused its power for political reasons to try to surveil Catholics who attend traditional Latin Mass, labeling them as quote-unquote radical traditionalist Catholics.

Personally, just 24 hours after I criticized Kamala Harris and her nomination, I was placed on a secret domestic terror watch list called Quiet Skies.

Sadly, there are more examples.

The bottom line is this, this must end.

President Trump's re-election is a clear mandate from the American people to break this cycle of failure, end the weaponization and politicization of the intelligence community, and begin to restore trust in those who've been charged with the critical task of securing our nation.

She is very, very clear.

And I have a lot to say about Tulsi coming up, but let me just go now to the questioning.

This is Michael Bennett, Senator Michael Bennett, asking her about Edward Snowden, Cut 22.

Do you believe, as the chairman of this committee believes, as the vast majority of members of our intelligence agencies believe, that Edward Snowden was a traitor to the United States of America?

Senator, I've confirmed that

when the rubber

road financed

it's available to make sure that there's a lot of

media.

It's not a moment to propagate theories, conspiracy theories,

or attacks on journalism in the United States.

This is when you need to answer the questions of the people whose votes you are asking for to be confirmed

as the chief intelligence officer of this nation.

As my colleague said, this is not about you.

It's about the people that serve the intelligence agencies of the United States.

Is Edward Snowden a traitor to the United States of America?

That is not a hard question to answer when the stakes are this high.

Senator, as someone who has

yes or no,

is Edward Snowden a traitor to the United States of America?

As someone who has

uniform in combat,

I understand how to do it.

Absolute disgrace.

No point of this at all.

There's no point of any of these hearings at this point.

There's no point in that.

There's no point of Michael Bennett.

Well,

I mean, he is.

I don't know anything about Michael Bennett other than I disagree with him greatly, but he, the way he talks, he just sounds like the dumbest senator.

You know,

my apologies to the senator from Hawaii, but

one of the dumbest senators.

But he's not interested in an answer here.

And if I could just point out,

you were there in Congress

before

Edward Snowden released what he released.

Now, let me ask you, the reason why it's hard to say, are you a traitor or are you a patriot, is because he did release very dangerous information about the United States and what we were doing.

But what we were doing was against the Constitution.

So is he a traitor that put us in jeopardy or is he a patriot for alerting people that we are breaking our own rules?

Now, if you as a senator, especially one on an oversight committee, would have done your damn job, you wouldn't have had the problem of Edward Snowden because you would have known, or did you,

you would have known that we were breaking the Constitution, that we were doing things we were not supposed to do.

It is your job as a senator on oversight

to root these things out before they become a problem.

And I believe Edward Snowden tried to go to members of the oversight committee and tried to blow the whistle.

And none of you guys wanted to hear him.

So then what do you do after that?

It seems to me that the problem is in the oversight committee, not just the intelligence

apparatus.

It seems to me, too, Tulsi tried to make a pretty clear line here of

he committed crimes.

Yes.

Edward Snowden committed crimes.

And while I think like what we

what we discovered from Edward Snowden was really important,

I think, quite clearly, there was illegal activity going on and all sorts of

cracks in the constitutional protections of American citizens were discovered through that process.

I think it's also sensible to not try to necessarily encourage every single person who thinks they're a brilliant whistleblower to start doing such things.

I think the Snowden case is kind of unique.

I think a lot of the the other quote-unquote whistleblowers have come out with stuff that honestly, you know, I think shouldn't have been released or

they're no heroes.

Snowden, I think, like did really deliver information

that we needed.

And I think

if it had gone through the normal processes, it would have been better.

But like at some point, as you know, If the normal processes don't work, there are things that rise to the level the American people need to know about.

We needed to know that the American that the American government was doing this to us yes and that's why they're trying to stop Tulsi because there are there are many many more things that they're doing that we don't know about I'm sure

we're we are scratching at the surface that's why uh Tulsi and cash and quite frankly RFK are so important.

Listen to RFK, his testimony, and the exchange with Bernie Sanders.

It's unhinged.

I'm going to make America healthier than other countries in the world right now.

Will you guarantee do what every other major country does?

It's a simple question.

And by the way, Bernie,

you know, the problem of corruption is not just in the federal agencies.

It's in Congress, too.

Almost all the members of this panel are accepting, including yourself, are accepting millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry

and protecting their interests.

Oh,

I thought that that would come.

No, no, no, no, no, no.

I ran for president like you.

I got millions and millions of contributions.

They did not come from the executives, not one nickel of PAC money from the pharmaceutical industry.

They came from workers.

In 2020, you were the single largest

pharmaceutical contributions from workers all over this country.

Workers

not a nickel from corporate

pharmaceutical dollars.

No, from workers in 1.5 million.

Yeah, out of 200 million.

All right, but

you are

10%.

Only 10%.

Okay, look, Bernie Sanders, and here's the real rub of this.

Bernie Sanders and RFK agree on the pharmaceutical companies largely.

Largely.

Largely.

I mean, Bernie Sanders has made a career out of bashing pharmaceutical companies it's like the only thing he was known for for the first half of his career correct so why all of a sudden does he have a problem with rfk

who is almost in lockstep with him on pharmaceutical companies so weird i can't even it's hard to keep track yeah anymore where these people stand on stuff it's not true it's not honest yeah it's not true it's not true it's not honest yeah and and that's got to stop that's why these guys are being pushed up against the wall and everything that they're saying about them is ridiculous.

It's ridiculous because

it's what Democrats are supposedly standing for.

You're supposed to stand for the little guy.

You're supposed to stand against the big government agencies that are crushing people.

But strangely, they're not.

And the American people no longer believe the bull crap that's coming out of your mouth and the mouth of the mainstream.

It's not even mainstream anymore.

That they are the alternative media.

They're the state-run media.

That's all they are.

And nobody believes it anymore.

Let me tell you about real estate agents I trust.

If you do the job right the first time, you don't have that irritating hassle of having to do it over and over again because you did it the wrong way first, right?

When it comes to buying and selling a home, you don't have a second chance.

It's got to be done the right time.

Over a decade ago, I formed a company called RealEstate AgentsITrust.com, and it exists as a way to make sure that you get the job done right the first time.

I didn't know anything.

I don't know how to interview a real estate agent.

I had no idea what the best practices were, why some real estate agents are better than the others.

I had no idea.

I had no idea that the whole way of selling a house is different today than it was 20 years ago.

Real Estate Agents I Trust.

This is a company that I started after working with the 500 best real estate agents in the country, according to the Wall Street Journal, and learned from them.

We learned how to find those real estate agents and then recommend them to you.

This is something I don't charge you for.

All you have to do is tell us where you are, where you're moving from, where you're moving to, whether it's across the street or across the country.

We will help you find the real estate agent you can can trust.

Realestateagentsitrust.com.

That's realestate agentsitrust.com.

Now, back to the podcast.

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and don't forget, rate us on iTunes.

We have to say,

welcome back to a dear friend of ours, Jeremiah Johnston.

He is a Christian Thinker Society president, Prestonwood Baptist Church apologetics pastor,

and one of the leading voices now, I would say, on the Shroud of Turin, and it is interesting, we talk about this on the podcast that comes out tomorrow.

I was a Catholic when I was young, and this was known as a Catholic relic.

And so every other church always said, oh, it's a Catholic thing.

And so they didn't pay attention to it.

But now, like, this is a big topic in the evangelical community, and it's going through all religions.

Why?

Well, it's going through all religions because 63 different academic disciplines have spent 500,000 scientific hours studying what this image is in the Shroud of Turin.

And

all of these researchers are saying this is the burial shroud of Jesus of Nazareth.

It's 2,000 years old.

It's incredible the science that we have now.

Back in, what was it?

78 or 88?

88 is the carbon date.

And that came back

as inaccurate.

Correct.

Said it was only

1,000 years old.

But I talked to the guy who was the Jewish atheist

who was on this team, tried to get the records, the actual data from Oxford that did the carbon dating, couldn't get it for years.

When he finally got his hands on it, he was like, oh my gosh, this...

This is completely inaccurate.

Why?

Well, it's inaccurate because they used a sample that was patched, and that raw data is why it was suppressed.

And Barry Schwartz, who is an atheist Jew, as you said, died last year believing that the man in the image is Jesus of Nazareth.

He died believing that.

Okay.

And now there's all kinds of new data that has come out there.

What is the new

better than carbon data?

Absolutely.

Waxis wide-angle x-ray scattering.

This is breaking news that we have on your program.

Wide angle x-ray scattering, which actually compares the linen cloth with other linen cloths that we have from Israel, from Masada, an AD 70, 2,000-year-old material.

And it shows that the shroud has been getting old.

The term is degradation.

It's been getting old for 2,000 years, not 700 years as the carbon-14 is about.

So

it can date it through how many years it's been degraded.

Exactly.

The linen fiber.

And it also shows, or something else shows,

that there are things in the fiber that only came from the springtime in Jerusalem.

Max Frye, criminologist from Zurich, Switzerland, spent five years of his life tracing the pollen.

And what's interesting on the podcast, and this podcast is an absolute remote remote drop.

I mean, it's going to break the internet tomorrow.

There is such a hunger for this information, especially for those of you that are watching right now.

You have young people that are really asking those questions.

We talk on the podcast.

There's this awakening happening in our country and indeed in our world for God.

There seems to be a fascination among Gen Z right now for this kind of evidence that the Shroud of Turin provides.

So Max Fry, the criminologist, has pollen spores that not only come, 45 of the 58 pollen spores are from Jerusalem, they only bloom in spring, Glenn.

When was Jesus crucified?

April.

April.

Bingo.

And by the way, we also trace,

you ask so many great questions on the Glenn Beck podcast.

You've got to watch it.

And you asked about, well, where does this show up?

And one thing I failed to mention on the podcast, the pollen isn't just from Jerusalem.

There's pollen from Odessa, where we know that the Shroud was in 544.

There's pollen from Constantinople.

There's pollen from France.

We know the Shroud was there.

There's pollen from Italy.

So when he did it, it not only gave us the fact that it goes back its great antiquity to Israel, but it also gave us the breadcrumbs of the Shroud's travels the last 2,000 years.

Wow.

Unbelievable.

What is it?

There's so many things we didn't get to.

Talk about

the knees, the marks of the knees on the shroud.

And I want to credit your fine editor who did an amazing job putting the podcast together.

He reminded me of something we forgot, that there is travertine limestone soil that is on the knees and on the feet of the crucified man.

And in the podcast, we talk about the moment where Jesus' shoulders are separated.

Do you remember in the Gospels, or if you watch the Passion, when

he drops the cross, the petibulum, the cross beam, and Siren of Cyrene is asked to carry it for him.

That's when we believe his shoulders were separated, but his knees hit the ground hard.

And if you look at the photo negatives of the image of the crucified man, you'll see that his knees looked just all kinds of abrasions all over the knees and in the feet.

And that soil comes from Jerusalem.

It's travertine limestone.

So it was

when they wrapped the body, that soil transferred to the cloth.

And it's still there from the knees.

It's not from France.

It's not from Europe.

This isn't a medieval forgery.

And this is where we don't check our brain at the door to be Christians.

And what's great about this podcast is we see the coming together of Athens and Jerusalem, faith and reason.

You and I talk science really way more than faith.

We look at this like a criminologist would look at a case and say, is this something from antiquity?

And if it is, what are the implications if we have the moment of Jesus' resurrection?

And I love the title you gave it, History's First Selfie, because we think Jesus took the first selfie in in the Shroud of Turin.

And we talk about this, and I don't want to rehash everything, but we talk about what that image is.

There's no oils, there's no paints, no pigments,

there's nothing that actually is on the shroud to make that image.

And so a study was done, how could you make that image?

And I guess they've come close, except the shroud burns up.

Right.

How does it happen?

It happens in one fortieth of a billionth of a second and it takes 40,000 trillion watts of electromagnetic energy to make an image similar to what we see in the shroud.

And what we cannot reproduce, the shroud is superficial, meaning it's only in one or two of the microfibers of each fiber.

If you think about that, it's superficial.

It's razor thin.

The image doesn't go all the way through the cloth, and this is what makes it fascinating.

But the blood does.

The blood, yeah, because that happens before the resurrection, obviously.

He's dead.

Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea, they wrap the body according to Jewish burial traditions.

And then 39 hours, that body comes alive through this incredible energy.

Here's

a little tidbit that I didn't mention on the podcast.

Can I share this with you?

And I do, so I'm a Bible scholar.

I base all of this on what I know of the scripture and its interpretation, its interpretive history.

In Mark 9, we know Jesus is transfigured and his face is still glowing.

Remember when Moses saw the Lord, his face is glowing.

I believe when John goes into the tomb, it's the early morning, probably 6 a.m.

Sunday, they're going to continue to mourn the body.

They would do this for seven days.

I believe the shroud of Turin had the face of Jesus glowing on it that first Sunday morning when he went in and saw the face of Jesus.

Because it said when he sees the Athonia in the Greek New Testament, the Sindon, he said,

then he believed.

That's the Greek terms for the shroud.

It's when he saw that image

in the Pseudarian, in the Sindon, in the Athonia, he believed.

And I believe Jesus' face was still glowing on it.

It is just, why do you think,

why do you think, because we talked about it, and

I don't think this isn't something that gives you faith.

This is something that,

you know,

we're asked to have faith without the evidence.

So I don't think this is something that the Lord did.

So he's like, you know, in 2,000 years, they're going to find this thing.

and they're going to...

But

it's just a reaction to what happened, a natural reaction on the fabric that what happened.

Why?

Why?

How has it made it this long?

And why do you think it's coming to the forefront now?

It's interesting because you've been warning us.

I'm an OG Blaze subscriber, so I watch you every day.

I really appreciate the warnings you've been given about AI and artificial intelligence and machine learning.

And

there's obviously pitfalls with that.

There's things that we need to be aware of, but there seems to be a controlled revelation of truth tied to technology.

And we see that with the Shroud of Turin.

We see that in the last 125 years.

We can date the Shroud back 2,000 years from history, antiquity, art.

We go through all that in the podcast.

But there's a controlled revelation from the Lord of people seeking his face where he's using modern technology

to authenticate the Shroud in ways that are just mind-blowing.

And we get into that in the podcast.

The VP8 image analyzer is something we don't get into, but we should definitely.

So, this is

on the shroud, and we don't know how this happened, right?

There's no,

it doesn't happen in the image.

It doesn't happen with any other image.

With any other image, it left a 3D imprint or image.

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck podcast.

Hear more of this interview and others with the full show podcast available wherever you get podcasts.

All righty.

I got a few things to say.

Let's start with who is having a hard time getting confirmed?

Okay, let's just go through the names here for a second.

What's really being discussed here?

Who's under the gun?

Well, let's start with Pete Hagseth.

What is he going to do?

He's going into the Department of Defense.

He is looking for those weasels that have been changing everything in our Defense Department, has been

culling anybody who disagreed with Joe Biden, anybody who thought Donald Trump might be right.

They got rid of all of those people.

Then they committed another atrocity, I believe, for our military, demanded that you get the COVID shot or you were out.

It was crimes

incompetence, maybe crimes of incompetence in Afghanistan, at least.

They were trying to control the message, control the military through DEI.

So

Pete Hegseth is a target.

Why?

Because he's going to find out what's going on, he's going to run investigations, and he's going to stop it.

Okay,

next,

FBI DOJ.

So

what is he going to do?

What is Cash Patel going to do when he gets into the FBI?

Well, he's going to investigate crimes, the weaponization

of the FBI, also the way that they protected those in Congress or those in power, i.e.

the Hunter Biden laptop, i.e.

the FISA courts.

So he's looking for bad guys while also trying to clean it up, because you can't clean it up if you don't know who the bad guys are.

Then you have the director of national intelligence and Tulsi Gabber.

She's under fire.

Why?

Well, she needs to go in and expose all of the black ops and those leaking lies to the press and shoring up the lies for members of Congress and

rooting out the darkness between the members of Congress, the White House, the military-industrial complex, and the intelligence community.

What is RFK?

Why is he being challenged?

Because

he's going to expose the lies of COVID, the corruption.

and corruption with pharmaceutical companies.

He's going after and breaking that all up.

These are all big businesses, you know, big businesses for congressmen and senators and the government.

This is the center of public-private partnerships.

Okay.

And they all involve people who want to go in and find out the root of what's really going wrong here.

So they're all under attack.

But what did the Democrats say is the existential threat to the Republic and all mankind?

What was it?

Global warming.

Global warming.

Yeah.

Global warming.

Guess who just, whose nomination just flew by?

Doug Bergham.

Bergamentum, yeah.

Sure did go fly by.

Doug Bergum.

That is weird.

You'd think for Interior, the Department of the Interior would be a concern for a bunch of people who think global warming is the biggest concern.

What he's going to do is he's going to reverse a lot of the things and make coal, gas, oil exploration okay for many parts of the interior of the United States.

He sailed through.

Now, how does he sail through if he's just going to be

his role will be to destroy the opposition to oil, gas, and coal?

Notice what he's not going to be doing.

He's not going to be investigating the government.

So

forget about what we said about the biggest threat.

No, no, the biggest threat seems to be the people who are looking into corruption.

So

I was a little outraged.

I've been a little outraged all week.

And I want to clarify things and make very, very clear.

We're talking about threats to our democracy.

That's what they said.

And I believe that to be true.

We're talking about the rule of law, right?

But

let's actually look at what is being said in these so-called confirmation hearings.

On day one,

with Bernie Sanders and RFK,

America's favorite millionaire socialist was railing about onesies.

Onesies.

What, that's the great moral crisis facing this country?

While we teeter on the edge of war, while the economy is in free fall, while we have corruption all throughout our government, with COVID and pharmaceuticals, onesies

is the thing you're bringing up?

While the very institutions he claims to protect

have all been turned into political weapons.

Then when RFK Jr.

had the audacity, the unmitigated gall to point out that this self-styled champion of the working class was the single largest recipient of pharmaceutical money in 2020, what happened?

What happened?

The old man went nuts.

Whoa, I knew this was going to come up in my socialist dreams.

what did he do

he did what they all do

he had to silence rfk

he had to have him dismissed he needed to discredit him he needed people not to hear what rfk was saying the same man who has spent decades raging against corporate greed suddenly has nothing but caveats and excuses when the money was going his way

now

i don't think it was but let's just say that was a lie about Bernie Sanders.

Let's just say that RFK just made that up.

Okay.

What had to happen?

Well, Bernie Sanders needed to be able to clarify, right?

He needed to be able to say, that's not true, and here's why it's not true.

But he couldn't.

Okay, he just had to shout it over what RFK was saying.

He had to silence and talk over RFK to stop the accusation.

He needed to defend himself and explain that's what would happen in a fair system.

But no one on the receiving end can silence the senators.

No one on the receiving end can talk over them

and say that's a lie and get the control of the room back so they can set the record straight.

The senators can.

See, the questions are akin to, when did you stop beating your wife?

And I think that was an actual question for Pete Hegseth last week, was it not?

When did you stop beating your wife?

These hearings are not advise and consent as the Constitution requires.

They are smear, destroy, and delay.

Let's move on to Cash Patel, the man accused, without any evidence, of course, of planning to weaponize the DOJ and FBI.

That's laughable.

Who's accusing him of that?

The very senators who have spent the last 20 plus years weaponizing the entire government against the American people.

The same people who oversaw the raids on journalists, the spying on sitting presidents, the suppression of political opponents, the imprisonment of pro-life activists while violent rioters just walked free.

These are the people who have the audacity to clutch their pearls about the politicization of law enforcement.

The hypocrisy is so thick, I almost choked to death on it.

And then there's Tulsi Gabbard.

God bless Tulsi Gabbard.

When she finally got a chance to speak, she laid it out plain.

Corruption in our intelligence community is not a theory.

It's a fact.

It's a matter of record.

It's not even in dispute.

But did anybody talk about that?

No.

Smear, silence, destroy.

Instead, they smeared her.

She's She's a Russian agent.

She's a traitor.

She's a spy for Syria.

She doesn't care about the Constitution.

These people are so desperate to maintain their stranglehold on power.

They will destroy anyone

who has the gall or the opportunity to expose them.

They're all rallying around the idea that these people must be stopped.

Why?

Why did Doug fly through with the Department of Interior if that's the biggest problem?

Because that's not the biggest problem.

They know the biggest problem right now is they're about to be exposed.

So they have got to destroy and delay and stop these people.

They asked her if Edward Snowden was a traitor.

They weren't interested in her answer because the truth is too dangerous for them.

They're not interested in an actual answer on any of these questions.

Here's the truth.

Is Edward Snowden a traitor?

Well, I don't know.

We could talk about that back and forth, but I know he shouldn't have ever had to blow the whistle, especially to the press.

But it's because of this very committee, senators.

It is because of many of you, in fact, you from Colorado that are questioning me on that.

You were in the Senate at the time.

Why wasn't he comfortable coming to you to blow the whistle?

Why is it

he couldn't become a whistleblower?

He had to go to the outside press.

See,

all of the things that they were doing that he exposed, I don't like the fact that he exposed them

because it hurt the United States, but I'm glad he exposed them because what you were doing, what you in oversight were allowing to happen for years

was against the Constitution, was against our rule of law.

So he shouldn't have had to blown the whistle.

You, all of you, sitting right there on this panel, you're in charge of oversight.

You failed.

And you dare question me?

Maybe you should do your damn job.

Maybe you should stop the unconstitutional surveillance programs before they ever begin.

These are the people that oversaw the FBI lying to the American people about Hunter Biden's laptop.

The laptop that proved the sitting president of the United States and his family took tens of millions of dollars from foreign adversaries, including China.

The same China that is threatening the United States, threatening Taiwan, the same China that these very senators allow to buy up American farmland and land around our own military bases.

The same China that floods our streets with fentanyl while their partners in Mexico butcher Americans at the same border.

While these same senators do nothing while millions of unknown, undocumented people flood over our borders and have empowered the cartels.

Don't you dare ask me who the traitor is, Senator.

Don't do it.

Where are you on any of these?

Let me ask you, Senator, let me ask all of you.

Who's the traitor here?

Is Edward Snowden the

traitor that just has to be executed?

Because treason comes with execution.

So is he the traitor here?

Is he the biggest traitor?

That happened 15 years ago.

Your technology on spying and corruption is far beyond anything he ever said.

Is he the traitor?

Or is, Senator, let me ask you, the president?

President Joe Biden, is he the traitor for taking millions of dollars from our enemy?

Is his family, did they commit treason?

Or is it the people under your oversight who knowingly spread false information to protect that family?

Or is it you, Senator?

Are you complicit?

Are you corrupt?

Or are you just simply incompetent?

Because it's one of the three, incompetence, corruption, or outright treason.

Which is it, Senator?

That's what I'd like to hear.

Pick one.

Because the country is waking up and the American people are demanding an answer.

And we will get it in the end.

You cannot build this house of lies.

It's already crumbling around.

Now would be the time to tell the truth, Senator.

Because we're looking for a lot of answers here.

Who is actually executing the duties of the president of the United States in the last six months?

Maybe the last four years.

I don't know how long.

When did you know, Senator?

Did you know who was protecting, who was silencing anyone that was trying to say, maybe we have a problem here?

The president is clueless?

By the way, while we're on this topic, who was responsible for the coup to overthrow a president of the United States?

Because that's what it was.

How did that happen?

Who was actually

there who who made that happen and then selected harris to be the democratic candidate who did that how did that happen i'm so interested to know because none of it was constitutional

and why

why did whomever actually came up with the huge list of names for presidential pardons include so many of you

senators So many congressmen, so many people who dare to point the finger my way.

Who is in charge of that list?

And why are you on those lists?

Is this the reason you're afraid of people that are simply looking for the truth?

Because I want to be crystal clear on what this really is.

Honey bunches of votes votes for all.

Tocal benefits.