Best of the Program | Guest: Sean Davis | 5/16/23

This podcast is supported by Progressive, a leader in RV insurance.

RVs are for sharing adventures with family, friends, and even your pets.

So, if you bring your cats and dogs along for the ride, you'll want Progressive RV Insurance.

They protect your cats and dogs like family by offering up to $1,000 in optional coverage for vet bills in case of an RV accident, making it a great companion for the responsible pet owner who loves to travel.

See Progressive's other benefits and more when you quote RV Insurance at progressive.com today.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Pet Injuries, and Additional Coverage and subject to policy terms.

My gosh, with all the things that

I am still, I hate to be creepy about this, but still kind of hot after Martha Stewart.

All that talk about Martha Stewart in a swimsuit on the cover of Sports Illustrated.

That is just that

review.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Or the transgender guy that's in a beginning on the cover.

That's another great cover.

It's another great cover.

And the good thing about the Martha Stewart part is

she's 80.

Just a year older than Joe Biden.

Don't you want to see him in the world?

Don't you want to see him?

Yeah, I would.

Of course.

Ooh, imagine a sex date between the two.

Okay, I gotta stop.

All right, but the program's coming up in just a second.

We have everything you need to know

on the Durham Report and so much more.

Make sure you're hearing the opening monologue of today's show and also hour number two about experts.

Anyway, May is Military Appreciation Month at American Giant.

All members of the military community, active duty, reservists, National Guards, veterans, military family members, receive a 30% discount.

It's American Giant way of saying thank you for your service in protecting our freedom.

We couldn't do what we do without you because they do it all in America.

American Giant founded on the principles of putting in a hard day's work and making a product that makes a difference with American workers.

American cotton, American quality.

So much of what our country used to be is gone.

The products that last, gone.

American Giant is committed to leading the way to show that Americans can still make quality clothing right here and clothing that lasts.

It's great clothing.

American-giant.com/slash military.

And receive your 30% military discount.

American-giant.com/slash military.

30% discount this month at American-Giant.com slash military.

You're listening to

the best of the Blenbeck program.

All righty, let's go to Jake Tapper because I think this one is the only example of an honest reporter from yesterday on the Durham report.

Here's what he said on CNN.

Regardless, the report is now here.

It has dropped, and it might not have produced everything of what some Republicans hoped for.

It is, regardless, devastating to the FBI.

And to a degree, it does exonerate Donald Trump.

Wait, what?

Now, Now, so you know, Jake Tapper was one of the first ones to really jump on that bandwagon and say, this is true.

He is involved in a Russia scandal.

So for him to reverse himself, that's a big deal.

For him to be on CNN and reverse himself, that's a big deal.

Maybe we're starting to see a little bit, a little bit of actual journalism come out from Jake Tapper.

Now, here's what we found out.

This is quite amazing.

What we found out yesterday was the FBI had zero,

zero intel or faith in any of this.

So they opened an investigation on something they had no faith on.

They had no intel.

And more importantly, what we found out is that they had been briefed on the fact that Hillary and her campaign was going to discredit Trump by claiming Russian collusion.

Joe Biden was made aware of Clinton campaign plans.

He was told in a meeting August 3rd, 2016, August 3rd,

2016.

by then CIA Director John Brennan in the Oval with Barack Obama, Biden, and James Comey, the FBI director, and other senior administration officials.

They were discussing Russia's efforts to interfere in the election.

And according to Brennan's handwritten note and his recollections from the meeting, he briefed on relevant intelligence known to date on Russian election interference, including

the Clinton plan intelligence.

Now, what was that?

Durham writes: specifically, Director Brennan's declassified handwritten notes reflect that he briefed the meeting's participants regarding the alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on the 26th of July of a proposal from one of her campaign advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security services.

End quote.

Now, how can any American say this is not a big deal?

Not only did all of this, and we already knew, we knew it came from the Clinton campaign.

Remember the early stories was this came from a GOP operative.

Remember, that was the early thing.

This came from a GOP operative.

They were doing research.

No, no.

The president, the FBI, the CIA, everyone knew that it was decided on July 26th and then briefed in the Oval in August that Hillary Clinton had something called the Clinton Plan Intelligence, where she would release things

to try to get the spotlight off of her email scandal.

Durham noted that even though Comey was in attendance at this meeting, it did not spark any FBI action.

So Comey

knew from the beginning.

So every time you saw Comey on television saying, well, we don't know and there's some evidence that we really have to look into, he had been briefed

in August.

and took no action on Hillary Clinton.

Then when the Durham report came out, not the Durham report, the Christopher Steele file, when that came out,

they all knew that that was the Clinton plan intelligence.

The Durham report goes on to say none of them had any faith in it at all.

In fact, while filing for the FISA court filings to be able to spy on Trump, the Durham report says the agents didn't then

or in hindsight have any belief that any of these things were true.

Okay, so let's just start adding up the crimes here.

You have intel that one campaign is going to release false information to tie them to the Russians.

Your FBI knows it.

Your CIA director is briefing the president, the vice president, Joe Biden, about the Clinton plan intelligence.

And they do nothing.

But then when they are delivered something that they know comes from the Clinton campaign,

they

turn on the machine.

They then start, the FBI then starts leaking this information to the press, which they have zero confidence in.

Durham noted that during Comey's attendance at this meeting, it didn't spark any FBI action.

He further highlighted an August 22, 2016 email that an FBI cyber analyst sent to the Bureau employees and senior intelligence officials informing them of the details of the Clinton plan.

They

failed

to remember any follow-up actions the Bureau might have taken after the second briefing on it.

Then the FBI, when they got the steel dossier, remember the one that no one in the administration believed anything in it,

the one that that they knew came from Clinton,

the one they had been told months before was coming in the Clinton campaign, what was it, the Clinton plan intelligence.

When they got it,

they went to Christopher Steele.

He's the author of the dossier.

and offered a million dollars.

We'll pay you and pay your primary sources money if anyone is able to prove this.

So now,

when Hillary Clinton's operatives couldn't get anything really solid, they pass it to the FBI.

The FBI looks at this and goes, this is garbage.

Yeah, I know, but it could be true.

All right, offer him a million dollars if he can come up with something.

Okay, anybody have a problem problem with that?

Anybody?

Then

they went.

One of the FBI agents, Brian Otten, traveled to Rome and met with Steele on October 2016.

And he made the offer, knowing that it relied primarily on one person or subsource.

The Bureau paid that sub-store source.

That sub-source was Igor Dachenko.

They paid him almost a quarter of a million dollars even after he was unable to provide any evidence for a single claim.

Your tax dollars paid him.

Now this is going to get worse.

More shockingly, according to the Durham report, the FBI had significant evidence that Dachenko himself

was Russian intelligence.

It had closed a counterintelligence investigation into him

in 2011

because agents mistakenly believed he had left the country.

The FBI investigated Dachenko as a possible Russian spy from 2009 to 11 after a colleague at the Brooking Institute, the left-leaning think tank where he worked, told the FBI that Dachenko raised the prospect of paying him for classified information if the colleague joined the Obama administration.

A second Brookings employee also told the FBI he suspected Dachenko of being connected to Russian intelligence.

It became a full-fledged investigation when the FBI realized that Duchenko was a known associate of two other spies

and had contacts with known Russian intelligence offices and had said he wanted to join the Russian diplomatic service.

He also told another person that he worked on special matters for the Russian army and that his Russian passport listed him as connected to the Russian military intelligence service.

They paid him $250,000 to prove that Trump was colluding with people like him.

He couldn't come up with that evidence.

Let me take you to Jonathan Turley.

Jonathan Turley said

the AP tried to dismiss this as not the crime of a century, but Donald Trump termed it.

But whether or not anyone will ever be held accountable is hard to get around,

that indeed nothing like this has ever been done before.

or that it was so damaging and divisive to our nation.

What's criminal is that it appears people might get away with it.

That doesn't mean it wasn't the crime of the century.

It just means people are not being held to account.

There is so much wrongdoing involved in all of this, but let's point out one big lie that we always knew was a lie, which the report now confirms.

Do you remember when Adam Schiff, then the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, claimed he had seen evidence that he couldn't share with us demonstrating the Russian collusion.

Now that the report verifies there never was

anything,

what was that evidence, Adam?

Given Durham's findings that there was no basis for action taken by the FBI in launching the

investigation, it would be a good time for former House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff to reveal the evidence that showed the Russian collusion.

There is no evidence.

So here's what you have, America.

You have a former president that knew someone was going to attack the Republican candidate and make up a story about Russian intelligence so the press would not talk to Hillary Clinton about her emails.

The president knew about it, the vice president knew about it, the CIA knew about it, and the FBI knew about it, but they took no action at all.

Now, if that isn't throwing an election, I don't know what is.

If that's not making sure your person wins because you immediately follow it up with being delivered that

you know is false,

being delivered and then start leaking everything to the press from official sources.

I don't know.

I'm not going to be happy until people go to jail.

Now, the FBI did come out and they said in their statement, the conduct in the 2016 and 2017 special counsel Durham examined was the reason that the current FBI leadership already implemented dozens of corrective actions, which now have been in place for some time.

So they fixed it.

Nothing to see here.

No one went to jail.

No one was fired.

No one was held accountable.

But trust us, they say, we've fixed it.

Boy, I'm so close to using a word that I know I can't use and follow it with you to the FBI.

This is the best of the Glenbeck program.

Welcome to the Glen Beck Program.

Now streaming this hour of the podcast on Twitter every day.

First hour of the broadcast is live on YouTube.

But those are, you know, the schlubs, really.

It's the Twitter people that we like the most.

Wouldn't you say, Stu?

Oh, 100%.

Yeah, 100%.

So

this hour for, you know, for the right people, really,

on Twitter.

Okay, anyway,

if you watch the news and you're watching anything from the left, you are going to hear a completely different story on the Durham report.

And you're going to hear that they have absolutely nothing, nobody did any wrong, and you could make a case because

he's not asking for anybody to be fired or anybody

jail time, nothing, nothing.

And so it seems like a big fat zero.

However, if you actually read the report, it is extraordinarily disturbing.

Sean Davis is with us.

He is the Federalist CEO and co-founder.

Welcome, Sean.

How are you?

I'm well, thank you.

Thank you for having me.

You bet.

So which is it?

Is it disturbing or a big nothing burger?

Oh,

it's beyond disturbing.

It's horrifying.

And you make a good point,

which the left-wing media are trying to glom onto.

Well, if it's so bad, why were there no prosecutions?

Durham actually talks about this in his report.

And I'm going to paraphrase him here, but it's that all the cases he was going to bring had to be brought in D.C.

because that's where the crimes were perpetrated.

You're not getting a fair trial or a jury of your peers in D.C.

D.C.

is uniformly left-wing, went 95% for Democrats.

And in political cases, which this clearly was,

They're going to vote the way they would vote at the ballot box, in the voting booth, not based on what the facts and the law law are.

That's a real problem

because we have all of these important cases of corruption are going to have to be tried in D.C.

How do you solve that?

I actually think it's super easy.

You know, the founders, they didn't want D.C.

to be a state because they didn't want this district that houses the entire federal government to be able to hold the federal government hostage and get what it wants.

We actually have that now, regardless of whether D.C.

is technically a state or not.

I think you have to completely get rid of the D.C.

trial court and the D.C.

Circuit Court, and you have to farm out these types of cases randomly to field offices and U.S.

attorneys throughout the country.

Get rid of D.C.

being able to control what happens in these cases and send these cases to Nebraska, Texas, Tennessee, Idaho.

100%.

100%.

You're right.

So, Sean,

they

show that the FBI

knew, the CIA knew the former president, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, they all knew that Clinton, they even had a name for it,

the

Clinton Investigative Project or something, they knew that she,

early in the summer, had made the decision to try to tie Donald Trump to Russia.

So they knew that, and they were, she was doing it to get people off of her trail for the

the emails that were on her server and they the FBI didn't do anything on that and then when they got the documents that they knew were from her team they knew there was nothing in that

But they launched this investigation and then started leaking these things to the media.

How is this not massive election interference?

It's 100% election interference.

And I'll tell you, we've been hearing about Watergate ad nauseum for about 50 years now.

This makes Watergate look like child's play.

It does.

Watergate was a two-bit break-in that happened once at a party headquarters.

This was an entire coordinated effort across the whole of the U.S.

government, the Intel community, the CIA, the FBI, that was perpetrated against a political campaign, against a president, and against the American people who elected him.

Everyone involved should be in prison.

Everyone.

I mean,

this is so much bigger than Watergate and so much more destructive because we now know with complete certainty that the FBI itself is not a law enforcement organization.

It is a vassal for the Democrat Party, and it exists to do nothing other than what the Democrat Party wants.

And I would say the CIA

and all of the intelligence agencies are on that same track, if not leading it.

I mean,

look at what they did with Hunter Biden.

The next election, they already planned, they have the laptop and they know about it.

And then our intelligence community meets with social media and says, you know, they're going to probably come out with something on Hunter Biden, but be careful.

Be careful because Russian disinformation.

And then they knowingly, to help the Biden campaign, they write something that was written

with their understanding that it was to be used to help Biden win at a debate.

I mean, and it was a former acting director of the CIA who put that letter together.

But it's actually even worse than what you described.

We broke a story last week based on evidence that congressional investigators have in the weaponization committee that the CIA itself was soliciting signatures for for that letter, which they all knew was a lie.

The FBI had that laptop for a year.

They had gotten it a year prior, pursuant to a federal grand jury subpoena.

So they all knew it was a lie.

But I think it's important that we don't forget that these are not recent misdeeds by the FBI.

It's not like this was a glittering organization until a couple years ago.

They were conceived in shenanigans.

Their building is named after J.

Edgar Hoover, a guy who's known for blackmailing members of Congress to get the way he wants.

This This agency is irreparable.

Oh, so you're one of the extremists that want to fire the FBI.

Want us to be without any policemen on the streets.

Wow.

That's what they say, Sean.

It is.

I will say that's not quite accurate.

I also want to get rid of the CIA and all the other three letter agencies

to declare war against the American public.

Yeah.

You know, we survived for, what, 200 years, years, 150 years without a corrupt FBI wreaking elections?

I think maybe we should go back to that.

Yeah.

So, Sean,

what do we do?

Because I don't think anyone

is going to jail for this.

We had

the IRS on Monday fire everyone that could have been the whistleblower, just fired the entire team that's been looking into the

tax fraud from Hunter Biden.

That sounds like retaliation.

How do we stop it when the Justice Department has to be the ones to prosecute?

And you're doing it in D.C.

Can the Republicans do anything?

That's such a good question.

And I think it comes back down to Congress having to once again do its job.

Over the past 30, 40 years, Congress has really enjoyed outsourcing all of its actual duties under the Constitution to the administration, to the executive branch.

They like this because they don't have any more accountability anymore.

They just get to go out and play politics and blame the executive branch.

It's time for them to take back their Article I authority and actually do oversight.

All these agencies exist at the pleasure of Congress.

They exist because Congress funds them and Congress created them.

And I would say it is long past time for Republicans to get a spine and to get some intestinal fortitude and do their jobs and rein in these agencies, if not to fund them entirely.

So can they do that without a budget?

Absolutely.

The power of the purse is absolute.

Article 1, Section 9, it's just so many of these guys are afraid of their own shadows.

They don't want to do anything that anyone in the media might characterize as mean or harsh.

God.

Man, we are just,

where are the

winter patriots?

Where are they?

Sean, thank you so much.

I appreciate it.

We'll be looking forward to more from you

at the Federalist, which is a great, great website.

You put something really tremendous together.

So thanks for that.

Thank you, sir.

You bet.

Sean Davis from the Federalist, the co-founder and CEO.

You're listening to the best of the Glendeck program.

So where do we start?

Where do we start?

Where do we start?

Well, let me get the bad news in and then give you sugar.

Okay, let me give you some.

And this isn't necessarily bad news because our Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve say this is absolutely untrue.

So it is a conspiracy theory, I'm sure.

Weiss Ratings, the nation's only independent ratings agency that

regularly evaluates the relative safety of U.S.

banks and credit unions, has made an announcement.

Now, so you know, you may not know Weiss ratings.

Since 2008, there have been 539 banks that have failed.

Weiss ratings, because they check on them regularly and do stress tests on them,

they provided advance warning on 535 of them or 99.3%.

That's it.

Just

so they missed a full 0.7%.

Yes, but we have the Fed who is all on top of it.

And, you know, they knew things like inflation is transitory.

So

you can go to them.

Now, here's the announcement.

They have warned that only

4,243 banks could be vulnerable to failure.

Now, I want you to hear this whole thing out.

4,000.

I know that sounds bad.

It does.

Okay, it sounds bad.

But you're really looking at 1,210 institutions or 12.8 that have now red warning flags signaling a risk of imminent failure.

12.8% of our banking?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Well, it's not 4,243.

No, it's not 42%.

Yeah, no,

it's 1,210 banks.

So I'll try to understand this.

They're saying 1,200 banks have a red flag

that signifies imminent risk.

No, no, no, imminent failure.

I thought you said imminent risk.

No, no, no.

A signaling risk.

Oh, yeah, you're right.

Of imminent failure.

Risk of imminent failure.

Okay, so not guaranteed, but imminent means very soon and probable.

Probable.

Okay.

Now, the 3,043 banks...

They only got a yellow warning flag.

Okay, that's good.

And they say

they're only at risk of failure in some sort of a financial crisis or a recession.

You mean if like 1,243 banks fail?

I mean, you could look at it that way.

Okay.

In some, 45% of all banks and credit unions are deemed vulnerable.

But I

mean,

that's not even half.

Conspiracies.

Right.

How many banks do we need?

Right.

What about having just one?

Right.

You know, that would make it so much easier.

Yeah.

Hey, have you heard that the ESG

things, they're falling apart?

Yeah.

It's weird when

you make like half the amount of money on your investments that everybody else is making.

You know, it's weird how fast people are like, I think I want out of this.

I think I, because I think there's been a lot of conservative pushback on this stuff, led by, you know, you largely talking about all of these ESG,

you know,

all the negatives of the ESG situation.

But I think, like, in some ways,

I hope that what you just said is true and that people are just looking at it, realizing it's worse.

They're not even performing well and are abandoning it on themselves.

It's not a political thing, right?

They're abandoning it because it doesn't work.

Correct.

That's even better.

That is better.

Than just proving to them that it's a bad idea.

Let's just remember that those people still have power that came up with that really bad idea that cost you money.

But usually when, I mean, who knows, right?

We know this isn't always the case, but usually when you introduce a new product, let's say, and it fails,

you don't typically get rewarded for that.

And I think

the markets do send a signal there.

It's exactly like, you know, if you are doing crack cocaine on the

snorting coke on the belly of a hooker,

you generally don't get rewarded for that.

But Hunter Biden.

Oh, Hunter Biden.

We were talking about Hunter Biden that time.

Yes, I agree with your analysis of Hunter Biden.

Hunter Biden.

Okay, now

here comes some sugar.

Now, I'm going to start slow because I don't want to give you a sugar high because that'll just wear it out.

You know, it'll wear off quickly.

So, let me give you just a little dose of sugar here.

The anarchist

is

a restaurant in Toronto, Canada, and it touted itself as anti-capitalist, anti-colonial cafe, shop, and radical community space on stolen land.

That's a long, that's a big sign.

It's a big sign.

It's a big sign.

How many forests had to die for that wood of that sign?

Anti-capitalist, anti-colonial cafe, shop, and radical community space on stolen land.

The anarchist.

Well, here's what they did.

And this was a brilliant idea.

They sold, at a profit, anti-Israeli literature, t-shirts depicting police being hung, propaganda pieces promoting LGBT terrorism,

and

some other

inciting materials.

And then they peddled bigotry and everything else on their Instagram page.

And here's the thing.

You know, they're good people.

You know, they posted wishing the Pope, the Catholic clergy, and the Canadian government the centuries of suffering and death that they've given the world.

So I think that's good.

The hashtag was burn every church, hail Satan, and decolonize.

So they're nice people,

just running a community place, and they were, they're, they feel for the average person.

They said, look, you just pay when you can, okay?

You pay what you can afford, pay what you can.

And

what's really surprising is

they're out of business.

So

end of that story.

Now,

capitalism always wins.

Well, does it?

Miller Light, you would think,

has been awake.

Or let me say,

have not been in a coma for the last month or so.

I don't know how much of their product they've consumed, but likely they've been.

I think it would take a medical coma

to not know what's happened to Bud Light.

It's been an incredible gift to them.

Yes, theirs skyrockets, and Bud loses its number one status.

Okay.

Big news if you're in the beer industry.

Right.

Well, they have put together

a new ad.

Can we play the ad, please?

Here's a little-known fact.

Women were among the very first to brew beer ever.

From Mesopotamia to the Middle Ages to colonial America, women were the ones doing the brewing.

Centuries later, how did the industry pay homage to the founding mothers of beer?

They put us in bikinis.

Yes.

Wow.

Wait, you just took the bikini lady.

Look at this shit.

Wild.

It's time beer made it up to women.

So today, Miller Light is on a mission to clean up not just their shit, but the whole beer industry's shit.

Oh.

Miller Light has been scouring the internet for all this and buying it back so that he can turn it into good for women brewers.

Literally,

how you ask?

Stop.

Okay.

Oh, God.

It's so stupid.

It's so stupid.

I can't take it.

I can't.

I can't take it.

First of all,

that was a very nice poster that she took down and shredded.

Yeah.

And I don't appreciate that.

And just to give you some science behind it, there's absolutely no way you're getting more benefit out of shredding a document, then I guess turning it into into some sort of fertilizer for beer,

then the electricity used to just shred the document.

There's no way

that's a worthwhile transition.

No, it's good for the

I would also like to point out.

Now, this came out

before Bud Light,

and then it

kind of went away.

And here's my thing:

what were you doing for the last month if not trying to make sure that never saw the light of day again?

Right.

They've been deleted off.

It should have been deleted off the YouTube page.

I mean,

if I'm Miller, I go and see if we can buy an EMP to shut down and erase and fry all the chips.

So, you know, they say the internet is forever.

Not with an EMP.

You want to be like a future draftee of the NFL deleting your old tweets.

That's what you want to be.

You want to be hiding your history.

Because you're right.

This has been a huge boom to Miller Light and Coors Light and all these other brands that are not Bud Light as they've cut their sales by 25% or whatever the current number is.

It was up as high as 25%.

And so they come out with this, which is just, again, it goes on to tell you that they're going to take the...

They literally claim, and I can't imagine this is true, but they claim at Miller Light, they're going on like, I guess, ebay and buying up old car uh card cardboard cutouts of bikini models for beer ads and then having them sent to them which again all of the emissions and all the other stuff associated with this is just a side hustle here but it goes all the way to them then they're taking it and they're composting it shredding it and composting it and then using it transporting it to somewhere else again where there it's going to make beer that's going to be transported somewhere else there's nothing better than cardboard beer i'll tell you that right now right if you can take that and mix it with some crap and you just let it steam in a pile for a while.

That's the original formula for Miller Lights.

You mix it into the...

May I just say, so what you're saying is that

men

said horrible things and took horrible pictures of women to sell beer.

Yep.

So you're now making that up by saying horrible things about men

to sell women beer.

And also, I will say, can I point out horrible things about women?

You're saying horrible things about women here as well, because what you're doing is denying their agency to live their lives.

You see, men didn't put women in bikinis.

What happened is individual women sent in their headshots and body shots to try out to attempt to get the jobs this woman in a sweater is now criticizing.

By the way, I don't know if you've noticed this, Glenn.

They treat these women as so much, they've taken their agency so much in this ad.

They have actually blurred out their faces in the ad.

I don't know if you noticed that.

The bikini picture, because you weren't looking at her face in the bikini picture.

The bikini picture.

Did you find that out through Lisa?

I had to watch it like 46 times and eventually.

Oh my God, their faces are gone.

But these are individual women who made individual decisions based on what they wanted to do.

Now, we can be critical of that as a career goal.

But if you're a model, getting into a national ad campaign, probably a big deal, probably something you're proud of.

But this woman in a sweater says you shouldn't be proud of it.

In fact, it wasn't even you doing it.

Men put you in the bikinis.

Well, I have to tell you,

I like the fact that she looks like mom because I've wanted my mother to make all of the choices in my life.

Yeah.

And that can just keep going on.

Say hello to the next generation of Zendesk AI agents.

Built to deliver resolutions for everyone.

Zendesk AI agents easily deploy in minutes, not months, to resolve 30% of customer and employee interactions on day one, quickly turning monotonous tasks into autonomous solutions.

Loved by over 10,000 companies, Zendesk AI makes service teams more efficient, businesses run better, and your customers happier.

That's the Zendesk AI effect.

Find out more at Zendesk.com.