Child Gender Mutilation? Totally Fine. Tattoos? ARREST PARENTS! | Guest: Vivek Ramaswamy | 11/14/22

In the time it takes us to say we're making a damn delicious caramel iced coffee with Folger's Instant Coffee, you know we're all about that drizzle.

You could be savoring every sip.

Damn right.

It's Folger's Instant.

Hello and welcome.

Let me tell you about something that is not a nightmare and that is buying meat.

Well, I mean, actually, it is a nightmare, unless you have decided to get your meat from Good Ranchers.

Good Ranchers is letting you lock your price in of all of your meat.

The meat you buy this November when you subscribe during their Black Friday savings.

This is your chance to inflation-proof your meat budget.

You're also going to get 70% off your free USDA choice steaks.

You'll save an additional $25 off every box when you subscribe.

So forget the high prices, the low quality of the grocery store.

Treat yourself or somebody you love to Good Ranchers, their award-winning service, the quality of Good Ranchers, and the American meat that comes from Good Ranchers.

It's goodranchers.com/slash Glenn, or use the promo code Glenn at checkout and grab the best offer of the year.

The Black Angus is one of the premium breeds of cattle for high-quality beef.

So don't have a normal Black Friday.

This year, have yourself a Black Angus Friday with two free steaks from Good Ranchers, American Meat Delivered.

That's goodranchers.com/slash Glenn.

Goodranchers.com/slash Glenn.

Can't move the catalyst.

We can just get together, it's a curse of life.

Stand up straight in the full night.

It's a whole new day of time to rise.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This is the Glenback program.

Hey there, you sick twisted freak.

Welcome to the program.

It is Monday.

We're going to bring you up to speed on

what we're still counting

and so much more in 60 seconds.

Have you ever taken a handful of your dog's kibble food and smelled it?

Right?

right,

smells awful.

What you're smelling is dead food.

The stuff gets sterilized so it can be put on a shelf in a store for up to two years, you know, or in your garbage for long periods of time.

That doesn't make sense for your dog because all of the nutrients have been cooked out.

Now, I'm not suggesting you change your dog food.

I'm suggesting you put the nutrients back in with a supplement developed by naturopathic Dr.

Dennis Black.

You sprinkle this onto the dog's food.

It's chocked full of vitamins, minerals, probiotics, antioxidants.

You name it.

If it's healthy for your dog, it's most likely in Rough Greens.

They want to give you your first trial bag, just for your dog to try for free, just to make sure he loves it as much as my dog Uno.

Just give your first trial bag.

You just pay for shipping at roughgreens.com/slash Beck.

That's RoughGreens, R-U-F-F-Greens.com/slash Beck.

Or you can call them at 833-G-L-E-N-N33.

It's roughgreens.com slash Beck.

Well, hello, Stu.

Glenn, how are you?

Oh my gosh, I am great.

It's just getting better and better.

Is it really?

It is.

I had missed that part of the news.

Yeah, have you?

So can you just tell me what exactly is going on now?

Yes, the Senate has been called for the Democrats over the weekend.

Two close races went the Democrats' way.

Blake Masters in Arizona lost, and Adam Laxalt in Nevada lost.

Now, simultaneously in Nevada, the gubernatorial candidate for the Republicans won.

So split between those two.

Both very close races.

Yeah.

But the Republican did win in Nevada, which is some good news.

Now, I understand that, thank goodness, they found some ballots from like the kitchen union or something.

What exactly happened with these extra ballots?

I don't know.

Who knows?

Who Who knows?

That's stuff they're going to sort out here, I guess, in the coming weeks.

I mean, again, there's people still challenging.

These are media calls.

But still, it does look that way.

I think, you know, Carrie Lake is, I'd be interested to hear what she says.

Maybe we'll have her on later today.

But

this is a race we talked about that would, if she could squeak it out, was going to be really, really close, but does not look all that promising by the votes that have come in.

I don't know if there's a different perspective from Arizona, but looking just at the results over the past three or four days, I don't think it looks as good as you'd hope.

The House still remains as a Republican favorite, though, like I keep, there's this, there's one of the, one of the sites, one of the mainstream sites keeps quoting it as like, Republicans,

221 seats is the projection, plus or minus four.

I was like, well, that's a big plus or minus four because the minus four is 217, which means they don't have control.

And that's that's sort of the like, if every single thing goes wrong, they could still lose the house.

They would definitely be the overwhelming favorite to win.

So far, though, hasn't every single thing gone wrong?

Well, I get you look at the races that are outstanding and you just see a lot of like California stuff.

Right.

You know, there's not a lot there.

You'd be like, okay, that one should come through.

Yeah.

Lauren Boebert's an interesting one.

The race seems to be completely counted, basically.

And she leads by a couple,

and I was going to say a couple thousand.

It's really just basically a thousand and change.

But she 50.00.

Is there a labor union that hasn't found their votes out?

We don't know that.

We don't know that.

We will eventually find that stuff out.

But she remains in the lead.

Uh-huh.

And

that would get you an extra seat.

There's a few more that I think are Republican favored.

They should pull through in the House.

And as much as this all feels really disappointing, clearing that hurdle is a major, major hurdle.

It was the only one that seemed like a real sure thing coming in.

It's going to be a much smaller, a smaller margin if they get it than we were hoping for.

But that doesn't matter all that much.

You get control of the committees.

You get control of the votes.

You get to be able, you can block stuff that's going through that Biden wants.

There's a lot you can do with just that one piece, but they do have to get that one piece.

If we don't get that one piece,

then it's a catastrophic election.

Then you can put it to the side of a catastrophic election.

Right now, I think people feel catastrophe because many people expected a red tsunami.

And, you know, I never thought that that was the most likely outcome.

But a stronger win than this.

Yeah.

A red wave.

You know, this has been a red.

We've been calling it a red tinkle because it feels like you got punched somewhere you didn't want to get punched.

Right.

But it does, it's still on the red side.

And so we'll see.

It's just blood.

It's just blood.

Yeah.

It's just blood.

You don't want to get punched there.

Yeah.

Thank you for that, Stu.

I appreciate it.

It's a good way to start a Monday.

So there is another election that is supposedly happening this week.

Don't know why he would be trying to get this done so fast.

You know, well, I actually do.

The reason why Mitch McConnell wants to have an election

this week is because nobody in the Senate is really prepared for it.

Nobody else has put their hat in the ring yet.

So

they're going to have a top-secret meeting on Tuesday.

Shh, don't tell anybody.

They're going to have a meeting on Tuesday, and that's when they're going to hear from anybody else that wants to put their hat in the ring.

I hope somebody puts their hat in the ring because Mitch McConnell has got to go.

If there's anyone that you could say,

I think they played a role in the loss here, It would be Mitch McConnell.

You know, why did you put so much money in the Murkowski race when

we knew it was going to be a Republican either way?

Yeah, that's terrible.

Why would you

just decide that one?

Yeah.

I think we all know why he did that.

He did that because he wanted to make sure he had Murkowski who would kowtow to him.

Oh, yes.

Oh, powerful Oz.

Yes, yes.

So we know why he did that.

We also know why he didn't put money into Blake Masters, which we could have won that race.

Oh, my gosh, yes.

It was definitely a winnable race.

Yeah, definitely.

A winnable race.

Yeah.

But he didn't put any money there.

Why?

Because he knew Blake Masters wouldn't kowtow to the all-powerful Oz, otherwise known as the Turtle.

Not Dr.

Oz.

Not Dr.

That's a different Oz.

Yeah, not Dr.

Oz.

Which I don't think he put any money into that one either, did he?

I don't know the answer to to that one.

That was certainly a tougher race.

Although, I think Oz wound up losing by what was it, four points.

But seemingly a winnable one.

When you have a guy who is incapable of communicating with other human beings, it does seem to be winnable.

You know, so here's what I'd like to ask you to participate in.

I would like you to write this phone number down: 202-224-3121.

That number again is 202-224-3121.

That'll get you to the Capitol switchboard.

Now you can go online and look for your senator and find the direct line to your Senate office, but I highly recommend that you do today.

In fact, Deb Fisher

from Nebraska, she should be called.

Roger Wicker from Mississippi, he should be called.

Rick Scott, Florida.

Ted Cruz, Texas.

Mike Braun from Indiana.

Josh Hawley from

Missouri.

John Barrasso, Wyoming.

He would be great to call.

Marsha Blackburn would also be called.

She should be called.

I mean, it wouldn't be a bad idea.

And let's see who's...

Let's see who's on the side for Mitch McConnell.

Who's a member of the Mitch's Bitches Club?

Who is it that will actually stand with this guy?

Because I think personally

that they should have another election and see if we can get anybody else to take over for Mitch McConnell.

Because

he was instrumental in getting nothing done.

Nothing.

The only thing that you can credit Mitch McConnell on is the Supreme Court.

And that's a big thing.

However, for all of the years that he's been running the dump, that's the only thing I can think of.

So what have you done for us lately, Mitch, besides screwed this up?

Here's the thing.

Mitch McConnell and his ilk are going to be exactly the same as they have always been.

Mitt Romney?

He said last week, there's only one person who is responsible for the red wave that is coming, and that is Mitch McConnell.

And I thought that was the dumbest thing I've ever heard because he wasn't going for the red wave.

He was working against the red wave.

But Mitch, but

Romney is right about this.

He does deserve credit for everything that has just happened.

So I highly recommend that you call your your senators and

wait a minute.

I think most of these are up for re-election next time.

Well, anyway, I think you should call them and say, hey, we want to know if you're going to vote for or against Mitch McConnell.

And if they say against Mitch McConnell, great.

If they say, it's a sacred ballot and

we're not sure who is

just let them know you're writing that down as a vote for Mitch McConnell

and you will

remember come election day

you will

oh you will remember

you'll remember that

then you might want to also call you know some of the others that uh might be thinking about, oh, I don't know, running for president.

Who could those be?

Who could those be?

There's a lot of senators are probably considering it clunny.

Yeah, probably.

I mean,

Rubio, you know, isn't it weird?

Rubio is an interesting story, right?

I mean, people forget.

Yeah, sure, DeSantis won by, what, 19 points?

I would assume Marco Rubio, who also won, I think, by 17 points in Florida.

That's a big story.

He ran already for president.

Yeah.

Maybe he's thinking it's time to run again.

Yeah.

And isn't he one of them that just came out and said, hey, maybe we should replace Mitch McConnell?

He showed some skepticism, it seemed.

He did see.

Yeah.

It seemed that way.

It would be interesting.

Now, you don't think that it's...

I mean, I take Marco Rubio at his word.

It's not just because he's running for president and knows you're not going to go anywhere in the Republican Party if you back Mitch McConnell, right?

Isn't that it?

Anyway, you might want to call some of these senators.

Again,

the number is 202-224-3121.

Could you run as a Republican if you were in the Senate?

Could you run if you had voted for

Mitch McConnell?

You could run.

Oh, well, you'd probably entertain the interest of a bunch of money from Mitch McConnell.

But that's the only upside in a primary.

I don't think a primary would, that would not look good in your primary record.

Yeah.

Probably not.

Probably not.

I voted for

it was a secret ballot.

I can't tell you who I voted for.

Oh, I think we know.

I think we know.

It'll be clear, I think, by that answer.

Because everybody who doesn't vote for Mitch McConnell, I think they're going to be fine saying, I didn't vote for Mitch McConnell.

Pretty sure.

Pretty sure.

So that's Romney.

I love him.

You've always been a big Romney guy in all the

I can always remember.

Deb Fisher,

Roger Wicker, Rick Scott, Ted Cruz.

Some of these are going to be easy.

They're going to say,

no, I'm not voting for him.

But just make sure everybody in the Senate on the Republican side understands you're not joking around.

You

are clear what Mitch McConnell has done for you and the country.

And I'm pretty much sick of it.

Mike Braun,

Josh Hawley,

John Barroso,

and Marcia Blackburn.

So it'd be good to just call.

Did I tell you that they're voting on that on Wednesday?

Just two days from now.

Two days from now.

And what, four days, five days after they called the Senate?

Yeah.

Isn't that weird?

That's weird.

Because

Schumer's not calling for a re-election until December.

But Mitch wants to get this done.

Wants to get this done right away.

Right away.

If there's anything you'd say about Mitch McConnell, it's that he's speedy.

Speedy.

Speedy is the word.

You know, I mean, he looks like a turtle, sure, but remember, the turtle won that race.

Well, let me tell you this.

Let me tell you this, too.

He, when he sees a continuing resolution or an omnibus bill, he is on it.

They'll give it to him and he'll say,

right away.

And then

he's nimble.

He gets it to the guys within hours of the vote.

So nobody can, you know, really look at it, but that's as fast as he can go.

He is fast.

So when we're looking at another omnibus or we're looking for a continuing resolution,

Mitch is our guy.

And

when we're looking now at the 2024 election coming up,

I think Mitch is the guy to chart the course to get that Republican Party back on track.

You do.

Well, in the same sort of way as I think

arsenic is a great laxative.

Okay.

You know,

you're stuffed up.

Take a little arsenic.

You won't have that problem anymore.

That's true.

You know what I mean?

So, no.

I think we're clear on that.

Diesel fuel,

diesel fuel crisis going on right now.

Last thing you should do is, I don't know, ignore it.

With diesel trucks that don't run, without trucks, grocery stores empty out fast.

You know what empties trucks out fast?

No diesel for the railway system.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Ask yourself this.

Are you prepared for that kind of thing?

Do you have enough food to feed your family in a crisis?

What about through the whole winter?

Because as crazy as it sounds, this is what we could be looking at.

Here's what you need to do.

Go to mypatriotsupply.com or preparewickglenn.com.

Go to preparewickglenn.com.

You'll get $250 off, the popular three-month emergency food kit from MyPatriot Supply.

You'll get breakfast, lunch, dinner, snacks.

The kits have everything for you and your family so

you can can survive a difficult situation.

$250 off per kit.

You can get enough for everybody in your family, My Patriots Apply, charging less so they can help families more.

In fact, this is the lowest price since 2019, so act now.

Don't miss this.

Your order ships fast and free and unmarked boxes for your privacy.

Save $250 now at preparewickglenn.com.

That's preparewitglen.com.

10 seconds station ID.

So, Glenn, what do you think the field looks like in 2024?

I know we're getting ahead of ourselves a little bit here, but I'm curious as to you think, do you think this develops the same way that it developed in 2020 where we have, or 2016?

7,000?

Where we have like almost everyone you've ever seen on Fox News as a candidate?

Yes, yes, I do, unfortunately.

Yes.

I think there was a hope among some that maybe you'd have, you know, Trump versus DeSantis, maybe like a Larry Hogan who's probably going to get in it as a moderate, something like that.

But like the two people with a chance to win, and then a limited field where you'd see two people kind of fight it out, and then you'd get to the end with some sort of rational conclusion to that story.

2016, there were so many candidates all at the same time.

Everybody joined in, tons of people below 1%.

You know, debate stages.

They split up over multiple days.

I mean, this is all coming back to me now, and it's starting to be terrifying.

Everybody is going to be running for vice president.

That's what's going to happen.

They're going to run for president, but they're

actually running for vice president.

That's what's going to happen.

That's what you'll see in the field.

And that happened, of course.

That played out in the Democratic primary in 2020, where a failed presidential candidate got the VP slot.

And if we have people like Mitch McConnell, we'll do that again.

know, we'll do, hey, it worked for the Democrat.

Let's get the least popular person

and put him on the ticket.

Do you think Mitch McConnell will be VP?

I think there's a good chance.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

That'll be interesting.

So let me go back to the 2016 crew for a bit.

Marco Rubio, you think, is I think there's a chance, yeah.

I think, yeah.

Ted Cruz.

Yes.

Now, Rand Paul is an interesting one.

Rand Paul has been very much in the news over the past couple of years, especially on the COVID stuff.

We did ask him this question directly when he was on the air with us one time, and his answer was definitely not no, I'm not running.

It was more of a, if Trump wins, I don't think there'd be much of a point.

Or if Trump runs, I don't think there'd be much of a point.

Meaning, I guess, that he'd clear the field at some point.

I don't think that's changing.

Unfortunately.

I don't think a great, a huge field really benefits.

the Republican Party or conservatism generally.

No.

And I like watching the, I like watching the varying viewpoints.

I like to see who's the best candidate.

I don't think a big primary necessarily is always damaging, but I don't know.

It seems to be so, so much of a sideshow.

You can't get anything accomplished.

Everyone's been, you know, 30-second answers on a debate stage from 12 different people does nothing.

No, and the nice thing is, this time you're going to have Liz Cheney joining in, too.

You think she's going to get into?

Of course she is.

And she'll run.

She's not a registered Republican anymore.

She'll be funded by the left like crazy, so she'll always be standing there.

She'll just keep going.

I don't know if they'll pick her or they'll find some, they're going to find someone to take her place.

I mean, it might be Larry Hogan, but someone in that, someone's going to take that wing of the Republican Party and give it a whirl, I think.

The Glenn Bach program.

World has a ton of troubles right now, and while some of them are just over the horizon, I believe there is a new dawn waiting for us.

Right now, it seems a little dark, but

why stay up at night thinking about it?

Because the sun is going to come up.

Truth is, you can handle each day's challenge if you're in the right frame of mind, and that starts with a good night's sleep.

The Giza Dream Sheets are back at their lowest price ever.

That means they're as low as $29.99 with the promo code back.

Just like everything else my pillow makes, these sheets come with a 60-day money-back guarantee.

Orders placed between now and December 25th will have their money-back guarantee extended until March 1st, 2023.

Listen, why sleep on anything but the very best?

Especially when the best is on sale for such a low, low price.

Get the Giza Dream Sheets today.

MyPillow.com.

That's mypillow.com.

The radio listener specials hit that square, put in the code BEC and save.

800-966-3117.

800-966-3117.

Mypillow.com promo code Beck.

Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

The promo code is stand up.

You'll get 30 bucks off your subscription to Blaze TV.

Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.

We say hello to Mr.

Pat Gray from

Gray Unleashed.

Welcome.

How are you feeling today?

Miserable would be a good word.

Despondent would be another word.

Huh.

Defeated would be a third that we could use.

So not spirited.

No, not spirited

in any way.

Except about the national divorce movement.

I'm kind of...

You're into that.

I'm kind of into that.

Yeah.

Do you think that

if we got a national divorce in the new, let's say, constitutional republic that we would like to live in, do you think the GOP would win the elections?

Somehow they'd still

blow.

They'd still find a way to lose.

There'd be a communist, one communist, and he'd be like,

party takes over.

I think I should fill all of the Senate seats and they'd win.

Yeah, that's probably true.

Yeah.

Probably true.

So we'd be going for it.

Isn't it bizarre, though, that every time you go to sleep with a lead, you wake up with not the lead it's kind of strange to me

i i wasn't expecting this over the weekend have you adam laxalt would drop the what almost three-point lead he had going into the weekend two and a half points something like that yeah and all of a sudden oh he he lost adam laxalt preparing him for a loss i'm like wait what How did that happen?

Well, all the precincts that came in were heavy Democrat.

We just thought they might be slightly Democrat.

Okay.

Wow, that happens a lot.

Didn't happen in the gubernatorial race, though.

That's good.

They did win.

That is true.

The Republican race.

And if you're going to do it, you know, if you're going to cheat, you'd think you would do

for voting.

Exactly.

Exactly.

That's why.

Or

that's what they want you to think.

You know what?

We'll give them the governorship.

We'll give them that.

They won't be able to say that.

As long as we have the Senate, then they won't be able to say anything.

It hurts, though.

It hurts.

It does.

And to see the victory lap that Biden is taking.

I mean, after that Xi message,

he meets with Xi for three hours, comes out talking about

how great it is that Democrats won.

How did he put it?

That, oh, election denialism was strongly rejected.

Because, you know, there's such wide and open and honest elections in China.

I'm glad he was able to shine light on that because they've been doing such a good job.

President G, very, very popular.

Very, very, very popular.

In fact, I think he might win 98, 99% of the vote if they let people.

That's because they call him Mr.

Freedom.

Mr.

Freedom.

Mr.

Freedom.

Mr.

Freedom.

Wow, I didn't see that one coming.

No.

But then again, I didn't see Laxalt losing.

No, I didn't either.

No.

Did not either.

At least it takes the edge off the Georgia race now, doesn't it?

Yeah.

It's like, eh, whatever.

It might be good for

Walker's chances.

I think there's an argument to be made that, like, now that control isn't 100%

teetering on that, maybe

they win.

Maybe Republicans will be more active than some sideline voters that don't typically go out to the polls.

Maybe.

Maybe.

Maybe.

I still think that.

Because my reaction is a little like Pat's.

Huh.

Well,

I mean,

I am.

It's a six-year term.

I'm getting out of the car.

I'm getting out of the car before they drive it over the cliff, but they are driving it over the cliff.

Assuming we still have a nation in the next couple of elections, it will be nice to have a one-seat cushion as we see how close these things are.

The next couple of elections?

Yes, towards Republicans.

I would expect

the next couple of months.

It is important, though.

And next time the map tilts towards Republicans, as we've discussed many times, this week.

Yeah, we have a better shot.

Yeah, 2024 should be a good year.

Now,

you said it's McConnell's going to see to that.

I'll tell you.

Well, I thought you were just talking about maybe replacing him with somebody talking more excitingly.

Now, there are some people that are talking about it as well.

You know, there's

Josh Hawley.

Okay.

Eric Schmidt.

Yes.

Rick Scott.

Good.

Ron Johnson.

All right.

Lindsey Graham.

Lindsey Graham.

Yeah.

That's a surprise.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Mike Lee.

Huh.

J.D.

Vance.

Okay.

Ted Cruz.

Like that.

Rubio.

Rubio.

There's a few.

Murkowski, Strangely Not.

What's a Strangely Not?

Stunning surprise.

Did they call that race yet?

I hate the Murkowski one.

I haven't checked that one in a while.

For the love of Pete, just call it Alaska.

I know.

I don't know if they have yet.

I do.

No, they haven't because they have to do the ranked choice thing and they have to wait for all the votes to come in.

But she's going to, I think Murkowski's the favorite there by

of course she is.

Of course she is.

You're going to go for

the more of the two evils.

Not the lesser.

It's never.

Yeah.

So Chewbacca is currently up by two points.

This is.

I went ask for a comment.

Asked for a comment.

That's what she said.

We've been talking about that race for like two weeks.

We're like, why have we not talked about this race with Pat in here?

We need Pat in here when we're talking about the Chewbacca race.

Right, because it's important to have somebody that can do.

Burkowski's at 42.8.

But the way this breaks out, of course, when you do the ranked choice voting, you're going to lose the last candidate first and her vote, which I think the last one is a Republican, but it's only a couple percent.

And that, let's just say that even goes to Chewbacca, which it could go either way.

The next one's a Democrat, and that's, I think, 9% of the vote.

And that percentage will be distributed between, it will almost exclusively go to Burkowski, which should pur over the 50-point barrier.

And that's the way I'm looking at that race.

Now, of course, there's still a bunch of votes to come in.

Alaska is one of these wins.

You're from labor unions?

Possibly.

I think you have 14 days after the election to have your, they wait 14 days, something like that,

to get all the votes in.

What?

Yeah.

Do they have to be at least

marked the day?

I think they have to be post-marked.

Alas.

And you might say, like, it's three towns away and it still takes 14 days in Alaska.

That could be the truth.

I don't know.

You know, Alaska is a little bit of a different place, but I mean, if there's one, you can't, there's no reason to do this in like California.

Like, there, Alaska, maybe you have a, there's some island out that no one's ever visited.

And I don't know.

It takes a while for the mail to get there.

Maybe, but, like, you know, it's like New York City.

We need six months.

Sorry.

I think Nevada did that.

Either Nevada or Arizona.

I was reading about one of the two, I can't remember over the weekend.

And they said that Saturday was the deadline for mail-in votes to arrive and be counted.

And it didn't even specify whether or not they had to be postmarked.

Yeah, they do have to count.

November 8th.

So that's good at least.

Well, the other ones they do is they're like, what?

You don't care about our military members serving overseas that want to get their votes in?

What happens about a person who is in a cave in Afghanistan?

and decides on election day he's going, he needs to, he gives it to a Sherpa who postmarks it on November 8th, who then has to walk it.

And he hasn't heard yet that we withdrew from Afghanistan a year ago?

He's in a cave.

How would he know?

Okay, you're right.

He just knows he wanted Catherine Cortez-Masto to be the next senator.

I think that's a very good point.

A very good point.

And, you know, while you're at it, I mean, sure, he's over in a cave, but...

You might be in the kitchen of some union kitchen where there's knives and

you've got to get around all all the knives as you're passing out the ballots and then collecting all the ballots and making sure that it gets there.

You might need a couple of months.

That's very likely

that happens.

It takes some time.

How many times have we seen that be the case for some of these voters?

Many, many times.

Many times.

Or you might be dead and it takes you a little longer to get it out of your casket, above ground, into the hand of a mailman and all the way to the voting place.

Right.

You know, it takes some time for the dead to get their vote counted.

They move slowly.

If you've ever seen

harsh movie or a zombie movement.

I don't know if you've seen this.

I've seen this happen.

You have to convince the worms to take that letter up above the soil.

And a lot of them don't want to.

No.

And

they have to grab that ballot with their teeth.

With their worm teeth.

With their worm teeth.

With their worm teeth and get that up there.

Yeah.

And worm teeth, you know, they might bite through the potato.

They start eating the ballot.

You have to get it up there before they finish dissolving it.

That was the problem with the with the Chads.

Oh, really?

Yeah.

The worm teeth.

The worm teeth.

It was worm teeth.

Dang it.

Man.

So many of our problems come back with worm teeth.

So many.

You know?

Yeah.

Good chunk of them.

Hey, so can I

just give you a story about Walgreens?

Walgreens has decided to close three locations in Boston.

Oh, what racists.

Hey, man.

Thank you for saying that.

Welcome.

So clear and obvious that that's all about racism.

It is.

Now, they might have been, you know, robbed every day.

Yeah, but who isn't?

That's just sheer, unadulterated racism.

Thank you, Pat.

I was glad somebody said it.

I was hoping you would see that like the city of Boston does.

Everything is racism now.

Everything is racist.

It's true.

It's true.

My wife and I went away.

I was in

Nashville.

I love Nashville.

It's a great town with great people around.

Went into a Walgreens there.

And that was an interesting experience.

Really?

Yeah, it was different than most of the Walgreens that I went to in a Walmart secret.

Well,

she was inside the store accosted by multiple homeless people while she was in her aisle and I was in my other aisle.

And she had to kind of come over and

let me know.

Now, this is like, you have.

She has a problem with homeless people.

in this circumstance.

Yes, first of all,

on the walk over there, obviously there were 1,400 homeless people that came up and asked us for money or looked at us in

a threatening manner of some sort.

But that's just Nashville.

That's just what's going on down there downtown.

After you could crawl over the giant bags of trash that are on every single corner.

But once you get past that whole circumstance, you think once you're inside the Walgreens, you're going to have

a respite of some sort.

Listen to this.

Parents elitism, Glenn.

Can you?

I need the elitism of this guy.

Oh, my gosh.

Oh, wow.

It's sad.

It's a real problem

when they shop at Walgreens all the time.

You know what I mean?

They're just like

the upscale.

The upscale Walgreens.

You do kind of expect, though, inside a store to not be harassed by people.

Okay.

And apparently not.

Okay.

Apparently not.

You expect to be harassed by salespeople trying to sell you stuff.

That's what I expect going into the business.

Is that the way it happens at Tiffany's?

I don't know, Glenn.

Do you want to get into an elitism battle on the air?

Oh, we're doing a lot of time.

I just want to make sure.

Let me tell you about Upside.

For people who aren't elitists, people who want to save money.

Upside is an app that you can just download from the App Store and it will save you tons of money.

In fact, Stu put it on his phone.

I did.

And I saved 35 cents because I'm such an elitist.

I care about 35 cents a gallon on my gas.

See, he doesn't even miss it.

He doesn't miss it.

I did miss it.

I was excited about the upside app.

And by the way, it's not just gas, too.

You can go to, they've got restaurants.

They've got all sorts of stuff on there.

Like, you just go on there.

You just pull up the map and then you just go to that place because you know you're going to save 8%, 10%.

I mean, it really is incredible.

I wish I, you know, again, you hear about these things and you don't do it for a while.

You save 8% at a restaurant.

That's, I mean, for me, thousands of dollars.

And you've saved all that money from the tip.

I mean, you give like you get double the back.

I mean, if you're saving 8%, you're only giving a 4% tip.

That's not what I give at all.

I give much more than that, Glenn.

Do you?

6%?

No.

No.

See,

this is what these guys, you know, the Monopoly Man, this is what they're like.

This is what they're like.

Anyway,

download your free upside app now at upside.com/slash Beck.

You'll get 25 cents back for every gallon on your first tank of gas.

You could get more, as Stu said.

He saved 35, but regular schlubs like us, probably not.

25 to 35,

you don't know.

25 cents per gallon for sure.

Every gallon of gas, every gallon that you put into your first tank of gas, once you've downloaded upside.com/slash back.

Do it now.

Upside.com/slash back.

The Glenn Back program.

This is the Glen Beck program.

May I ask a question?

Why is it that politicians are so gracious on

the first Tuesday of November?

Yeah.

And yet, when it comes to April 15th, this is a good, this is, yes.

You, you

must

have it in.

You have it in.

You don't have that in on April 15th.

Why, then,

there's hell to pay, mister.

There's hell to pay.

You know, I just recently paid my taxes, Glenn.

And you might say, wait a minute, isn't it in November?

And yes, that is accurate.

I did, well, file my taxes is the more appropriate way of putting it because I was owed money in a refund.

Now, they owed me money in a refund, so

I wasn't all that concerned about getting it in on time

because they owed me money, right?

Like, I mean, I obviously should have been more concerned about it.

That's when I'm really concerned.

But I mean, I'm like, obviously, I want the money back, but I know I'm going to get it back.

And it's like, I just didn't want to pay the penalties if I owed them money, right?

Correct.

Well, guess what?

I got my refund back and it was less than I was supposed to get because they actually penalized me for filing my return late, even though they owed me money.

So then they took money out of the refund and kept it because they said I didn't pay.

I didn't

pay early enough.

Sometimes.

It's not an awful lot lately, but sometimes when you speak, it makes me happy.

Why?

So wait a minute.

Wait a minute.

I want to go back.

How is it there are certain things that you

have to do?

Right.

But when it comes to voting,

get it in when you can.

You know, it is amazing.

You don't have to come on the day.

You can come up to, I don't know, six weeks beforehand.

And by the way,

if you just can't make it in that six-week period, you can come on election day.

And if you just can't make it on election day, you can mail your ballot.

And if you just can't mail your ballot early enough for it to arrive by election day, you just have to post-market on election day and then it can arrive up to two weeks late.

And if your candidate is behind and you're part of a labor union,

there's all new rules for you.

Right, all new rules.

But like, isn't this a normal like thing to ask people to do if you're paying a bill?

I know I send my bill in early so it arrives that day.

Right.

I think that's basic.

We say like all the time, like, yeah, we got to be able to prove who you are.

Voter ID is important.

And almost 90% of people agree with that point.

No, but the politicians really don't.

They don't, right?

They don't agree with that, you know.

And yet, when you go to an airport, it's definitely not racist to have photo ID.

No, not there.

It's not.

No.

No, that's the non-racist ID.

There are racist IDs and non-racist IDs.

Right.

Not sure which is which yet, but we'll get there.

The Glenn Back program.

When you find something that really works to solve a problem in your life, you grab onto that thing and you try not to let go.

That's how I've felt about Rough Greens for a while.

I have President Miles.

You may know President Miles.

And we call him President Miles because he sleeps approximately 22, 23 hours a day.

He's a 17-year-old pug.

He does not move around all that much, but when he does, it's always encouraging to see it.

He's kind of like the president of the United States.

He's still moving around.

You're kind of like, wow.

But to see him actually, you know, he definitely deals with joint pain issues, and it's tough for him to get around sometimes.

And that's why Rough Greens is really important to him.

For him, they have vitamins and nutrients packed into a supplement that basically, first of all, he loves eating and it tastes great for dogs, but also it gives him all those nutrients that are lost from the sort of dead dog food that you get on the store shelves.

Rough Greens is a sort of a supplement for your dog food, and your dogs absolutely love it.

Let me tell you how to get Rough Greens and

where you should go.

If you go

right now to roughgreens.com/slash Beck or 833-Glenn33, you you can call them at 833GLENN33 or RoughGreens.com slash Beck.

Mint is still $15 a month for premium wireless.

And if you haven't made the switch yet, here are 15 reasons why you should.

One, it's $15 a month.

Two, seriously, it's $15 a month.

Three, no big contracts.

Four, I use it.

Five, my mom uses it.

Are you playing me off?

That's what's happening, right?

Okay.

Give it a try at mintmobile.com/slash switch.

Up front payment of $45 per three-month plan, $15 per month equivalent required.

New customer offer first three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra.

See mintmobile.com.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This is the Glenn Back program.

Boy, there is a huge scandal brewing.

If you have heard about the FTX scandal and maybe don't understand what's really going on,

we have a ton to report in 60 seconds.

So here's a stat that should shock you a bit.

55% of Americans carry their credit card balance over from month to month.

55%

of Americans.

That's a huge number.

Things are expensive.

Life is expensive and getting more so.

The down economy that we've been experiencing has

seen to that.

But you and I both know this leads to massive credit card debt.

with through-the-roof interest rates.

How are you going to be able to handle that?

Well, there are some people that maybe be able to help you out.

It's American Financing.

They're America's home for home loans, and they've been helping people just like you save money now for over 20 years.

Their salary-based mortgage consultants are going to help guide you through every step of the process from free mortgage review to, you know, whatever outcome works.

for the the best for you.

They'll help you understand all of your options from flexible terms to fast

closings and they've got you covered with no obligations, no upfront or hidden fees.

It's American Financing.

In it for you, AmericanFinancing.net or call 800-906-2440, 800-906-2440.

It's AmericanFinancing.net.

American Financing, NMLS, 1-82334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Vivek Ramashwami is with us now.

Vivek.

Vivek, are you there?

Glenn, how are you?

I'm good.

Kind of a disappointing week last week, but recovering from it and moving on.

Yeah, well, you know, that's the only way forward, right?

I know, it is.

So, so, Vivek, I wanted to get you on to explain the FTX thing to somebody like me that's not really up on FTX and I haven't been following this 30-year-old guy.

Tell me what's happening and what it means.

It's a really interesting story, Glenn, and not all of the details are crystal clear yet.

I can give you the super detailed version if you're interested, but the slightly less summary version is that there's a guy who operated an exchange called FTX, right?

That was the exchange where people trade cryptocurrencies.

It's like Coinbase.

Yeah, exactly.

Except this is offshore, Coinbase is onshore.

So think about that as an exchange.

But it's a centralized exchange.

It just happens to trade cryptocurrency.

So it's like an old school, think about it as an equivalent of like a stock exchange, except people can trade cryptocurrencies on it.

You know, that's owned and founded by and lead owner is Sam Bankman Freed, who goes by SBF.

But he also had a separate hedge fund called Alameda.

So that's...

a trading firm.

So that's not an exchange.

That's just trading to try to make money like people always have.

On Wall Street, this has existed for a very long time.

hedge funds that just traded their own capital to make more money.

So he's operating both the exchange and his own hedge fund.

And it appears what happened was when that hedge fund encountered a bunch of losses and they have leverage, right?

That means they're borrowing.

That means they have to post collateral to cover for those losses.

So it appears what he did was he took customer funds from the exchange, but used that to borrow it and post it as collateral.

And when that came to light, the other participants in that exchange, particularly one big market participant, this guy Chang Peng Zhao, said that he was going to dump a bunch of the, and this is where it gets a little bit complicated, but a bunch of the token issued by the exchange that basically caused the value of that token, the instrument that people hold on the exchange, to collapse.

And that sent a free fall spiral that caused the whole house of cards to come crashing down.

So, you know, putting complexities and the details to one side, which we can get into if you want, the bottom line is there's a guy who was self-dealing, using customer money on an exchange to cover his own personal trading losses, tried to cover it up.

When that came to light, there was a house of cards that came crashing.

And unfortunately, many of those customers are likely going to lose a lot of their money, and even the portion they get back, they're not going to see for a very long time.

So that's just descriptively what happened.

But boy, is there a lot more that's interesting to this story when you look at this guy who was a major donor to the Democratic Party, one of the major faces of advocating for regulation of the cryptocurrency industry in Washington, D.C., that created the smokescreen that prevented people from being able to see through this fundamental fraud.

Okay, so let's I want to go there.

But first, let's start.

He's like 30 years old.

And

the woman running the hedge fund,

his girlfriend looks like she's 14.

Yeah,

I'm not going to ⁇ I don't have the facts, but I will tell you, it did not look

good.

It surprised me a little bit.

Right.

How is it that these two people pulled the wool over so many people's eyes?

So it's a great question.

I think it has to do with cultivating this do-good image, this futurist image on the promise of cryptocurrency and the importance of what that would mean for humanity.

I mean, at the end of the day, these are nothing, this guy is nothing more than a high-frequency trader.

And there's nothing wrong with being a high-frequency trader, but it's just you're in the business, ordinarily, to just make an extra buck, to make an extra buck by beating somebody else at the sport of trading effectively.

But what he managed to do was to disguise that in the veneer of this moral superiority, this morality.

And the funniest part about this, Glenn, is that a lot of people miss this.

This is going to have a backlash that I think is going to be over-inclusive, where this guy was operating a centralized exchange.

That's no different than an old-school exchange.

It just happened to offer trading in cryptocurrencies.

So there's really nothing that fancy or even futuristic, let alone morally humanistic, about it.

It's just an old-school exchange where people trade stuff, and the stuff they trade is a cryptocurrency.

But the actual promise of the future of cryptocurrency, of decentralization, is actually decentralized exchanges where there's no single centralized owner of the exchange.

And the irony here, Glenn, is I think this is going to provoke a backlash from regulators to the entire cryptocurrency,

including to decentralized exchanges.

And the irony, here's the ultimate irony that a lot of people miss.

He couldn't have done what he did if it were actually a truly decentralized exchange.

The only way he was able to borrow those customer funds as one actor and lend it over to his hedge fund to post his collateral is the fact that the exchange was centralized in the first place.

And so the irony here is you you have this guy who is the face of pro-regulation.

He was a pro-regulatory advocate in Washington, D.C., which is why everyone viewed him as

the good guy, the golden boy.

And yet, the irony is he happened to be the fraudster.

And then the reaction to that is likely going to include over-regulating decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges, which would have been probably the best way of actually preventing this fraud.

So that's the irony in the whole story that I think people haven't yet caught up to see.

Isn't also

big in

ESG

and the World Economic Forum?

He's all part of the smoke screen, exactly.

It's all just part of the smoke screen, Glenn.

That is part of it.

Now, there was a story that was floating around on social media yesterday that actually found that a subsidiary of FactSet, which is one of these ratings companies,

assigned an ESG score on a leadership and governance metric, including as it related to sustainability standards, that was higher for this company than ExxonMobil, which is a company that most Americans will know and has been around for a long time.

Okay, so that's the bit of the farce in this, but that's just one example of the farce.

He's pro-regulation, so the Democrats in Washington, D.C.

see him as a good guy.

He is the second largest donor to Democrats this cycle, donating over $30 million.

Another point on the strike and the tally of being the good guy.

Hang on,

didn't he also say that for 2024 he will donate up to a billion dollars to the Democrats?

Yes.

So the funny thing is what he said is he was going to donate $1 billion over the 2022 and 2024 cycle.

Now, the sad part for a lot of Democrats is they were kind of upset at it because you might think that meant like a few hundred million now and more $100 million then.

Actually, he only ended up donating $30 plus million.

So the side note to the story, kind of the comic part of this, is a lot of Democrats are actually upset at him for only ponying up a little over $30 million because he had committed to to a billion.

But you see, this guy hits a common pattern, over-promising and under-delivering.

Turns out that applies to political donations as well.

But the broader point, though, Glenn, is it's just checking all the boxes.

Speaking with Clinton on stage and Tony Blair, boldly wearing shorts, being the cool guy of the future, World Economic Forum, all that entire crowd, ESG ratings, donations to the Democratic Party, being vocally pro-regulation in an industry where the other entrepreneurs have, in my opinion, for good reason, resisted regulation.

That created the cultivated aura of this being one of the good guys, one of the guys you could trust.

And it reminds me a lot of actually that CEO of Volkswagen.

Remember this guy, Wintercorn?

He was the CEO of Volkswagen, which was the number one ESG award-winning company.

Yes.

Until they found, and by the way, he would wax eloquent about climate change and the energy transition until they found that he had actually rigged the emissions measurements in their own cars.

This reminded me a lot of that story, where the person who protests the case for the futurism of the ESG-Layden world, one of the good guys about the pro-regulation crowd, ended up being the most fraudulent of them all.

And it's not an accident that that pattern just repeats itself time and again, because it's all about creating a smokescreen to allow you to get away with a kind of fraud you would have never gotten away with if people hadn't been thrown off the scent with the smoke screen that you put up.

So that's the story.

It happens again and again.

And I wish people would learn the lesson, Glenn, but there's something about us as a people that make us suckers for the smoke screen of wanting to be the pro-ESG, pro-Democrat, pro-regulation, good guys.

That every time, that ends up being actually a pretty good way to throw the regulators and to throw customers off the scent and to be able to get away with something like this.

And Vivek, there's a real big

media angle here to this, too, because this is yet another example, Elizabeth Holmes style where they made this guy into a hero all the like he he doesn't brush his hair he there were stories about how he wears shorts to every meeting one story talked about how he would fall asleep on beanbag chairs outside of offices and they'd bring in all these multi-billion dollar donors past him while he was sleeping and then he would wake up and waddle into the the uh the meeting like 10 minutes later and this was like he's just a genius he's a he doesn't even care He's asleep on a beanbag outside the meeting.

One story talked about, these are all praising him, where he was playing video games during an entire presentation while he was in there.

And they gave him a billion dollars after this meeting, where he was playing League of Legends throughout an entire meeting.

Don't believe it.

And, like, there's no Maya Culpa from the media after all of this who built this guy into this celebrity to get all of these dollars.

And

there will never be a time.

All they'll get is a bunch of podcasts podcasts later on hosted by the same reporters who initially interviewed him and made him into this superstar.

I mean, it's a ridiculous cycle.

You make such a good point.

And this is less a story about this random guy, SBF, whatever.

He came two years ago.

He'll be gone two months from now.

But it's an indictment of our culture.

I mean, what is it about our...

state of our psyche, our cultural psyche in the U.S., even internationally, that causes us to bear this self-inflicting pain every time, to line up behind a guy who not only poses to be the boy genius.

I mean, that was Elizabeth Holmes' version of this, but to take that to the next level, to think that he is actually better than the rest of us just because he checked the boxes that we had created in our artificial edifice of ESG and of humanitarianism and of political philanthropy.

It's almost as though we did this to ourselves and he was just the guy who happened to ride the wave that the rest of our culture had created.

That's the more interesting part of this story because it's the Volkswagen thing all over again.

You know, it's Unilever in Kenya.

I mean, it's all the stuff I've been writing and talking about for two years.

We just see the same story repeat itself in different clothing.

It just happened to be in the clothing of cryptocurrency this time around.

So I heard on

the podcast all in, I heard Brian Armstrong, who is the CEO of Coinbase, saying

he didn't see this one coming at all.

He said, I just thought he was a really good, really good guy.

He said, now, in retrospect, I guess I did see things, but I ignored them.

Was there anybody who saw this?

Not that I know of.

I mean, I think that's what makes it such a big story, right?

And I'm not even, you know, I follow the cryptocurrency space, but that's not an area where I spend an immense inordinate amount of my time.

I'm focused more on equity markets, et cetera.

But there is something about seeing a guy who is calling for greater regulation in his own industry while also making greater donations to the very people who are responsible for crafting those regulations.

Gosh, that sounds awful.

I have a lot of bad taste in my mouth.

That alone just struck me as potentially false and inauthentic.

Now, was that going to underlie a $30 billion, $40 billion fraud?

I did not necessarily go the extent of predicting that.

There was something that was a myth about this in terms of calling for self-hating self-hating regulation while donating the very people who are going to write those regulations.

And that's strange.

That sounds a little like Zuckerberg.

It actually does, doesn't it?

It does.

Yeah, it does.

It does.

Its pattern repeats itself, Glenn.

You know it well.

So it's not going to be, we could probably count.

If we took 10 minutes, we could probably find 10 to 20 other examples that smell just like it.

We were with Vivek Ramaswamy, and we're going to continue our conversation with him in just a second because we haven't even gotten to the Ukraine part or the missing $1.7 billion.

We'll get to that in just a second.

First, let me tell you about rough greens.

If I handed you a plate of food and before you took the first bite, I said, oh, by the way, we've completely sterilized that,

would you be like,

what do you mean by that?

Well, we just, we wanted to make sure it didn't have any nutritional value in it at all.

Would you eat it?

More to the point, would you eat it every day?

If your answer is no, and I hope it is, then let me ask you, why would you expect anything to be different with your dog?

This is why your dog needs Rough Greens.

It's not a dog food, it's a supplement developed by naturopathic doctor Dennis Black.

And you sprinkle it on the dog food, and it has vitamins and minerals, probiotics, antioxidants, all the things that are healthy for your dog.

Now, Rough Greens wants to make sure that your dog loves it as much as our dogs do.

Uno loves this stuff.

It's like dog crack, I I swear.

You can get a free bag just for your dog to try out at roughgreens.com/slash Beck.

All you pay for is shipping.

It's your first free trial bag, roughgreens.com/slash Beck, or you can call 833-G-L-E-N-N33.

That's 833-GLEN33, roughgreens.com/slash Beck.

10-second station ID.

So I'm sketchy on all of this stuff, avaik, but

there's a missing $1.7

billion.

Is that accurate?

I can't say if it's accurate, but

that is what the latest reporting is.

Absolutely.

Yeah.

How do you misplace $1.7 billion?

Well, the funny thing is now they're talking about

the potential hack into the system too after the fraud story came to light.

So I'm sorry I have no basis for this other than intuition, but to say that that hack seems mysteriously well-timed.

So guys being

investigated now for fraud, being scrutinized for fraud, for himself misappropriating those funds to his affiliated hedge fund from an exchange that he was operating for customers.

And then suddenly there's a hack.

And I think that it strikes me as a little convenient to sort of say that, okay, the hack is something that we can blame because that's something that's outside of all of our control.

When, in fact, at the very moment, for two years, there wasn't any report of a hack, but now there's a report of a hack right when you are being investigated.

So that did smell a little bit amiss to me.

But the facts on this are changing by the day, changing by the hour.

But the lesson I think is actually less complicated than each of those detailed facts might, you know, might

invite.

And I think that it's pretty simple.

Whether it was cryptocurrency or anything else, there's just a guy who's operating in exchange for customers.

And you cannot use customer money

without their express permission to advance your own financial trading goals.

Period.

That is a hard line.

And whether you're regulated or not, that is an illegal act of misappropriation, of of theft, and then fraud and lying to the people who are you're stealing from.

So it actually, in a certain sense, has nothing to do with cryptocurrency, has nothing to do with crypto regulation.

The only double irony of this is that if it had actually been operated as a truly decentralized exchange, this guy couldn't have even done the thing that he did.

And so in a certain sense, the cryptoness of this, let alone the morality of this, is all just a deflection and a smokescreen from the essence of what was really nothing different than than just an old school Madoff-esque fraud.

And is there anything more than just trading into fiat currency

becoming in bed with Ukraine and the

main bank of Ukraine to trade cryptocurrency and get it into fiat currency so people could use it?

Do you think there's a money-making scam in there as well?

Well, I think there's no doubt that there is

in all of crypto exchanges, sort of a money laundering element to it.

Yeah.

In the sense that, you know, you're using the supposed anonymity of these exchanges to be able to

launder money that you otherwise would have not been able to launder.

But that's not unique to cryptocurrency.

It's absolutely in the current fiat.

So that's a bit of a deflection.

I know.

Thank you so much, Vivek.

I appreciate it.

Vivek Ramaswamy, he is the author of Nation of Victims and co-founder and executive chairman of Strive Asset Management.

The Glenn Back Program.

Hey, do you remember that time when our government pushed out a lot of student loan forgiveness?

Remember that plan?

Guess what?

You'll never guess.

Guess what?

Guess, guess.

All right.

Cyber criminals are already on top of it, and they're reaching out with emails and texts and phone calls, and they're pretending to be to the government to get your sensitive information.

Isn't that crazy?

Yeah, yeah.

So they could steal that money that I gave the government that you now have in your bank.

Oh, I love this.

Cyber criminals are way less evil than we give it, than we

than we think.

I mean, if you're comparing them to the government, then

they're much more evil than we think

when we're not comparing them to the government.

It's important to understand how cybercrime and identity

theft affect your life and you need to protect it.

Get 25% off now on a subscription with LifeLock.

25% off your subscription to LifeLock.

Go to Lifelock.com, Lifelock.com, use the promo code Beck or call 1-800-Lifelock, 1-800-Lifelock or Lifelock.com, promo code Beck.

If you had your money in FTX, you might need $30 bucks off right now go to blazetv.com slash Glenn the promo code is stand up for 30 bucks off

I want to share a story just to see if you can hear the cognitive dissonance in this story last month A 10-year-old boy walked into the nurse's office of his elementary school in Highland, New York.

He asked for some Vaseline.

He wanted the Vaseline to rub it on to his new tattoo, a crude rendering of his name in large block letters on the inside of his forearm.

The nurse

called

police.

The boy had gotten a tattoo with his mother's permission from a neighbor, according to local authorities.

While some states have no minimum age for receiving a tattoo if a parent allows it, New York State forbids anyone younger than 18 from getting tattooed with or without parental consent.

Last month, both the tattoo artist Austin Austin Smith, who was unlicensed, and the boy's mother were arrested

as pictures of the boy's arm stirred outrage across local and international news sites and social media.

You have got to be kidding me.

Now, let me give you another story.

Wait, why would you do a story

about a tattoo, a local news story about a tattoo?

Why would that be of any relevance whatsoever to the American people?

You mean, why would I do that?

Yeah, why would you?

I don't know.

You don't know why you'd cover it?

I don't know.

It was just placed here by my Zionist overlords.

Oh, okay.

And I had to do that.

Now, if I may continue, Stu, without your rude questioning,

let me tell you about another story.

This one we're featuring on our Wednesday night special.

Our Wednesday night special is all about a country that has gone insane.

Now, just remember the little tattoo story as we share...

this story about a father who lost his children to the state.

That moment the doctor places your newborn into your arms.

Your entire world changes.

I'll do everything in my power to keep you safe.

I'll fight for you every single day.

For Jeff, that moment arrived times two

when his twin boys, James and Jude, were born.

And from the start, Jeff loved being a dad.

I was the stay-at-home parent for them.

I've raised them since they were the youngest children.

And we were very close and had a super tight bond right up until the courts took them away from me.

Everything changed when the boys were two years old.

Jeff's then-wife began telling James that timeouts were only for little boys.

And that, the monsters only eat boys, you better not be a boy.

Scaring him in these little timeouts.

and when I put my foot down and stopped that she filed for a divorce almost immediately she's a pediatrician and using her connections with licensed care providers she was able to get psychologists to basically force me out of my house and that's when the situation escalated again Jeff who then still had 50-50 custody took this video of James when he was only three years old.

You're a boy, right?

No.

I'm a girl.

Who told you you're a girl?

Mommy.

She puts dresses on you?

Oh, wow.

And what else does she do?

She buys my headbands.

Uh-huh.

And

she gave me hair clips.

Oh, hair clips?

Okay.

She enrolled them in school as a girl under a fake girl's name.

She started to claim that I couldn't cut my son's hair and that I couldn't use male pronouns.

And she went to court to try to force me to use male pronouns at home to stop presenting him to the world as a boy.

This evening, there's a decision to share in a volatile custody case involving a seven-year-old's gender.

This case has taken on a life of its own.

The sexual question being, should a seven-year-old live as a boy or as a a girl?

The custody battles continued, but Jeff's ex-wife used her connections with psychologists to force her hand.

His 50-50 custody soon became every other weekend only.

This hurt the relationship between me and my sons tremendously.

And my sons were very sad about it and cried about it all the time.

So James, now 10, has lived his short life in a whirlwind of confusion.

So there was a time

when

every authority figure in my son's life except me was telling him he was a girl.

His teacher at school, the principal, the police officer at school, the librarian was telling him he was a girl.

The lunch lady was telling him he was a girl.

His brother, although he didn't want to, was forced to use his girl's name.

But there's one part of James's story that makes it even more tragic.

And here's the important thing to know about my case.

My son has never presented as a girl to me.

He only presents as a girl when he's with his mother.

So my approach was just very simple to show my son how great it is to be a man.

So we just did all the things that I did as a boy.

We hunted rabbits, we tracked animals, we did hikes,

we didn't need to worry about, we were able to tough everything out.

And my son flourished under these conditions.

On the weekends, Jeff shared with his sons his love for boxing.

You know, he didn't think he could make it through those first workouts, you know, and he saw that we could tough it out together.

We would get down there and do our one hour of floor work, working on our abs, working on our core, and we could do all that together.

In a boxing gym, everybody that does the work gets respect.

And they enjoyed that.

They were treated like young men.

Their time together shaped James immensely.

They came to understand themselves as in command of their world, able to make changes in their world.

And this eventually culminated in my son refusing to wear a dress at his mother's home

because he likes being a man.

He told the court-appointed counselor that he wanted to be a boy and wanted to go to school as a boy.

The court-ordered counselor, she said, well, this child is saying he wants to be a boy.

That must be because the father's making him say that.

And on that basis, she recommended that the court take the children away from me because my son has to be a boy.

The boy's mother moved them to California and Jeff says she's already beginning a full transformation for James.

He last saw them over a year ago.

But Jeff's battle is far from over.

In fact, quite the opposite is true.

But I assure you, I will not stop fighting for my son under any conditions.

We say save James, save thousands of children so we don't forget those other children.

He's fighting for more than just his son.

He's fighting for James, but also for all the other kids whose parents just won't speak up.

And in my daily prayers, I always remember the other children and their parents who either can't or won't fight for them.

Save James.

Save thousands.

Wait until you meet this dad on Wednesday.

I think this guy is

remarkable.

He is coming on against court orders.

He has a gag order.

He's not allowed to talk to anyone about this story.

He's going to be talking to us on Wednesday.

Come what may.

He is.

He actually would like the court to throw him in jail so he can challenge it because he says it is unlawful and unconstitutional to have him stop telling the story.

It's amazing that we

live in a world where New York is putting parents in jail if you give your child a tattoo.

However, you can take him to California and have them mutilated, and that doesn't seem to be a problem with anyone.

You don't want to miss this.

It is a special on Wednesday night.

It's a special commercial free two-hour special blazetv.com slash Glenn.

Make sure you use the promo code stand up.

You'll get $30 off of your subscription.

It is so important that we don't get frustrated or discouraged.

We must stand up.

Wednesday, 9 p.m.

Eastern, it's Targets of Tyranny, How to Survive Being an Enemy of the State.

So Thanksgiving and the holiday season are right around the corner.

And of course, that means a bunch of people probably visiting you.

Some of them you like, some of them you do not.

Fortunately, there's still time to look your very best and years younger with Genucelle.

This Thanksgiving season, you can save 70% off on Genucell's most popular package at genucelle.com/slash Beck.

Genucell products target forehead wrinkles, fine lines, dark spots, skin redness, that sagging jawline, and even the annoying bags and puffiness.

and they can go away right before your eyes.

Plus, with its immediate effects, you'll see results in less than 12 hours guaranteed, or your money back.

There's no risk here.

It's a pretty amazing thing if you think about it.

And if you can, anyone that you have on your Christmas list, any gifts you're going to be giving away coming up soon, it's a great way to go.

Genucelle, they're the best in the business from now until Thanksgiving.

Get your complimentary deep correcting serum absolutely free when you check out.

Or go to genucelle.com/slash Beck, enter the promo code Beck for an additional 10% 10% off your entire purchase.

And for the holidays, enjoy free shipping and a holiday gift bundle with every most popular package at genucelle.com slash Beck.

It's genucelle.com slash beck.

G-E-N-U-C-E-L dot com slash Beck.

Stay informed.

Sign up for the free newsletter today at Glennbeck.com.

Oh boy.

Big news from Egypt, you know, at the UN climate conference.

They have come out and said, according to a new study,

we've got nine years.

Nine more.

That's fantastic news.

I thought we were already pretty much toast.

Yeah, no, we've got nine more years.

We had past the point of no return.

No, no, no.

We have nine more years now.

Nine years.

Well, this is a miracle.

Well, I should say we we have nine years, but they're very concerned because new gas projects launched in response, you know, to Russia and Ukraine

is

will consume 10% of the remaining carbon budget that they have.

10% of the remaining carbon budget.

Yeah, yeah.

That sounds bad.

I thought this was good news.

It makes it all but impossible for nations to meet the Paris Agreement goal to limit the warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Now, quick question here.

Natural gas is - we're talking about the same substance, the one

the one that's almost exclusively responsible for the drops in emissions.

Yeah, yeah.

Moving from coal to natural gas.

Right, right, right.

But they're saying natural gas is the enemy.

Look, here's the problem.

Here's the problem.

You know, we've got more growth.

We have more growth.

We have 1% increase in carbon dioxide just from burning fossil fuels right now.

And

now listen to me.

Emissions in both the United States and India

have increased while China

and the European Union will probably report small declines.

From what?

From the COVID year?

Because they have not been increasing overall.

They've been decreasing and been on a long-term downward trend.

Stu,

scientists are warning of the world's dangerous trajectory right now.

The trajectory has been down.

No, no.

Leaders at the UN Climate Change Conference, okay,

they've advocated for natural gas as a transition fuel that will ease the world's switch from fossil energy to

renewables.

So at least four new gas projects have been reported or announced in the last 10 days with several African

countries pledging to expand export capacity and support and supply more fuel to Europe.

That's why it's important, Glenn, to keep Africa in the dark ages.

You know, hopefully, they can never have any piece of the civilization we've grown to know and love.

Well, if we keep them

in a situation where they have none of the resources that we have, that's much better for the planet.

Just punish an entire continent of people.

Absolutely.

It's easy.

Well, it is the rhetoric.

It's the rhetoric of increased natural gas

usage.

It's the production.

It's the rhetoric, I'm quoting, the rhetoric that has alarmed scientists and activists

who say expanding natural gas production could harm those very vulnerable communities and push the planet towards a hotter, hellish future.

Quote, gas is not a low-carbon energy source.

End quote.

Wow, that's a riven quote.

First of all, I thought so, too.

I thought so, too.

That's one of the scientists over there.

So the theory

is science.

If

we, if let's say they get natural gas and they are able to experience modern civilization,

they'll burn to death in a

hellish future.

That will, that

hellish future happens within an air-conditioned room,

with a room that has lighting and refrigeration.

Well, yeah,

or they can theoretically avoid some of this hellish future if they just continue their hellish present.

That sounds like a great idea.

I'm sure they would sign on for that immediately.

Why wouldn't they?

Why wouldn't they just surpass, just bypass, I guess, their entire

lives of potential economic growth?

Look, we have to reduce our growth.

No, we do not need to reduce our growth.

No, that.

I read it in the New York Times today.

Yeah, degrowth.

Yeah.

We have to have some degrowth.

That's not what you never say a plant when it dies.

You don't say that's degrowing right now.

I'll tell you that.

No one ever says that.

What is this term, degrowth?

That's what's happening when plants degrow.

It doesn't lead to anything other than degrowth.

Degrowth.

Degrowth.

Yeah.

Decompose, I hear that one a lot.

Why don't they ever say the economy?

We just need to decompose the economy for a little bit.

That would be a more sensible discussion.

Because that implies death.

Yes, it does

implies death.

Death is completely different than degrowth.

It is.

Is it?

Is it, though?

That's my question.

Yeah.

Is it?

Well, I'm not a scientist, so I can't tell you, but scientists are saying now we have to degrow.

And

I'm going to go out on a limb and say, I don't,

I don't think so.

But then again, I'm a guy who's like, hey, let's not mutilate our kids, you know,

especially if it means that they get a tattoo.

I want that parent in prison.

I mean, they can cut off the, you know,

parts of their body, but no tattoos.

American Society of Healthcare Pharmacists, which is the group that tracks the production of

medicines all around the world, recently came out and declared there's a worldwide shortage of antibiotics, amoxicillin being the biggest of them, because it's extremely important because it's used to combat all sorts of infections.

So some places you can't even get it.

This is why I want to talk to you about Jace Case.

It is a pack of five different courses of antibiotics that you can use to treat a long list of bacterial illnesses, things like UTIs, respiratory infections, sinusitis, skin infections, a lot more.

I want you to check this out, jacemedical.com, jaceja

medical.com, and fill out the online questionnaire.

It only takes a couple of minutes.

Then a licensed physician will review it and you're in business.

Have these things on hand before they become scarce again in your neighborhood.

JaceMedical.com.

The Best coast just got better.

Introducing Quantum of the Seas sailing from LA this fall.

Conquered next-level thrills on the boldest ship in the West, like Flowrider surf sessions, bumper cars, and soaring 300 feet above sea level on the North Star.

Plus, more than 15 dining options on board, all between discoveries in Ensenada and even overnights in Cabo.

You've never done Mexico like this.

Book your Boulder Baja adventure from Los Angeles today.

Come seek the Royal Caribbean.

Itineraries vary by sale date.

Ships registry Bahamas.

Got no room to compromise.

You gotta stand together if the correspondence

Stand up straight and hold the line.

It's a new day I'm turned around.

What you are about to hear is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.

This is the Glenback program.

Yes, it is.

Hello, you sick twisted freak.

Welcome to the program.

Well, we want to give you a little update on how things are going with the count.

Yes,

almost a week in and we're still counting.

We'll give you the update on that and so much more in 60 seconds.

First, I've encouraged you over and over again, do your own homework.

Media said that's dangerous.

You're just letting people do their own homework.

Yes, I trust the people.

Of course,

not the people of Pennsylvania, but that's a different story.

The folks over at Goldline Goldline want you to do the same.

You should be given a call this week.

They're going, or at least going to their website at goldline.com and checking out their notable weekly news vault.

You will find an excellent piece from Elliott Management, which manages over $50 billion in assets, warning that looming hyperinflation could lead to global societal collapse.

I love this one.

That one's great.

It's flown a little under the radar of the mainstream media, but Goldline has it.

This is a page that I recommended they do a while back, and they have it up.

And it is really important

if you want to stay ahead of things, you do your own homework.

Just go to their notable weekly news vault at goldline.com.

Also, they're offering a whole pile of free copper with every order right now.

The more you buy, the more you receive.

Goldline, call them today.

Find out how you can qualify for the free copper with every order.

Delivered right to your front door.

It's 866Goldline.

866Goldline or goldline.com.

So, Glenn.

So, Stu, nothing ever good starts with so, Glenn.

Yeah.

Can I walk you through

the house?

You mean my house, the unfinished house?

It'll be finished in six weeks, you know.

Six weeks now.

Oh, gosh, that's terrible.

I thought it was only two.

Two weeks.

Okay, good.

I know.

Your house is never going to be finished.

Never going to be finished.

Anyway, go ahead.

Not that house.

Now, Glenn.

Yes.

We have a situation where, let me give you the good news.

Okay.

For example, prediction markets.

Prediction.

Say the house should go Republican, 95% chance.

95% chance.

So that's pretty good.

That's really good.

Really?

Well, I do remember those prediction markets being very, very confident in things like Kerry Lake.

They were pretty confident.

Now they are not confident in Kerry Lake.

Now they're not.

No.

In fact, now there's a 94% chance that Kerry Lake will lose, according to the prediction markets.

Ha.

Wonder what happened there.

That's different than it was probably.

She probably had a 60 or 70% chance from mid to late last week.

I trust the prediction markets.

Right.

They could change, right?

But that's what they think.

They're confident.

Almost everybody will tell you, and you've heard this nonstop, even in the mainstream media, the Republicans will likely win the House.

Yeah.

But can I be a little pessimistic here and walk you through what we have?

Is it pessimism or is it reality?

I think it's real.

I think it's reality.

But it's not all bad news.

But just how confident do you feel in this scenario that I'm about to walk you through?

Okay, I'm guessing zero.

Okay.

But let me hear it.

I went through all the outstanding races.

Okay.

Looked at them.

And I have,

I don't know, what I tend to is a somewhat disturbing situation.

Okay.

So I ranked all of the races in the best chance for Republicans to win.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Okay.

So

212 are pretty much in the bag.

212.

212.

Got to get to 218, though.

Wow, 218.

That's a long way to six.

That's easy.

Oh, there's a lot of races.

There's a couple dozen races still out there.

I mean, you know, gosh.

You really have to be over 220 to even, because you know there's a lot of weasels in there.

Yes, for sure.

But 218 is control.

And at this point,

I will take 218 controls.

I will too.

All right.

So I've ranked them in the old school grading system from

your old high school days, A, B, C, D, F.

Ooh.

Okay.

Wow, that's harsh.

Now, none of these, I would say, are completely decided, but I came up with three A's.

Three A's.

Three.

Three.

So

and that means really high according to the grading scale.

These are the best of the the best.

Yes, not sure things.

Let me give you an example of a race that I put as an A.

Okay.

Lauren Boebert's race in Colorado.

Oh, that's an A.

That's an A.

As of right now, she leads by 0.4%

with 99% of the vote in.

How many votes is she away, actually?

Not percentage.

Not percentage.

That's a good question.

If you give me one moment, Glenn, of course, I can pull that up for you, and I'm completely prepared to give you any detail that's additional.

Why are you stalling?

I'm seeing you at any time.

And that's what's important about this particular coverage.

I can always tell you in a moment's notice.

And people need to understand this.

Wow.

I think we understand.

We're just looking for the number of votes that...

The number of votes in that race?

Yeah, in that race.

Yeah, I've got it at

1,122.

Thank you.

Okay, 1,000 votes away.

Now, but they're 99% in.

99% in.

And you'd think...

So basically what we're talking about there would the outstanding vote couldn't overturn it only if there was like a recount or something else.

I feel good.

I feel good about that.

I feel good about that.

That's the type of A race I'm talking about.

We have three of those.

That gets Republicans to 215.

Wait, we have three of those.

Three A races.

That are that good.

I think so.

There's another race in New York,

a 0.4.

In New York.

Yeah.

Okay.

0.4.

That's not Colorado.

That's New York.

Okay.

Yeah.

I mean,

when you say it that way,

you know, it doesn't sound as good, you know.

Right.

Where's the third one?

Third one.

Uh-oh.

That one's in California.

California.

That one is not even New York.

That's California.

All you have to do is depend on the fine people in New York and California.

Again, these are close races.

Okay.

But

I'm going to go ahead and just give us those three just for the optimistic take here on the house.

And that gives us

gets us to 215.

215.

Now, seeming even more cavernous in between 215 and 218.

It did just a few minutes.

It seemed really easy.

It seemed pretty easy.

With a couple dozen races out there,

why can't we get all we need is six?

Right.

Right.

But now of the A's, I only have three.

Three.

So now we're at 215.

Okay.

Now you'd say, what number?

B is still passing.

It's still a good grade.

It's still a good grade.

How many races would you like to see in the B column to make yourself comfortable that the Republicans are?

27.

27.

That's a good number.

27.

That's how I would feel.

I always feel these are going to go against us.

How many do we have?

Two.

Two.

Two races.

Two that are B's.

At least two.

That would take us to

217 issue.

Yes.

And you're going to be excited that here in our B's, we have another California.

Oh, good.

And you're going to be super confident because it's Arizona is the other one.

Oh, I hope it's Maricopa County.

Because that one's done.

So that's done so well.

Yes.

Yeah.

Now,

if we assume we have both of the A's and the B's, that gets us to...

Not 218,

which is what you need.

Yeah.

But 217.

217.

Which is one less than what you need.

So we don't have control.

We don't have control at 217.

Now, may I ask,

how much worse is a B from an A?

Is it like 1,100 votes?

Okay.

Or it should be 900 votes.

One race in Arizona.

It's a 0.2% lead with 94% of the vote in.

That's a B.

A B, boys and girls.

I'm not being unfair with these rankings.

That's a B.

And the only reason I say it's a B is because it was expected to be a pretty easy, not an easy win, but it's a purplish district, but it was projected to be a Republican-leaning district this time.

Now, of course, we've seen that before.

In what state?

In Arizona.

In Arizona.

Good, good.

Okay.

And then we have a...

a race in California where there is a six-point lead currently for the Republican.

However, only 52% of the vote in that's going to shrink as we get closer.

That's a B.

That's a B.

But that one was leading Republican anyway.

They've got the lead.

I'm going to give that a B.

All right.

That gets you to 217.

Now you go into the Cs.

Uh-huh.

Now, we just need one of these.

Just need one of them.

And you'd like how many to be there to just get one out of them.

I'd like

this.

Is a C.

This is a C.

C.

So again, you're in like toss-up area.

I would like

maybe

I'm going to shoot low.

Five.

Five.

That's a

nice guess.

Unfortunately, you lose.

You lose.

Because I only have three.

You only have three C.

C's.

Now, if you're optimistic and you take those A's and B's and you're like, okay, well, you can pick these off.

That's 217.

You've got to win one of these three.

He's still on.

This kid is going well.

Going well.

I think Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy, I think they've done their job.

I think they've done their job.

They should be rewarded with leadership.

They should be rewarded with new positions.

Now, here we have two California races and an Arizona in the seas.

We have what?

Two California races.

Please tell me it's like in the farming area of California.

Some of them are.

Again,

I know California, we make fun of it.

There are races that a lot of Republicans do win in California.

Yeah.

Some of them they're even favored in.

But not very much.

But like, for example, this one, which is

a toss-up

toss-up race, I would say, right now, if you look at the projections,

was a Biden plus six district.

Okay.

Okay, so one that Biden won.

All right.

But now in this environment, which is not necessarily, I mean, it's only slightly better for Republicans, maybe.

Right.

We need the Republican to win.

And, of course, we still have 30% of the vote to count.

So we don't know at this point.

Oh, 30.

Then you get into the Ds.

There.

That was it with the C.

There's three C's.

You've got some, I mean, you've got,

I think there's one that's in Arizona where the Republican leads by 0.6%

with 89% of the vote in, which I, my A's, I put, if you're over 95% in and you're winning, you know, I put that as an A.

This one's at 89% in winning, so a chance, certainly a chance.

And it was a likely Republican district going in.

So you'd think maybe there's a chance that

some of the votes will be.

Again, you see me.

I'm reaching for some of these, but that's, again, it's close.

0.6% lead.

But if we won all of the Cs.

C's, right?

That would give you to 220,

which again isn't great.

In fact, a lot of these

mainstream people looking at this are like, oh, well,

we project 221 for Republicans, plus or minus 4.

Well,

that's a big plus or minus.

Yes.

Yeah.

Because 225 at this point would be like, wow, that's fantastic.

Right.

217, bad.

Bad, bad, bad.

Bad.

Yeah, okay.

Then you got three Ds.

And then I have all the rest of them are Fs.

They're not going to win.

They're not going to win.

No.

Well, again, they're all in California, mostly at least all in California.

And they're all districts that lean Democrat.

And, you know, the Democrat even have the lead in a bunch of them.

May I just ask a quick question?

Yes.

Why is it

that it just seems to be in the sketchy states where they can't really count everything?

That might be why we picture them as sketchy.

Right.

It might be.

It might be.

Yeah.

It might be.

It might be something that, in theory,

as a lawmaker in one of these states, you'd be incentivized to correct your terrible practices because no one believes you're voting anymore.

Or you might not be incentivized

if you're actually doing it, exactly.

So again, you can see why, right,

you would say, hey, Republicans are favored in this race.

And I would say you're

probably,

maybe right.

But like 95% confidence.

Do you have 95% confidence in that scenario I just mapped out for you?

I mean, I think.

Wait, wait, wait, wait.

Are Republicans involved?

They are.

No, I don't don't have any confidence in it then.

You know, you may remember, Glenn, us saying over and over again: Republicans should win this election unless they screw it up.

Which

they always do, I believe.

Was the rest of that prediction?

They're very good at that.

You know, you got a couple ranked choice voting.

Now, who would you say?

I'm going to give you time.

I'm going to give you time.

Okay.

Who would you say

is most responsible for that loss?

Now, don't answer right away.

I want you to think, is there anyone that might be responsible that maybe we should reassign?

And I don't mean reassign their sex.

I mean reassign them to, I don't know, basement duty instead of running the show.

I just think about it.

I'll give you a minute.

It's up to you and me to make a difference to help our country become free again.

It starts with us and our children.

Look what's going on in our country today.

There is a bigger need than ever before for young people to rise up and say no to big government, but that's not happening.

Did you see the,

it wasn't ASU.

Maybe it was ASU

that had the voter polls, 94%

towards the Democrats?

Yeah, I did see that.

Yeah, it was good.

It was good.

No, no, seriously.

And luckily, all those parents paid for the education.

Yeah.

So that's good.

Anyway,

here's what you need to do.

I want you to go to tuttletwinsbeck.com.

They are offering free activity workbooks and 35% off all of their kids' books.

These things will teach your kids about freedom.

It will also teach your kids about socialism and why socialism is a siren

song.

It is very strong right now, and

we shan't listen to it anymore.

Please get these books from the Tuttle Twins.

Tuttle Twinsbeck.com.

Tuttle Twinsbeck.com.

Keep your kids safe and sane in a crazy socialist world with the Tuttle Twinsbeck.com.

10 seconds station ID.

Now,

just

who do you think

is responsible for this

based on your lead-in?

Yeah, yes.

I believe.

No, no, don't base it on my lead.

I'm trying to analyze this a little bit.

I believe, I'm talking it through like I'm on a game show.

Okay, okay.

Based on your question.

Based on my question, yes.

Do we have the game show music?

Based on your question,

I think what you want me to say.

No,

this is not high school.

This is not high school.

I'm not a progressive teacher.

No, but I think you have an opinion on this.

Yes, I do.

And you would say,

I guess I'll generalize as Republican leadership.

Mitch McConnell.

But Mitch McConnell doesn't have anything to do with the House.

That's why I'm.

No,

Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy.

Both of them.

Both of them should go.

Both of them should go.

These guys are the same guys that were in those positions under Donald Trump.

You know, when they got rid of Obama.

They didn't, gone, they didn't get rid of Obama.

Oh, they didn't get rid of that, did they?

Wow.

Well, these guys, they've done an awful lot.

And Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy have got to go, even if they're a minority, maybe especially since they're the minority leaders.

I mean, after a poor showing, usually what you see are repercussions for the people who led the charge to the poor showing.

That's usually how things work in the world.

Yes, right.

But not here.

You're

a football coach.

Your team is three and nine, and you're not going to make the playoffs, and you have

a big payroll.

Usually you get fired.

Right.

That's usually what happens.

Right.

But that doesn't seem to be the way that these things go in Washington.

Okay, here are the people that can make

Mitch McConnell a thing of the past.

Mitt Romney, call his office.

Now, Mitt Romney?

Is Mitt Romney really going to do a thing about Mitt Romney?

He loves him.

He should be responsible for him.

He should have red waves.

I know, but this is what he should know.

He should know that

I'm going to remember what you said about

Mitch McConnell being responsible.

And since you were wrong about that,

I'm sure you're going to

evict him.

And if not, don't worry about it because we have a very long memory.

And next election, you are out.

Remember, it's only two years.

Deb Fisher from Nebraska, Roger Wicker from Mississippi, Rick Scott, Florida, Ted Cruz, Texas, Mike Braun from Indianapolis, from Indiana, Josh Hawley from Missouri.

John Barrasso from Wyoming, Marsha Blackburn.

All of these people need to be

reminded

that when you lose

and you have put your money into an Alaska race that was going to go to the Republican no matter what, and you double down there.

It's really egregious.

It's really egregious.

He cut money from Arizona.

Could have won.

New Hampshire.

Could have won.

Took the money from there, put it into a race where two Republicans were going against each other because he didn't,

because he wanted to rescue Lisa Murkowski.

And why did he want to do that?

Because the candidate running against

Lisa Murkowski said she will not vote for Mitch McConnell's leadership.

All of these senators, all of these senators know what their constituents are saying about Mitch McConnell, but Mitch McConnell has a very heavy hammer, and he is trying to rush this thing thing through.

You've got to call them today.

The government switchboard at the Capitol is 202-224-3121.

Get on the phone, Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy.

Let's start first with the Senate because they're going to be meeting tomorrow and then, I guess, voting on Wednesday.

We have a very short time period.

Mitch McConnell must not be the majority leader.

The Glenn back program

I don't recommend things to you that I I don't believe in when I tell you I believe in relief factor it's not because

you know I've seen it work it it has worked with me in fact I've been feeling so good lately that I have stopped taking it recently and that's why my hands are wrapped

it is cold in Texas and that always fires everything off.

And I haven't been taking my Relief Factor.

Shame on you.

Three-week quick start is $19.95.

It's a trial pack.

Hundreds of thousands of people have ordered Relief Factor, and about 70% of them go on to order more.

Go to relieffactor.com or call 800 for relief.

800, the number 4 relief.

Get the 1995 three-week quick start.

Again, relieffactor.com or call 800, the number 4 relief.

Relief Factor.

Feel the difference.

You can save 30 bucks on your Blaze TV subscription for a limited time if you go to Blazetv.com/slash Glenn and use the promo code STAND UP.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Hey, welcome everybody to the program.

I think we need to reset, Stu.

I think we need to come up with a,

I don't know,

something positive.

A new way.

New way to do this show.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Because, I mean, it is a little depressing looking at some of the stuff.

Yeah, and tomorrow it's got to stop.

Tomorrow.

Tomorrow.

It has to stop.

Well, how how about stopping it now?

All we could do is have a country that's not a raging trash fire.

That's one thing we could do.

Where would we go for that?

Oh, I don't know how we'd get that.

I'm just saying if that existed, we could talk about other things.

Yeah, I don't see one.

I don't see any country that's not just a burning trash fire.

Nothing on the horizon?

Nope.

I mean, St.

Kitts, Bermuda.

They all seem like they're doing okay.

Maybe the whole thing is just being surrounded by water.

Until they're invaded.

Well, yeah, when they're invaded, that's all.

But, you know,

that probably won't happen.

I think I'd rather be trapped on Gilligan's Island because at least, well, no, I just remember the quicksand.

I was going to say, at least it made sense.

You know what I mean?

Right.

You knew who everybody was.

That's true.

You did know that.

I don't know that it made sense, but yes, you did know that.

Would you, do you think Gilligan's Island makes less sense than today's America?

No, no, definitely.

It was more sensible than that, obviously.

That's not an unfair comparison, though.

There's some good news.

There are good things on the horizon.

Do you know, we are three days away from fundamentally getting a sequel to a Christmas story.

Shut up.

Isn't that cool?

Peter Billingsley's in it.

Ralphie from back in the day, who's done a lot more since Ralphie, but he always gets called Ralphie anyway.

That's one of my bigger regrets

in

celebrity encounters.

Really?

What do you mean?

Well, remember in the days when we were really, really, really, really busy?

Yes.

Okay.

I do.

Where I didn't really have time to even think,

you know?

And people would make appointments for me and stuff and then brief me on the way into the room.

Right.

Yes.

Yeah.

Yeah.

And Peter Billingsley

was in my office one day.

And

I said, who the hell is Peter Billingsley?

And they said, Ralphie

from a Christmas story.

And I said,

why is Ralphie from a Christmas story in my office?

And we're walking towards my office.

And they said, he's really fascinating.

He really wants to meet you.

Door open.

I walk in.

Hey, Peter.

Okay.

I know nothing about his life.

Or what you're doing in the meeting.

Or what I'm even doing in the meeting.

I'm just there by myself with Peter Billingsley.

And

he looks like a grown-up Ralphie.

Which people used to say about you.

Yes.

People used to say you looked like a grown-up Ralphie.

I don't know if they still say that.

No, they don't.

No, they don't.

So Peter was there, and I said, hey, Peter.

You know, feeling kind of bad for him.

Right, because you're thinking this guy worked as Ralphie.

And

that it.

Now he's, you know, I don't know, flipping pancakes at the Waffle House.

Sure.

And

I said, so what have you, you know,

what do you, what have you been doing lately?

And he

said, well, we just finished Iron Man.

And I was like, ah.

I've got to reevaluate everything I was going to say to you.

He was the executive producer of Iron Man.

Of Iron Man.

Yeah.

yeah.

So now he's got a new movie out, he's got a new movie out, yes, he does, and uh, and he's playing Ralphie, yes.

He's decided to go, which is, I think, I as a person who absolutely loves that movie, and I know that's not necessarily universal, but it is a loved Christmas classic, I like it, yeah, yeah, uh, Christmas Story, which they've done a bunch of stuff with on that.

I mean, they had, didn't they have a Broadway show for a while?

It was really good.

Oh, you saw it?

Oh, I saw it, really.

I went with Peter,

of course, of course, you did, sure.

I went to a Christmas story musical with Ralphie.

Oh, gosh, just acting.

Your life is too good.

It's better than you deserve.

That's what I will say.

It really is.

It really is.

It really is.

But

they're actually doing a sequel to it with Ralphie grown up

hosting his own Christmas.

It looks fantastic.

It looks really fantastic.

And I think it's the same mom.

Yeah, I think you're right.

I think it's the same mom.

And it's coming out this week on HBO Max, I believe.

I I don't know if it's in the theaters as well, but in HBO Max, which I don't know.

I'm excited about it.

I did not see Yellowstone last night, which is something that

may have improved my mood a little bit.

Really?

I thought you loved Yellowstone.

I do.

I just didn't see it.

Oh, okay.

I didn't see it.

You're disappointed.

Are you, let me ask you.

You'll watch it tonight.

Are you the type of person, because I am this type of person, that if I'm watching a series

and a big episode airs and I don't see it, I literally will not go anywhere near social media media until I've seen it.

Yes.

I can't, because you go onto Twitter and just people are like, hey, that was great on Yellowstone when the alien came down and killed Kevin Costner.

And you're like, holy crap.

Really?

Yeah, good thing they saved it for the very end, though.

Like, no.

And you can't even, there's no way to filter it out.

Like, I want a,

this is a, a website I've been dreaming of for a while.

You tell me if this is a good idea.

I want a spoiler-free zone, right?

Where I can go and read, especially, especially with these things that these series that have like five years of episodes out, and you're just picking them up, because I do that all the time.

I really refuse to commit to a series at this point unless there's five years of it.

I'm kind of like that.

Give me five years.

Show me you can stay on the air for five years, then I'll start investing my time.

Because there's nothing worse than having something.

I skip everything that says one season, 2016.

Right.

You're like, God.

Yeah, I'm not even going to try it.

And it might be great.

But I'm going to be frustrated because it's going to just stop.

Yeah.

Right.

So unless you get five seasons, I don't even go in.

But let's say I'm on season two, episode three, and some amazing thing happens.

I can't look at any content about this show because they're going to give me what happened in season four and season five and season three.

So I can't know any of it.

So I can't, I don't get the full experience of watching the show because a big part of that now is you're following following along.

People are speculating as to what comes next.

People are trying to figure it out.

Oh my gosh, what happened to this character?

You can't do that in that sort of community vibe because you'll get it all.

So

I want a site that has, it's like a spoiler-free zone.

I say I'm on season two, episode three, and I can read all the articles from that time.

Yeah, I like that.

Yeah, I like that.

So somebody do that and then cut me in on the profits because I don't want to do it.

Well, that sounds like a binding contract.

Right.

Yes.

Anybody out there who's doing it, that's you.

Wow.

You are legally bound now to cut him in.

People don't realize that.

I think you'll back me up on this.

Anything said on the radio is a binding contract to anyone who has the same idea and might do it better.

Right.

So I went to see

George Clooney.

Now, see if this you think is.

This is another Peter Billingsley story, is it?

Where you're hanging out with George Clooney.

You didn't know who he was?

No, no, I knew who he was.

Okay, good.

So I went to see George Clooney and Julia Roberts in the movie Ticket to Paradise.

Okay.

It is actually, did you watch it with George Clooney and Julia Roberts?

I did not.

Okay, no, no.

No.

Here's the thing.

That one was not a decision that I made per se.

Right.

Right.

Yeah.

So I go and

I realize

before the movie starts,

there's no one under 50 in that room.

Okay.

There's nobody.

There's no young'uns going to see that one.

Wow, those are two big stars.

Yeah.

No, it's been out for a while, I think.

However, I realized

I just fell into the driving Miss Daisy category.

You know, nobody who was young went to see that or steal magnolias or whatever.

Right.

There is, yeah, there's that genre.

They're like, oh, I remember when they were young in their 40s and they were making movies.

They were so great.

And then

you're seeing all these people that you grew up with, and you're like, oh,

boy, they're sure aging well, aren't they?

You know, they have to stop shooting about 4:30 in the afternoon for these people.

I realize that's what that movie is.

That's like a.

Yeah.

That's like, I remember two of these people.

Yeah.

Yeah.

They were the stars of my day.

Yeah.

Where they were so great in Ocean's 11.

Right.

Back in the day, and they're still together.

It's been a while, Glenn, since Ocean's 11.

Don't tell me how long has it been.

That movie came out the same year as the September 11th attacks came out.

2001.

Ocean's 11.

That's 21 years old.

Wow.

When's the last time George Clooney was in a movie you've seen

or

made any, of any note?

So I saw on an airplane once

something he was in

where I don't remember.

He wasn't happy in his job and he was.

I don't remember.

I can't tell you the last time I saw a George Clooney movie.

Isn't that weird, though?

Because I still think of him as the biggest, you know, one of the biggest stars out there.

Give me some of the.

I would say...

So you got Ticket to Paradise, which of course he did.

I just saw it.

It was actually good.

It was actually good.

I would assume it probably would be.

You know, it's none of this funny business that goes on these days.

Anyway.

Now, I don't remember the Midnight Sky.

Do you remember the Midnight Sky?

Okay.

That was 2020.

Okay.

Then there was nothing in 2019 other than TV stuff.

Do you remember Money Monster from 2016?

Do not remember Money Monster.

I do not either.

Doesn't sound good.

No.

Do you remember Hail Caesar from 2016?

Ooh.

I do not.

Ow.

I saw that one because

somebody wrote it or

it had...

I kind of did it right.

Yeah, I know.

I'm trying to remember.

There was some reason we went and it wasn't for George Clooney and it was bad.

So you might remember, I could see you remembering Tomorrowland from 2015.

But again, we're back in 2015 here, and I still haven't gotten to one I'm sure you'd actually have seen or anyone in the audience.

Tomorrowland was.

Wasn't Tomorrowland that awful, awful movie that I thought looked really cool?

No, that wasn't.

That was another one.

That was the captain of Tomorrowland.

Yes, that was even

long before that.

No, I didn't see Tomorrowland.

And then I'll get to one that I do know that

you would appreciate, which was The Monuments, Men.

That's 2014.

Wow.

That's really the last George Clooney movie I would say he was like a star and was, was, was, and it wasn't a big hit, but it was like critically acclaimed, and I liked it.

And, you know, he was looking a little like he was wearing a toupee.

I don't think he was, but he was looking a little like he was wearing a toupee.

What does that mean?

He wasn't wearing a toupee, but he looked like he was wearing a toupee.

His hair was just not, you know, it made me feel better as a man.

You know, you can go to this George Clooney movie.

It's not like every Tom Cruise movie that just pisses you off.

This one is like, okay, all right.

He's looking pretty rough.

And then you find out he's 70 and you're like, okay, I no longer feel good about myself.

All right, back in just a minute.

Let me tell you about American financing.

Navigating your financing is tricky, tricky work, especially the more assets you have.

If you have a home, for example, knowing whether or not to refinance the mortgage and when is the kind of thing that seems complicated.

You might avoid dealing with it altogether.

What?

Me avoid problems?

Never.

Now's not the time for hesitation.

What you need to do is get somebody who can help you, somebody who is on your side and not the bank side.

That's what American financing is all about.

For over 20 years, they've been helping people just like you and me with the kind of financial decisions that can save tons and tons of money.

Their mortgage consultants can do a free mortgage review for you over the phone.

They'll let you know what your options are.

There's no obligations up front or hidden fees, just sound financial advice from a company that cares.

So please make the call to American Financing today.

A loan with them could literally change everything.

And you could skip up to two days in mortgage payments and close in as little as 10 days.

It's American Financing at 800-906-2440.

800-906-2440.

AmericanFinancing.net.

American Financing, NMLS 1-82334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

This is the Glenn Back Program.

Yeah, I think Chris Brown.

We're just talking about these big movie stars.

George Clooney hadn't done anything for a long time.

You go back to Leonardo DiCaprio and you're what?

Back to 2014?

You have Once Upon a Time in Hollywood with DiCaprio and Pitt, which was a big, you know, big thing.

But

before that, you're going back to 2015, 2013.

I mean, the revenant for Leonardo DiCaprio and Wolf of Wall Street.

It was 2013.

It's almost a decade ago.

Now, he's got a couple of things that look really good in the pipeline, including a Jim Jones movie about the Jones Down situation.

No, no, no, no.

I'm going to see that.

I love those

crazy stories.

Leonardo DiCaprio is in it?

Yeah.

Then it will not be the truth.

Because Jim Jones was a progressive Marxist.

Yes.

He was not a religious nuts.

Oh, he may have been that too, but

it wasn't a religion of anyone's.

Note.

No, it is a, he was a Marxist.

He was a Marxist.

You think Leonardo DiCaprio is going to tell that story?

No, that's no point.

You know,

maybe it's a situation like Clooney.

It's not like he can't get gigs, right?

He could go work if he wanted to, but, you know, he's busy selling multi-billion dollar tequila companies and just like, eh, why am I bothering?

Why Why am I showing up?

You know,

have you have you seen all the people that make these tequila companies?

And it's like, we're going to sell it for a billion dollars.

George Clooney did.

And I'm like, yeah, you're not George Clooney.

Right.

Yeah.

I mean, I don't know if you know that.

Yeah, it seems like the Clooney magic with that was not only is he George Clooney, but he also got the best people to make the best tequila.

And then, you know, really, everyone tries to do this, though.

I mean, who are, but it seems like this generation where you think of those people as the big movie stars, DiCaprio, Pid, Coluni, it's kind of gone, right?

I mean, they'll still make movies, but like,

is there anybody stepping into

that world?

Like, who would you put in that category of like a big-time movie star right now?

Because most of them wind up just doing TV.

Chris Pratch did a TV show for Amazon Prime, right?

Like, I mean, Brian Reynolds.

I mean, he's got, like, he's got like a Hulu series.

He's great, though.

He is great.

He is great.

He is very good, but it's like, it's a weird time for that.

And, of course, he's also, he's doing mint mobile commercials every 10 seconds.

I know.

He's just buying companies and just doing the commercials.

That's how they save, that's how they save money, is they just get Ryan Rails to do all their commercials.

They don't have to, you know, they don't have to pay him any extra.

I guess they get a discounted rate, maybe.

Decently the guy who owns a company.

These guys make me sick.

Right, they're too sick.

Because we barely have to work.

Yeah.

These guys.

Come on.

Yeah.

They slap their name on a bottle of

alcohol.

I want the best people that can make some tequila for me.

Right, I really like tequila.

Go hire someone who knows how to make it and put my name on it, please.

The Glenn Back Program.