Best of The Program | Guests: Jeff Brown & Janice Dean | 11/17/20

loves a challenge.

It's why she lifts heavy weights

and likes complicated recipes.

But for booking her trip to Paris, Olivia chose the easy way with Expedia.

She bundled her flight with a hotel to save more.

Of course, she still climbed all 674 steps to the top of the Eiffel Tower.

You were made to take the easy route.

We were made to easily package your trip.

Expedia, made to travel.

Flight-inclusive packages are at all protected.

Hey, welcome to the podcast.

You know, sure, it's not the daily,

but then what again

is the daily?

We talk a little bit about Dominion and what's happening with the ballot count today.

Also,

we went into something that's really, really important.

There was a lawsuit in California that has kind of put a lid on Gavin Newsom.

And it is good for freedom lovers.

We'll see what happens.

He says the same thing that the Michigan governor has said.

She's just going to go around the courts and she'll just use her own power to do it in other ways.

We'll see.

Is freedom on the rise or is it being slowly crushed to death?

Also, let's be more like France.

Yeah.

Actually,

we tell you why coming up in just a little while.

Nick DiPaolo joins us.

Also, Janice Dean, an amazing story of what Cuomo has actually done and how many people he's actually killed in the state of New York.

Don't forget to go to Blazetv.com slash Glenn.

The promo code is Glenn.

You get 30 bucks off your subscription.

You get access to not only the radio show, you can watch live every day, also Glenn Beck's TV show, which is coming up tomorrow.

Yep.

Good one on Georgia and what the choice is in front of Georgians.

This huge one, huge story that people are not paying attention to, and that follows a brand new Stew Does America as well.

So make sure sure to check it out.

Blazetv.com/slash Glenn.

Promo code is Glenn.

30 bucks off.

You're listening to the best of the Glen Beck program.

Jeff Brown is a frequent guest on this program when it comes to technology.

He's the founder and chief investment analyst for Brownstone Research.

He's the editor of The Bleeding Edge.

And I've kind of asked him to step out of his expertise in some ways.

He's not an expert on voting machines, but he is a tech expert.

He spent 25 years as high technology executive.

He's worked with Qualcomm, NXP, Semiconductors, also Juniper Networks.

And I asked him on Friday.

Tell me about the Dominion voting system.

So he's gone to work over the weekend and over the last few days, and he's been doing his homework and uh and looking for

the the odds of this being

us being able to easily compromise the dominion system.

Jeff Brown joins us now.

Hello, Jeff.

How are you?

Hi, good morning.

So you went, you started just using the users manual.

You went and read the God bless you, man.

You went and read the users manual.

Well, it's not very exciting reading, but it's a great place to start.

Obviously,

it's accessible directly from Dominion, and we can see how the company essentially manages the voting machine, and of course,

the security of the election process through its own technology.

And it also

goes to pretty detailed lengths to identify how much risk is actually involved

in in its own system, which might seem counterintuitive.

Yeah.

So first of all, is can you access the voting machines easily?

Can somebody from the outside with nefarious intent access these?

So the the answer to that is absolutely.

Now, there's some caveats.

One is is if we're talking about someone that's remote and not

at the

election or the polling center,

the machine would obviously have to be connected.

And as we learned,

in several instances, they were connected to the internet.

So if that, in a situation like that,

people would be able to access these machines with the right credentials.

Now, what's interesting, though, is that these machines are just like any computer that you or I would have.

They have what's called an administrative password.

And

people that are in charge of managing these machines at the polling centers

have access, essentially administrative access to the machines.

Anyone that has

the keys or the password to gain administrative access has the ability to modify, delete, alter,

change election results.

But how hard would that be?

Not hard at all.

In fact,

as I reviewed the security of the platform,

Dominion outlines in its user manual that with access,

a user would have the ability to, for example, tamper with the device configuration.

They can tamper with election result files.

They can audit or change or manipulate the audit logs of the Dominion system.

They can even tamper with transmitted election results.

So they can give one thing

to

the Federal Election Committee and alter the data that's actually

on the Dominion system.

Now what I found that was very interesting

is that the mitigation for many of these security vulnerabilities were to implement, I'll quote, implement the proper process for access control for memory card handling and unit storage.

So the solution was simply for

humans, i.e.

people that were working at these polling centers, to protect the memory card, which is easily accessible on the side of the machine.

So

So could you take the memory card, change it and put it back?

Or could you swap it out with a preloaded memory card?

Both.

The only security mechanism to secure the memory card is one of those small little plastic strings that is supposed to provide evidence that there hasn't been any tampering.

But you can simply cut that off, take out the memory card.

You could even switch the memory card and put a a new

kind of tamper-proof plastic

string back onto the Dominion system.

It would be very easy to take one memory card out, put another one in.

It would be easy to take out a memory card, alter the date and the information on the card

before it was transmitted for final tabulations.

So,

can you double votes or change or flip votes easily?

Can you just go into the software and

do those things?

Yeah, so again, anyone that would have administrative access to the Dominion machine

could easily do what you just suggested.

And there's another mechanism

that could also be used.

After all, this is a software platform, and the ability to,

for example weight a vote so

for every

one vote that's cast for one candidate two votes could actually be tabulated

and

what fraction of votes you you can why would you have that why

there's only one reason would be to manipulate the the voting results dominion systems I think as you probably know are used in some pretty nefarious countries where legal elections are

two?

No, this is just an example of what you can do with programming the machine.

But we read, as we saw,

in the

that

you know

it's been referred to as software glitches or a malfunction

or suddenly these machines stopped counting.

Obviously,

a simple explanation, the most simple explanation could be that obviously the software was being tampered with or different software was being used to change the voting results.

All right.

So

we have a motive.

We have means.

It could be done.

But we don't have any evidence that anything was done

at all.

So we're kind of going this

through the back way.

We're saying, do they have means, motive, and opportunity?

Yes, to all those things.

However, that doesn't mean a crime has been committed.

Is there any way to easily go and look at these machines and audit and know?

I mean, usually when you'll make a change to software,

you leave a trail.

Yes, that's right.

And so the answer is yes.

The right thing to do, the right thing to do to get definitive proof would be to do a full software audit of the software on the machines in these swing states, you know, where

the voter fraud is heavily suspected.

It would not be difficult to find the part of the software code that has been manipulated to produce different results.

That's the beautiful thing about software.

It just does what it's told.

So if it's instructed to miscount, then they can find,

a software engineer can find exactly where in the code

the software is that would cause false or fraudulent results.

It would seem logical that we would, as a nation, want to do this after, before, and after every election.

That we would.

Precisely.

I mean, I don't understand why we're working with archaic software.

There's no reason for any of this in today's age, is there?

There isn't at all.

And to make matters worse worse, it's almost as if the Dominion machines were designed to have several fail points.

In other words, several major security risks.

Why would you say that it was designed that way?

Because no one, if they were building a system or a network, whether it be for a corporation or a government, no one would design

these many security risks into a system if they wanted to keep the data and information unaltered and safe.

I'll use Dominion's own words.

For these different levels of tampering, of audit logs or device configurations,

they assign a risk rating.

And in many cases, the risk rating is high.

These are Dominion's own words.

Do you have the security?

Do you happen to have the book in front of you?

Because you said in the notes that I got that on page like

452 to 469,

they outline in detail the high and medium risk that ballots can be tampered with.

Correct.

Yes.

Page 452, tampering with device configuration.

The risk rating is high.

Page 455, tampering with election result files.

The risk rating is high.

Tampering with transmitted election result files also on page 455.

Risk rating is high.

These are just a few examples.

Why would you?

From their owner manual.

From their own user manual.

I understand why Texas would reject this.

Why would anyone buy it?

Why would anybody buy something for elections here in the United States unless you wanted to tamper?

Why would anybody buy that?

They wouldn't.

I can absolutely assure you that any,

for example, chief technology officer or chief security officer, they would never purchase a product with software that has all of these vulnerabilities for their business or their division of the government.

They would never do it.

To pull something like this off, does it require

what level of sophistication would it require?

And how big of a conspiracy circle would it require to change the votes in swing states?

Well, honestly,

if the bad actor is an insider, in other words, they work for the polling station, as long as they have administrative access,

they can manipulate the votes.

This is

no, you know, the system is no different than what consumers are used to in terms of

working with, for example, a Windows-based system.

These are normal kind of user interfaces.

You wouldn't have to be, with administrative access, my point is you wouldn't have to be a software engineer to do it.

Now, if you were remote and connected through the Internet, then you'd have to have a different level of skills.

And especially if you wanted to go back and make modifications and then basically cover your tracks and modify the audit logs.

So, the question you asked about whether or not you can audit it, somebody that was really sophisticated and wanted to do this on a wider scale could literally also alter those audit logs.

Now, why?

You know, again, to your question, you can actually design the system so the audit logs couldn't be altered, but they've designed the system so that they can be altered.

Unbelievable.

Jeff, thank you very much.

Jeff Brown, founder and chief investor analyst of Brownstone Research, also the editor of The Bleeding Edge.

You can find him at his website, BrownstoneResearch.com.

Thank you as always.

Right now, everybody's rounding the last curve and into the next year and hopefully making plans to be spending time with family and friends, gathering and breaking bread together this holiday season.

Seasons change, and I always think this time of the year is the best because it brings out the best in all of us.

Well, no matter what your holidays look like, I can pretty much guarantee that you're going to benefit from having a RECTEC because part of that best of this holiday is getting together for food and cooking every meal together and having it turn out just right.

So whether it's grilling, smoking, or even baking, RECTEC is going to rise to the challenge every time.

With its amazing smart grill technology, the RecTech monitors everything you cook in it to the tiniest detail, making sure to adjust the temperature as needed without you.

And you can control it entirely from an app app on your phone or device.

So, follow RekTech on all social media and sign up for their newsletter to get great recipes.

It's RekTech with a Q at the end, R-E-C-T-E-Q.com.

You're listening to the best of the Glendeck program.

Janice Dean is the Fox News senior meteorologist.

She is also the author of Mostly Sunny, which kind of,

well, except for this hour, maybe, kind of sums her up.

Mostly Sunny.

Hi, Janice.

How are you?

Hi, Glenn, and hi, Stu.

Thank you for having me today.

Hey, Janice.

I am thrilled to meet someone that

is as upset as Stu is on Andrew Cuomo.

I don't know how he gets away with what he has gotten away with in New York, but it's despicable.

It's really despicable.

Tell me how this story affected you before we get into all the stats.

Well, my husband lost both of his parents to coronavirus.

His dad was in a nursing home.

The plan was to have both parents in an assisted living facility close to where we are.

And the backstory on that is his parents lived in a four-story walkup in Brooklyn for almost 60 years.

They didn't want to move.

It was rent controlled.

We tried tried for many years to try to get them to move.

They wouldn't listen to us.

As they got older, they had more health problems.

His dad was suffering from dementia.

His health was going downhill very quickly.

His mom had problems walking.

She had to use a walker.

We had aides coming into the building, but my husband still had to go to their apartment.

There were trips to the ER.

It was to the point where we had to have 24-hour care for both of them.

They couldn't take care of themselves.

They couldn't take care of each each other.

So we found a great assisted living residence very close to us on Long Island.

And the plan was to have them both together in a double room.

His dad needed rehab because he had a lot of health issues.

So we had to get him in better shape.

And he was only there for a couple of weeks, Glenn, and when the coronavirus came into play, and that was at the very end of March.

We got a call on a Saturday morning saying his dad wasn't feeling well.

And up until this point, where we're getting updates, he was doing fine.

Both of them were doing fine.

And the Saturday morning, Sean gets the phone call that his dad isn't feeling well and that he's running a fever.

And three hours later, he's dead.

Holy cow.

Yep.

They call us to tell us he died three hours after the initial phone call of saying he wasn't well.

And because we were in quarantine, we couldn't go physically go see him for, you know, at least a week and a half.

We weren't able to go see him.

We were trying to get regular updates.

So, we didn't find out that he had COVID until the death certificate.

And

we didn't know that at this point, that the governor was putting COVID-positive patients into nursing homes.

It was only after he died that I started seeing the reports.

And I remember getting a phone call before he died from one of the aides that was taking care of him saying that they were moving him to another floor so that they could accept more patients.

So, that was my first red flag.

Yeah.

And your husband's mom.

Yeah.

My husband had to call his mom to tell her that her husband had died.

She hadn't seen him in many weeks.

It was the hardest thing he's ever had to do.

She got sick in her assisted living facility and was transported to the hospital.

And we didn't know she had COVID until she got to the hospital.

She died several days later.

And the other reason why I'm angry and I'm upset is because her number does not count because the governor will not count or at least won't release the numbers of COVID patients that got COVID in their elder care facilities but died in the hospital.

They're the only state that counts it like that, right?

They're the only state that says if you got it at a nursing home, but you died in a hospital, it doesn't count.

Correct.

And there have been people trying to sue for this information.

We were supposed to get the information from his health commissioner, Howard Zucker, before the election, and then it was delayed until after the election.

And now we're not supposed to get the total numbers until in January.

So the Empire Center, which is a watchdog of sorts,

has sued the governor and his health department for this information because if we're going to go forward and we're getting into a second wave now, if we don't have the actual total numbers, that's a big problem.

Do we have any idea of a guess, an educated guess?

The educated guess is double what they are reporting.

So the governor is reporting, I think, 6,500 deaths in the nursing home facilities.

And what I am hearing, the estimates are at least double that when you include those that died in the hospitals that got COVID in their elder care facility.

Put this into perspective, Stu.

What are other states looking at?

I mean, New York's performance in basically every category is worse than every other state.

The only states that compete with New York are states like New Jersey, which was largely overflow from New York.

And to show you how disingenuous Cuomo has been on this point, I mean, we all know that he imported COVID-positive patients into nursing homes.

And he also will not tell everyone what the actual total of nursing home deaths are.

He won't say what they are.

He will not report it.

It's been months and months and months, lawsuits and everything else.

But what makes him uniquely awful in every single way are things like this, where he uses the second point that he's only disclosing half the deaths as a defense for his initial policy.

Because when you ask him about his initial policy of importing these patients, he says, well, look at our numbers.

We're like 34th in the nation.

Well, you're only 34th in the nation because you're lying about the total, which is documented not by just conservative sources, but all over the mainstream media that this has not occurred.

They have not disclosed the correct number of patients.

So he uses his lie to defend his policy that affected so many lives.

It's incomprehensible how terrible he's been through this.

So Janice, how come the lawsuits are not winning?

How come you're not getting the release of the information?

What is the excuse?

They need more time, apparently.

They need more time to get all of this information.

It is very frustrating.

And of course, we have other questions like, Governor, why didn't you use the facilities that were provided by the federal government to you, including the Mercy Ship and the Javit Center, and some of the makeshift hospitals that were put in place where taxpayers spent millions of dollars making these makeshift hospitals so that you could put coronavirus patients into these places instead of nursing homes, the most vulnerable areas.

And the beginning of this, Glenn, he was talking, he knew, he said, if we put the virus in nursing homes, it would spread like dry grass.

There is evidence of him saying that on the record.

So he knew.

But I've read things that are very interesting to me that he was getting whispers in his ear by some of his top hospital donors that the hospitals were saying, We cannot deal with all of these corona patients.

We are not able to care for them like perhaps

a nursing home might.

So, maybe that's where we should put the coronavirus patients.

So, there's all sorts of interesting things that I think

an investigation might come up with.

So,

because my next question was,

why would he do this?

It was so clear.

The one thing we knew going into it is if you are elderly and sick or weak you're done we knew that that's the one thing we knew as it was coming over so he had to have

go ahead

no we did know that and since you know i would say in the last several weeks i've been doing a lot of these rallies with um some of the families that are going through the same thing that i'm going to through our family and i've talked to nursing care workers, and they have the same questions.

And they were the ones that actually right away raised their hand, wrote documents saying,

please do not do this.

We are not equipped to take COVID-positive patients into our home.

We don't have enough PPE.

We can't separate them.

This is going to be

like fire through dry grass.

All of these people, these experts, knew why did the governor still put out an executive order order forcing COVID-positive patients into nursing homes, not for one, not for two weeks, but 46 days until finally he rescinded the order?

And the other thing Stu knows very well is that if you go on the health care website of New York, you cannot find that executive order anywhere.

They have scrubbed it from the website.

This country is becoming so dangerous.

The politician, without

a free press, and I don't mean free as an, I think CNN is free to report anything they want.

They just choose differently.

But

without a press that is actually trying to stand for the people, not for the institutions, not for the parties, not for the politicians, but for the people.

We are so far off the reservation now of a country that can even be free.

We're not even getting the news and they're scrubbing it and nobody cares.

Well, you're right.

Some of those places don't care.

Thankfully,

the Blaze is helping me with this.

Fox News has helped me with this.

The New York Post has been doing some good investigative journalism.

The, you know, the Wall Street Journal as well, there have been a couple of articles in the New York Times.

But the problem is, and that's why I'm vocal, is because I am not seeing the mainstream media,

ask these questions or demand accountability of their leaders.

He really has been ruling with an iron fist.

And every time he does get asked the question,

he blames everybody else except the person that signed the order.

He's blamed God and Mother Nature and the New York Post and Fox News

and

the nursing care workers and the visitors.

And by the way, I was never able to visit my loved ones.

So I didn't have a chance to bring in COVID to the nursing home.

And

he has now gone to the tactic of saying, how dare you even ask?

That is so hurtful to me to even playing the martyr on this.

Right.

He's actually said, how cruel of you to put the blame on me.

And to see these interviews still to this day going around, I mean, he's published a book on his leadership that he continues to publicize.

And in my mind, he is profiting off the over 30,000 New Yorkers, including my in-laws, that died by publishing a book on leadership of New York after he has helped really.

I mean,

his order has helped kill thousands of relatives of New York State.

And this is not political, Glenn.

This is not about Republican or Democrat.

My in-laws were registered Democrats.

This is not about politics.

This is about accountability for something that went wrong.

And it's because of your leadership that we're put into this situation.

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Well, a judge has ruled that Gavin Newsom has violated the state's constitution by unilaterally ordering that all registered voters be sent mail-in ballots.

Now, this could play a role

in

the election in other states if this continues.

The Constitution is extraordinarily clear.

The legislature oversees the election, and only the legislature can change the laws.

This is something that the Trump administration was fighting fast and furious, if you will,

all throughout the end of summer and in fall.

And in some cases, they won that case.

I don't know why they didn't win in every case, but now in California.

However, however,

the court also

ruled that there was good cause for permanent injunction restraining Gavin Newsom from issuing any further unconstitutional orders that make new statutory law or legislative policy.

Wow.

So what that means is Gavin Newsom, all of the things that he has done now, issuing 58 executive orders, changing over 400 laws unilaterally, keeping people locked in place at home, has now been ruled unconstitutional.

This is fantastic news.

The judge rejected Newsom's argument that section 8627 of the Emergency Services Act gives him autocratic powers.

At least 24 of his executive orders rely on that section.

The most damaging order, of course, was the lockdown.

The Pacific Legal Foundation's new lawsuit uses the same separation of powers argument over victory established as a successful legal theory.

This color-blinded or this color-coded blueprint is complex in its mechanics and sweeping in its implications for businesses throughout the state.

Business owners are left without a representative voice as the governor decides fundamental public policy for the state.

This continuing exercise of one-man rule violates separation of powers because only the legislature is allowed to make these kinds of fundamental policy determinations under the California Constitution.

This is a California judge.

This is crazy.

I mean, crazy good.

Now, lawmakers up in Michigan are doing the same thing with Whitmer.

State Representative Matt Matick,

several of the Republican colleagues announced that they are seeking to hold impeachment hearings for Governor Whitmer in the state House of Representatives.

They posted this on Facebook over the weekend.

They listed several several reasons why they say Whitmer should be impeached and removed from office, including ignoring court orders, ignored during the process and the legislature.

They charge that she is using our kids as political pawns and denied special needs students who depend on the services that occur during in-person classes.

The Michigan Constitution empowers the state House of Representatives to impeach any civil officer for corrupt conduct in office or for crimes or misdemeanors.

In a statement responding to the lawmakers,

Whitmer's office, listen to this, she said, The governor doesn't have time for partisan politics or for people who don't wear masks.

Unbelievable.

Unbelievable.

You don't have time for partisan politics.

Really?

Oh my gosh.

So that is happening in Michigan, and we are going to need every citizen on high alert because as many people found out, do we have the Justin Trudeau audio from yesterday?

As many people found out for the first time over the weekend, the Great Reset is coming.

This is something that was trending, thank God, the Great Reset was trending on Sunday, and it is the same great reset that we've been talking about for several months and the police, or the police, the press has been ignoring.

Here's what the Prime Minister of Canada said over the weekend.

Building back better means getting support to the most vulnerable while maintaining our momentum on reaching the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the SDGs.

Canada is here to listen and to help.

This pandemic has provided an opportunity.

for a reset.

This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.

There's a couple of things that he said there.

First of all, he started with building back better.

Have you noticed that building back better is behind the heads of prime ministers all over the world now?

It's really weird.

It's really weird.

It's a terrible slogan.

No, no, no, no.

It's as good and as catchy as me read good.

Right.

I mean, it's a ridiculous statement.

It is a global statement now.

Build back better.

I've never heard anything so bad.

And that's why it sticks out.

But it's part now of the great reset.

And when they talk about reimagining economic systems, they're talking about shareholder capitalism, which is the closest thing I could describe to shareholder capitalism is the system they have in communist China, no hyperbole,

or the system that Germany went to in the 1930s, no hyperbole.

The elites at the World Economic Forum in June, the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and dozens of other nonprofits and corporations met to discuss how they plan to use the coronavirus pandemic to push the reset button on the global economy.

Many of the details are not hammered out yet until the World Economic Forum meets again early next year, but they did lay out their broad outline, and it is terrifying.

They want to impose a mountain of massive new government programs, including the Green New Deal, a jobs guaranteed, and government-controlled health care.

But that is just the start.

They also want to completely change the way businesses operate so that every corporation is coerced in becoming champions for left-wing social justice causes.

You want to know why Nike and everybody else is already on the bandwagon?

Because they know what's coming.

They want to create a new international digital currency that also could be used to displace the dollar as the world's reserve currency.

That is going to be disastrous for everyone in America that has saved money.

You remember I told you almost 20 years ago, there is no way to bring the United States' level of success and monetary prowess up.

You can't bring the rest of the world up to our standards, which means they have to bring us down to everyone else's standards.

And that is what this is all about in the name of social justice.

By the way, digital currency, an international digital currency, that is going to take the power, the economic power.

that we all have in the, you know, with the invisible hand of the market, and it goes to a small number of bankers and international officials.

They will be able to control absolutely everything.

And all of the elites now are pushing for the great reset and they know that this

movement would ordinarily be impossible to achieve because of countries like the United States.

This is why Donald Trump could not win this election.

They wanted to make sure he is not in office because he's the only one that would have stood against it.

And that's why the pandemic is so important to the left.

It's a big reason why so many left-wing politicians are now again asking for giant shutdowns of our economies.

Lori Lightfoot in Chicago issued a new stay-at-home advisory.

Illinois, threatening to shut down the entire state, according to the governor.

Virginia,

your governor, Ralph Northam, has increased restrictions on all indoor gatherings and many restaurants.

the governors of California, Oregon, Washington are gearing up for the same thing.

They are going to kill the small business, crush entrepreneurship, force all Americans to come crawling on their hands and knees to government for survival so they can reshape the entire world.

As Prince Charles said, who's a great supporter of the Great Reset, This is a golden opportunity to seize something good.

We are in the earliest stages, but much darker days lie ahead if Joe Biden becomes our next president, because we have strong evidence Biden and his closest allies are all devoted to the Great Reset.

It is important,

it is vital.

to you and your children's freedom and economic freedom that you know about the Great Reset.

Go directly to the World Economic Forum, their website.

It's weforum.org slash great hash reset.

But go to the sources.

Read through the World Economic Forum's report on reforming the way all corporations are going to operate.

It's called Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism.

Don't listen to people who are giving you conspiracy theories and don't spread anything from anyone else.

Go to the source.

It is vital do it now.

For a limited time at McDonald's, get a Big Mac extra-value meal for $8.

That means two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun, and medium fries, and a drink.

We may need to change that jingle.

Prices and participation may vary.