'Theater of the Absurd' - 9/27/18

The Blaze Radio Network

on demand

Glenn back Pat and Jeffy for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

Today he's sick.

Didn't quite make it back today.

It's the voice, I think, more than anything else.

So it's just he's pretty much lost that right now.

Triple 8727 BECK.

In about an hour, we're going to join the Kavanaugh hearings live.

So you'll be able to see and hear, well, hear

everything that happens there.

I don't know the schedule of events, but I would assume that

Kavanaugh will make some kind of statement, and then

Blasey Ford, if she's there, will make some kind of statement and then be asked questions.

Yeah, it was leaked her statement that was

the prepared statement.

the full transcript.

So it's surprising.

You know, I don't know that that means that she's going going to show up and here's what she's going to say, or if it means she's not going to show up and here's what she had to say to put in the record.

But it describes

everything about the

incident?

The incident, yeah.

The incident where two other men have come forward, by the way, now and said they were the ones that did it.

Yeah.

Not

Brett Kavanaugh.

They came forward to the Senate Judiciary Committee to claim that they're the ones who actually assaulted assaulted Christine Blasey Ford during the House party that she described in 1982.

Republicans on the committee released a timeline of events late last night, which included details about their interactions with the two men.

The timeline recounts GOP staff members interviewing a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr.

Ford in 1982.

That's fascinating.

That is.

But that's not what she says, though.

I know it.

But why would you're going to get two men to come and admit to this when they didn't do it?

No way.

Who's going to do that?

Now, I know the statute of limitations probably prevents any kind of prosecution, but you could be sued civilly.

It could ruin your reputation.

So that's a pretty bold move.

If they didn't do it and they're saying they did just to save Brett Kavanaugh's nomination,

I don't know who would do that or why.

Well, I don't either.

But, you know, like, of course, you know, they could have come forward like one of the accusers and just been, you know, all anonymous.

Yeah.

You know, like the anonymous mother who was speaking on behalf of her anonymous daughter.

Right.

And it was backed up by three of her anonymous friends.

Yeah, the only person who wasn't anonymous was Brett Kavanaugh.

And he pushed.

He pushed some woman up against the wall

in a physical and sexual way.

Right.

But the woman was anonymous.

But she was anonymous.

There's three other anonymous people who can verify it.

Right.

And will verify it because they saw it.

But anonymously, of course.

And the mother of the anonymous daughter was told this from her anonymous daughter.

That's unbelievable.

That's fact.

That's, man, it doesn't get any more factual.

It does not.

It really doesn't.

You can't deny it.

So here,

on this particular episode, we're supposed to believe that they're walking out of a restaurant together, and then all of a sudden, out of nowhere, Brett Kavanaugh just grabs one of them and jams him up against the wall.

Because he's been drinking.

I guess he was the only one drinking in this bar.

Couldn't possibly be that all the other people that were with him were drinking.

No.

If it took place at all, obviously.

Right.

And yes,

and then he slammed her up against the wall sexually violently.

I'm not sure I know what that means, sexually violently.

I was trying to think, that's not the actual quote, but it is something like that.

It is like that.

Yeah, because I remember thinking at the time, what exactly?

You'd have to really see that.

I mean, I think

that's a good idea.

I think that's

kind of like you know it when you see it.

Yeah, I guess.

It's just bad.

That one supposedly happened in 1998.

Yeah.

So the year is not unknown.

The people are anonymous, except for Brett Kavanaugh.

And we don't know very many details, but we do know it happened in 1998, and he was drunk, as he always is.

Right?

I think we're finding out that Brett Kavanaugh has been drunk about 98% of the time he's been alive.

Well, I mean, it certainly makes sense because, I mean, I thought the first time I saw his testimony, I thought, is he drunk?

Nobody thinks that.

No,

and really,

serious business.

business

if you

are this guy who is

a mad drinker partying assaulting women uh going to parties standing in line waiting to have sex with separate women and this happened over the course of many years and many parties do you think that uh an fbi background check someone someone who else who was standing in those lines someone else who was was assaulted, someone else who was in this bar drinking, someone else who was passing by on the street who owns the store next door to the bar that saw this sexually, violently embraced against a wall, drunks one night.

Well, it would have come out.

Yeah.

Oh, yeah.

I think someone would have remembered something.

Yeah, the...

The rape squad allegation that we talked about quite a bit on my show, Pat Gray Unleashed, which immediately follows this one.

Talked about this yesterday.

It's hard to believe believe that if that indeed happened, nobody ever talked about it.

We never heard a thing about it.

And this guy just went on with the rest of his life and became a respected judge in D.C.

And nobody said word one until now.

Come on.

Come on.

So,

including the woman who, by the way, kept going to the parties and

avoided the alcohol

so she wouldn't submit herself to the rape I guess.

I don't know.

Though the rape room was okay as long as it wasn't her, exactly.

Exactly.

That's my point.

So you didn't say anything to these girls?

Hey, don't drink the

punch because it's been spiked and you're going to wind up in the rape room.

I mean,

is this the line for the bathroom?

No, this is the rape line.

Yeah.

I mean, are you kidding me?

It's amazing.

And

it's just, it defies all logic and reason.

Sure does.

Now, yes, last night,

late in the afternoon, President Trump conducted a very long, in fact, I think it just wrapped up about 15 minutes ago at a press conference.

He just wrapped it up.

He just wrapped it up, and he had a lot to say.

I thought it was fascinating.

He had a lot to say.

He called the Kavanaugh allegations a big fat conjob.

Here he is.

Do we have that audio where Trump calls Kavanaugh a big fat conjob, the Kavanaugh allegation?

Well, the FBI told us they've investigated Judge Kavanaugh six times, five times, many times over the years.

They know him very well.

Six times, five times.

But here there was nothing to investigate from

at least one standpoint.

They didn't know the location.

They didn't know the time.

They didn't know the year.

They didn't know anything.

And it's like, where do you go?

Also, it's not for the FBI.

If you look at what Joe Biden said, he said, they don't do this.

And he said it very clearly.

So I think when you really look at it all, it's not going to change any of the Democrats' minds.

They're obstructionists.

They're actually con artists because they know how quality this man is, and they've destroyed a man's reputation.

And they want to destroy it even more.

And I think people are going to see that in the midterms.

What they've done to this family, what they've done to these children, these beautiful children of his, and what they've done to his wife.

And they know it's a big, fat con job.

And they go into a room, and I guarantee you, they laugh like hell at what they pulled off on you and on the public.

They laugh like hell.

I believe him.

I do too.

That's true.

I think they know it's true, and they're doing it anyway because they hate him.

They hate Trump and they hate Kavanaugh.

And they hate anybody on the right.

It's hard not to believe that.

Because they prove it every day.

They show us every day.

He also talked about how, yes,

he believes Kavanaugh, but I don't know.

Who knows what will happen tomorrow.

We'll see what the women have to say.

I know.

Listen to this.

The women could be convincing.

Yeah, they could be.

Here's what he said.

Women know how to lie.

As far as the other women are concerned, I'm going to see what happens tomorrow.

I'm going to be watching.

You know, believe it or not, I'm going to see

what's said.

It's possible that they will be convincing.

Now, with all of that being said,

Judge Brett Kavanaugh has been for many years one of the most respected people in Washington.

He's been on, I guess you'd call it the second highest court.

And

every single person knows him.

A lot of people know him well.

And those people don't believe what's going on.

You know, I guess you could call it the second highest.

You can call it whatever you are.

Some people have called it that.

I don't know.

He's growing up before everyone.

Hello.

So he absolutely believes that this is a smear job and a big fat con job, but the women might convince me tomorrow.

I don't know.

I don't know.

Believe me, I'll be watching.

Yeah, I do believe him.

I do believe he can be convinced of, and he kind of said it.

I can be convinced of almost anything.

I think he actually used that phrase during

the course of the press conference.

He had a ton of things to say.

In fact, he had so many things to say.

We just kind of put some of it together for you.

Oh, nice.

So that you could just kind of recap.

China has total respect for Donald Trump and for Donald Trump's very, very large brain.

Why has President Trump given so much to North Korea?

If I wasn't elected, you would have had a war.

President Obama thought you had to go to war.

You know how close he was to pressing the trigger for war?

We're not doing well.

Let me call the Russians to help.

We have pictures of President Trump.

Whoa, where can I get him?

Wow, that's a lot of hands.

He's doing a whole routine here.

Right.

Crazy stand-up.

You're with who?

I'm Thomas Peter from Sky News.

Okay, good.

Sky News.

Congratulations on the purchase.

She has helped him.

Nothing to do with me.

Thank you.

I hope you benefited.

Yeah, you.

Guy looks like he's shocked.

This is going to be not good.

It's going to be good.

The guy looks totally like stunned.

Have you ever been picked before for a question?

Excuse me, you said where, from where?

Rudao Media Network from Kurdistan region, north of Iraq.

I'm a Kurd.

Good.

Sir.

Great people.

Thank you, sir.

Great people.

Mr.

President.

Thank you.

Are you a Kurd?

Mr.

President.

Good.

They're great people.

They're great fighters.

I like them a lot.

Let's go.

I like this question.

Yes, please.

New York Times.

Come on, New York Times.

The failing New York Times.

Stand up.

Go ahead.

I like President Xi a lot.

I think he's a friend of mine.

He may not be a friend of mine anymore, but I think he probably respects, from what I hear.

You were talking about your administration's accomplishments at the United Nations, and a lot of the leaders laughed.

Well, that's fake news.

What was that experience?

It's fake news.

And it was covered that way.

Okay.

They weren't laughing at me.

They were laughing with me.

We had fun.

When you say, does it affect me in terms of my thinking with respect to Judge Kavanaugh?

Absolutely, because I've had it many times.

When I see it, I view it differently than somebody sitting home watching television where they say, oh, Judge Kavanaugh, this or that.

It's happened to me many times.

I've had many false charges.

If we brought George Washington here

and we said we have George Washington, the Democrats would vote against him, just so you understand.

And he may have had a bad past.

Who knows?

No.

He may have had some,

I think, accusations made.

Didn't he have a couple of things in his past?

Always like to finish with a good one.

Elton John said, when you hit that last tune and it's good, don't go back.

Let me ask you.

I've seen, have you ever seen?

They do great.

They're great.

They hit the last tune.

Everyone goes crazy.

I love it.

And then they go back.

That's amazing.

That's amazing.

That's tune.

It's so good.

That's amazing.

That's the President of the United States.

I love it.

I love it.

Great stuff.

For an hour and a half yesterday.

The Jim Acosta stuff was great, too, in this press conference alone.

Really good.

We can get to that after the break, but it's really good.

And I also saw Acosta questioned afterward in one of the Talking Head shows about President Trump being on the rails during this press conference.

And even he,

his comment was like, I don't really think he was ever on the rails.

Really?

Yeah.

Acosta admitted that?

Wow.

No, he sounded like he was having a great time.

I I know.

I don't know.

I know.

Go ahead.

Yeah, I know.

The failing New York Times.

Didn't let any of it bother him.

No.

Triple 8, 727 back.

It's Pat and Jeffy for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

And

our sponsor this half hour

is

Palm Beach, Palm Beach Letter.

Because we got to share some of the recent feedback that we've received from our partners at Palm Beach Letter and Tika Tiwari's Crypto course.

Now, 97%

of our listeners have given his cryptocurrency course a four or five-star rating.

That's amazing.

Some of the comments, thank you for demystifying this from William H.

I'm on my way now.

Just bought my first Bitcoin.

Excellent course.

Short lessons.

Keep your attention span.

Thanks a bunch.

I'll be following the Palm Beach newsletter from Brian M.

And it goes on and on and on and on.

Now, Glenn was looking for an expert

and found Tika and trust him to educate us.

And he's actually done an amazing job.

If you watched his course, it was fantastic when he and Glenn were on it together.

And it was so good to have someone

kind of explain exactly.

For so long, we talked about it not knowing what the heck we were talking about.

Exactly.

But it was nice to finally have someone talk about it that knew what they were talking about.

Yeah.

So check out this exclusive Glenn Beck course right now.

You don't have to buy a full Bitcoin.

You could invest a hundred bucks if you wanted to, or whatever you could afford to get it, to get started, but get started on the program.

Go now to smartcryptocourse.com.

It's smartcryptocourse.com.

Or you can call 877-PBL Beck.

877-PBL Beck.

Call right now.

It's Pat Gray and Jeffy for Glenn, triple 8-727-B-E-C-K.

President Trump covered just about everything yesterday in that press conference.

Yes, he did.

It was a marathon press conference.

He called on anybody and everybody, including Jim Acosta.

We'll play that for you in a few minutes.

He talked about a wide range of things from Kavanaugh all the way to NAFTA and had some fascinating things to say about Canada yesterday as well.

Did you reject a one-on-one meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau?

Yeah, I did.

Why?

Because his tariffs are too high and he doesn't seem to want to move, and I've told him, forget about it.

And frankly, we're thinking about just taxing cars coming in from Canada.

That's the mother load.

That's the big one.

However, here's the problem.

Name a Canadian car company.

You can't because there isn't one that I know of.

Is there a Canadian car?

I don't think so.

Well, GF moved a lot of plants there over there.

I love those Canadian cars.

Right.

They're American companies in Canada.

They're American companies that are producing their cars in Canada.

So who are you going to hurt by doing that?

You're going to hurt Americans paying higher prices for American cars.

That's what's going to happen.

We're very unhappy with the negotiations and the negotiating style of Canada.

We don't like their representative very much.

They've taken advantage.

I love Canada, by the way.

I have so many friends.

I have everybody.

So many friends.

He has everybody.

So many friends.

Everybody in Canada is a friend of his.

See?

Yeah, that's great.

That has nothing to do with this.

I'm representing the United States.

Mexico was totally, I mean, they were great.

By the way, the new president has been great.

Everything's great.

The deal is done.

Now it has to go through Congress, and a lot of things have to happen.

But we've done Bob Lighthizer, who's here someplace.

Where's Bob?

Where's Bob?

Bob Lighthiser has done

a great job of negotiating, as they have.

But the deal is done from the Congress.

But Canada has treated us very badly.

They've treated our farmers in Wisconsin and New York State and a lot of other states very badly.

Dairy products, 300%.

300%.

How do you sell a dairy product at 300%?

The answer is you don't.

What it is, is a barrier.

It's basically they're saying, we don't have any barriers.

By the way, it's 300%, so you don't send it in because you can't compete.

So Canada has a long way to go.

I must be honest with you, we're not getting along at all with their negotiators.

We think their negotiators have taken advantage of our country for a long time.

We had people that didn't know what they were doing, and that's why we had

Over the last five or six years, if you average it out, we had $800 billion a year in trade losses.

It's ridiculous.

It's not going to happen.

What about NAFTA?

Sir, Mr.

President, NAFTA.

What does that mean for NAFTA?

Will you be pulling out of NAFTA?

I don't like NAFTA.

I never liked it.

It's been very bad for the United States.

It's been great for Canada.

It's been great for Mexico.

Very bad for Europe.

I'm not going to use the name NAFTA.

I refuse to use it.

thousands of plants and factories close.

I've seen millions of jobs lost to

auto companies that moved.

I mean, Mexico has 25% of our auto business now because of NAFTA under our deal.

Not going to happen anymore.

Not going to happen anymore.

So, fascinating stuff.

To the point where he actually said that we don't like the representative, the trade rep from Canada.

We don't like him very much.

You just don't get that from an American president all that often.

So good.

That's so good.

His style is

refreshing, isn't it?

Did he turn down talking to him?

Yeah.

I got nothing to say to him.

Really, frankly, we don't like the guy there.

Frankly, we don't like the guy.

The guy's a douche.

So I

don't know.

So I'm asking him to bring somebody else next time.

Scott's an idiot.

We don't like him much.

Nobody likes him.

I mean, he might be a nice guy to people.

Nobody likes him here.

Nobody likes him.

Addicted to Outrage.

The new book from Glenn Beck, Addicted to Outrage, is available everywhere.

Order it now at Amazon.com.

Pat Gray and Jeffy for Glenn today, 888-727, B-E-C-K.

Also, we have the Brett Kavanaugh hearing.

It starts at 9 o'clock today.

So as soon as it gets going, we will carry that live because that's going to be a pretty big deal.

It's going to be very big deal, very interesting.

I would think so.

Yeah,

if she shows up, it's going to be fascinating.

It'll be, it'll be, no matter what, it'll be some kind of circus that we can look at, that's for sure.

And again, two other men came forward, said, yeah, we did this, not Rod Kavanaugh.

She's wrong because it was us.

So why would you do that if you didn't really commit the

crime?

Why would you do that?

I don't have an answer for you, Pat.

No, you don't.

No, you don't have an answer.

Do you?

Because there is no answer.

You wouldn't do that if it wasn't you.

No, I would not.

No, No, I've done it.

You wouldn't do it if it was you.

Thank you.

So I think we've established that much at least.

Maybe we don't even need the hearing.

No, we don't.

We're done.

Let's wrap it up.

So

something that came out

that was

in the news yesterday, if

Democrats win the midterm election, if they regain the House, it's going to mean some pretty, there's there's going to be some serious repercussions of that and i hadn't even thought of this but maxine waters would then

ascend to um

a position of power where she can start to subpoena and she said she will if she gets that position and she's in line for that position so she'll have subpoena power over

you know everything she'll be subpoenaing subpoenaing

everything and everyone and we're gonna allow that to happen

it's it'll be unbelievable.

It'll be, I mean,

can you imagine?

I can.

She will be going after him on

virtually every single issue.

She's going to be subpoenaing, subpoena, she'll subpoena documents from the Deutsche Bank about Russian money laundering.

She'll subpoena the finances of the Trump

Foundation, the Trump businesses, his family businesses.

You know, she's going going to go after all that stuff.

She's already said she is.

So

it's really critical that the Democrats don't gain control of the house in November.

No kidding.

And I don't know.

According to the polls, it doesn't look like it could be stopped at this point.

We just got to hope and pray for a miracle at this point.

Don Lemon

was on with

Cuomo yesterday, Chris Cuomo, and they were talking about Ted Cruz and his wife being accosted at that DC restaurant.

By the way, the restaurant just kind of directed the cruise, the Cruises, into a separate room, a private room.

And then

once all the excitement ended, they had him come back and sit down.

That actually makes sense because remember I talked about he had trouble opening the door.

Yeah.

And I thought, why would they have trouble opening the door, getting him out?

But they were getting him into another room, not showing them out of the restaurant, which was

great.

And they did call the police.

So, you know, those two things were some of the concerns we had.

Why do they have to leave and everybody else stays?

And why didn't they call the police and just get those idiots out of there?

Well, I guess they did.

Yeah, so that was good.

Yeah.

So Don Lemon is talking about that particular

incident and whether or not it's appropriate.

Listen to this.

Sometimes the only agency you have is to protest and to get in someone's face.

You don't have any power when it comes to government

and and in society.

I don't like it, but it is one reason I'm not a public official, that I'm not running for office.

In a way, I think it goes with the territory.

I don't like that they were blocking his wife, but that's what he signed up for.

And as a strict constitutionalist, which Ted Cruz is, he knows that it's protected under the First Amendment.

Again, I don't like it.

I don't want it to happen to him.

But that's not like it happened to his wife.

But that's what he signed up for.

That's part of the deal.

I don't know that that's what he signed up for.

Thank you.

I mean, you don't agree with Chris Cuomo very often.

No, you don't.

But that's madness from Don Lemon.

What are you talking about?

That's what he signed up for.

I mean, man, Chris goes on to say that it's, you know, that might be, you know,

that's what's happening, and we're okay with it.

But that's, you know, obviously we agree with that's not what he signed up for.

And we're not okay with it.

I would hazard a guess that 95 or 98% of Americans are not okay with it.

Well,

even Don Lemon is at the point where he's okay with it up to the point as long as it's not him.

You're right.

Yeah.

So if we're going to hound Don Lemon into restaurants when he's with his significant other, is he going to like that?

I'm sorry, you're a TV personality.

That's what you signed up for.

You signed up for it.

You signed up for it.

It's freedom of speech.

It's our right.

No, it's not your right to interrupt everybody else's dinner in public.

That's not your right.

No.

Your rights kind of stop where it's getting in the way of everybody else's rights.

You want to holler at me when I'm walking from my car into the restaurant?

You go ahead.

Disturbing the peace comes to mind.

You know, clogging up somebody's, hindering their business is not okay.

A lot of those things are not okay.

That's not part of free speech.

And we can't get to the point where we say, yeah, that's right.

It's just free speech, and that's what he signed up for.

Are you kidding me?

It's the same thing they did with the banker when

those idiots from Occupy Wall Street showed up as at his house and scared the hell out of his nine-year-old daughter when she was home alone.

And uh, everybody came rushing back home because 1,500 people or something were on their lawn.

Remember that?

Yeah, I do, yes.

Yeah, that's what he signed up for.

No, no, no, no, he did not.

No, that's not okay.

You don't go to people's homes

and scare that crap out of their children.

You know, there's there's some lines that you don't cross, and uh we're crossing them all right now.

Oh,

because we believe there's a line, there's many, there's, you know, there is no line.

Yeah.

Right?

If anything in the past was thought to have a line, then it needs to be crossed now or erased.

And that's what the Democrats are doing.

That's what Antifa is doing.

And it's just wrong.

We can't get used to this stuff.

We can't say, hey, you know what?

That's okay.

It's all right.

It's really not.

It's not not okay just because a U.S.

senator is

a public figure, that it's okay to hassle him in restaurants and everywhere he goes.

The Maxine Waters challenge to her supporters is not okay.

No, it is not.

And even though she could be in a position to start really wreaking havoc on this administration.

How could that be?

How could that be possible?

You know, two years ago, you wouldn't have ever thought that it would even be in the realm of possibility for Democrats to take back the house.

But here we are with a, what was it I heard last week, an 80% chance they're going to retake the house?

Not good.

I don't like that number.

No, I don't like it.

You can say another number and not use that one.

I can say another number.

Let's say 5%.

I like that.

You like that one?

Yeah, I like that one a lot.

All right, just believe that then, if you want.

It isn't true, but go ahead and believe it.

Now, yesterday we had the accusation on Brett Kavanaugh of

the rape gang that he was part of.

You know, we heard the rumors of that last week.

And

Sweatnick, and she came out with some of those details yesterday.

And then last night, this fourth allegation came out, and we talked about this a little bit earlier, that a bunch of anonymous people, Four women were with Kavanaugh, who was drunk.

And I don't know all the details, but they were in a bar.

They were under the influence of alcohol.

And then they were all shocked when Brett Kavanaugh shoved her friend up against a wall very aggressively and sexually.

Aggressively sexually.

How do you sexually shove someone up against a wall?

Did you grab her in a sexual place?

Is that what the allegation is?

Or did he just look like he had that look in his eye?

Or...

Shoved up against the wall.

Aggressively and sexually.

Yeah.

Now,

there were four witnesses, including my daughter, she says.

The writer of the letter provided no names, but said the alleged victim was traumatized

and had decided to remain anonymous herself.

A Democratic source said the minority wasn't satisfied by the Republicans'

questions about the incident during the call, calling them cursory and believed it should be investigated more deeply.

The alleged event occurred in D.C.

in 1998, and it says, when Kavanaugh was an adult.

He was an adult 20 years ago?

That's a surprise.

When he was an adult.

This is one of my favorites because of

the anonymosities of everything.

I mean, it's amazing to me that it's even, we even think it's news.

I know.

So

our buddy who banned birth control, Corey Gardner,

gets a letter from an anonymous lady.

Yeah, supposedly they're Republicans,

these anonymous people, are supposed Republicans.

Okay.

And she's talking about her daughter, but we don't know who her daughter is because the mother

is anonymous.

We don't know who the daughter is.

And

if you can corroborate the aggressively, sexually

toss up against the wall

that can back her story up 100%.

She's anonymous too.

Yeah.

And the other friend that had nothing to do with any of this is also anonymous.

So it's great.

Right.

It's a powerful allergy.

There's another anonymous person who saw this that can back it up too.

And can you believe we're at a point where we're talking about someone was pushed up against a wall?

I don't know how hard.

We don't know how aggressively.

We don't know what, you know, if he just grabbed her arm and turned her around, who knows what happened here?

But really, this is what you're going to.

And she's been traumatized ever since

by that incident.

Ever since.

I'm worried that she may not even have a job now because, you know, she's been so traumatized.

Can she work?

I don't know.

I don't know.

I don't know.

It wouldn't surprise me if she can't.

I don't know.

We'll never know.

Well, we'll never know because we may if they come and testify, but they're anonymous, so maybe not.

So all you have to do is send an anonymous complaint to a representative.

Yeah, right.

And

it's just all over the place.

You're fine.

Yeah.

Come on.

How do we go by this stuff?

I don't know.

How do we get to this place?

I don't know.

And

many things that have happened now, I don't think you ever get past, right?

They're already there.

They're already there.

I don't know that you've ever come back to.

Yeah, is every nomination process going to be this ugly now?

Yeah.

Probably.

Right?

I mean, even if it's half as ugly,

it's still going to be ugly, and you'll think, oh, well, it wasn't as bad as it wasn't bad as that one.

Which leads me to believe if he is not confirmed,

the very next nominee has to be, and he should do it right away, Amy Coney Barrett.

Go ahead and go after a woman, and let's see what happens.

All right, because you're the ones who are

concerned about, aren't you?

You're concerned about women's rights.

You're concerned about being sensitive to women, about equality.

And And so you better not go after a woman.

But would they?

Be interesting to see.

It would be.

What are they going to say about her?

Because they're not going to like her.

She's more conservative, by all accounts, than Brett Kavanaugh is.

So they certainly don't want her.

It'd be interesting to see.

It would be.

It would be interesting.

It'd be fun to watch if Trump said, you know what, you won.

You know what?

You didn't win.

I don't believe you.

But, you know,

we're going to let Brett just continue to do his lifetime appointment on the, I guess some people call it the second highest court in the land.

And we'll let him alone, but I'm going to nominate this lady.

We're just going to get somebody in there.

We'll get her in here.

Yeah.

Same day, same time.

It's pretty clear you guys want a woman, so let's

go with Amy Coney Barrett.

Triple 8-933-93.

From hurricanes to earthquakes and cyber warfare, every American should have a plan to get through an emergency.

Because, as we've seen, they can happen at any time.

Natural disasters, the power could be out, sometimes for weeks, depending on what happens.

It's just more urgent than ever that you be prepared.

And we've seen again and again, response and repair to infrastructure can be slow.

And we had so many things going on last year that FEMA, toward the end of the year, said, Look, we can't do it.

You're going to have to be prepared on your own.

We won't be there next time.

So

you might want to get prepared.

Best place to start is storing food that lasts up to 25 years.

Build up a supply over time so that you're ready.

I trust and I use my Patriot supply for my food storage.

I have a whole room upstairs, a little room dedicated to our food storage.

And

even a year's supply takes up just, you know, maybe

not even half of the room, maybe a third of the room.

And so it stores really easily and conveniently, and it doesn't take up a bunch of space, and it lasts again for 25 years.

Make today

the day that you become prepared, and you have that peace of mind.

Everybody in your household should have at least a four-week emergency food kit, and there's a special on those right now.

Save a hundred dollars when you go to my special website, uh, Glenn's special website, preparewithglenn.com.

Preparewithglenn.com.

These four-week food kits are shipped fresh and discreetly to your door.

So do this right now while you're thinking about it.

I know that you keep thinking, yeah, I got to do that.

It's a relief once you do.

It is.

I mean, it really is.

I don't know.

I don't think I have a year yet, but I'm pretty close to, I mean, I know that.

And that's a great feeling, isn't it?

I know we're up to, I think, three to maybe six months or something.

You know, we've all got a lot of things.

Which is a really good start.

But it is like, if I see it where we have it now, and it's like, okay.

All right, good.

We're good.

And the thing is, you know, people say, ah, you'll eat anything if you're hungry enough.

Yeah, but you don't have to.

I'm not sure if that's true, but you don't have to.

I guarantee it's not true because anything includes kale and I'm yeah, and I'm not eating it.

I don't care how hungry I am.

I'm not eating kale, but this is delicious food.

It really is good and easy to prepare.

So do it right now.

Order and save $100 per kit on their bestseller this week.

Call 1-800-200-7163 or go online at preparewithglenn.com.

Whatever this world cooks up, know with with this food, you're absolutely prepared.

800-200-7163 or preparewithglen.com.

The Kavanaugh hearing is about to begin, and this is the day that Christine Blasey Blasey Bluzy Ford is supposed to testify.

So we'll find out in moments.

And we'll be carrying that live.

Coming up in just a few minutes on the Glenn Beck program.

Glenn Beck is coming live to talk about the right path forward and to make fun of the people standing in the way.

He might not be able to save the country, but at least we can all go down laughing.

Glenn Beck Live, the Addicted to Outrage tour, on tour this fall.

Glenn Beck.

Now Gray and Jeffy for Glenn today.

We are about to

join the Cavanaugh hearing live.

Christine Blasey Ford is in fact there and ready to testify.

She did show up, and Chuck Grassley is speaking now and opening up the hearing.

Let's join that live.

They and their families have received vile threats.

What they have endured ought to be considered by all of us as unacceptable

and a poor reflection on the state of civility in our democracy.

So I want to apologize to you both for the way you've been treated.

And I intend hopefully for today's hearing

to be safe, comfortable, and dignified for both of our witnesses.

I hope my colleagues will join me in this effort of a show of civility.

With that said, I lament that this hearing,

how this hearing has come about.

On July the 9th,

2018,

the President announced Judge Kavanaugh's nomination to serve on the Supreme Court.

Judge Kavanaugh has served on the most important federal appellate court for 12 years.

Before that,

he held some of the most sensitive positions in the federal government.

The President added Judge Kavanaugh to his short list of Supreme Court more than nine months ago

in November 2017.

As part of Judge Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court, the FBI conducted its sixth full

field background investigation of Judge Kavanaugh since 1993, 25 years ago.

Nowhere in any of these six FBI reports,

which committee investigators have reviewed on a bipartisan basis, was there a whiff

of any issue, any issue at all related in any way to inappropriate sexual behavior?

Dr.

Ford first raised her allegations in a secret letter

to the ranking member nearly two months ago in July.

This letter was secret from July 30th, September 13th

to, no, July 30th until September 13th when I first heard about it.

The ranking member took no action.

The letter wasn't shared with me, our colleagues, or my staff.

These allegations could have been investigated in a way that maintained the confidentiality that Dr.

Ford

requested.

Before his hearing, Judge Kavanaugh met privately with 65 senators, including the ranking member.

But the ranking member didn't ask Judge Kavanaugh about the allegations when she met with him privately in August.

The Senate Judiciary Committee held its four-day public hearing from September 4th to September 7th.

Judge Kavanaugh testified for more than 32 hours in public.

We held a closed session for members to ask sensitive questions on that

on the last evening, which the ranking member did not attend.

Judge Kavanaugh answered answered nearly 1,300 written questions submitted by senators after the hearing, more than all prior Supreme Court nominees.

Throughout this period, we did not know about the ranking member's secret evidence.

Then, only at an 11th hour, on the eve of Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation vote, did the ranking member refer the allegations to the FBI.

And then, sadly, the allegations were leaked leaked to the press.

And that's where Dr.

Ford was mistreated.

This is a shameful way to treat our witness who insisted on confidentiality.

And,

of course,

Judge Kavanaugh, who has had to address these allegations in the midst of a media circus.

When I received Dr.

Ford's letter on September the 13th, my staff and I recognized the seriousness of these allegations and immediately began our committee's investigation consistent with the way the committee has handled such allegations in the past.

Every step of the way, the Democratic side refused to participate in what should have been a bipartisan investigation, and as far as I know, on all of our judgeships throughout at least the last four years or three years, that's been the way it's been handled.

After Dr.

Ford's identity became public, my staff contacted all the individuals she

said attended the 1982 party described in the Washington Post article.

Judge Kavanaugh immediately submitted to an interview under penalty of felony for any knowingly false statements.

He denied the allegations categorically.

Democratic staff was invited to participate and could have asked any questions they wanted to, but they declined.

which leads me then to wonder, if they're really concerned with going to the truth, why wouldn't you want to talk to the accused?

The process and procedure is what the committee always does when we receive allegations of wrongdoing.

My staff reached out to other individuals allegedly at the party, Mark Judge, Patrick Smith, Leland Kaiser.

All three submitted statements to the Senate

under penalty of felony, denying any knowledge of the events described by Dr.

Ford.

Dr.

Ford's lifelong friend, Ms.

Kaiser,

stated she doesn't know Judge Kavanaugh and doesn't recall ever attending a party with him.

My staff made repeated requests to interview Dr.

Ford during the past 11 days, even volunteering to fly to California to take her testimony.

But her attorneys refused to

present her allegations to Congress.

I nevertheless honored her request for a public hearing, so Dr.

Ford today has the opportunity to prevent her allegations under oath.

As you can see, the Judiciary Committee was able to conduct thorough investigations into allegations.

or thorough investigations into allegations.

Some of my colleagues, consistent with their stated desires to obstruct Kavanaugh's nomination by any means precisely,

by any means necessary, pushed for FBI investigations into the allegations.

But I have no authority to force the executive branch agency to conduct an investigation into a matter it considers to be closed.

Moreover, once the allegations

became public, it was easy to identify all the alleged witnesses and conduct our own investigations.

Contrary to what the public has been led to believe, the FBI doesn't perform any credibility assessments or verify the truth of any events in these

background investigations.

I'll quote then Chairman Joe Biden during Justice Thomas's confirmation hearing.

This is what Senator Biden said: quote, The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn't understand anything.

The FBI explicitly does not in this or any other case reach a conclusion period.

They say he he said, she said, they said, period.

So when people wave an FBI report before you, understand

they do not.

They do not.

They do not reach conclusions.

They do not make recommendations.

End of Senator Biden's quote.

The FBI provided us with the allegations.

Now it's up to the Senate to assess their credibility, which brings us to this very time.

I look forward to a fair and respectful hearing.

That's what we promised Dr.

Ford.

Some of my colleagues have complained about the fact that an expert on this side is investigating sex crimes, will be questioning the witness.

I see no basis for complaint other than just plain politics.

The testimony we will hear today concerns allegations of sexual assault, very serious allegations.

I think we'll take our break right now.

And

while Grassley is babbling endlessly, and hopefully, by the time we get back,

Christine Blaseypoard will be testifying.

888-727 Beck.

It is Pat and Jeffy for Glenn.

What is ransomware?

It's malicious software that locks your computer and demands ransom money to restore access.

And

it's

mind-numbingly irritating, plus costly.

Cyber criminals will demand payment

within a certain time, or you risk losing access to your data.

Interesting stories

about this more and more.

Yeah.

For For everyone.

And getting your data back isn't guaranteed either.

The average ransomware demand in 2017 was over 500 bucks.

So what can you do?

Well, don't automatically open email attachments from unknown sources.

And most importantly, use up-to-date computer security software.

There are so many threats in today's connected world.

And it just takes one weak link for criminals to get in.

So it's a good thing the new Life Lock Identity Theft Protection adds the power of Norton security to help protect against threats to your identity and your devices that you can't easily see or fix on your own.

Now, nobody can obviously stop every single cyber threat, prevent all identity theft, or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but new Lifelock with Norton Security can see threats you might miss on your own.

Go to lifelock.com or you could call them too at 800LifeLock.

1-800-LifeLock, use the promo code Beck, and you'll get an extra 10% off your first year, plus a $25 Amazon gift card with annual enrollment.

Again, it's promo code Beck, and some terms apply.

Go to lifelock.com.

Okay, we heard an almost endless opening statement from Chuck Grassley to open the Kavanaugh hearing.

He did finally end.

He did finally end.

And now we're hearing from the ranking Democrat, of course, Diane Feinstein.

Then we'll hear from the ranking socialist.

And after that, we'll be the ranking communist, followed by the undersecretary.

Then the person under the undersecretary.

And the over-under will be there as well.

But here, here we go.

Thank you.

I have to say, when I saw your CV, I was extremely impressed.

You have a bachelor's degree from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, two master's degrees.

All right, so again, Dianne Feinstein is making her opening address, and she's telling her just how impressed she is with her as a wonderful woman and some form of sexual violence in their lifetime.

So here's her opening statement.

When survivors do report their assaults, it's often years later due to the trauma they suffered and fearing their stories will not be believed.

Last week, I received a letter from a 60-year-old California constituent who told me that she survived an attempted rape at age 17.

She described as being terrified and embarrassed.

She never told a soul until much later in life.

The assault stayed with her for 43 years.

I think it's important to remember these realities as we hear from Dr.

Ford about her experience.

There's been a great deal of public discussion about the Me Too movement today versus the Year of the Woman almost 27 years ago.

But while young women are standing up and saying no more, our institutions have not progressed in how they treat women who come forward.

Too often, women's memories and credibility come under assault.

In essence, they are put on trial and forced to defend themselves and often re-victimized in the process.

27 years ago, I was walking through an airport when I saw a large group of people gathered around a TV to listen to Anita Hill tell her story.

What I saw was an attractive woman in a blue suit before an all-male judiciary committee speaking of her experience of sexual harassment.

She was treated badly, accused of lying, attacked, and her credibility put to the test throughout the process.

Today, Dr.

Christine Blasey Ford has come forward to tell her story of being assaulted and fearing for her life when she was a teenager.

Initially, as I said, Dr.

Ford did not want to make her story public.

Then, within 36 hours of coming forward, Republicans scheduled a hearing without talking to her or even inviting her to testify.

She was told she had to show up

or the committee would move forward with a vote.

It took a public outcry

from the majority excuse me, for the majority to back down and give her even a few days to come before the committee.

Republicans also scheduled this hearing with Dr.

Ford without having her allegations investigated by the FBI.

In 1991,

Anita Hill's allegations were reviewed by the FBI, as is the normal process and squarely within its jurisdiction.

However, despite repeated requests, President Trump and the Republicans have refused to take this routine step and direct the FBI to conduct an impartial investigation.

This would clearly be the best way to ensure a fair process to both Judge Kavanaugh and to Dr.

Ford.

In 1991, the Senate heard from 22 witnesses.

over three days.

Today, while rejecting an FBI investigation, Republicans are refusing to hear testimony from any other witness, including Mark Judge, who Dr.

Ford identified as being in the room when the attack took place.

And we believe Judge should be subpoenaed so the committee can hear from him directly.

Republicans have also refused to call anyone who could speak to the evidence that would support or refute Dr.

Ford's claim

to one witness

who could address credibility and character of either Ford or Kavanaugh.

And all things good and right in these universities.

What I find most inexcusable is this rush to judgment, the unwillingness to take these kinds of allegations at face value and look at them for what they are, a real question of character for someone who is asking for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court.

I'm begging you now.

In 1991, Republicans belittled Professor Hill's experience, saying, and I quote, it won't make a bit of difference in the outcome, end quote.

And they were right.

The burden of proof was on Professor Hill.

And today, that's an American Republican colleagues are saying this is a hiccup.

Dr.

Ford is mixed up and declaring, I'll listen to the lady, but we're going to bring this to a close.

What's worse,

many of our colleagues on the other side of the aisle have also made it clear that no matter what happens today, the Senate will plow right through and ensure Judge Kavanaugh would be elevated within a week.

In fact, on Tuesday, the majority went ahead and scheduled a vote on the nomination before we heard one word of testimony regarding allegations of sexual assault and misconduct by Brett Kavanaugh.

Republican leadership even told senators they should plan to be in over this weekend so the nomination can be pushed through without delay.

This is despite the fact that in the last few days, two more women have come forward with their own serious allegations of sexual assault involving Brett Kavanaugh.

And despite the fact that two other men have admitted to the thing

against Christine Blasey Ford.

She too did not want to come forward, but after being approached by reporters, she told her story.

And Michael Abenaught was a little bit of a moment.

She was at a college party.

I didn't want to, but Kavanaugh exposed himself to her.

She recalls pushing him over

and then seeing him laughing and pulling his pants out.

That's really not what she recalls.

And it took her

six days with lawyers to come to that conclusion.

All right.

Diane Feinstein continues to babble, and

Christine Blasey Ford continues to wait patiently through the Democrat, the ranking Democrat.

I guess we've got to hear her statement.

So she continues to make it.

And hopefully, when we come back, we'll actually hear from Christine Blasey Ford.

That'd be nice.

It would be nice.

Let's get to it already.

Coming up on the Glen Beck program.

You're listening to the Glen Beck program.

With Pat and Jeffy today, we are joining the Kavanaugh hearings live as Christine Blasey Ford is just beginning her testimony.

I'm going to tell you what happened to me while Brett Kavanaugh and I were in high school.

I have described the events publicly before.

I summarized them in my letter to Ranking Member Feinstein and again in a letter to Chairman Grassley.

I understand and appreciate the importance of your hearing from me directly about what happened to me and the impact that it has had on my life and on my family.

I grew up in the suburbs of Washington DC.

I attended the Holton Arms School in Bethesda, Maryland from 1978 to 1984.

Holton Arms is an all-girls school that opened in 1901.

During my time at the school, girls at Holton Arms frequently met and became friendly with boys from all boys' schools in the area, including the Landon School, Georgetown Prep, Gonzaga High School, as well as our country clubs and other places where kids and families socialized.

This is how I met Brett Kavanaugh, the boy who sexually assaulted me.

During my freshman and sophomore school years, When I was 14 and 15 years old, my group of friends intersected with Brett and his friends for a short period of time.

I had been friendly with a classmate of Brett's for a short time during my freshman and sophomore year, and it was through that connection that I attended a number of parties that Brett also attended.

We did not know each other well, but I knew him and he knew me.

In the summer of 1982, like most summers, I spent most every day at the Columbia Country Club in Chevy Chase, Maryland, swimming and practicing diving.

One evening that summer, after a day of diving at the club, I attended a small gathering at a house in the Bethesda area.

There were four boys I remember specifically being at the house.

Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge,

a boy named PJ,

and one other boy whose name I cannot recall.

I also remember my friend Leland attending.

I do not remember all of the details of how that gathering came together, but like many that summer, it was almost surely a spur-of-the-moment gathering.

I truly wish I could be more helpful with more detailed answers to all of the questions that have and will be asked about how I got to the party and where it took place and so forth.

I don't have all the answers and I don't remember as much as I would like to.

But the details about that night that bring me here today are the ones I will never forget.

They have been seared into my memory and have haunted me episodically as an adult.

When I got to the small gathering, people were drinking beer in a small living room, family room type area on the first floor of the house.

I drank one beer.

Brett and Mark were visibly drunk.

Early in the evening, I went up a very narrow set of stairs leading from the living room to a second floor to use the restroom.

When I got to the top of the stairs, I was pushed from behind into a bedroom across from the bathroom.

I couldn't see who pushed me.

Brett and Mark came into the bedroom and locked the door behind them.

There was music playing in the bedroom.

It was turned up louder by either Brett or Mark once we were in the room.

I was pushed onto the bed and Brett got on top of me.

He began running his hands over my body and grinding into me.

I yelled, hoping that someone downstairs might hear me.

And I tried to get away from him, but his weight was heavy.

Brett groped me and tried to take off my clothes.

He had a hard time because he was very inebriated and because I was wearing a one-piece bathing suit underneath my clothing.

I believed he was going to rape me.

I tried to yell for help.

When I did, Brett put his hand over my mouth to stop me from yelling.

This is what terrified me the most and this had the most lasting impact on my life.

It was hard for me to breathe and I thought that Brett was accidentally going to kill me.

Both Brett and Mark were drunkenly laughing during the attack.

They seemed to be having a very good time.

Mark seemed ambivalent, at times urging Brett on and at times telling him to stop.

A couple of times I made eye contact with Mark and thought he might try to help me, but he did not.

During this assault, Mark came over and jumped on the bed twice while Brett was on top of me.

And the last time that he did this, we toppled over and Brett was no longer on top of me.

I was able to get up and run out of the room.

Directly across from the bedroom was a small bathroom.

I ran inside the bathroom and locked the door.

I waited until I heard Brett and Mark leave the bedroom, laughing, and loudly walked down the narrow stairway, pinballing off the walls on the way down.

I waited, and and when I did not hear them come back up the stairs, I left the bathroom, went down the same stairwell, through the living room, and left the house.

I remember being on the street and feeling an enormous sense of relief that I had escaped that house and that Brett and Mark were not coming outside after me.

Brett's assault on me drastically altered my life.

For a very long time, I was too afraid and ashamed to tell anyone these details.

I did not want to tell my parents that I, at age 15, was in a house without any parents present, drinking beer with boys.

I convinced myself that because Brett did not rape me, I should just move on and just pretend that it didn't happen.

Over the years, I told very, very few friends that I had this traumatic experience.

I told my husband before we were married that I had experienced a sexual assault.

I had never told the details to anyone, the specific details, until May 2012 during a couple's counseling session.

The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed a very extensive,

very long remodel of our home.

And I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand.

In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail.

I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S.

Supreme Court and spoke a bit about his background at an elitist all-boys school in Bethesda, Maryland.

My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.

After that May 2012 therapy session, I did my best to ignore the memories of the assault because recounting them caused me to relive the experience and cause panic and anxiety.

Occasionally, I would discuss the assault in an individual therapy session, but talking about it caused more reliving of the trauma, so I tried not to think about it or discuss it.

But over the years, I went through periods where I thought about the attack.

I had confided in some close friends that I had had an experience with sexual assault.

Occasionally, I stated that my assailant was a prominent lawyer or judge, but I did not use his name.

I do not recall each person I spoke to about Brett's assault.

And some friends have reminded me of these conversations since the publication of the Washington Post story on September 16th, 2018.

This is the Glenn Beck program.

But until July

had never

Mr.

Kavanaugh

outside of therapy,

this changed in early July 2018.

I saw press reports stating that Brett Kavanaugh was on the short list of a list of very well-qualified Supreme Court nominees.

I thought it was my civic duty to relay the information I had about Mr.

Kavanaugh's conduct so that those considering his nomination would know about this assault.

On July 6th, I had a sense of urgency to relay the information to the Senate and the President as soon as possible before a nominee was selected.

I did not know how specifically to do this.

I called my congressional representative and let her receptionist know that someone on the president's shortlist had attacked me.

I also sent a message to the encrypted Washington Post confidential tip line.

I did not use my name, but I provided the names of Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge.

I stated that Mr.

Kavanaugh had assaulted me in the 1980s in Maryland.

This was an extremely hard thing for me to do,

but I felt that I couldn't not do it.

Over the next two days, I told a couple of close friends on the beach in Aptos, California that Mr.

Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted me.

I was very conflicted as to whether to speak out.

On July 9th, I received a return phone call from the Office of Congresswoman Anna Eschu after Mr.

Kavanaugh had become the nominee.

I met with her staff on July 18th and with her on July 20th describing the assault and discussing my fears about coming forward.

Later, we discussed the possibility of sending a letter to Ranking Member Feinstein, who is one of my state's senators, describing what occurred.

My understanding is that Representative Eshu's office delivered a copy of my letter to Senator Feinstein's office on July 30th.

The letter included my name, but also a request that it be kept confidential.

My hope was that providing the information confidentially would be sufficient to allow the Senate to consider Mr.

Kavanaugh's serious misconduct without having to make myself, my family, or anyone's family vulnerable to the personal attacks and invasions of privacy that we have faced since my name became public.

In a letter dated August 31st, Senator Feinstein wrote that she would not share the letter without my explicit consent, and I appreciated this commitment.

Sexual assault victims should be able to decide for themselves when and whether their private experience is made public.

As the hearing date got closer, I struggled with a terrible choice.

Do I share the facts with the Senate and put myself and my family in the public spotlight?

Or do I preserve our privacy and allow the Senate to make its decision without knowing the full truth of his past behaviors?

I I agonized daily with this decision throughout August and September 2018.

The sense of duty that originally motivated me to reach out confidentially to the Washington Post and to Anna Eshu's office when there was still a list of extremely qualified candidates and to Senator Feinstein was always there, but my fears of the consequences of speaking out started to exponentially increase.

During August 2018,

the press reported that Mr.

Kavanaugh's confirmation was virtually certain.

Persons painted him as a champion of women's rights and empowerment.

And I believed that if I came forward, my single voice would be drowned out by a chorus of powerful supporters.

By the time of the confirmation hearings, I had resigned myself to remaining quiet and and letting the committee and the Senate make their decision without knowing what Mr.

Kavanaugh had done to me.

Once the press started reporting on the existence of the letter I had sent to Senator Feinstein, I faced mounting pressure.

All right, we're going to take a quick break here and then get back to more of Christine Blasey Ford's testimony live from the Kavanaugh hearings.

Our sponsor this half hour is

ZipRecruiter.

You know what's not smart are job sites that overwhelm you with tons of the wrong resumes?

You don't need that.

You don't have time for that.

But you know what is smart?

ZipRecruiter.com/slash Beck.

Unlike other job sites, ZipRecruiter doesn't wait for candidates to find you.

ZipRecruiter finds them for you.

It's powerful matching technology, scans thousands of resumes, and then it identifies the people you need with the right skills, the right education, and experience for your job.

And it actively then invites them to apply so you get qualified candidates fast.

No more sorting through the wrong resumes, no more waiting for the right candidate to apply.

It's no wonder that ZipRecruiter is rated number one by employers in the U.S.

And right now, you can try ZipRecruiter for free at this exclusive web address, ziprecruiter.com/slash Beck.

That's ziprecruiter.com/slash Beck.

ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire.

Glenn Beck.

With Pat and Jeffy, who've been carrying the Kavanaugh hearings live, Christine Blasey Ford just finished up her opening statement, and now the senators are beginning to question her.

Please ask me to clarify it or ask it in a different way.

When I ask questions, sometimes I'll refer back to other information you've provided.

If I do that and I get it wrong, please correct me.

All right, this is the Special Prosecutor, Rachel.

I'm not going to ask you to guess.

I know it was a long time ago.

If you do estimate, please let me know that you're estimating, okay?

Fair.

We've put before you, and I'm sure you have copies of them anyway, five pieces of information, and I wanted to go over them.

The first is a screenshot of a WhatsApp texting between you and somebody at the Washington Post.

Do you have that in front of you?

Yes.

The first two texts were sent by you on July 6th.

Is that correct?

Correct.

And then the last one sent by you was on July 10th?

Correct.

Okay.

Are those three comments accurate?

I will read them.

Yes.

So there's one correction.

Okay.

I've misused the word bystander as an an adjective.

Okay.

Bystander means someone that is looking at an assault and

the person named PJ was not technically a bystander.

I was writing very quickly

Kavanaugh hearings live coming up on the Glenn Beck program with Pat and Jeffy.

Glen Back is coming live to talk about the right path forward and to make fun of the people standing in the way.

We might not be able to save the country, but at least we can all go down laughing.

Glen Back Live, the Addicted to Outrage tour, on tour this fall.

Glenn Beck.

Pat and Jeffy for Glenn.

He's still a little bit under the weather, but we've got the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford going on right now.

Let's rejoin that.

If we could find out when he worked there, then I could provide a more detailed timeline as to when the attack occurred.

Okay.

And that is, so that is not a correction in your statement?

It's just no.

Okay.

You also

wrote out a handwritten statement for the polygrapher when you took your polygraph test.

Is that correct?

Yes.

Okay.

And I see corrections on that where you crossed out.

So I will go on to the Washington Post article that was originally published on September 16th of this year.

And should I just not look at this for accuracy or are we just just gonna leave that be?

We may come back to it if we need to refer to it.

Okay.

On the Washington Post article,

did you submit to an interview by a reporter with the Washington Post for that article to be written?

Correct.

Okay.

And then finally, was the statement that you provided this morning.

I assume that to the best of your

recollection that that was accurate.

That this whole article is accurate?

No, no, no.

The statement that you made this morning.

Yes.

Okay.

I want to talk to you about the day that this happened leading up to the gathering.

Okay.

In your statement this morning, have you told us everything that you remember about the day leading up to that?

Yes.

Let me ask just a few questions to make sure that you've thought of everything, okay?

You indicated that you were at the country club swimming that day?

That's my best estimate of how this could have happened.

Okay.

And when you say best estimate, is that based on the fact that you said you went there pretty much every day?

Is that a yes?

Yes.

Okay.

Do you recall prior to getting there, so I'm only talking about up to the gathering, had you had anything to drink?

Not at all.

Were you on any sort of medication?

None.

Do you recall

knowing before you went who was going to be at that gathering?

I recall that

expecting that Mark Judge and Leland would be at that gathering.

Okay.

Do you recall an expectation that Brett Kavanaugh would be there?

I don't recall whether or not I expected that.

Okay.

Now,

let's talk about the gathering

up from the time you arrived till right when you went up the stairs, just that period of time, okay?

What was the atmosphere like at the gathering?

Mr.

Kavanaugh and Mr.

Judge were extremely inebriated.

They had clearly been drinking prior, and the other people at the party were not

the living room.

I want to ask you just to follow up on that.

When you you said it was clear that they had been drinking prior, do you mean prior to the time you had gotten there or prior to the time they had arrived?

Prior to the time that they arrived.

I don't recall who arrived first, though, whether it was me or them.

Okay, please continue.

Okay.

So I recall that

I can sketch a floor plan.

I recall that it was a sparsely furnished, fairly modest living room.

And it was not really a party, like the news has made it sound.

It was not.

It was just a gathering that

I

assumed was going to lead to a party later on that those boys would attend because they tended to have parties later at night than I was allowed to stay out.

So it was kind of a pre-gathering.

Was it loud?

No, not in the living room.

Besides the music that you've described that was playing in the bedroom, was there any other music or television or anything like that that was adding no.

Okay.

So there wasn't a stereo playing downstairs?

No.

Okay.

Sid the Glenn Becker.

Taking the Brett Kevin away from the board.

Thank you for being here.

Mr.

Chairman, you know, the way to make this inquiry truly credible

is to do what we've always done when new information about a nominee comes to light.

To use your words this morning, you want to reach the truth.

The easy way to ask the FBI to investigate is what we've always done.

Let them investigate, report back to us.

The same applies to the serious allegations made by Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swednick.

Let's have a nonpartisan, professional investigation, and then take the time to have these witnesses testify.

Chairman, you and I were both here 27 years ago.

At that time, the Senate failed

to administration, I think.

I said I believed her, but I'm concerned that we're doing a lot less for these three women today.

That's my personal view.

Now, Dr.

Ford, no matter what happens with this hearing today, no matter what happens with this nomination,

I know, and I hear from so many in my own state of Vermont, there are millions of victims and survivors out there who have been inspired by your courage.

I am.

Bravery is contagious.

Indeed, that's the driving force behind the Me Too movement.

And you sharing your story is going to have a lasting, positive impact on so many survivors in our country.

And we owe you a debt of gratitude for that, Doctor.

Now, some senators have suggested you were simply mixed up about who assaulted you.

An ally of Judge Kavanaugh in the White House even promoted a wild theory about a Kavanaugh look-alike.

You immediately rejected that theory,

as did the innocent man who had been called that look-alike.

In fact, he sent a letter to this committee forcefully rejecting this absurd theory.

And I asked consent to enter that in the record.

Without objection,

now,

how did you know Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge?

And is it possible that you would mix them up with somebody else?

No, it is not.

And the person that was

blamed for the incident is actually the person who introduced me to them originally.

So he was a member of Columbia Country Club, and I don't want to talk about him because I think it's unfair, but he is the person that introduced me to them.

But you

would not mix up somebody else with Brett Kavanaugh, is that correct?

Correct.

Or Mark Judge.

Correct.

Well, then let's go back to the incident.

What is the strongest memory you have?

Strongest memory of the incident?

Something that you cannot forget.

Take whatever time you need.

Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter,

the uproarious laughter between the two

and they're having fun

at my expense.

You've never forgotten that laughter.

You've never forgotten them laughing at you.

They were laughing with each other.

And you were the object of the laughter?

I was,

you know, underneath one of them while the two laughed.

Two friends having a really good time with one another.

Let me enter into the record

a statement by the National Task Force to End Domestic Violence.

Without objection, so ordered.

And a letter from 24 members of the House of Representatives urging the committee to use the NTF's trauma-informed approach and questioning Dr.

Ford.

Without objection, so ordered.

And letter from another 160

as Patrick Leahy

continues to interrogate

Christine Blazi Ford.

We're going to jump out here

for a break, and then we'll come right back to taking live coverage of this.

But just to recap everything Patrick Leahy just said there,

interesting.

Yeah.

It's a

pretty much a direct quote of everything.

Gotcha, we don't want to get anything.

Just a quick recap for you.

Gotcha.

I didn't think we were recording it, but man, that's bad we could play it back that fast.

Yeah, and probably there's more to come in just a second here.

Our sponsor this half hour is brought to you by American Financing.

There's a lot of benefits to refinancing your mortgage.

You can lower your interest rate.

You can shorten your loan term, which is awesome and highly recommended by all experts you could access cash or even consolidate high interest debt those are all great options that can help you save an incredible amount of money over the life of that loan you may be able to also save a thousand up to a thousand dollars a month so why wait for interest rates to increase they keep going up they've raised them three times already this year and they plan to do more so your next step should be a 10-minute call just a 10-minute call to American Financing, their salary-based mortgage consultant.

Why is that important?

Because Because they don't try to direct you to a program that's not right for you, but it is for them and their commission.

So it's huge that they're salary-based.

There's never any upfront fees to consider.

Plus, they have access to every loan in the industry.

So you can feel confident that your finance, refinance needs are being met quickly and they're in line with your budget.

So make that call today.

They offer the convenience of eSign too, which I love.

So you can complete your documents from the comfort

of your own home.

You don't, on your schedule, you don't have to go in and do all that customize a loan program and term to fit your financial needs they're licensed in all 50 states so call american financing today 800-906-2440 that's 800-906-2440 or you can go online at americanfinancing.net american financing nmls 18.

is this what you did this is what you american financing nml you're not trying to take my line no i never

well i did consider it obviously

Now I'm reconsidering it.

I mean, American Financing NMLS 18234, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.

Glenn Beck Mercury.

Pat and Jeffrey for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

The Kavanaugh accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, is being questioned now before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

We go back live to that.

That's helpful.

Okay, I'm going to put check marks next to homes that I can confirm are the correct locations, and then an X or a question mark when I don't know where these people live.

I'm only asking you to confirm if that map accurately shows where you were living at the time.

Where I lived at the time.

So I can't see the street name, but I'm happy to refer to the address or the neighborhood.

Okay, could you tell us that?

Yes, it's River Falls.

Okay.

It's near the, like,

what is the place called called the Naval Research Center on Claribarton Parkway okay was that a house or an apartment it was my parents home okay yeah all right okay

mr.

Chairman I ask consent to enter into the record

letters of support for Dr.

Ford from her classmates at Holton Arms School 1200 alumni of the school, 195 of your colleagues, students, and mentors, 1,400 women and men who attended DC schools, and 50 members of the Yale Law School faculty who are calling for a full FBI investigation.

I ask consent to enter these into the record.

Without objection, so ordered.

Dr.

Ford, as difficult as this experience must be, I want you to know that your courage in coming forward has given countless Americans the strength to face their own life-shattering past and to begin to heal their wounds.

By example, you have brought many families into an honest and sometimes painful dialogue that should have occurred a long time ago.

Name one time.

I'm sorry for what this has done to you and your family.

No one, no one should face harassment, death threats, and disparaging comments by cheap shot politicians

telling the truth.

But you and your family should know that for every scurrilous charge and every pathetic tweet, there have been thousands of Americans, women, and men, who believe you, support you, and thank you for your courage.

What about the other 110 children?

Watching your experience,

that many sexual assault survivors hide their past and spend their lives suffering in pain silence.

You had absolutely nothing to gain by bringing these facts to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The fact that you are testifying here today,

terrified though you may be,

the fact that you have called for an FBI investigation of this incident, the fact that you are prepared to name both Judge Kavanaugh and eyewitness Mark Judge stands in sharp contrast to the obstruction we've seen on the other side.

The FBI should have investigated your charges as they did in the Anita Hill hearing, but they did not.

Judge should be subpoenaed from his Bethany Beach hideaway and required to testify under oath, but he has not.

Judge Kavanaugh, if he truly believes there's no evidence, no witnesses that can prove your case, should be joining us in demanding a thorough FBI investigation, but he has not.

Today, you come before before this committee and before this nation alone.

I know you're joined by counsel and family.

The prosecutor on the Republican side will continue to ask questions to test your memory and veracity.

After spending decades trying to forget that awful night, it's no wonder your recollection is less than perfect.

A polished liar can create a seamless story.

But a trauma survivor cannot be expected to remember every painful detail.

That's what Senator Leahy has mentioned earlier.

One question is critical.

In Judge Kavanaugh's opening testimony, which we will hear after you leave, this is what he says.

I never had any sexual or physical encounter of any kind with Dr.

Ford.

I am not questioning that Dr.

Ford may have been sexually assaulted by some person in some place at some time.

Last night, the Republican staff of this committee released to the media a timeline that shows that they've interviewed two people who claim they were the ones who actually assaulted you.

I'm asking you to address this new defense of mistaken identity directly.

Dr.

Ford,

with what degree of certainty do you believe Brett Kavanaugh assaulted you?

100%.

100%.

I thought she was going to go like that.

In the letter which you sent to

Senator Feinstein, you wrote, I have not knowingly seen Kavanaugh since the assault.

I did see Mark Judge once at the Potomac Village Safeway, where he was extremely uncomfortable in seeing me.

Would you please describe that encounter at the Safeway with Mark Judge and what led you to believe he was uncomfortable?

Yes.

I was going to the Potomac Village Safeway.

This is the one on the corner of Falls and River Road.

And I was with my mother and I was a teenager, so I wanted her to go in one door and me go in the other.

So

I chose the wrong door because the door I chose was the one where Mark Judge was,

looked like he was working there and arranging the shopping carts.

And I said hello to him.

And his face was white

and very uncomfortable saying hello back.

And we had previously been friendly at the times that we saw each other over the previous two years, albeit not very many times.

We had always been friendly with one another.

I wouldn't characterize him as not friendly.

He was just nervous and not really wanting to speak with me.

And he looked a little bit ill.

How long did this occur after the incident?

I would estimate six to eight weeks.

Thank you, Mr.

Chairman.

Before we take a break, I can't let what Durbin, Senator Durbin said.

By the way, he's my friend.

We work on a lot of legislation together.

But you talked about the obstruction from the other side.

I cannot let it go by what you've heard me say so many times, that between July 30th and September 13th, there were 45 days this committee could have been investigating this situation, and her privacy would have been

protected.

So something happened here in between on your side that the whole country, well, not the whole country should have known about it, no, not know about it.

We should have investigated it.

We'll take a break now for 15 minutes.

There you go.

So Chuck Grassley puts the hammer down.

He does.

They're going to take a break.

Wow.

The thing that ticks me off about it all before we get back into the testimony and

some of the written statements for the moment.

By the way, this is the Glend Beck program with Pat and Jeffy for Glenn today.

Is that how the senators always have to, by the way, he's a friend of mine.

We work closely together on different legislation and stop it.

I know.

Well, they're trying to keep the decorum of the chamber in force, I guess.

I don't know.

This latest thing where you saw Mark Judge at a safe way

and he seemed uncomfortable to you and nervous.

You don't know his feelings.

It may have been six to eight weeks after.

May have been.

May have been.

She apparently remembers just how nervous he was and how uncomfortable he was, but some of the other details are just sketchy.

She remembers not wanting to go into a safeway with her mom.

Right.

She wanted to go into

the door.

And she knows perfectly, apparently, the feelings of Mark Judge inside his body.

So that's pretty impressive right there.

Yeah.

888 727 P-E-C-K, Pat and Jeffy for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

Addicted to Outrage.

The new book from Glenn Beck, Addicted to Outrage, is available everywhere.

Order it now at Amazon.com.

It's Pat Gray and Jeffy for Glenn today.

You can also join me in about half an hour on my show, Pat Gray Unleashed, on the Blaze Radio and TV network.

Also this afternoon on the News and Why It Matters as well.

So, what are they talking about, you think?

It's possible we might mention the Kavanaugh here.

Yeah, it's been an absolute circus so far, an absolute Travis Shemockery.

It's just a

it's ludicrous what is happening and the grandstanding of all these Democrats

and spinning or just flat out lying about everything that has transpired.

It's fascinating to watch.

Fascinating.

There's been a fourth, if you haven't heard, there's been a fourth allegation by somebody who wants to remain completely anonymous.

She was out with her daughter and two other people, all anonymously.

Brett Kavanaugh, for some reason, was with the four of them at a bar.

And when they were leaving the bar, she says they were all shocked when Brett Kavanaugh shoved her friend up against the wall very aggressively and sexually.

Now, was the anonymous mother with them?

Because I thought I read

that the anonymous daughter just told her

about the situation.

She says there were at least four witnesses, including my daughter.

The writer of the letter provided, no names, said the alleged victim was still traumatized and had decided to remain anonymous.

How could she not be?

Well,

being pushed

anywhere near a wall when it's aggressively and sexually, of course, that sticks with you the rest of your life.

Sure does.

You don't recover from something like that.

You don't.

There's no recovering.

Just like.

Blaisey Ford didn't recover.

No recovering from that.

Except.

Well, she became a doctor.

Went to about four different

very influential universities.

Yeah.

And I found it interesting, fascinating.

In fact, she went to a private girl's school, a very prestigious private girl school, which she just said, I went to an all-girl school.

When she described the all-male school that Kavanaugh attended, it was an elitist.

It was an elite.

An elitist

school that he attended.

Oh, okay.

Nice spin on that.

Yours wasn't, but his

was.

I see.

Well, look, she can't be expected.

Hers wasn't elitist.

She just got to hang out at the club every day every summer.

Day she hung out at the club.

Who among us?

Right.

She doesn't have a club that we hang out at every day.

That's not elite.

I had a club that was elitist.

It was the front porch.

Well, you know, on the mean streets of Helena, Montana.

I don't think there was a club.

I don't think that.

I'm trying to think if I even know of a country club on the mean streets of Helena Montana.

I don't think so.

I don't think you were lucky if you could find a concrete bunker where you could hide from all the bully fire.

Right.

I mean, the danger.

The danger of

the danger.

It just never stopped.

So this fourth allegation, and the Democrats have been saying how they want to stop everything now and talk to all of these people.

Well, I don't even know how you do that when this fourth allegation, this group wants to stay anonymous.

How do you even have them come and testify before the Senate committee?

Now,

we've been told that the vote will be held tomorrow, come what may.

So make up your mind, let's move on.

And they don't want that.

Now, you heard from her

with her statement, and now we're having some kind of questioning from the special prosecutor.

She starts getting into it good, then they cut her off.

Yeah.

They continue to cut her off, and then we have to hear from different senators make their statements, barely ask a question and say how good Ford is, and then, oh, I want to throw it back to the special prosecutor.

Do you buy her so far?

Do you buy it so far?

I think that she was assaulted by somebody, and I don't think it was Brett Kavanaugh.

That's the thing.

You know, the incident she describes could have happened.

Absolutely plausible.

Yes.

But I don't believe it was Kavanaugh who did it.

First of all, everybody who knows him really well says that's completely out of his character.

Women who dated him at the time say it was completely out of his character.

He himself seemed pretty believable when he said what he said the other night as his wife sat by his side on Fox News.

Yeah, well, how about that?

We're supposed to believe all women, just not her.

Right.

And I guess men can never be believed, but women always have to be believed.

When did that rule begin?

Any woman who claims, like, no woman has ever claimed that they were sexually assaulted

falsely?

Ask the Duke La Crosse team if that's ever happened.

Well, there was something there.

Don't worry about it.

Yeah, it's, I don't know.

I guess we're just supposed to suspend disbelief completely.

And so anybody and everybody who comes forward,

you just let them smear this guy without digging into the substance of it.

You know, that sleazy lawyer, Michael Avenatti, came forward with

the client who claims that Kavanaugh was part of a rape gang in high school.

And he's all pissed off that people have looked into her background.

What?

Okay, so you can dig into everything involving Kavanaugh.

We can't look into the accuser's background?

Right.

By the way, in her background, an ex-boyfriend claims that she stalked him and threatened him and his family when he stopped seeing her.

Right.

Now, is that relevant to whether or not Brett Kavanaugh was in a rape gang?

No, but it goes to character, right?

It goes to credibility,

yeah, mental stability.

Well,

so this whole thing is just uh, uh, well, it's a circus, it certainly is, and I still have I have a just a huge problem with it all because I can't believe that if you believe that uh Judge Kavanaugh was part of a

rape gang,

that none of it came out in how many FBI background checks have we done?

Yeah,

and

I mean, he's he's, I don't know if you know this, but he's a kind of the court that he's on is kind of like the second highest.

Yeah, the appellate court.

Some people call it, I think it's kind of like the second highest.

According to the president, that's what some people call it.

The second highest.

So who knows?

Yeah, you know, his life has been poked into already.

Yeah, so

none of the whole rape gang has been kept secret.

secret.

Yeah, and it's fascinating how all the women are sacred in this particular circumstance.

But do you remember how Monica Lewinsky was treated in the late 90s?

That September, a CBS news poll showed that most Americans viewed Lewinsky unfavorably and that she was more unpopular with women than with men.

Meanwhile, on TV and on the radio.

Monica was a young tramp.

Monica Lewinsky's behavior was unacceptable.

Get that!

That was Charlie Wrangell.

Monica was a young tramp.

A young tramp?

Can you imagine that today?

Oh, my gosh.

You've called an accuser, a young woman who's 21 years old at the time, a young tramp.

Wow.

Something about Monica.

Her lips never say no.

She's about Monica.

Lewinsky was portrayed not as a victim, but as a desperate and conniving slut whose obsessive behavior was to blame for the whole mess.

She comes off as someone who basically blackmails the president of the United States.

That's Bill Maher in 1998 after the Star Report came out.

And Katie Rolfe wrote a great article the other day, and she said there should be a term connoting the opposite of sexual harassment.

When a person of less power uses her sexual attractiveness or a personal relationship with a person of greater power to

wow, that's amazing.

She's at fault.

Because she's the person with less power who's trying to bring down the person of greater power.

Whereas today,

that whole thing has completely flipped around, and it's the power dynamic where they can't even say no.

If they don't even say no, it's still no.

Still no.

Because you're more powerful than they are.

Went ahead.

No pun intended.

As Marr saw the situation, it was Lewinsky who had seduced Clinton.

I think Monica Lewinsky is the one who should apologize to America.

She's the homewrecker.

And if anybody really owes an apology, I think it's her.

Yay!

Howard Stern, the radio personality, commissioned a song about Lewinsky.

Hey, look at me, I'm Monica Lewinsky.

They print pictures of my fat face and my do.

Though I barely finished school, I still know the golden rule.

Do onto others and then have them do you too.

Wow.

That is just a staggering reminder of how things used to be or how things are,

how things were when it was a Democrat involved with the allegations.

A little bit different.

Just a tad.

Treated just slightly differently.

And yes, it was a different time too.

But that just shows you just how far the pendulum has swung back the other way.

Amazing.

Sure is.

Wow.

The hearing for Kavanaugh is in recess right now.

They should be back in a few minutes.

We'll try to take it live when they resume.

But

we'd like to hear from you, too.

And you can call in on my show

and let me know what you think of

the testimony so far.

Has she been credible?

Do you believe her?

Do you think that an assault happened at all?

And if it did, do you believe it's Brett Kavanaugh?

And

I can't wait to hear more about these two guys who came forward yesterday or late last night, whatever this happened, and admitted it was them.

Right.

We can't believe them, but

we can believe the anonymous mother of the anonymous daughter with anonymous friends.

Right.

We can believe them.

But we can't believe the actual two other humans that have names.

What an upside-down world it is.

Boy no.

No kidding.

It is.

You wouldn't believe it unless you were right in the middle of living it, would you?

And I couldn't,

as bad as it was during the Obama administration, I don't think I could have predicted this.

I just, it's pretty amazing.

Triple 8727, back our sponsor this half hour is Goldline.

We've been telling you about Goldline's new silver maple flex that allows you to break off smaller pieces

for barter and trade.

And it comes in this really cool-looking container.

And

the silver itself,

it's beautiful.

It's not great looking.

It's all done by the Canadian Mint, and

it's aesthetically pleasing.

Plus,

if things really go sideways,

you've got this to barter with.

But don't forget about the importance of small gold bars as well.

When it comes to protecting ourselves, our families, and our portfolios,

it just makes sense.

You want to make sure that you have the maximum flexibility and diversity.

That's why Glenn owns both gold and silver, and I own both gold and silver.

As we've mentioned before, Glenn asked Goldline to create smaller bars of gold and silver so that people can carry them in the event that things go really badly, really sideways.

In addition to considering the new silver maple flex, these

remember that Goldline also offers an exclusive credit card size holder containing five individually sealed 1 10th ounce gold bars, which are also minted by the Royal Canadian Mint.

So between these legal tender gold and silver bars, you'll know, you'll have that peace of mind that if anything really goes tragically bad, if the economy just implodes, you can protect your family still.

You owe it to yourself to call Goldline today and learn more about these gold and silver bars.

Just call 866Goldline or go to goldline.com, take care of it online.

Call today.

See how easy it is to own gold and silver 866 goldline that's 866 goldline read their important risk information to make sure gold is right for you it's 1-866 goldline

glenn back with pat and jeffy

by the way we're gonna we'll have some more live coverage coming up on my show at pack ray unleashed immediately following this one on the blaze radio and tv network and then tomorrow Don't forget, it's more on trivia.

Every Friday during the football season, we've got Moron Trivia is back

at 12 Eastern on Pat Gray Unleashed.

And tomorrow's matchup, I don't know who it is, but it doesn't really matter.

It's just always fun.

I can't remember.

I saw who it was, but it doesn't matter.

Second hour of the show.

More on trivia.

And once again, I mean, Moron Trivia has proven to be an overwhelming success in college.

Oh, it's Baltimore-Pittsburgh, I'm being told.

Oh, okay.

Baltimore Pittsburgh.

That's a good game.

Oh, yeah.

Really good game.

And so that'll happen.

The show starts at 12 Eastern, and then

more on Trevia will be at 1

o'clock Eastern tomorrow.

Second hour of the show.

So

make sure you tune in.

By the way, hopefully Glenn will be back tomorrow.

I'm not sure if his voice is returned or not.

No, man.

We'll see.

But

he's been pretty sick this week.

It'll teach him to go to California.

He gets sick every time he goes.

It'll teach him.

I don't know why he goes.

Every time.

Triple 8, 933, 93.

We still have more of the confirmation hearing of Brett Kavanaugh.

And as far as I know, they're still planning to hold the vote tomorrow.

So no matter what she says, they're going to vote on it tomorrow.

And they've got a special prosecutor that's asking her questions.

Then

the senators are also jumping in as well.

And so far, it's been mostly the Democrats.

Yeah, it just seems strange that they just keep cutting her off.

And really, that's, I mean, that's what they want to do, right?

I mean, they want to be able to just cut her off because it appeared that this Rachel Mitchell, who is the Arizona prosecutor, and she prosecutors, she's the head of their special victims division, handles both the sex crimes and family violence out there.

Obviously, she's on leave from that position right now, but she's going to question Brett Kavanaugh.

And, you know, she's been questioning Christine Ford as well.

And it seems like she's trying to get to some points, you know, as a prosecutor would.

She's questioning.

Some of the questions seem benign, but she wants to set up to get to a point.

And as soon as she gets close to setting up that point, the Democrats jump in.

Yeah.

You got Patrick Leahy and all these other.

Right now it's Sheldon Whitehouse from Rhode Island.

They're just trying to jump in and help her with her credibility.

Amazing, yeah.

And to accuse the Republicans of doing something unfair and treating this process badly,

we'll see how it goes over.

I'm not necessarily buying it right now, that's for sure.

You're not necessarily buying it.

I'm not necessarily buying it, yeah.

Not necessarily buying it.

Yeah, we'll talk more about that

on Pat Gray Unleashed, and we'll have

lots of the audio clips for you tomorrow here back here on the Glenn Beck program as well.

We'll see you then.