Stella Assange

18m
As they lecture us endlessly about human rights in other countries, the Biden administration is trying to kill journalist Julian Assange for the crime of embarrassing the CIA. His wife Stella joins us from his extradition hearing.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Press play and read along

Runtime: 18m

Transcript

Speaker 1 Julian Assange has been locked away in one place or another for more than a decade. Julian Assange is so despised by elements within the permanent U.S.

Speaker 1 government that at one point, CIA Director Mike Pompeo discussed murdering him in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he was seeking asylum.

Speaker 1 Mike Pompeo has never been charged for that, which is a crime. Unelected bureaucrats can't just murder people they don't like.

Speaker 1 And he probably never will be charged with a crime.

Speaker 1 Virtually the entire ruling class in Washington is opposed to Julian Assange, and that's the reason that he has sat for years now in Belmarsh prison in London.

Speaker 1 Keep in mind, Julian Assange has not been charged with a crime in Great Britain, and yet he's being held there.

Speaker 1 So this fall, we went to Belmarsh and we asked Julian Assange, why do you think you're being held as the most wanted man in America without ever being charged with a real crime?

Speaker 1 Here's what he told us.

Speaker 1 We talked about why he is in prison. And my first question to him was, what do you think this is actually about since you haven't been accused of a crime?

Speaker 2 And he said something that really struck me.

Speaker 1 And I think having spent my life in Washington is absolutely right. He said, he first became famous when WikiLeaks published documents and videos that the U.S.

Speaker 1 government had kept secret from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They were gravely embarrassing to the Pentagon.

Speaker 1 But that wasn't the red line. The red line was several years later when WikiLeaks published information about surveillance by the CIA.

Speaker 1 And so I asked him directly, are you aware of anyone being harmed or killed on the basis of information that he published? He said, of course not.

Speaker 2 And he said it in a sincere way.

Speaker 1 Like, by the way, I think if people were killed because of of his publishing, because of the stories that he put online, he would feel bad about it. I mean, he seems like a humane person.

Speaker 1 He withheld information about CA because he didn't want to get people hurt. He famously published the contents of Hillary Clinton's email account.
I asked him, when you...

Speaker 1 published these emails, did you realize how powerful Hillary Clinton was?

Speaker 1 We had a conversation about that and I said, looking back, you know, do you regret doing that? He goes,

Speaker 1 honestly, it was fun.

Speaker 1 You'll notice that Julian Assange was not in that clip. That was a recap of our conversation with Julian Assange.
And the reason we did that was they wouldn't allow us to interview him on camera.

Speaker 1 So not only are they holding him, they hope until he dies, in a maximum security prison, but they're also preventing him from telling his own story to the world. All of this is a crime.

Speaker 1 Every person running for president of the United States should be forced to answer the question, will you pardon Julian Assange if he ever winds up on American soil?

Speaker 1 So far, no one has been forced to answer that question. We hope that will change.
The woman you saw in the clip is Julian Assange's wife, Stella.

Speaker 1 She has been his greatest advocate in the free world, and she is now leading the effort to stop his extradition to the United States, where he would wind up in a Supermax prison, never be heard from again until he dies.

Speaker 1 She is a lawyer, a human rights activist, and we're honored to have her join. us now.
Stella Assange, thank you so much for coming on.

Speaker 1 Can you give us an update, because I know this is taking place right now, it's in progress currently, what the status of this extradition hearing is?

Speaker 3 Well, look, we've just been in court for two days, and this decision could be the final one.

Speaker 3 We didn't know when we were coming into it yesterday whether we would have a decision today.

Speaker 3 And if the UK decides in favor of the U.S., then it will put Julian on a plane to the U.S. I mean, that is how imminent it is.
So, really,

Speaker 3 it's a very, very high-risk moment for Julian. And what happened during

Speaker 3 these two days is that

Speaker 3 the two judges said that they would withhold their decision until, well, they haven't set a date, but at least a week.

Speaker 3 And so we don't know what will happen next.

Speaker 3 It remains the case that if he loses this round, then that's it in the UK. There's no further possibility for appeal.

Speaker 3 He can try to go to the European Court of Human Rights, but last year,

Speaker 3 only one application to the European Court of Human Rights to stop an extradition or deportation was granted out of 63 applications. So it's really just in extremely rare cases.

Speaker 3 Of course, we say this is one of them. This is one where there would be irreparable harm.

Speaker 3 And of course, the European Court of Human Rights should stop an extradition if the the UK finds against him, but it's not a given. So Julian could be on U.S.
soil within a matter of weeks.

Speaker 3 That's still the case.

Speaker 1 Aaron Powell, Jr.: I'm confused by the role of the UK in this. As far as I understand, he's never been charged with a crime in the United Kingdom.

Speaker 1 And yet the UK government is holding him, holding a journalist, without charging him. I mean, this is what we accuse Russia and Iran and North Korea of doing.

Speaker 1 Why are British politicians degrading their own system and their history on behalf of the United States government? I feel like I'm missing something here.

Speaker 3 Well,

Speaker 3 this is the default state of affairs. The UK views itself as a lapdog.
I mean, it was obvious in court at one point. One of the judges asked the U.S.,

Speaker 3 well, if

Speaker 3 your argument is that if the Home Secretary sees that there's that the US issued this extradition request

Speaker 3 and that it's wrong on the face of it, that she wouldn't be able to do anything. And

Speaker 3 the US lawyers said, yeah, that's precisely right. It's completely lopsided.
The US can do whatever it wants, basically. And that was part of their arguments in court.

Speaker 3 I mean, not to get too much into the weeds of the court proceedings, but basically what they were saying was, you have to take the statements of these prosecutors at face value.

Speaker 3 You don't want to offend the United States, our ally.

Speaker 3 You would be implying that the prosecutors were lying, and of course that would never be the case. So they were trying to convince the court that they should just take it all at face value.

Speaker 3 And of course, inside the courtroom, it's like they're running two parallel cases. I mean,

Speaker 3 we're running

Speaker 3 the case that the true reality, which is that Julian's a journalist that exposed the wrongdoing of the country that's trying to extradite him, and the US is just trying to attack Julian with all sorts of nonsense.

Speaker 3 The UK is a willing participant. Of course, his imprisonment

Speaker 3 has gone for so long. He's been

Speaker 3 in Belmarsh high security prison for almost five years, but before that, in the embassy

Speaker 3 in the Ecuadorian Embassy in the heart of London. And during this time,

Speaker 3 when he was in the embassy, it was was surrounded by British police. They were spending something like

Speaker 3 millions and millions, I think it was five million pounds a year, on surrounding the embassy. And he was not charged with the crime at the time.

Speaker 3 It was a show of force. And of course, it was a show of force on behalf

Speaker 3 by this British police, but to show

Speaker 3 the United States that they were, you know, that

Speaker 3 they were showing their allegiance, basically. And that's how we've had this this lawlessness for over a decade to hound Julian and to kind of send a a signal.
And

Speaker 3 his imprisonment in Belmarsh, you know, is part of a game that they play, that the US says, well, the UK is keeping him. It's not really us.
He's not on US soil.

Speaker 3 And the UK goes, well, it's not really us because this is a US extradition request, and he's been there for almost five years. And so they play this game.
And they, you know,

Speaker 3 he's no one's responsibility. And it's just,

Speaker 3 it's a game that they've been playing for years and years.

Speaker 2 Hate to brag, but we're pretty confident this show is the most vehemently pro-dog podcast you're ever going to see. We can take or leave some people, but dogs are non-negotiable.
They are the best.

Speaker 2 They really are our best friends. And so for that reason, we're thrilled to have a new partner called Dutch Pet.
It's the fastest-growing pet telehealth service.

Speaker 2 Dutch.com is on a mission to create what you need, what you actually need, affordable quality veterinary care anytime, no matter where you are. They will get your dog or cat what you need immediately.

Speaker 2 It's offering an exclusive discount, Dutch is, for our listeners. You get 50 bucks off your vet care per year.
Visit Dutch.com slash Tucker to learn more. Use the code Tucker for $50 off.

Speaker 2 That is an unlimited vet visit, $82 a year, $82 a year. We actually use this.
Dutch has vets who can handle any pet under any circumstance in a 10-minute call. It's pretty amazing, actually.

Speaker 2 You never have to leave your house. You don't have to throw the dog in the truck.
No wasted time waiting for appointments. No wasted money on clinics or visit fees.

Speaker 2 Unlimited visits and follow-ups for no extra cost, plus free shipping on all products for up to five pets. It sounds amazing like it couldn't be real, but it actually is real.

Speaker 2 Visit dutch.com slash Tucker to learn more. Use the code Tucker for 50 bucks off your veterinary care per year.

Speaker 2 Your dogs, your cats, and your wallet will thank you.

Speaker 4 A incredible nutritional supplement called Immuno 150 is now available to the public.

Speaker 4 It contains 13 vitamins, 17 herbs, 18 amino acids, 17 antioxidants, 9 exotic fruits, COQ10, turmeric, and 70 plant-derived colloidal minerals.

Speaker 4 It may be the best health supplement in the world because of its 70 minerals. There's nothing like this amazing product.

Speaker 4 It supports the body with everything it needs to become healthy and stay healthy.

Speaker 4 Immuno150 contains seven times more minerals and many more vitamins and enzymes than found in foods and most nutritional supplements.

Speaker 4 Immuno150 can be ordered from Amazon or Walmart. Or call 844-519-3400.
That's 844-519-3400 Or visit the website imuna150.com. That's I-M-M-U-N-O-150.com.

Speaker 1 Does it, I know you live there, but you follow American politics.

Speaker 1 Was it surprising to you that Mike Pompeo, the neocon former CIA director who plotted to murder your husband, who had not been charged with anything in the U.S. at that point,

Speaker 1 that he was allowed to continue to be prominent in the United States? He ran for president after that.

Speaker 1 And no one in the American media said anything about it, really, with a few exceptions, but no one even mentioned that. You tried to murder your husband.
What did you think of that?

Speaker 3 Well, I think the CIA is a rogue organization that everyone on every level of the U.S.

Speaker 3 politics is

Speaker 3 terrified of.

Speaker 3 And they are trained to assassinate. They are trained to

Speaker 3 fabricate information and place it in the media and conduct propaganda warfare and

Speaker 3 to

Speaker 3 overthrow

Speaker 3 governments and so on.

Speaker 3 And

Speaker 3 not just abroad, it seems that there's a credible case that they've done so domestically too. I mean looking at this objectively, you think, well, what on earth is this? You know, there's a whole

Speaker 3 spiel about, you know,

Speaker 3 US democracy and so on.

Speaker 3 And the CIA is an agency that has

Speaker 3 caused all sorts of trouble for many countries around the world, but also domestically,

Speaker 3 they are a force for destabilization and compromise.

Speaker 3 And Mike Pompeo's ability to

Speaker 3 move around Washington without consequence, I don't think is because of his,

Speaker 3 I don't know, attractiveness to the Washington circles, but rather

Speaker 3 he's seen as a dangerous person. But, you know, he tried to run for president, and that didn't go very well.
And he wrote a book, and no one bought it except for his pack or whatever.

Speaker 3 So there's that.

Speaker 3 But yeah, he's a dangerous individual. And

Speaker 3 even within the CIA, I mean, we know this story about Julian and the murder plot because people within his organization said that he had lost the plot, that he had become obsessed with Julian, that he wanted to kill Julian,

Speaker 3 and that he was discussing it in the White House and so on. So that means that there was

Speaker 3 internal

Speaker 3 disagreement about his obsession.

Speaker 3 And

Speaker 3 that's a

Speaker 3 sign of hope, of course, within these organizations. There's always

Speaker 3 different types of people with different levels of integrity and commitment to the Constitution and so on. And the fact that many of them then spoke to these

Speaker 3 investigative journalists and

Speaker 3 exposed the

Speaker 3 crazy Pompeo

Speaker 3 murder plot is

Speaker 3 commendable, and

Speaker 3 I'm personally very, very thankful to them that they said something,

Speaker 3 not just because of the fact that we've been able to introduce it in court, but because

Speaker 3 it shows that it goes against

Speaker 3 very basic

Speaker 3 rules of integrity, and

Speaker 3 that this obsession with Julian that Pompeo had is part of

Speaker 3 a serious collapse, even within the CIA, that occurred during this time.

Speaker 1 Yeah, he is a dangerous person. He should be in prison.
And it's just striking that so few journalists ask him about that. None, so far as I know.

Speaker 1 So tell me, if your husband is extradited to the United States,

Speaker 1 do you think there's any chance he'll receive a presidential pardon?

Speaker 3 Any president who looks at this case and understands how it is a

Speaker 3 danger to the future of the U.S.,

Speaker 3 not just the Constitution, but the political culture that there has been in the United States that has been built on openness and a vibrant culture of

Speaker 3 opposition to centralized power,

Speaker 3 all of that will go out the window with this case. So any president who actually values these traditional

Speaker 3 constitutional protections should

Speaker 3 free Julian in

Speaker 3 whatever

Speaker 3 form that takes. If it's a pardon, then

Speaker 3 I welcome it. Frankly, I don't care how he's freed.
He just needs to be freed.

Speaker 3 The

Speaker 3 corruption and the lawlessness around Julian's case, it's politically motivated, it's rotten to the core.

Speaker 3 All of that is self-evident. And

Speaker 3 whatever happens, as long as Julian's free,

Speaker 3 you know, everything else is secondary as far as I'm concerned.

Speaker 1 And my last question, how is he doing, to the extent you can characterize it, physically and psychologically?

Speaker 3 Well, he's not doing well. He wasn't even attending these hearings, and this is

Speaker 3 the decisive hearing for Julian. As I said, if he loses this round, and we don't know yet if he's lost,

Speaker 3 then he'll be put on a plane to the United States,

Speaker 3 unless we can prevent it some other way. But

Speaker 3 he wasn't even attending, not even in person, not even over video link. He was able to call his lawyers during the hearing, so he was following what was happening in court.

Speaker 3 But if he hadn't been kept in Belmarsh High Security prison

Speaker 3 during the past five years, he wouldn't be in this state of deterioration and decline. He would have, of course, have attended his own hearing,

Speaker 3 especially one like this. And I think it's...

Speaker 3 should be a wake-up call that Julian's life

Speaker 3 is at risk, that every day he spends in prison is a day that his health deteriorates. I mean, five years inside that prison, many people don't survive it.

Speaker 3 There have been many people in Belmarsh who have committed suicide during this time, including a friend of Julian's who was

Speaker 3 also inside the whom he met in the prison and who became a friend.

Speaker 3 And you know, it's it's a harsh environment and he's under enormous pressure. And he he's

Speaker 3 he knows that the United States is the country that's plotted his assassination. So, like,

Speaker 3 the stakes could not be higher.

Speaker 3 But he knows there's a lot of support out there.

Speaker 3 He knows I'm doing this interview with Tucker, and he knows there's a lot of support. So, that is also

Speaker 3 something that keeps him afloat. He's a fighter.
And

Speaker 3 I think,

Speaker 3 you know, I think the world's waking up. I've seen a lot of support, actually.
I've seen a lot of attention this time around.

Speaker 3 The press is, I think, starting to realize what the implications are and how serious this is, and that it's not just about Julian, that it's actually

Speaker 3 threatening the press's ability to do its job in a very, very

Speaker 3 real way, especially the press that does the most important work, the one that makes those in power

Speaker 3 feel uncomfortable and worried about their future careers and freedom.

Speaker 1 Yeah, not many of those left, but some. Stella Sanchez, thank you so much for taking this time and Godspeed.

Speaker 3 Thank you, Tucker.

Speaker 1 Thank you.