Alex Berenson

Speaker 1 In 2002, you may remember, all the smart people in Washington assured us, in fact commanded us to believe that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, chem, bio, maybe nuclear.

Speaker 1 And the next year, on the basis of those claims, we invaded Iraq. But it turns out those claims were false.
Saddam did not possess those stockpiles. But here's the interesting thing.

Speaker 1 The people who told us that, who commanded us to believe them, never apologized. There was no contrition.
There was certainly no punishment.

Speaker 1 And because there wasn't, those people continue to ascend the hierarchy within Washington. They now run the federal government.

Speaker 1 And as a result of that, these same unwise people have led us down the same unwise paths again and again in the 20 years since. So that doesn't work as a management strategy.

Speaker 1 Letting people get away with massive screw-ups and then promoting them. You'd hate to see something like that happen after COVID.

Speaker 1 You would hate to see the people responsible for the lockdowns and the vaccine strategy dividing the nation on the basis of medical status. You'd hate to see those people go unpunished.

Speaker 1 Indeed, be rewarded. And so in an effort to prevent that from happening, we're going to speak today to someone who called it right and was not rewarded for it.
In fact, was reviled for it.

Speaker 1 but hasn't stopped. His name is Alex Berenson.
He joins us on set now. Alex Berenson, great to see you.

Speaker 2 Good to see you, Tagra.

Speaker 1 I think the guilty guilty should be punished, not mercilessly, but fairly, in the way that you would spank a child, and that the virtuous should be rewarded. And on this topic, you are the virtuous.

Speaker 1 So I just want to frame this conversation around a conversation that we had in January of 2022.

Speaker 1 And that conversation was described by the Washington Post as the most dishonest and dangerous segment ever to air on our show. Here's what it looked like.

Speaker 3 I have not said this to you before because I'm pretty careful and I'm pretty careful with the data, but these vaccines, these mRNA vaccines, the mRNA COVID vaccines need to be withdrawn from the market now.

Speaker 3 No one should get them. No one should get boosted.
No one should get double boosted. They are a dangerous and ineffective product at this point against Omicron.

Speaker 3 The spike that they make your body make that you then produce antibodies to is not the Omicron spike.

Speaker 3 And earlier today, Tony Fauci said, we're not going to give people monoclonal antibody products, the first generation products, because they don't work against the Omicron spike.

Speaker 3 The same logic applies to these mRNA vaccines and giving people boosters, even if in the very short term it knocks down infection rates, there's a boomerang effect.

Speaker 3 And that's what they're seeing in all these countries.

Speaker 1 Dishonest and dangerous. That was the Washington Post assessment of that clip right there.

Speaker 1 Given that it's been almost two years since you said that, how would you assess the accuracy of that statement?

Speaker 2 It was quite accurate.

Speaker 2 It turns out that the overall picture is a little bit worse than I thought because even when you give people, you know, what are quote-unquote

Speaker 2 targeted mRNA vaccines that are supposed to be targeted to the new variants, which is what we're, you know, the strategy we follow now, those don't really work very well in terms of making your body produce antibodies to the new variants either.

Speaker 2 So there's really no mRNA product that you can give at this point that is going to be useful.

Speaker 2 probably at all, certainly for more than a couple of months. mRNAs also come with side effects that look worse than they did at that time when I said that to you in January 2022.

Speaker 2 And there's something that we didn't know about at all, which is really the biggest, to me, long-term risk with the mRNAs, which is that they appear to make your body produce a kind of antibody that it normally only produces in response to an allergen, like bee venom.

Speaker 2 There's a specific subclass, it's called the IgG4 antibody, that people who've been repeatedly given mRNA, it looks like three shots is sort of where the where the switch comes on.

Speaker 2 If they're then infected, a number of these people will produce this IgG4 in volume. And frankly, I would say even immunologists and virologists have no idea what that means long term.
Now,

Speaker 2 I don't want to overstate the risks here because we don't know what they are. And Omicron is very mild in general for most people.
Most people shake it off

Speaker 2 after a few days, certainly a couple weeks, even if they're not particularly healthy. But this is a real risk.

Speaker 1 Has there ever been an effective and safe mRNA product that you're aware of?

Speaker 2 No, no, I mean,

Speaker 2 these products were nowhere near reaching the market before COVID.

Speaker 2 They were rushed onto the market supposedly as the answer to COVID in December of 2020 on the basis of large, let's acknowledge it, very large clinical trials, but clinical trials that had only lasted a few weeks, only generated a few weeks of safety data after the second dose.

Speaker 2 They appeared to work in early 2021. They certainly do cause the body to make a lot of spike protein and thus a lot of antibodies to the spike protein.

Speaker 2 And in the short term, you get a decrease in infections.

Speaker 2 To me, the real,

Speaker 2 I'll say mistake, because I don't want to...

Speaker 2 you know, I don't want to sort of impute anything more than that, but let's say the real mistake was made in the summer of 2021 when it was very clear that the vaccines were not working as promised and infections were starting to go up.

Speaker 2 And we saw this in, you know, we talked about this a lot in the summer of 2021.

Speaker 2 We saw this in Israel in the summer of 2021 before anywhere else because Israel had vaccinated more of its population more quickly than anybody else with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.

Speaker 2 And so what happened was instead of everybody pausing and saying, you know, let's take a breath here and let's see what we might need to do next,

Speaker 2 should we try a different type type of vaccine?

Speaker 2 Do we need to move away from vaccines? Because this is a respiratory virus that mutates quickly. And maybe that's not the, maybe an intranasal vaccine.
Maybe there's something we can do.

Speaker 2 The Biden administration, and most of the rest of the world, but really led by the Biden administration, said two things. We're going to give people a third shot, a booster, which had not been

Speaker 2 which had been tested on, I believe at that time, a couple of thousand people worldwide.

Speaker 2 And there was no, not even medium-term safety data about the booster.

Speaker 2 And that upset two of the senior scientists at the FDA who regulate vaccines so much that they announced their retirement within a few days after the Biden administration said we're going to do this booster in mid-August.

Speaker 2 And the second thing, which to me is even more incomprehensible and wrong, was they said we're going to have mandates.

Speaker 2 We're going to force essentially all working age Americans that we can reach to be vaccinated.

Speaker 1 Once it was clear it didn't work.

Speaker 2 Once it was clear it didn't work as advertised. At best you're going to get a few months of protection.

Speaker 1 So that's the point at which what I'm willing to believe was a mistake looks much more like a crime.

Speaker 2 It was an aggressive policy decision. And

Speaker 2 one of the things that I've concluded is that one reason the Biden administration may have done this is because Uncle Joe, as I like to call him, looks so terrible in the aftermath of the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Speaker 2 So

Speaker 2 that's the other thing that's happening in the summer of 2021. We leave, and a month later, the Taliban are in Kabul, and there are Afghans hanging off of airplanes.

Speaker 2 And the United States looks as bad as it has since probably Jimmy Carter and 1980s, in 1980 airline. Okay.

Speaker 2 So Joe Biden needs to prove he's doing something.

Speaker 2 Now, the reason that I've reached this conclusion is Let's take the Biden administration's theory about the vaccines at face value, which is not enough Americans are being vaccinated.

Speaker 2 And that's why we're having this Delta spike. And the unvaccinated may be a danger to the vaccinated, which, by the way, is not a great argument for vaccines if it's true.

Speaker 2 But so you're the Biden administration. You think you've got to get Americans vaccinated.
Okay, who dies from COVID, Tucker? Very old people and people who are really sick if they're younger.

Speaker 2 The vaccine mandates were workplace mandates. They only covered Americans Americans who were healthy enough to be in the workforce.

Speaker 2 Almost definitionally, those people are at very, very low risk from COVID. The people making this policy were not stupid.
They knew that.

Speaker 2 They had to know that even if the vaccines worked as advertised, which they knew they didn't work as advertised, you weren't going to be able to reach whatever tiny rump of unvaccinated elderly people there were with these mandates.

Speaker 1 And there were few, very few unvaccinated elderly people.

Speaker 2 That's one of the great sort of lies of the

Speaker 2 elite media, is that there were a lot of unvaccinated elderly people in red states. It's not true.
The differential is in people mostly under 65.

Speaker 2 So even if the vaccines had worked as advertised, and even if the mandates hadn't been unconstitutional and wrong, they wouldn't have reached the people.

Speaker 2 If you'd wanted to save people using the Biden administration's theory, it should have been, if you want a social security check, you need to be vaccinated.

Speaker 2 That's what would have gotten whatever

Speaker 2 few unvaccinated elderly people there were. And so when you make a decision that's that bad, even taking your incorrect policy assumptions into account, there's got to be another reason for it.

Speaker 1 Do we know, before we get to what that other reason might be,

Speaker 1 who made that decision? Who drove that decision?

Speaker 2 We don't. We don't.
We know that. For most of early 2021, the Biden administration was saying no mandates, no vaccine passports.

Speaker 2 You know, there was this discussion of private vaccine passports, of state vaccine passports, a few states.

Speaker 1 And they attacked anyone who suggested that they might substitute, including me.

Speaker 2 I remember that very well. That's correct.
Meanwhile, the states were sort of pushing them.

Speaker 2 There was this idea the federal government's going to be hands-off, and we're certainly not going to require mandates. I mean, Biden said that explicitly.

Speaker 2 And at some point in July 2021, this started to be discussed. And in a matter of weeks, without a congressional hearing, without

Speaker 2 a policy roundtable, without anything, it went from, this is not something we're going to do.

Speaker 2 We're just going to, you know, we're going going to give people a shot and a beer. There are all these sort of ridiculous theory,

Speaker 2 you know, ridiculous incentive programs, which to me were completely wrong, too, because you're essentially trying to bribe people into taking a pharmaceutical product, but those are better than mandates.

Speaker 2 It went from, we're never going to do this, to we're doing it. We're doing it to, I mean, Biden didn't say punish, but he did say, I'm frustrated with the unvaccinated.

Speaker 1 It was a pandemic of the unvaccinated. It was a pandemic.
He blamed Americans for a Chinese virus.

Speaker 2 Yes, he did that too.

Speaker 2 So in this period of weeks, this enormously important consequential policy decision, both from a health point of view and frankly from a constitutional civil liberties point of view,

Speaker 2 got pushed through with no public discussion at all. Biden just comes out on September 9th and says, I am going to impose workplace mandates.

Speaker 1 You think this was an effort to divert attention away from a foreign policy failure?

Speaker 2 I think that's part of the reason why. I think they wanted to show him doing something.
Something other than sitting at an empty table in the situation room looking at screens.

Speaker 1 Wouldn't it have been better to do something constructive, useful, life-affirming?

Speaker 2 Is that how it works?

Speaker 1 No, but like, here's a massive screw-up in Southwest Asia. We're going to have a massive screw-up here, so you don't think about it.

Speaker 2 It was also very popular, not just with the Democratic base, with the media.

Speaker 2 People,

Speaker 2 remember, for the previous six months, there had been the unvaccinated are stupid, the unvaccinated. Then it became the unvaccinated can get you sick.
And so there was. They're dirty.

Speaker 1 They can kill you. That's dirty.
And they deserve to die.

Speaker 2 There were ethicists seriously arguing whether unvaccinated people deserved to be sort of pushed to the back of the triage line if the hospitals overflowed. Which, of course, they never.

Speaker 1 They were denied organ transplants. Yeah.
I interviewed them. That is also true.
Yes. Because they weren't vaccinated.

Speaker 2 So this was a popular decision, too. Never, you know, he got to do something popular.
Yep.

Speaker 1 So in, so now, I mean, it's almost hard to hear all this. Maybe that's one of the reasons most people aren't talking about it because it's so painful to hear it.
But has there been any

Speaker 1 concerted effort by big media organizations to figure out what exactly happened and to look at this honestly?

Speaker 2 No,

Speaker 2 absolutely. I'm laughing because, you know, for two years I've been saying to people, look, you don't want to, you don't want to, you know, you don't want to be smeared the way I was smeared? Fine.

Speaker 2 You don't even want to write about vaccine efficacy? Fine. Here's a story you can write.
Literally billions of vaccine doses, mRNA vaccine doses, were paid for and never used. It was a

Speaker 2 billions. By my best guess, about 5 billion doses were made by Pfizer and Moderna and about 3 billion were used.
And all those other doses were paid for.

Speaker 2 or will be paid for when there may be a few more still to be delivered in the next couple of years to the EU.

Speaker 2 So that's 2 billion doses, probably about $40 billion, just literally poured down the drain. Now, that's an estimate, but it's an estimate sort of based on the publicly available data.

Speaker 2 Because what happened was

Speaker 2 in,

Speaker 2 so remember,

Speaker 2 the initial course is two doses.

Speaker 2 In April of 2021, the J and J vaccine, which is a different,

Speaker 2 it's a different delivery system. It's not mRNA.
It's a different biotechnology, comes under pressure. People, you know, it can cause this very unusual

Speaker 2 but terrible side effect where you get blood clots in your brain. And

Speaker 2 no one wants blood clots in their brain. So J and J,

Speaker 2 which was viewed sort of as the... an easier vaccine to administer, only one dose, didn't need to be refrigerated the same way.

Speaker 2 There was this idea for, let's say, for homeless people or for people who maybe you were going to have a hard time convincing to take a second dose, or for poorer countries where the refrigeration was an issue, J ⁇ J was going to be a good alternative.

Speaker 2 J ⁇ J sort of came off the table after April 2021 and there was this huge push. We're going to get everybody in the world two mRNA doses.

Speaker 2 And then the booster, we're going to get everybody in the world three RNA doses.

Speaker 2 Even after it became obvious to me that this wasn't working, there were the fights in the fall of 2021 were Should the U.S. get a booster before some African country gets its first dose, right?

Speaker 2 This is such a great technology.

Speaker 2 Who's going to get these supplies? So the companies ramped up and they made a ton and they sold it.

Speaker 2 They basically said to the governments that wanted it, if you want it, you've got to pay for it before we make it.

Speaker 2 Not like you have to cut the whole check, but you have to agree contractually.

Speaker 1 The down payment on the MRNA.

Speaker 2 Exactly. You want it.
You agree that when it's done, we deliver it, you take it. And so

Speaker 2 that's what the governments agreed to. Not just the U.S.
This This was the EU. And then there was this thing called COVAX

Speaker 2 where the companies sold vaccine to poorer countries that the US paid for in some cases,

Speaker 2 or other organizations paid for. Okay, the point is

Speaker 2 after late 2021, after it became clear that the boosters had stopped working, demand basically fell off a cliff. People said, you know,

Speaker 2 fool me twice, shame on you.

Speaker 2 But I'm not taking a second booster. and ever since the spring of 2022 there's been a basically

Speaker 2 you know outside of the like the deep blue states even in Europe there's very little demand and pediatric demand so low so the point is these companies they'd ramped up they'd made it and they they said we have contracts with you you're gonna pay us and the government's paid

Speaker 1 Why didn't the government say, I'm sorry, your product doesn't work?

Speaker 2 Well, that's not, that was one of the contract outs. There was no, there was.

Speaker 1 So you're saying that all of this proceeded for a full year in the face of overwhelming evidence that it didn't work and that it harmed people because it was a political diversion. That may be true.

Speaker 1 I have no way of knowing. I do, however, have sympathy for the people who say, wait a second, there's something else going on here.
I mean, and I know they're easy to mock, but like.

Speaker 1 It takes a lot to take attention away from Afghanistan.

Speaker 2 Right. No, I mean,

Speaker 2 I wouldn't say the evidence.

Speaker 2 the evidence that the vaccines don't work has been around since you know depending on

Speaker 2 depending on how you want to argue it's the summer or fall of 2021. The evidence that they're dangerous

Speaker 2 is slower to develop and the risks are more subtle than the people.

Speaker 1 I knew someone who died of a heart attack in January of 2021 and was told, and his family was told by the doctors that that's vaccine death right there.

Speaker 1 I know two other people who I'm really close to who had heart attacks after taking it And that's just my little world, which is very small.

Speaker 2 So like,

Speaker 2 it's definitely out there. So what people would say is people have heart attacks.

Speaker 1 Yeah, but not, I mean, I've lived here for 54 years. I've never, you know, had three people I know have heart attacks in like a short period of time, days after taking the vaccine.

Speaker 2 The reason that I push back on this is if the danger was more obvious, it would be easier to make the case that I'm making that this technology is, you know, is not safe or effective. Right?

Speaker 2 Like, I See, this is where I guess I'm a little different than maybe than you are. I don't believe that this entire regulatory apparatus would ignore screaming danger signs.

Speaker 2 And I don't believe doctors would. I don't.
I think that the problem is that the danger signs.

Speaker 1 But it seems like there are screaming danger signs. I mean, maybe I'm just totally imagining it.
I'm not an epidemiologist, but I mean, that's a lot for the small group of people I know.

Speaker 1 And moreover, it does seem like there has been a spike in unexplained death.

Speaker 2 I mean, so let me give you a counterexample, which is there's a military, you know, the military obviously was very highly vaccinated and the military reports its healthcare statistics

Speaker 2 by year, like,

Speaker 2 you know, pretty, pretty granular, at a pretty granular level. And it, and I've looked at those, okay, because once I found that, I was like, wow, if there's a signal, it's going to pop out here.
Yes.

Speaker 2 And it doesn't pop out. Okay.

Speaker 2 By the way, I'm not saying that the vaccines can't can't kill people that they don't have autoimmune that they don't cause autoimmune problems in some people that they don't cause strokes in some people that they we now have evidence they cause seizures in some little kids which

Speaker 2 which

Speaker 2 which the i wrote that story about three weeks ago in the on my on on reported truths on my on my website or you know on my sub stack and two about a week later the new york times wrote the story and they quoted people saying quoted doctors saying oh well you know the vaccines are going to cause fevers fevers in some kids.

Speaker 2 So we would expect this. You would expect this? You didn't tell any parents this until the FDA published a paper where everyone, where they had to admit it.
So this is,

Speaker 2 I mean, I guess I'm arguing against myself. Yeah, you are, pretty persuasively.

Speaker 2 But, but there are signals. There are things that are turned on.

Speaker 1 Let me just, so like, why would it fall to you

Speaker 1 to look at the data? Why would it fall to me to like make guesses about where is the national federally led effort to get to the bottom of the effects of these vaccines on the entire population?

Speaker 1 There isn't one.

Speaker 1 How can there not be?

Speaker 2 I'm just a reporter.

Speaker 1 No, I'm serious. Like, where's the CDC?

Speaker 2 The CDC is promoting these. They're still promoting them for children.

Speaker 2 For a virus that can't touch healthy children, that all kids basically have had by now.

Speaker 2 And when I say can't touch, I'm almost willing to say that with no, you know,

Speaker 2 you know, again, one in a million, right? There's a slight, slight chance. But it can't touch healthy children.
Every kid has had it.

Speaker 2 And we know now these vaccines can cause, or there's a strong signal that they can cause seizures. What are they doing? All over the rest of the world, they're not doing this.
Okay. So

Speaker 2 I don't know what we're doing. Okay.
I don't. I think

Speaker 2 I tend to believe policy gets set, people fall in love with it. they just won't admit they've made a mistake.

Speaker 1 So there are no ethical people at CDC, like none?

Speaker 1 I mean, because what you're describing, I'm just using your descriptions, which are highly informed since you do this for a living. You're describing like something that's horrifying and evil.

Speaker 1 And like, why doesn't just the facts that you stated? I'd say that's evil. So where are the CDC employees who are saying, like, I'm not participating in this?

Speaker 2 So I don't know. I guess what they're saying is

Speaker 2 no kids are getting the shots anyway, so it doesn't matter. So we're just going to,

Speaker 2 here's what they say publicly, which is, yes, we know there's a risk differential here. We know that this is much more dangerous to older people, COVID, I mean.

Speaker 2 But if we offer differential recommendations, that will confuse people because

Speaker 2 this they do think. They do think everyone is stupid.

Speaker 2 So

Speaker 2 if we offer differential recommendations, it will make the old people less likely to take it.

Speaker 2 If we tell a two-year-old, the the mother of a two-year-old not to have her kid get it, then it makes an 80-year-old less likely to take it. And we want the 80-year-old to take it.

Speaker 2 That's basically the excuse they use. I admit it doesn't sound like a very good excuse.
No, it doesn't.

Speaker 1 It doesn't. And you do feel like there's, again, something else going on here.
What is this doing to the population's attitudes about vaccines more broadly?

Speaker 2 Interestingly, it's not changing it as much as people on either side would say because Americans,

Speaker 2 I think, generally feel they've had good experiences with vaccines pre-mRNA. Now, of course, there's a group of Americans whose children developed autism and they blame that on the vaccines.

Speaker 2 I don't see strong evidence there, but I know that's a very controversial topic. I will say I don't see strong evidence there.
But in general, Americans,

Speaker 2 again, despite what both the anti-vax community and the sort of vaccine fanatic community says, have been generally over the years pretty willing to listen to the CDC's recommendations.

Speaker 2 Now there's some evidence that the mRNAs,

Speaker 2 what's happened with them has made overall vaccinations a little bit less common, but what it's really made is mRNA vaccinations a lot less common.

Speaker 2 So people, one of my core beliefs is that people are not stupid and people differentiate between these two new vaccines that came out from Pfizer and Moderna based on months of testing and were promised to fix COVID and didn't and everything else.

Speaker 1 But people may not be stupid, but doctors obviously are and unethical Because I know for myself, I would never go to a doctor who pushed mRNA vaccines. What does that say about you?

Speaker 1 If you're a doctor, it's your job to know what these things do. You had no idea, and you pushed them anyway.
So how many people are deciding, again, I'll speak for myself.

Speaker 1 I'm not going to any doctor who did that. I have contempt for those people.
I don't want to be around them. And it's totally changed my view of medicine.

Speaker 1 Are a lot of people reaching that conclusion, or am I just like in the insane

Speaker 2 10%?

Speaker 2 I think there's been a

Speaker 2 it's hard for me to, I haven't seen data on this. I will say this, and you know, know, my wife is a physician.
Yes.

Speaker 2 I think, and she never liked these vaccines, but I think that

Speaker 2 I think that doctors right now are not pushing these at all.

Speaker 2 But why is no one apologized? That's what I don't understand. No one ever apologized for anything, Tucker.

Speaker 1 But nothing gets, but this is science, and science is based on truth, period. That's what it is.
It's the pursuit of truth.

Speaker 1 And if we get something wrong, we admit it immediately, or else it's not science. But they're not admitting it immediately.
Therefore, it's not science.

Speaker 1 Therefore, it's like some weird witchcraft thing that i don't want anything to do with fair

Speaker 2 so what these people would say is in 2021 the vaccines did some good since then we don't know so much but they'll point to charts there's this one chart it's the bane of my existence that appears to show that vaccinated people you know die from covet even now at much lower rates than unvaccinated people The problem with that is the two groups are not comparable.

Speaker 2 Okay, this is, and I don't want to spend 15 minutes boring you and your audience with the science behind this, but the two groups are not comparable.

Speaker 2 The reason we do clinical trials, a clinical trial is an artificial

Speaker 2 experiment, but it generates the only data you can truly trust.

Speaker 2 Okay, you take two groups, you take a group of people, you split them in half, you have a computer, make sure that the two groups are completely equal or as close to complete.

Speaker 2 So, you know, if you're in one, then

Speaker 2 someone who's just like you in terms of smoking status and age and gender and history of heart disease, whatever, goes in the other group.

Speaker 2 You take a big group, you split them up,

Speaker 2 you give one group the vaccine or the drug, you give the other group a placebo, a sugar pill, or a saline shot. You follow them.
Nobody knows who got what. And at the end, you can say, okay,

Speaker 2 this benefit came from the vaccine or this injury, this safety problem came from the vaccine. You need that data.

Speaker 2 The truth is we never really got that data about the mRNAs because we blew up the clinical trials much too soon. And so we're all arguing on the basis of incomplete information.

Speaker 2 And the people, and the people who understand this are mostly on the pro-vaccine side.

Speaker 2 They mostly either indirectly or directly get money from Pfizer or the federal government or people with a giant stake in vaccines. And

Speaker 2 so I am arguing a lonely battle here. You certainly are.

Speaker 1 But where, okay, so leave the, and I should just remind our viewers who maybe haven't followed your career in the detail that I have, that you waited a long time before even addressing questions about vaccines.

Speaker 1 I mean, you originally were just pointing out the disparities between what they were claiming about COVID and what the data were showing, is I remember.

Speaker 2 Yes.

Speaker 1 I didn't even think you wanted to get into the vaccine stuff, but you kind of had no choice. Yes.
So you were not like some anti-vaxxer going back with Bobby Kennedy 30 years at all.

Speaker 1 So, but one common sense question that no one's ever adequately answered in my view is why weren't physicians in the public health community encouraging people to be healthier, especially when it became obvious like the first week that fat people were at a greater risk of dying?

Speaker 1 What could possibly account for their closing gyms,

Speaker 1 promoting obesity in the middle of the COVID pandemic?

Speaker 2 What is that?

Speaker 2 So the pandemic became an occasion for social scientists to try

Speaker 2 a lot of public health measures that they wanted to try.

Speaker 2 And, you know, one of those was sort of like,

Speaker 2 what signals are there that this is a serious illness? I mean, that was, I think, masking was a huge part of that, the push for masking.

Speaker 2 We don't want to stigmatize, right? So, although it's okay to stigmatize people who choose not to be vaccinated. Yeah, who smoke cigarettes or whatever.
Right.

Speaker 2 We don't want to stigmatize

Speaker 2 obese people, people who, you know, who don't take good care of themselves. So we're going to lie about where the risks are.
We're going to pretend that some 25-year-old is at real risk from COVID.

Speaker 2 And I think

Speaker 2 the other argument that they would make and did make at the time was, we think there's a real risk of hospital overrun. So if this spreads too quickly, remember, wait two weeks, flatten the curve.

Speaker 2 One of the things that I think wasn't widely understood was the people promoting that weren't saying we're not all going to get COVID because at the time they didn't realize how quickly they could rush a vaccine to market.

Speaker 2 Of course we all got COVID anyway because the vaccine didn't work. But the idea was we're going to get COVID over time so that you know when people, the hospitals won't be overrun.

Speaker 2 And like that was sort of the number one concern back in March 2020 was hospital over.

Speaker 2 So to do that you had to convince everyone to stay home in their view. You had to lock down everyone.
And so that meant you had to lie about who was at risk. That was the original sin.
Yes.

Speaker 2 The original sin of COVID was that. The original sin of the vaccines was pretending that they had been properly tested.

Speaker 1 Okay.

Speaker 1 I get all that. But it went beyond that.
I mean, they actively prevented people from getting in better physical shape, cardiovascular health.

Speaker 1 And then all the women's magazines, which are still influential,

Speaker 1 decided to put fat women on the cover and say, this is the new body ideal. And the soap companies, the makeup companies.

Speaker 1 This was clearly an orchestrated attempt to make people think it was okay to be fat in the middle of a pandemic that was killing fat people.

Speaker 1 So that's the point where I'm like, hmm, actually, they are trying to kill people. Because, like, what could, no, I'm serious.

Speaker 1 What could, if I, if I encourage my children to smoke cigarettes, maybe I'm trying to hurt them.

Speaker 2 Or maybe you're trying to sell cigarettes. Maybe if 60% of the country is fat and you're dove, you want to sell soap.

Speaker 1 Maybe, but, like, they'd never tried that before. There had never been a time.

Speaker 2 People Morris tried to sell cigarettes for a long time.

Speaker 1 Of course, but being fat, you know, no woman wants to be fat. And all the women's magazines spent decades telling women, you know, you shouldn't be fat.
That's where they don't want to be fat.

Speaker 1 And then during COVID, it's like, no, no, be fat.

Speaker 2 At the exact time where being fat could kill you. I think that trend was happening.
I see malice. Like, wow.

Speaker 2 I think that trend was happening before. I do.

Speaker 2 The

Speaker 2 DEI stuff on obesity. Which I agree.
Like, obesity is... Obesity is terrible for people in general.
I mean, even if it doesn't...

Speaker 1 Look, I'm not, I personally am not judging fatness at all.

Speaker 2 I'm just saying. No, but physically, it's terrible.

Speaker 1 It's not good for you, right? And for public health authorities to be promoting it and stopping people from getting on the treadmill, that's not the same thing.

Speaker 2 I don't know if they ever saw.

Speaker 2 They literally were. They were discouraging people from going.
Yes, they were closing gyms.

Speaker 1 But keeping liquor stores open. But keeping liquor stores open.
And we dispensaries.

Speaker 1 So that's the point where it's like, look, I'm not some kooky internet conspiracy guy, but how many signs do I need that you're trying to kill me before I say you're trying to kill me?

Speaker 2 I think people make bad decisions.

Speaker 1 Yeah, but they're all consistent. It's like, they're all pro-death.

Speaker 1 It's like, oh no, we're not going to spend any time working on therapeutics at all.

Speaker 2 Well, they did. They came up with one that didn't work at all, Remdesivir.

Speaker 1 But people were kind of trying all this different stuff and like the media immediately jumped, you can't do that. How dare you try something other than the vaccine?

Speaker 1 And then, you know, I interviewed this gym owner, Ian Smith,

Speaker 2 20 times.

Speaker 1 And he's like, I just want people to work out because that might help.

Speaker 1 Shut up, criminal. That's right.

Speaker 2 And so, I don't know. Like,

Speaker 1 I think it's important to be more like your dog. Your dog can't speak English.
He has no idea what you're saying. He just watches you and then he knows your intent.

Speaker 1 I'm watching them, and I can tell their intent, which is to kill me.

Speaker 2 What am I saying? Their intent is to make you feel good about yourself, even if it kills you.

Speaker 1 I don't see those as separate categories.

Speaker 2 They are, though. They are.
Yeah.

Speaker 2 I don't know. Don't you die? I don't know.
I don't know.

Speaker 1 Opioid OD.

Speaker 1 One feels good, the other doesn't, but they both kill me, right?

Speaker 2 Again, I.

Speaker 2 You're not going to get me to say it.

Speaker 2 No, I don't. Because I don't really believe you.

Speaker 1 Look, I don't understand what happened during COVID

Speaker 2 at all.

Speaker 1 And the last thing I'm going to do is going to speculate or say anything, you know, that I don't.

Speaker 2 You speculate all the time.

Speaker 1 I do, but on this, like, as to motive, it always makes me uncomfortable to speculate. Though, of course, I do do it, and I regret it every time I do it because you can't know another person's motive.

Speaker 1 But you can watch what they do.

Speaker 4 Hate to brag, but we're pretty confident this show is the most vehemently pro-dog podcast you're ever going to see. We can take or leave some people, but dogs are non-negotiable.
They are the best.

Speaker 4 They really are our best friends. And so for that reason, we're thrilled to have a new partner called Dutch Pet.
It's the fastest growing pet telehealth service.

Speaker 4 Dutch.com is on a mission to create what you need, what you actually need, affordable quality veterinary care anytime, no matter where where you are.

Speaker 4 They will get your dog or cat what you need immediately. It's offering an exclusive discount, Dutch is, for our listeners.
You get 50 bucks off your vet care per year.

Speaker 4 Visit Dutch.com slash Tucker to learn more. Use the code Tucker for $50 off.
That is an unlimited vet visit, $82 a year, $82 a year. We actually use this.

Speaker 4 Dutch has vets who can handle any pet under any circumstance in a 10-minute call. It's pretty amazing, actually.
You never have to leave your house. You don't have to throw the dog in the truck.

Speaker 4 No wasted time waiting for appointments. No wasted money on clinics or visit fees.
Unlimited visits and follow-ups for no extra cost, plus free shipping on all products for up to five pets.

Speaker 4 It sounds amazing like it couldn't be real, but it actually is real. Visit dutch.com slash Tucker to learn more.
Use the code Tucker for 50 bucks off, your veterinary care per year.

Speaker 4 Your dogs, your cats, and your wallet will thank you.

Speaker 5 At Blinds.com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you, your style, your space, your way.

Speaker 5 Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right.

Speaker 5 From free expert design help to our 100% satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows. Because at blinds.com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you.

Speaker 5 Black Friday deals are going on all month long. Save up to 45% off site-wide, plus an additional 10% off every order right now at blinds.com.

Speaker 4 Rules and restrictions apply.

Speaker 2 Now, I got something for you, Tucker. I'm ready.

Speaker 2 This is one of a kind.

Speaker 2 These are four of the great villains of COVID. Love that.
Here, I'm going to wear the camera. Next time you're shooting.

Speaker 1 You tell me what this says and what it means.

Speaker 2 Okay. Fauci and Gottlieb and Slavet and Borlay.
Now everyone knows who Tony Fauci is. The bottom guy's a veterinarian, I think.
He is.

Speaker 2 He's also the head of the world's largest, or what was the world's largest, largest in 2022 pharmaceutical company.

Speaker 2 Andy Slavet was the senior advisor for COVID response under the Biden administration in early 2021.

Speaker 2 And Scott Gottlieb is the former head of the FDA who left the FDA and three months, I believe three months of the day later, which was the earliest he could, joined the Pfizer board.

Speaker 2 where he is a senior board member of Pfizer. He also is on CNBC all the time,

Speaker 2 where he always manages to say something good about Pfizer's products.

Speaker 2 So

Speaker 2 three of these four men, not Tony Fauci, are defendants in my lawsuit against the Biden administration and Pfizer for their unconstitutional efforts to silence me and get me thrown off Twitter in 2021.

Speaker 1 So can I just,

Speaker 1 thank you for that. I will wear this with pride or without pants.

Speaker 1 But either way, I will have this on.

Speaker 2 It's one of a kind.

Speaker 1 It leads to my, to a question I've been wanting to ask you since we've had so many interviews over the years, but like

Speaker 1 two questions. One, you became very focused.
I mean, you were a successful novelist. Your books are in my shelves at home, actually.

Speaker 1 Former New York Times reporter, like you had this whole life that had nothing to do with any of this, and you just like basically threw it all away to go after this story.

Speaker 2 Why did you do that?

Speaker 1 And what have the effects been?

Speaker 2 I did it because I didn't have any choice. Because it's like you take one step and one step and one step.
I remember once being in Iraq. You don't have a choice.
You go write your novels.

Speaker 2 No, no, you don't have a choice. If you're a certain type of of person or a certain type of reporter.

Speaker 2 I was once in Iraq in 2004

Speaker 2 and I'm not a particularly physically courageous person, but it's a war zone.

Speaker 2 And I was talking to a colonel, a lieutenant colonel, who is a

Speaker 2 tough guy. And we were sort of out there.
And he said, this is just what you do.

Speaker 2 All of a sudden you're in the middle of it. Like you just take a step at a time and then there's kind of no going back.
And I pursued the story and the truth to the best of my ability.

Speaker 2 But you weren't even a reporter at the time. You've given up reporting and you're writing novels.
I'd always been a reporter.

Speaker 2 Even the novels would be better if they were a little bit less reported and a little bit more flights of fancy.

Speaker 2 That's my one regret as a novelist is that I could never, you know, not that I was, I mean, I'm writing about Islamic terror and, you know, in various, there are spy novels about modern events. But

Speaker 2 a really great novel, whatever the nominal category has some magic in it. And that's something hard for me to put in my novels.
I'm very fact-grounded. And so

Speaker 2 when, and I, you know, I write about this on Unreported Truths, like we talked a tiny bit about the, you know, the baby bust, which is something I'm now interested in

Speaker 2 because

Speaker 2 I look for stories that, you know, as an individual reporter who's not working for the New York Times, I can, you know, I can do in a, in a credible, reasonable way.

Speaker 2 You know, it'd be hard for me right now to go to Israel because I don't have a big organization backing me up if I get shot in the head or something.

Speaker 2 So these are, COVID, believe it or not, is very data-driven and is a story that

Speaker 2 I could follow. I look for stories where

Speaker 2 I think I can add something to the conversation because

Speaker 2 the mainstream media, usually for political reasons, doesn't want to report on it.

Speaker 2 And I look for stories that are important. And COVID obviously was the most important story.

Speaker 1 Do you look for stories that will

Speaker 1 make you super unpopular with everyone you've ever known during the course of your life?

Speaker 2 That's just an added bonus.

Speaker 2 Losing three-quarters of my friends

Speaker 2 and

Speaker 2 messing up my marriage was just an added bonus.

Speaker 1 But you kind of knew that.

Speaker 1 I don't mean to pick it an open wound, but you kind of knew that going in because anyone who asked, I mean, I remember the first couple posts you wrote on this. were greeted with ferocity.

Speaker 1 People were very angry.

Speaker 2 I don't like being told what I can and can't ask.

Speaker 1 That's a spirit.

Speaker 2 By

Speaker 2 anybody, and certainly not by the Biden administration or Pfizer.

Speaker 2 And

Speaker 2 this lawsuit,

Speaker 2 we have filed our initial suit. They have filed a motion to dismiss all three of which are the federal defendants.
Andy Slavet is his own defendant. And then

Speaker 2 Albert Borla, who's again the chairman of Pfizer, and Scott Gottlieb have their own lawyers.

Speaker 2 I guarantee you this is a good day for the law firms, right? But so they've tried to dismiss it. We've now filed a response to the motions to dismiss, which I think is very strong.

Speaker 2 And by the way, we're now asking for third-party discovery, meaning we want Twitter to turn over everything

Speaker 2 that Pfizer or the White House said about me. And Elon, I'm hoping, Elon, you'll hear this and you will tell your lawyers to do this and not fight the third-party subpoena.

Speaker 2 But so if we can get past the motions to dismiss, and I believe we can, we will get the discovery on what the White House and Pfizer were saying to each other about me and possibly somewhat more broadly in the summer of 2021 about the vaccines.

Speaker 2 And that,

Speaker 2 the world needs to know what was really going on, why everything changed, why the public attitudes towards vaccine skeptics got so much harsher.

Speaker 2 why there was a push for boosters, why there was a push for mandates.

Speaker 2 I'm not really exaggerating when I say that this lawsuit is maybe the only chance that we're ever going to have.

Speaker 1 Has anyone come up to you in your personal life to say, you know, congratulations, you've been vindicated. You took a lot of crap, but you turned out to be right?

Speaker 2 One person

Speaker 2 in my town has said to me, you know what, you were right about the lockdowns. No one's ever said it about the vaccines.
I think people just want to forget the vaccines.

Speaker 2 Most people were vaccinated, obviously.

Speaker 2 And they certainly want to forget what they thought and said to unvaccinated people.

Speaker 2 Yeah,

Speaker 1 there's a fascist strain right beneath the surface that I did not perceive until that moment. And it was very distressing.

Speaker 2 I mean, one thing my wife said to me, I can't remember when, and she was right. She said, you know, there's a large part of the country, must have been 2021,

Speaker 2 that if Tony Fauci said to them, this will just end if we just burn Berenson at the stake. Just burn him at the stake.
That's all we got to do.

Speaker 2 Like, there would have been people with pitchforks on our doorstep.

Speaker 2 You know, and she's Canadian. I think she was, she was, although the Canadians were behaved terribly.

Speaker 2 Well, the Canadians are very easy to control.

Speaker 1 I mean, it doesn't take much.

Speaker 1 But Americans, I, well, you're from this country. You grew up here.
Yeah.

Speaker 1 Were you surprised?

Speaker 2 Yes. Oh,

Speaker 2 this is what I wanted to say to you earlier when we were talking

Speaker 2 herd instinct. Okay, again, we were talking about the baby breast and how easy it is and why parents don't challenge, let's say, as you mentioned, you know,

Speaker 2 DEI stuff in classrooms that they might not like for their kids. I mean, just go back 3,000 years, okay, when somebody committed a crime.
There were no prisons, right?

Speaker 2 So how did you punish that person? You left them.

Speaker 2 You left them on their own without the protection of the herd. And mostly those people died, right?

Speaker 2 We think we're lone wolves, but we're herd animals. And if you can get, you know, 60, 70, much less 80 or 90% of the population moving a certain way, it gets harder and harder to stand up.

Speaker 2 And so

Speaker 2 I mean,

Speaker 2 I think that force is overwhelming.

Speaker 2 And I think the U.S. actually has more people willing to stand up, but that doesn't mean it has a lot.

Speaker 1 So given that, what's the next iteration of COVID? I mean, we're moving into flu season.

Speaker 2 Yeah,

Speaker 2 so I don't know what's going to happen to COVID. If Omicron stays this mild,

Speaker 2 it'll just be something.

Speaker 2 It'll run through nursing homes sometimes. It'll hurt some people.
Assuming the IgG4 thing doesn't become a true problem, there will be people who will be sick.

Speaker 2 I personally,

Speaker 2 I get flack from this from some of my readers. I think Pax Lovid actually works.
I think they will come up with some more antivirals. I mean, again, how do we get out of HIV? Not a vaccine.

Speaker 2 We got effective antivirals. And,

Speaker 2 you know, I think there will be some more antivirals for COVID.

Speaker 2 It should be manageable.

Speaker 2 The two big issues going forward actually are less to do with COVID and more to do with are they going to try to push mRNAs for other respiratory viruses, which they clearly are.

Speaker 2 Moderna, you know, that's Moderna's business. And Moderna's stock is down 85% since its peak, which was basically the same day as the Biden administration's mandate

Speaker 2 in September 2021. But they still are in business.
They're still a large, powerful company, and they want to sell you.

Speaker 1 Has anybody ever checked i mean has the sec for example ever checked the buy orders from policymakers or their spouses who were aware that that mandate was coming that's a great question i don't know that's that's i wonder if that's it's probably not even visible but uh but it's a great question to ask

Speaker 1 It's okay not to be perfect with finances.

Speaker 2 Experian is your big financial friend and here to help. Did you know you can get matched with credit cards on the app?

Speaker 2 Some cards are labeled no ding decline, which means if you're not approved, they won't hurt your credit scores. Download the Experian app for free today.

Speaker 2 Applying for No Ding Decline cards won't hurt your credit scores if you aren't initially approved. Initial approval will result in a hard inquiry, which may impact your credit scores.

Speaker 6 The holidays mean more travel, more shopping, more time online, and more personal info in more places that could expose you more to identity theft.

Speaker 6 But LifeLock monitors millions of data points per second.

Speaker 7 If your identity is stolen, our U.S.-based restoration specialists will fix it guaranteed or your money back.

Speaker 6 Don't face drained accounts, fraudulent loans, or financial losses alone. Get more holiday fun and less holiday worry with Life Lock.

Speaker 7 Save up to 40% your first year.

Speaker 6 Visit lifelock.com/slash podcast. Terms apply.

Speaker 1 Do you think that we will ever have lockdowns again?

Speaker 2 It would have to be way worse. I mean, there literally have to be people dying in the streets, I think.

Speaker 2 I think in general, there are a lot of people who are much more suspicious of the public health establishment.

Speaker 1 Because we've been inoculated

Speaker 2 against that. As we should be.

Speaker 2 But here's the other thing. You know, you say, well,

Speaker 2 I won or my position won. It's not really true.

Speaker 2 Here's, the virology community. continues to push gain of function research.
They continue to push these, you know, wandering wandering into caves looking for the worst possible virus.

Speaker 2 I mean, it's increasingly clear that virology is toxic and dangerous, at least this part of it, this emerging infectious diseases part of it, because you're much more likely to cause a pandemic than to prevent one.

Speaker 2 Either by messing with viruses in labs to make them more dangerous, which is really the most insane idea possible, or just going to these caves like where the bats are not bothering anybody and looking for dangerous viruses.

Speaker 2 And here's the, like, to me, one of the best pieces of evidence for this.

Speaker 2 Let's pretend that

Speaker 2 the Chinese lab is not the source of that. So by source, I don't mean that it was fully created there.
I mean they were probably experimenting with it and it leaked.

Speaker 2 Okay, I want to be clear what I'm saying. But let's pretend that let's pretend that this didn't somehow escape from a Chinese lab.

Speaker 2 Let's pretend that people who say that this came out of a farm in Wuhan, or the wet market in Wuhan, a pangolin, yes. A wet market in Wuhan are actually telling the truth.

Speaker 1 Yeah. Okay.

Speaker 2 The best thing you can say then is that this effort led by Peter Dasek and

Speaker 2 funded by the U.S. government that Tony Fauci was aware of, that the Chinese were very invested in,

Speaker 2 that was supposed to help prevent the next pandemic, did nothing to prevent the next pandemic, even though the next pandemic happened under their noses.

Speaker 2 That's the absolute best case for what happened in 2020. We funded a ton of research that did nothing to help us predict what the next problem would be or stop it when it happened.

Speaker 2 So what on earth are we doing? It's just like the vaccines,

Speaker 2 certainly at this point, all downside, no upside. The rational person stops gambling in that position.
Yes. But go to a casino, Tucker.
There are a lot of irrational people.

Speaker 1 But if you're promoting that, and if you're at any point along along the chain of COVID policy that I think inarguably got a lot of people killed and wrecked our economy and destroyed a generation of children who are now illiterate, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, has anyone ever been punished for that?

Speaker 2 No, no, no, absolutely not.

Speaker 1 Has anyone not been rewarded for it? They all seem.

Speaker 1 Can you tell us what these four guys are doing right now?

Speaker 2 Sure. Well, Tony is a, you know, he's given talks.
I believe at six figures a pop.

Speaker 1 He's still a Secret Service protector.

Speaker 2 He's still a Secret Service protection.

Speaker 1 My neighbor in D.C. just took a picture of him in in our dog park in northwest Washington, followed by Secret Service detail.

Speaker 2 Yes, he does. Oh, he certainly does.
Do you have secret service protection?

Speaker 2 I have a couple dogs that bark a lot. Yes.
Perfect.

Speaker 2 So Fauci works at Georgetown. He's a millionaire.
Yeah, Scotty Gotti is still, he has protection. Pfizer pays a couple hundred grand a year for his protection because he's so much at risk.

Speaker 2 Scott Leaf has a security deal. He certainly does.
You can find the details about it in the Pfizer proxy statement.

Speaker 2 He's on all the boards. He's on CNBC.
He's never apologized for slandering me or anything else.

Speaker 2 He's doing just fine. Slavit

Speaker 2 runs a healthcare-focused venture fund

Speaker 2 that funds things like getting

Speaker 2 trans medicines to people, to young teenagers in states

Speaker 2 where they aren't going to necessarily need to be seen by a doctor. True story.
That's one of the that's one of the and I may be exaggerating slightly but that is the point of one of his

Speaker 2 venture capital investments.

Speaker 2 And Albert Borla remains the chairman and CEO of Pfizer Incorporated

Speaker 2 you know and gets about $35 million a year.

Speaker 1 So all of them are fat, happy, and continuing to spread the evil.

Speaker 2 Yes, by the way, these two gentlemen, Scott Gottlieb and Albert Borla, their lawyers accused me of being in it for the money.

Speaker 2 From your substack. From my substack, yes.

Speaker 1 Do you make more or less than $35 million a year on your substack?

Speaker 2 It's close, but a little less.

Speaker 2 So, yeah, so, oh,

Speaker 2 by the way, just to go back to

Speaker 2 the 5 billion doses, 2 billion poured down the drain, the companies were paid for.

Speaker 2 No reporter.

Speaker 2 Actually, a few reporters in Germany,

Speaker 2 they were whatever, for whatever reason they're a little more interested in like the federal purse, have noted that, you know, hundreds of millions of doses in Europe were wasted.

Speaker 2 But I've never seen a story like that in the United States.

Speaker 2 And ironically, you know, you can find tons of stories about how Africa was going to be the next terrible wave, even into 2021, when it should have been clear to everybody that the African demographic is so much younger that there is basically zero risk from COVID.

Speaker 2 You can still find all these stories about how we have to get vaccines to Africa.

Speaker 1 We have to, the

Speaker 2 number of mRNA vaccines or COVID vaccines in general taken in Africa is near zero, certainly outside of South Africa.

Speaker 2 And my joke, it's not really a joke, this is the first time in history when rich white people have demanded to be the guinea pigs for

Speaker 2 an experimental medicine. Well, national suicide.

Speaker 1 And speaking of last question, but you alluded to this a second ago.

Speaker 2 Your

Speaker 1 new interest or one of your new interests is in

Speaker 1 the population and its decline because people are not having having kids.

Speaker 1 What's the overview?

Speaker 2 So, I mean, obviously, this has been going on for a while. We've been below replacement birth rates in the U.S., a little closer in the U.S., but in East Asia and Western Europe.

Speaker 2 But, you know, birth rates in general are trending down worldwide too. You know, Muslim countries, too, they're trending down.

Speaker 2 But COVID seems to have accelerated this process. And I first got interested in it because My question was, you know, are the COVID vaccines, are the mRNAs accelerating this fertility crisis?

Speaker 2 Because we know they can have an impact on menstrual cycles, and they seem to have at least a short-term impact on sperm.

Speaker 2 I don't know if it's production, but sort of production of healthy sperm.

Speaker 2 My conclusion right now is you can't really find an mRNA effect because this is happening in China too,

Speaker 2 which didn't use the mRNA.

Speaker 2 But all over the world, and certainly in the US and

Speaker 2 in Europe, it's most visible in Europe and in East Asia, birth rates have suddenly gone off a cliff. I mean, the South Korean birth rate now is barely one-third of replacement level.

Speaker 2 And there doesn't seem to be a bottom to this. And

Speaker 2 I mean, it's really stunning in that it's happening across every culture or, you know, every religion, every ethnicity.

Speaker 2 The only thing that the countries have in common, you know, attitudes towards women are different in these countries. The only things that these countries have in common is that they're wealthy.

Speaker 1 So you're saying, and now that I think about it, it's probably true, the birth rate in South Korea is lower than the birth rate in North Korea.

Speaker 2 That's a great question, but probably true. I haven't looked, but yes.

Speaker 1 I wonder if there's a clearer indicator of the health of a society than it's birth rate.

Speaker 2 I mean it's certainly it's certainly hard to square that with a healthy society or not a lot of anxiety among young people.

Speaker 2 And the idea that this is This is happening in wealthy societies, but it doesn't seem to be driven by economics because

Speaker 2 there's still pockets of high fertility for the ultra-Orthodox Jews and various other religious sects.

Speaker 2 and those people are very rarely wealthy so it's a so you know it's it's not a problem of lack of abundance it's it's caused by abundance well I mean the richer you are the fewer kids you have although at the very top certainly in places like New York

Speaker 2 right no you see this where you where there is a little I'm trying my best kids is a luxury good yeah at the very very top but but not broadly so I you know this is something I'm just beginning to explore I know you want me to make some grand pronouncements about it, but I really, I really, I find it fascinating.

Speaker 2 It's obviously fascinating to readers.

Speaker 1 Because I wonder what's more important than reproducing.

Speaker 2 Right. Well, you know, I mean, my joke is it's the future of humanity is at stake.
Now, obviously, we're not going to get to zero anytime soon, but it's pretty striking.

Speaker 2 And somebody said to me yesterday, well, you know, it's about the Earth's carrying capacity. And that's just nonsense.
I mean,

Speaker 2 we can support far more than 8 billion people with.

Speaker 1 I wonder, though, you hear a lot of chatter

Speaker 1 about, you you know a depopulation strategy

Speaker 1 i don't know if it's a strategy i doubt it was hammered out at you know davos or anything but clearly there's a depopulation instinct yeah that's what's so bizarre right clearly clearly it's look at the effects i mean if you're trying if you cared about your country you'd want people to have kids right

Speaker 2 do you want your do you want grandchildren of course because you love your children right so if you loved your population you'd want to have kids i mean i i agree it seems like a very basic idea that a healthy society

Speaker 2 at least retains its population. And, you know, the countries in East Asia are already beginning to shrink amazingly.

Speaker 2 Taiwan is shrinking. I mean, it's

Speaker 2 and as Elon said to me,

Speaker 2 this was a few months ago, he said, you know,

Speaker 2 you can make it very complicated demographically, but it's actually very simple.

Speaker 2 Multiply the current level of births right now by 85, and that's what the population will be in 85 years, assuming the trend doesn't continue.

Speaker 2 So for a country like Taiwan, they have 130,000 births this year. They have 23 million people.
85 times 130,000 is about 10 million.

Speaker 2 So when I say they're not close to replacement level, I mean they're not close to replacement level. They're going extinguished.

Speaker 2 Well, I mean, if that continued at that level, you would be, you know, you'd be down 90% in 100 years. I mean,

Speaker 2 it's pretty stunning.

Speaker 2 Look, these things can reverse. You look at, you know, popularly, the baby boom, you you know, post-World War II, there were tremendous, you know, growth in population in the U.S.

Speaker 2 and Japan and other countries. So these things can reverse, but there's no sign it's even stopping.

Speaker 1 Can I just throw one final thing at you? So

Speaker 1 the conventional view has always been, well, this is a result of birth control. It's become much more sophisticated and widespread in the past 50 years.

Speaker 1 But if you look at the rate at which people are like having sex,

Speaker 2 They're not having sex. They're not having sex.
Young men not having sex.

Speaker 1 So, I mean, who saw that coming?

Speaker 1 But that's probably about the darkest thing I can think of. Like, what is that?

Speaker 2 Right. That's part of this.
I mean, you know, and it's funny, right? Because for a couple years in the aughts, there was, oh, the internet is, you know, it's going to like, there's going to tinder.

Speaker 2 They're all, they're all going to be screwing all the time. All the, all the youth.
It turned out that's exactly the opposite. Didn't happen at all.

Speaker 1 And, and, which is worse.

Speaker 2 The latter is worse. Not is worse, I think.
Way worse. Way worse.
Yeah.

Speaker 1 Well, i just want to first of all thank you for the for the lovely sweatshirt which i will wear this afternoon all right and um and also to congratulate you on being vindicated and no one else even if no one else notices no one else notices but i noticed unreported truths my friend

Speaker 1 dishonest and dangerous

Speaker 1 okay alex baronson thank you very much thank you