Trump's Epstein problem

It was early this week when Congressman Hank Johnson, Democrat from Georgia's 4th, dropped a parody version of Dreamsicle by Jason Ispel.

Awful.

The congressman was adding his voice to an ever-growing chorus.

Just a day before him, a rapper named Tyson James dropped a bop called Epstein List.

We want the names of every pedophile on that list.

You siding with the devil when you say it don't exist.

Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, Trump.

Where'd that list step from?

And last night, not other than the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, followed suit, but not with bars.

I mean, the White House and the White House team are privy to facts that I don't know.

I mean, this isn't my lane.

I haven't been involved in that.

But I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there.

Why everyone, except maybe the president himself, hmm, seems to agree that we should see the Epstein files on Today Explained.

Support for Today Explained comes from Adio.

Adio is an AI-native customer relationship management platform that Adio says is built for the next era of companies.

A powerful data structure that adapts to your business model, syncs in all your contacts in minutes, and enriches your business with actionable data.

Addio says it also allows you to create those email sequences, those real-time reports, those powerful automations, which they claim can help you build what matters most, your company.

you can go to adio.com slash today explained to get 15 off your first year that's attio.com slash today explained thumbtack presents uncertainty strikes i was surrounded the aisle and the options were closing in there were paint rollers satin and matte finish angle brushes and natural bristles there were too many choices what if i never got my living room painted what if i couldn't figure out what type of paint to use what if

i just used thumbtack i can hire a a top-rated pro in the Bay Area that knows everything about interior paint, easily compare prices, and read reviews.

Thumbtack knows homes.

Download the app today.

Mr.

President, do you have any reaction to today's lane being named the best news show?

Wow.

I didn't know that.

I just you're telling me now for the first time.

I'm Sean Romsfram, and this is David Weigel, who covers politics for Semaphore, including the latest Epstein drama.

I'm hesitating on where to to start because it,

in the minds of people who are really interested in this story, it touches on everything.

It is, as Steve Bannon was telling attendees of Turning Point USA Student Summit last weekend.

Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things.

Not just individuals, but also institutions, intelligence institutions, foreign governments, and

who is working with him on our intelligence apparatus and in our government.

The hold this has had on the minds of a lot of Americans is

long and deep and serious.

And

it has now

kind of cannonballed into our politics as something Republicans are opportunistically trying to downpeddle and Democrats are opportunistically trying to hype.

But they can do all this because there are many Americans who think it's odd that this sex trafficker, one, got away with he was doing for so long, two,

died in prison, which is quite hard to do without

committing suicide in prison.

They're famously very hard to do.

And he, according to the government, pulled it off.

And

that he allegedly had, according to the Trump administration, evidence on a lot of people that no one can see.

Before we go any further, I want to get this out of the way.

Do we know, David, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that what's in these files would even satisfy all the people who would like to see them?

Well, no, people will not be satisfied by this.

And

they will not be satisfied by anything less than, I would say, the most lurid fantasies of what is in this information.

For example,

as soon as the DOJ memo went out over a holiday weekend without an author on it, I was seeing fake videos of Hillary Clinton entering Epstein's jail.

I am hearing breaking news.

More

of the surveillance footage has been released.

I knew it!

Oh, it's always the pantsuits.

She's so sad.

That's how you know it's her.

You can get a sort of fabricated satisfaction.

Will you get total satisfaction that the people that you thought were behind all this all along?

Probably not.

This is a theme with Trump's campaigns.

There are people who voted for Trump in 2016 thinking that one, he was going to put Hillary Clinton in jail.

Two, the crimes he was going to convict her of were just an unbelievable litany of murders and conspiracies conspiracies and

drug trafficking from Arkansas.

And the fact that that didn't

come out, that it wasn't provable that didn't happen, there are people who moved on and didn't talk a lot about it.

And there are people who will believe until they die that

the elites covered this up.

Donald Trump makes for a bit of an awkward messenger in this mission to release the Epstein files, considering unlike, I don't know, say like Kamala Harris, he has a long history and established friendship with the late New York financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Yes, you've pinpointed the irony of this entire story.

And I talked to some Democrats over the last few days about why they didn't make hay of his connections to Jeffrey Epstein in 2016, 2020, and 2024, because Democrats just decided that Trump is inoculated

by his connection to his base, generally speaking.

They're happy this week to focus on Epstein because the meta-narrative of Trump is that as he's a political outsider who knows all these people backwards and forwards.

The elite!

The elite!

Why are they elite?

I have a much better apartment than they do.

And the meta-narrative specifically for Trump among his voters was,

yeah, Donald Trump's on the record saying he knows Jeff Epstein.

I had a falling out with him a long time ago.

I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years.

I wasn't a fan.

Yeah, he's on these

videos and photos of him.

However, the problem it ran into around the Epstein story is that Cash Patel.

And to me, that's a thing I think President Trump should run on.

On day one, roll out the black book.

Diamond Gino.

Listen, that Jeffrey Epstein story is a big deal.

Please do not let that story go.

Keep your eye on this.

And all these people said things during the campaign as people who were not guaranteed to be administration that that would be proven, and they weren't.

And this is the best ammunition that Democrats have had the last week: video of these guys saying they're going to release this Episode information once they get their hands on it.

You can find this already.

Conservatives and, let's say, other anti-politics, anti-establishment voters who voted for Trump, they're still, they want to be faithful in Trump and believe that he's going to do the right thing.

These other guys are

dispensable.

You could see that the story was turning from people being disappointed in Donald Trump to being disappointed in people he hired.

In 2016, we trusted the plan with Trump, but now Trump has become the deep state.

The exact thing we voted him in.

It's not my place, but I do think the way that I'm seeing it played out is that Bongino will be here and Pam Bondi will be the foreguy.

I feel like we should ring a bell every time the Democrats and the Republicans are calling for the same thing.

How is it so many of them came to agree on this one?

Obvious play for the Dems?

The downside for them in talking about this is nil.

They are not worried about any of them being connected to Jeffrey Epstein's behavior because they know themselves.

They were not part of this.

If every theory of what Epstein was doing was proven to be true, the current leadership of the Democratic Party and the rank-and-file electeds would not suffer at all.

None of them were connected with it.

So it's gotten ⁇ it was pretty easy for them to talk about.

They just thought the upside was not very big.

Now it's very easy for them to talk about.

Do they have any power to actually expedite the release of these files or is it all in the DOJ?

No, it's in the DOJ.

What Democrats have done in the past few days is use opportunities in the Congress to attach an Epstein declassification amendment or language to bills.

If you're not hiding anything, prove that to the American people.

And if you are trying to hide something, as many

of Donald Trump's MAGA supporters apparently believe,

then the Congress should actually work hard to try to uncover the truth for the American people.

It's convenient that they have video of J.D.

Vance telling Theo Von.

Seriously, we need to release the F-Scene list.

That is an important thing.

Yeah, they have that video.

They could run that.

Is this going to be a top voting issue in 2028?

Who knows?

But it's helpful to them.

They have a video of the likely next Republican nominee making this promise that he couldn't keep.

And the worst case scenario for them is the administration reverses, it is released, and they have a bunch of information that's damaging Republicans and not themselves.

It's a very low-risk bet for them, which is the kind of bet Democrats like to make.

Trump doesn't seem to have satisfying answers for his base, for the people who are very loud and very online saying this is a betrayal.

Does he just hope this is going to go away?

Lots of stuff has gone away.

Trump has had a lot of problems that were going to take him out, and they didn't.

If I were Donald Trump, I'd be very confident that I can beast this out the way that I did the Access Hollywood tape, the way that I did indictments, that I'll get lucky and that people will move on.

But

the moment of maximum disappointment in Trump from the voters we're talking about was this cabinet meeting

after the DOJ memo where a reporter is asking Pam Bondi at the table, Pam Bondi, not Trump, asking Pam Bondi to clarify some of what the memo says and why the files that she said were on her desk have not been released.

And Trump intervenes and gets annoyed that the media is still asking about it.

Yeah, sure.

Could I just interrupt you?

And are people still talking about this guy, this creep?

Now, the only thing I'd say is that there is always a search in the press for is this going to be the moment when Trump loses his base, where the MAGA movement gets disappointed.

That hasn't really happened

for anything.

And there is

enormous capacity for forgiveness.

But electorally, we're looking at the midterms, we're looking at 2028.

And if there are millions of voters who

came into the coalition, let's say, with RFK Jr.

and Tulsi Gabbard because they thought he was going to turn everything upside down.

Well, what is he's done some things that no other president did, but he's also he was going to end the war in Ukraine day one, and he's he's selling arms to NATO so that they can give them to Ukraine.

He was going to end the war in Gaza.

It's not over.

There are ceasefires and hosts getting up.

He's not done that.

And he didn't do this.

And so there is a, it's not showing up in donations to Republicans, but when Republicans go back to the Trump electorate and say, hey, we noticed that you didn't usually vote, but you vote in 2024, are excited again.

A lot of them are going to say, nope, I don't trust anybody now.

But you are seeing people who were not normal Republicans, didn't usually vote in midterms.

Those people have drifted away and they have a very low level of faith right now.

I don't think they're going to walk away completely from

Trump over this, but they're not going to be Trump hype men the way they were in October 2024.

Semaphore.com, that's where you can read David Weigel.

The Epstein files live at the Department of Justice, so we are going to head there next on Today Explained.

Support for today's show comes from GiveWell.

Perhaps you've heard about these cuts to foreign aid, perhaps you even heard about them on Today Explained.

GiveWell is a nonprofit research organization that says for the last 18 years they've helped guide more than 130,000 donors and 2.5 billion of their dollars to highly cost-effective aid.

GiveWell does not claim to have all the answers, but they do say their researchers are analyzing the effect of cuts to U.S.

aid in real time and sharing what they've learned with everyone for free through research updates, grant write-ups, and candid conversations on podcasts.

GiveWell says they've already committed tens of millions of dollars in response to this year's cuts and that their researchers are working to forecast, find, and fund other cost-effective needs.

For trusted, evidence-backed insights into this evolving situation and information on how you can help, follow along at givewell.org/slash USAID.

Support for Today Explained comes from Delete Me.

Here's what data brokers do: they compile things like your name, contact info, social security number, home address, even information about your family members, and they sell it online.

Delete me says they can make it easy and quick and safe to remove your personal data online at a time when surveillance and data breaches are common enough to make everyone vulnerable.

Claire White, our colleague at Vox, has used Delete Me.

I think it's been about a year since I signed up for Delete Me and definitely at the beginning they were finding things from middle school, from high school, places where I had put my phone number and I don't even remember why.

And they were pulling that information and making sure that it was no longer accessible to whatever database it was living on.

It made me feel really secure and also taught me a lesson of where I do get this information.

You can take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me Now at a special discount for our listeners.

You can get 20% off your Delete Me plan when you go to joindeleteme.com slash today and use the promo code today at checkout.

The only way to get 20% off is to go to joindeleatme.com slash today and edit the code today at checkout.

That's joindeme.com slash today.

Use the code today.

Support for Today Explained comes from Greenlight for kids.

Summer means more free time and Greenlight thinks your kids should get a job, sell lemonade, wash cars, garden, do laundry, and make a little money.

Okay, Green Light, I'm into it.

Green Light is a debit card and money app made for families that helps kids learn how to save, invest, and spend wisely.

Oh, to Sham.

It's a colleague here at Fox.

She uses Green Light with her family, and here's what she said.

When I signed up for the Green Light app, I didn't know about the allowance feature.

When I found that the allowance section, I did set up a bunch of chores for my kids so that it can encourage them to help around the house.

Stuff like, you know, take the garbage out, bring the laundry downstairs.

If they check it in the app, then on Mondays, they get an allowance from me.

So, like, they also like it too.

They can also control how they're earning more money, you know, while they're still young.

You don't need to wait to teach your kids real-world money skills.

You can start your risk-free green light trial today at greenlight.com/slash explain.

That's greenlight.com/slash explain to get started.

Greenlight.com/slash explain.

Sonny, get a job.

I'm talking about Jeff Epstein, the New York financier.

My name is Ellie Hoenig.

I am a former federal and state prosecutor, and I am the author of the upcoming book, When You Come at the King, inside DOJ's Pursuit of the President from Nixon to Trump.

And when you say you're a former prosecutor, remind us where.

I was a fed at the Southern District of New York, which will become relevant to this conversation, as that is the office that prosecuted both Jeffrey Epstein and Jelaine Maxwell.

And then I was a state prosecutor later as well.

So, before we get to all the questions, let me just ask you a simple one.

If you're someone out there who's like, release the Epstein files, all of us as Americans, not as Democrats, not as liberals, not as Republicans, are actually lining together and saying we all want the Epstein files.

Who should they be most mad at right now that they don't have their Epstein files?

I'm going to answer with a what rather than a who.

The first thing they should be mad at is an ancient DOJ policy that says we DOJ, we federal prosecutors, do not just turn over, make public our closed investigative files because people want to know.

People want to know a lot of things.

People want to see all the closed files on the Trump cases.

People want to see every piece of paper from Robert Herr's investigation of Joe Biden.

People want to see everything from the Hunter Biden cases.

But there is a long-standing DOJ policy and principle that has been observed by both political parties that we don't turn these things over.

We don't slag people in public who can't defend themselves, who aren't charged with anything, who don't have the ability to go to trial.

But what's confusing people, I think, about that policy, at least right now, is one very specific moment.

Not all the moments where other people said these things should be released, but the moment where the person in charge of the department that doesn't typically release this kind of information said that she would.

Yeah, why would Pam Bondi say that?

It's sitting on my desk right now to review.

That's been a directive by President Trump.

If she didn't intend to look into that, did something happen?

The answer is I have no earthly idea.

But yeah, Pam Bondi has just handled this whole situation in an utterly inexplicable, inconsistent, and I think often dishonest manner.

I mean, look, she blazes into office as Attorney General, and she basically, by her actions, makes clear, I don't give a crap about that policy that I just talked about.

I'm going to be turning this all over.

I'm going to break the cover off this thing, and you all are going to know everything.

I think tomorrow, Jesse, breaking news right now, you're going to see some Epstein information being released by my office.

By the way, it goes back.

If you remember, months ago, Pam Bondi had her much ballyhooed phase one disclosure, right?

She called all these conservative influencers to the White House and gave them these white, thick binders labeled the Epstein files phase one.

And you've seen the photo of people triumphantly holding up these files.

Well, what happened when they opened those binders?

Absolutely nothing was in them.

It came out later from those influencers, among others, who I think were also disappointed.

Not a single new thing was printed or offered.

And this whole thing had been some sort of Europa dope.

And maybe at that point, Pam Bondi was hoping, all right, let's just hope this kind of fades away.

Clearly, when she said...

It's sitting on my desk right now to review, it wasn't because it appears there is no client list per se.

Now, that doesn't mean nobody is implicated, but this notion that there's some list, there's some piece of paper entitled Jeffrey Epstein's client list, one, two, three, seems to be pretty clearly an oversimplification.

So I think that's the $64,000 question.

Why this very sudden, very stark turnabout?

Well, since we can't necessarily answer that question yet, can we maybe answer the question of like how Pam Bondi came to be sitting at the top of the United States Department of Justice?

So Pam Bondi on paper looked like she was quite qualified to be the Attorney General of the United States.

She had been a prosecutor for 20 years.

She was the Attorney General of Florida, the state attorney general for two terms for eight years.

And so if you just take that resume, I'd say, yeah, that's actually quite comparable to several other AGs and more prosecutorial experience.

Perhaps more qualified than, say, like, I don't know, Matt Gates.

Speaking of government bureaucrats.

Yeah, Matt Gates had zero qualifications.

The objections that were lodged to her related to her independence and her credibility.

Primarily, two things.

One is she has a long history with Trump.

She has represented him briefly during one of his impeachments.

They've had political support for one another.

That's not that big a deal.

The bigger problem, though, is she was and in part remains a 2020 election denier.

Pam, did you just say fake ballots?

There could be.

That's the problem.

If they're letting

anybody know, Steve.

Do you have, have you heard stories of, you know, ballots that are fake?

And if so, just tell us what you know.

Well, we know that ballots have been dumped.

There were ballots that were found early on.

We've heard that people were receiving ballots that were dead.

And when she was confronted about this at her confirmation hearing in 2025 about her election denial.

Who won the 2020 presidential election?

She fell back on the old cop out line of Joe Biden is the president of the United States.

She wouldn't disavow her prior election denialism.

And meanwhile, there's been a lot of writing that Pam Bondi has perhaps brought the Justice Department under Donald Trump in a way that we haven't seen in decades.

What do you think is the clearest evidence of that?

Oh, I think that's true and I think it's provable.

I mean, if we think back through the last many As, and by the way, I'd include Donald Trump's prior AGs, Bill Barr, who, by the way, my first book is a criticism of Bill Barr's tenure as Trump's AG called Hatchet Man.

But I think Bondi is different and worse.

Because even Bill Barr didn't believe the big lie.

There's been no discrepancy reported anywhere that's looked at that.

And I'm still not aware of any discrepancy.

Barr had his lines.

Bondi has no lines.

And I'll give you something that to me was a really telling moment for Pam Bondi.

It's kind of been almost forgotten already in the shuffle of it all.

The signal scandal.

Hours before the U.S.

launched these surprise attacks on the Houthi militant group in Yemen, The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, had all the details right in front of him.

In addition to Goldberg, the chat included National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, Vice President J.D.

Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsa.

What does Pam Bondi do?

At a minimum,

any modestly halfway, semi-independent AG would at least say, We're going to investigate, we're going to get to the bottom of this, and then who knows, maybe come back in six months and say, All right, we looked at it, and while people were reckless, there was nothing quite criminal.

Pam Bondi,

in contrast, basically announces three three days in.

It was sensitive information, not classified, and inadvertently released.

And what we should be talking about is it was a very successful mission.

And that moment to me showed us that she is completely at Trump's beck and call and she will never intentionally do anything contrary to Trump's political interests.

Like maybe release the Epstein files.

Well, there you go.

I mean, that's one of the theories that's out there that perhaps there's something in there that's bad for Trump.

So now by coming in and being part of the cover-up, the Trump administration has become part of it.

I mean, it's just, you cannot see it any other way.

By the way, who knows?

But it's already been disclosed that Trump is in the address book, the black book.

There's all sorts of phone numbers for Donald Trump and Mar-a-Lago in there.

We know they're old friends.

I mean, this is a sort of forgotten moment, but Donald Trump, some magazine, did a magazine feature on Jeffrey Epstein ago before he had been convicted of any crime.

And both Bill Clinton and Donald Trump are quoted in the magazine.

And Trump's quote that he gave is something like, he sure does like beautiful women even younger than I do, or something, I'm not getting it word for word, but it's very close to that.

So would it be shocking if there was something embarrassing for Donald Trump in those files or Bill Clinton or whoever?

No.

Do you think the anger that's directed at Pam Bondi right now is misdirected?

And in fact, it should be going right to the top when Donald Trump is out there clearly stating he has no desire to see these files released, not to mention has previously made, you know, no secret of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Yeah, let me put it this way.

Either one of the president or the attorney general has the power almost without question to disclose whatever they want to disclose like that with a snap of the fingers.

You know, at one point, I think it was Pam Bondi said, well, we'd have to do redactions and

there's victims and yes.

So, of course, you'd have to protect victims and minors and redact out pornographic materials and all that stuff.

However, any one of them does have the ability to disclose whatever they deem fit tonight if they wanted to.

You think they'll do it?

There's two ways I see this going.

I don't think they'll ever open the files and just say, here you go, everybody.

I think either they will try to appease the public and the media by making some sort of partial, halfway disclosure, but that's not going to satisfy anybody.

And Pam Bandi just now reiterated she is sticking to that DOJ FBI memo.

She said that memo that says basically nothing more to see here.

No cases to be brought and case closed.

Basically, Pambandi just doubled down on that.

She said, that's our position.

And I'm not answering any other questions.

So, if people are wondering, are we ever going to just see a complete dump and complete satisfaction?

No, I don't think that's ever going to happen.

Ellie Hoenig, you heard about his book and his other book, but he also writes for New York magazine, subscribe at nymag.com.

Our show is produced by Denise Guerra and Hadi Mawagdi, edited by Miranda Kennedy, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, and mixed by Patrick Boyd and Matthew Billy.

This is Today Explained.

With a Spark Cash Plus card from Capital One, you earn unlimited 2% cash back on every purchase.

And you get big purchasing power so your business can spend more and earn more.

Capital One, what's in your wallet?

Find out more at capital1.com slash sparkcash plus.

Terms apply.

Hey, everybody, it's Andy Roddick, host of Serve Podcast for your fix on all things tennis.

The U.S.

Open's coming up, and we're covering it on our show.

Can someone knock off Alcarazin Center?

Can Coco Goff win her second U.S.

Open title?

Can Shviatek win her second Grand Slam title in a row?

Can Sabalenka break through and win her Grand Slam in 2025?

You can watch our coverage of the U.S.

Open on YouTube or listen wherever you get your podcast, brought to you in part by Amazon Front.