China's Economic Time Bomb: What Entrepreneurs Must Know | Jan Jekielek DSH #1055

For those that don't know the background of Epoch Times, you know, we were actually founded by Chinese Americans back in 2000s.

And back then, it was a completely different picture.

Tom Friedman from the New York Times wrote a column: We should learn from Chinese governance practices because they're so efficient.

It was unbelievable because I was sort of in the midst of the human rights side of things.

That's what actually got me into Epoch in the first place.

There's a whole organ harvesting regime, there's a whole business of using these people, murdering them for organ.

I was saying, No, these are not good governance practices.

We do not want to replicate this.

All right, guys, we are at Amfest.

We got Jan from Epoch Times today.

We're going to talk China, man.

That's awesome.

Yeah, there's a lot going on there.

And we were just talking about how a lot of the media doesn't really, you know, articulate it in the right ways.

Oh, absolutely.

And first of all, you know, I'm thrilled to be here with you, Sean.

We've been at this for years.

I mean, I don't, for those that don't know the background of Epoch Times, you know, we were actually founded by Chinese Americans back in 2000, so almost pushing 25 years ago, right?

With the express purpose to expose the Chinese regime for what it was.

And back then, it was a completely different picture of what.

China was about.

I mean, people were writing, I still remember back in 2009, Tom Friedman from the New York Times wrote a column where he was basically saying, you know, we should learn from Chinese governance practices, right?

Because they're so efficient and things like this.

It was unbelievable because I was sort of in the midst of the human rights side of things.

That's what actually got me into Epoch in the first place.

And there's a whole organ harvesting regime.

They take prisoners of conscience and there's a whole business of using these people, murdering them for organs.

And no one wanted to cover, you know, I was saying, no, these are not good governance practices.

We do not want to replicate this, right?

So, you know, just to give you a little, little bit of background.

So yeah, I'm ready to rock here.

Wow.

When was that organ harvesting?

being done?

So they're still doing it.

So we learned about it first back in 2006.

There were these two Canadian, one of them was a human rights lawyer, lawyer, another was a former Secretary of State.

They got together.

They were asked, hey, can you look into this?

We've heard rumors, right?

They looked into it and they made a report in 2006, which basically said, there's no other set of circumstances that would account for everything, the evidence that we do have.

I'll give you an example, okay?

There were newspapers that were advertising at the time, you could go to China and order a new heart.

if you had 200 grand or something like that in two weeks.

They'd service you in two weeks for a new heart.

Normally you have to wait years, right?

Because someone has to die, but not be completely dead, right?

They have to be brain dead, body alive, because you can't organ harvest from a cadaver except corneas and things like this.

So it was, you know,

this was a big deal.

This is just one piece of evidence.

They actually found 17 that all corroborated that this existed.

There was no smoking gun, but there was like, hey, this is...

Whatever is happening here is grossly unethical.

And you guys need to explain this.

Of course, it was met with total silence and that you guys are evil.

And this, you know, the typical response of the Chinese regime is to slander whoever it is that's, that's basically, you know, exposing it as opposed to actually deal with the substantive issue at hand.

Yeah.

And they even go after their own people.

I mean, look what they did to Jacques Ma.

100%.

So that's actually very, that's very interesting.

So

let's look at that for a moment, right?

Communist society is very unusual.

It's hard for us to kind of imagine it in a way.

It's unbelievably hierarchical, first of all, okay?

So the top of the pyramid right now is Xi Jinping.

He's the the dictator.

He runs multiple of these sort of central commissions at the top, including the military.

And essentially any order that he that comes from him, it has to be implemented at every single level, all the way down through to the bottom of society.

And, you know, with some of these tech, you know, basically very successful tech entrepreneurs like Jack, right?

Jack became, you know, very successful in his own right, right?

Of course, he was supported by the Chinese Communist Party.

Everything kind of stems from what the Chinese Communist Party will allow or not.

So he was absolutely kind of like a little bit of a golden child, right, of the regime until he got pretty big and successful and kind of started to have his own thoughts.

Right.

And then he got, he just disappeared for a while.

And there's a whole sort of structural system where, you know, you could say high-level officials or people at the level of Jack Ma will, you know, be re-educated to make sure that, you know, when they reappear, they're following the proper, correct way of thinking.

Yeah, he's a lot better these days.

Well, exactly, right?

And that's, because what are you going to do?

Like, yes, you're a billionaire, but that can disappear in one second.

Just like that.

Every bank, you want to, you know, people have been concerned about debanking in Canada and the U.S.

and other places.

There's been a lot of talk about that.

Mark Andreessen recently on Joe Rogan, amazing, amazing bit on there.

In China, take that to the ultimate extreme, right?

Where the basically anyone in the Politburo can essentially shut you down on a whim and everybody will go, yes, sir.

Why?

Because they know what's happening if they don't comply, which is they're coming after after you too.

Absolutely.

Yeah.

Do you feel like the Trump administration was the first administration to face China head on?

I think that would be a fair characterization.

I mean, there's been good and bad policy, okay, that's happened all the way along.

But I think it was during the Trump administration where the narrative on China, this is the key, really started to change.

Okay.

Because, you know,

Here's something, and this is something Cleo Pascal, a good friend of mine who's been on American Thought Leaders, my show multiple times, has talked about.

Chinese have this approach of, you can call it, I think she calls it gross national power.

They measure themselves.

They have all these different indicators that come down to one number, and they measure themselves against every other single nation in the world along all those features.

Right.

And so America, of course, is their number one competitor in their view.

Now, Xi Jinping is waging a people's war against America.

That's only a few years old, but that's official.

He said, we are waging a people's war against America.

Now, that doesn't manifest mostly as kinetic warfare.

It manifests as all kinds of other ways, okay?

But to make a long story short, what happened in the Trump administration is to me, for the first time with the imposition of these tariffs, okay, that Robert Lighthizer pioneered in a way to try to get the trade deficit into, you know, just this unbelievable trade deficit.

Robert Lighthizer's, by the way, philosophy is, if there's a huge sustained trade deficit, that means that someone is gaming the system.

He's not looking at it ideologically.

He's just, he's looking at it as, okay,

these guys are taking advantage of it in all sorts of different ways.

And I could enumerate that to you if you would like.

But he put forth the first policy that said, we're going to make you do something that you don't want to do.

Okay.

And the response, if you recall, was just, you know, all hellbreaking was this is unbelievable.

How could this possible?

And so forth.

And, but the effect was the Chinese regime actually had to do something that was in America's interest for the first time in quite some time.

And again, you know, some people will say, Jan, that's very, you know, you're exaggerating here.

I, you know, I don't think I am actually, right?

Because the only way you can really tell if you're doing something in the interest of America versus the CCB, they don't believe in win-win.

This is what this gross national power metric tells us, right?

They only believe that they're winning if you're losing.

Either you're suffering or they're growing much faster than you are.

One way or the other, you have to be on the losing end of it.

Yeah.

Right.

Well, I think they've harmed a lot of mom and pop businesses in America America because you could just order the same product in China for half the price these days.

You know, well, and not even that, like the last Trump 45 was actually trying to deal with this.

They kind of, they basically worked, there's something called the Universal Postal Union.

Okay.

And that determines, for example, let's say you're sending a package from China, you want to send it to America, right?

Something governs who pays for that.

Because of course, China has to pay for some of it and America has to be for it.

The way it works out, okay, under Universal Postal Union Urals, and I think it's still this way because I don't think they managed to change it, is the American postal system actually pays for the bulk of it?

Oh, really?

You see?

So there's just all these, that's just one piece.

I'm giving you an example of the different ways the CCP has really taken advantage of America by, for example, co-opting international institutions, right?

Or, or let's just, if I don't want to be so cruel to say co-opting, seriously influencing them in huge ways, right?

Yeah.

So, yes, absolutely.

The goods are cheaper.

Sometimes they're cheaper for strategic, military, strategic purposes.

For example, Huawei.

You know, I remember a long time ago, I talked with a Polish diplomat and I said, you guys are implementing Hawaii.

You guys are crazy.

Like this is, you're giving your full access to your comms, you know, or your communication network to China.

They could turn it off in a second.

And they're like, but, but it was such a, so much a better deal, she told me, right?

And I was like, yeah, well, the reason it's such a better deal is because it's their strategic,

I mean, I don't know if you could officially call it dumping, right?

But they're making goods incredibly cheap in order to gain that market share and gain an unbelievable level of control.

Okay, this is military strategy.

This is not, oh, we have cheaper goods and we're providing the same service that American business or say, you know, or a Norwegian or Swedish business would.

Right.

They're willing to operate at a huge loss at first, right?

Exactly.

On certain things which are of strategic importance to the regime.

Exactly.

They're playing the long game.

It seems like they've had this plan for a while, right?

100%.

Exactly.

Yeah, I feel like they're really a superpower.

Like we're neck and neck.

Some would even say they're ahead of us.

Well, and that we we could talk about that i mean there's tons of indicators i just had kyle bass for example on the show who's i don't know probably one of the smartest guys on the realities of the chinese economy and he would say well the chinese economy is in kind of a slow motion collapse as we saw oh really well you know the housing sector which is like 30 of the economy is dead struggling right i mean there was this massive massive bubble the bank that fails yeah yeah exactly all sorts of banks fails all sorts of these huge huge state

you know essentially any again any very large corporation is in effect a state corporation, right, in China, because again, the regime has complete on-off and decision decision-making error ultimately, right?

You know, TikTok would be a fantastic example of that.

And these recent court ruling that came out actually speaks to that exactly, that issue, right?

It's like they're basically saying, well, the Chinese regime won't let us share the algorithm, right?

Well, you're saying you're not a, you're, you're a private enterprise, but the regime dictates whether the algorithm is something you can actually, you know, sell or not.

That, that, something doesn't compute here, right?

Yeah, absolutely.

And they're really interesting, because, you know, I mentioned how we were founded by Felong Gong practitioners, right?

With the express idea to expose the regime.

We've made, you know, a project, if you will, of exposing the realities of the regime.

It was needed at the time because at the time, you know, people like it was Kissinger Doctrine.

I don't know if you remember this, but basically the idea was you have to get into China.

If you don't get in now, someone else will get that massive market.

And we have these great methods for you to do it.

And they set up all sorts of ways in which they could do it without great risk to themselves, but of great financial benefit to them to themselves.

And so, you know, it just became the kind of the narrative.

And you don't want to make them lose face.

We never really want to publicly say anything negative because if we would say something remotely negative, they might, they have this culture of not wanting to lose face.

So we don't, we won't do that.

And that

essentially was the doctrine until the Trump administration.

It's another reason why the Trump administration 45 was kind of monumental because people were coming out and saying, you know, for example, Mike Pompeo, the Secretary of State, distrust and verify.

Like, that's good.

That's our approach.

What?

Why would you distrust us?

That's crazy.

Talk about losing face, but it was incredibly important because it got people thinking, geez, there's something, there's, there's a lot of things that are wrong here.

But what in effect, what Epoch Times has done, right, is we've kind of been this, I guess, initially a thorn in the regime's side.

And then by helping change the narrative around China over the years, we've become this sort of,

you know, basically an organization that the regime really wants to destroy.

Really?

So they're going after you guys.

They're going after us hard in all sorts of ways.

Well, so, well, let me actually broaden it a little bit, okay?

From the perspective of the Chinese regime, right, Epoch Times is basically

a very successful operation launched by Falun Gong practitioners.

And why, and the regime itself, I'll have to give you a little bit of background here, okay?

Basically, in the 90s in China, the health system collapsed.

Again,

for whatever reason, they decided they wouldn't fund it, maybe they couldn't.

And there was this sort of resurgence of traditional methods of health and wellness.

And you could call them qigong.

This was kind of a catch-all phrase they made for basically things that are kind of like tai chi, even though technically tai chi is a martial art.

There are all these different practices, thousands of them, okay?

And one of them became extremely popular, and that was Falun Gong.

And it was very, it was also very unusual in the way it was kind of set up.

It's not, it's very self-directed.

Truthfulness, compassion, forbearance, these are the things that people are living.

These are the things that people that, and the belief is actually that really to get healthy physically, you need to live that.

You need to have that in your mind and heart.

And then there's these exercises that look a bit like Tai Chi.

that you do that will also help in that.

So mind, body, spirit, kind of all functioning together.

By the end of the 90s, there were 70 to 100 million people by government estimate doing this practice across the country.

And the thing about it that was really unusual, too, was that it was, you know, it didn't fit into the, you remember I talked about how hierarchical communism is.

It didn't fit into that at all because in Felong Gong, there aren't a lot of rules.

Like you're supposed to live by truth, compassion, prayers.

There's all these teachings that explain how to do that.

But if there are some rules, I mean, one of them might be be you have to understand the teachings yourself.

You can't copy someone else's way of doing the teachings.

There's no worship, for example, in it.

And also, there's no hierarchy.

So you're kind of, you know, you're a Falun Gong practitioner.

I'm a Falangong practitioner.

We're equal on the surface.

Of course, we have our own progress in our cultivation.

That's different, but we don't sort of front that.

I don't elevate myself and can tell you what to do, how you should do it, right?

Yeah.

And there's also no money collected for it, which is really interesting.

One of the first examples we heard about that the Chinese regime institutions started going against Falun Gong back in the 90s was when basically they were refused the money for it because there was this Qigong Research Society, as it was called, and they were getting a cut of all the sort of fees for people doing things with all these different Qigong masters and so forth.

And Li Hong Zhu, who's the founder of this, said, he didn't really want that, right?

He wanted just people to have their, to be able to better themselves in their own pace and so forth, right?

So anyway, what I'm trying to say is it didn't fit into the whole regime's mentality very well.

And suddenly there were only 60 million Communist Party members at the time.

It was bigger than the Chinese Communist Party and it was all walks of life.

It was people from like the Politburo, people from state security, and then migrant field workers on the other end and everybody in between.

It was a huge...

huge, huge movement.

So the dictator at the time decided, we're going to eradicate this group, to use his exact terminology, right?

And what did they mean by that?

Well, from the regime's perspective, it could mean any number of things.

Like if they can brainwash you or what they call euphemistically re-educate you, okay, into saying Falun Gong is evil or something like that, that might be enough.

But if you resist that, well, then any method, in fact, there was a rule.

They arrested millions of people, put them in the labor camps, black jails, you know, re-education camps, all of this.

And there was the rule was basically

any Falun Gong death in one of these places will be considered suicide.

Whoa, Because what that told, the message was, hey, we can actually do anything to these people to reform them, to re-edu, to what they, you've heard about these forced confessions sometimes that are taught by

to basically speak up publicly against what they had been doing.

But it turned out these people were really resilient.

And remember, so it's very, like it's, it's a very self-directed thing.

And I don't think they could understand that because of this unbelievable hierarchical nature and sort of totalitarian nature of communism.

Wow.

I didn't know that happened.

So what's the status of that these days, though?

Well, so it's very,

there's kind of two sides to it.

On the one hand, and you can look up, you know, for example, the Freedom House reports on this, on religious freedom in China.

On the one side, it remains one of the most, if not the most persecuted group in China.

And this is, you know, kind of what this new information, maybe I'll talk a little bit that we got from a Chinese dissident who's been in Australia for years is talking about.

But so it remains.

one of the most persecuted groups simply because it dares to survive in resistance to the regime.

Okay.

You remember?

So I don't know if you remember, there was a huge thing about Tibet, right?

Free Tibet for years.

And back in 2008, I remember I was with the International Society for Human Rights in Poland at the time.

There were, you know, basically the Tibetans, they did this huge action.

They had this huge banner.

They took it.

I forget exactly where they unrolled it, but they went to a bridge and they unrolled this massive banner off the bridge that said free Tibet or stop it.

I can't remember exactly.

But that was the moment when the Chinese regime said, we're going to wipe this out.

We're going to elevate the level of resources we're committing.

They want to wipe out every resistance movement, anything that remotely doesn't agree.

But with them, they said, okay, we're going to wipe this out for good.

And today, you don't even really hear much from Tibetans.

And it's really terribly sad because Tibetans remain a hugely persecuted group in China to this very, exactly, right?

But at one point, you know, there were act, there was a huge, even Hollywood was behind, you know, Free Tibet and so forth.

So my point is they're, they're very, very effective at wiping out the resistance movements, both within China and overseas.

But the ones that are most resilient, and I would argue, I think Falun Gong has been by far the most resilient both to infiltration for a bunch of reasons and also to, you know,

in America, right, you have, you know, from, again, in their view.

Epoch Times, you know, truth.

Remember, truth is the first principle of Falun Gong.

I like to say that that's really influenced how we've operated over the years.

Right.

Like we, I,

we can talk about our record.

I think we've been right on every major issue.

And there's a lot of media that have been very wrong on it.

Why?

Well, we just simply we wanted to find out the truth, whether that's China or otherwise.

But there's also, you know, Shenyun.

I don't know if you've heard of Shenyun, but Shenyun is this incredible dance performance, which started, I think, around 2006, 2007 in America.

Basically, Chinese Americans, many of them who are actual Falun Gong practitioners, started, they wanted to revive traditional Chinese culture and traditional Chinese dance where the art form was almost lost.

And so they started this in Middletown, New York.

And, you know, fast forward to today,

there's eight

traveling companies of Shen Yun.

Each one has a full Western orchestra with some Chinese instruments.

An amazingly unique sound.

I don't know if you can, you want to be able to cut a little bit of that in here because it's so, I find it incredible.

My wife and I go every year

and get like a ton of, you know, fantastic energy from it.

But, and they get, they have a million audience every year with the tagline, by the way, of China before communism.

Right.

So what what they're showing,

the grandeur, the beauty, the splendor of, and, you know, the

complexity of traditional China, which from the Chinese regime's perspective or any Chinese or any communist regime's perspective, no, we're the ones that are responsible for everything that's good about China, right?

But this show basically epitomizes the idea, no, that's actually untrue.

The truth is China has this grand history of 5,000 years, and we're going to show it to you.

And by the way, and we'll show you a little bit how the Chinese regime is actually not so good and isn't really responsible for much of that goodness.

So anyway, so there's that piece.

And there's another piece, which I keep thinking about a lot because this is an issue I've been covering for so long is this organ harvesting issue that we talked about earlier, right?

There's actually about six months ago, a survivor of this forced organ harvesting came forth.

Whoa.

And I,

listen, I know you, that's how I feel because I never thought we'd ever see one.

Exactly, right?

And so, you know, my father-in-law, he was a Holocaust survivor and his story, we made a filter about it.

There's all every Holocaust survivor I've ever talked to, they have this story where there's this one step they took and it was almost death.

But for whatever reason, they chose a path and it didn't happen and, you know, and goes back and forth like that.

And at the end, they're like, oh my goodness, I'm in Canada and I'm free.

How did this happen?

It's almost a miracle.

That's how this guy, Chen Yiming, that is how he is.

uh survived basically he almost died multiple times along the way but the bottom line is he's got a 14-inch gash across his side where they took out part of his liver and part of his lungs.

Whoa.

And he's alive to tell the tale.

And since that time, you want to talk about breaking narratives, right?

This is one narrative that the CCP has been trying to, you know, smirch, basically slander the worst possible way.

Cause, you know, how can you be admit to having a 10 or $9 to $10 billion organ harvesting industry in your country?

It's that big, right?

It's that big.

I mean, this is, again, it's very hard to estimate the exact numbers.

I don't want to, but the estimate is 60 to 100,000 transplants every year with no real credible organ donor system.

Wow.

Okay.

And that, and so, how did this all happen?

Well, what we think, and this is what the China tribunal that happened back in 2020 sort of asserted, is that

because of this Felong Gong persecution, see, in the, in the communist mentality, if you become the enemy of state, you're not really human anymore.

In fact, it's doubtful whether they really think of you as human in the first place.

But then now you become like matter to be used, right?

For the benefit of the state in a way.

So I think some very evil person thought to themselves, hey, I have a theory about who, I won't go into it here, but we can use this.

We've got millions of these people in the camps and we have this budding organ

transplant industry.

Well, the persecution of Falun Gong escalates and

near simultaneously, exponential growth in the Chinese transplant industry, new hospitals being built, all of these ads starting to happen.

So we actually know it's been happening since the early 2000s, but we only really figured it out in 2006 that this was real because it sounds so outlandish.

It sounds so

beyond the pale.

You know, actually, one of the key researchers on it called it an evil yet to be seen on this planet.

Wow.

And we don't like to believe that people are capable of such things, but the survivor, the regime, really hates him.

In fact, what they're trying to do is they're trying to lure him back to China now.

And if they can't do that, there's some we have some evidence that they want to see him.

He's, let's just say he's hiding in America, but I hope he'll come out for another press event soon.

Yeah.

And,

you know, it's just, it's, it's, it's a remarkable story and really important to know because think about it.

If we knew, if, if the American population at large understood that in China, this is happening, right?

You wonder why some of these, you know, really old and looking Chinese Communist Party leaders are living so long.

Well, they have unlimited organ supply for each of them.

If you're at the top of the pyramid, basically anything can be used to help you to survive or whatever.

I'm not, I don't know of a specific instance where that's happened, but I can tell you that's, that's how it works over there, right?

Yeah.

So

I think it's incredibly important.

It's a very interesting time where you have Shen Yun, you know, teaching America and frankly the world about the beauty of traditional culture outside of communism, which

you have this organ harvesting survivor out there that's basically like, I exist.

He doesn't even need to say anything.

He's just like, look, I'm here.

And they even admit they took those organs from him.

That's crazy.

Or they operated on him.

I don't think they said specifically they took the organs, but that's the second part.

And then, and meanwhile, you have Epoch Times, which has become this, you know, huge truth-telling media and gained its own reputation in

its own right.

So, what we're seeing is this huge push to basically attack the credibility of all of this in an elevated way.

And this China, I mentioned this Australian dissident a little while ago.

Basically, he got word in the last few months from his insider sources in China that in 2022, Xi Jinping, the dictator, elevated this to the, to having the minister of state security actually running this operation because it was so, I guess, you know, negative for the Chinese regime that they were losing their

credibility and they don't really have much more than, you know, whatever that is.

I, I,

there was this narrative for a very long time.

And as human beings, we've noticed it's very hard to change the narrative, the collective narratives that are in our our mind, I think, right?

We're actually, I think we're experiencing a time right now where that collective narrative is shifting.

And I would like to see, you know, people realize the reality of communist China.

And by the way, and one last thing I want to mention, communist China, the leadership is not the Chinese people.

And this is of absolutely critical importance.

What the regime fears the most is America.

and free countries speaking directly to the Chinese people instead of to this evil regime that pretends to represent them.

That's probably the biggest lie it's ever told is like, we represent the people.

They do not represent the disconnect with the governments and huge connect.

You know, one thing we found is propaganda work.

You know, you've been kicking around for a while.

You know how effective propaganda can be in any country, right?

So of course there's people in China that are, you know, that believe some of the things the regime will say.

They don't know what else to believe.

There's a, you know, there's what's called the Great Firewall of China, the most effective system.

Yeah, they censor everything, right?

100%.

Of course, you know, we use a system called Freegate and another one called Utzelship to punch holes in that firewall and get information across.

And millions read Epoch Times from inside China, in Chinese, in English, and in other languages.

So there's ways to do that, but it's hard because it's a highly sophisticated, multi-billion dollar system to keep the Chinese people to information away from them.

Right.

But I do feel like we're...

because we're in this very interesting time where narratives are being shattered and people are becoming more open-minded, the regime feels, and of course, because of this economic, you know, kind of brewing disaster that they're facing, they really want to stop the reality of all of that being exposed.

And we've been kind of the tip of the spear on that.

Yeah.

I don't think they'll be able to hold off all this information.

I think it's going to get there eventually.

Well, and here's something, right?

We have a new administration.

You notice that Kerry Lake has been nominated to be the director of the Voice of America, right?

Voice of America's constitutional charter is basically to talk about

America, you know, honestly, right?

Not from a political perspective, but just honestly.

And also, you know, report on things like the realities of communist China.

That would also be a fit very nicely under the VOA charter.

It's very interesting.

You know, Carrie, I know her personally.

She's been in media for decades, been an incredibly successful, you know, broadcast host and so forth.

And I know she understands these things, right?

So

they fear this greatly.

So you'll see, you know, unfortunately, the Chinese regime has huge amounts of money in Washington, D.C.,

has a huge influence on various legacy media.

And they're using, in my view, sometimes these people are being used in unwitting ways.

Right.

Okay.

And actually, there's a great Chinese dissident from New York, Chinatown that talks about this.

You know, in the 90s, he says, I was one of these people.

I was so pro-China, right?

Because I thought they had convinced me that being pro-CCP is the same thing as being pro-China.

And also they were supporting all my efforts, which was very nice and convenient, right?

But then he kind of, it just after 9-11, you know what the Chinese regime did?

A lot of people still don't know this.

They celebrated the attacks on the World Trade Center.

There were documentaries made that said, look, America deserves this.

No way.

Okay.

100%.

Right.

That's what opened his eyes.

He's like, you know what?

I've been on the wrong side.

I need to tell the truth here.

Right.

Wow.

But so there's a ton of people.

And this is what I mean.

I don't want to like,

there's some people that are getting paid to push the Chinese regime's options, but there's other people that are just sort of kind kind of along for the ride.

And maybe, you know, the incentive, you know, when you're incentivized in a very positive way, for example, financially,

it's harder for you to think opposite to what that financial incentive is.

That's a big way into the three warfares doctrine.

We'll come up on this.

But when I was growing up, when you thought of war, it was just physical violence, but there's much more to war than that, right?

Oh, 100%.

So.

Well, this is, you know,

there's a book that was written by two Chinese colonels who are now generals.

This was years ago.

It was called Unrestricted Warfare.

And Unrestricted Warfare was a book that basically explained using a lot of actual traditional ideas from,

for example, Sun Tzu, right?

Which you've heard about,

explaining how can we win a war without having to fire a shot, right?

And so this is, it's worth reading this manual.

I mean, it's kind of, it's a mind-blowing thing.

But among what's in there, among other things, is what's called the three warfares, warfares.

Okay.

And the three warfares are psychological warfare, public opinion warfare, and legal warfare.

The combination of these three is incredibly effective.

It sounds, hey, are those really warfare?

Yeah.

Yes.

Right.

And I might add economic warfare has been a huge play, right?

You know, how America has been hollowed out from the manufacturing side and the Chinese manufacturer.

You could say, well, the Chinese were just very smart and, you know, and a lot of people, you know, rich people in America made a killing of moving their manufacturing there.

Or you could think of it as as a, as you said, long game play to make America impotent from a manufacturing perspective and make the world dependent on China from a manufacturing perspective to the point where something like 20% of medical precursors in America, very important medicines, are now manufactured exclusively in China.

They could cut those off.

They threatened to do it during the pandemic.

Wow.

You see, talk about leverage from a now military perspective, right?

So legal warfare, lawsuits, right?

It's just kind of the simplest way, drain

things.

We're in the process of,

one of our CFO had an issue a while ago.

It's not related to the Epoch Times, right?

But

what I'm saying is this is very much in the CCP's interest.

And there's been all sorts of other lawsuits that have been pushed out against Shen Yun in the past.

For example, you know, environmental lawsuits against the campus where Shen Yun was done, repeatedly rejected, but draining them to the tune of millions of dollars, right?

That's just one example.

You know, the media warfare and so forth, media influence, it's, you know, it's huge, especially when, and unfortunately, there's a strong correlation between a lot of the media that have been writing, for example, hit pieces about Epoch Times, right?

And let's just say financial interests in China.

I'm not saying that they specifically were told you have to do this, but I'm saying that that alignment exists.

And of course, these things influence us in various ways at a minimum, right?

And of course, it could be worse than that.

Absolutely.

Yeah, and it's been really fun talking to Anna, man.

Where can people find you and keep up with you?

Oh, well, American Thought Leaders is my show.

It's on Epoch TV, which is our streaming platform.

I also have a YouTube channel, which actually, you know, it was actually censored really heavily for a while, but we've noticed it's starting to kind of gain a bit of life there.

So I've been putting 22-minute TV versions of my shows from Epoch TV on YouTube.

So you can check us out on YouTube.

We have some great new episodes on exactly these issues right now.

Um, and of course, theepochtimes.com-that's the website.

And you know, please join us.

We'll look it all below.

Thanks for coming out, man.

That was awesome.

Love talking with you, man.

That was great.

See you guys.