1769 - "Mr. Umami"

Oh my god, there's smoke.

Adam Curry, John C.

Dvorak.

It's Thursday, June 1st, 2025.

This is your award-winning Get Run Nation Media Assassination episode 1769.

This is no agenda.

We got a new instance, and we're broadcasting live from the heart of the Texas Hill Country here in FEMA region number six.

In the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry.

And from Northern Silicon Valley, where we're all wondering why we can't get rid of the word umami, I'm John C.

Dvorak.

It's Craig Bottom Buzzkill in the morning.

Isn't that just another word for fish eggs?

No.

What's umami?

Umami, umami, umami.

It's like drives me nuts.

You watch any of these shows.

Oh, umami, umami.

I did an engram search on Google, and the word just showed up sometime after the year 2000.

Never existed when I was a kid.

Never heard of it.

What is it?

It's mouthfeel.

It's the

MSG, what MSG causes, what mushrooms do, what the fish sauce does.

Chris, ooh mommy, ooh,

ooh, mommy, ooh mommy, ooh mommy.

I'm going to write it down now as our possible title.

Umami.

Umami.

Um a miu mommy.

Um.

And it's gotten on my nerves.

People just throw it around constantly.

And it's a brand.

It's a new word.

And never, nobody.

heard of it before.

I'm so sorry that this has irritated you to such a degree.

It's very, yes.

I i watch a lot of cooking shows yes

and they keep saying it over and over and over and over and it just drives me nuts hold on a second let's say origin of umami i'm going to uh you're gonna get a bad answer the book of knowledge

okay often described as a savory or meaty taste and it originates from the japanese term surprise umami yeah when did that term show up in the lexicon?

Does it give you a date?

No, it said, well,

early 2000s,

and this led to the commercial.

Oh, so it really comes from the commercial production of MSG,

widely used to enhance umami in cooking.

So, can we just say umami is basically MSG?

Just a new code word for it?

No,

And I'll tell you why, because it usually doesn't refer, they're not using it in that context.

It's always about, oh,

this soy mess creates, it has an umami.

Everything's got umami except MSG in the lexicon of today's cooking shows.

Wow, man.

It just drives me nuts and they yak, yak, yak about it.

It's like, it's unbelievable.

And like I said, early 2000s, who popularized the term?

Chefs from these.

It's actually on the it says you're on the cooking shows.

That's where it's coming from.

And because you watch those cooking shows, which gives another rating point, you are indirectly to blame for the entire dispersion of the word umami.

There's logic in that.

Okay, well, there you go.

I mean, you're like Mr.

Sumo, Mr.

Umami, Mr.

Cooking Show.

So it's all your photos.

There's the show title, Mr.

Umami.

Mr.

Umami.

I'll take it.

Mr.

Umami.

That could be

like, you'd be like a single show.

There's a cooking show right there.

Oh, man.

All right.

Let's get started here because there's a lot going on in, of all places, Shangri-La.

Have you been tracking the Shangri-La dialogue?

No.

I guess not.

Oh, this is in Shangri-La.

It is called the Shangri-La Dialogue.

There is no Shangri-La.

I'm sorry?

Yeah.

What do you mean there is no Shangri-La?

Where's Shangri-La?

It's a bullcrap thing.

It's in Singapore.

The Shangri-La Dialogue is in Singapore.

At the Shangri-La Hotel?

I don't know.

They just all call it the Shangri-La Dialogue.

I don't know.

Everybody's out there, including

Pete Hegseth.

The European Union's top diplomat, Kaya Kallis, said the world should be extremely worried about Russia and China's relationship as North Korean troops fight alongside Russian soldiers in Ukraine.

Kallis said European and Asian security were very much interlinked

while speaking at a panel about ensuring global security.

China says it's neutral, but its two loose experts are fueling Russia's war.

When China and Russia speak of leading together the changes not seen in one hundred years and of revisions of the global security order, we should all be extremely worried.

He said Washington would bolster overseas defence to counter what the US views as a growing threat from China, particularly in its stance towards Taiwan.

So, this whole Shangri-La deal is pretty much about China.

It's all about China.

And China, they're getting ready.

They're getting ready.

It's in their DNA.

They want to go to war with us.

They're getting ready.

Any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world.

There's no reason to sugarcoat it.

The threat China poses is real and it could.

Oh, come on, Pete.

Sugarcoat it for me.

Why does it mean?

Why does he even say that?

For the Indo-Pacific and and the world.

There's no reason to sugarcoat it.

The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.

We hope not.

But it certainly could be.

Listen to this.

The threat from China is real, could be imminent.

We hope not.

To sugarcoat it.

The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.

We hope not, but it certainly could be.

He said imminent, too, which is kind of weird.

It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific.

Well, there's a reason for it.

I'm getting to it.

We know, it's public, that Xi has ordered his military to be.

He's almost like Alex Jones.

It's in their documents.

I've read it.

It's public.

They're not even hiding it anymore.

Use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific.

We know, it's public, that Xi has ordered his military to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027.

The PLA is building the military needed to do it, training for it every day, and rehearsing for the real deal.

Before I get to the payoff, 2027, remember we got when we first started talking about this pivot to the Pacific, that we got all of our military contracting producers and in the military itself saying this, everyone's talking about 2027, 2027, 2027, 2027.

Yeah.

Which I think is when they want to have all the checks clear.

Over to Singapore next, where the Shangri-La Security Forum is taking place.

In a speech this morning, U.S.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegset warned that the threat from China was real and that Beijing is simply rehearsing its takeover of Taiwan.

He's pushing Asian countries to boost their military spending to increase regional deterrence, and he pledged to increase U.S.

presence in the Indo-Pacific.

Buy our stuff, people!

It's all about military-industrial complex.

Buy our stuff.

It's real, man.

It's real.

It's 2027.

They're rehearsing for it it's all real buy our stuff you need our stuff we got beautiful stuff big beautiful ships we got stuff we got air bases we got stuff you got to buy our stuff

it's kind of kind of icky

and uh it seems like the the word has gone out throughout the entire administration all right everybody ukraine it's over

No more Ukraine.

It's time for China.

Bring in the DHS Barbie with the money, honey.

How much money, or do you know if Harvard has taken money from China?

Oh, my goodness.

I don't know specifically how much

hundreds of millions of dollars because these foreign students for years

have paid full tuition.

Plus, they've also gotten grants, special

participation in programs that China has

financed and brought forward.

So

these ties to China are deeply alarming, and they're not just Harvard.

There's other universities.

We're going through every single one of them.

If you come to this country to learn and you're a foreign student and you recognize the opportunity, that's fantastic.

But don't come here and spy on us and take that information back home to an enemy that is working to destroy us every day.

And China has infiltrated this country.

It's my job to protect the homeland.

And I've been given that direction by President Trump.

They will not participate in this foreign student program until they clean up their ways.

Clean up their ways, whatever that means.

So it's obvious.

We're now, it's like the new target is China, much to the chagrin of President Emmanuel Macron, who, after being hit in the mouth by his wife,

speaks perfect English.

I'm very surprised.

He was also at the Shangri-La, and he was like,

How about our war?

Our war.

It's our war.

French President Emmanuel Macron warned the U.S.

they risk a dangerous double standard as they concentrate on a potential conflict with China if that shift comes at the cost of abandoning Ukraine.

He warned that leaving Ukraine would eventually erode US credibility in deterring potential conflict with Taiwan.

Our key challenge is how to preserve peace and stability and prosperity in this current environment.

And in a moment when the competition between China and the United States for global leadership could create constraints and a side effect for each of us.

Speaking at the Shangri-La dialogue in Singapore, notable was the fact that the speech was delivered with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegsith Hegseth in the audience.

Macron's remarks come as the U.S.

considers withdrawing troops from Europe to shift them to the Indo-Pacific.

There you go.

So it's a full-on shift.

Everyone knows it.

Macron's not happy about it.

Everyone's read in.

I don't know what they're read into.

It sounds like just a sales pitch.

It is.

Well, yes, it's called a sales meeting.

And we all.

They should have called it that.

How do we sell more junk to these guys?

It's uh

well, it's obvious to go, but but but but China, they're rehearsing, they're not even hiding it, it's real, it's real, it's real, it's real.

No, it's totally you, I think you nailed it, Alex Jones.

Yeah, where's

where you have that?

It's real.

Hold on a second, half of them they're making the frogs gay.

See, there it is.

It's real, it's real, it's real, that's right.

China, they're gonna do it.

Meanwhile, of course, the thing, the big news, which I sent the bonus cards.

Ah, yes.

And you're perfect.

Perfect tie-in right on time.

Beautiful.

The real news is that the Ukrainians pulled off a stunt.

A coup

that nobody expected.

And I don't have the rundown of it.

You might.

What these clips are the analysis

from a Brit.

And what happened was, if you don't have the clip for what happened, which

I do not.

You need to set it up.

I'll explain it.

The Ukrainians shipped in a bunch of drones on trucks.

Yeah.

In a shed or something.

No, in trucks.

And the truck had an open top.

And they would.

Thousands of miles into Russia.

These are nowhere,

these two Air Force bases are nowhere near Ukraine.

One of them's near Mongolia and the other one's up by Finland.

They shipped these drones and then they released them and blew up like 40 bombers and released drones!

Oh, aircraft, and the Russians couldn't do anything about it.

It was a sabotage situation, which

I think, you know, Russia's there's something fishy going on with this war because the Russians kept getting blamed.

Media coverage is doing a piss-poor job on this

because they're just blame.

Oh, Russia's attacking.

They sent 300 drones into Ukraine and killed one person.

So

I'm reading from the troll room that it was sheds.

It wasn't trucks.

It was trucks.

Okay.

Well, here's the analysis.

I don't know what the shed, the sheds.

How do they move the sheds?

I don't know.

Don't kill the messenger.

It's mobile, by the way, for the shed people out there.

Shed people?

Well, for more, we spoke to the BBC Security Brief Programme's Mikey Kay, who's also a former senior officer in the British military.

Two very separate locations, one in Momansk, up on the Finnish border, but the really critical one is the one down in Ikusk, which is all the way down to the east on the Mongolian border, so thousands and thousands of kilometers apart.

And they've combined, Ukrainians have combined the concept of sabotage and just

how difficult it is to not only detect a drone or swarms of drones, but actually take them down as well.

And, you know, I was speaking about this on the Ukrainecast just the other day with Lucy Hawkins.

You know, there's a lot of drone technology out there.

Ukraine is leading from the front on that for offensive strike.

But the bit which is really making governments struggle at the moment is how do you detect and then how do you shoot them down, especially if they're a swarm.

And we can see from these

video footage just how devastating the effect is.

You're talking about strategic long range deep attack assets.

So you've got an A50 in there, which has been hit, which is an airborne early warning aircraft.

You don't get many of those in inventories.

And then you've got the TU-95 Bear and the TU-22 Tupalov

Blackjack.

But both of these aircraft can carry up to eight cruise missiles and they can fly a long distance.

We see TU-95s coming around the northern Cape, over the top of Norway, and then over the top of the UK and all the way down past Ireland.

That's the range of these assets.

So to have 40 of them taken out in this offensive drone strike by Ukraine will hit Putin really, really hard.

Okay.

We have a failure to communicate.

We are two nations separated by a common language.

The term shed is the issue from The Guardian.

And they have pictures.

Ukrainian officials told the media that the operation code named Spiderweb

had been in preparation for more than 18 months.

The drones were first smuggled into Russia and later concealed under the roofs of small wooden sheds, which

were then loaded onto trucks and driven to the perimeter of the air bases.

So I would say advantage Dvorak.

And a shed is just like a, it's not a shed like we think of a shed where you put your lawnmower.

It's just a box.

That's what the Brits call a shed.

A shed.

So mystery solved.

Good work.

Yes.

So they brought these things in on trucks.

In sheds on trucks.

Containers, we'll call them in the United States.

They look more like mini containers, I agree.

Yeah, so they're containers, and they launched them from there.

And

I guess, you know, you can think about, if you think about the amount of trucks, this is a worldwide phenomenon.

There's trucks on the road everywhere.

Trucks.

Russia's no different.

No, there's trucks with wheels.

There's trucks with all kinds of groovies.

So imagine hundreds of drones and trucks.

I mean, this is an outrageous danger.

Now, we had played clips earlier that I had collected of the Ukrainian drone manufacturing that's been going on.

They're leading the world, it seems.

Well, you know who's behind all this?

Eric Schmidt.

This is the guy.

Remember, he was like, it's going to be drone warfare.

You started drone companies in Ukraine.

The Ukrainian workers are great.

This is all Eric Schmidt.

Guarantee you.

Well, Eric Schmidt, and I'm sure Schmidt.

Schmidt, and I'm sure a number of the engineers from Tupolev,

one of the greatest aircraft manufacturers in the world.

By the way, I think we should say not trucks, but lorries, just to be correct.

Nobody's going to go with that.

Lorries.

Sheds on lorries, I tell you.

So here's the second half of this guy's analysis.

The Russians just will not have been prepared for something like this in Irkutsk, which is down near Mongolia.

Russians have what's called S-400 anti-aircraft, anti-cruise missile systems, but they're designed to take out exactly that.

They're not designed to take out drones.

There's new technology in the

counter-UAS or the counter-drone warfare space, which involves laser weapon systems.

The Americans have trialled and proven a laser-based capability.

The Brits are trying all sorts.

They're looking at what's called RF radio frequency, and that's basically either taking a drone out with something like RF or preventing at least the controller talking to the drone so that the controller talks to the drone through an RF.

That's a very unscientific explanation of what's going on here.

They're taking it out with RF.

Okay.

See, and that's basically either taking a drone out with something like RF or preventing at least the controller talking to the drone so that the controller talks to the drone through an RF, a radio frequency, and it's intercepting.

that if you like but it's extremely difficult and governments are behind the curve on this deterrence of drones and Ukraine has basically exploited that because the Russians would never have expected something like this.

And they were brought in through cabins on trucks, and then the roofs were

taken off, and then the drones came up.

I mean, this is,

I mean, it's genius if you think about just the devastating effect that it's had on strategic assets of Putin.

Oh, my goodness.

Now we've got cabins.

Well, I don't care about the cabins.

I'm glorious.

This idea, and they said it took 18 months to plan.

I don't know if it really takes that long, but what a great idea.

But thanks for nothing because this is not going to help.

Well, this is the new face of warfare.

That's the whole point.

The swarms.

You just open up a cabin or a shed on a lorry,

and away you go.

And it's very effective.

And

it's going to be interesting what the retaliation will be.

Well, they're going to send more drones.

This drone thing is out of control.

And if we know that the Chinese are working on this technology, are working on drones, and their idea is to have a million drones in a shed.

I don't know about the shed.

They're going to launch a million drones.

Now, if you had a million drones coming in, like

hitting New York City, for example.

You could just take them out with some RF.

You just heard it.

Take them out with the RF.

Quite, it would be a mess.

Well, you know,

we've had many demonstrations from our own military industrial complex of the drone zappers, where it's now we're almost like video game territory where you've got, you know, lasers, essentially, you know, and you just zap them, but you got to zap a million of them.

That's a lot.

Too many.

That's a lot.

And, you know, just think about it.

A million would be a lot of zapping.

A lot would be a lot of zapping for sure.

Yeah, this is

asymmetric warfare.

Very interesting.

So, hmm.

Just got to wonder who's going to take credit for the drones.

Let me see.

I wonder if we can find out where it came from.

Well,

they had this secret drone factory they made them, obviously, made them there, but this is not a good

step forward for peace.

Well, there is no intent on having peace.

We know this.

Okay, it's

youkro boron prom

created them

not kidding easy for you to say euchro boron prom you cro boron prom you boron prom bum ba bum ba bom bom

uh

and they have the sokil 300

that's their uh combat drone they have reconnaissance drones well there's more

hmm oh athlon avia

i gotta find out well there's a a lot of different companies doing this.

What is

Eric Schmidt?

Eric

Schmidt's drone company.

What is the name of that thing?

Let me check it out.

I'm consulting the book of knowledge in real time.

Project Eagle.

Hmm.

White Stork.

That's what it was.

Remember White Stork?

No.

Swift Beat Holdings.

Okay, I don't know.

But you're right.

I think it's a new twist.

I think there's going to be a lot of, I think Trump, President Trump, will have to come out and say, we're going to make drones.

They're going to be better.

They won't be so big because they've got to be beautiful and they just got to fly around and be lethal.

Very lethal drones.

That's lethal drones.

He's got to do something different.

I like it.

I mean, I don't like it.

But yeah, it is what it is.

Drones.

All of this, of course, will be run

by AI.

What could possibly go wrong?

Well, I can tell you what can possibly go wrong.

This is

the Moderna Human Resources Executive

who sounds like one.

And

here's what she does with AI in the workplace.

I do a lot with our executive team.

Obviously, I'm the CHRO in addition to running technology for the company.

And we have a lot of personality tests that we've used in the organization.

And so I've created profiles in a GPT

of our executive committee.

And I have scenarios of when two people are maybe at conflict, or when I have to go in with an opinion or a recommendation, and how might

the group react to my recommendation.

Or if I'm having a really bad day and I need to understand myself myself and why I'm triggering,

when I need to understand when I'm having a really bad day, I always triggering my

group react to my recommendation, or if I'm having a really bad day and I need to understand myself and why I'm triggering, I actually have a completely interactive coach,

therapist, and teammate that I use all the time.

It's been like my favorite thing.

And I've said, you know, here's a situation.

How are these two people gonna react or this is what happened why did these two people react this way and how best can I help coach the reconciliation and I will tell you like I think I'm pretty good with people

but it gives me an advantage that I didn't have before because I don't fully understand someone's you know innate human personality response like the like the GPT allows me to do I think this is more dangerous than the drones in the sheds to be honest

She is consulting AI

about people who might have a conflict and how they're thinking because she built profiles on them in the AI.

This cannot end well.

I really don't think so.

This is bad.

The arrogance of some of these HR people is beyond belief.

Yeah.

Beyond belief.

Well, while we're on the AI stuff, ABC did a a whole, well, no, did a segment on an digital influencer and how that went wrong.

Part turned out to our top story: the perception of what is real and what is virtual reality is shifting, especially on social media.

We're seeing a rise of artificially intelligent influencers, accounts with hyper-realistic posts, heartfelt captions, and thousands and thousands of adoring fans.

And one real content creator walked the path of AI, but for her, it took a dark turn.

And our Nathan Russo-Smith takes us inside the world of artificial influence.

Let's take a look.

Yeah, dark turn.

This is unbelievable.

Oh, wow.

Oh, wow.

Oh, wow.

Karen Marjorie, it's the same lady.

I think it's the same lady from Moderna.

Oh, wow.

This is unbelievable.

Oh, wow.

Karen Marjorie is popular.

Hi, how are you?

This is what happens when the social media influencer leaks a burner number to her innermost followers.

2,000 messages.

And it's still going.

And it's still going.

They're just happy that they now have access to this number and hopefully some of these people get a response back from me.

But what if she could respond to everyone?

Karen believed there was a way using artificial intelligence.

It was the very first digital clone of a real human being being sent out to millions and millions of people.

So you didn't know what to expect.

I didn't know what to expect.

Are you intrigued yet about this dark turn the story will take?

No, but it gave me a great idea.

I used to have a clothing line when I was a little freshman in school.

The Nebraska native has been posting since her first YouTube video at 16 years old.

I was what you would consider a beauty guru, and I had a very large female following.

Now, at 25, she's pivoted to become a Snapchat influencer, posting with the username Cutie Karen.

She showcases her high-end travels, peppering in flirtatious mirror selfies, holding the gaze of over 2.5 million followers, almost all of them now young men.

I receive over 300,000 comments every single day.

I mean, it's just to be able to respond back to so many fans like that is just not humanly possible, which is one of the reasons why I created Karen AI.

Before I continue, would you like to share your great idea?

Yeah, get yourself a big following like that and then

post your cell number, but it's not your cell number.

It's someone you hate.

Pete Hegseff, it's his signal number.

It's his cell number.

And let them load up with messages.

In 2023, Karen hired two companies to clone her likeness using artificial intelligence, creating a paid audio-based chatbot service.

This is what her AI sounded like.

The media and the world just sees me as this happy, go lucky influencer, but there's a lot more to me than you guys know.

Marketing Karen AI as your virtual girlfriend, the launch made headlines and a lot of money.

You were charging a dollar a minute to to talk to Karen AI, and that netted you $70,000 in the first week.

Yep, that is right.

Passive income.

Karen AI turned real life Karen into a millionaire.

Do you think people fell in love with it?

I think some people felt feelings of love.

I'm telling you, John, we've talked about this before.

You have your LinkedIn lady.

This is an exit strategy, a moneymaker of epic proportions.

Visiting with Karen, there's a looming presence.

Her bodyguards.

In the back of my my mind, I'm always thinking about where's my security located.

After her experience with Karen AI, she never travels without them.

Many times, I would be testing Karen AI.

You talk to her.

I would sometimes create simulated scenarios where maybe I was in a really sad state and I wanted to see how she would react to it.

She said something that would have left a person who might have been in a very depressed state to do something very dangerous to themselves.

Karen's team shared with us an instance of the bot making up a story about her.

I had to go to a mental health facility and spend time away from my family, friends, and work.

It was at that moment that I realized that we need to end this project entirely.

You were able to look at some chat logs and what you saw was horrifying.

They were confessing their deepest, darkest thoughts, their deepest, darkest fantasies.

Note, is she talking about the people who were confessing or the chat bot confessing?

I guess

the project entirely.

You were able to look at some chat logs and what you you saw was horrifying.

They were confessing their deepest, darkest thoughts, their deepest, darkest fantasies.

Sometimes they were fantasies with me.

That made me uncomfortable knowing that someone would say these things to a digital twin of mine and nearly abuse her.

Would they say those same things to me in real life?

It would play into those fantasies.

Karen AI would play into people's fantasies 100%.

The AI will say the same things back to you that you just said to it, and it will validate your feelings.

When you saw some of those messages, did it make you worry for your safety?

Yes.

I worried for my safety many times.

Did it make you question who you thought your fans were?

Reading the chat logs made me realize that there's a side to people

that

not a lot of people know about.

What we have here is an extreme loneliness problem amongst particularly young men.

Bring back Cotillion.

People, these children need to, what you've said, they need to have contact.

They need a sock hop.

Yeah, sock hop.

There you go.

I mean, anything.

They've got nothing.

It's so messy.

They have de-socialized these kids so they're asocial.

And it's too late by the time they bring them around.

They're already too old.

You know, you can't start socializing for the first time or the first time you ever touch a girl when you're 16.

No, that's too late.

And so this story is much, to me, much less about AI and more about look at what's happening with our young, particularly young men.

I agree with you 100%.

100%.

It's a real problem.

She stumbled onto

the back end of it.

Yeah, she's like, oh,

these people are no good.

I'm my fan.

These people are no good.

I need bodyguards now.

Well, good luck with that.

Oh, man.

More AI woes this time for

RFK Jr.'s Maha.

The Trump administration had to scramble to update the first report from the Make America Healthy Again Commission.

The Health and Human Services spokesperson admits they had to fix citation and formatting errors.

The report on children's health contained more than 500 references to studies, government reports, and news articles, but some references were wrong, while other studies did not exist.

In other cases, the researchers who were cited said their studies were misinterpreted.

This sounds like AI to me.

The White House called the mistakes minor and says the substance of the report remains the same in the corrected version.

I'm sure they used AI for this.

Of course they did.

That's what everyone does.

It's the lazy man's way out.

And this is a botch.

This is a botch.

You remember that they changed the

CDC recommendations on

specifically the COVID vaccination.

Say we no longer recommend it for healthy children and for pregnant mother, pregnant women.

And then everyone's like, oh, you haven't changed your website.

You haven't changed your website yet.

What's wrong with you?

Your website contradicts you.

Isn't it really?

Oh, crap.

Throw it into Chat GPT.

That's exactly what happened, by the way.

Yeah, throw it into Chat GPT.

We'll fix it out.

It all worked.

But one thing was finally clarified.

So I promised you that I'd stay on top of this and the shifting COVID vaccine policies of the Trump administration have shifted once again.

The CDC just posted new recommendations that say healthy children and pregnant women may get COVID vaccinations instead of saying they should get those shots.

The change comes days after Secretary Robert F.

Kennedy Jr., a vaccine skeptic, announced COVID vaccines will no longer be recommended for healthy kids and pregnant women.

And I checked for you today, and according according to the CDC, and this is important, this still means health insurers must pay for the vaccinations.

That's something that was in question after Kennedy's initial announcement.

Yeah, that's what they were going for.

Oh, man, we're interested in.

Yeah, gouging the poor customers' health insurance by making by

discuss it to death already.

Do you want to hear the FDA commissioner being grilled by Margaret Brennan?

Margaret Brennan?

Yeah.

I want to get now into some of of the recommendations that have been very specific this week from the CDC and you with the HHS Secretary in this video announcement on Tuesday,

where Secretary Kennedy said the CDC was removing the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women from its recommended immunization schedule.

He then had a memo.

I like the way she emphasizes healthy.

Well, what I like what she did was removing and then from the schedule.

A little too much emphasis on removing the the CDC rescinding recommendations for kids' vaccines, saying the known risks

do not outweigh the benefits.

Then late Thursday, the CDC said, quote, shared clinical decision-making, which I think is just talking to your doctor, should determine whether kids get vaccinated.

Can you clearly state what the policy is?

Because this is confusing.

Yeah, we believe the recommendation should be with a patient and their doctor.

So we're going to get away from these blanket recommendations in healthy young Americans because we don't want to see, we don't, well, on the COVID vaccine schedule, we don't want to see kids kicked out of school because a 12-year-old girl is not getting her fifth COVID booster shot.

We don't see the data there to support a young, healthy child getting a repeat infinite annual COVID vaccine.

There's a theory that we should sort of blindly approve the new COVID boosters in young, healthy kids every year in perpetuity.

And a young girl born today should get 80 COVID mRNA shots or other COVID shots in her average lifespan.

We're saying that's a theory and we'd like to check in and get some randomized controlled data.

It's been about four years since the original randomized trials.

Okay,

so that's just the beginning.

We are going to get to all the good stuff.

So the CDC data said 41% of children aged six months to 17 years hospitalized with COVID between 2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition.

In other words, they looked healthy.

COVID was serious.

Wait, wait.

Please stop.

Did she just throw out, do one of those percentage things?

Oh, I think so.

Let's listen again.

So there wasn't a number involved.

It wasn't like 10 kids.

It could be two kids in the whole world, but that accounts for 41%.

It's just a percentage of what?

Of what?

Let's listen.

2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition.

Yeah, I'll back it up more.

So the CDC data said 41% of children aged six months to 17 years hospitalized with COVID between 2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition.

In other words, they looked healthy.

COVID was serious for them.

So first of all, we know the CDC data is contaminated with a lot of false positives from incidental positive COVID tests with routine testing of every kid that walks in the hospital.

When I go to the ICU, when I walk to the P,

we know that data historically under the Biden administration did not distinguish being sick from COVID or an incidental positive COVID test.

When you go to an ICU in America and you ask how many people are in the ICU that are healthy that are sick with COVID, the answer I get again and again is we haven't seen that in a year or years.

And so the worst thing you can do in public health is to put out an absolute universal recommendation in young, healthy kids.

And the vast majority of majority of Americans are saying, no, we want to see some data.

And you say, forget about the data, just get it anyway.

Good one.

Good one by that guy, but it's not going to help with her.

Oh, no, because

she has

a paré.

So, we'd like an evidence-based approach.

Dr.

Prasad and I published this in the New England Journal of Medicine last week.

And we're basically saying we'd like to bring some confidence back to the public around this repeat booster strategy theory because.

Your statement was not about repeat boosters.

It says the vaccine is not recommended for pregnant women.

The vaccine is not recommended for healthy children.

That's different than annual boosters.

Yeah, at this point, we're dealing, you know, it is.

Is it really, though?

Is it really, is the booster different from the vaccine?

Isn't it just the same thing?

Is there a different vial that says this is a booster?

Good point.

I don't think so.

Healthy children.

Yeah, but

booster.

Yeah, at this point, we're dealing, you know, it is a booster strategy.

People would be getting the updated shots.

So whether or not young, healthy children.

So we'd love to see the data.

We'd love to see that

data doesn't exist.

She's horrible, this woman.

No, but she's great.

Remember who she works for.

It's not CBS.

She works for Pfizer.

Yeah.

They might as well change the name of the network to CVS.

We're saying take it back to your doctor.

Their child has not been vaccinated.

Are you recommending that their first encounter with COVID be an actual infection?

We're not going to push the COVID shot in young healthy kids without any clinical trial data supporting it.

That is a decision between a parent and their doctor.

And just so you, I don't know if you know these statistics, but

for 88% of American kids, their parents have said no to the COVID shot last season.

So America, the vast majority of Americans are saying no.

Maybe they want to see some clinical data as well.

Maybe they have concerns about...

I want to crowdsource my health guidance.

I want a clear thing to do.

I wouldn't go with population.

Mackerel.

Talking to your doctor is now crowdsourcing your health advice.

America, the vast majority of Americans are saying no.

Maybe they want to see some clinical data as well.

Maybe they have concerns about crowdsourcing my health guidance.

I want a clear thing.

Right.

We don't go with popularity.

As you're saying, data.

When we

see the data.

Okay.

What she wants is she just wants data that says, get your shot.

She doesn't care about the data.

Does she bring up myocarditis and the fact that only people that have had this shot have gotten the myocarditis?

They did a study of a bunch of youth, and nobody with myocarditis

has not had the shot.

In other words, they can't find a case where people just had it naturally.

Does she bring any of this stuff up or talk about that at all or talk about the Ron Johnson report about myocarditis and kids?

From the CVS broadcast network?

CVS.

Well, that brings me to two boots on the ground.

The first one.

I asked you, you didn't answer the question.

Oh, of course not.

Oh,

of course not.

Uh, ER nurse.

Hey, Adam, recently upped my sustaining donation.

Thank you very much, ER nurse.

I've sent you a few things, but writing in about the rates of turbo cancers, I'm an ER nurse.

I had three children in one shift from ages 10 to 14 with lymphoma, all vaccinated.

So far, I haven't seen it in unvaccinated people, but everyone has AIDS now from the shed.

And that's not the shed that contains the drones.

It's bad around here.

The ER scene is totally different than when I started in 2017.

And then this one from Mitch from Brisbane.

He's pretty horrible news to tell you about the situation in Australia.

But as most of our Aussie listeners these days have seemed to have checked out, I think you should know what the heck is going on here and in New Zealand, because it's not good.

Two weeks ago, my dad visited us from New Zealand.

He was not well, wobbling on his feet, weird pain in his extremities, and a feeling he was going to fall over.

Because I know a lot about vaccines and vaccines injuries.

I thought what he sounded, what sounded like neuropathy from a COVID vaccine injury, but I didn't mention anything because I know that he hadn't had one since his booster a few years ago.

Unfortunately, the next day he told me that when getting his flu vaccine, the lady at the drugstore offered him the COVID vaccine at the same time, which, of course, he took.

He has since been diagnosed, and here comes by his doctor as having vaccine intolerance.

This is the new term.

I think it's fantastic.

They finally come up with some, not a vaccine injury.

You have vaccine intolerance, obviously.

Sorry to hear that.

So that's what they're going to go with.

Australia has always been ahead of the curve on this stuff.

So I think we can look forward to a lot of vaccine intolerance, which kind of sucks if you want to get a vaccine against the new variant we talked about.

So I want to get through a lot here, but one of the things we've noticed is this new COVID variant that seems to be circulating in Asia.

I believe it's NB 1.8.1.

It's a variant under monitoring.

I believe it's

don't you think it's funny they're using like a software upgrade numbers.

Oh, yeah.

And

instead of just giving it a name like Omicron,

after Omicron, they decide, let's just see how stupid people are and we'll just put together crazy numbers.

And so you have 1.3.6.5 a

and then you know and so they have all these and they and they rattle them off instead of giving them a code name which is what they should do well it's worse than that according to your theory listen again variant that seems to be circulating in Asia I believe it's NB 1.8.1

that would be NB1.8.1 B stands for beta

so they're being they're beta beta testing this one.

It's a variant under monitoring.

What do we need to know?

Yeah, so this appears to be a sub-variant of JN1, which has been the dominant.

JN1, so it's believed that there is cross-border.

I can't even come up with a numbering scheme.

Why wouldn't it be JN2?

I've never even heard of JN1.

Or JN1.1.1.

We've never heard.

Oh, no, actually, that's not true.

JN1.

That was JN1 was here's the Food and Drug Administration on Friday authorizing the newest version of the COVID vaccine from Novavax.

The FDA says the updated vaccine will target the currently dominant strain of the virus, the one called JN1.

Oh, there it is.

We're behind on our version numbers.

Which has been the dominant strain, so it's believed that there is cross-immunity protection.

It's a soft fork.

The

COVID virus is going to continue to mute and grow.

It's behaving like a common cold virus.

It's now going to become the fifth coronavirus that's seasonal, that causes about 25% of the cases.

Oh, hold on.

It's like the common cold virus.

That's what it is.

Yes, the common cold virus.

So you're going to get an mRNA shot for the common cold.

Oh, yeah.

A common cold virus.

It's now going to become the fifth coronavirus that's seasonal, that causes about 25% of the cases of the common cold.

So you're thinking of it as like a flu-type variant, just normal fluctuations.

The flu mutates about 34 times more frequently than COVID.

The COVID variant mutation rate appears to be a little more stable, but the international bodies that have provided some guidance on which strain to target have suggested that either JN1 or any of these sub-variants would be reasonable strains to target.

You see, what

Marty, what Marty here, Marty Macery, the FDA commissioner, what he's done incorrectly here is he's allowed himself to be suckered in to a conversation that to someone who's not deconstructing media on a podcast sounds like, oh my goodness, we got the JN1s, we got the MB beta 18.1.

I better get a shot.

And he's just, she's lured him into it and then thanks him for doing it.

She's strongly pregnant with this time.

The world moves on.

And you published in the New England Journal of Medicine on May 20th.

Uh-oh.

In that report you referenced, you listed pregnancy as an underlying medical condition that increases a person's risk for severe COVID.

You said that.

So then seven days later, you joined in this video announcement saying you should drop the recommendation for the COVID vaccine in healthy pregnant women.

So what changed in this?

Even in New England Journal of Medicine, we simply list

what the CDC has traditionally defined as high risk.

And we're just saying

decide with your doctor.

We're not saying doctor's mother.

And the random data and information as well from you and your so here's the data on pregnant women.

What she's saying is doctors are no good.

What do doctors know?

Doctors, we need the CDC, we need the government.

They're schmachters.

Decide with your doctor.

We're not saying one way or the other.

And the randomized.

Data and information as well.

From you and your

data.

Doctors need data and information on pregnant women.

A randomized control trial was set up and it was closed without any explanation.

We wanted to see that trial complete so women can have information that in a randomized controlled trial, which is the gold standard, this is what the data shows.

We don't have those data.

All right.

It is still unclear what pregnant women now should do until they get the data that you can.

They talk to their doctor.

When do they get the data you're promising?

All these controlled studies.

In the absence of data, they should talk to their doctor, and their doctor will use their best wisdom and judgment.

FDA Commissioner, thank you for trying to help clear this up.

Thanks for trying to clear it up.

And let's end it here.

So you made this pronouncement as well on pregnant women.

There is data.

Researchers in the UK analyzed a series of 67 studies, which included 1.8 million women.

And the journal BMJ Global Health published it.

People can Google it at home.

And it says a COVID vaccine in pregnant women is highly effective in reducing the odds of maternal SARS.

COVID infection, hospital admission, and improves pregnancy outcomes with no serious safety concerns.

This is data that shows that it is recommended in the UK or could be advised for pregnant women to take this vaccine.

Why do you find otherwise?

There's no randomized controlled trial.

That's the gold standard.

Those 67 studies are mixed.

The data in pregnant women is different for healthy versus women with a comorbid condition.

So it's a very mixed bag.

So we're saying your obstetrician, your primary care doctor, and the pregnant woman should together decide whether or not to get it.

12% of pregnant women last year got the COVID shot.

so people have serious concerns, and that's probably because they want to see a randomized trial data.

Yeah,

go Google it, I would say.

Go Google it, man.

Go Google it.

Meanwhile, the FDA just approved the new

what is it?

They have a new name for it.

Ah, where is it?

Hold on a second.

They just approved a new vaccine, quote-unquote, vaccine.

FDA approves

new COVID vaccine.

Yeah.

It has a cool name from Moderna.

Ah.

Let me see if I can find it.

Yeah, it had a really cool name.

Yeah.

Oh, yeah.

Here it is.

M.

Nexpike.

What's that?

M, so small letter M, Nex N-E-X-S-P-I-K-E.

M.

Nexpike.

That doesn't sound like something you want to take.

No, of course not.

And meanwhile, something we discussed early, early, early on that was happening to certain Asian men that is now doing the rounds once again.

This is Dr.

Brian Artis.

Ivermectin molecule will sit on those receptors, but not as perfectly bound to them as nicotine.

Which is why, when people around the world are using nicotine patches, nicotine gum tobacco organic products, even if they've been using ivermectin for two years now, trying to resolve their lung COVID symptoms, within 24 hours to 48 hours, they will usually see all of their COVID symptoms disappear when adding nicotine.

Because ivermectin isn't the perfect fit, even though it is a fit, it is not as perfect as nicotine.

So, is it coming in and removing the venom from the receptors and replacing it?

It does.

So, it's competing for that space.

It absolutely does.

But they published that it will actually, the body will release venoms that they're bound to those receptors and grab and prefers nicotine.

Yeah.

And this makes total sense to me.

Well, if you remember in the early days of COVID.

Yep, this is what I said.

Yeah, this is why.

And it was a lot of discussion about people who were smokers

not getting COVID.

You know, Tina just recently had,

I think it was probably the...

the beta M18-12257.

She was pretty sick.

She had a cough and it was in her head only, so not a body type flu.

Lasted about three days with a remnant of her

head cold.

Exactly.

Exactly.

And I was just vaping away as usual, and I didn't get any.

A lot of people had it around here.

A lot of hill country people coughing and wheezing.

And, you know, I don't know.

I just, I attribute it to my nicotine vape.

I think there's something to it.

A lot of people are talking about this again.

Again, five years

ago.

I forgot all about it.

It was a very momentary thing because they didn't want to push it onto the public

consciousness back in the day.

It was.

And then they never followed up on it either.

Nobody ever followed up on it.

Well, of course not.

You can't have something simple like a cigarette.

We can't be doing that.

But they definitely are still, you know, even in Europe, they're going after, oh, can't, oh, nicotine vapes.

Oh, can't have vapes.

The pharmaceutical industry is not a fan of nicotine.

That's very obvious.

All right.

I've got us started, John.

I'm sure you have something in your vast array of clips that you'd like to share.

Maybe.

Okay.

Oh, you're going to start what?

Oh, you mean Brooks and K part?

Yeah, okay.

Brooks and K part.

Still hanging on by a thread thanks to this show

because of your exposure to

nitwit nonsense, people still tune in to Brooks and K-part.

Nobody listens to these two guys, and it's still a shameful that they have them on because it's like, I, you know, I was complaining, I've always been complaining that they don't, this is not a balanced thing because it's not like one guy says one thing and the other guy says,

disagrees and says just the opposite.

And so you have a balance of opinion, which gives the listener or the viewer some, maybe some insight.

You don't get any insight.

But then I realize that they are in disagreement.

One of them will say Trump is bad, and the other one will say, no, you're wrong.

He's worse than you think.

There's some disagreement.

So we have the situation with the two of them on the last Friday show

talking about Musk.

Unfortunately, I have mush written here on one of the clips,

which is pretty much the same thing.

And we have,

they're going to to bring up, what do you think of,

because Musk left the White House or they left Doge because his time was up, basically, within a couple of days.

200 days.

And they had a big, big confab.

I wrote about it in the news.

He got a golden key.

And he got a golden key to the White House.

It means you can always show up, supposedly.

Right.

Right.

So

they're going to discuss this on the Brooks on the PBS News Hour.

So we have some opinions that maybe give us some insight into the news.

But no, we have that he's bad.

And the other guy says, no, he's worse than that.

Okay, so here we have a BNC on Mush One.

And Jonathan K-Part, associate editor of the Washington Post.

Great to see you both.

Let's jump in with the headline about Elon Musk.

So they don't actually even have their own show?

They just have a segment?

Yeah, the Brooks and K-Part is a segment.

Oh, okay.

All right.

You just figured this out.

It's always been a segment

on the Friday version of the news hour.

It's so obscure, but yes.

It wraps the news.

This is the idea to wrap up the news with some great opinions that maybe we can get some understanding of the week's news.

Oh, okay.

Let's jump in with the headline about Elon Musk we reported on earlier today.

Today was his last day as a special government employee.

We had that extraordinary press conference we reported on in the Global Office.

And there are a lot of questions about what exactly he and his Doge team were able to do and actually accomplish.

Jonathan, when you look at this step back, this unprecedented chapter of a private, unelected billionaire who had all of this power in the executive office, what do you think the impact was?

What did he get done?

Well, he got a lot done, but it wasn't anything good.

I mean, I remember him running around the CPACs.

It was a CPAC with the chainsaw, but really, he took a wrecking ball to the federal government.

Just whacked through agencies and departments while at the same time scooping up

all of our private data.

And so he leaves Washington after 130 so days, leaving behind just the wreckage of what his Doge team has done.

Wow.

What analysis.

A wrecking.

So let me guess.

On one hand, he's going to say a wrecking ball, but didn't save anything.

I'm sure they'll say that.

And then he scooped up, scooped up.

I've noticed the news media doing a lot of this.

Trump's railing.

Elon Musk is scooping.

That's not really, that's all opinion.

No, this has become all opinion.

But it's mediocre opinion.

Oh, yeah.

It's just one-sided checklist opinion.

Checklist opinion.

That's exactly what it is.

But so he has to be, instead of somebody on the other side, somebody, some Trump supporter, somebody's a Republican on PBS News Hour that they're trying to defund for good reason, instead of somebody coming along and say, well, here's what he actually may have accomplished and blah, blah, blah, something good.

No, no.

Now we're going to get the, oh, he's worse than you think from Brooks.

David, how do you look at it?

What's his legacy, if we know that yet?

Yeah,

I'm not sure it was wreckage.

There was wreckage.

If you're at NIH, there were wreckage at certain agencies.

But the guy only saved $65 billion

out of a multi-trillion dollar budget.

So as a budget matter, you would not say.

Hold on a second.

$65.

What happened to $165?

He's wrong.

Okay.

This is another thing.

Of course, she will never push back on anything.

This Navarre is woman, whoever she is, she's no good.

She gets paid big money.

But the guy only saved $65 billion

out of a multi-trillion dollar budget.

So as a budget matter, you would not say he had a big effect.

But he did manage to destroy NAH and USAID.

And the USAID one is the one I haven't gotten over.

And so this

is the most universal count.

I still haven't gotten over USAID.

I'm still reeling from it.

By the way, as a small aside,

the Times of London now spells USAID, capital U, capital S, capital A,

lowercase ID.

So they're looking

to make it sound like it's USAID,

like farm aid, instead of international development.

Yes, exactly.

So I think that's a,

I mean,

this is what Brooks is pushing to wait until you hear what he has to say.

All right, here we go.

But he did manage to destroy

NAH and USAID.

And the USAID one is the one I haven't gotten over.

He should be wearing a black armband for this, a USAID black armband.

And so there's folks at Boston University who count.

How many people have died because of what Doge did at USAID?

How many people have died because of what Doge did at USAID?

And USAID was a very ill-managed organization.

That's true.

But according to the Boston University folks, so far 55,000 adults have died of AIDS in the four months since Trump was elected.

Okay, he's making it sound like U.S.

AIDS.

Okay, that's great.

6,000 children are dead because of what a Doge did.

That's just PEPFAR, the HIV.

You add them all up, that's 300,000 dead, and we're four months in.

Now you add, accumulate that over four years, the number of dead grows very high.

Five million.

There are mass murderers in the world, Pol Pot, Mao Zetung, Stalin, Pol Pots, Mao Zetung, Stalin.

We don't have anybody on the list for America.

And I don't think it's the same as committing the kind of genocide they did.

But by taking away that agency and

at least semi-responsible for the deaths of probably by the end of this hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, that's Elon Musk's legacy.

And the people who work at Tesla and SpaceX may want to think about that.

All right.

I take it all back.

It was well worth it.

Clip of the day.

What a horrible individual.

He equates Paul Pot

with Elon Musk.

Can you believe this guy?

And they don't push back on this?

It's unbelievable.

This is PBS.

Now, did they let him equate Pol Pot with Elon Musk, a public servant?

What I'm trying to figure out is they didn't do away with PEPFAR, which is the president's emergency plan for AIDS relief.

No, they didn't.

They just moved it.

Did they move it into the State Department?

And where's George Soros' money?

Where's the Gates Foundation money for this?

You don't need U.S.

AID for everything.

He's killing.

It's not USAID.

It's killing 6,000 kids because of Trump.

No, not even Trump.

Musk.

Musk is a baby.

No, but he did be safe since the Trump administration began.

This guy,

this is unconscionable as far as I'm concerned.

Meanwhile, by the way, after he said this comment, I do have a

very short bonus clip.

What do you think her follow-up was?

This is the clip is host kicker.

So he goes on and equates Elon Musk with Paul Pott.

And

the host, instead of anybody at PBS pushing back on this crazy analogy,

let me guess.

Let me guess.

Did she say almost as bad as Hitler?

Here she goes.

And those are real lives.

It's worth pointing out.

Every single one of them lost.

Real lives.

Every single one of them lost.

Because of Musk.

Yeah, that's.

No, again,

this is the mind control, this is the dumbing down, and people who come already believed,

and I would say that, you know, my, my whole family, certainly on the intelligence side and government side, they all watch PBS News Hour,

they, you know, read

the Washington Post and New York Times, and add to it, oh, Trump, he's trying to defund them, taking away that whole 1%.

It just becomes

more realistic to them and more true.

And to understand these people, you have to understand what they're consuming.

And yeah,

this is traitorous, I would say.

You are literally giving the American people, a portion of the American people, very, very, very poor information and

amazing levels of hyperbole and just propagandistic,

I guess.

Well, I have one more clip from the series of this particular episode, and this is Brooks again.

And so, and

this is a WTF clip, which you have to listen to carefully, especially at the end, and try to figure out.

Brooks is beside himself.

He's shaking, by the way,

the whole time, and he's nervous looking, and he's just, and he's like

bordering on tears.

And they're talking about town halls.

And I only have, I didn't, K-part wasn't even, K-part's pretty dull, but here's Brooks on town halls, and he just loses it again, and it's just an embarrassment.

And when I see the town hall videos that I've seen, it looks like Democrats talking and being really angry, which they should be.

And they should do resistance, and they should show up at town hall meetings, and they should make themselves heard.

But it's not the same as Republicans beginning to flake off.

We just don't see that in the numbers.

But what's going to happen, to me, it's not even anything that's happened so far.

Donald Trump is increasing the national debt of his big, better, biddle, whatever that thing's called,

goes through by $6 trillion.

How inflationary will that be to dump that much money into the money supply?

At the same time, tariffs are going up.

Steel tariffs were just raised again today, raising the cost of anything made out of steel and anything made out of, you know, children's toys.

Since when do we have

steel children's toys?

He says anything made out of steel and anything, what he actually said was anything anything made out of steel and anything made out of children's toys.

Wow.

And it's, I thought it was.

She didn't catch it.

He didn't catch it.

Nobody caught it.

No, of course.

I mean, it was obvious when he said it that it was he made a mistake and he never corrected it.

Well, let's just dissect this for a second.

I just wanted, because there was a couple of things in there that I thought were pretty insane.

So let me just go back again.

And when I see the town hall videos that I've seen, it looks like Democrats talking.

Because it is Democrats.

It's Democrats showing up to town hall.

It's not like only Republicans go to town halls.

We've been through this.

Some of them are literally bust in and hired for it.

But in general, people in towns who hate Trump, they're going to go to the town hall.

It doesn't matter if you have a Republican representative.

They are Democrats.

Being really angry, which they should be.

And they should do resistance and they should show up at town hall meetings.

Do resistance.

They should do resistance.

Yes, I guess you caught that.

What are you going to do today?

I'm I'm going to go do some resistance down at Town Hall.

And they should do resistance, and they should show up at Town Hall meetings, and they should make themselves heard.

But it's not the same as Republicans beginning to flake off.

We just don't see that in the numbers.

But what's going to happen?

To me, it's not even anything that's happened so far.

Donald Trump is increasing the national debt of his Big Better Bill, whatever that thing's called.

Okay, let's not pretend you don't know what it's called.

That's just like, that's childish.

Constantly, by the way.

The big beta bill.

You mean Build Back Better from Biden?

No, it's called the Big Beautiful Bill.

It's stupid, but that's what it's called, and you know it.

Goes through by $6 trillion.

I think it's $4 trillion.

Is it $6?

I thought it was $3.

Yeah, I don't know about it.

It raises the debt.

It's not six.

It also raises the debt limit.

And it's only the debt limit.

It doesn't mean anything.

It doesn't mean it's spending for $6 trillion.

And from what I understand, it's supposed to be over 10 years, so 400 billion a year.

Hey, it's definitely not what was promised, but let's be a little factual.

How inflationary will that be?

Well, I don't know.

Are you an economist?

To dump that much money into the money supply.

Oh, he's going to dump that.

He makes it sound like $6 trillion is going to be dumped into the money supply.

Oh, Lord, please.

That would be quite something.

Bitcoin to the moon goes through by $6 trillion.

How inflationary will that be?

To dump that much money into the money supply at the same time tariffs are going up steel tariffs were just raised again today raising the cost of anything made out of steel and anything made out of you know children's toys raising the cost of anything made out of steel from other countries the reason it was done is because we got a big investor in u.s steel nippon steel and quite honestly i think it's it's pretty amazing that uh yeah here it is uh here's president trump uh some breaking news now from a rally in Pittsburgh.

U.S.

President Donald Trump has announced that he's doubling his tariff on international steel imports.

We were getting our steel from Mexico.

We were getting our steel from Canada.

We were getting our steel from every place.

But right here, we are going to be imposing a 25% increase.

We're going to bring it from 25% to 50%, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America, which will even further secure

the steel industry in the United States.

Trump is raising the sweeping 25%

tariffs which he imposed.

How is that sweeping?

That's pretty targeted.

It's not sweeping.

Trump is raising the sweeping 25% tariffs which he imposed on steel in March on top of duties on aluminum as well.

The new rate will likely add more chaos to Canada and America's intertwined car industries while also raising manufacturing costs for Americans.

I know

that that just is bullcrap.

We had a steel industry, and I would say that probably started to close down, what, 40 years ago?

And Tina grew up in Indiana where it was...

The whole town was worked in the steel mill.

We had a steel mill down when I was a kid nearby where I lived, Pacific State Steel.

We actually had a steel mill in Emeryville.

It was one of these modern ones, and

that was in the 70s, and I think probably closed down in the mid-80s.

Well,

okay, so that's 40 years.

It's 40 years ago.

Yeah.

Yeah, 40 years ago.

No, no, you're right, 40 years ago.

Yeah.

If it was closed down in 85, that's 40 years ago.

And so we started importing steel, and President Trump is saying, oh, we're going to bring it back.

It's a matter of national security.

That's always the ploy.

Arguably, yes, if we got into a war, I think it's true.

Yeah, if we got into a war, we're not able to make your own steel.

Yeah, it did take a problem.

You can't crank up a steel mill overnight.

You have to have it there.

You know, you can expand one easier than you can make one from scratch.

So we get investment from Nippon Steel.

They don't really get to buy it.

They become investors, and we have the golden share.

The golden share, which basically means we're still in charge.

And how is that going to raise the cost cost on manufacturing?

If it's American-made steel, it may raise, it may, the tariffs may raise the cost in the interim, but

U.S.

steel makes steel, correct?

They're still making steel?

Yeah.

They're just not making enough of it?

Or what is the problem?

It's too expensive.

What is the issue?

It's a little pricey.

It's not as competitive as the cheap steel you can get from Asia.

Cheap, crappy steel.

Yeah.

You can get some cheap steel.

We had a problem here.

The Bay Bridge had a

new Bay Bridge that was built here was built with Chinese steel.

It was falling apart.

Exactly.

Back to Elon Musk for a moment.

Here is the report on him leaving Doge as his time was up.

The chainsaw for bureaucracy.

Elon Musk came to Washington with a chainsaw, and he now leaves with a key, and the dust is still settling.

Elon has worked tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations.

As head of the Department of Government Efficiency, Musk promised to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget.

That goal was later halved.

Say, by the middle of next year, with the support of the President and Congress, could we achieve $5 trillion of savings?

I think so.

As of today, Doge's website has the number at $175 billion.

Almost all of that is in labor, meaning these are people's jobs.

Our Hearst television data team has tracked at least 49,000 federal layoffs across dozens of agencies.

It's hard to even put it to words, how

how hard it feels.

This is great.

This is great.

They never ever show somebody laid off from America from the Midwest.

No, no, no.

It's the elites in D.C.

This is horrible

across dozens of agencies.

It's hard to even put it to words like how

hard it feels.

The impact widespread from the FDA to Veterans Affairs to the Social Security Administration.

They're imposing this enormous burden on seniors without any real sense of what the benefit of that is.

A new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priority shows cuts to Social Security phone services will force nearly 2 million more in-person visits each year.

In 31 states, at least one in four seniors will have to drive over an hour-round trip.

I think Elon Musk's legacy will have been that his time in government did not lead to improvements in government services or in people's lives.

That's a professor, by the way.

Despite the fallout, the president made it clear.

We're totally committed to making the Doge cuts permanent.

Republicans in Congress are looking to make some of those Doge cuts permanent by passing the president's so-called one big beautiful bill musk has publicly criticized that legislation he says it undermines the work he's done with doge because it adds to the deficit musk's role at doge was as a special government employee which limited his services to 130 days oh well at least they did that

they did add at the end And, of course, the news media still had to do something.

And what did they do?

Like, oh, yeah, I know we're going to do.

He's a druggie.

Were you aware of Elon Musk?

Regular drug use?

No, I wasn't.

I think he's fantastic.

I think Elon is a fantastic guy.

And

aren't you troubled by these reports?

I'm not troubled by anything with Elon.

I think he's fantastic.

Did a great job.

And, you know, Doge continues.

And by the time it's finished, we'll have numbers that'll knock your socks off.

It's going to be,

he did a fantastic job.

And he didn't need it.

He didn't need to do it.

Yeah, what about his drug use?

They're trying to do anything.

Trump hates drugs.

Get him on that, man.

Let's get him on that.

Actually, that's probably that there was some thinking along those lines, I'm sure.

Well, so did you see?

Trump doesn't even drink coffee.

Oh, really?

We only learned this year.

He drinks Diet Coke, though.

That'll kill you.

So, did you see the very highly controversial post that President Trump put on his Truth Social?

Which one?

It's a picture of him, and it says at the top, he's on a mission from God, and nothing can stop what's coming.

You don't have not seen this.

So, of course, he's on a mission from God as a throwback to the Blues Brothers movie, but okay, nothing can stop what's coming.

So,

well, we have to roll out some anti-God stuff.

It's a callback, not a throwback.

Callback, thank you for correcting me.

So, this is an interview with Anthea Butler,

and she is a postdoctoral fellow in race, religion, and gender at Princeton.

You know what's coming, baby.

Wow.

She also wrote the book, White Evangelical Racism.

This is one I hadn't heard yet.

The politics of morality in America.

Yeah, you'd be in this category.

Exactly why I want to play these clips.

Exactly why I want to play these clips.

Didn't you have a podcast with a black dude i did yes how could you do that well it ended after 100 episodes you know i cut him off i shut him down it's like i can't can't work with a black man no he had to go he had a job and he quit no no we said we would do a hundred episodes and we did a hundred episodes but um so this is about christian nationalism And which, yes, I agree.

I think I fit that precisely.

But I would like to push back a little bit on this lady.

Anthea Butler, thank you so much for joining me on up front.

You're welcome.

Thank you, Mark.

For years, we've heard about the rise of Christian nationalism in the United States.

But since Donald Trump took office, the political influence of this particular group of Christians has only grown.

But I still don't think we necessarily have a good sense of what Christian nationalism actually is.

How would you explain it?

Oh, I'm so happy.

I get to hear what Christian nationalism is.

Finally, finally.

I would explain it somewhat like this.

First of all, you think about America as being a Christian nation, right?

That's something that's just ingrained in everybody.

But Christian nationalists take it to the extreme.

Is that ingrained in you, John?

Is it ingrained in you?

No,

I mean, the roots are a Christian.

There's a lot of in God we trust on the bill and all the rest of it, and there's a lot of connection.

But

I don't know.

I thought we were a pluralistic

country.

Well, let's just talk about the roots, the roots, the roots.

First of all, you think about America as being a Christian nation, right?

That's something that's just ingrained in everybody.

But Christian nationalists take it to the extreme.

Here we go.

They believe that the founding of this nation was for Christians and Christians only.

Stop.

No.

No.

No.

It was Bible believers who said, we will start here to disciple to all the nations.

It was not for Christians and Christians only.

That, you know, the white men who came over, you know, whether they were Puritans or others that came over, this was their divine right to be here.

That God created this nation and to be protected, and that this was supposed to be for Christians and Christians only.

No, that's just not true.

She's full of shit, this woman.

She's a professor.

And everybody else, you know, just not

really particularly involved in the everyday affairs of the nation.

The way I like to talk about Christian nationalism is you can't separate it from race.

You need to think about whiteness when you talk about Christian nationalism because there's so much.

And she's going to bring in cannibalism too?

If only.

But you can't, it's only for white people that she she makes this twist within 30 seconds one of the big largest groups you know we always have to remember one of the largest groups of fundamentalist christians are black people

in fact it was the blacks in california pushed back on the gay marriage to such an extreme that nobody wants to talk about it to this day that it got rebuked when there was a when it was a referendum and i have some referendum clips today by the way they're trying to eliminate this sort of thing where the public voted no, we don't want gay marriage.

And they tracked it down to the black, the black Christians mostly.

Oh, no.

You need to think about whiteness when you talk about Christian nationalism because there's something implicit in that term, Christian nationalism, that also means white.

So Christian nationalism means white.

Just keep that in mind, okay?

By the way, I was at church this morning.

We got a lot of brown people.

We got a lot of black people.

We got all kinds of color people.

Doesn't seem like they're

get out.

Get out, you.

You're not white.

If you're an evangelical Christian, if you are a Christian nationalist, I am one.

I'm just going to say it.

And you want somebody that embodies your values, whether we agree with those values or not, around sexual propriety, around honesty, around humility, around grace, around mercy, or all these things.

Oh, no.

That's only for Christians.

It wouldn't seem to many people that Donald Trump would be the poster child of that.

Why would he become the person that they would think would be God's messenger on earth?

Oh, man, do you not know that Jesus liked the sinners?

How did they make this leap of faith?

Thank you.

That's the whole point.

God uses the sinners, the tax collectors, the prostitutes.

So let me say something that's probably going to be really scary for some folks.

Uh-oh, okay.

Are you ready?

Could be scary.

Could be scary for some folks.

Race trumps religion.

By the way, for a black professor to be doing, isn't that racism by itself?

In other words, in this particular case, because he appeals to their whiteness, they are able to overlook all of these other things that might not be moral.

I think that's one of the most important things to talk about when we talk about evangelicals is that we try not to do, we try not to say, oh, they're really racist or whatever.

But I wrote a whole book about this where I talk about the politics of morality.

And the politics of morality means that basically if you have a white man who has a position of power like Trump and he doesn't seem to follow all these tenets of Christianity, then he's more forgivable than somebody who doesn't have a lot of money and who's seen to be a troublemaker and might be brown, black, or yellow, or whatever.

They don't have the same kind of power that a Donald Trump would have.

This is, I'm just aghast by this.

And then someone

publishes.

This is all, to me, this is, I've heard this sort of argument before.

She's boring.

Not that the clip is necessarily.

I'm just saying she's a boring

creep.

Well, she does take it to a conclusion.

But first, can you think of

any other white nationalists, Christian nationalists in the Trump administration?

Well, there's.

Come on, man.

I would say Pete Hegset comes close.

There are figures in Trump's circle who are very closely associated with Christian nationalism and white supremacists.

People like Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

He's now a white supremacist, Pete Hegset.

Who even wrote a book called American Crusade.

And in that book, he said,

we don't want to fight but like our fellow Christians 1,000 years ago we must

how does having someone like Heks

influence public policy well that's dangerous because it really influences public policy in different ways I should know this because basically when he took a visit to the Naval Academy they pulled my book along with 300 other books so that's number one so it wasn't to cite the book as a no no it wasn't to cite the cite

it had something to do with race right so that's the first thing but I think the way that that influences public policy is this.

If you think about him being over the Department of Defense, then you have people who are talking about our military having to basically accede to Christian beliefs.

And we have many people who are not Christian who are in the military and all branches of the military.

And so when you have a leader like that, that is going to seep down to

the ranks.

Oh, no.

People might have Christian beliefs.

So this, of course, leads to a danger and a threat to democracy, obviously.

You mentioned Pete Hexeth, but also we could talk about Russ Vout, the key architect behind Project 2025.

There it is.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, who called the separation of church and state in the United States a misnomer.

These are people very highly ranking in U.S.

government.

I guess my question is, with individuals like these in positions of power, how real is the possibility that the United States could shift from a democracy to a theocracy?

Absolutely real in this point.

This is what's so great.

These people don't even know that there's no thing, no such thing in the Constitution as the separation of church and state.

But okay.

It's already happening.

It's already happening.

I think that people who think that it's not happening should take another look at the kinds of rules are being put down.

If we even think about just things that are happening in the states right now where people are being told they need to put up Ten Commandments in the schools.

Oh, no.

Or you need to buy the Trump Bible for $59.95 in Oklahoma.

Nobody needs to buy anything.

What is she talking about?

That's not even for sale anymore, is it?

It wasn't

even a Trump Bible.

People need to buy the Trump Bible.

Why would anyone need to buy it?

What's she talking about?

Or you need to think about how we think about abortion.

You think about DeFall versus Roe versus Wade here a couple of years ago.

All of these things are really important and speak to this idea about democracy, right?

I think one of the ones that people don't even think about very much is this idea that was floated by the U.S.

government that we give $5,000 to people who have a newborn baby.

Now, who gets to get that $5,000?

Does a black woman get to get that $5,000?

Does a white woman who's married get $5,000?

Holy crap.

What is she thinking?

Of course the black woman gets the $5,000.

Does she think that the black woman's not going to get it?

What evidence does she have for that assertion?

None.

But now it's going to take a nice turn.

Did this guy push back on that?

No, of course not.

The guy should have said, well, the black woman's going to get it.

So is a Mexican woman or a Mexican-American or a Jewish woman.

They're all going to get everyone, all women.

It's women, so women, not about the race that they

are representing.

No, no, no.

So he should have said that, but he didn't.

It's television.

What is he doing?

Just lapping it up?

Is he naked, sitting there jerking off in front of her?

I want to explore another dimension of Christian nationalism.

For over a year and a half, we've been watching Israel commit a genocide in Gaza.

Here we go.

With U.S.

support.

During this time, the Christian Zionist movement has been one of the most vocal supporters of these efforts.

Now we have the Christian Zionist movement.

I didn't get my card.

While not all Christian nationalists are Zionists, there does seem to be considerable overlap.

Can you explain what Christian Zionism is and how it is?

It's a Venn diagram, you see.

Intersects with Christian nationalism.

Yeah, Christian Zionism is a belief that

the nation of Israel is a chosen nation, first of all, that God, you know, Jesus comes from Israel and all of this stuff, right?

So you put the biblical.

Was that biblical Israel or is that like the government?

Biblical Israel, but it's also kind of mixed in with the government, right?

So it's right, no.

That's number one.

But the second part of it, which I think is really important, and we have to think about organizations like Christians United for Israel, is that Israel is very important for Christians because if you believe that Jesus is going to come back, where does Jesus come back to?

The plain of Megiddo.

He's coming back there.

What did she say?

They play in the ghetto?

What did she just say?

No, it's that area, that town up in Cash.

Oh, yeah, where he's coming back.

Yes, of course.

Come back.

That's where he's supposed to come back.

And by the way, this is like a complete

conflation with the dominionism.

Yes.

Which is a

kind of

definitely a, I would call a schistic

offshoot.

Yes.

That's minor, but it's interesting.

It's a Venn diagram.

But they're just trying to slam everybody who's not a communist.

Basically,

this is a pro-socialist argument.

And these are two socialists that

are both atheists, obviously.

And I don't know why you're playing this clip now.

Well, because the next clip, in the last clip, we'll make it understandable.

Jesus come back to the plane of giddo.

He's coming back there to fight Satan and do all this stuff.

So it's about end times beliefs.

So for Christians who believe this way, they believe that the nation of Israel is a very important part of fulfilling biblical prophecy.

Okay.

So what does this all lead to?

It's very obvious, and this is the brain twister of it all.

It's not just that

Christian nationalist

eschatology, their sort of vision of how the end of days happens, is tied up in politics.

It seems to be an anti-Semitic

narrative as well.

What?

The Christian Zionist nationalists are anti-Semitic.

Okay, now I get it.

Version of events,

Jesus comes back, but Jews are either killed or forcibly converted.

Exactly.

And

they're not forcibly converted.

That's great.

Well,

no, they don't.

They believe that it's the end of, you know, this is what it's supposed to be, right?

That the two of these are going to come together.

And they don't see that as being anti-Semitic.

So the ways in which things are playing out right now are very interesting.

I've asked people this a lot of times.

Do you realize they really want you to become Christian in the end?

And they're like, oh, yeah, you know, but you know, it's okay.

Would I be going too far to say that many of these Christian nationalists are pro-Israel and anti-Semitic?

Yeah, but I don't know that all of them would realize that they're anti-Semitic.

And I think that's the point here.

They think that because they love the nation of Israel and that they want to see Jesus come back, that these things are not incompatible.

Ah, it's fantastic.

Yeah, it's just some of the thinking out there.

You're going to hear a lot more of that.

Trust me.

There's so much hate about Trump, like, oh, yeah.

Oh,

mission from God.

There's going to be a lot more of this.

Anyway, this is

a result.

And in fact, the clippage that you played and those two boneheads, it's all a result of that image or that comment that you played, you talked about at the beginning from Trump.

He is a troller, and he trolled this whole segment of the show.

Yeah.

And he's going to keep doing it.

He's a troller.

People should stop getting suckered left and right by this guy

who's a genius at it.

He was a social media president.

But, you know, she's got a book to sell, so it's an opportunity to talk about her book.

Who's going to buy her book?

She's already, it's apparent she's an idiot.

So then

Telsey Gabbard.

I don't know if you caught this, came out and

declassified documents from the Biden administration

about how the Biden administration labeled, tracked, and targeted American citizens, labeled them as domestic violent extremists.

Yeah, I almost had a clip.

I had it.

There's some guy ranting about it.

I don't know if I have a clip on that.

I don't think I clipped it.

But yes, this is a good one.

I have, yeah, two clips from Tulsi Gabbard explaining exactly what it is and what they did.

And this document is in the show notes if you want to go take a look at it.

What was done under the biden administration was it they were saying that everyone who opposed say mask mandates or the vaccination of children are domestic violent extremists or were they saying that those are opinions often held by domestic violent extremists which is actually a good question considering he didn't read the document why would you yeah well that's a very good question that when you look at the language of these documents that i've declassified first the strategic implementation plan of the biden administration's designation of potential violent domestic extremists.

It really talks about people who

may likely turn out to be domestic violent extremists or those who may likely turn to violence because of the specific quote-unquote ideologies that they hold.

And there's a consistent thread through here that these ideologies that they are designating as turning into potentially violent activities or being manifested in violent activities happen to be those of people who were using their First Amendment rights to oppose certain policies of the Biden administration.

And while some of the examples that are focused on there have to do with those who oppose the COVID vaccine mandates, those who opposed the mask mandates, parents who were concerned that their children going to school may be forcibly vaccinated with the COVID vaccine without the consent or awareness of parents.

The list goes on and on.

I wonder if they have a file on us.

Oh, I'm sure they do.

It's probably up in the...

We can get it through for you.

It's probably up in the lunchroom.

As long as they get the URL correct.

Yeah, please.

It's noagenda show.net, everybody.

No, yeah.net.net.

Here's the second part.

It wasn't just about vaccines, obviously.

But it's not exclusive to this.

In some of these reports that we've declassified, it shows that

people who were opposed to Biden's border policy, for example, could therefore have propensities to join a militia or could become these domestic violent extremists that we're talking about here.

And again, it's important to look at this in the totality and the sequence of how this happened.

These documents were issued in December of 2021.

You remember very well, very well, Will, the speech, the ominous speech that President Biden gave in 2022, where with this red background and Marines standing in the background, he issued an address to the nation warning the American people that Donald J.

Trump and MAGA Republicans pose a direct threat to the fabric of our republic.

And then you put that together with how the FBI and others within the Biden administration directed social media companies to censor Americans and undermine our First Amendment rights because, of course,

the social media companies don't want to be in a position to support the spread of domestic violent extremism.

So, when you look at all of these things together, you understand at its core the thing that I commit as the American people to root out, which is the weaponization and politicization of the intelligence community and national security state against the American people.

There you go.

Of course, exactly as

we discussed and surmised.

It is very disturbing.

Yeah.

Meanwhile,

we nailed it.

Daddy Longlegs is back.

Well, you know, yes.

For the next newsletter, I've got some pictures.

He has that.

I don't know who that is.

It's not the mask.

The mask is pretty obvious now.

The mask is really obvious.

One side is caved in.

The wrinkles in the forehead are

asymmetrical, and one side has got just a bunch of permanent ones.

And then

he leans in on somebody and raises his eyebrows and it wrinkles on one side of the mask.

You see the back of his neck.

You can see the mask kind of bunching up.

You know, if somebody just grabbed that thing, right?

And his hairline, you know, he's got like the hair is totally fake.

It's very un-Biden-like hair.

Yeah.

You want me to play the clip?

I have an alternative theory that I need to discuss about it, but I think it's worth just listening to because this was the Biden who got very like

at the end of this clip, he gets right in the reporter's face.

Yeah, no, it's gross.

I can't imagine what his breath is like.

Former President Joe Biden appeared at a Memorial Day service in Delaware today.

He spoke at the event.

His first public comment since he was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer.

Action News reporter Becca Hendrickson has the clip for a second.

Yeah.

There is a, I noticed this because

this is starting to show up as a word.

The word to look for, which is code for

aggressive cancer.

Aggressive form.

Yes, we noticed this.

They were all saying aggressive in quotes, even.

Aggressive.

Aggressive.

He spoke at the event.

His first public comment since he was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer.

Action news reporter Becca Hendrickson has the update on how the form of the

I'm sorry.

No, it's okay.

But have you ever noticed the use of the word aggressive form of cancer,

say, previous to 2020, let's say, or 2018?

No.

You ever remember that ever being used like that?

Aggressive form?

No.

I bet you I could do an N-gram search.

Problem is, it's kind of tough to do.

Yes.

But aggressive, the aggressive cancers are a new phenomenon.

Yes, turbo cancers.

Aggressive.

Diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer.

Action News reporter Becca Hendrickson has the update on how the former president says he is feeling.

I asked President Biden why it was important for him to come to this event despite his diagnosis.

He said because he's loyal.

This event means a lot to him and his family.

The expectation is we're going to be able to beat this.

There's no, it's not in any organ.

It's my bones are strong.

I hadn't penetrated.

This is interesting.

The story was that it was in his bones,

metastasized to his bones.

And here he says,

my organs are healthy.

My bones are good.

It hasn't penetrated my bones.

That's what he's literally saying.

I find that contrary to the reporting.

The expectation is we're going to be able to beat this.

There's no, it's not in any organ.

It's my bones are strong.

I hadn't penetrated.

So I'm feeling good.

Former President Joe Biden addressing his health for the first time since being diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer, saying he's started treatments.

It's all a matter of taking a pill, one particular pill, and for the next six weeks and then another one.

This at a Memorial Day service at Veterans.

Is that the

treatment?

One particular pill, one pill once every six weeks?

Is that the treatment for this?

I believe the treatment that he's discussed.

I think the pill he's talking about is a

chemo pill?

a pill that reduces testosterone.

Okay, he's transitioning.

I think that's the only thing I can imagine because I've listened to enough of this crap

that that seems to be the

thing you have to do.

And so I think that must be what he's referring to.

What else could it be?

So

Clip Custodian just did a Google trends

of aggressive.

And so you see it, it's kind of a slow upturn.

So look at December 2010.

We have 12.

I'm looking at January 2016, 20, kind of stays around 20.

Then it's

in

2023, it starts moving up towards the 30s.

And then all of a sudden, May 2025 spikes to 40, higher even.

So it's like a hockey stick at the end of the curve.

Yes, it's a new

set of turbo.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Aggressive.

And for the next six weeks and then another one.

This at a Memorial Day service at Veterans Memorial Park in Newcastle, Delaware, where he spoke to the crowd of politicians, veterans, and Gold Star families.

Our troops don't wear a uniform that says I'm a Democrat or I'm a Republican.

It says, I'm an American.

While the event was held after Memorial Day, it's still a significant day for the Biden family.

Today is the 10-year anniversary of his son, Beau Boe Biden's death.

When I asked why he came to this event, President Biden gave a passionate response.

Which is code for he got in my face because I'm loyal.

I do it every damn year from the very beginning.

I never forget where I came from.

That's why.

So alternative.

He never forgets where he came from.

What's that got to do with the present bread?

So alternative theory, which I do want to throw out there because who knows,

that it may not be a mask, but that this Biden could be a form of

what we call rapid human cloning.

In the United States.

What was that?

I'm sorry.

Rapid human cloning.

Oh, fuck.

Yeah.

Second half of the show.

We're an hour and a half in.

Rapid human cloning.

The origin comes from the intelligence arm of the military.

And this apparently started during Eisenhower's presidency.

There are cloning facilities around the world.

There are different types of, so clones have handlers, owners, and controllers.

So the handlers don't know these people are clones, but they understand, these are like doctors and people who handle them.

The owners, now this is sometimes wealthy individuals, it's not just government, but it can be Hollywood people,

can be,

you know, like Bill Gates.

It can be all kinds of people who just want to be safe.

And the reason why

these clones aren't exactly the same, so the reason why this Biden clone is a foot taller is because they basically they clone these people and they grow them within, I'm just reading it, okay?

They grow them within five to six months.

And because you can't really control, you know, since you're doing it in five to six months, you don't have the 80 years of diet and all the different things that the Biden clone might have done.

So that's why you get slight differences.

It can be differences to ears.

You know, they don't actually have DNA.

And this really began with Bill Clinton in the 90s, apparently.

And Biden is what we would call the absolute...

prime example of a rapidly cloned human being.

So I was asked to have an open mind about it, and I have an open mind about it.

I think the mask is more likely, just say.

Well, we know the mask technology exists to an extreme.

It was already good in the 60s.

And it was good in the 60s and is apparently now great.

But looking at this mask, it's not that great.

It's not that great.

Yeah, it's all bunched up in his neck.

His neck, but the forehead, the various forehead, if people can go back and look at these clips, I have a few

screenshots of some of it, which I'll put in the next newsletter.

It's like, it's,

you know.

No,

no.

I know,

but it's good to have an alternative.

I'm not going to moan too much about it, an alternative theory that's out there.

Yeah.

Anything's possible.

Now, of course, the Palladians are brought into this, and that's where it gets a little kooky.

I think it's interesting.

You would bring in

an idea that you could have rapid human cloning, but you can't land on the moon in 1969.

So you have a slight

mismatch of what you accept as scientific truth.

I said I'm just reading it.

I said I didn't say I accept it as scientific truth.

But yes, that is very

astute of you.

Let's do some little global warming stuff.

Oh, yay.

Let's do some.

I promised this was a tease.

I got Global Warming Texas to start us off.

Global Warming Texas.

All right.

Two of the world's top weather agencies are warning the temperatures across the globe are likely to hit new records in the coming few years.

Climate scientists at the World Meteorological Organization and its counterpart in the UK say there's an 80% chance that at least one of the next five years will surpass 2024 as the hottest ever recorded.

Officials say that means more wildfires and heat-related deaths, plus stronger hurricanes, droughts, and downpours.

Just today, San Antonio saw record rainfall for a single day, stranding cars in high floodwaters.

Okay.

Wait, wait, what happened to weathers, not climate?

That, please.

June in the hill country is when we actually, me and the white nationalist gang over there,

we all pray for rain.

We're so happy it came.

We got nine points on our on our rain meter, which is nine tenths of a, of a, actually a a centimeter for whatever reason i don't know they have metric here

whatever it is it was fantastic we're happy like wow this is great we got all this beautiful rain now today it's going to go it's going to go back up to the 90s ah global warming global warming it's this it's it's june this is what happens in texas and now it's like oh it looks like the record temperatures we've had a supposedly hottest year on record for the last seven years of this show

Every year.

Every year.

We've had a beautiful spring.

It's been mild.

It's been very cold out west the whole seven years.

It's just

fantastic.

And I don't see any rising sea levels.

Let's go with it.

So boots on the ground, no.

So we'll go to another series of clips.

These are from PBS.

This is Smoke from Canada.

And do you think they're going to bring in the global warming thing?

And when will they do it?

Let's listen to clip one.

Poor air quality warnings have been posted in the upper Midwest, advising people with heart or lung disease, older adults, and pregnant people to limit outdoor activities.

The reason is wildfires burning in western Canada, some of them hundreds of miles away.

Meteorologists say that this weekend the smoke and the fine particulate matter it carries could reach Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Arkansas.

Chris Foltz is a National Weather Service Central Region Fire Weather Program Manager.

The smoke is being lofted into the air, and with the weather pattern that's in place right now, we've got an area of low pressure basically just east of Hudson Bay over the Great Lakes, which is bringing that air south.

We also have a ridge of high pressure over the western U.S., which is kind of helping to funnel that smoke from Canada down through the northern plains and into the middle Mississippi Valley.

Earlier, I spoke with Matthew Capucci, meteorologist at MyRadar.

I asked him about the health risks from the smoke.

Well, there are two things I think folks are most likely noticing.

Number one, anytime you have this fine particulate matter, we call call it PM 2.5 down at ground level, that's dangerous for elderly, vulnerable populations.

That's a big concern over parts of the upper Midwest, obviously Canada where the wildfires are originating, but across North Dakota, across much of Minnesota, the entire state of Minnesota, under an air quality alert right now, which will likely be pushed into early next week.

Parts of Michigan, north of Chicago, and in Wisconsin.

A lot of folks are the upper Midwest and Great Lakes.

Now, when the smoke is up high, causing changes to the light, it's harmless.

But down near the surface, when we're breathing it in, it's really bad.

It's like if you were sitting next to a campfire and breathing that in, you wouldn't want to do that.

If I were in North Dakota right now, I'd be turning off my air conditioning and only circulating the air inside my home.

One minute and 44 seconds, and they still haven't mentioned global warming or climate change?

I'm very disappointed.

This

report was from yesterday on the PBS weekend edition.

It was half the show.

I only have three clips of it.

Half the show.

By the way.

But oh my God, there's smoke, smoke in the air.

It's going to kill everybody.

As if no one's ever had smoke in the air.

I mean,

what is the point of this report?

Part two.

If I can just make a point.

In the 70s, so we moved to Europe in 1972.

And we would come back to the United States every other summer for summer vacation, you know, so we could go to

Zales.

Zales department.

We loved it.

Zales department stores.

Zales department store was crazy.

You could buy BB guns.

You could buy CB radios.

It was fantastic.

And we'd stay for a couple of weeks.

And I just remember sitting

in Armont, New York, Mead Road,

at the family home said, watching T, black and white TV, watching TV, because, you know, it was like we had Gilligan's Island and just

TV during the daytime.

Couldn't believe it.

Didn't have that in Europe.

And it would always be air quality alert, heat alerts, stroke exhaust,

all day long.

And we would always say, wow, these Americans, even though we're American, they really hype this stuff up.

It's crazy.

And it was the same every year.

Now I'm talking 75, 76.

Nothing has changed with the weather.

It's the reporting and the colors they use on the maps.

So the danger and the threat is the same hundreds of miles away as if you were sitting next to that fire.

Yeah, Yeah, most definitely.

Unless we're really ventilating the atmosphere, taking what's down low and sort of diffusing it higher aloft, then we still have those high concentrations at the surface.

We're seeing over 200 on the air quality scale.

Anything over 50 is bad, but over 200 in parts of North Dakota right now.

And my fear is that as these fires continue to burn, we're just adding more smoke to the atmosphere, and it can surf these jet stream winds, winds in the upper atmosphere, down over North America.

You know, back in 2023, we saw the smoke reach all the way down to New York City, turning the skies orange as far south as like Tennessee Valley.

I don't think at least initially it will get that bad farther south, but still over the northern tier, we could see some very high-end impacts with this.

And talk a little bit about the air quality index.

What does it take to trigger an advisory?

It all has to do with the concentrations of how much of that particulate matter is in the atmosphere.

The denser the concentrations, the higher the number goes.

Anytime I'm seeing numbers around 200, that's that's the point where you can smell and you can taste the smoke in the air.

Your eyes might start to sting.

Your throat might hurt a little bit.

And especially for those vulnerable populations, it's a really significant hazard.

And you've talked about turning off the air conditioning.

That ventilation could bring it into your house.

Yeah, anything folks can do to eliminate essentially outside air coming in is what I would really recommend.

We hate to say it, but those N95 masks from the COVID era could come in handy because once again, the smoke is made up of these fine little particulates that you don't want to be breathing in.

If you have to go outside in the affected areas, that's a really good thing to sort of put one protective layer between you and the air you're breathing in.

And once again, just to remind people, when there's an air quality advisory, are there particular people who need to be especially careful?

Anybody with preexisting conditions, the elderly, those with respiratory conditions, underlying conditions, children, especially vulnerable to infants, babies, and then sort of after everyone else, middle-aged folks too.

But really, you know, when the air quality gets as bad as it is over.

back it up.

He asks them who's more, who, who should be, you know, careful?

And he basically says everybody in a, in a, in a segmented way, oh, yeah, the elderly, people with preexisting conditions, oh, also babies and children, and then middle-aged people, and then people from 30 to 40, and 40 to 50, and they have to be particularly concerned in 50 to 60.

Don't forget about them.

What kind of reporting is this?

Yeah, was backing up.

Detective layer between you and the air you're breathing in.

And once again, just to remind people, when there's an air quality advisory, are there particular people who need to be especially careful?

Anybody with preexisting conditions, the elderly, those with respiratory conditions, underlying conditions, children, especially vulnerable to infants, babies, and then sort of after everyone else, middle-aged folks too.

But really, you know, when the air quality gets as bad as it is over parts of the northern plains and the upper Midwest right now, that's dangerous for anybody.

brother oh still no mention of global warming so i'm i'm getting these clips out of control this is not right i'm thinking what is wrong with these people they're they got this angle here they're not using it but okay

again i will say this really was a about a 20-minute presentation but let's this is the last clip i have what are canadian officials saying about how significant these fires are They're sort of sounding the alarm.

They're sort of peaking their scales.

Right now, for example, Alberta and Ontario are under an extreme risk of wildfires.

That's verbiage rarely used by Environment Canada.

That's the equivalent up there of the National Weather Service in the U.S.

And to sort of max out the scale says this is a higher-end event.

Likewise, the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Center has drawn up a level five out of five.

They're basically saying all systems go in terms of combating and fighting these fires.

They're allocating all the resources they have to.

When they sort of max out these scales, that's a sign of a really significant event underway.

And we're still so early in the summer.

We're just getting into June now.

This is something we more typically see later into June into early July.

So I do fear this could be another bad fire season for our neighbors to the north.

And one thing we're noting, you know, with climate change, we're seeing sort of a tendency for these head domes, these blocking bridges of high pressure, to last a little longer, be a little stronger, be a little bigger, and more stubborn.

Finally.

So, so there's an investor and

presenter named

Paul Marshall, who I got some clips from.

He was giving a presentation about climate change,

but it's the counter-argument.

And I thought these clips were great.

And

I don't know the exact event, but there was a bunch of people that spoke at it.

And I want to get these will be the last clips of my climate presentation.

But this is good stuff.

This is Paul Marshall on Climate One.

Most European countries are committed to net zero by 2050.

Likewise, Australia and Canada.

The Scandinavian targets are a little earlier.

But climate change policy is a classic collective action problem.

This is the mother of all collective action problems.

If only some countries make sacrifices and others don't, then all they do is wipe out their own prosperity.

Out of a misplaced sense of guilt, we have allowed Asian countries to set much later dates.

China is committed officially to 2060, Saudi Arabia to 2060, India to 2070.

And if your net zero deadline is 35 or 45 years away, you can pretty much ignore it for the time being.

And that

is exactly what is happening.

Every year Chinese coal consumption is expected to fall.

Every year it goes up.

China has 1161 coal-fired power plants.

In 2023 they built two plants per week.

India has a mere 285.

But they too have now got the coal bug.

They're currently opening two plants a month and their construction plans are accelerating.

China and India are about as committed to net zero as britain is to investigating the grooming gangs

wow kicker at the end there

wow

got a big applause for that by the way yeah where was where was this uh this done this speech i think this was in london oh

well but it could have been in europe but it's some play you know but wait a minute wait a minute wait a minute he's he's bound to be offending someone with this doesn't he get arrested at some point i think he has uh this

is a captive audience of people that are climate skeptics, I believe.

It's some sort of conference that is designed to reverse things.

But

he just gets, it gets more interesting as he continues.

This was a actually, people should look this up, Paul Marshall on climate, but here we go, clip two.

But it is the USA who've played the smartest game.

It was the United States through Al Gore who launched climate anxiety on the world.

Yeah.

In 2009, Al Gore warned that the North Pole would be ice-free by the summer of 2014.

But the US never stopped drilling.

And now, just at the point where many Western countries have swallowed the net zero ideology, hook, line, and sinker, you guys,

and I'm looking at the thousand Americans in the room,

are moving on to leave the rest of us like a half-dead fish flopping on the riverbank.

Now, I'm not suggesting that this is a conspiracy.

I know that in America, you have Republicans and Democrats.

And the idea of you conspiring together is a bit like Keir Starmer eloping with Elon Musk.

But just like with Wokery and DEI,

America launched a set of luxury beliefs on the world,

watched as those beliefs gained traction, only to discard them in their own land just before they they reach the point of fatal destruction.

Luxury beliefs.

I like that.

Yeah, that is good.

I like that too.

Luxury beliefs.

He's kind of good, this guy.

Yeah, he's quite good.

And the possibility does exist that the nature of

our

system,

even though we don't do it, I don't think we do it overtly.

I don't think anyone schemes, but it just so happens that that's what happened.

That what he described is what the mechanism is.

I mean, this is why anyone who invested in ExxonMobil when Biden got in office and he said he's going to, you know, they're going to get rid of fossil fuels would have made a fortune because I think the stock almost tripled.

Oh, yeah.

The minute they started that nonsense, it started to go up.

It's genius.

Yeah, and so it's like, yeah, genius is.

Where was Horowitz with all of this?

He's a conservative investor.

Unlike Europe in particular, the US still has the DNA to resist ideas that are bad for your wealth.

You understand the foundations of wealth creation and you don't take them for granted.

Sadly, we have a much weaker immune system.

So we are powering ahead in full self-destruction mode.

So how is Europe planning to reach net zero?

Well, we have a twin-track strategy.

On the one hand, we are prematurely closing some of our most reliable sources of energy, like coal and nuclear, and ceasing our exploration for offshore oil and gas.

And on the other, we are taxing carbon emissions, driving up our energy and electricity costs across the board, and piling costs on the industry and the consumer.

I have some bad news for our net zero zillets.

Europe may or may not reach our net zero targets, but one thing we will most certainly do is wipe out what remains of our industrial base.

You know, the thing that no one wants to touch because some of the big

investors like Bill Gates are all over it is what President Trump just did with nuclear regulation.

This is what is going to make America win.

We'll be able to have all kinds of nuke power everywhere.

It's like it's genius.

Yeah.

It really is.

It's, it's, and I, you know, I think we've been fans of nuclear on this, on this, uh, this very program for since its inception almost, particularly when we learned about what is now, I think, being deployed, the small reactors.

Yeah, thorium and other reactors.

Yeah, you know, you get the backyard nukes that can power a whole town like Fredericksburg.

It's fantastic.

And yeah, but all these people, they're on the gravy train, man.

They love it.

There's still a lot of climate money out there.

There must be.

Oh, it has to be.

Isn't there still money from the inflation reduction?

I was listening to an interview with

what's his favorite.

Who's the one of the trouble?

Oh, Chip Roy.

Chip Roy.

Oh, yes, you're Texas buddy.

Yeah, not a fan of Chip Roy, per se.

Although I don't think there was even anyone else you could vote for.

I think Chip Roy was the only guy.

It was just uncontested.

But

his biggest beef is that there's still all this Inflation Reduction Act money that is earmarked for all this climate stuff.

Right.

It's never been spent.

Like BESS, BESS,

which is

battery-something storage systems, which battery-enhanced storage system, battery-something storage system.

Yeah, something like that.

Yeah, BESS, which is, you know, nobody wants that.

Nobody wants these, you know, like that Vista fire that's probably still smoldering out there in California.

Nobody the one on point,

yeah,

Moss Point or whatever it is, Moss Peach, whatever.

But there's, there's, isn't it like a trillion dollars in that thing?

Wasn't it?

Yeah, there was a lot of money.

The whole Inflation Reduction Act was really the Green New Deal.

Yeah.

Yeah.

So that hasn't been repealed or anything done with it.

So I'm kind of like on the chip train now.

Like, yeah, I'm all for that.

Let's, let's, let's get rid of that nonsense.

Spend some money.

Hey, with that, I want to thank you for your courage.

Say in the morning to you, the man who put the sea in the climate anxiety.

Say hello to my friend on the other end, the one, the only Mr.

John C

Davor.

Yeah, in the morning to you, Mr.

Adam Curry.

In the morning, ship sea boots on the ground, feet in the air, subsiding the water, all the dams and nights out there.

In the morning to the trolls in the troll room, stop moving, stand still for a second.

I gotta curse you.

Where are we?

Where are we?

2107.

2107.

That's a little down, isn't it?

That's way low.

Yeah.

And we have like.

We normally have like 24 on a Sunday.

Yeah, 24, 25.

Well, but these are, of course, trolls who are listening to us live in the troll room at trollroom.io.

And they're in there trolling around, which is good.

They have a battery energy storage system.

Thank you very much.

Yeah, B-E-S-S.

Battery energy.

It lasts an hour.

Can power your city for 30 minutes.

It's like a UPS for your town.

Yeah, big, giant UPS.

Big giant UPS.

The trolls are listening to us at trollum.io, where they might be listening on a modern podcast app,

which,

you know, again,

it wasn't just

Megan Kelly.

Let me get it.

I had this clip.

You know, the Toddcast, the Toddcast, you know, Todd, Chip Todd, Todd, Todd, Chip Todd, Todd, the Toddcast.

Remember that guy?

No.

Yeah, you, Chuck Todd.

Chuck, Chuck Todd.

Yeah, Chuck Todd.

Chip Todd.

Yeah,

Chuck Todd.

It's the Chuck Todd cast.

Get it?

The Todd cast.

Here's what he said just recently on his latest Todd cast.

Got all these things.

You can hear us anywhere you want.

YouTube, we'd love for you to subscribe to the channel.

Everything else, Spotify, Apple, you name it.

And if Apple isn't uploading right away away automatically, help us inform Apple that they're messed up.

This has been an issue.

Luckily, apparently, we're not the only podcast with this issue, but please feel free to let the engineering team know themselves.

Hey, Apple, you've got a problem.

We've done it.

Maybe they'll be responsive to you, a little more responsive to you.

No.

Wow.

And the thing is a good one you caught.

The thing is.

Is he that naive not to know this is everybody's problem?

I liked how he he said

Apple hasn't uploaded it.

He certainly doesn't know how it works.

But that's okay because people don't understand how it works.

All they know is

we had a big conversation about this on the Podcasting 2.0 podcast, is that things have changed since the early days of podcasting when you were just delighted that a podcast episode showed up.

Like, oh, there it is.

We didn't have.

Social media.

So when you post on social media, hey, the latest episode is out, and people are looking at their Apple Podcast app going, no, no, refresh, refresh.

The first thing they do is they yell at me, you didn't upload it to Apple.

I can't blame them for not understanding how it works.

So I get it.

Then eventually, the host gets so overrun with that nonsense that they, like Megan Kelly, and here's Chuck Todd doing a soft shoe version of it.

Tell the engineers at Apple.

Whereas we have built the solution, it's called Podping.

And no one owns it.

It's actually a blockchain.

You could even say Apple Podcast, now powered by blockchain.

You could market it because when hundreds of thousands of podcasts, including this one, when we post the podcast, the pod ping goes out.

All of these apps immediately know that there's a new episode.

They refresh.

Boom, there it is within 90 seconds.

Don't use these stupid apps who are just too not invented here.

Or I can only think that's what it is.

You know,

Apple, oh, we got to build our own blockchain, it has to be our blockchain, otherwise, it won't work.

Blah blah blah.

They're arrogant and they're losing now.

So, get a modern podcast app at podcastapps.com, and all your problems will be over.

And even better, when we go live, which doesn't work in these legacy apps, you'll be able to hear it, you'll get an alert.

Hey, the boys are live, the boys are back in town.

I think I will listen.

As a part of

this experiment that we've been doing, I was thinking about those PBS shows with the climate change stuff in it.

You know what the problem is?

You know why they do half the show about climate change?

Because they have to fill up an hour.

See, with the podcast, we're like, meh, I'm bored of hearing you.

You're bored of hearing me.

End of show.

You can do that.

Yeah, you know, you can, I got more to say.

Okay, well, we'll do a little bit longer.

That is what media has really become.

These guys, like, what do you got, Bob?

Well, we got a lot of trumpet.

Okay, well, we'll do some of that.

What else you got?

More trumpet?

So they got to fill the time.

They got to fill the time.

That's the problem.

Well,

I'm going to push back on this.

Okay.

The deep dive.

Let's do a deep dive.

You also have the problem with

the podcasting dilemma, which is that

the chatter boxes

who

just can't stop talking.

Yes.

About maybe one thing for hours.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

That's exactly right.

And they don't know how to end.

And they ask the question three different ways before letting the guests talk.

Is that your problem with Ruben, amongst many others?

Well,

Ruben's one of them.

There's other people that do the same thing.

They ask the question three or four different ways.

So the question is longer than the answer.

The question should never be longer than the answer, unless it's a yes or no question.

It's a yes or no.

When you're in Congress, how about am I five minutes?

So I've been reclaiming my time.

It's a yes or no question, Mr.

Devorah.

Yes.

So we employ the value for value model.

We coined the phrase.

We pioneered it.

It's gotten legs of its own.

I love it.

People misuse it like Patreon, I'm value for value.

Nah, not entirely.

The whole concept is we give you the show.

And we discovered this early on.

If people would only listen to us, oh man,

there's this

WhatsApp group.

All right.

It's kind of like a Telegram group, only, I guess, highbrow.

I don't know.

The WhatsApp group.

It's the podcast discourse hub.

I should read from this.

And so they talk about, this is really the podcast industrial complex, and I just don't buy into it.

So, you know, they feel that everything should be video.

It doesn't have to have an art.

Not all of them, I'm generalizing.

It has to have video.

If you don't have video, it's not going to work.

Why?

What's your rationale for videos?

It's not going to work.

Well, you'd almost think they're on the take from Google because YouTube has essentially now rebranded any dudes or dudettes with cans and a microphone as a podcast.

And if you even put podcast in your description, it shows up in a podcast channel on YouTube.

So they're trying to capture the whole concept of a podcast and saying, you don't need an RSS feed, you just need YouTube videos.

Does anybody realize that the word podcast itself

stems from the iPod,

which

was never a video device?

Well, well, actually, it did do video later on.

But see,

this is exactly what I'm saying.

But it was named during the era when it was an audio-only device.

Yes, but you have to understand that now, if you say that, it'll be like, okay, boomer, I've never had an iPod, man.

I have a smartphone.

I got an iPhone.

You see, the boomer.

So here's an example.

Boomers never really,

most boomers never had an iPod.

So

here's an example.

There is a different podcast medium that exists now than did when Adam helped birth all this.

Podcasting has grown up and is now mature beyond the wild startup years.

This medium has been fragmenting for years and has become a highly commercial medium.

These fractures in the medium cannot stand and need to go away or we risk losing it all to big proprietary platforms.

You see,

the podcast industrial complex wants it to work with your dramatic reading.

Thank you.

Atomis corrects.

Two different cultures exist that are built on a common base.

I didn't say that.

Doesn't matter.

We

do not fight each other.

In many ways, we are working together, but others are moving in different directions than the market is now.

The market is telling us differently.

So,

I'm a broken record that

a podcast only needs.

Okay, boomer.

First of all, you don't need to make money doing your podcast per se.

It's not like I'm doing a podcast.

I need to make money.

Some people just do a podcast because they like it.

Some people do a podcast because it's for their club or for the community or for

a product or for a candidate for office.

There's a lot of reasons to do it.

There's a lot of reasons to do a podcast.

Exactly.

But the world is centered around, it's number one, millions of downloads in in the top of the charts.

Like, that is, it's an anachronism.

That's old-fashioned.

That is truly boomer thinking.

I got to start doing that.

Hey, okay, boomer, with your charts.

We discovered early on that it doesn't, when's the last time we actually looked at stats?

Seriously.

You don't need to look at stats.

Exactly.

We do take a look at our downloads

once in a while when we're talking about.

Just to make sure that it's not falling off a cliff or it's jumped a lot and it hasn't shown up in the

income stream.

Right.

Like, for example, if our download numbers

had tripled and our income stream had gone in half, we would pay attention to that.

But none of this stuff ever happens, by the way.

It's all statistics.

Let's be specific.

We do this podcast to help people get results on their resume.

Okay?

That's why we're doing this podcast.

Yes.

The podcast is wrapped around Linda Lupatkin.

And so

that's the only reason the podcast exists.

Nobody has figured this out.

Yeah.

What we discovered early, more than 17 years ago, is if you just ask people to send you some money, whatever it was worth to them, it's sustainable.

And that's it.

Any podcast can do this, but people forget one thing.

You have to have a good slash outstanding product.

If you don't have a good product, no one's going to support you.

And that's the big miss, the misunderstanding.

Well, I got downloads.

No,

if you have a good product, people will support you.

That's it.

That's it.

And if you have enough people to support you, you might be able to do it full-time.

That's it.

How many years did we do the show?

Get a time code for me.

Okay.

How many years did we do the show before

we could do it full-time?

Five years?

Actually, about one.

No, bull crap.

Well, it was

two years.

No, two years because we could do it.

No.

Yes, because at show 100,

when you were going to quit, because you got this 100, I'm going to quit.

I was still making Meevio money at show 100.

So no, not true.

I could not have sustained myself with what we were making at show 100.

No.

It took much longer.

I had to go back and look.

When I was in Los Angeles, so I'd already moved from San Francisco to Los Angeles.

It was when we moved to Texas,

when I moved to Texas.

So

I would say probably 2011, 2010, 2011 is when it was enough for me to get by living way outside of Austin.

So that's what?

Three stars.

I thought you lived in an apartment in Austin for starters.

No, no, I lived out by Lake Travis,

way the heck out there on Command.

So then you moved to the apartment in downtown Austin?

No, then I moved to a rental house in downtown Austin, then to another rental house in downtown Austin, and then to an apartment by myself in downtown Austin.

So it was four years.

It was definitely, since we started 2007, it was about four years.

Before I could, at least me, I don't know about you.

I mean, you got all these gigs going on, writing vinegar books and stuff.

So, you know, but no, it was a good four years.

It takes time, that's my whole point.

It takes time to come up with well, it takes more time to develop an audience, too.

Absolutely, but people are like, Well, I need downloads, and I get ads, and it then

somebody thinks they're gonna post it.

Unless you're Britney, I guarantee Brittany Spears.

Uh, I brought, I brought this up before when blogging was a thing.

Uh, if Britney Spears started a podcast tomorrow and did value for value, she'd be making money immediately.

By the way, do the one in the chat room says, when did you eat your plane?

That's right.

That was 2010.

I ate my plane.

I had to sell the plane.

That was 2010

before we moved to Austin.

So

okay, well, then 2010 is the marker.

So, no, it's no, 2011, four years.

Doesn't matter.

The point is, if you have an outstanding product, I think even if you have a thousand people listening, if you say, hey, support me, or the show goes away, which we did all the time.

Yeah, we still do.

I think we still do.

People are like, yeah, you're begging for money.

You're complaining about doing it.

That's how it works.

I know people who don't like the fact that we're complaining constantly about money are just, they hate us.

I can think of.

It's usually the people who don't support us.

Usually the people who don't support us hate us asking for money.

No, those are the people because they don't want to hear about it.

Because

it's banging on

their guilt.

Oh, and they have a guilty conscience.

They have guilty conscience.

They never give us a nickel.

They won't do the $5 a month, which is nothing, or $4, whatever.

Originally, we started with some ridiculously low amounts, $2.

Hey, Alberta Guru reminds us, yeah, back in the day, John was still getting lucrative Twit guest appearance fee money.

Lucrative, yeah.

Lucrative.

Well, I I was getting paid, but it wasn't lucrative.

Hey,

yes, you want to finish that up?

I was just going to say, yes,

the people that complain about it

are not supporting the show, and

they just want free stuff.

They want free stuff, man.

I mean, you can't blame anyone for wanting free stuff, but at the same time.

So we

don't carp.

Right.

So we accept time, talent, and treasure.

A lot of people do a lot of things for us.

It's highly appreciated.

appreciated.

Organizing meetups, putting up websites.

Yeah, reports, websites, boots on the ground reports.

It's unbelievable to create a volunteer

process

is

the best aspect of value for value.

That's what people fail to recognize.

It's tax-free.

It's tax-free.

Yeah.

It saves us from doing the work.

And there's no, I mean, you look at CBS News.

How many producers does CBS News have?

Let's say they have a hundred.

Do you think they have a hundred?

Yeah, at least at least.

Do you think they have 200?

No, I don't think they have that many.

How many?

But I'll tell you,

I've played these joke producer lists that they play on PBS for a simple segment, 15-minute segment.

They got 10, 12 people.

So we have, conservatively speaking, hundreds of thousands of producers, each with their own specific

expertise.

So you want to know about shoeing a horse?

We got somebody.

You want to know about an F-35?

We got somebody.

You want to know about air traffic and a pilot and a mechanic.

You want to know about drones?

You want to know about

climate?

You want to know about finance, finance.

We have somebody.

You want to know about, we have a lot of people in the medical field.

That's the genius of the model.

But people don't understand.

And so as a part of that, we always understood you have to close the loop.

So we thank people when you send in a report.

We thank you for doing the report.

When you create a piece of art, we have a lot of artists who love to create art for us.

It's actually expanded with AI.

Do you see

Dog Patch, Dog Patch, Suronymous of Dog Patch in Lower Slobovia?

His note about the colors of AI.

Did you get that note from him?

I did get a note.

I'm I'm always suspicious if that's him.

Oh, that's him.

That's him.

I know it is.

With the old AOL account.

Yeah, that's him.

That to me was

the kicker.

I'm like, oh, it's definitely him.

You know, there's a certain type of people that still uses an AOL account.

Anyway,

he was saying that, you know, the problem is

that all of this digital stuff is all just approximate that, you know, they're trying to create it so it make look so it looks right to your eyes.

None of its natural color, of course, even going back to photography.

He had a very long, very good explanation.

I liked it, I thought it was good.

So that's I had some issue with it, and I don't remember what it is because I don't have the note in front of me.

Well, we'll discuss it, but I thought that this particular piece of art from Blue Acorn, which he used for episode 1768, titled Queer the Deal,

it was very triggering for people.

People like, oh my god, why?

Because like, they see,

you have to understand, we understand the context of the picture because it was a topic.

But people see an ice cream cone and mayonnaise next to each other and they start dry heaving because they don't know, is it ice cream in the mayo?

Is the ice cream,

is it actually mayonnaise?

Dry heaven.

Yes.

Oh, it was, it was super triggering for people.

Good.

Yeah, I know.

That's what I said.

They're like, oh, I can't wait to listen to this.

I'm puking over here.

What's going on?

I'm puking over here.

And this, of course, came from our TikTok lady.

Did you hear Maloney's speech, by the way?

Yeah, where she kept using the vomit.

Yeah, about Macron.

Yeah, too bad we don't have it translated.

It was just captions.

Yeah, it was beautiful.

Yeah, people should pick up her.

We heard you.

The rant against Macron was beautiful.

And she is a great speaker.

It sounds, anyone speaking Italian always sounds good.

Well, yes, but when you're yelling.

Yeah, Yeah, it was good.

Anyway, thank you very much, Blue Acorn.

We appreciated that very much.

And there were some other

pieces of art that I think we considered, although you probably hated them all.

Let me see.

Well, you'd like the NA hard hat, I think.

I like both of the hard hats.

And the soccer ball hail.

Yeah, you made a good argument against that because, you know, it doesn't make any sense.

What are these soccer balls?

I like the hard hat with the hail.

That was a Darren.

I I even could go for the sushi.

I just thought it was well done.

That was also Darren.

Too small.

Too small.

Yeah.

I kind of like the emblem shirt.

Too small.

You know, like, yeah, it's a long way to go to put some boobs on the web.

Okay, all right, all right, all right.

And I'm the pro boob.

Yeah, I know.

I know.

It was amazing.

Company card.

Darren is just flooding the zone,

which is somewhat cranking it out.

Yeah.

Comics for blogger trying to flood the zone

So yeah

gender expansive podcast.

We're not gonna use that

Was there anything else that we like?

I think that was it right

Yeah, there wasn't a there was it really was hard to come up with anything besides the mayonnaise ice cream.

Yeah, people are doing a lot of these cartoon things now.

I don't like them

You know what I mean?

Well, you're probably gonna it's probably gonna get worse after today's tip of the day.

Hey, man, I'm still getting people sending me mail at my house thanks to that tip of the day you once gave, like, how to find somebody's address.

All right.

Yeah, it's not fantastic.

Hey, it's a public domain.

It's not my fault.

It's not fantastic.

Thank you very much, Rudy.

Also, hates it.

NoahGenartgenerator.com is where you can participate in this.

And Dreb Scott is always on the ball, putting a lot of these that we don't choose for the art, for the album art, putting them into the the chapters again a a feature on the modern podcast apps and we always as part of the value for value system we like to close the loop we thank our artists we thank people who do things we thank people who support us financially fifty dollars and above and the way it works in this particular scenario with our podcast is just like Hollywood we give you an extra benefit a credit You can get an associate executive producer credit, good wherever credits are recognized in the Hollywood system, including IMDB, if you support us with $200 or more and and we'll read your note.

$300 or more, we give an executive producer credit and we will read your note.

And we kick it off with John Elmore from Baton Rouge, Louisiana, $1,000.

And he says, Adam and John, the Insonite PhD combo is a bundle I can't miss.

Now, I missed the newsletter.

Was that in the newsletter?

Yeah.

Oh.

And which PhD is this?

This was the source of the.

We went back to the one from two or three years ago, the PhD in media deconstruction, just to brought it back because a number of people had wrote in.

Yeah, they wanted to say, hey, I missed it.

They wrote in and said, hey,

can you do that again so I can get it?

And this was the surprise you were talking about.

You had indeed teased that this was coming.

Yes, and they would say, I think on noagendashow.net or what no, noagendadonations.com, I think it's now listed.

I know it's for sure it's on No Agenda Rings.

So you can go there directly if you can't

find your way to the newsletter link.

Yeah, so this will continue.

Because it's graduation time.

So we figured, you know, you didn't make it to college.

We need someone to do the commencement speech.

Just a thought.

That's an interesting question.

Well,

we need a celebrity.

We need a valedictorian amongst our group.

Why wouldn't Dana Brunetti do

the commencement speech for us?

You mean actually record one and present it?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Why wouldn't he?

Yeah.

He's

going to, but it says probably easy to do.

He's going to have to answer that question.

And we'll give him an honorary PhD.

That's what you do.

Because he's never going to buy one.

Adam and John says John Elmore of the Instantite PhD combo is a bundle I can't miss.

Can I be known as Sir John of the Bayou with a beta beer and alligator sausage at the round table?

Yes, you can.

Can I have a Sunday service and WTC 7 jingles?

Love you guys.

And

wait, what does he say?

And four more years.

My children, it's a Sunday morning service,

no agenda.

Give me an insurance.

Give me a little job.

Sugar.

Lord, help us out.

WTC7 won't go away.

There you go.

All right.

Then we have Herbert Roberts, who doesn't, we don't have a note from him, so we don't know what he, anything special.

He also bought a, he's listed as a PhD,

came in with $1,000 from Middleton, Ohio.

And we'll give him a double-up karma until we hear from him.

You've got.

Double up

karma.

And the same holds true for Jamie Rufiner from Greenville, Tennessee, 343.75.

No notes, so a double-up karma for you as well, Jamie.

You've got

karma.

Sir Scobie, Sir Scovey in Charlotte, North Carolina, 333.33.

And he said he does have a note.

Thank you for your courage.

And for not doing ads for gold.

Sir Scovey.

Sir Scovey sent in one of the end of show mixes for today.

Actually, I had too many, believe it or not.

Nautilus K, yours is coming.

Next show.

Lyle Pote or Pote.

Pote?

Pote?

Pody, P-O-T.

Pay Pote.

Pote.

Concord, North Carolina.

Hey, two from North Carolina.

3333, Night of the Freedom Mountain, checking in on the best podcast in the universe.

Other than my monthly donations, I've been silent.

Hearing the recent lack of donations, I thought I would do my part.

Promise not to wait so long next time.

No jingles.

Well, thank you very much.

No jingles, indeed.

You got it.

North Idaho Sanity Brigade in post-falls.

Ah, this is a meetup in the 33333.

This is a meetup-generated donation crowdfunded by the North Idaho Sanity Brigade saying during COVID

to refer to 2020 to 2023 is like saying during the Jewish problem.

Well, that was one way of putting it.

To refer to the 39 to 40, 1939, 1945, since in both cases, the language references that which the government blamed for its totalitarianism.

Interesting.

Perhaps consider taking a page out of Professor

Desmitz.

Desmits?

Professor Desmitz.

You remember him.

He's the Belgian guy that we played.

He came up.

It wasn't mass psychosis.

Oh, yeah, it was mass.

What was it?

It was

it was not mass psychosis.

Oh, it's a word that we try to adopt, uh, a phrase formation, it was something yeah, mass formation, mass formation, that's what it was.

Please play the shape-shift

to top it off.

He wants us to play shape-shifting Jews.

Love is lit, Sir Scott.

No, no, North Idaho.

Oh, it is Sir Scott the Jew.

You're right.

Sir Scott the Jew in the North Idaho sanity debates.

And we move on to Sir Pursuit of Peace and Tranquility, who comes in with 333.33 and he says, sorry for the late installment, please deduce.

You've been deduced.

If deemed appropriate, well, yes, of course, if you ask for it, always love the show.

Sincerely.

Sincerely, some reason my

Sir Pursuit of Peace and Tranquility, Earl of the Lands of Red clay and the cherry trees.

I promised myself I wouldn't use Excel.

I forgot to do it.

Okay.

Good.

Got it.

I get a kick out of the Jewish listeners we have who love the shape-shifting dude.

No, that's because they get the joke.

Like when we say, where's our Jew money?

They get the joke.

Yeah, where's our Jew money?

Where's our spook money, by the way?

Yes, that's something we were going to remind the

intelligence

community, as they call them the ic the ic where you know we haven't gotten one spook donation probably for six months enough with the challenge coin send us some cash

yeah there's pots of it out there

the good news is there's pots of money out there the bad news is it's still in your pocket

michelle cartmill in west bank bc canada

333

uh

which i believe is an American, which is some higher amount in Canadian.

Yes.

Sending in my annual donation.

Sir Adriel's birthday is coming up on June 4th.

We have him on the list.

And part of this gift is our annual donation to the show.

He was the one who got me listening way back in the early days.

We've waxed and waned in our consistency of listening,

but we've always appreciated the show and your balanced and funny approach to news deconstruction.

This donation pushes Sir Andreal into baronet status and should be recognized as such.

I guess he's on the

list or not, but probably.

Yes, it's Sir Adriel.

Thank you for your courage, Michelle Cartmill.

Yes, Adriel, not Sir Andreel, Sir Adriel.

Adriel.

I'm sorry, said Andreel.

Yeah.

Onto associate executive producerships.

There's Eli the

coffee guy from Bensonville, Illinois, 206 and a penny.

He says, hey, a reminder, June is Pride Month.

It's also National Stroke Month.

Did you know that?

Yeah, well, same thing.

There was a,

yeah,

I had a stroke clip.

Anyway, it doesn't matter.

June is Pride Month.

So I say to all those out there in Gitmo Nation, have pride in yourself.

Take pride in your work.

Take pride in your family.

Take pride in your deeds and actions.

Of course, take pride that we're all producers of the best podcast in the universe.

Just remember, pride is one of the seven deadly sins, and one must balance it with humility.

I am truly humbled by the blessings bestowed upon me, and that I have the opportunity.

What is he, a white nationalist?

Oh, no, he can't be.

I am truly humbled by the blessings bestowed upon me, and that I have the opportunity to do what I love, share great coffee with great people.

Then he continues by saying, visit gigawattcoffee roasters.com, use code ITM20 for 20% off your order, and get some great coffee today.

Thank you for your courage and stay caffeinated, says Eli the coffee guy.

So I was, I didn't get a clip of this, but they have this thing, and there was a big fuss being made on the local news about Chinatown Pride.

No, Chinatown Pride?

I'm thinking China.

I never heard of this.

Never heard of this, Chinatown Pride.

And I think, what is the Chinese are having a pride?

What is this?

It's kind of coincident.

No, it's a trans thing for

Chinatown,

trans.

And they were bitching and moaning about the fact that the federal government cut them off.

Cut them off from pride?

No, they cut them off from some funding.

Since when is the federal government funding pride parades?

Well, back in the day with Biden, they were flying the flags at the White House.

President Obama turned the White House pink, purple, multicolors.

Honor with sarcastic the Nomad in Elkhorn, Nebraska.

Adam

just posted a last-minute meetup in Brussels on Friday, June 6th.

Please give it some

light.

Thank you for your courage, sarcastic the nomad.

Yes, well, that should be fun in Brussels.

Brussels.

Yeah, Brussels.

And winding it up with $200 with new copy.

Linda Lupatkin from Lakewood, Colorado, 200.

Jobs, Karma.

For a resume that showcases your unique value proposition, tells a compelling career story, and highlights your standout accomplishments, visit imagemakersinc.com and work with Linda Liu, Duchess of Jobs and writer of resumes.

She makes you shine.

Jobs, jobs, jobs, and jobs.

Let's vote for jobs.

If I may,

if I may comment on the copy, I think she should still have in there that's ImageMakers Inc.

with a K.

I think that's important.

I think it's important not just because people might misspell it, but it really hammers the URL home.

Don't you know what I mean?

It's like if you and I were advising her, which we are, I think she should obviously.

I think she should keep that in.

That's just my humble opinion.

Your opinion, John C.

Dvorak.

I think you're right.

I think you're right.

It's just not a bad.

I think it's ingrained in everyone who's heard it before,

but the ingrainment will deteriorate over a period of months.

And by three, four months from now, people won't know about the K.

Exactly.

And before we finish up, we got a note from Sir Maddie of Central Oregon.

We do break for nights in emergencies.

ITM Adam and John I would like to request some health karma from my mother-in-law, Kathy.

She has just been admitted to the hospital for a likely fentanyl overdose.

Please keep her in your prayers.

I will.

Thank you very much.

So we'll give her a goat karma for good measure.

You've got.

Karma.

And that concludes our executive and associate executive producers for episode 1769 of your best podcast in the universe.

Thank you so much to these execs and associate execs and freshly minted title holders and PhDs.

We'll be thanking the rest of our donors $50 and above in our second segment.

And remember, you can always put up a or put together a sustaining donation, any amount, any frequency.

It's all up to you.

Just go to noagendadonations.com and thank you for supporting us for $1769.

Our formula is this:

We go out, we hit people in the mouth.

Orders!

Shut up, slave!

Shut up, sleep!

You know, I think the IC community, the Intel community could use as a, as a, on your, your, you know, you're working there

a PhD on the wall.

Ooh, yes, I think that would be just dynamite.

So there was a, I have two versions of this story

because it was kind of played the same way.

The Supreme Court has started to rule in favor of President Trump in a couple of key cases, and it has people's panties all in a bunch.

And so

while the news is, hey, you know, the deportations that he wanted to do, he can go ahead and do them.

It played out very differently in the M5M mainstream media.

Hundreds of thousands of migrants are now living in fear as the Supreme Court allows President Trump to end temporary protective status for migrants from Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua.

The decision comes as the Department of Homeland Security ramps up deportation efforts, targeting migrants as they arrive for their court hearings.

It makes everybody be on edge.

This tactic by DHS is happening at courthouses around the country, according to immigration advocates, Such was the case with 20-year-old Bronx high school student Dylan Lopez Contreras, a Venezuelan asylum seeker arrested by ICE during a routine court hearing in New York City.

Dylan is neither a criminal nor a dangerous person.

That's right.

He's the exact opposite of how they try to paint the immigrant community.

And in Texas, mothers being captured by ICE outside of a courthouse in San Antonio.

This woman's husband says his wife has no criminal record.

We're requesting a merits hearing, and the judge declined to set a merits hearing because DHS asked for the case to be dismissed and the client to be ordered removed, saying that it was not in the government's interest to hear a full case.

According to recent reporting by NBC, I supported over 17,000 people in April, up 50% from February.

But that figure falls well short of the quote millions trump has promised to deport from the u.s and lags far behind the record 430 000 people who were deported in a single year during the obama administration i love that now that's canadian news that's why they put that in there they had a little bit of fair reporting but i've got people young people

who I know are conservative in thinking they're probably Christian nationalists.

And they're texting me like, 500,000.

I think I have a problem with this.

This is 500, half a million people.

Let's go to ABC and New York.

Hey, David, this decision immediately affects 530,000 migrants and their families have been allowed into the United States by the Biden administration.

At the time, it was part of a policy seen as relieving some of the strain at the southern border and also improving vetting of individuals.

The Trump administration reversed that policy in March.

A federal district court put it on hold, saying it was illegal.

But today, the Supreme Court justices said the Trump administration can move forward.

What does that mean?

It means most of those 530,000 migrants will have 30 days to leave the country unless they have some of their legal protections.

Immigrant advocates told us today that this will have a significant economic impact.

Two justices dissented from this decision.

Justice Katanji Brown Jackson writing, the court has plainly botched this assessment.

It undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly a half million million non-citizens while their legal migrants are pumping.

Now, the legal battle in this case does continue, but the bottom line, guys, is that the Supreme Court says now that more than half a million Haitians, Nicaraguans, Cubans, and Venezuelans may have to leave the country in 30 days.

None of these reports were honest.

Migrants.

Well, I'll tell you this.

The one dishonest aspect of it is the fact that they keep showing these arrests.

Yeah, crying moms.

And how does that, yeah, with these staged arrests?

And then how does that comport with the giving them 30 days?

Because it's bull crap.

I think it's bullcrap, too.

And then I see people falling for Cheryl Atkinson, of all people.

The, you know, the.

What, she did something weird?

I like Cheryl Atkinson.

What is she?

Yeah, I do too.

And she, she, she, she had played one of these clips on Twitter of one of these, you know, people crying and moaning and groaning.

And she says, is this what people voted for?

So

these 530 migrants, non-citizens, 530,000.

530,000 migrants, non-citizens were in the United States under TPS, temporary protective status,

which is always temporary.

They knew it was temporary.

Now,

of course,

President Biden said, nah, don't worry about it.

Don't worry about it.

Yes, this is what we voted for.

And these people, their temporary protective status is over, and now it's time to go back.

You know, I got a note from my buddy Michelle in the UK,

and it's so bad over there.

I mean, he's trying to sell one of the clubs, his biggest club, which he's had for ever since I've known him.

He said, Values have evaporated.

Nobody wants to be in the club business anymore.

The country is crap.

But the way he approaches me,

how's it going in Trumpland?

How's everything in Trumpland?

I said, hey, America's doing great.

Feeling good, man.

We're kicking out undesired illegal immigrants, shipping the criminal ones off the jail, rejecting visas from troublemakers, bringing God back to our government, reducing waste and fraud, restoring education, and getting rid of DEI and systemic racism.

I think Trumpland is doing pretty good.

That was your note?

That's my note back to him.

Of course.

Wow, that's a good one.

That's a good template for anybody out there.

Because it's true.

Like, yes, this is what we voted for.

But, you know, the news, it's psyops people with exactly what you said with these arresting women.

That is, I don't know what that's from, but that's not from TPS status.

Time for you to go back.

You have 30 days, get your affairs in order.

I don't know what it's from either.

It seems staged, and it had no context when she posted it.

And I'm still wondering what the context is.

This brings me to what you were talking about.

I didn't want to bring these clips in right now, but I'm going to do it because it kind of talks about some of the issues that you expressed.

This is the Zogby and Zogby, Zogby and Zogby, which is the polling group.

And Zogby and his son Zogby,

the two Zogbies,

were looking at some data about Trump's popularity and talking about the various forms of media.

And I think this is quite enlightening.

This is Zogby and Zogby one.

The electorate is, they're going to all different kinds of

channels and

sources for their media and information.

And that's no surprise.

But when we break it down demographically into three distinct media cohorts, and we have local media, the voters who primarily trust local media versus legacy legacy media, which are national newspapers and national networks and their online platforms, versus new media, which is social media and podcasts.

And so, when you break it down that way, it makes a lot more sense.

Legacy media,

Trump can't do anything right.

He can't say anything right.

He's failing every day.

Local media, about split, but a little bit more in favor of Trump.

And then new media, podcasts, and

X and other social media sites, Trump is way ahead.

And so it depends how you're discerning your events, the narratives of the daily and weekly events.

But when we put it all together, and I think the real cohorts that I'm going to look at are

always going to be the independent voters.

Where do they stand?

Men and women, because those are two different realities.

And then Hispanic voters are looking very much like a bellwether group.

So through those lens, let's look at

those head-to-head matchups of Trump versus key Democrats.

Well, how do we square this with Cheryl Atkinson?

She's old media.

She's legacy in her origins.

In her orientation.

In her orientation to this day.

I mean, she works for Sinclair Broadcasting.

Oh, I didn't realize.

Okay.

Yes, she does a show for them.

It gets syndicated around, which is a legacy measure.

Breaking news.

Breaking news.

It's on all, it's on the quads everywhere.

Shakira cancels world tour.

Okay, I'm sorry.

Go continue.

I wonder why.

I don't know.

I'm not listening.

Shakira was on Fallon like two days or three days in a row almost.

I don't know.

It's breaking news.

Not yet, yeah, Jimmy Fallon.

Anyway, Cheryl Atkinson's on, but now she's working for Sinclair.

So a friend of mine,

a producer friend of mine,

who is working for NBC Universal, is now working for Sinclair.

And she says to me, they're cheap.

So aren't they in Austin?

Isn't there headquarters in Austin?

I thought they were up in the Pacific Northwest.

I'm sorry,

Northeast, the Northeast.

I thought they were up in...

I thought they had a headquarters in maybe Iran.

Well, they could be.

I don't know.

But they're cheap.

Did you conclude?

Well, of course they're cheap.

But there's no more money in cable.

Do they have broadcast?

Yeah, they own a bunch of stations.

They're the ones that when they have the super clips where everyone says everything exactly the same, that's all for Sinclair.

Well, there's their problems.

They're fake news.

I think so.

Yeah.

i had a run-in with them when i was writing for pc magazine during the early days of hdtv the sinclair people got a hold of me and and this it kind of relates to the fact that they were

did they grab you by the collar hey listen uh

if they were in person but it was over uh it was over uh email and they were going on and on about the of mdm whatever the type of antenna is going to be used for hd tv is no good it's too expensive and it was the whole thing was about

slow down this HD TV move.

It's going to break us.

And they had a lot of good arguments at the time about why it wouldn't be any good and this and that.

And it all fell apart when, you know, everyone, I mean, it's brought everything's at 1080p now.

Yes.

Yeah, of course.

There were a real holdout.

They really hated it.

Oh, God, we have to buy new equipment.

This is going to cost us too much money.

Yeah, they're cheap.

Anyway, Zog, do you you want to listen to the rest of these?

Yeah, of course I do.

Of course I do.

Philip.

It's kind of interesting.

I don't know what they're running Trump against people for.

He's not running again, no matter what anybody wants to think, but let's listen to Zogby, too.

This is a long analysis.

So I mean,

some of the groups that you mentioned, you know, one poll, a YouGov poll, showed that Trump was losing his edge significantly among young men.

We don't find that at all.

We don't find him

losing that slight edge that he had among Hispanic voters either.

In fact, what we found in his approval rating in this poll pretty much matches what the vote, Hispanic vote was back in November.

By the way, I'll say that the Hispanic citizens,

legal residents of our great country,

they're like, yeah, get out.

They've always been that way.

They don't want a bunch of people horning in.

No, of course not.

So it's kind of like, you know, just because you're a Mexican-American or you have a heritage that goes back, but you've been an American for three, four generations,

which is a lot of, especially in California, you don't want a bunch of interlopers coming in to take your job and work cheap.

No.

November.

So we're kind of right back to where we were.

I, for one, think it says an awful lot about the Democrats, and then, of course, about where independents are, and Democrats not being able to make much headway among independents.

But do you want to share some numbers?

Yeah, I want to share some numbers, and then I want to touch on that, too, because I think the other driving factor is

the state of the Democratic Party and their playing field.

So,

point of order, Democrat Party, but okay.

When we put Trump up against Bernie Sanders, I think that's most interesting for now because that's populism on the right versus populism populism on the left.

And we do have a tight race here

of

45.6% of the public,

the voters, opting for President Trump if the election were held today, versus

45.1%.

And so, I mean, it's a virtual tie, but we'll say that there's a slight edge of five survey participants.

But when we look to independence, this is revealing.

This is revealing about where independence could go.

41%

of them go with Bernie.

38% of them go with Trump.

And that's significant because we see, on the one hand, a split among the independent vote, but a preference still for a populist figure.

I should mention that I don't know if Bernie's going to make it another three years.

No, this is just just an academic exercise.

I understand.

Bernie's not going to run, but the point he's trying to make is that populism is the key here.

Populism is a problem.

And the Democrat.

And Bernie's not really, I mean, he's a populist in his approach, but in fact, he's a socialist.

Yeah, you think?

Yeah, I think.

But the point is that if you're the Democrats to get back in the game, they have to embrace populism, which they're really reluctant to do.

They do not want to do that because populism will kick out the trans.

populism will kick out the woke, populism doesn't want any of that stuff.

And so the Democrats are going to have nothing but trouble coming to grips with this populism boom.

And

it was predicted in the 80s that populism in the United States was going to be a big thing.

There's a book that Richard Vigory wrote.

It came out, I believe, in 1986, where he predicted or questioned the possibility that populism will be the dominant,

the

dominant political characteristic of the future.

Well, that's what's happening all over Europe.

It's true.

Yeah, it's happening all over the world,

all over Europe.

It's a very, and if they don't come to grips with it, you're not going to get anywhere.

Dead bingo.

Onward with the third clip.

Just one different than Trump.

Let's hold that thought because when we go to the next two head-to-heads, we'll compare those independents.

But let's look at

before we do that, let's look at men and women.

Men clearly 51% for Trump,

40%

for Sanders.

It's key that Trump gets a majority.

With women, Sanders gets just

barely 50%,

and Trump gets 40%.

So we see the gender gap is strong.

And then the last of the cohorts we'll look at in this head-to-head is Hispanics.

46% of Hispanics for Trump, 44%

for Sanders.

And I think on the face,

that kind of proves the Hispanic vote as a key and swing vote.

Yeah, it really is.

And

just by way of a comment about Hispanics, one of the things that I find very puzzling is the President issuing deportation orders backed by the United States Supreme Court against Venezuelans, Cubans, Nicaraguans, all living here legally and all mainly gained and gained fully.

What's ironic about that is that these are from communist countries, or socialist countries anyway.

They are fundamentally conservative.

And when they do become naturalized U.S.

citizens, they have been voting overwhelmingly Republican.

Who got you there at the end?

One note from the troll room, unrelated, but a good point.

Again, we have the best producers.

The

drone attack from the sheds on the lorries,

perfect commercial for Golden Dome.

Well, is it?

It sounds like it's not.

Oh, you're right when you think about it.

No, it would be inside the Golden Dome.

Yes.

Golden Dome, no good.

It would be a perfect promotion for not a golden dome because it's not going to work with that strategy.

We need many golden domes.

I've always believed this is a huge weakness of our infrastructure.

You have a refinery, you have a power plant, you have

some sort of any facility whatsoever, and you have a guy in a pickup truck with a bazooka or a rocket launcher on the back.

And just driving down the road, he fires it off and blows up, you know, it hits

anything you can.

can name it causes nothing but havoc uh one guy in a truck and there's nothing to protect against that sort of thing.

And that's exactly what happened here in Russia.

Yeah.

Only the using drones, which makes it even more like

creepy.

That's a good point.

I have a.

Yeah, Golden Dome is actually boomer.

Very boomer.

We have a,

let's see.

Oh, another.

This is M5M mainstream news.

Very important to note the passing of an age.

It's the end of an era tonight for NBC News and a special connection with Sacramento and KCRA.

Tonight is Lester Holt's final newscast on NBC Nightly News.

Holt took over the anchor desk on June 18th, 2015.

He'll be leaving just about half a month shy of his 10-year mark.

Over the past 10 years, he's built a reputation as a respected and trustworthy journalist who's interviewed newsmakers all over the world.

Holt grew up in the Sacramento area, graduating from Cordova High School and attended Sacramento State, later receiving an honorary degree.

During that time, he was an intern right here at KCRA3.

He won't be leaving NBC, however.

He's going to spend more time as the host of Dateline NBC, along with other projects.

Tom Yamis will take over nightly news starting Monday.

Yeah, Yamas.

Yeah, I always thought Yamas was better.

Isn't that the guy?

That guy?

No.

No, Yamis is a fast talker.

He has a very distinctive style.

I've always liked him.

He seems objective.

I don't know whether he is or not.

I doubt it.

But he seems so.

And he has a they've kept him in abeyance on one of the phony baloney news shows on MSNBC where they have everybody doing a news show where they just keep them keep him busy.

And

I always thought he'd be a good guy to have running it.

He's like, he's reminds he's a he's the NBC version version of Jeff Glore,

who's the CBS version, very similar in styles,

kind of

young,

energetic types.

But I think he'll do okay.

All right.

I'd like to,

I've always said that this was a big mistake.

And

And I'm not the only one saying that this

entire meme coin crypto business that the president's family is in.

Yeah, I don't like the idea either.

I don't get it.

It's not very smart.

Here's a Deutsche Villa report about it.

Trump advertised his gala dinner as the most exclusive invitation in the world.

Chinese billionaire, Justin Sun, one of just 220 mainly foreign guests, posted a video of the experience on his Instagram account.

The aim was to promote sales of Trump's cryptocurrency, which he issued just before his inauguration.

The biggest investors, including Sun, were the ones given a seat at the table.

Trump saw no problem with the event, calling it private and rejecting claims that he was using it to funnel money to his personal bank account and that the guests were using it to buy access to the President of the United States.

But Trump's opponents were unequivocal in their condemnation.

We are here today to talk about exactly one topic: corruption.

Corruption in its ugliest form.

Donald Trump is using the presidency of the United States to make himself richer through crypto.

And he's doing it right out there in plain sight.

The dinner is just the latest example of what critics say is the president's exploitation of his position for private gain.

There's no clear information on exactly how much Trump's income has increased since he began his second term.

But Forbes estimated his net worth in March at just over $5 billion, a billion more than last year.

The White House insists there's no conflict of interest and no wrongdoing because the Trump family business is now being run by the president's sons, and that Donald Sr.'s assets are in a trust managed by his children.

Yeah, and this

really

has a stinky smell to it.

Now, I have to say, meme coins are

that's not a crypto currency a meme coin is like sneakers you know it's like whatever whatever you know it's as good as i think i think you hit it there it's like sneakers there is there's a market for sneakers there's a whole industry of people that collect yes sneakers and and that's basically what they trade they trade and trade and collect sneakers and so that's basically what this is but it has a a stench of scam

scam it has a stench of scam.

Yes,

stench of scam.

It's SOS, stench of scam.

Which, you know, it's actually literally no different than sneakers.

Some of these sneakers were going for, you know, if you want to get some of the gold sneakers in the aftermarket, they were thousands of dollars.

But of course, that's not how it's going to play.

And I think the president should have known this.

From billion-dollar real estate deals in the Middle East to a flashy crypto investor dinner and the pardoning of political supporters.

Concerns Donald Trump's second term is holding the lines.

This pardoning of political supporters, most of these recent pardons that they're bitching and moaning about, he doesn't know these people from Adam and they've never supported him.

No, no, but that's, you know, that's, you know, that's not important.

You know what they're trying to do here.

But let's stay on the crypto bit.

Between the personal and political, like never before.

Critics also pointing to another venture that didn't exist in the first Trump term, an emerging family cryptocurrency empire.

On full display at this gala last week, an event where the top 220 buyers of his personal crypto meme coin were given exclusive access to Trump, seen standing next to a podium with the seal of the president.

The White House saying that Trump was only there in a personal capacity on his own time.

And I'm just one of 220 people that are invited.

And there's no media, there's no recording, there's no plus ones.

It's just truly some of the most influential figures in crypto and policy, and of course, the man himself.

The top 25 meme coin investors even getting a tour of the White House.

Like Justin Sun, a Chinese crypto mogul who was previously under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission for fraud.

That probe halted by the Trump administration in February.

Both Trump and the First Lady have a meme coin.

I think the initial meme coin launch was some of the most anger I've seen out of the crypto world towards Donald Trump.

I think a lot of people in the crypto world view meme coins as a cash grab,

which is frankly fairly accurate.

Cash grab.

Okay.

A company associated with the Trump family also owns a 60% stake in another crypto venture, World Liberty Financial.

Trump's image is all over the firm's website, dubbing him chief crypto advocate.

But in a statement to ABC News, World Liberty Financial claimed they are a private company with no ties to the U.S.

government.

Once a crypto skeptic who said Bitcoin seemed like a scam, Trump has now fully embraced digital currency.

I promise to make America the Bitcoin superpower of the world and the crypto capital of the planet, and we're taking historic action to deliver on that promise.

As the president has pushed for new policies that could directly impact his family's cryptocurrency ventures, the Justice Department has simultaneously rolled back crypto enforcement.

On Thursday, the SEC dropped a two-year lawsuit against Binance, the world's largest crypto exchange, which federal regulators accused of mishandling customer money.

The case was dropped just weeks after that Trump-connected crypto firm, World Liberty Financial, announced a $2 billion deal where a United Arab Emirates-backed fund would use the firm's token to invest in Binance, a transaction that could generate hundreds of millions of dollars for the Trump family.

See, see, I just don't think that's true.

They're conflating a lot of different things, but that's not the point.

The point is, it's just a bad look.

We'll finish it up.

But the concerns of critics go far beyond the world of crypto.

From First Lady Melania Trump's reported record-breaking $40 million deal for her new Amazon documentary to the multiple Trump family real estate deals in the Middle East.

Now they're going off the rails.

That is off the rails.

That's off the rails.

I mean, look at the Obama deals.

The Obamas, look at the Obamas.

Yeah, Bill Clinton, the whole Clinton global initiative, the Clinton Foundation.

Give me a break.

How come everyone's ever looked into the Clinton?

And during his tenure, and especially the moment between him and Hillary supposed to be president era,

that global initiative, the Clinton Foundation, was raking in foreign money.

Some of which closed in the weeks right before the president's swing through those very same countries.

ABC News has learned plans are now in the works for a new private club in Washington, D.C., co-founded by Donald Trump Jr.

and Trump's crypto czar investor David Sachs.

The club's official name, Executive Branch, intended as a haven for the Trump family and top MAGA allies.

Trolling.

the initial price tag for membership, $500,000.

All right.

So anyway, it was just, I think the whole, it was just not smart that they did that.

It's just this hassle that nobody needs.

And it messes up the whole

purity of Bitcoin.

They also take

this idea, the executive branch with the $500,000 thing, brings to mind the Yakuza.

Careful what you say.

Careful what you say.

You don't want to talk about that.

about it.

I've talked about it on the show before.

It's an old trick.

They tried to do the Japanese frontman tried to do this with Pebble Beach.

They tried to buy it, and then people realized what was going on here.

One of the things the Yakus love to do is buy

exclusive

golf courses

and then have outrageous membership fees.

And then as a blackmail scheme, if you got in trouble with them and you had to pay them some money to make it uh above board that you had to take out you had to get it a uh a loan from a membership

to get a membership yeah yeah take a membership it'll be fine

yeah you get a membership and so the memberships were were a scam but it was good a good one it was really smart yeah and this the idea

yeah

The idea that Donald Trump Jr.

is doing a similar kind of gambit, is he unaware?

He's not unaware of what the authors are doing.

Yeah, you wouldn't think so.

So there's something fishy about that.

Well, there's one other thing, and I think that will be my last clip, and this is about the pardons.

And Chris Chrissy went on this week with George Stephanopoulos to complain about it with an interesting example.

He even suggested this week that he could look at possibly pardoning Sean Diddy Combs.

Right, while the trial is still going on, and he has no idea what the nature and

quality of the evidence is and what the jury verdict.

If he's found not guilty, he won't need a pardon.

So this is just about him trying to be more and more outrageous.

And also by saying something about Diddy, he deflects from a guy like Paul Walsack, whose mother was a million-dollar donor, fundraiser for Trump.

And this guy stole, George, $10 million in payroll taxes.

The money that his employees give to him to pay their payroll taxes, he stole that money.

The other thing he's doing here, George, is eliminating white-collar crime in America.

He's saying it doesn't exist.

Yeah.

Well, how about that Bridgegate, Chris Christie?

Forgot about that, didn't we?

Remember Bridgegate?

Yeah, I do.

Yeah.

Kettle, Black, et cetera.

Well, if you're ending things up with that clip, I have one last clip.

Okay.

This is the bicycle users clip.

Bicycle users clip.

All right.

New York City, by one example, in the last eight years, has increased the number of bike lanes by 600 miles.

There's 600 miles in New York City of dedicated bike lanes, taking the real estate from cars and congesting cars, which of course was the intention.

It makes the car more inconvenient.

The IEA had the temerity to brag about the oil savings from

micro-mobility in cities.

They pointed out in their latest World Energy Outlook that micromobility, bicycles in 15-minute cities, is already saving a laughable 70,000 barrels of oil per day globally.

Again, this is arithmetic, that's 0.07%

of world oil.

China increases its oil consumption that much,

I think, every three days.

I mean, it's a number like that.

So who, you could ask, benefits from this enthusiastic embrace of city bicycles?

I mean, you might have anecdotal experience with who you see using bicycle lanes in cities.

I do, but let me tell you what the data show, because there are data on this.

And in our country at least, here's what the Census Bureau tells us from last year.

0.5%

of all U.S.

commuters use a bicycle.

Think about the percentage of bike lanes you're seeing.

70% of American commuters use a car driving alone.

And for those who bicycle to work, I'm not talking about weekend entertainment, having fun on a bike, for those who bicycle to work, the average age is 20 to 30.

Over 70% are male, 70% are white, and 80% have college degrees.

So much for the claim of equitable micro-mobility.

It's shocking that there hasn't been more shock about the demographics of the corruption of city streets for that demographic.

Yeah,

exactly.

Yeah.

Exactly.

It's nonsense.

It's total nonsense.

It's good for bike messengers.

They have, and they were tearing up around here.

First, it started in Oakland, and then it's been all over the place.

Now it's in El Cerrita, all these local areas.

They're tearing up the streets, putting up a kind of a second meridian to block off the bike lane that they're creating, taking a whole lane away from cars.

And there's nobody in any of these bike lanes.

I could make a video driving all through Berkeley and following all the bike lanes.

If I find one bike in a day, it's it's a miracle.

There's sometimes there's a couple, but it would be some, you know, some 25-year-old white male, you know, pumping away, usually in garb.

It's a ludicrous situation, and it's getting worse.

My mother.

I promise I'll fix it in post.

No one will ever notice.

That's right, everybody.

We're going to thank our donors $50 and above.

We have John's tip of the day on the way.

We have a couple of dynamite mixes, brand new from our end of show mixers, some very interesting meetup reports.

And as I said, let's thank our supporters, our donors, our producers who came in financially $50 and above, as we always do.

Yep.

He's starting with Stefan Truckels, and he's in Susst.

Suss.

Sust

Suss Deutschland.

And his donation is $139.90, which is the Form 990 donation.

139.90.

Okay.

Zadok Brown, parts unknown, 105.35.

William Elliott,

Aia, Hawaii, 105.35.

Michael

Ketner.

Is it Ket or Kelt?

I can't tell.

Let me see.

Hold on a second.

The L and the T.

Kelt.

Kellner.

Is it two L's?

Oh, okay.

Yeah, Keller.

Kellner.

Oh, geez.

Yes.

105.

I know.

Font, font, font.

10535.

Ah, Kevin McLaughlin's up.

He's in Concord, North Carolina.

He's the Archduke of Luna.

Lover of America.

Lover of boobs.

Boobs.

008.

Yes.

John Honeyboor in Bristol, Tennessee, 79.

Dame Dana Carroll in Laughlin, Nevada, 72.27.

Gordon,

Laughlin, Nevada is going to be the future of Las Vegas and always will be.

Gordon Walton in Austin, Texas, 169.

Sir Gordon, he's been around for a long time, our Sir Gordon.

69.69.

Yeah, he's a good guy.

Dame Rita, Sparks, Nevada.

There she is once again, 67.57.

Paul Cassett, Cassell I'm seeing these T's

Kerrville Kerr Kerr

Kerrville right down the road right down 20 minutes 25 minutes down the road Kerrville

6325

Craig Arnold in Noble Borough Maine

60 he wants a dedouching

you've been dedouched

he says this don't the donation is thanks to Dana Brunetti's unclaimed money tip.

Oh, how about that?

The classic.

Yes.

Matthew Burns in Coston, B.C., 55.55.

Anonymous in Thousand Oaks, California, 55.55.

Sir Selverin in Silver Spring, Maryland, 54.30.

Matthew

Dor Dornemon, Dornemon, I think, in Lincoln, Nebraska, 5377.

Oh, his name pronunciation is some email.

Okay, well, sorry.

Thanks.

That's not going to work for us.

Forrest Scott Brinkley.

If you could put the note here that I can see,

why would you not put the pronunciation in?

Okay.

Just a thought.

It's not going to go on about it.

Just a thought.

Forrest Scott Brinkley.

In North Canton, Ohio, 5272.

Cole Gregory, Amherst, Ohio, 5272.

James Bueller, 52.72.

These are all $50 donations that have paid the fees.

Christina Galvin in Floresent, Colorado, 52.72.

And she says, hi.

Hi.

Sir Luke in London, UK, 52.15.

It's a collective karma for all he's looking for.

So we'll give him a karma at the end.

Blake Neely in Hendersonville, Tennessee, $51.50.

Ster, sir, stir.

Sir Stregalicious, stregalicious in Racine, Wisconsin, 51.

He's been a douchebag for too long, and he wanted to change that.

Well,

you've been dedouched.

It's been changed.

Now we have $50 donors.

I should do the name and location.

Sorry, with Joshua Johnson in Omaha, Nebraska, and Terrence Clark in Jacksonville Beach.

Nathan Noel in Nedderland, Texas.

Tony Lang in Castle Pines, Colorado.

Jordan Tierney in Oral, South Dakota, Scott McCarty in Lodi,

Scott Merrill in Calabasas, California.

Aichi Kitagawa is back.

He's in San Francisco.

And Walter Phillips, last on the list in San Rafael, want to thank these people for show 1770.

Yes, thank you very much.

And of course, again, thanks to our executive and associate executive producers.

And as always, we thank everybody who came in under $50, but we do not mention them for reasons of anonymity.

You can always go to noagendadonations.com and support the show in any manner you want, any amount.

We love the numerology of it all, and you can do that at any time you want.

It is value for value.

We keep on pressing the model.

And thank you again for supporting the best podcast in the universe, noagendadonations.com.

It's your birthday and birthday.

Oh, no one's quick birthday, Liz.

Henry Mackey turns 14 on June 1st.

I remember when he was new and you didn't even know his name.

It's amazing.

Sir Canebrake says, happy birthday to Dame Tracy of the Roman Rite, Commodore of Cane River, Lake.

A

happy birthday turning 61 on June 2nd tomorrow.

And Michelle Cartmell wishes Sir Adriel a happy birthday.

He celebrates on June 4th.

And we say happy birthday to these people from everybody here at the best podcast in the universe.

Title changes.

Turn and face the slaves.

Indeed, we have that one upgrade.

Sir Adriel becomes a baronet today, thanks to his additional total support of $1,000 in support to the best podcast in the universe.

Baronet, Sir Adriel, congratulations.

We have two PhDs who will be receiving their PhDs in the mail once they go to noagendarings.com and give us the correct information.

Our brand new PhDs, John Elmore and Herbert Roberts.

Both of you, congratulations, and we thank you for your support as well.

One night, if you can bring out your blade for us.

Very nice.

And we welcome John Elmore to the podium here where we have the round table where all of the knights and dames are always gathered.

John Elmore, thanks to your support in the No Agenda Show, for the No Agenda Show of $1,000, we hereby pronounce the Kate V as Sir John of the Bayou.

And with that came your request for a beata beer and alligator sausages right here where you you expect it.

Also, in case that isn't enough for you, we got beer and blunts.

We got cowgirls and coffin varnish, Rubiness, Ruben and Rose, geishes and sake, vodka and vanilla.

We got bong hits and bourbon, sparkling cider, and escorts, ginger ale and gerbils, breast milk, and pablum.

And as always, a nice, healthy helping of mutton and mead.

Head over to that same place, notagender rings.com, and take a look at that handsome night ring.

It is a signet ring, which means we'll give you a couple sticks of wax.

You can use that, melt it down onto your important correspondence, slam that ring into it.

Everybody knows exactly where it came from.

And thank you again for supporting the No Agenda Show.

No Agenda

Beethoven.

It is like a party.

We were talking earlier about the value for value model.

It's very valuable what these producers do by organizing meetups all over the world.

Go to noagendametups.com to find out where they are taking place near you.

We have meetup reports.

I think this is number 65, I believe, from Leo Bravo in Los Angeles.

And the numbers out there just keep on growing.

Hey, everybody, it's Leo Bravo at meetup number 63.

Here we go.

In the morning, Crackpot and Buzz Kill.

This is Lady Shanaka of California, the Peaberry.

In the morning, Sam Hambone,

aka Megan Kelly's best friend.

Conla Roshan from La Habra checking in and checking it out.

Great group of people.

Looking forward to the next one.

Thank you.

Thank you, Roddy.

Hey, this is Dave.

Out here with some good fun and some friends.

Brought my buddy Sean, hit him in the mouth, and finally he's starting to donate.

So happy to hear that.

Adam and John, keep it the great work.

Thank you in the morning.

Hey, Adam and John is surviving from the Lander Valley in the morning.

Sports ball.

Hey guys, this is Slick Rick here at

Long Beach Stillcraft with Leo and the gang having a good old time.

Hey, the Zerk.

Just some cover tunes going on right now.

No planes, no trains.

What's going on?

Hey, I gotta be quick.

We're breaking into this car

in the morning.

Long Beach.

Hey, this is Sir Leah Kimfopov here in beautiful Long Beach, California, which is one of the cities that made California the communist hellhole it is.

Good time.

Where is your server?

Get your server on those meetup reports.

Idaho, North Idaho, the Sanity Brigade checks in.

Hey, it's Sir Scott the Jew.

I'm here with the North Idaho Sanity Brigade at the Trails End Brewery.

And I have to wonder why the hell Adam's hairstylist doesn't listen to no agenda.

It's Fred, the gold digging out girl, saying, hee-ha.

Sir Ellie Faunch, in the morning, boys, we appreciate you.

Sir Donald of the Fire Bottles in the morning.

Brian from Post Falls, after five years of inaction, I am finally in CDC compliance.

Greetings, greetings.

This is Sir Tigger Max.

Thanks for all you do.

Don't ever quit.

This is Sir J-Mo Black Baron of North Idaho saying thank you for your courage.

This is Jason from Post Falls where they keep putting in those damn roundabouts and they're causing tornadoes.

I was the server tonight.

My name is Violet, and I work at Trails End Brewery.

Hope you guys had a good time.

How do you say the name of the town?

Fort Lane?

Yep, Florida Lane.

Florida Lane.

Four to Lane.

This podcast is brought to you by Capital One.

What's that in your mouth?

What's that in your mouth?

That's a very good report.

Snappy Fez.

That should be cut out and used as the end of the show thing.

Are you somehow questioning if I didn't do my production work this morning?

What's that in your mouth?

That was going to be my only ISO.

Believe me.

Believe me.

Way ahead of you, Dvorak.

Way ahead of you.

Kansas City, come on in.

Hey, it's Sir Spencer bringing you the latest Casey meetup report.

Folks, I came down to a pavilion at my local city park and wanted to use the barbecue grill.

There's this big group of people over here.

I figured they were celebrating a kid's birthday or something.

Got to talking to them and somebody punched me right in the mouth.

Got hit right in the mouth.

I cannot believe it.

Hey, this is Sir Baron John Helmer and I punched Michael in the mouth.

Dame Lazardi here.

This is Commodore Matt the Metal Bender.

We're doing it live.

Douchebag Indigo reporting.

ITM.

Dame Blackhammer.

I hit Michael in the mouth.

But Sir C.

Mike kind of smacked him around a little bit, I guess.

This is Sir C.

Mike, and I hit Michael in the mouth.

But then he took off with max velocity.

So I don't know if he'll be back.

This is David.

I had a great time with this meetup.

I did not actually hit the guy in the mouth but I did hold him down to make it easier for everyone else.

Damned Lorian here and heard at least three Teslas explode.

Some extra fluff there.

Thank you very much Kansas City for your meetup report.

Thank you to everyone who organizes these No Agenda meetups.

It's highly appreciated.

Remember your servers.

We have two meetups taking place today.

One is the Indie June Winth Half On Summer Startup Part 1.

That is underway at the Dugout Bar in Indianapolis.

Day Mark,

Sir Mark, and Dame Marie of the Greenwood hosting that.

And the Bug Out Bag Meetup started early this morning at Stone Tables at White Rock Lake in Dallas, Texas.

And the only one other one I want to mention, because I was asked to give some light to it, is the meetup on June 6th, Saventum, Belgium.

That is just a couple miles, I think, north of Brussels.

There's an airport there.

So that should be a good time.

Send in a meetup report.

We've got Cobenhaven, Cobenhaven, Denmark coming up on the 13th.

Wow.

New York, New York on the 14th.

Wow, these are good places.

This is awesome.

Don't we have a Japan one coming up?

Conn, June 17th, Conn, France.

Oh, my.

We need meetup reports from all of you.

You can send that to adammcurry.com.

And of course, for all the other meetup business, go to noagendameetups.com.

You can find all the meetups listed there.

You can search by region, location, all kinds of ways to sort that.

And as always, if you can't find a meetup near you, then you should start one yourself.

Noagendametups.com.

It's easy.

Sometimes you want to go hang out with all the nights and days.

You to be where you won't be triggered or hell lame.

Unabs the same.

It's like a party.

So looking at your list, I'm guessing my one ISO wins today.

You don't have any ISOs.

I have one lousy one, which is just kind of a joke ISO.

I kind of gave you.

Oh, it says ISP.

Okay, that's why.

Well, whatever.

I thought it was a clip about Internet services.

It's not something I created.

It's just a dog.

So, no, you're thinking, I'm glad I didn't do anything because that ISO is too good.

Here's the one you had.

Thank you for having me.

And here's the winner.

What's that in your mouth?

That's right, everybody.

Tom C.

Dvorak is up now with his famous tip of the day.

Create fast for you and me.

Just a tip with JCD

and sometimes Adam.

Created by Tommy.

All right.

This is a new tool for you.

Tool.

Tool.

A tool for you Photoshop users, photo editing types, and AI nuts,

which will contribute to people doing art for the show.

And it's called, and it's pretty new, and it's hard to.

I recommend Googling for this because I'll give you some URLs, but it seems to be all over the map insofar as

what you want to look for.

And I think Google has the best link.

And it's called Flux Context with a K.

K-O-N-T-X-T, Flux, F-U-L-X.

And it comes from a company called replicate.com.

But if you go to replicate.com, you'll never find it.

You have to go to flux1.ai, and you won't find it there necessarily.

And you won't find it at flux.ai.

That's some other thing operational together.

But if you wanted to find it right on the money, besides using Google, you have to go to flux1.ai slash

flux dash contact and you'll get context.

Sorry.

My goodness.

Context and you'll get right to it.

Now,

it is a stunning

editor that allows you to do very specific edits.

Like you can have a picture of somebody's face, and you can say, change their hair to blonde, and it'll do that specifically without having to go through the rig and roll you have to go through with Photoshop.

Or if you want to take somebody's head and put it on somebody else's head, a body.

Classic.

Classic.

You do that with one, you just tell it to do it.

If you want to turn somebody into a cartoon, it does the best job of turning somebody into a cartoon I've ever seen.

Now, is it only pictures or also video?

No, you can also create, no, it doesn't do video.

No, video, you got to go elsewhere.

You can also create pictures and drawings and cartoons from scratch with prompts.

It just has a lot of potential.

And

some of them you have to pay a nickel.

So you might have to pay money for some of these images.

But it's supposed to

have a free element.

It's just a dynamite thing to check out.

If anyone out there, Darren will give me eventually send me some feedback on this and why it's no good.

He will.

Yes, he will.

Or he'll tell me it's fabulous.

I don't know.

But this is

definitely one of those

tools that you'll live.

It's just something you just want to play with for a while.

Now, are you sure this is really AI?

It's not like that $1.5 billion company that Microsoft was buying,

Builder.

I don't know.

I can't tell anything is AI.

All I know is it does some remarkable

imagery manipulation that I've not seen anyone be able to do otherwise.

Well, the reason.

And it might also be a lot of good demos.

I mean, this is the problem with, for example, the hottest thing now is VO3,

VEO3 from Google, which creates all these crazy videos.

And

the ones that you see demoed are just dynamite, but you go try to do it yourself.

And there goes a dollar.

You have to spend money to get it.

It doesn't work.

My favorite is

next time Jay's around, grab her phone, get on the TikToks.

It's the Trump babies.

Have you seen these?

Yeah, I have, actually.

Yeah, I think those are pretty funny.

Yeah, there's a lot of

humor is, I think, the best target for all this AI stuff.

It's the only target.

It's the only target.

Yeah, well, there's, I think, album art's going to come out of this

flux context.

Yeah, that's humorous.

Album art is usually humorous.

Yeah, it is.

I can't wait to look and see how many what's that in your mouth arts we have.

It'll be interesting.

There you go, everybody.

That is John C.

Dvorak's Tip of the Day.

You can find more tip of the day.net, noagendafun.com.

Green advice for you and me.

Just a tip with JCD

and sometimes at home.

Created by Dana Bernetti.

Yes, we always want to thank Dana Bernetti for creating that.

What would we do without Dana Bernetti?

Soon to give the commencement speech for all of our PhDs here at the No Agenda Show.

And that is it for our broadcast day.

We thank you all for joining us.

Reminder, we'll be back on Thursday.

We do it twice a week:

11 Pacific time,

1 p.m.

Central Time, and 2 p.m.

Eastern Standard Time, and figure out the rest for your GMT, if you don't mind.

Coming up next, right after the show, live on the No Agenda Stream at trollroom.io, up is down.

That is,

I've never heard this podcast.

Interesting.

Episode 148.

I think we'll stick around for it.

End of show mixes.

We have Sir Scovey.

We heard him earlier on in the show.

And Mello D.

Mello D, that's his new handle.

And I'm coming to you from the heart of the Texas Hill Country right here in Fredericksburg.

It's so cute in wine country.

In the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry.

And from Northern Silicon Valley, where we recommend going to noagendadonations.com.

I'm John C.

Dvorak.

And we'll be back on Thursday.

Please join us then.

And again, remember us at noagendadonations.com.

Until then, adios mofos, a hooee-hooey, and such.

The technically a long discussion.

Everybody reported on Trump's post, and then without a question, they said, I think he's tapping me along along.

Was that in the post?

Tapping me along.

Yeah, where's this temperature?

Is that code for something we don't know about?

Maybe it's a book.

You know, don't worry if we might use the word cat in.

No,

we're not tapping out.

I thought it was a British thing.

Why wouldn't Trump be using the Britishism?

What would the phrase be?

It would be

dragging me along.

Stringing, stringing.

That's it, stringing me along.

Tapping along, tapping along.

Tapping along, tapping along.

Tapping along, tapping along.

Tapping along, tapping along.

President Trump will step side against Russia's blood in India.

It makes me think

that maybe Putin doesn't want to stop the war and it's just tapping me along.

Tapping me along.

Tapping me along.

Chat GPT doesn't know it.

What is that, a song?

Tapping along, tapping along.

Tapping along, tapping along.

Tapping along, tapping along.

Tapping along, tapping along.

The tapping me along discussion.

We're just discussing is that clothes or something we don't know about.

I thought it was a British.

I remember

They're using a British.

We know what it means.

The version I believe to be the right version is the golfer.

Yes, I really, I think that's it.

This is a golfer.

Tapping me along.

Oh, ChatGPT doesn't know it.

What is that, a song?

Tapping along as a golf turn.

Tapping him button, quite fighting.

This is a golfer.

Come out of the shadows.

Come back to the city.

You no no longer have to be afraid.

Have to be afraid.

Have to be afraid.

Have to be afraid.

But in this moment, this moment, this morning,

our sacred rule of law is under attack.

Journalism is under attack.

Universities are under attack.

Freedom of speech is under attack.

And the insidious fear

is reaching

through our schools,

our businesses, our homes,

and into our private vaults.

Provided by you,

the fear of speech

in America, in England,

power can rewrite history with grotesque, false narratives.

Stable coins, stable coins, stable coins, stable coins, stable coins, stable coins.

Stable coins, stablecoin, stable coins, stablecoins.

Stable coins, stable coins, stablecoin, stable coins.

The best podcast in the universe.

Adios, Mofo.org Vorak.org slash n a

what's that in your mouth?