Tesla’s Chargers, The Writers’ Strike, and What Global Policies Will Save the World

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunello Cacchinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks Fifth Avenue for the Best Fall Arrivals and Style inspiration.

Most AI coding tools generate sloppy code that doesn't understand your setup.

Warp is different.

Warp understands your machine, stack, and code base.

It's built for the entire software lifecycle, from prompt to production.

With the powers of a terminal and the interactivity of an IDE, Warp gives you a tight feedback loop with agents so you can prompt, review, edit, and ship production-ready code.

Trusted by over 600,000 developers, including 56% of the Fortune 500.

Try Warp free or unlock Pro for just $5 at warp.dev slash top code.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher.

And I'm Scott Galloway.

And today we're opening our listener mailbag.

We always love hearing from listeners with your comments, critiques, and thought-provoking questions.

And today, you've asked us about everything from electric vehicles to intellectual property to the future of streaming and podcasts.

Scott, are you ready for the listener mailbag?

Which we love to do.

Born ready, baby.

Born ready.

We got it in actual mail.

No, no, people sent in and called it in.

All right, let's listen to the first question.

Hi, Scott and Kara.

Question regarding Tesla.

Tesla has recently announced that it will join with Ford and GM to allow these companies to use their charging stations.

Do you think this is going to grow into a monster that's going to require the FTC to get involved to have Tesla spin off its charging station division?

My name is Rich from New York, and I love the show.

Thank you.

Scott, I had no idea Rich was from New York at all.

At all.

Whatsoever.

I love it.

Rich, we love your accent.

Fantastic.

We've talked about this in previous shows.

Scott and I come down a little different.

We do think it's a really good thing.

Rivian also, I think, just agreed.

It looks like it's going to be the standard.

And that puts Tesla in a good position because it's been very prescient about putting these things out there.

I was at a stop this weekend, and there were Tesla chargers there and other companies.

I think all those other companies are toast, and there's a lot of them.

There's a whole bunch of them in the space competing if this becomes the standard.

That said, I do think eventually this becomes a commodity like a gas station and this and that.

So I don't know if they'll have the only standard, and they definitely have to be careful from a regulatory point of view of charging.

They will get license fees from everybody, so it's good for them in that if other people do businesses.

So it could be a very good little business for them.

I think it'll be seen as a key moment.

And initially, I thought the best analog was the App Store from Apple, but having, upon further reflection, I think a more apt analogy is AWS, and that is they took a cost center charging for their own vehicles, made a pretty substantial investment in it, and now they've turned around and turned a cost center into a profit center.

Yeah, very good.

That's much better.

I didn't like your app store because I think that's not quite the same thing.

Well,

I'm glad I've corrected myself.

I think they could make a lot of money here, and this might even be at some point spun off into a distinct business.

Whether the FTC gets involved, that's more about if the FTC continues to kind of stir from its 30-year slumber.

Could be very interesting.

They have to be careful.

And one of the things, as they're facing a lot of price cuts and everything else in their actual business and competition, which is going to be a problem, just that China's very juggernaut in the area, their version of Tesla is suffering because of price cuts and expenses.

And this is going to be a problem for Tesla.

This is an area where they are way far ahead, as they are in many areas like battery.

And so you can see them, you know, this was important for them to have because if people are using these Teslas, you need to worry about range anxiety, which I think that's what it's called, you know, and having these things.

But you're going to have gas stations are going to be turned into charging places and there will be new companies to create this.

It won't just be Tesla doing it.

They'll license it or people will do a version of it that works or something that

could work with it.

Some of these chargers are going to be instantaneous.

Toyota's working working on one that's going to be a 10-minute charge.

And so every gas station you see will be a charging station for in some fashion that people will drive in 10 minutes.

And it will be a profit center, very tight profit center with margin, very low margins, I think.

Tesla's been a leader here.

So for this short amount of time, they certainly will benefit from the prescience of doing what they did, I think.

It was a smart move.

He's got like Starlink.

He's got a lot of smart moves that aren't the main event that I think are smart on their part.

But I do think Tesla is going to see enormous competition itself going forward.

Anyway, here's another one.

It comes via email.

I'll read it.

My beloved favorite podcasters, Kara and Scott, beloved.

We're beloved, Scott.

I love your show and converted many friends and family to listen to you.

The interaction between the two of you is both entertaining and edifying.

Dick jokes included.

Okay, if you insist.

I have a question about EV cars and the infrastructure needed to support the expansion of EV cars.

I've been wondering lately if the U.S.

Electrical grid and related infrastructure is really ready for the expansion car manufacturers are planning in the next decades.

I recently came across several interviews online on the subject and heard very opposing views and cannot really understand if people raising the alarm are veritable or not.

What do you think?

It would be great to hear you interviewing some subject matter experts on this.

I work in supply chain and I can attest the supply chain is a really sexy job that could benefit for more women in it.

Machaloha Aliche.

Well, I love Hawaii Aliche.

This is a good question.

It's a similar thing in where this infrastructure is coming.

And I just mentioned that I think every gas station will eventually be converted to an EV charger.

And we definitely have to upgrade electricity.

And of course, electricity is not without its issues and related infrastructure.

And I think it's something definitely to be concerned about as we move forward.

There's lots of ways to create electricity, including nuclear, which is, I think, when we'll have more nuclear energy across our country over the next few decades as we try to get to zero.

There's no other way to get to it without using nuclear energy.

And so I do think we have to be thinking hard.

I think this is moving slowly enough that they'll be able to upgrade.

It's not going to be a sudden shift of everyone to electric cars, although it's moving much more quickly and there's advances.

But yes, it's really important.

We should have subject matter experts on this.

I will look for one, Scott.

Well, I don't know if you heard this, but Lorena Bobbitt was in an auto accident last week and died.

Do you know why?

Some dick cut her off.

Oh, no.

Okay, hold on, hold on.

hold on my first wife left me because of my small dick she said kara that she just wasn't feeling it she just wasn't feeling it all right two dick jokes thank you i heard nothing after he said he liked my dick jokes so yeah any infrastructure yeah inflation act or infrastructure act supply chain yeah we definitely need more women in the supply chain congratulations you get a gardens of gotcha pin from bokistan okay go ahead um anyways i look i love infrastructure i think any investment in infrastructure is an investment in the the middle class, which is the greatest innovation in history.

And it's been shown that if you can give people more time with their families, if you can invest in

whether it's internet, whether it's GPS,

whether it's roads, that there's all sorts of spillover into the main street economy.

So there isn't an infrastructure investment I don't like.

And when you don't...

make investments in infrastructure, you send the worst signal in the world to you send the worst signal possible to the world when your airports look like third third world countries, when your apartment buildings that are literally in a stone's throw from an apartment building going for $5,000 a square foot collapses in the middle of the night when bridges are collapsing.

It just says to the whole world that we are being blown by China, who spends 10 times.

the amount per GDP or per capita on infrastructure as the U.S.

So I don't care if it's expanding the electric grid.

These create great middle-class jobs.

We need vocational training to suck up some people who've been sort of left out of the incredible prosperity but no progress movement we've had over the last 30 or 40 years.

Whether or not the electrical grid is actually the place, you know, when it collapses on itself, I don't know.

I heard you talk about nuclear.

I am a huge fan of nuclear.

I'm hoping that has a renaissance.

But yeah, infrastructure, we are overdue.

I think that is one place it would probably be worth once interest rates coming down again.

That is one of the few places I think you could justify increasing the national debt because that will result in growth.

Trevor Burrus: And these charging businesses are clearly going to be a business.

I mean, that's what everyone worries about.

A lot of the grumbling came from Tesla users because people will be on the Tesla chargers.

Although, I was at this rest stop, and everyone was at the gas station and not at the Tesla or the other chargers.

I think it takes a long time.

You can't just sit there, and that's the issue: fast charging, which Toyota is working on very fast.

They're all working on very fast charging, but Toyota supposedly has a 10-minute one coming out in a couple of years.

This is going to be an area of ripe for innovation and how to share it.

I happen to have a charger at at my house.

It was like there are companies where you can say you have a charger and charge people for using it overnight and things like that.

A lot of this just sits there.

But definitely,

to me, if you're going to do something innovative that has both analog and digital parts, all the information you have from people, really.

interesting businesses are going to come out of this stuff.

And again, the gas stations are going to go by the wayside.

And it makes sense to repurpose them as electrical things.

If you're a gas company, you've got to be interested in investing in this, I would imagine, don't you think?

Yeah, but here's the thing.

I mean, okay.

So there's the hopeful side and then there's the realist glass, half-empty center side, and that is 97%

of transportation is still fueled by fossil fuels.

And what I have found from Exxon, BP, and Shell and all the rest is there's a lot of jazz hands around investments in renewables.

And if you actually look at the balance sheet and see where they're actually investing money, They are dwarfing these investments in renewables, in new fields, and new exploration, because at the end of the day, the best business in the world over the last hundred years hasn't been microprocessors.

It hasn't been the internet.

It's been fossil fuels.

And you could argue that if you want to follow the flow of power globally for the last century, you just follow the flow of energy.

And we wouldn't have hospitals.

We wouldn't have any of this without fossil fuels.

So in these companies, you want to talk about stocks that have performed the last two or three years.

And it hasn't been because of excitement over their move to renewables.

It's been an unfortunate recognition that we're going to be dependent upon fossil fuels for the long time.

The emergent player globally that people don't talk about that much, but the emergent player that grew its GDP faster than any large economy last year is the kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Fossil fuels are still going to dominate for a long, long time.

Yeah, you know, people had a lot of horses and wagons and things get replaced.

I hope so.

I think it's the case.

It always happens.

There used to be like carts, you know.

Anyway, we'll see.

We'll see.

We have different thoughts.

I think it's a great business area, and it's something, you know, that will be slower in coming than people think.

But certainly at this point, Tesla's ahead on that issue.

Okay, let's listen to another one.

Hi, Karen Scott.

This is RJ calling from LA, one of the homes of the writer's strike.

And my question is for both of you, but mostly the one who's been maligning that strike for the past few weeks.

Professor the dog, you've made it clear on multiple occasions that you don't think the WGA or labor unions in general are effective.

You said that screenwriters have no currency in the market compared to directors and compared writers to tenured professors who don't pull their weight.

Thing is, you've also said that IP is one of the most valuable assets that a media company can own, then who originates IP?

Writers do.

And it's not like these media companies aren't making record profits.

They pay their executives enough to meet the WGA's demands many times over.

So, respectfully, Prof G,

what do we do to capture the wealth that we're generating for all these other people?

Square this circle, oh patron saint of erectile dysfunction.

Save us, Prof G.

And thank you both so much for your insights and your commentary every week and to your team for making sure that we can appreciate them.

Oh, I love this guy.

Patron saint of erectile dysfunction.

No shit, he's a writer.

I know.

Let me say, the candle is being made for that right now.

I just ordered it on CandleStack.

He's in the right business.

Oh my God, I love this guy.

Do you want to take this first or do you want me to do this?

No, I don't.

I feel like he was talking to you, penis problem.

I don't know what to say.

I think you're mean to writers.

And let me just tell you, this guy sounded like every writer who calls me and complains about you.

Oh, no, he was much kinder.

He's like one of the few writers I haven't heard from.

I get a call a day about you.

So by very well-spoken people, but go ahead.

Go for it, Scott.

Yeah, so my assertion that unions are ineffective, it's not my assertion, it's fact.

Union membership over the last 40 years in America has been cut in half, not because their mission isn't noble.

We all believe in a stronger middle class.

We all believe in higher wages.

There should be one union, and it should be the U.S.

government, and it should enforce minimum wage.

I would like to see minimum wage raised to 25 bucks an hour.

Yes, I said it.

A lot of businesses would go out of business.

A lot of small businesses would go out of business, and it would be worth it.

Above that, labor in the United States is based on supply and demand.

And what I have found from a lot of these writers, similar to what I hear from a lot of tenured professors, is they think they are very, very precious.

Nobody owes you a living.

writing for succession or for SpongeBob SquarePants.

And the reality is, if there is not enough good jobs that make enough money for you, go elsewhere.

There are three legs of the stool of this type of journalism.

There are newspaper writers, there are writers for television, and there are authors.

I would speculate that the best compensated over the last 30 years by far have been writers in Hollywood.

Now, having said that, their leverage here, their leverage here is they have totally miscalculated, as is usually the case on behalf of unions.

And that is, they have thrown these writers at a German pillbox and they are going to get shot up and torn apart.

Why?

Because everybody, due to this massive overinvestment in content for the last decade, has a Netflix, a Hulu, an Amazon Prime queue that is about 300 hours.

Raise your hand if anybody, anybody at home feels any impact from the writer's strike right now.

No hands are going up.

So your union has massively, massively miscalculated.

And if you want to make a moral argument, I was just at Summit at Sea with the founders of Google who are each worth $60 billion.

If you want to talk about compensation and taxation and what is fair, let's talk about teachers, let's talk about nurses.

But that is a much bigger boat we're going to need.

Your writers union has poorly served you.

You have absolutely no leverage and nobody owes you a living in writing.

What we do owe people is dignity and work, 25 bucks an hour, minimum wage.

But the writers who for some reason have decided that they are owed a living in Hollywood, guess what?

Most of us can't make a living in Hollywood, so we do something else.

All right, square the circle.

They do create the IP.

How can they get that power then?

Because they don't.

They work for these companies and they give up their IP by doing so, by taking their salaries or whatever.

How do they get to a position of power?

I want you to square the circle because they are creating the shows.

They are creating the IP.

They are creating the ideas.

But this is the bottom line.

There's too many of them.

We went through this orgy of overinvestment and they have absolutely played into the hands of the studios who dreamt.

of a multilateral forced pause in spending to recalibrate down costs.

So

how do they quote unquote get some of the rights to the IP, amazing IP that they create?

I want to be clear.

I get tremendous joy from original scripted television.

I can go through a list of moments that have really been meaningful for me personally, but here's the bottom line.

Just as there are too many people in fashion design, there are too many people opening restaurants.

There are too many people who dream of being an athlete.

There are too many writers in Hollywood who were supported by the sugar high of an orgy of spending that is no longer sustainable.

And their union has decided to strike when

they are at an absolute trough of leverage.

Now, I'm not, again, I love the basic notion, the basic intention of unions.

The construct has been ineffective.

I've been on boards where we deal with unions.

The New York Times used to bring in union representatives, not exactly a bastion of conservatism, saw the union as the enemy and would roll their eyes and then they'd leave the room and we would slowly but surely pick them apart.

Unions have been disorganized.

They don't attract good talent.

They have a reputation for corruption.

One union, 25 bucks an hour.

Above that, my brothers and sisters, nobody owes you a living.

All right.

So you're going to stick to it.

You're sticking to it.

You're sticking to it.

But where do I have this wrong?

What I'd like you to answer, though, is is there a way, is there a different economic relation between right or just fewer of them is your argument right now, just not as many.

Is there a way that they can own the IP, for example?

But that all comes down to negotiating, which all reverse engineers to the same place, and that is leverage.

The reason why a plumber coming out with any sort of apprenticeship or any certification in plumbing can make $100,000, $120,000, $140,000 their second year as a plumber, is there aren't enough of them.

And the reason why the WGA has massively miscalculated is relative to the amount of money.

that is going to go into original scripted drama relative to where it's been the last decade, there are just too many writers.

So

how do you get rights to future IP?

Simple.

You get leverage by taking out capital.

And that is a lot of what I'll call tier two and tier three riders are going to need to go find a living somewhere else the same way cab drivers had to find a living somewhere else when Uber came in and disrupted them.

Or get paid what the studio tells them to pay.

How do you get to his, this idea that the news, the executive pay is so high?

That's a different talk show, Kara.

I mean, think about this.

Okay, we're going to talk about income inequality.

I'm just having you answer his question, Scott.

Sure.

But there, this is an emotional argument.

David Zaslov, a fairly mediocre executive, at least over the last couple of years, has made a quarter of a billion dollars.

So why shouldn't writers get some living wage?

I can't argue with that.

Look at what tech billionaires make.

Cheryl Sandberg and Mark Zuckerberg make $2 billion and $60 billion by depressing teens.

So if we're going to talk about executive compensation, the reality is it is very hard to rein in CEO compensation because boards decide the compensation.

They get to know Lisa or Bob, who are nice people, and a CEO is very important.

What we need to do is increase taxation on people making this amount of money because we live in a capitalist society where if you're smart enough to figure out a way to get to the top of the pyramid, you're going to be exceptionally overcompensated.

And if we don't think that's the right thing to do, shareholders should rise up, and some do, and go after CEO compensation and try and replace the board.

What is a no-brainer is we need to restore a progressive tax structure such that that we can take some of those taxes and retrain people who are displaced by autonomous driving.

Truck drivers, number one job in America for people who are not college educated.

Those folks are really going to get kicked in the nuts by technology.

But there is this certain feel, quite frankly, and this will solicit a lot again, my Twitter feed will file up, between my colleagues in academia and the writers where somehow they see themselves and their jobs as a birthright to be well compensated in this industry.

No, it's not.

You You have no more a birthright to be compensated well in this industry as teachers or nurses who are vastly underpaid.

There is no social good or very little social good.

So the question is, do you make enough money?

If you don't, you have the same choice every other American has to make every day.

Maybe I go to another industry.

Yep.

All right.

I'm going to let it stop there.

I tend to agree with you largely on some of this.

I just have that argument, as I told you about, with a bunch of people about headline writers and AI.

I was like, you don't have a right to write headlines anymore if it's cheaper by AI.

And it is.

And you can bemoan it all you want, but that's not a job people should be doing.

They should be doing a better, something that AI can't do.

So I understand this.

I do think there is a moment to think about IP that is very different, like what you'll be willing to do for selling your IP, which means making a lot less, right?

If you want to own your IP, you make a lot less.

Those relationships might change over time of who owns the IP and who has the rights.

And that would be interesting.

I do think they are in a deleveraged position as you do.

I think they absolutely are on lots of levels.

Well, Ray Charles, Ray Charles negotiated to own the master copies of his albums because he was singular.

And when there's very few writers, and 10 years ago, when there was an upsurge in spending, writers had a lot of leverage.

There just weren't enough writers relative to the spend.

It has flipped.

And the folks at your union have grossly miscalculated their leverage.

All right.

Let's leave it at that.

RJ, I'm sorry you didn't get the answer you wanted, but I love your question.

Very well, well written, I'll say.

Well written.

I want to apologize for coming across as so defensive and combative and angry.

I have gotten so much shit from people.

Yeah.

And so I apologize.

I am defensive around this issue.

And I'm actually going on a podcast with an old fraternity brother of mine, a guy named Billy Ray, who used to be on the negotiations committee for the WGA because

he's been very generous with me and I want to be thoughtful about the issue.

But anyways, I apologize for being so defensive.

I'm just sick of, quite frankly, just getting attacked by people with very eloquent, eloquently written attacks.

But you are the patron saint of erectile dysfunction.

You know it.

If that's wrong, I don't want to be right.

You are.

See what he did to you?

He threw you a bone there, so to speak.

A boner.

He threw you a boner.

He threw you a boner.

I'll hail to the flaccid king.

Anyway, let's go on a quick break.

When we come back, a listener wants to know how we can prevent the end of the world.

Support for this show comes from OnePassword.

If you're an IT or security pro, managing devices, identities, and applications can feel overwhelming and risky.

Trellica by OnePassword helps conquer SaaS sprawl and shadow IT by discovering every app your team uses, managed or not.

Take the first step to better security for your team.

Learn more at onepassword.com/slash podcast offer.

That's onepassword.com slash podcast offer.

All lowercase.

Support for Pivot comes from groons.

If you've ever done a deep internet dive trying to discover different nutrition solutions, you've likely had the thought, surely there's a way to improve my skin, gut health, immunity, brain fog without offending my taste buds.

Well, there is.

It's called groons.

Groons are a convenient, comprehensive formula packed into a daily snack pack of gummies.

It's not a multivitamin, a greens gummy, or a prebiotic.

It's all of those things and then some for a fraction of the price.

In a Groons daily snack pack, you get more than 20 vitamins and minerals, 6 grams of prebiotic fiber, plus more than 60 ingredients.

They include nutrient-dense and whole foods, all of which will help you out in different ways.

For example, Groons has six times the gut health ingredients compared to the leading greens powders.

It contains biotin and niacinamide, which helps with thicker hair, nails, and skin health.

They also contain mushrooms, which can help with brain function.

And of course, you're probably familiar with vitamin C and how great it's for your immune system.

On top of all, groons are vegan and free of dairy, nuts, and gluten.

Get up to 52% off when you go to groons.co and use the code PIVOT.

That's G-R-U-N-S.co

using the code PIVOT for 52%

off.

Scott, we're back with more listener mail.

This one came in via email.

Let me read it to you.

Scott and Carroll, longtime fan and steadfast listener.

I'm a communications consultant who is increasingly asked by clients to worry less about earned media and traditional kinds of PR and more about owned media, blogs, email newsletters, and wait-for-it podcasts.

My question is: where does this all go?

In a year or five years, or what will we be using to tell stories?

Are we looking to a future of more in-person, real-life conferences and meetups, Or are we just going to be swiftly shunted to social reality as the preferred method of storytelling and B2C messaging?

TLDR, if streaming and podcasts are both over, what's next?

Thanks.

Kenny from Chattanooga.

Well, Kenny, thanks for writing.

I don't think it's over.

It's just changing.

I think

it's great to communicate via podcasts as a company.

Some of them are quite good.

I mean, look, my succession podcast was won by HBO.

It just was really well done.

Blogs are a good way to do it.

Email newsletters.

Own media is actually very effective compared to earned media.

I guess that's what you call it, and traditional kinds of PR, because I don't think people are listening.

I think that it will change.

You should be on TikTok.

You should be doing storytelling anywhere storytelling is happening.

I don't know if that's a problem.

I don't think streaming is over.

I don't think podcasts are over.

I think there was

over spending with celebrities and things like that, which I thought was economically ridiculous.

All of us knew that at the time.

They were economically ridiculous.

But any way you can tell stories is fine.

I don't think traditional PR is going to work anymore, that's for sure.

And that will be replaced by AI if used at all.

It's mostly useless, it seems like me.

Wonderful advertising is still a great way to tell a story.

And there's lots of new creative ways to do that.

If there was one skill I could give my kids, it would be storytelling.

It's not Mandarin.

It's not computer science.

I think storytelling

is enduring, whether it's the ability to raise capital or lower cost of capital, whether it's the ability to entice a crowd, whether it's the ability to attract mates.

Storytellers, whether it's Mick Jagger or Beyonce, have a broader selection set of mates because what they are is they're amazing storytellers.

This is now what the next part of this are what are the mediums?

And that's a tougher one to tell.

I don't think anyone saw the rise of TikTok.

Obviously, it's social media.

I'm a huge fan, a huge fan of getting together in person.

I'm not even talking about can.

So that was great.

It really was.

I learned a lot, but go ahead.

I agree.

But something did strike me when I was there.

It is very stratified and it's kind of like not even, it's really kind of sequestered to the top 1%.

And what I would like to see as part of an infrastructure act is a fairly significant investment in what we refer to as third places, parks, opportunities for nonprofits, leagues.

Used to be churches, other communities, religious institutions,

subsidized extension classes.

We need to touch, smell, we need more, more unsupervised opportunities for random encounters in the service of other people.

And that's one of the reasons I'm a fan actually of national service because I used to go to Westwood Park and play basketball.

And I remember it was 28 bucks a year.

And I got to play in every league there.

I made a bunch of great friends.

I found mentors.

You know, my dad's been married four times.

So I've been to every temple, Presbyterian church, and Unitarian church in Los Angeles.

And I made a lot of wonderful friends there.

But there is an absence of third places, and

we need something more than just conferences that kind of the tech elite go to.

We need a reason to get it.

Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, all of that.

We need more of it.

It's school, kids in school and everything else.

That sure was a very clear signal from the pandemic that kids need to be in schools.

They just need to physically.

Online schools just don't work.

And after school, you know, drill team and drum line.

And I mean, just all that stuff is so important.

You know, one of the things that Clara loved at Conn, there was a daycare that they had that was free, which was great.

So we could go off and do work and stuff.

And Amanda could get a break.

And they loved it with other kids.

They met kids from all over the world.

And it was really interesting.

And I was like, do you want to come with us to see this thing in Valls or whatever?

And she's like, I'd like to go back to school.

You know what I mean?

She just wanted to hang with people, which was interesting.

I do agree with you.

I I think it's interesting because on the storytelling, it's critically important.

And you're just going to have to just cope with whatever's come.

And you don't have to make owned media, blogs, email newsletters, and podcasts sucky.

You don't have to if you're a PR person.

They can be really interesting.

You can be interesting and tell a story well, even if it's PR, right?

Even if it's about your company.

It's just, it's just become boring.

And it's done by people who are not interested in what they're doing in a medium that's dull.

And so storytelling, you can be good no matter where you are, what you're doing.

And you should find new and creative ways to, I guess I said, TikToks and everything.

And as what Scott said, to real life thing, I think you're 100% right.

I think we have to invest more in all variety of in-person things.

It's so well worth it for people to do it.

Oddly enough,

I went to church when I was a kid and I didn't, I don't at all anymore, like most people.

Actually, the numbers are really striking.

I've been walking past churches and wanting to go in and not just because it was in France and pretty.

I had this feeling like, I kind of want to go in for a service.

And I don't want to go to the Catholic church because I have all kinds of issues, but I was like, the community part is what I loved about it.

The sitting in a room full of people.

Please greet your neighbor.

Remember that?

Turn to the left, give them a blessing, say hello, shake their hand.

It's wonderful.

I just, for some reason lately, I've been having a feeling it's not religious.

It's not, it's something else.

It's something beyond religion.

And so, yes, I would, it's a weird feeling.

I don't, it's so strange that every time I go past a church, I want to go in for a service, which is interesting.

Quaker meeting.

When I used to go to temple or to the Presbyterian church, I noticed the temple was more about education.

The sermon, whatever you call it, the rabbi was basically almost educating us.

We talked about politics, and it was just some incredibly,

you know, well-educated, a lot of domain expertise, rooting it in life lessons.

When I went to the Presbyterian church, what I found is it was just a bunch of good people who wanted to be together in the agency of something bigger than than them.

And it was just a, I remember the minister coming up to me, I think it's called the minister.

I was an 11-year-old, first service coming up to me and go, I heard you're out staying with your dad, my mom and dad.

You know, he was on his third wife.

And he said, come over tomorrow.

I have a bike for you.

Every 11-year-old boy needs a bike.

You know, these are like good people trying to help strangers.

And I miss that a lot.

The problem is I just can't get over the legacy stories.

But I agree with you.

I miss that community and that

connection.

And it's helpful.

And even if it was elite, Com was, it was just fun.

I have to say, being around a lot of people just walking down, all kinds of people.

I was watching people outside.

They were leaving the Palais because we had an apartment across from it after they'd done their awards.

And they were having a great time, right?

You know, we, you could, they, they, they, you didn't see this, but it was on a screen on the front of the palais.

You could watch the ceremony as people were winning their things.

It was lovely to watch.

Claire and I sat and watched it, and then everyone poured out and then went off to things.

and it was a really nice, even if it was elite, it was this was sort of the people, the regular grunts who were getting awards and stuff.

I found it very lovely to watch people just spill out of a

gathering and it just was I don't know it was really nice.

Anyway, here's the next one.

I'll read it.

Hello, Ms.

and Mr.

Swishaway.

That's our name just together, just so you know, swishaway.

What kind it sounds like a toilet product?

Swishaway, yeah.

Swishaway.

What kind of global policies, in your views, would prevent existential technological disaster for the next generation?

Oh, just a light one.

Examples of already always happening existential threats, rapid climate change and species extinction from fossil fuel, global political destabilization, social media, Skynet, AI, and nuclear war, atomic tech.

I'll take my answer off the air via my genetically enhanced and AI-enabled palm pilot.

Thank you, Eric from Brooklyn.

Oh, man, global policies.

Well, I guess I'll start again.

We need to have AI policies in place right before this starts to really roll out around the uses of it.

And we could imagine all the bad uses easily.

So I think that's

number one: a global regulatory body dealing with this issue immediately.

As to climate change, again, a global body that agrees to do things.

We have a lot of people who don't believe in climate change.

And in the absence of that, a much faster move, as much as I love all the renewables and as much as I love solar, et cetera, et cetera, and I'm interested in fusion, the work they're doing on fusion.

We've got to bring nuclear energy back.

It's not nuclear bombs.

It's not, and it's been relatively safe over the time.

And even the Chernobyl, very, very small number of deaths compared to what fossil fuel is doing to this world.

We have to make a choice here.

And so that's one thing, I think, nuclear energy.

And I think many, many people who protest against it are misguided and don't understand

the overall feelings about it.

I just did an interesting interview with Oliver Stone.

He has a new documentary called Nuclear Now.

It's quite good.

He has some kooky ideas in general about other things,

but he's correct

in this particular point.

Via social media, another, we have to have global standards for social media, but unfortunately it's now owned by

people who some of whom have lost their marbles in many ways and so allegedly lost their modules.

And so there's nothing we can do since it's private.

Most of them are privately owned.

More regulation, any regulation about that.

Scott?

American superpower is our optimism.

Our species superpower is cooperation.

And this isn't a new idea.

And there are examples of a lot of wonderful organizations that reach across borders for the common good across not only the Commonwealth, but the well-being of humanity.

We have the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which is obviously comprised of Western nations, But we have the Geneva Conventions.

We had rules around war that we all agreed to.

We decided to not have

to use gas, to use chemical, to have chemical attacks in World War I.

I'm sorry, in World War II, after we saw what they could do in World War I, we now have an agreement.

There is technology, battlefield technology, with these hyper-lasers that when they're fired, will blind everybody on the field permanently.

That technology exists, and every nation, including nations that are at war with each other, have decided to sign up for that, and they do not deploy that technology on the battlefield.

We have multilateral agreements around bioweapons.

So we have been able to do this.

And what's required is leadership and a comity of man and to realize that we have.

We went from 50,000 nuclear warheads in the U.S.

and Russia, respectively, down to 10,000 because we cooperated.

So these

agencies have real meaning and they work.

And we need more of them, specifically around, I think, probably AI or technology more generally.

We need an AI regulatory body.

I think it should be run first out of NATO for security reasons, but then we all need to cooperate.

We cooperate.

The World Health Organization attempts to get everyone on the same page.

We've got to work with China on AI.

100%.

But we have taken our worst enemies.

and decided across the most sensitive topics to work together in the past.

And there's no reason why we can't continue to do that and have better organizations that are even stronger and serve humanity.

We do cooperate.

And so this isn't anything new.

We just need what we need is we need leaders who recognize it's worth the effort, it's worth the work, and we want to plant trees the shade of which we will never sit under because these are long-term investments.

100%.

Any thoughts on any other parts?

I think regulation of social media would be nice for once.

I don't know if you can do that.

That'll be interesting.

I don't know if you can do that globally.

I think that's individually.

That becomes much more regional, right?

Based on, I don't know, that's a, I would just settle for any regulation around social technology.

Technology is the largest industry in history that has avoided any regulation for this long.

And they have learned from the sins of the father, specifically Microsoft, who didn't want to play the regulation or the lobbying game and then immediately was like found guilty of monopoly abuse.

And so the new tech Titans are much smarter and they weaponize a pay-for-play government.

And they have been incredibly deft and effective.

They're owning space now.

I don't know if you saw, but Sam Altman, I don't know if you saw this, but Sam Altman, the Mr.

Regulate Me Please guy, it ends up that he's actually participating or funding regulators who have all of a sudden decided that the regulation they're proposing is not the right regulation.

So we need leadership here.

We need more Marguerite Vestiers, Lena Kahn, Professor Tim Wu, who just left the administration.

But these organizations matter, they're important, and they can work.

Yeah, they can.

Absolutely.

We've got to trust our regulators a little more rather than demonize them.

Support for this show comes from IBM.

Is your AI built for everyone or is it built to work with the tools your business relies on?

IBM's AI agents are tailored to your business and can easily integrate with the tools you're already using so they can work across your business, not just some parts of it.

Get started with AIAgents at iBM.com.

That's IBM.com.

The AI built for business, IBM.

Support for Pivot comes from groons.

If you've ever done a deep internet dive trying to discover different nutrition solutions, you've likely had the thought, surely there's a way to improve my skin, gut health, immunity, brain fog without offending my taste buds.

Well, there is.

It's called groons.

Groons are a convenient, comprehensive formula packed into a daily snack pack of gummies.

It's not a multivitamin, a greens gummy, or a prebiotic.

It's all of those things and then some for a fraction of the price.

In a Groons daily snack pack, you get more than 20 vitamins and minerals, six grams of prebiotic fiber, plus more than 60 ingredients.

They include nutrient dense and whole foods, all of which will help you out in different ways.

For example, Groons has six times the gut health ingredients compared to the leading greens powders.

It contains biotin and niacinamide, which helps with thicker hair, nails, and skin health.

They also contain mushrooms who can help with with brain function.

And of course, you're probably familiar with vitamin C and how great it's for your immune system.

On top of it all, groons are vegan and free of dairy, nuts, and gluten.

Get up to 52% off when you go to groons.co and use the code PIVOT.

That's G-R-U-N-S dot C-O using the code PIVOT for 52%

off.

Okay, last one.

I'll read it.

Kara and Scott, you guys are so in the on everything.

I'm amazed by your intellect.

How do you stay on top of it all?

What do you read specifically?

Do you carve out time in your day?

How do you make it a priority with the kids?

Susie from Pittsburgh.

Yes, Susie, we're geniuses.

I don't know what to tell you, but we are, our intellects are so massive.

I just, that's how we do it.

That's it.

That's our purpose.

Go ahead, Scott, you go first on this one, Menela.

I get asked this a lot, and I don't have a good answer.

I think greatness is in the agency of others.

Whenever we do the show,

one of the analysts at Prop PropG, Mia Silverio, puts together notes for me.

I did an editorial call this morning and we'll literally just spend an hour on the phone with the 10 people that work at PropG just talking about ideas.

And if something's really interesting, we start pulling data on it.

I learn a lot from you, Kara.

I try and find interesting media sources.

I do find less so now, but Twitter used to bubble up really interesting things, sort of crowdsource interesting ideas.

And I'm very fortunate.

I have a lot of people who will text me something, including you saying, this is really an interesting article that

cuts to the core, if you will.

But I don't have my go-to when I was a consultant, I had the secret weapon or two.

I used to go to The Economist and I used to go to something, my real secret weapon was something called American Demographics, which was

an incident magazine.

I've read that.

But now it's just kind of a hodgepodge.

Now it's sort of crowdsourcing from my team and colleagues.

Yeah, I would say I'm a little more disciplined than Scott is in that regard.

I read all the major newspapers every morning, every, or at the evening, and look for stories.

And I read widely the Atlantic.

I read, or I scroll it, and then I pick the ones I want.

I read the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post.

I look at Politico.

I look at the San Francisco Chronicle.

I just am interested in San Francisco.

I look everywhere for the information.

I love the puck newsletters.

I tend to stick with

news sources I trust and which I've covered.

So I used to spend a lot more time on on Twitter.

It's a waste of my time unless I'm interested in dunking.

Like if funny dunks is what I find there now, I used to find a lot of interesting ideas, but I now specifically search people.

I have a list of people on any one subject that I look for, whether it's politics or banking or something like that.

Everyone else, I absolutely ignore, and I didn't used to do that.

I used to be very open on Twitter.

I do those emails, like CNN's Five Things.

I love the email that Semaphore puts out, the Puck newsletter, the Axios.

Yeah, I'll look at all the newsletters.

Casey's platformer, I look at...

Dealbook from Andrew Ross Swergeny does a great job.

On Instagram, I love Jessica Yellen's News Not Noise.

I find it's like a quick hit to get up to speed on stuff.

I like Oliver Darcy's CNN thing.

That's a lot of media, but

I have cut back for sure.

When I want to know about something, I go in a deep dive on the regular media things.

I watch some TV.

I watch Stephanie Rule's 11th Hour because I like Stephanie's.

It has a nice synopsis up top.

Everything else is noise to me.

I find it noisy.

I look at it sometimes,

but a lot of it is repetitive and sort of a dog race kind of stuff.

And I find it, I don't like a dog race.

Like, who's up?

Yeah, the, the set and Saturday and Sunday, God, I consume a lot of me.

Yeah, Saturday and Sunday morning for me are Fareed Zakaria, Michael Smercanish.

And on Sunday morning, I go to Margaret Brennan at Face the Nation.

Oh, see, there you do do a lot more.

And then I tend to get recommendations from friends.

People send me stuff a lot of the time.

And I talk to people more than most people.

And so I'd rather do the reporting myself.

That's just because of me.

But I do carve out time in the morning and in the late evening.

And priority for the kids, I stop.

We have dinner usually.

I try not to look at the phone

or try to respond.

Most of the time on the phone, I'm responding to my other kids, like someone that's trying to reach us or family or Scott or something like that.

And then we on pivot and also on, we send stories back and forth all day long on things.

And we do that.

Like, I looked at this.

What about this?

It's really helpful.

So, it's a lot of people you trust.

But in general, we're very interested and curious people, I would say, don't you think, Scott?

We love it.

We're information vacuums, aren't we?

I find this stuff, I don't even think of it as work.

I just find this stuff so interesting.

And

people know I find it interesting.

And I develop nice relationships this way.

I just heard from someone, this Molly Jung Fast woman, I thought, oh, I was flattered that she took the time to message me.

I have another good friend, Whitney Tilson.

And whenever Whitney finds something that he thinks I would enjoy, he sends it to me.

And your friends are a great source.

What I would say is, where do you start?

When you find stuff that you think is relevant to other people, start emailing stuff to them and they'll start emailing back.

Or texting.

I tend to text more than anything else.

And then lastly, I do other things that are just weird.

I just started listening.

I listened to history podcasts quite a bit.

I'm listening to one called The History of Rome, which is 12 13-minute segments on the history of Rome.

And I'm going to go all the way through it.

I had studied.

I do a lot of historical reading on a lot of stuff, but I used to read, now I listen.

And I find it, they're 12 minutes.

It doesn't take that long.

And if I get tired, I turn it off, but never goes anywhere.

And so I do that.

I do that.

And so with the kids, I try to,

you know, do just stuff with them.

We do, just, we just take time.

Just take time, don't you?

You took your kid to the soccer game.

We did marshmallows last night.

We traveled.

We brought them on our trips.

We both brought them on our trips.

Yeah, but even, and also, I mean, just thinking about it, it keeps going is probably once a week do a full episode of the daily from the New York Times if it's a subject matter that I want to know more about.

I think they do a fantastic job.

I just listened to a finance podcast with my friend Scott Goodwin, who's a credit investor, and this is an incredible podcast on credit cycles.

He's with Diameter Capital.

So occasionally I find a finance podcast that I'll go deep into.

But oh my God, it's so

much content.

It's so

much great stuff out there.

I watch a lot of docs on Netflix and mostly on Netflix, actually, and HBO.

I watch documentaries all the time, which I love on things that aren't news things, like

on physics.

This in no way is instructive or helpful.

We've basically just told them to do meth and watch media all day, watch and listen to media all day.

Right, all the time.

Anyway, those are great questions.

Send us more.

Go to nymag.com/slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 855-51PIVOT.

Okay, Scott, that is the show.

We'll be back on Friday for more.

And again, listeners, thank you for your great questions.

I love the way you guys ask questions, whether it's RJ handing it to Scott.

I like that.

Push back, argue with us.

We love it.

We will argue back at you.

We love the questions we get in person.

We love meeting you, as we've said.

We really do enjoy it.

And if you don't agree with us, tell us.

We love to hear from you.

We are not the world's experts on everything.

And if we're wrong, let us know.

And if we're right, let us know.

All right, Scott, read us out.

Today's show was produced by Larry Naman, Travis Larchuk, and Taylor Griffin.

Ernie Intertot engineered this episode.

Thanks also to Drew Burroughs, Miel Silverio, and Gaddy McBain.

Make sure you subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Box Media.

We'll be back later this week for another breakdown of all things tech and business.

This month on Explain It To Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well: collagen smoothies, and cold plunges, Pilates classes, and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It To Me, presented by Pureleaf.

Support for the the show comes from Mercury.

What if banking did more?

Because to you, it's more than an invoice.

It's your hard work becoming revenue.

It's more than a wire.

It's payroll for your team.

It's more than a deposit.

It's landing your fundraise.

The truth is, banking can do more.

Mercury brings all the ways you use money into a single product that feels extraordinary to use.

Visit mercury.com to join over 200,000 entrepreneurs who use Mercury to do more for their business.

Mercury, banking that does more.