The Future of Antitrust, Bitcoin, DWAC, and more

Support for this show comes from Nike.

What was your biggest win?

Was it in front of a sold-out stadium or the first time you beat your teammate in practice?

Nike knows winning isn't always done in front of cheering crowds.

Sometimes winning happens in your driveway, on a quiet street at the end of your longest run, or on the blacktop of a pickup game.

Nike is here for all of the wins, big or small.

They provide the gear, you bring the mindset.

Visit Nike.com for more information.

And be sure to follow Nike on Instagram, TikTok, and other social platforms for more great basketball moments.

CRM was supposed to improve customer relationships.

Instead, it's shorthand for can't resolve much.

Which means you may have sunk a fortune into software that just bounces customer issues around but never actually solves them.

On the ServiceNow AI platform, CRM stands for something better.

With AI built into one platform, customers aren't mired in endless loops of automated indifference.

They get what they need when they need it.

Bad CRM was then.

This is ServiceNow.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher.

And I'm Scott Galloway.

So, Scott, 2022 can't end without a little accountability.

On every episode or so, we make predictions about business, mostly you, tech politics, you name it.

Today, we're going to look back and see what we got right and what we could have gotten right if it hadn't been for Elon Musk.

We'll also hear from some friends of Pivot with their own predictions for the new year, and we'll make some of our own.

So, let's look into the crystal ball once again.

Another year together, Scott Galley, you and I.

All right, to start things off, here's a prediction you made in November of last year.

2022 is going to be the year of staggering MA, all in the pursuit of a super app.

I think that these companies, social media platforms, can kind of manipulate their earnings by either not cleaning up fake accounts or cleaning them up.

I think Jack Dorsey is going to see God over the next two months, clean up a ton of accounts, show shitty earnings and growth, puke on himself.

The stock will go down to 40.

And then Square is going to acquire Twitter and try and become a 10 cent.

All right.

Lots going on here, Scott.

Someone did acquire Twitter.

It was not who you said.

And Square was what you thought it was going to happen with Jack being involved in, obviously, because he's the creator of Square.

Someone, Elon did acquire, tried to make it into a super app.

So that's kind of right.

Bots were a big part of the drama.

How close would you say you were on this?

Well, I like to think I just predicted that Twitter would be acquired.

Okay.

So come on.

It was an independent, hold on.

It was an independent company.

It since 2006.

We predicted the year got acquired.

Yeah.

Yep.

Yep.

I think we got sort of a semi-win there.

Kissing your your cousin.

I don't know.

Yes.

Okay.

My God.

Why would you say kissing your cousin?

Why would you bring that into this?

Anyway, the stock will go down to 40 in squares.

The stock did not go down.

It sold for 54.20.

And that's largely because someone made a non-economic decision to buy it.

But this idea of super app, do you think Elon will be able to pull that off?

It's his only way out.

I mean,

he's already, he's literally like shit to bet.

And I'm talking like Falcon Model X shitting here.

I mean, it's just the revenues are gone.

They're not coming back from advertising.

And so he's got to do serious jazz hands here, and it's going to be payments.

Payments.

And he has a background in payments.

He knows how to do it.

That's true.

Yeah.

All right.

Some of the biggest acquisitions of 2020 weren't in social media.

They were in gaming, actually.

In January, Zynga announced that it would acquire Take-Two for more than $12 billion and one of the biggest deals in video game history.

But the record stood for less than two weeks when Microsoft came with a deal of its own, proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard for nearly $70 billion.

Sony got in early in the action, snatching up the developer of Destiny for nearly $4 billion.

There's a question of whether the Microsoft Activision deal will go through.

I know they're in DC recently.

They're worried about that.

So where is the M ⁇ A action?

Very briefly, your prediction, where's it going to be?

For 2023.

Yeah.

You talked about Pinterest before.

I think this was always in there.

I think there's got to be a lot because everything's gotten cheaper.

I think Disney will make some acquisitions.

And I think that

Snap and Pinterest are hard to tell because they're dual-class shareholder companies.

So they don't, but

I think the place you're going to see a lot of acquisitions or consolidation isn't any ad supported media.

They're just, they're subscale.

They've run out of, they've run out of time.

They don't make any sense economically.

And one way, you either cut costs or you consolidate.

And we're going to see both of them.

Okay.

So that's the area you're looking at.

That's the area you're looking at.

Any ad-supported media from Viacom, from CBS, pairing with Paramount.

I mean, you just, all of these guys, they're all Comcast has got to do something big here Disney's got to do something all of them are looking at each other and saying hey I know I told you I didn't like you but now maybe we should go to the prom together it just yeah

this is a dramatic cut in valuations uh a recessionary ad environment and new apex predators called apple amazon prime and netflix all calling on unilever and png and the other biggest advertisers is going to turn it's going to create a lot of strange bedfellows yeah it's interesting if the microsoftion deal doesn't go through i wonder what microsoft will be looking upon upon.

It's interesting.

We'll see.

They'll do something.

They're in a strong position.

Okay, Scott, let's hear a prediction from a friend of Pivot.

This one comes from The Verge's Alex Heath, who's done a great job this year, by the way.

Alex, good job.

Let's listen.

Hey, Karen Scott.

Alex Heath, deputy editor at The Verge here.

My prediction is that in 2023, the Apple versus Meta narrative will ramp up significantly with the launch of Apple's long-rumored pricey mixed reality headset, followed by the next version of Meta's ConsumerQuest Quest headset later in the year.

These two companies have been duking it out on mobile for years where Apple is dominant.

Now Apple is coming for the headset market, which Meta currently dominates and Mark Zuckerberg is staking the company's future on.

I expect Apple to lean heavily on its pro-privacy marketing and leverage its expertise and hardware to really make a splash here.

These headsets are precursors to the real holy grail device that both Tim Cook and Zuckerberg are obsessed with, AR Glasses.

I think this is going to be one of of the most fascinating big tech rivalries to watch over the next several years.

Thanks.

That's a very smart discussion from Alex.

Meta has invested $100 billion in RD for the Metaverse, including $15 billion in the last year.

A lot of money.

Apple is very good at devices.

The rumored AR-VR headset is expected to release in 2023 after production issue delays.

It's going to cost, I don't know, it was $3,000?

I forget.

It's some high figure.

I'm still not into these mixed reality headsets yet, but maybe I'm not being visionary enough.

What do you think, Scott?

I think it'll be the Air Maz Apple Watch.

I think it'll get a ton of media coverage.

They'll, you know, point to things that are successful at this price point.

And I think it'll just fade into oblivion.

I'm with you.

I think people won't put anything on their face that doesn't make them more attractive to strangers.

But they put AirPods in.

Remember, they thought you looked like they were.

They're making more attractive.

But at first, you remember?

You looked weird.

Do you remember how they talk about these little weird little white things hanging out of you?

Anyway, I don't know.

AirPods are the most successful piece of jewelry in history.

And they're just such an elegant, simple product.

I've never thought

wearables outside of AirPods.

And I think

your iPhone's the ultimate wearable.

I don't think, I think the fever dreams that all of these folks have, including Tim Cook, around...

Yeah.

I think it's very instinctual.

And that is the majority of animals that you could eat or could eat you don't come straight at you.

They come at you from your side.

And your peripheral vision, when it's blocked, is very uncomfortable.

And so I've just never bought that people want to put anything that creates a sense of a loss of peripheral vision or makes you less attractive.

It's very hard to put a computer on your face without it looking weird.

And at this price point, it'll be a niche product.

It'll get a massive amount of PR and then slowly but surely it will fade into oblivion.

And we'll see.

Yeah, I'm with you on this.

For some reason, I just don't.

I've never, now, the thing is, if you've never considered it, you've never seen the one that works, right?

That's the thing.

The one that works is going to be,

that's the thing.

And I do say, literally, I just found my

Google glass device, but I put it on and I kind of still like it.

I'm like, this is kind of the right idea.

If it was glasses, that gate gave talk to me.

And again, I love my AirPod Maxes.

And if they were smaller and spoke to me and gave me a little more information than an AirPod could, I could see it.

Like AR glasses.

If they were to my specifications for my eyesight, I might like them.

If it was saying turn left here, it was talking to me.

I could see it.

It's just so far everything I've seen, very heavy on the on the sides because they have the batteries, very small amount of features

and still not quite what I want in them.

I want them to be AirPods.

I want them to be maybe a little heavier than AirPods with a little more feature set and maybe a camera.

This is a long time thing.

I'm not so sure about this one, Alex.

We're not so sure about this one, Alex.

Anyway, Scott, were you surprised surprised that we didn't talk about the metaverse a lot in 2022?

We really, we kind of shit all over it, really.

I think, I mean, if I had tried to figure out a way to kneecap meta, which is a net negative for society, I couldn't have come up with a strategy as brilliant as this.

Okay.

All right.

Well, here's a prediction you made early in the year in February.

We're about to see a tripling in

real estate in a specific region.

Any guess?

In 2022, we're going to see a 3 to 5x

increase in the value of real estate in this neighborhood.

All right.

Any ideas?

No.

What?

Tell me.

Guess you want to guess?

I don't want to guess.

I don't guess.

I'm not going to guess.

In the metaverse, specifically like sandbox.

Oh, yeah.

Okay.

That one was wrong.

Although they spent money, but the real estate value did not go up.

It did not catch on with the people.

Very similar to how I feel about glasses.

You had a chance being right in 2022.

VCs and private equity more than double their investments in the metaverse compared to 2021.

That's according to McKinsey.

But in the metaverse's four most popular worlds, real estate values fell by as much as 80%.

Thoughts?

Spending on it.

Oh, I got this hugely wrong.

I also, one of my other predictions that I made in my predictions tech last year that I got wrong was that OpenSeas valuation would double.

I bought into the notion.

I see my kids spending money on digital assets, whether it's skins or new weapons on Fortnite or the games they play.

And I thought that given the speculative nature that young people had embraced of assets and Web3,

that the next thing would be online real estate.

And I also thought NFTs were going to take off.

So I not only got it wrong on real estate, I got it wrong on NFTs.

NFT volume is down 97%.

So

this was wrong all in caps.

All right.

Okay.

Any

guesses?

Want to make another stab at it?

It's not.

I mean, it feels like anything Web3,

it doesn't feel like this is coming back.

I think the video game,

the video game folks are going to figure out ways to continue to extract more revenue from people with assets that kind of integrate into their game playing.

But it looks as if digital real estate and I don't want, I still think NFTs are going to have value.

I still think people are going to want to have a Chino logo or something.

Should you

brag.

There is some assets here that will work, others that won't.

I just don't think people are rushing to think about them.

I just, they're busy sorting out what they have right now.

All right, Scott, let's hear from another friend of Pivot.

Here's Congressman Ro Khanna.

Hi, Karen Scott.

This is Ro Khanna.

Thanks for having me on the show.

In terms of tech legislation, we've got to get the privacy bill passed.

It's passed committee.

It's time we get this done.

I'm really hopeful because I don't want to come on the show again and have Karen ask me why we have done nothing about this for year after year after year.

I also think we've got to do antitrust.

I'm not sure.

I'll vote for it, the antitrust legislation.

Candidly, I'm not sure if that's going to come up in the lame dot.

That's probably a project for the next Congress.

And finally, we've got to make sure that the Internet stays free of censorship, wide open, robust debate.

And let's see if we can find bipartisan consensus to do that.

Again, I think that's a project for the next Congress.

Thanks a lot.

He's scared of me.

He's scared of me.

Yes.

Why don't you have privacy legislation, Roe, and all of you, every one of you?

I just can't understand this.

I don't understand why this seems to be the lowest stakes thing that Congress can do is protect consumer privacy.

And I just, I never understand why they can't do a good bill.

There's been so many across the world and across this country.

There's lots of people have trod here.

They could come up with the best practices of all of them and come up with something that'll work for the industry and also consumers, mostly consumers, in my opinion.

Antitrust, I don't think they're ever going to reform antitrust.

I don't know where they have the and censorship, they're never going to agree on this.

As long as you have Josh Hawley and Tom Cotton around and

others,

it's just not going to happen.

Anyway, what do you think?

I think it speaks to a bigger issue, and that is when the world and technology move as fast as they move and externalities can prop up as quickly as they can prop up.

You know, we weren't expecting our new heroes, you know, Meta and Google, to

be a huge cause of teen depression.

Just these things pop up so fast that

our government can't respond quickly enough.

And specifically our government, our government's kind of feature was checks and balances, power to the people, the people have spoken, three houses of government, president, Congress, Senate, and versus a parliamentary system in Canada, Australia, and the UK where they elect a government and the government, you know, the head of that, the government then picks a head, and that person can get shit done because they kind of control government.

Or it's as if if the president won, it meant overnight that Congress and Senate had more Republicans or Democrats based on the party of the president.

And I think it's turned into a bug for us.

And that is, I'll use my senator, Senator Gillibrand, take some money from Sam Bankman-Freed.

And the tough thing is that they don't have to do anything.

All they have to do is nothing and legislate.

They just have to show up to meetings and say, I have some concerns and just keep asking questions and slowball the shit out of Senator Klobuchar's legislation and just kill it because they have taken money from big tech, whose fastest growing expense line is not AI, it's not SGNA, it's lobbying.

So our system is become the intransigence or slowballing used to be a feature.

It's become a bug.

Yep, I think you're right.

Roe, you better pass privacy legislation.

Honestly, really, this is ridiculous.

Ridiculous, ridiculous.

Anyway, let's go on a quick break.

When we come back, we'll hear from some more friends of Pivot and evaluate our predictions about Twitter.

As a founder, you're moving fast towards product market fit, your next round, or your first big enterprise deal.

But with AI accelerating how quickly startups build and ship, security expectations are also coming in faster, and those expectations are higher than ever.

Getting security and compliance right can unlock growth or stall it if you wait too long.

Vanta is a trust management platform that helps businesses automate security and compliance across more than 35 frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more.

With deep integrations and automated workflows built for fast-moving teams, Vanta gets you audit ready fast and keeps you secure with continuous monitoring as your models, infrastructure, and customers evolve.

That's why fast-growing startups like Langchain, Ryder, and Cursor have all trusted Vanta to build a scalable compliance foundation from the start.

Go to Vanta.com slash Fox to save $1,000 today today through the Vanta for Startups program and join over 10,000 ambitious companies already scaling with Vanta.

That's vanta.com slash box to save $1,000 for a limited time.

Support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you $100 credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply.

Only on LinkedIn ads.

Scott, we're back.

Here's a rare one, a prediction from me.

I usually don't go in for this sort of thing.

Let's see how I did.

So the SEC is investigating this back deal between Trump and Digital World Acquisition Corp.

to see if the two negotiated before DWAC went public.

Oh, God, she's social.

I don't think anything's going to happen.

I don't think.

It's like the Musk thing.

Slap on the wrist.

Slap on the wrist.

I made a prediction in June of this year.

In August, the whistleblower told the SEC of potential violations at DWAC.

So far, the SEC hasn't taken any action against the SPAC, but has requested more information from the company.

DWAC shareholders accused the SEC of delaying the merger.

I think it hardly matters anymore, but the SPAC certainly has other problems.

It spent much of the fall trying to convince shareholders to approve an extension so the SPAC could close its deal.

With Trump's media company, it finally received shareholder approval in November.

Closed the deadline when it would have had to dissolve.

And of course, Trump himself is still under investigation after the Mar-a-Lago raid.

He's been allowed, he's also been allowed back on Twitter.

I just don't think this deal gets done.

I don't, it's, it's financially, it's really a mess there, apparently.

But Trump is using it quite actively and not going back to Twitter.

So, I mean, maybe, I don't know.

I don't know.

I just don't think anything terrible is going to happen to this group of people who

seem a little bit sketchy.

I think the regulars have, as it relates to Trump, have bigger fish to fry.

The SPAC is kind of taking care of itself.

Yeah.

And that is who would have thought a tech media company run by Devin Nunes

is not working out.

It's gone, I mean, it's still got about a billion-dollar market cap.

It hit a high.

I think it touched almost 100.

I think it's now at about 21.

I think this is a company, a stock going to zero.

So

I think the attitude is just let it play out.

They're going to, you know,

they're getting what they should get.

Nothing's happening.

Nothing's happening.

Nothing's happening both as a business and as an investigation, but we'll see.

It's, you know, just put it on the top of the fire, the firing pile of crap that Trump has to deal with.

By the way, Rumble, Getter, and Parlor are out of business.

They just don't know yet until they find the next mentally ill person who says they're going to buy it.

We'll see where these go.

They're very hard to do.

Scott, social media sites are hard to do.

They are.

Okay, Scott, here's one I know you'll like.

It's another friend of Pivot.

Let's listen.

Hey, Karen Scott, it's me, Molly Wood, climate tech investor and tech commentator and reluctant crypto expert here to talk about what's going to happen in crypto in 2023.

First of all, I think we'll start to see a lot more differentiation between Bitcoin, a still fairly decentralized investment vehicle and store of value, and crypto, the highly financialized Web3 industry that got co-opted by venture capital and startups and exchanges and NFTs and ways to make a quick buck that has obviously blown up spectacularly.

It'll take a long time before that industry recovers and has goodwill and trust.

But I predict that Bitcoin will be just fine.

It has way too much value to go anywhere.

Now, what I'm hearing in the crypto space is that it is rudderless and leaderless.

And most people expect that its very near future will actually be defined by Elon Musk and whatever he does in terms of creating payments on Twitter using Dogecoin.

Because if that happens and succeeds, it will demonstrate real utility using a coin that's closely related to Bitcoin.

So I'm not saying I like this prediction, but Elon is like gravity in the tech world right now.

Everything gets sucked into his orbit.

So I have to assume my sources are most likely correct.

Oh, good God.

Well, it actually makes sense.

You know,

if they manage to create payments on Twitter, like you just, you know, we've talked about,

sure.

And using Dogecoin, sure.

If they manage to sell something that has utility on it or you use it for payments, sure.

I don't know if I would trust Twitter.

I wouldn't have trusted the old Twitter, and I certainly don't trust the new Twitter.

So I'm not sure I would use it.

I use Apple Pay.

I use all kinds of different things.

I might trust it if Apple used it.

I might.

trust it if Amazon used it.

I think she's right overall about Bitcoin.

I think Bitcoin will be differentiated.

So my most liked tweet of 2022 was, I said, I am doubling down on the most innovative payment technology in history, USD.

And, you know, the crypto Taliban came from me.

I don't think Bitcoin's ring-fenced here.

I think Bitcoin has more,

the wrong term is utility.

It's established itself as a viable store of value because people believe that they will stop mining it at 21 million coins.

There's real issues around for citizens of countries that have unstable currencies that want to get

their assets or their net worth into something

more sustainable.

And they have currency controls so they can't

transit

or can't transfer it to dollars, remittance payments.

There's utility and store value there.

But to think that I think Bitcoin's going below $10,000, maybe even south of that.

And the kind of what I'll call the crypto bulls have this, have Molly's narrative.

And that is, oh, you know,

this is like 2000, and the bad stuff's going away, but the good stuff is going to come back even stronger.

Did you see Kathy Wood has re

articulated her million-dollar price call for Bitcoin in 2030 because the hash rate has gotten better?

I mean, it's just you listen to her, and I'm like, you're allowed to say whatever predictions you want to make, but when you're taking in billions of dollars of retail investor money, I just find that near reckless to say something's going to go up 60x.

I don't think Bill Cohen was like that nutcase.

I think he's calling her a nutcase.

I mean, I would agree.

It's just like, okay,

pass the ayahuasca around.

Yeah, all the people who already have investments in crypto and Web3 are now retreating to, oh, but these are the good things.

Well, they're going to do that.

That's normal.

I think that's normal.

I do think that if one of the bigger ones that you trust, the Amazons, the Apples, do things around that,

I literally would not do any transactions on Twitter ever.

Believe me, it's not Elon in this case.

I would have trusted them before.

I thought they were very porous as a company security-wise.

And I wouldn't want any of my financials on that particular thing before, and definitely not now.

Well, Bitcoin has already differentiated itself because it hasn't gone to zero like almost everything else.

So,

but

I mean,

I've never

understood.

I'm a no-coiner.

I don't own a single coin.

I've never understood the notion of a store of value.

I find this bullshit argument that it's supporting the incremental energy use i think anything that takes up the energy consumption of argentina is a problem for a kind of invented mechanism that we should be able to do something different

and i don't trust something where they can't even it's a mystery who the founder is i just yeah the whole thing

If Bitcoin goes, and again, it was at a couple hundred dollars not that long ago.

If it goes below $1,000, we're all going to say, well, of course it did.

And so I don't,

I don't, we'll see.

My prediction is that Bitcoin falls under this.

Everyone's getting their turn at the woodshed here in the Web3 levered Ponzi scheme that is Web3.

All right.

Okay, good.

All right.

Let's get to the next one.

It's finally time.

We talked about Twitter a lot this year.

There were times when you thought the deal was done and times we thought Elon was done.

Let's rewind back to December of 2021.

Here's what you said.

Within 90 days, there's going to be an offer for Twitter.

Okay.

Scott, you said three months is actually four.

Musk made his offer in April, and that's pretty close.

So good for you.

Here's another Twitter prediction.

This one's from June after Musk paused the deal before they sued each other.

Twitter right now is at about 40 bucks a share, which is way off the supposed closing price of 54.20.

It's going to be in the 20s in the next, I don't know, 30 to 60 days, as it becomes, two things become increasingly clear.

The person who agreed to buy it is not going to buy it.

And it's very difficult to get someone to show up with $45 billion.

That one was off.

Twitter stock never dropped below 32, and of course he bought it.

And here's a prediction from both of us.

This came in October after Musk finally said he'd buy the company and his team worked to hammer out the deal.

You and I weighed in on what his opening moves could be.

Let's listen.

The Twitter transaction is going to close and it's almost immediately.

It will probably not be the worst acquisition in history.

AOL's acquisition at Time Warner is probably the worst.

Within 60 seconds of closing, the world is going to realize that this is the second worst acquisition in history.

Which means Elon will will do something loud.

I don't know, something.

He'll like marry Kim Kardashian.

I don't know.

Something like, oh, yeah, because then Kanye would be mad.

Oh, God.

He'll try to do a lot of hand waving.

He's going to have to wave those hands.

There's going to be a lot of jazz hands coming out of this closing.

Well, he didn't marry a Kardashian, but a lot of jazz hands.

And he did let Kanye West on and then kicked him off.

I think I was pretty good on this one so far.

I did think the deal was going to close.

I think he was going to be forced to.

I think he got himself, he overpaid.

I thought, I didn't think he'd lose his mind quite the way he did.

I'm surprised.

I thought he was an opportunity to be quiet and do something significant to a company that needed it.

He chose another path from the get-go.

Where is it going?

How do we think we did?

Well, initially, I thought that this makes no sense and he's going to worm out of it.

He's doing it for attention.

And then I read the lawsuit and saw what their counsel was claiming and that this deal he signed was hermetically sealed.

And when the data changes, I change my mind, and I'm like, when we said this, he's fucked, he's got to close.

Yeah, we did say that.

We were very consistent on that.

But if he'd been able to get out of this deal and he'd just say, had done subject to due diligence and all that sort of stuff, which you often see in these types of agreements, a non-binding letter of intent, he would have backed out and the thing wouldn't be at $22.

It'd be a $10 right now.

It probably is at $10 right now.

It's just a private section.

If that.

But to give ourselves some credit here, as soon as we saw the agreements,

when you had all these Carnival Barkers

saying, oh, Twitter's toast and he didn't know about the bots.

As soon as I read the legal complaint from Twitter, I'm like, it closes.

He has to close.

And when you looked at the semantics or how it's going to play out in the Delaware Chancery Court and how the Delaware Chancery Court affects or cures decisions, it's like we said when everyone else, when the loudest people were saying, no, it's not going to close.

He doesn't have to close.

It's termites in the house and he didn't disclose it.

We're like, no,

he's locked and loaded.

Yeah.

So do you expect him to be this

the way he's behaving?

I did not, obviously.

But I certainly, the minute he did, I said something rather strong about it.

But I did not think he would be this much of a troll.

As much as this has been just, like I've said, this isn't the unwinding of a company or the undoing of a company.

It's the undoing of a person.

I think he's become Charles Lindbergh.

I think he's gone from Edison to Lindbergh in about six months.

What was interesting for me through this process is I genuinely feel like you've lost a friend.

I feel like this took, yeah, I feel like it took a toll on you.

You know, you try to have hopes for some people, I guess.

That's what it is.

He's not a friend.

I've been very aware of his negative qualities for a long, long time.

But I wouldn't say someone said he's your friend.

I was like, he was never my friend.

Yeah, but you gave him a lot of the benefit of the doubt.

I did because I thought he could do this.

Let me first say, I think you were deeply disappointed in some of the things, some of the ways he has acquitted himself in terms of his behavior.

Yeah, it's very strange.

I find it very strange and cruel.

Needlessly cruel, I think, is what I said.

And I understand why, because of the people around him and et cetera.

But he's his own man, and he doesn't have to behave this way.

The way to talk, I know every administration says the previous administration sucks.

He didn't need to trample all over these people, these employees.

There's a way of classily removing people.

I think he should have gone quiet, actually, and then surprised us.

You know, the hand waving, which I think we were right,

is really untoward, and it remains that way.

And it only brings him negative things.

Like, you know, Neuralink is being looked at for the animal abuse, which probably wouldn't have happened had he not made such a spectacle of himself.

You know, Tesla is going to suffer for it.

His various and sundry foreign statements about foreign affairs are just unwelcome, I think.

He can say them, but he doesn't know what he's talking about most of the time.

And so, I hope that,

you know, he's just

replatforming white supremacists,

seems like just to stick it in people's eye.

I don't understand what this does to make a better business of this thing.

And I recently come around to saying, let's just focus on the business because it's not a good business right now.

He's losing advertisers.

He's got to come up with a new business.

So far, the subscription stuff.

Maybe he can have a payment thing.

That said, I don't think I would, in any case, give him any of my financial information ever.

I wouldn't like it.

Can you imagine attaching your bank to Twitter, for example?

I know my bank is attached to certain to Apple Pay.

Maybe it's not.

Maybe I don't even do that.

But he's got to come up with a business.

Is this going to be a good business or not?

And then see what he can scroll out of with the bankers.

I think we'll see what happens there.

If he can, if he can buy the debt himself and what he can do.

But it's going to cost him a lot of money.

This is a real heavy lift.

Well, in the very competitive race to the bottom, that is Elon Musk's behavior over the last six months, whether it's trying to fire people for cause with no legal basis for that, whether it's embarrassing and doxing low-level employees that then get serially harassed, whether it's

claiming,

basically just lying back and forth, coming up with lies and people thinking that they're going to believe this bullshit.

The real low point, I mean, the real low point was when he tried to spread conspiracy theory about the assault on Paul Pelosi.

Yep.

It's unforgivable.

That was just so

just such a vile thing for

someone with this kind of power

to do.

And then, you know, putting a young, taking him off.

I just, I think he's literally, I think the analogy here, I think you're the one that first said it, is Charles Lindbergh.

And the way it's going to impact him is the net favorability of Tesla.

I spent my, you know, the majority of my life in brand strategy.

The net favorability of the Tesla brand has literally crashed.

And to believe that is not going to impact Tesla sales, margins, and ultimately its stock price,

this guy hasn't lost $40 billion on a $45 billion transaction.

He's lost $300 or $400 billion on this transaction.

It doesn't have to be like this.

It doesn't have to be like this.

Again, let me just say, totally capable of making this better.

Why do you need to do the rest of this?

I don't even slightly understand.

I don't think there's any method to this madness at all.

And the Paul Pelosi thing thing is repulsive.

It was repulsive.

And then maybe it knocks,

it affects me as a person, as a gay person, but so cruel.

So just like, what?

Like, when I saw that, I was like, what?

Like, and by the way, these Twitter files, read some all you want.

Just do them, do them in a way that protects people's privacy.

Secondly,

you don't think like one of them was like, nobody wants this to come out.

It's like, yeah, I love.

internal memos.

I'd love to see what happened, but don't make fetch happen when it just didn't in the first one.

And if you have it in the second one, great.

That'd be great.

But why don't you give it to lots of reporters who are who can really track down and do reporting and not just do a series of ridiculous tweets and do actual reporting and get it right.

That would be great.

And if something bad, we're open to something bad.

But don't say there's something bad if there's not something bad.

Just wait and let the proof speak for itself.

So we'll see.

But honestly, just focus on the business.

I can't anymore with this guy this year, I think.

Just make the business great.

We all love Twitter.

We would love these kind of things to survive.

We'd love it to be better.

So just make the business better and stop with the rest of it.

You know?

Anyway, Scott, one more quick break.

We'll be back for our own predictions.

Say hello to the next generation of Zendesk AI agents.

Built to deliver resolutions for everyone.

Zendesk AI agents easily deploy in minutes, not months, to resolve 30% of customer and employee interactions on day one, quickly turning monotonous tasks into autonomous solutions.

Loved by over 10,000 companies, Zendesk AI makes service teams more efficient, businesses run better, and your customers happier.

That's the Zendesk AI Effect.

Find out more at Zendesk.com.

Support for the show comes from Saks 5th Avenue.

Saks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in or when that Brunella Caccinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks 5th Avenue for the best fall arrivals and style inspiration.

Okay, Scott, I know you come up with a whole list of predictions at the end of the year.

I won't ask for them all, but what do you think the biggest story of 2023 will be?

What will be the Elon Musk Twitter of next year?

Will it be a switch flip on EV Tech?

Could Meta spin off Instagram if its stock goes any lower?

Do you like that one?

Or could Warner Brothers Discovery sell CNN to cover its debt?

Doubtful.

What do you think?

Let me have some predictions.

2023, I think the Patagonia Vest recession is just getting started.

I think it would be impossible not to believe that every tech company in the world isn't watching what Elon Musk has done at Twitter and said, well, let's let's do this.

Let's hold on to 80% of our revenue, which we could do.

And maybe we don't fire 70% of the people.

But if he can maintain a minimal acceptable standard for the product with 70% or 80% fewer people, maybe we could do it with 20% fewer.

You're going to see

layoffs are just getting accelerated.

The ad-supported ecosystem is just going to be chaos with these new Apex predators in the ecosystem of Netflix and Apple and Prime all calling on the same advertisers with a recessionary environment where people are looking for excuses to pull advertising dollars.

Anyone who's in the business, including us, quite frankly, of ad-supported media,

we're going to see chaos and consolidation.

We're going to see consolidation of the sub-scale.

Everyone from

AMC networks to Lyft are going to be acquired.

The 2023's tech of the year, Kara, is going to be AI.

And I have something I was really, or something I think is sort of interesting.

I looked at peer-reviewed research, the volume of peer-reviewed research done in academic institutions, and it absolutely skyrocketed over 24 months for research on the metaverse and crypto.

And then it came down almost as fast as it went up.

It wasn't sustainable.

Whereas it was a slow build around things like

the web or the cloud.

And what it makes sense that the slow build around academic peer-reviewed research are more sustainable technologies.

Because in peer-reviewed research, basically, what you're saying is: hey, colleagues at MIT and Carnegie Mellon and at the Haas School, this is what I think about the future of cloud.

What are your thoughts?

And they learn from each other and it informs their research.

So, a slow build is a more enduring technology.

And the peer-reviewed research around AI versus crypto or metaverse is much more of a slow, sustained build.

And I think that 2023 is going to be the year that the promise or the performance catches up to the promise, especially when you're going to be able to get a lot of money.

Do you use GPT chat?

That's That's the new hot thing for the five seconds.

Well, there's the popular stuff where you get to say, all right, a great Dane drinking sacapa in the form of an old master, and it creates an influence.

You know, they had Kara Swisher and a white supremacist live together reality show.

That's good.

Yeah, it ends up in being a crime procedural, and someone dies, and it's not me.

But go ahead.

I was just going to say, throwing it Colin Oscar.

Anyways,

but you're going to see, especially in the medical field, I think that's where AI is really going to.

But 2023 is going to be just as whatever, the metaverse or crypto.

2023 is going to be the year of AI.

I think we've hit peak personal genius.

I think we're going to see a lot of orange jumpsuits next year.

I think Sam Bakeman-Fried was kind of, I said this around Adam Newman and I was wrong.

But I think there's going to be real pushback on this notion that individuals are more important than institutions.

I think people are just finally hit their breaking point.

Streaming consolidates.

We're just going to see fewer streaming players.

They're going to need to be required.

You know, it just doesn't make any sense.

Like, Like, Peacock isn't working.

I mean, the little guys just

can't survive.

By the way, I had my fourth TV show canceled yesterday.

BBC Tech Explorer with Scott Galloway was canceled yesterday because the streaming platform, the BBC, is no more.

I am literally the COVID-19 of television networks, Jared.

When are you going to realize you have to do a TV show with me?

You always say that.

Well, I'm just going to say that.

I don't think it's you.

I don't think you are the missing ingredient.

Yes, I am.

I'm actually the missing ingredient.

But go ahead.

Anyways, I'll be home soon.

Yeah.

Streaming Consolidates.

Fourth TV show.

I literally killed networks.

Anyways,

Tesla posts record revenues, profits, and deliveries, and the stock is cut in half.

This thing just makes absolutely no sense.

It's been cut in half.

The perfect analogy for Tesla is Netflix.

Had the market to themselves for 10 years.

There were 18 competitors on the market last year.

Now there's 32.

He is off.

He is just off doing ridiculously stupid things at some point.

And then my last prediction was the U.S.

reasserts its dominance and hegemony.

If you look at everything geopolitically, food independence, energy independence, our economy appears to be growing again and we're reducing inflation.

Our vaccines are working.

The smartest people in the world want to come here.

We're kicking the shit out of Putin in a proxy war without putting any boots on the ground.

I just think the U.S.

right now, if you look at it honestly, as much as we dislike each other, as much as we want the situation room and to shitpost America or feel bad about ourselves,

America has pulled away from the rest of the world on almost every important dimension.

Yeah, well, we'll see.

The only issue is, look, people are getting weary of funding Ukraine all the time.

I think there's statistics showing that.

I do think China coming online is going to raise inflation.

That should decrease inflation.

Well, maybe.

Get the gunk out of the supply chain.

That should,

but also they have energy demands.

Energy prices could go up.

I see.

Stuff like that.

And they love their demand economy now.

They're a food demander, by the way.

So food prices could go up.

They're an importer of food now.

I agree with you.

I think things are going well for the Biden administration.

What did I get wrong there?

What do you very much agree with or very much not agree with?

A lot of them I do.

I think the Tesla thing, I think it has a gravity that

doesn't live on regular people's planets.

I think I

think,

but I do see more and more people wanting other alternatives to Tesla, and that makes sense.

The question is, is it Apple?

Is Tesla Apple or is it not?

Like, you know what I mean?

Is it like an Android?

I suppose, I don't know what the, is it Android or Apple, I guess, where people want alternatives to it?

Because everyone still buys the Apple, right?

I don't think everyone's going to still buy the Tesla.

I think you're correct.

But I'm not a luxury car buyer, so I don't know.

And I don't think they're going to, and I think their service problems are going to become worse.

And

so you got to have alternatives.

And I don't, I just don't think the car is.

attractive enough given how many more attractive cars are coming out and people buy on romance i think something Johnny Ive told me I agree with him.

It's not a beautiful product.

It's a beautiful, it's a well-done car, but people want some choices, colors and everything else.

So yeah, I think about that.

Oh, wait, I forgot.

My best performing stocks.

I do stock picks even though.

It's a stupid thing to do.

Yeah, I know.

Airbnb.

I'm a shareholder in Airbnb.

It's been cut in half.

I think it's dominant and I think it'll.

it'll rock it up again.

All right.

Chinese internet sector.

I think Chinese internet stocks are going to are a great bargain right now.

A basket of Chinese e-commerce stocks.

They're traded a fraction of what their American peers trade at.

And then you're going to love this one.

Best performing stock of big tech.

Meta.

It's been over-punished.

It's trading at a PE of an old economy firm right now.

And

if you look at the way they account for their expenditures around the metaverse, they take them as expenses, not as R ⁇ D.

They don't capitalize them.

So the day they exit this fever, dream, or hallucination of the metaverse, the company becomes massive.

Right, if they do that,

he seems committed, but we'll see.

But even so,

it's not the nightmare that's going to keep haunting them because they're taking the expenses real time.

They're being very conservative in terms of their expenses.

They're an accounting professor's dream.

Marcus, he does think so in that regard correctly.

He's a very strong manager.

He's a very strong manager.

Okay, those are fascinating, Scott, and so many.

I do think my, this is one that I've thought about a lot and I've talked about a lot.

I do think Apple's going to act on the App Store dominance.

I think there's a lot of pressure here.

Most recently from Elon Musk, who backed off immediately.

But the stuff that's going on with Epic and a lot of them, I think Apple's going to act here.

They're going to try to cut it off by cutting the fees or something.

It just seems like there'll only be a more growing effort with Republicans in Congress to pressure on this.

I think it's the right pressure to bring to Apple.

And I suspect...

clever as they are, they'll do something first to assuage all their critics.

It won't be perfect, but they certainly, they may do something that's more transparent.

I think they know when it's time to do something, and I think it's probably time to do something.

What do you think of that?

Yeah, well, they tried that last year, right?

With the small business relief, where if you were doing under a million dollars, they reduce it to 15% instead of 100%.

Yeah, 15%.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I think what you're saying makes sense.

Tim is kind of thinking two steps ahead usually on this.

I just don't know if they're under that much serious threat, though, because I can't imagine the first piece of regulation is going to be against Apple.

Yeah.

Yeah.

That's fair.

That's fair.

I don't know.

I think they'll act before Congress acts.

That's my feeling.

We'll see.

If it gets any pressure, they'll move.

They're like that.

They're very good at that.

They're very jiu-jitsu-y.

Okay.

We have actually one more prediction from a friend of Pivot, one of our best friends of Pivot.

We probably should have played this earlier.

Let's listen.

Hey there, Pivot.

It's your old pal, Steph Rule.

My 2023 prediction is that Kara is finally going to end this lesbian charade and deliver Elon Musk's 11th child.

At which point, she, Scott, and Elon will officially become a thrupel.

They will then be departing Vox to distribute Pivot exclusively on OnlyFans.

It's going to be a wild 2023.

All right.

What can we say, Stephanie?

First of all, I don't have a uterus anymore, so I cannot deliver his 11th child.

But I appreciate the effort.

Scott, would you like to be in a thrupel together with Elon?

So there are so few things I am not up for.

I mean,

at this point, like, I'm pretty much open to anything.

Yeah.

And yeah, this is, but this is one of those things.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

There is no sexual attention between any of us.

You literally, that's your go-to.

You remind, you remind our listeners every other week.

Well, I don't want them to think we're like TJ Holmes and Amy Koback, whoever they are.

They're people, apparently.

Good for ratings.

commit to the show kara no

oh my god stephanie very funny it's not a chara my chara no i'd be in a thrupple with stephanie and her husband he's good looking

okay all right wait we can joke about you and me and melon but i'm not allowed to joke about her and andy all right okay you do that that'll be nice you know she's very good with the halloween and other decorations you'd have a lovely life by the way i've been in several threesomes they're a lot of work They're a lot.

You got to take like juice breaks and nutrition breaks.

They're a lot of work.

Yeah.

Okay.

All right.

TMI on that one.

Yeah.

I wanted a sandwich one time, whatever.

Another go to sleep and watch a movie.

Anyway, all right, Stephanie, thank you so much for that suggestion.

We're going to pass.

But I'm sure there's other cool things that are going to be happening in 2023.

Again, I'd say that I'm thrilled to be with Scott Galloway still

all.

this time.

And it's still been fun and interesting.

You keep me honest.

And I think I do the same for you.

And it's actually really.

You keep me honest.

Well, it's enjoyable.

I think I hope it's enjoyable.

We'll be also in Europe.

We'll be doing a live pivot from London and one in Germany, and we're very excited.

So we're going to hit another continent.

And by the way, if you've never had a producer gather clips of your predictions for the past year and play them back to you, I highly recommend it.

It's a deeply humbling experience.

But you know what?

We hold ourselves accountable.

When we get things wrong, we say so.

We get things right.

tout them endlessly because we're egomaniacs.

Okay, Scott, that's the show.

We'll be back on Friday with a special look back at the biggest stories of 2022.

And now, Scott, I predict that you will read us out.

All right, everyone.

Today's show was produced by Lara Naiman, Evan Angle, and Taylor Griffin.

Ernie and Dertott engineered this episode.

Thanks also to Drew Burrows and Mia Silverio.

Make sure you subscribe to the show wherever you listen to the podcast.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media.

We'll be back later this week for another breakdown of all things tech and business.

Thank you, Drew, Mia, Ernie, Lara, Evan, and Taylor for a great year and

making us look better than we deserve.

Thanks very much.

Yes, indeed.