The Growing U.S.-China Divide, Senate's Journalism Bill is DOA, and Congressman Ro Khanna

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunello Cacchinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks Fifth Avenue for the best follow rivals and style inspiration.

So your AI agents.

They make the team that uses them more productive, right?

But if they aren't connected to other agents or your data or your existing workflows, how productive can they really make your teams?

Any business can add AI agents.

IBM connects your agents across your company to change how you do business.

Let's create Small to Business, IBM.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher.

And I had my person invaded by a man named Dr.

Joseph.

He's very good-looking.

Yes, I saw that.

I had a column ask me.

I didn't feel the need to put it on the Twitter, but you did.

Tell us about it.

Tell us about your adventure into your colon, Scott.

Look,

I have a wonderful life.

I have people who love me immensely, and I'm going to do smart things that keep me around longer.

And that's what it is to get a colonoscopy.

It's the third leading cause of cancer death or the number three cancer killer.

And it's not entirely preventable, but mostly preventable, unlike most cancers.

And simply put, they go in, they find these polyps.

They can turn cancerous, but the good news is they grow really slowly.

So when you find them, you just take them out.

Did you have polyps?

I have the colon of a supermodel.

Oh, do you?

I do too.

I do too.

You had a clean colon.

I can't believe you do, but go ahead.

He was showing, I know, beef and bourbon.

It's what's for dinner.

I should not have a clean colon.

Anyways, he showed my colon to a bunch of people.

He was very excited about it.

And I was still coming off the meds, and we had a little party.

Everybody came in and checked out my colon.

But I did this.

I talked about it.

And the new stuff, you used to have to drink all this horrible liquid.

I've had two of them.

I had my second recently as I'm turning.

It's my birthday week, Scott.

So thank you for the birthday wishes.

70.

This is 70, right?

Yeah, right.

60.

Which you're soon going to be reaching.

The prep was great.

It was just a pill.

Is this your first colonoscopy?

Is this your first one?

No, I had one.

I had one eight years ago, but I forgot about the Niagara Falls

of your inner.

It's nice.

Don't you think it's nice?

I felt good.

I felt good.

It feels good at first, and then you're like, again, really?

No, but I feel clean afterwards.

It's like every, it's like,

I hit my target weight.

I'll get, that's good.

I've hit my target weight.

Yeah.

You know who got me to get one?

I'll tell you, is Katie Couric.

Katie Couric?

Yeah.

You know, she's the famous colonoscopy person.

And she yelled at me for a good year to get it.

And it was great.

It was good.

It was, it's a very good thing.

Everybody should get them.

They're very easy now, except for the pooping part, which is actually very pleasant, I found.

My doctor was dreamy, too.

He's got great hair.

Yeah.

And it happens really fast.

And then you get beautiful pictures of your colon.

Did you get to take some home?

I got to take some home.

Yeah, they gave me a whole bunch.

I'm going to get them framed.

Shall we

bring them together?

It's my Christmas card.

I thought you were going to give them to me as a present.

Okay.

Get a colonoscopy.

It's easy.

Right, right, yes.

Dr.

Joseph.

Thank you, Dr.

Joseph and team.

Okay.

All right.

We're going to talk about a lot today.

U.S.

and China square off over TikTok, Apple, and more.

And Meta scores a big win with the U.S., but a loss overseas.

And we'll speak with Representative Rokana about the Twitter files.

He got doxxed by Elon Elon Musk.

In any case, the first thing I have to say: Brittany Griner is free, and I'm very pleased.

We talked about this last week.

Of course, it's because we talked about it.

No, they made a deal.

We're learning details, but we're told she was in the custody of U.S.

officials.

Another prisoner, Paul Whalen, was not part of the deal, sadly.

He's an analyst who is still in prison there.

But she is out, and that's a great thing.

She was going to have a really terrible life as a gay person there.

She's unusually tall.

I know that sounds weird, but she stands out and subject to incredible working conditions where she was in a work camp.

And so I just, it's wonderful.

I think that's wonderful.

I feel sad for Paul Willen, but there's many political prisoners all around, but he's been there quite a while too.

Anyway, good news.

You're not going to like what I have to say about this.

Oh, no.

What?

Let me just say she was incarcerated illegitimately.

I am really happy for her and her wife.

Yeah.

I would have done everything I could have, and I appreciate that she inspired people to raise awareness.

I could not be happier for her.

She was held illegitimately.

We got played here.

Because?

Well, when they found,

let's assume that she did have marijuana vaping cartridges.

And I want to be clear, I've likely traveled accidentally with marijuana vaping cartridges before.

I don't vape anymore, but I've had marijuana on my person before, probably at an airport.

So I'm sure you have.

She has been,

she was incarcerated illegally.

um

if

they we they got played as soon as they found out who she was they said okay she's from a community of color she's from the lgbt community they will be outraged this is our opportunity to get the merchant of death back and yeah victor bout provided arms to the taliban to afghanistan basically anyone that was willing to kill americans he gave them the artillery and the ammunition for this is a very bad person who has killed a lot of u.s servicemen and paul whelan served his country paul Whelan was a Marine.

It is pretty clear, and this is on Wikipedia, that Paul Whelan was working for our security apparatus and was captured.

And what I really don't like about this was all the images floating around Twitter right now, showing pictures of President Biden and Vice President Harris with Brittany Griner's wife.

And I would like to see pictures of when they called Ms.

Whelan and his kids and said, sorry, we didn't get as much Twitter activity over his illegal incarceration, so he's not coming home.

The reason

now you don't know what's going on.

Okay, all right, I'm going to let you not go on much longer on this one.

Well, he's not coming back.

He's not on a plane to Dubai right now.

Yeah.

A lot of thoughts and prayers right now for a former Marine who's been in captivity for much longer.

Indeed,

I don't want this to go on any much longer.

I think you're making it in a zero-sum game that is not that.

That's the way these things tend to work.

And that you have to, here you are picking among between people who are the Russians are cynically doing this and so this is precisely what they want us to do which is argue over which one's better um and i think you celebrate your small victories and you don't uh you don't like if paul whelan had come home first would you be celebrating that small victory i would i would i would i would absolutely 100

we got played we got played this was a bad trade we got played we'll see what the details are before we know what exactly has happened but i am very happy she's home i i'm i too am happy she's home home.

This leads to more people from disenfranchised communities that have been treated like shit in the U.S.

for 200 or 300 years that will inspire Twitter outrage,

get incarcerated again at Moscow airport.

Well, no, I don't.

I think

you're being very simplistic about a very complex situation.

But nonetheless, we'll disagree.

I'm happy she's home.

I'm happy she's home as well.

In the opposite direction, Sonny Balwani has been sentenced to nearly 13 years in prison.

This comes after Elizabeth Holmes was sentenced to more than 11 years last month.

During the sentencing hearing, Balwani's attorneys tried to direct attention away from their clients saying decisions were made by Elizabeth Holmes.

You know, he got slightly more than she did.

He was in charge of the lab.

He didn't have any medical background, by the way, and certainly was

sort of rode these employees who were in that lab to lie and sort of attack George Schultz's grandson, Tyler Schultz, etc.

So he was more actively carrying out things, but he's sort of blaming her uh he's gonna appeal presumably but uh it seems like it's relatively equal sentences relatively equal sentences

i think this may this makes sense right they couldn't send the woman to prison and have the guy that kind of did the same thing get get any less so i mean we've said a few times it's the ceo but it looks like they were kind of literally sort of partners in crime here and partners in in you know big quotes i thought it was just inappropriate they were having a relationship.

I don't know.

The whole thing just stinks.

And I think it would have been outrageous had

the person with the ovaries gets a prison sentence, but not the dude.

She was the CEO, but I mean, him trying to say

they were in it together, a decision made by Elizabeth Holmes.

And she was, of course, doing the same.

He had a hold on her.

They were partners, and they're both going to jail relatively same times.

They'll probably get out a little earlier, both of them.

And so it seems like fair.

And it seems like this particular trial showing that you can't commit fraud on investors.

Of course, it wasn't about patients.

They didn't have that case.

It was about these investors being defrauded.

It was a pretty straightforward case.

And there they go, off to jail.

We'll see if they get allowed to appeal or anything else, but it looks like a pretty solid case against both of them.

And then there are more mysterious departures at Salesforce.

Salesforce is a sponsor of ours, but nonetheless, we're going to talk about them.

It seems a little messy there.

Last week, co-CEO Brett Taylor announced his departure from the company.

And now Tableau CEO Mark Nelson and Slack CEO Stuart Butterfield said they're out too.

I know they are close to Brett Taylor myself.

I think the moves are connected.

Spooked investors, Mark Benioff, who has founded the company and has been a sort of a big force there.

This is his second co-CEO who has left.

He had a guy named, I think it's Kevin Block, many years ago.

He was going to be co-CEO.

It didn't.

didn't happen.

There's a lot of discussion about that they're not keeping up with the rest of the industry in terms of results.

Shares of the company are down about 11% in the last five days and 51% for the year hitting its lowest point since March 2020.

It seems a little chaotic.

This trying to find an heir or

someone who's going to take over after Mark Benioff, who is a very charismatic CEO.

Apparently, according to the Wall Street Journal, Brett spent too much time with other CEOs and not with the engineering and product staff.

And so more and more is going to come out, what's going on, But he's got to really find a plan.

Scott?

This was really shocking to me.

When Brett Taylor stepped down, it really shocked me because he was arguably, I mean, he was definitely online, the heir apparent to be the CEO of a really important company to go run a startup.

That was truly shocking to me.

And it also is a pretty negative forward-looking indicator on the company and to be blunt, on Mark.

Because when you're about to hand over the keys and Brett's still a fairly young man to a really important company, and he decides to leave,

you know, he either doesn't like the company or either maybe personally, he just was decided.

They had gotten along.

They had a good relationship, but it sort of got tense, including the Twitter stuff.

He was a chairman of Twitter, and of course, that took up a lot of his time.

So I think we'll see a lot more here.

What's going on?

But yeah, you're right.

It's not a good symbol, except when the other two from companies they bought in 2020, the end of 2020, led by Brett, Salesforce acquired Slack for more than $27 billion.

Investors worried they had overpaid for it.

And so, you know, there's obviously a link between Stewart and Brett, presumably.

So it's, you know, he's got a lot on his hands here.

He doesn't have strong executives.

It's never a good sign.

This reminds me a little bit of Disney when some of those people left.

Well, let's...

Let's take a moment to bring this back to me.

Sure.

Okay, sure.

I did my predictions deck yesterday.

Yeah.

And I always like to go through like, what are black swan events that could happen in 2023?

And one of the black swan events I came up with is what if the cloud just doesn't have the growth we all think it has?

What if cloud-based technology across Azure,

Google Cloud, AWS, and all these, you know, snowflake, every kind of cloud-based company, what if all of a sudden we find out that the budgets, the corporate budgets for cloud are not infinite and begin to flatline and even decline?

That is where you see the NASDAQ really throw up because so many high flyers are based on, they go, well, it's a cloud-based company and the cloud is a gift.

It keeps on giving.

What happens when it stops giving?

And

Salesforce is a cloud-based company.

And you said the stock's gotten cut in half.

And what you got to look at is when senior management starts leaving, I mean, sometimes

the CEOs of companies that are acquired, I was a CEO of a company that was acquired by Gartner.

I lasted 14 months.

I left.

a lot of money on the table.

I just couldn't stand being there.

No fault to Gartner.

I just, it just a cultural clash.

Yeah.

But so I understand that, but Brett Taylor leaving to go do a startup.

I thought, well, maybe he just wants to hang out with his family.

He's made a lot of money.

He's going to do a startup.

So there's definitely issues here.

And to your point, I think you're exactly right.

More's going to come out.

Yeah.

Yeah.

You're talking about tensions.

This is not unusual, by the way.

I co-CEOs, I hate them.

Like it's just, it sets it up for you either make someone the CEO or you don't, but you leave the room room if you're a, especially when you're such a charismatic and big voice as Mark Benioff, right?

There's no way you can, he's also a big man.

I know it sounds silly, but he's a force.

Mark's got a lot on his hands.

He really does, especially as we had it continue to head into headwinds here.

And he's got a lot of competition.

Speaking of sponsors who regret their ad buys, ads from high-profile brands, including Uber, Amazon, and Snap, have been appearing in white nationalist Twitter profiles.

At least one of these profiles was previously banned in 2013.

One of them is particularly terrible.

The Daily Stormer guy, Elon Musk, has brought back thousands of banned accounts.

A former Twitter employee told the Washington Post the profiles would need to be flagged to prevent ads from appearing on them.

Actually, I've spoken to people at these companies.

They were assured by Twitter.

They tell me, every one of them, that this would not happen, that there was brand safety.

This would never happen.

They made these ad buys recently, and this happened.

They're all going to cut.

ads.

I mean, they couldn't believe it.

They couldn't.

They were shocked.

And, you know, hot mess, not even a hot mess, just a mess.

This was assured.

They assured us this wouldn't happen.

Now it's happened.

Not good.

None of them were happy people at these companies.

Well,

I got it wrong.

I said that when you lay off 70 or 80% of your staff, the site's going to go down.

There's just no way.

And what's actually happened here is that it ends up that the dozens or hundreds of people escorted out of the building on the content moderation team that they were actually doing things.

And the new content moderation team is a guy named Elon Musk.

And one, he has absolutely no idea what he's doing and is not capable.

And you're going to see this happen everywhere.

And within six weeks of the acquisition, 50 of the 100 largest advertisers have taken their ad budgets to zero, which means the other 50 have likely decreased, which means the biggest advertisers are soft 70 to 80 percent.

If that's a proxy for, I mean, I mean, you've never seen, distinct of this being a terrible acquisition, distinct of all the noise, the news here is that a company that was doing $5 billion in revenue is probably now doing one.

I mean, yep.

First time ever I've noticed ads on Twitter, which is interesting.

Yeah, I've never noticed them either.

But I, okay, here's what I have: this weird ear product that you go into your ear.

It looks like a thing you collect spaghetti with, and it pulls dirty stuff out of your ear, and it shows the dirty stuff.

I know, but it was like, what?

And then there was a noisy dog, a real squirrel sounds of a noisy, super rough duck.

Yeah, it's becoming Fox.

There was no other stuff.

Have you noticed the ads on Fox versus CNN?

Wooden pet carvings, a game that you play called Super Winner, and then this very weird Pilates challenge.

I'm like, I keep taking pictures of them because I'm like, what is this?

Really bad.

These people were furious.

Furious.

Anyway, let's get to our first big story.

The U.S.-China divide is growing and it could swallow.

the tech industry.

First, Apple is ramping up efforts to move its supply chain out of China.

We've talked about that to Vietnam, India, after a rocky fall that saw worker protests.

Apple's Chinese production facility, the uprisings, China's strict COVID measures, which have been lightened now suddenly this last day or two, have created supply chain delays for products like the iPhone Pro.

Now Apple is telling suppliers to prepare for assembly outside.

There's obviously, it's going to be more difficult to operate in those things.

And also, there is, just so you know, Chinese activists are currently, I think they still are staging a hunger strike outside of Apple's headquarters.

They're urging the company to remove restrictions of airdrop in China.

So, you know, people are trying to escape to get back to their hometowns.

It's not great for them.

And, you know, it's a very tough situation there.

Now, again, China just announced in the last few days of lifting of quarantines and restrictions, et cetera, et cetera, and taking power away from

local officials who have been very...

crack downy and they're going to pull that off.

There's still quite a few rules happening there, but it's much less so.

It's sort of maybe us a year ago, essentially.

What do you think?

Yeah, this is

every board or every company I'm involved in that had woke up, whether it was during COVID, and you realize that when the COVID, when there were outbreaks and total shutdowns in China, and all of a sudden,

you know, 500 or 550 stores no longer had tops because they were all being produced, we became way too concentrated in terms of supply chain.

And

first it was COVID.

Now there's more of an existential risk.

And that is we didn't see this company.

But she used to be, or China used to be, the government was very kind of not pro-democracy, but pro-capitalism.

He's shifted.

And he is,

I think it's just fascinating.

I think they look at the U.S.

and go, okay, the dollar ascending to a superior position than the government.

And that your tech innovators can shitpost the government.

Your kids become addicted to social media.

Companies becoming more powerful powerful in terms of their command of data.

He just said, you know what?

Not here, girlfriend.

We're done.

We're not going that way.

And we didn't expect them to do that.

And the reason why the Hang Seng and Chinese stocks were so

traded at such incredible multiples is that the second most powerful government in the world was the wind at their back.

And now it's the wind in their face.

The government has said, we are not opting for the dollar.

We are going to force, we're going to turn off social media for kids, except for one app.

They can only...

quarantine you.

We're going to quarantine you.

Yeah.

And

it's caught American and Western companies totally flat-footed.

And Tim Cook, as always, who's playing chessnot checkers here, has been working on this for a while.

It's going to cost them tens of billions of dollars.

It's going to hit their margins.

And it's the smart thing to do.

They will leave enough.

in China such that if she or anyone in China starts putting demands on Apple, he can say, well, we hope you don't decide to do that.

But if you do, we're just fine.

We'll ramp up in India, we'll ramp up in Vietnam.

So they won't totally exit.

And the U.S., let's remember, the U.S.

eventually, these do take a while, as many people point out to me, with the Chips Act.

Biden was in Arizona where TSMC is building a chip manufacturing fabs for clients, including Apple and NVIDIA.

Tim Cook was there too.

So he's placing bets all over the place.

It'll be, you know, I still think they have lingered in China far too long and allowed themselves to be exposed, including selling into the market.

Same thing, you know, there were stories about Tesla not selling enough Teslas in China.

They're the two most exposed companies in China.

Tesla denied these reports, but

if people aren't outside, they're not buying car Teslas and stuff like that.

It's a really interesting thing to pull away from this incredible manufacturing

juggernaut of China.

And I think that's going to be hard to replace because these other countries just don't have the infrastructure or

the government that can control it in quite the same way.

So it's going to be more expensive.

It's going to be more difficult.

They've got to now negotiate with all these new players.

It's going to raise the level of complexity rather significantly.

I mean, this brings us back to just how, what a shit show

is Elon Musk right now.

Okay, so China.

China and Tesla.

I think it's like a quarter of their sales and 40% of their cash flow.

It's their growth market.

They have manufacturers.

I work with Apple.

It's not unusual to have done that, but go ahead.

Okay.

Tim Cook isn't in charge of content moderation for Snap right now and kicking off and on Yee.

I mean, it is so insane and ridiculous.

The big story here isn't all this bullshit noise of Twitter and moderation.

It's the fact that Tesla is about to pay a huge price and has become infected with Musk's ridiculous behavior at Twitter.

The fact that he's like, unlike Tim Cook, isn't focused on very important issues for the golden goose in China.

Here's the problem, though, for him there.

Let me say, how he can't sell more cars there if they're under strict quarantine.

Now, now that it's lifted, that might change.

One of the things that someone was rightly pointed out to me is that this has tamped down consumption across the globe.

And so prices will rise if China gets out of their apartments.

We're going to see a rise in energy prices, a rise in.

all kinds of things because they have demand there.

And so this would make sense that if he's trying to sell cars in China, you could see Apple selling more iPhones if people are home, but cars, not so much.

And so, you know, it's a smart bet to have been there.

I think the problem is

the quarantine and the shutdowns have affected him very strongly.

And again, the company's utterly denying this.

The CEO at the end of the day is supposed to, their job is to make.

is to make better decisions allocating finite capital.

They have finite investment capital,

they have finite human capital, and they have their own finite capital.

And so the notion, we're so used to letting these idols of ours do anything.

The fact that this individual, given the incredible importance of Tesla globally, the incredible issues that Tesla faces, including the ones you've outlined, is now the new head of content moderation at Twitter, and that's where he's spending all his time.

Where the hell is the ported Tesla?

Well, there are executives at Tesla.

There was a really great profile, I think, in the information about the guy who's actually running.

He's sort of a mini Elon over there at Tesla.

And he's got Gwen Shotwell at SpaceX, who's been doing a good job.

So he might say, I'm over there and I've got great executives, which may be the case.

So that would be his excuse.

And they should make that person CEO.

Nate, yes, co-CEO.

You know, that's going to work.

Yeah, but the good news is in China, they are loosening the restrictions on lockdowns.

Those protests appear to have paid off.

We'll see what happens.

Same thing in Iran.

That's another place where you're going to see a lot of action, I think.

Meanwhile, in America, the deal between the Biden administration and TikTok is delayed again over security concerns.

U.S.

officials are said to be worried about the algorithm manipulation and data sharing.

They've got to tread very carefully here and do the right, do, do it right.

State governments aren't waiting for the feds to take action last week.

Republican governors, of course, because it's a great topic for them in Maryland and North Dakota, have both banned TikTok on some government devices.

I mean, listen, I've talked to several different, I was with a bunch of government people and someone asked about TikTok.

They're like, we're not putting TikTok on our devices.

Are you kidding me?

These are Biden people.

Wisconsin's congressional representatives have called on their state's governors to do the same.

You know,

they've got to reach this deal, especially when the Republicans control the House.

They'll do, I'm sure, some sort of hearing.

They're going to love to do hearings.

This would be one of them on the top.

So they've got to come to a conclusion of that deal or somehow

make a deal with TikTok.

Yeah, one of my predictions yesterday, I think TikTok is going to breach a trillion dollars.

I think it's going to be the fourth most valuable company by the end of 2023.

And there's so much money on the line here that I think they will come to some sort of accommodation or deal.

There's so much value here.

Well, Beijing doesn't want to be pushed around, you know, and they worried about protecting

the intellectual property of the thing.

And most people who know this company said they're not going to, this is their golden goose and they're not going to let Americans regulate their company.

Well, but here's the thing, and I'm not sure it's again, I think we might do a bad deal.

Among Gen Z and millennials, two-thirds of Gen Z would rather have TikTok than all of cable

and streaming television.

If they were presented with a choice, you can either have TikTok or you can have basically anything that comes through,

everything from Netflix to app, take it all, all of it.

Two-thirds of them chose TikTok and 53%

of

millennials chose TikTok.

So TikTok right now across this emerging cohort

who advertisers are obsessed with, who are going to be coming into their prime income earning years, would rather have TikTok than basically the rest of media.

I mean, it's just, it's, it's,

TikTok is the most ascendant, not media, it's the most ascendant company in history in terms of its velocity.

And whether it be a good idea or a bad idea, I think when you have this many young people that's addicted to a product, when you have this much money on the line, they're going to figure it out.

Yeah, all right.

Okay, we'll see.

I mean, I think the Biden administration has to tread very carefully here for a lot of reasons.

I'd like them to ban it.

I just don't think they will.

There won't.

They won't.

You know, Marco Rubio wanted to do that.

Trump had talked about it, but actually wanted to have a sweet deal for Oracle.

But we'll see.

I mean, there's got to be some solution here because it's got this technology that's very valuable.

It's a very valuable.

You know, I always say when I talk about TikTok, I'm like, setting aside the Chinese government.

And it's really, and everyone laughs because you really can't.

Anyway, it's a really

ignoring for a moment.

All right.

the Daily Stormer guy on Twitter.

It's quite an enjoyable.

No, it's not.

It's got weird ads for cleaning out your ears.

I'm surprised I haven't seen a colon ad on Twitter.

Anyway, all right, Scott, let's go on a quick break.

When we come back, Facebook says no news is good news, and we'll speak with Congressman Rokana about his emails.

Support for this show comes from Robinhood.

Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform?

With Robinhood, not only can you trade individual stocks and ETFs, you can also seamlessly buy and sell crypto at low costs.

Trade all in one place.

Get started now on Robinhood.

Trading crypto involves significant risk.

Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto LLC.

Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services.

Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC insured or SIPIC protected.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.

Securities trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC, member SIPIC, a registered broker dealer.

Support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you $100 credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply.

Only on LinkedIn ads.

Scott, we're back.

Like most users, Facebook will not pay for news.

This week, Congress killed the Journalism, Competition, and Preservation Act.

That's been pushed by Amy Klobuchar, Senator Klobuchar.

The bill would have allowed media organizations to collectively bargain for rev shear deals with tech giants like Facebook.

Meta was so opposed to the bill, it announced that it would stop hosting news on its American platforms rather than pay publishers.

Consumer advocacy groups weighed in against the bill as well, saying it could harm content moderation and small publishers.

This thing is probably not going to happen.

This company, this is something that happened in Australia, passed a law like this, but they did have Rupert Murdoch, you know, was really pretty much the one pushing for it.

Facebook did stop briefly hosting news there and reached a deal with the government.

It pays Australian news publishers, but it wasn't going to do this here in this country.

I think you have a better sense for this than I do.

What are your thoughts?

I thought it was problematic back in Australia.

I was like, why are they paying for it?

I mean, I get the, I don't want to paint their fence, but publishers can make these decisions themselves, right, of whether to be on it and whether they get efficacy out of it.

A lot of them were paid by Facebook in this country and elsewhere.

I remember when they came to me to try to pay me to be on Facebook, and I'm like, why do you have to pay me?

Like, I thought it was weird, right?

They that they did that.

It's either good for me or bad for me, right?

Or I can make money off it or I can't.

And so I never really loved the Australia one.

I was not, you know, even though it's really irritating that Facebook makes these declarations of stop hosting news.

Their argument, of course, is that they're helpful to news people.

They, they, they provide distribution.

I was trying to think of where people could go if you're a news publisher.

Someone asked me, a pretty prominent news publisher, like, where do we go?

And I'm like, well, TikTok's got the Chinese government and Facebook, you know, you know, it doesn't really work and you end up not in charge of your data as much.

And like, there aren't any alternatives, right?

There just aren't.

I couldn't think of one.

And I was thinking, oh, I should call Scott and ask him.

You know, I think it's quite hard to figure out where you go, but I'm not sure why Facebook would pay them at all.

I just, I don't understand it.

I mean, I like that.

I think they should be able to collectively get together and negotiate different things, but why?

Like necessarily?

I mean, Facebook's in the catbird seat here.

Yeah, it doesn't make any sense.

It would kind of be like forcing, taxing Tesla

and then taking those subsidies and shifting them to traditional Detroit automobile companies.

It's like

you're taxing the ones that are more successful to try and maintain the less successful.

And the difference here is that the less successful play a really important role in our society.

The number of journalists has been cut in half the last 30 years.

The number of PR and comms people who want you to have dinner with some CEO to hear their vision on technology has gone up sixfold.

So the ratio of bullshit spin to journalism has gone the wrong way, 12x, right?

So you can see the need and what Rupert Murdoch played it perfectly to basically put a tax on more successful media companies to subsidize his.

So that it just kind of, if you're a capitalist, it doesn't make any sense.

I think what they should do, and I don't know if you can target these new media companies, I do think they should be paying their fair share of taxes, which they don't.

But I'm actually now a fan of what the UK does, and that is they place a tax on households to sponsor the BBC, which does its best to call balls and strikes.

Because the reality is really hard-hitting, fact-checking, fact-checked journalism that attempts to

that attempts to do long-form, thoughtful, important journalism and gumstreet journalism, it's a shitty business.

And I do think that there's a social good, and we should come up with a way to subsidize it and have two layers, have a subsidized layer of media and then the private media on top of it.

But this, if you're a capitalist, it's really hard to see the logic here.

It's, it's kind of like, okay, they're the bad guys, we're the good guys, let's tax them and pay us.

It doesn't, I don't, I think it's very hard to argue this.

Yeah, it's interesting.

Let me read Amy Klobuchar's statement, continually allowing the who is the backer, the key architect of this bill.

And this would, just so you read that, she argued that it would help small local journalism survive if they could band together.

I'll comment on that in a second.

Continuing allowing big tech companies to dominate policy decisions in Washington is no longer a viable option when it comes to news compensation, consumer and privacy rights, or online marketplace.

We must get this done.

You know, it was being put in a bill, a defense bill, all kinds of things.

It's interesting.

Canada and New Zealand are considering similar measures.

Australia passed it.

But one of the things that's It's not just Facebook that opposed it.

It feels kind of funny.

And one of the things, there's a real bifurcation between powerful media companies like the New York Times, which I consider a monopoly at this point, right?

Versus these small sites.

They'll just be bullied by the New York Times, right?

Although, by the way, today, the New York Times reporters are on strike, which is interesting.

I can't believe it got to that for the day, their 24-hour strike they're doing over their contract.

But they really do.

I don't see it helpful that small companies can join with the New York Times, right?

Is that true?

They've arced out for 24 hours.

Yeah, 24 hours.

You know what?

That's what you do.

That's what they do.

They're going to put in the international reporters

are not in this union.

Anyway, they got to do something.

It's been like a year.

It's been like a long time.

This is what you do, Carrie.

You got another job.

Okay.

All right.

Now, anyway, you anti-union person.

Problem is that nobody has alternatives to distribute their work and small operations don't have the money to do news websites that will attract reach and everything.

And so one of the two dozen groups said

JCPA, this is the name of the bill, would make myths and disinformation worse by allowing news websites to sue tech platforms for reducing a story's reach and intimidating them into not moderating offensive and misleading content.

I've never been very comfortable with this bill.

I have not.

And you know, Amy, Senator Kolbuchar talked about it on stage, and I felt it was

a lot of overreach.

I can't believe I'm agreeing with Facebook, but

I do.

I did at the time, and I still do.

It feels funny.

It feels funny.

Well, it's the wrong legislation.

There should be legislation saying that you're responsible when we can reverse engineer teen depression to the actions or lack thereof of a media company.

You're responsible.

That when you license your IP to an overseas, and Facebook doesn't do this, Apple does, when you license your IP to a foreign entity such that you can charge the domestic entity $10 billion and thereby suppressing revenue, top line revenue in a low-tax domain and increasing revenues artificially in a high-tax domain, that's pure tax avoidance.

We need legislation that is equitable, not like, oh, we like that, we don't like them, we're angry at them, so we're going to come up with weird legislation that is sort of counter to our value.

Focus on privacy legislation, that would be, and of course, Senator Colbert, antitrust legislation, things like that.

Anyway, one of the things is there's pressure to find more alternative revenue streams.

The Washington Post may spin off its publishing software.

The Post has been struggling.

And their tech person who...

Do we know anyone that works at the Washington Post?

We do.

We do.

Give us a little pillow talk.

I think that they're struggling, I think.

I don't even know what it is.

I've never heard of it.

It's this publishing software they have.

They've done a lot of interesting publishing software.

And they, under this guy who just literally just left, a lot of tech people have just left there recently because they wanted to spin it off and be able to compensate people.

It's hard to have these software and technology things within a company, but they've been doing a lot of different, some of which has worked.

There was one called Zeus that didn't really work very well.

But Bezos is allowing them to do these things and spend some money, but they're never going to thrive within a media company.

It's just not the same incentives.

So I have a story about this.

I just thought of it.

When I was on the board of the New York Times, we owned About.com, and About.com at one point was worth a billion dollars.

And About.com was really hot at one point.

It was.

It was a content farm where you come to a

shitty product, but go ahead.

Anyways, it was a content farm where someone would write great content or marginal content on southern cooking.

Mostly marginal.

Get traffic.

They'd run ads against it.

They'd pay Google to get traffic and they'd do an arbitrage.

And we thought it was a hot company and we loved it or management loved it because they got to accessorize their analog outfit with digital earrings and say we were an internet company.

And I said in a board meeting with the About people, I said, do you think we should spin about.com?

And I thought management at the time was going to reach it.

They were so visibly shaken that I actually asked that in a board meeting because I'm like, why do we own about.com?

Just so Janet Robinson can get on an earnings call and say that 15% of our revenue comes from from digital.

And they absolutely should have spun it.

It had no business being inside the New York Times.

The editorial could not have been more different.

And immediately, I was accosted outside by the management of About.com that said, Thank you.

They all wanted their payday, right?

They all wanted to be an internet company with their own options.

And Janet and Arthur were just so incensed that I would bring this up.

Anyways, we ended up selling it like two years later for $200 or like for a fraction of that.

When Google said, you know what, we're doing a panda at midnight tonight.

Panda.

Remember Panda?

Yeah.

Basically, they said, we have figured out about dot-com the arbitrage that you're doing and we figured out a way that we're going to capture those revenues.

And overnight, our revenues were down like 60% and we ended up selling for scrap to Barry Diller.

Yeah, there was a whole bunch.

Demand, remember demand?

Yeah, by the way.

Richard Rosenblatt.

I talked to Richard Rosenblatt at the time.

That was another one.

Demand was a lot like about.

And they got killed by the panda.

The panda.

I remember that was 2011 everybody the panda oh my god I spent so much time talking about that was ridiculous last thing uh Facebook is not gonna get off the easy in Europe regulators the European data protection board has reportedly ruled that Facebook can't run advertising based on users personal data this this is where this hurts this is where it hurts the board instructed the Irish regulator to issue a hefty fine along with this decision the ruling won't be publicly revealed for at least a month in which Medic could appeal this is their whole business model obviously and so the EU is striking where it hurts, right?

Everyone was looking for reasons five years ago to have a photo op with Cheryl and say that they were part of the Pepsi generation and pass legislation that helped our innovators.

It is entirely flipped.

Everyone's looking for reasons to go after,

especially Meta right now.

Yeah, yeah, I would say.

U.S.

should be focusing on privacy, antitrust, et cetera, although Facebook wouldn't be subject to the antitrust bill that's in her clovichar passed.

All right, let's bring in our friend of Pivot.

Congressman Roe Conner represents California's 17th congressional district, which includes much of the Bay Area.

This week, the Congressman's 2020 emails, his email address, his personal email address, showed up in the Twitter files urging the social network not to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story.

Welcome, Congressman.

Thank you.

Thanks for having me back.

So I brought you here because apparently you've been doxed by Elon Musk.

I want to talk about what you wrote to Twitter at the time when this Hunter Biden laptop story happened.

But talk to me.

Has there been an impact?

Have you had to change your email?

What's happened is your email appeared on Twitter in some documents that were released around the Hunter Biden story.

And you wrote an excellent email to Vigigade about what they were doing at the time.

But have you had to change your email?

I haven't had to change my email.

I did get a lot of

emails when that happened, a few hundred.

but I've taken some security measures to make sure that the account doesn't get hacked.

You know, I think that Taiwan probably wanted to show that it was actually my account, and that's why they put my email out there.

Yeah.

Did you like that?

Were you irritated?

You know, being a member of Congress is a pretty privileged position.

I didn't care as much for me, but I thought it wasn't appropriate for some of the more junior staff people at Twitter.

I mean, I think there should have been more care on that.

Yeah, absolutely.

But let's get into what you said.

You said Twitter was violating First Amendment principles and banning, not the First Amendment, because it's a government thing, and banning New York Post story about Hunter Biden's laptop.

As we said, Twitter is a private company.

Talk about why you wrote that email and explain it a little bit for people.

Well, I think the easy thing for people to default to is to just say, well, we're a private company.

The First Amendment doesn't apply.

Well, obviously, but Twitter is the modern public square.

And the question is, what value judgments are they making to allow for all types of speech?

Now, I think they made the correct decision not to have the explicit Hunter Biden photos out there.

That doesn't serve any value.

And I said, fine, but to take down

the New York Post story, I mean, look, the New York Post is no friend of mine.

If you Google Rokan and New York Post, you'll just see negative articles.

But I would never think of saying, let's block the New York Post or not have the New York Post.

And so I think that they just went too far in taking down some of the accounts that were sharing a New York Post article.

And that was not a good look for Silicon Valley.

And it's not the type of public square we want.

And why did you write it?

Why did you write it?

I wasn't surprised necessarily, but what caused you to write it at the time?

Because they had been in a, I just interviewed Joel Roth, and he said one of the reasons is because they had PTSD from the Hillary Clinton emails, where they felt they did get played by foreign governments.

And so they were on high alert.

And so was everybody.

And this could have been that kind of situation.

It could have been, although this one was

a newspaper putting this out, I mean, which could be sued for defamation, and Twitter doesn't even have liability there.

But

I reached out privately.

I didn't even do it publicly.

I reached out privately because I thought that

this is not something that Silicon Valley should be doing.

I was hearing a genuine

chatter about it in the halls and Congress.

And

I obviously care about the Valley being thoughtful and being stewards of democracy.

And I thought, let me at least make them aware that this this is not a good policy.

I think they were surprised.

They thought I was probably reaching out to get them to remove it.

And I had the opposite perspective.

And to their credit, they eventually did reverse the decision.

Very quickly.

Very quickly, they reversed it.

Representative, it's great to see you.

Good to see you.

The argument you made that Twitter is the de facto public square has made a lot.

I think we would argue that it's the private square.

But anyway, your argument is a valid one, a valid one.

What do you think so far of the content moderation approach of Twitter since the acquisition?

Well, I think there's some things they've done well, which is to get rid of the bots or to make an effort there.

I think Musk's statement that he doesn't want any amplification of hate is promising, but the question is who's going to implement it.

But there are other places where, you know,

the jury's still out.

Like there are all of these really extremist groups trafficking in hate

that are, based on my knowledge, still out there.

And

Musk has said he doesn't want them to be going viral or amplifying it.

So the implementation of that has to still.

And he's also

let on people who were previously banned.

If you had to write that email again, what would you write to him about letting

the Daily Stormer guy back on, et cetera, et cetera?

Well, I would say that for people who are trafficking clearly in

blatant hate and that that is the primary thing that they're doing or in things that are inciting hate, that that is not part of

the public square, that that doesn't need to be part of it.

Even if there's some of that, it may be technically protected in the First Amendment.

I would say Twitter can have some judgments that don't have that as part of their conversation.

I view that as very different as a newspaper article that's criticizing a presidential candidate.

Right, right.

Did you put any credit credit in the fact that they were worried about getting played by foreign governments when they did that?

And I think that they still are under that threat, is that

a lot of stuff can be cooked and put up there, even if it's done by a valid newspaper in the United States.

Yeah, I guess I'm not sure that that should be their responsibility.

I mean, I don't think they need to be fact-checking the New York Times and the Washington Post and

the New York Post, I mean, and all the media publications about whether the media is being played.

I think that that's a sufficient amount of

vetting.

Not to say that those are good stories.

They're stories about me that have been written by the New York Post that I think are false.

But

they're not defamation.

They're within the bounds of public debate.

Yeah, it's interesting.

New York Post said Jeff Bezos might be the father of my son, but he's not,

which I thought was amusing, but it wasn't amusing.

It was irritating.

But you're right.

I didn't do anything about it, and nor could I.

When you think about First Amendment principles, so you don't think these companies should be doing anything.

So you're kind of on the idea of let it flow, like, which is what Elon is saying.

Is that tenable in today for a company?

It certainly could be problematic for a business, but you think Congress should not get near it, get essentially near any of this.

Well, no, I think that there need to be standards on safety.

So certainly the incitement of violence that even Brandenburg doesn't allow that, that shouldn't be on the site

and inciting illegal conduct i think there need to be disclosure laws so if we need to be knowing what they're doing in terms of who they're allowing on the platform and i would say that when elon has said that you shouldn't be amplifying hate and the hate doesn't have a space on the platform that seems to me a thoughtful uh guideline but then it has to be implemented and it seems to me the question is how is it being implemented and why are some of these people who are just trafficking in uh in in in white supremacy and all uh still being on the site.

Because that to me is not speech.

I mean, you can have, even in a town hall, you can have reasonable restrictions, right?

So I just think of it as a sort of a town hall I'm doing.

If someone got up to me in my town hall and said, you know, Congressman Conna, there was this article in the New York Post that says that President Biden is implicated in X, Y, and Z.

I wouldn't ask the police to escort them out.

I would answer the question.

If someone got up there and started spouting, you know, anti-Semite rhetoric or racial rhetoric, I would ask them to leave.

And I guess my view is that's the same sort of criteria for Twitter.

Representative, you serve on the House Committee on Armed Services, and I immediately had to look up on Wikipedia what their jurisdiction is.

But among other things, they oversee detainee affairs and policy.

And I was just curious if you had any thoughts on our prisoner swap this morning.

Well, I give the President and Secretary of Blinken a lot of credit for

having

secured the release.

And obviously, you know, you have to have diplomacy.

We had to give up

a prisoner.

My understanding is it was someone in Russian arms trafficking.

But I think that they made the right decision to secure the release.

And it also shows, frankly, I was criticized for saying that we need to maintain diplomacy and diplomatic channels with Russia, but I think it shows why we do.

Scott, you want to follow up there?

Scott does not have this opinion.

Well, my fear, Representative, is that this was very strategic, that they incarcerated Ms.

Griner, knowing that they wanted this merchant of death back and that we've been played and that there's no moral clarity around these types of things.

But over time, what we

unfortunately I think we've done is just guaranteed that more people from communities, disenfranchised communities are going to be incarcerated.

I think this is a bad deal for the U.S.

long term.

But I'd love to hear your your thoughts.

You know, I mean, look at Gary Gray.

I hear the perspective.

I understand your concern.

It's why we typically say we aren't going to negotiate with terrorists and aren't going to engage in these kind of

swaps.

In this case, though, I think that

the humanitarian concern outweighed it.

I mean, politics is never perfect, and I give the president credit, but we have to be sensitive that this doesn't become a pattern.

And

I hear your point.

I don't think it's an easy, easy answer, but I do give the president credit for this.

All right.

I'm going to move on to the privacy bill.

And you always joke with me about it.

That it's not going to get passed.

It's going to get passed.

So if Congress had passed a privacy bill years ago, it probably should have.

So how do we get to one?

How do we place limits on how long companies can retain user data?

How do we mandate end-to-end encryption?

What are the actual chances of a strong privacy bill ever emerging from Congress?

We have a bill.

It's passed, as you know, the House committee finally.

We should just pass it.

Look, I know this is not popular among some of my California colleagues.

There's a sense that California's regulation is stronger.

And I agree with that.

Let's try to get as much of California in, but ultimately, something strong is better than nothing.

And if we don't do it in the lame duck, we're going to get very unlikely, we're going to get it in a Republican House with a Democratic Senate.

So I think we can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

And there are strong provisions in the privacy system.

So will it pass in the lame dog?

I hope so.

I mean, you have people like me coming out, not that my voice

is determinative, but if a few more California members start coming out for it,

then it can.

I think it would be a real missed opportunity if something that passed the Committee 55 to 2 doesn't pass.

Doesn't pass.

So you've also called for a new federal agency to protect regulation.

Is that a way to go with this?

Is there anything wrong with our current system that combines the FTC, FCC, DOJ, state regulators, congressional laws?

You think

the idea of a federal tech agency for tech is very controversial.

Well, here's why I think it matters, Carol, because you know as well as I do that these tech companies often run circles around the regulators.

Yes,

we'll have a law requiring consent and they'll figure out how to have the check button bright enough in the right place on the screen and they do the dark patterns.

So I think it requires people of real technical competence to regulate tech.

It requires Congress to have regulation, but I think we need an army of better equipped tech regulators.

And that's no knock on the people there.

They just don't have enough staff.

They don't have enough technical expertise.

And that's why I've called for this.

Now, what agencies it's under, I'm open to.

An agency, a new agency, a new federal agency, or part of?

No, I think it could be part of the FTC.

I think it could be part of the FTC or it could be some agency that FTC that's for FTC, FCC, and DOJ to report to.

What would you call it?

Department of Information is not a good one.

FTC's

technology department.

You know, we created this with the CHIPS Act at the NSF for a positive reason.

We created the NSF Tech Directorate, and that was to help science funding be commercialized into technology.

This would be for helping regulators figure out

how to regulate technology.

Chances of this?

This one is harder because this requires spending, and I don't think a Republican Congress is going to want to expand government oversight.

Ironically, some of their concerns would be better met if they're really concerned with big tech, if they had a strong FTC.

Something I'm just shocked it's not getting more coverage.

I'm curious what your thoughts are regarding President Biden's proposal to move South Carolina up to be the first state that holds the primary for the presidential race.

Yeah, you know, I mean, here's the thing with South Carolina: Carolina.

Someone was telling me, Jamie Harrison was actually telling me this, which I didn't know.

40%

of black slaves came through the port of Charleston.

So there's a huge symbolic

place that South Carolina has in our nation's history.

And

I have no problem, I think, with it being first, as long as you also have Nevada, New Hampshire, and I think the three of those together, where you have a population that is Latino, Asian, a white working class population in New Hampshire, and a black, a significant black population in South Carolina would be great.

I think not having the three

would be problematic.

And I don't think it really matters who's first or who's three days after.

Yeah.

All right.

Let me ask in that.

Rain, you're a member of the House Progressive Caucus.

Where are progressives right now?

It would seem to me the election was very much like, we like the middle.

The voters were like, we don't like the election deniers we like the competent people in the middle kind of thing how do you look at the progressive agenda going forward

well the president uh basically implemented a lot of the progressive agenda so they liked the agenda enough i mean the american rescue plan had a lot of uh progressive ideas in terms of the child tax credit the chips act i wrote as a as a as a progressive with senator schumer uh the climate bill was progressive the president forgave student loans that was progressive president made a decision on marijuana so i i think that you're right.

And the abortion issue, I think, is a, I mean, that's a beyond a progressive issue, but it's an issue that obviously progressives were strong on.

I guess what I think the voters were saying is: yes, we want to protect a woman's right to choose.

Yes, we want to protect democracy,

but we're still concerned about the economy.

And then the question is going to be for the next two years:

what are we going to do on the economy?

And I still think progressives have good ideas on that.

Should a progressive candidate primary Biden in 2024?

No, no.

I mean, that's, I mean, Biden's done well.

He's achieved things.

You've got Trump DeSantis lurking out there.

You know, I think that I've said this a number of times, that I think that the time for the Democratic Party to have the fight about the future is 2028.

I think we want to have this president succeed as much as possible.

I have a last question, Scott.

I have one more.

Jack Dorsey called on Elon.

I want to get back to what happened with your stuff.

Your emails were released.

He called on Elon to release everything without filter, presumably meaning more emails.

Do you support that given the privacy stance?

Like

these are letters people wrote to a company.

They're owned by a corporation.

Should that be sort of the way corporations operate with radical transparency?

Is that even possible?

You know, I think in this case, if there are emails from

people of significance and you can have that be transparent, it's probably for the good.

I don't think

I know that I try to assume anything I write on email anyway eventually

get out.

Doesn't say that mean that I haven't written

bad emails.

But I think that that's different than

taking

information

from someone on privacy, right?

Like when we write a letter to someone, which is what an email is, you can't really say, well, they took thy letter and they shared it with someone else.

I mean, you're sending a letter.

There's no expectation necessarily of privacy.

But I think that there has to be sensitivity, particularly for those people who are in

lower level positions.

And they shouldn't be opening up, I think, people's inboxes

without consent, unless the company had clear policies on that.

And what did you think of what came out so far?

I know there's Twitter files too coming, but Twitter Files 1 was not a particularly good movie.

It showed a group of people struggling

in a good way.

No, I mean, I seen your commentary on it, and I tend to share that view that there wasn't some,

it wasn't that there was some smoking gun that

they were being pressured in a nefarious way to hand bid in the election.

I mean, I think that there, so I didn't see that being a smoking gun.

I did see this genuine debate about

what the First Amendment principles should be about and speech should be about.

And I think to the extent that it has opened up that debate in this country, the Twitter follows, I think that's a good thing.

But I didn't think it was a gotcha moment as much as a, this is a new forum.

We've got to really think what the rules of these forums are going to be that respect different people.

I will say this, I was surprised at how many conservatives have

who have criticized me in the past liked my stance on this.

Yeah, your favorite.

And I think it made me think that it's not about Hunter Biden, and it's not about the laptop, and it's not about Biden.

What's going on in this country is there are too many times where we try to silence people we disagree with.

We try to condemn people we disagree with.

We try to act as if sort of we're morally

than people we disagree with.

And I think some people are just like,

thank you for believing that you can have honest disagreement in this country and that someone doesn't have to be morally inferior if you disagree with them.

And I think to the extent we can have more of that spirit in this country,

we can have some chance of getting past the culture wars, which have really polarized the nation.

Well, I think we'll end on that.

Rokana, hero of conservatives.

It's really great to hear.

Rokana is on Twitter at Rep Rokana, and you can find his email address in the Twitter files if you need to do it.

He still has it.

Uh, we really appreciate him.

Please write him as many of you as possible and say hey,

say hey, hero of conservatives.

Anyway, thank you.

There goes my South Carolina bid.

All right, okay, all right.

Thank you, Congressman.

Thank you, Representative.

All right, Scott, one more quick break.

We'll be back for predictions

as a founder.

You're moving fast towards product market fit, your next round, or your first big enterprise deal.

But with AI accelerating how quickly startups build and ship, security expectations are also coming in faster, and those expectations are higher than ever.

Getting security and compliance right can unlock growth or stall it if you wait too long.

Vanta is a trust management platform that helps businesses automate security and compliance across more than 35 frameworks like SOC2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more.

With deep integrations and automated workflows built for fast-moving teams, Vanta gets you audit ready fast and keeps you secure with continuous monitoring as your models, infrastructure, and customers evolve.

That's why fast-growing startups like Langchain, Ryder, and Cursor have all trusted Vanta to build a scalable compliance foundation from the start.

Go to Vanta.com slash Fox to save $1,000 today through the Vanta for Startups program and join over 10,000 ambitious companies already scaling with Vanta.

That's vanta.com slash vox to save $1,000 for a limited time.

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Saks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized from the in-store stylist to a visit to Sachs.com where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in or when that Brunella Cuccinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks 5th Avenue for the best fall arrivals and style inspiration.

Okay, Scott, let's hear some predictions.

Let's hear one from you.

So I did my predictions predictions webinar yesterday.

13,000 people, Kara.

Very nice.

How many did you get for your colonoscopy?

Slightly fewer.

Slightly fewer.

But they had soft, gentle, loving hands.

Anyways, 2023 is going to be just as whatever the metaverse or crypto, 2023 is going to be the year of AI.

I think at my long shot acquisition here, I think Disney could acquire Roblox.

Just Iger's, Iger's been the...

He said he's not going to be doing too much, but okay.

He's got to do something.

He's got to do something big and bold, Kara.

The current model,

he's got to do something big.

And he's got the license to do something big because he has so much credibility.

So, this is my thinking.

Just as their acquisitions have been to take characters from subscale companies like Lucasfilm or Pixar and bring them into the parks and monetize them all sorts of ways through content in the parks, I think that they could go the other way here and take Disney to Roblox and create the Disneyverse.

Yeah.

Remember, he talked about that.

He talked about the worries about Facebook's version or other people's version because he was worried about things that would happen to their characters.

But go ahead.

Well, 50% of American youth are on Roblox.

So what if they figured out a way to take all those incredible characters that they have at Disney right now and put them on Roblox?

So, and because Roblox stock, like every other stock, is off 50 or 60%.

It's got a market cap, I think, of 18 billion.

And I think Disney's 160 or 180, for the first time in a long time, Roblox is quote unquote acquirable.

Anyways, my long shot, long ball here is Disney acquires Roblox.

Yeah.

And you think, Tesla, this is the year.

This is the year, right?

Yeah, this, this, this, anyways, as you said, my Waterloo.

And my final prediction was the U.S.

reasserts its dominance and hegemony.

If you look at everything geopolitically, food independence, energy independence, our economy appears to be growing again and we're reducing inflation.

Our vaccines are working.

The smartest people in the world want to come here.

We're kicking the shit out of Putin in a proxy war without putting any boots on the ground.

I just think the U.S.

right now, if you look at it honestly, as much as we dislike each other, as much as we want the situation room and to shitpost America or feel bad about ourselves, America has pulled away from the rest of the world on almost every important dimension.

Yeah, well, we'll see.

The only issue is, look, people are getting weary of funding Ukraine all the time.

I think there's statistics showing that.

I do think China coming online is going to raise inflation.

That should decrease inflation.

Well, maybe.

If they get the gunk out of the supply chain, that should lower costs, I think.

But also, they have energy demands.

Energy prices could go up,

stuff like that.

And they're a demand economy now.

They're a food demander, by the way.

So food prices could go up.

They're an importer of food now.

So we'll see.

I agree with you.

I think things are going well for the Biden administration at this moment.

What did I get wrong there?

What do you very much agree with or very much not agree with?

I think Disney is a tough row for Mr.

Iger.

I don't think he's going to to be able to do a whole lot.

I think it's going to, he's going to be doing a lot of cutting is what he's going to have to do and consolidating more than anything.

But, you know, that sounds like a good acquisition.

I don't think they're going to be acquired.

That's a big rumor that was out there.

Anyway, we want to hear from you.

Send us your questions about business, tech, or whatever's on your mind.

Go to nymag.com/slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 8-55-51-PIVOT.

Before we go, we're nominated for best co-host for the Signal Awards.

You can vote for us.

Go to signalaward.com.

Find the link to vote for us in our show notes.

Okay, Scott, that's the show.

We'll be back on Tuesday for more.

Read us out.

Today's show was produced by Larry Naiman, Evan Engel, and Taylor Griffin.

Ernie Intertod Engineered in this episode.

Thanks also to Drew Burrows and Meal Silverio.

Make sure you subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts.

Thank you for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media.

We'll be back next week for another breakdown of all things tech and business.

I have the colon of a supermodel.

This month on Explain It To Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well.

Collagen smoothies and cold plunges, Pilates classes, and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It To Me, presented by Pureleaf.

Olivia loves a challenge.

It's why she lifts heavy weights

and likes complicated recipes.

But for booking her trip to Paris, Olivia chose the easy way with Expedia.

She bundled her flight with a hotel to save more.

Of course, she still climbed all 674 steps to the top of the Eiffel Tower.

You were made to take the easy route.

We were made to easily package your trip.

Expedia, made to travel.

Flight-inclusive packages are at all protected.