Queen Elizabeth, Code 2022, and Return of the Dawg!

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Saks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunella Caccinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks Fifth Avenue for the Best Fall Arrivals and Style inspiration.

Thumbtack presents.

Uncertainty strikes.

I was surrounded.

The aisle and the options were closing in.

There were paint rollers, satin and matte finish, angle brushes, and natural bristles.

There were too many choices.

What if I never got my living room painted?

What if I couldn't figure out what type of paint to use?

What if

I just used thumbtack?

I can hire a top-rated pro in the Bay Area that knows everything about interior paint, easily compare prices, and read reviews.

Thumbtack knows homes.

Download the app today.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher from the Beverly Hilton at the Code Conference in Los Angeles.

And today,

at long last, I'm joined by the man who puts the Scott in Scott-Free August, Scott Galloway.

Once there was a world,

a podcast, but that world had been invaded by people with more charisma.

Who will save us?

Who will save us from these woke people?

Who will come?

Who will be inappropriate?

The dog.

That's right.

That's right.

You're welcome, Kara.

That's your Superman theme song.

Hello.

What the hell?

Super dog.

Super dog.

Super dog.

Who was that super dog when I was a kid at commercial?

Wonder dog.

Wonder dog.

Your wonder dog.

Go on.

Because he was kind of stupid.

He was a little dumb.

He was kind of dumb.

He was likable, though.

Yes, he was a likable, dumb.

Likable dog.

He was super.

Scott, welcome back.

Thanks, Carol.

It's good to be back.

I really do appreciate that.

I know you cannot believe I admit it, but

I had great co-hosts.

I had great co-hosts.

Great-ish.

Some were just

less great than others.

Okay, fine, but they were all very good.

No, they weren't.

But anyways, go ahead.

In any case.

Some better than others.

People really missed you.

They missed you.

And I think it was, i tried to assemble uh a group of of people that would try to best you but it didn't really work it didn't came close

came close i would agree he's my successor yes he's he's um he's bob chapek he's the chapek in my iger that's not a good thing speaking of iger yeah uh at the code conference uh

someone people calling him a thirst trap to me which i told him yeah he's very and then he had to look up thirst trap yeah he's he's dilf right

yeah he's a daddy i'd like to what's the term yeah there you go i don't like it when you use that type of language, Kara.

Oh, that's right.

Anyway, a lot has happened while you're away.

We wanted to make sure you weren't out of loop.

So I reached out to the friend of the show, George Hahn, to help you catch up on what you missed.

Let's listen.

Okay.

Welcome back, Scott.

George Hahn here with a quick rundown of all the news you missed during Quiet August.

Robin Hood, Peloton, and Snap all announced layoffs.

Cox bought Axios.

Amazon will buy iRobot, not a DVD of the Will Smith movie.

Andreessen Horowitz backed Adam Newman.

Walmart teamed up with Paramount Plus.

Chipotle workers in Michigan voted to unionize.

Game of Thrones came back to HBO.

Kinda.

The DOJ searched Mar-a-Lago.

Someone assaulted Salman Rushdie.

President Biden signed the CHIPS Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and canceled some student loan debt.

And the New York Times ran a profile of a very handsome guy named Scott Galloway.

I'm George Hahn, and this has been your August News rundown.

He's a jaunty fellow.

Anyway, so today we'll talk about everything that happened at Code.

There were some bold challenges to tech titans, threats from CEOs, promises from politicians, including a senator.

It's been a very exciting few days.

Queen Elizabeth, though, passed away on today, Thursday.

She was 96 years old, and her 70-year reign was the longest in British history.

15 prime ministers, I think, somewhere like that.

One queen.

Britain now enters an official mourning period that will last 12 days.

The London Stock Exchange could be closed for several days.

And the royal, formerly known as Prince, is now King Charles III.

He is 73 years old.

This news comes just days after the queen appointed Liz Truss as Britain's new prime minister.

It's kind of she appointed her.

This is maybe her 16th, and then died.

I really like the queen.

I know you're supposed to say you like royalty, but I find she handled herself rather beautifully over those many years and developed into a real leader.

There's all kinds of leaders you can have.

It's nothing short of remarkable because if you think about it, if you think about monarchy as an institution or the crown as an institution, and I think institutions matter, I think organizations or people need connective tissue in the form of institutions.

It's really the only monarchy that's kind of survived or hasn't ended up embarrassing the people who.

Well, they're a little embarrassing.

There's been a lot of embarrassing.

Yeah, but if you think about it, I mean,

imagine a CEO overseeing.

So when she took over, the pound was at $4.

The sun rose and set on a colony of Britain.

It was the most powerful nation in the world up until World War II.

And it's been in steady decline, and it's had a bit of a renaissance over the last couple of decades.

But I always think, how do you relate something like this for young people?

And I think what she kind of, at least what I take away from her monarchy, is you don't always need to respond to everything.

She showed, I think, a lot of discipline and grace when she was given a hard time or when she could have weighed in to try and defend herself.

But she showed tremendous resilience.

She kind of has the definition of grace and also service.

I can't imagine that at a lot of points in her life, she didn't look back on the guy who abdicated and said, you know what, it would have been probably a little bit easier for me just to go hunting stags.

And she took service very

seriously.

And the fact that she leaves after a 70-year reign on what has been a civilization that has gone through a lot and decline, it's just remarkable.

Find another person, CEO, head of anything that has spent 70 years somewhere and comes out with their brand as strong or better than that.

I think it'll be interesting in Britain.

You know, there's all these controversies around the market, and some of the family just embarrassed themselves, especially Prince Andrew, I would say.

And then the fighting, the sort of gossipy stuff around Harry and Megan.

It's kind of silly.

That's silly to me.

And it's just weird and gossipy.

And I know the tabloids in London just rage at these things.

But she has conducted herself with enormous grace.

And despite all this, you can't control your kids.

It's a weird fishbowl.

The thing I think about all the time, I was just in London at Buckingham Palace, actually.

I was showing, I have a picture of Claire in front of it with Louis and Amanda.

And one of the things I remember is when I told him the guy snuck in, remember the guy snuck in twice, actually, and went to her bedroom and just hung out with her.

And hung out with her.

And she managed to just call security.

But just, I was thinking, oh my God, like in this day and age, where you worry about people like that.

I don't know.

I just, I condolences to Britain.

Whatever you think of her.

Good leader, very strong leader, consistent leader.

Was she in failing health?

My sense is she was pretty.

But my sense is she was fairly robust, almost.

Fairly.

I think the last couple of months they've been trying to protect.

I think she got COVID.

That was all right.

You know, that wasn't it.

It's just, she's 96 years old.

And, you know, she's had a very robust life hunting.

But I don't know if the monarchy will survive.

I'm not interested.

I'm not, you know, I'm not going to shit post the king, but I think it takes a special type of grace and resilience.

Yeah, we'll see if he can.

And maturity that I'm not, because here's the thing.

The functional families are the ones you don't know.

And

no institution

can predict greatness based on a bloodline.

It just doesn't work that way.

And so the construct is outdated.

Oh, totally.

And when you're under the including incorporation.

100%.

And when you're under this kind of scrutiny in this spotlight in this 24-bit, these institutions that are based on bloodline don't survive, nor should they quite frankly but this is this monarchy has had more upsides than downsides yeah and it'll be interesting to see if they can maintain that you know if they demonstrate that type of resilience with a new with a new figurehead and i like charles i see he's a big he was early to climate change stuff he's a good man he's he's one

he's been a little tetchy come on he was raised in range rovers and bananas i get it i get it i get it i get it but but one of the things is it'll be interesting and i think probably he'll he's an interim interim king really he's quite old he's you know although she lived that long most importantly you know he's an outstanding dresser yes he's that counts for a lot so william will come along and we'll see where it goes in any case condolence i think it should move to la and buy a porsche and have podcasts yes that's true that would be really good

um you know what queen elizabeth Good on you.

Right on.

Rest in peace.

Rest in peace.

Well done.

Rest in peace.

Say hi to Diana.

That's what a lot of the tweeting is about that.

Really?

Yeah.

It's weird.

Britain's getting a little mad because America's being very cheeky about the whole thing.

They're the home of cheek.

I know, exactly.

No, Britain's not being cheeky.

They're like, except this is our world.

I know, but

there was a little bit of a pushback.

You know what?

We'll be responsible.

You saw my tweet.

Moves to London once.

And then I put the announcement that the queen died.

What did you say?

I said, moves to London once.

I mean, everyone's sending me messages saying, you moved to London.

I'm a total narcissist.

Everyone's like, you moved to London.

Look what happened.

Look what happened.

You're going back there now, right?

You've been back.

Yeah, I'm going to Vegas first to meet with friends because parting with my fraternity brothers is more important to me than my family.

But yeah, I'll be there eventually.

By the way, just so you know, because I know you're excited about my move, it is super easy to move a great Dane to London.

It's super easy.

It's super efficient and really easy to get a 150-pound dog across the Atlantic when everybody's more worried about the dog than you.

And also, I just want to shout out to our immigration system and visa system.

Super efficient and well run, Kara.

Super efficient.

Amazing and well run.

Are you going to come back with like the Madonna accent?

I'm Scottish.

Hello, Cara.

I'm going to be wearing kilts all the time.

No, I'm doing this.

It's too late for my oldest, but I think if my youngest gets a Scottish accent, he's just going to.

Scottish, you're living in London.

Yeah, but I'm a huge, we're a huge Glasgow Rangers fans.

And yet you're living in London.

So British accent.

But here's the thing: when you have a Scottish accent.

Here's the thing when you have a Scottish accent, and I learned this from my father.

When you have a Scottish accent, you can not only think with your dick, you can listen to it.

It is the

player, the player tool.

It is the ultimate weapon of a guy looking to spread a seed to the four corners of the earth.

Do not do a British accent to me at all.

Do not.

Do not do cockney.

Hello.

No.

Cockney.

Yeah.

It's funny because my mom, for some reason, my mom and her sisters,

my parents, my mom got pulled out of school at the age of 13 out of London.

Somehow, because she was good at maths, she ended up at a good school.

Her other sisters have what we call like a wrong side of the tracks accent.

And I like that one more.

I like the bad Cockney.

That's probably offensive, right?

Anyways, no, no, go ahead.

Is that a hate crime?

Is that a hate crime in Britain?

Everything

is a hate crime in Britain.

Anyway, go ahead.

Anyways, all right.

I'm very excited for your move.

I'm going to miss you, but I'll be staying in your apartment in New York, which is fine.

You leaving is great.

We will still be doing pivot, obviously, different times and stuff like that.

And we're going to be doing a lot more, actually.

Yeah.

So, speaking of which, plumbing, it's ending.

Let's talk about code.

This is my last code.

The code will continue.

Yeah.

It was epic.

20-year reign.

Two queens.

Two queens have a.

This is okay.

Let's get on to bigger news.

Code 20.

So, can I just say something first?

Is congratulations, but I made an observation.

Okay.

The thing that struck me about code this year, I think you're smart, and I think it shows a lot of wisdom to leave while people are still applauding.

Because I look at this format.

I mean, let's talk about who you brought.

Evan Spiegel, you know, the CEO is a snap.

Oh, who's the CEO of the most valuable company in the world?

Tim Cook, he was here.

Oh, but what about Steve John?

Well, his wife and Johnny Ive were here.

Oh, but what about Google?

Oh, the CEO was here.

I mean, for what this is, the CEO of Amazon, for what this is,

it just couldn't be better.

But here's the thing, and I hope you don't take this the wrong way.

It's always a bad thing to say.

You're the tallest right now.

I think this format, I think the sun has passed midday.

And I think you have really great business instincts and have decided, I'm going to ring the bell at the top.

and move to the next thing.

Because I think this format of getting famous tech people on stage.

I would agree.

I think it's losing its shine.

I don't think it's losing its shine.

It's that, you know, after a while of yelling at essentially white guys over many years, and I don't mind doing it.

I'm very good at it.

I think I want to change it out into something fresh.

We're going to do some pivot stuff.

And how do you rethink it?

But how do you present it?

And what can you show?

I thought this morning when we did the climate change stuff with people you've never heard of, people were riveted.

So many people came up to me.

There's lots of ways to do interesting things.

It doesn't have to be a panel.

I want to rethink events because I do like the community aspects of it.

I had dozens.

We had a lot of younger people here, if you notice.

We had a program to bring in lots of young people.

Someone just came up to me, a younger person, and said, this has,

I needed a push to be thinking about things, especially around the climate change stuff and different things.

That was good.

And I think the inspirational nature of gatherings is really important.

So I don't want to give up on gatherings.

I want to give up on, I don't want to give up on this one either.

It's just like, I don't want to do it.

I made this cake many, many, many times and I made a really good one this time.

You're leaving while people are applauding and that takes discipline.

I think, I think, I've been thinking about ours.

I think we need Rufus de Sol and Edibles.

I know you do.

I know you feel.

We need some really cool music acts and some edibles.

Let's talk about any of this because I designed it.

I really designed it the way it is.

Two of the biggest themes of the week, which came out.

One I was surprised about was what to do about TikTok and whether any of our social media

president.

Now, interestingly, Vanessa Pappas was supposed to come and she got sick and she couldn't come.

I don't think she would have enjoyed those.

No, she wouldn't have because everyone was like,

Matthias Dopfner, you and I.

Matthias, I live in Europe.

I'll help you.

Thank you.

Matthias

He's very tall and

unfortunately for him, a really sort of negative article landed the minute he got on stage, the right before.

But he called for the ban, the ban of TikTok.

It is, of course, a tool of espionage, as you have written just a couple of weeks ago.

And I think we should just have this kind of self-respect, and that's why I concretely think TikTok should be banned in every democracy.

I think it's just insane not to do that.

Coming out of this conference, the headline news, if there's any impact here,

it is that there was almost universal coagulation or consensus that TikTok is an existential threat and should be banned.

And I want to be, and I have come 180 on this.

Initially, I thought, oh, it's great that Facebook or Meta has some competition.

And then I saw the way my 12-year-old got addicted to this thing.

And then I kind of did the math.

If you believe

there is no separation between the CCP and Chinese companies, which there is not, they disappear CD.

That's the point you made on your wonderful program.

Thank you for saying that.

If you believe that China has a vested interest in the decline of American civilization or at a minimum, a diminishment or diminishing our geopolitical power, then why on earth wouldn't they put their thumb on the scales of content that is more anti-American?

And I believe they're doing that now.

That's what I would do if I were them.

I'd be like, let's take, if if you're Kim Kardashian, Joe Rogan, or Jonathan Haidt, you have some content that's very pro-America and some content that's anti-America.

And they can very easily, elegantly, and under the cover of dark, put their thumb on the scale of content that

positions us in a negative light.

And you know what?

I think it's happening.

I think they're already doing it.

And if you look at political.

And they hide it amongst the delightful stuff.

And there's a lot of that.

A lot of dancing.

And then someone saying, a young person saying capitalism doesn't work.

And then a young person saying, oh, our elections have been weaponized.

Or you're the income.

I mean, and not only that, we give them a lot to work with.

A lot of it's true.

But so what do you end up with?

You end up with young people who, a third of them, believe that socialism wouldn't be a better way to run our society.

And so

Trump got very little right.

What he did get right, TikTok should be.

banned or spun to American interests.

But it's an existential thing.

A lot of people, you know, I was going to write Vanessa.

We're going to try to get her on the podcast.

But definitely,

someone from TikTok came up to me and and they're like, We want to get away from China, essentially.

I think every person at TikTok.

These are Americans.

Yeah, these are Americans.

They see the only thing in between them and their Gulf Stream and their homes in the Hamptons is the lack of a Chinese wall.

I think they would love for nothing.

I think they're good people.

I think they would love for nothing more than to several TikToks.

It's not going to, it's not going to happen, though.

Well, if the evaluation by the U.S.

government happens and they're working with Oracle now to separate stuff, there's still that still going on post-Trump.

It It sort of died down when he stopped yelling and he tried to get a vague and this and that.

But I think that they, I don't know what China will do is the thing.

Like, will they allow it to happen?

And that, you know, are their interest in money more than their interest in influence?

And then they'll get banned.

They'll get banned.

I don't think they're afraid to.

They put companies out of business because they decide they play the long game.

They're like, no, that doesn't work for us, D D.

Yeah.

Oh, Jack Ma, you have some thoughts about the CCP.

We're going to disappear your ass for a moment.

What I mean is it's getting banned in this country eventually.

And that's that.

But just some data here.

People under the age of 18 are spending more time on TikTok than they spend on every streaming network combined.

So parents have to ask themselves, if Disney Plus, Amazon Prime, Netflix, Hulu, all of them

were owned by a Chinese company and that content could be influenced by the CCP, would you be down with that?

No, no, no, we don't think of it the same way.

And again, it's wrapped in delight.

It's interesting we're talking about TikTok because they weren't here.

But one of the things, the other thing we talked about, a lot of stuff was about politics and where regulation is going and running for president.

We had Bob Iger, as I said, Thirst Trump Bob at Bob Iger.

You're a man crush.

Iger spoke about the future of streaming, movie going, and even answered a question from The Verge's Alex Heath with some details about Twitter bots.

Interestingly enough, because I watched, I read the news these days about it, we did look very carefully at all of the TikTok, I'm sorry, all of the Twitter users, I guess they're called users.

Yes.

Yeah.

And we,

at that point, estimated, with some Twitter's help, that a substantial portion, not a majority, were not real.

How many?

Did you have to?

I don't remember the number, but we discounted the value

heavily.

Don't remember.

Okay.

I don't remember.

The audience was laughing there because Bob held out his hands like he'd caught a big fish.

But several people text me today, say he's going to get subpoenaed by Elon Musk because of the things.

He said some very detailed stuff about, which I haven't seen before,

you know, about his, he almost bought Twitter.

He was very close.

Yeah.

It was almost done.

And then over a weekend, he decided not to do it.

I mean, here's the thing.

It could be 80%.

It doesn't legally exonerate him from closing on the contract.

No, I get that.

I get that.

But I'm just saying this will be, I wonder if he'll be brought into this because we discounted the value.

And then he later said that deal we had, it was pretty cheap.

That was built into our economics of the deal.

I think he'll make a scene of it.

He's going to use it to make a scene of it and maybe subpoena Bob Iger.

I don't know if that will happen.

I wrote him.

I'm like, maybe you're going to get subpoenaed now and have something to do because he doesn't have anything to do now except invest and things like that.

But it was interesting how close, I didn't realize how close they had come to buying that company.

It sounds like

you said the deal was promised.

Yes.

It just needed his signature.

They were going to use it not as a social media network, but to distribute uh they didn't have the technology essentially to make it an entertainment distribution network which it was a great idea like you've talked about with cnet and things like that bob also said uh it was interesting that twitter helped him of course they helped him iger was also uh bullish on netflix he said nothing about discovery he was naming things that he thought were going to survive and discovery warner was not in that list he left them out he thought disney was good he was he was pretty um honest about disney and the challenges they face i thought he did a great job look it it's simple there's too much investment.

They've got to consolidate.

Zaslov is probably doing the right thing.

He realizes he can't win the spending war.

He's cutting costs.

Because here's the thing about Discovery Warner.

There's no set of media assets in the world that are acquirable.

I mean, if you look at Warner, if you look at HBO, what would Apple pay for HBO?

Could it buy?

Probably not.

Yes.

But

these are assets that can't be, they take decades or generations to build.

And it's one of the few set of media assets that could be acquired.

That's why Twitter's in this world of, I don't want to call it, it's either a good thing, you'd say it's good for shareholders because the stock should be at 15 or 20, and it's not, it's at 43 because it can be acquired.

There's no one who controls it.

Speaking of which,

you know, Evan Spiegel, he controls the company.

Yeah.

And that is probably bad for shareholders.

He claims it is.

No, it's not.

It's a dual-class shareholder company.

Discovery you can buy.

You can buy it.

Discovery has one class of stock because what Jeff Buchas did to Jon Stanky, and that is he sold him something for more than it was was worth.

Jon Stanky has now done to David Zaslov because Zaslov wants to be in Hollywood and be the man.

And so he overpaid for it and he took on $55 billion in debt.

Yeah, it's a lot.

And so if the company ends up being worth $60 billion, it means the equity value will be $5 billion and it'll go to three bucks.

Yeah, interesting.

And also, what was interesting, when you're talking about buyers, Apple, obviously any of the tech companies, Amazon, Apple, would want to buy this company.

Who will buy it?

Comcast.

That's really interesting because here's the thing.

And we've talked about this.

You don't get to a quarter of a trillion dollars in market capitalization in Philadelphia without being, you know, without killing people and being smart.

They're both, those, those guys come to play.

They're smart.

They have amazing assets.

They have vertical distribution, whether it's Sky in the UK, whether it's Comcast here.

So to get that kind of verticalization around content, they've got to do something.

I don't know if it's buying.

Dude, Bob actually said that.

They said cable companies got to get out of the cable business.

Not the internet business, the cable business.

And they got to push back.

And so if this thing becomes cheap enough, and the thing is, they may not even need to go hostile.

They might just buy a ton of the debt, a ton of the equity, and just sit around and say, all right, let us know when you're ready.

They have to spin off CNN, probably.

Well, I think they would with CNN.

I think the way the good bank, bad bank here would probably be Warner and HBO, because there's some synergy there around movie releases and those franchises and Lucasfilm

and Marvel.

And then you would spin the cable assets.

Not Marvel, Marvel's Disney.

I'm sorry.

Who is it?

Warner.

Warner has DC Commons.

Is it DC?

I could give a shit.

Men and Tites.

Right.

Men and Tits.

So same, same.

And then what you would have is then you would, the bad bank would be the cable assets that are still very profitable, but in decline.

And it would trade at a lower EBITDA, but you would spin that into kind of good bank, bad bank, and hopefully get a higher base.

There's the internet assets.

Where do you put those?

Yeah, I think they'd.

connectivity.

They just would that would probably go with the cable.

Who knows?

At this price point, there's probably enough money in private equity that some private equity partner could convince himself into coming in and taking it private and then splitting it up.

Yeah.

Something's going to happen there.

It's stock cutting costs isn't enough.

Yeah.

So I think that I think something, I mean, we've said this, something's going to happen in the next 12 months.

And Disney Plus has done a great job.

By the way, have you seen House of Dragon?

No.

It's really good.

I don't want to to see it's really good.

Dismemberment and

the opening scene is really

moral.

Bob was very interesting.

I think he's a really smart guy.

I wanted to bring him in here.

We did ask Bob Chapik to come, but Bob Iger is one of these people who has a real perspective, and now he can really talk around leadership, around lots of things, mistakes.

I thought he was very reflective and excellent.

Yeah, he's very good.

He was a great interview, and he looked fantastic.

He really is.

He's a handsome man.

He's a handsome man.

I like his new outfit.

Can you imagine if he had a Scottish accent?

Oh, my God.

He's slaying.

He's slammed.

Thirst strap, Bob, look it up.

Okay, one company that's not quite on top of its game, but still is innovative.

Snap, we sat down with CEO Evan Spiegel.

Scott and I did for a conversation about competition, TikTok, and the future of his company.

Scott had a number of pointed questions.

I was the good cop in this one.

I'm usually the bad cop.

Let's listen to one.

I listened to your earnings call last night.

You didn't say anything.

What is your, how is your board not letting you speak on earnings calls?

Why aren't you speaking?

Isn't this exactly the time where CEOs should be speaking directly to investors?

That was a huge mistake that I shouldn't have made.

To be honest with you,

I wasn't even thinking about it.

Obviously, I'm on the call.

I'm waiting for a question.

No one asked a question addressed to me.

It wasn't planned.

You just felt like there were other people.

I don't mean to put words in your head.

Yeah, no, it wasn't planned.

I was waiting.

I actually kind of expected a question, kind of given everything going on.

But I'd also come in person in May to pre-announce that we were going to miss the bottom end of our guidance to a big investor conference, answered a bunch of investor questions there in person.

So like, I wasn't thinking like, oh, I'm not engaged with investors because I spend quite a lot of time answering their questions and really helping them understand.

So Evan, I thought, did very well, even though tough questions.

He's in a, you know, they laid people off.

There's all kinds of problems

he had.

But I thought he was super articulate about his things and facing issues.

What did you think of his session?

You were pointing out to something very clear.

He should talk on the call, for one, but he's facing a lot of headwinds.

Well,

his people reached out and said he wants to have a conversation with you.

And I initially said no, because I know what happens.

I meet these people and they're all very likable.

Not all of them.

And well, most of the ones I talk to, I like.

And so I don't like to talk to them.

And anyways, but I had a brief conversation with them.

But

there's something that really scares me, and that is there's a very dangerous calculus or alchemy in our society.

And that is young men who have not experienced a lot or have not experienced a lot of hardship.

you know, maybe went to Harvard or maybe went to Stanford.

And then they figure out a way to have total control of their company so they don't have to listen to anybody.

As you discussed.

And they have a media company that has influence over hundreds of millions of people.

And it hasn't gone good places.

So a young man who's known nothing but privilege, who has unfettered power over society and content.

He does not.

It's a small company.

I think the best thing for us would have been if Facebook had never really had only reached the heights of Snap.

You're right.

That's right.

So you made that point.

You'd rather your son use Snap.

I think he's a more, I think he's less of a mendacious fuck than either Mark or Cheryl.

I think

he strikes me as just more thoughtful.

And also, it's more of a communications medium than an SBNI media.

He's a thoughtful product.

And it's innovation and it's more fun, but there's just no getting around it.

Young men who come from privilege, who have total control and no guardrails.

No one can tell him what to do.

You sound like someone you do a podcast with, but go ahead, keep going.

I like that I've infected you.

These are the most dangerous people in the world

and uh so i hope he

i you know i hope that he continues to reflect and be a thoughtful young man which he strikes me as but i think a lot of people would have said the same thing about mark zuckerberg not as much there was more there was more signals and you brought some of those you raised some of those red flags early on with conversations with him but i don't like the idea

Young men need guardrails.

Yes.

Those Japanese soldiers that retreated into the hills in the Philippine islands, they accomplished nothing except occasionally terrorizing the village without guardrails, without a board that can fire you.

I would agree with this.

In this case, I think he's handled himself rather well.

They had a bad

thing.

I don't think he has that much influence because I don't think it's that big a company.

It just isn't.

And I think the reason it's not that big a company is very like, remember how small Apple was until it wasn't, because he focuses on quality of product, a really good experience.

He's not willing to do the things Mark Zuckerberg was willing to do that he didn't do.

That said, and he's very innovative and Facebook has copied every one of his good ideas, trying to put him out of it.

They tried to buy him and when he wouldn't sell, they try to kill him, essentially, by subsuming all the stuff.

But here's what I thought he did well, is that he's been in trouble like this before when they were, and I do think he's got a bigger market.

He talked about it a little bit that he, they're cut, they've cut back like on the pixie, all kinds of stuff.

I think he has a bigger market than you realize because I think people are weary of the Facebook experience.

And my kids have not left

that product, have not used it.

They do not leave it.

It's a utility to them.

And I don't think

the AR stuff is interesting.

I think lots of people use those filters and it's fun.

It's a fun way to communicate in most cases.

They've made some errors in some of the filters, usually around race.

But I think he's right.

He's got a good little business there if he does it right.

And he did cut back.

And I'm probably sad about cutting back some of his very creative things because he's a very creative thinker.

The The problem I have is that control, that control.

That's my problem.

Otherwise, I think he's a very good entrepreneur and has made a beautiful product.

Power corrupts.

Yes.

And you talked about it's you're right.

It doesn't have two and a half or three billion like Meta.

It has a half a billion, but it's not the number of people, the amount of influence.

It's who it has influence over.

Right.

Because I don't know about you.

I found out my 14-year-old had been on Snap for a year and I didn't even know it was.

Oh, I knew.

I know.

Oh, I'm a, I'm a absentee, you know, I'm a bad parent, but but I don't like the idea.

I just don't like the idea of a young man with no guardrails deciding how people, young people communicate with each other.

That's a fair point.

You know, I like Snapchat.

I found my son.

He snuck out of my house.

The maps they put in.

Louis' not very sharp.

She's not the sharpest technological

tag in the box.

I love that.

There's no, he's got the wrong mom if he's trying to pull one over on social media.

It's a longer story, but Alex tried to turn on Zono's music player in his room and then came in and said he's not here.

And so he and I used Snapchat maps to find where Louise had gone up to make out with a girl.

He was like 15 years old.

You don't promote that.

You're that kind of mom.

No, I'm not promoting that.

It was when I used to come home from college because

I never

got laid, my mom would put firewood in the fireplace, like, Jesus Christ, man, go get him.

No, she was like, no,

15, use my Uber and two in the morning.

No, he's not allowed to do that.

No.

15, 2 in the morning.

That's a little young.

Yeah.

So

I found him on Snap Maps of all things, and I knew where he he was.

And I said, you're the CCP.

I know.

You're tracking people with me.

You're in, blah, blah, blah.

Get your ass home.

Just face recognition to find the girl and start calling her parents.

Stay away from my son.

In any case,

the militia etherider coming for your ass.

No, I'm not sure.

I found him on Snap Maps.

And he didn't even like, he didn't even, and he wrote me a text.

I'll never forget.

I saved it.

I took a picture.

He goes, sometime it's going to be like that, Chief.

Yeah, it's coming.

That's Karnati.

I love that.

And I was like, oh, he's so comfortable.

That's common.

Anyway, last thing, he talked about whether or not he'd sell the company.

He did not answer.

Yeah.

What do you think of what he did?

I don't know what he did.

Did he answer?

Did he not answer?

No, he gave, well, I'll give him this.

He gave an impassioned reason for the amount of value they'll sell.

But here's the thing.

The right answer would be, in my view,

what's coming next on the stage?

Well, look, look, if you look at Twitter, Pinterest, Snap, the bottom line is they've all been kind of 10-year, fun, cute experiments in the fact that they can't compete with these monopolies of Meta and Google.

I mean, occasionally we talk about their innovation.

They only get so big.

But they always break our hearts.

And that is they go up.

We talk ourselves into believing they're going to be able to carve out a niche.

And then they freaking collapse.

And that's what's going to happen to Twitter if it doesn't get acquired.

Yep.

And these companies should be part of larger organizations, whether it's Comcast, they're the bottom line.

So Snap, who should it go to?

Apple.

I would say, actually, I would think Disney would be interesting for Snap.

Oh, Snap, Disney.

Yeah, good.

It's joyous.

It's nice.

It's the same distribution they could have had with Twitter without all the fucking garbage.

They do not need it.

Yeah, Snap.

Okay, good.

Young people.

Yeah, right.

Okay.

What about Twitter?

If it doesn't, Elon thing, whatever.

I think Twitter is so damaged goods right now.

Twitter needs a ⁇ I mean, we talked about it.

Twitter just needs to totally reconstruct its business model and move to subscription.

Well, here's the thing.

Subscription works, like we were talking about, HBO.

It works when you have a superior product.

HBO, for the majority of its life, had a superior product versus, you know, the the A-team or ABC's, you know, Wednesday movie of the week, whatever it was.

And it appealed to a narrower audience and wanted high-quality TV where they could watch violence and sex.

It's wrapped in fantastic storytelling.

And people are willing to pay for that.

And Twitter has a small group, and they're lying about how small it is.

It's much smaller than they've advertised, but people would pay for it because it's a small commitment.

You and I are addicted to it.

We pay for it.

So they need a total rethink about their business model.

I don't know what's going to happen.

Actually, I think I know what's going to happen in the next couple of weeks with them.

But if anything,

the chancery court is going to say, you're all wet.

I think maybe his lawyers sit down with him the week before.

I think they're already in discussions and said, you're going to lose.

And they're like, boss, you're going to lose.

And he doesn't want to lose that publicly.

So I think they're probably already in conversations around what the fee is for him to go away.

And what happens?

Yeah, we'll see.

But that's the correct question because even if they give, even if he pays them $10 billion, which is $12 a share, Twitter hasn't demonstrated an ability to do great things with capital so far.

What happens to the stock?

Because it should be at 20 bucks, which means it should be trading about $15 billion less than now.

That's when you and I move in.

That's when we come in.

That's we come in.

That's when we come in.

Let's get some bankers.

There we go.

Okay.

Scott, really briefly, you asked Evan Spiegel a question about being a parent,

a man, really, in this society.

Do you have any advice for young fathers in terms of trying to balance

the push and the pull of having that kind of scrutiny and that kind of pressure and also trying to manage a household with three kids and be a good partner?

Oh,

gosh.

I knew he was going to ask a man question, but go ahead.

I mean, it's just so.

So I struggle with it every day.

I mean, just before going on stage, I'm thinking about, you know, I'm hosting a dinner after this.

I'm thinking about, do I have 30 minutes in between the time I get off stage, you know, 15 minutes to drive home, 15 minutes to read to Hart, who's our four, you know, four and a half year old

before I have to go to this dinner so that I can have that, you know, precious time together.

It's all consuming.

I think this is, as parents, what all of us struggle with all the time.

I think that there's a lot of warranted attention around the fact that women are expected to be these multi-dimensional superwomen.

And if they have careers, inevitably, if they're on a panel, the first thing that's asked is, how do you manage balance?

And I don't think what gets a lot of attention is that I think men feel,

or a lot of men, most men, and a lot of women, have this internal conflict in that as society has told me, and it's more and more competitive society, I need to be a baller professionally.

That's my job.

My job is to go out and hunt the mastodon and bring home the meat.

And if I haven't done that, I've failed as a man.

At the same time, in this competitive society, to do that, you basically have to work all the fucking time.

I've just never, I have said that.

You said, I didn't see my kids.

I have never bought a kid's.

I've never, I think balance is a myth.

I did not see my kids the first five years of their life because I'm like, I got to make more money.

And it was just that clear.

And I don't, I'm not talented enough to make a lot of money without working my ass off.

I have not been able to figure that out.

And at the same time,

it's very upsetting.

Men have some of those same paternal, like conflicted emotions.

Like, fuck.

He's talking about reading too.

I'm not being a good dad.

I'm not being a good partner.

But at the same time, I've really

failed on a cosmic level if I can't maintain the economic security of my household.

And him, it's a little bit different because he's had economic security from a young age.

But he has the same.

You're laying off 2,000 people.

And the comms people are like, we got to talk about this and we got to think this through.

And it's like, well, you know, it's bedtime or it's bath time.

It's like, I'm sorry, I can't be there.

I got, I got a lot of people depending on me.

And this, this tension and this,

it's present for women and it's also present for men.

Yeah, it was a good moment.

I realized.

And also, Pete Buddhaj talked about it.

He was, he was negotiating that infrastructure stuff when he was in the hospital.

One of his, his kids were quite sick.

And so that was, he talked about fatherhood.

Of course, his is under seizure in a very different way across the country.

It was, I thought, I thought that was really good.

It was a great moment.

It was a great question, Scott.

I never would have asked it, and I'm glad you did.

Thank you.

Anyway, let's go on a quick break.

When we come back, we'll talk about the dueling answers from Senator Klobuchar and the CEO of Amazon, and we'll play Tim Cook's big win.

So your AI agents, they make the team that uses them more productive, right?

But if they aren't connected to other agents, or your data, or your existing workflows, how productive can they really make your teams?

Any business can add AI agents.

IBM connects your agents across your company to change how you do business.

Let's create Smarter Business, IBM.

Support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you a hundred dollar credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply only on LinkedIn ads.

Scott, we're back with more from code.

Another big theme this week: antitrust legislation and competition.

Senator Klobuchar, Amy Klobuchar, joined us early on Tuesday to talk about the state of her big tech antitrust bill.

Here's what she said.

Do you go talk to them or what do you does it have to be?

We have to continue to talk to them.

We have made so many changes to the bills

that have been

in response to concerns that they have raised.

At some point, we know that, for instance, just one example,

the news organization bill, you know, when they claim that that is somehow going to break the internet, well, they've been doing it in the land down under, and it hasn't brought the internet under, basically, in Australia.

So we know that we have examples in other countries where some of this stuff is going on.

And as time goes on, that's going to become increasingly clear.

So we continue to talk to them.

But the truth is, you can't wait and be basically you're becoming a patsy if you just sit there and wait for them to decide they suddenly like this bill because they don't want to see any bills passed, unfortunately.

All right.

She was good.

That was a good interview with her.

She's a politician, so she talks.

Look, my observation is: look who you had here: Representative Conna, Governor Newsom, Mayor Pete, Senator Klobuchar.

Who else do we have that's here because they're running for president?

I mean, they're all running for president.

Mark Cuban.

Oh, and Mark Cuban, you literally have, I think they're all running for president.

Yeah.

I'm cynical, and that is, I think this cost plus, Mark Cuban cost plus drugs.

Yes, that's what I said.

It's a book.

It's like a book.

It's a great thing.

I think he's a good man.

I think it'll be great.

I think it's, quite frankly, in the back of his mind is he's thinking it's a great platform to raise awareness to be drafted as a presidential candidate.

I think they all wake up in the morning and say, hello, Madame President.

Yes, I think you say that.

What did you think?

Is the bill going to get passed?

Did big tech win this round?

I suspect.

It feels like it's already been walked.

You know, I said fat chance about this bill, this Inflation Reduction Act and the infrastructure bill, so I'm not going to go.

I don't know.

Someone's going to be able to do that.

I think here's what it is.

It gets through.

It gets through, and it'll be so watered down as to be almost meaningless.

It just won't.

It's just death by a thousand cuts.

And then all the big tech executives, including Cinder, get up and say, act as if they're like open to it and they want to be regulated.

And they have an army of lawyers and politicians that they have paid off.

Just

that is their job.

That's the way the system works.

So at this point.

Yeah, I don't.

Look,

I'm sort of, I don't know if this term is bereft or resigned, but at least Senator Klobuchar is fighting the good fight.

She's She's not afraid of them.

I think she's very pragmatic.

I think she's an impressive woman.

They were trying to make the case that it was overly broad, including Andy Jassy, one person who has been very active.

And as opposed to Jeff, Andy goes to Washington and talks to people.

He's the CEO of Amazon, obviously.

Here's what he said.

There is such a crazy us versus them mentality in this country right now, everywhere, including in how government is thinking about some of these larger companies.

There aren't many, if any, big issues that have ever been solved by scapegoating or demonizing a group of people.

And that's kind of what's happening right now.

And I actually think that we have a much better chance of solving an issue that we may want to regulate and in a way that doesn't unintentionally hurt consumers or small and medium-sized businesses if the private and public sector work together and collaborate on that.

And it has not been something that's been willing to do so far.

The tech industry has put $95 million in ads.

And I've seen so many ads that Amy Klobuchar is is breaking the internet.

I don't believe she's breaking the internet.

You know, you all play tough, too, if they're playing tough on the same way.

Look,

we've been very clear for many months, and we have shared this with everybody, including the senator, that we're, let's figure out what we want to regulate.

If you want to actually stop censorship of data, write a bill about that.

If you want to change the way data privacy is conducted, write a bill about that.

It makes it seem so easy.

he gets to do whatever he wants they don't let's all work together which means put more fucking espresso pods in the box don't go to the bathroom here's diapers

yeah oh andy isn't he lovely he's so

let's work together i know that was let's work together

because they're they're really put into this because she made a joke about that said her her she told her husband told her daughter don't be mean to mom today she's got four four of the biggest companies world trying to get her and russia just banned her because she had been in the ukraine ukraine um and so uh you know they she's definitely she I think she said she had three lawyers and they had 2800 I'm sure that's an exaggeration on her part but she's right she's outmatched in terms of this is a very powerful senator but she's

the thing something very interesting and somewhat related happened with Amazon and I think it's I think it's it's it's cogent or or highlights the issue here the majority of the big tech people you talk to especially the CEO Google who is exceptionally talented and exceptionally likable and I think a good person person.

Alphabet itself.

And Google, he's

all of it, whatever.

That seventh ring of hell.

So he's essentially when you push him on a hard issue, like what are you going to do about privacy or this thing?

A lot of thoughtful, you know, these are

complex problems, Kara.

But we're open to talking to people.

No, they're not.

They're opening to pretend to listen.

We're open to legislation.

No, they're not.

We're going to release the hounds and start giving money to anybody who gets in the way of this.

And here's the thing that's so sad about it.

It's what I call the illusion of complexity.

These are complex problems.

Well, this is how complex the problem was for Amazon.

Amazon experience with their new Lord of the Rings, they got critic bombed.

And that is bad actors do what occasionally they do to you and me and Twitter.

And that is a bunch of people, fake actors, showed up and started trashing it.

And you don't know who's behind it or why.

So what did Amazon do?

They took it down, they implemented AI and identity, and they figured it out in like 48 hours.

And they put it back up, and there's veracity around on those reviews.

So Amazon figured it out in 40 hours, but Sunder's like, it's too complex a problem.

We can't.

That was the joke I had is that when they talked about the smartest people ever, they act like smart.

And whenever there's something difficult,

election misinformation is a big, big problem.

Oh, we kick off one account and 60% of it goes away.

Yeah.

So this.

I don't say it's easy.

You know, Alex Samos who I really easier than they would claim.

That is correct.

It's about incentives.

And it moves and morphs all the time.

And it's a nuisance to them in a lot of ways

and a profit-sucking nuisance.

They have a profit motive in

creating the illusion of complexity around this.

I think these problems are solvable.

We're not talking about the realm of the possible.

We're talking about the realm of the profitable.

But what's interesting is Jassy's not going down with the fight and neither is she.

So we'll see who prevails there.

She may pull it out.

She may get the votes.

I feel like she would break people's arms.

Well, it's fairly by the thing about this that's on her side is it's a bipartisan issue.

And everybody hates big tech for different reasons, but they all share a disdain for these companies.

And public sentiment has turned on them.

So we'll see.

Only issue is nobody really cares about tech legislation compared to many other legislations.

So that's all.

It's not the high.

That's what's benefited tech is that people are like, oh, I like my maps.

I'm not that mad at them.

I think they have a harder time passing tech legislation than they do, say pharma, insulin prices that can enrage people.

We'll see.

Another issue that Jassy talked about, he seemed, as usual, combative on labor unions.

He said the statin is on vote had disturbing irregularities and hinted at a prolonged battle.

Interestingly, Christian Smalls came later.

He happened to be in L.A.

and he called and said, can I come?

And it was too late for him to ask Jassy a question, which would have been irritating to Jassy, I'm sure.

But, you know, Jassy's not the only one with union problems.

And you talked about this in your presentation.

Unions have become the perfect enemy for corporations because they're ineffective.

46 of the 47 countries that have organized labor around the world have seen a massive decline.

They've been cut in half in terms of membership.

If it was a business, it would have been put out of business.

And here's the thing.

I'm a huge fan of unions, but they need to be organized.

They need to be less corrupt and they need to be totally focused on the well-being of their workers.

Look,

I think every union, almost every union, is not effective.

I think that there should be one union, and it should be the federal government.

And I think they should demand minimum wage.

If minimum wage had just kept pace with productivity the last 50 years, it would be 23 bucks a share.

That's right.

And here's what the great uncoupling was.

In the early 70s, up until the 70s, productivity and wages largely were inextricably linked.

And that is, everybody got to share.

Our society, government, workers got to share in the increases in productivity that we have registered.

We're going to be more productive in one month this year than we were in an entire year in 1950.

But in the 1970s, something happened.

I don't know if it was Milton Freeman or Jack Welch

shareholder activism.

All of a sudden, everything was optimized for shareholder value.

And they found a lot of surplus compensation in workers.

They found out workers are willing to work for less.

And so they stopped raising their wages and there was no minimum wage.

And minimum wages exploded from $7.25 to $7.25.

Yeah, but Jassy noted this, but then he was as if he's like, well, we're paying $18.

I'm like, you're still not paying enough.

That's not the comparison.

$7.25 is obscene, is obscene.

Well, I just don't get it.

There should be one union.

Why wouldn't we have, okay, minimum wage, 25 bucks an hour, federal minimum wage?

Yeah.

And here's the thing: you said the union is the government.

The union is the government.

It's the best union in the world.

It's the most noble.

It's the most concerned.

It's not corrupt.

You won't find them on their boats.

Anyways, I think teachers' unions have lost a lot of credibility.

But anyways, 25 bucks a share.

And let's be clear, the market would go down and it'd be worth it.

Stocks would go down and be worth it.

Productivity would go up.

Bring dignity back to work.

Et cetera, et cetera.

Anyway, we'll see.

He's going to really, I think he's going to win on these issues, unfortunately.

They've only got one, and and that's, and they're, he kept saying irregularities in Staten Island.

It was funny.

Whatever.

Anyway, we'll see where it goes.

He says he can take care of them better than the unions can.

And in many ways, he might be right on that.

Yes.

And yet, and then they can also not take care of them.

There's no leverage for workers in that.

And they will continue to have no leverage.

He's like, they can go.

I'm like.

They're disorganized.

And I love the media.

Like a Starbucks in Wausa, Wisconsin unionizes, and everyone's talking about the return of of unions.

This is the ultimate dead cap bounce.

There'll be some very well-publicized stories of the rejuvenation of unions, and they will resume their structural decline.

The government needs to move in here and restore dignity to work full stop.

Another pair of code attendees found themselves at opposite size of an issue, Tim Cook and an audience member.

Let's play a clip from the audience QA.

Not to make it personal, but I can't send my mom certain videos, or she can't send me certain videos.

And so we leave.

Buy your mom an iPhone.

So that was great.

Tim, we talked primarily about Steve Jobs.

There were some great questions.

Of course, he'd flown in from the event, the iPhone 14 event, and

all the announcements they made,

which was great of him to do that.

I appreciated that.

I'm not sure if he had a choice, but there he is.

He came and did a good job, actually.

Perfect.

They represent the reason I have an iPhone is that I think it makes me more attractive.

And the three of them are more attractive than any three Android executives.

But one of the things that was interesting about that, it was primarily, I wanted to keep keep it to Steve Jobs and the legacy and also the impact.

I didn't want to talk about the next iPhone.

I don't care.

I mean, I do, but I don't.

And so it was an interesting reflection for them.

You know, I did not sure it would work, but I think it really did.

People found it very moving, I think, in a lot of ways.

I thought it was going to.

Yeah, it was very thoughtful.

It was people just thinking out loud about ideas.

I thought Johnny Ive was tremendous.

You really got a sense of why he was who he was, his impact on Apple.

And I thought Lorene had some really amazing.

And you got different versions of Steve Jobs.

And they didn't hesitate to talk about more difficult parts.

But from today's perspective, he seems less, you know, just venal than lots of people.

But all three of them are, I was really intimidated.

We were on the stage with Avon, and I got off, and I saw all three of them just sitting there in line.

And they all made eye contact with me because I was getting off.

And I was too intimidated to introduce myself.

You know, I wanted to, I want to know them.

Yeah, I know.

Easy for you to say.

But I was too intimidated to introduce myself, and I regret that.

Anyways, of course.

Yeah, it was really interesting.

I thought it worked.

It was very thoughtful.

And I think they even found it hard.

We had a conversation before, and I, you know,

it required them to think a little bit about legacy and things like that.

So I thought that was very genuine.

And I think that's what I liked about it is that they had very genuine, it's very hard to be canned, actually.

And I think they had reflections that were really important about care of duty, of care of creation.

I think Johnny talked about this a lot, carelessness in design.

I think they talked a lot about ideas and the need for ideas.

And one of the things I do believe when he died, everything shifted.

I just do.

It was, he was, listen, he was not perfect and he was at all kinds of

warts all over him.

He did.

But

he definitely represented a passion for excellence that I think has carried on at Apple.

You never, you don't really go, this is a shoddy product on anything you get from them.

You may not like something and they may not do something.

Well, we talked about ping, for example, a social network.

But I thought that they talked about the idea of passion, excellence, and the marriage of art and commerce in a lot, in the way that we forget everything.

I feel like everyone's sort of took the wrong lessons from Steve Jobs away.

And I think they did articulate that he would not like the present moment, like especially politically, but also lack of privacy.

He talked a lot about privacy.

And Lorene was very clear that he would be very outspoken now and not on Twitter, but just outspoken.

I agree with her.

I think that's the case.

This is a tough one for me because I think that, and there's some good, but there's bad to this.

When societies become wealthier, more educated, their reliance on a super being or church attendance goes down.

And so they try and fill that void with other super beings.

And I think it's been somewhat unfortunate, but the closest thing we have to a religion is technology.

And you can understand it.

It's mystical.

I don't know how my iPhone works.

It can do amazing things.

And I think Steve Jobs has become the Jesus Christ of this information economy.

And I think it's set off

not any fault of his own, but it's set off because of a variety of societal factors, the idolatry of money, the idolatry of innovators, the mysticism.

Because the people that technology could develop on the platform, meaning we have decided that these are the new clergy, the new gods.

Well, he was the only one at the moment.

The new idols.

Well, now Elon's taken that model.

They just live by a different set of standards, and it's bad for society.

Yeah, I would agree.

One of the things Tim said, we didn't design this so people would do the scrolling.

I mean, you know what I mean?

Like, I think there,

every interview I do with him, he talks about that.

And I think the most famous one is when I asked him what he would do if he was in Mark Zuckerberg's situation when there was all that stuff going on at Cambridge Analytica and all the misinformation stuff.

And he never, he's really loath to insult.

And he goes, and I've never seen him maybe once or twice do it.

And he said, and Jobs liked to insult.

So it was a very different personality.

And he said,

I never would have been in that situation.

I love Tim Cook because I think Tim Cook demonstrates a lot more grace than the majority of executives in big tech.

He doesn't make it about him.

He doesn't take the opportunity.

I don't think I've ever really seen him shitpost anyone.

That's the closest.

I wouldn't have been in this position.

It's the closest I've ever seen him to criticize anybody.

I would agree.

I would agree.

I like the fact that he comes from a background that probably wasn't

easy for him to advance in the corporate world early in his career.

He's a very personality.

But he doesn't make it an issue.

I think people know about it.

He's an an adult it's called an adult you know one time i saw him raise his eyebrows once about travis kalinek and i was like oh dear he doesn't like and what people you pointed this out but okay everyone talks about steve jobs unbelievable when steve jobs died apple had a 300 billion dollar market cap that's right it's not two and a half trillion dollars there isn't an individual alive there isn't an individual anywhere in the history that has added more shareholder value than tim cookie i argued that with two people here i was like uh have you noticed like it's not about the money i said they have lots of innovative products give me a break.

AirPods, all kinds of stuff.

AirPods, if they were on their own business, would be a Fortune 200 company.

And sometimes the watch is really interesting.

And the iPhone is the most profitable product in history because of some of the innovation he's brought.

And shareholder value matters.

A lot of people can retire sooner.

A lot of people can take care of their parents.

A lot of people can buy nice homes.

They also haven't done it by

privacy violations over and over again.

Yeah, they haven't fucked up democracy.

They have issues in China.

Issues in China.

They got to get out of China in a lot of ways.

I think that they'd be the almost perfect company in that regard.

All right, Scott, one more quick break.

We'll be back for wins and fails of code.

As a founder, you're moving fast towards product market fit, your next round, or your first big enterprise deal.

But with AI accelerating how quickly startups build and ship, Security expectations are also coming in faster.

And those expectations are higher than ever.

Getting security and compliance right can unlock growth or stall it if you wait too long.

Vanta is a trust management platform that helps businesses automate security and compliance across more than 35 frameworks like SOC2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more.

With deep integrations and automated workflows built for fast-moving teams, Vanta gets you audit ready fast and keeps you secure with continuous monitoring as your models, infrastructure, and customers evolve.

That's why fast-growing startups like Langchang, Ryder, and Cursor Cursor have all trusted Vanta to build a scalable compliance foundation from the start.

Go to Vanta.com slash Vox to save $1,000 today through the Vanta for Startups program and join over 10,000 ambitious companies already scaling with Vanta.

That's vanta.com slash vox to save $1,000 for a limited time.

Support for the show comes from Sachs Fifth Avenue.

Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunella Caccinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks Fifth Avenue for the best follow follow-arvals and style inspiration.

Okay, Scott, let's do some wins and fails of code.

What's your favorite or least favorite moment of the week?

I'll give you what I thought was the most insightful moment.

Okay, that's fine.

And this is a prediction, and I know we don't do any predictions on today, but I think I understand men my age.

And the thing I love about these moments that you put together is occasionally there's an unscripted moment and you see something.

When Sunder Pachai was asked about Twitter, he was just like, oh, God, don't keep me away from that septic tense.

And then someone asked about Pinterest, and there was a weird pause.

What about something like Pinterest?

You know, look, me, I can't comment on

any M ⁇ A DL or, you know, I think.

I have to say.

I don't think so, but you're very good at asking the question.

That's what they say.

That's what they say.

Google is speaking to Pinterest.

I would agree.

And I just like, I get men, and I don't know if you.

I saw it.

It's like, okay, something's going on.

That's right.

I think I said something.

And that's the wonderful thing about getting people together.

Cam and I, he's not a very good poker player, that's Undor.

Well, I just that moment, I looked around to see if anyone else, and I immediately

sent a message to my friend.

I'm like, Pinterest is in play from Google.

Yeah.

And maybe I get, you know, your gut.

I think you read it exactly right.

Your gut may be wrong, but I'm like, oh, wait.

Oh, wait.

Yeah.

Something's going on here.

Indeed.

They'd have to look at it.

That was my favorite.

They have to look at it.

It's a perfect fit with Google.

It's information.

It's all kinds of stuff.

It adds a lot of really good technology.

Commerce.

Commerce.

And they've failed in commerce.

So they've failed again and again.

Sort of a human search engine a little bit.

Exactly.

I think you're right.

I think that's good.

All right.

What's your, what's something you didn't like?

There was nothing I really wouldn't say I didn't like.

I mean,

I find all these people who just are fascinated by tech, claiming they're not running for, I would love somebody to say, I would, I think, and I think it'd be smart.

I think if Senator Klobuchar or Mayor Pete or Secretary Boudish said, you know what?

I'm an ambitious woman.

I'd like to be president.

I have a vision for the country.

Well, if Hillary Clinton did that, it didn't work for her.

Well, and they might say, it's not my time because we've got a good president and I'm going to fight for him should he decide to run again.

But yeah, I'd love to be president and just leave it there.

Instead, like, no, I got on, I got my ass on Delta to come out to this conference to just say, I'm not running for president over and over, but meanwhile, be in front of a bunch of important tech people.

I just find it like, come on, enough already.

Come on.

You're out, you're out in your car making out, I have snap maps or whatever the fuck it is.

It's just like, come on.

So

that I just, a lot of eye-rolling.

Yep.

I mean, they either, either all of these people who are, who are supposedly the most likely people to run for president seem to love you and come to code.

Yeah.

And I think that's part of that.

Yeah, this is what I'm going to try.

I'm pitching my bets all over the map so I can get to the White House so I can hang out there.

There you go.

Just hang out.

I don't want to do anything but go in that weird place.

You promised me a weekend in the Lincoln bedroom.

I know, you and I together.

We're going to do it.

We're going to do it.

We're going to sully the place, though.

We're going to sully it.

We're going to trump it up.

I'm sure he sullied it already.

So, anyway, my favorite moment, I think, all of it.

It was really good.

I felt really good as a whole.

I really liked doing the climate stuff.

I thought it was good.

I thought John Dore was quite good.

There wasn't a speaker.

Someone said, What's your favorite piece?

I don't have one.

I don't have one.

I thought they were all excellent.

John Dore just reeks of class.

I know.

I think they all brought it from Mark Cuban to the very last one.

They all brought it.

And by the way, they they didn't have to.

And they did.

And they were, I thought they were, nobody was fake, very little talking pointy.

It was, they were really good interviews.

All the people who did other, like yourself and Preet Barara, did a great job.

I thought the food was amazing.

Food was good.

Staff did a beautiful job.

The signage.

And I loved the last day of climate change stuff.

I thought they were great.

Everybody stuck around.

We had always had a problem with that.

I think I loved those panels.

I love the strawberries from Oishi and the Nova meat.

And there wasn't a thing I didn't like about it.

I have to say.

That's my win.

My win is this conference and your 20 years.

And I think there's something bigger here.

Like you, for the last 20, when you started this 20 years ago, it was a different world.

And your background and the fact that

you kind of, well, I'll say, live out loud.

I think that this conference gave you...

I think you're the first person to kind of pull this off for 20 years.

Klaus Schwab has kind of done it with the World Economic Forum, but that's got a different flavor.

And I just really, really, I love the fact and I respect the fact that you're going out while everyone is applauding.

You're pulling the plug on it while it's still the number one rated show.

So I think that takes a lot of discipline.

I have something else to do.

But most people can't give up the temptation.

Most people, they have their show canceled.

I got two things to do.

I have a new podcast coming.

We debut.

Just take the fucking compliment.

I will.

Fine.

Okay, good.

Thank you so much.

I can't believe it.

How smart I am.

Do you have a fail?

No.

That's my win.

My fail.

It's not really a fail.

I think that your leaders,

I think the queen has been such a pillar of grace.

I mean, if you were to try and embody what's wonderful about Britain, a lot of it would be Britain, you know, they believe in the rule of fair play.

They're

gentle men and gentle women.

That's what they think, but go ahead.

Well,

I think she demonstrates, she has consistently reinforced.

a civil civilization.

She has.

And I think she's always,

you know, just tremendous service to her country.

Non-divisive.

So

it's got to be a moment for whatever it is, the 65 million citizens where they really collectively mourn someone who everyone kind of feels a little bit that she was their sister, then their mother, then their grandmother.

So

I think that's a, I don't know, we call it a fail.

I guess it's a win, but it's a nice, it's a nice moment.

when Britain, you know, monarchies in that whole situation, it's man-made.

That institution

was invented by them.

And it's a nice moment for them to reflect on not only her, but the disability.

Yeah, it's just

it does demonstrate.

And dovetailing with code, one of the things I was trying very hard was to talk about divisiveness and the ability to talk.

A lot of people, even Hanand Giriras, talked about persuasion and getting along and having common.

Almost everybody's talked about that.

And I wanted to foster

more than the you suck, which some of them do, was what are we going to do about it now?

And that's why why we did the climate change.

What are we going to do about it?

All right, enough.

What are we going to do now?

But she never gave into the temptation to start criticizing the other side.

She never, which was great, which was great.

I think that was good.

And that's what we tried to do here.

So, on to our new things.

That's the show, Scott.

But you're back.

So, that's what's critical.

Hello, ladies and gentlemen.

I can't believe how much people miss you.

That's right.

They missed you so much.

They did for good reason.

They miss us together.

Anyway, we'll be dropping bonus episodes of code interviews in coming weeks, starting with a full Evan Spiegel interview and the feed on Saturday.

Scott did an amazing job, as you'll see, when you hear the rest of it.

Da-da!

Oh my God, it's so good to have me back.

It's so good.

You missed it.

Be honest.

You really missed it.

I got a little bit bored.

I got a lot of bad bad.

Yeah, you do.

That's what happens.

And this is fun for you.

I think you like me.

I think you like me.

You really like me.

Today's show.

Read us out, Scott.

You have to read us out.

Today's episode was produced by Lara Naiman, Evan Angle, and Taylor Griffin.

Ernie Intertot engineered this episode.

Thanks also to Drew Burrows and Mili Severo.

Make sure you subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media.

We'll be back next week for another breakdown of all things Kekkin business.

He's a total douchebag, but he's your douchebag and he's back.

This month on Explain It to Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well.

Collagen smoothies and cold plunges, Pilates classes, and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It To Me, presented by Pureleaf.