Let's Say Gay, The U.S. Bans Russian Oil, and Guest Jeffrey Sonnenfeld

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunello Cacchinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks Fifth Avenue for the Best Fall Arrivals and Style inspiration.

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start?

Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to.

Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin, or what that clunking sound from your dryer is?

With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one.

You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app.

Download today.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher.

And so, for my wife's birthday, she asked me to take her out somewhere really expensive.

So, you know where I'm taking her?

Where?

A chevron station, Kara.

A chevron station.

Who are you?

You need to introduce yourself.

Not everybody knows.

I get it.

I get it.

The prices are high.

You know why I only date really fury women?

Okay, why?

Because someone's got to ask for unleaded, unleaded, and it's not going to be me.

It's not going to.

The dad jokes went over huge, so I'm going all dad jokes.

No, those aren't dad jokes.

I don't know what they are.

They're not even dad jokes.

I know what you're thinking.

You like the dirty jokes.

Okay, I have a dirty joke.

All right.

What do I now say right before I climax?

What do I say, Kara?

No, no.

Welcome to my TED Talk.

All right, that's enough, Scott Galloway.

I'm Scott Galloway.

All right.

Today, the Biden administration says no to Russian oil and yes, maybe to cryptocurrencies.

We'll talk about that.

We're speaking with Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a big giant fan of his, about companies that are still doing business in Russia.

He's been keeping track.

But first, a word about Florida.

Earlier this week, the state legislature passed the don't say gay bill, which is called, and

the people who are for it don't like that name, but there you have it.

And the governor, Governor DeSantis is expected to sign it into law.

We take issue with this bill, and this is why we have decided to remove our business from Florida.

People may not agree with us, but we feel this bill,

even though it doesn't have the word gay in it, Governor DeSantis, is aimed at the LGBTQ people very clearly.

And it's one of these

dog whistle bills in which they don't have to say something and they mask parental rights for what is essentially targeting.

They're using just like I call it critical gay theory, essentially.

They're things that they didn't like before, they're going after again using this bill.

It's got a lot in it, and there's lots of places to read about it.

I will put out as many links as possible, both which I agree with and don't agree with, but it should not be codified into law.

This is vast overreach.

If you're just someone who doesn't like government, this is enormous overreach into schools.

It's lacks of trust in teaching.

It's solving, just like with the trans issues, it's solving a problem that nobody really has and making people feel better about parental rights.

As someone who's a big-time parent, this is not what you need.

If you have problems with your schools, you deal with them on the local level, but it's ridiculous and it's absolutely aimed at

a certain group of people.

Anyway, for that reason, we don't agree with it.

We don't like it.

We think it's cruel and unnecessary and a dog whistle.

We're moving next year's pivot out of Miami.

We had a great time.

We love Miami.

We love a lot of the politicians there.

And we had them on our stage.

This isn't what we wanted.

We were looking forward to throwing a bigger and more expensive pivot next year in Miami, in the streets of Miami.

Now, that's not going to happen, at least not in Florida.

We have had contact from many people, including governors of states, who are very happy to have us there.

I get that people disagree on what parents should be able to say to their kids in school and stuff like that, but this is just not the way to do it.

Scott,

plenty of people in Florida oppose the bill, correct?

Yeah.

And so let's be clear.

I mean, it's difficult to have total clarity around this decision because we asked, we went online in an HQ2 move said, where should Scott's man Man Cave be?

Because that's where we're going to hold the next event.

And people said, Nashville or Austin, which also have their own problems.

I mean, we can't move every conference to San Francisco and Boston, right?

But there is something to be said about flexing your capitalist muscles and say there's a lot of options.

I'd rather not

spend money in Florida.

I think you feel very, I think you speak to this with a specific resonance.

I'm learning from you on this.

You said something that really I thought was very powerful a few episodes ago.

You said, you know, Jewish kids are Jewish with their parents, black kids are black with their parents, but gay kids oftentimes aren't gay with their parents.

And that I had never really thought of it that way.

And then on the far left made the mistake of thinking that they've been asked to protect us from what offends us.

And then on the far right, they've made a trope of what threatens us.

And in the same week that they put out this bill to protect our children from teachers who are trying to supposedly pull the gay out of them or talk about sex, by the way, nowhere in Florida is sex part of the curriculum.

And K through 30,

this isn't a problem.

It's not there.

And in the same week, we also, and this didn't get as much attention, but it falls under the same false flag, passed a law here, DeSantis backed law called the election security law that creates more bureaucracy to investigate election fraud.

And by the way, DeSantis bragged that Florida came out of their election audit with a near-perfect score.

There is no election fraud in Florida.

So what Republicans have decided to do is try and scare people into believing that primary school teachers are trying to talk your kids, talk about sex and trying to talk your kids into being gay.

And they are not.

I speak, I have exposure and experience here.

This isn't part of what is going on.

In addition, there's no election fraud, but they all want to go after the far-right crazies who unfortunately, because of gerrymandering, control the elections and say to them, We're protecting you from election fraud and from people that want to turn your kids gay or talk about sex.

And guess what, folks?

You need to be talking about food insecurity among children.

Kids aren't showing up to school and learning about sex, they're not learning because they're fucking hungry.

That's what we need you focused on.

So this is more of the same.

It is rather than doing their job and focusing on real problems, it's polarizing us, It's tapping into the absolute, our worst instincts, and it is a waste of government money.

It also takes the trust between teachers and parents, which has been eroded during the pandemic, for sure.

But at some point, this is not what the teachers are doing.

And so someone who went through this.

hiding and not being able to talk about things, this will have a chilling effect on anything that they don't know.

The bill, I don't even understand it.

It's so broad and so strange and unnecessary.

It's really one of these things that everyone's going to watch themselves.

So one of the things that draws, I'm getting a lot of like, they're obviously bots.

You know, do you believe you believe you clearly you're a groomer, nice try groomer, which is like a weird, I hate the fact that the word that I use for keeping my dog clean is being used in this way.

It's so sick.

And literally, like, no one's grooming anybody.

This is crazy.

This is crazy and sick.

And the sickness is in your heads, the people that think this is correct.

It's that you have a sickness.

You're like QAnon people that are screaming about pedophiles in the basement of a pizza place that doesn't have a basement.

It's insanity.

And, you know, also the idea that you could make anybody gay.

I mean, I'm not going to go into this, but you can't.

You can't stop them from being gay.

And you can't.

I grew two sons in the Castro of San Francisco.

Two lesbians raised them.

They are the straightest people.

We make straight people for you, by the way.

And Claire was spinning around.

I don't know what she's going to be, but I can't make her.

I just can't, it's like, and I'm not interested in making her.

And also, word, word on the other side, you can't make people straight either, folks.

It's kind of in the batter.

Let's get used to it.

Kind of in the batter.

You're just going to have to go with it.

Yeah.

Anyway, so let's just say with laws like this one or similar states' actions in Texas, we can't be rewarded with our business.

You know what?

Ultimately, we're capitalists.

We don't want to spend money on it.

I like that narrative.

But through the magic of capitalism, we're voting with our dollars and spending them elsewhere in a state that doesn't ask LGBTQ people and their children to feel shame.

Or just waste our money or try and and gaslight us.

Do your goddamn job.

Yep, exactly.

Do your job and focus on real issues.

Hunger, there's lots of issues.

There's not enough funding for

repair the damage that the pandemic has done to all of us in education, whatever your side on this thing is.

Obviously, we have to focus on kids.

This is not.

focusing on this is not protecting kids this is protecting parent insecure parents and it's not about parental rights and you're being played for a fool and go for it if you want to do do that, we're not going to be there to join you for that one.

Anyway, that is our statement.

Thank you.

This is the city that's in the lead right now.

I have mine.

I have my favorite.

What's yours?

Oh, I like Palm Springs.

I like Colorado.

I'm thinking, you know, you know, by the way, we did operate All Things D during Proposition 8, but the government was trying to fight it.

You know, that got through because of propositions.

It was

touch and go on that one.

We almost removed it from California, but then there was movement against it.

In any case,

Palm Springs, Boulder.

We're going to end up in Denmark.

Denmark.

Toronto, I think Canada is kind of interesting.

I don't know.

Where do you want to go?

What's your favorite?

I think the leader right now, and by the way, I just want to be clear.

We are whores.

We can be bought.

Send me gifts.

Send me hats.

Send me plants.

Capitalism.

But here's the thing.

We're expensive.

We made fun of Jeff Bezos for this.

You know that.

You got that, right?

Who predicted it would be in D.C.

or New York?

Because that's where he built his new midlife crisis man caves.

And guess what?

I was wrong.

It was both.

All right.

Where's your favorite man cave position?

I want to spend more time in the great state of Colorado, specifically Boulder.

So I think Boulder, and I'll add, I'm kind of fancy.

I like Aspen.

I think Aspen would be awesome.

But I'm leaning towards Colorado.

And we also like the governor and know him.

We do like him.

We do.

We do like him.

And by the way, I heard he lives with another man.

I'm not going to say the three-letter words.

They have children.

Do not say that.

They have children that are probably straight.

This is dangerous.

you're you're a danger to our children karao whatever anyway we love colorado we love all the states by the way that are not giant assholes like florida today um anyway uh anyways

i just want to i know that i know that by the way again look who should we shout out to the the mayors that we had at at pivot mia mayor suarez and also mayor cava um so we we we support you and we would love to be there but no thank you and for those who say you know i there's i just

whatever.

Have your opinion.

We're not.

You know what being outside?

Speaking of international, you know what I think is the hottest city of 2022?

Stockholm?

Mexico City, Mexico.

I think Mexico City is the next hot spot.

I think it's the next Austin and Miami.

By the way, I'm heading to Austin this afternoon.

Do you know what the temperature is in Austin right now?

What?

No.

It's 39 degrees.

It was advertised as warm.

It's the same temperature in Austin as it is in New York right now.

I need to speak to the manager.

Well, Texas is its own bag of tricks on that thing.

But if bedto becomes governor that could be an attractive situation for the pivot people um even though they have these shitty bills we like you know you know that kind of thing but the guys who pass this bills are in office right now anyway speaking of in office disney ceo bob chappic is that chappic chapek whatever i think it's because of kara swisher i think you heard kara swisher Oh, he may have.

Is now taking a stronger stance on the don't say gay bill.

We we criticize Bob.

Earlier this week, he took a lot of flag for not directly condemning it.

Then on Wednesday, Wednesday, he told shareholders that he'd meet with Ron DeSantis to oppose the bill.

It had no effect because it was too late.

Bob two, Bob one, on the other hand, Iger tweeted in favor of against the bill, opposed the bill before it was passed.

I think he was he's still living, but he was rolling over in his grave, his CEO grave.

But he was a liberal leader.

I'm sorry.

He really was.

And he didn't do everything right either.

But boy, this Bob Jaipik is.

Yeah, but

let's give Bob C.

some credit.

I think a step back from the wrong direction is a step in the right direction.

He did what was right.

Sandeep Matrani, WeWork, initially said they weren't going to pull out.

It looks like they're going to pull out.

It's not too late to do the right thing.

It's never too late to do the right thing.

All right, okay.

I think Bob C.

got it right.

And by the way, this was an obvious one.

Disney, Disney?

I mean, look at their products.

They've been having gay times at the, remember, they opened it up.

Look what their headquarters are, and they're going to piss off.

I mean, they're i'm gonna go out on a limb here and assume that they are they have a disproportionate number of incredibly talented people who identify very strongly with the lgbt community and for them to this was just such a tone-deaf move on his part i could anyways but good for well he shouldn't have yelled at scarjo either so he's he's got some of a he's kind of a tough guy

no he's the one that put out that statement about scarlett johanson remember the the the beef they had about over the payments with streaming they put out a statement about her that i was shocked that i you would not have seen.

But now I think, okay, Bob too, thank you for doing the right thing.

Let's talk about some news now.

Apple unveiled some new toys at its first event of 2022.

There were no cards, goggles, or game-changing phones.

Like we said, there wouldn't be.

There was a new entry in the popular iPhone SE line.

That's the one that still has a home button.

It's cheaper.

A new desktop product called the Mac Studio, which looks small, powerful, and very expensive per Apple tradition.

Are you going to get a new iPad Air?

I found this to be the least inspiring Apple event I've seen in a while.

I mean, I usually watch watch it online and try and get a feel for the new products.

I thought this was a giant yawn.

But, anyways, they have, don't they call it tick and talk?

Why is it a yawn?

They're just putting out their new products.

It's like, don't be like,

they can't just go magic every time.

Why not?

It's a $3 trillion company.

They'll come out with when these glasses, you know, you're going to hush up when these glasses come out, these AR,

glasses, multiverse glasses.

It's about audio, not video.

I got you those for Christmas, so I'm hoping.

You always lie.

You always say that.

You never get me anything.

Not even a gesture.

I don't even get a gesture.

You know, my mom called and said I didn't get her Christmas present.

I did, but that's okay.

We got our subscription to CNN Plus.

And you're welcome, Lucky.

Just see Scott Galloway.

Speaking of which, I'm so glad Jennifer Griffin is on Fox News.

I gave a big shout out to her today.

Again, she was whacking down Hannity with facts.

And she is, you know, she's deproliferating my mother's propaganda, which is very, I'm very sorry.

She's deprogramming her.

Yeah, she's deprogramming her.

We put Lucky in a van and took her to some ranch and deprogrammed her?

Yes.

It is.

No, she's she's that's what I say to my kids.

I say, these people are going to show up in what looks like corporate wear, but they're here to shock you, put you in a van, and then take you somewhere and return a little boy that behaves.

I threaten them with that.

Is that wrong?

Do that.

That's a bad parenting move.

In any case, Lucky is against the don't say gay bill, just so you know.

She thinks it's ridiculous.

Is she ridiculous?

Lucky?

She's like, it's ridiculous.

That's what we need it for.

Why don't they just yell at a teacher if they put dirty stuff?

I'm happy to hear that because I mean this sincerely.

Now that I'm sort of emotionally invested in you, I worry about your and her relationship.

I'm glad to hear that.

I would too.

It was very damaged by a lot of this stuff.

I can tell you,

it was very damaged by how she reacted.

And that is why these are bad bills.

Anyway, speaking of someone who wants to return, Elon Musk wants to tweet without someone looking over his shoulder.

Currently, his tweets about Tesla have to be approved by company lawyers.

Now he wants a judge to throw that settlement out saying it's become unworkable.

Last month, Mutt said the SEC was trampling his First Amendment rights.

Unless we forget, Musk and his brother Kimball are under investigation for insider trading.

Anyway,

he's on Twitter a lot.

Someone was like, do you believe what Elon just said?

I'm like, I can't keep track.

I've done it.

By the way, congratulations.

I think he just had another baby.

But he had another kid?

Who do you have this kid with?

Grimes.

That's what's being reported.

I thought they had brought.

I don't care.

It's his life.

You know what?

His personal life.

Families are complex.

And not only that, I don't think it should be fodder for any media anywhere, but unless you're the president and you have entitled weirdo kids.

I believe she talked about it.

I think that's what I saw.

In any case, what do you think about this Twitter thing?

Look, I do think this is, whereas the majority of issues big tech brings up are not First Amendment issues, I do, in fact, think this is a First Amendment issue.

And I don't think the SEC should be in the business of infantilizing people and saying you can't tweet or you have to have this old white guy or gal review your tweets.

I think what they should do.

I think that what they should do is say, okay, did you commit market manipulation?

Yes, you did.

We're going to actually grow a pair and do our fucking job and accuse you of market manipulation.

And we aren't responsible for trying to dictate whether or not you need a babysitter around your communications.

This was just stupid.

We should decide whether you say something publicly on whatever platform.

And

if you are sending up a flare saying the stock is worth $420 and you have funding secured and the market believes you and goes up, you are guilty of market manipulation.

They shouldn't be putting in place this weirdness.

You can sign them or do whatever.

You're right.

100%.

They are treating him.

Elon, you should tweet whatever you want.

That's right.

And not only that, these things,

so many of these people get upset around Twitter.

And this has happened to me and say, that's it.

I'm done with Twitter.

It's addictive.

In fact, Elon said that in 2019, not sure about the good of Twitter going offline.

He didn't really deliver on that.

Because the bottom line is they're not only addicted to the dope that they get, but they're addicted to the relevance and awareness.

And no matter what the issue is, they're going to weigh in because they are total narcissists.

I can't imagine the worst thing that could happen to Trump was that he was kicked off Twitter.

I think he'd literally, if someone said you can be back on Twitter or president again, I think it'd be a toss-up for him because he constantly needs to talk about stars or talk about.

So literally, they can't be, they cannot

hear about themselves and see the reaction.

They would rather be in the news in a negative way than not in the news.

Yep.

Okay.

All right.

Well, it's Elon, tweet on, says us.

Yeah.

And SEC, do your job.

You're the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Enforce the laws.

You're not his godparent.

You're not his mentor.

You're not his mama.

Let's get to our first big story.

The United States will ban all imports of Russian oil.

That's a major escalation in U.S.

sanctions and one that will likely rise the price of gas, as Scott referenced in our first joke that he told.

President Biden acknowledges much.

Here's what he said when announcing the move.

The decision today is not without cost here at home.

Putin's war is already hurting American families at the gas pump.

Since Putin began his military buildup on Ukrainian borders, just since then, the price of the gas at the pump in America went up 75 cents.

And with this action, it's going to go up further.

I'm going to do everything I can to minimize Putin's price hike here at home.

Okay, that was genius.

Putin's war and Putin's price hike.

And of course, the Republicans are trying to hang this around the Democrats' neck, even though now they're supporting this thing.

It can get very political.

Who does it hurt more?

The Russians or the United States?

U.S.

buys about 10% of Russians' exported oil.

Russian oil made up 8% of oil imports last year.

And over 70% of Americans, though, say they're willing to ban Russian oil, even if it means they have to pay more for gas, according to a new poll.

I thought that we only got about 3% and represented only about 1% of their exports.

And Germany, you know, in the Netherlands, you're talking about 20% or 30%.

So it's just not that big a deal for us.

And gasoline prices are so visible because when you think about it, when you're driving around town, you don't see, you see a for sale sign on a house, but you don't see signs everywhere that says 800 grand for this house.

Whereas every third block, you see this giant billboard with a number on it, and it's gas prices.

So gas prices relative to our collective awareness around what's going on in the economy play a much outsized role.

Because the reality is, even with these price hikes, Kara, as a percentage of our disposable income, gas prices have consistently gone down in terms of how much it costs relative to our disposable income.

I bet over the last 40 years, even with these price hikes, the gas is probably one of the few categories where the prices have not outpaced inflation.

In addition, higher prices will provide more cloud cover for increased investments in renewables.

And also at the end of the day, and this is where the leadership vacuum, where I think Biden really could have stepped into an opportunity here, I think he should have had declared some sort of emergency, almost like a wartime act, and said, we're going to build two dozen nuclear power plants and we're going to get off these very heinous fossil fuels and at the same time drill baby drill for the next three to five years yeah let's let's become we are almost we are a net or exporter of energy at this point but my sense is let's get totally off the crack it's also having interesting second order effects did you notice did you notice that venezuela uh released an american uh political prisoner because you know why i'm sure biden has gone there and i'm sure and not only that they did no they did they were very explicit this in a weird way, it might create a thaw in our relationship with Iran, because all of a sudden, America's like, you know what?

We need more reliable supply chain around oil, which includes going to zero.

It's going to be, it's very complicated on the Russian level, because like everything that comes down to supply chain, your ability to actually move this liquid.

And in the U.S., we're good at producing heavy or refining heavy crude, but not light crude.

And in Russia, they've built an infrastructure to transfer it into Europe, whereas they're now going to have to build an infrastructure to transfer it into China.

But what we're seeing is the world's largest, I'm hopping all over the place, I apologize, but we're going to see the world's largest LBO.

And that is at 5 million barrels a day, at the natural hedge of gasoline or oil prices going up, we're going to see Putin pull off what is the world's largest

in history, LBO, and

use that oil revenue to take the depressed prices of companies private.

And we saw that this week.

So what's going on here is fascinating, but I don't think it really, like, it's not going going to tank our economy.

Well, probably not.

No, everything's up right now.

But, you know, it's not, I think

it'll be a political issue for sure.

It seems that polling people are for it, including not drinking Russian vodka.

And the pictures coming out of Ukraine are insane, like the booming of hospitals.

And

it's not a, it makes it very, a lot of cover for Biden to say we can't, sorry, we can't take this gasoline.

Also, the greater electric car adoption.

Electric cars are 10% of the U.S.

market by 2026.

It should be higher, I would think.

Tesla stock is up, by the way, on the Biden announcement.

There you go.

Even though he's mad, Biden never says Tesla's name.

It's still doing rather well.

Well, you know, there's a bill.

Don't say Tesla to second graders.

That's the new Biden state plan employer.

That's one of the things.

One of the, the person who wrote that bill, by the way, admitted what he was doing.

He's like, people get famous when they get gay.

I was like, oh my God.

Like,

got the shit beat out of me by my mother, for goodness sake, not hitting, not physically, but you know what I mean?

Like, are you kidding me?

Like, yeah, it's the celebrity that's so fantastic.

Anyway, Tesla's doing well.

Oil companies,

they could get access to more drilling sites.

There's been a lot more approval of drilling sites and obviously the Keystone Pipeline for temporary, but we have to get off of it.

That's really it.

Because then they went to Saudi Arabia.

Apparently, the bone saw guy didn't call us back.

you know, let's get away from that guy like immediately.

Other than Norway, pretty much everyone you buy oil from is not who you want to be doing business with.

Right, exactly.

U.K.

will phase out Russian oil by the end of the year.

The EU says it will wean off Russia by 2030.

Let's wean off oil.

Let's wean

off.

Don't use the word wean.

Don't say wean.

Don't say wean because that's a sexual word.

No, it's not.

China and India could buy up the excess Russian oil at a discount.

U.S.

could import oil from Venezuela.

China's a winner here.

Yeah.

Anyway, one of the things that's interesting, and this is a sidelight, not having to do with oil, but one of the other areas of high growth is cybersecurity.

And Google plans to buy a cybersecurity firm, it's a consulting firm, Mandiant, for over $5 billion.

Mandiant famously uncovered the SolarWinds Hack of 2020 that infiltrated the U.S.

government.

Russia is believed to be responsible.

The U.S.

government could stop the Google Mandiant deal on antitrust grounds.

There were others looking at it.

I'm to understand that Microsoft didn't make an offer.

It was too high, and they're actually very good at the consulting business.

Google's been very light in the consulting area, and this gets them into it rather quickly.

Mandiant has a great reputation.

So just, you know, this is going to be another good business for a lot of tech businesses, cybersecurity in heavy in the way that cloud is, I think.

I can't imagine an industry that on a risk-adjusted basis, you know, is just going to grow for the next 10 years.

Yeah, it's a lot of money for this.

I think a lot about...

you know, young people, especially young men.

And I'm like, if you don't want to go to a four-year college, you're just not cut out for it, which two-thirds of American youth don't end up with a traditional BA.

If you like technology, if you're relatively good at math, if you're kind of of a systems thinker or can recognize patterns, try and figure out a way to get some type of certification around cybersecurity.

I just think there's going to be a line out the door

for people

doing that now that you've keep pushing.

You're just thinking of leaving us.

Don't blame it on that bitch, cybersecurity.

You haven't touched me in years.

Welcome to my TED Talk.

Do not say that to the kids.

We're going to have a list of things you don't say to the kids, and it's mostly you.

Like, I couldn't believe you behaved last week.

I just want to tell you he didn't behave at first and we had to retape that so in any case i got way too dirty you know what they should have a law in florida against scott galloway being like within don't say dog dog near near anyone near anyone really um but i don't i just have a question because i don't understand this acquisition is it they're going to incorporate those technologies and flip them on and as a as a component of google cloud or are they looking to get into the consulting business no they need a consulting it's a consulting firm it's a consulting business and they're bad at it google's now in consulting it's sort of yeah, yeah.

Google's bad in consulting.

Like, Microsoft does a lot of consulting around its software.

Oh, really?

They want to be in a consulting.

They want to be consulting and also.

So they're going to wrap it into their bigger Google Cloud contract.

I need to speak to Sunder.

Plus, I want him as a friend.

I think he would save me for myself a lot.

I need him and you texting me late at night, telling me what a fucking idiot.

I don't want Sundar texting late at night.

He's a very nice guy, but he's not a very interesting texter.

Oh, smell you, says the woman who gets late nights texts from Sunder.

I get late night tests from other people not i bet you do you saucy me

i bet you do

like the governor of colorado and we will never be together as as opposite gays tarred terror

governor governor polis we need to call him by his title i'm telling you i'm already i'm announcing it now i like to have candidates right up front my 2024 ticket my dream ticket is senator klobuchar and governor polis um he said to me in an interview he's not interested in going further just yeah right none of them are every morning, they wake up in the mirror and they say, Good morning, Mr.

President.

No, I don't think so.

I think he's telling the truth.

Anyway, he has tons of money.

He doesn't need to, he doesn't need anything.

You don't run for president for money unless you're Donald Trump.

Anyway, let's go on a quick break.

When we come back, the Biden administration gives a tentative thumbs up to crypto.

We'll be speaking with our friend of Pivot, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld.

Hello, Daisy, speaking.

Hello, Daisy.

This is Phoebe Judge from the IRS.

Oh, bless, that does sound serious.

I wouldn't want to end up in any sort of trouble.

This September on Criminal, we've been thinking a lot about scams.

Over the next couple of weeks, we're releasing episodes about a surprising way to stop scammers.

The people you didn't know were on the other end of the line.

And we have a special bonus episode on Criminal Plus with tips to protect yourself.

Listen to Criminal wherever you get your podcasts and sign up for Criminal Plus at thisiscriminal.com slash plus

support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you a hundred dollar credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply only on LinkedIn ads.

Scott, we're back.

President Biden has put out an executive order on cryptocurrencies.

The order calls for the government to research into the risks and benefits of crypto, as well as possibly a digital dollar.

It's a plus for the crypto industry because there were no new regulations yet, but he's getting the agencies to think about it.

I thought it was, I looked, I read the whole damn thing.

I can't believe it.

But it was, I think it was bullish.

And it did talk about the problems of crypto, but it felt like someone's saying, you know, this internet thing might be good and let's look into it.

That's what it like back in the 90s.

And the crypto sector really liked it.

Others did not.

Ted Cruz didn't like it.

He always has the worst hot take on any current issue around.

But anyway, what do you think?

So every morning, my oldest, my 14-year-old, gets up.

gets showered, feeds the dogs, cleans up after the dogs, and is literally in the car with his backpack on and his homework ready, looking at flashcards and ready to go to school.

My youngest wakes up.

I have to go in there, wake him up, and then go back in three or four times.

And at which point he's gone full like plague, I have to plague.

I cannot go to school today.

And at some point, I start yelling at him and all he's said, he'll scream back, I'm awake.

Like, that's it.

I'm awake.

I feel like this thing was a giant.

I'm, we're awake.

We actually understand the words crypto.

We're awake.

Because I read through it and it said to me, like, they just want to say, all right, we're.

We're not asleep at the switch here and we're going to do something.

But I got no sense for what any of this means in terms of whether they're going to, how they're going to regulate it.

Well, they were worried.

Cryptocurrency people were worried about bad regulation, bad, quick regulation rather than thoughtful.

I don't think they wanted to slow it down.

I think they have been asking for regulation.

I think it's a good idea to get on this.

But I think they were expecting bad regulation regulation or people that are, there's a lot of sort of in the media and also in regulation, ah, crypto, they're all a bunch of grifters, essentially, which is not true.

And so I think, you know, I felt it was the right thing.

It was, it was measured.

It was like, we need to look at this.

It directed them to do so.

This digital dollar thing is interesting.

I don't know if it would work.

Again, I think it's the right thing to do.

You over there, you know, at this department, you do this.

You justice department, look at this.

I don't know.

There's 16% of the U.S.

population is invested in crypto.

I think lots more people will in the future.

It's like the internet.

It's like the internet.

All right, but I'm telling you, if your ass isn't in the car in five minutes, we're leaving without you.

Okay.

It's a good thing for the crypto people.

In any case, let's bring in our friend of Pivot.

Jeffrey Sonnenfeld is a senior associate dean at Yale School of Management and the founder of the Chief Executive Leadership Institute.

He's been tracking the comings and goings of companies in Russia since the conflict began in a list that's updated daily.

Welcome, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld.

Thank you.

It's an honor to join you.

A delighted to be with you, Karen Scott.

Thanks.

Okay.

So let's, I know you've been on a lot of shows, so I'm glad you remembered our name.

Thank you so much.

It's sort of a Kara Schwister schedule for these days, almost a Scottish day.

So let's talk a little bit about what you've been putting out in this list.

First of all, tell me why did you decide to start doing this?

And then let's go into the specifics of the list.

As two of the most honest people in public discourse about business impact on society, you know why this was needed.

This is the only interview where I would have to explain it.

So, but it's because the viewers don't know what you know through your lifetime experience, and that is the dangerous qualities of spin out there.

When the three of us began whatever it is we do, we could call early in the morning and often reach a CEO or find a way to trap somebody in a corner office.

These days they're so overprotected, overmanaged.

uh with lieutenants and and and uh palace guards around them that the spin is so distracting and misleading.

So as I saw a couple of companies,

war broke out on the 24th, we saw a few companies that moved early.

And I thought, well, that's great.

And you saw the Klingon effect of people putting out these gauzy messages with

quasi-trade group type things with trying to look like they're nonprofits or whatever they are, putting out this weird mixes of five or six of these good guy companies.

Wait, that's not consistent.

We're not accountants or auditors or economists or attorneys, but we want to unpack the language.

As we started to do that, we realized there's a lot less here than meets the eye in some cases and more in others.

And so we started to come out with a crude sort.

Now it's, we're up to 330 companies, as it's constantly moving, a little almost 340 now that have decisively curtailed their operations.

And there are about 40 that are intransigent and digging in their heels.

We try to understand that, but the impact it has

is

that the CEOs who had courage to step out in front

are often inspired the not-so-courageous CEOs or the ones who don't have the support of their boards.

So they do what people in the business jargon world will call the benchmarking.

They want peer affirmation.

So putting out the good guys' list, they can see there's a thundering herd there of people moving with you.

Don't worry, those who are worried about you.

Well, although most of the focus has been on the bad guy, not the bad guy.

I don't want to say that.

Because it's a difficult decision.

Let me just say, it's a difficult decision to do this.

And there's lots of reasons why you wouldn't or you would.

It's very complex.

They've got partnerships.

It's not as easy as I'm just going to stop buying, you know, Russian vodka or whatever people do, consumers.

So talk about

what the difficulty of doing this is.

And what's the decision to stay or go?

As you said, 300 companies have left Russia, but many notable ones remain in tech, Cloudflare, banking, Citi, Consumer Goods.

Kimberly Clark, which makes Kleenez, Huggies, and Scott Tissues.

Hyatt, Hilton, and Marriott are still there.

Whirlpool, Consumer Electronics, Mondelez, which makes Oreos, Tobleron, and Ritz, is still there.

Energy, Halberton.

Well, I didn't expect them ever to leave anywhere.

But well, others have left, including Apple,

Credit Suisse, Procter Gamble, American Airlines, McDonald's and Coca-Cola, ExxonShell, BP.

So

how does the decision to stay or go happen?

You know, not to

flatter my host here again and sound like I'm pandering.

Oh, please do.

There's a logic here, but it's not a logic we've seen before.

As we've both been tracking social engagement, all three of us, with leaders for a long time, it's usually the consumer products firms that are the first movers because they're very sensitive to customer feedback, boycotts, and things.

That wasn't the case here.

Nike, Adidas, H ⁇ M, and if you count Apple or whatever is consumer-oriented, those are almost the entirety of the early movers in terms of consumer goods.

Most of the rest of the the consumer goods, the packaged goods companies, the fast food, fashion fragrances were the last, or some of the last to move.

Who moved first?

Well, it's people that have entanglements, I guess, with oligarchs and complex state-owned enterprise things.

So I understand them pulling out.

They basically had to.

And companies that can't get product in because of transportation sanctions, okay, they had to.

But then there are a lot of others that were shocking.

The professional service firms, as long as we've been doing this, you have to admit, we've never seen the law firms and the accounting firms and consulting firms, Bain,

McKinsey, BCG, and EY, Deloitte, PWC, KPMG, Grant Thornton, and others that are now 16 law firms, they'd usually rather shoot themselves than actually take a position on geopolitical conflicts.

But it isn't consumer feedback that they worry about.

And it's not even the plunging response from investors that we saw on Monday as we posted our list and their stock fell on a day where the markets indices were down 3% to 5%.

Their stocks went down 25 to 30%.

No, these companies, they're privately owned partnerships.

It's the revolt from within.

You know, whether or not it's the pandemic to endemic stuff, the voice and independence or Gen Z or the Great Resign, but

the internal chat groups and the feedback of these professionals saying they're ashamed of what we're doing in there.

And then there are those who stay that say, oh, we have this big workforce.

And in the spirit of perestroika,

we went in there in the 90s as a brand of liberation and freedom.

We've built these bridges between East and West, and we don't want to shatter all that public trust now with the general citizenry.

And how do we go back in if it looks like we hate Russian and stuff?

So that is the tortured explanation.

It shows a mindset.

Sure, sure, but you have it.

So, Scott, go ahead.

I just should disclose that Jeffrey Sonnenfeld is a hero of mine.

I think if you were to distill the conscience of capitalism down to some sort of animated, it would look something like Jeff Sonnenfeld.

Jeff, I was fascinated by how the EU used bigger nations with more gravitas and put them in the room with smaller nations to get a unanimous vote or give them the confidence or the cloud cover to vote in favor of sanctions.

Are you comfortable disclosing who are your sort of go-to's in the business world that you feel have so much gravitas and so much power that you want them out front?

Well, these days they'll sound like they're retirees, but they weren't at the time.

But the people that I'll often go to just among we friends

is

that, of course, Ken Frazier of Merck is the gold standard.

You remember the last line in Enemy the People.

Ibsen says the strongest person in the world is the person who could stand alone.

That's Ken Frazier, of course.

And

Indra Nui is she married

the whole idea of

performance with purpose before he became such a cliché.

She actually shows that doing good is not antithetical to doing well.

Those are two who stand out.

There are a number of other in the media space that may surprise you, especially given the headlines of the last 24 hours, but Bob Iger of Disney has been

a less public but certainly firm standard bearer.

And I know you both know him and his space so well.

Those are a couple that stand out.

There's Brad Karp of Paul Weiss, who has been a very effective quiet agent for change in the professional services world.

So there are a few offhand.

So I'd also love to know that you have to balance, or where's the fulcrum between a very powerful agent of capitalism is the for-profit incentive.

And at the end of the day, these CEOs are responsible for earnings.

At the same time, they're also stakeholders in social capital in a much larger ecosystem.

How do you personally decide?

How do you personally draw that line when you see an issue around the pandemic or behavior or around the invasion of Ukraine?

When do you decide this is where we really need to call on folks and start putting pressure on them?

Well, you know, I certainly, as you have seen, the condemnation that would come in from

the right in the media labeling socially engaged CEOs somehow that it's an insincere political correctness.

And on the left in the media or elsewhere, just cynical of management, just seeing that they're out there similarly.

for cosmetic

reasons and that it's not authentic.

And there are a lot of good critiques on both sides on that front, but it's not fair.

The reality is, these business leaders are largely political centrists, and they're not driven by ideologies.

They're largely pragmatists and problem solvers.

And as they see issues,

and

when people on the right say, oh, do they take on this issue or that issue?

And then they talk about the slippery slope of every human injustice.

Does a corporation have to do that or take care of the shareholders?

Well, even Friedman, in the much misquoted, or certainly

misunderstood misunderstood statement that he wrote in the New York Times magazine in 1970, said that he talked not just about the shareholders, you know, the bottom line being the only responsibility of business.

He talked about something called social and community

responsibilities.

And in there, he talked about social amenities, which is actual term for it.

And it had to do with being a responsible employer and community member.

Even he acknowledged it, but it's been distorted.

It's sort of like

that

Robert Frost never said that good fences make good neighbors.

That was not the intention of his poem.

In fact, you read the next verse, he says just the opposite.

And Rudyard Kipling never said east is east and west is west, never the chains shall meet.

Until you read the next verse, he's saying just the opposite.

So there's been an arc distortion of Milton Friedman for people's delight and pleasure.

So it isn't a win.

People say, well, stay in your lane then.

Well, your lane is understanding the geopolitical context.

And it matters if you have a breakdown in trust in society that free markets, free enterprise doesn't work.

Great capitalists need to know there's trust in the system.

When de Tocqueville came to this nation in 1840, beyond any of our memories, he wrote in Democracy in America, not just about the spirit of volunteerism, which we all celebrate.

He also talked about a term that people think was coined last year, social capital.

And he said social capital is more valuable than financial capital.

And he saw that as distinctive in America.

We don't legally prescribe everything.

The laws are intended to be written to be loose.

We adapt to them because of a foundation of public trust.

And as that trust is being eroded for a lot of the issues we talk about at other times, including this one, then business leaders need to step in, whether or not it's patriotism or personal values or enlightened self-interest.

They all converge.

Well, I do know.

I do know they get exhausted too at the same time.

During the Trump administration, at one point, Texio is like, which one?

We're going to just split them all up and each take one, essentially.

And so, and they also have from the bottom, as you say, employees, and they've given them voice to complain about whatever the issue of the day happens to be.

And in some cases, like with masking or

the pandemic, people in the company have different opinions.

And so they have a real, you know, they have a real fight on their hands.

And some companies like have opted.

If you remember, there's a couple of companies that are like, we don't, don't bring it to work.

Don't bring those kind of things to work.

When it comes to Russia, it's been uniformly

do something about it, like do something about it.

So I'm going to take the other side.

Why should, why,

not that it's virtue signaling it why do why do should people do this why in this case with russia uniglo's founder for example said he won't pull out of russia because quote clothing is a necessity of life what are the drawbacks of cutting off a country in this way for a company

um i think in reality the drawbacks are are very much overstated a drawback is there'll be some residual ill will when the situation is resolved and they try to re-enter that market or there'll be a denial on some humanitarian reasons that Abbott Labs and Abvi and Amerisoris-Bergen are arguing that we need to be providing drugs in there.

And

in fact, those drugs are helping injured Ukrainians.

If there's anybody in Ukraine who's taking some pills from Vladimir Putin's factories, I think they must be crazy.

That we can't even ascertain.

the

safety of what's being produced there.

Nobody from those companies and the senior leadership, no scientists can even electronically surveil what's going on there, let alone alone personally visit.

How can they responsibly operate there?

I think it's dangerous.

I think it's a mistake.

I think there's not going to be residual ill will.

As we saw in South Africa, when those 200 companies meaningfully joined in the late 1980s with government sanctions, government sanctions, by the way, led by the U.S., were over Ronald Reagan's veto.

As you'll recall, it was Mitch McConnell and a Republican Senate who overrode Reagan's veto.

But the argument that President Reagan used was it was going to hurt the well-being of Black Africans to impose these sanctions.

And as Chief,

as Bishop Tutu told me personally, said, who is he to speak on behalf of us?

We want the corporate sector to give more teeth to these governmental sanctions.

And that made all the difference.

To strangle civil society, to bring it to a halt, is what they need to do.

That's what Gandhi did.

That's certainly how rid of Eric Honecker in East Germany.

That's how he got rid of Nikolai Tchaitescu in Romania.

It's when civil society fails, it shows that the tyrant is not the totalitarian success he or she claims there.

In this case, it's always a he, really, that has the stranglehold.

And that shows an impotence in the part of the leader that will lead somebody to fail to fail.

So they're received as heroes afterwards.

It's sort of like the palace guard in the Wizard of Oz, where after she throws the bucket of water

and the witch is destroyed, that the guard nails and says, hail Dorothy.

They'll be received as

the liberators.

So it'll be a good thing.

So there's a difference between Gillette pulling out and a Google or a Facebook or an Apple.

Some companies just have more impact than others.

We think a lot about big tech.

Are you comfortable saying who you believe in big tech has taken a leadership roller out around these issues

at the expense or the cost of shareholder value?

And rather than not necessarily naming names, but which companies maybe have been slower than they should have been?

Well,

since you and I like to name names,

I think Citrix has been been a disappointment.

I think Cloud has been a disappointment.

And with the

most of the most of the digital currency people, Coinbase has been great,

but the others have been enablers with a libertarian spirit.

They don't realize that they are serving,

they're operating as servants to a tyrant.

If you don't like totalitarian control, then why are you enabling payment systems?

And even if it's just skirting minimally the Swift system and Visa, PayPal, MasterCard, American Express, even the Chinese banks, despite what President Xi Jinping is saying publicly and equivocating, slightly leaning towards Russia, the China Industrial Development Bank has cut off, curtailed all financing into Russian companies, is that we shouldn't have our cyber currency people or digital currency people,

cryptocurrency people flooding the market there if it's even only helping the cognitive and the oligarchs.

It's a bad thing.

So those are the ones that disappoint me but shockingly michael dell who is you know uh

you would not be out there as you know screaming from the mountaintops flamboyant statements he's always more subtle he was a very first mover and tim cook uh very impressively and i'll say what we will on other occasions about meta and google and things they were right out front did this hurt shareholders no i think it was brand enhancing and many of the ways where tim cook has been such a forceful uh as you both have talked about defender of privacy sometimes it cost them a little in the short term but it was a huge huge return, they thought, for reinforcing the value of the brand.

I think these companies have done their shareholders themselves, their reputations a lot.

And they needed that.

And they sort of needed that, correct?

In some way.

Some of them did, for sure.

And I think Facebook moving quickly, and I suspect that's Nick Clegg's influence.

You know, even IBM moved right away, right up front in HP and their competitors.

Yeah, I admire that.

What two or three companies would have the most impact who have not acted?

If you could pick two or three companies to stop doing business tomorrow that would have the most impact who have yet to seize operations there, what would those two or three companies?

Well, some of them wouldn't have the greatest consumer awareness, but a number of ad agencies that haven't left, like WP did leave, that took out Ogilvy and Mather and J.W., J.

Waldo Thompson and Younger Rudy.

That was great, but late.

But companies that are there, Dentsu, it's just

some very bad stuff that's being produced with slick propaganda.

Dentsu should not be there.

Interpublic group, shame on them.

How could they still be there?

That would have some tangible effect.

Burger King, you talk about the franchise arrangements they have.

You know, well, others with franchises have figured this out.

Starbucks and McDonald's, which didn't have much as franchises, they figured out how to work around this.

Young Brands has figured out some bypasses, buybacks, curtailing new investment.

Burger King defiantly staying in there is, I think, symbolically a bad thing.

But Abvy and America's Bergen and some players that are that are quite large there.

Furigamo, it's easy to 1% of Furragamo's business.

It's just symbolically stupid.

Why are they there?

So those are some that I would go for offhand that just doesn't make sense to me.

And then the oil services companies,

what are they doing now with the blockades of Halliburton and

Baker Hughes and others?

Yeah, okay.

So if you were a Russian CEO, this is my last question, and Scott may have one more.

If you were a Russian CEO in tech or finance or consumer goods, how would you respond to these sanctions?

What is happening within Russia?

There's obviously

Wall Street banks are buying up up the debt of Russian companies right now.

How would you deal right now as a Russian CEO?

I would try for asylum as fast as possible.

It's hard to operate at the top of these companies in an honest, transparent way.

Right now, the leaders of those companies,

it's like being this CEO of IG Farben under Hitler.

What should the CEO of IG Farben do to survive?

They should resign and surrender their citizenship and get the hell out of Dodge.

What do you really think, Jeffrey?

Stop being so coy, would you please?

They're being so coy.

How can you not love this guy?

Sorry, go ahead, Jeff.

I'm replacing Scott with you now.

That was a good one.

That happened 10 years ago, and it's still happening.

Jeff, use this as weapons.

Let's just assume people buy into this, are inspired by the leadership you and many of these CEOs have demonstrated.

What can people in the media, what can people with platforms, what can consumers do?

You know, there are a lot of ways by taking a look at this list, and again, it's continually updated so we don't hear from too many attorneys within an hour, is

that they certainly affect their buying decisions, their employment decisions.

This is one thing that I think the three of us have had mixed feelings about some of the generational attributes that come along in consumer marketing theories.

When it comes to Gen Z, I think sometimes the baby boomers drop the ball.

Consciousness 3 has been knocked unconscious.

But when it comes to Gen Z, at least for now, overwhelmingly, it affects where they buy, where they seek employment, and where they invest.

So I would certainly heavily market towards where a lot of your audience is a younger, influential, enormous audience.

And the people who pay attention

to your show, your operation, and your podcast are the people that I think should be paying attention to these lists and affecting their decisions.

That's in a major way.

I also would like Gina Ramondo and Commerce Department to have a sharper eye on what some of these companies are doing.

Just between us, there are some universities that we should be holding accountable.

Up until last week, when I outed, don't cut me off on this, but MIT actually had Victor Veckelsberg on their board

while knowingly a sanctioned oligarch until we pointed that out and then he was removed.

And they still took hundreds of millions of dollars from him and others without publicly disclosing this

for very sensitive work on AI, cryptocurrency, and some much scarier things I won't mention on air that we uncovered that MIT was doing in a large way that other universities were retreating from.

And universities, as we talk about in China, similarly, have been making mistakes.

I don't think they were trying to actively sabotage national security, but there's a naivete and recklessness in the university world that we need to be, you know,

you remember Voltaire's Candide.

There was a philosopher in there called Panglos, who's his mentor advisor.

Panglos in Greek means windbag.

And he,

and what Candide's lesson was that I guess what we have to do with all the horrors in the world is clean up our own act.

It was, it was cultivate your own garden, Voltaire had said.

And I really think that's also an important takeaway.

We should look in our own employers, our own institutions.

How well are we doing?

And I think in the university world, I think we need to match the standards that we often use when we're criticizing corporations.

Well, that is speaking to the choir of Scott Galloway.

Scott, start to look into NYU immediately.

Anyway, Jeffrey, thank you so much.

We really appreciate it.

For anybody who wants to find this, the list is online.

We'll put the link in our show notes.

But, Jeffrey, you're doing really great work.

And it's really important to just, you know, show, not just tell, just show what they're doing.

And that's

my brother.

Stay strong.

Just drop it.

Just drop it.

I'll send the attorneys your way.

Thank you.

Thank you.

All right.

Thanks, Jeffrey.

Well done.

Thanks.

Bye-bye.

All right, Scott.

One more quick break.

You really love him, don't you?

He really does.

I think Professor Sonnenfeld is the most influential academic in the world today.

When shit gets real, we're talking about pandemic response.

We're talking about invasions of sovereign nations.

He is the only person that can overnight get 50 of the 100 biggest COs on a Zoom call that night.

I have a lot of interaction with Jeff.

He gets together, not only in the business world, in the academic world.

He brings together twice a year the deans and presidents, I'm sorry, the presidents, chancellors, and provosts of kind of the hundred biggest universities in the nation.

And he invites me to these things and he calls me before and he says, I'll say, what do you want me to do?

And he's like, I want you to provoke and anger them.

Oh, no, that's why you like him.

And then I say something stupid and he steps in and protects me.

Oh, okay.

But he really wants to catalyze a conversation.

And he's not afraid to call these CEOs out by name and say, hey, Cloudflare, get out of Russia.

And by the way, you know, I would just want to say to all these companies, you're eventually going to leave.

Just get out of there.

Just do it now.

Anyway, but

Professor Sonnenfeld, he really is,

he is making an enormous difference.

All right, Scott.

I'm glad that that's your hero.

We'll be back for predictions.

Your sausage mcmuffin with egg didn't change.

Your receipt did.

The sausage mcmuffin with egg extra value meal includes a hash brown and a small coffee for just $5.

dollars only at mcdonald's for a limited time prices and participation may vary bundle and save with expedia you were made to follow your favorite band and from the front row we were made to quietly save you more expedia made to travel savings vary and subject to availability flight inclusive packages are adult protected

Okay, Scott, predictions?

Predict something.

We did very well last week.

Two of our things went well.

Well, no, I'm I'm just doubling down.

I can't, so for the life of me, I can't figure out

when

so when Russia absorbed or usurped or whatever the term is, Crimea, Crimea, Crimea,

I could sort of,

you thought, okay,

on a risk-adjusted basis, maybe this made sense for them.

For the life of me, I can't understand the end game here because a stat that is just really stuck in my mind is

it takes five times as many troops to occupy a nation as to invade it.

This is supposed to be the easy part.

I mean, look at how fast we invaded Iraq.

And then look at how damaging and how difficult it was to try and occupy it or nation build and all the other brain dead things we did over there.

But I don't understand the endgame here.

And the only thing I can think of, and we talked about this on Tuesday, and it's my prediction, I think the world's largest leverage buyout is Putin is going to take the largest companies in Russia, take them private, and then he's going to re-dole out these companies to the new generation of oligarchs.

So my prediction is

going to find new oligarchs.

Well, this is my prediction.

I think an influencer is about a really big influencer in social media who's maybe Russian or maybe not, is about to become a billionaire.

Oh, interesting.

Because Putin is basically going to reabsorb all the industrial conglomerates, buy them on the cheap, and then he's going to start doling them out again.

Dictators and oligarchs are very smart at rewarding their allies.

They are very smart.

So Abramovich, who owns Chelsea FC, I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that maybe he isn't the genius businessman that his tens of billions would connote, but he happened to be Yeltsin's roommate and told Yeltsin to pick Putin, and Putin rewarded him with the ability to buy yachts and huge townhouses and one of the better Premier League teams.

So he's going to do the same thing.

He's going to take that shit back.

Putin came to power

by diminishing some oligarchs and ascending others.

And he's about to do the same thing again.

All right.

I like it.

I like it.

I think it'll be interesting.

I can't wait to see what Russian star gets that.

And he's going to take all these assets back and he's going to say, all right, sell it back to me for pennies on the dollar.

Or you're found dead on a bench in a London park and you'll still be maybe be worth $1 billion, not $10 billion.

And then he'll start re-dolling it out to the next generation of influencers.

He's more loyal to him.

He can't live forever.

Anyway,

interesting.

Stephanie rule last night on the 11th hour, which I watch regularly.

What time is it on?

11 o'clock, the 11th hour.

Oh, thank you.

Thank you.

Okay, thank you.

The former ambassador to

Ukraine, who never

fell into Ruji Giuliani's crosshairs, Marie Yovanovich, was on.

And she said, Russians might win this war, but they'll never win the peace.

I thought that was a great line.

Well,

when do they and when do we learn?

I mean, we both went into Afghanistan and then tried to hold it, and that didn't work out well.

It's their turn next.

It's also, quite frankly, it's a time for some soul-searching and some uncomfortable mirror gazing about what we did in Iraq and how many hundreds of thousands of Iraqis we killed.

And by the way, fortunately for us, social media wasn't there.

These people just didn't float off to a better place.

They were brutally killed.

They died under rubble.

Although, nonetheless, it's tragic what's happening to these people's lives and pointless.

I keep thinking, this is pointless.

This is so stupid

to do this.

And here we are.

And no one's going to win anything.

It's like Trotsky said, you may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.

That is true.

And it's kind of the failure of our species, if you will.

And that is that if we can't figure out ways to solve stuff politically, economically, we go to it militarily.

And amongst other things, war turns good people into murderers.

And it absolutely ravages a generation of young people who were born at the wrong place in the wrong time.

Exactly.

It's just, I mean, it really is a, it's kind of the failure of our species is that it still is, we kind of go through, you know, this, can we solve it this way?

Can we solve it this way?

And then we go to military.

And it's just military.

And I can't for the life of me figure out what his endgame is here.

I just don't get it.

I also believe that we are, and I'm going geopolitically making a big mistake, and that is we're rewarding his reputation for being crazy.

We're saying, okay, don't do this because he's crazy.

I don't think he's crazy.

Anyway, but I don't, this will impact us probably in more ways than just increased gas prices.

Indeed, in any way.

We love hearing from our listeners.

So if you have ideas for cities, we got so much response.

It was crazy and so many great responses.

We're not, you know, we're not going to be like, we're never going to pick a perfect place, but we are looking for one.

We're dating right now.

We're dating.

We're going to find one.

Toronto would be nice.

I love Montreal too.

Montreal in the summer.

Good bagels, stuff like that.

Good food.

Hottest women in the world.

Oh my God, I feel triggered.

All right.

Anyway, we love hearing from our listeners.

Even if we don't agree with you, we love hearing from you.

We love hearing from you.

If we agree with you, obviously more.

And please send us suggestions.

And if you've got a question for us, go to nymag.com slash pivot or call 85551PIT.

The link is in our show notes.

Okay, Scott, that's the show.

We'll be back on Tuesday for more.

Please read us out.

Today's show was produced by Lara Naiman, Evan Engel, and Taylor Griffin.

Ernie Intertot engineered this episode.

Thanks also to Drew Burroughs.

and Mia Silverio.

Make sure you subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media.

We'll be back next week for another breakdown of all things tech and business.

Care, have a great rest of the week and a good weekend.