Epic v. Apple, Facebook’s VIP List and a Friend of Pivot Brian Derrick on the California Recall

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunello Cachinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks Fifth Avenue for the Best Fall Arrivals and Style Inspiration.

Now Now you can do that, do that with the all-new Acrobat.

It's time to do your best work with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher.

And I'm Scott Galloway.

Scott, oh, you're calm today.

It's much different than

the hungover.

Are you?

Fashion week.

Daddy goes to some bad fashion week parties.

You go to why?

Why?

Why?

Because I'm 10 years years into a 70-year midlife crisis.

Okay.

And every 10 years, I'm like, I'm definitely too old to be here.

Now

I just managed to suppress that self-awareness with alcohol.

So I see.

I got a solution.

So wait, so you may have gotten so old that you're now cool again, like Larry David, who you don't, who has a slight resemblance to you in a weird way.

He was there at Fashion Week and he was talking on his phone in the middle of the fashion show.

It was kind of perfect.

Yeah, me and Larry David, that's a comparison comparison I want.

He's so talented.

Anyway, did you find any fashions you like?

Was it very lively?

I mean, is it COVID?

Do they care at all?

New York, I mean, New York's on fire right now.

Yeah, really.

Beautiful out.

Not that I notice good-looking people, but there are, from what I understand, a lot of them roaming around the streets right now.

A lot of parties.

I went to a

bar the other night, and it was so crowded.

I walked in.

I'm like, I can't be here.

This is just too crazy.

But I mean, packed, shoulder to shoulder.

And people feel cool.

The city feels, I mean, the city feels great, Kara.

I mean, it really feels very vibrant.

Yeah, I know it does.

I'm not thrilled with the packed thing.

I think we're still vulnerable.

But nonetheless, it does feel great on the street for sure.

It feels fun.

I just got here and I came from,

I arrived at Penn Station, which was not Penn Station.

That was a pleasing moment arriving at the new Moynihan Penn Station, which I had not.

So talk about that.

I love infrastructure.

Oh, wow.

It's really like Penn Station is really the armpit of all train stations in America, I think.

Anywhere.

I would say globally.

I would say globally.

And it's, you know, full of just filth and crazy people and people waiting and crowds.

And it's just, just grime after grime, just and ugly, everything.

The whole thing, highly inconvenient.

The new one you emerge out of, and it's this beautiful, it's not big, but it's a, it's not like grand like, say, Union Station or some others that you come out of in Europe, every one of of them in Europe.

But it's quite beautiful and lovely and clean and weird.

I was like, where am I?

This was something I haven't seen.

So I used to travel to New York quite a bit and I haven't been.

But it was a nice surprise, I'll tell you that.

The morning.

That's great.

That's nice.

Yeah, it was nice.

Oh, you know, you saw Larry David a fashion show.

You know who I saw?

Who?

I saw Jesus.

No, you didn't.

He was a cross-dresser.

Really?

Who?

Get it?

Cross-dresser?

No, I don't.

Oh, oh, my God.

That's a a terrible joke.

Oh, my God.

Awful.

That's why I'm here for terrible jokes.

Do you know what?

We're taping on National Bald Day, just so you know.

The staff just informed me.

National bald day.

Yeah.

Congratulations.

I choose to be bald.

I shave my head.

There's a difference.

I choose to have a hair.

Is there a lot of hair there?

No.

You know, I did it.

It raised literally, I was raising a ton of money in the 90s, and I was starting to lose my hair.

My hair used to be my best feature.

Granted, low bar.

I can't believe it.

I can't imagine you with hair.

I cannot imagine.

In grad school, I had a skateboard and a ponytail.

I cannot imagine that.

That's how you lose your virginity at 19.

That's how you don't get laid until you're a sophomore at UCLA, which is like dodging bullets in a shape of a wish I had known that, Scott, with hair, but not in fact we do not.

Anyway, I have really good hair.

But anyways, I shaved my head.

Yeah.

And all of a sudden, the valuations of all the companies I started in the Bay Area.

Because you look like Lex Luther.

That's really it.

Well, you look like an internet guy.

Like an MBA from Berkeley and outdoor plumbing and a shaved head was a recipe to raise money.

It's a thing.

It's a thing.

All right, we got to talk about some other things.

Speaking of looks, let me just say, Facebook and Ray-Ban, I want to unveil a pair of connected sunglasses.

The frames look like standard Ray-Bans, and they include a discrete camera.

Let's hear a clip from the Zuckerberg announcement.

We've believed for a long time that glasses are going to be an important part of building the next computing platform and unlocking a whole new set of experiences for people.

The glasses do not stream or post directly to Facebook.

First of all, I need to take this apart.

Ray-Ban is mine, Facebook.

Like, literally, that is my look.

People on the train today recognize me from my Ray-Bans.

And now Facebook is sticking.

Now, they can't put it in the aviators because they can't put their discrete cameras in there.

But everything about it is, I don't know what, what truck they lined up in front of Luxotica, which owns Ray-Ban now, to give them this money.

A discrete camera is not something I want from Facebook.

I'm sorry.

And we will talk about some other issues they had, some other stories today.

But what's the case?

It's also a copy of spectacles, Snapchat spectacles.

You know, it's so unlike them to copy Snap.

That's a bit of a shocker.

Yeah, I don't get it.

I've never understood the camera on glasses thing.

And I thought, I did think of you.

I thought, what's next?

They're going to put some sort of listening device into copper.

I'm like, they're literally.

I think this is passive-aggressive towards you.

I think it is.

Do you know it is?

Here's the deal.

Everyone around me got a pair to try, not me.

They didn't send me a pair.

Casey Newton, who lives in my house, it was delivered to my house.

I didn't know what it was.

I threw it on his porch.

They delivered it to my other tenant, Lauren Goode.

Let me just tell you, they are just Andrew Bosworth.

Whoa, hold on.

Lauren Goode, the other podcast host, is your tenant?

Yeah, now she is, yeah.

Are you like an encampment for media executives?

Well, the other tenants bought their own house, and so Lauren moved in.

Now she lives there.

Now I have two tech.

Yes, it's a tech.

It's a wayward home for tech writers.

That's what it is.

This is hilarious.

I don't get it.

Is Maureen Dowd in the basement right now?

Oh, no.

By the way, she wrote a great article.

I'm not even going to go there.

So I don't understand the whole Facebook thing, the Facebook and Ray-Bans.

Face raybands.

What is it?

I don't know.

I just, I don't understand these things at all.

It's not going to work.

I was there for the beginning of Google Glass.

The idea is good for workers, I guess, and stuff like that.

I don't think people are going to go around and do their life.

I think it's part of the metaverse thing.

Right.

He just doesn't have a new fresh idea and they're doing this and they own Oculus.

I don't know.

Stick with Oculus, Mark.

That makes sense to me.

Like, this is just, these never work.

The first Google Glass that came out, speaking of Fashion Week, you know, that was my most famous line of all time, Sergey Bren.

When they put, remember, they put them on a bunch of supermodels or a Victoria's Secret thing.

They were all like modeling with those.

And actually,

Google Glass are kind of cool looking, right?

And DVS were there.

So Sergei said, what do I think?

And I said, you've just rendered supermodels unfuckable.

That's really what I said.

You.

You're a salty little minx.

You love that.

Anyway, another thing, President Biden is a new, I don't want to talk about it.

Like, stay away.

Get off my lawn, Facebook.

Get off my fucking Ray-Ban lawn.

That's all I have.

It's passive aggressive.

It is.

I think they're doing it on purpose.

Let's pick Ray-Ban and not give a pair to Kara.

That's right.

House Democrats want a new privacy bureau inside the FTC.

They've talked about creating this for a long time.

They're asking for $1 billion to make it happen.

That's more than three times the FTC's entire annual budget.

It's not going to happen.

They were going to do a separate internet agency.

Not going to happen.

That's what struck me in this article is that the FTC's budget is probably what Facebook spends, I don't know, in six months on PR to convince people that they're not a monopoly.

To think about how much money we've been spending and how much, you know,

stimulus programs, six to seven trillion dollars, and literally, what, a half a percent of that?

Not even that.

I mean, just no, these people are outgunned.

300 million.

I know.

They have like a thousand people, something like that.

It's really, you know, they do need to reform these agencies to deal with the modern age.

And I've talked to Amy, we've talked to Aiden Klobuchar about that, if you remember, Senator Klobuchar.

And it's just,

it's the right idea, the privacy bureau.

The issue is they have to actually define privacy.

Like, what is it?

You should be able, like, you know, one of my tenants, Casey, wrote a good piece about this piece on WhatsApp privacy.

You should be able to report bad things, right?

Even in an encrypted app.

You should be able to do certain things.

So the question is, what is privacy?

I think it's going to be the big.

Well, I wasn't here, but every week I would pretend I was here and I would do wins and fails in my mind.

And one of my

wooden privacy.

This is what I would have said.

I would sit my 11 and 14-year-old down and go, okay, wins and fails.

Yeah.

You know, Preetz was on the money, by the way, but go ahead.

Yeah, he got that right in like a hot minute.

Yeah.

Preetz was right.

Anyways,

yay for Preet.

And by the way, in French, it's Prit.

It's Prit.

Why does he encroach on

the genius, which is the informidable force marginal line of the dog?

Anyways.

I'm so excited to see you together.

We're going to take a picture.

I love you.

Anyways,

Apple, the biggest fail I thought from a brand standpoint

was this Apple hashtag mirroring that went fishing on your phone when they positioned their brand around privacy.

And I was critical of a move.

When you have someone who's shot 17 people, a terrorist, and you get a court order, I believe that Apple should open the phone.

And then Apple goes, does a 180 and says, we're going to go onto the client without your permission

and start uploading images.

Well, no, that's not exactly what's working, but

when they were going to cross-reference any of the things that you're going to do, they've got to have 30 instances of it.

Then it doesn't go, it goes to a moderator.

I had Ashton Kutcher and Julie Cordua on Sway, and we.

I'm sorry, you're saying that for credibility?

No, but they have their wife.

Oh, what is that?

No, they run Thorne.

No, they run Thorne.

This is a big ADA.

What does John Cryer think of Antitrust?

No, he has Thorn.

Thorne is a big deal in this area.

It's been around for 10 years.

In any case.

Anyways, look, you're more knowledgeable than your

woman.

But you're right.

It's a bad look.

It's a bad look.

But not only is it a bad look, it's contrary to this whole, which I think was a brilliant positioning around privacy as a basic human right.

And then you know what the best brand move of the month was?

I'm going off script here.

Right.

Was Brian Chesky announcing that they were going to use their platform to help resettle Afghan refugees.

It tapped into the core product.

He does that a lot.

He did that.

And by the way, Charlottesville, he did that same thing.

The stock was up several billion dollars on the announcement.

I mean, it was just good for shareholders.

He's done that a bunch of times, things like that, whether it was around Charlottesville or the

Capitol March.

He cut them off.

Interpreted help, but it was about housing them when they wanted to come back.

He uses his, he's a little patagony in that regard.

Yeah.

Yeah.

And you know what your second best line is?

Speaking about privacy, the second best line,

just close second to making models on Foleball is when you said that people should people should wait, what did you say?

People should have secrets.

You said something along that, or people should be able to have secrets.

That really stuck with me.

I like that.

What's your secret?

Oh, gosh.

We're going to need a bigger boat.

Okay.

All right.

We have to get to our big stories, but I just want to say SpaceX is launching its first ever all-civilian mission to space.

The four-person crew will orbit the Earth for three days.

The mission is funded by tech billionaire Jared Isaacman, also on board, a physician's assistant at St.

Jude's.

The mission aims to raise $200 million for the children's hospital.

I think this one's okay.

I'm good with this one.

This one feels like it's a good marketing moment.

Real people are going in space.

It's not some ridiculous billionaire's joyride kind of thing.

I kind of like this.

I think this is the right way to do it.

Well, I would describe Virgin Galactic as being brand or marketing-driven.

Blue Origin being, quite frankly, ego-driven.

It's one guy who's decided to play with his rocket.

I think SpaceX is engineering-driven and he is better managed.

And look at the difference between the SpaceX and Blue Origin.

These guys shot up to the Klarman line, big fucking deal, basically going twice as high as a private plane.

Is that true?

Anyways, about 60 miles up.

Is it 60 miles or 60 kilometers?

Anyways, this thing is actually going into

near orbit and circling,

orbiting the Earth three times.

I mean, this is kind of the real deal.

It is.

These things make me very nervous.

I don't think people appreciate

how dangerous space travel is.

I mean, the term space means that there are like billions of particles in every square meter in our atmosphere.

Space wants to kill you.

That's exactly right.

Not only does space want to kill all organisms, space doesn't want to let any material survive.

No, nothing.

Things degrade, things decompose.

So

all of this, whenever they get off the launch pad, because you're basically taking several hundred megatons of a flammable fluid and pointing people and saying, okay, hold on.

And then, I mean, you just hold your breath because it's very dangerous.

That's not what happens here.

But if it doesn't, I think this is the way to do it, stuff like this.

Real people orbiting the Earth, raising money, getting people interested in the technology seems like a good way to spend money

rather than just doing a woohoo ride fly over the world.

I just find that irritating.

Anyway.

Agreed.

All right.

On to our first big story.

Apple is expected to reveal a new iPhone today, but the biggest update may be in its App Store.

That's because of a ruling in the Epic versus Apple lawsuit, which came down in Apple's favor with one big exception.

A judge ruled that Apple does not have to reduce the fees it charges developers in its app stores.

It's currently from 15 to 30 percent.

Fortnite Epic's Game Maver remains banned from the App Store.

However, because they broke their contract.

However, the judge allowed the developers can use the non-app store payments to get around the Apple store fees.

That's a big change.

It's a big win.

Epic still filed an appeal because it didn't declare Apple a monopolist, et cetera, et cetera.

It's a really interesting ruling.

And to me, Apple did win because they were going in this direction direction anyway with their previous settlement the week before.

And Mark German, who writes really well about Apple, was like, look, it's not that much money for them.

They were going in this direction anyway.

And most people will probably still pick Apple as the payment system.

So what do you think about this?

Mark German.

So let me guess.

He's your dog walker.

No.

Anyways,

yet.

Look,

this was...

This is an interesting case of the media deciding, oh, wouldn't it be more interesting to say epic fail for Apple, right?

And the the reality was it was probably more of a win for Apple.

And it distills down to what a lot of antitrust lawyers on both sides of the issue will say, and that

being a monopoly isn't illegal.

It's abusing monopoly power.

And what they've said is: okay,

my understanding of the ruling is the judge has basically said you've invested a lot, you've done a good job, people get utility from this, consumers clearly love it, they don't feel angry that

they have to wait for someone to come install their cable between the hours of one and five and three months because you have a regulated monopoly.

But what they've said is it's monopoly abuse.

You can continue to charge 30%.

You can continue to have somewhere between 55 and 85% market share, depending on how you calculate it.

But what you can't do is that once someone's downloaded the app, then decide that all tail activity within the app, you get a commission on.

They saw that as monopoly abuse.

So I thought it was more of a win for Apple, if you will, than for the...

I actually did think the judge did a good job.

She was very, it seems like she sort of cut the baby a little bit kind of thing.

Yeah, it's cut the baby 100%.

And I think she was very deft in doing it, but she definitely didn't go far.

She didn't want to be lose on appeal, obviously.

Now, Epic is appealing this, and it's going to keep going upwards.

But I feel like Apple was going to give on this.

I think German is right that people will probably use Apple's, you know, it's a couple billion in there.

They don't care.

They make so much money everywhere else, including the new iPhone, presumably.

So it's an interesting thing.

they could have, it could have been, they missed a really tough ruling.

They, they did not get the tough ruling that maybe many people think they deserve, which I think was interesting.

Have you heard anything about the new iPhone or what it's supposed to be?

No, I don't.

I haven't looked at it at all.

I usually go to Apple events.

I used to go to Apple events, but no more they're all virtual.

And I think they like it that way.

You know, they were so cool when Jobs was doing them.

They honestly were.

They were fun.

It was sort of like a...

It was like a Trump rally, but for tech reporters, I guess.

Anyway, I don't know.

I don't know.

They'll probably have a better camera.

It'll probably be sleeker.

Who knows?

Something like that.

I found an iPhone, and I just want to say to the original owner to please stop calling my new phone.

I will probably get it because I'm on that every year.

You get a new iPhone thing.

I don't feel like you get it.

I like my iPhone.

Smell you.

Smell you, baby.

Smell me.

Last thing, aside from this, I think Epic's probably not going to win on appeal, but you know, they've got a really good lawyer.

There's a woman named Christine Barney who works for them.

But

I think think Apple's not the focus of, I think Apple's moved enough that

they're assuaging some of their critics.

We'll see.

They're not the easiest nut to crack compared to a lot of the others.

That's all.

So South Korea did, though, pass law essentially banning Apple's and Google's monopoly on App Store payments.

This was the law that people were worried about, and that the Apple and Google tried to get the Biden administration to move in on, and they didn't.

So this law essentially forces them to use payments.

So they're going to have to just do this.

This is my feeling.

Yeah, but it it also kind of highlights that these rulings, they are going to have to change the law.

If we do, in fact, believe that

big tech's power has become bad for the economy and bad for job growth, and I think there is a lot of evidence of that, you are probably going to have to have a fundamental shift in antitrust laws, because as they are interpreted now, it is going to be very difficult for Lena Kahn or they can I just hope the FDC and the DOJ doesn't become like the Los Angeles Rams in the 80s when Joe Namath is literally almost in a wheelchair, we decide to draft him, or we take David David Beckham to the LA Galaxy.

It's like we don't need, we don't need kind of these formerly important and impressive.

We need people to come there and actually get shit done.

And so you don't want a dream team that then loses to Croatia in the semifinals of the Olympics.

I don't know where I got that.

But anyway.

In any case, you're right.

They've got to be careful.

Like I said about MGM last week,

they should not be pursuing cases that are not going to be winning cases.

They have to have winning cases, is what you're saying.

Yeah, it's true.

So we need to take a break.

And then when we come back, we'll discuss a new story about Facebook.

Not flattering.

I know you're surprised.

And we'll talk to a friend of Pivot about the California recall, which is today.

Thumbtack presents project paralysis.

I was cornered.

Sweat gathered above my furrowed brow and my mind was racing.

I wondered who would be left standing when the droplets fell.

Me or the clawed sink.

Drain cleaner and pipe snake clenched in my weary fist.

I stepped toward the sink and then...

Wait, why am I stressing?

I have Thumbtack.

I can easily search for a top-rated plumber in the Bay Area, read reviews, and compare prices, all on the app.

Thumbtack knows homes.

Download the app today.

Support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you $100 credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply.

Only on LinkedIn ads.

Scott, we're back with our second big story.

Even as Facebook claims to clamp down on a harmful speech, it carves out exceptions for millions of celebrities, politicians, and other public figures.

That's according to a new report from the Wall Street Journal.

It's quite a, it's a really terrific story.

Documents reviewed by the journal detail the use of a quality control system called XCheck, where VIP users are whitelisted exempt from the usual rules.

XCheck includes at least 5.8 million users and has various elite tiers.

In an internal review from 2019, it found that, quote, we are not actually doing what we say we do publicly and that, quote, these people can violate our standards without any consequences.

Facebook seems to have misled its own oversight board in describing the system.

What a shock, saying that it was used in, quote, a small number of decisions.

Oh, this comes as a shock to me.

I don't know about you.

Yeah, this is just, I'm shocked, Kara.

I'm shocked.

It's like the Melania thing.

She was asked to tweet to stop

the attack on the Capitol, and she said, no.

This is a new book by Stephanie Grisham.

I mean, like, I'm shocked by this, once again.

Melania?

So, well, it's a story that Stephanie Grisham, who was her press secretary, has written a book.

And in it, she said, she tweeted, she texted Melania, do you want to, we need to tweet something about the attack on the Capitol?

And she said, no, she wouldn't want to do that to stop the attack.

Anyway, in some ways, we knew this.

Facebook let Trump out of a lot, speaking of Melania, Trump out of a lot of things that other people couldn't, just labeled it misinformation when it was kind of forced to.

But the post stayed up.

Facebook says the system is designed to protect VIPs from having their posts mistakenly deleted or hidden.

So what do we do here?

I mean, look, this system is untenable.

That's the only thing I could think about.

I just thought it is.

I actually think Facebook should be elevating and deprioritizing certain individuals.

I don't think

they don't want to do that.

Well,

they are doing it.

They had their fallback position is we want to give voice to the unheard, and we want to give everyone a platform such that they could let really damaging, noxious content run unfettered, because a lot of that content

inspires engagement.

But they have been editing.

They have been making these kind of judgment calls.

So that's fine.

And I think they should be making those judgment calls, but they also have to accept responsibility for the editorial voice that they're shaping and putting out.

And that editorial voice has been one of the most damaging propaganda voices in history.

So yeah, Trump's brought this all into sharp relief.

They were sort of wandering around doing this forever and Trump

became the test case.

I like that.

Good stuff.

Yeah.

Good stuff.

But is that sharp relief unfuckable now?

Jesus Christ.

I brought it into sharp relief.

I think this company is and has always been that way.

But nonetheless, not as people.

Not as people, I'm talking about a company.

I think that this is, you know, one of the problems with Facebook is it just piles on, that they lie to the public or they, or they say one thing.

The other thing is the author wrote me back and he's like Jeff Horowitz and he says, well, I can't, but one thing, I didn't know it was this bad.

And two, that they wrote it all down.

And I wrote back to him, welcome to the Thunder Zone with a picture of Tina Turner, obviously.

And then I said, they write it down because they don't think there's anything wrong with it.

And they're proud of it even.

And then every now and then, one person who sort of...

leaves the building every now and then is like, just a second here, this could be problematic.

And so it goes to this idea of that they don't like any dissent within this company.

They don't have anyone in that room being an irritant to whatever.

They're just, they're all like, they're in violent agreement with each other, the people that work there.

Well, and this is, this is the problem with the group thing.

I'm on a board of a company and they were talking about, choosing my words carefully here, a merger with other companies.

And the controlling shareholder kind of busted into song why it was a good thing.

And

I didn't push back, but I wanted a discussion and I highlighted the other issue.

And the lead director called me and said that didn't land well.

It's important we get along.

And I'm like, boss, the thing that Enron's board and Theranos' board had in common was they all got along really well.

And it's not our job to get along.

Our job in a company and at a board and even among senior management meetings, and I hate it because I have a big ego.

And I was on an editorial call this morning at PropG, and someone said, Scott, that's fucking stupid.

That makes no sense.

And my ego gets all angry.

But unlike Mark Zuckerberg, I recognize, you know, a key part of shaping the crafting the right solution solution is evidence and respectful debate and conflict.

And the thing about Facebook that they've always held true to is the moment they put anyone with any gravitas or backbone on the board, that person soon leaves.

And anytime they bring.

It's more to employees, too.

It's these employees.

Well, that's right ahead of it.

They acquire a company, and these amazing companies they acquire are clearly led by leaders who have a viewpoint and probably don't back down when Mark Zuckerberg says, we want to give voice to the unheard.

Or we promised we wouldn't use your data

or make it interoperable with our other platforms, but we've decided to do that.

And then when these guys push back or gals push back, before you know it, they've decided to leave.

So the key, I mean, the key to

Facebook is clearly like, all right, everybody try to figure out what Mark thinks and get there first.

And that typically leads to very, very

leads to bad places.

Like the things they say, like, we don't do this, and then they do it.

Like, of course they do it, but they're actually proud of it, and they honestly don't think there's anything wrong with it.

Like, pointing out that the screet cam is a problem.

You should be like, it's interesting because on the Snapchat glasses, when I was talking to Evan Speedley, he's like, we make it clear it's a camera so that people know they're being recorded.

The Facebook one, you can't tell it is.

There's a small white light on the glasses, and that's it.

They think that's a good thing.

Like, that people are possibly being photographed taken of them and they're being recorded.

And that's the difference.

Like, literally, Evan Speedley, like, I made it big and yellow, and it looks like a camera.

So it, you know, and this is the same thing is they don't think there's anything wrong with coddling these people and letting them do what they want and then lying about it when someone says, what?

Like, huh?

Like, and I think their problem was Trump arrived and Trump has sort of blown this company, blown this company.

Everything that's happened to Facebook is related to Trump bad, like that we see the badness in it is related to Trump.

There's a bigger meta-theme here around.

I mean, the thing is, if you're going to screw up and violate people's privacy or weaponize the election, you don't want to do it once.

You want to do it a thousand times because we don't know where to look and what to focus on with Facebook.

We've almost become, it's almost just become noise.

It's become musak in the background, their total disregard for the Commonwealth and their incredible competence to lie and then still put on a smiley face and to get on stage and act like we're proud of the progress we've made.

And it's like, Jesus Christ, what progress is that exactly?

But just as dangerously between COVID, between Trump, between all the shit with big tech, we're missing so many dumpster fires.

It's like when the house is on fire, you can't focus on the plumbing.

And I was even thinking about, I hope this Bitcoin introduction in El Salvador brings some focus to the new leadership in El Salvador, which is a 40-year-old who used to run a disco, which is slowly demanding, and he's slowly dismantling the democracy there.

And

I hope the best thing that could come out of El Salvador is...

Bitcoin, Scott.

Well, I know, but let's talk about Bitcoin.

That's what they want to talk about, as opposed to this guy slowly but surely dismantling any remnants

of democracy in el salvador and there's just so many tragedies all over the world that we don't that we don't have the luxury of even focusing on anymore because it's such a shit show

uh deservedly between the pandemic but big tech has basically basically given it's like the war on drugs made us more vulnerable to terrorism because we were doing stupid things like trying to track every you know

any inbound drugs into the nation.

It just took valuable resources away from more pernicious threats.

And I feel as if the same thing is happening with big tech, that Facebook has basically created cloud cover for every other company that wants to do

bad shit.

But yet we go on, Scott.

Yeah, we do.

We do.

We move on.

We go to fashion week.

We go to fashion.

We go to fashion week.

I couldn't jump.

I'm wearing literally an old t-shirt and pedal pusher pants right here, sweatpants.

Anyway.

I move anywhere.

By the way, I do.

I do.

I hate to admit, I always get to people like, how's Kara?

Where's Kara?

On the train today, six people.

Yeah.

Six people?

Six people.

Nice.

People really, they're thrilled.

They're like, we're so glad Scott's back.

I'm like, okay.

Go on.

That's all they did to say.

That's right.

They like us.

They like us.

They really like us.

Let's bring on our friend of Pivot, Brian Derrick.

A political consultant who has worked for Lambda Legal and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand.

His Instagram stories were chicken soup for the liberal soul around the 2020 election, where he dropped frequent civics lessons and soothing electoral updates.

Hi, friends.

It might seem really early to be talking about the midterms, but the organizing and fundraising that happens in the next six months will likely determine which seats are actually winnable one year from now.

He continues to motivate voters at the local level on Instagram and through his platform Oath.

So he joins us now to break down what's at stake in the California recall.

This is very exciting.

So Brian, welcome to Pivot.

Well, thank you so much for having me on.

So let's give us some quick background here.

Explain the recall in like 30 words or less.

Like, why is this happening?

Essentially, the recall is an effort by Republicans to remove Governor Gavin Newsom from office in California because he responded strongly to the pandemic and fought for basic public health measures.

And Republicans have seen that as an opportunity to grow their base, fundraise in California, and try to recall him from office.

He also did some dumb things, let's be clear.

Like he did that dumb dinner, for example, at possibly the most elite restaurant in all of California.

Yeah, I think there's definitely blame to go around.

But the good news today is that he is very likely to survive this recall.

All data that we have points to him coming out successful and going on to run again in 2022.

That's right.

There's another election.

How much money has been spent here?

So the governor has raised to date about $80 million

through both committees that he's been fundraising through, compared to his nearest opponent has raised about $13 million.

So he's by far been the dominant fundraiser in the space.

Republicans have really failed to show that they were going to have a true path to victory that was going to allow them to fundraise anywhere near.

And how much are Californians spending?

how much are California voter I mean citizens having to spend to do this sure the the recall election itself will cost upwards of 200 million dollars and so there is a real cost associated with putting this on the ballot and asking all 58 counties of California to hold an election in the middle of a pandemic so first off and most importantly uh do you know who tournament giants bane is do you watch game of thrones i do They call me Giants Bane.

Want to know why?

He's the guy with the beard who has murder in his heart.

You look like a handsome version of him.

And by the way, I just want to shout out to our producers.

I asked for better-looking people and they delivered.

Brian, you are just fucking dreaming.

You are dreaming.

Enough.

Is that trader?

Isn't this recall literally the best example?

Just as Mark said, capitalism would collapse on itself.

Isn't this some evidence that democracy, when it's taken too far, collapses on itself?

When you decide mid-cycle that you put in place a construct, which at least conceptually is if someone is really upsetting the populace that voted for them and you get enough signatures, you get a recall.

Okay, that all makes sense.

But we're now in a situation where, if I understand it correctly, the sitting governor can get 49.9%

and a whack job conservative talk show host can get 13%.

And congratulations, Governor Elder.

Isn't this an example?

Shouldn't we be using this as a catalyst to revisit the entire recall construct?

That is a very astute point.

And to explain that point a little bit further, so the recall breaks down into two questions.

Question one, should Newsom be recalled?

And if greater than 50% of voters vote yes on that question, whoever wins a plurality or the most votes on question two will become the governor, regardless of how many that is.

So yes, it could be no

candidate has ever become governor in the United States in any state with less than 30% of the vote.

And so if Newsom is recalled, it would likely be historic that someone with very little support in the state became the governor.

To your point, I don't think this is a great example of how this aspect of democracy should function.

It's really through serendipity that we ended up here.

California has the lowest bar to recall elected officials in the entire country.

There have been 179 recall attempts in California in the United States.

Exactly.

Exactly.

And there have only ever been four gubernatorial recall elections in the United States, two of them, including this, in California.

And the reason that we're actually here is because

the original recall effort failed to get enough signatures in the time allotted, which again is the most time any state is allowed to gather those signatures.

But a judge extended for four months, gave them four more months to collect those signatures to

make this recall happen.

And so they only had a million of the approximately 1.5 million they needed by the original deadline and needed an extra four months in order to get across the finish line.

Yeah, it's the whole thing is just stinky.

So what are the major differences between this recall and the Gray Davis recall, which did work for putting Arnold Schwarzenegger in office?

I would say the primary differences are the political landscape of California has shifted left.

For the last three presidential elections, Democrats have won a greater and greater vote share of California votes.

And now to the point that registered Democrats

are outnumbering registered Republicans two to one in California.

So

if everyone were to go cast their ballot, it would not be a close election,

which is why it's just about turnout.

The other important difference between this and 2003 is that

Newsom's approval rating is actually quite high.

It definitely hit rough spots, especially after the missteps that we already mentioned.

But his approval rating has consistently been over 50%, whereas I believe Gray Davis was in the 30s

at the time that he was recalled.

Yeah.

Okay, Scott.

Do you think there's a trend or this will will represent that the pendulum swung too far

and there's an overcorrection and we might come back from this notion that state legislatures can boot a cut, impeach a governor mid-cycle, that at some point you just say, well, we have elections for a reason.

And if someone is unpopular, you get to vote for them in a maximum of 48 months.

And usually it's two years or less from now.

Do you think we're going to move back to just saying, okay, elections are where we decide who does and does not deserve to be in office?

Or are we going to continue to see this kind of,

I'm showing my biased, nonsense?

Is this, have we hit peak mid-cycle weirdness?

No.

I hope so.

I hope so.

I hope so.

That is why in many states, there's a requirement that an elected official is convicted of a crime in order to be recalled.

California does not have such a requirement.

My hope is that

this is the extent of people's short-sightedness with

wanting their electeds to be immediately,

to face immediate accountability for any disagreement, the public policy disagreement that they have with them.

Yeah.

Or say it's fraud, because there's been an uptick in the voter fraud narrative of Fox News in social media and stuff like that.

So there are all sorts of reasons why the 2020 election, in my opinion, was full of shenanigans.

And my fear is they're going to try that in this election right here in recall.

Pay attention to the voter fraud going on in california because it's going to have big consequences not only for that state but for upcoming elections they're doing this again like he's gonna he's gonna win because of fraud i think that that is a

possibly the most consequential outcome of this election um assuming that gavin newsom stays in office which i believe is very likely is

that Republicans have really

consolidated around this narrative of voter voter fraud.

Every election is a fraud.

Everything they lose is a fraud.

Exactly.

And you hear them repeating it across Fox News.

Donald Trump has chimed in multiple times about this election to say that it must be rigged.

Larry Elder's doing it.

Larry Elder's doing it.

If you look on his campaign website, already the no results are out for this election.

And already it says, and I quote, he's asking people to sign on to investigate and ameliorate the twisted results of this 2021 recall election.

Good God.

When we'd have no results.

A lot of tech people involved in this.

Chamoth on one side and Dave Hastings.

They've gotten strangely quiet, haven't they?

Like, yeah, well, no,

he's sending me answers to four questions I have tomorrow for my column.

But Chamoth is doing it, and then Reed Hastings is on the other side.

Can you talk about this tech involvement?

Because that's been funding.

There's not a lot of money on that side, but there is tech money involved.

And it was sort of started by them in a weird way.

It felt like it was started by them.

Absolutely.

So I think it's important for people to know that there's no limit on the campaign contributions that are allowed to participate in this kind of election.

And so you have donations of $1 million plus dollars being made on both sides of the aisle.

And so if you have those kinds of resources, I do think that People see the governor of California as being an important player in those kinds of tech conversations and public policy narratives.

narratives.

And they want to make sure that they have their voice heard in who's going to be pushing or advocating against any kind of regulation in tech.

It just feels like the Cold War, where we have the Soviet Union, one tech billionaire on one side, and we have America, another tech billionaire on the other side.

And then Vietnam, or these ridiculous recalls where they have proxy wars, where it ends up being Reed Hastings versus somebody else.

And

democracy is just kind of stuck in the middle.

It's these guys pulling the levers.

It's a weird form of Cold War.

It represents so much bad shit.

Too much money in politics, recall.

So I'd love, Brian.

You kind of swim in this stuff.

I'd love to get, we have a part of the show where we do predictions.

I would love for you to say, just kind of shoot from the hip on some predictions or thoughts around 2024 or what we are missing around politics wherever you feel comfortable.

Make some

give us some stuff that you think is going to play out in the next couple of years.

Absolutely.

In the near term, I think we are likely to see,

and I'm using air quotes here, a smoking gun come from the sham audit in Arizona, which Republicans have been dragging on for many months.

And I see that completely changing the direction that Republicans take for both the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential election.

A smoking gun that makes it adds fuel to the flames of conspiracy?

That will add a lot of fuel to the conspiracy fire.

You already have some Republicans who are claiming some twisted kind of victory out of that audit that's been debunked many times.

But I think that what we should expect is for Republicans to double down and triple down and to seek the rock bottom that seems to not exist in terms of questioning the legitimacy of our free and fair elections in order to boost their polling and fundraising numbers.

I don't see.

Except when they win, and then it's not a problem, right?

Is that correct?

That is correct, but they don't seem to know when that is.

I mean, for example, they continually question the validity of mail-in ballots, but of the 16 states that had more than 50% of voters cast their ballot by mail, Donald Trump won in nine of them.

And so they really don't seem to know when to quit.

And a lot of it's not based in any kind of factual reality,

but it is great for their fundraising numbers.

Trump raised 2000.

Right, exactly.

That's the heart of it.

So let me ask you, when did you decide to run this civics class on Instagram and your local election resource platform?

I got a question during the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a friend about delegates and why there were thousands of these delegates and who are they and how does it work.

And the simplest way I had to explain it to him was to draw it out.

And so I did that on a whiteboard, made a video and sent it over.

I also posted it online and that was sort of how it all began.

People really seemed to appreciate contextualizing what was happening in the news within our system of governance and the importance of

the structure around.

what was happening.

And so I continued to do that through both stories and posts and on my whiteboard and

tried to be as responsive as I could to people as they would submit more and more questions.

I also do think that it is a generalization, but true, that Democrats tend to look to federal government and federal officials to solve their problems.

When in reality, a lot of times the decisions that we want to be made differently are happening down the street in city hall or in our state house.

So, therefore,

this local election resource is very important.

Exactly.

And so, I wanted to push people people to look local and participate locally.

Is that the best way to get through?

I mean, I don't think they're dumb by any stretch.

My son and I had just a really fascinating conversation about politics yesterday.

I think they're quite up on things, but it's a good way to reach them, presumably.

Do you have a broad range of people looking at that or is it a demo that looks at it?

Because some of the best COVID stuff was like stuff on Instagram.

I have to, not just Instagram, but TikTok actually, especially.

Some of the, they also have the misinformation, but people ignore the good stuff that comes through on those platforms.

Absolutely.

I think my core demo has been Democrats who have felt really low or unenthusiastic or not included in the conversation, haven't understood where they can make their voice heard.

And that really spans all ages.

That's young people who are a little bit disaffected with the system.

That's older folks who might have lost a little bit of faith in the movement.

And so being able to show people exactly where they can make their voice heard and have the greatest impact, I think, is the best way to challenge that kind of powerlessness that people might be feeling in a really overwhelming time and brutal news cycle.

Right.

And in places they aren't.

Scott, last question.

Your picks are Democratic and Republican nominees for president of 2023.

Oh, good one.

Who I would like or who is most likely.

Let's do both.

Let him do both.

Let's do both.

Here we go.

I think the most likely.

We want your brain, not your heart.

Okay, sure.

I i think that the most likely scenario seems to be donald trump versus joe biden round two really so you think biden's gonna get there

and you think that trump announces and gets the nomination recent

i i yeah i know people are not happy to hear that i think that recent um that's what you're like tormond you like kick-ass take names you train egret to kill others

recent what i think that

recent recent tidbits and and headlines have pointed to Trump running.

I think he will be, I think he will clear the field.

I think people will run against him.

I think it will be very difficult to do so.

And I think that if he wins the nomination, or even before that, Joe Biden will feel compelled for the same reasons he felt compelled to run in 2020.

He will feel compelled to run again.

And so that's why I say that seems like the most likely scenario.

Who would you like?

If Trump does not run, I think we're looking at possibly um

pence or if it goes the other way

josh holly on the republican side do you think liz cheney has any chance or nikki haley or

i

do not see a moderate republican rising to the top in this climate isn't that weird that liz and and nikki are considered moderate

you're you're absolutely

somebody with at least one foot in

this reality that the rest of us are living in, I guess, is the only way that I could possibly describe them.

And then.

And then

likely Vice President Kamala Harris on the left.

Okay.

Well, there it is.

Brian.

Thank you very much.

We appreciate it.

Thank you for having me on.

His Instagram is at BrianDerek underscore.

And also his resource platform, Os, and vote.

Everybody vote in the election.

And then we will see what happens.

Thank you so much.

Thanks, Brian.

We'll be back for wins and fails.

Adobe Acrobat Studio, so brand new.

Show me all the things PDFs can do.

Do your work with ease and speed.

PDF spaces is all you need.

Do hours of research in an instant.

Key insights from an AI assistant.

Pick a template with a click.

Now your prezo looks super slick.

Close that deal.

Yeah, you won.

Do that, doing that, did that, done.

Now you can do that, do that, with Acrobat.

Now you can do that, do that with the all-new Acrobat.

It's time to do your best work with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

If you're waiting for your AI to turn into ROI

and wondering how long you have to wait,

Maybe you need to do more than wait.

Any business can use AI.

IBM helps you use AI to change how you do business.

Let's create Smarter Business, IBM.

Okay, Scott, wins and fails.

I'm going to start.

I'm going to start this.

I saw, first time I ventured in a theater in like...

two years, really, two years.

I double masked, the person I went with had some money and bought all the seats on every side of them.

So we were like not surrounded.

It was kind of interesting.

There's a couple of words for that.

First is white.

Second is privilege.

I'm sorry, David.

You know what?

I just went as a guest.

In any case, I didn't know this was happening.

In any case, I went to see the new Marvel movie, Shang-Chi.

Oh, is that good?

Fan frigantastic.

Really?

It was funny.

Aquafina.

It was amazing.

It was well done.

It was gripping.

Michelle Yao is in it, who I love, who she could do in.

She'd read a phone book.

I'd be thrilled to watch her.

But she kicks ass.

There's an actor, and I think it's Tony Leung, and he's really amazing because it's a very conflicted role.

This guy has to fight his father.

And I got to tell you, it was tremendous.

Really?

Trump is immense.

Is it okay for kids?

Can I take my voice?

Yes.

Oh, yeah.

Yeah.

There's not even slight amounts of anything in it.

I love that.

It's kick-ass.

And again, aquafine is amazing.

Everyone in it was great, and it was wonderful.

Thank you.

It was totally worth it.

Do you have a fail?

It was,

I do not.

Well, yes, a lot of them.

Like, yes, all these people dying of COVID still continues to shock me.

And then that story in the Washington

about the guy who couldn't, he had a heart attack.

He couldn't get in the hospital because all the

hospital, yeah.

The COVID people.

I'm sorry, they're sick, but fuck you people.

This guy shouldn't have died.

He should have been able to get on ice cream.

Well, you know, last week, our prediction, we talked about the lack of leadership from Biden and literally on queue the next day, mandatory vaccinations.

So just in terms of media, I love talking about media.

I'm watching a great series called Mr.

in Between, which is out of Australia.

I'm just fascinated with Australian culture.

Anyways, it's called Mr.

in Between.

It's with this really talented guy who also writes a show named Scott Ryan.

It's about a low-level criminal.

Just a really interesting, there's a human side of it that, you know, criminals have families too.

Anyways, but that's not my win of my fail.

My fail is I watched a CNBC interview with, I think, I believe her name is Deidre Bosa, and she interviewed the CTO and chief legal counsel of Tether.

And as far as I can tell, and the part of my brain that should be able to understand cryptocurrency has clearly died because I still can't get my head wrapped around crypto.

But essentially, Tether is sort of a money market fund where a lot of people who hold foreign currencies can't buy Bitcoin

with their Argentinian pesos.

So they convert it to this stable coin called Tether, and it doesn't create a digital trail for the triggers currency reserve restrictions or tax.

A lot of people don't want a digital trail around their

currency flows, or anyways, their capital flows.

And then they buy these tethers and then they buy Bitcoin.

And a dramatic amount of Bitcoin is purchased in Tether, the stable coin.

And Deir True did a great job of asking some very basic questions of what are you doing with this money?

And they claim that they're buying commercial paper, which would mean about one of the five or ten biggest commercial paper purchasers in the world.

And no one can find anyone who has sold them commercial paper.

No one can find an intermediary that is willing to disclose that they're purchasing commercial paper on their behalf and they're working with like Delta Bank of the Cayman Islands.

I mean, this thing, it was literally something out of a movie.

If you feel like a bald thing, speaking of

dumb, it doesn't reek like, it doesn't smell like Teen Spirit.

It smells like fraud.

And if Tether ends up to be not legitimate, the amount of cryptocurrency that is purchased with Tether, it could literally tank the entire market.

So my fail is the the lack of disclosure around cryptocurrency and specifically around Tether.

And I'm late to the game here.

A lot of people have done great work around this, but this smells like it could be really, really bad.

It literally sounds like a bond movie, like someone who has this and is

not like a bond movie.

It sounds like Bernie Madoff.

They won't disclose where this money is actually going, the securities they're supposedly purchasing with it.

Anyways, my win is.

Yeah, this area is going to be full of this kind of stuff for a while until

it gets to And have some sort of regulation.

And not that that's not going to stop some fraud, but

it does put.

My win is I think Carter, Jimmy Carter, was a terrible president and a fantastic ex-president.

And there are two roles, and you can have a lot of influence as an ex-president.

You speak with a very big voice.

And I think that

the individual who will go down, perhaps as great a contrast as there has been in history of someone who was a terrible president, but a fantastic ex-president, And there was further evidence, I thought, at the 9-11 memorial is George W.

Bush.

There is little cultural overlap between violent extremists abroad and violent extremists at home.

But in their disdain for pluralism, in their disregard for human life,

in their determination to defile national symbols, they are children of the same foul spirit.

And it is our continuing duty to confront them.

I think his decision to not only go into Afghanistan and then decide to build schools and set up a democracy in a small NATO nation,

and then use that as a jumping off point to Iraq.

I mean, literally first ballot hall of fame of catastrophic geopolitical decisions, a terrible president.

But I also think he speaks with a lot of gravity and heart and soul as an ex-president.

And some of his comments at the 9-11 Memorial,

I think were really courageous.

He's courageous about it.

I'm sorry.

I got to to push back.

I think that stuff, I'm not forgiving him for the whole thing.

I didn't say we should forgive him.

No, I know, but he's getting a pass.

Because he's so adorable now.

I think people give him a pass.

I think that was a great speech.

He should have said it a lot.

He said some important stuff.

No, no, but

he talks about that while there's little cultural overlap between

people who attack these towers,

they have the same disdain as domestic terrorists.

He said this a tremendous line that they come from the same, they reek of the same foul spirit.

And that was a brave thing to say for a Republican to say, these people in January 6th, these insurrectionists are no different than the terrorists who attacked us on 9-11.

I thought that was a courageous thing to say for a Republican.

Let me ask you a question.

Why is it brave?

It's the truth.

Why is that brave for him to say that we applaud people for saying what they should have said six months ago?

The only person who actually was.

What other Republican has shown that bravery?

There's been a bunch.

There's been a few.

That's one.

Kitsinger.

I know.

What I can't believe is the bar is so low that we can only name a few.

I just find it like, it's not brave to do the right thing.

I am shocked that there's not more.

I know we should give it to him because he does paintings and he's real nice now and he hugs Michelle Obama.

But I got to say,

where were they when it mattered, when it really,

they had a chance to go at Trump?

They didn't.

They didn't.

They didn't.

They didn't.

I think my win is George W.

Bush,

his speech at the 9-11 Memorial.

And I think he will go down similar to Jimmy Carter as a terrible president who became a very productive and thoughtful ex-president.

But I agree with you.

I don't think that, I mean, Afghanistan,

I'm with you on the Jimmy Carter part.

You with me on Jimmy?

Yeah, he didn't do anything that bad.

Like, he wasn't great, but he wasn't Afghanistan bad.

There's nothing as oppressive as a weak and feeble government.

And Jimmy Carter proved himself, in my opinion, to be a weak and feeble government.

Anyway, my win is George W.

Bush's speech at the 9-11 Memorial.

All right.

Well, we will go with that.

We will go with that, Scott.

That's the show.

We'll be back on Friday for more.

I'm looking forward to a good listener question for Friday's show.

If you've got one, submit it to nymag.com/slash pivot.

We've had amazing questions from the audience.

They've been terrific.

Scott, will you please read us out?

Today's show is produced by Lara Naiman, Evan Engel, and Taylor Griffin.

Ernie Entretot engineered this episode.

Make sure you subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts.

Or if you're an Android user, check us out on Spotify.

If you'd like the show, please recommend it to a friend.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media.

We'll be back later this week for another breakdown of all things tech and business.

Torman from Game of Thrones.

He's a political consultant now.

Nice to see him reinvent himself.

This month on Explain It to Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well.

Collagen smoothies and cold plunges, Pilates classes and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It to Me, presented by Pureleaf.

Olivia loves a challenge.

It's why she lifts heavy weights

and likes complicated recipes.

But for booking her trip to Paris, Olivia chose the easy way with Expedia.

She bundled her flight with a hotel to save more.

Of course, she still climbed all 674 steps to the top of the Eiffel Tower.

You were made to take the easy route.

We were made to easily package your trip.

Expedia, made to travel.

Flight-inclusive packages are at all protected.