Kevin Mayer exits TikTok, Palantir’s scorching S-1, and a listener mail question about cable news with Baratunde Thurston

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunella Cacchinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Sacks Fifth Avenue for the best fall arrivals and style inspiration.

Thumbtack presents.

Uncertainty strikes.

I was surrounded.

The aisle and the options were closing in.

There were paint rollers, satin and matte finish, angle brushes, and natural bristles.

There were too many choices.

What if I never got my living room painted?

What if I couldn't figure out what type of paint to use?

What if

I just used thumbtack?

I can hire a top-rated pro in the Bay Area that knows everything about interior paint, easily compare prices, and read reviews.

Thumbtack knows homes.

Download the app today.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher.

Scott is still on his luxurious month-long vacation, so I'm joined by the talented Baratunde Thurston, who was on the show Monday, and I'm thrilled that he's back again today.

Baratunde is a writer, activist, comedian, and host of the new podcast, How To Citizen with Baratunde launching this week.

Welcome back to the show.

Thank you for having me back, Cara.

It's

nice to work with you.

I had a lot of fun looking forward to doing it again.

And, you know, Scott doesn't want to come back.

No, we could work something out.

We could just work something out.

I know.

You know, something I'm feeling like a real chemistry here that I don't have with Scott, which is, you know, you're not offensive.

Not offensive.

Is that the bar you have for chemistry?

Well, you know, I don't know what to say.

He's actually a little bit nervous.

I think he's a little bit more most nervous of all the many great guest hosts I've had.

I think he's like, he was pretty good.

He was pretty good.

Here's the thing about Scott, given his background.

He will appreciate having more diversity in the marketplace, more competition to hone his skills so he comes back better, faster, stronger.

Yeah, he's a walking font of diversity.

None of us is the big dog.

No, nothing, I guess.

Anyway, I'll be happy to have him back, but I see him every week in this pivot live.

We did an interview with Google CEO, Alphabet CEO, Sundar Pachai, and then Tim Wu, who's the Columbia University professor on antitrust.

It was really interesting.

But let's talk about the topics this week.

There's so much going on.

RNC recap.

I mean, what, please?

I mean, yeah.

So I turned it off last night.

I was like, I can't deal with it.

It was painful.

I think

I hope that Kimberly Guilfoyle takes advantage of the other great feature of the state of California, which is legal access to marijuana.

She just needs to bring it down several notches, go on a retreat, do some deep breathing, some meditation,

and like breathe into this.

There's a lot of anger that's going on.

Yeah.

Well, you know, I met her when she was married to Gavin Newsom, who was the governor of California, who was having a really hard time, by the way.

Oh, yeah, yeah.

It was, she was calmer, but she was intense then.

She was really quite intense then.

But it's really taken, it was, that was the weirdest speech.

And I, you know, I don't like to focus on

what's really interesting is you don't like to focus on gender, but the women in particular have seemed particularly like,

I don't know, it's just,

I don't know, it's really, it's really quite unusual.

And, but the whole group of them, there's sort of like, there's this sort of tone throughout it.

It's very hunger games.

The music and everything else is very like, and now we will bring out the, the, the, this, and the, the aggressive

shows of diversity.

I don't know how else to put it.

Well, so here's how, here's how I see it.

I thought about this in a fever dream, so bear with me.

But But I remember as a kid, we always had animals in the house.

We had dogs and cats.

And those animals would sometimes get sick and they would poop or vomit on the floor.

And we'd use newspaper to cover it up.

And the RNC this week felt like the newspaper that we used to cover up.

the excrement left by these animals.

And

there's some true information in those newspapers.

You can learn something from it.

It's not all lies, but the larger picture is, your room is covered in excrement.

And I think there's been a distraction this week when people say things like law and order, where they feel free to just criticize entire squads of the country that live in cities.

And we don't do that, right?

We're not allowed to do that in reverse.

And instead, we're not going to acknowledge the kidnapping of children, the selling out of our troops overseas to Vladimir Putin.

And so we're going to wrap ourselves in a flag, but it's covered in X-ray.

And I think we're just,

they allowed themselves to focus on the small bits of truth in a really disgusting scene that they've allowed to learn.

Let me ask you, the harder question.

I mean,

is it effective?

Like,

the amount of lying was really quite astonishing, just bold.

It was a bold choice.

It was an Emmy.

There should be a choice.

An Emmy for that.

Yeah.

I don't know if it's effective.

We'll find out in November if it's effective.

I suspect that it works for people who are already there, who are already with them.

I want that to be true.

And I know that self-identified Republicans as a group are shrinking relative to other independent and Democratic Party affiliations.

So

I hope we were looking into a small cult rather than a truly effective case.

Well, it's interesting the uses.

It's very,

it's very autocratic in a way that is an American autocracy.

You know what I mean?

It was really, it was a really, you know, it's got, it was sort of stuck in the 80s.

I thought the Melania Trump,

whatever it was, speech was really particularly disturbing with the militaristic outfit.

I know she, she's very careful about it.

I don't like to focus on women's clothes, but she's very particular about what she picks, what she wears.

And she was messaging a lot through her clothes.

And then the walk down the colonnide, and I realized they took down those

trees so she could do a cat down it like you know what i mean like the the visual it was for the visual and and i was like huh and in some ways i was like wow that's a that's a commitment you know what i mean at the same time it was horrifying all they have is the personality you know if you think about past conventions they're platforms for up-and-coming candidates to make their pitch right there was one i think republican senator contested on stage this week, Joni Ernst.

Everybody else, they decided it was to their advantage to not be there.

And so all you're left with is the Trump kids and people who owe this man favors.

Like, yes, Donald Trump did a great thing for Kaylee McEnany and looked after her pre-existing condition, but that pales in comparison to trying to strip the health insurance from millions of people who might have pre-existing conditions by canceling all bosses.

He called me.

I'm like, that's what people do, your boss does when you have rest.

I was like,

he actually called me and I was like,

low low bar, low bar on the cancer thing.

And he pays you to live for it.

It was fascinating.

That was, he was like, or he was surprisingly nice.

You know what I mean?

And like, it reminds me of when we interviewed Rupert Murdoch at Co, at one of our All Things Ds.

And I said this to myself and then I had to catch myself.

I was like, he was, he was quite, someone was like, he was kind of avuncular, you know?

And I was like, don't be fooled.

Like, I'm, he was.

He was, he's really charming and pleasant in person.

And I was like, it doesn't, what he does is what's more important.

And the, the avuncular niceness was sort of like it was distracting from what the real thing.

And let me just ask you, you know, one of the things my mom, who's a big Fox news watcher, as everybody knows,

she was immediately drawn to

Tim Scott.

which I was sort of, he's like, he's okay.

He's very reasonable.

He's this.

And I was like, wow, that worked.

You know what I mean?

It was really interesting.

Like the mixing in of reasonable seeming Republicans Republicans with the others was a really fascinating trick.

And my fiancé pointed out, you know, they seemed very specifically savvy about painting the picture of people from Wisconsin and some of these swing areas,

the only places that will matter given the way we sort of do democracy in America.

So.

The flood of information that we talked about in the previous episode works because we're overwhelmed.

And so it's just the most recent data is the relevant one.

And I think the upside to that, for clarity, at least, not for the health of our democracy, is we will forget this entire week in a week.

Yeah, I agree.

And that whatever front this dude has put on, he will undermine on Twitter.

In the next week.

That's what I was saying.

Five, four.

And speaking of which, there's on their news.

There's

the hurricane, which looks like it's not as serious as they thought it would be.

And then the NBA teams halting their season in protest of police brutality and the Jacob Blake shooting.

I think that's going to be what people

I hate to say it, really care about, like this kind of thing, is they're not getting their basketball, they're not getting, you know, this is where, and then his reaction to it, which I think will be probably be bad.

There, there's also a such, there's a mean-spirited and um othering that happened at the RNC that I want to take a second to reflect on, which is it's it's very popular to just dump on

cities

and blame it on the Democrats and say it's needles and crime and drugs and riots.

And that's objectively not true.

But I think, you know, if we did this in reverse and said, well, let's do a sorting function on Republican leadership and COVID and count the deaths.

If we did this in reverse and talked about opioid addiction or unemployment or the net drain on the federal coffers from some of the poorer states and counties in our country, they're led by a certain party with a certain political ideology.

The Democrats did not do that during their convention.

They featured rural people and talked a lot about Jesus and tried to open the door.

And the Republicans expressed disrespect and contempt for more than half the country, you know, from many different perspectives.

And so it was a small convention made for a small group of extremists.

Yeah, that was interesting.

This idea of rioting.

You know, someone today, I was engaged with someone, I think it was probably a Russian bot, but they were like, oh, you know, they're not, nobody's writing about the crimes, you know, the crimes going up in New York.

And I literally just Googled news,

murder New York, and there was like hundreds of articles.

And I go, it's called Google.

It's, of course, it was covered, you imbecile.

Like, it was just, it was, they was like, crickets.

I'm like, crickets?

What do you think?

Does it bring you some level of joy to engage with questionably human beings?

No, because avatars.

No.

It's a disease.

Do you need to do this?

I don't know.

I don't know.

Anyway, speaking of things things that actually are working in a weird way and not a good way, we're going to get on to big stories.

TikTok CEO Kevin Mayer has unexpectedly stepped down from the role at the company that he took four months ago.

In a memo to employees, Mayer said the changes on the app and pressures from the Trump administration prompted him to leave.

Mayer had said a big draw to the company was its global nature.

He was a trusted executive at Disney prior to joining TikTok, was in line to one of the CEO possible choices.

He did not get that job, but he was right at the top of Disney.

Earlier this week, TikTok sued the federal government for Trump's executive order and banning the app in the U.S.

So, you know, this is interesting.

So, you know, we interviewed Vanessa Pappas, who is a former Google executive who's running the U.S., who's now taken over for him.

Is this working?

Is this idea of sort of ruining TikTok, which I think Mark Zuckerberg, it's his favorite thing to have happen?

Is it working?

This is something where Zuckerberg and the president are aligned.

And I I just want to give kudos to Sarah Cooper.

Clearly, she's gotten through.

And this is all an attempt to shut down her very effective mockery of our president on that platform.

Wow.

You're going to talk about going for censorship.

I think I'm on the outside of this.

I don't know a ton of TikTok insiders.

I'm not a big TikToker myself, but it looks to me like this man stepping down makes sense.

He didn't sign up for this.

And it's a flash of both realistic threats to his business and his power, and also a bit of fear that this pseudo-authoritarian way of going about it, he's kind of read the coverage.

And it's like, this isn't going to end well.

So I think as much as there is legitimacy to challenging and questioning how Chinese companies and the Chinese government enter various markets and don't allow the reverse.

I think this just looks like intimidation and very political in how it was pulled off.

And there's a counter lawsuit.

But I think for this person who probably has other executive and high-compensating options out there, it's a big headache.

So, that's a very, you know, he was going to be a billionaire.

They were going to take this company public.

And this was his big shot to run like a very big company.

And so, you know, it's obviously going to be sold.

The Rush sale is ridiculous.

That's why the lawsuit is here.

So, it delays everything that Trump has been trying to do, which is Russia deal, which is kind of ridiculous on so many levels because it's a very different.

Oh, that's funny.

That was a turn of phrase.

I thought you said Russia.

No, China dealt.

Sorry.

Russia's in there always.

But

this deal, it's a very, you know, I've talked to a lot of security people.

In doing this, it's very difficult to shift the platform.

Even a company like Microsoft, who is one of the lead possible purchasers for this.

And didn't really want to buy it at first.

They wanted to make an investment in it.

And then presuming it was going to go public, et cetera, et cetera.

Sort of similar to the way Facebook did, because Microsoft took a big investment very soon after went public, which is, I think, what Kevin Mayer was hoping for.

You know, slowing this whole thing down till after the election, I think is the goal.

And then presumably

Trump will back off on the Chinese stuff.

You know, a lot of it, this whole idea of China, which was another thing at the convention, was that this was a China virus.

They're trying to get us, the threats of China.

That's Peter Navarro, who is, I think, one of the most particularly.

Trade representative.

Yeah.

Yeah, whatever.

He's, you know, he's a chucklehead, really, and inaccurate almost completely on lots of stuff, but he seems to have the ear of the president.

And,

you know, it just keeps continuing this.

And so it's basically wrecked a business that had so much promise.

And we'll see how it affects the company itself, but it can't help but do that.

And that's, I think, the goal here.

And I think delaying it and slowing it down is the smart move.

Is there something

when you talk to more CEOs than I do?

And

does the fear and concern about an unstable business environment extend beyond uh a chinese-owned tech company does it make them all nervous that a weaponized u.s regulatory environment by a mercurial president could be coming for them next

well no because you know he started off by doing all those tweets like he just didn't want a good year and they at first they were very nervous and now they're like

you know what i mean it didn't really happen in fact in this case he's got a if you're owned by china yes you have an president has enormous uh power around national security if he declares national security most of these things are not that so he can't he doesn't have most of his things like his executive order on 230 and some other things they're just toothless they're they're you know a lot of like i'm gonna build the wall and then he just does it and i think the other thing i want to know is does anybody have a heads up on the tweet so that they can make money off of him because he does yes i mean that's

the market and that's

sort of it's not moving as it did at the beginning of his administration everyone's on to him essentially it's These are tricks that they use.

He does the same thing over and over again.

And so I think one

person who I talked to was worried about what, if

he wins the autocratic nature, will he start to go after, sort of reward people that he is close with and hurt people that are sort of anti-Trump.

And a good example here is Oracle suddenly entering the picture.

The least likely company to be here.

I don't care what they say.

They're incompetent to the task to do this.

And they're a stalking horse, obviously, and they've been brought in by

some of the other owners, which are U.S.

venture firms, two of which are close to the Trump administration,

and

people who work there are particularly close.

And so they've been brought in as a pal of Trump's to make the price go up and possibly force Microsoft into giving a VIG to the U.S.

government, which is just unprecedented.

And I think that's what it is.

And then the person you focus in on, obviously, is Jeff Bezos, who is sort of,

he's lost it.

he's in court about it, the Defense Department award that was very well.

And that's a really important business for Amazon to go into.

You know, they've got it, they have to get bigger because they're so big.

They're to government contracting the way Elon Musk has a way.

A lot of these companies have Microsoft.

And so it's really,

it's a real fine line because he can hurt them in things like that.

And that's, you know, Jeff's lucky because he's got a business everybody loves.

So I'm at him easily, but the postal Service is one way to do it.

There's all kinds of ways.

It just doesn't work very well.

You know, it's real hard to take down.

And if I was a betting person, I'd bet on Jeff Bezos and not Donald Trump.

Jeff Bezos follows through with things.

He's a vicious competitor.

So long as it remains one man, as opposed to an entire infrastructure of media and politics,

if you look at you can tear down the reputation and reduce trust in institutions broadly.

And I think that's part of what the attempt with the president and the postal service is.

Let's reduce confidence in this thing that everybody loves.

And so if he can point that at particular businesses

over time consistently and he stays in power, then I think there might be a greater risk of, oh, I guess I'm not supposed to trust this thing because the president told me not to.

And Fox News told me not to.

And this senator, who seems like a really nice, you know, ball-headed, articulate black guy, told me not to, too, because he co-signed on it.

He's not going to be able to do that.

I think Keith Scott, I think he fighting, picking a fight with Jeff Bezos is not one I would do.

I mean, it's interesting because when they were, you know, when his, his sex came out, you see how he hit back hard.

He just said, yeah, here they are.

You know what I mean?

And so he's a very different, he's

tough.

I wouldn't cross him.

And I think, and he's highly competent as opposed to the president.

And so it'll be interesting to see if he, he would be, Amazon would be the company.

They're also looking, investigating Google and not Facebook.

And the FTC is investing in Facebook, but that's been slow rolled, the Facebook investigations.

And they have the most exposure in terms of emails and other proof that they've been trying to shut down competition.

But we'll see.

We'll see.

And I think in a Biden administration, mostly they'll be hands-off for tech.

So that would be their

a Biden administration, even though Facebook is advantage in this, is probably better for everybody because they'll not do anything.

I don't think a Biden administration would do nothing.

I think there's too much pressure.

on the left and the right to deregulate to i'm sorry to regulate and break up these companies uh to some degree and he probably had a handshake deal with elizabeth warren which is like i'm going to copy and paste some of your plans and get this done.

But he won't be wildly, whimsically, interpersonally savage about it.

And there'll be a thing called a process.

He talked about removing 230.

I don't think he knows, Biden knows what he's talking about, but certainly Elizabeth Warren is head of the FTC, which is what my prediction was.

All right, Barrettonday, let's go on a quick break and come back to talk about Palantir and its IPO and a listener mail question.

Every day, millions of customers engage with AI agents like me.

We resolve queries fast.

We work 24-7 and we're helpful, knowledgeable, and empathetic.

We're built to be the voice of the brands we serve.

Sierra is the platform for building better, more human customer experiences with AI.

No hold music, no generic answers, no frustration.

Visit sierra.ai to learn more.

Support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you a hundred dollar credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply only on LinkedIn ads.

And we are back.

Controversial data mining company Palantir filed to go public this week.

A lot of companies did.

A lot of tech companies did.

Palantir works with governments and law enforcement to analyze and process their data and has had several contracts with the U.S.

government, including with ICE.

A reminder: Peter Thiel, one of the company's founders, is a Donald Trump campaign donor and supporter.

In a letter to investors, CEO Alex Karp threw some serious shade at other Silicon Valley companies without naming names.

He wrote: The engineering elite of Silicon Valley may know more about building software, but they do not know more about how society should be organized or what justice requires.

Our company was founded in Silicon Valley, but we share fewer and fewer of technologies, values, and commitments.

Is that a dog whistle?

The company had a valuation of 20 billion, expected to be the biggest IPO since Uber, until Airbnb goes public.

That is, um, so

here we are, speaking of that topic.

Uh,

Hands up for the S1 filings and just

the potential to stir the pot with that.

That is some very expensive reday trolling going on there.

And whether I agree with the statements or not, I just got to give credit.

That was sharp.

I like that.

I like that use of a regulatory filing to crochet at one stage.

You know, in the filings, the letter adds, the company won't be working with China.

You know, it's just, it's really, it's really, the politicization of politicization of this stuff is really you know and of an s1 it's just i just don't even get it i just don't i don't know what the point is i don't know what the goal is it's it's again it's a dog whistle to the trump people um

yeah i think that's they're they're seeking favor they're currying favor with the would-be autocrat and like you said signaling We're on your team.

We stand with you.

We co-sign on the things you do.

And we're going to start calling people enemies without quite saying that word, but they're other than that.

Yeah, what's interesting is sort of the idea of how much these companies need to work with the government.

And they do, because you look at the numbers for Google or Amazon or Microsoft or any of them or Apple even.

Now Apple does not work with the government, in fact, has been at cross purposes with the government many times.

But they need to move into government work.

They really do because that's where the big money is.

Elon Musk just broke the defense contractors stranglehold by getting a huge, a huge contract, which I think he probably had a lot of pushback from defense contractors, I'm guessing, although he's been somewhat favorable to the Trump administration.

It's not clear sometimes what he's doing.

But, you know, this idea, you know,

that is the understatement of the decade.

It's not clear sometimes what Iran's doing.

It's not clear.

You never know what he could come out with at any time, but he's a complex person, I would say.

This idea that you have to be this political

and then you have to move in, especially when employees are such as Google, for example, have pushed the company away from this kind of stuff.

Amazon's very deep into some of this stuff with recognition and some other things.

And all of them are very, and with ICE, you know, Salesforce got dragged into that.

When you're a company now, when you have these issues around ICE or

drones or whatever, or whatever it is, what do you do?

How does it look?

Do you have to signal on the other side where the people that won't spy on

protesters or i think it's worth a pause to understand like what palantir is um i didn't know until this week where the word came from i did that it's this lord of the rings reference to the evil eye of sauron's glow so that's that's troubling that you're going to take sauron's tool and use it for what um you know these tech tools are supposed to be neutral but you signaled from the beginning that you're on the side of evil not too exciting i think it is going to be increasingly important for leaders in these businesses to question the use of their tools.

We're not in the Pollyano and naive world of, oh, I'm just, I'm just trying to make the world a better place.

I'm just going to like technology will fix it.

It'll make education better because we gave a kid a laptop.

Like, that's not how this works.

So it's not entirely surprising that there's a politicization of the S1 because tech has been politicized because it's being abused.

And in policing, which is where Palantir works in law enforcement, the idea of this body, which is already so unaccountable, and we see so dramatically this week with Jacob Blake and what's happening in Kenosha, that they have the tools to type in a protester's name into their magic box and suck in all this data that they've been collecting, that deserves being questioned.

We need FOIA requests and things like that.

So if you're a tech CEO, and you recognize you sit on top of this immense power, you've got to wrestle with it.

There's no easy answers.

It's not like, I do it, I don't do it.

But you've got to wrestle and listen to the customers and listen to the people and listen to our constitution

and listen to your employees as we figure out how we regulate and have some reasonable use of some of this.

But why go out on a limb on one side?

Like

sitting in the middle, like, look, Jeff Bezos is again deep into recognition, very controversial.

You know, it's a part of AWS.

Because I think our current environment has forced us to.

It would not have been as controversial for a tech company to work with immigrations and customs enforcement if that agency had not kidnapped hundreds of children and intentionally lost the records around them and created these criminal prison camps on the border in violation of human rights.

Like, so working for the government, quote unquote, is one thing.

Co-signing on massive public human rights violations against children in plain sight,

that's not a neutral act anymore.

That is an act of inhumanity, and you got to speak against that.

We all have an oath to stand up for human rights, regardless of who's in the government and the fact that it's not.

Yeah, and you foresee the heat ray thing,

this idea.

This is another tech thing.

They were doing some extreme immigration policies in the first four years as a pitch, which is putting

heat rays designed by the Miller-Jamaica.

Let me read this from the New York Times, designed by the Miller-Jamaic people's.

This afternoon, a separate meeting with top leaders suggested suggested deploying a microwave weapon, a heat ray designed by the military to make people's skin feel as if it was burning when they got within range of its invisible beams.

It's like a dog fence.

I can't even begin to understand what it's called, the active denial system.

Let me just say it was

developed by the military as a crowd dispersal tool two decades ago.

The active denial system has been largely abandoned amid doubts over its effectiveness and morality.

I mean, yeah, I did a show a long time ago for Science Channel called The Future of, and I got hit with one of these non-lethal weapons, as they were called.

It was a noise machine, and my head hurt for half the day after that.

And I doubled, there's footage somewhere of me looking like I got punched because I just doubled over from this pain.

The other challenge with this stuff, Kara, is Who do these get tools get used against?

When we say law and order, when we say law enforcement, it's being used against the least of us, the least wealthy, the least politically powerful.

If we were going to take the magic of palant here and its ability to suck records in from all these different data sources, I would be more okay with it if we used it for dirty cops.

Right.

Why don't we use those records?

Why don't we use it to find the pedophile priests?

You know, like there's another way to do this, but it turns out we're just handing the tools over to those who abuse power in the first place.

And that's imbalanced.

A lot of these tools have been.

There have been some amazing things that Google and others have done around children and pedophiles and things like that.

Like a lot of these things, they can be, you know, I use the expression tools and weapons.

And what's happened here is that a company like Palantir has weaponized things.

And the Trump administration is willing to look into things like heat rays and things like that that have been discarded.

You know,

has been discarded as immoral and are right up there saying, why not?

Yeah, I just I think it's a good test of someone's intent, who they want to give this power to and who they want it to be used against.

And if you're telling me that you're going to use a palantir like, you know, Lord of the Ring Sauron Orb to find tax dodging, to find corruption in the halls of great power, to find the cops who've been fired from three different departments but managed to get hired again so they can kill again,

then we can have a conversation.

But if you're just going to use it on people who already have so little or protesters, which that heat ray thing is probably going to be used on, then we got ourselves a problem.

Well, you know, the problem is they all work both ways.

And that's the question of who's deploying it.

Like, you know, I always use the example of a knife.

Like, look, a knife

cuts all kinds of good food and things like that.

And it also is.

But Palantir is not a knife.

It is like an automated high-speed switchblade in the hands of a demon.

You know, like, that's not a fair fight.

Okay.

Please buy our stock.

We're going public at a valuation of $20 billion.

Yeah, just in terms of the imbalance, not that people, not that everyone uses it as a demon.

They're the ones who grounded it in Sauron.

Like, I didn't do that.

That was Peter Thiel.

They were built as they were 100%.

You leaned into it.

So anyway,

that company deserves a lot of scrutiny.

I hope investigative reporters who have written a lot about it will continue to do so.

Okay, Baratunde, let's take a listener question.

Let's go to the tape.

Hey, Kara and Baratunde.

I loved your episode earlier in the week.

My question relates to the media world.

Next, our media group and WGN America are launching a prime-time cable newscast next week.

It starts on Tuesday.

They're promising unbiased news in that time slot, which you don't find on the other cable channels.

It's all opinion shows.

The company's invested a lot of money.

I'm very curious what your prediction is.

Is there a lane for them, especially with CNN moving into opinion in recent years and such a divided time in American politics?

This is an excellent question, Bertundi.

Let me give you my quick thought is

I think the problem, and I agree, CNN has lost its narrative the same way.

You know, I think MSNBC does a little better, but one of the things I keep thinking about, why not just have reporters there instead of all these pundits?

That's what they've really moved into.

Like it would be, if there was a show where you actually had people who've done reporting talking about it, that would be so helpful to people.

Like, you know, rather than these quick reductive takes.

And it's one of the reasons I seldom go on cable.

I seldom do, because it does, it plays into a desire to say something quick and dirty, essentially.

How do you look?

I think there is room for this, but maybe I'm wrong at this point.

Maybe we're all wrong.

It's always possible.

I just want to give this caller kudos for perfectly pronouncing Baratunde.

Well done.

I'm a big fan of you.

Thank you so much for that.

I agree that what we could use more of is actual journalism and less opinions about the journalism that the host has read

if we're going to try to create a new lane.

I sadly don't think that this is going to be very successful.

It's a mild prediction, but I think we are so pushed into corners and there's so much money

encouraging us to have this quick reaction that this probably won't cater to a huge and growing market.

What I would love to see, and this is coming out of Chicago, which is interesting, is more local news.

And what we need, I think, as a democracy is to fund local news.

So, if someone were going to be throwing money into the news business right now, I'd say support local newsrooms, local news gathering, and create a network of those that can feed up into something like this and maybe into a CNN and a Fox News and an MSNBC.

But we're missing that ground layer.

And so that gives all the punditry even less.

It's really interesting because the idea of unbiased news, and the executive behind it said, we're so sick and tired of polarization of news, news should not be polarizing.

But you know, you every bit of news, like here's the city, there are policeful protests, and there is some looting.

And now it's either mobs or there's no, you know, it's not that bad.

When, like, it's just, it goes like you can't even just say this is what happened here in this small area, this happened.

You know, look with the Sharpie and everything else, you can't the idea of getting unbiased news if it was ever unby the way let me just be clear it was the ideas of you know a bunch of east side of new york for a long long time let's you know what i mean like and i'm not sure why they had it right necessarily um i don't know if there's a that there could but i always think that if they just put on cnn just the reporters it would be it's always better when you have just the reporters on it always is whenever i'm watching any of this stuff i tend to agree with that and i think there's a formula that's proven financially successful and small D democratically destructive, which is just the quick reaction force of opinion that the news has become on cable.

I met someone who took a job with a major cable news operation within the past two years and came from a local news background.

I said, what are you going to do on camera?

What's your show about?

It's like, I'm just going to, it depends on what the president tweets.

That was this person's legitimate response.

I'm just going to react to the president's tweets.

It's cheap to do that financially.

And it cheap ends all of us to build a whole information ecosystem around that lack of depth.

So I wish them well if what they're trying to do is provide a bit more depth.

I think just saying unbiased, that's also loaded terms.

And we'll just have to see what the product is they put out there.

Well, now you're a comedian, and obviously, some of the smarter stuff of this sort of punditry does come from comedians, which who actually ground a lot of their comedy in fact, right?

And still still.

Yeah.

How do you look at that?

Because that's where some, my kids, for example, they watch all those

comedians, you know what I mean?

And it's really interesting.

And I find them rather better informed than most people, certainly than my mother.

I think the key difference with, if we just take two shows as an example, there are so many people who've done this.

John,

my good friend John, John Oliver, Hassan Minaj, they respect the audience.

They assume that that you're capable of handling big ideas, of listening for more than 30 seconds at a time, of processing complexity.

And what I have found in my own journey in this business is there are a lot of executives who do not have that same faith in their audiences as some of these comedians do.

And so they're able to pack more investigative journalism into a comedic monologue because they try, as opposed to pre-writing off a listener or a viewer or a reader saying,

they'll never click on that.

I know my readers.

And maybe you don't.

Maybe you're underestimating them.

And also, being funny helps a lot.

But I think before the funny

is a faith in people to be able to handle it.

So, when you're doing, let me ask you about your own thing, how to citizen, you're not going to try to be like, satisfy the liberals or satisfy, you know, or anger the conservatives.

How do you approach it?

I'm not going out of my way to anger anyone or satisfy anyone.

I'm approaching this from the perspective of my own fatigue with news rage,

with my own absence of an outlet to do something.

I feel like there's so many of us who want to be involved and contribute to some kind of helping, but we're not being given much more than voting.

And I think the act of citizening and being in a democracy comes down to so much more than that.

So it's almost like a course, like a practice where I'm trying to remember what else can I do to be a better citizen?

And we're doing it topically.

So our first episode's all about love, actually, not expected.

And then power in the second episode, Valerie Cowher, Eric Liu set us off.

And then we're getting into COVID and we talk about criminal justice and policing, but it's all about finding people who are doing something rather than academics who've just written something great.

or people who have opinions.

Yeah, I think it's dangerous everywhere.

And not just, you know, I think cable news, news as much as i rail against social media because it lets you know sort of the inmates run the asylum essentially i do think cable at fox news at the top but all of them are responsible for sort of the cheapening and and and uh

downgrading of our mentality it just is it's just so i can't watch it anymore in a lot of ways there's only a few people i like oddly enough i watch as as as tarnished as he had become but brian williams is actually an old style journalist kind of stuff and so i tend to like watch him because it's like, at least you're getting perspectives.

I don't feel like it's a, I'm not waiting for the hit, depending.

Anyway, it's a really interesting time to launch a linear television service.

We'll see how that goes.

And if the other consequence, and it's not just cable news, but if we think quickly about local news and the perception of crime in this country, independent of the data, Americans are terrified of crime, even though we've hit recently 30-year lows.

That's not just because Americans are a fearful people.

It's because we've been sold a fearful narrative repeatedly, which has been profitable for certain media outlets to sell repeatedly, that the criminals are coming right for you.

And they're not, and they haven't been.

And so that's a function of a broken news ecosystem, which breaks our democracy.

So we got to get better at it.

I'm going to try to contribute with our show a little bit

and I'll mess up, but

it's the effort.

That's the thing.

It's so true.

And it actually did start off with local news.

I had a friend who wrote those teasers for local news for its job.

And he's, I was like, well, how do you do those?

And he goes, all you have to do is like think of something scary, like killer bees, could you be next?

And could you be next?

Is they always, you know, like guns in toddlers and, you know, weapons, could you be next?

You're like, is my baby going to shoot?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Could you be next?

Is was like, and that's how they did it.

And then that sort of voice, like, could I be next?

Is a killer bee going to kill me?

No, a killer bee is not going to kill kill you.

But it was that, that was my, could, I was going to write a book called, could you be next?

Anyway,

you can still do it.

No, I'm not going to.

All right, Veritonde, one more quick break.

We'll be back with predictions.

You have to have a prediction for us.

Okay.

Support for this show comes from Robinhood.

Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform?

With Robinhood, not only can you trade individual stocks and ETFs, you can also seamlessly buy and sell crypto at low costs.

Trade all in one place.

Get started now on Robinhood.

Trading crypto involves significant risk.

Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto LLC.

Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services.

Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC insured or SIPIC protected.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.

Securities trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC, member SIPIC, a registered broker dealer.

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start?

Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to.

Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin, or what that clunking sound from your dryer is?

With thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro.

You just have to hire one.

You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app.

Download today.

Okay, Beratunde, you are in the hot seat.

This is usually Scott's segment, but I have faith in you.

What do you predict we will see in tech, business, media, politics over the next few months or years or whatever you want?

I think we're going to see at least three things.

First, we are going to see more people who have served in this administration doing a patriotic thing and serving the Republic instead, telling their stories.

and standing for the flag, truly, not just saying it

and testifying against this administration, against this president, and its unconstitutional ways.

And that will bring a little flutter to my heart that there is still some patriotism left in the deep sense, not just in the rhetorical sense.

I think we're going to see the internet and the rhetoric around this election get very, very ugly.

And I hate to predict that, but I know it's true.

It's going to get bad.

And so I encourage all of us to brace ourselves, to find whatever deep breathing we need to like power through this and to remember where the margin of this election is going to be decided and not distract ourselves energetically fighting bots online, even though I know Karen, that's one of the things I have to stop to do.

And I predict that we are

going to grieve a lot more in the coming months due to continued assaults against our citizenry by those sworn to protect and serve us, due to those who would take weapons to a protest and use them to gun people down, as Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha this week.

And so I also encourage us to create some emotional space to grieve all that our country's going through.

We've lost nearly 200,000 to COVID.

We're losing people constantly in our streets by those who are supposed to protect us.

We have lost money and self-esteem and relationships.

But this moment is painful.

And I think what's been missing so much from our political environment is people speaking to that pain, certainly from those in power right now.

So I want to do that for a second and predict more pain is coming.

Let's make space to grieve and love and try to heal through all of this trauma that is

grievous is a very important thing.

It is a critical thing.

People don't try to not do that and paper it over with all kinds of ways, whether it's drugs or drinking or just denial.

It's really interesting.

You know, I'm glad you said that because I, you know, one of the things I didn't bring up today was the comments that Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingram made about this kid who shot people in Kenosha

celebrating him.

But, you know, it was really kind of astonishing.

But, you know, I thought, I was going to say something, and I'm like, you know what?

They're just trash.

I'm not going to do it.

And, you know, let's just take out the trash.

That's what that's how I felt.

Let's clean up America.

Let's clean up America.

That's something we can get by.

That's a good slogan.

That could be

Fisher Thirst in 2020.

Let's clean up America.

Take it out the trash.

We got a broom.

That was, you know, years ago that was in D.C., Sharon Pratt Kelly, who was a very unsuccessful person.

I remember her.

Yeah, I lived there.

Remember the broom?

She wandered around with a broom all the time.

And it sounded great, but then there was not a lot of good execution.

But it was a good idea to broom people out.

So let's broom them out.

All right.

I really appreciate you doing the show this week.

You've been an excellent co-pilot.

And I hope you'll come back.

I hope you'll come back.

Lots and lots.

Eager to return.

Thank you for having me.

The whole team has been great.

The audience has been great.

Your caller who said my name right has been great.

And I think, you know, if I could do a quick plug for this show, what I've liked about it as I've listened to Pivot for years is that you recognized long ago that tech isn't just about tech, that business isn't just about business.

This is all about our culture, who we are as people, and it's about why that stuff matters.

So to your producers, to your researchers, to you and Scott, well done.

Because it's one of my must listens.

So it's been an honor to be up here.

Thank you so much.

And well,

you class up the joint rather significantly.

Anyway, thank you so much.

And please listen.

When is your podcast debut?

As we record, Cara, it is dropped into the feed.

So if you're listening now, you can subscribe, download, give me a good rating because some guy gave me a one star before even hearing it and acknowledged it like a trolly troll.

It's called How to Citizen with Baratunde.

You can find it online with howtocitizen.com.

And we're encouraging actions.

That's the other great thing about this show that I'm excited about.

So all that stuff's available in the cloud, as I like to say.

Cool.

Fantastic.

It's my heart radio.

It's called How to Citizen, and it will be, it's dropping now.

So, go on there and give him, battle the one star, guys.

Yes, How to Citizen with Bear Tunde, five stars.

Woohoo!

Out of those one stars.

They don't like women who speak up.

Anyway, I don't look.

I don't look at them.

It's funny that you look at them.

I don't look at them at all.

Literally, it's the only review.

So, everyone being

a fan of the family, I'll get off of Twitter and I'll go attack one star.

Okay, I promise you.

All right.

Okay, well.

Thank you.

Thank you.

You've been a great co-host.

Thanks for watching.

Thank you so much.

I appreciate it.

Today's show was produced by Rebecca Sinanez.

Fernandez Finite engineered this episode.

Eric Anderson is Pivot's executive producer.

Thanks again to Baratun Day Thurston for co-hosting with me this week.

And please listen to his new podcast, which is dropped, How to Citizen with Baratun Day.

Make sure you subscribe to that show and this one on Apple Podcasts.

Or if you're an Android user, check them out on Spotify or frankly wherever you listen to podcasts.

If you liked our show, please recommend it to a friend.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York magazine Unboxed Media.

We'll be back next week with the epic return of Professor Scott Galloway, co-hosting our breakdown of all things tech and business.

This month on Explain It To Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well.

Collagen smoothies and cold plunges, Pilates classes, and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It to Me, presented by Pureleaf.

Support for the show comes from Mercury.

What if banking did more?

Because to you, it's more than an invoice.

It's your hard work becoming revenue.

It's more than a wire, it's payroll for your team.

It's more than a deposit, it's landing your fundraise.

The truth is, banking can do more.

Mercury brings all the ways you use money into a single product that feels extraordinary to use.

Visit mercury.com to join over 200,000 entrepreneurs who use Mercury to do more for their business.

Mercury, banking that does more.